Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
164
Are We a Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?
By Eric Julien*
We are in the habit of thinking about extraterrestrials as potential invaders. What is this idea of
them as a security threat based on? Essentially on two aspects: ignorance of our impact in the
universe; and our beliefs forged by popular movies. Yet the reality is very different. To these two
reasons can be added a third: the fear of being inferior. It is enough to analyze the present
situation and to understand the laws that govern the world in order to become conscious of our
own role in the appearance of UFOs, that is, of extraterrestrials. It is important to distinguish two
historical periods: before and after the Second World War!
We are not going to discuss here the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH), which is logically
supported by the observations of tens of thousands of witnesses. Indeed, the equation is
rigorously simple. Unusual aerial and undersea phenomena are observed by witnesses many of
whom are trustworthy (pilots, air controllers, scientists, ship commanders, military officers, and
so on). These phenomena, sometimes in the form of objects detected by radar, are not only
outside the framework of "natural" explanations but demonstrate intelligent behavior: following
of vehicles or people, evasive bearings, instantaneous disappearances and/or appearances of
creatures inside and outside the vessels, flybys over strategic locations, etc. The performance of
these objects, attested by physical measures, is well beyond that of our best technologies.
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
165
Overwhelming clues
At the end of 1953, the very official (United States) Project Blue Book delivered its initial report
on UFOs as Captain Ruppelt explained: “Since June 1947, when the first UFO report had been
made, ATIC had analyzed 1,593 UFO reports. About 4,400 had actually been received, but all
except 1,593 had been immediately rejected for analysis…. in five and a half years something
like 44,000 UFO sightings had been made…The reports that we were interested in were the
26.94 per cent or 429 "Unknowns," so we had studied them in great detail.”1
A qualitative and quantitative study of the engineer Laurent Gonin, a volunteer contributor to the
SEPRA [Service d'Expertise des Phénomènes de Rentrées Atmosphériques - Atmospheric Re-
entry Phenomena Expertise Department], enlightens us on the reality of these feats and of this
intelligence.2 In his report on cases of simultaneous radar and visual sightings, he identifies the
measured feats of UFOs:
• 23% of UFOs have a speed higher than mach 3.
• 18% of UFOs are stationary.
• 14% of UFOs disappear on the spot.
• 5% execute sharp turns (equivalent to several tens of g's).
and their intelligent behavior:
• 24% carry out aerial maneuvers.
• 19% follow planes.
• 12% flee from planes.
• 8% simulate a near-collision
• 3% are in formation.
• 3% engage in aerial combat.
As of September 28, 1947 (some weeks after the historic observation made by Kenneth Arnold),
a memorandum of General Nathan F. Twining, Chief of the Air Material Command, clearly
established that for the whole of the observations:
"A. The phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious. B. These objects
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
166
are approximately in the form of a disk ... d. the reported characteristics, such as the elevated
speed of ascent, the maneuverability (particularly in rolling), as well as the possibilities of
evasion when they are detected by radar, let us believe that certain of these objects are controlled
manually, automatically or at a distance."3
This memo, reference TSDIN/HMM/ig/6-4100, showed from the beginning that our MHD
(MagnetoHydroDynamic) technology was incompatible ("particularly in roll") with the
technology at work in UFOs. Besides, a letter from General Schulgen addressed to the FBI
indicated on September 5, 1947, "the Army Air Forces has no project with the characteristics
similar to those which have been associated with the Flying Discs."4
If these creatures, objects or phenomena are not from here, they are from
elsewhere! QED. But are their feats truly incomprehensible? No! The
book, The Science of the Extraterrestrials, describes the new temporal
paradigm in which UFOs are perfectly explainable.5
The problem thus is twofold. How do UFOs act? What do they want? To
answer these two questions we need to go through a close examination
of the state of the art in scientific matters. A third question is implicit:
Who are they? Maybe, then, we will define what the Elsewhere means. Before getting there, we
need to recall that contemporary science is far from at an end. We are but at the beginnings of our
quest.
The special issue marking the 35th anniversary of La Recherche, dated October 2005, invited us
to discover "the most perplexing enigmas of science."6 For the occasion, 35 enigmas were picked
for presentation. An exhaustive list of the questions that lack answers would probably resemble a
phonebook.
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
167
Among the most important enigmas are included those that touch on
Ufology! "In search of zero time?"; "What is life?"; "The ultimate
equation for physics?"; "How do neurons manufacture
consciousness?"; "Why do people have so few genes?"
Although emblematic, the choice of those 35 enigmas was
necessarily arbitrary. Ufologists as well as parapsychologists might
have suggested plenty of others. What needs recalling is that before
rushing to embrace prosaic solutions to explain UFOs, certain
scientists would do well to sweep their own rooms. This digression has as its purpose to open the
minds of those whom the development that follows might frighten.
We are going to show that the atomic weapons put in use at the end of the Second World War
constituted the founding and triggering element of the flying saucer era. We have, in our
ignorance, created the conditions for the irruption of the galaxy into the environment of our little
blue planet. Far from representing but a scientific interest for our visitors, we have become their
security threat. From there stems the sprawling spectrum of their behaviors in our view.
A burdensome character, an annoying book
Let us start with the phenomenological indices of the correlation
between nuclear devices and UFOs. One of the most striking aspects of
Ufological casuistry is the flyby, or even the neutralization of nuclear
sites, be they civil or military. The work of Jean-Jacques Velasco and
Nicolas Montigiani, OVNI, l'évidence, is useful in more than one
respect.
To the minds of many, this book is above all the work of the
management of the SEPRA (in the bosom of the Centre National
d'Etudes Spatiales) more than of private citizen Velasco. Though declaring that he was
expressing only his own opinions, and not those of his prestigious institution, Jean-Jacques
Velasco yet relies on the files of SEPRA accumulated through the course of the years, reports of
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
168
which he shows all the affection he has for them by entitling his second chapter "I open my
files." These archives are unique in all the world:
• they were drawn up in the bosom of an official state entity,
• they cover a period of several decades of recorded UFO cases.
The official reaction to the appearance of the work was most disturbing. Right away, Jean-
Jacques Velasco was asked to submit his resignation from SEPRA to the CNES (Centre National
d'Etudes Spatiales – France’s equivalent to NASA) since his academic conclusions were not to
the liking of his superiors. In essence, Velasco declares that UFOs are of extraterrestrial origin
and that a nuclear/UFO correlation is indubitable. In return for his resignation, which curiously
occurred in silence, the CNES accepted the launching of a Steering Committee presided over by
Yves Sillard for the successor of SEPRA, that is, GEIPAN (with an "I").
Yves Sillard was, among other things, Director General of the CNES. He was even there at the
start of GEPAN in 1977, this being the structure that preceded SEPRA.7 Sillard has confirmed
the words of Jean-Jacques Velasco concerning the proportion (13.5 %) of the cases of UFOs that
are unexplained and inexplicable with the fundamentals of current science. Let us not forget that
Yves Sillard is a scientist at a high level.
Before approaching the substance of the book, it would not be unimportant to indicate that
Carnot Editions, publisher of Velasco and Montigiani, went into liquidation some months after
this publication! It is difficult to make an enlightened commentary on the reasons for this
bankruptcy. It remains no less true that this coincidence is disturbing. Velasco is thus prevented
from having his book widely distributed. Furthermore, he is in litigation to retrieve his author's
rights. The response of the CNES was to offer him a position in the Communications Department
of CNES. What is more inhibiting to expressing oneself than responsibility for the
communication of the department to which one belongs? By all appropriate means, Jean-Jacques
Velasco has been silenced.
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
169
What does this series of obstacles mean? Many Ufologists have seen in the work, OVNI,
l'évidence, nothing but a compilation of the best-known cases. On the basis of these comments, I
myself approached the reading of his book with this truncated view. In closing it, I realized that
the majority of French Ufologists had not understood its main point at all. They had bypassed the
essential. The reminders of the solid cases in reality served a clear objective: the nuclear/UFOs
correlation. This is no novelty in and of itself. Many knew that UFOs had done flybys over
strategic sites. But why?
The French ought to remember that Michel Debré, who later became Prime Minister, had
pleaded before the French Senate, in July 1954, for the manufacture of atomic weapons, and a
budget of 100 million francs was approved for the development of the nuclear arsenal in
December 1954; this was the year of the greatest wave of UFOs that the country has known, in
particular above military nerve centers (Vernon, Coulommiers, Metz, Orange) in the second half
of the year. French military officials do not have a short memory. Besides, they were the first to
record observations of Mysterious Celestial Objects (MCO).
UFOs have also done flybys over plenty of other places, essentially in the country, in the middle
of nowhere. Thus, in the ambient noise, the "nuclear" signals do not appear clearly. The novelty
comes from the placement in perspective of three aspects of importance since the dawn of the
UFO phenomenon as understood today:
• The superposition of the statistical patterns for observations of UFOs with those for
nuclear tests.
• The same people are behind nuclear deployment and official reports on UFOs.
• UFOs are often spotted above nuclear sites.
It is not unimportant to note a connection between the audit of SEPRA and the comments of J.J.
Velasco.8 He indicates at the start of his seventh chapter: "A wild course of the arms industry will
make the factories turn to the sole advantage of guns, instead of improving the lot of the
populace." When one knows that 36% of the people questioned in the audit of the SEPRA are in
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
170
or tied to the military, and that they constitute the majority of those interviewed, one will hardly
be astonished at the consequences described above.
Nor will one be astonished at the wall of silence that covers the UFO phenomenon in the media,
an embarrassed silence that they replace without restraint with the dismissive tone of sarcasm.
Did you know that the CNES, reputedly a civilian center, benefited, as assigned project manager,
from 15 million francs of the 2000 budget for military space equipment of the Ministère de la
Défense Nationale {National Defense Ministry}, with some 250 million francs of budget
upstream under consideration? The budget of the European Union for military space equipment
is 500 million euros annually. The part that comes back to France represents 2.5% of its own
budget for military equipment. For the USA, it is 10%! Taking into account the American budget
devoted to military equipment overall, there is no doubt that the technical progress made across
the Atlantic has been well beyond that in Europe.
As for those who demand proof, let them start by requiring transparency. But too few free
themselves of the tricks that the nuclear expo exhibitors play before their eyes. The UFO is never
under the expected cup. Distraction is an old method but it always works. They even applaud
their trick by hiding behind the smokescreen of rationalism.
The nuclear actors become Ufologists
Velasco indicates: "This is the outcome of the most secret program ever put in motion by
humanity: the Manhattan Project. The mission was the work of a team of physicists placed under
the authority of the physicist Julius Robert Oppenheimer (and among these scientists there figure
names that we will find, in some cases, closely involved in stories of flying saucers, such as John
von Neumann, Robert Sarbacher or even Edward Condon)" [my emphasis].
Examining official documents declassified by the USA, the former head of the SEPRA specifies
that the first meeting on the subject of UFOs took place at Los Alamos, high point of the nuclear-
military establishment, on Wednesday, February 16, 1949, in the presence of Edward Teller,
father of the H-bomb. Investigations of UFO flybys have been conducted in the bosom of the
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
171
predominantly nuclear air bases (Albuquerque, Los Alamos, Kirtland, Sandia, Alamogordo,
Holloman, Pepperell, Malmstrom, Minot, Fairchild, Kingcloe, Wurtsmith, Sawyer, Plattburg,
Loring, Pease, and so on). On October 2, 1968, a silo at the Minuteman missile base in North
Dakota was deactivated despite the efforts of the military forces, while the UFO was observed for
two and a quarter hours (there were twenty witnesses).
The Batelle Institute, a private industrial research organization, itself had reported on this factor:
"20% of unknown aerial phenomena observed above American territory occur over regions that
include strategic sites."9 Velasco cites for example the nuclear plants at Hanford, Oak Ridge, and
Knoxville, where interceptions are attempted, in vain. We know today that French cases
demonstrate the same nuclear interest on the part of the extraterrestrials. Thus, this was the case
for the observations of five eyewitnesses on board a military craft above the atomic testing zone
of Colomb-Bechar in the Algerian desert in December 1965.
To return to the USA, and taking into account the extent of its territory, this figure of 20% does
not represent any random distribution. Nor is it by chance that we have the presence of nuclear
specialists among those dealing with the subject of UFOs. Plenty of experts in other disciplines
could have been chosen to conduct the official investigations. It becomes clear from that point on
that the secret surrounding UFOs was maintained by the best experts of the information
blackout, those of the Manhattan Project. This is the reason that the UFO files are at a level
higher than Top Secret.
Recalcitrant rationalists adorn themselves with the virtues of the Condon report of the Colorado
Project, of which the conclusion is unquestionably a denial of the UFO phenomenon, and
furthermore of the extraterrestrial hypothesis. This American report from 1969 marks a period to
the investigative activities of the Condon Commission, named for the famous physicist Edward
Condon, active participant in the Manhattan Project (secret development of nuclear weapons).
And yet, the body of the text of this report indicates very clearly that a non-negligible number of
cases remain perfectly inexplicable. Put otherwise, the conclusion of the investigation was
already written before it took place! Doctors MacDonald, Hynek, and Saunders denounced
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
172
Condon's striking lack of objectivity, as he had become a de facto spokesman for the United
States Air Force.
Similarly, Velasco makes mention of Project White Stork, allotted from 1951 to 1953 to the
Battelle Memorial Institute (Columbus, Ohio), in the framework of Project Blue Book.
Lieutenant Edward J. Ruppelt, in charge of Blue Book secretly entrusted to the Battelle Institute
the task of demonstrating that a statistical study on the exogenous character of UFOs was
feasible. According to Velasco, the Batelle conclusions, indicated in Special Report Number 14
(classified as confidential) of the Blue Book report, and relying on close to four thousand cases
spread from 1947 to 1952, establish that 19.7% of the cases are inexplicable. That is to say, a rate
close to, and indeed higher than, that (13.5%) of the SEPRA. But the remarkable aspect of this
report is the clustering of UFOs around military and/or nuclear sites! Let us note that of the
twelve observations declared solid by the Batelle Institute, seven are of oval or discoid form.
The UFO/nuclear correlation
But let us return to the nuclear/UFO correlation. Velasco and Montigiani write on the nuclear
programs: "the declassified historical archives reveal the taking of positions on the part of men
responsible for great scientific or military programs having to do with nuclear energy. All make
allusion to UFOs."
Conversely, Jean-Claude Sidoun teaches us in his book, Ovnis, "that in May 1950, a study of
Lincoln La Paz, meteorite specialist, confirmed the analysis of 209 observations made by
witnesses of quality setting out how forays of unknown aircraft had signaled particular interest in
all the sectors of nuclear activity positioned in the USA."10
The authors of OVNI, l'évidence observe that atmospheric nuclear testing began in July 1945,
coming to an end in 1981. Close to 440 megatons of nuclear power were dissipated in the
atmosphere. In contrast, the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (300,000 deaths) had but 0.015
and 0.021 megatons of power. The largest explosion was over Soviet territory: 50 megatons!
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
173
ILLUSTRATION BY PAUL DIMARE
The authors indicate, "the total number of explosions in the atmosphere reached 543 aerial tests,"
of which the most active periods were 1954, 1958, and 1961 through 1963. In the last three of
those years, they specify, up to one explosion every three days was recorded! They assert that as
of 1958 "underground tests began ... for forty years under the aegis at first of the two traditional
great nuclear powers. They were joined by France, the United Kingdom, China, India, and
Pakistan. Today, we arrive at a total of 1876 underground tests. The last, carried out by India,
occurred in 1998."
That is, a total of 2419 nuclear explosions on Earth from 1945 through 1998! For the
atmospheric tests, 440 megatons. But how many megatons for the underground tests,
representing the great majority of total nuclear tests? Maybe 1800 megatons cumulative, by
extrapolation from the preceding data. What effects does this prodigious energy have on the
space-time continuum? What really occurs at the atomic scale for our visitors? How do they view
the some 7000 nuclear warheads still operational just in the American arsenal, and close to 6000
warheads on the Russian side? Supposing that each warhead possesses a power of only 20
megatons, we obtain 260,000 megatons of potential destruction for only two nations! What more
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
174
of the entire globe? Would this figure not be enough to frighten the extraterrestrials? Are they
afraid only that we will destroy ourselves, or on the contrary that we are a threat to them?
In OVNI, l'évidence the authors show a most revealing diagram, where, to save himself from an
all-out attack, Jean-Jacques Velasco specifies: "I am relying on just a single form of data to
support my demonstration, the cases of visual/radar aeronautical observations of UFOs. And
again: out of 1400 aeronautical cases worldwide, we will keep just 140, pulled from Laurent
Gonin's base. Those which were subject to radar measurement simultaneously with the visual
observation."11
Knowing that Report Number 11 of the Institut des Hautes Etudes de Défense
Nationale (IHEDN) indicated as of 1977 that, according to a Gallup poll, 90% of observations
did not come to the attention of experts, the real number of radar/visual cases is a good deal
larger than the figures presented below.
The following diagram is a correlation between UFOs and nuclear tests.
Curved lines represent UFO radar/visual sightings. Light rectangular bars represents atmospheric nuclear tests. Dark
rectangular bars represent underground nuclear tests. Source: Velasco & Montigiani, OVNI, l'évidence, p. 158.
Velasco notes, "in 1998, the end of underground nuclear testing marks the stop of the
radar/visual cases."12
Even beyond these exceptional visual/radar cases, the curves of
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
175
observations of UFOs fall drastically in the years since 2000 in France (see the linked-to audit of
the SEPRA). This is also implied in the UFO crash retrieval book of Ryan Wood where the last
of his database of 74 possible crashes occurred in 1996.13
The diagram below shows the
correlation between UFO crashes (approximately 70 from Wood’s database) and nuclear tests
(2419). We can see that the extraterrestrials might have anticipated future increases in nuclear
explosions.
The above graphs inspire two hypotheses. Either the extraterrestrials have voluntarily stopped
visiting us thanks to the current nuclear military inactivity, our earlier activity thus having drawn
their attention, or – the second hypothesis - it is this very military activity that provoked the
involuntary appearance of UFOs in our skies! Thus there would be an underlying physical law
linking nuclear tests and observations of UAP (Unidentified Aerospatial Phenomena). This is just
one of the innovative elements provided by The Science of the Extraterrestrials, which appeared
in July 2005. This work shows that these two hypotheses are but one and the same.
It is because we disturb them that they come. But they appear physically for the same reason that
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
176
makes them come. An atomic explosion is a foray into the space-time continuum that they
occupy! Breaking an atomic nucleus means extracting the very many chronons existing below the
threshold of the chromodynamic scale (study of the quarks of the nucleus). These chronons are
imperceptible at our scale of temporal flow but constitute the framework of existence of the
evolved extraterrestrials. Besides, they have become ultraterrestrials – imperceptible in our space
time continuum – becoming extraterrestrials only when materializing!
Thus, nuclear explosions would produce sudden and undesired materializations of extraterrestrial
vessels as secondary effects! It seems that these secondary effects are the achilles heel of the
extraterrestrials and the argument for a global nuclear strategy conducted by the U.S. superpower.
This seems to set the conditions for its protectorate against the extraterrestrials on a global scale.
Before and After Atomic Weapons
A work that I warmly recommend for your attention is that of Jean-Claude Sidoun. This book,
OVNIS : Guerre froide « le grand jeu » [UFOs: Cold War, "the great game"], describes
brilliantly in 430 pages the context of nuclear armament and compares it with Ufological
observations.
Jean-Claude Sidoun was one of the rare civilian investigators to have participated in the activities
of the GEPAN (Groupe d'Etude des Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non-identifiés), the predecessor
of the SEPRA. His work, well documented (close to 230 historical references), demonstrates in a
convincing fashion some essential points:
• UFOs are not human technologies.
• They appeared massively with the nuclear era.
• UFOs concentrate on strategic sites.
• A policy of disinformation is cleverly maintained in the USA, as elsewhere.
• The USA has constantly fed a global arms race by provoking potential and actual
conflicts.
• This American militaro-industrial policy aims to maintain its planetary domination.
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
177
• Its ultimate goal is to confront an extraterrestrial threat, imminent today.
The author wants to show thus that the "cold war," which still endures, is a pretext, by the
overbidding that it entails in terms of military investments, for the maintenance of Research and
Development in view of ending up at a global spatial defense against the ETs.
Sidoun reviews a series of Ufological cases arising during the Second World War, before atomic
weapons. There he describes events outside the reach of human technical feats, even today. At
first impression, if the UFOs precede the nuclear era then there is no direct link. In reality, the
chronology of our temporal material flow is not at all respected in the universe of quantum
theory, of which the scale involves precisely the chain reaction mechanisms of the atomic
nucleus. Put otherwise, our future was the present of the extraterrestrials in their space-time.
This notion is largely acknowledged even in special relativity theory.
Thus, the few years prior to the first human nuclear test underline the interest of the ETs in our
evolution. But why would they suddenly become interested in our presence on the battlefields of
the Second World War, while humanity has constantly known war everywhere on Earth, in every
era, without any sightings of UFOs? Why this sudden interest in our survival? Can it really be a
matter only of our survival when one thinks of the innumerable genocides that humanity has
known in history without the intervention of ETs?
This question seems essential to us. Observations of UFOs were made well before the middle of
the 20th century. But, on the one hand, the reports were extremely rare, and on the other hand,
the pretext of defense secrets could not be invoked in a civilization unaware of the possibility of
building airships. Put otherwise, every aerial observation prior to the 20th century could be
recorded by the historians without affecting the sensitivity of the military institutions. The
extreme rarity of the observations thus was real.
Now, civilian aviation rapidly became military. Thus, the reports originating from pilots or air
controllers during the second global conflict, in Europe (Germany) as well as Asia (Japan), early
on were put under wraps in the national interest. Thus there were many more observations after
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
178
the second half of the 20th century than there were official reports. The nagging question was to
know which adversary had manufactured these unknown objects. Yet, the Foo Fighters
(luminous balls) encountered in flight by war pilots were not man made. Besides, it is remarkable
that UFOs before 1945 were all, with some very rare exceptions, luminous appearances and not
objects! Appearance of material objects and atomic tests are thus connected.
A small digression is needed. It is stated by most of us that the stars, and the sun in particular,
experience continuous thermonuclear explosions. In this case, our atomic tests would seem
benign with respect to stellar power. The truth is that the thermonuclear activity of the stars is a
hypothesis, nothing more. An alternative has been proposed, that of the "cold sun," or rather of
an "electromagnetic sun." One of the great enigmas to be resolved is the very high temperature of
the solar corona (several million degrees at hundreds of thousands of miles from the surface), in
comparison with the surface temperature of 6000°K. The current theory suggests the hottest
temperature to be toward the heart and not the periphery of the star. Thus, the thermonuclear
argument would no longer hold and then our atomic activity would become remarkable in the
galaxy.
The Nuclear Arms Race
The work of Jean-Claude Sidoun enlightens us on the successive programs
of nuclear militarization of the two great powers. The USA and USSR
both knew their own waves of UFO observations above their respective
strategic centers. If the dawn of the UFO age were the occasion for each to
accuse the other of espionage, each rapidly realized that no one on Earth
had the technical capacity to replicate with the astounding feats of UFOs.
We can hypothesize that the CIA was created in September 1947 principally to resolve this UFO
enigma and to proceed as a priority matter with "the potential evaluation of the danger that could
be represented by flying saucers."14
We see here that the materialization of an UFO (they had
previously been only luminous) made the authorities fear a manifest superiority on the part of
extraterrestrials. Because at this time they had a ship and aliens in their hands. Besides, it is
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
179
legitimate to ask why the director of the AMC (Air Material Command), Lieutenant General
Nathan Twinning, is the one asked by his superior, General Georges Schulgen, for a
memorandum of recommendations. Is Twinning not the one who is in possession of an ET craft
that is indeed physical, that is made of aerial material? Was Twinning not the one who affirmed,
"the phenomena reported are real and not from the domain of fiction"?
The US Air Force has incessantly been helped in this by the CIA and even by yet more secret
agencies, in augmenting its military budget for the purposes of developing arms capable of
neutralizing these incredible ships. It is highly probable that the Pentagon, and in particular those
responsible for the military atomic program, have come to understand the nuclear dimension of
the UFO phenomenon. If they did not necessarily destroy the ET ships, the nuclear explosions
seemed to possess one virtue: they materialized them!
In rendering visible the invisible, the US Air Force at least had the advantage of specifying the
threat in terms of the number of observations. From there came the multiplication of atomic tests.
From there came the curve of radar/visual (UFOs materializing) cases matching that of atomic
tests. Thus maybe they multiplied the UFO crashes, as may have been the case a year later in
1948 in Laredo, Texas? Did this policy of evaluation of the extraterrestrial threat have nuclear
proliferation as a consequence? It is now clear that the number of warheads greatly surpasses
national needs. Let us see that.
The United States military plans of 1945 known as ‘Charioteer’ and ‘Dropshot’ had as a goal
militarily forcing the Soviet Union to its knees by means of atomic bombardments. These plans
slightly preceded the great waves of UFOs. It is remarkable to note that Charioteer planned: "in
the course of the first month of the war 133 bombs on 70 Soviet cities. Then, in the course of the
two following years 200 other atomic bombs and 250,000 tons of ordinary bombs."
This plan thus had as a goal the capitulation of the Bolshevik enemy. In total, less than 350
nuclear bombs for the Eastern bloc! Moreover, the bombs of 1945 reached at most 100 kilotons.
That is, 35 megatons dumped on the adversary. This figure is to be compared to the current
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
180
260,000 megatons of potential destruction for only two nations! That is, 4000 times the capacity
for destroying two subcontinents, one on each side of the old Iron Curtain. Imagine an
overproduction of food 4000 times global needs. What to make of this overproduction? Thus
such is the nuclear overarming of planet Earth.
We are convinced from now on that this race for atomic weapons had no other goal than to
neutralize the potential extraterrestrial enemy. In doing this, we have also given a pretext to
extraterrestrials to become the enemy. Maybe we have pushed them to this extreme. Thus it
seems that the abductions and the hybridizations are the consequence of this policy of global
overarming intentionally instituted by the USA, in response to the U.S. nuclear threat.
The Balance of Terror was maintained by the Nonproliferation Treaty of 1972 (SALT accords).
The USA disrupted this balance with its NMD (National Missile Defense) program, since
become MD (Missile Defense), having as a strategy that is not national but international, in
accordance with bilateral defense treaties between the USA and certain countries. In breaking
this fragile balance, the USA from that point on engages the other great nations in a new arms
race.
The cornerstone of MD, for which the 2002 budget was 7.5 billion dollars, is the development of
high-energy laser weapons. Two versions of laser weapons embarked on are programmed: some
Boeing 747-400s (Yal.1-ABL) and a network of "satellite-killer" satellites. The United States
military space budget would amount to 120 billion dollars. Sidoun invites us to compare it to that
of the Apollo program (in current dollars): 25 billion dollars! By way of example, the recent
contract for about 100 Airbus craft going to China was for about 9 billion dollars. Why so much
money for the space weapons of the armed forces?
The problem is to be found in the identification of the adversary. Foreign Embassies have put
forth this strategy of U.S. overbidding because no Rogue State could claim to pose a threat to the
U.S. military forces. Even China shows a monstrous military delay compared to the USA. It has
but a few tens of nuclear warheads. Moreover, its equipment both defensive and offensive is
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
181
aging. We know that Americans and Russians have collaborated on the development of laser
weapons for twenty years. The question thus remains the same. What is this enemy that pushes
the Pentagon to claim ever more technologies, ever more military power? Why such eagerness to
ratify laser weapons tests as fast as possible for 2008 according to the agenda reported by
Sidoun?
We are a Nuclear Threat to Extraterrestrials
The year 2008 could be the start of a confrontation between humanity and extraterrestrial races.
Who will trigger it? Humans? Or previously peaceful ETs? What will the outcome be? So many
questions that could be resolved only by a planetary becoming aware through diplomatic means
in the service of World Peace. But who will take this torch? Toward whom will the eyes turn?
Who will the new human diplomats be who will negotiate with the visitors from space? What is
there to negotiate?
As we have seen, we are a threat to extraterrestrials and they are not likely to accept the use of
nuclear weapons. Any war that sparks nuclear confrontation such as Iran might trigger an
extraterrestrial response against humanity that collectively threatens extraterrestrial civilizations.
Informed Ufologists may, with good reason, wonder about the efficacy of laser weapons on ships
that can dematerialize themselves. Is the vocation of these weapons to fire on targets that are
numerous, moving, even elusive? A series of nuclear explosions in space could deal with this
difficulty by eliminating the furtiveness of the extraterrestrials. But to overcome a shield, it is
enough to multiply the number of swords. Unless the sword is the invincible Excalibur. That is
why certain people think that the target is not the UFO but ... the asteroid!
Extraterrestrials capable of so many exploits must surely have the power to divert a celestial body
toward Earth as predicted by so many prophets and described by Immanuel Velikovsky. Is this
how extraterrestrials will respond to the threat posed by humanity’s use of nuclear weapons?
*Translated by Chuck Brandstater
Julien, “Are We A Security Threat to Extraterrestrial Civilizations?”
Exopolitics Journal (April 2006). ISSN 1938-1719 vol. 1, no. 3
182
About the Author: Eric Julien (aka Jean Ederman) is trained as
a fighter pilot, has been a military air controller, a twin-engine
pilot in commercial aviation, and an airline port chief; he has
worked in the framework of operations in large Parisian airports.
Holder of a Diploma of Advanced Specialized Studies in
Economic Sciences with a concentration in new technologies, he
obtained training as a director of international airports at the
Ecole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile (National School of Civil
Aviation). He confirms having had contacts with extraterrestrials
and is sharing his understanding of the universe through this work. More info at:
http://www.exopoliticsinstitute.org/EricJulien.htm .
[Note: Eric Julien is a speaker at the Extraterrestrial Civilizations & World Peace Conference – see Banner below]
ENDNOTES
1 Edward J. Ruppelt, The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects , ch 16.
2 Laurent Gonin, cited in Jean-Jacques Velasco and Nicolas Montigiani, OVNI, l'évidence (Carnot Editions, 2004).
3 “The General Twining Letter,” http://www.roswellfiles.com/Articles/twining.htm
4 George F. Schulgen Memorandum to FBI Liaison Section. September 5, 1947. Cited in:
http://www.ufoscience.org/history/swords.pdf 5 Eric Julien, La Science des Extraterrestres (JMG Editions, 2005).
6 France’s most popular scientific magazine, http://www.larecherche.fr
7 See Eric Julien, "The SEPRA, civil or military?" http://www.exopoliticsinstitute.org/institute-Eric-SEPRA-article-
En.htm 8 See Eric Julien, "The SEPRA, civil or military?"
9 Velasco & Montigiani, OVNI, l'évidence, 159
10 Sidoun, Ovnis: Guerre froide “le grand jeu” (JMG Editions, 2005) 127.
11 OVNI, l'évidence, 158.
12 Velasco and Nicolas Montigiani, OVNI, l'évidence, 159.
13 Ryan Wood, Majic Eyes Only: Earth’s Encounters with Extraterrestrial Technology (Wood Enterprises 2005).
14 Sidoun, Ovnis: Guerre froide “le grand jeu,” 77.