15
ASSESSMENT OF TRUSTWORTHINESS OF ONLINE AUDITED REFLEXIVITY Frank LaBanca, EdD Director

Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

  • Upload
    tex

  • View
    54

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity. Frank LaBanca, EdD Director. 21 st -century Approach to Presentation. Resources. Evolution of this research. What I’m not focusing on . . . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

ASSESSMENT OF TRUSTWORTHINESS OF ONLINE AUDITED REFLEXIVITY

Frank LaBanca, EdDDirector

Page 2: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

21st-century Approach to Presentation

• Resources

Page 3: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Evolution of this research• What I’m not focusing on . . .

• Multicase study of the impact of problem finding on the quality of authentic open inquiry science research projects.

Page 4: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Evolution of this research• What I am focusing on . . .

• The impact of a novel reflexivity technique (reflective writing) on the emergent outcomes of the problem finding study.

Page 5: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

“Metareflexivity”

• My role• My auditor’s role

• Methods development

Page 6: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Characteristics of high quality reflexivity

• Critical self reflection• Ongoing record of experiences, reactions, and emerging

awareness of assumptions, biases, or positionality • Identifying, accepting, verifying, and/or unlearning of

preconceived personal and theoretical commitments • Emerging awareness of ideas• Build trustworthiness

Page 7: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity
Page 8: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Data sample• Unit of study: “Post” – (my writing) 37 units

“Response” – (audits) 26 units

• Lines of text: 2625

Data analysis

Pilot study

Writing/Revising

Data collection

4/06-6/06

7/06-9/06

10/06-12/06

1/07-3/07

4/07-6/07

7/07-9/07

10/07-12/07

1/08-3/08

4/08-6/08

0

2

4

6

8

10Frequency of post entries (3-month intervals)

num

ber o

f pos

ts Study design

Page 9: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Emergent ThemesTheme Sample Code Code definition

Describing Tasks Define Defining something

Elaborate Providing context, elaboration of a statement, or an explanation

Task Explaining what I'm doing

Concept building Community Workings of the science research community of practice

Role Role of teachers, professionals, adults

Studbehav Student behaviors

Theory Linking behaviors to theory

Decision Points and Interaction

Consider Considering alternatives

Emerge What emerges from the data?

Solution A possible solution to a problem

Advice Taking advice from someone

Disagree Disagreeing with a colleague

Opinion Opinions of others that influence my thought

Metacognitive actions

Benefits The benefits to a decision

Influence How I am being influenced by my daily activities

Motivation What motivates me (or someone else)

Page 10: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Distribution of Themes

Page 11: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Findings• Describing Tasks– Explanations, often elaborated– Audit trail for dependability

• Concept Building– Subject behaviors to theory– Nature of socially constructing situated knowledge– Auditors: Learning theory and alternate learning

theory

Page 12: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Findings• Decision Points and Interaction– Considering alternatives– Evolution of ideas– Auditors: Agree and consider– Auditors: Influence on each other: elaboration

• Metacognitive actions– Influence of external factors: past, present, future– Looking for clarification: process and change– Auditors: Connecting with their own interests and

passions.

Page 13: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Benefits of a blog for reflexivity

Effective tool for qualitative research• Online, accessible, asynchronous• Ease of use• Convenience for auditors• Impact of auditors on each other for variety• Transparent

Page 14: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Limitations• Single case study• Bias towards technology• “Metareflexive”

Page 15: Assessment of trustworthiness of online audited reflexivity

Thank you

www.labanca.net

problemfinding.labanca.net