51
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1. CDM – Executive Board page 1 CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD) Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006 CONTENTS A. General description of project activity B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period D. Environmental impacts E. Stakeholders’ comments Annexes Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the project activity Annex 2: Information regarding public funding Annex 3: Baseline information Annex 4: Monitoring plan

Bekasi PDD

  • Upload
    yudhie7

  • View
    48

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Bekasi PDD

Citation preview

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 1

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD)

Version 03 - in effect as of: 28 July 2006

CONTENTS

A. General description of project activity

B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology

C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period

D. Environmental impacts

E. Stakeholders’ comments

Annexes

Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the project activity

Annex 2: Information regarding public funding

Annex 3: Baseline information

Annex 4: Monitoring plan

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 2

SECTION A. General description of project activity

A.1 Title of the project activity:

>>

Bekasi Power CCPP project in Indonesia

Version 2.5

Date 12/05/2009

A.2. Description of the project activity:

>

The project activity is an installation of 130 MW combine cycle power plant (CCPP) connected to the

grid and firing natural gas. The project activity is undertaken by PT. Bekasi Power at Pasirgombang

village, Cikarang sub district, Bekasi, in West Java, Indonesia.

The project technology consists of two Gas Turbine Generator (GTG) units each capacity of 42.1 MW

(ISO Rated). This will be combined with two Heat Recovery Steam Generators (HRSGs) and one Steam

Turbine Generator (STG) unit of 50 MW rated capacity along with all electrical systems, controls and

instrumentation.

The project will supplement the installed electricity generating capacity supplying the grid, and displace

the production of existing and new and more carbon intensive generation. The electricity will be sold to

the state-owned electricity company (“Perusahaan Listrik Negara or PLN”) in the Java-Bali-Madura

(herein after referred to as “JAMALI”) grid and to private customers connected to the JAMALI grid.

PT. Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk. (PGN) and PT. Bayu Buana Gemilang (BBG) have agreed to

supply the natural gas to the project activity. For detailed technical description please refer to section

A.4.3.

Contribution to sustainable development

Benefits for Local Economy:

• The successful supply of power to the region will increase capacity, voltage and peaking power

and significantly create opportunities for the local economy and development.

• The construction and operation of the power plant will directly create employment for the local

skilled and semi-skilled population. About 150 people will be employed during the construction

phase and 70 people during the operation phase.

Benefits to the environment:

The generation of power from natural gas will reduce the dependence on coal of existing and planned

grid based electricity generation. This will have a positive impact not only through a reduction of

greenhouse gas emissions but also through a reduction of other harmful emissions.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 3

A.3. Project participants:

>>

Name of Party involved

((host) indicates a host Party)

Private and/or public entity(ies)

project participants (as

applicable)

If Party wishes to be

considered as a project

participant

Indonesia (host) PT. Bekasi Power No

United Kingdom Agrinergy Pte Ltd No

A.4. Technical description of the project activity:

A.4.1. Location of the project activity:

>>

Pasirgombang village, Cikarang sub district, Bekasi District, in West Java, Indonesia.

A.4.1.1. Host Party(ies):

>>

Indonesia

A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.:

>>

West Java

A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community etc:

>>

Bekasi District

A.4.1.4. Detail of physical location, including information allowing the

unique identification of this project activity (maximum one page):

>>

The geographical GPS coordinates of the project activity are:

Latitude: 06°16’S

Longitude: 107°10’E.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 4

Figure 1: Location map of Indonesia

The project activity is located in Pasirgombang, Cikarang sub district, Bekasi, West Java. It is 35km from

Jakarta, 65km from Soekarno Hatta Airport and 56 km from Tanjung Priok.

Figure 2: Location map of West Java, Indonesia

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 5

Figure 3: Location map of project activity location

A.4.2. Category(ies) of project activity:

>>

Category 1: Energy industries (renewable-/ non renewable sources)

A.4.3. Technology to be employed by the project activity:

>>

The project activity has two Gas Turbine Generator (GTG) units each with a capacity of 42.1 MW (ISO

Rated). This will be combined with two Heat Recovery Steam Generators (HRSGs) and one Steam

Turbine Generator (STG) unit of 50 MW rated capacity along with all electrical systems, controls and

instrumentation.

Technical details of gas turbines (2 set)

Manufacturer : General Electric

Model : PG 6581 B

Fuel : Dual (Natural gas & Diesel oil)

Fuel pressure : 22 bar (g) (at inlet gas turbine)

ISO Rated Site Rated

Inlet air temperature, °C 15 32

Inlet air pressure, bar (g) 1 1

Design output, kW 42,100 37,970

Design heat rate, kJ/kWh 11,220 11,491

Design exhaust flow, kg/h 530,000 492,600

Exhaust temperature, °C 548 558.9

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 6

High temperature gas coming out of the turbines will pass to two sets of Heat Recovery Steam

Generators (HRSGs) to produce steam. The HRSGs are manufactured by Thermax Babcox & Wilcox and

will deliver a Maximum Continuous Rating (MCR) of 86 tph. The type of the HRSG is dual pressure:

high and low pressure.

Technical details of HRSG

Input temperature : 589.31°C

Outlet temperature : 158°C

Steam quantity : 78-86 tph (Control range per HRSG)

Steam pressure : 92 kg/cm2

Steam temperature : 535°C

Supplementary firing : 0.95MMSCFD

Technical details of steam turbine

Manufacture’s model : C11-R16-X

Generation capacity : 50 MW

Steam pressure : 88 kg/cm2

Steam temperature : 530°C

Steam quantity : 165.8 tph

The steam turbine is a single shaft, single cylinder condensing type turbine.

Other auxiliary systems including a water cooling treatment and disposal plant, chemical system

compressed air system, lifting equipment, main station fire fighting system, ventilation and air

conditioning will also be installed.

Fuel Supply

PGN and BBG have agreed to supply a minimum of 0.5 million MMBTU per month of natural gas to PT

Bekasi Power. The pressure of gas supplied by PGN is approximately 8-15 bars - it will be necessary to

install a compressor to raise the pressure to 20-22 bars to ensure it matches the pressure required by the

gas turbine.

High speed diesel (HSD) will be used only if there is a disruption to the gas supply.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 7

A.4.4 Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:

>>

A 10 year crediting period has been chosen for the project activity.

Year Annual estimation of emission

reductions in tonnes of CO2e

Year 1 369,225

Year 2 369,225

Year 3 369,225

Year 4 369,225

Year 5 369,225

Year 6 369,225

Year 7 369,225

Year 8 369,225

Year 9 369,225

Year 10 369,225

Total estimated reductions (tonnes CO2e) 3,692,250

Total number of crediting years 10

Annual average over the crediting period of

estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2e) 369,225

A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity:

>>

The project has not received any public funding.

SECTION B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology

B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the

project activity:

>>

Approved baseline methodology AM0029 - Methodology for Grid Connected Electricity Generation

Plants using Natural Gas - Version 03

Version 05 - Tool for demonstration assessment and of additionality

Version 01 - Tool to calculate emission factor for an electricity system

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 8

B.2 Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project

activity:

>>

Applicability conditions Project activity

The project activity is the construction and

operation of a new natural gas fired grid-

connected electricity generation plant

This condition is satisfied as the project activity is

the construction and operation of a new natural

gas fired grid-connected electricity generation

plant. PT. Bekasi Power is finalising negotiations

with PLN on a cooperation agreement for the sale

of electricity. The CCPP is expected to operate at

full capacity from December 2009.

The geographical/physical boundaries of the

baseline grid can be clearly identified and

information pertaining to the grid and estimating

baseline emissions is publicly available

Yes, the geographical/physical boundaries of the

baseline grid (JAMALI grid) are clearly identified.

The data pertaining to the grid and for estimation

of baseline emissions is publicly available.

Natural gas is sufficiently available in the region

or country, e.g. future natural gas based power

capacity additions, comparable in size to the

project activity, are not constrained by the use of

natural gas in the project activity

Natural gas is sufficiently available in Indonesia.

Further, implementation of the project activity

does not divert natural gas that would have been

used elsewhere.

B.3. Description of the sources and gases included in the project boundary

>>

The spatial extent of the project boundary, as indicated below, includes the project site and all power

plants connected physically to the baseline grid.

Project Boundary

The greenhouse gases included in or excluded from the project boundary are shown in Table below.

Source Gas Included? Justification/Explanation

CO2 Yes Main emission source

CH4 No Excluded for simplification.

This is conservative. Baseline

Power

generation in the

baseline

N20 No Excluded for simplification.

This is conservative

Power generation by

project activity

Power generation by existing capacity and

capacity additions in the baseline grid (i.e.

JAMALI Grid)

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 9

CO2 Yes Main emission source

CH4 No Excluded for simplification Project

activity

On-site fuel

combustion due

to the project

activity N20 No Excluded for simplification

B.4. Description of how the baseline scenario is identified and description of the identified

baseline scenario:

>>

The baseline scenario is identified as per the guidance given in AM0029, Version 03.

Step 1 Identify plausible baseline scenarios

Alternatives to be analysed should include:

1. The project activity not implemented as a CDM project;

2. Power generation using natural gas, but technologies other than the project activity;

3. Power generation technologies using energy sources other than natural gas;

4. Import of electricity from connected grids, including the possibility of new interconnections.

Table 1: Baseline scenario assessment

Alternatives Plausibility/Eligibility

1. The project activity not implemented as a CDM project

Natural Gas CCGT without CDM Plausible. This is a plausible alternative that can deliver

similar services to the proposed project activity. Meets all

eligibility conditions.

2. Power generation using natural gas, but technologies other than the project activity

Natural Gas Open Cycle Gas Turbine Not plausible. An open cycle gas turbine has a relatively lower

thermal efficiency and is now rarely implemented. Alternative

(2) is not a plausible baseline scenario of the proposed project.

3. Power generation technologies using energy sources other than natural gas

(a) Coal-fired power plant Plausible. Power generation in Indonesia is dominated by coal-

based power plants for both base and peak load and therefore

(a) represents a plausible baseline scenario. A typical 2x65

MW coal based power plant can provide services similar to

the proposed project activity and is a credible alternative.

(b) Oil-fired power plant Not plausible. At the project start date, oil prices were too

high to be considered a plausible baseline scenario. Moreover,

the Indonesian government is trying to reduce its dependence

on oil. Therefore, option (b) can not be considered a plausible

baseline scenario.

(c) Nuclear power plant and Not plausible. Indonesia is yet to commission its first nuclear

power plant.

(d) Hydro power plant Not plausible. Hydro power plants are of seasonal nature with

low plant load factors and involve higher capital cost and

higher gestation periods.

(e) Wind power plant Not plausible. Wind is not viable in Indonesia without

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 10

government subsidies.

(f) Biomass power plant Not Plausible. Not a realistic and credible alternative. There

are currently in Indonesia no comparable biomass based power

plants constructed recently.

(g) Geothermal power plant Not Plausible. Not a realistic and credible alternative.

Geothermal power plants are very difficult to finance and

implement.

4. Import of electricity from connected grids, including the possibility of new interconnections.

Import from neighbouring power grids Not plausible. The Sumatra, Kalimantan, and Sulawesi grids

are not connected to the JAMALI grid.

From the above baseline scenario assessment analysis, scenario 1 and scenario 3(a) are considered the

plausible alternatives applicable to the project activity.

Step 2 Identify the economically most attractive baseline scenario alternative

Investment analysis is used to identify the most attractive baseline scenario. Levelised Cost of Electricity

Generation (IDR/kWh) has been chosen as a suitable financial indicator for the alternatives remaining

after step 1.

Table 2: Fuel price comparison per unit of energy

Emission Factor Fuel Type Fuel price Energy in Joule Price of fuel

Cts USD/ TJ KgCO2/TJ

Natural Gas 5.49 USD/mmBTU1 1,055 J/BTU 5.21 64,200

Coal 54 USD/tonne2 23,027 TJ/tonne 2.19 96,100

Coal has a lower cost of energy compared to natural gas

The basic levelised cost of electricity generation methodology used in this PDD is based on ‘Projected

Costs of Generation Electricity: 2005 update’ published by International Energy Agency (IEA)3. The

formula applied to calculate the levelised electricity generation cost (EGC) is the following:

−+

−+++

=

t

t

trEt

trFtMtIt

EGC])1.([

])1).([(

Where:

EGC Average lifetime levelised electricity generation cost per

kWh

It Capital expenditure in the year t

1 Source: Gas purchase agreements - 5.495 USD/MMBTU from BBG (50%) and 5.5 USD/MMBTU from PGN (50%) 2 Source: Jakarta Stock Exchange, 30 May 2007 (KOB Kalimantan 5900kcal/kg cif prices) cif = cost + insurance + freight (avg freight prices) 3Source: http://www.iea.org/Textbase/publications/free_new_Desc.asp?PUBS_ID=1472, Annex 5

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 11

Mt Operation and maintenance expenditures in the year t

Ft Fuel expenditure in the year t

Et Electricity generation in the year t

r Discount rate

n Lifetime of the System

Summary of assumptions taken for levelised cost calculation

Table 3: Specific assumptions for CCPP comprising advance class gas turbine

Assumptions S1. Value Units Source

Capacity of the plant 130 MW

Capital expenditure (initial) It 148,610,772 USD

O&M in the year t Mt 385,000 USD

Fuel expenditure Ft Fp*Fq USD

Fuel quantity Fq 7,313,509 MMBTU

Feasibility

study

Fuel price Fp 5.49 USD/MMBTU Gas purchase

agreements

Fuel escalation 2.5 % (2 years)

Electricity generation in the year t (Net) Et 943,540 MWh

Discount rate r 10 %

Lifetime of the System n 25 Years

Feasibility

study

Electricity Generation Cost EGC 6.59 cents

USD/kWh Calculated

4

4 Source: Levelised Electricity Generation Cost calculation is performed in the supporting doc “financial analysis” excel spreedsheet

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 12

Table 4: Specific assumptions for Coal based power plant

Assumptions S1. Value Units Source

Capacity of the plant 2 x 65 MW NA

Capital expenditure (initial) It 166,664,000 USD

O&M in the year t Mt 479,606 USD

Fuel expenditure Ft Fp x Fq USD

PT PLN Persero -

PLTU Crash

programme

Fuel quantity Fq 429,883 tonnes Calculated5

Fuel price Fp 54 USD/tonne

Fuel escalation 1.5 %

Jakarta Stock

Exchange, 30 May

2007

Electricity generation in the year t (Net) Et 943,540 MWh

Discount rate r 10 %

Lifetime of the System n 25 years

NA

Electricity Generation Cost EGC 4.91 cents

USD/kWh Calculated

Table 5: Levelized costs of generation

Alternatives Generation cost of electricity6

Natural Gas 6.59 cents USD/kWh 613.1 IDR/kWh

Coal 4.91 cents USD/kWh 457.1 IDR/kWh

From the above assessment, it is clear that the project activity has a lower financial indicator (higher cost

of generation) compared to coal.

Sensitivity analysis

A sensitivity analysis has been performed to confirm the conclusion regarding the financial indicator.

The financial indicators are calculated for a variation of the following critical parameters:

- Plant load factor

- Cost of fuel

The sensitivity analysis was conducted for scenarios with variations in each and both of the above factors

to assess

5 Source: DIJPE data on GEF - Based on JAMALI average of 33.2% thermal efficiency

6 Based on the conversion rate at time of the decision (9300 IDR/USD)

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 13

Table 6: Sensitivity analysis for each option

Parameter

Alternative Variation Levelised

Cost (IDR/kWh)

Project activity not implemented as a CDM project,

i.e. 130 MW gas based combined cycle power plant

with advance class gas turbine.

+/-5

+/-10

603.7/623.5

656.6/569.5

Fuel Price

2 x 65 MW coal fired pit head based power plant

using conventional technology

+/-5

+/-10

468.0/446.1

479.0/435.2

Project activity not implemented as a CDM project,

i.e. 130 MW gas based combined cycle power plant

with advance class gas turbine.

+/-5

+/-10

603.7/623.5

595.3/635.2

Load

Factor

2 x 65 MW coal fired pit head based power plant

using conventional technology

+/-5

+/-10

446.6/468.9

437.1/482.1

The results of the sensitivity analysis conducted confirm that the cost of power generation using coal is

the cheapest option and this is considered as the most economically attractive baseline scenario.

Figure 1: Variation of levelised cost with load factor

Figure 2: Variation of levelised cost with fuel cost

Additionality

Project additionality as per the methodology has been described in the subsequent section B.5.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 14

B.5. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below

those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity (assessment

and demonstration of additionality):

>>

As recommended in AM0029, the project proponent is required to establish that the GHG reductions

arising from the projects activity are additional to those that would have occurred in absence of the

project activity as per the latest version of the “Tool for the demonstration and assessment of

additionality”.

As per the national and local existing legislation /regulation, there are no legal restrictions in Indonesia

relating to the utilization of any fuel for grid connected generating stations.

Since 2007, PT Bekasi Power was aware of the benefits from CDM, and hosted and participated in a

CDM seminar in Jababeka in February 2007. Based on the CDM incentive, PT Bekasi Power decided to

proceed with the project activity as a CDM project and this was notified in the following board meeting

(March 2007) as well as in the earliest feasibility study (April 2007). The board of directors approved the

investment and concluded an engineering, procurement & construction contract (Start date) later in July

2007.

In order to demonstrate that the project activity is not the baseline scenario, the methodology provides a

set of steps. For AM0029, the following steps are required:

Step 1: Benchmark Investment Analysis. This step consists of the additionality tool step 2, sub-step 2b

(Option III: Apply benchmark analysis); sub-step 2c (Calculation and comparison of financial indicators)

and sub-step 2d (Sensitivity analysis)

Step 2: Common practice analysis. This step consists of step 4 of the additionality tool

Step 3: Impact of CDM registration.

Step 1: Benchmark Investment Analysis

Sub-step 2b: Option III – Application of benchmark analysis

According to the methodology AM0029, the benchmark investment analysis is undertaken and the

generation cost of electricity is taken as the most appropriate financial/economic indicator.

Sub-step 2c: Calculation and comparison of financial indicators

Corresponding levelized tariff for all the plausible options to the proposed project activity has been

calculated and presented in Section B.4 above. The cost of electricity generation for the proposed CDM

project activity is IDR 613.1 per kWh against 457.1 IDR/kWh for the coal based alternative.

On analyzing this data, it can be clearly seen that the project activity is not the most economical for

power production. Using coal as fuel is economically the most feasible investment for producing power

in the Western Java grid.

Sub-step 2d: Sensitivity analysis

The findings of sensitivity analysis on levelized tariff of generation for natural gas and coal presented in

section B.4 above further substantiates that even with reasonable variations in price of fuel and PLF, the

electricity generation cost using natural gas remains more expensive than that using coal.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 15

Step 2: Common practice analysis

As recommended in AM0029 methodology, the project proponent is required to establish that the project

activity is not common practice in the relevant country and sector, by applying step 4 (common practice

analysis) of the latest version of the “Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality”.

Sub-step 4a: Analyze other activities similar to the proposed project activity:

The Indonesian power system is divided into four independent regional grids, namely Sumatra, Java-

Madura-Bali (JAMALI), Kalimantan and Sulawesi. The JAMALI interconnections system is the largest

(77% of power consumption) in the country, and the power generating capacity of this system totals

22,296 MW7 linked with extra high voltage transmission cables of 500 kV, and high voltage transmission

cables of 150 kV and 70 kV.

The common practice analysis will only consider ssimilar activities as CCGTs and Coal power plant

operating or under implementation, and located in the JAMALI grid.

Table 7: Natural gas and coal based power plants developed in the JAMALI grid

Power Plant Location Operation

Year

Capacity

(MW) Type of Fuel

Project owner

Tanjung Jati B Tanjung Jati 2006 1320 Coal Tanjung

Jati B

Cilegon Cilegon, Banten 2006 740 Gas &

HSD Oil

PT PLN

(Persero)

Cilacap Cilacap 2006 600 Coal PT Sumberenergi

Sakti Prima

Krakatau Krakatau 2003 80 Coal PT Krakatau

Daya Listrik

Cikarang Cikarang, Bekasi 2003 150 Gas &

diesel

PT. Cikarang

Listrindo

Paiton II Paiton 2000 1220 Coal PT Java power

Paiton I Paiton 1999 1290 Coal PT Paiton

Energi

Muara Tawar Bekasi, West Java 1995 2035 Gas &

HSD Oil

PT PLN

(Persero)

Tanjung Priok Jakarta Raya 1993-1994 2 x 590 Gas &

HSD Oil

PT Indonesia

Power

Tambak Lorok Semarang 1993 2x 530 Gas &

HSD Oil

PT PLN

(Persero)

Gresik East Java 1990 2260 Gas &

diesel

PT PLN

(Persero)

Grati Pasuruan, East

Java 1964 2 x 462

Gas &

HSD Oil

PT Indonesia

Power

7 Source: POWER GENERATING INDUSTRY IN INDONESIA - July 2008 - http://www.datacon.co.id/powergenerating.html

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 16

Sub-step 4b: Discuss any similar Options that are occurring:

Indonesia is facing a crisis in electric power supply, as demand is growing by 8% a year as against

production growth of only 3% per year8. For the most recent 10 years, coal-based power plants have

accounted for over 80% of the total installed capacity above. Indonesia is the second9 largest exporter for

coal in the world.

Technology:

Out of the seven CCGT power plants mentioned above, six (Cilegon, Muara Tawar, Tanjung Priok,

Tambak Lorok, Gresik, and Grati) are publicly owned by the Indonesian government. Those multi-fuel

fired CCGTs have the flexibility to choose between a range of fuels, depending on economics and

availability and are thus better able to diversify fuel risks and dispatch risks.

The only similar CCGT plant (Cikarang), built in 2003, benefits from a substantially lower gas

price10

.This IPP experienced a decline of 33%11

in its power output between 2004 and 2006. Similarly,

several other power plants using gas as fuel in the country facing the similar barriers: inadequate pipeline

infrastructure, uncertainty in domestic gas supply resulting in delay in the construction and interruption

of the process of production. Cilegon and Gresik (PLTGU) have experienced a shortage in gas supply12

and many gas-fired power plants have been forced to revert to fuel oil.

Between 2002 and 2006 the share of public and private gas based power plants decreased to 27%13

of

total generation, whilst the share of oil and coal increased by 41.3% and 34.5% respectively.

In light of abundant availability of cheap coal and to reduce dependence on fuel oil, the Indonesian

government has undertaken a “Crash Program”. This program involves the construction of 24 new coal

fired power plants units (PLTU) with a total capacity of 8,192 MW. In Java, 10 units of PLTU with a

total capacity of 7,140 MW will be built (plants will have a capacity of 300 MW to 660 MW). The

current trend in Indonesia is clearly focused on the construction of coal based power plants.

Mainly due to the government’s plan to encourage coal based power projects it is likely that the share of

power generation fired by natural gas will decline. Therefore, we consider that this evidence supports the

fact that the project activity is not common practice in Indonesia.

Step 3: Impact of CDM registration

When the project activity is successfully approved and registered as a CDM project, the income from

CERs sales will improve the financial attractiveness of the project activity and act to offset the higher

cost of electricity generation.

As validation takes place after start date we provide a chronology of events below:

8 Source: POWER GENERATING INDUSTRY IN INDONESIA - July 2008 - http://www.datacon.co.id/powergenerating.html

9 Source: World Coal Institute – Coal facts2008 - http://www.worldcoal.org/assets_cm/files/PDF/coalfacts08.pdf

10 Source: Pt Cikarang Listrindo invoice, price of gas: 2.45 USD/MMBTU

11 Source: Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization, Gvt of Indonesia. JAMALI fuel consumption (2002-2006) 12 Source: POWER GENERATING INDUSTRY IN INDONESIA - July 2008 - http://www.datacon.co.id/powergenerating.html 13 Source: Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization, Gvt of Indonesia. JAMALI fuel consumption (2002-2006)

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 17

Table 8: Chronology of events

Prior

consideration

EPC

contract

Construction

start date

Stakeholder

meeting

EIA

approval Expected COD

March 2007 July 2007 October 2007 May 2008 May 2008 December 2009

B.6. Emission reductions:

B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices:

>>

In line with the methodology, the emission reductions are calculated as explained below.

yyyy LEPEBEER −−= (1)

Where:

yER Emissions reductions in year y (t CO2e)

yBE Emissions in the baseline scenario in year y (tCO2e)

yPE Emissions in the project scenario in year y (tCO2e)

yLE Leakage in year y (t CO2e)

Baseline emissions

Baseline emissions are calculated by multiplying the electricity generated in the project plant (EGPJ,y)

with a baseline CO2 emission factor (EFBL,CO2,y), as follows:

yCOBLyPJy EFEGBE ,2,, ⋅= (2)

Where:

yPJEG , Net electricity generated in the project activity during the year y, MWh

yCOBLEF ,2, Baseline CO2 emission factor, tCO2/MWh

As per AM0029, to address the baseline uncertainties in a conservative manner, EFBL,CO2,y should be

determined as the lowest emission factor among the following three options:

Option 1: The build margin, calculated according to “Tool to calculate emission factor for an electricity

system”; and

Option 2: The combined margin, calculated according to “Tool to calculate emission factor for an

electricity system”, using a 50/50 OM/BM weight.

Option 3: The emission factor of the technology (and fuel) identified as the most likely baseline scenario

under “Identification of the baseline scenario” above, and calculated as follows:

( ) MWhGJCOEF

MWhtCOEFBL

BLyCOBL /6.3/2,2, ∗=

η (3)

Where:

BLCOEF Fuel emission coefficient (tCO2e/GJ), based on Table 2.2 of 2006 IPCC Guidelines for

National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 18

BLη Energy efficiency of the technology, as estimated in the baseline scenario analysis above

According to AM0029, this determination will be made once at the validation stage based on an ex ante

assessment and once again at the start of each subsequent crediting period (if applicable). If either option

1 (BM) or option 2 (CM) are selected, they will be estimated ex post, as described in “Tool to calculate

emission factor for an electricity system”.

Option 1: Build Margin, calculated based on “Tool to calculate emission factor for an

electricity system”

Build Margin emission factor

The build margin refers to a cohort of power units that reflect the type of power units whose construction

would be affected by the proposed CDM project activity. The value of build margin emission factor is

calculated based on the generation-weighted average emission factor (tCO2/MWh) of representative

power units during the 5 most recent years or the most recent 20% of the generating units built.

The BPPT (Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, Indonesia) calculated a build

margin emission factor of 0.937 tCO2/MWh which has been officially approved by Ministry of

Environment of Indonesia and Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization.

The build margin emission factor is 0.937 tCO2/MWh.

Option 2: The combined margin, calculated based on “Tool to calculate emission factor for an

electricity system”, using a 50/50 OM/BM weight

As per the “Tool to calculate emission factor for an electricity system”, the combined margin emission

factor is calculated as combination of operating margin (OM) and build margin (BM) emission factors.

According to AM0029, the weighting of OM and BM is 50/50.

yBMBMyOMOMyCM EFwEFwEF ,,, .. +=

(4)

Where: BMOM ww + = 1

Operating Margin emission factor

The operating margin refers to a cohort of power plants that reflect the existing power plants whose

electricity generation would be affected by the proposed CDM project activity.

The simple operating margin approach is not appropriate to calculate operating margin emission factor

because the low-cost/must-run resources for the Jawa-Madura-Bali (JAMALI) grid constitute 61.4%14

of

the total grid generation in average of the five most recent years. Therefore, the average operating margin

has been preferred.

The BPPT (Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, Indonesia) calculated an

operating margin emission factor of 0.844 tCO2/MWh, which has been officially approved by Ministry of

Environment of Indonesia and Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization.

14

Source: Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization, Gvt of Indonesia. JAMALI LCMR Ratio (2002-2006)

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 19

yBMBMyOMOMyCM EFwEFwEF ,,, .. +=

937.0*5.0844.0*5.0, +=yCMEF

Applying a 50/50 weight to the values for operating margin and build margin emission factors provided

in the BPPT database, the Combined Margin emission factor calculated is 0.891 tCO2/MWh15

.

Option 3: The emission factor of the technology identified as the most likely baseline scenario

under “Identification of the baseline scenario”

As demonstrated under section B.4 earlier, coal fired power plant represents the technology that

represents an economically attractive course of action and therefore coal fired power plant has been

identified as the baseline scenario. The emission factor of the coal fired power plant is calculated using

this equation as follows:

( ) MWhGJCOEF

MWhtCOEFBL

BLyCOBL /6.3/2,2, ∗=

η

Based on the IPCC default value for coal emission coefficient ( BLCOEF ), the value used for the

emission factor calculation is 0.0946 tCO2/GJ16

. And the value of the energy efficiency ( BLη ) is 31.8%17

.

)/(6.3*%8.31

/GJ)(tCO 0.0946 2,2, MWhGJEF yCOBL =

e/MWh tCO1.070 2,2, =yCOBLEF

The result of the baseline emission factor for coal fired power plant is 1.070 tCO2/MWh.

Baseline Emissions Factor

Emission factors determined using the three options are summarised in the table below

Table 9: Emission factors determined using the three options:

Options Emission Factor

(tCO2e/MWh)

Option 1 : Build Margin for JAMALI Grid 0.937

Option 2 : Combined Margin for JAMALI Grid 0.891

Option 3 : Emission factor of coal based power plant 1.070

The lowest of all the three options for JAMALI Grid is Option 2 (Combined Margin) and hence this is

the appropriate Baseline Emission Factor. Accordingly, the Baseline Emission Factor value applicable to

the project activity is 0.891 tCO2e/MWh.

15 Source: http://dna-cdm.menlh.go.id/Downloads/Others/KomnasMPB_Grid_Sumatera_JAMALI_2008.pdf 16 Source: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Table 2.2 (2006) 17 Source: Refer to Annex 3 for the calculation of energy efficiency for coal technology

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 20

As per AM0029, in case the Build Margin or the Combined Margin is selected as the Baseline Emission

Factor, the Baseline Emission Factor (Combined Margin) will be determined ex-post, as described in

“Tool to calculate emission factor for an electricity system”. In line with the ex-post determination of the

baseline emission factor the Build Margin must be updated annually ex-post for the year in which the

actual generation and associated emission reduction occur.

Project emissions

The project activity is on-site combustion of natural gas to generate electricity. The CO2 emissions from

electricity generation (PEy) are calculated as follows:

∑ ⋅= yyy COEFFCPE (5)

Where:

yFC Total volume of natural gas combusted in the project plant (m3 or similar) in year y

yCOEF CO2 emission coefficient (tCO2/m3 or similar) in year y for natural gas and is calculated

as follows:

fyCOyy OXIDEFNCVCOEF ⋅⋅= ,2 (5a)

Where:

yNCV Net calorific value per volume unit of natural gas (GJ/m3) in year y as determined from

the fuel supplier, wherever possible, otherwise from local or national data;

yCOEF ,2 CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of natural gas in year y (tCO2/GJ), from IPCC;

fOXID Oxidation factor of natural gas

For start-up fuels, IPCC default calorific values and CO2 emission factors are acceptable, if local or

national estimates are unavailable.

The values for the above parameters are referred in the B.6.2. section:

fyCOyy OXIDEFNCVCOEF ⋅⋅= ,2

Leakage

Leakage may result from fuel extraction, processing, liquefaction, transportation, re-gasification and

distribution of fossil fuels outside of the project boundary. This includes mainly fugitive CH4 emissions

and CO2 emissions from associated fuel combustion and flaring. Since the project activity does not use

LNG, the leakage emissions are given as follows:

yCHy LELE ,4= (6)

Where:

yLE Leakage emissions during the year y in tCO2e

yCHLE ,4 Leakage emissions due to fugitive upstream CH4 emissions in the year y in tCO2

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 21

Fugitive methane emissions

For the purpose of estimating fugitive CH4 emissions, the quantity of natural gas consumed by the project

in year y is multiplied with an emission factor for fugitive CH4 emissions (EFNG,upstream,CH4) from natural

gas consumption and subtracted by the emissions from fossil fuels used in the absence of the project

activity, as follows:

[ ]4444 ,,,,,, CHCHupstreamBLyPJCHupstreamNGyyyCH GWPEFEGEFNCVFCLE ⋅⋅−⋅⋅= (7)

Where:

yCHLE ,4 Leakage emissions due to fugitive upstream CH4 emissions in the year y in t CO2e

yFC Quantity of natural gas combusted in the project plant during the year y in m³

yNGNCV , Average net calorific value of the natural gas combusted during the year y in GJ/m³

4,, CHupstreamNGEF Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions of natural gas from production,

transportation, distribution, and, in the case of LNG, liquefaction, transportation, re-

gasification and compression into a transmission or distribution system, in tCH4 per GJ

fuel supplied to final consumers

yPJEG , Electricity generation in the project plant during the year in MWh

4,, CHupstreamBLEF Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions occurring in the absence of the

project activity in tCH4 per MWh electricity generation in the project plant

4CHGWP Global warming potential of methane valid for the relevant commitment period

The emission factor for upstream fugitive CH4 emissions occurring in the absence of the project activity

(EFBL,upstream,CH4) should be calculated consistent with the baseline emission factor - Option 2(EFBL,CO2).

As presented in the Annex 3, the emission factor was found to be the lowest with Combined Margin

method for the JAMALI grid, so the same calculation procedure has been adopted to calculate

EFBL,upstream,CH4, as presented below:

∑ ⋅

⋅+

⋅=

i

i

i

CHupstreamkki

j

j

j

CHupstreamkkj

CHupstreamBLEG

EFFF

EG

EFFF

EF44

4

,,,,,,

,, 5.05.0 (8)

Where:

4,, CHupstreamBLEF Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions occurring in the

absence of the project activity in tCH4 per MWh electricity generation in the

project plant

j Plants included in the build margin

kjFF , Quantity of fuel type k (a coal or oil type) combusted in power plant j included

in the build margin

4,, CHupstreamkEF Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions from production of the

fuel type k (a coal or oil type) in tCH4 per MJ fuel produced

jEG Electricity generation in the plant j included in the build margin in MWh/a

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 22

i Plants included in the operating margin

kiFF , Quantity of fuel type k (a coal or oil type) combusted in power plant i included

in the operating margin

iEG Electricity generation in the plant i included in the operating margin in MWh/a

As per AM0029, since the Combined Margin has been selected as the Baseline Emission Factor (Option

2), the factor for upstream fugitive CH4 emissions occurring in the absence of the project activity will be

determined ex-post, and will be calculated in consistent with the Baseline Emission Factor, as described

in “Tool to calculate emission factor for an electricity system”.

Table 10: Default emission factors for fugitive CH4 upstream emissions

Parameter Defaul

t value Unit Source Remarks

EFcoal,upstream,CH4 0.8 tCH4 /kt coal Table 2 of AM0029:

Default emission

factors for fugitive CH4

upstream emissions

Since the predominant sources in

the region are currently using

surface mining coal18

, the default

emission factor value used is 0.8

tCH4 /kt coal.

EFoil,upstream,CH4

4.1 tCH4 / PJ Table 2 of AM0029:

Default emission

factors for fugitive CH4

upstream emissions

This value includes production,

transport, refining and storage of

the oil.

EFNG,upstream,CH4

296 tCH4 / PJ Table 2 of AM0029:

Default emission

factors for fugitive CH4

upstream emissions

This value includes production,

processing transport and

distribution of natural gas. It is

applicable for the rest of the world.

The calculation of leakage emissions are provided in Annex 6.

18 Source: http://www.energybangla.com/index.php?mod=article&cat=CoalSector&article=1531

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 23

B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation:

The data/ parameters that are available at validation include the following:

Data / Parameter: yBMEF ,

Data unit: tCO2/MWh

Description: Build Margin Emission factor of JAMALI Grid

Source of data to be

used:

Official Information on Baseline Emission Factor in JAMALI Electricity Grid

by Ministry of Environment of Indonesia dated Januari 19, 2009

http://dna-

cdm.menlh.go.id/Downloads/Others/KomnasMPB_Grid_Sumatera_JAMALI_2

008.pdf

Value applied 0.973

Justification of the

choice of data or

description of

measurement methods

and procedures actually

applied:

Build Margin Emission Factor has been calculated by BPPT (Agency for the

Assessment and Application of Technology, Indonesia) in accordance with

“Tool to calculate emission factor for an electricity system” and its usage in

CDM project has been officially approved by Ministry of Environment and

Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: yOMEF ,

Data unit: tCO2/MWh

Description: Operating Margin Emission factor of JAMALI Grid

Source of data used: Official Information on Baseline Emission Factor in JAMALI Electricity Grid

by Ministry of Environment of Indonesia dated Januari 19, 2009

http://dna-

cdm.menlh.go.id/Downloads/Others/KomnasMPB_Grid_Sumatera_JAMALI_

2008.pdf

Value applied: 0.844

Justification of the

choice of data or

description of

measurement methods

and procedures actually

applied :

Operating Margin Emission Factor has been calculated by BPPT (Agency for

the Assessment and Application of Technology, Indonesia) using average OM

approach in accordance with “Tool to calculate emission factor for an

electricity system” and its usage in CDM project has been officially approved

by Ministry of Environment and Directorate General of Electricity and Energy

Utilization.

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: BLCOEF

Data unit: tCO2e/TJ

Description: Emission factor of coal which has been identified as the baseline scenario fuel.

This data is used to calculate the emission factor of coal based power

generation.

Source of data to be Table 2.2 of 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 24

used:

Value applied -

Justification of the

choice of data or

description of

measurement methods

and procedures actually

applied:

As per AM0029, the fuel emission coefficient is to be determined based on

national average fuel data if available, otherwise IPCC default value is

considered.

Any comment: Calculated with NCV of gas is monitored.

Data / Parameter: BLη of coal power plant

Data unit: %

Description: Energy efficiency of the coal fired power plant which has been identified as the

baseline scenario

Source of data used: Calculated as the average of energy efficiency for the most recent coal fired

power plant, connected to the JAMALI grid. Values used are fuel consumption,

NCV of coal and net electricity generated and published by Indonesian

Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization.

Value applied: 31.8%

Justification of the

choice of data or

description of

measurement methods

and procedures

actually applied :

Official Information on Baseline Emission Factor in JAMALI Electricity Grid

published by Indonesian Directorate General of Electricity and Energy

Utilization.

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: Coal consumption in coal fired power plants in JAMALI region

Data unit: kilotonnes

Description: These data are used as inputs to calculate the Energy efficiency of the coal fired

power plants

Source of data used: JAMALI Grid – Build Margin and Operating Margin calculation database.

Value applied:

Coal Power Plant

Quantity of fuel

consumed

(kilotonnes)

Paiton I 4,437

Paiton II 4,273

Krakatau 0.8

Cilacap 764.1

Tanjung Jati B 1,525

PT. PJB-

steam/coal 2,753

IP-Steam coal 13,165

Justification of the

choice of data or

The source of data comes from the official data given by Indonesian

Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization. The same data is

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 25

description of

measurement methods

and procedures

actually applied :

used to calculate the official JAMALI Grid

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: Electricity generated from Coal fired power plants in the JAMALI Grid

Data unit: GWh

Description: These data are used as inputs to calculate the Energy efficiency of the coal fired

power plants

Source of data used: JAMALI Grid – Build Margin and Operating Margin calculation database.

Value applied:

Coal Power Plant

Gross electricity

generation

(GWh)

Paiton I 9,116

Paiton II 9,109

Krakatau 2.2

Cilacap 1,937

Tanjung Jati B 3,869

PT. PJB-

steam/coal 4,929

IP-Steam coal 23,875

Justification of the

choice of data or

description of

measurement methods

and procedures

actually applied :

The source of data comes from the official data given by Indonesian

Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization. The same data is

used to calculate the official JAMALI Grid

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: yNCV of Coal

Data unit: TJ/Gg

Description: Net calorific value per mass unit of coal

Source of data used: Indonesia Mineral, Coal and Geothermal Statistic 2006, pp. 28

Value applied: 24.03

Justification of the

choice of data or

description of

measurement methods

and procedures

actually applied :

This value is based on national statistic and published by Indonesian Ministry

of Energy and Mineral Resources.

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: yNCV of HSD, IDO and MFO

Data unit: GJ/ kiloliter fuel

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 26

Description: Net calorific value per volume unit. This data are used as inputs for calculating

the Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions occurring in the

absence of the project activity.

Source of data used: NCV values of HSD, IDO and MFO found in the calculation of JAMALI Grid

build margin and operating margin by BPPT (Agency for the Assessment and

Application of Technology, Indonesia).

Value applied: Refer to Annex 6

Justification of the

choice of data or

description of

measurement methods

and procedures

actually applied :

The source of data comes from the data given by Indonesian Directorate

General of Electricity and Energy Utilization. The same data is used to

calculate the official JAMALI Grid.

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: yfCOEF ,,2 of natural gas

Data unit: tCO2/GJ

Description: The CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of natural gas in year y

Source of data used: IPCC default value has been applied (Chapter 2, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for

National Greenhouse Gas Inventories)

Value applied: 56.1 tCO2/TJ

Justification of the

choice of data or

description of

measurement methods

and procedures

actually applied :

As there are no national data available for the emission factor of the fuel used,

default value based on Table 2.2 of 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National

Greenhouse Gas Inventories has been applied.

Any comment: -

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 27

B.6.3 Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions:

>>

As per methodology AM0029, the emission reductions by the project activity is calculated as follows:

yyyy LEPEBEER −−=

Where:

yER Emissions reductions in year y (t CO2e)

yBE Emissions in the baseline scenario in year y (tCO2e)

yPE Emissions in the project scenario in year y (tCO2e)

yLE Leakage in year y (t CO2e)

Baseline Emissions

Baseline Emissions (tCO2e): yCOBLyPJy EFEGBE ,,, 2.=

yPJEG , = Annual expected net electricity generated in the project activity (MWh)

= Gross electricity generated – Auxiliary power consumption @ 3.71% of gross generation

yPJEG , = [[2*(8640*37.97) + (8640*50)] - [2*(8640*1.3) + (8640*2)]]*90%

= 943,540 MWh

And baseline emission factor value is:

yCOBLEF ,, 2= 0.891 tCO2e/MWh (Refer to section B.6.1. Option 2)

Therefore baseline emission is:

=yBE 943,540 x 0.891 = 840,694 tCO2e

Project Emissions

Since the consumption of natural gas is provided in MMBTU, the project emission is calculated by

applying a conservative equivalence between MMBTU and Joule of (1 Btu = 1055.056 Joule).

Nevertheless, for the purpose of the monitoring plan, the actual project emission with the exact yCOEF ,

as per AM0029 will be calculated.

Project Emissions (tCO2e):

yPE = 7,313,509 (MMBTU) * 1.055,056 (GJ/MMBTU) * 0.0561 (tCO2e /GJ)

yPE = 432,877 tCO2e

Leakage

Leakage emissions due to fugitive upstream CH4 emissions (refer to Annex 6 for details of calculation)

Likewise the project emission, the leakage is calculated using a conservative equivalence between

MMBTU and Joule of (1 Btu = 1055.056 Joule). Nevertheless, for the purpose of the monitoring plan,

the actual leakage with the exact yNCV , as per AM0029 will be calculated.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 28

yLE = [7,313,509 (MMBTU) * 1.055,056 (GJ/MMBTU) * 0.000296 (t CH4 per GJ)]

– [943,540 (MWh) * 0.000473 (t CH4 per MWh)] * 21

yLE = 38,592 tCO2e

Emissions reductions

yER = 840,694 - 432,877 - 38,592

= 369,225 tCO2e

B.6.4 Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions:

>>

A summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions for all years of the crediting period has been

presented in the table below.

Year

Estimation of

project activity

emissions (tCO2e)

Estimation of

baseline emissions

(tCO2e)

Estimation of

leakage

(tCO2e)

Estimation of overall

emission reductions

(tCO2e)

Year 1 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Year 2 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Year 3 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Year 4 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Year 5 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Year 6 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Year 7 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Year 8 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Year 9 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Year 10 432,877 840,694 38,592 369,225

Total (tCO2e) 4,328,770 8,406,940 385,920 3,692,250

B.7 Application of the monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:

>>

Monitoring methodology and monitoring plan for the project activity has been prepared using the

guideline provided in Approved monitoring methodology AM0029 Version 03, “Grid Connected

Electricity Generation Plant using Non- Renewable and Less GHG Intensive Fuel”.

The applicability of this methodology to the proposed CDM project activity has been discussed in

Section B.2 above.

All the data to be monitored to estimate project, baseline and leakage emissions for verification and

issuance will be kept for two years after the end of the crediting period or the last issuance of CERs for

the project activity, whichever occurs later.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 29

The primary parameters to be monitored for calculating project emissions are listed below. Other

parameters will be calculated using the primary parameters.

For project emissions:

1. Annual fuel (s) consumption in project activity.

2. Net Caloric Values (s) of the fuel used in the project activity.

3. Fuel emission factors for fuel used in the project activity.

B.7.1 Data and parameters monitored:

>>

The following tables include specific information on how the data and parameters that need to be

parameters would actually be collected during monitoring for the project activity.

Data / Parameter: yNGFC ,

Data unit: m3

Description: Natural gas combusted in the project activity during the year y

Source of data to be

used:

Daily fuel flow meter reading at project boundary

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

For ex-ante calculation is 7,313,509 MMBTU

Description of

measurement methods

and procedures to be

applied:

This data will be recorded daily. There will be two main flow meters which will

be installed by the supplier. There will be two crosscheck meters which will be

installed by the project proponent.

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

The gas flow meters will be maintained and calibrated as per standard

procedures at least once in year to ensure accuracy. The readings of the main,

cross-checked, and master meters can be checked as QA/QC.

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: yNGNCV ,

Data unit: GJ/m3 (or kcal/SCM)

Description: The Net Calorific Value (energy content) per volume unit of Natural Gas in year.

Source of data to be

used:

Fortnightly fuel supplier data

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

NCV of Natural Gas is not applied for the ex-ante calculation.

Description of

measurement methods

Data will be recorded and archived electronically/paper by project proponent

fortnightly.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 30

and procedures to be

applied:

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

No additional QA/QC procedures may need to be planned.

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: yHSDFC ,

Data unit: Liters ( or kilo liters)

Description: Quantity of High Speed Diesel (HSD) combusted in the project activity during

the year y.

Source of data to be

used:

As per plant records

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

For ex-ante calculation, HSD consumption is considered as zero.

Description of

measurement methods

and procedures to be

applied:

As HSD will only be used during emergencies, the monitoring using flow meter

will occur as and when HSD is used.

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

This can be crosschecked against the supplier receipts.

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: yHSDNCV ,

Data unit: kcal/kg

Description: The Net Calorific Value (energy content) per mass unit of HSD in year.

Source of data to be

used:

As per plant records

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

As HSD consumption is considered as zero, The Net Calorific Valued of HSD

Gas is not applied for the ex-ante calculation.

Description of

measurement methods

and procedures to be

applied:

This value will be obtained from the suppliers. If the value from supplier is not

available then IPCC value will be used. Data from supplier will be recorded and

archived electronically/paper by project proponent.

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

No additional QA/QC procedures may need to be planned.

Any comment: -

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 31

Data / Parameter: yPJEG ,

Data unit: MWh

Description: Net electricity exported to the grid by the project activity in the year y

Source of data to be

used:

The kWh output will be measured and recorded from the electronic meters

installed at the project site.

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

943,540 MWh

Description of

measurement methods

and procedures to be

applied:

Electricity supplied to PLN and grid connected private users will be metered at

the point of delivery and is therefore net of transmission losses. All data will be

transmitted electronically back to a master meter at the plant. The daily reading

at the master meter will be archived electronically. Data archive will be

maintained for two years after the end of the crediting period.

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

Net electricity generated can be crosschecked against electricity sales invoices

and the gross electricity generation date which is also metered and stored.

Calibration will be done once a year as per standard and procedure.

Any comment: -

Data / Parameter: NGfCOE ,,2

Data unit: tCO2e/TJ

Description: CO2 Emission Factor of Natural Gas

Source of data to be

used:

Table 1.4 of 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

56.10 tCO2e/TJ

Description of

measurement methods

and procedures to be

applied:

Default values for Carbon Emission Factor of Natural Gas as 2006 IPCC

Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories has been considered. This

data will be recorded annually based on latest IPCC information available and

will be archived in electronic/paper form. Archived data will be kept up to two

years from the end of crediting period or the last issuance, which ever occurs

later.

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

No additional QA/QC procedures may need to be planned

Any comment: Carbon Emission factor of natural gas will be updated as per the latest guidelines

available from IPCC on national greenhouse gas inventory on year to year basis.

Data / Parameter: NGfOXID ,

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 32

Data unit: -

Description: Oxidation Factor of Natural Gas

Source of data to be

used:

Table 1.4 of 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

1

Description of

measurement methods

and procedures to be

applied:

Default values as 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas

Inventories: Reference Manual has been considered. This data will be recorded

annually based on latest IPCC information available and will be archived in

electronic/paper form. Archived data will be kept up to two years from the end of

crediting period or the last issuance, which ever occurs later.

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

No additional QA/QC procedures may need to be planned

Any comment: Oxidation factor of Natural Gas will be updated as per the latest guidelines

available from IPCC on national greenhouse gas inventory on year to year basis.

Data / Parameter: HSDfCOE ,,2

Data unit: tCO2e/TJ

Description: CO2 Emission Factor of HSD

Source of data to be

used:

Table 1.4 of 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

74.10 tCO2e/TJ

Description of

measurement methods

and procedures to be

applied:

Default values for Carbon Emission Factor of Natural Gas as 2006 IPCC

Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories has been considered. This

data will be recorded annually based on latest IPCC information available and

will be archived in electronic/paper form. Archived data will be kept up to two

years from the end of crediting period or the last issuance, which ever occurs

later.

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

No additional QA/QC procedures may need to be planned

Any comment: Carbon Emission factor of natural gas will be updated as per the latest guidelines

available from IPCC on national greenhouse gas inventory on year to year basis.

Data / Parameter: HSDfOXID ,

Data unit: -

Description: Oxidation Factor of HSD

Source of data to be

used:

Table 1.4 of 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 33

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

1

Description of

measurement methods

and procedures to be

applied:

Default values as 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas

Inventories: Reference Manual has been considered. This data will be recorded

annually based on latest IPCC information available and will be archived in

electronic/paper form. Archived data will be kept up to two years from the end of

crediting period or the last issuance, which ever occurs later.

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

No additional QA/QC procedures may need to be planned

Any comment: Oxidation factor of Natural Gas will be updated as per the latest guidelines

available from IPCC on national greenhouse gas inventory on year to year basis.

Data / Parameter: yCMEF ,

Data unit: tCO2/MWh

Description: Combined Margin Emission Factor for JAMALI grid

Source of data to be

used:

Official Information on Baseline Emission Factor in JAMALI Electricity Grid

by Ministry of Environment of Indonesia dated January 19, 2009

http://dna-

cdm.menlh.go.id/Downloads/Others/KomnasMPB_Grid_Sumatera_JAMALI_2

008.pdf

Value of data applied

for the purpose of

calculating expected

emission reductions in

section B.5

0.891 tCO2/MWh

Description of

measurement methods

and procedures to be

applied:

No measurement required. Combined Margin Emission Factor has been

calculated by BPPT (Agency for the Assessment and Application of

Technology, Indonesia) using the average of the Build Margin and the average

Operating Margin in accordance with “Tool to calculate emission factor for an

electricity system” and its usage in CDM project has been officially approved by

Ministry of Environment and Directorate General of Electricity and Energy

Utilization.

QA/QC procedures to

be applied:

No additional QA/QC procedures may need to be planned.

Any comment: -.

B.7.2 Description of the monitoring plan:

>>

The Monitoring and Verification (M&V) procedures define a project-specific standard against which the

project's performance (i.e. GHG reductions) and conformance with all relevant criteria will be monitored

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 34

and verified. It includes developing suitable data collection methods and data interpretation techniques

for monitoring and verification of GHG emissions with specific focus on technical performance

parameters. It also allows scope for review, scrutiny and benchmarking of all this information against

reports pertaining to M & V protocols.

The monitoring plan is prepared considering in following areas of Project Activity:

1. Establishing and maintaining the appropriate monitoring systems for consumption of NG and

electricity generated by the proposed project.

2. Quality control at Project Activity and measurements.

3. Assigning monitoring responsibilities to personnel.

4. Data storage and filing system.

B.8 Date of completion of the application of the baseline study and monitoring methodology

and the name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies)

>>

The baseline study and application of baseline methodology was completed on 01/01/2009

by: Donald Gautier and Marrisa Girsang, PT Agrinergy Indonesia. Not a project participant.

Contact information: PT Agrinergy Indonesia. Wisma Pondok Indah 2, 17th floor, Suite 1704. Jalan

Sultan Iskandar Muda Kav V-TA, Jakarta 12310. Tel. +62 21 7592 2999

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 35

SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period

C.1 Duration of the project activity:

C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity:

>> 09/07/2007

C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity:

>>

25 years

C.2 Choice of the crediting period and related information:

C.2.1. Renewable crediting period

C.2.1.1. Starting date of the first crediting period:

>> 01/11/2009

C.2.1.2. Length of the first crediting period:

>>

10 years 00 months

C.2.2. Fixed crediting period:

C.2.2.1. Starting date:

>>

NA

C.2.2.2. Length:

>>

NA

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 36

SECTION D. Environmental impacts

>>

D.1. Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts, including transboundary

impacts:

>>

PT Bekasi Power implemented an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) /Analisa Mengenai Dampak

Lingkungan (AMDAL) in compliance with the environmental regulations: Law Number 23 Year 1997

about Environmental Management and Regulation of the State Minister of Environment Number 8 Year

2006 about Writing Guidelines of EIA. The EIA is the revision of earlier EIA in April 1999 of Jababeka

Industrial Estate Phase III, where PT Bekasi Power is located. This EIA has been approved by Governor

of West Java Province in 19th May 2008.

The construction project of the PLTGU is consisted of 3 phases: pre-construction (preparation),

construction and operational phase. The preparation phase comprises of several activities such as

engineering preparation, involving feasibility study, permit process and confirmation of gas supply.

Construction process involves material and heavy equipment transports, land opening and processing,

work force mobilization, construction of ME and demobilization of heavy equipments. Operational

process involves work force mobilization, commissioning, gas supply, operations of the power plant,

waste treatment and maintenance.

Table 11: Construction Phase

Environmental

Component

Possible Impacts Environmental Management Plan

Air Quality Decreasing air quality due to the

increase of gas wastes (HC, CO2,

NOx, and SO2) and dust due to

various construction activities.

• Managing the truck loading schedule

• Localizing source of impact by installing

fences around the construction site

• Frequent maintenance of soil excess

around the construction site and spraying

around the construction site to reduce the

amount of dust

Noise Noise and vibration resulted from

the usage of machines such as

compactor, bulldozer, back hoe,

excavator and other construction

equipment.

• Project schedule management

• Foundation construction plan utilizes the

Bore Pile method

Surface water Material/soil excess and liquid

waste, resulting from the workers

domestic activities.

• Maintenance of drainage plan to

mitigate waste risk and sedimentation

due to construction activities.

• Liquid waste management (lubricating

oil & domestic waste )

Local fidgetiness Risk of local complaints due to the

declining air quality, noise

pollution and traffic

• To provide hotline service for response

purposes and inputs from locals

Employment and

business

The locals will benefit from

employment demands and increase • To provide priority for locals by

considering the work qualification

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 37

opportunity of per-capita income from the

existence of the project activity

required in the project.

• To inform the locals concerning

employment opportunity and the

requirements necessary.

• To provide wage in accordance with the

applicable standard, education level and

work expertise

Table 12: Operation Phase

Environmental

Component

Possible Impacts Environmental Management Plan

Air quality The existence of gas pollution

containing CO2, NOx, H2O and hot

air.

• Constructing Buffer Zone along the

inhabitant borders with wall of 4 meters

tall and to plant pollutant absorbing

vegetation.

• Plantation of trees with high lushness

factor such as mahogany, rubber tree, etc.

• To conduct flare stack air up to 20 meters

high in order to mitigate over pressured

gas risk.

Noise Noisy from blow down action • Installments of latex absorber to cover the

joints of windows and doors.

• To install noise emitting machines in a

noise absorbent building.

• To cover the production machines in

order to reduce noise emission.

• To instruct employees to wear earplugs.

Surface water Liquid waste from domestic

activity operation and waste oil

Hazardous waste in form of waste

oil and lubricant

• The liquid waste will be transmitted to

the containment tube before being

directed to the liquid waste treatment unit

for industrial area.

• Waste oil and lubricant are contained in

an oil catcher. The waste is then gathered

into sealed drums and handed over to

third parties that possess the permit from

the Ministry of Environment.

Solid waste Solid waste produced from

domestic activities

• Waste is managed through selection of

organic and non organic waste. The

waste is collected and transported by

cleaning units everyday, which then will

be transported to the final disposal site.

Local fidgetiness Risk of local complaints due to the

declining air quality, noise

pollution and traffic

To provide hotline service for response

purposes and inputs from locals

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 38

Employment and

business

opportunity

The locals will benefit from

employment demands and increase

of per-capita income from the

existence of the project activity

• To provide priority for locals by

considering the work qualification

required in the project.

• To inform the locals concerning

employment opportunity and the

requirements necessary.

• To provide wage in accordance with the

applicable standard, education level and

work expertise

D.2. If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host

Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental

impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party:

>>

There are no significant environmental impacts of the project.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 39

SECTION E. Stakeholders’ comments

>>

E.1. Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled:

>>

PT Bekasi Power applied / communicated to the relevant stakeholders to comments. The stakeholders

list includes the government and non-government parties, which are involved in the project activity at

various stages. All the identified stakeholders are invited by PT Bekasi Power by sending written letters

explaining the purpose of the meeting. PT Bekasi Power also posted a notice in a local newspaper on 9th

May 2008 for announcing the stakeholder meeting to the public. The notice indicated the agenda of

meeting, venue and time of meeting. PT Bekasi Power has conducted a stakeholder consultation process

in an open and transparent manner on 15/05/2008 at President Executive Club- Bekasi. They have

invited all identified stakeholder explaining clearly about the project and sought their view on the

project. The meeting was attended by the representatives of the identified stakeholders. The list of

participants with their signature and comments are kept for record and photographs of the event were

also taken.

The stakeholders identified for the project are as under.

� Deputy of Regent of Bekasi Regency

� Chief of Tanjung Sari Village, North Cikarang Subdistrict

� Elected body of representative administering the local area (village Tanjung Sari)

� Chief of Environmental Control & Mining Agency, Bekasi Regency

� Chief of Police of North Cikarang Sektor (Representative)

� Gas Supplier (PGN and BBG)

� Contractor

� CDM Consultant

� Local community

The agenda of the stakeholder consultation included:

• Presentation of Project activity by PT Bekasi Power

• Analysis of CDM project and sustainable benefits by Agrinergy

• Open discussion and question and Answer session

E.2. Summary of the comments received:

>>

There were a number of comments received from the stakeholders attending the meeting. These have

been summarized below:

Table 13: Comments received from the stakeholders

Comments From

1. PT Bekasi Power is expected to conduct reforestation in the

project area and around the project location especially in critical

area, to reduce negative impact from the waste gas emission

from the power plant and also to support the Million Tree

project in Bekasi Regency.

Mr.Drs.Bambang

Sulaksana, MM (Chief of

Environmental Control &

Mining Agency, Bekasi

Regency)

2. The locals expect that the negative impact to the society will be

mitigated in regards to the construction and operation of the

Mr.Nuraedi

(Representative of

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 40

power plant. Mr Nuraedi also raised following questions:

a. Will there be any inspection conducted routinely to ensure

that the project will not generate negative impact?

b. Will the electricity generated by the power plant available

for sale to the community?

Tanjung Sari Community)

3. The authority expects that PT Bekasi Power can mitigate safety

risks in relation to the community and environment and also to

encourage the community to purse alternative dispute resolution

if there exists an issue between them and PT. Bekasi Power.

Due to its vital nature, the authority will also secure the site

professionally based on the standard security procedure.

Iptu Sawon

(Representative of Chief

of Police of North

Cikarang Sector)

4. Will the project benefit the industry and the society by

providing employment opportunity to the locals?

Edi Efendi

(Representative of

Tanjung Sari Community)

E.3. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:

>>

Following are the responses on the comments:

Table 14: Responses on the comments

No Answers

1. PT Bekasi Power has conducted reforestation including critical areas (as much as ± 16,000

hectares) in Bekasi Region to mitigate negative impact generated from the

disposal of waste gas emission of the power plant

2. PT Bekasi Power will ensure that the negative impacts will be mitigated from the development

and operation of the power plant by applying technical expertise, such as selective usage of pipe

and implant of pipe. Aside from that, according to the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM),

the power plant project will be monitored routinely alongside with verification process. The

electricity generated by the power plant is intended for industrial purposes at Jababeka Region,

3rd

phase.

The contractor ensures that the construction and operation of the power plant will apply safety

procedures and healthy work environment. Negative impact will also be mitigated using

technical methods such as automatic shutdown mechanism, should leakage occur to the

systematically monitored device. In addition, the project will also utilize devices to monitor

waste gas emission

3. Bekasi Power is grateful for the support from the authority and also expects similar support from

all parties in order to materialize the continuity of the project

4. While generating benefit to the society by reducing Greenhouse gas emission through the usage

of a clean fuel the project will also bring social and economic benefit by increasing employment

opportunity to the community both directly and indirectly.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 41

Annex 1

CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY

Organization: PT. Bekasi Power

Street/P.O.Box: Jalan Niaga RayaKav 1-4

Building: Plaza JB / Jababeka Center

City: Bekasi

State/Region: Cikarang Baru

Postfix/ZIP: 17550

Country: Indonesia

Telephone: (021) 8984 1770 /72 /73

FAX: (021) 8984 1911

E-Mail:

URL: http://www.jababeka.com

Represented by: Teguh Setiawan

Title: Managing Director

Salutation: Mr.

Last Name:

Middle Name:

First Name:

Department:

Mobile:

Direct FAX: (021) 572 7338

Direct tel: (021) 572 7337

Personal E-Mail: [email protected]

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 42

Organization: Agrinergy Pte Ltd

Street/P.O.Box: 10 Hoe Chiang Road

Building: #08-04 Keppel Towers

City: Singapore

State/Region:

Postfix/ZIP: 089315

Country: Singapore

Telephone: +65 6592 0400

FAX: +65 6592 0401

E-Mail:

URL: www.agrinergy.com

Represented by:

Title: Director

Salutation: Mr

Last Name: Atkinson

Middle Name:

First Name: Ben

Department:

Mobile:

Direct FAX: +65 6592 0401

Direct tel: +65 6592 0400

Personal E-Mail: [email protected]

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 43

Annex 2

INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING

No public funds have been used in the project activity.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 44

Annex 3

BASELINE INFORMATION

Grid Emission Factors

The Operating Margin data for the most recent three years and Build Margin data for the Jawa Madura

Bali (JAMALI) Grid based on database in Directorate General of Electricity and Energy Utilization and

approved by Ministry of Environment of Indonesia are as follows:

Average Operating Margin

Total GHG reduction in 2004, 2005, 2006 (tCO2) 243,312,048

Total net electricity produced in 2004, 2005, 2006 (MWh) 288,316,859

Average Operating Margin for the most recent three years (tCO2/MWh) 0.844

Build Margin

Total GHG reduction in 2006 (tCO2) 27,161,539

Total net electricity produced in 2006 (MWh) 28,937,555

Build Margin (tCO2/MWh) 0.937

Combined Margin

Build Margin (tCO2/MWh) (50%) 0.937

Average Operating Margin (tCO2/MWh) (50%) 0.844

Combined Margin (tCO2/MWh) 0.891

Calculation of energy efficiency of coal fird power plant

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 45

Annex 4

MONITORING INFORMATION

Monitoring Plan for CDM activity:

The general conditions set out in this monitoring plan for metering, recording, meter inspections, test &

checking; and communication shall be applicable for both electrical energy and natural gas, where

relevant and applicable. The monitoring and controls are part of Distributed Control System (DCS) of

entire plant. All monitoring and control functions are done as per the internally accepted standards and

norms.

Data for Calculation of CER:

The Emission Reductions (ERy) will be calculated based on calculations for Project Emissions (PEy);

Baseline Emissions (BEy) and Leakage (LEy)

ERy = BEy – PEy - LEy

The parameters that would be monitored for PEy are:

1. Natural Gas Consumption (FCf,NG): Based on daily meter readings for the total natural gas

consumption, archived electronically/ paper.

2. Net Calorific Value of Natural Gas (NCVf,NG): Based on fortnightly fuel supplier data , archived

electronically/ paper.

3. HSD Consumption (FCf,HSD): Based on plant records data, archived electronically/paper .

4. Net Calorific Value of HSD (NCVf,HSD): Based on fuel supplier data, archived electronically/ paper.

The parameters that would be monitored for BEy are:

5. Net Electricity Generation (EGy): Based on daily meter readings of the net electricity generated.

6. .Emission Factor based on Combined Margin (EFCM,y) for the JAMALI grid of Indonesia: Official

Information on Baseline Emission Factor in JAMALI Electricity Grid by Ministry of Environment of

Indonesia dated January 19, 200919

.

I. Monitoring for Net Electricity Generation (EGy):

Electricity supplied to PLN and grid connected private users will be metered at the point of delivery and

is therefore net of transmission losses. All data will be transmitted electronically back to a master meter

at the plant. The daily reading at the master meter will be archived electronically. Data archive will be

maintained for two years after the end of the crediting period.

The energy meter shall be tested for accuracy at least once a year against an accepted laboratory standard

meter in accordance with electricity standards by an accredited third party. The meters shall be deemed

to be working satisfactory if the errors are within specifications for meters of 0.2 accuracy class.

II. Monitoring for Natural Gas Consumption:

Natural gas is supplied by two of gas supplier companies, PGN and BBG. The natural gas consumption

metering is done by using two main meters and two check meters. The main meters are installed and

owned by the Gas Supplier and check meters are installed and owned by the project proponent. The main

meters and check meters are installed both in the gas pipeline of PGN and BBG at the gas compression

facility area. Project proponent will also install the master meter before the gas turbine to ensure that

19 http://dna-cdm.menlh.go.id/Downloads/Others/KomnasMPB_Grid_Sumatera_JAMALI_2008.pdf

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 46

total gas that coming from the two pipelines equal to gas that enter gas turbine. The meter reading are

displayed in the plant DCS and is recorded from DCS on daily basis in electronic format. The joint meter

reading indicating the natural gas consumed for the month are recorded and signed by project proponent,

PGN, and BBG at the end of each month. The joint meter readings are archived in paper form. The

metering equipment shall be maintained in accordance with relevant standards.

The natural gas meter shall be tested for accuracy once a year against an accepted laboratory standard

meter in accordance with prescribed standards. The meters shall be deemed to be working satisfactory if

the errors are within specifications of meters. The consumption registered by the main meter will hold

well as long as the error in the meters is within the permissible limits.

If the recorded reading of the main meter and the check meter differ by more than two percent in a

month, both the meters will be tested and calibrated immediately one after the other.

If any of the meter is found to be not working or faulty, the meter will be taken out of service and

calibrated / tested immediately. Calibration / test of the natural gas meters shall be done by an accredited

third party as per a reputed & relevant international standard. All the calibration certificates including

that of the master laboratory meter shall be maintained by the project participant.

III. Monitoring for Net Calorific Value of Natural Gas

The natural gas calorific value measurement shall be done using chromatograph by the gas supplier and

transmitted to project proponent. The calorific value of the gas would be provided fortnightly by the

supplier and recorded/archived electronically/paper by the project participant.. The calibration of the on

line chromatograph shall be established by certified calibration gas.

IV. Monitoring for High Speed Diesel (HSD) Consumption:

High Speed Diesel (HSD) may be used in case there is a distraction of gas supply or during emergencies.

As per the applicability of AM0029, Natural Gas should be the primary fuel. Small amounts of other star-

up or auxiliary fuels can be used, but can comprise no more than 1% of total fuel use, on energy basis.

As HSD will only be used during emergencies, the monitoring using flow meter will occur as and when

HSD is used. The amount of HSD used can be crosschecked against the supplier receipts.

V. Monitoring for Net Calorific Value of HSD:

The HSD calorific value measurement will be obtained from the suppliers. If the value from supplier is

not available then IPCC value will be used.

VI. Team for CDM Monitoring Plan Implementation:

The organization structure and division of responsibilities for implementation of CDM project activity is

described below:

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 47

Director shall be responsible for appointment of CDM team for the implementation of CDM project

activity. Any change in the CDM team composition or responsibilities shall be notified by Director.

Project proponent will outsource an independent company to do O&M (Operation and Maintenance) of

the power plant.

The Appointed (A) person shall be responsible for collecting and recording all the data as required by the

PDD and monitoring plan.

The Appointed person (B) is responsible for verifying the data collected and recorded on a day to day

basis and archiving of the data. He is also responsible for ensuring the calibration of all the instruments

are done according to the schedule and the requirement of monitoring plan.

The Appointed person (C) is responsible for the overall implementation & administration of the

monitoring plan. Conflicts, Discrepancies, Mistakes etc in relation to the monitoring plan of the CDM

project activity shall be referred to appointed person (C) for resolution and his resolution in this regard

shall be final and binding.

Note: Appointed Person (A) and (B)

might be from Independent Company,

since the O & M will done by the

Independent (Outsourcing) Company

Appointed person (C) (Project

Proponent)

- Implementation & Administration of

CDM Project Activity

- Resolution of conflicts, discrepancies

and mistakes

Appointed person (B)

- Verification of data collected

- Archiving of Data

- Monitoring Calibration Plan

Appointed person (A)

- Collecting and recording of data as

required by CDM Project Activity

Director (Project

Proponent)

- Appointed of CDM

Team

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 48

Annex 5

LEAKAGE CALCULATIONS

Leakage may result from fuel extraction, processing, liquefaction, transportation, re-gasification and

distribution of fossil fuels outside of the project boundary. This includes mainly fugitive CH4 emissions

and CO2 emissions from associated fuel combustion and flaring. Since the project activity does not use

LNG, the leakage emissions are given as follows:

yCHy LELE ,4= (6)

Where:

yCHLE ,4 Leakage emissions due to fugitive upstream CH4 emissions in the year y in tCO2

[ ] 44,,,4,,,4 CHCHupstreamBLyPJCHupstreamNGyyyCH GWPEFEGEFNCVFCLE ⋅⋅−⋅⋅= (7)

Where:

yCHLE ,4 Leakage emissions due to fugitive upstream CH4 emissions in the year y in t

CO2e

yFC Quantity of natural gas combusted in the project plant during the year y in m³

yNCV Average net calorific value of the natural gas combusted during the year y in

GJ/m³

4,, CHupstreamNGEF Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions of natural gas from

production, transportation, distribution, and, in the case of LNG, liquefaction,

transportation, re-gasification and compression into a transmission or distribution

system, in t CH4 per GJ fuel supplied to final consumers

yPJEG , Electricity generation in the project plant during the year in MWh

4,, CHupstreamBLEF Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions occurring in the

absence of the project activity in t CH4 per MWh electricity generation in the

project plant, as defined below:

4CHGWP Global warming potential of methane valid for the relevant commitment period

Combined Margin

∑ ⋅

⋅+

⋅=

i

i

i

CHupstreamkki

j

j

j

CHupstreamkkj

CHupstreamBLEG

EFFF

EG

EFFF

EF

4,,,4,,,

4,, 5.05.0 (8)

Where:

4,, CHupstreamBLEF Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions occurring in the

absence of the project activity in t CH4 per MWh electricity generation in the

project plant

j Plants included in the build margin

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 49

Power Plant in Build Margin

GJ/

k t fuel

GJ/ k

ltr fuel

(3) (4) (1)* (3)

PT Paiton Energi Paiton I Steam-Coal 4,437 kton 24,030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 9,116,000 3,549.9

PT Java Power Paiton II Steam-Coal 4,273 kton 24,030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 9,109,000 3,418.4 PT Magma Nusantara

Listrindo Wayangwindu Geothermal 922,000 - Chevron Texaco Energi

Indonesia Ltd. Darajad Geothermal 735,000 -

PT Geo Dipa Energi Dieng Geothermal 319,000 -

PT Indonesia Power Pemaron GT-Oil 61,422 kltr 36.11 0.0000041 tCH4/GJ 201,325.5 9.1 PT Cikarang Listrindo

Power Cikarang GT-Gas 4,070,300 MMBTU 4,294.57 TJ 48,000.0 0.296 tCH4/TJ 403,000 1,271.2

PT Krakatau Daya Listrik Krakatau Steam-Coal 0.836 kton 24,030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 2,230 0.7

Muara Tawar Block 3 GT-Oil 16,294,549 MMBTU 17,192.38 TJ 48,000.0 0.0041 tCH4/TJ 1,618,000 70.5

Block 4 GT-Oil

PT Sumberenergi

Sakti Prima Cilacap Steam-Coal 764 kton 24,030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 1,937,000 611.2

Tanjung Jati B Tanjung Jati B Steam-Coal 1,526 kton 24,030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 3,869,000 1,220.9

Cilegon Cilegon CCGT-Gas 6,666,284 MMBTU 7,033.60 TJ 48,000.0 0.296 tCH4/TJ 742,000 2,081.9

28,973,555 12,233.82

Total electricity generation in the plants included in the build margin (EG j) = 28,973,555 MWh

(2) (1)

Quantity of fuel

combusted

(FFj,k)

Fuel TypePower Plant in

Build MarginOwner unit

Quantity of fuel

combusted

(FFj,k)

NVC

Electricity generation

(Eg)(MWh)

Emission

factor for

upstream

fugitive

methane

emissions from

production

of the fuel

(EFk,upstream,

CH4)

unit unit

Total

(FFj,k)*

(EFk,upstream,

CH4)

kjFF , Quantity of fuel type k (a coal or oil type) combusted in power plant j included

in the build margin

4,, CHupstreamkEF Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions from production of the

fuel type k (a coal or oil type) in t CH4 per MJ fuel produced

jEG Electricity generation in the plant j included in the build margin in MWh/a

i Plants included in the operating margin

kiFF , Quantity of fuel type k (a coal or oil type) combusted in power plant i included

in the operating margin

iEG Electricity generation in the plant i included in the operating margin in MWh/a

Calculation of 4,, CHupstreamBLEF is shown in the table below:

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 50

Power Plant in Operating Margin

GJ/

k t fuel

GJ/ k

ltr fuel

(3) (1)* (3)

IP HSD HSD 2,170,653 kilo litre 42,728.6 36.1 0.0000041 tCH4/GJ 321.329

IP MFO MFO 461,319 kilo litre 41,019.0 40.6 0.0000041 tCH4/GJ 76.808

IP IDO IDO 2,343 kilo litre 41961.0637 36.9257 0.0000041 tCH4/GJ 0.355

IP Gas Gas 48,298,358 MMBTU 50,959.60 TJ 48000 0.296 tCH4/TJ 0.296

IP Coal Coal 13,165 kton 24030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 10531.818

PT PJB HSD HSD 1,450,468 kilo litre 42,728.6 36.1 0.0000041 tCH4/GJ 214.718

PT PJB MFO MFO 1,593,046 kilo litre 41,019.0 40.6 0.0000041 tCH4/GJ 265.236

PT PJB Gas Gas 71,160,078 MMBTU 75,081.00 TJ 48000 0.296 tCH4/TJ 22223.975

PT PJB Coal Coal 2,753 kton 24030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 2202.207

Muara Tawar Gas Gas 16,294,549 MMBTU 17,192.38 TJ 48000 0.296 tCH4/TJ 5088.944

Tanjung Jati B Coal Coal 1,525 kton 24030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 1220.224

Cilegon Gas Gas 4,420,921 MMBTU 4,664.51 TJ 48000 0.296 tCH4/TJ 1380.696

IPP Jatiluhur Hydro

IPP Dieng Geothermal

IPP Salak 4,5,6 Geothermal

IPP Wayang Windu Geothermal

IPP Drajat II Geothermal

IPP Cikarang gas 4,070,300 MMBTU 4,294.57 TJ 48000 0.296 tCH4/TJ 1271.194

IPP Paiton I Coal 4,437 kton 24030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 3549.866

IPP Paiton II Coal 4,273 kton 24030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 3418.414

IPP Krakatau Coal 0.836 kton 24030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 0.669

IPP Cilacap Coal 764 kton 24030.8 0.8 tCH4/kton 611.243

52377.991

Total electricity generation in the plants included in the operating margin (EG i) (MWh) = 100,014,611

OwnerPower Plant in

Operating MarginFuel Type

Quantity of fuel

combusted

(FFj,k)

unit

Quantity of fuel

combusted

(FFj,k)

unit

NVC

Total

Emission

factor for

upstream

fugitive

methane

emissions from

production

unit(FFj,k)*

(EFk,upstream,CH4)

(1) (2)

4,, CHupstreamBLEF (Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions occurring in the absence of

the project activity in t CH4 per MWh electricity generation in the project plant)

= 0.5 *(12,233.82 tCH4/28,973,555 MWh) + 0.5 * (52,377.99 tCH4/100,014,611MWh)

= 0.000473 tCH4/MWh

Calculation of Leakage emissions due to fugitive upstream CH4 emissions ( yCHLE ,4 )in t CO2e is shown

in this table below:

Sr.

No. Parameter Unit Symbol Value/year

1 Quantity of natural gas combusted in the project

plant G Joule yFC 7,313,509

2 Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane

emissions of natural gas t CH4 per GJ 4,, CHupstreamNGEF 0.000296

3 Electricity generation in the project plant during

the year MWh yPJEG , 943,540

4

Emission factor for upstream fugitive methane

emissions

occurring in the absence of the project activity

t CH4 per

MWh 4,, CHupstreamBLEF 0.000473

5 Global warming potential of methane 4CHGWP 21

6 Leakage emissions due to fugitive upstream

CH4 emissions = [(1)*(2)]-[(3)*(4)]*(5) t CO2 yCHLE ,4 38,592

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 03.1.

CDM – Executive Board page 51

- - - - -