Upload
keran
View
50
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
AMM360A Textile Testing Result Presentation. By Ho Yi Chiu (Chloe) Winter 2012. Garment Selected for Textile Testing. Harajuku Mini for Target Collection Girl’s Plaid Sleeveless Ruffle Dress. Fabric A Brushed Cotton 100% Cotton. Fabric B Cotton Homespun - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
AMM360A Textile Testing Result PresentationBy Ho Yi Chiu (Chloe)
Winter 2012
Garment Selected for Textile Testing
Harajuku Mini for Target Collection
Girl’s Plaid Sleeveless Ruffle Dress
Fabric ABrushed Cotton
100% Cotton
Fabric BCotton
Homespun100% Cotton
Important Test ResultsTest # Text Name Fabric A Fabric B
1 Laundering, Colorfastness to ✔
3.5 Tensile Strength ✔ 4.5 Tear Strength ✔ 5 Dimensional Stability ✔
12 Abrasion Resistance (Taber) ✔ 5/5 0/5
Test #1Laundering, Colorfastness to
Fiber Type Fabric A Rating
Fabric B Rating
Wool (Worsted) 5 5Spun Polyacrylic (Orlon 75) 5 5Spun Polyester (Dacron 54) 5 5Spun Polyamide (Nylon 6, 6) 5 4Bleached Cotton 5 2Filament Acetate 5 5
**Results were rated using the AATCC Gray Scale for Evaluating StainingFrom the scale of 1 (high color transfer) to 5 (no color color transfer)
Fabric A Performed Better
Test #3.5Tensile Strength
Fabric A Fabric B
8” x 3” 3” x 8” 8” x 3” 3” x 8”
Yarn being tested Warp Filling Warp Filling
Break Load (lbf) 161.5 80.83 87.95 80.11
Elongation (inch) 0.7348 0.8360 0.4443 0.6086
Elongation (%) 24.49% 27.87% 14.81% 20.29%
Fabric A Performed Better
Test #4.5Tearing Strength
Tearing StrengthFabric A Fabric B
4” x 2” Dry 87 lbs. 60.5 lbs.4” x 2” Wet > 100 lbs. 72 lbs.2” x 4” Dry 81 lbs. 48 lbs.2” x 4” Wet 73 lbs. 45 lbs.
**CPP/AMM Test Method 4.5 was used instead of CPP/AMM Test Method 4because I was unable to obtain digital read-out result for Fabric A (4” x 2” Dry)
Fabric A Performed Better
Test #5Dimensional Stability
**The best performance resulted from Cool Wash / Cool Rinse / Line Dry
Fabric A Performed Better
Fabric A Fabric B Warp Filling Warp Filling
Hot wash/Cool rinse/Hot dry - 7.3% - 1.3% - 8.3% - 2.6%
Hot wash/Cool rinse/Cool dry - 9.1% - 2.1% - 8.9% - 3.1%
Warm wash/Cool rinse/Hot dry - 5.2% 0% - 7.1% - 0.8%
Warm wash/Cool rinse/Cool dry - 6.3% - 1.0% - 7.3% - 1.6%
Cool wash/Cool rinse/Hot dry - 5.5% - 1.6% - 8.9% - 1.6%
Cool wash/Cool rinse/Line dry - 3.7% - 0.8% - 6.3% - 0.8%
Test #12Abrasion Resistance (Taber)
Fabric A Performed Better
Fabric A Fabric B
# of rev.
Weight before
test
Weight after test
% weight
loss# of rev.
Weight before
test
Weight after test
% weight
loss
1: Thread Breakage 117 0.192
oz0.186
oz 3.13% 24 0.086 oz
0.085 oz 1.16%
2: 100 Revolution / Rupture
100 0.191 oz
0.186 oz 2.62% 34 0.085
oz0.084
oz 1.18%
3: Rupture 160 0.187 oz
0.178 oz 4.81% / / / /
Conclusion…
Based on the observed test results, Fabric A performed better than Fabric B. Therefore, Fabric A is recommended for the specified garment.