40
/ 40 1 Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012 lity in Health Ca lity in Health Ca and and sic Tools of Quali sic Tools of Quali Zekeriya Aktürk aile.atauni.edu.tr

Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Quality in Health Care and Basic Tools of Quality. Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012. Zekeriya Aktürk aile.atauni.edu.tr. Objectives. At the end of this session , the trainees should be able to ; define terms related with quality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 401

Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 203.10.2012

Quality in Health Care Quality in Health Care andand

Basic Tools of QualityBasic Tools of Quality

Zekeriya Aktürkaile.atauni.edu.tr

Page 2: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 402

Objectives

• At the end of this session, the trainees should be able to;– define terms related with quality

– express the benefits of quality

– explain the quality diagram Plan-Do-Check-Act

– discuss ways to improve quality in primary care

– describe quality circles/peer review groups

– describe workflow

– describe processes

– explain the seven tools of quality improvement

Page 3: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 403

2000 BC: Eat this root...

1000 AC: The root is useless, come do this prayer...

1850 AC: Prayer is superstition...Take, drink this elixir...

1940 AC: The elixir is snake oil...Use this drug...

1985 AC: The drug is ineffective...Take this antibiotic..

2000 AC: Antibiotics are not working...“Eat this root..."

The Story of Drugs

Page 4: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 404

What is Quality?

• peculiar and essential character

• an inherent feature

• degree of excellence

• a distinguishing attribute Websters Dictionary

Page 5: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 405

• Appropriateness for work.

(Dr. Joseph Moses Juran)

Quality

Page 6: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 406

• Appropriate for the conditions.

(Philip Bayard Crosby)

Quality

Page 7: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 407

• The level you can cover the needs.

Quality

Page 8: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 408

• Meeting the requirements at the first time, all the times and at the correct time.

Page 9: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 409

• Customer satisfaction.

Quality

Page 10: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4010

Some terms

• ISO 9001:2000• Quality assurance• Quality improvement• Total quality management• Process • Procedure• Instructions• Documentation• Quality circles

Page 11: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4011

Stakeholders

PatientsManagers

QUALITY

Workers

Page 12: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4012

Quality Cycle

W. Edwards Deming

Page 13: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4013

Quality is a process

Page 14: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4014

Corrective system

1

2

3

4

Analyze customer needs

Corrective actions

Control the process

Marketing

Quality approaches

Page 15: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4015

Preventive System

1

2

3

4

Analyze customer needs

Design and improve

Control the process

Marketing

Page 16: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4016

Three areas in quality

• Structure– The structure of health system is important.

Economical and political restrictions will effect the quality of services

• Process– What are we doing for our patients in reality? Can we

accomplish our responsibilities?

• Outcomes– Is our practice really making any change? What about

patient satisfaction, mortality, morbidity…?

Rajakumar MK. Asia Pacific Family Medicine 2002; 1: 74–78

Page 17: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4017

Page 18: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4018

• “I think I have said enough to show how we have progressed and how each one of us is only a link in a chain that began long before us and will continue long after we have gone. Therefore, we must honor our predecessors and delight in those who shall follow.”

• “Quality is very simple. It is love – love of knowledge, love of man, and love o God.”

Avedis DonabedianSpanish Journal of Health Care and Quality, 1999

Page 19: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4019

Basic Tools of Quality

1. Cause and effect diagram

2. Check sheet

3. Control chart

4. Flow chart

5. Histogram

6. Pareto chart

7. Scatter diagram

Page 20: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4020

1 - Cause and effect diagram

• A Cause-and-Effect Diagram is useful in examining the factors that have contributed to the problem. To develop the Cause-and-Effect Diagram, we have to go through four steps, namely: – identify the problem's characteristics – brainstorm the reasons why the problem is occurring using a

Causal Table (also known as the Why-Because Technique) – group the causes by relationship using an Affinity Technique – create a Cause-and-Effect Diagram

Page 21: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4021

S1: Identify the problem's characteristics

Question Answer

1. What is this problem about?

Delay in attending to users.

2. Who is affected by this problem?

One-fourth (25%) of patients wait more than 90 minutes for care.

3. When does this problem occur?

Waiting time increases beginning midmorning on Mondays and Fridays.

4. Where does it occur? In the health center, mainly at the registration

desk, in the doctor's waiting room, and in the laboratory.

Page 22: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4022

Step 2: Brainstorm

• Next, the team participates in brainstorming sessions to analyze the causes of the waiting-time problem.

• After the team is finished with brainstorming, we have a list of possible causes for the problem.

Page 23: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4023

Immediate Cause Root Cause

Staff arrives late to work

• staff member has a second job• staff must complete domestic chores before

coming to work • staff experiences unexpected delay in getting to

work

Too much paperwork

• disorganization of the files • complicated storage methods • complicated procedures

Lack of user cooperation

• users don't respect turns • users don't bring ID cards • users don't keep appointments

Limited space • insufficient capacity for number of users

Procedures take too long

• lack of automation of procedures • outdated methods

Page 24: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4024

Step 3: Affinity Technique

• In preparation for describing the causes graphically, the team decides to group them by relationships, or affinities, into policy and user issues.

• Working with a group of between five and eight participants, we ask each participant to write down, individually, on four or five cards, their ideas about the common factors of the causes.

• After 10 minutes, the cards are put on the wall and the ideas reordered in groups. Each participant moves any cards to group them by affinity, until all the participants are in general agreement with the grouping of ideas.

• In our example, the causes may be grouped under the following headings:– policy – personnel – user – methods/procedures

Page 25: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4025

Step 4: Create the Cause-and-Effect Diagram

Page 26: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4026

2 - Pareto Analysis

• After analyzing the causes of long waiting times, we need to choose the most important causes to solve. One way to do this is by using a Pareto Analysis

Page 27: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4027

Step 1: Frequency Analysis

• The first step of the Pareto Analysis is to gather data on the frequency of the causes.

• We can continue on the above example of waiting times. Let us interview a sample of 50 users and 20 staff members of the health center to determine which of the possible causes happen most frequently in the health center.

Page 28: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4028

Possible Causes of Long Wait Time Percent of Total

Policies require excess information on users 1

Policies require complicated procedures 1

Too much paperwork 2

Not enough funding 2

Inadequate schedules 13

Inadequate policies 2

Clinic personnel have too many chores at home 2

Clinic personnel have other jobs 2

Clinic personnel lack punctuality 6

Clinic personnel have insufficient training 2

Clinic personnel aren't motivated 1

Clinic personnel are careless 1

Clinic personnel don't follow the schedule 16

Users forget ID cards 1

Users don't keep appointments 2

Users are uncooperative 1

Delay in handing over lab results to doctors 14

Outdated methods 12

Lack of automation 9

Procedures take too long 11

Here are the results of the survey, in a table:

Clinic personnel don't follow the schedule

Delay in handing over lab results to doctors

Inadequate schedules

Outdated methods

Procedures take too long

65%

Page 29: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4029

• The Pareto Principle states that a problem can be solved by focusing on solving the most frequently occurring causes.

• Usually, there are four to six causes that lead to 80% of the problems.

• These are called the "vital few" causes.

Page 30: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4030

• To identify the "vital few" causes, we rank the causes based on the frequencies we found in the survey, we have to calculate the cumulative percentage (each percentage added to the one before it) so we can build a pareto graph.

• We construct a chart with the cause, percentage, and cumulative percentage:

Page 31: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4031

Cause % Cum. %

Clinic personnel don't follow the schedule 16% 16%

Delay in handing over lab results to doctors 14% 30%

Inadequate schedules 13% 43%

Outdated methods 12% 55%

Procedures take too long 11% 66%

Lack of automation 9% 75%

Clinic personnel lack punctuality 6% 81%

Page 32: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4032

Step 3: Pareto Graph

• Now we are ready to draw the pareto graph. We draw a horizontal axis (x) that represents the different causes, ordered from the most to least frequent. Next, we draw a vertical axis (y) with percentages from 0 to 100%.

• Now, we construct a bar graph based on the percentage of each cause. We construct a line graph of the cumulative percent.

• Finally, we draw a line from 80% on the y-axis to the line graph, and then drop the line down to the x-axis. This line separates the important causes from the trivial ones.

Page 33: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4033

Page 34: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4034

3 - Check Sheet

Page 35: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4035

4 - Control chart (Shewhart chart)

Page 36: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4036

5 - Flow chart• A flowchart is a schematic representation of

an algorithm or a process

Page 37: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4037

6 - Histogram

• A histogram is a graphical display of tabulated frequencies. It shows what proportion of cases fall into each of several categories.

Page 38: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4038

Histogram of age

Page 39: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4039

7 - Scatter Diagram

Page 40: Atatürk University Medical Faculty, Class 2 03.10.2012

/ 4040

Summary• What is quality?

• Describe the quality cycle

• How did Donabedian define Structure, Process, and Outcome?

• What is ISO?

• What are quality circles?