Upload
m-martin
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.elsevier.com/locate/vetmic
Veterinary Microbiology 122 (2007) 16–24
Association of hepatitis E virus (HEV) and postweaning
multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) with lesions
of hepatitis in pigs
M. Martın a,b,*, J. Segales a, F.F. Huang b, D.K. Guenette b,E. Mateu a, N. de Deus a, X.J. Meng b
a Departament de Sanitat i d’Anatomia Animals, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA),
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spainb Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Received 18 April 2006; received in revised form 18 December 2006; accepted 20 December 2006
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the presence of swine hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA and antibodies in postweaning
multisystemic wasting syndrome-affected (n = 114) and non-affected (n = 46) pigs and the possible association with hepatitis
lesions. Forty-four pigs were RT-PCR positive (28.2%); 25 of them were PMWS cases, while 19 were non-PMWS pigs. In both
groups, HEV RT-PCR results were associated with hepatitis (OR = 5.61 for PMWS-affected pigs and OR = 5.17 for non-PMWS
affected pigs; p = 0.01). No interaction was detected in a logistic regression between PMWS occurrence and HEV infection for
the development of hepatitis lesions. Seropositivity to HEV was more likely to occur in pigs with hepatitis (51.9%) compared to
pigs without hepatitis (36.1%; p = 0.03). Significant differences in optical densities were notices comparing the lesional stage of
pigs ( p = 0.009). While pigs with slight or moderate hepatitis were seropositive, pigs with more severe lesions were seronegative
to HEV. These results indicate that swine HEV infection can be a significant contributor to the development of moderate hepatitis
in pigs regardless of the PMWS status.
# 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: HEV; Hepatitis E; Porcine circovirus type 2; Postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome; Swine
* Corresponding author at: Departament de Sanitat i d’Anatomia
Animals, Facultat de Veterinaria, Universitat Autonoma de Barce-
lona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. Tel.: +34 935811046;
fax: +34 935813297.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Martın).
0378-1135/$ – see front matter # 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.12.020
1. Introduction
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a small non-enveloped
RNA virus of approximately 7.2 kb which has recently
been classified within the family Hepeviridae, genus
Hepevirus (Emerson et al., 2004). HEV is the
.
M. Martın et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 122 (2007) 16–24 17
causative agent of hepatitis E, an important cause of
acute hepatitis in humans in many developing
countries although sporadic cases are increasingly
reported in industrialized countries (Emerson and
Purcell, 2003). The disease appears often as a self-
limiting acute hepatitis with a low case-fatality rate;
however, in pregnant women it can cause up to 25%
mortality because of the development of fulminant
acute hepatitis (Purcell and Emerson, 2001).
In 1997, a novel strain of HEV in pigs, designated
swine HEV, was identified in swine herds in the United
States and was shown to be genetically and
serologically related to human HEV strains (Meng
et al., 1997). Swine HEV can infect non-human
primates, and conversely a US-2 strain of human HEV
infected pigs (Meng et al., 1998; Halbur et al., 2001).
These findings raised a concern about human
infections with swine HEV. In fact, pig handlers in
the United States and other countries have been found
to be at increased risk of zoonotic infection by HEV
(Drobeniuc et al., 2001; Meng et al., 2002; Withers
et al., 2002). It is now recognized that swine are a
reservoir for HEV and swine HEV can infect humans
(Garkavenko et al., 2001; van der Poel et al., 2001;
Yoo et al., 2001; Choi et al., 2003; Takahashi et al.,
2003; Banks et al., 2004). In Spain, HEV RNA has
been detected in human cases of hepatitis, urban
sewage and swine faecal samples, confirming thus that
autochthonous HEV strains circulate in both human
and animal populations in Spain (Pina et al., 2000;
Clemente-Casares et al., 2003).
Pigs infected with HEV develop a subclinical
infection; however microscopic lesions of hepatitis are
observed in both experimentally (Halbur et al., 2001)
and naturally (Meng et al., 1997) infected pigs. Swine
HEV has been shown to replicate in liver as well as in
gastrointestinal tract and other extrahepatic tissues
(Williams et al., 2001; Choi and Chae, 2003; Meng,
2003).
Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), the primary
causative agent of postweaning multisystemic wasting
syndrome (PMWS), is also considered a hepatitis-
inducing virus in pigs (Rosell et al., 2000). In fact,
approximately 45% of PMWS-affected pigs have a
mild to severe hepatitis (Segales et al., 2004)
consisting of lympho-histiocytic infiltrations in portal
areas or irregularly distributed throughout the hepatic
parenchyma (Rosell et al., 2000). These hepatic
lesions resemble those described in pigs naturally and
experimentally infected with swine HEV (Meng et al.,
1997; Halbur et al., 2001).
The objective of the study was to explore the
possible participation of swine HEV and PMWS with
the presence of hepatitis lesions in pigs.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Case selection and sampling
A total of 160 pigs of 1–5 months were included in
this study. All animals came from conventional
Spanish pig farms and were submitted alive to the
Pathology Diagnostic Laboratory at the Veterinary
Faculty of Barcelona (Spain). One hundred and
fourteen had been submitted under suspicion of
PMWS that was later confirmed by fulfilling the case
definition criteria for this disease as reported else-
where (Segales and Domingo, 2002). At arrival,
animals were bled via the cranial cava vein and
euthanized with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital.
Serum samples were kept frozen at �80 8C until used
for analyses. During necropsy, samples of tissues
including liver were taken, fixed by immersion in 10%
buffered formalin and processed for routine histo-
pathologic examination. Additionally, 46 pigs sub-
mitted to the laboratory for conditions other than
PMWS were also studied. For these pigs blood was
taken as well as samples of liver, bile, lymph nodes
and faeces. Fresh and fixed material was available for
these later animals.
In the 160 studied pigs, other conditions diagnosed
were bacterial pneumonia, porcine reproductive and
respiratory syndrome (PRRS), enteric salmonellosis,
colibacillosis, swine influenza, coccidiosis, Glasser’s
disease and streptococcal meningitis.
2.2. Histopathology
Within the PMWS group, 64 (56.1%) animals had
hepatitis and 50 (43.9%) had no liver lesions as
determined by the microscopic examination. Thirteen
out of 46 (28.3%) non-PMWS animals had hepatitis.
Hepatic lesions were scored from I to IVaccording to a
previously described classification for PMWS-affected
pigs (Rosell et al., 2000). With this criteria, 54 animals
M. Martın et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 122 (2007) 16–2418
(50 PMWS and four non-PMWS) had stage I lesions
(slight multifocal lymphohistiocytic infiltrates in the
portal tracts and/or irregularly distributed in the liver
parenchyma), 19 pigs (10 PMWS and 9 non-PMWS)
had stage II lesions (intermediate to intense lympho-
histiocytic inflammation of the portal tracts often
accompanied by clusters of mononuclear inflammatory
cells in the liver parenchyma), three pigs with PMWS
had stage III lesions (multifocal clusters of mono-
nuclear inflammatory infiltrates within the hepatic
parenchyma, a variable hepatic plate disorganization,
and frequent presence of apoptotic bodies), and one
PMWS-affected pig was classified as having stage IV
lesions (generalized perilobular fibrosis, with disorga-
nization of liver plates and massive loss of hepatocytes,
and remaining stroma of the lobules diffusely infiltrated
by mononuclear cells).
2.3. RT-PCR to detect swine HEV
For both groups, a semi-nested RT-PCR was used to
detect swine HEV RNA in serum (n = 156). Addition-
ally, in the other non-PMWS pigs, the same RT-PCR
was performed on fresh samples of liver, bile, faeces
and mesenteric lymph nodes. The primers were
designed based upon the alignment of the available
partial ORF2 sequences of Spanish HEV strains (VH2
[AF195062], BCN [AF058684] and E11 [AF195063]),
the prototype swine HEV strain [AF082843], and eight
other swine HEV strains identified from pigs in USA
and Japan (Huang et al., 2002; Takahashi et al., 2003).
RNA was extracted with TriZol (Life Tech, USA) from
100 ml of serum or with the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen,
Hilden, Germany) for tissue samples. Reverse tran-
scription was performed at 42 8C for 1 h with Super-
Script II (Invitrogen, USA). The semi-nested PCR was
performed using degenerate primers which can detect
potential genetically diversified field strains of swine
HEV: forward primer for both rounds (F1) 50-TTVGGGCTYCTYGACTTTGC-30, external reverse
(R1) 50-CCRCCRAGAAGYGTATCAGC-30, and inter-
nal reverse (R2) 50-CCRCGRCCCACCTCACCAAC-
30 (V = A or C or G; Y = C or T; R = A or G). PCR
parameters for both rounds of PCR included an initial
denaturation step at 94 8C for 6 min, followed by 35
cycles of denaturation for 50 s at 94 8C, annealing for
30 s at 48 8C, extension for 60 s at 72 8C, and a final
incubation at 72 8C for 7 min. The expected product of
the semi-nested RT-PCR was 212 bp. Negative (water)
and positive (prototype strain of swine HEV, GenBank
accession number AF082843) controls were included in
each set of RT-PCRs. The amplified PCR products were
examined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. A pig was
considered to be RT-PCR HEV positive when at least
one of the examined samples was positive.
2.4. Swine HEV sequencing
Twelve PCR products were sequenced (10 corre-
sponding to pigs with hepatitis and two from pigs
without hepatitis), and the resulting sequences were
compared genetically and phylogenetically to other
known HEV strains available in GenBank including
representatives of genotypes 1–4. Sequence align-
ments were generated by CLUSTALX (1.83) (Thomp-
son et al., 1997). Phylogenetic tree was constructed by
the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987)
based on the partial nucleotide sequence of the ORF2
region (212 nucleotides). Bootstrap values were
determined on 1000 iterations of the data sets and
the final tree was displayed using the TreeView
program (1.6.6) (http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/
rod/treeview.html). The HEV sequences reported in
this paper were designated as UAB1–UAB12 and have
been deposited in GenBank database with accession
numbers: DQ383734–DQ383745.
2.5. Serology to swine HEV
IgG antibodies to HEV were detected using a
previously standardized in-house ELISA (Meng et al.,
1997). Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with a
purified 55 kDa truncated recombinant capsid protein
of the Sar-55 strain of human HEV (kindly provided by
Drs. Robert Purcell and Suzanne Emerson of the
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) in 0.1 M
sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.6). After 2 h incubation
at 37 8C, the solution was replaced with 100 ml/well of
blocking buffer (10% FBS + 0.5% gelatine in washing
buffer). Serum samples in duplicate were added to each
well and incubated at 37 8C for 30 min. Plates were
washed four times with washing buffer before adding
HRP-conjugated goat anti-swine IgG as the secondary
antibody (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories, Inc.,
USA). After incubation at 37 8C for 30 min, the plates
were washed four times with washing buffer. ABTS
M. Martın et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 122 (2007) 16–24 19
solution was added to each well for colour develop-
ment. The optical density (OD) of each sample was read
with an ELISA plate reader with a 405 nm filter. Test
samples with OD values equal to or greater than the cut-
off value (0.300) were considered positive for anti-HEV
IgG (Meng et al., 1997). Preimmune and hyperimmune
anti-HEV swine sera were used as negative and positive
controls in each plate.
2.6. Statistical analyses
The x2-test (Fischer’s exact test) was used to
analyze the relationship between histopathology and
either RT-PCR or ELISA results (positive or negative).
The Mann–Whitney test was used to correlate the
ELISA OD values with liver histopathological results.
In order to compare the possible interaction between
PMWS and the HEV status for the presence of
hepatitis lesions, a stratified analysis was done and the
Mantel–Haenszel x2 was calculated. Additionally, a
backward stepwise logistic regression was performed
where the hepatitis status was considered to be the
outcome variable. All analyses were done using Epi-
Info 2000 v.3.2.2. (CDC, Atlanta, USA).
3. Results
Of the 156 tested animals by RT-PCR, 44 (28.2%)
pigs (all of them between 4 and 14 weeks of age) were
Table 1
Detection of swine HEV RNA and antibody in serum samples of PMWS-
without hepatitis
Age
(weeks)
PMWS-affected pigs
With hepatitis Without hepatitis
Swine HEV
RNA
Anti-HEV
antibodies
Swine HEV
RNA
Anti-HEV
antibodies
4 – – 0/2 (0.0) 0/2 (0.0)
6 2/6 (33.3)a 4/6 (66.7) – –
8 7/25 (28.0) 10/25 (40.0) 2/18 (11.1) 6/19 (31.6)
10 2/10 (20.0) 6/10 (60.0) 1/15 (6.7) 4/16 (25.0)
12 9/14 (64.3) 11/15 (73.3) 1/8 (12.5) 5/8 (62.5)
14 1/4 (25.0) 3/4 (75.0) 0/3 (0.0) 3/3 (100)
16 0/2 (0.0) 2/2 (100) 0/2 (0.0) 2/2 (100)
18–20 0/1 (0.0) 1/2 (50.0) – –
Total 21/62 (33.9) 37/64 (57.8) 4/48 (8.3) 20/50 (40.0
a Number of positive cases/number of total cases tested (percentage o
positive for swine HEV and 30 of them (68.2%) had
lesions of hepatitis. These lesions corresponded to
stages I or II, except for one animal that was in stage
III. Regarding their PMWS status, 25/110 (22.7%)
corresponded to PMWS pigs and 19/46 (41.3%) to
non-PMWS animals. In both groups of pigs (PMWS
and non-PMWS) swine HEV RT-PCR positive results
were significantly associated with the presence of
hepatitis (Odds ratio (OR) = 5.61, CI95% = 1.78–
17.68, p < 0.01 for PMWS animals and OR = 5.17,
CI95% = 1.28–20.82, p < 0.01 for non-PMWS pigs).
To determine whether HEV infection and PMWS
statuses might interact for the development of
hepatitis, a logistic regression was done. Results
indicated that both factors were independently
associated to hepatitis obtaining very similar OR
than above. The age distribution of pigs, presence of
hepatitis and swine HEV RNA detection are summar-
ized in Table 1.
IgG anti-HEV antibodies were detected in 43.8%
(70/160) of the sera tested in the study. Seroprevalence
was 51.9% (40/77) in pigs with hepatitis lesions and
36.1% (30/83) ( p = 0.031) in pigs without hepatitis
(Table 1). Average OD values of sera from pigs with
hepatitis (0.425 � 0.369) were higher than OD values
in pigs without hepatitis (0.252 � 0.173) ( p = 0.002).
In addition, significant differences in OD values were
also observed according to the severity score of
hepatitis: the average ODs for pigs in stages I and II
were 0.413 � 0.100 and 0.502 � 0.259, respectively,
affected and non-affected pigs from 4 to 20 weeks of age with and
Non-PMWS
With hepatitis Without hepatitis
Swine HEV
RNA
Anti-HEV
antibodies
Swine HEV
RNA
Anti-HEV
antibodies
1/1 (100.0) 0/1 (0.0) 2/7 (28.6) 2/7 (28.6)
1/1 (100) 0/1 (0.0) 2/10 (20) 2/10/(20.0)
3/3 (100) 0/3 (0.0) 3/5 (60) 1/5 (20.0)
0/1 (0.0) 0/1 (0.0) 1/3 (33.3) 0/3 (0.0)
4/7 (57.2) 3/7 (42.8) 2/3 (66.6) 2/3 (66.6)
– – – –
– – 0/5 (0.0) 3/5 (60.0)
– – – –
) 9/13 (69.2) 3/13 (23.1) 10/33 (30.3) 10/33 (30.3)
f positive cases).
M. Martın et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 122 (2007) 16–2420
Fig. 1. A phylogenetic bootstrapped tree (1000 iterations) based on the nucleotide sequences of a 212 bp region within the ORF2 gene of HEV
was constructed with the aid of the ClustalX program. Only bootstrap values above 50% are shown. Sequences from the present study are shown
in boldface. Other 38 sequences of HEV (genotypes 1–4 and avian HEV) were included for comparison and phylogenetic analysis (GenBank
accession numbers in parentheses). Sequences of porcine origin are shown in italics.
M.
Ma
rtınet
al./V
eterina
ryM
icrob
iolo
gy
12
2(2
00
7)
16
–2
42
1
Table 2
Percentage of nucleotide sequence identity of the swine HEV isolates from Spanish pigs in the current study with other HEV isolates of swine and human origin
Meng SwJ791 Osh205 P143 NLSW28 CV7 CV11 CV18a CV19 E11 VH1a VH2a UAB1 UAB2 UAB3 UAB4 UAB5 UAB6 UAB7 UAB8 UAB9 UAB10 UAB11 UAB12
Meng –
SwJ791 82 –
Osh 205 83 83 –
P143 83 87 85 –
NLSW28 87 86 84 86 –
CV7 84 84 86 87 86 –
CV11 85 80 83 84 83 92 –
CV18a 84 83 86 85 87 99 91 –
CV19 86 82 83 80 90 87 87 88 –
E11 87 84 85 84 90 89 89 89 100 –
VH1a 86 84 85 85 90 89 88 90 93 93 –
VH2a 85 84 85 85 90 91 88 92 93 94 93 –
UAB1 86 86 87 84 89 89 86 89 97 97 92 94 –
UAB2 87 86 86 85 90 90 88 90 100 99 93 95 100 –
UAB3 86 85 86 84 89 89 86 89 97 97 92 93 99 100 –
UAB4 86 83 84 87 86 87 87 86 87 87 88 87 90 90 90 –
UAB5 85 85 86 85 89 91 87 90 93 93 92 95 96 96 96 91 –
UAB6 85 85 85 86 88 91 87 90 91 92 89 94 94 94 94 90 97 –
UAB7 85 84 85 86 88 91 87 89 91 92 90 94 94 94 94 90 97 99 –
UAB8 86 85 86 84 87 88 86 87 96 95 91 92 98 99 99 90 95 94 94 –
UAB9 86 86 87 84 89 89 86 89 97 97 92 94 100 100 99 90 96 94 94 98 –
UAB10 86 86 87 84 88 89 86 88 97 96 91 93 100 100 99 90 96 94 94 98 100 –
UAB11 85 85 85 86 88 91 87 90 91 92 89 94 94 94 94 90 97 100 99 94 94 94 –
UAB12 86 86 86 85 88 89 87 88 97 96 92 93 99 100 99 91 96 94 94 99 99 99 94 –
The corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the strains are shown in Fig. 1.a Spanish human isolates.
M. Martın et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 122 (2007) 16–2422
while animals in stages 0, 3 and 4 had a negative
average (OD < 0.300) ( p = 0.009). Swine HEV
seroprevalence was 50% (57/114) in animals with
PMWS and 28.3% (13/46) in pigs without PMWS
( p = 0.009). Within seropositive animals, no differ-
ences were noticed regarding OD values between
animals with and without PMWS. Moreover, 12
seronegative pigs were found to be HEV viremic.
Phylogenetic analysis based on the ORF2 gene
region revealed that all Spanish swine HEV isolates
from this study were in the same cluster together with
other Spanish human and swine HEV isolates and
belonged to genotype 3 (Fig. 1). Sequence analyses
revealed that all the UAB swine HEV isolates shared
95.5 � 3.5% (89.0–100%) nucleotide sequence iden-
tity to each other and 92.4 � 4.5% (84.6–100%)
nucleotide sequence identity to other Spanish HEV
isolates of either human or porcine origin. The UAB
swine HEV isolates shared 89.1 � 5.7% (77.4–100%)
nucleotide sequence identity with other genotype 3
HEV isolates (Table 2).
4. Discussion
In pigs, infectious hepatitis can be caused by
viruses, bacteria, and parasites (Sims, 1996). Among
those agents, PCV2, the etiological agent of PMWS,
and HEV are among the most recently recognised
causes of infectious hepatitis (Meng et al., 1997;
Hamel et al., 1998). Hepatitis is considered as one of
the hallmark pathological lesions in PMWS (Rosell
et al., 1999), although approximately one third of the
PMWS-affected pigs with stages I and II hepatic
lesions are negative for PCV2 detection in the liver
(Rosell et al., 2000). The results from the present study
indicate that HEV is associated with hepatitis in pigs
and this association is not affected by the PMWS
status of the animals. Therefore both agents (HEV and
PCV2) probably may act independently in the
development of the hepatitis lesions observed.
The fact that seroprevalence against HEV was
significantly higher in animals with hepatitis reinforce
the idea that HEV is involved in the development of
hepatitis in pigs. Also, higher ELISA OD values were
detected in pigs with stages I or II of hepatitis compared
either with animals having higher scores or having no
hepatitis lesions. Moreover, the hepatic lesions
described for swine HEV infection under both natural
and experimental conditions (Meng et al., 1997; Halbur
et al., 2001) are similar to the lesions of hepatitis
described in this study for the HEV positive pigs. It has
been hypothesized that liver lesions observed in human
HEV infection may be attributable to an immune
response against the virus rather than to a direct effect of
virus replication (Jameel, 1999; Nagasaki et al., 2005).
In our case, the animals with compatible stages I or II
lesions were mostly seropositive while pigs with other
lesional stages were seronegative. However, in the
present study the average of positive OD for animals
with hepatitis was 0.425, a value too low to support this
hypothesis in pigs. All animals with lesional stages III
and IV were PMWS-affected pigs. The fact that the
presence of PCV2 in stages III and IV hepatic lesions is
systematic and usually massive (Rosell et al., 2000),
indicates that those cases with higher lesion scores are
probably associated only with PCV2 infection.
In the non-PMWS group, samples other than serum
were available including liver, bile, lymph nodes and
faeces. In some of those animals HEV could be
detected in some of the samples but not the others,
being bile and lymph nodes the most frequently
positive ones. In both PMWS and non-PMWS pigs,
some seronegative animals with hepatitis were HEV
positive by RT-PCR. These results are in accordance
with de Deus et al. (2006) and emphasize the need for
defining a sampling and analysis strategy based not
only in antibodies or HEV RNA detection in serum.
All HEV viremic pigs from this study were
approximately 4–14 weeks of age, which is consistent
with earlier reports in other countries (Meng et al.,
1997; Huang et al., 2002; Meng, 2003; Takahashi
et al., 2003). Seroprevalence to anti-HEVantibodies is
age-dependent and varies depending on the ages of
pigs (Meng et al., 1997).
Thus far all swine HEV isolates identified from pigs
worldwide belong to either genotypes 3 or 4, and all
the Spanish swine HEV isolates from this study
belonged to genotype 3, which further confirms earlier
reports in our country (Pina et al., 2000; Clemente-
Casares et al., 2003).
Taking together, the data from this study suggest
that HEV can be a primary agent of subclinical
hepatitis (stages I or II) in pigs and also that PCV2 can
be a hepatitis inducing agent PMWS-affected pigs.
Furthermore, HEV and PCV2 do not seem to be
M. Martın et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 122 (2007) 16–24 23
synergistic in the development of hepatitis lesions in
young pigs.
References
Banks, M., Heath, G.S., Grierson, S.S., King, D.P., Gresham, A.,
Girones, R., Widen, F., Harrison, T.J., 2004. Evidence for the
presence of hepatitis E virus in pigs in the United Kingdom. Vet.
Rec. 154, 223–227.
Choi, C., Chae, C., 2003. Localization of swine hepatitis E virus in
liver and extrahepatic tissues from naturally infected pigs by in
situ hybridization. J. Hepatol. 38, 827–832.
Choi, I.-S., Kwon, H.-J., Shin, N.-R., Yoo, H.S., 2003. Identification
of swine hepatitis E virus (HEV) and prevalence of anti-HEV
antibodies in swine and human populations in Korea. J. Clin.
Microbiol. 41, 3602–3608.
Clemente-Casares, P., Pina, S., Buti, M., Jardi, R., Martın, M.,
Bofill-Mas, S., Girones, R., 2003. Hepatitis E virus epidemiol-
ogy in industrialized countries. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9, 448–454.
de Deus, N., Seminati, C., Pina, S., Mateu, E., Martin, M., Segales,
J., 2006. Detection of hepatitis E virus in liver, mesenteric lymph
node, serum, bile and faeces of naturally infected pigs affected
by different pathological conditions. Vet. Microbiol. 21 [Epub
ahead of print].
Drobeniuc, J., Favorov, M.O., Shapiro, C.N., Bell, B.P., Mast, E.E.,
Dadu, A., Culver, D., Iarovoi, P., Robertson, B.H., Margolis,
H.S., 2001. Hepatitis E virus antibody prevalence among per-
sons who work with swine. J. Infect. Dis. 184, 1594–1597.
Emerson, S.U., Purcell, R.H., 2003. Hepatitis E virus. Rev. Med.
Virol. 13, 145–154.
Emerson, S.U., Anderson, D., Arankalle, A., Meng, X.-J., Purdy, M.,
Schlauder, G.G., Tsarev, S.A., 2004. Hepevirus. In: Fauquet,
C.M., Mayo, M.A., Maniloff, J., Desselberger, U., Ball, L.A.
(Eds.), Virus Taxonomy, VIIIth Report of the ICTV. Elsevier/
Academic Press, London, pp. 851–855.
Garkavenko, O.A., Obriadina, A., Meng, J., Anderson, D.A.,
Benard, H.J., Schroeder, B.A., Khudyakov, Y.E., Fields, H.A.,
Croxson, M.C., 2001. Detection and characterisation of swine
hepatitis E virus in New Zealand. J. Med. Virol. 65, 525–529.
Halbur, P.G., Kasorndorkbua, C., Gilbert, C., Guenette, D., Potters,
M.B., Purcell, R.H., Emerson, S.U., Toth, T.E., Meng, X.-J.,
2001. Comparative pathogenesis of infection of pigs with hepa-
titis E viruses recovered from a pig and a human. J. Clin.
Microbiol. 39, 918–923.
Hamel, A.L., Lin, L.L., Nayar, G.P., 1998. Nucleotide sequence of
porcine circovirus associated with postweaning multisystemic
wasting syndrome in pigs. J. Virol. 72, 5262–5267.
Huang, F.F., Haqshenas, G., Guenette, D.K., Halbur, P.G., Schom-
mer, S.K., Pierson, F.W., Toth, T.E., Meng, X.J., 2002. Detection
by reverse transcription-PCR and genetic characterization of
field isolates of swine hepatitis E virus from pigs in different
geographic regions of the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40,
1326–1332.
Jameel, S., 1999. Molecular biology and pathogenesis of hepatitis E
virus. Expert. Rev. Mol. Med. 1999, 1–16.
Meng, X.-J., 2003. Swine hepatitis E virus: cross-species infection
and risk in xenotransplantation. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
278, 185–216.
Meng, X.-J., Purcell, R.H., Halbur, P.G., Lehman, J.R., Webb, D.M.,
Tsareva, T.S., Haynes, J.S., Thacker, B.J., Emerson, S.U., 1997.
A novel virus in swine is closely related to the human hepatitis E
virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9860–9865.
Meng, X.J., Halbur, P.G., Shapiro, M.S., Govindarajan, S., Bruna,
J.D., Mushahwar, I.K., Purcell, R.H., Emerson, S.U., 1998.
Genetic and experimental evidence for cross-species infection
by swine hepatitis E virus. J. Virol. 72, 9714–9721.
Meng, X.J., Wiseman, B., Elvinger, F., Guenette, D.K., Toth, T.E.,
Engle, R.E., Emerson, S.U., Purcell, R.H., 2002. Prevalence of
antibodies to hepatitis E virus in veterinarians working with
swine and in normal blood donors in the United States and other
countries. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 117–122.
Nagasaki, F., Ueno, Y., Kanno, N., Okamoto, H., Shimosegawa, T.,
2005. A case of acute hepatitis with positive autoantibodies who
actually had hepatitis E virus infection. Hepatol. Res. 32, 134–137.
Pina, S., Buti, M., Cotrina, M., Piella, J., Girones, R., 2000. HEV
identified in serum from humans with acute hepatitis and in
sewage of animal origin in Spain. J. Hepatol. 33, 826–833.
Purcell, R.H., Emerson, S.U., 2001. Hepatitis E virus. In: Knipe,
D.M., Howley, P.M. (Eds.), Fields Virology. Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 3051–3061.
Rosell, C., Segales, J., Plana-Duran, J., Balasch, M., Rodriguez-
Arrioja, G.M., Kennedy, S., Allan, G.M., McNeilly, F., Latimer,
K.S., Domingo, M., 1999. Pathological, immunohistochemical,
and in-situ hybridization studies of natural cases of postweaning
multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) in pigs. J. Comp.
Pathol. 120, 59–78.
Rosell, C., Segales, J., Domingo, M., 2000. Hepatitis and staging of
hepatic damage in pigs naturally infected with porcine circovirus
type 2. Vet. Pathol. 37, 687–692.
Saitou, N., Nei, M., 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new
method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4,
406–425.
Segales, J., Domingo, M., 2002. Postweaning multisystemic wasting
syndrome (PMWS) in pigs. Vet. Q. 24, 109–124.
Segales, J., Rosell, C., Domingo, M., 2004. Pathological findings
associated with naturally acquired porcine circovirus type 2
associated disease. Vet. Microbiol. 98, 137–149.
Sims, L.D., 1996. The liver. In: Sims, L.D., Glastonbury, J.R.W.
(Eds.), Pathology of the Pig. A Diagnostic Guide. The Pig
Research and Development Corporation and Agricultural Vic-
toria, Victoria, pp. 109–126.
Takahashi, M., Nishizawa, T., Miyajima, H., Gotanda, Y., Iita, T.,
Tsuda, F., Okamoto, H., 2003. Swine hepatitis E virus strains in
Japan form four phylogenetic clusters comparable with those of
Japanese isolates of human hepatitis E virus. J. Gen. Virol. 84,
851–862.
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., Hig-
gins, D.G., 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible
strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality
analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876–4882.
van der Poel, W.H., Verschoor, F., van der Heide, R., Herrera, M.I.,
Vivo, A., Kooreman, M., de Roda Husman, A.M., 2001. Hepa-
M. Martın et al. / Veterinary Microbiology 122 (2007) 16–2424
titis E virus sequences in swine related to sequences in humans,
the Netherlands. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7, 970–976.
Williams, T.P., Kasorndorkbua, C., Halbur, P.G., Haqshenas, G.,
Guenette, D.K., Toth, T.E., Meng, X.J., 2001. Evidence of
extrahepatic sites of replication of the hepatitis E virus in a
swine model. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 3040–3046.
Withers, M.R., Correa, M.T., Morrow, M., Stebbins, M.E., Seriwa-
tana, J., Webster, W.D., Boak, M.B., Vaughn, D.W., 2002.
Antibody levels to hepatitis E virus in North Carolina swine
workers, non-swine workers, swine, and murids. Am. J. Trop.
Med. Hyg. 66, 384–388.
Yoo, D., Willson, P., Pei, Y., Hayes, M.A., Deckert, A., Dewey, C.E.,
Friendship, R.M., Yoon, Y., Gottschalk, M., Yason, C., Giulivi,
A., 2001. Prevalence of hepatitis E virus antibodies in Canadian
swine herds and identification of a novel variant of swine
hepatitis E virus. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8, 1213–1219.