Printed Wednesday, 26 August 2015

Assignment Brief – QCF BTEC

Assignment 6 Front Sheet

Qualification Unit number and title

Edexcel BTEC Level 3 Extended Diploma in IT Unit 14: Event Driven Programming

Learner name Assessor name

Michael Gosling

Date issued Hand in deadline Submitted on

w/c 25th April 2016 w/c 6th June 2016

Assignment title Project Reflection and Evaluation.

In this assessment you will have opportunities to provide evidence against the following criteria. Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found.

Criteria reference

To achieve the criteria the evidence must show that the learner is able to:

Task no. Evidence

D1 Evaluate the suitability of event driven programs for non-graphical applications.

T6

Report

D2 Evaluate an event driven application.

T6

Report

Learner declaration

I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.

Learner signature: Date:

Printed Wednesday, 26 August 2015

Assignment brief

Qualification Edexcel BTEC Level 3 Extended Diploma in IT

Unit number and title Unit 14: Event Driven Programming

Assessor name Michael Gosling

Date issued w/c 25th April 2016

Hand in deadline w/c June 6th 2016 (6 Weeks)

Assignment title Project Reflection and Evaluation.

Purpose of this assignment

Project Reflection and Evaluation.

Scenario The company management have possibly secured a large contract with another local government organisation and because of your impressive performance. However you have been nominated to produce a small report that evaluates the suitability of event driven programs for non-graphical applications. Company policy expects that on completion of every project that the main developers evaluate the application. As you were the main developer on the last company project we would like you to indicate where improvements could have be made to the program and how amendments to the interface would have enhanced the final solution. This information will be submitted to the client as a possible suggestion for new versions of their program.

Task 1 D1 For D1, learners will evaluate the suitability of event driven programs for non-graphical applications. Evidence for this criterion should be a short report, or similarly detailed presentation.

Task 2 D2 For D2, learners will evaluate an event driven application. There is the option here for the learner to review their P5 work, or to be given a generic program to review. Alternatively, the tutor could give the learners the work of one of their peers to review. Evidence should be a short report, or similarly detailed presentation.

Evidence checklist Tick Boxes

• Report

Sources of information Work Experience/Workplace learning frameworks – Centre for Education and Industry (CEI University of Warwick) – www.warwick.ac.uk/wie/cei Learning and Skills Network – www.vocationallearning.org.uk Network for Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths Network Ambassadors Scheme – www.stemnet.org.uk National Education and Business Partnership Network – www.nebpn.org Local, regional Business links – www.businesslink.gov.uk

Printed Wednesday, 26 August 2015

Work-based learning guidance – www.aimhighersw.ac.uk/wbl.htm.

This brief has been verified as being fit for purpose

Assessor Michael Gosling

Signature Date

Internal verifier Julie Johnson

Signature Date