Belgium Stand on Death Penalty

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Belgium Stand on Death Penalty

    1/3

    Name: Rahul Gabbita

    Committee: GA-6 Legal

    Agenda: Death Penalty

    Country: Kingdom of Belgium

    Death. One word defines the end of everything a person has lived for. Death Penalty or

    Capital Punishment is the act of executing someone as punishment for a particularly serious

    crime after a legal trial.

    Should the state award death to an alleged criminal? Should it be vengeful and cruel just like

    the criminal it intends to punish? The answer is simple and straightforward.. No. It is not

    something a progressive, reformist state of the 21stCentury would do.

    The Kingdom of Belgium strongly believes that death penalty is a merciless and inhuman

    act. In letter and spirit, we abide by Article 3 of United Nations Universal Declaration of

    Human Rights that states Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

    We do not take this stand in a casual or condescending manner but with utmost honesty and

    conviction and we mention the following points to substantiate our point of view.

    the fact that the last execution in Belgium took place in 1950 bears testimony to ourcommitment to the ideology.

    In fact the last time a non-war death punishment was imposed in Belgium was in1918 though we formally abolished capital punishment only in 1996.

    Our seriousness to anti-capital punishment is signified to the citizens of the nationand to the world by including article 14bis that prohibits death penalty in the Belgian

    constitution.

    The reasons that inspire us to be steadfast in our purpose are the following

    1. The purpose of the legal system is to rehabilitate the criminals and reinitiate theminto the society. What reform can be achieved in death? To that end, the death

    penalty is quite contradictory to the justice system as it goes against its very purpose.

  • 8/11/2019 Belgium Stand on Death Penalty

    2/3

    2. Securing the lives of citizens is the most important responsibility of the state. Wecannot relinquish this responsibility by taking the easier option of using death penalty

    as a deterrent.

    3. The fact that homicide in Belgium in particular and in countries that have abolished

    death penalty in general are much lower than those in the countries that retain it. The

    U.S., with the death penalty, has a higher murder rate than the countries of Europe orCanada, which do not use the death penalty.

    4. Flawedverdicts can result in death to innocent citizens. And there is nothing that thestate can do later to rectify this error. And we remind you that no less than 4% of

    executions end up with the wrong persons head on the chopping block.

    We are aware of the fact that several of the developed and powerful nations including the

    United States Of America support capital punishment. And they would have their reasons,

    as we have ours.

    The most common argument that the nations on the other side of the debate put

    forth is that death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder. However, surveys of themost pre-eminentcriminologists prove otherwise. 87% of them believe that abolition ofthe death penalty would not have any significant effect on murder rates .

    The other argument that it is a burden on the exchequer to keep the criminal inrehabilitation or asylum is indefensible as the value of a human life cannot be and shouldnot be measured in dollars. We strongly believe that it is the responsibility of the state toprovide the criminals an opportunity to reform by providing the necessary counseling andconditions.

    Thus, in line with the moral stand of our citizens ,the King and the successive governments,

    Belgium strongly opposes sentencing and executing its citizens. Instead, it believes thatimprisonment without parole after a proper trial can lead to reform and rehabilitation. . . It

    also hopes that other retentionist countries realise its negative implications and establish a

    moratorium or progressively restrict its use according to international minimum standards.

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/capitalpunishment/

    http://www.unbrussels.org/component/content/article/1-latest-news/517-10th-anniversary-of-world-and-european-day-against-the-death-penalty.html

    http://www.eu-un.europa.eu/articles/en/article_6337_en.htm

    http://ccrjustice.org/files/CCR%20Death%20Penalty%20Factsheet.pdf

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/capitalpunishment/http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/capitalpunishment/http://www.unbrussels.org/component/content/article/1-latest-news/517-10th-anniversary-of-world-and-european-day-against-the-death-penalty.htmlhttp://www.unbrussels.org/component/content/article/1-latest-news/517-10th-anniversary-of-world-and-european-day-against-the-death-penalty.htmlhttp://www.unbrussels.org/component/content/article/1-latest-news/517-10th-anniversary-of-world-and-european-day-against-the-death-penalty.htmlhttp://www.eu-un.europa.eu/articles/en/article_6337_en.htmhttp://www.eu-un.europa.eu/articles/en/article_6337_en.htmhttp://ccrjustice.org/files/CCR%20Death%20Penalty%20Factsheet.pdfhttp://ccrjustice.org/files/CCR%20Death%20Penalty%20Factsheet.pdfhttp://ccrjustice.org/files/CCR%20Death%20Penalty%20Factsheet.pdfhttp://www.eu-un.europa.eu/articles/en/article_6337_en.htmhttp://www.unbrussels.org/component/content/article/1-latest-news/517-10th-anniversary-of-world-and-european-day-against-the-death-penalty.htmlhttp://www.unbrussels.org/component/content/article/1-latest-news/517-10th-anniversary-of-world-and-european-day-against-the-death-penalty.htmlhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/capitalpunishment/
  • 8/11/2019 Belgium Stand on Death Penalty

    3/3

    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology