10
AMM360A Textile Testing Result Presentation By Ho Yi Chiu (Chloe) Winter 2012

AMM360A Textile Testing Result Presentation

  • Upload
    keran

  • View
    50

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

AMM360A Textile Testing Result Presentation. By Ho Yi Chiu (Chloe) Winter 2012. Garment Selected for Textile Testing. Harajuku Mini for Target Collection Girl’s Plaid Sleeveless Ruffle Dress. Fabric A Brushed Cotton 100% Cotton. Fabric B Cotton Homespun - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

AMM360A Textile Testing Result PresentationBy Ho Yi Chiu (Chloe)

Winter 2012

Page 2: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

Garment Selected for Textile Testing

Harajuku Mini for Target Collection

Girl’s Plaid Sleeveless Ruffle Dress

Page 3: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

Fabric ABrushed Cotton

100% Cotton

Fabric BCotton

Homespun100% Cotton

Page 4: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

Important Test ResultsTest # Text Name Fabric A Fabric B

1 Laundering, Colorfastness to ✔  

3.5 Tensile Strength ✔  4.5 Tear Strength ✔  5 Dimensional Stability ✔  

12 Abrasion Resistance (Taber) ✔  5/5 0/5

Page 5: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

Test #1Laundering, Colorfastness to

Fiber Type Fabric A Rating

Fabric B Rating

Wool (Worsted) 5 5Spun Polyacrylic (Orlon 75) 5 5Spun Polyester (Dacron 54) 5 5Spun Polyamide (Nylon 6, 6) 5 4Bleached Cotton 5 2Filament Acetate 5 5

**Results were rated using the AATCC Gray Scale for Evaluating StainingFrom the scale of 1 (high color transfer) to 5 (no color color transfer)

Fabric A Performed Better

Page 6: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

Test #3.5Tensile Strength

  Fabric A Fabric B

  8” x 3” 3” x 8” 8” x 3” 3” x 8”

Yarn being tested Warp Filling Warp Filling

Break Load (lbf) 161.5 80.83 87.95 80.11

Elongation (inch) 0.7348 0.8360 0.4443 0.6086

Elongation (%) 24.49% 27.87% 14.81% 20.29%

Fabric A Performed Better

Page 7: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

Test #4.5Tearing Strength

Tearing StrengthFabric A Fabric B

4” x 2” Dry 87 lbs. 60.5 lbs.4” x 2” Wet > 100 lbs. 72 lbs.2” x 4” Dry 81 lbs. 48 lbs.2” x 4” Wet 73 lbs. 45 lbs.

**CPP/AMM Test Method 4.5 was used instead of CPP/AMM Test Method 4because I was unable to obtain digital read-out result for Fabric A (4” x 2” Dry)

Fabric A Performed Better

Page 8: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

Test #5Dimensional Stability

**The best performance resulted from Cool Wash / Cool Rinse / Line Dry

Fabric A Performed Better

  Fabric A Fabric B  Warp Filling Warp Filling

Hot wash/Cool rinse/Hot dry - 7.3% - 1.3% - 8.3% - 2.6%

Hot wash/Cool rinse/Cool dry - 9.1% - 2.1% - 8.9% - 3.1%

Warm wash/Cool rinse/Hot dry - 5.2% 0% - 7.1% - 0.8%

Warm wash/Cool rinse/Cool dry - 6.3% - 1.0% - 7.3% - 1.6%

Cool wash/Cool rinse/Hot dry - 5.5% - 1.6% - 8.9% - 1.6%

Cool wash/Cool rinse/Line dry - 3.7% - 0.8% - 6.3% - 0.8%

Page 9: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

Test #12Abrasion Resistance (Taber)

Fabric A Performed Better

Fabric A Fabric B

# of rev.

Weight before

test

Weight after test

% weight

loss# of rev.

Weight before

test

Weight after test

% weight

loss

1: Thread Breakage 117 0.192

oz0.186

oz 3.13% 24 0.086 oz

0.085 oz 1.16%

2: 100 Revolution / Rupture

100 0.191 oz

0.186 oz 2.62% 34 0.085

oz0.084

oz 1.18%

3: Rupture 160 0.187 oz

0.178 oz 4.81% / / / /

Page 10: AMM360A  Textile Testing Result Presentation

Conclusion…

Based on the observed test results, Fabric A performed better than Fabric B. Therefore, Fabric A is recommended for the specified garment.