Artful Conversations || Two Young Interviewers Get a Sense of Heritage from African/American Artist and Educator Dr. J. Eugene Grigsby, Jr

  • Published on
    20-Jan-2017

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Transcript

  • National Art Education Association

    Two Young Interviewers Get a Sense of Heritage from African/American Artist and EducatorDr. J. Eugene Grigsby, Jr.Author(s): Bernard YoungSource: Art Education, Vol. 48, No. 2, Artful Conversations (Mar., 1995), pp. 37-43Published by: National Art Education AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3193512 .Accessed: 15/06/2014 23:00

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

    .

    National Art Education Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to ArtEducation.

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 195.34.79.176 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:00:56 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=naeahttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3193512?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • TWO YOUNG INTERVIEWERS GET A SENSE OF HERITAGE

    FROM AFRICAN/AMERICAN ARTIST AND EDUCATOR

    Dr. J. Eugene Grigsby Jr. THE QUEST

    The quest for discovering information and asking better questions about art, artists, African Americans, and how to encourage the interest of young teenagers about this worthy body of material started in conversations I had with two of my children. We were speaking about the general lack of attention multicultural groups in their schools receive in the curriculum. In particular we were concerned about the placement of African American and Hispanic groups in contemporary history. I was concerned with how Amber and Camille, my two adolescent daughters, could learn extensive information about contemporary artists of color who were not in major art history textbooks but I thought were nationally prominent enough to merit study. I was also concerned with how these artists reached high levels of achievement How did they get to be successful? The approach to information gathering that engaged these two adolescents through a learning-research project concerning art history had to be handled in a sensitive manner because of the period of development these youngsters were going through and the fact that I was their father. I frankly was very interested in how children might develop their knowledge about ethnic artists and increase their appreciation for art history, while maintaining a high level of interest as learners.

    BY BERNARD YOUNG

    THE NATURE OF THE STUDY Over several months my two

    daughters, under my direction, created a study to learn more about the development and careers of three African American artists. Throughout the study we emphasized and embraced the concept that ethnic variation in society should be welcomed and personally accepted; and that ethnic artists have made numerous contributions to the richness of American society. We selected three individuals who had reached very high levels of accomplishment in art and inquired how they were assisted in developing these capabilities. One of the subjects was Dr. J. Eugene Grigsby, Jr., an internationally known artist and educator, who was 75 years old at the time of the study. The interview with Dr. Grigsby is the focus of this article.

    The method used in the study was the interview. An interview is a meeting at which information is obtained from a person, resulting in a report or reproduction of information. First, decisions on what information should be sought were made. Then a questionnaire was constructed. And finally, reexaminations and revisions of the questions were made by the two investigators. Developing a method to ask questions and even possible biasing factors that may be introduced by the interviewer were also discussed.

    MARCH 1995 / ART EDUCATION

    This content downloaded from 195.34.79.176 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:00:56 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • METHODS TO COLLECT INFORMATION

    We identified individuals who were located geographically in the Southwest, whose racial origin was African American, and who had obtained at least national competence in their field or showed evidence for the potential of such competence. The interview methods were used to understand the development and educational processes that were important in enabling the three informants to reach these high levels of knowledge and skill.

    All the questions were written and structured by Amber and Camille; the categories were suggested by this writer. Four major characteristics outlined and used by oral historian E. Culpepper Clark (1985) were discussed and adopted: the interview was to be oral, autobiographical, the result of memory and a function of a joint intellectual endeavor. Categories developed were education and development, childhood experiences and art, teaching experiences, heritage, and ethnicity. The interviewers asked about special artistic or intellectual characteristics evident in the individual during early development such as the role of the home environment in guidance and support from early to later years; also, the type and quality of instruction in art from early through advanced years, and active learning time invested by the individual and any other factors the individual regarded as relevant to development.

    Before interviewing the selected three artists, Amber and Camille tested their questions on several people and discussed the results with me for proposed revisions. In the beginning stages of the study I asked Camille (age

    13) what type of qualities she and Amber (age 15) had looked for and what type of questions they had asked each artist and she replied: "We asked them simple questions at first, then as the interview went along we asked more complicated ones." The more I discussed this with these two young interviewers and the more interviews they conducted the better their questions were and the more they appreciated the process for obtaining accurate information.

    I realized about midway through the project that the training to interview and ask questions was excellent development for Amber's and Camille's writing and speaking skills. And interviewing these articulate, successful artists seemed to enhance the youngsters' self-esteem. The interviews were structured with times planned for the artists to elaborate and tell their own stories. These interviews typically took place in the artist's studio or home at a time that was convenient for the artist. Working in the artist's studio was an educational experience for the interviewers since special equipment, a studio atmosphere, and real examples of works in progress were available to be viewed.

    The three artists interviewed expressed and demonstrated great interest and pride in the opportunity to be interviewed and to share with a young person their abilities, talents, and histories. All the interviews were tape-recorded (with the consent of the interviewee), and these tapes were the basis for each summarized written report.

    CLARK'S GUIDELINES AS A CHECK ON VALIDITY

    The two young interviewers had to understand that we had to depend on

    "Orality" along with its shortcomings and strengths. One initial shortcoming was the lack of clarity often expressed by the interviewee and the failure of the interviewer to pick up on this at the time of the interaction. Communicative interaction between two people often results in each influencing the other. For example, one of our artists stated after the interview that he had answered questions in a way that he thought a teenager could understand, but he would have answered in a different fashion to an adult. A strength of this process is that it is a joint creation of a personal history, expressed and created by at least two people.

    The interviewers realized very early that the product would have an important relationship with autobiography. The interviewees were valued for the personal perspectives and historical experiences they rendered. Three African American

    ART EDUCATION / MARCH 1995

    This content downloaded from 195.34.79.176 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:00:56 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • artists from three distinct generations created fascinating interest levels for the interviewers.

    The factor of memory made the histories highly selective. Amber and Camille usually had follow-up questions designed to check or review information given earlier in the interview. Getting the interviewee to express accurately an experience, as it was lived through rather than how it was recalled during the initial period of questioning was a difficult task for these young interviewers. Efficiency in recall definitely has a relationship to how long ago an event happened. Recognition memory is much easier than recall memory, and interviews like these basically required recall from long-term memory.

    Clark (1985) uses the term "Joint Intellectual Product" for the personal historical evidence derived through the

    conversation between the interviewer and interviewee. The interviewer becomes an active agent in creating the historical record. The interaction between these two parties, bringing with them different levels of experience, understandings, and expectations, gave these interviews a highly creative product, but a product not easy to finalize. Each time the interviewer and interviewee met and discussed prior questions and answers, the discussions became elaborated and expanded.

    INTERVIEWING DR. J. EUGENE GRISBY, JR.: THE DEVELOPING TALENT OF AN ARTIST

    The following excerpt is from an interview conducted in Dr. Grigsby's home and studio in Phoenix, on July 17, 1992.

    BIOGRAPHICAL INTRODUCTION Dr. J. Eugene Grigsby was born in

    Greensboro, North Carolina, in 1918. He attended Morehouse College where he received a B.A. degree in 1938. He received an MA from Ohio State University in 1940, and was granted a Ph.D. in 1963 from New York University. Dr. Grigsby is currently living in Phoenix, Arizona, where he and his wife have been residents for many years.

    Dr. Grigsby is both an artist and art educator, and throughout his career, he has expressed an interest in people, especially the less fortunate, and the conditions under which they live. This interest and concern for people led Dr. Grigsby on a search for his heritage in African, Indian, and European backgrounds, primarily the African background. This search for his heritage is reflected in an article Dr. Grigsby wrote in 1990, titled, "Afro- American Culture and the White

    Ghetto," in which Dr. Grigsby refers to "a continuum of ancient African cultures to the modem" (p. 67). In this article, the author describes how the African American culture of today is shaped by ancient African culture, by Caribbean, Central and South American, American Indian influences, and by those of the Europeans who overran the African continent (Grigsby, 1990).

    As an artist, Dr. Grigsby expresses this concern for his heritage through painting and printmaking. Dr. Grigsby paints with both oils and acrylics, and uses two different printmaking techniques, serigraphy and lithography. InArtists Select: Contemporary Perspectives by Afro- American Artists, Dr. Grigsby describes his paintings and prints, "My efforts have continually stressed the visual impact through the relation of shapes, textures, colors, lines, and spaces, interlaced with rhythms and patterns" (p. 14). In his artwork, Dr. Grigsby explores the visual imagery of African pattern to "explore and touch upon the human qualities ingrained in each of us which cause us to react, for good or evil, towards one another" (p. 14). Dr. Grigsby has exhibited his artworks in both solo and group shows in America, Europe, and Africa, where many of his paintings and prints are found in collections.

    Dr. Grigsby's book, Art and Ethnics, 1977, reveals his interest in young people and his research on the increasing awareness of ethnicity, diversity, and heritage in art. Dr. Grigsby writes, "In the effort to assure youth that they are important and that their ancestors have made valuable contributions, it is also important for them to know that other people, different from themselves, have also

    MARCH 1995 / ART EDUCATION

    This content downloaded from 195.34.79.176 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:00:56 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

  • made contributions to humanity, which can be respected and appreciated, and that each student has a contribution to make in the effort to improve the quality of living ..." (Preface xii). As an art educator, Dr. Grigsby has taught at high school and university level. He taught high school in Phoenix, Arizona, from 1946 to 1966, and was a professor at Arizona State University from 1966 to 1988. Dr. Grigsby has also lectured in Africa, South America, and the Caribbean.

    Dr. Grigsby has won many awards as both an artist and art educator. These awards include the 25th Anniversary Medallion presented by the National Gallery of Art, the New

    York University Founder's Day Certificate for Scholastic Achievement in 1964, the Arizona State University Graduate College Distinguished Research Award in 1982-83, the National Art Education Association's Art Educator of the Year Award in 1988, and the Governor's Award for a significant contribution to the arts in Arizona in 1989. And finally, in 1992, Dr. Grigsby received the Arizona History Makers Award for exceptional accomplishments.

    WHERE AND WHEN WERE YOU BORN?

    I was born in Greensboro, North Carolina in October 17, 1918.

    IN YOUR POINT OF VIEW WHAT DOES AN ARTIST DO?

    An artist does an awful lot of things. It depends first on what kind of artist one is. I concentrate my own work in the visual arts limited primarily to painting and printmaking, although I have done some photography. The painting is limited to acrylics, because of the nature of oils, their volatile nature, fumes, and all those elements; they will get to you after a while. The same thing with printmaking. The toxic materials you use may be quite debilitating, and they can be a concern about your health, if you expect to stay here for a while. Coming back to what does an artist do. Avisual artist

    Even your future is big in Texas! Whether your looking find the best place

    for a job or looking to fill a position, you'll to start is the Flacement Service at the

    NAEA National Convention. We'll be hosting an all new Placement Service this year that is sure to be a great success! Applicants only...

Recommended

View more >