25
THE MAKING OF AN AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE - THE ILLEGAL STATE DEFAMATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST PRINCE JUDGE MATTHEW The Untold Story Behind The Arbitration Court of International Justice, the First Licensed ‘People’s’ Court for the Enforcement of Human Rights Law by Michael Henry Dunn January 27, 2015 Is Enforcement Really Possible Against the Corrupt Plutocracy? The “Unused Back Door” of International Human Rights Law The Illegal and Unconstitutional Defamation Campaign Launched by a US Army Counter-intelligence Agent Against the ACIJ’s Principal Spokesman The Making of an “American Dissident Prince” - Genius-level Asperger’s Autistic, Veteran Federal Agent under Vladimir Putin, Archaeologist, International Judge – and Grand Master of the reborn Knights Templar Post-Snowden, post-Wiki-leaks, in an era when a former top US Intelligence advisor recommends the wholesale reversal of the secrecy paradigm in the name of “open-source” intelligence (giving up the trillion-dollar covert industry in favor of basing policy on what everyone can find and see) — in this bewildering time the “spinners” of the world are gradually waking up to the fact that the best spin is the transparent absence of heavy-handed spin (or even light-handed spin), in favor of the disorienting practice of open-hearted candor. Yet still one wants to tell one’s story — which will inevitably be a kind of “spin,” markedly different from the story being advanced by the opposition. However, in this time of deep cynicism toward both mainstream and “alternative” media, those in the freedom movement have learned to have their spin-detectors set to maximum. Those who have set the dial to “paralyzed nihilism” will, of course, find liars and pretenders everywhere, and true-hearted freedom workers nowhere. With that preamble done, I am here to tell you the open-heartedly candid story of the creation of The Arbitration Court of International Justice (ACIJ), and its supporting campaign, Justice4Humanity. Or, as Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid famously put it, “Who are those guys?” Justice4Humanity is an independent grass-roots coalition of human rights advocates supporting The Arbitration Court of International Justice (ACIJ), to institute meaningful enforcement of international human rights law.

American Dissident Prince Judge Matthew

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Report on Prince Judge Matthew as an American political dissident, by the independent grass-roots non-profit civil rights activism group "Justice 4 Humanity", exposing the illegal state-sponsored false defamation campaign persecuting Matthew as a dissident, and proving all defamation criminally false. Report in connection with his role as an independent judiciary Spokesman for Judges of the Arbitration Court of International Justice (ACIJ)

Citation preview

THE MAKING OF AN AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE -THE ILLEGAL STATE DEFAMATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST

PRINCE JUDGE MATTHEW

The Untold Story Behind The Arbitration Court of International Justice,the First Licensed ‘People’s’ Court for the Enforcement of Human Rights Law

by Michael Henry DunnJanuary 27, 2015

Is Enforcement Really Possible Against the Corrupt Plutocracy? The “Unused Back Door” of International Human Rights Law The Illegal and Unconstitutional Defamation Campaign Launched by a US Army

Counter-intelligence Agent Against the ACIJ’s Principal Spokesman The Making of an “American Dissident Prince” - Genius-level Asperger’s

Autistic, Veteran Federal Agent under Vladimir Putin, Archaeologist,International Judge – and Grand Master of the reborn Knights Templar

Post-Snowden, post-Wiki-leaks, in an era when a former top US Intelligence advisor recommends the wholesalereversal of the secrecy paradigm in the name of “open-source” intelligence (giving up the trillion-dollar covertindustry in favor of basing policy on what everyone can find and see) — in this bewildering time the “spinners”of the world are gradually waking up to the fact that the best spin is the transparent absence of heavy-handedspin (or even light-handed spin), in favor of the disorienting practice of open-hearted candor.

Yet still one wants to tell one’s story — which will inevitably be a kind of “spin,” markedly different from thestory being advanced by the opposition. However, in this time of deep cynicism toward both mainstream and“alternative” media, those in the freedom movement have learned to have their spin-detectors set to maximum.Those who have set the dial to “paralyzed nihilism” will, of course, find liars and pretenders everywhere, andtrue-hearted freedom workers nowhere.

With that preamble done, I am here to tell you the open-heartedly candid story of the creation of TheArbitration Court of International Justice (ACIJ), and its supporting campaign, Justice4Humanity.

Or, as Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid famously put it, “Who are those guys?”

Justice4Humanity is an independent grass-roots coalition of human rights advocates supporting The ArbitrationCourt of International Justice (ACIJ), to institute meaningful enforcement of international human rights law.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 2

Recognizing the Facts through the Fog

The core of the story is simple: Certain individuals (fortuitously placed and trained to do something about it)saw that massive human suffering and ever-increasing trampling of essential human rights are largely due tosystematic violation of international human rights law by what may loosely be termed “corrupt oligarchic and/orplutocratic forces.” They saw that these forces work their will through governments, covert operations, privategroups, and financial institutions; that they manipulate public opinion through illegal propaganda via mediaconglomerates owned by these same forces — all in the service of an agenda which is blatantly self-serving andhostile to the welfare and freedom of humanity. The plutocratic creation and control of the central bankingsystem are clearly the key to their power — requiring a virtual financial revolution to defeat the implementationof their agenda.

And these individuals recognized that existing international courts were inherently limited (to some extent, bydesign), and had proven themselves entirely unequal to the task of effectively protecting humanity from thesesystemic violations.

Some of the codified international laws which go unenforced include the following:

(An excerpt of chapter titles from The Judge’s Manual for Enforcement of Human Rights Enforcement, copyrightIgnita Veritas University, 2015, all international rights reserved)

Illegal Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction

False Arrest and Prolonged Detention as Persecution

Unlawful Travel Restrictions for Persecution

Torture – Any and all forms which violate human dignity

Unlawful Interference or Restriction of Communication

Banking Violations: Unlawful Blocking of Use of Private Funds

Violation of Equal Protection of Law by Selective Enforcement

Propaganda Violations as Covert Operations

Propaganda for False Justification of State Aggression

Propaganda for Destabilization and Covert Warfare

Illegal Violation of Nation-State Sovereignty

Subversive Destabilization and Covert Warfare

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 3

Genocide by Implementation of Systemic Policies

A quick scan of these violations will bring dozens of instances to mind for well-informed persons whichexemplify how the corrupt plutocracy runs rough-shod over human rights as a daily business of maintainingcontrol.

Knowing the inescapable truth that only an alliance of nations under the rule of law based on shared humanvalues could possibly accomplish the enormous task of reversing this bleak downward slide, the men andwomen of Justice4Humanity set about to see what they could contribute to such a movement, knowing thatmany thousands of others shared the same realizations, and were also struggling for a viable solution.

The Unused Back Door of International Human Rights Law

To begin with, the creation of an international court of justice possessing effective jurisdiction has hitherto onlybeen accomplished by lengthy negotiations between nations — indeed by a process that was “inter-national.”In this case, a major new legal institution was created by a handful of committed human rights advocates,international judges, and lawyers — with the significant factor that the institution derives its legitimacy fromdecades of existing agreements between nations, relying on provisions of international law that had simplynever before been utilized.

(And since the question on nearly every reader’s mind will be regarding the enforceability of such a court, let usdispense with that upfront at this link.)

The authority and the jurisdiction are therefore “statutory” — triggered by fulfillment of existing internationalstatutes, binding on all U.N. member nations. The law is clear. The licenses are real. The standards of dueprocess required are in place. This part of the story is straightforward.

The human story behind the creation of the court, however, is more complex. Anthropologist Margaret Meadfamously advised us to “never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world;indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." This is certainlytrue of the ACIJ.

Personalities and would-be saviorshave been paraded, celebrated,debunked and vilified, leaving thepeople emotionally exhausted andhopeless. Caution is well-advised.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 4

Reality Check – Why Should We Trust These Guys?

While it’s true that the Law is not about personalities, and that the ACIJ is designed to be a permanentinstitution of social justice for the people, the documented reality is that infiltration, disinformation, and“controlled opposition” are common tools by which meaningful change has long been blocked. Personalitiesand would-be saviors have been paraded, celebrated, debunked and vilified, leaving the people emotionally

exhausted and hopeless. Caution is well-advised.

Some who once had hope may now suffer from semi-permanent jaded cynicism. This project is not addressedto them. To those who believe that justice is possible, that human freedom is possible, and who are willing toaccept responsibility to take action (rather than waiting around for the Big Rescue and the Magic CurrencyReset) I will simply offer suggestions about how to tell the disinformation agents and agitators from genuine andeffective human rights advocates:

If they are promising an overnight transformation by means of Secret Good Guys doing all the work forus, releasing heretofore Hidden Trillions for mass distribution — this is not real.

If they are focusing primarily on “fear mongering” – trumpeting the heinous crimes and all-powerfultentacles of the Bad Guys without offering practical, real-world solutions — this is not helpful.

If they trigger friction and hostility among freedom-movement figures, and engage in mud-slinging andcharacter assassination — this is a serious warning sign.

If they suggest violent tactics or strategy (except for justifiable self-defense) — expose and denounce it.

If they denounce religion as merely a “system of control,” beware — genuine spirituality and interfaithharmony are our greatest assets in achieving freedom.

If they consistently offer supposed “inside information” which only paints a picture of a worldcompletely controlled by the “all-powerful ultra-elite” in which we are all helpless slaves or puppets —ignore them. Seize and use the freedom you have, and it will expand.

You are reading an article which was created by an alliance of genuine human rights advocates working in the

Middle East, California, the UK, India, and the US East Coast. Justice4Humanity is made up of passionatelycommitted volunteers who believe the human family’s best hope for peace and freedom is for a global allianceto peacefully enforce international human rights law.

Impunity must end. If impunity ends, many grievous violations will be greatly lessened. Suffering will be greatlylessened. Freedom will be enhanced. Hidden systems of oppression will be disabled. It will not be easy and itwill not happen overnight. But we believe it is the only way.

Right. Sounds good. And again, “who are those guys?”

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 5

I’ll tell you in a moment. First, one more important caveat:

Ahem, Ahem, Ad Hominem

Courts of law are not about personalities. Internationalinstitutions designed to last centuries and anchored inbinding agreements between nearly all the sovereignnations of the world do not rise or fall based on thevirtues or flaws of the comparative handful of men andwomen who labored to bring them about.

Or, as the humble founders of the Twelve StepRecovery movement put it, “principles beforepersonalities.”

The first point of attack for opponents who wish to distract people from the principles which threaten theirwrongdoing is to search out and expose the personal flaws, scandals, or even the mildly unsavory details fromthe earlier years of the messengers or advocates of those threatening principles. They then proceed to paradethese supposedly fatal flaws in sensational fashion, as demonstrated by the now well-known and blatant use oftabloid press by the Rupert Murdoch media conglomerate to selectively punish politicians who dared to opposeits power. This is known as the “logical fallacy” of ad hominem rebuttal — an attack on the person rather thanon the principles in question.

If no such flaws or scandals can be found, they can be (and frequently are) cunningly created, as we shall see. Itis documented that US and UK counter-intelligence forces devote considerable resources to the defamation andcareer destruction of political dissidents. The only reasonable option under such circumstances is topreemptively expose the exposers, and tell the unvarnished truth (as Lincoln didn’t actually say),“warts and all.”

Thus, the best offense being a total absence of defense (in the new transparent paradigm), I will now proceed toexpose and share the virtues, flaws and supposed scandals of the key movers behind the campaign for theindependent ACIJ — but only in the course of telling the essential story with no distracting tangents.

Daring to Name It — A Prominent US Intelligence Expert Expects “Revolution”

In the late summer of 2013, in the course of free-lance journalistic work, I began a series of Skype conversationswith an American-born international judge who was working in Egypt. Our conversations focused on theinadequacy of the current international justice system to uphold human rights and national sovereignty.

If no such flaws or scandals can be found,they can be (and frequently are) cunninglycreated…The only reasonable option undersuch circumstances is to preemptively exposethe exposers, and tell the unvarnished truth(as Lincoln didn’t actually say), “warts andall.”

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 6

Credible evidence exists to convince many intelligent observers that a behind the scenes war has been raging inrecent years between what is generally termed “the Cabal” and an alliance of benevolent forces in the militaryand intelligence communities of various nations which had recognized the corrupt nature and appalling agendaof the plutocratic elite. An end-game appears to be underway, in which the stakes are enormous. Exposure ofthe actual history and nature of the Cabal would mean (in the best case scenario) disgrace, poverty, and prisonfor some of the world’s most eminent families. Their best option to prevent such defeat remains the one theyhave resorted to for centuries: create chaos and upheaval, and then impose an ever more restrictive “order” onthe chaos they themselves had triggered.

At this writing, the danger of worldwide global financial collapse is being trumpeted even by corrupt mainstreammedia. The only questions remaining would seem to hinge on timing and control: when does it happen? Andwho controls the end-game and reset? Does the Cabal emerge triumphant, having imposed draconian control inthe wake of global financial chaos? Or will the Alliance acquire the strength to step in at a key moment,asserting the essential human values of cooperation and the rule of law to give mankind a fresh start?

Meanwhile, the aforementioned former US Intelligence Advisor, Robert Steele, has recently observed thatclassic conditions which are precursors to revolution are now present in the United States and Britain. But whatkind of revolution might unfold? If revolution and financial collapse are in fact imminent, will the human familyunify in cooperation under international law, or descend into chaos and war?

Even mainstream media outlets such as The Huffington Post are now daring to articulate the need for a peaceful

revolution, as when prominent spiritual leader and best-selling author Marianne Williamson wrote in an op-edin December of 2014:

“Our democracy is dying…It's time to say it: we need a peaceful revolution in America. In the words of PresidentJohn F. Kennedy, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable." TheAmerican people have simply got to stand up now…”

It has become apparent that only a global alliance operating under international law with the broad consent ofthe world community can ultimately bring to justice the corrupt plutocratic faction which has come to dominateand control the nominally democratic governments of NATO (and their formidable military forces) to furthertheir agenda.

So long as these corrupt factions retain control via the fiat currency system in the network of central banks, solong as they manipulate a façade of democracy to use the NATO military forces to violate national sovereignty —so long, in other words, as they enjoy impunity from their massive violations of international law — so long willthe implementation of their agenda of greed and oppression gain momentum.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 7

Restoring Human Rights and the Rule of Law

But what international court can possibly take on these forces? What venue can be trusted? And even if lawfuljudgments against human rights violators are made, on what basis can enforcement take place? The use ofmilitary might to further the goals of the moneyed elite is among the oldest and bloodiest tragedies known tomankind. The banking families who control the G7 are hardly likely to surrender meekly and peacefully.

What court of law can possibly hope to impact the hard geopolitical realities? I refer you again to the words ofMargaret Mead regarding the history of small groups of thoughtful committed citizens who changed the world.This is the story of one such group.

Enter Prince Judge Matthew of Thebes

You may look him up under thatname on LinkedIn, where his profileis very detailed as toaccomplishments, but limited (as istypical for the professional usage ofLinkedIn) as to personalinformation. Given his fifteen yearsof service to the Russian Federationas a veteran national securitylawyer, his careful online profilewhich respects the confidentialityof others is understandable —federal law enforcement agents arenot in the habit of broadcastingtheir personal information all overthe internet.

But now we are sharing the story of how the first legitimate international court of human rights “for the people”came into being. And since the alliance of human rights advocates who have collaborated to found the ACIJhave asked Prince Matthew to be a spokesman for the Court, he has consented to a greater level oftransparency in this article.

(Note: Prince Judge Matthew is not an adjudicating judge of the ACIJ Court itself, but is an independent judgeaccredited for other governmental and international Courts. As a temporary part-time volunteer supportingACIJ, he has agreed to be an external spokesman.)

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 8

Prince, Archaeologist, Judge, Veteran Federal Agent, Genius-level High-FunctioningAutistic, and Grand Master of the Knights Templar

Let’s begin with the title. The status of “Prince” is legitimately used by recognized descendants of royal houses(both ruling and deposed), and by those who have been ennobled by the fons honorum (literally, “source ofhonor”) powers traditionally vested in recognized kings under customary international law. Prince Matthew’sstatus was earned for merit, officially bestowed by fons honorum of HRH King David of Mann, of theIndependent Kingdom of Mann (a non-ruling royal house legalized and recognized by Queen Elizabeth II), thedirect descendant of the original founder and first Royal Patron of the 12th century Knights Templar (as provenby official genealogy records of the Anglican Church). This was granted in 2013, as a necessary part of installingMatthew as the Grand Master of the direct continuation of the original Templar Order, because such Orderstraditionally have a “Prince Grand Master” (e.g., the Sovereign Military Order of Malta).

The remarkable story of the restoration of the Sovereign Magistral Order of the Temple of Solomon (as it isproperly called) is a tale unto itself, which is given in detail on the Order’s Web Page "Restoration" . (As of 2015,the Templar Order signed a treaty of full independence with the Kingdom of Mann, so it is not dependent on norinfluenced by any other sovereign entity.)

As to the designation ‘of Thebes’ which follows his name, this correctly follows chivalric rules of nobility titles, bywhich the person must have established a knightly commandery or monastery in the place for which they holdthe designation. Prince Matthew founded a Templar Commandery in Luxor, which is ancient Thebes, where heregularly pursues archaeology, restoring the full authentic heritage of the Templar Order. I would later learnthat the modern Templar Order encourages a revival of the ancient concept of nobility as being a responsibilityof greater service to humanity rather than a badge of bloodline superiority. A Templar nobility title turns out tobe recognition of service and a call to greater service, all based on egalitarian meritocracy.

NOTE: Those who have read recent historically inaccurate accounts which misidentify the Templars as “anearlier version of the Cabal” may wish to know that the historical record demonstrates that the infamous 1307persecution of the Templars was ordered by King Phillip IV of France, a brutal tyrant whom historians identify asthe founder of the modern centralized authoritarian state. Then as now, the Templars were Human Rightschampions —they were instrumental in the creation of the Magna Carta (the first civil rights and foundation ofindividual freedom in the West) — and were inter-faith mystics who shared sacred knowledge with theirMuslim enemies.

The reality is that the ideals of Chivalry have been making a quiet comeback for the last thirty years (thank you,George Lucas, for the Jedi Knights). Service to humanity, reverence for women, communion with the DivineSource, willingness to defend the oppressed and combat evil, a commitment to a disciplined moral life — theseare the ideals of the thousands of “knights and dames” in genuine chivalric movements worldwide.

The ACIJ is not a Templar project. But there are Templar knights and dames who have chosen Human Rights astheir mission and are supporting this effort.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 9

Judge whether they are for real by the unequivocally humanitarian tangible work which they contribute. “Bytheir fruits ye shall know them.”

When I was introduced to Prince Matthew in Indonesia in the spring of 2013, he had volunteered legal expertiseto a human rights group there out of a desire to further the anti-globalist, pro-national sovereignty cause. Ilearned that Matthew was an international judge who had worked with the ‘old-school’ mentors of PresidentVladimir Putin, and assisted the Russian Presidential Administration in cleaning up the Russian mafia in the yearsfollowing the resignation of Boris Yeltsin.

My contact then mentioned in passing, “Oh yeah, he’s also the Grand Master of the Knights Templar.”

I did not follow up that intriguing item for many months. In the course of my research, I had heard rumors thatsome lineal remnant of the Templars had survived and was active in the alliance against the Western bankingelite. I had learned to disregard rumors. We needed expert help on international law.

This led to several lengthy Skype conversations between me and Prince Matthew, exploring these issues. Wequickly discovered a remarkable affinity on multiple fronts, from the political to the esoteric, and becamecollaborators in several projects. We decided to do an article on the viability of a new kind of internationalhuman rights court, exposing the flaws of the current global courts, and proposing an alternative.

Yes, reader, the candor thing again — he is now a close friend. I have collaborated with Prince Matthew sincethen on multiple projects related to human rights advocacy and interfaith harmony.

Over the course of many months, the following facts emerged about this remarkable man:

A lifelong Egyptology hobbyist, he eventually completed a doctorate in archaeology, among othergraduate degrees

He was a Druid High Priest in New England at age twenty-three. He worked his way through college byplaying piano and guitar (his own compositions) at restaurants and cocktail bars and doing psychicreadings at New Age bookstores.

He lives on the edge of the Sahara Desert with his beloved Great Dane, “Raissa” (Arabic for ‘LadyPresident’), and enjoys a close relationship with the Village Elders of the ancient culture of the region.

His brain functions at an abnormally high, super-computer level, due in part to his extraordinarily high-functioning Asperger’s autism.

He is able to process information and generate doctoral-level historical research and legal documents atphenomenal speed in uninterrupted work sessions which often go as long as 24 to 36 hours.

He exhibits classic symptoms of Asperger’s autism noted by medical specialists, in which he tends to becompulsively obsessed with facts (i.e. encyclopedic data), virtually “missing the part of the brain” whichcan invent non-factual falsehoods.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 10

He is an accredited international judge licensed by a ministry of justice and a bar association ofinternational judges.

His primary function representing sovereign countries was to assist as a Special Envoy in their efforts toimprove relations with the United States.

He endures an extremely high level of nearly constant pain resulting from multiple factors, includingnerve pain from the symptoms of Autism; post-traumatic stress disorder from his years in nationalsecurity; and the after-effects of a nearly fatal motorcycle crash at 140 km/hr (on a governmentassignment)

Although his motorcycle crash fractured multiple bones and required a year and a half of excruciatingphysical therapy, he worked on a notebook computer from a hospital bed with only one working arm,and surprised doctors by willing himself out of a wheelchair to walking in a record 3 months.

Since he now walks with a cane, his fellow Templar Knights tend to call him “Sir Limps-a-lot”

He witnessed both of Egypt’s recent revolutions first-hand as they unfolded.

He is at once a man of deep faith and a formidable intellectual.

As an American political dissident, he has been the focus of a well-orchestrated smear campaign byelements of the US intelligence community.

It is this last fact which, in part, prompts this article. Prince Matthew would really much rather remain behindthe scenes, and let the institution he helped to bring into being represent itself by its own authority and impact.A man does not generally choose to live alone on the edge of the desert engaged in high-level research out of adesire to be a famous freedom-fighter (nor do veteran federal agents usually splash their personal histories allover Facebook).

And while his high-functioning Asperger’s autism is virtually undetectable in ordinary conversation (as he enjoysa high degree of normal “affect,” with a razor wit and a gleeful laugh), he has warned this writer not to expectfinesse in people skills from him, much less an ability to “schmooze” in society. “On one level, Michael, I’m justa Rainman who’s learned to put on a show…”

This is a very private man.

By sheer force of will, he has overcome extraordinary challenges to carve out a unique niche, freely contributingaccomplishments which would proudly fill out the resumes of a dozen lesser men. As a Templar Knight he hasdone this quietly, in keeping with the Order’s ancient motto, Non nobis, Domine, sed Nomine tuo da gloriam (notunto us, O Lord, but to Thy Name be the glory).

But because searchable traces remain on the internet of the documented criminal defamation efforts led by aUS Army counter-intelligence officer, we must set the record straight, so that those who have cause to fear the

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 11

impact of an effective international court of human rights will not be able use the deception of ad hominemattack, which is the last refuge of the morally corrupt and intellectually destitute.

When it comes to systematic violation of human rights, Prince Judge Matthew of Thebes can speak frompersonal experience.

From New York to Moscow to Thebes: the Making of a Dissident American Prince

My relationship to Matthew began with him being in the position of a mentor. My job was to absorb and distillthe information he shared, and produce useful, anti-globalist articles on human rights law to be disseminated onthe web. I would learn his life story only gradually. One feature of autistic brain-function is the ability to follow alogical thread down an endless trail of consequences and potentialities with an exhaustive focus which leavesordinary brains in the dust. While this can result in a dizzying amount of information being imparted in a singleconversation, it seldom leaves room for ordinary small talk or personal tangents. Perceiving his preference forprivacy, I learned to keep to the subject at hand.

As an inveterate storyteller and tangent-enthusiast, this was a hardship to which I had to become accustomed.Rather like Dr. Watson in his early months of acquaintance with Sherlock Holmes, I had to pick up Matthew’shistory largely by inference and analysis.

Tidbits leaked out over the months. He had been fascinated with ancient Egypt from the age of eight. Hedeveloped an early interest in Wicca which led to his involvement with a community of covens in upstate NewYork in his early twenties, where he achieved the status of high priest, learning “angelic languages” andpracticing traditional spirituality (he recently shared that it was Wicca which led eventually to his passion forCatholic Christianity). His highly developed extra-sensory abilities led to making extra income as a psychic atNew York and Pennsylvania area New Age bookstores.

Autistics can be extraordinarily sensitive to their environments, as their ability to process information is so acutethat painful overload is a constant risk. Matthew found in his early twenties that he was painfully “allergic” on apsychic level to American urban culture. Seeking his Russian family roots (multiple lines of anti-Bolshevik TsaristCossacks), he established himself in Moscow shortly before the end of the regime of Boris Yeltsin — a time ofcorruption and chaos in which organized crime was ruining the country.

His Russian was never great. He speaks Russian, so he tells me, with an absolutely horrible American accent.But it is at least intelligible to Russians, with a specialized technical vocabulary. And it provided, at one point inhis career, a perfect cover for his law-enforcement work.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 12

I will jump forward here: after he trained withthe Federal Security Service (“FSB”) and wasworking as an undercover agent during VladimirPutin’s crackdown on the Russian mafia, hisbarely passable American-accented Russianallowed him to blunder into mafia-owned barsin the persona of a stupid American tourist. His“handler” — the veteran agent whoaccompanied him — played the role of anexasperated taxi-driver who was keeping himcompany. Together they would case the joint,noting who was there and who was meeting

whom, while Matthew distracted the crowd by taking over the piano when the Mafioso pianist took a break.

On one such occasion, he took the mafiaso pianist’s favorite tune — the theme from The Godfather (of course)— and improvised dazzling New Age-style variations on it. Seeing the crowd’s enthusiasm, the house playergrew jealous (with his boss angrily demanding that he show up the Americanski — or else!), and a battle ofdueling Godfathers went back and forth for an hour….while useful intelligence was quietly being gathered.

But the bulk of his work was as a Special Envoy, serving the effort to improve Russian-American relations. Thiswork was not secret. He openly wore an FSB officer’s uniform to a meeting with US Embassy officials inMoscow, while presenting his report for Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on behalf of Russian agencies,just to make sure that the US State Department understood that he was an American citizen who had chosen toopenly and lawfully represent the Russian Federation.

This does not serve to endear one to American counter-intelligence forces — especially those factions which arecontrolled by the corrupt financial elite.

The Court, the Research, the License, the Mission

My first collaboration with Prince Matthew produced an article on the shortcomings of existing internationalcourts and the need for a licensed court to which ordinary people could go for justice when their rights wereviolated by governments, corporations, or “private groups.” As I was gradually taken into his confidence, Ilearned that such a court was not merely hypothetical: the legal infrastructure was already being put in place —and an academic institution had been founded: Ignita Veritas University or IVU), with full licensing, to host theemerging International Law Centre in which The Arbitration Court of International Justice (ACIJ) would behoused. A team of international judges and attorneys at a prominent law center in Egypt had presented theresearch on which the Centre would be based, and obtained licenses from various government agencies tolegally perform the functions listed below (an excerpt from the university’s website):

He openly wore an FSB’s officer’s uniform toa meeting with US Embassy officials inMoscow, while presenting his report forSecretary of State Madeline Albright onbehalf of Russian agencies, just to make surethat the US State Department understoodthat he was an American citizen who hadchosen to openly and lawfully represent theRussian Federation.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 13

IVU is internationally licensed and accredited by the Ministry of Education as a university educationalinstitution, with lawful authority to grant a full range of academic degrees. It maintains advancedacademic and scholarly research programs in international law, relevant specialties of ancient andmedieval history as related to geopolitics, and other areas of importance to the stability of civilizations.

IVU is also internationally licensed by a Ministry of Education and Ministry of Scientific Research as aneducational accrediting agency, with lawful authority to accredit other universities and their academicprograms, including the management of transfer credits between institutions.

IVU is internationally licensed as a law centre, authorized to provide expert legal consultation andstrategic or transactional legal work for private, governmental or intergovernmental organizations.Combining its law centre and university aspects in the context of international law, it also functions as ageopolitical research institute. As a United Nations NGO institution, it is authorized to assign delegatesto contribute to UN events and to provide advisors and technical experts to assist UN projects, allowingthe university to effectively contribute to applied geopolitics.

Under its licensed authority from the Ministry of Justice and also statutory authority of international law,IVU serves as the host NGO institution for the autonomous Arbitration Court of International Justice(ACIJ), a UN-level Court of Law with full judiciary authority. The international licenses of the host NGOempower the ACIJ Court to serve as an independent judiciary body for binding commercial arbitration,and also as a non-governmental Court of Justice for the adjudication and enforcement of internationallaw.

It gradually dawned on me that this could actually happen. The need for such a Court is dire. The timing of itsemergence seemed to be highly fortuitous. The statutory authority appeared capable of surviving the inevitablechallenges, scorn, and likely attack of corrupt plutocratic elements.

Clearly, we would need to begin familiarizing the public with the potential of the ACIJ, since funding would notcome from governments (as with the existing treaty-based courts), but must come from the people themselves,with the aim of establishing a permanent endowment.

Getting the Word Out — the Founding of The Alliance Journal

For this purpose, The Alliance Journal was founded as a scholarly academic journal, folded into the IVU, to servethe needs of the anti-globalist, pro-national sovereignty cause:

The Alliance Journal celebrates the existence and continued development of a meaningful and functionalalliance of intellectuals, academics, independent journalists and researchers who define themselves as Anti-Agenda and Anti-Globalist, who thereby support the network of allies of the NAM-BRICS Alliance in defense ofhuman rights and individual freedoms.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 14

The Court would need experienced international judges. A relationship was established with a bar association ofinternational judges, based in the prestigious Ain Shams University in Cairo, giving the ACIJ access to more than12,000 judges in Europe and the Middle East. Alliances with sympathetic barristers in the UK also came intobeing over the many months during which the groundwork for the court was accomplished.

The Magnitude of the Task – and the Need for Careful Strategy

Two crucial elements remained to be decided: funding and strategy.

Those of us working to help launch the first licensed “People’s” International Court of Human Rights did not (anddo not) kid ourselves about the magnitude of the task — nor of the formidable vastness and corruption of theforces arrayed against it. Two courses of action presented themselves:

a) A “go slow” approach could be pursued, in which the court would quietly build up a record of enforcement,processing low-profile cases as plaintiffs came forward, utilizing existing fast-track enforcement mechanismsunder existing international law to attach assets or seize bank accounts to enforce monetary awards ofdamages, looking to eventually win public recognition and support in careful, gradual steps, or

b) A full-press public campaign for recognition of the Court’s legitimacy and potential global impact could bemounted, aiming to create a broad popular movement which might swiftly bring the Court the funding andsupport required to quickly move into large-scale processing of human rights cases.

The decision was made to pursue the latter course, as it became clear that in the absence of funding andsupport, the Court’s momentum would slow to a crawl. As the global crisis deepened over the months, we werealso aware that the behind-the-scenes war was entering a crucial and possibly decisive phase in which the needfor a non-tainted, legitimate court of human rights would be acute.

The Campaign, the Launch – and Refuting the Defamation

Preparing to launch the campaign, the ACIJ was strengthened by the creation of Justice4Humanity, a US-basedteam of talented social media consultants who would design the campaign and advise on strategy. Immediatelythe question arose — what are the weak points? Where might the ACIJ be vulnerable to the inevitable adhominem attacks which would ensue once the campaign began in earnest? How could the campaign pre-emptively assert the truth in the face of anticipated false defamation?

Prince Judge Matthew had let me know early in our acquaintance that he had been targeted for defamation byUS counter-intelligence forces and that he had taken vigorous action to defend himself. In the course of hisservice to the Knights Templar Order, he consistently shared with new associates the fact that he had been so

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 15

targeted, so that they might come to him to establish the truth behind any lingering online traces of thedefamation campaign.

A decision was made to vigorously expose this illegal defamation upfront at the launch of the Justice4Humanitycampaign, and to present the truth of Prince Matthew’s life and work.

This centralized and illegal defamation campaign was spearheaded by a supposedly “former” US Army Counter-Intelligence officer who had been transferred to the US Department of Commerce (DOC). Six FBI criminalcomplaints were filed by Prince Matthew, including 3 FBI complaints directly against the DOC. These caused 2major federal investigations, by the Office of Inspector General in Washington DC, and a “national security”investigation by the US State Department. The legal departments of 8 major corporate Internet providers agreedwith the evidence of criminality, shutting down all accounts and banning all users of the defamation group.

As a result of the criminal complaints, the ring-leader of the racketeering group was transferred from DOC toUSAID, suspended for 10 months, then expelled, barred from government work in Washington DC or New York,given a severe demotion to a sub-department of the Highway Administration in his small home town, andeventually pushed out of government service permanently.

The Documented History of Illegal Defamation Directedat Political Dissidents by US Government Agencies

The following academic proof of illegal defamation against political dissidents (meaning anyone at all whodisagrees with the Western governments) comes from an early draft of the much anticipated Judge’s Manual forEnforcement of Human Rights, being developed by Prince Judge Matthew as a university textbook:

“The reality that the US government does in fact persecute political dissidents, specifically by discrediting andlegal harassment, is proven by evidence of the FBI “CoIntelPro” (counter-intelligence program) [1] whichcontinues as an unofficial program [2] of routine methods [3] which were proven by a US Federal Court to beongoing [4]. The primary method is “legal harassment” with false testimony and fabrications for abuse ofprocess leading to false defamation [5], to discredit any person who does not agree with current US geopoliticalpolicies.

The American illegal program or methods are directly mirrored in the United Kingdom “CONTEST” program,revealing the connection to military intelligence. The UK program targets any political dissent with “grievances”about government violations of civil rights or human rights [6], often driven by “Defense Advisory Notices” fromthe military [7], resulting in secret “Control Orders” to “prevent, restrict or disrupt” the lawful activities ofdissidents [8], often through legal harassment and false defamation.

The European Commission Directorate General for Justice Freedom and Security proved that the CONTESTprogram was uniformly implemented throughout the NATO alliances [9]. The UN Human Rights Council

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 16

condemned those proven methods as illegal political persecution of any person who “powerful entities do notlike or agree with” [10].”

The Targeting of Prince Judge Matthew for Illegal Defamationby the US Government

As an American-born, highly-qualified international lawyer who had chosen to openly and legally work with theRussian government in anti-Agenda, anti-Globalist projects, Matthew was clearly a prime target for such illegalpersecution.

The primary ring-leader of the racketeering group from the US Department of Commerce against whomMatthew’s complaints were filed, eventually admitted to four years of active service in the US Army “Office ofthe Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence”, specializing in “Counter Intelligence” and other “intelligenceoperations” as an “Intelligence Officer”. This was combined with 13 years of computer experience with“systems for IT news distribution” (closely related to “information warfare” capabilities, especially Internetpublication of state-sponsored disinformation campaigns such as false defamation against political dissidents).

The flagship inflammatory accusation in the aggressive campaign of unlawful false defamation by the USDepartment of Commerce was the claim that Judge Matthew was “disbarred”, and supposedly “admitted” towrongdoing. As with all the other fabricated defamation, this claim has been proven to be false. Indeed, the factthat he is now a registered accredited international judge proves that he was vetted by a full panel of accreditedjudges (representative of the international judiciary profession), and in fact holds the full credibility, authorityand weight of the Rule of Law itself in his hands.

(In the Appendix attached to the conclusion of this article, detailed evidence is provided of Prince Matthew’ssuccessful effort to defend himself against the politically-motivated illegal defamation campaign leveled at him.)

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 17

Conclusion — The Need for the ACIJ is Dire

Ironically, this proven campaign of illegal defamation by US Government agencies against a prominent Anti-Agenda, Anti-Globalist international judge provides a powerful example of the need to support the ACIJ as aviable, legitimate Court to which individuals may appeal to enforce international human rights law against thecorrupt oligarchic factors which trample on the law as a daily method of doing business.

Only an international court with statutory authority, funded by non-governmental public support, upholding thehighest standards of due process and with robust and energetic enforcement mechanisms in place, can reversethis deadly trend.

Given that Prince Matthew and myself (in my capacity as Senior Editor of The Alliance Journal and a member ofJustice4Humanity) have been asked by our team of human rights advocates to serve as spokespersons for theACIJ, we know that we will be targets, and we are both willing to endure the scrutiny and inevitable attacks thatcome with the territory of mounting a serious challenge to the corrupt financial elite. It should be carefullynoted that we will be energetically assertive in invoking the Rule of Law against any illegal, unconstitutional falsedefamation attacks such as were leveled at Prince Matthew.

Influential allies are coming forward. Extensive networks of support are being activated. Major developmentsare forthcoming shortly. This institution is for real, and will be a permanent institution of real social justice, withglobal jurisdiction, and vigorous enforceability.

We therefore invite those who recognize the crisis to explore cooperation with the ACIJ and Justice4Humanity atthe earliest opportunity.

Michael Henry Dunn

Senior Editor, The Alliance Journal

--------------------------------------------------------------------

CITATIONS TO SOURCE REFERENCES: List After Appendix (Below)

APPENDIX:

THE DEFAMATION CAMPAIGN AGAINST PRINCE JUDGE MATTHEW

(A law firm certified package of the relevant documentary evidence will soonbe available upon request):

The following verified facts about the state-sponsored campaign of illegal defamation againstPrince Matthew are adapted from a certified Barristers Opinion from a licensed UN NGO

international law center:

In December 2007, an international law firm for which Matthew was a figurehead “President”,was targeted by a low-level “Business Development Specialist” (here called “Ringleader”), in theUS Department of Commerce (DOC) Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) in NewYork. Using as an excuse two “potential clients” (who never actually hired the law firm) referredby DOC, in retaliation for the law firm refusing to accept the clients (both rejected for fraud),DOC engaged in aggressive and persistent criminal extortion and racketeering, making illegaldemands enforced by a relentless campaign of governmental pressure and threats, especially byfalse defamation, aggravated by victim and witness intimidation – all federal crimes.

This organized criminal activity from DOC was conducted under false color of official authority,with Ringleader illegally claiming to be a “federal agent”, despite the fact that DOC is merely anadministrative agency with no law enforcement authorities. The attacks consisted of continuallyinventing knowingly false and inflammatory accusations, intended solely for the purpose ofsabotage. Despite the fact that the law firm had 40 executives and 6 offices in 5 countries, allaccusations and defamation were personally directed at Matthew as its figurehead “President”.

In January 2008, within only two weeks after threats of sabotage by DOC, the website anddatabase servers of the law firm were shut down, blocking all access to client files. This causedinterruption of work for all clients, creating discontent among clients of the firm.

On 12 January 2008, Matthew filed an FBI criminal complaint with the Internet Crime ComplaintCenter (“IC3”) division, which resulted in local police causing the servers to be restored inFlorida, and yielded evidence indicating the servers were shut down “at the request of agovernment agency” such as DOC abusing its authority. Evidence in the case file proves that anonline defamation campaign by Ringleader under DOC in 2009 admitted possession of a 2007internal document which could only have been stolen from those private servers during thatevent.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 19

On 12 March 2008, Matthew filed a 1st FBI criminal complaint against DOC, with full evidence ofall violations. This FBI complaint was joined by two victim-witnesses who signed affidavits, bothbrokers targeted by DOC extortion and defamation merely for referring clients to the law firm.

On 03 December 2008, Matthew filed a 2nd FBI criminal complaint against DOC, with fullevidence of all continuing violations. This FBI complaint was joined by another two victim-witnesses who signed affidavits, both executives of an independent Savings & Loan financialinstitution targeted by DOC extortion and defamation merely for being a client of the law firm.

Both federal complaints were referred to the FBI Public Corruption Squad “C-14” in New York,which investigated and referred to an Office of Inspector General in Washington DC, but the FBIdid nothing to intervene to stop the escalating organized criminal attacks against the law firm,which was fully in good standing.

On 08 December 2008, Matthew also filed a 3rd federal complaint against DOC with the USDepartment of State, with evidence that the racketeering ring was abusing US Embassyfunctions to extend the reach of their federal crimes in violation of international law, provingthat military methods officially recognized as “information warfare” were being used as illegalpersecution.

In February 2009, Ringleader was removed from DOC and transferred to an “informationtechnology” division of USAID (related to “information warfare” capabilities), apparently todeflect pressure and scrutiny away from DOC as the subject of 3 federal criminal investigations.

Without any law enforcement intervention, despite federal investigations, the persecution byDOC accelerated into a prolonged campaign of criminally false defamation on the Internet. All ofit was personally directed at Judge Matthew, and all postings were proven to be coordinatedamong the same group of state-sponsored criminal perpetrators connected to DOC.

On 16 December 2009, in retaliation for his removal from DOC caused by multiple criminalcomplaints against him, Ringleader created a dedicated blog for false defamation againstMatthew and his former law firm, under a branded campaign name (here called “Defamers”).

Beyond false inflammatory disinformation, the campaign included manufacturing forgeddocuments pretending to be third parties, and even fake “lawyer review” websites (listing veryfew names – probably fictitious except for Matthew’s name, and not allowing any positivecomments). False claims about the law firm were apparently used as an excuse for the primarypurpose of persecuting Matthew individually as a political dissident.

On 31 January 2010, Matthew filed an FBI complaint against Defamers with the IC3 division ofthe FBI National White Collar Crime Center (“NW3C”). In retaliation for this criminal complaint,the branded Defamers blog site immediately began illegally using the logos of NW3C itself, and

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 20

of another FBI government contractor, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), todescribe the group’s identity.

On 03 February 2010, Matthew filed another FBI complaint against Defamers for fraudulentmisuse of the NW3C and ACFE logos, and illegally impersonating federal agents to misrepresentthe source of the false defamation campaign. This caused both FBI contractors to supportintervention for removal of the campaign from all legitimate and lawful online sites.

Eight Major Internet Service Providers Agree to Shut DownCriminal Defamation Websites Directed at Judge Matthew

A subsequent audit of Investigations & Enforcement Results verifies that the DOC ring-leader ofthe criminal defamation campaign was eventually sanctioned and neutralized by federal andeven national security agencies. It presents evidence that the legal departments of 8 majorcorporate internet service providers agreed that the campaign was flagrantly criminal and shutdown all accounts and banned the users of the operation.

The law firm had no relations with or obligation to DOC, and DOC has no administrative orregulatory authority over any law firm. The racketeering operated by and through DOC used amodus operandi of referring potential “clients” (the same few fraudulent supporting actors) to afirm, as a pretense for abuse of authority as extortion, enforced by false defamation underexaggerated color of official authority.

The facts that the ring-leader was a career Army counter-intelligence officer, and that counter-intelligence is the primary source of state-sponsored persecution of political dissidents, indicatethat DOC was used as a vehicle for special operations against dissidents. DOC is a prominentfeature of US Embassies worldwide, and “commerce” is a convenient sphere to attack dissidentsglobally by depriving them of the basic human right to practice their profession or make a living.

In 2009, Judge Matthew had a political conflict with a State Bar association in the United States.He had held only inactive “Associate Membership” status, which is not a license, and thus neverused it, instead practicing law under foreign law licenses and authorizations.

One year after he had left the law firm of which he was the figurehead “President”, two clientsbreached their commercial transaction contracts with that law firm, by fraudulentlymisrepresenting their projects and failing to provide their documents for the law firm to workwith.

Both clients filed complaints with the local State Bar against Matthew personally, although hewas never assigned to their cases and had already left the firm a full year earlier, claiming a

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 21

license violation for not “refunding” their retainers. However, nothing was owed to them, andby their breach of contract they in fact owed substantial penalties to the law firm.

Documents in the case file indicate that the State Bar did not follow many of its own rules andprocedures providing for fair defense against false claims. It disregarded evidence of the foreignlaw licenses of both Matthew and the law firm, which would prove that the Bar had nojurisdiction. It also ignored extensive documentary evidence proving every point in bothcomplaints to be knowingly false.

The Bar disregarded evidence which had been accepted by the FBI, establishing that both clientswere being coordinated by a non-client organized crime group supported by the US Departmentof Commerce (DOC), which was using their false complaints to perpetrate criminal extortion todemand tens of millions of dollars from the firm, enforced by a campaign of unlawful falsedefamation online. It also ignored the fact of prior criminal complaints with the FBI against thatsame group, and that such complaints had been accepted and referred to a specialized “PublicCorruption” division, indicating that they were taken seriously.

Review of the case file by defense lawyers revealed that the State Bar appeared to be politically“persecuting” him, primarily discriminating against his living exclusively in foreign countries andrelying on foreign licenses. Such multinational lifestyle was apparently perceived as an insult totheir authority and a threat to their relevance with all international lawyers from their localState.

Matthew insisted upon resigning from the local State Bar, since it was not a “license”, was neverused, and never needed. Furthermore, he would have had to pay approximately $100,000 for a“full trial” type litigation, only to defend a non-active non-license of no benefit to him, which henow saw as merely an instrument of sabotage by abuse of authority. The Bar had alreadydemonstrated persistent and escalating violation of his due process rights, and highly politicizedpersecution. Thus, politically motivated bias and prejudice were evident, and no fairness orlawfulness could be expected.

As the only way to be allowed to resign, he was forced to sign a standardized “VoluntaryRevocation” document stating that he “admitted to the charges as stated”. However, in thatdocument, no actual “charges” were stated, as nothing was stated that would be a violationunder the Rules of Conduct.

He only “admitted” out of context the isolated fact that the firm did not give a refund, but thedocument was not permitted to mention the overriding legal fact that by binding enforceablesigned contracts breached by both clients, no refund was owed. He did not admit anything thatwould constitute wrongdoing, and certainly did not admit anything for which any lawyer wouldbe “disbarred”.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 22

The voluntary resignation form also officially stated that it could “not be used for any otherpurpose”, but yet was aggressively used for every other imaginable illegal purpose, all as aninstrument of persecution of a political dissident.

The clients never filed any civil lawsuit against Matthew or the law firm, apparently becausethey knew the evidence proved their complaints false, and a Court would most likely make thempay the penalties owed to the firm for their breach of contract. In the entire history of the lawfirm, not one complaint was ever filed against its own foreign international law license, of whichall clients had a copy.

Months after Matthew’s resignation in protest, direct documentary evidence emerged,revealing the active and prominent involvement of the DOC in driving and coordinating theentire State Bar process. (The DOC had no standing in the case, had conflict of interest as thesubject of 2 prior FBI criminal complaints against it, and has no authorized function or any lawfulpurpose for interfering in the legal profession.)

The following key pieces of evidence (provided to qualified persons upon request) prove thatthe State Bar process was politically motivated, criminally corrupted, knowingly violatedjurisdictional limits, and was intentionally abused for unlawful persecution as a dissident:

2007 – Membership Cards in State Bar & American Bar, proving that the local State status wasmerely inactive “Associate” membership, which cannot be considered a “license”, and does notconstitute being “at Bar”, such that using the term “disbarred” is a false portrayal intended onlyto be inflammatory and defamatory. That the “Associate” card was issued in 2007 proves thatthis inactive non-license status was held for 2 years before the State Bar “investigated” the falsecomplaints.

2006 – Certification by Panama Bar Association, issued in 2009 by the “National LawyersAssociation of Panama”, proving that the law firm was registered with the Bar as a “ProfessionalAssociation” since 2006, and was thus internationally licensed from the exclusive jurisdiction ofPanama. This proves that any personal law license from Matthew was irrelevant, not used andnot needed, as the firm had its own license. The 2006 registration date proves that this law firmlicense was held 3 years before the false complaints to the local State Bar.

All clients of the firm were given copies of the full Panama license before being allowed to hirethe firm, proving that the complaints to the local State Bar were intended solely as a directpersonal attack against Matthew as an individual, and were not part of any legitimate dispute.

2006 – Notarized Affidavit of Founding Partners of Law Firm, issued in 2009 by one of severalmanaging partners, evidencing that Matthew was only the figurehead “President” (by power ofattorney) of the international law firm, and proving that the firm was in fact managed bymultiple “founders and partners Lawyers registered at the Panama Bar Association”, adescription which does not include Matthew.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 23

2008 – Notification to American Bar & State Bar, entitled “Urgent Request for Support inDefense of Legal Profession”, issued by Matthew in March 2008, notifying the American BarAssociation and local State Bar of “a direct attack on the legal profession, and a wrongfuldeterrent to the provision of necessary legal services”, with a lawyer and law firm in goodstanding “being persecuted by the DOC”. It requested to “defend the integrity of the legalprofession… and to uphold the rule of law”, as “An honest [lawyer] should not be disadvantagedagainst or subordinated to a corrupt ‘official’ of any agency.”

This proves that both Bar associations were given a copy of the 1st FBI complaint against DOC,highlighting evidence that DOC had “the declared intent of having the firm and all its lawyersdisbarred ‘throughout the whole world’”, for corrupt and illegal purposes, a full year before theone-sided State Bar process against Matthew. Both Bar associations did nothing.

2008 – Emails Proving DOC Arranged the State Bar Process, a string of emails between an“Investigator” of the local State Bar and Ringleader of DOC, dated December 2008, obtained bya private investigator. It evidences the aggressive targeting of Matthew as a private person byDOC, prompting the Bar to reply that his “alternate address is personal information and shall notbe disclosed”, revealing the political motivations for illegal harassment unrelated to the falsecomplaints.

The emails prove that the Bar had full knowledge of the fact that “Associate” status was inactiveand was not a “license” at all, as the Investigator quoted a State Bar statute that “AssociateMembers… may not practice law”. This proves that the process was advanced with knowledgeof lack of jurisdiction, and that the later statements wrongfully describing “voluntary revocationof license” as “disbarred” were knowingly and intentionally false, and thus could only beintended as defamation for persecution.

The emails prove that DOC was actively reaching out to clients of the law firm and referringthem to the local State Bar, thus abusing color of authority to encourage anybody to make anypossible complaints, admitting “I have passed on your information to our clients”, andvolunteering “assistance to identify other involved parties”. (The FBI “C-14” division noted thatit is highly illegal for any government official to refer to “our clients” indicating bribe-taking forpersonal gain by abuse of authority.)

Outrageously, the State Bar Investigator wrote, “I will give Mr. Vertman a call and coordinatewith the Assistant Bar Counsel overseeing this matter.” This is a major admission, proving thatthe DOC Chief Legal Counsel named Vertman was directly coordinating the entire process withthe higher level of the Bar, thus flagrantly prejudicially corrupting the process by illegal abuse ofauthority. This is direct evidence of the federal crime of victim retaliation by DOC, as Vertmanwas in charge of defending against the 2 FBI criminal complaints filed by Judge Matthew, andwas legally responsible for disciplining Ringleader, not aiding and abetting the organizedcriminal campaign of persecution.

AMERICAN DISSIDENT PRINCE, ACIJ 24

Conclusion

Judge Matthew has been independently verified through informal communications with officialchannels, with successful confirmation of all claimed credentials, experience and qualifications,and validation that all statements in his curriculum vitae and public biographical profiles aretruthful and accurate.

He is genuinely a highly decorated national security veteran, former independent Presidentialadvisor, and accomplished international lawyer and diplomatic special envoy. He has beenentrusted with tens of billions and occasionally trillions of dollars in a trustee and fiduciarycapacity, and appears to have been entrusted with national security command decisionsaffecting potentially millions of lives, as well as entrusted with real military force.

For no serious complaints to have happened, no civil lawsuits, no criminal violations, and noliabilities nor adverse consequences resulting from his highly sensitive activities, over so manyyears, is statistically surprising. This indicates that he is diligent, loyal, reliable, trustworthy,follows missions to completion, and does not make mistakes under pressure.

The only real “adverse information” touted by his political opponents are two regulatory events,which were pushed forward by American local agencies which lacked jurisdiction, solely bymeans of unlawful abuse of power in violation of due process of law. Those wrongfulaccusations are proven by voluminous documentation to be knowingly false, made for theprimary purpose of politically motivated and unconstitutional persecution against him.

CITATIONS TO SOURCE REFERENCES:

[1] Allan M. Jalon, A Break-In to End All Break-Ins: 1971 Stolen FBI Files Exposed Government’sDomestic Spying Program, Los Angeles Times, 08 March 2006.

[2] Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall, The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI’sSecret Wars Against Domestic Dissent, South End Press, Boston (1990), pp.xii, 303.

[3] Tim Weiner, Enemies: A History of the FBI, Random House, New York (2012).

[4] Bud & Ruth Schultz, The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in America,University of California Press (2001).

[5] Brian Glick, War at Home: Covert Action Against US Activists and What We Can Do About It,South End Press, Boston (1989); Ward Churchill, Agents of Repression: The FBI’s Secret Wars,South End Press, Boston (2002).

[6] UK Prime Minister & Home Secretary, The United Kingdom’s Strategy for CounteringInternational Terrorism, HM Government, March 2009, pp.14, 80, 83, p.44.

[7] Defense Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee, Defense Advisory Notice System (DA-Notice System), Official Website (www.dnotice.org.uk), “Home” page, as of January 2014.

[8] UK Prime Minister & Home Secretary, The United Kingdom’s Strategy for CounteringInternational Terrorism, HM Government, March 2009, pp.67, 69.

[9] European Commission Directorate General for Justice Freedom and Security, Acquis of theEuropean Union, Section: “Terrorism”, October 2009, pp.34-35.

[10] Frank La Rue, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of theRight to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, UN Human Rights Council, A/HRC/17/27 of 16 May2011, Summary, Articles 26, 34.