Upload
kims3515354178
View
602
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Appendix F. CYK Algorithm for the Membership Test for CFL
The membership test problem for context-free languages is, for a given arbitrary CFG G, to decide whether a string w is in the language L(G) or not. If it is, the problem commonly requires a sequence of rules applied to derive w. A brute force technique is to generate all possible parse trees yielding a string of length |w|, and check if there is any tree yielding w. This approach takes too much time to be practical.
Here we will present the well-known CYK algorithm (for Cocke, Younger and Kasami, who first developed it). This algorithm, which takes O(n3) time, is based on the dynamic programming technique. The algorithm assumes that the given CFG is in the Chomsky normal form (CNF).
Let w = a1a2 . . . . an, wij = aiai+1 . . . aj and wii = ai . Let Vij be the set of nonterminal symbols that can derive the string wij , i.e., *Vij = { A | A wij , A is a nonterminal symbol of G}
2
Vij
ai aj. . . . .wij =
V11 V22 V33 V44 V55
a1 a3
V66
a2 a4 a5 a6
V12 V23 V34 V45 V56
V13 V24 V35 V46
V14 V25 V36
V15 V26
V16
w =j
i
Construct an upper triangular matrix whose entries are Vij as shown below. In the matrix, j
corresponds to the position of input symbol, and i corresponds to the diagonal number.
Clearly, by definition if
S V16 , then string
w L(G).
CYK Algorithm
3
The entries Vij can be computed with the entries in the i-th diagonal and those in the j-th column, going along the direction indicated by the two arrows in the following figure. If A Vii (which implies A can derive ai ), B V(i+1)j (implying B can derive ai+1. . . aj ) and C AB, then put C in the set Vij . If D Vi(i+1) (which implies D can derive aiai+1), E V(i+2)j (implying E can derive ai+2. . . aj ) and F DE, then put F in the set Vij , and so on.
Vii Vjj
Vi(i+1)
V(i+2)j
V(i+1)j
Vij
Vi(j-1)
CYK Algorithm
ANI
. . . . .ai ai+1 ajwij = ai+2
4
V11 V22 V33 V44 V55
a1 a3
V66
a2 a4 a5 a6
V12 V23 V34 V45 V56
V13 V24 V35 V46
V14 V25 V36
V15 V26
V16
w =
For example, the set V25 is computed as follows.
Let A, B and C be nonterminals of G.
V25 = { A | B V22 , C V35 , and A BC }
{ B | C V23 , A V45 , and B CA }
{ C | B V24 , A V55 , and C BA }
. . . . .
(Recall that G is in CNF.)
CYK Algorithm
ANI
5
In general, Vij = { A | B Vik , C V(k+1) j and A BC } i k j-1
. . . . .
Vii
ai
Vjj
ai+1 aj
Vi(i+1)
V(i+2)j
V(i+1)j
Vij
wij =
Vi(j-1)
CYK Algorithm
6
{A, D}
a aa a b bw =
{A,D} {A,D} {A,D} {B} {B}
{D}D AD
{D}D AD
{D}D AD
{S,C}S ABC DB
{ }
{D} {D}{S,C}S ACC DB
{B}B SB
{D} {S,C}{S,B,C}
SAB,CDBB SB
{S,C}{S,B,C}
SAC,CDBB SB
{S,B,C}SAB,S ACCDB, BSB
S aSb | aDb
D aD | a
S AB | AC A a B SB B b
C DB D AD | a
CFG G
CNF CFG
CYK AlgorithmExample:
Since S V16 , we have w L(G).
7
CYK Algorithm
Here is a pseudo code for the algorithm.
//initially all sets Vij are empty
// Input x = a1a2 . . . . an.
for ( i = 1; i <= n; i ++ )
Vii = { A | A ai };
for ( j = 2; j <= n; j++ )
for ( i = j-1; i =1; i-- )
for ( k = i; k <= j-1; k++)
vij = vij { A | B Vik , C V(k+1) j and A BC };
if ( S Vin ) output “yes”; else output “no”;
V11 V22 V33 V44 V55
a1 a3
V66
a2 a4 a5 a6
V12 V23 V34 V45 V56
V13 V24 V35 V46
V14 V25 V36
V15 V26
V16
w =
The number of sets Vij is O(n2), and it takes O(n) steps to compute each vij. Thus the time complexity of the algorithm is O(n3).