12
Revised 23 June 2011 Page 1 of 12 Expanded algebraic thinking draft framework I am working on the assumption that the three ways (apart from parameters) that letter symbols are used are unknowns, generalised numbers and variables . There are three fairly brief tests which examine what strategies students are using with each of t hese uses of letter symbols. The fourth test examines the prerequisite knowledge that is required for many of these strategies.

Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 1/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 1 of 12 

Expanded algebraic thinking draft framework

I am working on the assumption that the three ways (apart from parameters) that letter symbols are

used are unknowns, generalised numbers and variables. There are three fairly brief tests which

examine what strategies students are using with each of these uses of letter symbols. The fourth

test examines the prerequisite knowledge that is required for many of these strategies.

Page 2: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 2/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 2 of 12 

Solving Equations (finding unknowns) 

This is assessed in the solving equations diagnostic test. Before using this as a written test, you

should use it as a one-on-one interview with a selection of students. Ask one question at a time,

always asking students to explain how they got their answer. Make notes on what you observe.

The highest strategy a student can use is determined by a student responding correctly to

consecutive strategy levels with at least 1 of 3 questions correct, e.g. to be classified as partially

working backwards a student would need to correctly answer at least one question from each of

levels 1, 2 and 3.

You will notice that question 12 ( ) is not used for classifying highest strategy. This

is because most students just use guess and check to solve it.

Page 3: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 3/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 3 of 12 

Level Highest Strategy QuestionStudent

response

0 None No answer

1

Primitive (including guess

and check, known basic

facts, and counting

techniques)

  17

  5

  24

2 Inverse operations

  17.2

  4.3

  74.2

3

Partially working

backwards (some

working backwards

combined with guess and

check or known basic

facts)

  8

  11

  5

4 Working backwards

  5.6

  72.6

  8.8

5 Formal operations

  2.625

  0.8125

Solve for n, i.e. get into the form n = ......

(Solution will be an expression, not a

number)

 

n=(c+4b)/a

Page 4: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 4/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 4 of 12 

Expressing generality 

This is assessed in the generalisation diagnostic test.

The aim of the test is to find out the extent to which students can use letter symbols to express

generality.

Students may be able to only express generality as a process, e.g. “you multiply the number by

four”. Students may write this process view symbolically, e.g. 4 × n =. The key clue to look for here

is the equals sign.

A quite different understanding is that an algebraic expression is the answer to a problem, e.g. 4n.

In this case the students are seeing the algebraic expression as an object.

Often the answers that students give are ambiguous, e.g. 4 × n. In this case we do not know

whether students are viewing 4 × n as a description of the process of multiplying n by 4, or as an

object and are simply not using the convention of dropping the multiplication symbol. In this case I

would look at the student’s answers to the first four questions on the algebraic knowledge test. 

Furthermore students may or may not be able to express either process or object views of

generalised numbers in additive, multiplicative, linear or non-linear situations. For the most difficult

type of expression (non-linear) I have added a further level of operating on the expression.

Page 5: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 5/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 5 of 12 

Level Description ContextStudent

response

0 No generalisation Jim has some money ($n ) in his pocket and his

mum gives him $20. How much money does he

have now?

(Note that because we don’t know how much money Jimstarted with, it’s not possible to give a simple number as an

answer.)

No answer

1 Additive processAdd 20

n + 20 =

2Additive

process/objectn + 20

3Multiplicative

processThere are 4 classes at Waitati school and every

class has the same number (n ) of students in it.

How many students are at the school altogether?

(Note that because we don’t know how many students are ineach class, it’s not possible to give a simple number as an

answer.)

Multiply by 4

4 × n =

4Multiplicative

process/object4 × n 

5Multiplicative

object4n

6 Linear process I have n  sheep on my farm and each one gave

birth to twin lambs, but 5 lambs died in a

snowstorm. How many lambs are left?

(Note that because we don’t know how many sheep I have,

it’s not possible to give a simple number as an answer.) 

Multiply by 2

then subtract

5

2 × n  – 5 =

7Linear

process/object2 × n  – 5

8 Linear object 2n - 5

9Non-linear

processI think of a number (n ) and multiply it by 1

more than the number. I then take away the

number I first thought of and simplify the

expression. What is my final answer?

(Note that because we don’t know what the original number

was, it’s not possible to give a simple number as an answer.) 

n × (n+1) =

10Non-linear

process/objectn × (n+1)

11 Non-linear object n(n+1) – n

12Operating on

expressionsn

2

Page 6: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 6/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 6 of 12 

Using variables 

This is assessed in the relationships diagnostic test. Before using this as a written test, you should

use it as a one-on-one interview with a selection of students. Ask one question at a time, always

asking students to explain how they got their answer. Make notes on what you observe.

There would appear to be two main issues within students’ uses of variables to describe

relationships. The first issue is whether they can use multiple representations (context, table, graph,

equation) but graphs are not considered in this test.

The second issue is whether they can find a relationship between two variables or just use the

iterative pattern within one variable. There are likely to be levels of difficulty within this. I suspect

that the level of difficulty for all iterative approaches will be similar (and lower than multiplicative

relational).

Some students will not be able to see a relationship between two variables and will be restricted to

the iterative process of adding down the column in one variable. These students should only be able

to fill in the first box in each table as I have chosen a large value of  x  for the second box to prevent

them from doing this. (At least easily!)

More advanced students will be able to see a relationship as a process, e.g. “you multiply the

number by 17” and will be able to fill in the second box in the table. I am describing this as a process

view of the relationship between two variables.

Even more advanced students will be comfortable with general equations and be able to write a

symbolic equation, e.g. y  = 17 x.  I am describing this as an object view of the relationship between

two variables, as I believe they are seeing the equation as an object that can be used.

A significant number of students get x and y the wrong way round. This is not a trivial error, but

reflects lack of understanding of structure (students and professors issue).

Page 7: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 7/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 7 of 12 

Level Description ContextStudent

response

0No use of

relationships

I have a thermometer which always gives too high a

reading. Complete the empty boxes in the following table.

My thermometer

reading (OC)

Accurate temperature

(OC)

4 4

5 5

6 6

7

68

No

answer

1 Additive iterative 4

2Additive relational

process65

3Additive relational

object

Write an equation that describes the relationship between

the accurate temperature (y) and my thermometer

reading (x). (An equation is something like y  = 10 x )

y  = x  + 3

4

Known fact

multiplicativeiterative

Some triangles are made out of matchsticks. Complete the

empty boxes in the following table.

Length of triangle

(matches)

Total number of

matches

1 3

2 6

3 9

4

42

12

5

Known fact

multiplicative

relational process

126 

6

Known fact

multiplicative

relational object

Write an equation that describes the relationship between

the number of matches (y) and the length of triangle (x).y  = 3 x  

7

Multiplicative

iterative

There are the same number of seats in each minibus.

Complete the empty boxes in the following table. 68

Page 8: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 8/12

Page 9: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 9/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 9 of 12 

Algebraic knowledge

There are five components of algebraic knowledge in the test, with four questions on each. A

student can therefore get a score between 0 and 4 for each component.

Questions 1 to 4 examine students’ knowledge of algebraic notation and conventions.

Questions 5 to 8 examine students’ knowledge of arithmetic structure (BEDMAS). 

Questions 9 to 12 examine knowledge of inverse operations. Note that knowledge of inverse

operations (i.e. which operation is the inverse of which) is a different issue, and prerequisite, to

whether students can use inverse operations to solve equations.

Questions 13 to 16 examine students’ acceptance of lack of closure, i.e. can they accept that an

answer to a problem may be a general expression rather than just a simple number.

Questions 17 to 20 examine students’ understanding of equivalence. 

Page 10: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 10/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 10 of 12 

Question Answer Component

Q1

If c = 4 then what is the value of 5c?

20

Algebraic

notation

and

convention 

Q2

If k  = 3 then what is the value of 2+k ?

5

Q3

Denise has the following problem to

solve:

“Find value(s) for x and y in the

expression: x + y = 18” 

She answers as follows:a. 10, 8

 b. 8, 10

c. 9, 9

Which of her answers is (are)correct? (Note that you may give more

than one answer)

a, b, c

Q4

Megan has the following problem to

solve:“Find value(s) for x in the expression:

 x + x = 14” 

She answers as follows:

a. 10, 4

 b. 5, 9

c. 7, 7

Which of her answers is (are) correct?

(Note that you may give more than one

answer)

c

Q5

What is the value of the following?

12 + 3 × 218

Arithmetic

structureQ6

What is the value of the following?

10 - ( 7 - 2 )5

Q7

What is the value of the following?

 

6

Page 11: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 11/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 11 of 12 

Question Answer Component

Q8

What is the value of the following?

15 - 10 ÷ 5

13Arithmetic

structure

Q9

Replace the box with +, -, × or ÷

If  then

 y = 84 □ 7 ÷

Inverse

operations

Q10

Replace the box with +, -, × or ÷

If  z  + 38 = 65 then

 z  = 65 □ 38 -

Q11

Replace the box with +, -, × or ÷

If 412

 p then

 p = 4 □ 12 

×

Q12

Replace the box with +, -, × or ÷

If 6n = 32 thenn = 32 □ 6 

÷

Q13

What is the perimeter of this shape?

(Note that because we don’t know

how big u is, it’s not possible to give asimple number as an answer.)

2u + 16

Lack of

closure

Q14

What is 3 less than n?

(Note that because we don’t know how big

n is, it’s not possible to give a simple

number as an answer.)

n - 3

u  u 

5 5

6

Page 12: Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

8/11/2019 Algebraic Thinking Framework 2007

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/algebraic-thinking-framework-2007 12/12

Revised 23 June 2011

Page 12 of 12 

Question Answer Component

Q15

There are n people who send emails to 5

friends each. How many emails are sent

altogether?

(Note that because we don’t know how many

students are in each class, it’s not possible to give a

simple number as an answer.)

5n 

Lack ofclosure

Q16

Take n away from 6n + 2

(Note that because we don’t know how big n is, it’s

not possible to give a simple number as an

answer.)

5n + 2

Q17

What number should replace the empty

box?

5 + 8 = □ + 103

Equivalence

Q18

What number should replace the empty

box?

83.71 – □ = 93.71 – 22.7912.79

Q19

Given that 9 x   + 5 = 19,

what should replace the empty box?

9 x   + □ = 173

Q20

Given that 7 x   + 5 = 13,

what should replace the empty box?

9 x  + 5 = □ + 132 x