Upload
arturo-mejia-3636
View
332
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
1/26
Case PresentationBarilla SpA
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
2/26
Introduction
Company & Industry background
Worlds largest pasta producer in 1990
Pasta Share - 35% in Italy and 22% in
EuropeChannels of Distribution
Products divided in 2 categories Fresh
and Dry
Fresh Products had 21 day Shelf Lives
Dry Products had Long ( 18 to 24 Months)
or Medium(10 to 12 weeks) Shelf Lives
Retail Outlets Small independent shops
and Supermarkets (Chain and
I
ndependent)
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
3/26
The Issue
During the late 1980s, Barilla suffered increasing
operational inefficiencies and cost penalties that
resulted from large week-to-week variations in
its distributors order patterns
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
4/26
Distribution Procedure
Original flow ofgoods and
informationPLANT
CDCs
GDs DOs
Signora
Maria Shops
Independent
supermarkets
Chain
supermarkets
Customers Customers Customers
Barilla run
depots
*CDC = Central Distribution CentreGD = Grand DistributorsDO = Organized Distributors
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
5/26
Sales and Marketing
Advertising Heavy, Brand Positioned as the HighestQuality
Trade promotions Frequent
Canvass period, 10 to 12 in a year, typical duration of 4 to
5 weeks Distributor could buy as much product as desired to meet
present and future needs at the offered discount
Volume Discounts also given
Sales representatives used more at DOs than GDs
Merchandise Barilla Products
Set up In-Store Promotion
Take note of competitors prices, stockouts, newproduct launches
Work out ordering strategies for the retailer etc
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
6/26
Demand Fluctuations
Just in Time Distribution
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
7/26
Variability in Demand
ReasonsTransportation discounts
Volume discount
Promotional activity
No minimum or maximum order quantities
Product proliferation
Long order lead times
Lack of forecasting systems or sophisticated
analytical tools at Distributers end
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
8/26
Exhibit 12: Demand
Fluctuations
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
9/26
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
10/26
Bullwhip effect
Amplified Variation in demand as
one moves up the Supply Chain
(away from the customer)
RetailerWholesalerDistributorFactory
orderorder order
Order Variation
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
11/26
The Causes of Bullwhip Effect
Demand Forecast
Long lead times
Order Batching Price fluctuation (Promotional sales)
Inflated orders in high estimateddemand scenarios
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
12/26
Counteracting the Bullwhip
Effect Reduce Uncertainty- POS
- Sharing Information
- Centralizing demand information
Reduce Variability Year round or Everyday low pricing
Reduce Lead Times- Information lead times: EDI
- Order lead times: Cross Docking
Strategic Partnerships Quick Response
Continuous Replenishment
Advanced Continuous Replenishment
Vendor managedInventory (VM
I)
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
13/26
Just-In-Time Distribution
(JIT
D) Vendor-Managed Inventory Concept
Treats end-customer as the Input
Aims at managing the Input filter that Produces
the Orders Decision-making authority for determining
shipments in hands of Barilla SpA
Barilla would monitor the flow of its productsthrough the distributors warehouse, and then
decide what to ship to the distributor and whento ship it
Distributor provides Data on the shipment andcurrent stock levels for each Barilla SKU Sell-through Info one step behind POS Data
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
14/26
Expected Benefits of JITD
Manufacturer Reduced manufacturing costs
Better Relationship with Distributors
I
ncreased supply chain visibility Increase Distributors dependence on Barilla
Improvement in manufacturing planning using
objective data
Reduced inventory levels
Distributors Improved fill rates to Retail stores
Additional service without any extra cost
Reduced Inventory Holding costs
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
15/26
JITD - Internal Resistance
Sales Representatives feared reduction in
responsibilities
Flattened sales levels
Risk ofInability to adjust shipments
quickly to stock-outs
Lack of infrastructure to handle JITD
Increased competitor shelf space atdistributor
Inability to run Trade promotions
Unsure about the cost benefits
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
16/26
JITD External Resistance
Unconvinced Distributors
Not willing to share warehouse data
Perceived power transfer to Barilla Lack of faith in Barillas inventory
management
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
17/26
Possible methods to counter
Resistance Demonstrate that JITD benefits the
distributors
Run experiment at one or more of thedistributor sites
Maggiali needs to look at JITD notas a logistics program, but as a
company-wide effort
Get Top management closely involved
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
18/26
Experiments at Dry-product
depots Barilla spa ran first JITD experiment at itsFlorence depot
During the very first month of the program
Inventory dropped from 10.1 days to 3.6 days
Service level to retail stores increased from98.9% to 99.8%
Depots staff was not comfortable working withsuch low inventory levels
Inventory levels finally allowed to increase to
5 days One of the arguments against JITD was that it
will lead to waste empty spaces in the warehouses
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
19/26
Experiments at Dry-product
depots In Florence case
Barilla growing at rapid rate in the region
Plans to expand warehouse
Existing warehouse able to accommodate the
increased requirement Substantial investment on expansion was
avoided
JITD next tried at Milan Depot
Similar performance improvement asFlorence
These experiments established the credibility of
JITD system
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
20/26
Implementation at D. O.
Cortese The decision to implement JITD in Marchese DC
of Cortese involved
Barilla: Director of Logistics, Executive vicepresident of sales and Manager in charge of
JITD implementation Cortese: Nine managers including Managing
director, new services manager, logisticsmanager and logistics, purchasing, marketingand sales personnel from Corteses MarcheseDC
Consultant Claudio Ferrozzi was roped in
Neutral party trusted by both the groups
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
21/26
Implementation at D. O.
Cortese For six months, Barilla team analyzed daily shipment data
of the DC
Created the data base of DCs historical demandpattern
Simulated shipments with JIT
D in place The implementation yielded phenomenal results
Prior to JITD
Stock out rate : 2 to 5% ( Occasionally as high as
10 to 13%)
After JITD Negligible stock out rate of less than.25%(Never
exceeded 1%)
Average inventory level also dropped
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
22/26
Adaptation to different
distributors
With new confidence they
approached other customers
Customers apprehensive aboutJITD repeating the same success as
Cortese for them as they had varied
systems
Barillas team developed capacity to
translate customers standards into
internal standards
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
23/26
Adaptation to different
distributors Developed a protocol which could be used
to communicate with all customers
Each SKU identified with three differentproduct codes Barillas code
Customers code
EAN (European article numbering system)barcode Most common barcode standard inEurope
Advantages of the coding system Information can be received through any
code
Reduce impact of internal changes in product
or code on clients system
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
24/26
Communication with
consumersCustomer each day sent following
information to Barilla via EDI:-1. Customer code number to identify itself
2. Inventory for each SKU carried by DC
3. Previous days sell through-Allshipments of Barilla products out of DC toconsumers on the previous day
4. Stock outs on previous day for every BarillaSKU carried by DC
5. An advance order for any promotions thatthe customer planned to run in the future
6. Preferred delivery carton size
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
25/26
Lessons learnt
One needs to prove credibility of any newperformance initiative for others to buy his/heridea
Best place to experiment with an idea is within
the organization To succeed in a new initiative, involvement oftop management is imperative Barrilla could finally succeed in implementing JITD
with Cortese. Whole of top management from bothsides was involved in the decision making. Which
never happened earlier Sometimes roping a consultant helps
Market is ever growing. If performance measuresseem to create spare time/capacity instead ofchucking them, look out for ways to increase themarket.(Like in Florence depot warehouse case)
8/8/2019 Barilla SpA Case Solution[1]
26/26
THANK YOUTHANK YOU