Upload
maxim-lime
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BA Damonse, March 10 2015
Operational Prospects for Implementation: A Reflection
Informed, critically engaged & science literate
public
Framework Intention
Systematise collective effort of multiple role players
Improve co-ordination
Encourage science promotion and communication
Foster better, more valuable science engagement
Improve balance in portfolio of activities
Enhance collective impact
Framework Scope
Across DST (intra- departmental)
Its entities (NRF, CSIR, HSRC, SANSA, ASSAf)
Universities, museums, science centres
Other Science Councils
Other Government departments
Private sector
International opportunities
Strategic Partners
Framework Enablers
Effective coordination – coordinating body
Adequate funding
Participation of relevant stakeholders and role players
Establishment of a monitoring and evaluation framework
Framework Coordination
National – SAASTA
Intra-departmental – across DST
Inter-departmental – clusters
Inter–governmental – continental, international
Coordination with Science and Technology Research Institutions
SAASTA Business unit of NRF DST projects (largely) High level of contract funding (13/14 approx R90M) Dual role – funder and practical implementer Maths and Science Education – strong focus Science communication and awareness increasing in recent
years Website(s), resource production, exhibits, infrastructure,
project management Approx. 50 staff
8
Funding Model(s)
New Funding Formula
SOURCESScience Awareness ENETop slicing 4% - DST entitiesTop slicing 4% - within DST (P2-5)
New approach(es) for funding transfer to SAASTA
Private partnershipsNRF Projected Expenditure (incl. capital) for 2015/16
Market Segmentation
Public
Learners
Scientists & researchers
Science Interpreters
Policy makersJournalists
Community
Tertiary Students
Industry Entrepren-eurs
Monitoring, Evaluation & Research
Audit –who is doing what? How? Why?
Meaningful Performance Indicators
National SURVEY instrument
Visitor studies, informal learning, attitudinal studies
Long term tracking studies
Media monitoring and analysis
Skilled M&E Practioners
Phased Approach
Phase 1
Securing stakeholder buy-in Consolidating existing systems , identification of new systems Re-alignment of existing projects Conceptualisation of new programmes. Implementing programmatic activities not adversely affected by
absence of and/or lack of adequate systems. Reconstruction of baseline data for input, output, outcome and
impact indicators.
Phased Approach
Phase 2
Implementation of all the systems developed in Phase 1.
Continuation and consolidation of programmes
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Phased Approach
Phase 3
Full scale system performance monitoring and project-based evaluations to establish emerging impacts and outcomes, which includes periodic international benchmarking and comparative studies.
Growing reach while concomitantly increasing efficiencies of the institutions, programmes and systems developed