12
Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 70 | June 14 www.dynasafe.com Anniston Static Detonation Chamber Process Improvements Mr. Charlie Diggs North American Sales Manager Dynasafe

Anniston Static Detonation Chamber Process Improvements · Anniston Static Detonation Chamber Process Improvements ... Cartridge, 20mm HEI MK106-0/1 5,040 Cartridge, 40mm Red Smoke,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 70 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Anniston Static Detonation Chamber Process Improvements

Mr. Charlie Diggs

North American Sales Manager

Dynasafe

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 71 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

SDC 1200CM

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 72 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Off-Gas Treatment System

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 73 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Anniston History

• Construction began in June 2010 and completed September 2010.

• Commissioning began September 2010 and ended OCT 2010.

• Emissions testing was conducted in November and December of 2010.

• Surrogate Processing was conducted December 2010 through February 2011.

• Chemical Munitions Processing began in March 2011 and ended September 2011.

• Decontamination began in September 2011 and ended in April 2012.

• Throughput, Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (TRAM) began in April 2012 and is scheduled to complete in September 2014.

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 74 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Chemical Weapons Destroyed (HD/HT)

Nomenclature Inventory

Nominal Agent Fill

(lbs) Quantity Destroyed

105mm M60 projectile with hex plug (palletized) 36 2.97 106.92

105mm M60 non-fuzed projectile (over-packed) 69 2.97 204.93

105mm M60 projectile with M57 fuze (palletized) 2,088 2.97 6,201.36

105mm M60 projectile with M57 fuze (over-packed) 4 2.97 11.88

155mm M110 projectile (palletized) 22 11.70 257.40

155mm M110 projectile (over-packed) 1 11.70 11.70

4.2-inch M2A1 projectile (palletized) 144 6.00 864.00

4.2-inch M2A1 projectile (over-packed) 49 6.00 294.00

4.2-inch M2 projectile (palletized) 178 5.80 1,032.40

4.2-inch M2 projectile (over-packed) 146 5.80 846.80

Total 2,737 9,831

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 75 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Conventional Munitions Destroyed

Nomenclature Quantity Destroyed

CTG, 40mm HE, ICM, M397 306

ADAPTER, BOOSTER, M147 77

ADAPTER, BOOSTER, T45E1 104

ADAPTER, BOOSTER, T45E7 1,576

Cartridge, 20mm HEI MK106-0/1 5,040

Cartridge, 40mm Red Smoke, M713 840

Cartridge, 60mm HE M49A4 86

Cartridge, 60mm HE, M49A2 840

Cartridge, 60mm HE, M49A4 420

CTG, 57mm HE, M306A1 3,299

CTG, 60mm HE, M49A4 (Comp B) 33,156

CTG, 90mm CANISTER, APERS, M590E1 9,609

FUZE, BD, M91A2 1,985

FUZE, GENERAL PURPOSE, M223 (boxed) 1,113

FUZE, GENERAL PURPOSE, M223 (granulated in bags) 48

GRENADE, HAND RIOT, CS M47 2,523

GRENADE, HAND RIOT, CS M7A2, M7A3 1,593

M692 ADAM Projectile, HE, 155mm 4

M74 Anti-Personnel (AP) Mines 40

M86 Pursuit Deterrent Munition (PDM) 96

Propellant (loose in lbs) 36

Signal Smoke and Illumination, Marine MK 13 428

Simulator, Flash Artillery M21 1,261

TNT / HE (1 lb blocks) 16

WHD, 2.75 IN HE, MK1 MOD 16

Total 64,512

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 76 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Process Water System Improvements

• Clogging of PRW strainers while processing conventional munitions.

• Installed Bleed Water System (BWS) modification to increase tank and filter capacity.

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 77 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Agent Contamination Improvements

• Some agent migration was experienced in Loading Chamber Two during the Chemical Munitions campaign. This was expected due the design of the system at that time. Lessons Learned have been incorporated into subsequent designs to lessen agent migration into this part of the system.

• At all times agent vapors were in engineering controls.

• We wanted to find a way to evacuate the agent vapors during non-processing times more efficiently.

• Two improvements were made to the system.

• A bypass valve was installed around the orifice in the off gas piping.

• A vent line on Loading Chamber Two was modified to allow a path directly to the Thermal Oxidizer.

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 78 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Bypass Valve around the Orifice

• During periods were detonations are not expected in the detonation chamber the bypass valve is open allowing an increased flow from the detonation chamber and loading chamber two.

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 79 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Venting of the Loading Chambers

• The Loading Chamber One and Two can now be vented directly to the Thermal Oxidizer.

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 80 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Future Improvements

• There are currently two improvements scheduled to be preformed in September of this year.

• A chiller will be installed on the downstream side of the Induced Draft fans to remove moisture in the system.

• A system will be installed on the off gas piping to cool the piping. This will increase throughput during peak rates.

Area Clearance Protection Systems Demil Systems Slide 81 | June 14

www.dynasafe.com

Summary

• The transparency and open communication between URS, U.S. Army and Dynasafe is what lead to the improvements.

• All of these process improvements have been integrated into the new designs of the Static Detonation Chambers and Off Gas Treatment Systems.

• The design improvements were a joint effort between Dynasafe, URS and the U.S. Army.

• Dynasafe is committed to continuous improvement through lessons learned of previous and existing operating facilities.