Upload
dokhuong
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
155
CHAPTER V
AN ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMERS’ SATISFACTION
AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE INTERNET
BANKING
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Banking industry is also one of the predominant industries adopting
technologies which are helpful in providing better services to customers. Quality
of service is improved by using technological innovations. Internet banking is
time-saving. There will be huge acceptance of internet banking with the passage
of time with growing awareness and education. A great many people are shifting
to internet banking and are readily accepting the usefulness of this bounty. Many
factors are attracting the public like perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness,
security and privacy. Perceived ease of use is the degree to which using IT is free
of effort for the user. Internet banking is the latest development that has added a
new dimension to banking transactions by allowing customers to conduct financial
transaction through the Internet while perceived usefulness is defined as the
degree to which a person believes that using a particular technology would
improve job performance.
Banking institutions have taken several adequate measures to ensure
complete security for internet banking. Hence, the present chapter deals with the
156
level of satisfaction regarding the internet services offered by the public and
private sector banks, factors identifying the satisfaction of customers towards the
internet banking services offered by the banks and the factors determining the
customer satisfaction for public and private sector banks in Tirunelveli district.
5.2. LEVEL OF SATISFACTION
Increased competition, slower growth and mature markets are also forcing
many businesses to review their customer service strategy. Many businesses are
channeling more efforts to retain existing customers rather than to acquire new
ones. Moreover, banks carry on business with public money and therefore,
customers expect better services from them. Hence the present section attempts to
discuss the level of customers’ satisfaction towards the services on internet
banking among the selected public and private sector banks in Tirunelveli district.
The level of satisfaction has been determined by the score values
calculated for nineteen statements which are associated with customers’
satisfaction/fulfillment towards the internet banking services offered by the banks
by adopting 7-point scale (ranging from one indicating ‘strongly disagree’ to
seven indicating ‘strongly agree’), namely Likert Type Scale. Thus, the total
satisfaction score of a respondent is obtained by adding up the scores of all the
nineteen statements. The level of satisfaction is classified into three categories
namely low level, medium level and high level satisfaction for analytical
purposes.
The score values ³ `X + S.D. and the score values £ `X – S.D. have been
classified as high level of satisfaction and low level of satisfaction respectively.
157
The score values between (`X+S.D.) and (`X-S.D.) have been classified as
medium level of satisfaction. `X and S.D. are the arithmetic mean and standard
deviation calculated from the score value of six hundred respondents.
The calculated values of `X and S.D. are 117.41 and 12.49 for public
sector banks respectively.
Therefore,
`X + S.D. (117.41 + 12.49) = 129.90 = 130 and above - High level of
Satisfaction
`X – S.D. (117.41 – 12.49) = 104.92 = 105 and below - Low Level of
Satisfaction
(`X - S.D) and (`X + S.D.) between 105 to 130 - Medium Level
of Satisfaction
In the case of private sector banks, the calculated values of `X and S.D.
are 115.37 and 10.41 respectively.
Therefore,
`X + S.D. (115.37 + 10.41) = 125.78 = 126 and above - High level of
Satisfaction
`X – S.D. (115.37 – 10.41) = 104.96 = 105 and below - Low Level of
Satisfaction
(`X - S.D) and (`X + S.D.) between 105 to 126 - Medium Level
of Satisfaction
For testing the relationship between respondents’ profile variables and
level of satisfaction, Chi-square test is employed. For computing Chi-Square test,
the following formula is used.
(O – E)2
Chi-Square = å ---------- with (r-1) (c-1) degrees of freedom.
E
158
Where,
O = Observed frequency,
E = Expected frequency,
c = Number of column in a contingency table and
r = Number of row in a contingency table.
The calculated value of Chi-Square is measured with the table value of
Chi-Square for given level of significance usually at 5 per cent level. If at the
stated level, the calculated value (C.V.) is less than the table value (T.V.), the null
hypothesis is accepted or otherwise it is rejected.
5.2.1. Levels of Satisfaction
The levels of satisfaction of the six hundred sample respondents from
public and private sectors in Tirunelveli district are given in Table 5.1.
TABLE 5.1
LEVELS OF SATISFACTION
Sl.
No.
Levels of
Satisfaction
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
No. of
respondents Percentage
No. of
respondents Percentage
1. High 51 17.00 32 10.70
2. Medium 218 72.70 237 79.00
3. Low 31 10.30 31 10.30
Total 300 100.00 300 100.00
Source : Primary Data
159
FIGURE 5.1
LEVELS OF SATISFACTION
It is clear from Table 5.1 and Figure 5.1 that out of the 300 public sector
banks, 51 respondents (17.00 per cent) come under the category of high level of
satisfaction and 31 respondents (10.30 per cent) come under the category of low
level of satisfaction. But nearly 218 respondents (72.70 per cent) of the sample
from public sector banks have medium level of satisfaction.
In the case of private sector banks, out of the 300 customers, 32 customers
(10.70 per cent) are in the category of high level of satisfaction, 237 customers
(79.00 per cent) come under the category of medium level of satisfaction whereas
31 respondents (10.30 per cent) only have low level of satisfaction.
0
50
100
150
200
250
High Medium Low
No
. o
f R
esp
on
de
nts
Levels of Satisfaction
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
160
5.2.2 Gender and Level of Satisfaction
In determining the satisfaction of the respondents, gender plays a vital
role. Table 5.2 shows the gender and level of satisfaction of the respondents.
TABLE 5.2
GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION
Sl.
No. Gender
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
High Medium Low Total High Medium Low Total
1. Male 31
(60.80)
148
(67.90)
21
(67.70)
200
(66.70)
25
(78.10)
174
(73.40)
20
(64.50)
219
(73.00)
2. Female 20
(39.20)
70
(32.10)
10
(32.30)
100
(33.30)
7
(21.90)
63
(26.60)
11
(35.50)
81
(27.00)
Total 51
(100.00)
218
(100.00)
31
(100.00)
300
(100.00)
32
(100.00)
237
(100.00)
31
(100.00)
300
(100.00)
Source: Primary data.
Note : Figures in brackets represent percentage to total.
From Table 5.2 and figure 5.1, it is inferred that in the case of public sector
banks, out of 51 respondents with high level of satisfaction, 31 respondents (60.80
per cent) of the respondents are male and 20 respondents (39.20 per cent) are
female. In case of medium level of satisfaction, out of 218 respondents, 148
(67.90 per cent) are male and 70 (32.10 per cent) are female. It also shows that
out of 31 respondents with low level of satisfaction, 21 respondents (67.70 per
cent) are male and 10 respondents (32.30 per cent) are female.
In the case of private sector banks, out of 32 respondents with high level of
satisfaction, 25 (78.10 per cent) are male and only 7 (21.90 per cent) are female.
In the case of medium level of satisfaction, out of 237 respondents, 174 (73.40 per
161
cent) are male and 63 (26.60 per cent) are female, whereas in the case of low level
of satisfaction, out of 31 respondents, 20 (64.50 per cent) are male and remaining
11 (3550 per cent) are female.
In order to test the relationship between gender and the level of satisfaction
of the respondents, the following null hypothesis is formulated: “The level of
satisfaction is independent of gender”. The Chi-Square test is applied to
examine the null hypothesis and the computed results are given in Table 5.3.
TABLE 5.3
GENDER AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION: CHI-SQUARE TEST
Particulars Public Sector
Banks
Private Sector
Banks
Calculated Value 0.9570 1.5794
Table value at 5 per cent level 5.991 5.991
Degrees of freedom 2 2
Inference Not Significant Not Significant
* Significant at 5 per cent level.
Source : Primary Data
It is inferred from Table 5.3 that for both the public sector and private
sector banks, the calculated values are less than the table values. Hence, the null
hypothesis is accepted. Therefore, it could be inferred that gender does not
influence the satisfaction of respondents towards internet banking.
162
5.2.3 Age and Level of Satisfaction
Age is one of the important factors in determining the satisfaction of the
respondents. The age and level of satisfaction of respondents are shown in
Table 5.4.
TABLE 5.4
AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION
Sl.
No
Age
(in
years)
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
High Medium Low Total High Medium Low Total
1. Below 25
6
(11.80)
34
(15.60)
7
(22.60)
47
(15.70)
6
(18.00)
51
(21.50)
9
(29.00)
66
(22.00)
2. 25-45 15
(29.40)
113
(51.80)
19
(61.30)
147
(49.00)
20
(62.50)
148
(62.40)
20
(64.50)
188
(62.70)
3. 46-65 26
(51.00)
69
(31.70)
2
(6.50)
97
(32.30)
5
(15.60)
19
(8.00)
--
24
(8.00)
4. 65 and Above
4
(7.80)
2
(0.90)
3
(9.70)
9
(3.00)
1
(3.10)
19
(8.00)
2
(6.50)
22
(7.30)
Total 51
(100.00)
218
(100.00)
31
(100.00)
300
(100.00)
32
(100.00)
237
(100.00)
31
(100.00)
300
(100.00)
Source: Primary data.
Note : Figures in brackets represent percentage to total.
From Table 5.4, it is observed that in the case of public sector banks, out
of 51 respondents the high level of satisfaction is maximum with 26 (51.00 per
cent) who belong to the age group between 46 – 65 years followed by 15
respondents (29.40 per cent) are of the age group between 25-45 years, 6
respondents(11.80 per cent) are in the age group below 25 years and 4 respondents
(7.80 per cent) belong to the age group 65 years and above respectively. In the
case of medium level of satisfaction, out of 218 respondents, maximum of 113
163
(51.80 per cent) of them belong to the age group between 25-45 years and 69
(31.70 per cent) belong to age group of 46 – 65 years respectively. Further it is
also shown that, out of 31 respondents with low level of satisfaction, maximum of
19 (61.30 per cent) of them belong to the age group between 25-45 years and 7
(22.60 per cent) of them belong to the age group of below 25 years respectively.
In the case of private sector banks, out of 32 respondents the high level of
satisfaction, maximum of 20 (62.50 per cent) of them belong to the age group
between 25-45 years. The table 5.4 also reveals that 6 (18.00 per cent) who belong
to the age group of below 25 years, 5 (15.60 per cent) in the age group of 46-65
years and only one (3.10) customer in the age group of 65 years above is with the
high level of satisfaction respectively. In the case of medium level of satisfaction,
maximum of 148 (62.40 per cent) respondents belong to the age group between
25-45 years. The table also infers that 51 (21.50 per cent) respondents belong to
the age group of below 25 years. Further, it also shows that in the case of low
level of satisfaction, out of 31 respondents, maximum of 20 (64.50 per cent)
respondents belong to the age group between 25-45 years and 9 (29.00 per cent)
belong to the age group of below 25 years.
In order to test the relationship between age and level of satisfaction of the
respondents, the following null hypothesis is formulated: “The level of
satisfaction is independent of the age”. The Chi-square test is applied to examine
the null hypothesis and the computed results are given in Table 5.5.
164
TABLE 5.5
AGE AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION: CHI-SQUARE TEST
Particulars Public Sector
Banks
Private Sector
Banks
Calculated Value 30.4338 6.6566
Table value at 5 per cent level 12.592 12.592
Degrees of freedom 6 6
Inference Significant Not Significant
* Significant at 5 per cent level.
Source : Primary Data
It is clearly evident from Table 5.5 that in the case of public sector banks,
the calculated value is greater than the table value. Hence, the null hypothesis is
rejected. Therefore, it could be inferred that the age influences the satisfaction of
the customers towards internet banking services.
In the case of private sector banks also the calculated value is less than the
table value, and hence the null hypothesis is accepted. Therefore, it could be
inferred that the age does not influence the satisfaction of the customers towards
internet banking services.
5.2.4. Educational Qualification and Levels of Satisfaction
Education is a vital factor which influences the satisfaction of the
respondents. Independent identity of respondents can be proved only through
education. Qualification of respondents and their level of satisfaction are shown
in Table 5.6.
165
TABLE 5.6
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS AND
LEVELS OF SATISFACTION
Sl.
No
Educa-
tional
Quali-
fication
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
High Medium Low Total High Medium Low Total
1. Graduate 34
(66.70)
125
(57.30)
15
(48.40)
174
(58.00)
15
(46.90)
146
(61.60)
19
(60.30)
180
(60.00)
2. Post Graduate
13
(25.50)
56
(25.70)
9
(29.00)
78
(26.00)
16
(50.00)
79
(33.30)
10
(32.30)
105
(35.00)
3. Others 4
(7.80)
37
(17.00)
7
(22.60)
48
(16.00)
1
(3.10)
12
(5.10)
2
(6.40)
15
(5.00)
Total 51
(100.00)
218
(100.00)
31
(100.00)
300
(100.0)
32
(100.00)
237
(100.0)
31
(100.0)
300
(100.0)
Source: Primary data.
Note : Figures in brackets represent percentage to total.
It is revealed from Table 5.6 that in the case of public sector banks, out of
51 customers with high level of satisfaction, maximum of 34 (66.70 per cent) are
in the category of graduate level followed by 13 (25.50 per cent) in the category of
post graduate level and only 4 (7.80 per cent) in the category of others. In the
case of medium level of satisfaction, out of 218 sample respondents, maximum of
125 (57.30 per cent) respondents are in the category of graduate level followed by
56 (25.70 per cent) in the category of post graduate level and 37 (17.00 per cent)
in the category of others. Out of 31 respondents with low level of satisfaction,
maximum of 15 (48.40 per cent) respondents are in the category of graduate level
followed by 9 (29.00 per cent) in the category of post graduate level and 7 (22.60
per cent) in the category of others.
166
In the case of private sector banks, out of 32 respondents with high level of
satisfaction, maximum of 16 (50.00 per cent) respondents are in the category of
post graduate level followed by 15 (46.90 per cent) in the category of graduate
level and only one (3.10 per cent) is in the category of others. In the case of
medium level of satisfaction, out of 237 respondents, maximum of 146 (61.60 per
cent) respondents are in the category of graduate level followed by 79 (33.30 per
cent) in the category of post graduate level and 12 (5.10 per cent) in the category
of others. Out of 31 respondents with low level satisfaction, maximum of 19
(60.30 per cent) respondents are in the category of graduate level followed by 10
(32.30 per cent) in the category of post graduate level and only 2 (6.40 per cent)
are in the category of others.
For finding out the relationship between educational qualification and
level of satisfaction towards internet banking services, the following null
hypothesis is formulated: “There is no relationship between educational
qualifications and level of satisfaction among the respondents”. To test the
above hypothesis, Chi-square test is applied. The computed results of Chi-Square
test are presented in Table 5.7.
167
TABLE 5.7
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND LEVELS OF SATISFACTION:
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Particulars Public Sector
Banks
Private Sector
Banks
Calculated Value 4.3823 3.6982
Table value at 5 per cent level 9.488 9.488
Degrees of freedom 4 4
Inference Not Significant Not Significant
* Significant at 5 per cent level.
Source : Primary Data
It is clearly evident from Table 5.7 that, in case of public and private sector
banks, the calculated Chi-Square values is less than the table values. Therefore,
the null hypothesis is accepted. Hence, it could be inferred that the educational
qualification does not influence the satisfaction of the respondents towards the
internet banking services.
5.2.5. Profession and Levels of Satisfaction
Level of satisfaction also depends upon the occupation or profession of the
customers. The researcher has made an attempt to study the relationship between
profession and level of satisfaction of the respondents. Profession of the
respondents and their level of satisfaction are shown in Table 5.8.
168
TABLE 5.8
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PROFESSION OF THE RESPONDENTS AND
THEIR LEVELS OF SATISFACTION
Sl.
No.
Occu-
pation
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
High Medium Low Total High Medium Low Total
1. Govt. Emp-loyees
6
(11.80)
51
(23.40)
3
(9.70)
60
(20.00)
6
(18.80)
38
(16.00)
--
44
(14.70)
2. Businessmen
1
(2.00)
16
(7.30)
8
(25.80)
25
(8.30)
3
(9.40)
39
(16.50)
5
(16.10)
47
(15.70)
3. Private Com-pany employees
7
(13.70)
35
(16.10)
7
(22.60)
49
(16.30)
9
(28.10)
69
(29.10)
16
(51.60)
94
(31.30)
4. House-wives
3
(5.90)
9
(4.10)
2
(6.50)
14
(4.70)
1
(3.10)
10
(4.20)
1
(3.20)
12
(4.00)
5. Retired Persons
6
(11.80)
7
(3.20)
--
13
(4.30)
--
4
(1.70) --
4
(1.30)
6. Bank Emp-loyees
23
(45.10)
69
(31.70)
7
(22.60)
99
(33.00)
12
(37.50)
42
(17.70)
4
(12.90)
58
(19.30)
7. Doctors 2
(3.90)
4
(1.80) -
6
(2.00) --
2
(0.80) --
2
(0.7)
8. Teachers 2
(3.90)
15
(6.90)
3
(9.70)
20
(6.70)
1
(3.10)
23
(9.70)
5
(16.10)
29
(9.70)
9. Students 1
(2.00)
12
(5.50)
1
(3.20)
14
(4.70) --
10
(4.20) --
10
(3.30)
Total 51
(100.00)
218
(100.00)
31
(100.00)
300
(100.0)
32
(100.00)
237
(100.0)
31
(100.0)
300
(100.0)
Source: Primary data.
Note : Figures in brackets represent percentage to total.
From Table 5.8, it is revealed that in the case of public sector banks, out of
51 customers with high level of satisfaction, maximum of 23 respondents (45.10
per cent) who are bank employees followed by 7 respondents (13.70 per cent)
private company employees and 6 respondents each (11.80 per cent) are
169
government employees and retired persons. In the case of medium level of
satisfaction, out of 218 respondents, maximum of 69 (31.70 per cent) respondents
are bank employees followed by 51 respondents (23.40 per cent) who are
government employees and 35 (16.10 per cent) private company employees.
Further, it also shows that out of 31 respondents with low level satisfaction,
maximum of 8 (25.80 per cent) of them are businessmen followed by 7 (22.60 per
cent) each of private company employees and bank employees respectively.
In the case of private sector banks, out of 32 respondents with high level of
satisfaction, maximum of 12 (37.50 per cent) are bank employees followed by 9
(28.10 per cent) private company employees and 6 (18.80 per cent) government
employees. In the case of medium level of satisfaction, out of 237 respondents,
maximum of 69 (29.10 per cent) are private company employees followed by 42
(17.70 per cent) bank employees, 39 (16.50 per cent) businessmen and 38 (16.00
per cent) government employees. It also shows that in the case of low level of
satisfaction, out of 31 respondents, maximum of 16 (51.60 per cent) are private
company employees followed by 5(16.10 per cent) each of businessmen and
teachers respectively.
For finding out the relationship between profession and level of
satisfaction, the following null hypothesis is formulated: “There is no
relationship between profession and levels of satisfaction of the respondents”.
To test the above hypothesis, Chi-square test is applied. The computed results of
Chi-Square test are presented in Table 5.9.
170
TABLE 5.9
PROFESSION AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION:
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Particulars Public Sector
Banks
Private Sector
Banks
Calculated Value 35.9590 24.2556
Table value at 5 per cent level 26.296 26.296
Degrees of freedom 16 16
Inference Significant Not Significant
* Significant at 5 per cent level.
Source : Primary Data
It is clearly evident from Table 5.9 that in the case of public sector banks,
the calculated Chi-Square value is greater than the table value at 5 per cent level.
Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, it could be inferred that there is
a relationship between profession and levels of satisfaction of the customers
towards the internet banking services.
In the case of private sector banks, the calculated Chi-Square value is less
than the table value at 5 per cent level. Hence, the null hypothesis is accepted.
Therefore, it could be inferred that there is no relationship between profession
and levels of satisfaction of the customers towards the internet banking services.
5.2.6 Monthly Income and Levels of Satisfaction
Levels of satisfaction may also depend upon the monthly income of the
respondents. Hence, an attempt is made to study the relationship between
171
monthly income and level of satisfaction of the respondents. The monthly income
of the sample respondents and their level of satisfaction are shown in Table 5.10.
TABLE 5.10
MONTHLY INCOME AND LEVELS OF SATISFACTION
Sl.
No.
Monthly
Income
(`)
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
High Medium Low Total High Medium Low Total
1. Below
15000
10
(19.60)
53
(24.30)
15
(48.40)
78
(26.00)
3
(9.40)
52
(21.90)
5
(16.10)
60
(20.00)
2. 15000-
30000
17
(33.30)
57
(26.10)
11
(35.50)
85
(28.30)
16
(50.00)
94
(39.70)
23
(74.20)
133
(44.30)
3. 30000-
45000
15
(29.40)
73
(33.50)
5
(16.10)
93
(31.00)
7
(21.90)
55
(23.20)
1
(3.20)
63
(21.00)
4. Above
45000
9
(17.60)
35
(16.10) --
44
(14.70)
6
(18.80)
36
(15.20)
2
(6.50)
44
(14.70)
Total 51
(100.00)
218
(100.00)
31
(100.00)
300
(100.0)
32
(100.00)
237
(100.0)
31
(100.0)
300
(100.0)
Source: Primary data.
Note : Figures in brackets represent percentage to total.
From Table 5.10, it is revealed that in the case of public sector banks, out
of 51 respondents with high level of satisfaction, maximum with 17 (33.30 per
cent) respondents have monthly income between ` 15000 - ` 30000 followed by
15 (29.40 per cent) with monthly income between ` 30000 - ` 45000, 10 (19.60
per cent) with monthly income of below ` 15000 and 9 (17.60 per cent) with
monthly income more than ` 45000. In the case of medium level of satisfaction,
out of 218 respondents, 73 (33.50 per cent) respondents have monthly income
between ` 30000 - ` 45000 followed by 57 (26.10 per cent) with monthly income
between ` 15000 - ` 30000, 53 (24.30 per cent) with monthly income of below `
172
15000 and 35 (16.10 per cent) with monthly income more than ` 45000. Further,
it also shows that out of 31 respondents with low level of satisfaction, majority of
15 (48.40 per cent) respondents have monthly income below ` 15000 followed by
11 (35.50 per cent) with monthly income between ` 15000 - ` 30000 and 5 (16.10
per cent) with monthly income of ` 30000 - ` 45000.
In the case of private sector banks, out of 32 respondents with high level of
satisfaction, majority of 16 (50.00 per cent) respondents have monthly income
between ` 15000 - ` 30000 followed by 7 (21.90 per cent) with monthly income
between ` 30000 - ` 45000, 6 (18.80 per cent) with monthly income above `
45000 and 3 (9.40 per cent) with monthly income of below ` 15000. In the case
of medium level of satisfaction, out of 237 respondents, majority of 94 (39.70 per
cent) respondents have monthly income between ` 15000 - ` 30000, followed by
55 (23.20 per cent) with monthly income between ` 30000 - ` 45000, 52 (21.90
per cent) with monthly income below ` 15000 and 36 respondents (15.20 per cent)
with monthly income above ` 45000. Further it also shows that out of 31
respondents with low level of satisfaction, majority of 23 (74.20 per cent)
respondents have monthly income between ` 15000 - ` 30000 followed by 5
respondents(16.10 per cent) with monthly income of below ` 15000, 2
respondents (6.50 per cent) with monthly income of more than ` 45000 and only
one (3.20 per cent) with a monthly income of ` 30000 - ` 45000.
In order to test the relationship between monthly income and level of
satisfaction, the following null hypothesis is formulated: “There is no
relationship between monthly income and levels of satisfaction”. To test the
173
above null hypothesis, Chi-Square test is applied. The results are presented in
Table 5.11.
TABLE 5.11
MONTHLY INCOME AND LEVELS OF SATISFACTION:
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Particulars Public Sector
Banks
Private Sector
Banks
Calculated Value 16.2230 17.1770
Table value at 5 per cent level 12.592 12.592
Degrees of freedom 6 6
Inference Significant Significant
*Significant at 5 per cent level.
Source : Primary Data
Table 5.11 reveals that in case of both public sector and private sector
banks, the calculated values of Chi-Square are greater than the table values. It
implies that the null hypothesis is rejected. Hence, it could be inferred that there is
no relationship between monthly income and levels of satisfaction towards
internet banking services provided by the public and private sectors banks in
Tirunelveli district.
5.2.7 Marital Status and Levels of Satisfaction
The levels of satisfaction may also depend upon the marital status of the
respondents. An attempt has been made to study the relationship between marital
status and levels of satisfactions of the respondents. The marital status of the
respondents and their levels of satisfactions are shown in Table 5.12.
174
TABLE 5.12
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN MARITAL STATUS OF THE
RESPONDENTS AND LEVEL OF SATISFACTION
Sl.
No.
Marital
Status
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
High Medium Low Total High Medium Low Total
1. Married 40
(78.40)
159
(72.90)
20
(64.50)
219
(73.00)
20
(62.50)
129
(54.40)
21
(67.70)
170
(56.70)
2. Un-
married
11
(21.60)
59
(27.10)
11
(35.50)
81
(27.00)
12
(37.50)
108
(45.60)
10
(32.30)
130
(43.30)
Total 51
(100.00)
218
(100.00)
31
(100.00)
300
(100.0)
32
(100.00)
237
(100.0)
31
(100.0)
300
(100.0)
Source: Primary data.
Note : Figures in brackets represent percentage to total.
Table 5.12 reveals that in the case of public sector banks, out of 51
respondents with high level of satisfaction, 40 (78.40 per cent) respondents are
married while 11 (21.60 per cent) are unmarried. In the case of medium level of
satisfaction, out of 218 respondents, 159 (72.90 per cent) are married while 59
(27.10 per cent) are unmarried. Out of 31 respondents with low level of
satisfaction, 20 (64.50 per cent) are married while 11 (35.50 per cent) are
unmarried.
In the case of private sector banks, out of 32 respondents with high level of
satisfaction, 20 (62.50 per cent) respondents are married while 12 (37.50 per cent)
are unmarried. In the case of medium level of satisfactions, out of 237
respondents, 129 (54.40 per cent) are married while 108 (45.60 per cent) are
unmarried. In the case of low level of satisfaction, out of 31 respondents, 21
(67.70 per cent) are married while 10 (32.30 per cent) are unmarried.
175
With a view to test the following null hypothesis namely, “The levels of
satisfaction is independent of the marital status”, Chi-square test is applied and
the results are shown in Table 5.13.
TABLE 5.13
MARITAL STATUS AND LEVELS OF SATISFACTION:
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Particulars Public Sector
Banks
Private Sector
Banks
Calculated Value 1.8958 2.4746
Table value at 5 per cent level 5.991 5.991
Degrees of freedom 2 2
Inference Not Significant Not Significant
*Significant at 5 per cent level.
Source : Primary Data
It is observed from Table 5.13 that in case of both public sector and private
sector banks, the calculated Chi-Square values are less than the table values at
5 per cent level. Hence the null hypothesis is accepted. So, there is no
relationship between marital status and level of satisfaction of the sample
respondents among the public and private sector banks in Tirunelveli district.
5.2.8 Usage of Internet banking and Level of Satisfaction
The usage of internet banking services by the sample customers and their
level of satisfaction are shown in Table 5.14.
176
TABLE 5.14
USAGE OF INTERNET BANKING AND LEVELS OF SATISFACTION
Sl.
No.
Usage in
Years
Public Sector Banks Private Sector Banks
High Medium Low Total High Medium Low Total
1. Less than One year
18
(35.30)
64
(29.40)
13
(41.90)
95
(31.70)
6
(18.80)
34
(14.30)
7
(22.60)
47
(15.70)
2. 1 – 2 13
(25.50)
63
(28.90)
9
(29.00)
85
(28.30)
10
(31.20)
83
(35.00)
10
(32.20)
103
(34.30)
3. 2 – 3 8
(15.70)
45
(20.60)
6
(19.40)
59
(19.70)
13
(40.60)
48
(20.30)
7
(22.60)
68
(22.70)
4. More than 3 years
11
(21.50)
46
(21.10)
3
(9.70)
61
(20.30)
3
(9.40)
72
(30.40)
7
(22.60)
82
(27.30)
Total 51
(100.00)
218
(100.00)
31
(100.00)
300
(100.0)
32
(100.00)
237
(100.0)
31
(100.0)
300
(100.0)
Source: Primary data.
Note : Figures in brackets represent percentage to total.
From Table 5.14, it is inferred that in the case of public sector banks, out
of 51 respondents with high level of satisfaction, maximum of 18 (35.30 per cent)
respondents are using internet banking for less than one year followed by the
respondents who use the internet banking for 1-2 years, more than 3 years and 2-3
years which constitute 25.50 per cent, 21.50 per cent and 15.70 per cent
respectively. In the case of medium level of satisfaction, out of 218 respondents,
maximum of 64 (29.40 per cent) are using internet banking for less than one year
followed by 63 respondents (28.90 per cent) who use the internet banking for 1-2
years, more than 3 years (21.10 per cent) and 2-3 years which constitute 20.60 per
cent. Out of 31 respondents with low level of satisfaction, maximum of 13 (41.90
per cent) of them are using internet banking for less than one year followed by the
respondents who use internet banking for 1-2 years, 2-3 years and more than 3
177
years which constitute 29.00 per cent, 19.40 per cent and 9.70 per cent
respectively.
In case of private sector banks, out of 32 respondents with high level of
satisfaction, maximum of 13 (40.60 per cent) are using internet banking for 2-3
years followed by the respondents who use the internet banking for 1-2 years, less
than one year and more than 3 years which constitute 31.20 per cent, 18.80 per
cent and 9.40 per cent respectively. In the case of medium level of satisfaction,
out of 237 respondents, maximum of 83 (35.00 per cent) are using internet
banking for 1-2 years followed by the respondents who use the internet banking
for more than 3 years, 2-3 years and less than one year which constitute 30.40 per
cent, 20.30 per cent and 14.30 per cent respectively. Further it also shows that,
out of 31 respondents with low level of satisfaction, maximum of 10 (32.20 per
cent) are using internet banking for 1-2 years followed 7 respondents each (22.60
per cent) by all those using internet banking for less than one year, 2-3 years and
more than 3 years respectively.
In order to test the relationship between usage of internet banking and
level of satisfaction of the respondents, the following null hypothesis is
formulated: “There is no relationship between the usage of internet banking
and levels of satisfaction”. The above null hypothesis is tested by applying Chi-
square test. The computed results are given in Table 5.15.
178
TABLE 5.15
USAGE OF INTERNET BANKING AND LEVELS OF SATISFACTION:
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Particulars Public Sector
Banks
Public Sector
Banks
Calculated Value 9.0333 11.8800
Table value at 5 per cent level 12.592 12.592
Degrees of freedom 6 6
Inference Not Significant Not Significant
*Significant at 5 per cent level.
Source: Primary Data
Table 5.15 shows that in the case of both the public and private sector
banks, the calculated Chi-Square values are less than the table values at 5 per cent
level. Hence the established null hypothesis is accepted. It is concluded that
there is no relationship between the usage of internet banking and levels of
satisfaction of the respondents among the public and private sector banks in
Tirunelveli district..
5.3. FACTORS IDENTIFYING CUSTOMERS’ SATISFACTION
TOWARDS INTERNET BANKING
In this section, an attempt is made to identify the factors which are
perceived by the customers towards the internet banking services offered by the
banks. Nineteen statements relating to satisfaction of the customers towards the
internet banking services of banks are selected, so as to identify the significant and
important factors with the help of factor analytical technique.
179
5.3.1. Analytical Framework
The technique adopted to identify and analyse the special attractions that
galvanised the customers in public sector banks and private sector banks is factor
analysis. The principal factor analysis method is mathematically satisfying
because it yields a unique solution to a factor problem. Its major solution feature
is the extraction of maximum amount of variation as each factor is calculated. In
other words, the first extracts the most variance and so on.
Most of the analytical methods produce results in a form that is difficult or
impossible to interpret. Thurstone argued that it is necessary to rotate factor
matrices if one wants to interpret them adequately.
He pointed out that original factor matrices are arbitary in the sense that an
infinite number of reference frames (axes) can be found to reproduce any given
‘R’ Matrix.
There are several methods available for factor analysis. But the principal
factor method with orthogonal varimax rotation is mostly used and widely
available in factor analysis computer programme.
Further orthogonal rotations maintain the independence of factors that is,
the angles between the axes are kept at 90 degrees. One of the final outcomes of a
factor analysis is called rotated factor matrix, a table of co-efficient that expresses
the ratios between the variable and the factors that have been prepared. The sum
of squares of the factor loadings of variable is called communalities (h2).
180
The communality (h2) of a factor is its common factor variance. The
factors with factor loadings of 0.5 or greater are considered as significant factors.
This limit is chosen because it had been judged that factors with less than 50 per
cent common variation with the rotated factor pattern are too weak to report.
In the present study, the principal factor analysis method with orthogonal
varimax rotation is used to identify the significant dimensions of satisfaction of
customers towards the internet banking services provided by public sector banks
and private sector banks.
5.3.2 Testing for Sampling Adequacy – Public Sector Banks
Before extracting the factors, to test the appropriateness of the factor
model, Bartlett’s test of sphericity is used to test the null hypothesis that the
variables are intercorrelated in population. The test statistics of sphericity is based
on a chi-square transformation of the determinant of the correlation matrix.
Another useful statistic is the Kaiser-Meyer Oklin (KMO) test of sampling
adequacy. Small value of the KMO statistic indicates that the correlation between
parts of variable cannot be explained by other variables and that factor analysis
may not be appropriate. Generally, a value greater than 0.5 is desirable.
The correlation matrix is examined carefully and the two tests namely
Bartlett’s test of sphericity and Kaiser-Meyer Oklin test are undertaken to test if it
is judicious to proceed with factor analysis in the present study. The computed
results for public sector banks are given in Table 5.16.
181
TABLE 5.16
MEASURES OF SAMPLING INADEQUACIES – PUBLIC SECTOR
BANKS
Measures Estimated Value
Kaiser-Meyer Oklin Measure of Sampling Adequacy 0.8641
Bartlett’s Test of Sphercity Appropriate Chi-Square 3023.7009
Significance 0.0000
Source : Primary Data
From Table 5.16 it has been observed that the Bartlett’s test is significant
with P=0.000, being less than 0.05. Sampling adequacy measured using the
Kaiser-Mayer Oklin (KMO) of 0.8641 is taken as acceptable. Thus the factor
analysis may be considered an appropriate technique for analysing the data.
Factor analysis is done with 19 variables (item) by orthogonal varimax
rotation for the satisfaction of customers towards the internet services provided by
public sector banks and private sector banks.
5.3.3 Customers’ Satisfaction towards internet services provided by Public
Sector Banks
The rotated factor matrix for the variables relating to the satisfaction of the
customers in public sector banks in the study is given in Table 5.17.
182
TABLE 5.17
ROTATED FACTOR MATRIX – PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS
Sl. No.
Variables Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Factor 5 h2
1. Internet banking is exactly what I need 0.7793 0.1215 0.0776 -0.0128 0.0374 0.6296
2. I have truly enjoyed Internet banking 0.7548 0.0200 0.3406 0.0999 -0.0474 0.6983
3. I am satisfied with my decision of
purchasing using internet banking 0.7187 0.0928 0.2649 0.1433 0.0154 0.6160
4. The website has adequate security
features 0.6596 0.3879 0.0510 0.2418 0.2158 0.6930
5. I will ask my family and friends to use
internet banking facilities 0.5981 0.1313 0.4415 0.0665 -0.1998 0.6141
6. Bank’s servers perform well 0.5704 0.4148 0.0562 0.2476 0.2088 0.6054
7. The service delivered through the
bank’s website is quick 0.1693 0.8275 0.1551 0.2189 -0.0694 0.7802
8. The bank’s website makes accurate
promises about the services delivered 0.2310 0.7817 0.0812 0.1597 -0.0369 0.6978
9. Customer’s online transaction with the
bank is always accurate 0.1545 0.7701 0.2751 0.1960 0.0344 0.7321
10. When the bank promises to do
something by a certain time, it does so 0.0092 0.6685 0.5001 0.2111 0.0628 0.7454
11. If I had to do transaction again, I
would choose the same internet
banking service of my bank 0.3235 0.2109 0.7066 0.1668 -0.0556 0.6793
12. I am very committed to my
relationship with my bank 0.1708 0.1939 0.6912 0.3211 0.1185 0.6616
13. Internet banking at my bank has really
pleased me 0.3925 0.2238 0.6521 0.1390 -0.0824 0.6553
14. The bank’s site provides a
confirmation of the service ordered 0.3182 0.1725 0.6275 0.2536 0.0237 0.5896
15. I trust this bank 0.0138 0.0464 0.5018 -0.0527 0.1492 0.5887
16. The bank’s site provides quick
confirmation 0.1092 0.1613 0.1533 0.8872 -0.0409 0.8501
17. Internet banking gives prompt
services 0.1813 0.2234 0.0887 0.8341 -0.0116 0.7864
18. The bank’s website performs the
service in the first instance itself 0.0795 0.2475 0.1857 0.7590 0.0449 0.6801
19. I am satisfied with the service of
internet banking 0.0590 -0.0221 0.1424 -0.0037 0.9129 0.8576
Eigen Value 7.3656 1.9784 1.2632 1.1988 1.0163
Percentage Variance 38.80 10.10 6.60 6.30 5.30
Cumulative Percentage 38.80 48.90 55.60 61.90 67.20
183
Table 5.17 gives the loadings received by the factors under F1, F2, F3, F4
and F5 for public sector banks. From the above table, the rotated factor loadings
for the nineteen statements (variables) of satisfaction of customers towards
internet banking services provided by public sector banks are observed. It is clear
from Table 5.17 that all the nineteen statements have been extracted into five
factors namely F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5. The factors with identified new names
which influence satisfaction of customers in public sector banks are discussed
below:
The first factor is designed as “Fulfillment of Customers’ Needs” on the
basis of the loaded variables. Six variables in this category are important with
high factor loading. It indicates that among the various performance scale,
‘Internet banking is exactly what I need (0.7793)’, ‘I have truly enjoyed Internet
banking (0.7548)’, ‘I am satisfied with my decision of purchasing using internet
banking (0.7187)’, ‘The website has adequate security features (0.6596)’, ‘I will
ask my family and friends to use internet banking facilities (0.5981)’ and ‘Bank’s
servers perform well (0.5704)’ are important attributes in this category. Thus, the
fulfillment of customers’ need is identified as an important factor to influence the
customers’ satisfaction towards the internet banking services rendered by the
public sector banks.
The second factor is narrated as “Fast and Accurate Services” on the
basis of the loaded variables. Four variables in this category are important with
high factor loading. It indicates that among the various performance scale, ‘The
service delivered through the bank’s website is quick (0.8275)’, ‘The bank’s
website makes accurate promises about the services delivered (0.7817)’,
‘Customer’s online transaction with the bank is always accurate (0.7701)’ and
184
‘When the bank promises to do something by a certain time, it does so (0.6685)
are important attributes in this category. Thus, the fast and accurate services of
internet facilities is identified as an important factor to influence the customers’
satisfaction towards the internet banking services rendered by the public sector
banks.
The third factor is prescribed as “Choice of Bank and their Services” on
the basis of the loaded variables. Five variables in this category are important
with high factor loading. It indicates that among the various performance scale,
‘If I had to do transaction again, I would choose the same internet banking service
of my bank (0.7066)’, ‘I am very committed to my relationship with my bank
(0.6912)’, ‘Internet banking at my bank has really pleased me (0.6521)’, ‘The
bank’s site provides a confirmation of the service ordered (0.6275)’ and ‘I trust
this bank (0.5018) are the important attributes in this category. Thus, the choice of
the bank and their internet services are identified as an important factor to
influence the customers’ satisfaction towards the internet banking services
rendered by the public sector banks.
The fourth factor is highlighted as “Quick Confirmation and Prompt
Services” on the basis of the loaded variables. Three variables in this category
are important with high factor loading. It indicates that among the various
performance scale, ‘The bank’s site provides quick confirmation (0.8872)’,
‘Internet banking gives prompt services (0.8341)’ and ‘The bank’s website
performs the service in the first instance itself (0.7590)’ are important attributes
in this category. Thus, the quick confirmation of transaction and prompt services
are identified as an important factor to influence the customers’ satisfaction
towards the internet banking services rendered by the public sector banks.
185
The fifth factor is designed as “Satisfaction with the services provided”
on the basis of the loaded variables. One variable in this category is important
with high factor loading. It indicates that among the various performance scale, ‘I
am satisfied with the service of internet banking (0.9129)’ is an important
attributes in this category. Thus, the satisfaction with the services of internet
banking is identified as an important factor to influence the customers’
satisfaction towards the internet banking services provided by the public sector
banks in Tirunelveli district.
Table 5.18 presents the overall highest factor loadings for the satisfaction
of the customers towards internet banking services provided by the public sector
banks.
TABLE 5.18
VARIABLES WITH THE HIGHEST FACTOR LOADINGS FOR THE
SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMER TOWARDS INTERNET BANKING
SERVICES PROVIDED BY PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS
Factors
Names of newly
extracted
dimensions
(Factors)
Selected Statements (Variables) Factor
Loadings
F1 Fulfillment of
customers’ needs
Internet banking is exactly what I
need 0.7793
F2 Fast and accurate
services
The service delivered through the
bank’s website is quick
0.8275
F3 Choice of the banks
and their services
If I had to do transaction again, I
would choose the same internet
banking service of my bank
0.7066
F4 Quick confirmation
and prompt services
The bank’s site provides quick
confirmation
0.8872
F5 Satisfaction with the
services provided
I am satisfied with the service of
internet banking
0.9219
186
It is clearly evident from Table 5.18 that the statements, ‘Internet banking
is exactly what I need (0.7793)’, ‘The service delivered through the bank’s
website is quick (0.8275)’, ‘If I had to do transaction again, I would choose the
same internet banking service of my bank (0.7066), ‘The bank’s site provides
quick confirmation (0.8872) and ‘I am satisfied with the service of internet
banking (0.9219)’ are the statements with highest factor loading under the
dimensions namely, ‘Fulfillment of customers’ needs (F1)’, ‘Fast and accurate
services (F2)’, ‘Choice of the banks and their services (F3)’, ‘Quick confirmation
and prompt services (F4)’ and ‘Satisfaction with the services provided (F5)
respectively. Hence, it is concluded that these are the identified dimensions
(factors) which influence the satisfaction of the customers towards the internet
banking services provided by public sector banks in Tirunelveli district.
5.3.4 Testing for sampling adequacy – Private Sector Banks
The correlation matrix is examined carefully and the two tests namely
Bartlett’s test of sphericity and Kaiser-Meyer Oklin test are undertaken to test if it
is judicious to proceed with factor analysis in the present study. The computed
results for private sector banks are given in Table 5.19.
TABLE 5.19
MEASURES OF SAMPLING INADEQUACIES – PRIVATE SECTOR
BANKS
Measures Estimated Value
Kaiser-Meyer Oklin Measure of Sampling Adequacy 0.8641
Bartlett’s Test of Sphercity Appropriate Chi-Square 3023.7009
Significance 0.0000
Source: Primary Data
187
From Table 5.19 it has been observed that the Bartlett’s test is significant
with P=0.000, being less than 0.05. Sampling adequacy measured using the
Kaiser-Mayer Oklin (KMO) of 0.8641 is taken as acceptable. Thus the factor
analysis may be considered an appropriate technique for analysing the data.
Factor analysis is done with 19 variables (item) by orthogonal varimax
rotation for the satisfaction of customers towards the internet services provided by
private sector banks.
5.3.3 Customers’ satisfaction towards internet services provided by Private
Sector Banks
The rotated factor matrix for the variables relating to the satisfaction of the
customers in private sector banks in the study is given in Table 5.20.
188
TABLE 5.20
ROTATED FACTOR MATRIX – PRIVATE SECTOR BANK
Sl. No.
Variables Factor
1 Factor
2 Factor
3 Factor
4 Factor
5 h
2
1. I trust this bank 0.8346 0.1396 0.0352 0.2696 0.0085 0.7900
2. I am very committed to my
relationship with my bank 0.7675 0.1167 0.1325 0.2495 0.1199 0.6968
3. The bank’s site provides a confir-
mation to the service ordered 0.7031 0.0907 0.3063 0.0815 0.1616 0.6291
4. If I had to do transaction again, I
would choose the same internet
banking service of my bank 0.6933 0.1737 0.2943 0.1131 0.1662 0.6378
5. Internet banking at my bank has
really pleased me 0.6631 0.1589 0.3714 -0.0056 0.0995 0.6127
6. The service delivered through the
bank’s website is quick 0.1779 0.8180 0.0074 0.1621 0.0920 0.7355
7. Customer’s online transaction
with the bank is always accurate 0.0888 0.7922 0.1091 0.1724 0.0496 0.6795
8. The bank’s website makes
accurate promises about the
services delivered 0.0190 0.7747 0.1796 -0.0894 0.3100 0.7368
9. When the bank promises to do
something by a certain time, it
does do 0.2987 0.6845 0.0768 0.0845 0.1676 0.5989
10. I am satisfied with the services of
internet banking 0.2597 0.1797 0.7588 0.2163 -0.0299 0.7232
11. I have truly enjoyed internet
banking 0.1963 -0.0531 0.7333 0.3293 0.1655 0.7148
12. I will ask my family and friends
to use internet banking facilities 0.4114 0.2256 0.7218 0.0444 0.1374 0.7619
13. I am satisfied with my decision of
purchasing using internet banking 0.2135 0.1079 0.6660 0.4672 0.1071 0.7304
14. The website has adequate security
features 0.2668 0.1450 0.1257 0.8248 0.0881 0.7961
15. Bank’s servers perform well 0.1523 0.1333 0.2050 0.8158 0.2001 0.7885
16. Internet banking is exactly what I
need 0.1056 0.0598 0.3440 0.7513 0.1412 0.7174
17. The bank’s site provides quick
confirmation 0.1056 0.1329 0.0857 0.1802 0.8487 0.7889
18. The bank’s website performs the
service in the first instance itself 0.1721 0.1035 0.0623 0.0773 0.8199 0.7223
19. Internet banking gives prompt
service 0.0975 0.2826 0.1028 0.1446 0.7985 0.7885
Eigen Value 7.2711 2.2261 1.6759 1.3720 1.0747
Percentage Variance 38.30 11.70 8.80 7.20 5.70
Cumulative Percentage 38.30 50.00 58.80 66.00 71.70
189
Table 5.20 gives the loadings received by the factors under F1, F2, F3, F4
and F5 for private sector banks. Table reveals the rotated factor loadings for the
nineteen statements (variables) of satisfaction of customers towards internet
banking services provided in private sector banks. It is clear from Table 5.20 that
all the nineteen statements are extracted into five factors namely F1, F2, F3, F4
and F5. The factors with identified new names which influence satisfaction of
customers in private sector banks are discussed below:
The first factor is designed as “Confidence and Confirmation of
Services” on the basis of the loaded variables. Five variables in this category are
important with high factor loading. It indicates that among the various
performance scales, ‘I trust this bank (0.8346), ‘I am very committed to my
relationship with my bank (0.7675)’, ‘The bank’s site provides a confirmation to
the service ordered (0.7031)’, ‘If I had to do transaction again, I would choose the
same internet banking service of my bank (0.6933)’ and ‘Internet banking at my
bank has really pleased me (0.6631)’ are important attributes in this category.
Thus, the confidence and confirmation of services provided by the bank is
identified as an important factor to influence the customers satisfaction towards
the internet banking services rendered by the private sector banks.
The second factor is narrated as “Fast and Accurate Services” on the
basis of the loaded variables. Four variables in this category are important with
high factor loading. It indicates that among the various performance scale, ‘The
service delivered through the bank’s website is quick (0.8180)’, ‘Customer’s
online transaction with the bank is always accurate (0.7922)’, ‘The bank’s website
makes accurate promises about the services delivered (0.7747)’ and ‘When the
bank promises to do something by a certain time, it does do (0.6845)’ are
190
important attributes in this category. Thus, the fast and accurate services of
internet facilities is identified as an important factor to influence the customer
satisfaction towards the internet banking services rendered by the private sector
banks.
The third factor is prescribed as “Satisfaction with the services
provided” on the basis of the loaded variables. Four variables in this category are
important with high factor loading. It indicates that among the various
performance scales, ‘I am satisfied with the services of internet banking (0.7588)’,
‘I have truly enjoyed internet banking (0.7333)’, ‘I will ask my family and friends
to use internet banking facilities (0.7218)’ and ‘I am satisfied with my decision of
purchasing using internet banking (0.6660)’ are important attributes in this
category. Thus, the satisfaction with the services provided by the bank is
identified as an important factor to influence the customers’ satisfaction towards
the internet banking services rendered by the private sector banks.
The fourth factor is highlighted as “Security and Fulfillment of
Customers’ Needs” on the basis of the loaded variables. Three variables in this
category are important with high factor loading. It indicates that among the
various performance scales, ‘The website has adequate security features (0.8248)’,
‘Bank’s servers perform well (0.8158)’ and ‘Internet banking is exactly what I
need (0.7513)’ are important attributes in this category. Thus, the security and
fulfillment of customers’ needs are identified as important factor to influence the
customers’ satisfaction towards the internet banking services rendered by the
private sector banks.
191
The fifth factor is designed as “Quick Confirmation and Prompt
Services” on the basis of the loaded variables. Three variables in this category is
important with high factor loading. It indicates that among the various
performance scales, ‘The bank’s site provides quick confirmation (0.8487)’, ‘The
bank’s website performs the service in the first instance itself (0.8199)’ and
‘Internet banking gives prompt service (0.7985)’ are important attributes in this
category. Thus, the quick confirmation and prompt services rendered by the banks
is identified as an important factor to influence the customers’ satisfaction towards
the internet banking services provided by the private sector banks in Tirunelveli
district.
Table 5.21 presents the overall highest factor loadings for the satisfaction
of the customers towards internet banking services provided by the private sector
banks.
TABLE 5.21
VARIABLES WITH THE HIGHEST FACTOR LOADINGS FOR THE
SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMERS TOWARDS INTERNET BANKING
SERVICES PROVIDED BY PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS
Factors
Name of newly
extracted dimensions
(Factors)
Selected Statements
(Variables)
Factor
Loadings
F1 Confidence and
confirmation of services I trust this bank 0.8346
F2 Fast and accurate services The service delivered
through the bank’s website is
quick
0.8275
F3 Satisfaction with the
services provided
I am satisfied with the
services of internet banking 0.7066
F4 Security and fulfillment
of customers’ needs
The website has adequate
security features 0.8872
F5 Quick confirmation and
prompt services
The bank’s site provides
quick confirmation 0.9219
192
It is clearly evident from Table 5.21 that the statements, ‘I trust this bank
(0.8346)’. ‘The service delivered through the bank’s website is quick (0.8275)’,
‘I am satisfied with the services of internet banking (0.7066)’, ‘The website has
adequate security features (0.8872)’ and ‘The bank’s site provides quick
confirmation (0.9219)’ are the statements with highest factor loadings under the
dimensions namely, ‘Confidence and confirmation of services (F1)’, ‘Fast and
accurate services (F2)’, ‘Satisfaction with the services provided (F3)’, ‘Security
and fulfillment of customers’ needs (F4)’ and ‘Quick confirmation and prompt
services (F5)’ respectively. Hence, it is concluded that these are the identified
dimensions (factors) which influence the satisfaction of the customers towards the
internet banking services provided by private sector banks in Tirunelveli district.
5.4 IMPACT OF SERVICE COMPONENTS ON OVERALL
SATISFACTION OF CUSTOMERS TOWARDS INTERNET
BANKING
The service components in banking are extracted into five factors for both
public and private sector banks separately. The above said five variables are the
components of services offered by the banks which determine their satisfaction of
the customers. The mean scores of these five variables are taken for analysis as
independent variables. The overall satisfaction mean score is taken as the
dependent variable. The multiple regression model is used to analyse the impact
of independent variables on dependent variables.
The fitted regression model for public sector banks is
Y = a + b1 X1 + b2 X2 + b3 X3+ b4 X4 + b5 X5 + e
Where,
Y = Mean Scores on the overall satisfaction,
193
X1 = Mean Scores on the fulfillment of customers’ needs,
X2 = Mean Scores on the Fast and accurate services,
X3 = Mean Scores on the Choice of the banks and their services,
X4 = Mean Scores on the Quick confirmation and prompt
services,
X5 = Mean Scores on the satisfaction with the services provided,
b1, b2, … b7 = Regression coefficient of independent variables,
a = Intercept and
e = Error term.
The regression analysis has been applied for the public sector banks and
the results are shown in Table 5.22.
TABLE 5.22
IMPACT OF SERVICE COMPONENTS ON OVERALL SATISFACTION
OF CUSTOMERS TOWARDS INTERNET BANKING – PUBLIC SECTOR
BANKS
Sl.
No. Independent Variables
Regression
Coefficient t-Values
1. Fulfillment of customers’ needs 0.2131* 2.3869
2. Fast and accurate services 0.4332* 3.2968
3. Choice of the banks and their services 0.1039 1.2365
4. Quick confirmation and prompt services 0.0968 0.9856
5. Satisfaction with the services provided 0.1442* 2.1092
Constant 1.2963
R2 0.7947
F-Statistics 14.9314*
* Significant at 5 per cent level.
194
It is found from Table 5.22 that the influencing variables such as
fulfillment of customer’s needs, fast and accurate services and satisfaction with
the services provided are statistically significant at 5 per cent level and these
variables have direct impact on satisfaction of the customers towards internet
banking services provided by the public sector banks. A unit increase in the
above said three variables results in an increase in overall satisfaction by 0.2131,
0.4332 and 0.1442 units respectively. The independent variables explain the
changes in overall satisfaction to the extent of 79.47 per cent.
The fitted regression model for private sector banks is
Y = a + b1 X1 + b2 X2 + b3 X3+ b4 X4 + b5 X5 + e
Where,
Y = Mean Scores on the overall satisfaction,
X1 = Mean Scores on the Confidence and confirmation of
services,
X2 = Mean Scores on the Fast and accurate services,
X3 = Mean Scores on the Satisfaction with the services provided,
X4 = Mean Scores on the Security and fulfillment of customers’
needs,
X5 = Mean Scores on the Quick confirmation and Prompt
Services,
b1, b2, … b7 = Regression coefficient of independent variables,
a = Intercept and
e = Error term.
The regression analysis is applied for the private sector banks and the
results are shown in Table 5.23.
195
TABLE 5.23
IMPACT OF SERVICE COMPONENTS ON OVERALL SATISFACTION
OF CUSTOMERS TOWARDS INTERNET BANKING – PRIVATE
SECTOR BANKS
Sl.
No. Independent Variables
Regression
Coefficient t-Value
1. Confidence and confirmation of services 0.0457 0.9326
2. Fast and accurate services 0.3831* 2.0326
3. Satisfaction with the services provided 0.1944* 3.3645
4. Security and fulfillment of customers’ needs 0.1097 1.3248
5. Quick confirmation and prompt services 0.1331* 2.8473
Constant 2.3194
R2 0.7181
F-Statistics 11.3314*
* Significant at 5 per cent level.
Source: Primary Data
It is shown from Table 5.23 that the influencing variables such as fast and
accurate services, satisfaction with the services provided and quick confirmation
and prompt services are statistically significant at 5 per cent level and these
variables have direct impact on satisfaction of the customers towards internet
banking services provided by the private sector banks. A unit increase in the
above said three variables results in an increase in overall satisfaction by 0.3831,
0.1944 and 0.1331 units respectively. The changes in overall satisfaction towards
internet banking services are explained by the changes in the independent
variables included to the extent of 71.81 per cent.
196
5.5 REASONS FOR OPENING AN INTERNET BANK ACCOUNT
There are many reasons for opening an internet bank account. The
following are the important reasons for opening an internet bank account among
the public and private sector banks such as ‘convenience’, ‘24 hours service’,
‘anywhere connectivity’, ‘curiosity’, ‘better rates’, ‘safe and secure’, ‘low service
charge’, ‘easy to maintain banking transaction activity’ and ‘online shopping’. In
order to find out the association between category of banks and the reasons for
opening an internet bank account, ‘t’ test is applied and the computed results are
presented in the following Table 5.24.
TABLE 5.24
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CATEGORY OF BANKS AND THE
REASONS FOR OPENING AN INTERNET BANK ACCOUNT
Sl.
No. Reasons
Mean Scores among
t-value Public
Sector
Banks
Private
Sector
Banks
1. Convenience (24 hours service,
anywhere connectivity)
4.6355 4.5567 1.36
2. Curiosity 4.0200 3.9567 0.75
3. Better rates 3.9867 4.0500 0.82
4. Safe and secure 4.1600 4.1400 0.31
5. Low service charges 4.2233 4.1133 1.42
6. Easy to maintain my banking
transaction activity
4.4367 4.3467 1.61*
7. Online shopping 4.1400 4.2467 1.42
* Indicates that the difference is statistically significant at 5 per cent level.
Source: Primary Data
197
It is inferred from Table 5.24 that out of seven reasons for opening an
internet bank account in public sector and private sector banks, only one reason
that is, ‘easy to maintain my banking transaction activity’ is statistically
significant at 5 per cent level and other reasons are not statistically significant. It
is found that there is an association for the reason ‘easy to maintain my banking
transaction activity’ among the public and private sector banks in Tirunelveli
district.
5.5.1 Reasons for choosing a particular bank for opening an Internet Bank
Account
The following are the important reasons for opening an internet bank
account at the particular bank in the study area such as, ‘I have a traditional bank
account with the same bank’, ‘The brand name of the bank’ and ‘The excellent
service offered by this bank’. Table 5.25 presents the details about the reasons for
selecting a particular bank for opening an internet account.
TABLE 5.25
REASONS FOR CHOOSING A PARTICULAR BANK FOR OPENING AN
INTERNET BANK ACCOUNT
Sl. No.
Reasons Public Sector
Private Sector
Total
1. I have a traditional bank account with the same bank
141
(47.00)
118
(39.30)
259
(43.20)
2. The brand name of the bank 50
(16.70)
58
(19.30)
108
(18.00)
3. The excellent service offered by this bank
109
(36.30)
124
(41.70)
233
(38.80)
Total 300
(100.00)
300
(100.00)
600
(100.00)
Source: Primary Data
Note : Figures in bracket indicate percentage to total.
198
From Table 4.2 it has been observed that out of 600 respondents in total, a
maximum of 259 (43.20 per cent) customers are choosing because of having a
traditional bank account with the same bank and it is followed by the excellent
service offered by the bank and the brand name of the bank which constitute 38.80
per cent and 18.00 per cent respectively.
5.5.2 Problems in choosing the Internet Banking
There are certain problems in choosing the internet banking too. The
following are the important problems in choosing the internet banking among the
public and private sector banks such as ‘privacy policy of the internet banking’,
‘security issue of using the internet banking’, ‘ethical standard of the internet
banking’, ‘willingness of the internet banking to listen to customer’s opinion and
new ideas’, ‘response speed of the internet banking when making the queries or
sending feedback’, ‘ability of internet banking to provide up-to-date information
on products and services’, ‘regulatory control for maintaining honesty’,
‘supervision systems to provide true information to customers and ‘executing
contacts with customers seriously’. In order to find out the association between
category of banks and the problems in choosing internet banking, ‘t’ test is
applied and the computed results are presented in the following Table 5.26.
199
TABLE 5.26
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CATEGORY OF BANKS AND THE
PROBLEMS IN CHOOSING INTERNET BANKING
Sl.
No. Problems
Mean Scores among
t-value Public
Sector Banks
Private
Sector Banks
1. Privacy policy of the internet banking 9.1000 8.8133 2.31*
2. Security issue of using the internet
banking 9.0267 8.9200 0.88
3. Ethical standard of the internet
banking 8.4800 8.5067 0.20
4. Willingness of the internet banking to
listen to customer’s opinion and new
ideas
8.8600 8.3767 1.44
5. Response speed of the internet
banking when making the queries or
sending feedback
8.7433 8.8627 0.70
6. Ability of internet banking to provide
up-to-date information on products
and services
8.6700 8.5033 1.20
7. Regulatory control for maintaining
honesty 8.6533 8.6100 0.34
8. Supervision systems to provide true
information to customers 8.8233 8.7300 0.82
9. Executing contracts with customers
seriously 8.7233 8.7067 0.13
* Indicates that the difference is statistically significant at 5 per cent level.
Source: Primary Data
It is found from Table 5.26 that out of nine problems in choosing the
internet banking, the problem namely, ‘Privacy policy of the internet banking is
statistically significant at 5 per cent level and the other problems are not
statistically significant.