Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
America’s Port
Port Briefing November, 2010
Port of Los Angeles
• Founded in 1907• Proprietary Department of the
City of Los Angeles• Landlord Port• Nation’s busiest container Port• 43 miles of waterfront• 7,500 acres of land and water• 26 major cargo terminals• Land use diversity
• Annual container volume of 6.7 million TEUs (CY 2009)
Port of Los Angeles
APM – 484
APL – 292
Evergreen -205
YTI – 185
Vacant - 84
CSCL - 75
WBCT - 186
TRAPAC - 173
TTI - 375
Pier A - 170Matson - 70
CUT - 108
LBCT - 102
ITS - 246
PCT - 256
Cruise
Cruise
Autos
Marinas
Liquid Bulk
Liquid Bulk
Pasha
SSA
Autos
San Pedro Bay Ports
North American Container Ports
(CY 2009 in TEUs)• Los Angeles 6.75 million
• Long Beach 5.07 million
• New York/N.J 4.59 million *
• Savannah 2.36 million
• Vancouver 2.15 million
• Oakland 2.05 million
• Houston 1.80 million
• Seattle 1.58 million
• Tacoma 1.55 million
• Montreal 1.25 million
* Estimated
POLA faired well in a difficult market
2009(TEUs)
2008(TEUs)
Difference(TEUs)
Percent Change
Los Angeles 6,748,994 7,849,984 (1,100,990) -14.0%
Long Beach 5,067,597 6,487,716 (1,420,119) -21.9%
Vancouver 2,152,464 2,492,107 (339,643) -13.6%
Oakland 2,051,153 2,236,244 (185,091) -8.3%
Seattle 1,282,833 1,376,232 (93,399) -20.2%
Tacoma 1,075,646 1,347,975 (272,329) -6.8%
Prince Rupert 264,724 181,890 82,834 45.5%
Portland 174,203 245,459 (71,256) -29.0%
Total 18,817,614 22,217,607 (3,399,993) -15.3%
The Port of Los Angeles performed better than the West Coast average in 2009.
Top Container Ports (2009)
Top 20 Container Ports in the World in 2009 (Million TEU)Rank '09
Rank '08 Port 2009 2008
Absolute Change
Percent Change
1 1 Singapore 25.87 29.92 -4.05 -13.5%2 2 Shanghai 25.00 27.98 -2.98 -10.7%3 3 Hong Kong 20.98 24.49 -3.51 -14.3%4 4 Shenzhen 18.25 21.41 -3.16 -14.8%5 5 Busan 11.95 13.43 -1.48 -11.0%6 5 Los Angeles & Long Beach 11.82 14.34 -2.52 -17.6%6 8 Guangzhou 11.19 11.00 0.19 1.7%7 6 Dubai 11.12 11.83 -0.71 -6.0%8 7 Ningbo - Zhoushan 10.50 11.23 -0.73 -6.5%9 10 Qingdao 10.26 10.32 -0.06 -0.6%
10 9 Rotterdam 9.74 10.80 -1.06 -9.8%11 14 Tianjin 8.70 8.50 0.20 2.4%12 12 Kaohsiung 8.58 9.68 -1.10 -11.4%13 13 Antwerp 7.31 8.66 -1.35 -15.6%14 15 Port Klang 7.30 7.97 -0.67 -8.4%15 11 Hamburg 7.01 9.74 -2.73 -28.0%16 16 Los Angeles 6.75 7.85 -1.10 -14.0%17 18 Port Tanjung Pelepas 6.00 5.60 0.40 7.1%18 17 Long Beach 5.07 6.49 -1.42 -21.9%19 22 Xiamen 4.68 5.04 -0.36 -7.1%20 21 Laem Chabang 4.64 5.13 -0.49 -9.6%
Source: Liner Intelligence (www.ci-online.co.uk)
San Pedro Bay Long-Term Forecast
(Annual Total San Pedro Bay Container Handling Volumes)
Annual Growth Rate in Recovery Averages Around Five Percent
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
2025
2027
2029
2031
2033
2035
Mill
ion
TEU
s
Actual 2009 Forecast 2007 Forecast
POLA Top Trading Partners
(2009 All Cargo Value)
• China/HK - $102.3 billion (40% of US)
• Japan - $27 billion (29% of US)
• Taiwan - $9.3 billion (39% of US)
• S. Korea - $7.7 billion (19% of US)
• Thailand - $6.2 billion (43% of US)China/HK represents 52% of the total
Containerized Cargo Containerized Cargo
Los AngelesTop 5 Imports
2008
Los AngelesTop 5 Imports 2009
Furniture 556,426 Apparel/Footwear 447,168
Apparel/Footwear 516,546 Furniture 370,867
Auto Parts/Tires 297,684 Auto Parts/Tires 246,965
Electronics 291,202 Electronics 214,713Toys/Sporting Goods
259,371 Toys/Sporting Goods 205,422
TOTAL 1,921,229 TOTAL 1,485,135
Service Advantage• 24 weekly sailings to Asia• 100 intermodal trains a day serving
over 13 major markets in the U.S.• 8 container terminals with over 70
cranes on 1600 acres• Almost 18,000 longshore labor force
• 53’ of water
• 50 container ship berths
• 113 miles of rail track
• 43% of all U.S. containers arrive SP
Bay
Competitive Service Times
• 113 miles of rail on Port property
• More that 100 trains a day
• 4.7 million TEU in 2009 (SPBP)
• Alameda Corridor
• Near Dock/On-Dock Rail:• 1986 – SPRR/UPRR ICTF
• 1997 – Terminal Island Container Transfer facility and APL
• 1999 – West Basin Container Terminal
• 2002 – APM Terminals
• 2014 – new on-dock rail for TraPac
We have rail capacity!
14
Regional Rail Network
We have extensive rail network connecting us to
inland U.S.
LA
El Paso
Laredo
Dallas
HoustonNew Orleans
Memphis
St. Louis
Chicago
OmahaDenver
SLC
San Antonio
Atlanta
New York
KC
Port of L.A. Advantage
• Port capacity approx 11.2 million TEUs
• POLA adds “green” credentials to the
supply chain
• 660 million sq. ft. of warehousing and DC
facilities within 80 miles from the port
• Foreign Trade Zone Status
• Population of 19 million within a 2 hour truck trip from the Port
• A large business base of over 485,000 firms
• Concentration of manufacturing activity in Southern California with over 930,000 workers
Expanding for Trade1. TRAPAC : +60 acres, new wharf, on-
dock rail, approx 2015
2. Yang Ming: +30 acres, new wharf, TBD
3. China Shipping: +30 acres, new wharf, approx 2013
4. Evergreen: +55 acres, new wharf, TBD
5. YTI : updated wharves, TBD
6. APL : +40 acres, new wharf, approx 2014-2015
7. Plains All American : new wharf, storage area, approx 2013
8. ICTF modernization and new BNSF Rail yard : approx 2015 – 2016
9. Channel deepening to 53’
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Capacity (assuming 7000 TEU/acre*) :•Current - 11.2 million TEUs•Additional after above projects - 1.5 million TEUs•Total - 12.7 million TEUs
8
* Terminal Operators determine TEU per acre depending on operations
9
Page 18
Capital Improvement Plan
FY09/10 CIP Budget: Terminals/Commerce $133 M Transportation Projects 27 M Security 21 M Community 122 M Maritime Services 23 M
Total $326 M
FY 2010 – 2015 Forecast:
Fiscal Year Ending June 30
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TotalCIP Expenditures $ 326 $ 292 $ 253
$ 203
$ 129
$ 102
$ 1,311
• Waterfront Development
• Visitor serving
• Re-development plan
• Community involvement
Commercial / Retail
Our Challenge:Port Related Pollution
• Five-Year Action Plan• Joint Port Initiative• Pollution-Reduction
Targets:• Diesel Particulate Matter by 47%• Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) by 45%• Sulfur Oxides (Sox) by 52%
• $2+ billion program
Our Solution:The San Pedro Bay Clean
Air Action Plan
Clean Trucks Program
• $2 Billion Program• Reduction of 80% truck emissions• Replacing 16,800 trucks by 2012• Ban pre-1994 engine model year
trucks• $35/TEU fee truck replacement • July 2010: 93% truck visits with
compliant trucks• 8300 complaint trucks of which
6500 are model year 2007
Clean Truck Program
• Port invest $ 88 million to turn-over older trucks.• 8300 complaint trucks of which
6500 are model year 2007• Employee mandate enjoined• July 2010: 93% truck visits with
compliant trucks
• New trucks improve reliability and efficiency
• Improve image as a responsible corporate neighbor and citizen
Program Updates
• $3 billion infrastructure needed off-terminals
• Infrastructure cargo fee postponed until Jan 2012
• Port Check, no claiming of container when using compliant truck
• PierPass, Off-peak hours continue
Port of Los AngelesThe Right Place for
Business• 1600 acres of container terminal backland
• 53’ deep draft
• 50+ container berths with 71 gantry cranes capable of berthing 20 Post Panamax container vessels at one time
• Capacity for 11.2 million TEU (7,000 TEU/acre) Population of 19 million within a 2 hour truck trip from the Port
• A large business base (over 485,000 firms)
• Concentration of manufacturing activity in Southern California with over 930,000 workers
• ILWU: 10,130 permanent and casual labor in 2004 to 17,000 plus today at POLA/POLB (69% increase)
