Upload
elaine
View
46
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Aortic Dissection. Aortic Dissection. From: iradonline.org/images/aorta-layers.gif. Types of Aortic Dissections. Stanford Classification Type A = involves ascending aorta Type B = does not involve ascending aorta DeBakey Classification Type I = ascending and descending aorta - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Aortic Dissection
From: iradonline.org/images/aorta-layers.gif
Types of Aortic DissectionsStanford Classification
Type A = involves ascending aorta
Type B = does not involve ascending aorta
DeBakey Classification
Type I = ascending and descending aorta
Type II = ascending aorta only
Type III = descending aorta only
From: www.massgeneral.org/tac/patients/diseases.asp?id=a_dissection
Aortic Dissection Risk FactorsTypically: Systemic Hypertension Systemic Hypertension Did I mention systemic hypertension?
Present in 60-90% of patients
In younger patients, must consider other factors: Bicuspid aortic valve (9% under 40 in one review) Inflammatory disease (giant cell, syphilitic aortitis, RA, etc.) Collagen Diseases (ED Syndrome, Marfan’s (50% in those under 40 in one
review)) Preexisting aortic aneurysm Coarctation
Others: CABG Trauma Iatrogenic (intravascular procedures) Cocaine use (thought to be catecholamine mediated)
Clinical Manifestations/FindingsAcute onset of tearing chest pain, frequently
radiating to the backSyncopeAsymmetric BP in UEWeak/absent peripheral pulsesAortic Insufficiency/Heart FailureMIRenal failureParaplegiaBack PainPericardial effusion
Many different presentations; how to diagnose clinically?
One relatively small study found that in 250 patients with acute chest and/or back pain, certain findings were particularly relevant: sudden onset of tearing/ripping chest pain, widening of mediastinum or aorta (or both), and pulse or BP differentials (or both).Absense of all three, low probability (7%)Characteristic chest pain, intermediate probability
(31%)Mediastinal Widening, intermediate probability (39%)Pulse/BP differential, high probability (>83%)Combination of all three, high probability (>83%)
Bottom line is that you need imaging to assist in
the diagnosis
Imaging StudiesCXR: abnormal in majority of patients (90%
sensitive), but cannot rule out dissection (although completely normal imaging is helpful)
CT: up to 98% sensitive and up to 100% specific (depending on the study)
TEE: up to 98% sensitive 95% specific
MRI: sensitivity & specificity >98%
Aortography: sensitivity <90%
Acute ManagementRisk of death for untreated acute dissection is
estimated at 1% per hourIV antihypertensives (goal of SBP <120 or lower if
tolerated) and negative ionotropic agents (goal HR < 60)
Pain controlCardiac monitoring, preparation for aggressive
resuscitation Ultimate goal initially is to prevent death and
irreversible end-organ damage
From: www.ajronline.org/cgi/content-nw/full/183/1/109/FIG1
Definitive TherapyAscending Dissections Surgery ASAP
Descending DissectionsIf stable and uncomplicated: managed
medicallyIf unstable or complications: surgery
Subsequent ManagementBlood pressure control… the lower, the
better
Serial imaging with MRI/CT on annual basis to evaluate for aneurysm formation, anastomotic leakage, recurrent dissection
Consideration of second operation to repair aforementioned complications