1
B1 inhomogeneities lead to significant variations in image intensity and tissue contrast across the brain, particularly in spin echo sequences. While intensity variations can be corrected by post- processing, improved contrast uniformity will require improvements in B1 and/or flip angle uniformity achieved by RF pulse sequence design (e.g. sparse spokes) or parallel transmit/rf shimming (Multix). and same time it has served as a basis for more specific sequence sets targeted at pathology (see posters showing and T1 parametric imaging) Exam Card v2 for Anatomic Imaging of Human Brian at 7T JL Creasy 1 , EB Welch 2,3 , RG Avison 2 , AW Anderson 2 , JC Gore 2 , MJ Avison 2 1 Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, 2 Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville Tennessee, 37232 3 MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, Ohio 44143 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION RESULTS / DISCUSSION RESULTS / DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS MATERIALS AND METHODS CONCLUSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES REFERENCES The increased signal to noise ratio (SNR) available with ultra-high field MRI (≥7T) offers the potential for significant improvements in spatial resolution and/or reduced scan times in clinical neuroimaging. However the increased B0 and B1 (RF) inhomogeneities, field-dependence of tissue T1, T2 and T2* values, and significantly increased RF power deposition demand parameter and sequence modifications before this SNR advantage can be realized. Here we report on our ongoing development of a general purpose 7T neuroimaging protocol. Our goal was to implement a bundle of high resolution MRI sequences providing familiar (T1, T2, T2* etc), as well as new (susceptibility weighted imaging, SWI) tissue contrast types. To ensure broad utility in a clinical population, total study duration with whole brain coverage was designed to be no longer RF power deposition and B1 inhomogeneities remain the most important factors influencing pulse sequence design at ultrahigh field, although distortion and signal dropout associated with B0 inhomogeneities in low bandwidth imaging sequences may be problematic. Migration of low flip angle, gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequences to 7T is relatively simple, as the absence of refocusing pulses drastically reduces the SAR. Also, there is less flip angle sensitivity with GRE, and pixel bandwidths tend to be high, particularly for 3D sequences. B1 issues are more problematic for thin slice 2D (high peak B1), 2D spin echo (peak B1, B1 inhomogeneity), turbo spin echo (peak B1, B1 inhomogeneity, SAR), and FLAIR (B1 Creasy et al. RSNA, 2007, Chicago Il Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science VUIIS Building, Medical Center North 1161 21st Ave, South Nashville, TN 37232-2310 Tel: (615) 322-8359 Fax: (615) 322-0734 URL: www.vuiis.vanderbilt.edu T2* SAG – reveals tiny venous structures (zoom) Studies were performed on a 7T Achieva whole body MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems) using a 16 channel head coil (Nova Medical). Subjects were recruited under protocols approved by the Vanderbilt University IRB, and consisted of young healthy volunteers, and patients scheduled for 3T neuroimaging as part of their clinical care. Scan parameters were refined in an iterative fashion, beginning with the sequences and parameter sets developed in our first round of protocol development (ExamCard v1) [Creasy et al, 2007]. The ExamCard v1 protocol consisted of a SmartScout, SENSE reference scan, T1 3D TFE, T2* 2D FFE, SWI, T2 2D GRASE, 3D SWI (7 echo), T2*/T1 3D TFE, B0 and B1 mapping scans, and a multiple flip angle 3D SPGR sequence for T1 parametric imaging. For ExamCard v2, further refinements included: 1) Addition of a TOF MRA sequence 2) Conversion of multiecho SWI sequence from 7 echo with no gradient “fly-back” to 5 echo with “fly-back” 3) Incorporation of full 3D flow compensation in SWI 4) Incorporation of a refocusing flip angle sweep in the FLAIR GRASE sequence to reduce SAR and mitigate B1 inhomogeneities 5) Incorporation of RF spoiling in the reference scan Table 1: 7T Clinical Exam Card v2.0 Name TR TE FA Voxel Size SENSE Scan Time SmartScout 2.7 1.3 8 2.23 x 2.23 x 2.2 - 1:29 REF 8.0 .85 5 4.0 x 4.0 x 4.0 - 1:55 T1 3D TFE 5.3 2.4 7 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.7 2.9 (RL) 8:58 2D FFE 532 11.8 40 0.5 x 0.5 x 3.0 2.0 (RL) 4:54 SWI 22.0 14.8 12 0.5 x 0.5 x 1.0 2.0 (RL) 4:03 T2 GRASE 12426 59 90 0.5 x 0.64 x 3.0 2.0 (RL) 5:36 T2 FLAIR GRASE 15000 61 90 0.6 x 0.64 x 3.0 2.0 (RL) 6:30 SWI 5 echo 19 3.2 (=3) 10 1.00 x 1.00 x 1.00 2.0 (RL) 5:12 3D T2* Sag 20 9.7 8 0.33 x 0.33 x 4.0 2.0 (RL) 4:20 3D T1 “Thick” 4.9 2.6 7 0.5 x 0.5 x 2.5 2.0 (RL) 3:27 B1 MAP 30/12 0 1.68 50 3.0 x 3.0 x 5.0 - 6:51 MFA SPGR 14 3.2 20 1.0 x 1.0 x 2.5 2.0 (RL) 5:09 TOF MRA 23 3.5 20 0.25 x 0.45 x 1.00 2.4 (RL) 8:03 T2 GRASE 3D TOF MRA SWI minIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding: NIH/NIBIB BRP; Vanderbilt U. Dept. of Radiology T1W 3D TFE 2D FFE 3D T1W “Thick” B1 Map 5 echo SWI with “flyback” gradient T1 Map (B1 corrected) T 1 [sec] 4.0 0.0 T2W FLAIR GRASE

B1 inhomogeneities lead to significant variations in image intensity and tissue contrast across the brain, particularly in spin echo sequences. While intensity

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: B1 inhomogeneities lead to significant variations in image intensity and tissue contrast across the brain, particularly in spin echo sequences. While intensity

B1 inhomogeneities lead to significant variations in image intensity and tissue contrast across the brain, particularly in spin echo sequences. While intensity variations can be corrected by post-processing, improved contrast uniformity will require improvements in B1 and/or flip angle uniformity achieved by RF pulse sequence design (e.g. sparse spokes) or parallel transmit/rf shimming (Multix). and same time it has served as a basis for more specific sequence sets targeted at individual anatomic regions or types of pathology (see posters … showing hippocampal anatomy, melanoma metastases, and T1 parametric imaging)

B1 inhomogeneities lead to significant variations in image intensity and tissue contrast across the brain, particularly in spin echo sequences. While intensity variations can be corrected by post-processing, improved contrast uniformity will require improvements in B1 and/or flip angle uniformity achieved by RF pulse sequence design (e.g. sparse spokes) or parallel transmit/rf shimming (Multix). and same time it has served as a basis for more specific sequence sets targeted at individual anatomic regions or types of pathology (see posters … showing hippocampal anatomy, melanoma metastases, and T1 parametric imaging)

Exam Card v2 for Anatomic Imaging of Human Brian at 7T

JL Creasy1, EB Welch2,3, RG Avison2, AW Anderson2, JC Gore2, MJ Avison2 1Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, 2Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS),

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville Tennessee, 372323MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, Ohio 44143

INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION RESULTS / DISCUSSIONRESULTS / DISCUSSIONRESULTS / DISCUSSIONRESULTS / DISCUSSION

MATERIALS AND METHODSMATERIALS AND METHODSMATERIALS AND METHODSMATERIALS AND METHODS

CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONCONCLUSION

REFERENCESREFERENCESREFERENCESREFERENCES

The increased signal to noise ratio (SNR) available with ultra-high field MRI (≥7T) offers the potential for significant improvements in spatial resolution and/or reduced scan times in clinical neuroimaging. However the increased B0 and B1 (RF) inhomogeneities, field-dependence of tissue T1, T2 and T2* values, and significantly increased RF power deposition demand parameter and sequence modifications before this SNR advantage can be realized. Here we report on our ongoing development of a general purpose 7T neuroimaging protocol. Our goal was to implement a bundle of high resolution MRI sequences providing familiar (T1, T2, T2* etc), as well as new (susceptibility weighted imaging, SWI) tissue contrast types. To ensure broad utility in a clinical population, total study duration with whole brain coverage was designed to be no longer than 50 minutes.

The increased signal to noise ratio (SNR) available with ultra-high field MRI (≥7T) offers the potential for significant improvements in spatial resolution and/or reduced scan times in clinical neuroimaging. However the increased B0 and B1 (RF) inhomogeneities, field-dependence of tissue T1, T2 and T2* values, and significantly increased RF power deposition demand parameter and sequence modifications before this SNR advantage can be realized. Here we report on our ongoing development of a general purpose 7T neuroimaging protocol. Our goal was to implement a bundle of high resolution MRI sequences providing familiar (T1, T2, T2* etc), as well as new (susceptibility weighted imaging, SWI) tissue contrast types. To ensure broad utility in a clinical population, total study duration with whole brain coverage was designed to be no longer than 50 minutes.

RF power deposition and B1 inhomogeneities remain the most important factors influencing pulse sequence design at ultrahigh field, although distortion and signal dropout associated with B0 inhomogeneities in low bandwidth imaging sequences may be problematic. Migration of low flip angle, gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequences to 7T is relatively simple, as the absence of refocusing pulses drastically reduces the SAR. Also, there is less flip angle sensitivity with GRE, and pixel bandwidths tend to be high, particularly for 3D sequences. B1 issues are more problematic for thin slice 2D (high peak B1), 2D spin echo (peak B1, B1 inhomogeneity), turbo spin echo (peak B1, B1 inhomogeneity, SAR), and FLAIR (B1 inhomogeneity of inversion) sequences. The choice of specific scan parameters and sequences in the ExamCard (Table 1) reflects these influences. For example, for T2 weighting at 7T GRASE is preferred over TSE because of the lower SAR and reduced sensitivity to B1 inhomogeneity.

RF power deposition and B1 inhomogeneities remain the most important factors influencing pulse sequence design at ultrahigh field, although distortion and signal dropout associated with B0 inhomogeneities in low bandwidth imaging sequences may be problematic. Migration of low flip angle, gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequences to 7T is relatively simple, as the absence of refocusing pulses drastically reduces the SAR. Also, there is less flip angle sensitivity with GRE, and pixel bandwidths tend to be high, particularly for 3D sequences. B1 issues are more problematic for thin slice 2D (high peak B1), 2D spin echo (peak B1, B1 inhomogeneity), turbo spin echo (peak B1, B1 inhomogeneity, SAR), and FLAIR (B1 inhomogeneity of inversion) sequences. The choice of specific scan parameters and sequences in the ExamCard (Table 1) reflects these influences. For example, for T2 weighting at 7T GRASE is preferred over TSE because of the lower SAR and reduced sensitivity to B1 inhomogeneity.

Creasy et al. RSNA, 2007, Chicago IlCreasy et al. RSNA, 2007, Chicago Il

Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging ScienceVUIIS Building, Medical Center North1161 21st Ave, SouthNashville, TN 37232-2310

Tel: (615) 322-8359

Fax: (615) 322-0734

URL: www.vuiis.vanderbilt.edu

T2* SAG – reveals tiny venous structures (zoom)

Studies were performed on a 7T Achieva whole body MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems) using a 16 channel head coil (Nova Medical).

Subjects were recruited under protocols approved by the Vanderbilt University IRB, and consisted of young healthy volunteers, and patients scheduled for 3T neuroimaging as part of their clinical care.

Scan parameters were refined in an iterative fashion, beginning with the sequences and parameter sets developed in our first round of protocol development (ExamCard v1) [Creasy et al, 2007]. The ExamCard v1 protocol consisted of a SmartScout, SENSE reference scan, T1 3D TFE, T2* 2D FFE, SWI, T2 2D GRASE, 3D SWI (7 echo), T2*/T1 3D TFE, B0 and B1 mapping scans, and a multiple flip angle 3D SPGR sequence for T1 parametric imaging.

For ExamCard v2, further refinements included:

1) Addition of a TOF MRA sequence

2) Conversion of multiecho SWI sequence from 7 echo with no gradient “fly-back” to 5 echo with “fly-back”

3) Incorporation of full 3D flow compensation in SWI

4) Incorporation of a refocusing flip angle sweep in the FLAIR GRASE sequence to reduce SAR and mitigate B1 inhomogeneities

5) Incorporation of RF spoiling in the reference scan

Specialized ExamCards were developed as extensions of ExamCard v2 for imaging specific anatomical regions (e.g. hippocampus) or pathologies (demyelinating disease, metastatic disease, and primary brain tumors).

Studies were performed on a 7T Achieva whole body MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems) using a 16 channel head coil (Nova Medical).

Subjects were recruited under protocols approved by the Vanderbilt University IRB, and consisted of young healthy volunteers, and patients scheduled for 3T neuroimaging as part of their clinical care.

Scan parameters were refined in an iterative fashion, beginning with the sequences and parameter sets developed in our first round of protocol development (ExamCard v1) [Creasy et al, 2007]. The ExamCard v1 protocol consisted of a SmartScout, SENSE reference scan, T1 3D TFE, T2* 2D FFE, SWI, T2 2D GRASE, 3D SWI (7 echo), T2*/T1 3D TFE, B0 and B1 mapping scans, and a multiple flip angle 3D SPGR sequence for T1 parametric imaging.

For ExamCard v2, further refinements included:

1) Addition of a TOF MRA sequence

2) Conversion of multiecho SWI sequence from 7 echo with no gradient “fly-back” to 5 echo with “fly-back”

3) Incorporation of full 3D flow compensation in SWI

4) Incorporation of a refocusing flip angle sweep in the FLAIR GRASE sequence to reduce SAR and mitigate B1 inhomogeneities

5) Incorporation of RF spoiling in the reference scan

Specialized ExamCards were developed as extensions of ExamCard v2 for imaging specific anatomical regions (e.g. hippocampus) or pathologies (demyelinating disease, metastatic disease, and primary brain tumors).

Table 1: 7T Clinical Exam Card v2.0Table 1: 7T Clinical Exam Card v2.0

Name TR TE FA Voxel Size SENSEScan

TimeSmartScout 2.7 1.3 8 2.23 x 2.23 x 2.2 - 1:29

REF 8.0 .85 5 4.0 x 4.0 x 4.0 - 1:55

T1 3D TFE 5.3 2.4 7 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.7 2.9 (RL) 8:58

2D FFE 532 11.8 40 0.5 x 0.5 x 3.0 2.0 (RL) 4:54

SWI 22.0 14.8 12 0.5 x 0.5 x 1.0 2.0 (RL) 4:03

T2 GRASE 12426 59 90 0.5 x 0.64 x 3.0 2.0 (RL) 5:36

T2 FLAIR GRASE 15000 61 90 0.6 x 0.64 x 3.0 2.0 (RL) 6:30

SWI 5 echo 19 3.2 (=3) 10 1.00 x 1.00 x 1.00 2.0 (RL) 5:12

3D T2* Sag 20 9.7 8 0.33 x 0.33 x 4.0 2.0 (RL) 4:20

3D T1 “Thick” 4.9 2.6 7 0.5 x 0.5 x 2.5 2.0 (RL) 3:27

B1 MAP 30/120 1.68 50 3.0 x 3.0 x 5.0 - 6:51

MFA SPGR 14 3.2 20 1.0 x 1.0 x 2.5 2.0 (RL) 5:09

TOF MRA 23 3.5 20 0.25 x 0.45 x 1.00 2.4 (RL) 8:03

T2 GRASE

3D TOF MRA

SWI minIP

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Funding: NIH/NIBIB BRP; Vanderbilt U. Dept. of RadiologyFunding: NIH/NIBIB BRP; Vanderbilt U. Dept. of Radiology

T1W 3D TFE

2D FFE3D T1W “Thick”

B1 Map

5 echo SWI with “flyback” gradient

T1 Map (B1 corrected)

T1 [sec]

4.0

0.0

T2W FLAIR GRASE