Agriculture Technology Management Agency (ATMA), Kolhapur ...atmamis.org/UploadFiles/2900.pdf · Kolhapur and Vice Chairman, ATMA, Kolhapur for his Guidance, valuable suggestions

Agriculture Technology Management Agency (ATMA), Kolhapur Page 1



CONTENTS

CHAPTER TOPIC PAGE No.

I Introduction 1

II Methodology 3

III Background Information about the District 9

IV Description of Ongoing Extension and Development

activities in the Kolhapur District 63

V Analysis of the Existing Farming Systems (trend & SWOT

analysis) Under each AES & the Research & Extension

gaps emerged & the strategies to bridge the gap.

67

VI Analysis of the farming situation of major crops or

commodities in each AES & the Research & Extension

gaps emerged & the stragegies to bridge the gaps.

181

VII Strategies to overcome the gaps in IPM /INM/Seed

replacement/ marketing/PPP/Farm mechanization, burinig

problems in the District.

273

VIII Strategies for human resource development. 292

IX Activity schedule for the identified research & extension

strategies 298

X Policy issues to be addressed to the Government. 311

XI Base line date of the District with respect to the issues/

opportunities and challenges. 313

XII Vision for the next five years. 317

XIII Operational Modalities 320


A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T

I consider it a rare opportunity and privilege to express my reverential

gratitude to District Collector and Chairman, ATMA Kolhapur, for extending me

encouragement, inspiring guidance, suggestions and constructive approach without

which it would have not been only difficult, but also impossible for me to

successfully complete. The Strategic Research and Extension Plan (SREP).

I express my sincere and profound to Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Prishad,

Kolhapur and Vice Chairman, ATMA, Kolhapur for his Guidance, valuable

suggestions and encouragement for preparing SREP.

My sincere gratitude to Joint Director of Agriculture, Kolhapur Division,

Kolhapur for his kind support and encouragement time to time.

I am immensely grateful to all the district officers at Agriculture and Allied

Departments for their valuable information’s and constructive criticism provided

during preparation of SREP document.

My sincere gratitude to Joint Director of Agriculture, Kolhapur Divisin,

Kolhapur for his kind support and encouragement.

I am thankful to Principal RAMETI, Kolhapur, Agronomist, Regional

Extension Centre, Agriculture College, Kolhapur, for imparting training to District

AES Team and under whose guidance the SREP is presented in its current shape.

I am extremely grateful to members of ATMA governing council ATMA

District Farmer Advisory Committee and Management Committee of ATMA,

Kolhapur for constant help, warm encouragement and critical suggestion in

preparing SREP.

Finally my thanks and appreciations to Dy. Project Director 1 and 2, ATMA

and Subordinate officers for their untiring efforts in completion of the SREP.

Specially thankful to Mr. Khamkar, Computer Operator who devoted a lot.

In the end, I tender on apology for errors and omissions which might have

crept in this manuscript inadvertently.

BASAVRAJ MASTOLI

Project Director, ATMA, Kolhapur


Shri. Chandrakant (Dada) Bacchu Patil Cabinet Minister Government of Maharashtra.

Co-operation, Marketing and Textiles, Public

Works (Excluding public undertakings) Dept.

& Guardian Minister, Kolhapur District

M E S S A G E

The public extension system has undergone several transformations since

independence and lot of investment have been spent on public research and extension

system. This investment has been a major contribution on national success in raising food

grain production.

Previous research and extension planning of Government no doubt made on

important contribution to agriculture development, but it needed to be overhauled to meet

the technological needs of farmers during 21st century. Recently it was recognized that

extension should be broad based on the basis of the farming system approach. Issues like

financial sustainability, lack of farmers participation in executing programme planning

and weak research extension linkage are some constraints are arises as in present

extension system.

The Strategic Research and Extension Plan is the basic document, which does not

only decide, the development activities that need to be carried out, but also in which

manner and by whom it has to done. The SREP prepared for Kolhapur District will

provide a guideline for promotion and implementation of action plan for all the 12 blocks

of district.

The SREP prepared and complied by Project Director, ATMA of Kolhapur

contains excellent strategies on extension and research plan for the holistic development

of agriculture and allied sectors in the district. It also helps to develop Comprehensive

District Agriculture Development Plan. I complainant Shri Basavaraj Mastoli for his

endeavor and believe that this book will help implementing the strategic plan, C-DAP of

Kolhapur District & action by ATMA Kolhapur.

Date: 30/4/2015

Place: Kolhapur Chandrakant Bacchu Patil


he X Five Year Plan Approach Paper called for radical overhaul of extension services

and significant improvements in sophistication of technology dissemination methodologies. It

highlighted the need for specific measures to ensure that research technology development and

extension services meet the special needs of farmers. The PFAE and experiences under ATMA

approach have also been directed towards similar strategies. Accordingly, The Department of

Agriculture & Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India is implementing the

Support to State Extension Programmers for Extension schemes during the Xth

Plan period.

The Scheme “Support to State Extension Programmers for Extension Reforms” is the

main scheme to operationalize agriculture extension reforms across the country. The district

level autonomous body called agricultural technology management agency (ATMA) will have

the responsibility of implementing the extension reforms at district level.

Agricultural technology management agency is a district level body created under the

Innovation Technology Dissemination component of National Agricultural Technology project

(NATP) pilot testing agricultural extension reforms. This is an autonomous institution with

participant of all the key stakeholders involved in agricultural activities for sustainable

agricultural development. It has the flexibility to receive funds directly (Government of India /

States, Membership fees, beneficiaries’ contribution etc). ATMA has the main responsibility of

all the technology dissemination activities at the district level. It has linkages with all the line

department, research organizations, non-governmental organizations and agencies associated

with agricultural development in the district with a substantial representation of farmers

organizations. Research and extension units within the district, research-extension-farmer linkages

such KVKs, ZRSs, Department of Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal Husbandry, Fisheries,

Sericulture, Marketing, etc. are constituent members.

Under the pilot programme four district of Maharashtra State were selected. The effective

result of Project was seen and it really help to the farmers in sustainable farming. Keeping in

view the effective result in the Pilot district, the GOM make a comprehensive G.R. on 29 th

March 2005.

T CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION


In Kolhapur district the ATMA has started in 2006. One of the first task of ATMA is to

facilitate the preparation of strategic Research and Extension Plan (SREP) of the district. The

SREP is prepared through participatory methodologies Such as participatory Rural Appraisal

(PRA) involving all the stakeholders and farmers. The SREP contains detailed analysis of the all

information on existing farming systems in the district and research extension gaps required to be

filled-up. It also prioritizes the research extension strategies within the district. It becomes the

basis for development of work plans at block/district level.

The SREP is the basic document which is not only decides. The development activities

that need to be carried out but also in which manner and by whom it has to be done.

Kolhapur District is situated in the Sub- Mountain Zone. The district is divided into three

(3) ACZ namely, Sub-Mountain, Mountain & Plain region. It mainly comprises of the basins of

river Panchaganga, Krishna, Warana, Vedganga, Dudhaganga, Ghatprabha. The District is very

rich in flora & fauna in different zones. Besides other commodities, Sugarcane is the

identification mark of the District in the State due to its Agro-Ecological Situation and

productivity. Every Agro-Ecological Situation in the district has its own production system,

technological gaps & other limitation storage & processing.


The extension and research intervention would differ across the agro- ecological zone as

per prevailing agro-ecological situations (AESs) between the crops, livestock, & farming

systems as affected by various factors. The SREP will have two sections namely, “Diagnostic”

section and “Strategic” section the diagnostic section has two sub section namely Information &

Analysis section. In the information sub section, information from the different line departments

gathered & recorded along with the detailed data of representative villages under each AES.

In the analysis sub section the data so collected is analyzed.

The following methodology was adopted for preparation of SREP.

Step 1 : Registration of ATMA (Agricultural Technology Management Agency),

Kolhapur Dt. 2/07/2005.

The registration of ATMA was done under the Societies Registration Act 1960.

Step 2 : To understand the concepts & principles of Reforms in Extension & to sensitize

on operation of SREP in the district, five day training on the orientation of

SREP, Revisiting of SREP & extension Reforms was organized for district level

Officers & Scientists & Other stakeholders at RAMETI, Kolhapur from Dt.

29/7/2013 to 2/8/2013.

Step 3 : Identification of Agro-Eco Situations & constitution of AES Teams. The district

has been divided into four (4) AES. Representative villages has been selected on

the basis of size, accessibility, availability of different farming systems of that

AES,

Sr. Name of Agro- Name of the Agro-Eco Blocks covered Representative

No. Climatic zone Situation (AES) Village

1. Sub mountain region Upland rain fed light to Panhala, Shahuwadi, Punal, Tal.Panhala

medium soils Ajara, Bhudargad

2 Sub mountain region Upland rain fed medium Radhanagari, Kagal, Padavalawadi,

to blacks soils Karveer,Gadhinglaj Tal. Karveer

3 Mountain region Up land, rain fed lateritic Chandagad, Nagave,

soils Gaganbavada Tal. Chandgad

4 Plain region Midland irrigated black Shirol, Hatakangale Umalwad,

soils Tal. Shirol

Agro ecological situation were identified based on soil type , rainfall pattern, topography

in consultation with the scientists, NGOs, Officials from the Agriculture & line department.

Step 4 : The district core team consisting of district officers of Agriculture department

& officer of line department , 4 AES teams are formed. Training to AES Teams were given

during 6/2/2014 to 7/2/2014. The master trainers were involved in conducting training

programme for district core team.

The core team members were oriented on the following aspects.

1. Reforms in extensions - institutional & Operational.

2. Orientation on SREP.

3. Farming system approach.

4. Sustainability aspects like.

CHAPTER II. METODOLOGY


a. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM).

b. Integrated Pest Management (IPM).

c. Gender participation issues.

d. SWOT analysis.

e. Field exercise on participatory data collection.

f. Participatory tools & Techniques & preparation for field exercise.

g. Presentation of reports.

h. Planning for data collection from representative villages.

Step 5 : Information / data from representative villages of each AES is collected by

using participatory methodology during 20/2/2014 to 21/2/2014.

Step 6 : Data / Information collected from representative villages are rechecked /

recollected for prioritization of research & extension issues on 9/4/2014 and

29/4/2014 respectively.

Following PRA tools are used for data collection.

a. Social mapping & resource mapping

b. Group discussion.

c. Venn diagram.

d. Transect map.

Step 7: Developing Strategies for research & extension was carried out during

22/07/2014,27/07/2014,24/09/2014,26/11/2014,24/12/2014.

Step 8: After the presentation of initial findings, by each AES, district level officers of

line department, NGOs, Scientist from SAU & progressive farmers suggested

some modifications & alteration on the report. RAMETI, Kolhapur plays role in

training the district core team & act as a facilitator in finalisining the SREP.

These suggestions were incorporated in the report & final SREP draft was

prepared.

Step 9: Finally the SREP was approved by GB on 24/02/2015.


Table No. 2.1: Spread of AES in the District

Sl

No

Name of the

ACZ

Area

(ha)

% of

Geogr.

Area

of the

dist.

Name of AES Area

(ha)

% of

Geogr.

area

of the

dist.

B1 B2 B3 B4

A % A % A % A %

1 Sub-

montane

Zone

42,071 54 1. Upland rainfed

light to medium

soils

282,559 36 Panhala 20 Shahuwadi 37 Ajra 19 Bhudargad 24

56871 104352 54888 66448

2. Upland rainfed

medium to black

soils

259,214 33 Radhanagari 34 Kagal 21 Karveer 26 Gadhinglaj 19

89232 57754 67113 48115

2 Western

Ghat Zone

214,002 28 3. Upland rainfed

lateritic soils

124,770 16 Chandgad 77 Gaganbavda 23 - - - -

96542 28228 - - - -

3 Plain Zone 93,305 12 Midland irrigated

Black soils

111,720 14 Shirol 45 Hatkanagale 55 - - - -

50783 60937 - - - -

4 Scaracity

Zone

48,243 6

Total area 776,261 100

• B1, B2, B3……… are the Blocks • % area to agro-climatic zone and under AES may be asked.

Table No. 2.2: Representative village for each Agro-Eco situation for the district

Sl.

No.

Name of the Agro-

climatic zone (ACZ)

Name of the Agro-

ecological situation

(AES)

Blocks covered Representative village

1 Sub mountain region Upland rain fed light

to medium soils

Panhala, Shahuwadi, Ajara,

Bhudargad

Punal,Tal. Panhala

2 Sub mountain region Upland rain fed

medium to blacks soils

Radhanagari, Kagal,

Karveer,Gadhinglaj

Padavalawadi, Tal.

Karveer

3 Mountain region Up land, rain fed

lateritic soils

Chandagad, Gaganbavada Nagave,Tal. Chandgad

4 Plain region Midland irrigated black

soils

Shirol, Hatakangale Umalwad,Tal. Shirol


Table No. 2.3: Production and Productivity of important commodities under each

AES enterprise-wise for the district

S.No. Name of the

Commodity 1,995 2,000 2,005 2,010 2,012

A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y

1 Sugarcane 961 177,477 81,000 897 81,583 91,000 763 65294 86 1127 98100 87 1421 127,890 86

2 Rice 1,019 2,276 2,234 1,063 2,328 2,190 1105 2791 2526 1127 2918 2589 914 2,366 2589

3 Soybean 440 647 1,470 629 1,219 1,938 747 1159 1551 591 1145 1938 417 1032 2476

4 Kh. Gr. Nut 601 1,341 2,232 657 989 1,506 660 1095 1659 582 798 1371 414 720 1738

5 Ragi 230 340 1,477 248 347 1,398 238 304 1279 229 353 1541 19 5 1837

6 Rabbi Jowar 117 125 1,068 115 151 1,311 118 180 1524 128 169 1321 98 143 1464

7 Wheat 112 217 1,938 84 150 1,786 92 194 2109 79 180 2278 21 45 2150

8 Gram 91 76 835 128 87 678 107 94 882 90 79 875 35 47 1348


Kolhapur District - AES Map


Geographical Information

Mountain Zone, Sub Mountain Zone and Plain Zone Map.

Alaititude – West 910 m. to East 548 m.


History:

The history of Kolhapur may be divided into three periods, viz. early (1) Hindu

period, partly mythic and partly historic, reaching to about 1347 A.D. (2) The musalman period

from 1347 A.D to about 1700 A.D. and (3) Maratha period since 1700. Kolhapur would seem to

be one of the old cities in 14th

century. In making some excavation on its site in 1877 , the

foundation of a large Buddhist relic mound were turned up and in the centered of the mound was

found a square lid, on inscription of about the third century before Christ recording .The gift of

“Bramha made by Dhamaguta “

Apart from the inscriptional evidence on the basis of which the early history of

Kolhapur is being traced here. There are many references in puranas which throw light both on

the derivation of the word Kolhapur and the sacredness that the city has come to possess on

account of the location of Ambabai temple there . The puranic evidence has to be utilized with

great caution, but it would be wrong to keep it out of sight altogether. According to ‘Puranas’

this tract of the country was originally called ‘Kurir’ from the name of Goodness Mahalaxmi

writing her mace (Kur) in lifting her favored retreat from the waters of the great deluge.

According to another legend, the name ‘Kolhapur’ is derived from the story that a

demon ‘Kola’ (Kolhapur) was defeated and killed on a hill in the vicinity of Kolhapur.

Presage light has been thrown by the recent theory put forward by G.H.Khare.

According to him, the name might have been evolved by its geography. The original kannada

word ‘Kolla’ or Golla’ (river bed) must be the source as the Kolhapur situated on bank of river

panchaganga.

The growth of the district in modern times is fascinating Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaja is

an architect and founder of modern Kolhapur. The district is abundant in natural vegetation,

animal wealth and minerals. As result, Kolhapur is not only one of the most agriculturally

advanced district of Maharashtra but also of India. It is also a fast becoming industrialized

district and already a front runner in agro based industries Kolhapur district is one of the leading

and shining examples in the co-operative movement of India.

Miscellaneous:

Kolhapur city is situated on the bank river panchaganga and is known as “ Dakshin

kashi’’

Kolhapur Goddess Mahalaxmi is one of the shaktipeethas mentioned in India mythology.

Chhatrapati shahu Maharaja is an architect and founder of modern Kolhapur,

The district is pioneer in trade and commerce. Chh. Shahu Maharaj established a jaggery

(gur) market at Shahupuri in 1895.

Kolhapur is listed as one of the industrially developed district of Maharashtra.

Foundation of industrial development in Kolhapur district was laid down by Chhatrapati

Shahu Maharaj in the form of stone laying of shahu mill on 27th

sept 1906 also

The first sugar factory was started under the leadership of Shri. Madhan Mohan Lohia in

1939, however, the development of sugar industry is found remarkable after 1956.

CHAPTER III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT THE DISTRICT


General Features of the District: A. Location :

The district of Kolhapur lies in the south-west of Maharashtra between 15 to 17 North

Latitude and 73 to 74 East longitude and spreads across the Deccan platue in tha rain shadow

region of the sahyadri mountain ranges on the southernmost tip of the state Maharashtra. The

sangli district lies to the north, Belgaum district of Karnataka state is to the east and south,

Ratnangiri and sindhudurg districts of Maharashtra west & river Warana is to the north which

forms the natural boundaries to the district. It has an area of 7685.00sq.kms. Which about 2.5 per

cent is of total area of the state and it ranks 24th

in the state as far as area is concerned.

B. Area and Administrative set up :

Administratively the KOLHAPUR district is divided into 6 sub division, 12 Thasils, 1029

Panchayats , 1216 Villages, one municipal corporation, 9 municipalties, 12 Panchyat Samitis , 27

Police Stations & 19 Outposts,

For the administrative purpose, the district is divided into twelve talukas and sixrevune

sub-divisions known as present; such-divisions are-

a) Karveer – Covering Karveer, Gaganbawada tahasil

b) Radhanagari – Covering Radhanagari, Kagal tahasil

c) Panhala – Covering Panhala, Shahuwadi

d) Bhudargad– Covering Ajara, Bhudargad tahasil,

e) Gadhinglaj- Covering Gadhinglaj, Chandgad tahasil

f) Ichalkaranji- Covering Hatkanangale, Shirol

And Agriculture purpose, divided into three sub-divisions; such division are –

a) Kolhapur sub division – Covering Shahuwadi, Panhala, Hatkanangale, Shirol

b) Karveer sub division – Covering Karveer, Kagal, Radhanagari, Gaganbawada

c) Gadhinglaj sub division – Covering Gadhinglaj, Bhudargad, Ajara, Chandgad

The district collector, along with the district judge, superintendent of police, chief

executive officer of the Zilla parishad and other senior officers of the state Government, looks

after the development and regulatory factions in the district. At the taluka level, the Tahsildar,

Taluka Agriculture Officer, Block Development Officer, Judicial Magistrate, Deputy Engineers

and other officer, look after their respective department’s developmental and regulatory factions.

Accordingly to 2011 census, the total population of Kolhapur district is 38,74,015. It

holds 9th

place in Maharashtra as per census. As per the census of 2011 the population of rural

area is 26.45 lakhs (70 %) and 12.30 lakh (30 %) of the urban area. Out of the total urban

population of district, 47 % population is in Kolhapur city, and 25% population in Ichalkaranji

city and the remaining 28% population is covered is covered by the 8 municipal cities in the

district.

C. Demographic Structure :

The Geographical area of the district is 776261 ha. and net sown area is about 576976 ha.

Land not available for cultivation is 77905 ha. The Land holdings in the district are fragmented

and 85% of holders are below hectors.

The District population of 38,74, 015. The Male number is 19,83,574 & Female

18,90,741 constituting a male / female ratio of 1000 : 953. The Urban population is 12,29,896.

The SC population is 4,49,641 constituting a 12.77 % of the total population where as S. T.

population is 21,387 constituting a 0.60 % of the total population. The Literacy % of the

District is 82.90. The population Density is 455 per Sq. km. (Data is as per 2001 & 2011Census.)


Table No. 3.1: General features of the District Kolhapur

SL

.

No

Name of the

block/

Taluka/

Mandal

Geogra-

phical

Area

(Chou.

KM)

No. of

Gram

Panc-

hayats

No. of

revenue

Villages

Average Rainfall and rainy days (in mm) Temperature

(0C)

Relative

Humidity

(%)

Sunshine hours

2010 2011 2012 2012 2012 Wind

Velocity

(Km/

hr)

Kh-

arif Rabi

Sum-

mer Avg in

mm

No.

of

Days

Avg.

in mm

No.

of

days

Avg.

in mm

No.

of

days

Min- Max Min- Max

1 Karveer 712.90 117 129 1109.6 66 1042.3 83 843.9 64 18 31 49 85 4.2 3.2 8.8 8.9

2 Panhala 536.60 111 130 776.00 55 684.00 58 3123.00 100 23 32 53 81 4.4 2.9 8.0 8.4

3 Shahuwadi 906.90 106 145 1418.00 63 1355.00 68 693.00 62 22 33 54 82 5.2 2.9 8.1 8.3

4 Kagal 656.30 83 86 1870.00 83 1731.00 82 523.00 56 17 32 48 80 4.9 3.3 8.5 8.5

5 Hatkanangle 654.10 62 61 950.00 60 641.00 59 1302.00 77 16 38 4 82 4.1 3.4 8.4 8.6

6 Shirol 570.90 53 54 486.00 46 216.00 24 1805.00 80 14 40 25 36 4.3 3.4 8.3 8.6

7 Gadhinglaj 484.40 89 93 2889.00 95 4265.00 97 5829.00 119 17 37 58 76 4.8 3.5 8.2 8.7

8 Chandgad 961.00 110 157 6063.00 132 6945.00 111 1307.00 78 18 38 61 74 6.6 3.0 7.9 8.3

9 Ajara 556.90 74 100 1610.00 87 1597.00 85 603.00 49 32 22 64 73 5.8 3.1 8.0 8.5

10 Bhudargad 619.00 97 117 1150.00 73 952.00 57 1370.00 81 15 35 40 80 5.4 3.3 8.0 8.3

11 Radhananagri 907.00 98 114 2056.20 87 1946.00 86 434.00 36 16 37 57 74 5.3 3.2 7.8 8.1

12 Gaganbawada 280.00 29 39 2646.00 98 3166.00 93 724.00 54 19 39 63 72 6.3 2.9 7.9 8.2

Total 7846.00 1029 1,225 22770.90 929 24376.60 889 20297.00 881

Average

1897.58 77.4 2031.38 74.1 1691.42 73.4 19 35 48 75 5 3 8 8


Table No. 3.2: Demographic Information for the Kolhapur District (Census 2011)

S.No. Name of the

Block Population

Workers No.

% of

Literacy Male No. Female No. Agri. Non.-agri Categories No.

Total Total SC ST Gen.

1 Karveer 1037713 77.79 535839 5,01,874 29651 203192 145656 6143 885914

2 Panhala 259417 71.1 135449 1,23,968 15506 31970 34030 591 224796

3 Shahuwadi 185661 64.4 91869 93792 8942 17443 21065 509 164087

4 Kagal 275372 70.48 141334 1,34,038 19371 31288 36662 523 238187

5 Hatkanangle 807751 74.8 4,17,996 3,89,755 42560 148687 117004 6865 683882

6 Shirol 391015 74.65 1,99,821 1,91,194 42647 54001 59931 10511 320573

7 Gadhinglaj 225734 68.89 1,10,727 1,15,007 17875 24224 22569 1625 201540

8 Chandgad 187220 65.35 92736 94484 8554 16232 16630 2228 168362

9 Ajara 120265 66.8 57406 62859 6046 11512 10174 236 109855

10 Bhudargad 150368 70.04 75824 74544 9053 13024 14677 293 135398

11 Radhananagri 199713 69.52 1,03,190 96523 14424 7142 20993 523 178197

12 Gaganbawada 35772 61.6 18467 17305 2868 2559 5070 159 30543

Total 3876001 72.91 19,80,658 18,95,343 217497 561274 504461 30206 3341334

Ref.: District Socio Economic Survey 2013


SC

5,04,461

(13%)

ST

30,206

(1%)

Gen.

33,41,334

(86%)

SC

ST

Gen.

Details of Categories in the District


D. Transport and communication:

In Kolhapur district the length of total roads (including the road under municipality

jurisdiction) in the year 2012-13 was 9280 k.m out of them 7980 k.m were made from other

resources. In Kolhapur district, the length of railway track is 35.57k.m and had 6 railway

stations. A big nearest airport is at Belgum 105k.m from Kolhapur.

There were 562 post offices in the district in the year 2012-13 and 86 telegram offices.

The ratio of post office per 100 was 15. There were 225535 telephone holders in the district out

of which maximum connections were given in karveer talukas and minimum in Gaganbawada

taluka. Now a day mobile cell phone facility is in the hands of households.

KOLHAPUR DISTRICT ROAD MAP


Agro climatic feature:

A) Soil and Land Use Pattern

Soil:- The majority of the soils of the Kolhapur District are non- calcareous in nature (45 soil

series) and only few blocks have calcareous soils. Due to lift irrigation & heavy use of water &

talking sugarcane as monocarp, the natural drainage system has been disturbed resulting into rise

in water table and ultimately developing salinity in the soils of river basins.

On the whole the soils of Kolhapur District are low to medium in organic matter content;

available N-content is low to high, available K2O is high in the soils.

Due to heavy use of chemical fertilizer & excess irrigation water, 5356 ha. Of land became

saline in the Shirol & Hatkalangle block.

Natural Resources Map

4 Types of Soils.


TABLE No. 3.3: INFORMATION ON SOILS FOR THE DISTRICT (AREA IN HA)

Sl.

No. Name of the block

Geographical Area

(ha)

Black soils Red Soil Sandy Sandy Loam Other

Area

(ha)

% Area

(ha)

% Area

(ha)

% Area

(ha)

% Area

(ha)

%

1 Karveer 67,113 30,201 45 3356 5 7382 11 13,423 20 12,751 19

2 Panhala 56,871 22,748 40 8531 15 7393 13 10,237 18 7,962 14

3 Shahuwadi 104,352 7,305 7 48002 46 15653 15 29,219 28 4,173 4

4 Kagal 54,754 30,115 55 2190 4 8,213 15 13,688 25 548 1

5 Hatkanangle 60,937 35,343 58 1828 3 7,312 12 6,094 10 10,360 17

6 Shirol 50,783 31,993 63 0 0 2539 5 4,063 8 12,188 24

7 Gadhinglaj 48,115 21,652 45 9623 20 5,774 12 9,142 19 1,924 4

8 Chandgad 96,542 0 0 57925 60 11,585 12 24,135 25 2,897 3

9 Ajara 54,888 20,857 38 9880 18 6,587 12 11,526 21 6,038 11

10 Bhudargad 64,446 22,556 35 14178 22 7,734 12 14,823 23 5,155 8

11 Radhananagri 89,232 4,462 5 49078 55 11,600 13 22,305 25 1,787 2

12 Gaganbawada 28,228 0 0 11291 40 4,234 15 8,468 30 4,235 15

Total 776,261 227,232 215,882 96,006 167,123 70,018

Percentage 29% 28% 12% 22% 9%


Table No. 3.4: Information on problem Soil in the District-Kolhapur

S.

No. Problem Soil Area in ha

Extent of severity

Very Severe Severe Mild

1 Saline 5356.00 2142.40 1874.60 1339.00

2 Alkaline 3350.00 1407.00 1172.50 771.00

3 Acidic 313111.00 14017.00 67644.00 231628.00

4 Soil erosion 497141.00 172278.00 198365.00 126498.00

5 Iron Toxicity - - - -

6 Micro-nutrients

deficiency 12175 (No.) - - -

7 Water logged condition 3076.00 855.00 1073.00 1148.00

8 Others - - - -



Land: -

The total number of operational land holding in the District is 6,13,491. Out of this the

maximum is under marginal farmers (54.23 %). The details of demographic information are

given in Table No. 3 A.

Pattern of land Ownership

Sr.No Operation Holding Number Area in ha.

1. > 20.0 ha 263 14253

2. 10.0- 20.0ha 729 9367

3. 5 - 10.0 ha 4938 31861

4. 2.0 - 5.0 ha. 43311 12125

5. 1.0 - 2.0 ha. 99912 139196

6. 0.50 - 1.00 ha. 131618 93868

7. < 0.50 ha. 332720 73112 .

Total 613491 482952

Table No. 3.5: Information of Operational Land Holding

Sl.

No.

Name of the

Block

Operational holding (number and area)

Large* Medium* Small* Marginal*

No. of

holdi-

ngs

Area

No. of

hold-

ings

Area

No. of

hold-

ings

Area

No. of

hold-

ings

Area

1 Karveer 20 338.88 2478 7363.34 7845 10710.55 59836 19611.19

2 Panhala 28 567.91 2581 8927.56 5298 7268.49 48035 12642.9

3 Shahuwadi 140 2752.78 5058 16856.73 8244 11598.51 37719 11948

4 Kagal 46 1495.6 2970 9226.36 8708 11975.4 44349 16504.72

5 Hatkanangle 42 827.1 2710 7911.16 9434 12865.03 55319 20228.43

6 Shirol 21 496.26 2111 6001.48 9065 12385.31 41063 16896.91

7 Gadhinglaj 28 465.09 3009 9159.64 9163 12609.33 53846 17159.11

8 Chandgad 185 3182.9 5621 19311.98 7734 10851 40987 12537.87

9 Ajara 62 1286.49 5746 10340.03 6994 9775.11 28213 9841.84

10 Bhudargad 38 481.41 3170 10491.52 6089 8444.73 37119 11236.6

11 Radhana-

nagri 84 1565.3 3235 11042.08 5928 8233.77 43576 12462.31

12 Gaganba-

wada 66 1057.65 1762 6267.93 1805 2581.86 5757 1953.67

Total 760 14517 40451 122900 86307 119299 495819 163024

• Please indicate the Range

• Please collect the data separately for Male and Female wherever is possible

Source: District Socio Economic Survey 2013


Table No. 3.6: Information on Land use pattern in the Kolhapur District.

S.

No

Name of the

block

Geographical

Area (ha)

Cultivatable

Area (ha)

Cultivated

Area (ha)

Cultivable

waste (ha)

Current

Fallow

(ha)

Forest

Reserved

(ha)

Pasture

(ha)

Land

put to

non agri.

Use (ha)

Land

under

misc.

planta

tion

(ha)

Barren &

uncultu-

rable

land

(waste

land) (ha)

1 Karveer 67,113 63,369 46,123 5,414 2,864 804 3,839 5,833 5 2,172

2 Panhala 56,871 33,612 29,551 4,393 3,698 11,591 2,641 2,086 62 2,937

3 Shahuwadi 104,352 56,007 45,234 9,438 3,623 21,912 10,517 3,689 121 9,915

4 Kagal 54,754 54,555 44,398 271 3,106 1,114 1,023 3,197 377 1,316

5 Hatkanangle 60,937 60,005 46,170 775 3,978 1,433 2,813 5,108 0 798

6 Shirol 50,783 48,631 39,349 1,509 3,070 864 1,212 4,061 21 837

7 Gadhinglaj 48,115 44,155 39,675 100 4,380 1,818 798 1,277 0 1,204

8 Chandgad 96,542 54,970 50,850 1,622 2,498 27,100 1,845 3,574 0 7,867

9 Ajara 54,888 37,489 31,990 2,243 3,256 12,273 1,860 2,117 0 1,243

10 Bhudargad 64,446 35,376 30,184 1,528 2,785 23,790 785 3,429 879 1,172

11 Radhananagri 89,232 38,824 29,012 13,097 3,351 26,775 1,453 1,260 2,623 11,756

12 Gaganbawada 28,228 13,759 9,769 0 3,990 10,626 2,617 270 0 1,022

Total 776,261 540,752 442,305 40,390 40,599 140,100 31,403 35,901 4,088 42,239

Percentage 70% 57% 5% 5% 18% 4% 4.5% 1% 5%



B) Climate

The climate of the Kolhapur plain is temperate and similar to the other district of Bombay

Deccan adjoining the Ghats. In the western part of Kolhapur near the Sahyadri, it is always

cooler than that in the eastern part which is liable to hot winds during April and May. The nights

over the whole district are generally cool due to the influence of the sea breezes which set in

during the afternoons and continue till late in the evening.

The whole year climate of Kolhapur district may be divided into three periods as

follows:-

(1) Hot weather period from March to May,

(2) Rainy period from June to October and

(3) Cold weather period from November to February.

C) Rainfall and Temperature

The Kolhapur district has monsoon sub-tropical climate characterized by hot summer,

wet monsoon and dry winter. The district receives rainfall ranges from 600 mm to 6000 mm and

rainfall is 1691 mm.

The monsoon season (June to September) is characterized by high to moderate rainfall as

compared to eastern part of the district. The Maximum & Minimum temperature of the district is

ranges from 16 to 35.9c.

Table No. 3.7: Block wise average rainfall information of District Kolhapur

Sr.

No.

Name of

Block

Average Rainfall and rainy days (in ‘mm’)

2009 2010 2011 2012

Rainfall No.of

days Rainfall

No.of

days Rainfall

No.of

days Rainfall

No.of

days

1 Karveer 808.80 56 856.7 50 878.6 69 2584 89

2 Kagal 825.30 63 776.0 55 684.0 58 3123 100

3 Panhala 1403.00 56 1418.0 63 1355.0 68 693 62

4 Shahuwadi 1820.20 68 1870.0 83 1731.0 82 523 56

5 Hatkanagale 872.80 45 950.0 60 641.0 59 1302 77

6 Shirol 665.00 44 486.0 46 216.0 24 1805 80

7 Radhanagari 4885.00 95 2889.0 95 4265.0 97 5829 119

8 Gaganbavada 4478.00 106 6063.0 132 6945.0 111 1307 78

9 Bhudargad 1609.00 79 1610.0 87 1597.0 85 603 49

10 Gadahinglaj 915.00 60 1150.0 73 952.0 57 1370 81

11 Ajra 1885.00 75 2056.2 87 1946.0 86 434 36

12 Chandgad 2502.00 90 2646.0 98 3166.0 93 724 54

Total 22669.10 837.0 22770.90 929.0 24376.60 889.0 20297.00 881.0

Average 1889.09 69.8 1897.58 77.4 2031.38 74.1 1691.42 73.4


Table No. 3.8: Information on Occurrence of Drought / Floods in the District Kolhapur

Sr.

No. Name of Block

Occurrence of

Drought / Floods Year Severity % cropped area affected

Livestock

mortality

% of Farm

families affected

1 Hatakanagle, Shirol,

Kagal & Gadhinglaj Drought 2012 S > 50 % loss to 2965 ha -

2 All Blocks Flood & high

rainfall 2011 S

> 50 % loss to 398.89 ha

368759 Farmers

< 50 % loss to 334.11 ha.

3 All Blocks Flood & high

rainfall 2013 VS

> 50 % loss to 8241.50 ha

< 50 % loss to 5103.26 ha.



Climatic Condition 5 division. Rainfall – 7000-600 mm. Temperature – 42-7 cm.



Rocks, Minerals and Bauxite Areas.



4 Types of Soils.



Rocks, Minerals and Bauxite Areas.


Natural Resources Map Satellite Photograph

Kolhapur District

Distance – South to North – 165 km., East to West – 90 km.


D) Dairy Activity

There is a strong dairy co-operative structure, with a well built infrastructure in the farm

of more than 4381 co-op. Dairy societies spread throughout the district Kolhapur Jilla Dudha

Utpadak Co-op Sangh (Gokul), Warna Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh and Yalgud Sahakari

Dudh Utpadak Sangh are the three major milk unions operating for collection of milk and milk

processing activities in the district. Additional two milk unions have also established in the

district and have commenced their operation in the district viz. Shri Mahalaxmi Sahakari Dudh

Sangh, Hamidwada Siddhart World Trade Pvt. Ltd., Parvati India Estate, Yadrav, Siddharth Milk

Foods, Shirol, Samrudhi Milk Foods, Kagal, Shahu Dudh, Kagal.

The average per day milk collection in the district is 14.53 lakh liters. The district

occupies third position in the state in terms of milk production and estimated per capita milk

availability at 449 gms is much above the state average of 187 gms.

Dairy development activity is the mast popular allied agricultural activity of is recognized

as one of the major income generating activities in the district. Most of the women SHGs are

taking up diary as income generating activity.

Table No. 3.9: Details of milk processing plant and chilling plant with capacity in Kolhapur

district is as below: (Figures in lacks)

Activity Kolhapur Sangh Warana Sangh

Capacity Handling (Average)

7-00 4-68

6-00 3-80

Chilling centre Capacity Handling (Average)

Lingnoor 1-25 1-06 Borvade 1-00 1-19 Gogave 0-50 0-51 Tavarevadi 1-00 0-7

Hatkanangle Hanimanal 0.060 Kale 0.065 Bambavade 0.090

Table No. 3.10 : Expected milk procurement in Kolhapur District

Sr. No. Taluka liters

1 Shahuwadi 87850

2 Panhala 160770

3 Hatkanangale 136340

4 Shirol 93990

5 Karveer 196445

6 Gaganbavada 33200

7 Radhanagari 97476

8 Kagal 133452

9 Bhudargad 87791

10 Ajara 77550

11 Gadhinglaj 122580

12 Chandgad 104956

Total 1332400


Table No. 3.11 : Milk Procurement of Co-operative Federation and Private

Projects in Kolhapur District

Name of the Sangh / Private Project Taluka Total Proces-

sing Units

Capa-city

per day

Sangh

1) Kolhapur Zilha Dudh Utpadak Sangh Karvir 1 700,000

2) Warana Sahakari Dudh Sangh Panhala 1 600,000

Private Project

1) Mehata Dairy Karvir 1 70,000

2) Chatrapati Shahu Milk & Milk Kagal 1 70,000

3) Sidharth Milk Foods Shirol 1 200,000

4) Swabhimani Agro Products Shirao 1 40,000

5) Samrudhi Milk Products Kagal 1 10,000

6) Hamunan Yalgud Kagal 1 10,000

7) Sahyadri Dudh Utpadak Sangh Chandgad 1 7,000

Table No. 3.12: Chilling centers in Kolhapur District

Name of Co-op Sangh Chilling Centres Capacity Average procurement

per day

1) Kolhapur Zilha Dudh Sangh

Lingnoor, Gadhinglaj 1.25 105426

Borvade(Bidri), Kagal 1.00 109701

Gogave Shahuwadi. 0.50 43600

Tavaravedi Chandgad 1.00 73319

2) Warana Dudh Sangh

Hatkanangle -- --

Hanimanal 0.060 --

Kale 0.065 --

Bambavade 0.090 --


E) Animal Husbandry

Animal Husbandry is year round source of employment and income to farmers as also

those who are full time engaged in livestock farming. Livestock farming is a beneficial activity

and has helped in increasing the socio-economic level of people at large in rural areas.

As per the 2007, the bovine population at the district comprised of 899564 cattles

including 253347 cross breeds and 646217 Buffaloes.

Livestock and Poultry farming contributes to increasing national income through

production of milk, meat, wool, eggs and other by-products and their sale in domestic as well as

international markets. Poultry is next to diary in terms of importance under animal husbandry

sector. Poultry has developed on commercial scale in the district. There are large scale layer

units in the district functioning properly in the co-operative sector. The district is having 4.03

lakh commercial layers and 5.28 lakh commercial broilers.

In the district small and marginal farmers, traditional shepherds in particular take up

sheep of goat rearing for mutton /meat purposes. The population of district prefers mutton /meat

to chicken in their diet. Therefore, sheep and goat is an activity having great scope for

development. The sheep, goat milk and wool production in the district is 71.4 lakh kg and 132.61

MT respectively.

Table No. 3.13 : Table : Taluka wise Livestock population (As per year 2007) and

Veterinary Hospitals in Kolhapur District.

Sr.

No.

Taluka Cows Buffa-

lows

Permanent Vet. Hospital Artificial

Inseminati

on Centre

Vet.

Polyclinic/

Mini

Polyclinics

Gr1

Dispen-

saries

Gr2

Dispen-

saries

1) Shahuvadi 24,727 52,437 1 6 6 13

2) Panhala 25,160 61,701 1 4 8 13

3) Hatkanangale 25,623 69,132 1 10 10 21

4) Shirol 19,653 68,434 1 7 14 22

5) Karvir 34,403 95,578 1 12 7 20

6) Gaganbavada 4,617 9,884 0 3 2 5

7) Radhanagari 20,891 46,620 0 8 6 14

8) Kagal 32,435 70,167 1 9 8 18

9) Bhudargad 11,777 36,170 0 7 3 10

10) Aajara 10,268 31,221 0 5 4 9

11) Gadhinglaj 18,025 59,425 1 12 4 17

12) Chandgad 25,768 45,448 0 8 5 13

T O T A L 253,34

7

646,21

7

7 91 77 175


Table No. 3.14: INFORMATION ON LIVESTOCK STATUS IN THE DISTRICT

S.

No. Block

Milch Draught

Animal Sheep Goat Poultry Birds

Horse

&

Pony

Oth-

ers Cows Buffaloes No No No

Bac-

kyard Farm

L UP E L UP E

1 Karveer 1016 13647 - 47100 7993 - 10080 42460 13769 64170 65052 359 562

2 Panhala 976 8025 - 28438 3695 - 11602 7244 15168 74522 184378 78 35

3 Shahuwadi 2808 3888 - 25429 1016 16276 4557 24421 52446 80081 65 46

4 Kagal 349 11630 0 28257 7406 - 9163 27661 15692 24523 26390 253 0

5 Hatkanangle 829 8625 - 28000 7475 - 7044 31641 8443 141434 87869 501 1844

6 Shirol 1085 6657 - 28653 4378 - 5376 15735 7914 17300 24925 334 319

7 Gadhinglaj 615 3522 - 29268 2264 - 12791 18835 22760 23638 99497 232 44

8 Chandgad 1528 2711 - 25015 704 - 19391 1642 13479 27652 44355 9 0

9 Ajara 304 876 - 13381 602 - 8901 52 13903 44063 38268 3 3

10 Bhudargad 638 1993 - 18534 780 - 9863 2667 11296 37542 45125 72 180

11 Radhananagri 1440 5755 - 23518 1357 - 10649 13113 14466 26567 19436 361 0

12 Gaganbawada 693 334 - 3266 1024 - 2827 61 6031 9632 23920 135 0

Total 12281 67663 0 298859 38694 0 123963 165668 167342 543489 739296 2402 3033

L = Local

UP = Upgraded

E = Exotic



F) Fisheries Development.

In Kolhapur District, fisheries play an important role for betterment of rural economy through better use of land and water resource.

Prominent rivers, that and low through the district include Krishna, Warna, Doodh Ganga, Vedganga, Hiranyakeshi, Gathprabha, Panchganga,

Tamrapari with go riverine stretches around 955 km length. Thre riverine portions are leased to Fisheries Societies. The annual fish production

of the district is 3240 MT involving an aggregate annual income of Rs.972.00 Lack. The composition of catch received include local major fist

viz. Tambir, Shingoda, Maral, Wam etc. and local minor fishes such as, Alkut, Khudas, Vans, Dandvan, Dandoi, Tambudki etc.

Table No. 3.15: Details of Fisheries Units.

Inland Ponds Rivers Reservoirs

Nos.

Unit

s

Species

cultured

Averag

e

Yield

per

Ha.

(MT)

Expecte

d

Yield

per Ha.

Gap

In

Yiel

d

Kg.

Reasons

For

Gap in

Yield

Boat

&

Net

Units

Species

harvested

Averag

e

Catch

Per

Boat

Kg.

Gap

In

Catc

h

Per

Boat

Kg.

Reason

s

For

Gap

In

Yield

No

s

No.

Of

boat

s

&

net

unit

s

Species

harveste

d

per

boat

kg.

Averag

e catch

per

Ha.

In kg.

Expecte

d catch

Per

Ha.

In

Kg.

Gap

In

Yiel

d

Catc

h

Per

Ha.

Kg.

Reasons

For gap

In

yield

48

Cattla,

Rohu,Mrig

al,

Cyprinus

Grasscarp,

Silver carp

.46

1.1

.64

Non

Avalabili

ty of

Require

no. of

fingerling

s fish

seed

River

Portio

ns

90

Cattla,

Rohu,Mrig

al,

Cyprinus &

Local

fishes

- -

Riverin

e

pollutio

n

7

-

-

.07

.36

.29

Non

Avalabili

ty of

Require

no. of

fingerling

s fish

seed


G) Irrigation

The gross irrigated area in the district is 203664 ha. – 26.26%. At this 36% area is irrigated by surface water from 7 main pernial rivers

viz. Krishna, Warna, Doodh Ganga, Vedganga, Hiranyakeshi, Gathprabha, Panchganga and other rivers. The remaining 64% area is irrigated by

wells/canals and tanks. There are 4 major, 6 medium and 83 minor irrigation projects in the district. Besides series of Kolhapur type weirs for

lifting water from the rivers out of the net irrigated area. Cereals are produced on 172 thousand ha., Pulses on 31thousand ha., Oil Seeds on 134

thousand ha., Sugarcane on 109 thousand ha.

Table No.3.16: Information on rain fed and irrigated area in the district Kolhapur

Sl.

No.

Name of the

block

Rainfed area

(ha) %

Irrigated area (source wise)

Major Medium Minor

% P A % P A % P A

1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

1 Shahuwadi 63369 30.07 8901 6209 17580 7489 7042 3025

2 Panhala 33662 16.31 8817 7215 13944 9708 1999 2047

3 Hatkangale 56007 21.08 25026 23454 0 0 665 323

4 Shirol 54555 36.94 28492 19515 0 0 0 0

5 Karvir 60005 34.05 28905 26848 2611 1884 1577 831

6 Gaganbavada 48621 36.07 0 0 16170 3610 1315 1255

7 Radhanagari 47691 16.71 12118 11721 740 450 1773 96

8 Kagal 59622 7.22 18088 20994 0 5220 1269 1431

9 Bhudargad 38753 13.22 2708 2318 12754 10142 2675 1737

10 Ajara 35322 25.75 0 0 14863 3704 3410 811

11 Gadhinglaj 38824 28.01 0 0 15902 7771 3048 1532

12 Chandgad 31545 26.71 0 0 14967 8716 9406 2220

Total Kolhapur Dist. 567976 23.80 23.80 133055 118274

109531 58694

34179 15308

Source: Irrigation Dept.,Kolhapur


Lift Wells /

Bore wells Tank ZP Level project Local level project

% P

(7+10+13) A (8+11+14) P A P A P A P A

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

50 33523 16723

366 0 3025

1314

208

57 24760 18970

1484 0 2047

528

332

71 25691 23777

1611 0 323

621

496

58 28492 19515

1419 0 0

65

107

88 33093 29563

2971 0 831

463

419

15 17485 4865

198

1255

0

0

37 14631 12267

1060 0 96

345

285

82 19357 27645

3215 0 1431

950

1002

42 18137 14197

312 0 1737

149

0

13 18273 4515

274 0 811

341

1487

28 18950 9303

1591 0 1532

1001

947

33 24373 10936

735 0 2220

475

560

69 276765 192276 15236 15308 6351 5843

Source: Irrigation Dept., Kolhapur


Table No. 3.17: Information on Rain fed area & Project wise Irrigated area in the Kolhapur District Area in ‘ ha.’

Sr. No. District Command Area % Irrigated Area (Sourcewise)

P A %

Major Irrigation Project

1 Radhanagari 26650 15 26560 26560

72.00 2 Tulshi 5710 3 5710 5710

3 Dudhganga 61032 33 61032 39365

4 Warna 39753 49 39753 24797

Total 133055

133055 96432

Medium Irrigation Project

5 Kasari 14190 14 14190 8609

55.00

6 Patgaon 12070 12 12070 9516

7 Jangamhatti 5730 6 5730 4773

8 Kumbhi 13500 13 13500 8007

9 Kadvi 13368 14 13368 4889

10 Chikotra 9110 8 9110 5917

11 Chitri 9653 9 9653 8378

12 Jambre 5350 6 5350 1890

13 Ghatprabha 6936 7 6936 3032

14 Hiryankeshi 3784 4 3784 1577

15 Dhamni 2100 2 2100 0

16 Ambeohal 6342 6 6342 0

Total 102133

102133 56588

Minor Irrigation Project

17 Total 215 Project

40677 46 40677 24436 60.07

Source : Irrigation Dept. Kolhapur

a . % - Share of total area under irrigation.

b . P - Potential area of the project.

c . A - Actual area irrigated.



Irrigation Sources.

Rivers Medium Percolation

15 Project Tank

Major 12 234

Project Minor K-T weir

4 Irrigation 412

Tanks

148



Irrigation Potential

Rainfall K-T Weir

River Valley Irrigation

Dam Project


H) Sericulture Development

Sericulture enterprise is and employment generating farm based activity particularly for

farm women is getting slow momentum in the district. Mulberry plantation and rearing at silk

warm cocoon is a nontraditional activity for farmers of the district. The procurement of cocoon

be Govt. has promoted sericulture.

In Kolhapur District total 154 farmer have 171 acres of mulberry plantation in 64 villages

in Ajara, Chandgad, Gadhinglaj, Hatkanangale, Shirol, Karveer, Shahuwadi Taluk’s.

Upto October, 2014 end, farmers have product 19679.400 kg cocoon from 39205 DFLs

in different villages of Kolhapur district.

Currently more and more farmers are turning towards sericulture we hope good number

of acres plantation in near future.

Kolhapur district central grainge center at Gadhinglaj provides sericulture eggs carden all

over Maharashtra.

Table No. 3.18: Information of Area under Mulberry and Cocoon

Production

Sl.

No. Taluka

No. of

units

Area under

Mulberry (ha)

Average Cocoon Production

(kg/ha)

Taluka District State

1

Hatkangale 39 18.8 162 137 150

Shirol 24 12 140 137 150

Gadhinglaj 50 20.5 148 137 150

Chandgad 42 17.2 145 137 150

Total 155 68.5 595 548 600

I) Farm Mechanization

Farm mechanization is an important sector as it leads to increased crop production and

land productivity, better utilization of irrigation potential, adoption of multiple cropping patterns

etc. Besides minimizing cost, increasing income, reducing drudgery in operations, increases in

cropping intensity etc. Post harvest machineries helps in reduction in loss during and adds value

scientifically through clearing, grading and packing.

Majority of crops grown in general of Sugarcane in particular would need farm

mechanization. The present population of tractors, power tillers and drought animals are16289,

17157, 108273 respectively.


Table No. 3.19 : BLOCK WISE INFORMATION ON THE AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS AND FARM MACHINERY

Sr.

No

Name of the

Block

Agricultural Implements and Farm Machinery

Tractors Pump Sets Power tillers Sprayers Puddlers Weeders Harvester /

Thresher

NO.

Of

House

holds

No.

NO. Of

House

holds

No.

NO.

Of

House

holds

No.

NO.

Of

House

holds

No.

NO.

Of

House

holds

No.

NO.

Of

House

holds

No.

NO.

Of

House

holds

No.

1 Karveer 2343 2343 37343 37343 4132 4132 11715 11715 12276 12276 35145 35145 53 53

2 Panhala 1590 1590 23754 23754 3014 3014 7950 7950 11591 11591 23850 23850 47 47

3 Shahuwadi 1160 1160 19813 19813 2147 2147 5800 5800 10734 10734 17400 17400 24 24

4 Kagal 1893 1893 34962 34962 3611 3611 9465 9465 9217 9217 28395 28395 49 49

5 Hatkanangle 1697 1697 29219 29219 3196 3196 8485 8485 0 0 25455 25455 37 37

6 Shirol 1965 1965 31379 31379 3749 3749 9825 9825 0 0 29475 29475 43 43

7 Gadhinglaj 1731 1731 32943 32943 3471 3471 8655 8655 279 279 25965 25965 67 67

8 Chandgad 1497 1497 27989 27989 2798 2798 7485 7485 13976 13976 22455 22455 38 38

9 Ajara 1061 1061 17633 17633 1324 1324 5305 5305 12445 12445 15915 15915 31 31

10 Bhudargad 937 937 19249 19249 1249 1249 4685 4685 1182 1182 14055 14055 29 29

11 Radhananagri 1378 1378 26987 26987 1834 1834 6890 6890 9481 9481 20670 20670 37 37

12 Gaganbawada 159 159 4391 4391 78 78 795 795 1769 1769 2385 2385 9 9

Total 17411 17411 305662 305662 30603 30603 87055 87055 82950 82950 261165 261165 464 464

Source: ADO, ZP, Kolhapur


J) Marketing Infrastructure trade & commerce The district is pioneer in trade and commerce. Chh. Shahu Maharaj established a jaggery

(gul) market at Shahupuri in 1895. The market is now shifted to Shahu Market Yard’ which is a

regulated Agricultural produce Market. It is well known for jaggery trading in India. For the

growth of trade and commerce; Shahu Maharaj invited the traders from Gujrath , M.P Rajasthan

and Karnataka. They were treated respectfully and concessions were given in various taxes.

Because of the helping hand extended by the public, private and co-operative Banks, trade and

commerce in the district flourished on larger scale. The means of communication, Transportation

have also helped for the upliftment. The sansthas such as the Shetkari Shakari Sangh Kolhapur

Zilla Sahakari Tambakhu Kharedhi Vikri Sangh, Shirol Taluka sheti Sahakari sangh and 18 other

shakari sanstha are working at taluka level.

The district had 12 regulated market yard consisting of four main market yards and eight

sub-market yards. The main market yards are at Kolhapur, Jaishingpur, Market Gadhinglaj and

Pethwadgaon. However, Jaysingpur Market yard is a singal market yard in the district with no

sub –market yard. They have facilities for provision of storage and agriculture products. In these

Market Yards paddy, Jaggery groundnut, mage, jawar, wheat, Groundnut, and chills etc. are

brought for sale.

The chief exports of the district are rice, suger, chilli powder, tobacco, gur (Jaggery),

cloth, oil engines, leather goods and silver ornaments from Hupri, Kolhapuri Chappals, from

Kapashi and Kolhapuri gur from Malkapur. Outstanding among them is Kolhapur jaggery. Its

fame and taste have crossed the boundaries of the nation and reached the countries. Hupari, has

developed skillful and delicate art of ‘Silver ornament.’ This silver ornament making unit has

vast potential for marketing in the world market especially in Europe and Middle East where

imitation jewelry has a great demand.

Proper marketing of goods produced is very vital for the success of all rural development

programmes. It is essential to ensure to ensure availability of adequate market infrastructure and

payment of remunerative prices. The marketing problems of agricultural and nonfarm products

are different in nature. Therefore, it is desirable to develop right type of product specific

marketing infrastructure. Storage Godawons and market yard facilities play an important role in

creation of scientific storage capacity and ensuring remunerative prices to producers of

agricultural and allied production.

The important agriculture produce of the district are Paddy, Soyabean, Pulses, Maze,

Soyabean, Groundnut, Sunflower, Potato etc. Soyabean, Groundnut and Sunflower need

systemic storage facilities, Cold Storage facilities are required particularly for Horticulture

produce such as vegetables and fruit crops.

The basic marketing infrastructure available in the district include 4 main market yards

viz., Kolhapur, Vadgaon, Jaysingpur, Gadhinglaj and 21 Sub-situated at Karveer, Kagal,

Shahuwadi, Shirol, Chandgad and Ajara etc. Taluka. In District 629 rural godowns (Capacity

155, 150 tons) three cold storage (Capacity 76.5 tons) and 35 Onion storage (14900 tons) are

available to store agricultural products. CWS has constructed a godown with capacity of 10000

MT near district headquarter.

Good market are available in Kolhapur for Jaggery, Gadhinglaj for Chillies, Jaysingpur,

for Tobacco, Groundnut, Jowar, Shirol and Kolhapur for vegetables,. Hatkanangale and Shirol

blocka, especially Nandani are famous for taking up very good production of vegetables and

floriculture.


Table No. 3.20: Information regarding markets for the District (2013-14) (Quaintal)

Sl.

No.

Name of the

block

Name of the

market centre

Total

Periodicity

(Rs.)

Important

commodities

handled

Commodity

wise

quantity

handled

(annual)

Area covered

No. of farm

families

covered

1

Karveer,

Panhala,

Radhanagari,

Gaganbawada,

Bhudargad,

Shahuwadi,

Kagal

Agriculture Produce

Market Committee,

Kolhapur

9,58,77,955

Jaggery 765264 Karveer, Panhala 1213

Onion 1364801 Karveer, Pune 8164

Potato 640091 Karveer 2411

Gralic 68856 Karveer 812

Tomato 147570 Karveer, Panhala 955

Cabbage 51841 Karveer, Radhanagari. 711

Brinjal 56037 Karveer, Bhudargad 635

2 Gadhinglaj,

Ajara, Kagal,

Chandgad,

Agriculture Produce

Market Committee,

Gadhinglaj

1,03,56,814

Jaggery, Chilli,

Jawar, Soyabean,

Maize

2051300 Gadhinglaj, Ajara, Chandgad 756

Chandgad, Gadhinglaj, Ajara

345

3 Jaysingpur Agriculture Produce

Market Committee,

Shirol

52,77,742

Tobaco,

Soyabean, Jawar,

Wheat

57800 Shirol 1678

4 Vadgaon Peth Hatkanangale 94,28,299 Rice, Groundnut 30000 Hatkanangale 1322

Source: Market Committee, Kolhapur

Table No. 3.21: Public–Private Partnership in Market related initiatives in the district

Type of partnership Partners Activity

undertaken

Volume of

trade (Tons)

Value of trade

(in Rs.) Terms of reference

I II III

Public Private Partnership

Banana Sanjeevani Agro

Tamadalage

-- Banana

Plantation

17 tons / day 1.70 lakhs per day As per guidelines of

Public Private

Partnership Ms.B.G.Ghadage 13 tons / day 1.00 lakhs per day

Public Private Partnership

Rice Gomtesh Agro

Tamadalage

Rice

Demonstration

5 tons / per day 1.00 lakhs per day


Table No. 3.22: Movement and Flow pattern of Different Commodities from regulated markets to the District

(Optional) (2013-14) (Quaintal)

Name of

the

commo-

dity

Location of the

trade

Quantity (volume) of the trade Value of the trade

Inflow Outflow Inflow Outflow

Di

st Block

Vil

l. Dist Block Vill. Dist Block Vill Dist

Bloc

k Vill.

Dis

t

Bloc

k Vill.

Jaggary

KO

LH

AP

UR

Karveer,

Panhala,

Shahuw-

adi

23 7,65,264

Karveer,

Panhala,

Shahuw-

adi

23 7,65,264

Karve

er

7 1,86,53,61,60

0 Karv

eer,

Panh

ala,

Shah

uw-

adi

23

Kol

hap

ur

Karv

eer

5

Onion 17 13,64,801 17 13,64,801 6 19,43,93,0670 17 4

Potato 7 6,40,091 7 6,40,091 4 85,55,41,690 7 2

Garlic 2 68,856 2 68,856 1 20,79,33,200 2 1

Tomato 36 1,47,570 36 1,47,570 25 12,64,63,000 36 13

Cabbage 42 51,841 42 51,841 20 2,66,34,950 42 11

Brinjal 52 56,037 52 56,037 35 7,49,39,950 52 22

* Information may be collected from organized and unorganized market



Table No. 3.23: – Information on Market Infrastructure facilities available in the district Kolhapur

S.No. Name of the

Location

Name of the

structure*

Type of

service

offered

Location of

facility

Commodities

handled

Capacity Tariff if any

Installed Used

1

Shri. Shahu

Market Yard,

Kolhapur

APMC, God

owns

Storage for

Agril. Comm. Kolhapur

Jaggery, Onion,

Potato, Fruits 6800 4235

300 Ton

500/Annum

2 Sub Market, Kagal Private

Godown

Storage for

Agril. Comm. Kagal

Jaggery, Chilli,

Jawar,

Soyabean,

Maize

4000 2317 --

3 Sub Market,

Malkapur APMC Office

Office Hall,

Godown Malkapur

Brinjal, Sweet

Potato 500 256 18000/Annum

4 Shri Shahu Market

Yard, Kolhapur C.W.H.

Agril and

Storage Kolhapur

Jaggery, Chilli,

Jawar,

Soyabean,

Maize

12150 11250 --

5 Shri Shahu Market

Yard, Kolhapur

Co-op

Godown

Agril and

Storage Kolhapur

Jaggery, Chilli,

Soyabean, 25264 8100 --

6 Shri Shahu Market

Yard, Kolhapur

Private

Godown

Agril and

Storage Kolhapur

Jaggery, Chilli,

Soyabean, 99150 82554 --

7 Sub Market Yard,

Kagal

Co-op

Godown

Agril and

Storage Kagal

Jaggery, Chilli,

Soyabean, 3000 2260 --

* Name of the structure like warehouse, cold storage, park house etc.



K) Forest

The total forest coverage of the district is measuring 1672 sq.kms. out of which 563 sq.

kms. Is a reserved forest and 417sq. kms. Is a protected forest. The forest area is about 22 % of

the total geographical area pf the district.

There are three main types of forest in the Kolhapur district.

1) The sub-Tropical Evergreen,

2) The Moist Deciduous and the semi Evergreen,

3) The Dry Deciduous forest.

In sub tropical evergreen forest, the principal trees are Jambul, Anjan, Surangi, Jackfruit

etc. The ground covered with the flora mostly consists of Karvi Brachan and others. In semi

evergreen and moist deciduous forest, we find Amba, Nana, Sissum are found in very little

quantity. These forests have been classified as reserve and protected forests, the practice of

shifting cultivation known as ‘Kunari’ has caused considerable devastation to the forest.

Firewood and grass are the main marketable products from this forest. The other forest products

like kaju fruit, Shikakai, silver cotton, Ani and wax etc. are received from the above forest.

The wild life found in Kolhapur forest division Gaur, Panther, Tiger, Sambar, Barking

deer Wild boar, Jungle fowl, peafowl, Giant squirrel etc.

However the increase in human population resulting in increasing demands for housing

and agricultural land, easy access in to forest areas. These all factors contributed to threat the

wild life in the Kolhapur Forest Division. The habitats of the wild animals have been drastically

reduced and population of wild animals that remaining feel cornered in small areas of

Wilderness.

Wild elephants migrated to Chandagad Range of Kolhapur Division in March 2004 from

highly rugged terrain of Sahyadri Mountain ranges on the boundary of Maharashtra and

Karnataka State from Karnataka State.

The number of elephants rose from Chandgad. At Present there are 4 elephants in

Kolhapur Division.

The wild elephant have also increased their roaming range during last six years since

there first migration to this area. These wild elephants have depredated upon agriculture as well

as on horticulture crop such as Paddy (Rice), Sweet Potato, Raggy (Nagali), Sugarcane, Coconut,

Arecanut, Banana, etc. in these villages.

Thus the wild elephants and other wild animals are causing extensive damage to the

property of villagers and more over have become threat to human life as well. The four persons

have been killed by the elephants during last 5 years. The local forest Staff is doing efforts to

specify the local villagers with their cooperation using traditional methods such as using

crackers, sounding drums, arranging “Hakara” etc. to keep the elephants away from human

habitations.


Table No. 3.24: DETAILS ON MEDICINAL, AROMATIC AND OTHER MINOR FOREST BY PRODUCE

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Sl.

No. Name of the block Crop Organic

Production

in Tons Organic

Production

in Tons Organic

Production

in Tons

1 Kolhapur Forest Division

(11 Forest Range)

Aromatic crops 0 0 0 0 0 0

Medicinal crops 0 0 0 0 0 0

Non- timber forest

produce

Hirda 1.59 Hirda 105.2 Hirda 130.774

Tamalpatra 15.4 Tamalpatra 12.82 Tamalpatra 130.774

Shikekai 0.455 Shikekai 6.25 Shikekai 28.41

Cashewnut 1.61 Cashewnut 16.102 Cashewnut 4.816

Dudhaphal 1.38 Dudhaphal 0.14 Dudhaphal 0.45

Karanj 0.27 Karanj 0.13 Karanj 0.49

Amasol 1.1 Amasol 1.5 Amasol 1.00

Gardal 7.75 Gardal 16.03 Gardal 14.00

Wastol 0.06 Wastol 0.2 Wastol 0.2

Triphala 2.35 Biba 0.07 Biba 0.65

Kadipatta 0.26 Triphala 0.54 Kadipatta 0.50

Gum 0.01 Honey 50 Liter Gum 0

Triphala 1.01 Triphala 0.200

Source: Department of Forest.


L) Agri. Clinic and Agri. Business Centers (ACABC)

A scheme for setting up of Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centers has been launched

with active participation of NABARD. These centers will provide a package of soil and input

testing facilities and other consultancy services. They will strengthen transfer of technology and

extension services and provide self-employment opportunities to technically trained person.

Bank provide loans on attractive terms for setting up these centers with refinance support from

NABARD. The scheme aims at supplementing the existing extension network to accelerate the

process of technology transfer to agriculture and providing supplementary service of input

supply and services for which farmer’s presently depend largely upon state agencies.

GOI has announced a subsidy for establishment of ACABC units which is open to

Agriculture Graduates/ Agri. Diploma holders in the subjects allied to Agriculture, Animal

Husbandry, Forestry, Dairy, Veterinary, Poultry, Farming and Pisciculture. The subsidy would

be admissible only in respect of agripenure trained under the ACABC scheme. Credit linked

capital subsidy @ 36% of the capital cost of the project funded through bank loan is available.

In respect of beneficiaries belonging to SC, ST, Women and other disadvantaged sections

categories the rate of subsidy is 44% of the block capital cost.

There is one ACABC training centre is available at Uttur in Ajara Taluka. There are 353

ACABC trainers in the District.

M) Banking

The District is under Lead Bank Stewardship of Bank of India, a Prominent Nationalized

Bank in the country. There are 23 nationalized banks and 8 public sector /private scheduled

banks with 289 branches of which 182 branches have been allotted specific service area covering

1145 villages. The Kolhapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Occupying major share of

rural finance in co-operative sector. They have 189 branch net work in the district. Maharashtra

State Co-op. Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd. Operating in the district with their

16 branches. Beside there are 60 Urban Co-op Banks and 2161 Co-operative Societies (Pat

Sanstha) contributors to the development of the district, In addition to above new generation

banks viz., HDFC, ICICI, Axis, Federal Bank, City Union Bank, have also opened their branches

at Kolhapur.


Table No. 3.25: List of credit institutes in operation for Agriculture and allied sector in the district.

Sl. No. Name of the block

Type of credit Organization and amount distributed in a year

Co-op Banks

No of

branches

No. of Borrower Amount

(in lakhs) ST MT LT TOTAL

1 Karveer 37 3216500 574375 38292 3829167 45836

2 Panhala 16 767270 137013 9134 913417 10934

3 Shahuwadi 11 287783 51390 3426 342598 4101

4 Kagal 18 1076252 192188 12813 1281253 15337

5 Hatkanangle 20 1353189 241641 16109 1610939 19283

6 Shirol 16 1262593 225463 15031 1503086 17992

7 Gadhinglaj 15 679773 121388 8093 809254 9687

8 Chandgad 13 364529 65094 4340 433963 5195

9 Ajara 10 401530 71702 4780 478012 5953

10 Bhudargad 13 535910 95698 6380 637989 7637

11 Radhananagri 16 577449 103116 6874 687439 8229

12 Gaganbawada 6 119202 21286 1419 141908 1686

Total 191 10641982 1900354 126690 12669026 151870

ST = Short term loan

MT= Medium term loan

LT = Long term loan

Source: District Lead Bank.

Cont……..


Sl. No. Name of the

block

Nationalized Banks Regional Rural Banks Private Banks

No. of

bran-

ches

No. of Borrower Amount

(in

lakhs)

No. of

bran-

ches

No. of

cre-

ditors

Amo-

unt

No. of

bran-

ches

No. of

creditors Amount

ST MT LT TOTAL

1 Karveer 99 2340787 677596 61600 3079982 24499 1 1054 2339 25 1248641 6354

2 Panhala 15 558376 161635 14694 734705 5844 0 0 0 5 2399 2074

3 Shahuwadi 12 209432 60625 5511 275568 2192 1 191 211 2 111717 567

4 Kagal 14 783235 226726 20611 1030573 8197 1 349 746 6 417800 2163

5 Hatkanangle 35 984774 285066 25915 1295756 10307 2 544 1559 24 525306 2098

6 Shirol 14 918843 265981 24180 1209004 9617 1 452 861 20 490137 2551

7 Gadhinglaj 14 494700 143203 13018 650922 5178 0 0 4 3 263887 1833

8 Chandgad 11 265284 76793 6981 349057 2777 0 0 0 2 141510 985

9 Ajara 8 292211 84587 7690 384488 3182 0 0 0 4 913 148241

10 Bhudargad 12 390005 112896 10263 513165 4082 0 0 0 1 279 1448

11

Radhananagri 13 420234 121647 11059 552940 4398 0 0 0 1 224165 1561

12

Gaganbawada 2 86749 25111 2283 114143 901 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 249 7744630 2241867 203806 10190303 81171.95 6 2590 5720 93 3426754 169875.3


Cont……..


Sl. No. Name of the block Total All the banks

No. of

branches No. of creditors Amount

No. of farmers

covered

No. of farmers

not covered

1 Karveer 162 8324277 79028 37460 2212782

2 Panhala 36 1985689 18851 11297 527841

3 Shahuwadi 26 744779 7071 6499 197979

4 Kagal 39 2785332 26443 11226 740405

5 Hatkanangle 81 3502042 33247 18750 930923

6 Shirol 51 3267579 31021 13143 868597

7 Gadhinglaj 32 1759248 16702 8474 467648

8 Chandgad 26 943398 8957 6042 250777

9 Ajara 22 1039157 10263 1861 276232

10 Bhudargad 26 1386932 13167 6086 368678

11 Radhananagri 30 1494432 14188 3934 397254

12 Gaganbawada 8 308495 2907 4694 82005

Total 539 27541360 261845 129466 7321121



O) Agro Processing.

The food processing industry offers dual benefits of resources use and value addition. It also adds employment generation. The district

agricultural products which can act as resource for food processing units. The Kolhapur district is the Sugar Bowl of Maharashtra. Along with

Sugar other food processing units such as Milk Processing, Fruit Processing, Vegetable Processing, Food Grain Processing offers great scope

for rising income level of district. Jaggery manufacture is a popular processing activity in the district and has ample scope for expansion. Being

near to Kokan Cashew Processing is picking up. In Kolhapur District more than 647 Agriculture goods processing co-operative societies exist.

Table No. 3.26: Information on Agro-processing facilities available in and outside the district

but serving the need of the district.

S.

NO

.

Taluka Food

Product

Production

Capacity

P.A.

Agro

Products

Production

Capacity

P.A.

Jaggery

Produ-

ction

Capacity

P.A.

Flour

/Rice

Milling

Produ-

ction

Capacity

P.A.

Cashew

nut

Production

Capacity

P.A.

Milk

Processing

Production

Capacity

P.A.

1 SHAHUWADI 17 6 TON 4 1 TON 21 100 TON 2 3 TON 10 12 TON 16 400000 LTR

2 PANHALA 8 3 TON 0

69 700 TON 9 20 TON 8 11 TON 18 600000 LTR

3 HATKANANGLE 98 200 TON 37 10 TON 10 65 TON 19 78 TON 12 9 TON 31 800000 LTR

4 SHIROL 62 40 TON 13 3 TON 1 3 TON 5 6 TON 5 10 TON 27 1500000 LTR

5 KARVEER 198 456 TON 23 30 TON 61 750 TON 39 87 TON 12 16 TON 30 1500000 LTR

6 GAGAN BAVDA 0

0

0

0

4 9 TON 15 800000 LTR

7 RADHANAGARI 12 1000 KG 5 3 TON 33 29 TON 1 1 TON 8 20 TON 21 1700000 LTR

8 KAGAL 20 3 TON 7 4 TON 31 45 TON 7 21 TON 19 28 TON 28 2000000 LTR

9 BHUDARGAD 16 4 TON 1 3 TON 9 30 TON 3 1 TON 18 31 TON 10 520000 LTR

10 AJARA 139 156 TON 7 6 TON 1 5 TON 2 2 TON 97 78 TON 20 400000 LTR

11 GADHINGLAJ 38 40 TON 5 9 TON 1 6 TON 6 18 TON 78 87 TON 23 1800000 LTR

12 CHANDGAD 52 180 TON 10 8 TON 0

24 25 TON 91 101 TON 27 1900000 LTR

TOTAL 660

112

237

117

362

266

Ref.: District Industry Centre, Kolhapur


Table No. 3.27: Information on Agro. -Processing (Sugar Factories) facilities available in the Kolhapur District

Sr

.

N

o.

Name of the

Block

Location of

the Processing

unit

Name Commodities

Processe

Type of

Processing

Capacity ( M.T.)

Installed Sugar

Production

1 Karveer Kolhapur Chha. Rajaram Sah. Sakhar Karakhana Sugarcane Sugar 2,200 500100

Kuditre Kumbhi S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 3,000 776960

2 Kagal Kagal Shahu Sahakari Sakhar Karakhana Sugarcane Sugar 3,500 946930

Hamidwada Mandlik Sah. Sakhar Sugarcane Sugar 2,500 651550

Kagal Dugdhganga-Vedganga Sugarcane Sugar 4,500 767000

3 Panhala Asurle Porle Datt S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 2,500 471615

. Warananagar Warananagar S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 7,500 1605650

4 Shahuwadi Shahuwadi Udaysingh S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 2,500 148900

5 Hatkanagale Ichalakaranji Panchaganga S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 5,000 770170

Hupari Jawahar S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 7,500 1664550

Narande Sharad S.S.Karkhana Sugarcane Sugar 2,500 715860

6 Shirol Shirol Datta S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 7,000 1512380

Shirol Gurudatta S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 4,200 763880

7 Radhanagari Parite Bhogawati S.S.Kharkhana sugarcane Sugar 4,000 651370

8 Gaganbavada Asalaj Dr. D. Y. Patil S.S.Kharkhana sugarcane Sugar 2,500 559700

9 Bhudargad Bidri Mauni S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 3,500

Indira Gandhi Mahila S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 2,500 125000

10 Gadahinglaj Harali Gadhiglaj S.S.Kharkhana sugarcane Sugar 2,000 205900

11 Ajra Gavase Ajara S.S.Kharkhana sugarcane Sugar 2,500 41865

12 Chandgad Halakarni Daulat S.S.Kharkhana Sugarcane Sugar 3,500 0

Chandgad Nalavade Sugars Sugarcane Sugar 2,500 270444

Rajgoli Hemras Technology Sugarcane Sugar 3,500 524926

Source: District Socio Economic Survey, Kolhapur


Table No. 3.28: Information of Co-generation (Electricity) production by Sugarcane Factories.

Sr.

No.

Name of the

Block

Location of the

Processing unit Name

Capacity (Mega

Watt)

Total Electricity Production

(Unit)

1 Karveer Kuditre Kumbhi S.S.Kharkhana 17.5 30231000

2 Kagal Kagal Shahu Sahakari Sakhar Karakhana 21.5 34300000

Hamidwada Mandlik Sah. Sakhar 12 22649850

Kagal Dugdhganga-Vedganga 27 43442825

Kagal Senapati Santaji 23 46035000

3 Panhala Asurle Porle Datt S.S.Kharkhana 23 52500000

. Warananagar Warananagar S.S.Kharkhana 44 91412500

4 Hatkanagale Ichalakaranji Panchaganga S.S.Kharkhana 30 47444000

Hupari Jawahar S.S.Kharkhana 27 38102015

Narande Sharad S.S.Karkhana 6 1872600

5 Shirol Shirol Datta S.S.Kharkhana 36 75000000

Shirol Gurudatta S.S.Kharkhana 15 30316000

6 Gaganbavada Asalaj Dr. D. Y. Patil S.S.Kharkhana 20 6000000

Chandgad Rajgoli Hemras Technology 20.5 45000000

Total 564305790


P) Power Supply

The continuance of availability of Power is the back bone of any irrigation project.

Inadequate and poor electricity supply disturbs the irrigation schedule, reduce the production of

may also Jeopardize the economic viability of the project.

There were 101208 pump sets energized in the district.

Q) Self Help Group (SHG)

SHG is homogenous group of people voluntarily formed to save whatever amount they

can conveniently save out of their earning and mutually agree to contribute to common fund of

the group, to be lent to member for meeting their productive of emergent credit needs.

Concept of SHG has taken strong roots in rural area of the programmed has by now

devolved in to massive peoples movement. SHG linkage approach has today been accepted

widely as a sustainable mechanism, to ensure the reach of various financial service to the poor.

This has also helpful to banks in many way and minimize operational problems at rural branches

viz.

1. Reduction in transaction cost by way of externalization of a part of the credit cycle.

2. Mobilization of small savings.

3. Assured and timely repayment leading to transfer recycling of funds.

4. An opportunity for expansion of business and coverage of poor client etc.

5. Prospects of future quality clients.

In Kolhapur district, Agriculture Dept., ATMA, NABARD, DRDA,MAVIM and NGO’s

have made efforts for formation of SHGs. About 61311 and more SHGs are formed in the

district and which SHGs are linked with bank credit linkage 42127 to the tune of Rs.279.33

Crore.

Extension is last but not the least important input for agriculture development. The

Kolhapur district is having KVM - 985, NGOs – 10, SHGs – 11961, Agri poly Clinics – 5,

NABARD, Agril. College – 1, Research Stations – 5, Regional Extension Center – 1, RAMETI –

1 and ATMA

S) Horticulture

Horticulture has now been recognized as the major potential area for economic

development of the rural economy. The area expansion programmed like EGS linked horticulture

development. The district has around 60,000 ha. consisting of about 8% cultivable area under

plantation of Horticulture. The area under different horticulture crops are, fruit crop 17060 ha.,

Vegetables 23198 ha., Floriculture 4557 ha. And spices and Condiments 5334 ha. Realizing the

growing demand for flowers in the domestic market as well as abroad, the Agri. Dept. and

farmers have made joint effort and established small units of green house. The progressive

farmer in the district have established units of 500 sq.mt. green houses for cultivation of flowers.


Table No. 3.29: Information of Area, Production, Productivity of Horticulture Crops.

Sr.

No. Name of Crops Verities

Area

Ha.

Production

M. T.

Productivity

M. T./Ha.

A Fruit Crop

1 Mango Alphanso,Keshar, Totapuri. 2350 4699.58 2.00

2 Cashewnut V-1, V-4, V-6, V-7 3017.70 3017 1.00

3 Coconut Banavali,orange Dwarf, T 574.97 43.13Lac Fruits 7500 Fruits

4 Chiku Kali Patti, Cricket Ball, 275.45 1581.95 5.75

5 Banana G-9, Basarai, 450.00 15750 35.00

6 Grape Thomson Seedless, Tash-a

Ganesh,

344 8600 25.00

B Vegetable Crop

1 Tomato Namdhari 2535, Vaibhav,

Dhanshree, Bhagshree,

Fhuleraja.

653.63 20182 30.00

2 Cauliflower Pusakatki, Pusa-synthetic, Snow

Ball, Kuwari,

447 8998 20.00

3 Cabbage Golden Acer, 524.24 13190 25.00

4 Onion Basvant-780, Fhule-safed,

Fhule-samarth, N-2-4-1

137.32 2224 16.00

5 Potato Khupari, chandramukhi, Hupri

Jyoti,

968.29 19365 20.00

6 Sweet Potato Local 2300 27,600 12.00

C Flowers

1 Marigold 457 2285 5.00

2 Roses

(Greenhouse)

Grant gala, Bianca, Golden

gate,

51.74 155.22 Lac

flowers

3.00 lac

flowers/ha.

3 Gerbera

(Greenhouse)

Asmara, Brebrora, Winter

Queen,

Glarier, Dana Elam, Rosado,

12 36 Lac flowers 3 Lac

flowers/ha.

4 Carnation

(Greenhouse)

Kobra, Madam Koliat, Paridha, 1 3 Lac flowers 3 Lac

flowers/ha.

D Spices

1 Chilli Sankeshwari, Phule jyoti, 286 429 1.50

2 Garlic Agrifound white, Godawari,

Shewta, Yamuna Safed,

10 60 6.00

3 Turmeric Salem, Kaddapa, 32 96 3.00

T) Land Development

Soil and Water are the two basic natural resources in Agriculture. Agriculture Production

can be successfully only in the soil maintains fertility and has sufficient moisture to support

plant growth. Land development activities include all activities undertaken by farmers to

improve productivity of land, to prevent erosion of soil and to improve land quality which

include, soil conservation measures, land reclamation, on farm development etc. On farm

development activities are important for increasing efficient water usages and avoiding ill effects

of excess water in case of irrigation. Land provides food, fuel, fodder and shelter besides

supporting other economic life supporting systems construction of Earthen Nala Bunding,

Cement Nala Bonding, Farm Fond CCT, Terracing, Loose bolder etc. works were completed in

the district.


U) Sugarcane Trash Management

The Agri. Dept. and ATMA Kolhapur had implemented Sugarcane dry wastage leaves

(Sugarcane Pachat) utilization programmed to convert the dry wastage in to compost and vermin

culture. The various benefits received from program such as Sugarcane 90% area had covered.

Dry wastage available for 8 Lakh ton. Dry wastage covered into compost 5 Lakh ton. Water

saved 8 covers ltd. Electricity earned /saved 75 Lakh unit. Production cost reduced by 35% lie

Rs. 50 Corer and production increase by 10% i.e. 100 Corers.

V) Industrial Scenario

Kolhapur is listed as one of the industrially developed districts of Maharashtra.

Foundation of industrial development in Kolhapur district was laid down by Chhatrapati Shahu

Maharaj in the form of stone lying of Shahu mill on 27th

sept. 1906. This was not only the frist

cotton mill but also run on the principle of joint stock capital system in Kolhapur district itself.

Within year because of the financial difficulties, the mill was taken over by the Kolhapur

sansthan. In 1949 the Kolhapur Sansthan was merged in to the Bombay state. In 1928 the first

power loom factory was much developed in this field and it became stable during the period of

Second World War.

The engineering industry which has made much progress in Kolhapur district came into

existence in 1912.The first industrial school was established and engineering and engineering

factories were established in Kolhapur and Ichalkaranji The first sugar factory was started under

the leadership of Shri. Madhan Mohan Lohia in 1939. However, the development of sugar

industry is found remarkable after 1956.

Today the industries such as sugar industry , spirit and alcohol, oil engine, spare parts,

aluminum vessels, silver ornaments etc. are spread all over the district.

Present position of Industrial Estates in seven towns of Kolhapur district. The M.I.D.C.

has developed near about 546.14 hectors of land in villages like Shiroli and Kagal.

The traditional industries are Spinning of Woolen Yarn, manufacturing of Kolhapuri

Chappals, Leather Tanning, Silver Ornaments, Carpentry, Tailoring, Toy making etc. which are

based on agricultural and other natural resources.

The employment generation in the non farm sector is the key for reducing the

dependency of labour force on agriculture. The rural industry using Agro Products as resource

play vital role. Kolhapur district shows expansion of various rural industries as a result of

entrepreneurial capacity of the people.

The small size and tiny units such as Electrical and Diesel Pump Set, Tractors, Power

Tillers, Sprayers, Cultivators, Threshers, Rotavators, Iron Plough, Urea Bricket Machines,

Dibbling, Sowing, Transplanting and Fertilizer Application Machines etc. are showing

satisfactory progress in MIDC areas in the district.


Table No. 3.30: Information on Area, Production & Productivity of major crops of the District Kolhapur Sr.

No. Name of Crop

1,980 1,985 1,990 1,995

A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y

1 Sugarcane 476 40,174 84,399 477 40,119 84,107 626 56,024 89,495 961 177,477 81,000

2 Rice 1,050 2,212 2,107 1,116 2,548 2,283 1,007 2,539 2,521 1,019 2,276 2,234

3 Soybean 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 136 946 440 647 1,470

4 Kh. Gr. Nut 500 521 1,042 635 1,178 1,855 685 1,108 1,918 601 1,341 2,232

5 Ragi 405 386 952 367 515 1,404 293 380 1,297 230 340 1,477

6 Rabbi Jowar 34 14 424 54 20 370 52 70 1,339 117 125 1,068

7 Wheat 118 187 1,585 239 274 1,146 92 126 1,374 112 217 1,938

8 Gram 89 46 517 165 82 497 123 74 602 91 76 835

Sr.

No. Name of Crop

2000 2005 2010 2013

A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y

1 Sugarcane 897 81,583 91,000 763 65294 86 1127 98100 87 1421 127890 90

2 Rice 1,063 2,328 2,190 1105 2791 2526 1127 2918 2589 914 2366 2589

3 Soybean 629 1,219 1,938 747 1159 1551 591 1145 1938 417 1032 2476

4 Kh. Gr. Nut 657 989 1,506 660 1095 1659 582 798 1371 414 720 1738

5 Ragi 248 347 1,398 238 304 1279 229 353 1541 208 382 1838

6 Rabbi Jowar 115 151 1,311 118 180 1524 128 169 1321 98 143 1464

7 Wheat 84 150 1,786 92 194 2109 79 180 2278 21 45 2150

8 Gram 128 87 678 107 94 882 90 79 875 35 47 1348

Note : A -Area in ‘00’ ha. P - Production in ‘00’ M.T. Y - Yield in ‘Kg / ha.’


Table No. 3.31: DETAILS ON CROPS AND CROPPING SYSTEMS IN THE DISTRICT

(2012-13)

S.No. Blocks

Major Crops Area (ha)

Farming system

Paddy Soyabean Sugarcane Rabi

Jowar Wheat Gram G.nut Ragi Cashew

1 Karveer 8,151 3,367 21,797 414 209 180 3578 469 -- Agriculture + Animal

Husbundary

2 Panhala 7,292 15,000 11,481 102 95 90 2521 1194 -- Agriculture + Animal

Husbundary

3 Shahuwadi 9,900 68 4,114 34 490 450 1200 3843 5 Agriculture + Animal

Husbundary

4 Kagal 5,715 5,773 22,206 786 77 229 3633 53 1.40 Agriculture + Animal

Husbundary

5 Hatkanangle 1,290 13,298 18,349 3,514 453 496 6828 -- -- Agriculture + Animal

Husbundary

6 Shirol 210 5,595 24,014 1,353 380 499 1529 -- -- Agriculture + Animal

Husbundary

7 Gadhinglaj 8,586 15,872 10,383 1,970 210 690 9606 300 4 Agriculture + Animal

Husbundary+Horticulture

8 Chandgad 14,057 39 10,085 223 10 25 5070 5721 16.50 Agriculture + Animal


9 Ajara 8,195 927 4,347 98 36 70 3457 3185 22.50 Agriculture + Animal


10 Bhudargad 11,510 68 2,910 7 56 103 2655 3260 7.55 Agriculture + Animal


11 Radhananagri 10,475 70 8,519 60 4 5 1228 1969 39.70 Agriculture + Animal


12 Gaganbawada 2,060 0 3,048 0 0 1 48 779 4.60 Agriculture + Animal

Husbundary

Total 87,441 60,077 141,253 8,561 2,020 2,838 41353 20773 101.25


Table No. 3.32 : Information on Infrastructure facilities under Department/SAU/NGO/Pvt. Sector

S.No Type of Infrastructure Utility No/Area Capacity Present status

1 Training Hall Under Use 2 80 Good

2 Meeting Hall Under Use 1 20 Good

3 Office-cum-laboratory Building Under Use 788 sqm 40 Good but insuficient for the Agril. Chemistry.

Plant Pathology do not have laboratory

4 Traing Hall for farmers NIL NIL NIL Need to be constructed for farmers training,

meeting, workshops etc

5 Farmers Hostel/Women Hostel

NIL NIL NIL Need to be constructed for lodging purpose to

the farmers and women of Kolhapur district

6 Agro-met observatory

7

ZARS, Shenda park, Kolhapur Under use 1 Class B Needs replacement of some agro-met

instruments such as single and double

stevenson screens, thermograph and

hygrograph etc and some spare thermometers

8 ARS, Radhanagari Nil Nil Nil Needs to be installed

9 ARS, Gadhinglaj Nil Nil Nil Needs to be installed

10 Office Building For office work purpose 1/968 Sq.F. - Owned

11 Training Hall Useful for 40 participants

in each hall

2/861 Sq.F. each

hall.

40 Participants

in each hall. In use

12 Computer Lab - 1 For 40 participant at a time 1/861 Sq.F. 40 Participants In use

13 Hostel facility for participants On hired basis 7000 Sq.F. 80 Participants In use

14 Dinning Hall - 1 As per requirement 600 Sq.F. 80 Participants In use

15 Vehicles /Buses hired as required As per requirement - - Annual rate contract up to 31-3-2015

16 Store room - 2 For office purpose 2/175 Sq.F. each

store room. - In use

17 Waiting room For guest lectures 1/175 Sq.F. - In use

NOTE: Infrastructure facilities such as office building (rented and owner), seed farms (with location), agro-processing, Nurseries (with location), storage godowns

veterinary hospitals/polyclinics, A.I, centers, research stations, training Institutes, testing laboratories, demonstration farm etc. ¨ This information should mention location

¨ Also supplement with map showing locations.


Table No. 3.33: CROPS IF ANY PRODUCED UNDER ORGANIC FARMING

Sl.

No. Name of the block Organic produce Crop*

Area Production No. of

farmers

Ha % Tons % No. %

1 T.A.O. Karveer Jaggary Sugarcane 23 0.09 188 0.000852 15 0.24

Nagali Various Vegetables 3 0.47 60 0.49 12 -

2 T.A.O. Kagal Jaggary Sugarcane 25 0.03 12 23.33 37 0.24

3 T.A.O. Radhanagari Organic Vegetables Various Vegetables 9 0.01 45 4.83 120 1.30

4 T.A.O. Gaganbavada Nagali Grains Nagali 210 11 315 11 642 11

Subdivision Karveer

270

620

826

5 T.A.O. Shahuwadi ----- Nil ------

6 T.A.O. Panhala Ceriads Nagali 1000 85 896 7 4433 6

7 T.A.O. Hatkanagle Cereles & seeds Ground Nut & Jawar 170 1 45 1 267 4

8 T.A.O. Shirol Horticulture Plants Guava 6 2.9 500 7.6 65 7.2

Subdivision Kolhapur

1176

1441

4765

9 T.A.O. Gadhinglaj

Jaggary Sugarcane 8 0.09 60 0.01 7 0.001

cashew nut cashew 50 10 30 5 75 60

Jawar grain Jawar 10 2.5 5 1 20 3

10 T.A.O. Ajara cashew nut cashew 150 2 135 5 297 3

Nagali Products Nagali 100 2 8 2 250 1

11 T.A.O. Chandgad Nagali Products Nagali 100 2 10 1 430 3

12 T.A.O. Bhudargad Nagali Products Nagali 100 2 10 1 500 4

Subdivision Gadhinglaj

518

258

1579

Total District

1964

2319

7170

* Three major crops may be considered

** Information for the last 3 years may be collected


Table No. 3.34: Information on research and extension development activity in the district (2012-13)

Department /SAU/ZRS/KVK/NGO

Sl.

No.

Sector(Central /

State / district)

Name of the

Scheme

Requirement of the scheme Allocation of the year

Shortfall /

Surplus

Extn. Research Extn. Research

1 Central Krishi Vigyan

Kendra Extension - 3.50 lac - ¹

1 Kolhapur district,

M.S.

Zonal Agricultural

Reseasrch Station,

Kolhapur

3.00 25.00 0.00 10.82

Short fall by

Rs. 17.18

lakh

• Separately for each organization

• Constraints as recorded by the department


Table No. 3.35: Information on Input and Service Providers in the district

Name of the

Block

Seed Fertilizers Pesticides

Animal Feed

& poultry

feed

Veterinary

medicines

No. of

hortic-

ulture-

nurs-

eries

Fodder

N Q

No

of

units

Quantity N Q N Q N Q N Q

* *

Comm-

odities

Q *N *P *K

Karveer 222 2981 482 20183 8236 7279 330 16.00 574 16809 24 30.81 27 3

Maize

and

perrrinal

product.

5384

Panhala 159 2113 237 6240 2534 2240 171 3.00 351 13463 17 30.81 12 2 4258

Shahuwadi 44 1963 91 1553 634 560 43 2.00 276 4085 14 31.76 3 1 3317

Kagal 219 3063 326 10091 4118 3639 260 11.00 324 11333 18 20.38 31 4 5030

Hatkanangle 132 3903 234 8539 3485 3079 180 47.00 103 6058 22 14.93 92 10 2508

Shirol 88 1126 257 10868 4435 3919 140 52.00 114 1536 23 13.27 121 13 1551

Gadhinglaj 106 4081 140 3881 1584 1400 125 11.00 305 8253 20 21.57 23 3 6568

Chandgad 86 2064 126 5434 2218 1960 86 4.00 367 5475 16 36.97 17 2 4508

Ajara 31 1836 48 3105 1267 1120 29 3.00 247 4966 10 23.22 14 2 2754

Bhudargad 76 1877 145 2329 950 840 83 2.00 413 7021 12 27.02 9 1 3317

Radhananagri 116 1857 178 4658 1901 1680 139 6.00 526 11261 15 27.02 33 4 4317

Gaganbawada 16 362 32 776 317 280 17 1.00 81 873 6 10.66 2 1 1192

Total 1295 27226 2296 77657 31679 27996 1603 158 3681 91133 197 288.42 384 46 0 44704

N= No. Of outlets ** Name of the fodder commodities

Q = Quantity in metric tons

*N= Nitrogen, P= Phosphorous, and Potash

Cont….


Information on Input and Service Providers in the district

Sr.

No. Name of Taluka

No. of

Service

Centers

Classification

Seed /

Fertilizer

supply

Irrigation

systems

Farm

equipments and

machinery

Agriculture

consultancy

Diagnostic

Services

provided

NGO’s

1 Karveer 255 255 26 15 2 2 36

2 Kagal 208 208 31 2 3 7 4

3 Radhanagari 150 148 12 5 1 1 0

4 Gaganbavada 28 20 3 2 2 1 1

5 Shahuwadi 26 26 6 6 4 1 26

6 Panhala 50 49 17 1 4 1 11

7 Hatkangale 345 269 102 2 73 13 3

8 Shirol 567 286 195 68 76 28 0

9 Gadhinglaj 134 134 16 9 5 2 4

10 Bhudargad 46 46 2 15 3 2 5

11 Chandgad 175 175 6 6 2 2 2

12 Ajara 158 158 17 4 3 2 -

Total 2142 1774 433 135 178 62 90


Table No. 3.36: Information and Communication system prevailing in the district…….

S.

No

Type of Communication

facility

Sector

Total Public

No.

Private

No.

1 Post Offices, 562 35 597

2 Telephone exchanges (No.) 149499 0 149499

3 Telephone booths (public) 10374 0 10374

4 T.V. Station 1 2 3

5 Radio Station 1 2 3

6 News Papers 0 68 68

7 Periodicals 1 45 46

8 Talkies - - 37

9 Video Centre - - 2

10 Cable User - 120567 120567

* Information may be collected from district information officer


Extension & Developmental Schemes in the Kolhapur District are funded by central

and State Government. However Central and State Sector, a major part of the fund is used.

Table No. 4.1: Ongoing schemes

(Rs. In lakhs.)

Department Name of the

scheme

Activities under the

scheme (units)

Physical status Financial status

Targets Achievements Targets Achievements

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1.

Agriculture

Centrally

sponsored cereal

development

programmed

A. Plant protection - - - -

B. FSS 63 63 10.71 10.71

C. Field Demonstration 795 795 19.14 19.14

D. Farmers training - - - --

E. Exposure visit - - - -

F. IPM 1200 1200 6.00 6.00

G. Supply of bio fertilizers - - - -

H. Supply of urea bricket

machine - - - -

I. Green manuring - - - -

Agriculture

extension through

agricultural

exhibitions

A. District Level 1 1 4.00 4.00

B. Taluka Level 5 5 0.50 0.50

Strengthening of

Agro polyclinics

A. Minor works 1 1 5.50 5.50

B. Material supply &

Machinery 13 13 2.00 2.00

C. Maintenance - - - -

Centrally

sponsored oilseed

development

programme

A. Seed production - - - -

B.Infrastrucure facilities - - - -

C.Field demonstration 732 732 25.6 25.6

D.Mulching Demonstration - - - -

E. FSS 36 36 8.16 8.16

F. Farmers training - - - -

G. Demonstration on use - - - -

H. Supply of plant - - - -

Centrally

sponsored pulses

development

programme

A. Field demonstration 2388 2388 23.82 23.82

B. FSS - - - -

C. Demonstration on bio

pesticides

- - - -

D. Farmers training - - - -

E. Seed village programme - - - -

F. Supply of plant - - - -

Centrally

sponsored maize

development

programme

A. Seed village programme - - - -

B.Field demonstration 35 35 1.40 1.18

C.Farmers training - - - -

D.Plant protection - - - -

3 Taluka level workshop - - - -

4 District level wokshop - - - -

Strengthening of

T.S.F.

A. Minor works 4 4 4.10 4.10

B. Material supply - - - -

CHAPTER IV. DESCRIPTION OF ONGOING EXTENSION &

DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN THE KOLHAPUR

DISTRICT.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Sugarcane

development

programme

A. Seed production

programme

1 Foundation seed 130 130 5.20 5.20

2 Certified seed 1296 1296 25.92 25.92

B. Officers training 2 2 0.40 0.40

C. Farmers training - - - -

D. Field demonstration 628 628 47.10 47.10

E. Exposure visit 2 2 1.00 1.00

F. FSS 19 19 3.23 3.23

G. Green manuring 1311 1311 9.83 9.83

H. Shed net - - - -

2.

Horticulture

E.G.S. Linked

horticulture

development

programme

Planting of horticutural plants

on farmers field

National

horcitultural

mission

A. Production of planting

material

- - - -

1. Establishment of nurseries 2 2 12.50 6.25

a. Fruits - - - -

1. Cashew nut 45 45 6.75 7.50

2. Banana 100 100 10.53 10.53

b. Flower 36 36 6.53 6.54

3 Creation of water 135 76 150.00 146.62

4 Proected cultivation - - - -

a.Green house 40 58 146 142.79

b. Mulching - 7 0 0.78

c. Shedding net - 7 - 9.52

5. HRD 1006 1006 6.60 6.60

6. Pollination support through

bee keeping 100 110 60.00 60.00

7. Post harvest management - - - -

A. Pack house 21 7 31.50 10.50

8. Self employment & value

addition 20 7 130.00 38.06

3.

Soil &

water

conserveat

ion

1. National

watershed

development

programme

All activities 4313 886 517.65 106.43

2. River valley

project

Small Storage structure - - - -

3. Western ghat

development

Earthen nala bunds - - - -

C. N. B. - - - -

C.C.T. - - - -

4. Activities

taken under

Statutory

development

board

E.N.B. 10 2 40.30 6.30

C.N.B. 2 - 4.45 -

C.C.T. 45 15 6.66 1.48

L.B.S. 310 111 8.67 3.15

5. Development

of saline soils

Area treatment - - - -


1 2 3 4 5 6 7

4.

Animal

Husbandry

Name of Activity Unit

Cost(Rs.)

Physical status Financial status

Target Achievemen

t Target Achievement

Supply of 10+1 goat

unit 87857/- 95 95 8346415 8346415

Construction of 1000

broiler shed 225000/- 0 0 0 0

Supply of 40+2 goat

unit 300000/- 0 0 0 0

Construction of silage

pit 105000/- 10 10 1050000 1050000

Supply of power driven

chaff cutter 15450/- 84 84 1297800 1297800

Prapan & Vitaran of

fodder seeds 2164000/- 38807 38807 2164000 2164000

Kamdhenu Dattak

Gram Yojana 152500/- 20 20 3050000 3050000

Mobile marketing units

for poultry meat and

eggs, subsidy ceiling

Rs.3.75 Lakh per unit

375000 0 0 0 0

Supply of Veterinary

Mobile Units cum

Diagnostic Laboratories

2400000 0 0 0 0

Modernization of

Veterinary

Dispensaries, Gr.-1 for

online data entry.

55000 0 0 0 0

A.I. Delivery System

Under RKVY 600 0 0 226075 226075

5.

Zilla

Parishad

Interventions Physical Financial (in lakh)

21. Agriculture

Mechanization. Traget Achievement Traget Achievement

Tractors 30 30 13.50 13.50

Power Tiller 65 65 29.25 29.25

Pump set 304 304 28.00 28.00

Sprayers 63 63 0.70 0.70

Rotavator 70 70 14.00 14.00

Reversible plough 13 13 1.95 1.95

Biogas 4123 4123 443.00 443.00


1 2 3 4 5 6 7

6.

Social

forestry

1. Organization of

Vanamahotsav

Sale of seedlings 1 1 1.76 1.74

2.Development of

Central nurseries

Production of Seedlings 5 4.5 4.73 5.09

3. Kisan nurseries Raising of seedlings 2.20

Lakhs

- 0.43 0.40

4. Western ghat

development

Planting of trees on

waste land

260 ha. 2.20

Lakhs

14.60 11.59

5. Sampurna Gramin

rojagar yojana

Plantation of trees 32.9 32.9 8.01 6.77

6. Raising of

medicinal plant

seedlings

Raising of seedlings 1.16

Lakhs

1.16

Lakhs

1.69 1.55

7. Planting of forest

tree plant along the

Planting of forest tree

Plants along the road

side

13.2 KM 13.2 KM 10.45 6.32

8. Integrated waste

land development

Planting on private

waste land

22.80ha

17300

Fruit

plant

seedings

22.80ha

17300

Fruit plant

seedings

70.00 64.89


(TRENDS & SWOT ANALYSIS) UNDER EACH AES AND THE

RESEARCH & EXTENSION GAPS EMERGED & THE STRATEGIES

TO BRIDGE THE GAPS

In Kolhapur district four Agro Ecological situation have been identified on the basis

of soil type, Topography, irrigation facilities available.

AES- I Upland rain fed light to medium soils

The total area of this AES is 282559 ha. which is 36.15 % of the total geographical

area of the district. These AES comprises Panhala , Shahuwadi, Ajra, Bhudargad blocks.

The crops like paddy, nagali, are grown. Soils are undulating causes accumulation of water in

low land.

AES -II up land rain fed medium to black soils.


area of the district. These AES comprises Radhanagari, Kagal, Karveer, blocks. The crops

like paddy, nagali, sugarcane groundnut, Soybean are grown. Soils are medium to black.

AES -III up land rain fed lateratic soils.


area of the district. These AES comprises Chandgad, Gaganbawada blocks. The crops like

paddy, nagali, cashew nut are grown. Soils are lateritic undulating.

AES -IV Mid land irrigated black soils.


area of the district. These AES comprises Hatkangle, Shirol blocks. The crops like

sugarcane soybean vegetables groundnut & horticultural crops are grown. Soils are black.

The Table No. 15 to 36 shows information of secondary data of representative

villages under each AES.

CHAPTER V. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING FARMING SYSTEMS


Table-15 (5.1)

Information on Operational Land Holding in Representative village in the District Kolhapur.

Sr.

No.

Name of

Village

Operational Holding (No & Area)

Very large Large Medium Small Marginal Land

Less

No. No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area

1 Punal 1 36.79 2 10.51 22 63.41 84 114.18 541 201.43 20

2 Padvalwadi - - - - 14 41.3 44 6.7 345 273.11 28

3 Nagve - - - - 92 29.11 110 34.81 114 36.08 1

4 Umalwad - - - - 21 55.52 119 159.9 689 238.58 165

Table-16 (5.2)

Information On Demography of Representative village in the District Kolhapur

Sr. Name of Popu- Male Female Children % of Workers Categories

No. Village lation Literacy No. No. .

(2001) Agri Non.Agri SC ST OBC Other

1 Punal 2,800 1,041 802 957 72 42 18 255 - - 3,045

2 Padval- 1,100 400 390 390 75 690 100 - - 22 1,078 wadi

3 Nagve 816 240 230 346 79 420 50 102 - 85 629

4 Umalwad 5,085 2,650 2,435 998 93 300 - 1,625 39 3,421 -

Table-17 (5.3)

Information of irrigated area in representative village in the District Kolhapur

Sr. Name of Rain fed % Irrigated source wise

No Village Area Major Medium Minor Lift Well Total

(ha.) (ha.) (ha.) (ha.) (ha.) (ha.)

______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ A % A % A % Area % Area % Area %

1 Punhal 137 47.00 - - - - - - 128 44 25 9 153 53

3 Padvalwadi 346.11 82.00 - - - - - - 26 6.2 14.2 3.4 42 10

5 Nagve 680 91.89 - - - - - - 30 4.11 20 2.7 60 8.11

7 Umalwad - - - - - - - - 338 82 130 18 370 100

Table-18 (5.4)

Information of irrigation project nearing completion in representative village in the

District Kolhapur Sr. Name of Type of Name of Area Irrigated (Ha.)

No. Village Project Project _________________________

Projected Actual

1 Punal - - - -

2 Padvalwadi - - - -

3 Nagve - - - -

4 Umalwad - - - -


Table-19 (5.5)

Information of land use pattern in representative village in the District Kolhapur (Area in ha.)

Sr. Land use pattern AES I AES II AES III AES IV

No. Punal Padvalwadi Nagve Umalwad

1 Geographical Area 426.32 419.80 740.00 506.55

2 Cultivable area 290.20 381.11 581.00 405.04

3 Cultivated area 217.00 176.76 205.00 370.00

4 Culturable waste 55.94 105.35 200.00 84.04

5 Current fallow 17.26 20.00 150.00 16.99

6 Forest 36.79 - 100.00 -

7 Pasture 71.78 24.49 - -

8 Land put to non agri . use 10.71 7.20 16.00 -

9 Land under misc. plantation - 79.00 30.00 -

10 Barren & un culturable land 16.84 7.00 11.00 35.52

Table-20 (5.5)

Information of Soils in representative village in the District Kolhapur (Area in ha.)

Sr. Name of Black Alluvial Soil Lateritic Soils Sandy Soils Sandy loam Other

No. village Area % Area % Area % Area % Area %

1 Punal 191.85 45 85.26 20 149.21 35 - - - - -

3 Padvalwadi 62.97 15 41.98 10 - - 251.88 60 62.97 15 -

5 Nagve - - 740 100 - - - - - - -

7 Umalwad 178 44 187 46 40.04 10 - - - - -

Table-21 (5.6)

Information on Area, Productivity & Production of major commodities in Representative

village in the District Kolhapur

A) Paddy

Sr. Name of . 1,975 1,980 1985 1,990

No. Village A P Y A P Y A P Y A P Y

AES I Punhal 81 1,620 20 80 1,680 21 80 1,760 22 53 1,325 25

AES II Padvalwadi 69 143 22 67 167.3 25 56 151.2 27 56 168 30

AES III Nagve 100 180 18 115 230 20 100 230 23 105 263 25

AES IV Umalwad - - - - - - - - - - -

Sr. Name of . 1,995 2,000 2,005 2010


AES I Punhal 55 1,210 22 50 1,100 22 71 1,775 25 74 1840 136

AES II Padvalwadi 56 151.2 27 56 140 25 56 224 40 61 626 38

AES III Nagve 120 300 25 120 312 26 125 362 29 131 580 76

AESIV Umalwad - - - - - - - - - - - -

A - area, P - Productivity in kg./ha, yield in M. T.


B) Sugarcane

Sr. Name of 1,975 1,980 1,985 1990


AES I Punhal 125 9,750 78 100 8,400 84 150 12,600 847 193 17,117 89

AES II Padvalwadi 39 2,430 700 40 2,920 730 59.074, 312.11 730 54.0 74,055.29 750

AES III Nagve 12 600 50 15 750 50 28 1,566 56 28 1,540 55

AES IV Umalwad - - - 160 - 110 160 - 100 140 - 90

Sr. Name of 1,995 2,000 2,005 2010 .


AES I Punhal 193 15,633 81 183 14,823 81 153 9,945 65 187 42500 7854

AES II Padvalwadi54.07 3,784.9 700 53.07 4,245.6 800 49.94 3,495.8 700 56 63000 3528

AES III Nagve 30 1,800 60 30 1,740 58 35 2,100 60 38 32000 1216

AES IV Umalwad 130 - 85 120 - 80 105 - 75 1288 2000 10496

A - area, P - Productivity in kg/ha, yield in M. T.

C) Groundnut

Sr. Name of 1,975 1,980 1,985 1990


AES I Punhal 20 240 12 35 350 10 20 380 19 15 240 16

AES II Padvalwadi 26 26 10 24 24 10 22 26.4 12 27 29.7 11

AES III Nagve - - - - - - - - - - - -

AES IV Umalwad - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sr. Name of 1,995 2,000 2,005 2010


AES I Punhal 15 330 22 20 400 20 19 285 15 17 415 70

AES II Padvalwadi 25 32.5 13 28 33.6 12 31.13 37.36 12 30 450 13

AES III Nagve - - - - - - - - - - - -

AES IV Umalwad- - - - - - - - - - - -



D) Soyabean

Sr. Name of . 1,975 1,980 1,985 1,990


AES I Punhal - - - - - - - - - - - -

AES II Padvalwadi - - - - - - - -- - - - -

AES III Nagve - - - - - - - - - - - -

AES IV Umalwad - - - - - - - - - 40 - 25

Sr. Name of . 1,995 2,000 2,005 2010


AES I Punhal - - - - - - - - -

AES II Padvalwadi 7 11.2 16 10 19 19 12 20.4 17 17 1500 25

AES III Nagve - - - - - - - - -

AES IV Umalwad 50 - 25 50 - 23 5 - 20 27 1800 49


E) Nagali

Sr. Name of 1,975 1,980 1,985 1990


AES I Punal 48 432 9 34 306 9 15 210 14 336 12

AES II Padvalwadi - - - - - - - - -

AES III Nagve 55 55 10 55 66 12 60 60 10 5566 12

AES IV Umalwad - - - - - - - - - - -

Sr. Name of 1,995 2,000 2,005 2010


AES I Punal 3 45 15 2 28 14 2 30 15 3 1500 5

AES II Padvalwadi - - - - - - - -

AES III Nagve 58 58 10 62 744 12 60 72 12 58 1300 75

AES IV Umalwad - - - - - - - - -



F) Rabbi J0war

Sr. Name of 1,975 1,980 1,985 1990


AES I Punhal - - - 22 352 16 8 128 16 8 192 24

AES II Padvalwadi30.69 55.24 18 25.69 43.67 17 18.69 28.03 15 18.69 28.03 15

AES III Nagve - - - - - - - - - - - - -

AES IV Umalwad - - - 150 - 27 150 - 25 145 - 25

Sr. Name of 1,995 2,000 2,005 2010


AES I Punhal 7 182 26 15 240 16 20 240 12 22 600 13

AES II Padvalwadi11.69 14.02 12 8.69 8.69 10 6.69 6.69 10 10 500 5

AES III Nagve - - - - - - - - - - - -

AES IV Umalwad140 - 25 120 - 23 110 - 20 - 52 700 36


G) Wheat

Sr. Name of 1,975 1,980 1,985 1990


AES I Punal - - - - - - - - -


AES III Nagve - - - - - - - - -

AES IV Umalwad - - - 90 - 30 80 - 32 - - -

Sr. Name of 1,995 2,000 2,005 2010


AES I Punal - - - - - - - - -


AES III Nagve - - - - - - - -

AES IV Umalwad 60 - 30 50 - 25 40 - 25 47 900 42



Table No. 22 A (5.7)

DETAILS ABOUT NUMBER OF FAMILIES UNDER EACH KIND OF

RESOURCE SITUATION IN THE REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE OF THE AES

District: KOLHAPUR Agro-ecological situation: I

Village: Punal Tal: Panhala

Sl. No

Categories

No. of families and their percentage

No %

1

Resource Rich 117 20%

2. Resource Poor 468 80%

TOTAL 585 100%

* Note : Classify the farm families into two categories i.e., Resource Rich and Resource Poor

based on the size of the land holding and the resource availability with the farmers such

as sources of irrigation , farm machinery, capital etc.

Table No. 22 B (5.8)



District: Kolhapur Agro-ecological situation: II

Upland rain fed medium to black soils Village – Padavalwadi, Tal. Karveer

Sl. No Categories No. of families and their percentage

No %

1 Resource Rich 96 23

2 Resource Poor 322 77

Total 418 100





Table No. 22 C (5.9)



District: Kolhapur Agro-ecological situation: III

Village: Nagave, Tal. Chandgad

Sl. No Categories No. of families and their percentage

No %

1 Resource Rich 71 12.75

2. Resource Poor 486 87.25

Total 557 100




Table No. 22 D (5.10)



District: Kolhapur Agro-ecological situation: IV

Village: Umalwad Tal.: Shirol

Sl.

No

Categories

No. of families and their percentage

No %

1

Resource Rich 536 57%

2. Resource Poor 402

43%

TOTAL 938 100%





Table No.. 23 A (5.11)

DETAILS ABOUT PREDOMINANT EXISTING FARMING SYSTEMS (EFS)

IN THE REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE OF AN AES

District: KOLHAPUR Agro-ecological situation: I

Village: Punal Tal. Panhala

Resource Rich Resource Poor

Sl.No.

Existing farming system

No. & % of families

associated

No. & % of families

associated

Number Percentage Number Percentage

1 Agriculture 0 0 0 0

2 Agri+AHDS 100 85.47 400 85.47

3 Agri+Horticulture 07 5.98 52 11.11

4 Agri+Horticulture+AHDS 10 8.54 16 3.41

Total 117 468

Table No.. 23 B (5.12)




Village - Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer


Sl.No. Existing farming system

No. & % of families

associated

No. & % of families

associated


1 Agriculture 6 6 168 52.17

2 Agricultural AH 84 88 119 36.95

3 Agriculture + Horticulture 6 6 35 10.86

4 Agriculture +Animal

Hasbundary + Horticulture 0 0 0 0

Total 96

322

Note: Separate sheet should be used for each resource rich and resource poor


Table No. 23 C (5.13)




Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad


Sl.No.

Existing farming system

No. & % of families

associated

No. & % of families

associated


1 Agril 4 5 38 8

2 Agril + AH 37 52 78 16

3

Agril + Hort 17 23 240 49

4

Agriculture +Animal

Hasbundary +

Horticulture

13 20 130 27

Total 71 486

Table No.. 23 D (5.14)



District: KOLHAPUR Agro-ecological situation: IV

Village: Umalwad Tal. Shirol


Sl.No. Existing farming system

No. & % of families

associated

No. & % of families

associated RP


1 Agriculture 165 30.7 98 24.3

2 Agricultural + AH 50 9.3 157 39.05

3 Agriculture + Horticulture 110 20.5 45 11.1

4 Agriculture +Animal

Hasbundary + Horticulture 211 39.1 102 25.3

Total 536

402


Table No. 24 A (5.15)

MAJOR ENTERPRISES ASSOCIATED WITH EACH EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM (EFS)

UNDER EACH RESOURCE SITUATION IN REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE

District: Kolhapur Agro-ecological situation: I

Village: Punal Tal- Panahala Resource Situation : RR

Sl.No.

Type of enterprises/

commodities

No. of families (%) associated with 2-3 dominant enterprises/

commodities in representative villages

EFS-I

EFS-II

(100)

EFS-III

(7)

EFS-IV

(10)

1. -Agicultural crops

-Irrigated

- - -

Sugarcane - 50(50.42) 4(57) 2(20)

fodder - - - -

Cereals

Paddy

- -

23(23.07)

-

3(42)

-

3(30)

Finger millet - Ragi - 11(11.36) -

Total - 84(84.85) - -

Oilseed - - - -

Sunflower - 3(3.41) - -

Groundnut - 6(5.98) - -

Total - 9(9.39) - -

2. Horticultural crops

Orchards - - - -

Vegetables

Brinjal

-

-

5(71)

-

Floriculture

Merigold - - 1(14) -

3. Fodder Crop

4 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

- -

69(69)

31(31)

--

--

--

- -

4(40)

3(30)

1(10)

-

5 Fisheries - - - -

6 Sericulture - - - -

7 Poultry - - - -

8 Agriculture labour - - - -

9 Duckeries - - - -

10 Bee Keeping - - - -

11 Vermi-compost - - - 1(10)

12 Any other - - - -


Table No. 24 B (5.16)




Village: Punal Tal- Panhala Resource Situation: RP

Sl.No.


commodities

No. of families (%) associated with 2-3 dominant

enterprises/ commodities in representative villages

EFS-I

EFS-II

(407)

EFS-III

(45)

EFS-IV

(16)


-Irrigated

- - -

Sugarcane - 260(64) 4(8) 1(6)

Cereals-

Paddy

85(21)

16(30)

2(12)

Oilseed - - - -

Soyabean - 0.42 - -

Groundnut - 1.06 5(10) 1(6)

Fodder Crop - - - -


Banana - - 7(13) 2(12)

Gauva - - - -

Chiku - - - -

3. Vegetables

Tomato - - - -

Bringal - - 5(10) 3(19)

Cauliflower - - 7(13) -

Other - - - -

4. Floriculture

Marigold - - - -

5 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

-

-

-

-

-

-

23(44)

18(35)

--

--

--

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

6(38)

2(12)

-

1(6)

-

6 Fisheries - - - -


8 Poultry - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - -


12 Vermi-compost - - - -



Table No. 24 C (5.17)

MAJOR ENTERPRISES ASSOCIATED WITH EACH EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM (EFS)UNDER

EACH RESOURCE SITUATION IN REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE


Village: PadvalwadiTal. Karveer Resource Situation : RR

Sr.NO Type of enterprises/

commodities



EFS-I (6)

Agriculture

EFS-II(82)

Agri.+AHD

EFS-III (8)

Agri+Horti

EFS-IV

Agri+AH+Horti

1 Rainfed

-

Jawar 2(33.5) 20(23.8)

2 Agricultural Crops

-Irrigated

Sugarcane 4 (66.6) 30(35.7) 3(3.12)

3 Horticultural crops

Mango

5(5.20)

4 -Animal husbandry -

- -

Cows

9(10.7)

Buffalows - 25(29.7) - -

Sheep - - - -

Goat - - - -

5 Fisheries - - - -


7 Poultry - - - -


9 Duckeries - - - -





Table No. 24 D (5.18)




Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Resource Situation : RP


commodities



EFS-I (168)

Agriculture

EFS-II(119)

Agri.+AHD

EFS-III (35)

Agri+Horti

EFS-IV

Agri+AH+Horti

1 Rainfed-

jawar, soybean 28(8.69) 34(10.55)

-

- 2

Agricultural Crops

-Irrigated –

Sugar cane, G.nut, Soybean

140(43.47) - 19(5.90) -

3

Horticultural crop-

Orchard, mango-

16(4.96)

Vegetables - - - -

Floriculture

4

Animal husbandry

-Cows - 7(2.17) - -

Buffalows - 20(6.21) - -

Sheep - 30(9.31) - -

Goat - 28(8.69) - -

6 Fisheries - - - -


8 Poultry - - - -







Table No. 24 E (5.19)




Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad Resource Situation : RR

Sl.

No.


commodities



EFS-I (4) EFS-II (37) EFS-III

(17)

EFS-IV

(13)

1

-Agicultural crops

-Irrigated

1(25%)

7(18%)

2(11%)

2 (15%)

Sugarcane – - 2 (50%) 15(40%)

3(17%)

3(23%)

Rainfed -

Paddy -

1(100%) 3(8%) 1(5%) 1 (8%)

Nagali, -

2 -Horticultural crops

- Orchards

Cashew – 11(67%) 5(38%)

-Vegetables

- Floriculture

3 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows -

5(13%)

1(8%)

-sheep

7( 21%) 1(8%)

-Goat

4 -Pigs

5 Fisheries

6 Sericulture

7 Poultry

8 Agriculture labour

9 Duckeries

10 Bee Keeping

11 Vermi-compost

12 Any other

* Separate sheet may be used for resource rich and resource poor farmers.


Table No. 24 F (5.20)




Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad Resource Situation: RP (486)

Sl.No.


commodities



EFS-I

(38)

EFS-II

(78)

EFS-III

(240)

EFS-IV

(130)

1 -Agicultural crops

-Irrigated

sugarcane

1(25%) 7(18%)

2(11%)

2 (15%)

Rainfed

Paddy

2(50%) 15(40%)

3(17%)

3(23%)

Nagali 1(100%) 3(8%) 1(5%) 1 (8%)


- Orchards

Cashew

11(67%) 5(38%)

-Vegetables

- Floriculture

3 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

5(13%)

1(8%)

-Buffalows

-

7( 21%) 1(8%)

-sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry


8 Duckeries

9 Bee Keeping

10 Vermi-compost

11 Any other


Table No. 24 G (5.21)




Village: Umalwad Tal- shirol Resource Situation: RR

Sl.No.


commodities



EFS-I

(165)

EFS-II

(50)

EFS-

III(110)

EFS-

IV(211)


-Irrigated

- -

Sugarcane 83 (50%) 11(22%) 48(43) 31(14.6)

Total 83 11 48 31

Rain fed Oilseed

Soyabean 107 (65%) 7(14%) 17(15.4) 13(6.16)

Groundnut 16 (10%) - 6(5.4) -

Total 123 7 23 44

2. Horticultural crops -

Banana 3 (2.7) 11(5.2)

Gauva 11 (10) 7(3.3)

Chiku 1 (.9) 3(1.4)

Total 15(13.6) 21

3. Vegetables -

Tomato - 2 (1.8) 12(5.6)

Bringal - 3 (2.7) 07(3.3)

Flower - 3 (2.7) 2(0.9)

Cauliflower - 2 (1.8) 3(1.4)

Other - 15 (1:2) 1(0.4)

Total - 15(13.6) 25

4. Floriculture -

Marigold - 1(0.9)

Total - 1(0.9)

5 Fodder Crop - 8 (7.2)

Total - 8 (7.2)

6 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

-

07(14)

20(40)

-

-

5(10)

-

70 (33.17)

40 (18.9)

2(0.9)

7 Fisheries - - - -


9 Poultry - - - -

10 Agriculture labour - - - 5 (2.3)

11 Duckeries - - -

12 Bee Keeping - - -




Table No. 24 H (5.22)




Village: Umalwad Tal- shirol Resource Situation: RP

Sl.No.


commodities



EFS-I (98) EFS-II (157) EFS-III (45) EFS-IV (102)

1. -Agricultural crops-Rainfed - - -

Sugarcane 43(43.8) 20(13) 13(28.8)

Oil seed -

Soyabean 35 (35.7) 9(6) 5(11.8)

Groundnut 20 (20.4) 9(6) 3(6.6)

Total 98 18 21

2. Horticultural crops - - -

Banana 2 (4.4) 2 (2)

Gauva 6 (13.3) 6 (6)

Chiku - -

Total 8 8

3. Vegetables - -

Tomato 5(11.11) 5(5)

Bringal 3 (6.6) 3 (3)

Flower 2 (4.4) 2 (2)

Cauliflower 2 (4.4) 2 (2)

Other 2 (4.4) 2 (2)

Total 14 14

4. Floriculture - 1 1

Merigold - 2 (4.4) 2 (2)

Total - 2 2

Fodder Crop - - -

Total - - -

5 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

38(24)

70(69)

-Buffalows

76(48) 22(22)

-sheep

40(39)

-Goat

-

- 2(2)

-Pigs 5(3) -

6 Fisheries - - - -


8 Poultry - - - -






Table No- 25 A (5.23)

CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT ENTERPRISES TOWARDS

ANNUAL INCOME UNDER EACH EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM


Village: Punal Tal- Panhala Resource Situation : RR

Sl.No.

Type of enterprises/ commodities

(CB Ratio)

Contribution of different enterprises/commodities

(P/S/T) towards annual net income in each EFS

EFS-I EFS-II EFS-III EFS-IV

1 -Agricultural crops

-Irrigated

Sugarcane - P - 2.00 -

Rice - P - 0.70 -

Finger millet (-) - P - 0.35 -

2

Horticultural crops

Orchards - - -

1.Cashew - - T - 1.40

2.Banana - - -

Vegetables

1.Cauliflower

- - T - 0.85

3

7

8

9

-Animal husbandry

-Cows

S- 1.50

-Buffaloes

- S - 1.52 -

-Sheep

- - -

-Goat

- - -

4 Bee keeping - - -

5 Duckeries - - -

6 Agriculture labour - - -

7 Vermi-compost - - -

8 Any other - - -

Note: P= Primary S= Secondary T= Tertiary Q=Quaternary

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS AGRICULTURE SECTOR IS 1:3.3 (3.05 lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS HORTICULTURE IS SECTOR 1:2.0 (2.25lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS ANIMAL HUSBUNDARY SECTOR IS 1:1.5 (3.02 lacks)


Table No- 25 B (5.24)




Village: Punal Tal.: Panhala Resource Situation : RP

Sl.No.

Type of enterprises/ commodities

(CB Ratio)


(P/S/T) towards annual net income in each EFS



-Irrigated

Sugarcane - T - 1.70 -

Rice - T - 0.50 -

Finger millet (-) - T - 0.30 -

2

Horticultural crops

Orchards - - -

1.Cashew - - P - 1.20

2.Banana - - P -1.50

Vegetables

1.Cauliflower

- - P - 0.85

3

7

8

9

-Animal husbandry

-Cows

S- 1.30

-Buffaloes

- S - 1.30 -

-Sheep

- - -

-Goat

- - -

4 Bee keeping - - -

5 Duckeries - - -

6 Agriculture labour - - -

7 Vermi-compost - - -

8 Any other - - -


NOTE - C.B RATIO IS AGRICULTURE SECTOR IS 1:2:5 (2.50 lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS HORTICULTURE IS SECTOR 1:3:5 (3.55lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS ANIMAL HUSBUNDARY SECTOR IS 1:2:6 (2.60 lacks)


Table No- 25 C (5.25)




Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Resource Situation : RR

Sr.

NO


commodities


(P/S/T) towards annual net income in each EFS(Lakhs)

EFS-I

Agriculture

EFS-II

Agri.+AHD

EFS-III

Agri+Horti

EFS-IV

Agri+AH+Horti

1 Rainfed

P- 2.8 P-2.2 P-2.6 NIL 2 Agricultural Crops

-Irrigated - Sugarcane

3 Horticulture

MANGO-

GUAVA

- S -1.9

-

4 -Animal husbandry

-Cows -

- -

Buffalows - T- 1.8 - -

Sheep - - - -

Goat - - - -

Pigs - - - -

5 Fisheries - - - -


7 Poultry - - - -


9 Duckeries - - - -





NOTE - C.B RATIO OF AGRICULTURE SECTOR IS 1:2.8 (2.80lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO OF HORTICULTURAL SECTOR IS 1:1.9 (1.90lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO OFANIMAL HUSBUNDARY SECTORE IS 1:1.8 (1.80lacks)



NOTE - C.B RATIO OF AGRICULTURE SECTOR IS 1:2.8 (2.80lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO OF HORTICULTURAL SECTOR IS 1:1.9 (1.20lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO OF ANIMAL HUSBUNDARY SECTORE IS 1:1.8 (1.60 lacks)

Table No- 25 D (5.26)




Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Resource Situation : RP


commodities


(P/S/T) towards annual net income in each EFS (Rs. In lakh)

EFS-I

Agriculture

EFS-II

Agri.+AHD

EFS-III

Agri+Horti

EFS-IV

Agri+AH+Horti

1 Rainfed


Sugarcane

-Irrigated P – 2.8

P – 2.2

P – 2.6

-

3 Horticultural

MANGO

GUAVA

- - T– 1.20

-

4 -Animal husbandry

-Cows - - - -

Buffalows - S - 1.60 - -

Sheep - - - -

Goat - - - -

Pigs - - - -

5 Fisheries - - - -


7 Poultry - - - -


9 Duckeries - - - -





Table No- 25 E (5.27)




Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad Resource Situation: RR

Sl.No.


commodities


(P/S/T) towards annual net income in each EFS(in Lakh)


1 Agicultural crops

-Irrigated

-sugarcane

P - 1.85 P - 1.84 P - 1.82 P - 1.82

Rainfed

Paddy

P - 0.98

)

)

P - 0.88

P - 0.85 P - 0.99 P- Nagali P - 0.56

P - 0.58

P - 0.60

P - 0.62


- Orchards cashew -

S - 2.00 S - 2.00

- Dry

3 Vegetables

- Floriculture

4 Animal husbandry

- - -Cows

T - 1.50 T - 1.51

Buffalows T - 1.52

T - 1.50

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

5 Fisheries

6 Sericulture

7 Poultry

8 Bee keeping

9 Duckeries


11 Vermi-compost

12 Any other



NOTE - C.B RATIO IS HORTICULTURE IS SECTOR 1:2.0 (2.00lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS ANIMAL HUSBUNDARY SECTOR IS 1:1.5 (1.50 lacks)


Table No- 25 F (5.28)




Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad Resource Situation : RP

Sl.No. Type of enterprises/ commodities

Contribution of different enterprises/commodities (P/S/T)

towards annual net income in each EFS (in Lakh)


1 Agicultural crops

-Irrigated -

-sugarcane P - 1.75 P - 1.72 P - 1.73 P - 1.76

-Rainfed

Paddy P - 0.95 P - 0.96 P - 0.87 P - 0.99

Nagali P - 0.60 P - 2.65 P - 0.68 P - 0.63


- Orchards cashew – S - 1.98 S - 1.99

Irrigated

Dry

3 Vegetables

4 Floriculture

5 Animal husbandry (T)

-Cows - T - 1.49 T - 1.48

-Buffalows T - 1.45 T - 1.50

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

6 Fisheries

7 Sericulture

8 Poultry

9 Bee keeping

10 Duckeries


12 Vermi-compost

13 Any other


NOTE - C.B RATIO IS AGRICULTURE IS 1:3.3 (3.30 lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS HORTICULTURE IS 1:1.9 (1.98 lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS ANIMAL HUSBUNDARY IS 1:1.4 (1.49 lacks)


Table No- 25 G (5.29)




Village: Umalwad Tal-shirol Resource Situation: RR

Sl. No.


commodities


(P/S/T) towards annual net income in each EFS (Lakhs)



-Irrigated

Sugarcane S - 2.5 S - 2.5 S - 2.5 S - 2.5

fodder S- 0.50 S- 0.50 S- 0.50 S- 0.50

Cereals Jowar S- 1.25 S- 1.25 S- 1.25 S- 1.25

Pulses

Oil seeds

Soyabean S – 1.2 S – 1.2 S – 1.2 S – 1.2

Groundnut S – 0.90 S – 0.90 S – 0.90 S – 0.90


Banana - P- 3.00 P- 3.00

Gauva - P - 1.2 P - 1.2

Chiku - P – 1.3 P – 1.3

4 Vegetables

Tomato - P- 1.8 P- 1.8

Bringal - P-1.5 P-1.5

5 Flowriculture

Merigold - P-0.65 T-0.65

Oilseed

6 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

-

T-0.75

T-1.2

-

T-0.75

T-1.2

7 Fisheries - - - - 8 Sericulture - - - 9 Poultry - - -

10 Bee keeping - - - 11 Duckeries - - - 12 Agriculture labour - - - 13 Vermi-compost - - - 14 Any other


NOTE - C.B RATIO IS AGRICULTURE IS 1:3 (5.35 lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS HORTICULTURE IS 1:4 (9.45 lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS ANIMAL HUSBUNDARY IS 1:1.2 (1.95 lacks)


Table No- 25 H (5.30)




Village: Umalwad Tal-shirol Resource Situation : RP

Sl.No.


commodities


(P/S/T) towards annual net income in each EFS(Lakhs)



-Irrigated

Sugarcane S – 1.5 S – 1.5 S – 1.5 S – 1.5

fodder S- 0.30 S- 0.30 S- 0.30 S- 0.30

Cereals S- 0.75 S- 0.75 S- 0.75 S- 0.75

Pulses

Spices

2 Oil seeds S – 1.0 S – 1.0 S – 1.0 S – 1.0

Soyabean S – 0.70 S – 0.70 S – 0.70 S – 0.70

Groundnut S – 1.1 S – 1.1 S – 1.1 S – 1.1 3 Horticultural crops

Banana P- 2.00 P- 2.00

Gauva P - 1.0 P - 1.0

Chiku P – 0.75 P – 0.75

4 Vegetables

Tomato - P- 1.2 P- 1.2

Bringal - P-1.1 P-1.1

Flower - P- 1.0.5 P- 1.0.5

5. Flowriculture

Merigold - -

Oilseed

6 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

-

T-0.55

T-1.0

-

7 Fisheries - - - 8 Sericulture - - - 9 Poultry - - -

10 Bee keeping - - - 11 Duckeries - - - 12 Agriculture labour - - - 13 Vermi-compost - - - 14 Any other - - -


NOTE - C.B RATIO IS AGRICULTURE IS 1:2 (5.25 lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS HORTICULTURE IS 1:2.5 (7.1 lacks)

NOTE - C.B RATIO IS ANIMAL HUSBUNDARY IS 1:1 (1.55 lacks)


Table No. 26 A (5.31)

TYPE OF IMPROVED FARMING SYSTEMS (IFS) EVOLVED BY INNOVATIVE FARMERS OR

RECOMMENDED BY RESEARCH SCIENTISTS FOR EACH RESOURCE SITUATION


Village: Punal Tal- Panhala Innovative farmer Name: Sambhaji Baburao Patil

Sl.No.


commodities

No. of families associated and their %


IFS-I IFS-II IFS-I IFS-II

1 Agricultural crops - - - -

Irrigated

Sugarcane

- 8 (6.83%) - 15(32%)

Fodder - - - -

Rain fed

Cereals – Paddy

-

4(3.41%)

-

9(1.92%)

Pulses - - - -

Spices - - - -

2 Horticultural crops - - - -

Vegetables - - - -

Floriculture - - - -

3 Oilseed - - - -

4 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

- -

70(59.82)

10(8.54)

- -

332(70.00)

87(18.50)

5 Fisheries - - - -


7 Poultry - - - -

8 Bee keeping - - - -

9 Duckeries - - - -




* IFS-I and IFS-II for any resource situation, if available. Otherwise it is deemed that there is no

Recommended farming system by research or by innovative farmer


Table No. 26 B (5.32)

TYPE OF IMPROVED FARMING SYSTEMS (IFS) EVOLVED BY INNOVATIVE

FARMERSOR RECOMMENDED BY RESEARCH SCIENTISTS FOR EACH RESOURCE

SITUATION


Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer . Innovative farmer Name: Vishnu Sakharam Devakar

Sl.No. Type of enterprises/

commodities





- - -

Sugarcane (Plantation) 1(1.04)

-Irrigated

2 Rainfed - - - -


Orchards

Vegetables

-- Floriculture

4 Animal husbandry

Cows - - - -

Buffalows - - - -

Sheep - - - -

Goat - - - -

Pigs - - - -

5 Fisheries - - - -


7 Poultry - - - -


9 Duckeries - - - -




ANNUAL INCOME OF INNOVATIVE FARMER- 350000/- C.B RATIO - 1:3.5


Table No. 26 C (5.33)




Village: Nagave Tal. Chandagad Innovative farmer Name: Mr Vijay Ramchandra Pednekar

Sl.No.


commodities





-Irrigated

-sugarcane (Drip) - 1 Nos

1 (1.7%)

-Rainfed


Cashew

- Orchards - 15

Irrigated

Dry

Drip

-Vegetables

- Floriculture

3 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry

7 Bee keeping

8 Duckeries


10 Vermi-compost

11 Any other

* IFS-I and IFS-II for any resource situation, if available. Otherwise it is deemed that there is no recommended

farming system by research or by innovative farmer


Table No. 26 D (5.34)




Village: Umalwad Tal- shirol Innovative farmer Name: Anil Mahavir Magdum.

Sl.No.


commodities




1 Agricultural crops - - - -

Sugarcane – Drip Singale eye

buded planting

65 (39%) - 45 (46%) -

Soyabean improved Variety

2 Horticultural crops - -

Vegetables Mulching GH

Shadenate

- -

Flowriculture - - -

3 Animal husbandry

Cows - - - -

Buffalows - - - -

Sheep - - - -

Goat - - - -

Pigs - - - -

4 Fisheries - - - -


6 Poultry - - - -


8 Duckeries - - - -




* IFS-I and IFS-II for any resource situation, if available. Otherwise it is deemed that there is no recommended

farming system by research or by innovative farmer


Table No. 27 A (5.35)


ANNUAL INCOME UNDER EACH IMPROVED FARMING SYSTEM(IFS)


Village: Punal Tal- Panhala Innovative farmer- : Sambhaji Baburao Patil

Sl.No.


commodities

Contribution of different enterprises/commodities (P/S/T/Q)

towards annual net income in each IFS



1 -Agricultural crops - - - -

Sugarcane (2.0) - P-2.00 - P

Fodder - - - -

2 Cereals

Paddy (1.70)

- P - P

Pulses - - - -

Spices - - - -

3 Horticultural crops - - - -

Vegetables - - - -

4 Floriculture - - - -

Oilseed - - - -

5 -Animal husbandry

-Cows (1.6)

-Buffalows (1.2)

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

-

-

-

-

-

P

S

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

S

S

-

-

-

6 Fisheries - - - -


8 Poultry - - - -









Table No. 27 B (5.36)




Village::Padavalwadi Innovative farmer: Vishnu Sakharam Devakar

Sl.No. Type of enterprises/

commodities

Contribution of different

enterprises/commodities(P/S/T/Q) towards annual net

income in each IFS( In lacks)




Sugarcane - Plantation

-Irrigated

P -.3.50

- - -

2 Ranfed - - - -


- Orchards

-Vegetables-

- Floriculture

- - - -

4 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

- - - -

Buffalows - - - -

Sheep - - - -

Goat - - - -

Pigs - - - -

5 Fisheries - - - -


7 Poultry - - - -


9 Duckeries - - - -







Table No. 27 C (5.37)




Village: Nagave Tal. Chandagad

Sl.No. Type of enterprises/ commodities


towards annual net income in each IFS (In Lakh)



1 Agicultural crops

-Irrigated -

-sugarcane + drip P - 2.10 P – 2.07 P – 1.98 P - 1.98

-Rainfed

-Paddy

-Nagali


- Orchards CASHEW

-Irrigated

Dry

3 -Vegetables

- Floriculture

4 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

5 Fisheries

6 Sericulture

7 Poultry

8 Bee keeping

9 Duckeries


11 Vermi-compost

12 Any other




Table No. 27 D (5.38)




Village: Umalwad Tal- shirol Innovative farmer: Anil Mahavir Magdum

Sl.No.


commodities


towards annual net income in each IFS




Sugarcane + drip + single eye

bluded planting.

S – 2.48 S- 2.25

Soyabean


Vegetables

Floriculture

Oilseed

3 -Animal husbandry

-Cows

-Buffalows

-Sheep

-Goat

-Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry

7 Bee keeping

8 Duckeries


10 Vermi-compost

11 Any other



Table No. 28 A (5.39)

TREND ABOUT GROWTH OF EXISTING ENTERPRISES / COMMODITIES / LIVESTOCK

IN THE REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE

Village – Punal Tal. Panhala District: Kolhapur

S.No

Name of enterprises /

commodities /

livestock

Unit

Trend about no. of units in the village

Remarks 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09

1 Agriculture

Sugarcane

ha 204 175 150 150 130 increase in area due to

uncultivated area brought into

paddy cultivation

fodder ha - - - - -

Cereals ha 20 45 25 35 40 Availability irrigation

facilities

Pulses ha - - - - -

Spices ha - - - - -

Othre ha - - - - -


Banana ha 0 0 0 0 0

Gauva ha 0 0 0 0 0

Chiku ha 0 0 0 0 0

Grape ha 0 0 0 0 0

Vegetables ha 2.76 02 1.5 01 0 Heavy rainfall and

anticipation of disease

3 Floriculture

Merigold ha 1 0 0 0 0

Oilseed

Soyabean ha 0 0 0 0 0

Groundnut ha 20 25 35 32 30 increased demand of meat and

wool

4

Animal husbandry

Sheep - - - - -

Goat 90 - - - -

Buffalo

996 850 705 700 695 - Disease resistant breed

(pandarpuri)

Local 500 600 570 600 650

Graded 490 150 135 100 45

Cow 2700

Local - - - - -

Cross breed 2700 2000 1700 1200 800 High milk yield

- Pigs - - - - -

- Poultry 250 - - - -

- Commercial - - - - -

- Back yard 1250 - - - -

5 Fisheries - - - - -

6 Duckeries - - - - - -


S.No


commodities /

livestock

Unit Trend about no. of units in the village

Remarks 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09

6 Sericulture

7 Bee keeping

8 Vermi-compost 1 - - - -

9

Produce from

common land and

others

- Fuel wood

- Minor forest produce

10 Agriculture labor 300 350 400 550 650 Industrialization

11 Tapping of toddy trees

12 Non-farm enterprise

- Regular service

- Daily wage earning

- Transport of

material through

tractor / bullock cart

- Mat making

- Rope making

- Wood carving

- Handloom etc.


Table No. 28 B (5.40)

TREND ABOUT GROWTH OF EXISTING ENTERPRISES / COMMODITIES /

LIVESTOCK IN THE REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE

District : Kolhapur Village : Padavalwadi Tal : Karveer

S.No Name of enterprises /

commodities / livestock

Trend about no. of units in the village Remarks

2,012 2,011 2,010 2,009 2,008

1 Agriculture

Irrigated + rainfed crop

paddy 59 56 56 56 56 increase in area due to

uncultivated area brought into

paddy cultivation sugar cane 63 53 54 54 59 Availability irrigation facilities

ground nut 35 28 25 27 22 Introduction of intercropping in

main crop soybean 8 10 7 - - Heavy rainfall and anticipation of

disease rainfed crops only

jawar 8 8 11 18 18

2 Horticulture -

orchard mango 3 - - - - -

tomato, brinjal 2 - - - - -

flowers - - - - - -

3 Animal husbandry - - - - - -

sheep 32 22 18 15 15 increased demand of meat and

wool goat 75 - - - - -

buffalow - - - - - -

-local 375 250 212 197 172 Disease resistant breed

(pandarpuri) -graded - - - - - -

cow - - - - - -

-local - - - - - -

-cross breed 50 38 40 29 17 High milk yield

4 Fisheries - - - - - - 5 Duckeries - - - - - - 6 Sericulture - - - - - - 7 Bee keeping - - - - - - 8 Vermi-compost - - - - - - 9 Produce from

common land and others

- Fuel wood

- Minor forest produce

- - - - - - 10 Agriculture labourer - - - - - - 11 Tapping of toddy trees - - - - - - 12 Non-farm enterprise

- Regular service

- Daily wage earning

- Transport of material

through

tractor / bullock cart

- Mat making

- Rope making

- Wood carving

- Handloom etc.

- - - - - -


Table No. 28 C (5.41)

TREND ABOUT GROWTH OF EXISTING ENTERPRISES / COMMODITIES /

LIVESTOCK IN THE REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE

District :Kolhapur Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad

S.

No


commodities / livestock

Unit Trend about no. of units in the village Remarks

2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09

1 Agriculture

- Irrigated + rainfed crops

-Sugarcane Acre 51 45 41 38 35 -Availability irrigation

facilities & FRP

- Rainfed crops only

-Paddy 107 109 113 120 125 -increase in area due to

fallow area brought into

paddy cultivation

-Availability Improved

Varieties

-Finger millet 54 55 57 59 60 -Fluctuation of Market

Price

-Ground nut

2 Horticulture

- Orchard

- Cashew 40 35 28 25 20 -Consumers Demand

- Flowers

3 Animal husbandry

- Sheep

- Goat

- Buffalo 175 160 150 140 120 -Market Assurance

- Local

- Graded

- Cow 40 29 17 21 17 -Market Assurance

- Local

4 Fisheries

5 Duckeries

6 Sericulture

7 Bee keeping

8. Vermi-compost

9 Produce from common land and others

- Fuel wood

10 Agriculture labourer -- -- - -- -- --

11 Tapping of toddy trees


- Regular service


Table No. 28 D (5.42)

TREND ABOUT GROWTH OF EXISTING ENTERPRISES / COMMODITIES / LIVESTOCK IN

THE REPRESENTATIVE VILLAGE

District :Kolhapur Village: Umalwad Tal. Shirol

S.

No

Name of enterprises

/ commodities /

livestock

Unit

Trend about no. of units in the village Remarks

2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 2008-09

1 Agriculture

-Sugarcane

Acre 135 128 110 124 117

Market assurance,

Mechanisation of farming

2 Oilseed

Soyabean ha 25 37 51 58 62 Increase area in veg.crop

Groundnut ha 30 33 36 42 47 Increase area in veg.crop


Banana ha 5 3 4 2 2 Good Market prices

Gauva ha 50 61 69 87 111 Low market prices

Chiku ha 1 1 1 0 0

Grape ha

4 Vegetables

Tomato ha 25 32 47 88 109 Crop shift into Sugarcane

area Bringal ha 5 8 13 16 19

5 Floriculture

Marigold ha 5 4 3 1 0 Good Market prices

6 Animal husbandry

- Sheep

- Goat

7 Fisheries

8 Duckeries

9 Sericulture

10 Bee keeping

11 Vermi-compost

12 Produce from common land and others

- Fuel wood

- Minor forest

produce -- -- - -- -- --

Agriculture labourer

450 500 550 600 650 due to Machanisation &

industralization




- Regular service


Table No. 29 A (5.43)

TREND ABOUT AREA / NUMBER PRODUCTIVITY OF MAJOR COMMODITIES

Name of enterprise : Sugarcane Name of commodity :Agriculture

Name of village : Punal Tal. Panhala District : Kolhapur

Name of agro-ecological situation: I

Table No. 29 B (5.44)

TREND ABOUT AREA /NUMBER PRODUCTIVITY OF MAJOR COMMODITIES

Name of Enterprise : Name of Commodity :SUGAR CANE

Name of Village :Padavalwadi, Tal. Karveer

Name of agro-ecological situation: II

District : Kolhapur

117 124

110

128 135

92 95 98 102 105

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Area (Hr.)

Productivity

76 84

94 95 98

65

76

88 88 92

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Area (Ha.)

Productivity


Table No. 29 C (5.45)


Name of enterprise : Name of commodity : Paddy

Name of village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad District : Kolhapur

Name of agro-ecological situation: III

Table No. 29 D (5.46)


Name of enterprise : Sugarcane Name of commodity :Agriculture

Name of village :Umalvad District : Kolhapur

Name of agro-ecological situation :IV

32 35

41

47

57

29 30

38

42

51

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Area

Productivity

117 124

110

128 135

92 95 98 102 105

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Area (Hr.)

Productivity


Table No. 30 A (5.47)

ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS WITH REGARD TO

EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM

District: Kolhapur Agro-ecological situation: I Village: Punal Tal. Panhala

Resource Rich / Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-II

Sl.

No

.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy

1 Agricultural crops P Low Yield

coz of heavy

rain fall and

poor

management

5% Sugarcane

Plantation

Due to

lack of

knowledge

Training &

Demonstration

It should be

made available

in proper time.

Sugarcane

Proper Water

Management

Due to

lack of

awareness

Training &

Demonstration

It should be

made available

in proper time.

IPM

Price 100% Farmer should

get the prices

as per the

production

cost

Policy

problem

Labour 80% Agri

Mechanization

through

Farmer’s

Group

Industriali

zation

Training n agri

mechanization

linkage to

farmers groups

Farm

mechanisms

40%

Electricity 50%

fodder - Same as above

Cereals S

Pulses - - - - - -

Spices - - - - - -

2 Horticultural crops T - - - - -

Vegetables p - - - - -

3 Floriculture

Marigold T Poor

management

5 % IPM Due to

lack of

proper

guidence

It should be

made available

in proper time.

4 Oilseed

Groundnut S Poor

management

04% IPM Due to

lack of

proper

guidence

It should be

made

available in

proper time.


Sl.

No

.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy

5 Animal husbandry

cows T Yield of milk

is low & dry

period is

more

50% AI n

Developing

high yielding

cattle on farm

Due to

lack of

proper

guidence

Arrenge

traning &

Demonstration

farmer

buffalos

sheep

Goat

pigs - - - - - -

6 Fisheries - - - - - -

7 Sericulture - - - - - -

8 Poultry - - - - - -

9 Bee keeping - - - - - -

10 Duckeries - - - - - -

11 Agriculture labour - - - - - -

12 Any other - - - - - -

Note : Use separate sheet for each major resource situation


Table No. 30 B (5.48)


EXISTINGFARMING SYSTEM


Resource Rich Name of the EFS= EFS-III

Sl.

No

.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed strategy

1 Agricultural crops P Low Yield

coz of heavy

rain fall and

poor

management

10% Sugarcane

Plantation

Due to

lack of

knowledge

Training &

Demonstration It

should be made

available in proper

time.

Sugarcane

Proper Water

Management

Due to

lack of

awareness

Training &

Demonstration It

should be made

available in proper

time.

IPM

Price 90% Farmer should

get the prices

as per the

production

cost

Policy

problem

Labour 50% Agri

Mechanization

through

Farmer’s

Group

Industriali

zation

Training n agri

mechanization

linkage to farmers

groups

Farm

mechanisms

40%

Electricity 50%


Cereals S

Pulses - - - - - -

Spices - - - - - -

2 Horticultural crops T - - - - -


3 Floriculture

Marigold T Poor

management

15 % IPM Due to

lack of

proper

guidence

It should be made

available in proper

time.

4 Oilseed

Groundnut S Poor

management

08% IPM Due to

lack of

proper

guidence

It should be made

available in proper

time.


Sl.

No

.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed strategy

5 Animal husbandry

cows T Yield of milk

is low & dry

period is

more

50% AI n

Developing

high yielding

cattle on farm

Due to

lack of

proper

guidence

Arrenge traning &

Demonstration

farmer buffalos

sheep

Goat

pigs - - - - - -

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 C (5.49)


EXISTINGFARMING SYSTEM


Resource Rich / Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-IV

Sl.

N

o.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation of

enter-

prises in

EFS(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affecte

d

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons for

non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy

1 Agricultural

crops

P Low Yield

coz of

heavy rain

fall and

poor

manageme

nt

5% Sugarcane

Plantation

Due to lack

of

knowledge

Training &

Demonstration It

should be made

available in

proper time.

Sugarcane

Proper Water

Management

Due to lack

of

awareness

Training &

Demonstration It

should be made

available in

proper time.

IPM

Labour 80% Agri

Mechaniz-

ation through

Farmer’s

Group

Industrializa

tion

Training n agri

mechanization

linkage to

farmers groups


Cereals S

2 Horticultural

crops

T - - - - -


3 Floriculture

Marigold T Poor

manageme

nt

15 % IPM Due to

lack of

proper

guidence

It should be made

available in proper

time.

4 Oilseed

Groundnut S Poor

manageme

nt

14% IPM Due to

lack of

proper

guidence

It should be made

available in proper

time.

5 Animal husbandry

cows T Yield of

milk is low

& dry

period is

more

55% AI and

Developing

high yielding

cattle on farm

Due to

lack of

proper

guidence

Arrenge traning &

Demonstration

farmer buffalos

sheep

Goat

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -



Table No.30 D (5.50)

ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS WITH REGARD TO EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM

District: Kolhapur: Agro-ecological situation: II Upland rainfed medium to black soil

Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Resource Rich Name of the EFS= EFS –I

Sl.

No.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation of

enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons for

non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy

1 Agricultural crops

Low yield 65% Intercropping

with pulses

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstrat

ion

Irrigated

sugarcane

figures/ha P

rainfed

sugarcane

2 Horticultural

crops - - - - - -

orchards - - - - - -

3 Vegetables - - - - - -

4 Floriculture - - - - - -


cow

buffalows

sheep

goat

pig

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -

Note : Use separate sheet for each major resource situation, P-Primary,S- Secondary,T-Tertiary


Table No.30 E (5.51)


District: Kolhapur: Agro-ecological situation: II Upland rainfed medium to black soil

Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Resource Rich EFS –II

Sl.

No

.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of

enter-

prises

in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Low yield 50%

Sugarcane

Plantation

Method

Lack of

awareness

Sustainable

sugarcane

initiation

Irrigated

sugarcane figures/ha P

rainfed

sugarcane

2 Horicultural crops - - - - - -




5 Animal husbandry

cow S Poor

Managemen

t

62% cleaning ,

vaccination

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonst-

ration buffalows S

sheep T

goat

pig

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 F (5.52)

ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS WITH REGARD TO EXISTINGFARMING SYSTEM

District: Kolhapur: Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer

Resource Rich EFS –III

Sl.

No.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation of

enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affecte

d

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Low Yield

& Low

Productivity

65% Efficient use

of fertilizer

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstration

Irrigated

sugarcane figures/ha S

rainfed

sugarcane S

2 Horticultural crops - - - - - -

orchards P

Poor

Managemen

t

20%

cleaning of

orchard,

interculturing

operations

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstration




cow

Buffalos - - - - - -

sheep - - - - - -

goat - - - - - -

pig - - - - - -

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 G (5.53)


District: Kolhapur: Agro-ecological situation: II Village:Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer

Resource Poor EFS –I

Sl.

No.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation of

enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Lack of

knowledge

of new

technology

45%

Paired row

system of

plantation

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstration

Irrigated

sugarcane

figures/ha P

rainfed

sugarcane

2 Horticultural

crops - - - - - -




5 Animal

husbandry - - - - - -

cow

Buffalos

sheep

goat

pig

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 H (5.54)


District: Kolhapur: Agro-ecological situation: II Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer

Resource Poor EFS –II

Sl.

No.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation of

enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Lack of

knowledge

of new

technology

55%

Paired row

system of

plantation

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstration

Irrigated

sugarcane

figures/ha P

rainfed

sugarcane

2 Horticultural

crops - - - - - -




5 Animal

husbandry - - - - - -

cow T Poor

Management 45%

Vaccination

camps,

Trainings.

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstration

Buffalos

sheep

goat

pig

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 I (5.55)

ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS WITH REGARD TO EXISTINGFARMING SYSTEM

District: Kolhapur: Agro-ecological situation: II Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer

Resource Poor EFS –III

Sl.

No.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation of

enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affecte

d

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Low Yield

& Low

Productivity

25% Efficient use

of fertilizer

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstration

Irrigated

sugarcane figures/ha S

rainfed

sugarcane S

2 Horticultural crops - - - - - -

orchards P

Poor

Managemen

t

30%

cleaning of

orchard,

interculturing

operations

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstration




cow

Buffalos - - - - - -

sheep - - - - - -

goat - - - - - -

pig - - - - - -

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 J (5.56)


District: Kolhapur Agro-ecological situation: III Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad

Resource Rich Name of the EFS= EFS-I

Sl.

No.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities

Combi-

nation of

enter-prises

in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affecte

d

person

s

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons for

non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy

1 Agricultural

crops

Irrigated

Sugarcane P low yields 54% -Adoption of

Sustainable

Sugarcane

Initiation

Technology

lack of

knowledge

lack of skill

Taininig,

Demo,

visits

Rain fed

Paddy P Low

Productivity

46% Adoption of

high yield and

Hybrid

Varieties

lack of

knowledge

Taininig,

Demo,

2 Horticultural

crops

Orchards

cashew

4 Vegetables

5 Floriculture

6 Animal

husbandry

Cows

Buffalos

- Sheep

- Goat

- Pigs

7 Fisheries

8 Sericulture

9 Poultry

10 Bee keeping

11 Duckeries

12 Agriculture

labour

13 Any other



Table No.30 K (5.57)



Resource Rich Name of the EFS= EFS-II

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of

enter-

prises

in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons for

non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Irrigated


Sustainable

Sugarcane

Initiation

Technology

lack of

knowledge

lack of skill

Taininig,

Demo,

visits

Rain fed

Paddy


Orchards

cashew

Vegetables

Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

Cows S Poor

Management,

Increased

cost of

production.

34% A I Camp,

use of

nutrient cake

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstrati

on,

vaccination

Buffalos

- Sheep

- Goat

- Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry

7 Bee keeping

8 Duckeries


10 Any other



Table No.30 L (5.58)



Resource Rich Name of the EFS= III

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of

enter-

prises

in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Irrigated

Sugarcane P low yields 62% Adoption of

improved

package of

practice

Lack of

awareness

Training

Demos

exposure

visit

Rain fed

Paddy


Orchards

cashew S Poor

Manageme

nt

&unawaren

ess of

marketing

52% -Adoption

Of INM &

IPM

-Farmars

Producer

Company

lack of

knowledg

e

lack of

skill

Taininig,

Demo,

Vegetables

Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

Cows

Buffalos

- Sheep

- Goat

- Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry

7 Bee keeping

8 Duckeries


10 Any other



Table No.30 M (5.59)



Resource Rich Name of the EFS= IV

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of

enter-

prises

in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affecte

d

person

s

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Propose

d

strategy

1 Agricultural crops S low yields 68% Adoption of

improved

package of

practice

Lack of

awareness

Training

Demos

exposure

visit

Irrigated

Sugarcane

Rain fed

Paddy


Orchards

cashew S Unawareness

of marketing

62% -Farmars

Producer

Company

lack of

knowledge

lack of

skill

Taininig,

Demo,

Vegetables

Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

Cows S Poor

Management

, Increased

cost of

production.

38%

A I Camp,

use of

nutrient cake

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstr

ation,

vaccinati

on

Buffalos

- Sheep

- Goat

- Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry

7 Bee keeping

8 Duckeries


10 Any other



Table No.30 N (5.60)



Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-I

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation of

enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problem

s with

each

enterpri

se

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons for

non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Irrigated

Sugarcane P low

yields

70% -Adoption of

Sustainable

Sugarcane

Initiation

Technology

lack of

knowledge

lack of skill

Taininig,

Demo,

visits

Rain fed

Paddy P Low

Producti

vity

56% Adoption of

high yield and

Hybrid Varieties

lack of

knowledge

Taininig,

Demo,


Orchards

cashew

Vegetables

Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

Cows

Buffalos

- Sheep

- Goat

- Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry

7 Bee keeping

8 Duckeries


10 Any other



Table No.30 O (5.61)



Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-II

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of

enter-

prises

in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Irrigated


Sustainable

Sugarcane

Initiation

Technology

lack of

knowledge

lack of

skill

Taininig,

Demo,

visits

Rain fed

Paddy P Low

Productivity

62% Adoption of

high yield

and Hybrid

Varieties

lack of

knowledge

Taininig,

Demo,


Orchards

cashew

Vegetables

Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

Cows S Poor

Managemen

t, Increased

cost of

production.

44%

A I Camp,

use of

nutrient cake

Lack of

awareness

Training,

Demonstr

ation,

vaccinati

on

Buffalos

- Sheep

- Goat

- Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry

7 Bee keeping

8 Duckeries


10 Any other



Table No.30 P (5.62)



Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-III

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of

enter-

prises

in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Irrigated

Sugarcane S low yields 68% Adoption

of

improved

package

of practice

Lack of

awareness

Training

Demos

exposure

visit

Rain fed

Paddy P Low

Productivit

y

70% Adoption

of

high yield

and

Hybrid

Varieties

lack of

knowledge

Taininig,

Demo,


Orchards

cashew S Poor

Manageme

nt

&unawaren

ess of

marketing

62% -Adoption

Of INM &

IPM

-Farmars

Producer

Company

lack of

knowledge

lack of skill

Taininig,

Demo,

Vegetables

Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

Cows

Buffalos

- Sheep

- Goat

- Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry

7 Bee keeping

8 Duckeries


10 Any other



Table No.30 Q (5.63)



Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-IV

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of

enter-

prises

in EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems with

each

enterprise

No.

of

affect

ed

perso

ns

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption

of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Irrigated

Sugarcane P low yields 72% Adoption

of

improved

package

of practice

Lack of

awareness

Training

Demos

exposure

visit

Rain fed

Paddy P Low

Productivity

78% Adoption

of

high yield

and

Hybrid

Varieties

lack of

knowledge

Taininig,

Demo,


Orchards

cashew S Poor

Management

&unawareness

of marketing

62% -Adoption

Of INM &

IPM

-Farmars

Producer

Company

lack of

knowledge

lack of skill

Taininig,

Demo,

Vegetables

Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

Cows T Poor

Managament

and Increased

cost of

production

47% A I

Camp,Use

of

Nutrient

Cake

Lack Of

Awareness

Training,D

emonstrtio

n,Vacciatio

n

Buffalos

- Sheep L

- Goat

- Pigs

4 Fisheries

5 Sericulture

6 Poultry

7 Bee keeping

8 Duckeries


10 Any other



Table No.30 R (5.64)


District: Kolhapur Agro-ecological situation: IV Village: Umalwad Tal. Shirol

Resource Rich Name of the EFS= EFS-I

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy

1 Agricultural crops P Low yield 45 % Use

Micro

irrigation

Lack of

awarness

Training

Demonstration Sugarcane

Planting

Method

53 % Paired

row

system

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Flood 1% Manag-

ement

practices

Natural

Calamaty

Proper Extension

programme

Fodder

Cereals

Pulses - - - - -

Spices - - - - -


Banana

Gauva - - - - -

Chiku - - - - -

Grape - - - - -

3 Vegetables

Tomato - - - - -

Bringal - - - - -

Flower - - - - -

Cauliflower - - - - -

Other - - - - -

4 Flowriculture

Merigold

5 Oilseed

Soyabean S Storage &

Marketing

60% Valuaddat

ion

Lack of

Knowledge

PHT Training

Demonstration,

Exposure village

Groundnut - - - - -

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 S (5.65)



Resource Rich Name of the EFS= EFS-II

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Micro

irrigation

Lack of

awarness

Training


Planting

Method

59 % Paired

row

system

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Flood 10% Manag-

ement

practices

Natural

Calamaty

Proper Extension

programme


Marketing

60% Valuaddat

ion

Lack of

Knowledge

PHT Training

Demonstration,

Exposure village Cereals

Pulses - - - - -

Spices - - - - -


Banana

Gauva - - - - -

Chiku - - - - -

Grape - - - - -

3 Vegetables

Tomato - - - - -

Bringal - - - - -

Flower - - - - -


Other - - - - -

4 Flowriculture

Merigold

5 Animal husbandry

Cows T Poor

Managame

nt and

Increased

cost of

production

47% A I

Camp,Us

e of

Nutrient

Cake

Lack Of

Awareness

Training,Demonst

rtion,Vacciation

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 T (5.66)



Resource Rich Name of the EFS= EFS-III

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Micro

irrigation

Lack of

awarness

Training


Planting

Method

53 % Paired

row

system

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Flood 1% Manag-

ement

practices

Natural

Calamaty

Proper Extension

programme

Fodder

Cereals

Pulses - - - - -

Spices - - - - -


Banana T Low yield 20% Improved

Packaging

Practices

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Gauva - - - - -

Chiku - - - - -

Grape - - - - -

3 Vegetables

Tomato - - - - -

Bringal - - - - -

Flower - - - - -


Other - - - - -

4 Flowriculture

Merigold

5 Oilseed


Marketing

60% Valuaddat

ion

Lack of

Knowledge

PHT Training

Demonstration,

Exposure village

Groundnut - - - - -

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 U (5.67)



Resource Rich Name of the EFS= EFS-IV

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Micro

irrigation

Lack of

awarness

Training


Planting

Method

23 % Paired

row

system

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Flood 05% Manag-

ement

practices

Natural

Calamaty

Proper Extension

programme

Fodder

Cereals

Pulses - - - - -

Spices - - - - -



Packaging

Practices

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Gauva - - - - -

Chiku - - - - -

Grape - - - - -

3 Animal husbandry

Cows T Poor

Managame

nt and

Increased

cost of

production

47% A I

Camp,Use

of

Nutrient

Cake

Lack Of

Awareness

Training,Demonst

rtion,Vacciation

4

Oilseed


Marketing

60% Valuaddat

ion

Lack of

Knowledge

PHT Training

Demonstration,

Exposure village

Groundnut - - - - -

5 Fisheries - - - - - -


7 Poultry - - - - - -


9 Duckeries - - - - - -


11 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 V (5.68)



Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-I

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Micro

irrigation

Lack of

awarness

Training


Planting

Method

28 % Paired

row

system

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Flood 10% Manag-

ement

practices

Natural

Calamaty

Proper Extension

programme

Fodder

Cereals

Pulses - - - - -

Spices - - - - -


Banana

Gauva - - - - -

Chiku - - - - -

Grape - - - - -

3 Vegetables

Tomato - - - - -

Bringal - - - - -

Flower - - - - -


Other - - - - -

4 Flowriculture

Merigold

5 Oilseed


Marketing

52% Valuaddat

ion

Lack of

Knowledge

PHT Training

Demonstration,

Exposure village

Groundnut - - - - -

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 W (5.69)



Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-II

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy

1 Agricultural crops P Low yield 12% Use

Micro

irrigation

Lack of

awarness

Training


Planting

Method

23 % Paired

row

system

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Flood 09% Manag-

ement

practices

Natural

Calamaty

Proper Extension

programme


Marketing

28% Valuaddat

ion

Lack of

Knowledge

PHT Training

Demonstration,


Pulses - - - - -

Spices - - - - -


Banana

Gauva - - - - -

Chiku - - - - -

Grape - - - - -

3 Vegetables

Tomato - - - - -

Bringal - - - - -

Flower - - - - -


Other - - - - -

4 Flowriculture

Merigold

5 Animal husbandry

Cows T Poor

Managame

nt and

Increased

cost of

production

42% A I

Camp,Us

e of

Nutrient

Cake

Lack Of

Awareness

Training,Demonst

rtion,Vacciation

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 X (5.70)



Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-III

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Micro

irrigation

Lack of

awarness

Training


Planting

Method

23 % Paired

row

system

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration


Marketing

60% Valuaddat

ion

Lack of

Knowledge

PHT Training

Demonstration,


Pulses - - - - -

Spices - - - - -



Packaging

Practices

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Gauva - - - - -

Chiku - - - - -

Grape - - - - -

3 Vegetables

Tomato - - - - -

Bringal - - - - -

Flower - - - - -


Other - - - - -

4 Flowriculture

Merigold

5 Oilseed

Groundnut - - - - -

6 Fisheries - - - - - -


8 Poultry - - - - - -


10 Duckeries - - - - - -


12 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.30 Y (5.71)



Resource Poor Name of the EFS= EFS-IV

Sl.

No.


commodities

Combi-

nation

of enter-

prises in

EFS

(P/S/T)

Specific

problems

with each

enterprise

No. of

affected

persons

(%)

Proposed

solution

Reasons

for non-

adoption of

proposed

solution

Proposed

strategy


Micro

irrigation

Lack of

awarness

Training


Planting

Method

23 % Paired

row

system

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration


Marketing

26% Valuaddat

ion

Lack of

Knowledge

PHT Training

Demonstration,


Pulses - - - - -

Spices - - - - -



Packaging

Practices

Lack of

Knowledge

Training

Demonstration

Gauva - - - - -

Chiku - - - - -

Grape - - - - -

3 Animal husbandry

Cows T Poor

Managame

nt and

Increased

cost of

production

37% A I

Camp,Use

of

Nutrient

Cake

Lack Of

Awareness

Training,Demonst

rtion,Vacciation

4

Oilseed

Groundnut - - - - -

5 Fisheries - - - - - -


7 Poultry - - - - - -


9 Duckeries - - - - - -


11 Any other - - - - - -



Table No.31 A (5.72)

TYPE OF CHANGING SCENARIO IN RURAL AREAS WHICH IS HAVING A

BEARING ON EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM

Name of village: Punal Tal. Panhala District :Kolhapur

Type of agro-ecological situation : I

S.No. Type of changing scenario

Effect of each scenario

on farming system

(H/M/L)

Remarks

1 Migration of people to urban areas H FACILITIES OF

MARKET

2 Lack of animal draught power H INCREASED FARM

MECHANIZATION

3 Increase in farm machinery L EASY AVAILABILITY

AND SAVING OF TIME

4 Shortage of labour H INGRESSES WAGE

5 Reduction in availability of fodder L LAND UTILIZATION

UNDER CASH CROPS

6 Increase in number of unemployed rural youth H LACK OF SKILL

TRAININGS

7 Increase in level of education M ADOPTION OF NEW

TECHNOLOGY

8 Reduction in availability of irrigation water M Load shading of electricity

9 Increase in rural indebtedness L

10 Better trasnport facilities L EASY APPROACH TO

MARKET

11 Milk collection centers/route M MILK COOPERATIVE

SOCIETIES NETWORK

12 Marketing facilities at the village level L

UNAVAILABILITY OF

MARKET

INFRASTRUCTURE

13 Slackness towards agriculture L LOW OUTPUT FROM

AGRICULTURE

14 Low relative profitability from farming M

DIVERSION OF SOME

FAMILIES FROM

FARMING

15 Absentee land lordism L

16 Selling land to others M

17 Purchasing land from others L

18 Any other -

H=High; M= Medium; L = Low


Table No. 31 B (5.73)

TYPE OF CHANGING SCENARIO IN RURAL AREAS WHICH IS HAVING A BEARING ON


Name of Village::Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer District : Kolhapur

Type of agro-ecological situation :II

S.

No. Type of changing scenario

Effect of each

scenario on farming

system (H/M/L)

Remarks

1 Migration of people to urban areas H FACILITIES OF MARKET

2 Lack of animal draught power M INCREASED FARM

MECHANIZATION

3 Increase in farm machinery H EASY AVAILABILITY AND

SAVING OF TIME


5 Reduction in availability of fodder H LAND UTILIZATION UNDER

CASH CROPS

6 Increase in number of unemployed rural

youth M LACK OF SKILL TRAININGS

7 Increase in level of education H ADOPTION OF NEW

TECHNOLOGY

8 Reduction in availability of irrigation water H Load shading of electricity

9 Increase in rural indebtedness M

10 Better trasnport facilities H EASY APPROACH TO

MARKET

11 Milk collection centers/route H MILK COOPERATIVE

SOCIETIES NETWORK

12 Marketing facilities at the

village level L

UNAVAILABILITY OF

MARKET INFRASTRUCTURE

13 Slackness towards agriculture H LOW OUTPUT FROM

AGRICULTURE

14 Low relative profitability from farming H DIVERSION OF SOME

FAMILIES FROM FARMING

15 Absentee land lordism H

16 Selling land to others H -------

17 Purchasing land from others

18 Any Other L -------




TYPE OF CHANGING SCENARIO IN RURAL AREAS WHICH IS HAVING A BEARING ON


Name of village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad District: Kolhapur

Type of agro-ecological situation : III


S. No. Type of changing scenario


on farming

system (H/M/L)

Remarks

1 Migration of people to urban areas L

Employment opportunities

in urban area

2 Lack of animal draught power M

Increased Farm

Mechanization

3 Increase in farm machinery M

Due to unavailable of

farm labor

4 Shortage of labour M Demand of higher wages

5 Reduction in availability of fodder M -

6 Increase in number of unemployed rural youth H Due to illiteracy ratio

7 Increase in level of education M

Unavailable of Higher

education

8 Reduction in availability of irrigation water -


Agriculture and allied

activities

10 Better trasnport facilities L -Easily Access

11 Milk collection centers/route H Due to Dairy Activities

12 Marketing facilities at the village level L

Unavailability if

marketing Infrastructure

13 Slackness towards agriculture M -

14 Low relative profitability from farming M -

15 Absentee land lordism -

16 Selling land to others L

Increase in

Industrialization


Due to employment

deployment programme

18 Any other -



TYPE OF CHANGING SCENARIO IN RURAL AREAS WHICH IS HAVING A

BEARING ON EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM

Name of village: Umalwad Tal. Shirol District :Kolhapur

Type of agro-ecological situation :

S. No. Type of changing scenario


on farming

system (H/M/L)

Remarks

1 Migration of people to urban areas M

Industrialization,

Urbansation

2 Lack of animal draught power M

INCREASED FARM

MECHANIZATION

3 Increase in farm machinery

H

EASY

AVAILABILITY

AND SAVING OF

TIME


5 Reduction in availability of fodder L

6 Increase in number of unemployed rural youth H

LACK OF SKILL

TRAININGS

7 Increase in level of education M

ADOPTION OF NEW

TECHNOLOGY

8 Reduction in availability of irrigation water -

Load shading of

electricity


10 Better trasnport facilities L

EASY APPROACH

TO MARKET

11 Milk collection centers/route

H

MILK

COOPERATIVE

SOCIETIES

NETWORK

12 Marketing facilities at the village level

M

UNAVAILABILITY

OF MARKET

INFRASTRUCTURE

13 Slackness towards agriculture

M

LOW OUTPUT

FROM

AGRICULTURE

14 Low relative profitability from farming

L

DIVERSION OF

SOME FAMILIES

FROM FARMING

15 Absentee land lordism -

16 Selling land to others L -------


18 Any other - -------




TYPE OF NEW MARKET OPPORTUNITIES IN URBAN / RURAL AREAS WHICH ARE

HAVING BEARINGS ON FARMING SYSTEM

Name of village: Punal Tal. Panhala District :Kolhapur

Type of agro-ecological situation

S.No. Type of new market opportunities Effect of each opportunity on farming system

(H/M/L)

1 Vegetables H

2 Fruits M

3 Mulberry silk L

4 Oilseeds L

5 Pulses L

6 Mushroom L

7 Flowers M

8 Meat (goat/sheep) M

9 Sale of Seeds to outside L

10 Sale of Organic products to outside L

11 Basmati rice L

12 Honey L

13 Handicraft No

14 Others No


Table No.32 B (5.77)

TYPE OF NEW MARKET OPPORTUNITIES IN URBAN / RURAL AREAS WHICH ARE HAVING

BEARINGS ON FARMING SYSTEM

Village: Padavalwadi Tal.: Karveer District : Kolhapur

S.No. Type of new market

opportunities

Effect of each opportunity on farming

system (H/M/L)

1 Vegetables brinjal H

2 Fruits mango gava H

3 Mulberry silk L

4 Oilseeds ground nut soybean H

5 Pulses H

6 Mushroom L

7 Flowers H

8 Meat (goat/sheep) H


10 Sale of Organic products to outside M

11 Basmati rice L

12 Honey L

13 Handicraft L

14 any other L





District :Kolhapur Name of village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad

Type of agro-ecological situation – III

S.No. Type of new market Opportunities Effect of each opportunity on farming system

(H/M/L)

1 Vegetables H

2 Fruits H

3 Mulberry silk L

4 Oilseeds H

5 Pulses H

6 Mushroom L

7 Flowers L




11 Ghansal/Ambemohar H

12 Honey L

13 Handicraft L

14 Others

15 Milk H





District :Kolhapur Name of village: Punal Tal. Panhala

S.No. Type of new market opportunities Effect of each opportunity on farming system

(H/M/L)

1 Vegetables H

2 Fruits M

3 Mulberry silk L

4 Oilseeds L

5 Pulses L

6 Mushroom L

7 Flowers M

8 Meat (goat/sheep) M



11 Basmati rice L

12 Honey L

13 Handicraft No

14 Others No





District : Kolhapur: Name of Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer

S.No. Type of new market

opportunities

Effect of each opportunity on farming

system (H/M/L)

1 Vegetables brinjal H

2 Fruits mango gava H

3 Mulberry silk L

4 Oilseeds ground nut soybean H

5 Pulses H

6 Mushroom L

7 Flowers H



10 Sale of Organic products to outside M

11 Basmati rice L

12 Honey L

13 Handicraft L

14 any other L





District :Kolhapur Name of village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad

S.No. Type of new market Opportunities Effect of each opportunity on farming system

(H/M/L)

1 Vegetables H

2 Fruits H

3 Mulberry silk L

4 Oilseeds H

5 Pulses H

6 Mushroom L

7 Flowers L




11 Ghansal/Ambemohar H

12 Honey L

13 Handicraft L

14 Others

15 Milk H





District : Kolhapur Name of village:Umalwad Tal. Shirol

S.No. Type of new market opportunities Effect of each opportunity on

farming system (H/M/L)

1 Vegetables H

2 Fruits H

3 Mulberry silk L

4 Oilseeds M

5 Pulses L

6 Mushroom L

7 Flowers M

8 Meat (goat/sheep) L



11 Basmati rice No

12 Honey L

13 Handicraft No

14 Others No



DIVERSIFICATION AND INTENSIFICATION OF FARMING SYSTEMS


Village: PunalTal. Panhala Resource Rich

Sl.

No.


commodities

Contribution of different enterprises / commodities

in terms of net income

Intervention

(Diversification /

Intensification) EFS

OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed

upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III

1 Agricultural crops -Irrigated

1)Sugarcane

2.00

2.50

2.50

-Diversification by

Sugarcane Plantation

+Intercroping by

pulses+ Drip Irrigation

-Rainfed -

1)Paddy

0.70 1.05 1.05 Diversification by

mixed cropping of

perrinial tur, Seed

Production of Local

Varities

2)Nagali 0.35 0.65 0.65 Intensification by

organic product,Value

addition,high Yielding

varities

Total 3.05 4.20 4.20


1)Cashew

1.40 2.00 2.00 Intesification of value

addition and

packaging to get better

price,Farmars

organization for better

marketing

2)Banana - 3.17 3.17 Diversification of

sugarcane area into

banana crop

Vegetables

1)Cauliflower 0.85 1.10 1.10 Diversification of

intercropping in

sugarcane crop

Total 2.25 6.27 6.27

3 Animal husbandry

-Cows (local) 1.50 2.00 2.00 Repalcement of local

cows with crossed

breed like Jersy HF

Diversification

-Buffaloes (local) 1.52 2.00 2.00 Repalcement of local

cows with crossed

breed like

Surati,Pandharpuri,etc.

Diversification

Total 3.02 4.00 4.00

Note: * In intervention column mention whether the mutually agreed upon FShas been Diversified or

intensified if so in what manner.





Village: Punal Resource Poor

Sl.

No.


commodities



Intervention

(Diversification /


OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed

upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


1)Sugarcane

1.70

2.20

2.20

-Diversification by


+Intercroping by

pulses+ Drip Irrigation

-Rainfed -

1)Paddy


mixed cropping of

perrinial tur, Seed

Production of Local

Varities

2)Nagali 0.30 0.55 0.55 Intensification by

organic product,Value

addition,high Yielding

varities

Total 2.50 3.65 3.65


1)Cashew


addition and


price,Farmars


marketing

2)Banana 1.50 2.00 2.00 Intensification of

improved technology

for export quality

Vegetables

1)Cauliflower 0.65 0.90 0.90 Diversification of

intercropping in

sugarcane crop

Total 3.35 4.50 4.50

3 Animal husbandry


cows with crossed

breed like Jersy HF

Diversification


cows with crossed

breed like


Diversification

Total 2.60 3.30 3.30







Village:Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Resource Rich

Sl.

No.


commodities

Contribution of different enterprises /

commodities in terms of net income Intervention

(Diversification /


OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


3.2

Diversification by

intercropping of Pulses

and vegetables

Intensification by


metod (SSI

Technology)

Irrigated –

1)sugar cane 2.2 3.2

Rainfed-

1)Paddy

0.60 0.90 - 0.90

Diversification by

mixed cropping of

perrinial tur,Seed

Production of Local

Varities

2)Soyabean 0.55 0.90

0.90

Intensification by value

addition,Processing and

seed production

3)Groundnut 0.64 0.85

0.85

Intensification high

yielding varities,seed

production,harvesting

by improved technology

Total 3.99 5.85

5.85


- Orchards

Mango

1.50 2.80 2.80 Intensification of Post

harvest Management

3 Animal husbandry

Cow 0.75 1 1 Diversificaton of an

enterprised by an

introducing 2 cows or 2

buffelows or 10 goates

Buffalows 1 1.5 1.5

Sheep 0.08 0.1 0.1

Goal 0.1 0.12 0.12


5 Sericulture - - - - -

6 Poultry 1.2 1.3 - 1.3 Diversifiacation of

Hybrid varieties to

overcome cost of

production


8 Duckeries - - - -

9 Agriculture labour - - - - -

10 Any other - - - - -

Note: * In intervention column mention whether the mutually agreed upon FS

has been Diversified or intensified if so in what manner





Village:Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Resource Poor

Sl.

No.


commodities


commodities in terms of net income Intervention

(Diversification /


OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


3.2

Diversification by

intercropping of Pulses

and vegetables

Intensification by


metod (SSI

Technology)

Irrigated –

1)sugar cane 2.00 3.2

Rainfed-

1)Paddy

0.50 0.80 - 0.80

Diversification by

mixed cropping of

perrinial tur,Seed

Production of Local

Varities

2)Soyabean 0.50 0.85

0.85

Intensification by value

addition,Processing and

seed production

3)Groundnut 0.60 0.80

0.80

Intensification high


production,harvesting

by improved technology

Total 3.60 5.65

5.65


- Orchards

Mango

1.40 2.60 2.60 Intensification of Post

harvest Management

3 Animal husbandry

Cow 0.60 1 1 Diversificaton of an

enterprised by an

introducing 2 cows or 2

buffelows or 10 goates

Buffalows 0.90 1.5 1.5

Sheep 0.07 0.1 0.1

Goal 0.1 0.12 0.12



6 Poultry 1 1.3 - 1.3 Diversifiacation of

Hybrid varieties to

overcome cost of

production


8 Duckeries - - - -


10 Any other - - - - -

Note: * In intervention column mention whether the mutually agreed upon FS

has been Diversified or intensified if so in what manner





Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad Resource Rich

Sl.

No.


commodities



Intervention

(Diversification /


OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed

upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


1)Sugarcane

1.80

2.10

2.10

-Diversification by

intercropping of

vegetables and

floriculture + Drip

Irrigation

-Rainfed -

1)Paddy


intercropping of

perrinial tur

2)Nagali 0.75 1.00 1.00 Diversification by

intercropping of

perrinial tur

Total 3.33 4.30 4.30


- Orchards

-Cashew


addition and


price,Farmars


marketing

Total 2.00 3.00 3.00

3 Animal husbandry


cows with crossed

breed like Jersy HF

Diversification


cows with crossed

breed like


Diversification

Total 3.02 4.00 4.00

4 Forestry - - - 1.80 Diversification by

planting on waste land

5 Any other


Intensified if so in what manner.





Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad Resource Poor

Sl.

No.


commodities



Intervention

(Diversification /


OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed

upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


1)Sugarcane

1.30

1.90

1.90

-Diversification

sugarcane with drip

irrigation and

intercropping of

pulses

-Rainfed -

1)Paddy

0.88 1.10 1.10 Intensification by

value addition and

seed production

2)Nagali 0.65 0.90 0.90 Diversification by

intercropping of

perrinial tur

Total 2.83 3.90 3.90


- Orchards

-Cashew

1.00 1.40 1.40 Intesification by value

addition and farmars

organization for

marketing.

Total 1.00 1.50 1.40

3 Animal husbandry

-Cows (local) 1 0.17 Repalcement of local

cows with crossed

breed like Jersy HF

Diversification


cows with crossed

breed like

Surati,Pandharpuri

etc. Diversification

Total 0.27 0.47 0.47

4 Forestry - - 1.50 Diversification by

planting of bamboo

on waste land

5 Any other


Intensified if so in what manner.





Village: Umalwad Tal. Shirol Resource Rich

Sl.

No.


commodities


commodities in terms of net income (Lakhs) Intervention

(Diversification /


OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed

upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


-Irrigated

1)Sugarcane 2.5 3.25 3.25 Diversification sugarcane

with drip irrigation and

intercropping of pulses

2)Soyabean 0.75 1.00 1.00 Intensification

Valueaddatation,seed

production

3)Groundnut 0.90 1.10 1.10 Intensification high


production,harvesting by

improved technology

Total 4.15 5.25 5.25


1)Banana 3.00 3.50 3.15 IntensificationINM & IPM

2)Guava 0.60 1 1 Intensification of High

Density Planting,Value

addition and packaging

3 Vegetables

Tomato 1.00 1.10 1.10 Intensificationof Hybrid

Varieties and IPM

Bringal 1.12 1.40 1.40 Intensification of Hybrid

Varieties and IPM

Flower 0.90 0.93 0.93 Intensification of Hybrid

Varieties,High tech

floriculture and IPM

4 Flowriculture

Merigold 0.64 1.00 1.00 Intensification INM IPM

5 Animal husbandry

-Cows

0.75 1.00 1.00 Repalcement of local cows

with crossed breed like

Jersy HF Diversification

-Buffaloes 1.20 1.50 1.50 Diversification by

Repalcement of local with

crossed breed like

Pandharpuri ,Surati,

-Sheep

-Goat 0.40 0.60 0.60 Diversification by


crossed breed like

Usamanabadi

-Pigs


Intensified ifso in what manner.





Village: Umalwad Tal. Shirol Resource Poor

Sl.

No.


commodities


commodities in terms of net income (Lakhs) Intervention

(Diversification /


OP-I

Proposed Mutually

Agreed

upon

OP-IV OP-II OP-III


-Irrigated

1)Sugarcane 2.4 3.25 3.25 Diversification sugarcane

with drip irrigation and

intercropping of pulses

2)Soyabean 0.65 1.00 1.00 Intensification Value

addatation,seed production

3)Groundnut 0.80 1.10 1.10 Intensification high yielding

varities,seed

production,harvesting by

improved technology

Total 4.15 5.25 5.25


1)Banana 2.80 3.10 3.10 IntensificationINM & IPM

2)Guava 0.60 1 1 Intensification of High

Density Planting, Value

addition and packaging

3 Vegetables

Tomato 0.90 1.00 1.00 Intensification of Hybrid

Varieties and IPM

Bringal 1.05 1.30 1.30 Intensification of Hybrid

Varieties and IPM

Flower 0.90 0.93 0.93 Intensification of Hybrid

Varieties,High tech

floriculture and IPM

4 Flowriculture

Merigold 0.64 1.00 1.00 Intensification INM IPM

5 Animal husbandry

-Cows

0.75 1.00 1.00 Repalcement of local cows

with crossed breed like Jersy

HF Diversification

-Buffaloes 1.20 1.50 1.50 Diversification by


crossed breed like

Pandharpuri ,Surati,

-Sheep

-Goat 0.40 0.60 0.60 Diversification by


crossed breed like

Usamanabadi

-Pigs




Table No. 34 A (5.91)

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR

PROMOTING THE MODIFIED FARMING SYSTEM


Village: Punal Tal. Panhala Resource Rich

Sl.

No.


commodities

Contribution of different enterprises

/ commodity in terms of net

income(Lakhs)

Gap in

adoption of

new

enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons

for gap in

Adoption

**

Proposed

strategy

*** Existing farming

system

Mutually

agreed upon

farming system


- Irrigated

Sugarcane 2.00/ha 2.50/ha F 1 2,5,6

Rainfed crop

1)Nagali 0.35/ha 0.65/ha P 1,2 2,5,6

2)Paddy 0.70/ha 1.05/ha - 1 2,5,6

- - - ** ***

2 Horticultural crops - - - - -

1)Cashew 1.40/ha 2.00/ha P 1 2,6

2)Banana - 3.17/ha

3)Cauliflower 0.85/ha 1.10

4 Animal husbandry

- Cows

1.50

2.00

P

1

5,6

- Buffaloes 1.52 2.00 P 1 5,6

- Sheep P

- Goat -

- Pigs -

** Reasons for gap in adoption *** Proposed Strategy

1. Lack of Awareness 1. Mass media support

2. Lack of Resources 2. Farm Trial & Demonstration

3. Lack of Skilled Persons 3. Linkage with Credit Institution

4. Financial problem 4. Intensification

5. Lack of finance 5. Exposure visit

6. Others farmer follow it. 6. Training

7. Fear of loss of yield if fertilizers does is reduced. 7. Diversification


Table No. 34 B (5.92)




Village: Punal Tal. Panhala Resource Poor

Sl.

No.


commodities


/ commodity in terms of net

income(Lakhs)

Gap in

adoption of

new

enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons

for gap in

Adoption

**

Proposed

strategy


system

Mutually

agreed upon

farming system


- Irrigated

Sugarcane 1.70/ha 2.20ha P 1 2,5,6

Rainfed crop

1)Nagali 0.30/ha 0.55/ha P 1,2 2,5,6

2)Paddy 0.50/ha 0.90/ha - 1 2,5,6

- - - ** ***

2 Horticultural crops - - - - -

1)Cashew 1.20/ha 1.60/ha P 1 2,6

2)Banana 1.50/ha 2.00/ha P 1, 2,6

3)Cauliflower 0.65/ha 90/ha P 1 2,5,6

4 Animal husbandry

- Cows

1.30

1.70

P

1

5,6

- Buffaloes 1.30 1.60 P 1 5,6

- Sheep P

- Goat -

- Pigs -


1. Lack of Awareness 1. Mass media support

2. Lack of Resources 2. Farm Trial & Demonstration

3. Lack of Skilled Persons 3. Linkage with Credit Institution






Table No. 34 C (5.93)

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING

THE MODIFIED FARMING SYSTEM


Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Resource Rich

Sl.

No.


commodities


enterprises / commodity in

terms of net income/HA

Gap in

adoption

of new

enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons

for gap in

Adoption

**

Proposed

strategy

*** Existing

farming

system

Mutually agreed

upon farming

system


Irrigated

Sugaracnc 2.2 3.2 P 1 2,6,5

Rainfed

Paddy 1.2 1.5 P 1 2,5,6

Soyabean 0.55 0.90 P 1 2.6

Ground nut 0.9 1.2 P 1 2,5,6


Orchid

Mango 1.5 2.80 P 1 1,2,5,6

Vegetables

Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

Cows 0.75 1 P 1 5,6

Buffelows 1 1.50 P 1 5,6

Goat 0.40 0.50 P 1 5,7

Sheep - - - - -



6 Poultry - - - - -

7 Bee keeping - - - - -

8 Duckeries - - - - -


10 Any other - - - - -

** Reasons for gap in adoption *** Proposed Strategy 1 Lack of Awareness 1 Mass media support 2 Lack of Resource 2 Farm trail and demonstration 3 Lack of skilled person 3 Linkage with credit institution 4 Financial Problem 4 Intensification 5 Lack of Finance 5 Exposure Visit 6 Other farmer following 6 Training 7 Fear of loss of yield if fertilizer is reduced. 7 Diversification


Table No. 34 D (5.94)




Village: Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Resource Poor

Sl.

No.


commodities



terms of net income

Gap in

adoption

of new

enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons

for gap in

Adoption

**

Proposed

strategy

*** Existing

farming

system

Mutually

agreed upon

farming system


Irrigated

Sugaracane 2 3.2 P 1 2,6,5

Rainfed

Paddy 0.50 0.80 P 1 2,5,6

Soyabean 0.50 0.85 P 1 2,5,6

Ground nut 0.60 0.80 P 1 2,5,6


Orchid

Mango 1.40 2.60 P 1 1,2,5,6

Vegetables

Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

Cows 0.60 1 P 1 5,6

Buffelows 0.90 1.50 P 1 5,6

Goat 0.40 0.50 P 1 5,7

Sheep - - - - -



6 Poultry - - - - -




10 Any other - - - - -


1 Lack of Awareness 1 Mass media support

2 Lack of Resource 2 Farm trail and demonstration

3 Lack of skilled person 3 Linkage with credit institution

4 Financial Problem 4 Intensification

5 Lack of Finance 5 Exposure Visit

6 Other farmer following 6 Training

7 Fear of loss of yield if fertilizer is reduced. 7 Diversification


Table No. 34 E (5.95)




Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad Resource Rich

Sl.

No.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities



terms of net income(lakhs) Gap in

adoption

of new

enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons

for gap in

Adoption

**

Proposed strategy

*** Existing

farming

system

Mutually

agreed upon

farming

system


- Irrigated

-Sugarcane 1.80 2.10 F 1,3,4 1,3,5

- Rainfed

-Paddy 0.98 1.20 p 1,3,4 1,3,5

-Nagali 0.75 1.00 P 1,3,4 1,3,5


- Orchards

Cashew nut 2.00 3.00 P 1,2 1,2,5

- Vegetables

- Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

- Cows 1.50 2.00 P 1 2,5,6

- Buffaloes 0.20 2.00 P 1 2,5,6

- Sheep

- Goat

- Pigs










Table No. 34 F (5.96)




Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad Resource Poor

Sl.

No.

Type of

enterprises/

commodities



terms of net income(lakhs) Gap in

adoption

of new

enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons

for gap in

Adoption

**

Proposed strategy

*** Existing

farming

system

Mutually

agreed upon

farming

system


- Irrigated

-Sugarcane 1.30 1.90 F 1,3,4 1,3,5

- Rainfed

-Paddy 0.88 1.10 p 1,3,4 1,3,5

-Nagali 0.65 0.90 P 1,3,4 1,3,5


- Orchards

Cashew nut 1.00 1.40 P 1,2 1,2,5

- Vegetables

- Floriculture

3 Animal husbandry

- Cows 1.40 1.90 P 1 2,5,6

- Buffaloes 1.20 1.60 P 1 2,5,6

- Sheep

- Goat

- Pigs














Village: UmalwadTal. Shirol Resource Rich

Sl.

No.


commodities



terms of net income

Gap in

adoption of

new

enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons

for gap in

Adoption

**

Proposed

strategy

*** Existing

farming system

Mutually

agreed upon

farming

system


- Irrigated

Sugarcane 2.5 3.25 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Oilseed 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Soyabean 0.75 1.00 F 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Groundnut 0.90 1.10 F 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

2 Horticultural crops 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Banana 3.00 3.50 F 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Guava 0.60 1 F 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

3 Vegetables 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Tomato 1.00 1.17 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Bringal 1.12 1.17 N 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Flower 0.90 0.94 N 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

4 Floriculture

Marigold 0.64 1.00 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

5 Animal husbandry

Cows 0.75 1.00 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Buffaloes 1.20 1.50 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Sheep

Goat 0.40 0.60 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Pigs

6 Fisheries - - -

7 Sericulture - - -

8 Poultry - - -

9 Bee keeping - - -

10 Duckeries - - -

11 Agriculture labour 5 5 F 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4,

12 Any other - - -


1.Lack of Awareness 1.Mass media support

2.Lack of Resources 2.Farm Trial & Demonstration

3. Lack of Skilled Persons 3.Linkage with Credit Institution










Village: Umalwad Tal. Shirol Resource Poor

Sl.

No.


commodities


/ commodity in terms of net income Gap in

adoption of

new

enterprise

(F/P/N)

Reasons

for gap in

Adoption

**

Proposed

strategy


system

Mutually

agreed upon

farming system


- Irrigated

Sugarcane 2.40 3.25 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Oilseed

Soyabean 0.65 1.00 F 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Groundnut 0.80 1.10 F 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4


Banana 2.80 3.10 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Guava 0.60 1 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

3 Vegetables

Tomato 0.90 1.00 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Bringal 1.05 1.30 N 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Flower 0.90 0.93 N 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

4 Floriculture

Marigold 0.61 1.00 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4


- Orchards

- Vegetables

- Floriculture

6 Animal husbandry

Cows 0.75 1.00 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Buffaloes 1.20 1.50 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

Sheep

Goat 0.40 0.60 P 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4



9 Poultry - - - - -



12 Agriculture labour 5 5 F 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4

13 Any other - - - - -


1.Lack of Awareness 1.Mass media support

2.Lack of Resources 2.Farm Trial & Demonstration

3. Lack of Skilled Persons 3.Linkage with Credit Institution







IDENTIFICATION OF DIFFERENT FARMING SITUATIONS

IN EACH CROP IN EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM

Name of district: Kolhapur

Representative village: Punal Tal. Panhala Name of crop : Sugarcane

Name of agro-ecological situation : Area in ha : 204 Hector

Time of

sowing

Source of irrigation

Well Tank Canal Lift Rainfed

Early

Normal √ X X

-

Late

√

* For identification of different farming situations in each crop, conduct focused group discussions

with the farmers and draw a two-way table as shown above by taking two factors at a time keeping

other factors constant. The factors for identifying the farming situations are :

1. Type of soil

2. Time of sowing

3. Source of irrigation

4. Previous crop

5. Problem soil etc.,

Table No.35 B (5.100)



Name of district : Kolhapur

Representative village: Punal Tal. Panhala Name of crop : Paddy

Name of agro-ecological situation : Area in ha : 20 Hector

Time of sowing Source of irrigation

Well Tank Canal Rainfed

Early

Normal √ √

Late

* For identification of different farming situations in each crop, conduct focused group discussions

with the farmers and draw a two-way table as shown above by taking two factors at a time keeping

other factors constant. The factors for identifying the farming situations are :

1. Type of soil

2. Time of sowing


4. Previous crop



Table No.35 C (5.101)

IDENTIFICATION OF DIFFERENT FARMING SITUATIONS IN

EACH CROP IN EXISTING FARMING SYSTEM


Representative village : Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Name of crop : Sugarcane

Name of agro-ecological situation : II Area in ha : 8.5 HA

Time of

sowing


Well Tank Canal Rainfed

Early

Normal √ - - √

Late

* For identification of different farming situations in each crop, conduct focused group discussions with

the farmers and draw a two-way table as shown above by taking two factors at a time keeping other

factors constant. The factors for identifying the farming situations are :

1. Type of soil

2. Time of sowing


4. Previous crop


Table No.35 D (5.102)




Representative village Nagave Tal. Chandgad Name of crop : Sugarcane

Name of agro-ecological situation : III Area in ha : 34 ha


Well Tank/river Canal Rainfed

Early × × × ×

Normal √ × √ ×

Late × × × ×




1. Type of soil

2. Time of sowing


4. Previous crop



Table No.35 E (5.103)




Representative village Nagave Tal. Chandgad Name of crop : Paddy




Early × × × ×

Normal × × × √

Late × × × ×




1. Type of soil

2. Time of sowing


4. Previous crop


Table No.35 F (5.104)




Representative village – Nagave Tal. Chandgad Name of crop : Nagali




Early × × × ×

Normal × × × √

Late × × × ×




1. Type of soil

2. Time of sowing


4. Previous crop



Table No.35 G (5.105)




Representative village Nagave Tal.Chandgad Name of crop : Cashew


Time of sowing



Early × × × ×

Normal × × × √

Late × × × ×

* For identification of different farming situations in each crop, conduct focused group discussions with the

farmers and draw a two-way table as shown above by taking two factors at a time keeping other factors

constant. The factors for identifying the farming situations are :

1. Type of soil

2. Time of sowing


4. Previous crop



TABLE No- 36 A (5.106)

TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH

IMPORTANT AGRICULTURAL CROPS ARE CULTIVATED


Representative village : Punal Tal. Panhala Name of crop : all

Name of agro-ecological situation : I Area in ha : 338 Hector

S

.No.

Farming

situation*

Area and % under different farming situations Total

EFS-1 EFS-2 EFS-3 EFS-4

Area (%) Area (%) Area (%) Area (%) Area (%)

1 Well & lift

irrigation 198 58.57% 87 25.73% 53 15.68% - - 338 100%

Total 198 58.57% 87 25.73% 53 15.68% - - 338 100%

* Describe the farming situation for the crop (such as tubewell irrigated/tank irrigated/rainfed rice etc.)

@ Separately for each important crop

Example:

EFS-I.. Agril._AH EFS-2..Fruit_AH – Agril. EFS-3.. Agril.-Fruit. EFS-4..Agril…Veg

TABLE No- 36 B (5.107)




Representative village : Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Name of crop :ALL

Name of agro-ecological situation : II Area in ha : 179 HA

S.

No.

Farming

situation*




1

IRRIGATION

WELL, LIFT

IRRIGATION

98 54.74 32 17.87 28 15.64 21 11.73 179 100

TOTAL 98 54.74 32 17.87 28 15.64 21 11.73 179 100



Example:



TABLE No. 36 C (5.107)




Representative village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad Name of crop : Paddy


S.

No.

Farming Area and % under different farming situations Total

situation* EFS-1 EFS-2 EFS-3 EFS-4


1 Rainfed 57 31 21 16 37 26 35 27 150 100

TOTAL 57 31 21 16 37 26 35 27 150 100



Example:


TABLE No- 36 D (5.108)




Representative village: Umalwad Tal. Shirol Name of crop : all

Name of agro-ecological situation : IV Area in ha : 422 Hector

S.

No.

Farming Area and % under different farming situations

Total



1 Well & lift

irrigation 84 20 63 15 64 15 211 50 422 100

Total 84 20% 63 15% 64 15% 211 50% 422 100%



Example:



ANALYSIS OF STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS

(SWOT) IN THE KOLHAPUR DISTRICT

On the basis of existing farming systems & mutually agreed upon or alternate farming system

following are the SWOT analysis of each farming system.

1. AES- I

Existing farming system- I (Agriculture) RR/RP

Under existing farming system I only agriculture crop like Paddy, Nagali, Sugarcane crops

are grown. Generally Paddy & Nagali are grown in rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are grown in

suru season i.e. In Jan.- Feb. Month

SWOT analysis of the EFS- I

Strength Weakness

A.Assured rainfall A. Heavy Soil erosion because of heavy

rainfall.

B. Vast sugarcane cultivation B. Complicated loan procedure.

C. High percentage of women participation C. Non availability of regular electric

supply.

in the farm & allied activities D. Non availability of good quality seed.

D. Assured income from sugarcane

Opportunities Threats

A. Scope for growing hybrid rice varieties A. Capital investment is high

B. Scope for processing B.Unstable market prices

C. Scope for contract farming

D. Soil fertility can improved by use of pulses

in Nagali crop.

E. Can prepare good vermicompost.

Mutually agreed upon farming system

Existing farming system- I (Agriculture) RR/RP

Sugarcane, Paddy, Nagali + Pulses, Groundnut


Strength Weakness

A. Assured rainfall A. Heavy Soil erosion because of heavy

rainfall.



supply.





B. Scope for processing B. Unstable market prices



in Nagali crop.



Existing farming system- II (Agriculture + animal husbandry) RR / RP

Under existing farming system II agriculture crop like Paddy, Nagali, Sugarcane crops are

grown. Generally Paddy & Nagali are grown in rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are grown in suru

season i.e. In Jan. - Feb. Month.

Subsidiary enterprises like raring of Cows , Buffalos , gaots & backyard poultry are doing by

the farmers.

SWOT analysis of the EFS- II

Strength Weakness


rainfall.

B. Availability green fodder B. Complicated loan procedure.


supply.

in the farm & allied activities D. Non availability of improved breeds of

cows,

D. Assured income from sugarcane, Milk buffalos, goats & poultry.

E. More employment are created.


A. Scope for growing hybrid rice varieties A. Capital investment is high.

B. Scope for processing. B. Unstable market prices.

C. Scope for contract farming. C. Required good management practices.

D. Soil fertility can improved by dynamic

method of fast compost composting.



Existing farming system- II (Agriculture+ Animal husbandry) RR/RP

Sugarcane, Paddy, Nagali + Pulses, Groundnut, cow, buffalos, gaots, poultry.


Strength Weakness


rainfall.



supply.



Opportunities Threats A. Scope for growing hybrid rice varieties A. Capital investment is high




in Nagali crop.



Existing farming system- III (Agriculture + Horticulture) RR / RP

Under existing farming system III agriculture crop like Paddy, Nagali, Sugarcane crops are

grown. Generally Paddy & Nagali are grown in rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are grown in suru

season i.e. In Jan. - Feb. Month. Horticulture crops like mango are grown.

SWOT analysis of the EFS - III

Strength Weakness


rainfall

B. Availability green fodder B. Complicated loan procedure


supply.

in the farm & allied activities

D. Assured income from sugarcane,





C. Scope for contract farming. E. Required good management practices.


method of fast compost making.

E. Can prepare good vermi compost.


Existing farming system- III ( Agriculture + horticulture) RR / RP

Sugarcane, Paddy, Nagali + Pulses, Groundnut, mango

SWOT analysis of the EFS – I

Strength Weakness


rainfall.



supply.








in Nagali crop.

E. Can prepare good vermicompost .


2. AES - II

Existing farming system - I (Agriculture) RR / RP

Under AES II, in existing farming system I only agriculture crop like Paddy, Groundnut,

Sugarcane crops are grown. Generally Paddy & Groundnut crops are grown in kharif season under

rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are grown in suru season i.e. In Jan. - Feb. Month.

SWOT analysis of the EFS - I

Strength Weakness


rainfall

B. Availability green fodder B. Complicated loan procedure


supply.

in the farm & allied activities






C. Scope for contract farming.





Sugarcane, Maize, Paddy, Nagali + Pulses, Groundnut


Strength Weakness


rainfall.



supply.








in Nagali crop.



Existing farming system - II (Agriculture + animal husbandry) RR / RP Under AES- II, existing farming system II agriculture crop like Paddy, groundnut,

Sugarcane crops are grown. Generally Paddy & groundnut crop are grown in rainfed condition &

Sugarcane crop are grown in suru season i.e. In Jan. - Feb. Month.

Subsidiary enterprises like raring of Cows, Buffalos, gaots & backyard poultry are doing by

the farmers.

SWOT analysis of the EFS - II

Strength Weakness A. Assured rainfall A. Heavy Soil erosion because of heavy rainfall.


C. High percentage of women participation C. Non availability of regular electric supply.

in the farm & allied activities D. Non availability of improved breeds of cows,


E. More employment are created. E. Low milk production.

F. Viable milk co-operative societies F. No regular vaccination.

G. non cultivation of fodder crops like legumes.

H. Stall feeding is only option for commercial cattle

raring.



B. Scope for processing. B. Unstable market prices


D. Soil fertility can improved by dynamic D. Free grazing of cattle is a menance.



F. Processing & value addition of surplus milk.


Existing farming system - II (Agriculture + Animal husbandry) RR / RP


SWOT analysis of the EFS – II

Strength Weakness A. Assured rainfall A. Heavy Soil erosion because of heavy rainfall.



in the farm & allied activities D. Non availability of improved breeds of cows,



F. Viable milk co-operative societies F. No regular vaccination.

G. non cultivation of fodder crops like legumes.

H. Stall feeding is only option for commercial

cattle raring.










Existing farming system- III (Agriculture + Horticulture) RR / RP

Under existing farming system III agriculture crop like Paddy, Nagali, Sugarcane crops are

grown. Generally Paddy &Groundnut crops are grown in rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are

grown in suru season i.e. In Jan. - Feb. Month. Horticulture crops like mango, cashewnuts are grown

on waste land soil are grown.


Strength Weakness


rainfall.

B. High percentage of women participation B. Complicated loan procedure.

in the farm & allied activities C. Non availability of regular electric

supply.

C. Assured income from sugarcane,

D. More employment are created.



B. Scope for fruit processing. B. Unstable market prices






Existing farming system- III (Agriculture + horticulture) RR / RP

Sugarcanemixed cropping with soybean, Paddy, Nagali + Pulses, Groundnut, cashewnut

SWOT analysis of the EFS – I

Strenght WeaknessA. Assured rainfall

A. Heavy Soil erosion because of heavy rainfall.



supply.

in the farm & allied activities D. Lack of availability of good market rate.



F. More waste land is available for

Cashew nut planting.

Opportunities Threats A. Scope for growing hybrid rice varieties A. Capital investment is high








3. AES - III


Under AES III, existing farming system I, only agriculture crop like Paddy, Nagali, Sugarcane

crops are grown. Generally Paddy & Nagali are grown in rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are

grown in suru season i.e. In Jan. - Feb. Month.


Strength Weakness


rainfall.

B. Soil suitable for growing horticulture crops B. Complicated loan procedure.


supply. in the farm & allied activities. D.

Non availability of quality seed.

D. Assured income from sugarcane. E. Application of imbalanced use of

fertilizers without

Understanding soil fertility status.

F. Non adoption of IPM technology.


A. Scope for growing hybrid rice varieties. A. Capital investment is high

B. Scope for fruit processing. B. Unstable market prices

C. Scope for contract farming. C. Erratic rainfall

D.Soil fertility can improved by use of pulses D. Non availability of labour during peak

period.

in Nagali crop.


F. Scope for seed production



Sugarcane + maize, Paddy, Nagali + Pulses, Groundnut, sericulture


Strength Weakness

A. Assured rainfall. A. Heavy Soil erosion because of heavy

rainfall.

B. Vast sugarcane cultivation. B. Complicated loan procedure.

C. High percentage of women participation. C. Non availability of regular electric

supply.

in the farm & allied activities. D. Non availability of quality seed.

D. Assured income from sugarcane.

Opportunities Threats A. Scope for growing hybrid rice varieties. A. Capital investment is high




in Nagali crop.



Existing farming system - II (Agriculture + animal husbandry) RR / RP Under existing farming system II agriculture crop like Paddy, Nagali, Sugarcane crops are grown.

Generally Paddy & Nagali are grown in rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are grown in suru season i.e. In Jan.

- Feb. Month.

Subsidiary enterprises like raring of Cows, Buffalos, gaots & backyard poultry are doing by the

farmers.


Strenght Weakness

A. Assured rainfall. A. Heavy Soil erosion because of heavy rainfall.

B. Availability green fodder. B. Complicated loan procedure.


in the farm & allied activities. D. Non availability of improved breeds of cows,



F. No regular vaccination.

G. Non cultivation of fodder crops like legumes.


raring.









G. Scope for raring of silk worm


Existing farming system - II (Agriculture + Animal husbandry) RR / RP



Strenght Weakness

A. Assured rainfall. A. Heavy Soil erosion because of heavy rainfall.



in the farm & allied activities. D. Non availability of improved breeds of cows,



F. Water harvesting. F. No regular vaccination.



raring.






method of fast compost making. E. Unscientific raring of silk worm.



G. Scope for raring of silk worm


Existing farming system - III (Agriculture + Horticulture) RR / RP

Under AES III, existing farming system III agriculture crop like Paddy, Nagali, Sugarcane

crops are grown. Generally Paddy & Nagali are grown in rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are

grown in suru season i.e. In Jan. - Feb. Month. Horticulture crops like cashewnut are grown.


Strenght Weakness

A. Assured rainfall. A. Heavy Soil erosion because of heavy

rainfall.



supply.

in the farm & allied activities. D. Non availability of labour during peak

period.

D. Assured income from sugarcane, Milk

& Cashewnut

E. More employment are created through the

cashew processing.



High yielding varieties of nagali. B. Unstable market prices

B. Scope for processing. C. Required good management practices.

C. Required good management practices.



E. Can prepare good vermi compost.


Existing farming system - III (Agriculture + horticulture) RR / RP

Sugarcane, Paddy, Nagali + Pulses, Groundnut, cashewnut, sericulture


Strenght Weakness


rainfall.



supply.

in the farm & allied activities. D. Non availability of good quality seed.

D. Assured income from raring of silkworm.

E. Govt. Support to silkworm raring.


A. Scope for growing hybrid rice varieties. A. Capital investment is high




in Nagali crop.


G. Scope for cashewnut fruit processing.


4. AES - IV Existing farming system - I (Agriculture) RR / RP

Under AES IV, existing farming system I, only agriculture crop like Sugarcane, groundnut, soybean,

crops are grown. Generally soybean & groundnut crpos are grown in rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are

grown in suru season i.e. In Jan. - Feb. Month


Strenght Weakness A. Expertise of farming communities & willing A. Complicated loan procedure.

to try out new innovations in agril. crops. B. Non availability of regular

electricsupply.

B. Soil suitable for growing horticulture crops C. Non availability of good quality

seed.

C. High percentage of women participation D. Application of imbalanced use of

in the farm & allied activities. fertilizers.Without understanding soil

D. Assured income from sugarcane fertility status.

E. Accessibility to agricultural university, E. Non adoption of IPM technology.

National highways, Central railways.

F. Vast sugarcane cultivation.

G. Natural water resourses.

Opportunities Threats A. Scope for fruit processing. A. Capital investment is high.

B. Scope for contract farming. B. Unstable market prices.

C. Soil fertility can improved by use of C. Erratic rainfall.

bio fertilizers D. Non availability of labour during peak

D. Can prepare good vermicompost. period.

E. Scope for seed production



Sugarcane + soybean, Groundnut, Kharif jowar, sericulture



to try out new innovations in agril. crops. B. Non availability of regular

electric supply.

B. Soil suitable for growing horticulture crops

C. High percentage of women participation

in the farm & allied activities.


E. Accessibility to agricultural university,





A. Scope for growing high valve crops. A. Capital investment is high.



D. Soil fertility can improved by use of pulses.


F. Soil fertility can improved by dynamic



Existing farming system - II (Agriculture + animal husbandry) RR / RP

Under AES IV, existing farming system II agriculture crops like Sugarcane, groundnut , soybean crops

are grown . Subsidiary enterprises like raring of Cows, Buffalos, gaots & backyard poultry are doing by the

farmers.


Strenght Weakness A. Availability green fodder. A. Losses caused due to submergence

condition at the time of rainy season.

B. High percentage of women participation in B. complicated loan procedure.

the farm & allied activities. C. Non availability of regular electric supply.

C. Assured income from sugarcane, Milk. D. Non availability of improved breeds of

D. More employment are created. cows, buffalos, goats & poultry.

E. Low milk production.


G. Non cultivation of fodder crops like

legumes.


cattle raring.

Opportunities Threats A. Scope for growing hybrid rice varieties. A. Capital investment is high.







G. Scope for raring of silk worm.


Existing farming system - II (Agriculture+ Animal husbandry) RR / RP

Sugarcane+ soybean, Maize, Groundnut, cow, buffalos, gaots, poultry, sericulture


Strenght Weakness A. Availability green fodder A. Losses caused due to submergence

condition at the time of rainy season.

B. High percentage of women participation B. Complicated loan procedure.

in the farm & allied activities C. Non availability of regular electric supply.

C. Assured income from sugarcane, Milk. D. Non availability of improved breeds of

D. More employment are created. cows, buffalos, goats & poultry.

E. Low milk production.




cattle raring.

Opportunities Threats A. Scope for growing hybrid rice varieties. A. Capital investment is high.







G. Scope for raring of silk worm.


Existing farming system - III (Agriculture + Horticulture) RR / RP

Under AES IV, existing farming system III agriculture crop like Sugarcane, soybean, crops

are grown. Generally soyabean are grown under rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are grown in

suru season i.e. Jan. - Feb. month. Horticulture crops like banana, cocnut, mango & vegetable crops

like tomato are grown.


Strength Weakness A. Expertise of farming communities & willing A. Complied loan procedure.

to try out new innovations in agril. crops. B. Non availability of regular electricsupply.

B. Soil suitable for growing horticulture crops C. Non availability of good quality seed.

C. High percentage of women participation in D. Application of imbalanced use of

fertilizers the farm & allied activities. Without understanding soil fertility status.

D. Assured income from sugarcane. E. Non adoption of IPM technology.

E. Accessibility to agricultural university, F. Glut in market of tomato.



G. Natural water resources.



C. Soil fertility can improved by use of bio C. Erratic rainfall.

fertilizers. D. Non availability of labour during peak

D. Scope for production of vermicompost. period.

E. Scope for seed production.

F. Scope for growing hitech floriculture.


Existing farming system - III (Agriculture + horticulture) RR / RP

Sugarcane, soyabean, coconut, high tech flouriculture, tomato, cauliflower, sericulture



to try out new innovations in agril. crops. B. Non availability of regular electric

supply.

B. Soil suitable for growing horticulture crops. C. Non availability of good quality seed.

C. High percentage of women participation in D. Application of imbalanced use of

Without understanding soil fertility status. Fertilizersthe farm & allied activities.

D. Assured income from sugarcane. E. Non adoption of IPM technology








fertilizers. D. Non availability of labour during

D. Scope for production of vermicompost. peak period.


F. Scope for growing hi tech floriculture.


Existing farming system- IV (Agriculture + Animal husbandry + Horticulture) RR / RP

Under AES IV, existing farming system IV agriculture crop like Sugarcane, soybean crops are grown.

Generally soybean are grown under rainfed condition & Sugarcane crop are grown in suru season i. e. Jan. -

Feb. month. Cows, buffalos & goats are rared. Horticulture crops like banana, coconut, mango & vegetable

crops like tomato are grown.

SWOT analysis of the EFS - IV

Strength Weakness A. Expertise of farming communities & willing A. Complied loan procedure.

to try out new innovations in agril. crops. B. Non availability of regular electric supply.

B. Soil suitable for growing horticulture crops C. Non availability of good quality seed.

C. High percentage of women participation in D. Application of imbalanced use of fertilizers

the farm & allied activities. Without understanding soil fertility status.

D. Assured income from sugarcane. E. Non adoption of IPM technology.


National highways, Central railways. G. Low milk production.

F. Vast sugarcane cultivation. H. No regular vaccination.

G. Natural water resources.

H. Co-operative milk societies for milk collection.




fertilizers. D. Non availability of labour during peak

D. Scope for production of vermicompost. period.




Existing farming system - IV (Agriculture + Animal husbandry + Horticulture) RR / RP

Sugarcane + soybean, coconut, high tech flouriculture, tomato, cauliflower, sericulture, cows, Buffalos,

goat & aquaculture



to try out new innovations in agril. crops. B. Non availability of regular electric supply.

B. Soil suitable for growing horticulture crops. C. Non availability of good quality seed.

C. High percentage of women participation in D. Application of imbalanced use of fertilizers

the farm & allied activities. Without understanding soil fertility status.

D. Assured income from sugarcane. E. Non adoption of IPM technology








fertilizers. D. Non availability of labour during peak period.

D. Scope for production of vermicompost.



G. Scope for use of saline soils for aquaculture

H. Milk processing.


TABLE No- 37 A (6.1)

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY

FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME FROM AGRICULTURAL CROPS

Name of agro-ecological situation : I District : Kolhapur

Representative village-Punal Tal. Panhala Crop : Sugarcane Farming system :II,III,IV

Type of farmer : RPF / RRF+ Farming situation: 4

Sl.

No. Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

1 Sowing :

- Time

- Method

Jane- Feb

Ridges & Furrow

Pair Row

Jane- Feb

Ridges &

Furrow

P

Due to lack

of proper

knowledge

2

2 Varieties

CO-86032, Co-0265,

Co-92005

CO-86032,

Co-0265,Co-

92005

P Due to lack

of proper

knowledge

2

3 Seed rate (per ha.)

80000 Bud stick

10000 Bud

stick

F

Due to lack

of proper

knowledge

2

4 Seed treatment

Malathion & Bavistin

Solition

Malathion &

Bavistin

Solition

F Due to lack

of proper

knowledge

1

5 Organic manure

(tons /ha)

10 Mt/Ha. 5 Mt/Ha.

F Lack of

availability

8

6 Fertilizer / nutrient

(kg/ha)

- Basal (N+P+K)

- Top dress (M+ )

At the time of planting

25:60:115

After 6 – 8 Weaks

100N 12-16 Weak

25N At the time of

Earthing 100:55:00

As per

Recommenda

tion But Not

in time

P Lack of

Resources

5

7 Method of fertilizer

use :

- Basal

- Top dress

By line application

mix with soil

Broadcasting P Lack of

Knowledge

1

8 Micro nutrient

(specify) :

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of

application

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

F Lack of

Knowledge

1

9 Pest management- Chemical and

mechanical

chemical P Lack of

Knowledge

1

10 Disease management Chemical and

mechanical

chemical p Lack of

Knowledge

1

11 Post harvest

management

- - - Lack of

Knowledge

1

CHAPTER VI.

ANALYSIS OF THE FARMING SITUATION OF MAJOR

CROPS OR COMMODITIES IN EACH AES AND THE

RESEARCH & EXTENSION GAPS EMERGED AND THE

STRATEGIES TO BRIDGE THE GAPS.


Sl.


Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

12 Weed management

- Mechanical

- Herbicide

Chemical and

mechanical

Chemical and

mechanical

P Lack of

Knowledge

1

13 Water management :

- Number of

irrigations

- Method of irrigation

As per schedule

Drip irrigation

Flood

irrogation and

drip irrigation

P Lack of

Knowledge

6

14 Land management :

- Salinity/ acidity

- Water logging

- - - - -

15 Method of harvesting - - - - -

16 Any other - - - - -

17 Average Yield (Q /

ha.)

- Grain

- Fodder

-

- - - -

+ RPF = Resource Poor Farmer + RRF : Resource Rich Farmer

@ Separately for each farming situation under each existing farming system

(*) F = Full P = Partial N = Nil

** Code for specific reasons for gap in adoption *** Code for farmer proposed extension

strategy

1.Lack of Awareness

2. Lack of knowledge

3. Lack of skill

4. Lack of motivation

5. Lack of credit

6. Lack of labour availability

7.Fear of Risk

8. Lack of Resources

9. Lack of input availability

10. Lack of market & infrastructural

12.Recommendation is not profitable& incompatible

13. Recommendation is inappropriate

14.Poor management practices

1.Imparting knowledge to the farmer regarding

recommended package of practices by

organizing the training &demonstration

programme to the farmer

2.Implementing seed production programme

3.Involvement of NGO & KVK

4. Implementation of 4 point programme

5.Promotion of adoption INM

6. Promoting the high yielding varieties

&recommended technological packages.


TABLE No- 37 B (6.2)



Name of agro-ecological situation : I District : Kolhapur

Representative village-Punal Tal. Panhala Crop : Paddy Farming system : II,III,IV

Type of farmer : RPF / RRF+ Farming situation: 4

Sl.


Recommen-ded

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

1 Sowing :

- Time

- Method

First weak of

june

45x30 cm

First weak of

june

45x30 cm

N

-

-

2 Varieties JS335, JS9605,

MACS-58

JS335, JS9605,

N

-

-

3 Seed rate (per ha.) 75 Kg/Ha 50 Kg/Ha N 0 1

4 Seed treatment

PSB, Rhizobum

Bavistin Solition

PSB,

Rhizobum

Bavistin

Solition

P 1 1

5 Organic manure

(tons /ha)

5 Mt/Ha. 1-2 Mt/Ha. P 3 1


(kg/ha)

- Basal (N+P+K)

- Top dress (M+ )

50:78:00 At the time of

sowing

25:50:00

P 1,3 3,1

Total


use :

- Basal

- Top dress

By line

application mix

with soil

Broadcasting P 1,3 1

8 Micro nutrient

(specify) :

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of

application

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

F 1,3 1

9 Pest management Chemical &

Mechanical

chemical P 1,3 1

10 Disease management Chemical &

Mechanical

chemical F 1,2,3` -

11 Post harvest

management

- - - - -


Sl.

No.

Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

12 Weed management

- Mechanical

- Herbicide

Chemical and

mechanical

Chemical and

mechanical

P 3,5 1


- Number of irrigations


As per schedule

Drip irrigation

Flood irrogation

and drip

irrigation

P 1,3 1


- Salinity/ acidity

- Water logging

- - - - -

15 Method of harvesting

By cutting sharp

Sickle at time of

maturity,

as per

reccomended

N - -

16 Any other

17 Average Yield (Q / ha.)

- Grain

- Fodder

25-30Qt/ha

18-20 Qt/ha P 1,5 1,6




** Code for specific reasons for gap in adoption

1.Lack of Awareness

2. Lack of knowledge

3. Lack of skill

4. Lack of motivation

5. Lack of credit

6. Lack of labour availability

7.Fear of Risk

8. Lack of Resources

9. Lack of input availability





*** Code for farmer proposed extension

strategy

1.Imparting knowledge to the farmer regarding

recommended package of practices by organizing

the training &demonstration programme to the

farmer

2.Implementing seed production programme

3.Involvement of NGO & KVK

4. Implementation of 4 point programme

5.Promotion of adoption INM

6. Promoting the high yielding varieties

&recommended technological packages.


TABLE No- 37 C (6.3)



Name of agro-ecological situation : II District : KOLHAPUR

Representative village - Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Crop :PADDY Farming system : I,II,III,IV

Type of farmer : RPF / RRF+ Farming situation:1,2,3,4,5 AES- II

Sl.


Recommended

practice Existing practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

1 land preparation PLOUGHING,2-3

TIME

HARROWING

AND BED

PREPARATION

PLOUGHING,2-3

TIME

HARROWING

AND BED

PREPARATION

N - -

2 Sowing :

- Time

- Method

11 JUNE -15

JULY

DIBBLING

1 JU - 15 JULY N - -

3 Varieties JAYA,

RATNAGIRI 24,

JAYA , SONAM P 1 1

4 Seed rate (per ha.) 30-40 KG 40- 50KG P 1 2

5 Seed treatment BRINE WATER

SOAKING

- F 1 1

6 Organic manure

(tons /ha)

10 TONN/HA 1 TONN/HA P 1 9

7 Fertilizer /

nutrient (kg/ha)

- Basal (N+P+K)

- Top dress (M+

)

50:50:50

50

50:15:15

15

P

-

1,9

-

5

-

Total

8 Method of

fertilizer use :

- Basal

- Top dress

BROADCASTING BROADCASTING N - 5

9 Micro nutrient

(specify) :

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of

application

DEPEND ON

SOIL TYPE

- F 1,9 5

10 Pest management

-

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

CHEMICAL P 8 1

11 Disease

management

-

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

N - -

12 Post harvest

management

GRADATION - F 1 -

13 Weed

management

- Mechanical

- Herbicide

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

MECHANICAL

BY LOCAL

SICKLE

P - -


Sl.


Recommended


Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

14 Water

management :

- Number of

irrigations

- Method of

irrigation

NUBER OF

IRRIGATION AS

PER SCHEDULE

TOTAL

RAINFED

P - -

15 Land management

:

- Salinity/ acidity

- Water logging

- - - - -

16 Method of

harvesting

- - -

17 Any other - - - - -

18 Average Yield (Q

/ ha.)

- Grain

- Fodder

40 - 45 QTL/HA 20 25 QTL/HA P 1, 4 1,4

=+ RPF = Resource Poor Farmer Farmer + RRF : Resource

Rich




1. LACK OF AWARENESS 1. IMPARTING KNOWLEDGE TO THE FARMER

REGARDING RECOMMENDED PACKAGE OF

PRACTICE BY ORGANISING THE TRAINING AND

DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM TO THE FARMERS 2. LACK OF KNOWLEDGE

3. LACK OF SKILL

4. LACK OF MOTIVATION 2. IMPLEMENTING SEED PRODUCTION

PROGRAM.

5. LACK OF CREDIT 3. INVOLVEMENT OF NGOs & KVKs

6. LACK OF LABOUR AVAILABILITY 4. IMPLEMENTATION OF 4 POINT PROGRAM

7. FEAR OF RISK 5. PROMOTION OF ADOPTION OF INM

8. LACK OF RESOURCES 6. PROMOTING THE HIGH YIELDING VARIETIES

AND RECOMONDED TECHNOLOGICAL

PRACTICES 9. LACK OF INPUT AVAILABILITY

10. LACK OF MARKETED

INFRASTRUCTURE

11. LACK OF SPECIFIC RECOMONDATION

FOR AES

12. RECOMENDATION IS NOT

PROFITABLE AND INCOMPATIBLE

13. RECOMMENDATION IS IN

APPROPRIATE

14. POOR MANAGEMENT PRACTICES


TABLE No. 37 D (6.4)

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGYFOR IMPROVING THE

PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME FROM AGRICULTURAL CROPS


Representative village - Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Crop :PADDY Farming system : I,II,III,IV

Type of farmer : RPF / RRF+ Farming situation:1,2,3,4,5 AES- II

Sl.

No

.

Items of

package

Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy (***)

1 land

preparation

PLOUGHING,2-3

TIME HARROWING

AND BED

PREPARATION

PLOUGHING,

2-3 TIME

HARROWING

AND BED

PREPARATIO

N

N - -

2 Sowing :

- Time

- Method

11 JUNE -15 JULY

DIBBLING

1 JU - 15

JULY

N - -

3 Varieties JAYA, RATNAGIRI

24,

JAYA ,

SONAM

P 1 1

4 Seed rate (per

ha.)

30-40 KG 40- 50KG P 1 2


SOAKING

- F 1 1

6 Organic

manure (tons

/ha)


7 Fertilizer /

nutrient

(kg/ha)

- Basal

(N+P+K)

- Top dress

(M+ )

50:50:50

50

50:15:15

15

P

-

1,9

-

5

-

Total

8 Method of

fertilizer use :

- Basal

- Top dress

BROADCASTING BROADCAST

ING

N - 5

9 Micro nutrient

(specify) :

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of

application

DEPEND ON SOIL

TYPE

- F 1,9 5

10 Pest

management

-

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

CHEMICAL P 8 1

11 Disease

management

-

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICA

L

N - -


Sl.

No

.

Items of

package

Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy (***)

12 Post harvest

management

GRADATION - F 1 -

13 Weed

management

- Mechanical

- Herbicide

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

MECHANICA

L BY LOCAL

SICKLE

P - -

Sl.

No

.

Items of

package

Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy (***)

14 Water

management

- Number of

irrigations

- Method of

irrigation

NUBER OF

IRRIGATION AS PER

SCHEDULE

TOTAL

RAINFED

P - -

15 Land

management :

- Salinity/

acidity

- Water

logging

- - - - -

16 Method of

harvesting

- - -

17 Any other - - - - -

18 Average Yield

(Q / ha.)

- Grain

- Fodder

40 - 45 QTL/HA 20 25 QTL/HA P 1, 4 1,4

=+ RPF = Resource Poor Farmer Farmer + RRF : Resource Rich



** Code for specific reasons for gap in

adoption

*** Code for farmer proposed extension

1.Lack of Awareness 1.Imparting knowledge to the farmer regarding

recommended package of practices by organizing the

training &demonstration programme to the farmer 2. Lack of knowledge

3. Lack of skill

4. Lack of motivation 2.Implementing seed production programme

5. Lack of credit 3.Involvement of NGO & KVK

6. Lack of labour availability 4. Implementation of 4 point programme

7.Fear of Risk 5.Promotion of adoption INM

8. Lack of Resources 6. Promoting the high yielding varieties &recommended

technological packages. 9. Lack of input availability






TABLE No- 37 E (6.5)




Representative village - Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Crop : SUGARCANE ( SURU)

Farming system : I,II,III,IV Type of farmer : RPF / RRF

Farming situation:1,2,3,4,5

Sl.

No

.

Items of

package

Recommended


Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

1 Sowing :

- Time

- Method

JAN - FEB

RIDGES AND

FORROWS

JAN - FEB

RIDGES AND

FORROWS

N - -

2 Varieties CO-86032, CO-

7125, CO- 149

CO - 671, CO -

740, CO - 8614,

CO - 86032

N - -

3 Seed rate (per

ha.)

30-40 Qt. 40- 50 Qt. P 1 2


SOAKING,BAVIST

IN,MELATHION,JA

GGARY

- F 1,4 DEMO

5 Organic

manure (tons

/ha)


6 Fertilizer /

nutrient

(kg/ha)

- Basal

(N+P+K)

- Top dress

(M+ )

250:115:115 175:60:60 P

-

1,9

-

5

-

Total

7 Method of

fertilizer use :

- Basal

- Top dress

BROADCASTING, BROADCASTIN

G N - 5

8 Micro nutrient

(specify) :

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of

application

DEPEND ON SOIL

TYPE - F 1,9 5

9 Pest

management

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

CHEMICAL P 8 1

10 Disease

management

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL N - -

11 Post harvest

management GRADATION - F 1 -


Sl.


Recommended


Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

12 Weed management

- Mechanical

- Herbicide

CHEMICAL &

MECHANICAL

MECHANICAL

BY LOCAL

SICKLE

P - -

13 Water management

- Number of

irrigations

- Method of

irrigation

NUBER OF

IRRIGATION AS

PER SCHEDULE

TOTAL RAINFED P - -


- Salinity/ acidity

- Water logging

- - - - -

15 Method of

harvesting CUTTING CUTTING N - -

16 Any other - - - - -

17 Average Yield

(Q / ha.)

- Grain

- Fodder

85-90 tonn/HA 60-75tonn/HA P 1, 14 1,14


#NAME?






3. Lack of skill












TABLE No- 37 F (6.6)



Name of agro-ecological situation :AES III District : Kolhapur

Representative village-Nagave Tal. Chandgad Crop :Sugarcane (Suru)

Type of farmer : RPF / RRP Farming situation:I, II , III

Sl.


Recommen-ded

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the

gap(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy(***)

01 Sowing :

- Time

- Method

Jan – Feb

Ridges and

Furrows

Jan – Feb

Ridges and

Furrows

N

N

Lack of

awareness

Imparting

knowledge to

the farmers by

adapting

various package

of practices by

organizing

training

programme to

innovative

farmers

02 Varieties

CO-671, Co-149,

CO 7219, C0

7125, CO-8014

CO-671, CO-

740, Co 8014

CO-86032

N Lack of

awareness

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 25000-30000 bud

sticks

25000-30000

bud sticks

P

04 Seed treatment

Dipping of sticks

in malathion

- F

05 Organic manure

(tons /ha)

25MT/Ha

5-10MT

P Lack of

awareness

and finance

06 Fertilizer /

nutrient (kg/ha)

- Basal (N+P+K)

- Top dress (M+ )

At a time of

planting

25:60:115

After 6-8 weeks

100N

12-16 weeks 25N

At a time of

earthing 100:55:0

As per

recommendayti

on but not in

time

P Lack of

awareness

and finance

07 Method of

fertilizer use -

Basal

- Top dress

By line

application mix

with soil before

planting

Broadcasting F Imparting

knowledge to

the farmers by

adapting

various package

of practices by

organizing

training

programme to

innovative

farmers

08 Micro nutrient

(specify)

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of

application

Depending upon

soil type

nil F

09 Pest management Chemical and

mechanical

Chemical P

10 Disease

management

Chemical and

mechanical

nil F

11 Water

management

As per schedule Flood irrigation P Lack of

awareness

Mass media


Sl.


Recommen-ded

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

12 Method of

harvesting

By sharp koyata As

recommended

N

13 Average yield

100Mt/ha 50-65Mt/ha P Lack of

awareness

Mass media


#NAME?






3. Lack of skill












TABLE No- 37 G (6.7)



Name of agro-ecological situation :AES III District : Kolhapur

Representative village-Nagave Tal. Chandgad Crop :Paddy

Type of farmer : RPF / RRP Farming situation: I, II, III

Sl.


Recommen-

ded practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy (***)

01 Sowing :

- Time

- Method

15 May -15

July

Dibling

Transplanting

15 May -15

July

Dibling

Transplanting

N

N

02 Varieties

Jaya, R-24, R-1,

Indrayani

Jaya, Sonam,

R-24

P

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 30-40kg 30-40kg P

04 Seed treatment

Brine water

Soaking

- F

Imparting

knowledge to

the farmers by

adapting

various package

of practices by

organizing

training

programme to

innovative

farmer

05 Organic manure

(tons /ha)

10 T/Ha

5-6T/Ha

P Lack of

awareness

and finance


(kg/ha)

- Basal (N+P+K)

- Top dress (M+ )

50:50:50

50

50:15:15

15

P Lack of

awareness

and finance

07 Method of fertilizer use :

- Basal

- Top dress

By line

application mix

with soil before

planting

Broadcasting F Lack of

awareness

08 Micro nutrient (specify) :

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of application

Depending

upon soil type

- F Lack of

awareness

09 Pest management

-

Chemical and

mechanical

Chemical P

10 Disease management

-

Chemical and

mechanical

F `

11 Post harvest

management

gradation F

12 Water management As per Schedule Totally rain

fed

P


Sl.


Recommen-

ded practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoptio

n

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy (***)

13 Method of Harvesting Vaibhav sickle Vaibhav

sickle

N Lack of

awareness

14 Yield 40-45q/ha 20-30q/ha P Lack of

awareness

Mass media

support


#NAME?






3. Lack of skill












TABLE No- 37 G (6.8)



Name of agro-ecological situation: IV District : Kolhapur

Representative village-Umalvad Tal. Shirol Crop : Sugarcane

Farming system : I,II,III, IV Type of farmer : RPF / RRF+

Farming situation: 4

Sl.


Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

01 Land prepration

Sowing :

- Time

- Method

Jane- Feb

Ridges & Furrow

Pair Row

Jane- Feb

Ridges & Furrow

N

-

-

02 Varieties

CO-86032, Co-

0265, Co-671

Co-8014

CO-86032, Co-

0265,

N

-

-

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 25000-30000 Bud

stick

20000-25000

Bud stick

P 1 1

04 Seed treatment

Malathion &

Bavistin Solition

Malathion &

Bavistin Solition

P 1 1

05 Organic manure

(tons /ha)

10 Mt/Ha. 5 Mt/Ha.

P 2 1


(kg/ha)

- Basal (N+P+K)

- Top dress (M+ )

At the time of

planting

25:60:115

After 6 – 8 Weaks

100N

12-16 Weak 25N

At the time of

Earthing

100:55:00

As per

Recomandation

But Not in time

P 1 2

Total


use :

- Basal

- Top dress

By line application

mix with soil


08 Micro nutrient

(specify) :

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of

application

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

F 1,3 1

09 Pest management Chemical and

mechanical

Chemical P 1,3 1

10 Disease

management

Chemical and

mechanical

Chemical F 1,2,3` -


Sl.


Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

11 Weed management

- Mechanical

- Herbicide

Chemical and

mechanical

Chemical and

mechanical

P 3,5 1


- Number of

irrigations

- Method of

irrigation

As per schedule

Drip irrigation

Flood irrogation

and drip

irrigation

P 1,3 1


- Salinity/ acidity

- Water logging

- - - - -

14 Method of

harvesting

By cutting sharp

koyata at time of

maturity,

as per

recommended

N - -

15 Any other


ha.)

- Grain

- Fodder

100mt/ha

80-85 P 1,5 1,6

17 Post harvest

management

- - - - -

18 Yield

19 Marketing

Greading Storage








3. Lack of skill












TABLE No- 37 H (6.9)



Name of agro-ecological situation District : Kolhapur

Representative village-Umalvad Crop : Soyabean

Farming system : I,II,III, IV Type of farmer : RPF / RRF+

Farming situation: 4

Sl.


Recommen-

ded practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

01 Sowing :

- Time

- Method

First weak of

june

45x30 cm

First weak of

june

45x30 cm

N

-

-

02 Varieties

JS335,

JS9605,

MACS-58

JS335,

JS9605, N - -

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 75 Kg/Ha 50 Kg/Ha N 0 1

04 Seed treatment

PSB,

Rhizobum

Bavistin

Solition

PSB,

Rhizobum

Bavistin

Solition

P 1 1

05 Organic manure

(tons /ha) 5 Mt/Ha.

1-2 Mt/Ha.

P 3 1


(kg/ha)

- Basal (N+P+K)

- Top dress (M+ )

50:78:00

At the time of

sowing

25:50:00

P 1,3 3,1

Total


use :

- Basal

- Top dress

By line

application

mix with soil


08 Micro nutrient

(specify) :

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of

application

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

F 1,3 1

09 Pest management Chemical chemical P 1,3 1

10 Disease management Chemical chemical F 1,2,3` -

11 Post harvest

management - - - - -


Sl.


Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

12 Weed management

- Mechanical

- Herbicide

Chemical and

mechanical

Chemical and

mechanical P 3,5 1

13 Water management

- Number of

irrigations

- Method of

irrigation

As per schedule

Drip irrigation

Flood

irrigation and

drip irrigation

P 1,3 1


- Salinity/ acidity

- Water logging

- - - - -

15 Method of

harvesting

By cutting sharp

Sickle at time of

maturity,

as per

recommended N - -

16 Any other


ha.)

- Grain

- Fodder

25-30Qt/ha 18-20 Qt/ha P 1,5 1,6



(*) F = Full P = Partial





3. Lack of skill












TABLE No- 37 I (6.10)



Name of Agro-ecological situation: IV District : Kolhapur

Farming system : I,II,III,IV Type of farmer : RPF / RRF+

Farming situation: 4 Representative Villege:- Umalwad

Crop:- Groundnut

Sl.


Recommen-ded

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy (***)

01 Sowing :

- Time

- Method

Second weak of

june – Last

Weak of July

30x10 cm

Last weak of

june – Last

Weak of July

45x15 cm

N

-

-

02 Varieties

SB-11, JL-24,

TAG-24,

TG-26, TMV-10

SB-11, JL-

24, TAG-24,

TG-26,

N

-

-

03 Seed rate (per ha.) 100-120 Kg/Ha 80-100

Kg/Ha

N

0

2

04 Seed treatment

PSB, Rhizobum

Bavistin Solition

PSB,

Rhizobum

Bavistin

Solition

P 1 1

05 Organic manure

(tons /ha)

5 Mt/Ha.

1-2 Mt/Ha.

P 3 1


(kg/ha)

- Basal (N+P+K)

- Top dress (M+ )

25:50:00 At the time

of sowing

20:40:00

P 1,3 4,9

Total


use :

- Basal

- Top dress

By line

application mix

with soil


08 Micro nutrient

(specify) :

- Dose (kg/ha)

- Method of

application

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

Depending

Upon

The

Soil type

F 1,3 1

09 Pest management Chemical chemical P 1,3 1

10 Disease management Chemical chemical F 1,2,3` -

11 Post harvest

management

- - - - -


Sl.


Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

extension

strategy (***)

11 Weed management

- Mechanical

- Herbicide

Chemical and

mechanical

Chemical and

mechanical

P 3,5 1


- Number of

irrigations


As per schedule

Sprinkler

irrigation

Flood

irrogation and

drip irrigation

P 1,5 5


- Salinity/ acidity

- Water logging

- - - - -


By Bibbling

Method

As

Recomended

N - -

15 Any other

Average Yield (Q /

ha.)

- Grain

- Fodder

15-20Qt/ha

8-10 Qt/ha P 1,5 1,6








3. Lack of skill












TABLE No. 38 A (6.11)

TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH IMPORTANT

HORTICULTURAL CROPS ARE CULTIVATED

Name of district :Kolhapur

Representative village: Punal Tal. Panhala Name of hort. crop :Vegetables

Name of agro-ecological situation: : I Area in ha : Hect.

S.

No.

Soil type

Number of Families (%) under

different Farming Situations Total

Irrigated Rained Area (%)

1 Red Soil 3 0 3 100%

Total 3 0 3 100%

* Describe the farming situation for the hort.crop

@ Separately for each important hort. crop

TABLE No.38 B (6.12)




Representative village: Punal Tal. Panhala Name of hort. crop : Sugarcane

Name of agro-ecological situation: I Area in ha : 0 Hect.

S.No.

Soil type


different Farming Situations

Total

Irrigated Rainfed Area (%)

1 Black Soil 13 0 13 100%

Total

13 0 13 100%




TABLE No. 38 C (6.12)



Name of district : KOLHAPUR

Representative village Padvalwadi Tal. Karveer CROP - MANGO


S.No. Soil type

Number of Families (%) under different

Farming Situations Total


1 Black Soil 5 1 5 100

Total 5 1 5 100


@ Separately for each important hort. Crop

TABLE No. 38 D (6.13)




Representative village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad

Name of agro-ecological situation: III EFS III Area in ha : 40ha

Sr.

No.

Soil type

(Cashew Nut)




1 Black Soil 00 00 00 00

2 Red Soil 10 60 70 100

Total




TABLE No. 38 E (6.14)




Representative village: Umalvad Tal. Shirol Name of hort. crop : Tomato

Name of agro-ecological situation: IV Area in ha :22 Hect.

S.No. Soil type




1 Black Soil 100 00 22 100

Total

100 00 22 100



TABLE No. 38 F (6.15)




Representative village: Umalvad Tal. Shirol Name of hort. crop : Banana

Name of agro-ecological situation: IV Area in ha :6 Hect.

S.No. Soil type




1 Black Soil 100 00 6 100

Total

100 00 6 100




TABLE No. 38 G (6.16)




Representative village: Umalvad Tal. Shirol Name of hort. crop : Guava

Name of agro-ecological situation: : IV Area in ha :62 Hect.

Sr.

No.

Soil type




1 Black Soil 25 75 62 100

Total

25 75 62 100

* Describe the farming situation for the hort. crop


TABLE No. 38 H (6.17)


IMPORTANT HORTICULTURAL CROPS ARE CULTIVATED


Representative village: Punal Tal.Panhala Name of hort. crop : Banana

Name of agro-ecological situation: IV Area in ha : 8 Hector

S.No. Farming Area and % under different farming situations Total



1. Rainfed - - - - - - - - - -

2 Irrigated - - - 6 75% 2 25% 8 100%

Total - - - 6 75% 2 25% 8 100%




TABLE No. 38 I (6.18)



Name of district : Kolhapur Name of crop:- Mango

Representative village Padvalwadi Tal. Karveer Area in ha:-5 ha


S.

No

Farming

situation*




1 IRRIGATED - - 4 80 - - - - 5 100

2 RAINFED - - 1 20 - - - -

Total

5 100

5 100

TABLE No. 38 J (6.19)


IMPORTANT HORTICULTURAL CROPS ARE CULTIVATED

Name of district :Kolhapur

Representative village: Umalvad Name of hort. crop :Guava

Name of agro-ecological situation: IV Area in ha :64 Hector

S.No. Farming Area and % under different farming situations Total



1

Irrigared

13

20

10

15

10

15

31

50

64

100

Total

13 20 10 15 10 15 31 50 64 100




TABLE No.39 A (6.20)

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING

THEPRODUCTIVITY / INCOME FROM HORTICULTURAL CROPS

Agro-ecological situation : II District : Kolhapur Representative village – Padvalwadi Tal. Karveer

Crop : MANGO Farming system : I

Type of farmer : RPF / RRF+ Farming situation:1,2,3,4,5

Sl.


Recomme-

nded

practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap (**)

Farmer

Proposed

Extension

Strategy

(***)

1 Variety Keshar,Ratna Alphanso F 1,3 1

2 Spacing (mts) 10 * 10 7 * 7 P 1,2,5 1

3 Manure (kg/plant) 20-25kg/plant 5 kg/plant P 1,3 -

4 Major nutrients : (N+P+K)

- Dose (Kg/plant)


1:05:1 kg/plant

by Ring

Method

1:1:1

-

P 1,3 -

5 Micro-nutrient ( )

- Dose (kg/plant)


As per soil

type

- F 1,3 1

6 Weed management

- Around the plants

- In between the rows

Chemical and

mechanical

Mechanica

l

P 1,3,5 2

7 Pest management Chemical 3-4 spray P 1,3 1

8 Disease management Chemical Chemical - - -

9 Water management

- No. of irrigations


By drip

irrigation

1-3

irrigation

P 1,4,6 1

10 Special practices

- Training

- Prunning

- Girdling

- Bahar treatment

- - - - -

11 Harvesting

- Method

- Time (hour)

By manually By

manually

N - -

Farm level processing

- Grading

- Packing

- Processing

- Storage (months)

Squash/juice - F 1,4 1


Sl.


Recomme-

nded

practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the

gap (**)

Farmer

Proposed

Extension

Strategy

(***)

13 Marketing

- Location of market

- Distance from farm

- Mode of transport

- Marketing by indivi-

dual / group

- Any other

Group Individual F 1 2

Average yield (T/ ha.) 5-10 MT/ha 2-3MT/ha P 1,8 1,4

(+) RPF = Resource Poor Farmer RRF = Resource Rich Farmer







3. Lack of skill













GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE

PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME FROM HORTICULTURAL CROPS

Agro-ecological situation :III District : Kolhapur Representative village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad

Crop : Cashew nut Existing forming system – III

Type of farmer : RPF/RRP Farming situation: I

Sl.

No Items of package

Recommende

d practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

Extension

Strategy (***)

01 Variety V1, V4, V7 V1, V4, P Lack of

awareness

On farm

training

02 Spacing (mts) 7 × 7 mt 7 × 7 mt N -

03 Manure (kg/plant) 10-12kg/plant 2kg/plant F Lack of

awareness

04 Major nutrients :

(N+P+K)

- Dose (Kg/plant)

- Method of

application

As per soil

type

F Lack of

awareness

05 Micro-nutrient ( )

- Dose (kg/plant)

- Method of

application

As per soil

type

F Lack of

awareness

06 Weed management

- Around the plants


2,4-D and

Gramaxgin

Mechan-

ically

P Lack of

awareness

Farm trial and

Demonstration

07 Pest management Endosalphan

and Carbaryl

F Economical

constraints

Farm trial and

Demonstration

08 Disease management Dithan M 45

1% B.M

F Economical

constraints

Farm trial and

Demonstration

09 Water management



Drip irrigation F Economical

constraints

Farm trial and

Demonstration


- Training

- Prunning

- Girdling

- Bahar treatment

- - -

11 Harvesting

- Method

- Time (hour)

By manually By

manually

- Lack of

awareness

Involvement of

NGO and

Extension for

harvesting

methods

12 Farm level processing

- Grading

- Packing

- Processing

- Storage (months)

Squash/ Juice

Feny

F Lack of

awareness

Lack of

Infrastructure

facility


Sl.

No Items of package

Recommende

d practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for the

gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

Extension

Strategy (***)

13 Marketing



- Mode of transport


dual / group

- Any other

Group Individual

ly

F Lack of

awareness

Training on

marketing of

Cashew and

field visits.

14 Average yield (T/ ha.)

1.5to 2 0.75 to 1 P Lack of finance Mass media








3. Lack of skill












TABLE No. 39 C (6.22)



Agro-ecological situation :IV District : Kolhapur Representative village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol

Crop : Guava Existing forming system – I,II,III,IV

Type of farmer : RPF/RRF (+) Farming situation: 1,2,3,4

Sl.

No

Items of package

Recommende

d practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

Extension

Strategy (***)

01 Variety

Sardar 49,

lalit, Safed,

Vilas

Sardar 49 N - -

02 Spacing (mts) 6x6 mt. 6x6 mt. N

03 Manure (kg/plant) 20-30 Mt/Ha. 10-20

Mt/Ha.

P 1,3 1


(N+P+K)

- Dose (Kg/plant)

- Method of

application

900:300:300

gm/Plant By

ring merhod

Broadcasting F - -

05 Micro-nutrient

- Dose (kg/plant)

- Method of

application

As par Soil

type

- F 1,3 1

06 Weed management

- Around the plants


Chemical &

Mechanical

Chemical &

Mechanical

F - -

07 Pest management Chemical chemical N 1,3 1

08 Disease management Chemical chemical N 1,3 1

09 Water management



By Drip

Irrigarion

Flood &

Drip

Irrigarion

N 0 1


- Training

- Prunning

- Girdling

- Bahar treatment

- - - - -

11 Harvesting

- Method

- Time (hour)

By Manually By Manually N - -

12 Farm level

processing

- Grading

- Packing

- Processing

- Storage (months)



Sl.

No Items of package

Recommende

d practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

Extension

Strategy (***)

13 Marketing



- Mode of transport

- Marketing by

indivi-

dual / group

- Any other

Local Market Local Market F - -

14 Average yield

(T/ ha.)

700-1500 fruit

/plant

600-1000

fruit /plant

F 1,8 4








3. Lack of skill












TABLE No.39 D (6.23)



Agro-ecological situation :IV District : Kolhapur Representative village :Umalvad Tal. Shirol

Crop : Banana Existing forming system – III, IV


Sl.

No

Items of package

Recommende

d practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

Extension

Strategy (***)

01 Variety

G-9,Basrai,

Lal velchi

G-9 N - -

02 Spacing (mts)

1.5x1.5mt,

1.35x1.35mt.

1.50x1.35 mt.

1.50x1.50

mt.

N

03 Manure (kg/plant)

40-50 Mt/Ha.

20-25

Mt/Ha.

P 1,3 1


(N+P+K)

- Dose (Kg/plant)

- Method of

application

100:40:100

gm/Plant By

ring merhod

Broadcastin

g

F - -

05 Micro-nutrient

- Dose (kg/plant)

- Method of

application

As par Soil

type

- F 1,3 1

06 Weed management

- Around the plants


Chemical &

Mechanical

Chemical

&

Mechanical

F - -



09 Water management



By Drip

Irrigarion

Flood &

Drip

Irrigarion

N 0 1


- Training

- Prunning

- Girdling

- Bahar treatment

- - - - -

11 Harvesting

- Method

- Time (hour)

By Manually By

Manually

N - -


- Grading

- Packing

- Processing

- Storage (months)

By Manually By

Manually

N - -


Sl.

No Items of package

Recommende

d practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

Extension

Strategy (***)

13 Marketing



- Mode of transport


dual / group

- Any other

Local Market Local

Market

F - -


50-60 Mt./Ha 40-50

Mt./Ha

F 1,8 4








3. Lack of skill












TABLE No.39 E (6.24)



Agro-ecological situation :IV District : Kolhapur Representative village :Umalvad Tal. Shirol

Crop : Tomato Existing forming system – III, IV


Sl.

No Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons for

the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

Extension

Strategy

(***)

01 Variety

Pusa Rubi, Vaishali,

Dhanashri, Rajeshri,

Bhagyshri,

Hybrid High

yielding

Variery

N - -

02 Spacing (mts)

45x30 cm 45x30 cm N - -

03 Manure (kg/plant) 10-12 Mt/Ha. 8-10 Mt/Ha. P 1,3 1


(N+P+K)

- Dose (Kg/plant)

- Method of

application

300:150:150 By ring

Method

250:150:150

Broadcasting

P 1,3 1

05 Micro-nutrient

- Dose (kg/plant)

- Method of

application

As par Soil type - F 1,3 1

06 Weed management

- Around the plants


Chemical &

Mechanical

Chemical &

Mechanical

F - -



09 Water management



By Drip Irrigarion Flood & Drip

Irrigarion

N 0 1


- Training

- Prunning

- Girdling

- Bahar treatment

- - - - -

11 Harvesting

- Method

- Time (hour)



- Grading

- Packing

- Processing

- Storage (months)



Sl.

No Items of package

Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Specific

reasons

for the gap

(**)

Farmer

proposed

Extension

Strategy

(***)

13 Marketing



- Mode of transport


dual / group

- Any other

Local Market Local Market F - -


40-50 Mt./Ha 40-45 Mt./Ha F 1,8 4








3. Lack of skill












TABLE No. 40 A (6.25)

TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE

PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT ANIMAL IS MANAGED

Name of district : Kolhapur Name of animal : Cow

Name of Representative village : Punal Tal. Panhala Name of agro-ecological situation :I

Existing farming system : II

Sl.

No. Ownership of land resource

No. of families (%) under different

farming situations Total (%)

Local breed Improved breed

No % No % No %

1 Land owners :

Irrigated + Rainfed 2700

Only irrigated 2000 74 2000 74

Rainfed only 500 19

500 19

2 Landless 200 7 200 7

Total 2700 100% 2700 100%

(Separately for each existing farming system)





Name of Representative village : Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Existing farming system II

Name of agro-ecological situation : II

Sl.



farming situations Total

(%) Local breed Improved breed

No % No % No %

1

Land owners :

• Irrigated + Rainfed

• Only irrigated

• Rainfed only

47 72.3 18 27.7 65 100

2 Landless

TOTAL 47 72.3 18 27.7 65 100



TABLE No.40 C (6.26)




Name of Representative village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad Existing farming system : II

Name of agro-ecological situation :AES III

Sl.

No.

Ownership of land


farming situations

Total

resource Local breed Improved breed (%)

No % No % No %

1 Land owners :

Irrigated + Rainfed 13 15 73 85 86 100

TOTAL 13 15 73 85 86 100




Name of district : Kolhapur Name of animal :

Name of Representative village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol Existing farming system : I/II/III/IV

Name of agro-ecological situation :IV

Sl.

No.

Ownership of land


farming situations

Total


No % No % No %

1 Land owners :

Irrigated + Rainfed 32 86% 5 14% 37 100%

Only irrigated

Rainfed only

2 Landless

TOTAL 32 86% 5 14% 37 100%





FOR IMPROVING THE PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME OF MILCH AND MEAT ANIMALS

District :Kolhapur Type of animal : Cow

Farming situation:1,2,3,4 Representative Village : Punal Tal. Panhala

Agro-ecological situation : I Existing farming system:II

Sl.

No. Items of the package

Recommended

practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

1 Breed upgradation :

* Artificial insemination:

- Breed

- Location

* Natural insemination :

- Breed

- Location

H.F.

Jersey and HF

(50%)

P

-

1,5

2 Feed management (per animal)

- Green fodder (Kg/day)

- Dry fodder (Kg/day)

- Concentrates (gms/day)

- Minerals (gms / day)

- Vitamins (ml. / day)

25Kg/Day

7Kg/Day

8Kg/Day

2ml/Day

30gm/Day

12-15Kg/Day

10-12Kg/Day

4-5Kg/Day

P

N

P

F

F

-

1,2,3,5

-

1

-

-

-

3 Inter calving period (months) 14 Monts 17-18 Monts F 1 5

4 Health care (per year) (+)

- HSBQ (No. of vaccinations)

- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

HSBQ -2

FMD -2

HSBQ -1

FMD -1

P

P

5. General management : - Washing (times / day)

- Cleaning (times / day)

- Housing (Paccca / Kutcha)

- Drinking water (lts. / day)

Every day

Twice a day

Pacca

40lts/day

Every day

Good floring

As per

required

N

F

P

N

-

1

4

-

1,2,3

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 12 lits/day 5-6 lts/day P 1,2,8 1


(+) Write only for those diseases which are relevant for the village / situation. Strike out

the rest

@ Separately for each farming situation under each exiling farming system

** Farmer proposed extension

strategies:

1. Imparting knowledge to the farmer regarding recommended package of practices by organizing the training

programme to the innovative farmers..

2. Involvement of NGOs & KVKs.

3. Mass media support.

4. Organization of Vaccination camp . 5. Organization of A.I. camp.




THE PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME OF MILCH AND MEAT ANIMALS

District : Kolhapur Type of animal : Cow

RepresentativeVillage : Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Farming situation:1,2,3,4

Agro-ecological situation : II Existing farming system: II

Sl.

No Items of the package

Recomme-

nded practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reason

s for

gap in

adoptio

n (**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

1

Breed upgradation :


BREED HF HF - - N

LOCATION

NATURAL INSEMINATION

BREED HF - F 1,2, -

LOCATION

2

Feed Managament

(per animal)

Green fodder (Kg/day) 25 30 - - -

Dry fodder (Kg/day) 7 4 F 1,2, 1

Concentrates (gms/day) 8 4 P - -

Minerals (gms / day) 2 - F - -

\Vitamins (ml. / day) 30 - F - -

3 Inter calving period (months) 14 14 - - 5

4

Health care (per year) (+)

HSBQ (No. of vaccinations) HSBQ - 1 HSBQ - - -

FMD FMD - 1 FMD - - 4

Rinder pest

Mastitis

Thilaris

Any other

5

Ganeral Management

Washing (times / day) EVERYDAY EVERYDAY N - 1,2,3

Cleaning (times / day) TWICE /

DAY EVERYDAY F - -

Housing (Paccca / Kutcha) PACCA GOOD

FLOARING P - -

Drinking water (lts. / day) 40 LTR 40 LTR N - -

6 Average milk yield (lit/day) 10 LTR 6 LITR P 1,2,3,4 -


(+) Write only for those diseases which are relevant for the village / situation. Strike out the rest


** Reasons for gaps: *** Farmer proposed extension

strategies:

1. IMPARTING KNOWLEDGE TO THE FARMER REGARDING RECMMENDED PACKAGE OF

PRACTICE BY ORGANISING THE TRAINING PROGRAM TO THE INNOVATIVE FARMER.

2.INVOLMENT OF NGO AND KVK

3.MASS MEDIA SUPPORT

4. ORGANISATION OF VACCINATION CAMPS

5.ORGANISING OF A.I. CAMPS






Representative Village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad Agro-ecological situation : II

Existing farming system: II

Sl.


Recommend

ed practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoptio

n

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons for

gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Jercy H.F.

H.F.

Local

F

Lack of

awareness,

skill persons

By training

2 Feed management (per

animal)






25kg/day

7kg/day

8kg/day

2ml/day

30gm/day

20kg/day

10kg/day

1-2kg/day

-

-

P

N

P

F

F

Lack of

awareness,

skill persons

By training

3 Inter calving period (months)

14 months 14 months

F

Lack of

awareness,

lack of skill

persons

By training



- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

HSBQ-2

FMD-2

HSBQ-2

FMD-2

P

P

Lack of

awareness

By arranging

Vaccination

camp





Every Day

Twice/Day

Pucca

40lts/Day

Every Day

-

Good

floring

As per

required

N

F

P

N

Lack of

awareness

Training and

Vaccination

camp

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 10lts/Day 4-5 lit/Day P Lack of

awareness

Training



the rest







Farming situation:1,2,3,4 Representative Village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol

Agro-ecological situation : IV Existing farming system: II,IV

Sl.


Recommende

d practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location


animal)






25Kg/Day

7Kg/Day

8Kg/Day

2ml/Day

30gm/Day

7-8Kg/Day

2-3Kg/Day

4-5Kg/Day

P

N

P

F

F

-

1,2,3,5

-

1

-

-

-


14 Monts 20-22

Monts

F 1 5



- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

HSBQ -2

FMD -2

HSBQ -1

FMD -1

P

P





Every day

Twice a day

Pacca

40lts/day

Every day

Good

floring

As per

required

N

F

P

N

-

1

4

-

1,2,3

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 10 lits/day

4-5 lts/day

P

1,2,8 1



the rest


** Reasons for gaps: *** Farmer proposed extension strategies:





Name of district : Kolhapur Name of animal : Goat



Sl.

No.

Ownership of land

resource




No % No % No %

1 Land owners :

- Irrigated + Rainfed 90 100 - - 90 100

- Rainfed only - - - - - -

2 Landless

Total 90 100 - - 90 100



TYPE OF FARMING SITUATIONS UNDER WHICH THE PARTICULAR MILCH AND MEAT

ANIMAL IS MANAGED

Name of district : Name of animal : Goat

Name of Representative village :Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Name of agro-ecological situation : IV

Existing farming system :II

Sl.

No.

Ownership of land

resource

No. of families (%) under different farming

situations Total


No % No % No %

1

2

Land owners :

- Irrigated + Rainfed

- Rainfed only

Landless

2 0.47 3 0.71 5 1.2

TOTAL 2 0.47 3 0.71 5 1.2







Name of Representative village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad Name of agro-ecological situation :III


Sl.

No.

Ownership of land

resource




No % No % No %

1 Land owners :

- Irrigated + Rainfed 61 69% 61 69%

- Rainfed only 27 21% 27 21%

2 Landless

TOTAL 88 100 88 100





Name of Representative village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol Name of agro-ecological situation :IV


Sl.

No.

Ownership of land

resource




No % No % No %

1 Land owners :

- Irrigated + Rainfed 105 100% 105 100

- Rainfed only

2 Landless

TOTAL

105 100% - - 105 100






District : Kolhapur Type of animal : Goat

Farming situation: 1,2,3,4 Representative Village : Punal Tal. Panhala

Agro-ecological situation : I Existing farming system: II

Sl.

No

.

Items of the package Recommended

practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap

in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Osmanabadi

Natural Service

Local

Local

Natural Service

F

N

1

1,2







5 kgs/day

2 kgs/day

0.5 kgs/day

2ml/day

15 gms/day

2-3 kgs/day

2 kgs/day

-

-

-

P

P

F

F

F

1,2,4

1

Inter calving period (months) 7months 8months F 1,2 1



- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-





-

-

Pacca

2lts/day

Kaccha

2lts/day

P

N

1,2,4

3

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) .5 to 1lit/day

Meat purpose

Meat purpose

P

1,2,8

1,3



the rest


** Farmer proposed extensionstrategies:





4. Organization of Vaccination camp .

5. Organization of A.I. camp.





District : Kolhapur Type of animal : goat

Representative Village : Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Farming situation:1,2,3,4

Agro-ecological situation :II Existing farming system: II

Sl.


Recommended


Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



BREED OSAMANABADI OSAMANABADI N - -

LOCATION NATURAL

SERVICE

NATURAL

SERVICE N - -

NATURAL

INSEMINATION

BREED LOCAL LOCAL N - -

LOCATION NATURAL

SERVICE

NATURAL

SERVICE - - -

2 Feed Management

(per animal)

Green fodder (Kg/day) 5 3 P 2, 1

Dry fodder (Kg/day) 2 GRAZING - 1,2,4,5 1

Concentrates (gms/day) 1 1 F - -

Minerals (gms / day) 2 - F - -

\Vitamins (ml. / day) 15 - F - -

3 Inter calving period

(months) 7 11 F 1,2 1

4 Health Care (per year)

(+)

ETV ETV - F 1,2,4, 4

HS HS - F - -

Rinder pest

Mastitis

Thilaris

Any other

5 General Management

Washing (times / day) - - - - -

Cleaning (times / day) - - - - 3

Housing (Paccca /

Kutcha) PACCA KACHAA P 1,2 -

Drinking water (lts. / day) 2LITR 2LITR N - -

6 Average milk yield

(lit/day) .5-1 - P 1,2,3 1,3












District :Kolhapur Type of animal : goat

Representative Village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad Agro-ecological situation : III


Sl.


Recommended

practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Osmanabadi

F

Lack of

awareness

Training


animal)






5 Kgs/day

2 Kgs/day

.5 Kgs/day

2ml/day

15 gm/day

5 Kgs/day

1.5 Kgs/day

N

F

F

F

F

Lack of

awareness

Training


7 months 7 months N - Training


- HSBQ (No. of

vaccinations)

- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

ETV-2

HS

ETV-1 P Lack of

awareness

Organizat

ion of

Vaccinati

on camp



- Housing (Paccca /

Kutcha)

- Drinking water

(lts. / day)

Pucca

2lit/day

Kuccha

2lit/day

P

N

Lack of

awareness

Mass

media

6. Average milk yield

(lit/day)

0.5-1lts/day

Lack of

awareness

Mass

media







4. Organization of Vaccination camp.






District : Kolhapur Type of animal : goat

Farming situation: 1,2,3,4 Representative Village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol

Agro-ecological situation : IV Existing farming system: II

Sl.

No

.


practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons for

gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Osmanabadi

Natural Service

Local

Local

Natural Service

F

N

1

1,2







5 kgs/day

2 kgs/day

0.5 kgs/day

2ml/day

15 gms/day

2-3 kgs/day

2 kgs/day

-

-

-

P

P

F

F

F

1,2,4

1

Inter calving period (months) 7months 8months F 1,2 1



- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-





-

-

Pacca

2lts/day

Kaccha

2lts/day

P

N

1,2,4

3

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) .5 to 1lit/day

Meat purpose

Meat purpose

P

1,2,8

1,3



the rest







4. Organization of Vaccination camp.






Name of district :Kolhapur Name of animal : Sheep

Name of Representative village :Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Name of agro-ecological situation :II


Sl.



farming situations

Total

(%)


No % No % No %

1 Land owners :


- Rainfed only NIL - NIL - NIL -

2 Landless - - - - - -

TOTAL - - - - - -





Name of district : Kolhapur Name of animal : Sheep

Name of Representative village : Punal Tal. Panhala

Name of agro-ecological situation I Existing farming system : II

Sl.No. Ownership of land

resource




No % No % No %

1

2

Land owners :


- Rainfed only

Landless

90

-

100

-

-

-

-

-

90

-

100%

-

TOTAL 90 100 - - 90 100%






Name of district : Kolhapur Name of animal : Sheep 7

Name of Representative village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad Existing farming system : II

Name of agro-ecological situation :AES III

Sl. No. Ownership of land

resource


situations Total


No % No %

1 Land owners :

- Irrigated + Rainfed 7 100% - - 7 100%

- Rainfed only

2 Landless

Total 7 100% - - 7 100%




Name of district :Kolhapur Name of animal : Sheep

Name of Representative village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol Name of agro-ecological situation :IV

Existing farming system : I/II/III/IV

Sl.

Ownership of land


farming situations

Total

No. resource Local breed Improved breed (%)

No % No % No %

1 Land owners :

6

100

6 100


- Rainfed only

2 Landless

Total 6 100 6 100



TABLE No. 45 A (6.42)

GAP IN ADOPTION AND PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGY FOR

IMPROVING THE PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME OF MILCH AND MEAT ANIMALS

District : Kolhapur Type of animal : Sheep

Representative Village : Punal Tal. Panhala Farming situation: 1,2,3,4

Agro-ecological situation : IV Existing farming system: II,IV

Sl.

N

o.

Items of the package

Recommen

ded

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap

in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Deccani

Sangamneri

Natural

service

Local

Natural

service

F

N

Lack of

awareness

Mass media







.5 Kgs/day

0,5 Kgs/day

2ml/day

15 gm/day

Grazing F

F

F

F

F

Lack of

awareness

Mass media

3 Inter calving period (months) 7 months 12 months F Lack of

awareness

Mass media



- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

ETV-2

HS

F Lack of

awareness

Mass media





Pucca

2lit/Day

Kuccha

2lit/day

P

N

Lack of

awareness

6. Average milk yield (lit/day)

0.5-1lit

Lack of

awareness

Upgradation of

local goat





strategies:



the rest


** Farmer proposed extentionstrategies:

1. Imparting knowledge to the farmer regarding recommended package of practices by organizing the training .







TABLE No. 45 B (6.43)


PRODUCTIVITY / INCOME OF MILCH AND MEAT ANIMALS

District :Kolhapur Type of animal : Sheep

Representative Village :Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Farming situation: 1,2,3,4

Agro-ecological situation :II Existing farming system: II

Sl.

No

.


practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons for

gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL


animal)






NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

3 Inter calving period

(months) NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL


- HSBQ (No. of

vaccinations)

- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

5 General management :

- Washing (times / day)


- Housing (Paccca /

Kutcha)


NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

6 Average milk yield

(lit/day) NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL





strategies:













Representative Village : Nagave Tal. Chandgad Farming situation:1,2,3,4

Agro-ecological situation : III Existing farming system: I,II,III,IV

Sl.

N

o.

Items of the package Recommende

d practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoptio

n

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Deccani

Sangamneri

Natural service

Local

Natural service

F

N

Lack of

awareness

Mass media







.5 Kgs/day

0,5 Kgs/day

2ml/day

15 gm/day

Grazing F

F

F

F

F

Lack of

awareness

Mass media

3 Inter calving period (months) 7 months 12 months F Lack of

awareness

Mass media



- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

ETV-2

HS

F Lack of

awareness

Mass media





Pucca

2lit/Day

Kuccha

2lit/day

P

N

Lack of

awareness

6. Average milk yield (lit/day)

0.5-1lit

Lack of

awareness

Upgradatio

n of local

goat





strategies:













Representative Village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol Farming situation: 1,2,3,4

Agro-ecological situation : IV Existing farming system: I,II,III,IV

Sl.

No

.


practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons for

gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)


* Artificial

insemination:

- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Deccani

sangamneri

Natural service

Local

Natural service

F

1

1,2


- Green fodder(Kg/day)


- Concentrates

(gms/day)



0.5 kgs/day

0.5 kgs/day

2ml/day

15gms/day

Grazing

-

-

-

-

F

F

F

F

-

1,2,4

1


7months 8to 9 months F

1,2 1

4 Health care (per year)

(+)

- HSBQ (No. of

vaccinations)

- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Any other

-

--

-

-

-

-



- Housing (Paccca /

Kutcha)

- Drinking water

(lts. / day)

Pucca

2lts/day

Kaccha

2lts/day

P

N

1,2 ,4

-

6. Average milk yield

(lit/day)

.5 to 1 lts/day

-

P

1,2,8 1,2





strategies:












Name of district :Kolhapur Name of animal : - Buffaloes



Sl.

Ownership of land


farming situations

Total

No. Resource Local breed Improved breed (%)

No % No % No %

1 Land owners :

500

50.20

496

49.79

996

99.99


- Rainfed only 300 30.12 150 15.06 - -

2 Landless 70 7.02

10 1 - -

Total 870 87.34 656 65.85 996 100%





Name of district : Kolhapur Name of animal : Buffalo

Name of Representative village : Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Name of agro-ecological situation : II



resource


situations Total

(%)


No % No % No %

1

2

Land owners :


- Rainfed only

Landless

137

100

-

-

137

100

TOTAL 137 100 - - 137 100







Name of Representative village : Nagave Name of agro-ecological situation :III



resource




No % No % No %

1

2

Land owners :


- Rainfed only

Landless

156

65

71

29

156

65

71

29

TOTAL 221 100 221 100

Table No.46 (6.48)




Name of Representative village : Umalvad Name of agro-ecological situation IV


Sl.No.

Ownership of land


farming situations

Total


No % No % No %

1

2

Land owners :


- Rainfed only

Landless

210

55

79

21

85

30

74

26

295

85

78

22

TOTAL 265 100 115 100 380 100






District :Kolhapur

Type of animal : Buffalo Representative Village : Punal

Agro-ecological situation : I Existing farming system: II

Sl.

No

.


practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons for

gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Murha

pandharpuri

Murha

pandharpuri

Murha

pandharpuri

local

N

F

1,2,3

-

5

1







30kgs/day

7 kgs/day

6 kgs/day

2ml/day

30-60gms/day

10kgs/day

5

2-3 kgs/day

2ml/day

10-30gms/day

P

P

P

F

F

1,2,3

1

3 Inter calving period (months) 16 months 20-22 months F 1,2, 1



- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

HSBQ2

FMD2

HSBQ 1

FMD1

P

P

1,2,3,4

1

4





Every day

Twice/ day

Pucca

40 lts/day

Once a day

-

-

40 lts/day

P

F

P

N

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 5-10 lit/day 4-5 lit/day P 1,2,6,8 1,2,3



the rest


** Farmer proposed extension strategies:

1.Imparting knowledge to the farmer regarding recommended package of practices by organizing the training

.programme to the innovative farmers..

2.Involvement of NGOs & KVKs.

3.Mass media support.

4.Organization of Vaccination camp . 5. Organization of A.I. camp.





District :Kolhapur

Type of animal : Buffalo Representative Village :Padvalwadi

Agro-ecological situation : Existing farming system: II

Sl.


Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap

in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



BREED Murrah Murrah N - 5

LOCATION - - - - -

NATURAL INSEMINATION

BREED Pandharpuri Pandharpuri N - 1

LOCATION - - - - -


Green fodder (Kg/day) 30 20 P - -

Dry fodder (Kg/day) 7 10 P 1,2,3,4 1

Concentrates (gms/day) 6 2 P - -

Minerals (gms / day) 30-60 - F - -

\Vitamins (ml. / day) 2 - P - -

3 Inter calving period (months) 16 24 F 1,2 1


HSBQ (No. of vaccinations) HSBQ - 1 HSBQ N - 1

FMD FMD - 1 FMD N - 4

Rinder pest

Mastitis - - - - -

Thilaris - - - - -

Any other - - - - -

5 General management :

Washing (times / day) EVERYDAY ONCE IN

WEEK

P 1,2 -

Cleaning (times / day) TWICE / DAY - F 1,2 -

Housing (Paccca / Kutcha) PACCA KACCHA P - -

Drinking water (lts. / day) 40 LTR 40 LTR N - -

6 Average milk yield (lit/day) 5-10 5-10 P 1,2,3 1,2,3



the rest



strategies:





District : Kolhapur Type of animal : Buffalo

Representative Village : Nagve Agro-ecological situation : III


Sl.

N

o.

Items of the package Recommende

d practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Murha

Surati

Murha

Local

Murha

F

F

Lack of

awareness

Organization

of camp







30 kgs/day

7 kgs/day

6 kgs/day

2 kgs/day

30 -60gms/day

15 kgs/day

10 kgs/day

1-2 kgs/day

-

-

P

N

P

F

F

Lack of

awareness

Organization

of camp

3 Inter calving period (months) 16 months 24 Months F

Lack of

awareness

Organization

of camp



- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

HSBQ-2

FMD-2

HSBQ-1

FMD-1

P

P

Lack of

awareness

Training





Every Day

Twice/Day

Pucca

40lits/Day

Once in

week

-

Kuccha

40lits/day

P

F

P

N

Lack of

awareness

Training

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 5-10 lits/day 3lits/Day P Lack of

awareness

Training





District :Kolhapur

Type of animal : Buffalo Representative Village :Umalvad Tal. Shirol

Agro-ecological situation : IV Existing farming system: II

Sl.

No

.


practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap

in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)



- Breed

- Location


- Breed

- Location

Murha

pandharpuri

Murha

pandharpuri

Murha

pandharpuri

local

N

F

1,2,3

-

5

1







30kgs/day

7 kgs/day

6 kgs/day

2ml/day

30-60gms/day

10kgs/day

5

2-3 kgs/day

2ml/day

10-30gms/day

P

P

P

F

F

1,2,3

1

3 Inter calving period (months) 16 months 20-22 months F 1,2, 1



- FMD

- Rinder pest

- Mastitis

- Thilaris

- Any other

HSBQ2

FMD2

HSBQ 1

FMD1

P

P

1,2,3,4

1

4





Every day

Twice/ day

Pucca

40 lts/day

Once a day

-

-

40 lts/day

P

F

P

N

6. Average milk yield (lit/day) 5-10 lit/day 5-6 lit/day P 1,2,6,8 1,2,3



the rest



strategies:

1. 1.

2. 2.

3. 3.

4. 4.




IMPROVING THE FISH SEED PRODUCTION / INCOME

Part I : Seed production and Rearing :

Village : PunalTal. Panhala District Kolhapur

Farming situation:I Agro-ecological situation;I

S.N

o Item of package

Recommended

Practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons for

gap in

adoption

(**)

Farmer

Proposed

extension

strategy

(***)

1 A Induced breeding (Happa)

(i) Carp

(ii) Catfish

(iii) Prawn - - - - -

B Spontaneous breeding

(common carp)

2 Nursery preparation

a Routine manuring

(i) Raw cow dung

(ii) Lime

b Instant manuring

(i) Inorganic fertilizer Nill Nill Nill Nill Nill

(ii) Oil cake

(iii) Raw cow dung

3 Insect control

(a) Manual

(b) oil, soap

4 Spawn stocking

(a) Single species

(b) Multi species

5 Feeding schedule

(a) Oil cake

(b) Rice bran

(c) Green leaf

6 Disease

7 Rearing period


(i) Yield within 15 days

(Recovery %)

(ii) Yield within 30 days

(Recovery %)

(iii) Yield within 45 days

(Recovery %)

9 Marketing

10 Production of fish (ton/ha)




THEFISH SEED PRODUCTION IS MANAGED

Name of district :Kolhapur Representative village : Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer

Name of agro-ecological situation : II Existing farming system : I/II/III/IV

Sl.No. Sources of

Irrigation



(%)

Black soils Red Soils

No % No % No %

1 - Irrigated - - - - - -

2 - Rainfed - - - - - -

TOTAL - - - - - -


Note: For deciding the farming situations in which fish seed is produced take two factors as

shown in the table ( 1. Sources of irrigation 2. Soil Type) i.e., the pond is under rainfed

condition or under the irrigated condition and similarly what is the soil type of the pond.






Village :Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer District :Kolhapur

Farming situation : II Agro-ecological situation ; II

S.No Item of package Recommended

practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

Reason for

gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

Proposed

extension

strategy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1. A Induced breeding (Happa) - - - - -

(i) Carp - - - - -

(ii) Catfish - - - - -

(iii) Prawn - - - - -

B Spontaneous breeding - - - - -

(common carp) - - - - -

2 Nursery preparation - - - - -

a Routine manuring - - - - -

(i) Raw cow dung - - - - -

(ii) Lime - - - - -

b Instant manuring - - - - -

(i) Inorganic fertilizer - - - - -

(ii) Oil cake - - - - -

(iii) Raw cow dung - - - - -

3 Insect control - - - - -

(a) Manual - - - - -

(b) oil, soap - - - - -

4 Spawn stocking - - - - -

(a) Single species - - - - -

(b) Multi species - - - - -

5 Feeding schedule - - - - -

(a) Oil cake - - - - -

(b) Rice bran - - - - -

(c) Green leaf - - - - -

6 Disease - - - - -

7 Rearing period - - - - -

8 Method of harvesting - - - - -

(i) Yield within 15 days - - - - -

(Recovery %) - - - - -

(ii) Yield within 30 days - - - - -

(Recovery %) - - - - -

(iii) Yield within 45 days - - - - -

(Recovery %) - - - - -

9 Marketing - - - - -

10 Production of fish (ton/ha) - - - - -






Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad District Kolhapur

Farming situation : III Agro-ecological situation: III

S.

No Item of package

Recommended

Practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

Reason for

gap

in adoption

Proposed

extension

strategy


(i) Carp

(ii) Catfish

(iii) Prawn - - - - -


(common carp)


a Routine manuring

(i) Raw cow dung

(ii) Lime

b Instant manuring


(ii) Oil cake

(iii) Raw cow dung

3 Insect control

(a) Manual

(b) oil, soap

4 Spawn stocking

(a) Single species

(b) Multi species

5 Feeding schedule

(a) Oil cake

(b) Rice bran

(c) Green leaf

6 Disease

7 Rearing period



(Recovery %)


(Recovery %)


(Recovery %)

9 Marketing



TABLE No.48 E (6.55)




Village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol District Kolhapur

Farming situation : IV Agro-ecological situation ;IV

S.N

o Item of package

Recommended

Practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

Reason for

gap

in adoption

Proposed

extension

strategy


(i) Carp

(ii) Catfish

(iii) Prawn - - - - -


(common carp)


a Routine manuring

(i) Raw cow dung

(ii) Lime

b Instant manuring


(ii) Oil cake

(iii) Raw cow dung

3 Insect control

(a) Manual

(b) oil, soap

4 Spawn stocking

(a) Single species

(b) Multi species

5 Feeding schedule

(a) Oil cake

(b) Rice bran

(c) Green leaf

6 Disease

7 Rearing period



(Recovery %)


(Recovery %)


(Recovery %)

9 Marketing



TABLE No. 48 F (6.56)


IMPROVING THE PRODUTIVITY / INCOME

Part II : Commercial production and rearing :

Village : Punal Tal. Panhala District :Kolhapur

Farming Situation :I Agro-ecological situation – I


Practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

Adoption

Reason for

gap

in adoption

Proposed

extension

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 Culture components

(a) Indian Major carp

(b) Exotic carp

(c) Prawn

(d) Cat fish

2 Pond preparation

(a) Organic manure (kg/ha)

(b) In organic manure (kg/ha)

(c) Bio-fertiliser (kg/ha)

(d) Lime (kg /ha)

(e) Water depth Nill Nill Nill Nill Nill

3 Weed control

(a) Manuring

(b) Mechanical

(c) Chemical

4 Stocking size / No.

(a) Spawn

(b) fry

(c) Fingerlings

5 Feeding schedule

(a0 Rice bran

(b) Oil cake

(c) Green leaf

6 Sample netting

- Monthly

- Quarterly

- Half yearly

7 Aeration

8 Disease

9 Harvesting method

10 Culture method

Average yield (ton / ha)




COMMERCIAL FISH PRODUCTION IS MANAGED

Name of district :Kolhapur Representative village :Padavalwadi Tal.Karveer

Name of agro-ecological situation :II: Existing farming system :II:

Sl.No. Sources of

Irrigation



(%) Black soils Red Soils

No % No % No %

1 - Irrigated - - - - - -

2 - Rainfed - - - - - -

TOTAL - - - - - -


Note: For deciding the farming situations in which Commercial fish is produced take two factors as shown in the table (

1. Sources of irrigation 2. Soil Type) i.e., the pond is under rainfed condition or under the irrigated condition and

similarly what is the soil type of the pond.


TABLE No. 49 B (6.58)




Village :Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer District :Kolhapur

Farming situation :II Agro-ecological situation ;II


practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N)

Reason for

gap in

adoption

Proposed

extension

strategy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 Culture components - - - - -

(a) Indian Major carp - - - - -

(b) Exotic carp - - - - -

(c) Prawn - - - - -

(d) Cat fish - - - - -

2 Pond preparation - - - - -

(a) Organic manure (kg/ha) - - - - -

(b) In organic manure (kg/ha) - - - - -

(c) Bio-fertiliser (kg/ha) - - - - -

(d) Lime (kg /ha) - - - - -

(e) Water depth - - - - -

3 Weed control - - - - -

(a) Manuring - - - - -

(b) Mechanical - - - - -

(c) Chemical - - - - -

4 Stocking size / No. - - - - -

(a) Spawn - - - - -

(b) fry - - - - -

(c) Fingerlings - - - - -

5 Feeding schedule - - - - -

(a) Rice bran - - - - -

(b) Oil cake - - - - -

(c) Green leaf - - - - -

6 Sample netting - - - - -

- Monthly - - - - -

- Quarterly - - - - -

- Half yearly - - - - -

7 Aeration - - - - -

8 Disease - - - - -

9 Harvesting method - - - - -

10 Culture method - - - - -

Average yield (ton/ha) - - - - -


TABLE No. 49 C (6.59)




Village :Nagave Tal. Chandgad District :Kolhapur

Farming Situation : III Agro-ecological situation –III


Practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

Adoption

Reason for

gap

in adoption

Proposed

extension

1 2 3 4 5 6 7



(b) Exotic carp

(c) Prawn

(d) Cat fish

2 Pond preparation




(d) Lime (kg /ha)


3 Weed control

(a) Manuring

(b) Mechanical

(c) Chemical


(a) Spawn

(b) fry

(c) Fingerlings

5 Feeding schedule

(a0 Rice bran

(b) Oil cake

(c) Green leaf

6 Sample netting

- Monthly

- Quarterly

- Half yearly

7 Aeration

8 Disease

9 Harvesting method

10 Culture method



TABLE No. 49 D (6.60)




Village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol District :Kolhapur

Farming Situation : IV Agro-ecological situation – IV


Practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

Adoption

Reason for

gap

in adoption

Proposed

extension

1 2 3 4 5 6 7



(b) Exotic carp

(c) Prawn

(d) Cat fish

2 Pond preparation




(d) Lime (kg /ha)


3 Weed control

(a) Manuring

(b) Mechanical

(c) Chemical


(a) Spawn

(b) fry

(c) Fingerlings

5 Feeding schedule

(a0 Rice bran

(b) Oil cake

(c) Green leaf

6 Sample netting

- Monthly

- Quarterly

- Half yearly

7 Aeration

8 Disease

9 Harvesting method

10 Culture method




PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING

INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Cropping system/sequence: Present crop: Sugarcane Previous crop: Sugarcane

Next crop: Sugarcane Name of crop under study: Sugarcane Moisture condition: Irrigated

District: Kolhapur Village: Punal Tal. Panhala Name of agro-ecological situation: I

Sl

No

.

Particulars Existing

practice

Recommended

practice

Gap in

adoption

( F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap in

adoption

(* *)

Proposed

strategy

(* ** )

Soil Testing / Soil Health

Cards

Use of manure (T/ha)

- FYM 5-6 Mt/Ha. 8-10 Mt/Ha. P c 2

- Compost

- Vermi compost

-

Use of major fertilizers :

Basal dose (kg/ha)

N 200:100:100 340:170:170 N - -

P

K

Top dress (kg/ha)

N

-

Use of micro-nutrients

(Kg/ha)

- As per Soil

Testing

As per Soil

Testing

F a,c 2

-

Cultivation of legume

- As rotational crop Paddy Gram

- As inter crop Groundnut Groundnut p N N

- As green manure Senhemp

Use of bio-fertilizer (kg/ha)

Any other

* F = Full P = Partial N = Nil

** Code for reasons for gap in adoption *** Code for proposed strategy

A. Lack of awareness A. Mass media

B. Other farmers follow it B. Mass media

C. High residual effect of fertilizer / manure C. On farm trial/demonstration

used in previous crop D. On farm trails / demonstrations

D. Fear of loss of yield if dose is reduced E. Linkage with credit institutions or credit

E. Lack of finance thrift activity in self help group

F. Any other (specify)





Cropping system/sequence: Present crop:PADDY Previous crop:GRAM

Next crop:PADDY Name of crop under study :PADDY Moisture condition : Irrigated/Rainfed

District :Kolhapur Village :Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer Name of agro-ecological situation:II

Sl

No

.


practice

Recomm-

ended

practice

Gap in

adoption

( F/P/N)(*)

Reasons for

gap in

adoption

(* *)

Proposed

strategy

(* ** )


Cards


- FYM 8-10 10-12 P A,C 2

- Compost - - - - -

- Vermi Compost - - - - -


Basal dose (kg/ha)

N 100 100

N

A,C 2

P 50 50

K 50 50

Top dress (kg/ha) - - - - -

N - - - - -

-


(Kg/ha)

- AS PER

SOIL TEST

F A,C 2


- As rotational crop - GRAM F A 1

- As inter crop - - - - -

- As green manure - GLYRICIDI

A

- - -


B.G.A - 8-10 TONN F A 1

AZOLLA - 4-5 TONN F F 2

Any other



a. Lack of awareness A. Mass media

b. Other farmers follow it B. Mass media

c. High residual effect of fertilizer / manure C. On farm trial/demonstration


d. Fear of loss of yield if dose is reduced E. Linkage with credit institutions or credit

e. Lack of finance thrift activity in self help group

f. Any other (specify)





Cropping system/sequence: Present crop:Paddy Previous crop:Paddy

Next crop:Sugarcane Name of crop under study: Moisture condition : Irrigated/Rainfed

District:Kolhapur Village: Nagave Tal.-Chandgad Name of agro-ecological situation:III

Sl

No

.


practice

Recomm-

ended

practice

Gap in

adoption

( F/P/N)(*)

Reasons for

gap in

adoption

(* *)

Proposed

strategy

(* ** )


Cards


- FYM 8-10 10-12 P A,C 2

- Compost - - - - -

- Vermi Compost - - - - -


Basal dose (kg/ha)

N 100 100

N

A,C 2

P 50 50

K 50 50

Top dress (kg/ha) - - - - -

N - - - - -

-


(Kg/ha)

- AS PER

SOIL TEST

F A,C 2


- As rotational crop - GRAM F A 1

- As inter crop - - - - -

- As green manure - GLYRICIDI

A

- - -


B.G.A - 8-10 TONN F A 1

AZOLLA - 4-5 TONN F F 2

Any other














Cropping system/sequence: Present crop: Sugarcane Previous crop: Sugarcane

Next crop: Sugarcane Name of crop under study: Sugarcane Moisture condition: Irrigated

District:Kolhapur Village: UmalvadTal. Shirol Name of agro-ecological situation:IV

Sl

N

o.


practice

Recommende

d practice

Gap in

adoption

( F/P/N)

(*)

Reasons

for gap in

adoption

(* *)

Proposed

strategy

(* ** )

Soil Testing / Soil Health Cards


- FYM 10-12 Mt/Ha. 8-10 Mt/Ha. P c 2

- Compost

- Vermi compost

-


Basal dose (kg/ha)

N 340:170:170 340:170:170 N - -

P

K

Top dress (kg/ha)

N

-

Use of micro-nutrients (Kg/ha)

- As per Soil

Testing

As per Soil

Testing

F a,c 2

-


- As rotational crop Gram Gram

- As inter crop Groundnut Groundnut N N N

- As green manure Senhemp Senhemp


-

Any other











MAJOR GAP IN ADOPTION OF IMPROVED TECHNOLOGY OF ALL THE AES FOR

PARTICULAR CROP / COMMODITIES & STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME THOSE GAPS

IN DISTRICT KOLHAPUR

* Code for reason for gap

in adoption

** Code for farmer proposed

extension strategy

*** Code for strategies

proposed to overcome the

gap

1. Lack of awareness 1. Imparting knowledge to the farmer

regarding recommended package of

practices by organizing the training &

Demonstration program to the farmers.

1. Demonstration

2. Lack of Knowledge 2. Implementing seed production

program

2. Training

3. Lack of skill 3. Involvement of NGO,s & KVKs. 3. Exposure visit

4. Lack of motivation 4. Implementation of 4 point program 4. Soil testing

5. Lack of credit 5. Promotion of adoption of INM 5. Use of urea brickets

6. Lack of labour availability 6. Promoting the high yielding varieties

& recommended technological packages.

6. Seed village scheme

7. Fear of Risk 7. Mobilization of SHGs /

FIGs

8. Lack of Resources 8. 4 point pragramme of

paddy cultivation

9. Lack of input availability 9. Use of gypsum

10. Lack of market &

infrastructure

11. Lack of specific

recommendation for AES

12. Recommendation is not

profitable & incompatible.

13. Recommendation is in

appropriate

14. Poor Management

practices.


Table No. 50 E (6.65)

District : Kolhapur AES – 1

Crop:- Paddy (Rained) Resource situation – RRF & RRP

Sl.

No. Production Practices (items)

Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed to

overcome

the gap

Fs-1 Fs-2 Fs-3

1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety P - - 1 1 2

3 Seed rate per ha. P - - 1,9 1 2

4 Seed treatment F - - 1 1 2

5 Organic mannure P - - 1,9 - 2

6 Fertilizer / Nutrients (Kg. / ha.) P - - 1,9 - 4,5,8

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

7 Method of fertilizer used P - - 1 5 2

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

8 Micro nutrient F - - 1,9 5 4

Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Method of application - - - - - -

9 Pest management P - - 8,9 - 2

10 Disease management N - -

11 Post harvest management F - - 1 - 2

12 Weed management P - - 7,9 - 2

13 Water management P - - 1 - 2

No. of irrigation - - - - - -

Method of irrigation - - - - - -

14 Land management - - - - - -

Salinity / Acidity - - - - - -

15 Mthod of harvesting N - - - - -

16 Average yield (Qtl./ha.) P - - 1,14 4 1,2


Table No. 50 F (6.66)

District : Kolhapur AES – 1

Crop:- Sugarcane (Suru) Resource situation – RRF & RRP

Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed

to

overcome

the gap Fs-1 Fs-2 Fs-3

1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety N - - - - -

3 Seed rate per ha. P - - 1 1 2


5 Organic mannure P - - 1,5,9 - 2

6 Fertilizer / Nutrients (Kg. / ha.) P - - 1,5,9 5 4

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

7 Method of fertilizer used F - - 1,6 1 1,2

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -


9 Pest management P - - 5,6 - 1,2


11 Weed management P - - 5,6 - 2

12 Water management P - - 1,5 - 2





14 Mthod of harvesting N - - - - -



Table No. 50 G (6.67)

District : Kolhapur AES – II


Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed

to

overcome


1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety P - - 1 1 2



5 Organic mannure P - - 1,9 - 2

6 Fertilizer / Nutrients (Kg. / ha.) P - - 1,9 - 4,5,8

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

7 Method of fertilizer used P - - - 5 2

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -


9 Pest management P - - 8 - 2


11 Post Harvest Management F - - 1 - 2

12 Weed management P - - 7 - 2

13 Water management P - - - - 2





15 Method of harvesting - - - - - -



Table No. 50 H (6.68)



Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed

to

overcome


1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety N - - - - -


4 Seed treatment F - - 1 1 2,3

5 Organic mannure P - - 1,5,9 1 2


Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

8 Micro nutrient F - - 1,9 1 1,2

Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -


9 Pest management P - - 5,6 1 1,2

10 Disease management N - - - - -

11 Weed management P - - 5,6 1 2

12 Water management P - - 1,5 1 -





14 Method of harvesting N - - - - 1,2

15 Average yield (Qtl./ha.) P - - 1,14 1,4 1,2


Table No. 50 I (6.69)


Crop:- Groundnut (Rainfed) Resource situation – RRF & RRP

Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed to

overcome

the gap

Fs-1 Fs-2 Fs-3

1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety P - - 1 1 2


4 Seed treatment F - - 1,5 1 1

5 Organic mannure P - - 1,2,5,9 1 2

6 Fertilizer / Nutrients (Kg. / ha.) P - - 1,2,5 5 4,9

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

7 Method of fertilizer used F - - 1,2 1 2

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -



10 Disease management P - - 1,2 1 2

11 Weed management P - - 1,5,7 1 2

12 Water management - - - 1,5 1 -





14 Method of harvesting N - - - - -

15 Average yield (Qtl./ha.) P - - 1,14 1,6 1,2,3


Table No. 50 J (6.70)



Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed to

overcome

the gap

Fs-1 Fs-2 Fs-3

1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety P - - 1 1 2



5 Organic mannure P - - 1,9 1 2

6 Fertilizer / Nutrients (Kg. / ha.) P - - 1,9 1 4,5,8

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

7 Method of fertilizer used P - - 1 1 2

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -


9 Pest management P - - 8,9 1 2

10 Disease management N - - - 1 -

11 Post harvest management F - 1 1 2


12 Water management P - - - - 2








Table No. 50 K (6.71)

District : Kolhapur AES – III

Crop:- Nagli (Rained) Resource situation – RRF & RRP

Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed

to

overcome


1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety F - - 1 1 1,2,6





Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

7 Method of fertilizer used P - - 1,6 1 2

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

8 Micro nutrient - - - - - 4

Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -


9 Pest management - - - - - -

10 Disease management F - - - - -

11 Pest harvest management - - - - - -

11 Weed management P - - 1,5,6 1 2

12 Water management P - - 1,5 1 2








Table No. 50 L (6.72)

District : Kolhapur AES – III


Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed to

overcome

the gap

Fs-1 Fs-2 Fs-3

1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety N - - - - -





Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -



10 Disease management F - - - - -










Table No. 50 M (6.73)

District : Kolhapur AES – IV


Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed to

overcome

the gap

Fs-1 Fs-2 Fs-3

1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety N - - - - -



5 Organic mannure P - - 1,3 1 2

6 Fertilizer / Nutrients (Kg. / ha.) F - - 1,3 1 4

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -


9 Pest management P - - 1,2,3 1 1,2

10 Disease management F - - 1,2,3 - -








15 Average yield (Qtl./ha.) P - - 1,8,14 1,6 1,2


Table No. 50 N (6.74)


Crop:- Soyabean (Rained) Resource situation – RRF & RRP

Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed

to

overcome


1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety P - - 1 - 2

3 Seed rate per ha. N - - - 1 -


5 Organic mannure P - - 3 1 2

6 Fertilizer / Nutrients (Kg. / ha.) P - - 1,3 1 4

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -


9 Pest management N - - - - -

10 Disease management F - - 1,2,3 - 2








15 Average yield (Qtl./ha.) P - - 1,14 1,6 1,2,3,6


Table No. 50 O (6.75)


Crop:- Groundnut (Rained) Resource situation – RRF & RRP

Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed

to

overcome


1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety N - - - - 2

3 Seed rate per ha. N - - - - 2

4 Seed treatment P - - 1 1 1


6 Fertilizer / Nutrients (Kg. / ha.) P - - 1,3 1 4,9

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -


9 Pest management N - - - 1 4,2

10 Disease management N - - - - 2


12 Water management P - - 1,6 1 -








Table No. 50 P (6.76)


Crop:- Kharif Jawar (Rained) Resource situation – RRF & RRP

Sl.


Gap in adoption in

the different

situations in which

the crop/

commodity is grown

Reasons for

gap in

adoption as

perceived by

the farmers

Strategies

as

perceived

by the

farmers

Strategies

proposed to

overcome

the gap

Fs-1 Fs-2 Fs-3

1. Sowing

time

N - - - - -

Method - - - - - -

2. Variety N - - - - -

3 Seed rate per ha. N - - - - -

4 Seed treatment N - - - 1 1


6 Fertilizer / Nutrients (Kg. / ha.) P - - 1,3 1 4

Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Basal (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -

Top (N+P+K) Kg./ha. - - - - - -


Dose Kg./ha. - - - - - -



10 Disease management P - - 1,3 - 2










Table – 50 Q (6.77)

CONSOLIDATED GAPS IN PRODUCTION PRACTICES OF A CROP / COMMODITIES & PROPOSED

STRATEGIES OF THE KOLHAPUR DISTRICT

Name of District- Kolhapur Name of crop- Paddy (rainfed)

Items

AES - I AES II AES III AES IV

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

Strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy to

overcome

gap

Sowing N - N - N - - -

- Time - - - - - - - -

- Method - - - - - - - -

Varieties P 2 P 2 P 2 - -

Seed Rate P 2 P 2 P 2 - -

Seed Treatment F 2 F 2 F 2 - -

Organic Manure P 2 P 2 P 2 - -

Fertilizer / Nutrient P 4,5,8 P 4,5,8 P 4,5,8 - -

kg/ha. - - - - - - - -

- Basal dose - - - - - - - -

- Top dressing - - - - - - - -

Method of fertilizer use P 2 P 2 P 2 - -

- Basal - - - - - - - -

- Top - - - - - - - -

Micro-Nutrient F 4 F 4 F 4 - -

-dose kg/ ha. - - - - - - - -

-Method of application - - - - - - - -

Pest Management P 2 P 2 P 2 - -

- paddy stem borer - - - - - - - -

Disease Management N - N - N - - -

Post harvest management P 2 F 2 F 2

Weed Management F 2 P 2 P 2 - -

Water Management P 2 P 2 P 2 - -

- No. of irrigation - - - - - - - -

- Method of irrigation - - - - - - - -

Land Management P - - - - - - -

- Salinity/ acidity - - - - - - - -

Method of Harvesting - - N - N - - -

Av. Yield Kg/ha. P 1,2 P 1,2 P 1,2 - -


Table – 50 R (6.78)



Name of District- Kolhapur Name of crop- Sugarcane (Suru)

Items


Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

Strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy to

overcome

gap

Sowing P 2 N - N - N -

- Time - - - - - - - -

- Method - - - - - - - -

Varieties P 2 N - N - N -

Seed Rate P 2 P 2 N - P 1

Seed Treatment F 2 F 2,3 F 2,3 P 1

Organic Manure F 8 P 2 P 2 P 1

Fertilizer / Nutrient P 5 P 4 P 4 P 2

kg/ha. - - - - - - - -

- Basal dose - - - - - - - -

- Top dressing - - - - - - - -

Method of fertilizer use P 1 F 1,2 F 1,2 P 1

- Basal - - - - - - - -

- Top - - - - - - - -

Micro-Nutrient F 1 F 5 F 1,2 F 1

-dose kg/ ha. - - - - - - - -


Pest Management P 1 P 1 P 1,2 P 1


Disease Management P 1 N - F - F -

Weed Management P 1 P - P 2 P 1

Water Management P 6 P - P 2 P 1



Land Management - - - - - - - -


Method of Harvesting - - N - N - N -

Av. Yield Kg/ha. - - P 1,14 P 1,2 P 1,6


Table – 50 S (6.79)



Name of District- Kolhapur Name of crop- Groundnut (Rainfed)

Items


Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

Strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy to

overcome

gap

Sowing - - - - - - N

- Time - - - - - - - -

- Method - - - - - - - -

Varieties - - - - - - N -

Seed Rate - - - - - - N -

Seed Treatment - - - - - - P 1

Organic Manure - - - - - - P 1

Fertilizer / Nutrient - - - - - - P 4,9

kg/ha. - - - - - - - -

- Basal dose - - - - - - - -

- Top dressing - - - - - - - -

Method of fertilizer use - - - - - - P 1

- Basal - - - - - - - -

- Top - - - - - - - -

Micro-Nutrient - - - - - - F 1

-dose kg/ ha. - - - - - - - -


Pest Management - - - - - - P 1


Disease Management - - - - - - F -

Post harvest management - - - - - - N -

Weed Management - - - - - - P 1

Water Management - - - - - - P 5





Method of Harvesting - - - - - - N -

Av. Yield Kg/ha. - - - - - - P 1,6


Table – 50 T (6.80)



Name of District- Kolhapur Name of crop- Soyabean (Rainfed)

Items


Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

Strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

Adop-

tion

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy to

overcome

gap

Sowing - - - - - - N -

- Time - - - - - - - -

- Method - - - - - - - -


Seed Rate - - - - - - P 1

Seed Treatment - - - - - - P 1


Fertilizer / Nutrient - - - - - - P 3,1

kg/ha. - - - - - - - -

- Basal dose - - - - - - - -

- Top dressing - - - - - - - -

Method of fertilizer use - - - - - - P 1

- Basal - - - - - - - -

- Top - - - - - - - -


-dose kg/ ha. - - - - - - - -




Disease Management - - - - - - F 1

Post harvest management - - - - - - N -







Method of Harvesting - - - - - - - -

Av. Yield Kg/ha. - - - - - - P 1,6


Table No. 50 U (6.81)



Name of District- Kolhapur Name of crop- Nagli (rainfed)

Items


Gap in

adoption

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

adoption

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

adoption

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

adoption

N/ P/ F

Propo

sed

strate

gy to

overc

ome

gap

Sowing - - - - N - - -

- Time - - - - - - - -

- Method - - - - - - - -

Varieties - - - - F 1,2,6 - -

Seed Rate - - - - P 2 - -

Seed Treatment - - - - F 2 - -

Organic Manure - - - - P 2 - -

Fertilizer / Nutrient - - - - P 4 - -

kg/ha. - - - - - - - -

- Basal dose - - - - - - - -

- Top dressing - - - - - - - -

Method of fertilizer use - - - - P 2 - -

- Basal - - - - - - - -

- Top - - - - - - - -

Micro-Nutrient - - - - F 4 - -

-dose kg/ ha. - - - - - - - -


Pest Management - - - - - - - -


Disease Management - - - - F - - -

Weed Management - - - - N - - -

Water Management - - - - P 2 - -



Land Management - - - - P 2 - -


Method of Harvesting - - - - N - - -

Av. Yield Kg/ha. - - - - P 1,2,6


Table No. 50 V (6.82)



Name of District- Kolhapur Name of crop- Kh. Jawar (rainfed)

Items


Gap in

adoption

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

adoption

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

adoption

N/ P/ F

Proposed

strategy

to

overcome

gap

Gap in

adoption

N/ P/ F

Propo

sed

strate

gy to

overc

ome

gap

Sowing - - - - - - N -

- Time - - - - - - - -

- Method - - - - - - - -


Seed Rate - - - - - - N -

Seed Treatment - - - - - - N 1


Fertilizer / Nutrient - - - - - - P 4

kg/ha. - - - - - - - -

- Basal dose - - - - - - - -

- Top dressing - - - - - - - -

Method of fertilizer use - - - - - - F 2

- Basal - - - - - - - -

- Top - - - - - - - -


-dose kg/ ha. - - - - - - - -




Disease Management - - - - - - P 2







Method of Harvesting - - - - - - N -

Av. Yield Kg/ha. - - - - - - P 1,2,3


VII. 1) PROMOTING INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

Farmers are not aware of how much quantity of fertilizer should be use for a given crop in a field.

What is content of NPK & micro nutrient in the soil ? Then the detrimental effect of continuous use of

chemical fertilizer, the productivity of the soil may deteriorate, this is reason of the revival of the interest in

the use of organic manure or bio fertilizer in a greater way. Under INM, in each AES the gap in adoption of

INM are found as under, To bridge this gap, develop strategies for each AES as under.

TABLE No.51 A (7.1)


INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT

Agro-ecological situation: I Crop :Sugarcane Pest:Wooly aphids

Season: All Village: Punal Tal. PanhalaDistrict:Kolhapur

Sl.

No. Particulars

Recommended

Practice

Existing

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N) *

Reasons for

gap in

adoption (*)

Proposed

strategy

(**)

1 Cultural practices (Y/-) :

- Summer ploughing

- Timely sowing - - - -

2 Resistant variety (specific)

CO-86032,CO-

92005

CO-92005

Co-86032 P a,c 2

3 Bio pesticides (No.of applications)

- Neem product

5%Neemark 2-3

time application

As per

Schedule N - -

- NPV

4 Bio agent (Y/-)

- Egg parasite

1Crysoparla carnia

2 Micromus

3.conabatra

aphidivora4cerphid

fly

.conabatra

aphidivora P

a,c 2

5 Other practices (Y/-)

- Pheromone trap - - - - -

- Light trap

- Etc.

6 Pesticides (No. of applications)

- Spraying 2-3 2 P a,c 1,2,3

- Dusting 2

- Seed treatment

- Soil applications 10% Phorate As per

Recomanded

- Etc.

7 Any other Pair Row planting

Method

Burning of

Sugarcane Trashes

As per

Recomanded - - -

* F = Full, P = Partial, = NIL




CHAPTER VII.

STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME THE GAPS IN INM /

IPM / SEED REPLACEMENT / MARKETING / PPP /

FARM MECHANISATION,BURNING PROMBLEMS

IN THE DISTRICT KOLHAPUR


TABLE No.51 B (7.2)



Agro-ecological situation :II Crop :JOWAR Pest : STEM BORRER

Season : KHARIF Village :Padavalwadi Tal. KarveerDistrict :KOLHAPUR

Sl.

No. Particulars

Existing

practice

Recommended

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N) *

Reasons for

gap in

adoption (*)

Proposed

strategy

(**)


- Summer ploughing As per

Recomme

nded

MAR-APRIL N - -

- Timely sowing 15 JUNE - 15

JULY N - -

- Etc.

2 Resistant variety (specific) PKV 400 CSH14,1,7, P A,C 1,2

3 Bio pesticides (No.of

applications)

- Neem product

-

5% NEEM

ARK 2-3

APPLI.

F A,C 1,2

- NPV - 500ML/HA F A,C 1,3

- Etc.

4 Bio agent (Y/-)

- Egg parasite -

TRICHODER

MA F A,B 1,2 - Etc.

- CHRYSOPERL

A CARNIA


- Pheromone trap - - - -

- Light trap 10-12 F A,B 1,2

- Etc.

6 Pesticides (No. of applications) - - - - -

- Spraying - - - - -

- Dusting - - - - -

- Seed treatment - - - - -

- Soil applications - - - - -

- Etc. - - - - -

7 Any other - - - - -


* Code for reasons for gap in adoption ** Code for proposed strategy :

1 Lack of awareness 1 Farmers Field School

2 Non availability of traps, bioagents 2 On farm trial/demonstration of compost preparation

3 Lack of Knowledge 3 Training regarding nutrient management


TABLE No. 51 C (7.3)



Cropping system/sequence: Name of crop under study: Paddy

Moisture condition: Irrigated/Rained Name of agro-ecological situation:III

Season: June-October Village:Nagave Tal. Chandgad District:Kolhapur

Sl.

No

.


Practice

Recommended

Practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N) *

Reasons for

gap in

adoption (*)

Proposed

strategy

(**)

1 Cultural practices (Y/-) : March to April

15th

June to 15th

July

As per

recommended

N

- Summer ploughing

- Timely sowing

- Etc.

2 Resistant variety (specific) Ratna RP 4-14 IR

20,IET 3116

Jaya

Ratnagiri

P Lack of

awareness

Farm field

school

3 Bio pesticides (No.of applications) 5% Neemark

2-3 appli

- F Lack of

awareness

Farm field

school

- Neem product

- NPV

- Etc.

4 Bio agent (Y/-) Tricogramma

Crysoperla carnia

Lack of

awareness

Farm field

school

- Egg parasite

- Etc.


- Pheromone trap 10-12 traps

- Light trap

- Etc.

6 Pesticides (No. of applications)

- Spraying 3 1 P Lack of

awareness

Farm field

school

- Dusting 1-3 1

- Seed treatment -

- Soil applications 10 % Phorate 1

- Etc.

7 Any other











TABLE No. 51 D (7.4)



Agro-ecological situation :IV Crop :Sugarcane

Pest :Wooly aphids Season :All

Village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol District :Kolhapur

Sl.

No. Particulars

Recommended

Practice

Existing

practice

Gap in

adoption

(F/P/N) *

Reasons for

gap in

adoption (*)

Proposed

strategy

(**)


- Summer ploughing

- Timely sowing - - - -

- Etc.

2 Resistant variety (specific) CO-86032

CO-671

Co-86032 P a,c 2

3 Bio pesticides (No. of

applications)

- Neem product 5%Neemark

2-3time application

As per

Schedule N - -

- NPV

- Etc.

4 Bio agent (Y/-)

- Egg parasite 1Crysoparla carnia

2 Micromus 3.conabatra

aphidivora 4cerphid fly

.conabatra

aphidivora P a,c 2


- Pheromone trap - - - - -

- Light trap

- Etc.

6 Pesticides

(No. of applications)

- Spraying 2-3 2-3 P a,c 1,2,3

- Dusting 2

- Seed treatment

- Soil applications 10% Phorate

As per

Recommended

- Etc.

7 Any other Pair Row planting

Method

Burning of Sugarcane

Trashes

As per

Recomanded - - -

N- Nil, P- Partial, F- Full

Code for reasons : Code for proposed strategy :

a. Lack of awareness 1. Mass media

b. Non availability of organic manure 2. On farm trial / Demonstration of compost preparation

c. Lack of knowledge 3. Training regarding nutrient management

d. Fear of loss of yield if dose is reduced

e. Lack of finance

f. Non availability of input


VII. 2) STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT

The concept of Integrated Pest Management (IPM), where integrated use of cultural, biological &

chemical methods is made & greter stress is given to the prevention rather than use of costly insecticides.

Possible emergence of pest & disease is tackeled by the IPM.

Gap in adoption of IPM technology are analysed by collecting the data of representative villages in

district by PRA method. As under :

TABLE No.52 A (7.1.1)

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR SEED REPLACEMENT RATIO

District: Kolhapur Village: Punal Tal. Panhala

Name of crop: Sugarcane Preferred variety:Co-92005,Co-86032

Agro-ecological situation :I

Sl.

No.

Source of seed

of preferred variety/ hybrid

Quantity of

seed used (of

preferred

variety) (Q)

Area sown (ha)

under the crop with

different varieties

Quality of

seed of

preferred

variety

(G/A/P)* Preferred

variety

Other

varietie

s

A Purchase from outside:

- From Private dealer 20000-25000

buds

100 30 G

- From public sector - - - -

B Use of self produced seed:

- From own field 36000 buds 150 8 A

- From others field 25000 buds 50 - A

C Any other - - - -

Total 300 38

* G = Good A = Average P = Poor

- Approximate shortfall in the quantity of seed of preferred variety

in the village (Q):

- Willingness of farmers to produce seed of preferred variety for

commercial sale to other farmers (Y/N) :

- What are the kind of support / assistance required from outside

* Supply of foundation seed of parental lines (Y/N)

* Training on seed production and seed certification (Govt.) etc. (Y/N)

* Any other (specify)


TABLE No.52 B (7.1.2)


District: Kolhapur Village: Punal Tal. Panhala

Name of crop: Paddy Preferred variety:jaya,karjat,R-1

Agro-ecological situation: I

Sl.

No.

Source of seed

of preferred variety/

hybrid

Quantity of

seed used (of

preferred

variety) (Q)

Area sown (ha)

under the crop with

different varieties

Quality of

seed of

preferred

variety

(G/A/P)*

Preferred

variety

Other

varieties


- From Private dealer 2.5 3.75 8.00 G

- From public sector 1.5 10 - -


- From own field 20.40 40 17.20 A

- From others field - - -

C Any other - - - -

Total 24.40 53.75 25.20 * G = Good A = Average P = Poor

TABLE No. 52 C (7.1.3)


District: Kolhapur Village : Padavalwadi Tal. Karveer

Name of crop : PADDY Preferred variety : JAYA, SONAM,

R -24 Agro-ecological situation :II

Sl.

No.

Source of seed


Quantity of seed

used (of preferred

variety) (Q)

Area sown (ha)

under the crop with different

varieties

Quality of

seed of

preferred

variety

(G/A/P)*

Preferred

variety

Other

varieties


- From Private dealer 0.75 1.75 9.25 G

- From public sector 3.15 6.5 - G


- From own field 9.4 21.1 20.9 A

- From others field 0.75 1.75 - -

C Any other -

Total 14.05 31.1 30.15



TABLE No.52 D (7.1.4)


District:Kolhapur Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad

Name of crop :Paddy Preferred variety :Jaya, R 24, Indrayani Agro-ecological situation:III

Sl. No. Source of seed


Quantity of

seed used (of

preferred

variety) (Q)

Area sown (ha)

under the crop with

different varieties

Quality of seed

of

preferred

variety

(G/A/P)*

Preferred

variety

Other

varieties


- From Private dealer 35 58.30 G

- From public sector


- From own field 45 75.00 A

- From others field

C Any other

Total 80 133.30


TABLE No.52 E (7.1.5)


District :Kolhapur Village: Nagave Tal. Chandgad

Name of crop : Nagali Preferred variety :GPU 28 Agro-ecological situation :III



Quantity of seed

used (of preferred

variety) (Q)

Area sown (ha)

under the crop with

different varieties

Quality of

seed of

preferred

variety

(G/A/P)*

Preferred

variety

Other

varieties


- From Private dealer - - - -

- From public sector

B Use of self produced seed: - - - -

- From own field

- From others field

C Any other - - - -

Total



TABLE No. 52 F (7.1.6)


District: Kolhapur Village: Umalvad Tal. Shirol Name of crop: Sugarcane Preferred variety: Co-0265, Co-86032

Agro-ecological situation: IV



Quantity of seed used

(of preferred variety)

(Q)

Area sown (ha)

under the crop with

different varieties

Quality of

seed of

preferred

variety

(G/A/P)*

Preferred

variety

Other

varieties


- From Private dealer 40000-50000 buds 180 - G

- From public sector - - - -


- From own field 60% 58 70 A

- From others field 40% 80 48 A

C Any other - - - -

Total



VII. 3) A. STRATEGY FOR SEED REPLACEMENT RATIO

Apart from the seed rate , there is another concept of seed replacement ratio, which actually

means a quality seed in percentage terms which is used as a fresh seed each year for a given crop. The

hybrid crops, seed loses its vigor after one germination, the seed replacement ratio rate is always 100 %.

Seed replacement ratio for improved varieties like Paddy, groundnut, nagali & soybean in the district is

respectively.

The gap in adoption in seed replacement ratio AES wise is as follows.

Table No. 53 A (7.2.1)

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING PREFERRED

HORTICULTURAL PLANTING MATERIAL

CROP – MANGO

Sl.

No.

Sources of preferred planting

material of horticultural crops

Quantity of

planting

material used of

preferred

variety

Area sown (ha) under the

crop with different varieties

* Quality of

preferred

planting

material

required for the

district

Variety Area in

Ha.

A Purchase from outside

- from private nursery

- from public sector

150

350

KESHAR,

ALPHANSO

KESHAR

2ha

3ha

G

G

B Use of self produced planting

material

- from own field

- from other field

- - - -

C Any other - - - -

* Good A= Average

Table No. 53 B (7.2.2)

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING PREFERRED

HORTICULTURAL PLANTING MATERIAL

Crop- Guava, Variaty-L49

Sl.

No.

Sources of preferred planting

material of horticultural crops

Quantity of

planting

material used of

preferred

variety

Area sown (ha) under the

crop with different varieties

Quality of

preferred

planting

material

required for the

district

L49 G-vilas

A Purchase from outside

- from private nursery

- from public sector

277 Plant

60 Ha.

2 Ha.

G

B Use of self produced planting

material

- from own field

- from other field

-

-

-

-

C Any other - - - -

* Good A= Average


Table No. 54 A (7.2.3)

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR PROMOTING SUCCESS STORIES AND ITS REPLICATION

Title of success

story

Whether it

shall

Spread on its

own

(Y/-)

Reasons behind

Non-adoption of

Successful

Technology *

Type of

Recommendation

Proposed

Strategy

**

Sugarcane Per

acare 100me/ tonn

yield

Seed treatment , Drip

irrigation, Fertigation

INM& IPM, Training,

Demonstrations, Farm visit

Demostraton & training Seed

treatment , Drip irrigation,

Fertigation INM& IPM,

Training , Demonstrations,

Farm visit

Y

Lack of awareness

& knowledge

Paddy Y Lack of awareness

& knowledge

Use improved variety,use

improved plantation

methods, Fertigation

INM& IPM,

Demostraton & training Use

improved variety,use improved

plantation method, Fertigation

INM& IPM,

Table No. 54 B (7.2.4)


Title of success

story

Whether it

shall spread

on its own

(Y/-)

Reasons behind

non-adoption of

successful

technology *

Type of

recommendation

Proposed strategy

**

Honye bee rearing Y - Training, Exposure

Visits, Demonstrations

Training, Exposure

Visits, Demonstrations


Table No. 54 C (7.2.5)


Title of success

story

Whether it

shall

Spread on

its own

(Y/-)

Reasons

behind

Non-

adoption of

Successful

Technology

*

Type of

Recommendation

Proposed

Strategy

**

1 Sugarcane Per

acare 150 tonn

yield

Y -


irrigation, Fertigation INM&

IPM,


Farm visit



IPM,


Farm visit

2 Guava Y -

Use improved variety, High

Density plantation Drip


IPM,

Use improved variety, High

Density plantation Drip


IPM,

3 Banana

Imported Fruit

quality

Y -

Use of tissue culture plant Drip


IPM,

Ripening Chamber,chips

production

Use of tissue culture plant Drip


IPM,

Ripening Chamber,chips

production

4 Tomato

production Y -

Use hybrid variety Drip


IPM

Use hybrid variety Drip


IPM

Table No. 55 A (7.2.6)

PROPOSED STRATEGY FOR MANAGEMENT OF LAND AND WATER RESOURCES

Agro-ecological situation: I Representative village : Punal District :Kolhapur

Sl.

No.

Problems

Severity of

problems

(H/M/L)

Units

affected

Root cause

of the

problem

Proposed

technological /

management

solutions

1 Degradation of private land resource

- Fallow land H H H -

- Gully cources M M M -

- Rill erosion M M M -

- Salinity / alkalinity / acidity - - - Soil testing

- Perennial weed H H H Chemical &

mechanical

control - Water logging L L L -

- Cultivated land M M M -

2 Degradation of common land resource

- Gully erosion - - - -

- Destruction of tree component - - - -

3 Loss of surplus run off from the village - - - -


Table No. 55 B (7.2.7)


Agro-ecological situation :II Representative village : Padavalwadi District :Kolhapur

Sl.

No

.

Problems

Severity of

problems

(H/M/L)

Units

affected

Root cause

of the

problem

Proposed

technological /

management

solutions

1 Degradation of private land

resource

- Fallow land - - - -

-

-

- Gully cources - - - -

- Rill erosion - - - -

- Salinity / alkalinity / acidity M M M SOIL

TESTING - Perennial weed M M M

- Water logging L L L

- Cultivated land H H H

2 Degradation of common land

resource



3 Loss of surplus run off from the

village

- - - -


Table No. 55 C (7.2.8)


Agro-ecological situation :III Representative village : Nagave District :Kolhapur

Sl. No. Problems

Severity of

problems

(H/M/L)

Units

affect

ed

Root

cause

of the

problem

Proposed

technological /

management

solutions

1 Degradation of private land resource

- Fallow land H H H -

-

-

- Gully cources M M M -

- Rill erosion M M M -

- Salinity / alkalinity / acidity - - - Soil testing

- Perennial weed H H H Chemical &

mechanical

control - Water logging L L L -


2 Degradation of common land resource


- Destruction of tree component M M M M

M Loss of surplus run off from the

village M M M M


Table No. 55 D (7.2.9)


Agro-ecological situation :IV Representative village : Umalvad District: Kolhapur

Sl. No. Problems

Severity of

problems

(H/M/L)

Units

affected

Root

cause

of the

problem

Proposed

technological /

management

solutions

1 Degradation of private land

resource

- Fallow land - - - -

-

-

- Gully cources - - - -

- Rill erosion - - - -

- Salinity / alkalinity / acidity M M M Soil testing

- Perennial weed H H H

Chemical & mechanical

control

- Water logging L L L -


2 Degradation of common land

resource



3 Loss of surplus run off from the

village - - - -


Table No. 56 A (7.2.10)

ISSUES FOR POLICY CONSIDERATION IN AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED SECTORS

District: Kolhapur Village : Punal Tal. Panhala Agro-ecological situation: I

Sl.

No. Issue / problem

Proposed

policy intervention Modality for implementation

1 Micro irrigation 1.Subcidy Problem

2.electricity

3.Machanisation

4. Use of solar system

Subsidy in time

12 hours electricity supply

Training to dealers and farmers

Policy decision at Govt. level

2. Farm Machanisation 1. Subcidy Problem

2. inAvailability Of Agril tools and

Machinary

3.Land Holders Farmer are low

Provide subsidy to specific tools.

Machinery bank at circle level.

3. Market price 1.Non giving And Declaration fixed

Market price in local Market

Give market rate as per

production cost.

4 Sugarcane pest white Grub Chemical & Mechanical control Give Training on the basis of

INM & IPM

5 Fodder Development Silagepits, Azola, Hydroponic Method Give training demonstration,

exposure visit.

Table No. 56 B (7.2.11)


District : Kolhapur Village : Padavalwadi Agro-ecological situation: II

Sl.

No. Issue / problem

Proposed

policy intervention

Modality for

implementation

1 Marketing Chain Market Instability, fluctuations of market

rate.

Provide infrastructure facility at

rural level.

2 Jaggery Market Price Declaration of fixed market price. MSP as per production cost

Table No. 56 C (7.2.12)


District :Kolhapur Village :Nagve Agro-ecological situation:-III

Sl.

No. Issue / problem

Proposed

policy intervention

Modality for

implementation

1. Micro irrigation 1.Subcidy Problem

2.electricity

3.Machanisation

4. Use of solar system

Subsidy in time

12 hours electricity supply

Training to dealers and farmers

Policy decision at Govt. level

2. Farm Machanisation 1. Subcidy Problem


Machinary

3.Land Holders Farmer are low

Provide subsidy to specific

tools.

Machinery bank at circle level.


Market price in local Market

MSP as per production cost


Table No. 56 D (7.2.13)


District: Kolhapur Village : Umalvad Tal. Shirol Agro-ecological situation: IV

Sl.

No. Issue / problem

Proposed

policy intervention Modality for implementation

1 Micro irrigation 1.Dely Subcidy Problem

2.electricity

3.Machanisation

1.Provide subcidy in Time

2. 12Hour Electricty

3.Training to dealer& Farmer

2. Farm Machanisation 1.Subcidy Problem


Machinary

1.Provide subcidy to specific

Farm tools


Market price in local and Foregin Market

1.Give Fixed Market rate as per

production cost.

4 Sugarcane pest white Grub Biological & Mechanical control Give Training on the basis of

INM& IPM,

5 Banana Public Private Partnarship Creat Jointly adoption of Farmer

Public Private Partnarship

6 Fodder Development Silagepits, Azola, Hydroponic Method Give Training, Demonstration,

Field visit

7 Real time database at village

level

Data availability facility at village level Provide all IT facility at

grampanchyat level.

8 Remote sensing technology Technology of assessment of crop

damage and area validation

Provide facility through

MRSAC policy decession at

Govt. level

9 Details of fertilizer use

efficiency

Instruction tag on fertilizer bag regarding

efficient use of fertilizer printing on

packing.

Modification of FCO, policy

decession at Govt. level.


VII. 3) B STRATEGIES FOR SEED REPLACEMENT AND ORGANIZING

SEED VILLAGE SCHEME IN KOLHAPUR DISTRICT

Sr.

No.

Name of

crop

Total seed

requirement

(Qtl)

Demand

as per

projected

(Qt.)

Availability

(Qt.) SRR

norms

Deficit

(Qt.) Strategies (Qt.)

1 Paddy

Scheme 57000 17000 14327 2773

1. Organizing seed village.

2. Encouraging SHGs & NGOs go

for seed bank.

2 Nagali

Scheme 708 212 0 212



for seed bank. Encouraging private

seed suppliers.

3 Groundnut

Scheme 47227 14168 1351 12817



for seed bank.

4 Soyabean

Scheme 35115 10535 8991 1544



for seed bank.


VII. 4. STRATEGIES FOR HORTICULTURAL PLANTING MATERIALS IN

KOLHAPUR DISTRICT (12-13)

Sr.

No.

Name of

fruit crop

Total graft

requirement Availability Deficit Strategies

1 Mango 34,158 38,412 - -

2 Cashew

nut 109,236 73,000 36236

Encouraging Govt. & private nurseries for

grafting.

3 Coconut 18,779 22,563 - -

4 Chiku 10868 26,326 - -

5 Guava 10000 8000 2000 -

6 Banana 1500000 2900000 - -

VII. 5. MARKETING & MARKETING STRATEGIES

For years, it has been noted that in the farm sector , marketing has been receiving a last

priority than production. Even though the potential contributions which efficient marketing can make

the overall development of agriculture sector & allied sector has been realized. The govt. Investment

in agriculture marketing has been insignificant proportion. Production goes up when farmers are

assured of remunerative market. This is clear from our experience in the commodities like tomato,

soybean, paddy, Transportation, processing, storage, & marketing intelligence are few vital elements

of an efficient marketing system.

So farmer need to know answer to question like what to produce, when to produced, quantity

of production, how to sell, place of selling, price of the produce, quality of a product.

Sr.

No. Taluka

Storage Structures Markets (Numbers)

Rural Godowns Cold Storage Onion Storage Main Market

Sub

Market Nos. Capacity Nos. Capacity Nos. Capacity

1 Karveer 105 20700 0 0 35 14900 1 5

2 Kagal 70 12500 0 0 0 0 0 4

3 Radhanagari 49 9800 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Gaganbavada 9 950 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Shahuwadi 19 3400 0 0 0 0 0 1

6 Panhala 79 28450 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Hatkangale 74 15500 0 0 0 0 1 4

8 Shirol 57 23350 3 76.5 0 0 1 1

9 Gadhinglaj 57 15000 0 0 0 0 1 3

10 Bhudargad 29 8000 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 Chandgad 51 13750 0 0 0 0 0 1

12 Ajara 30 3750 0 0 0 0 0 2

Total 629 155150 3 76.5 35 14900 4 21

MARKETING STRATEGIES

1. Change the attitude of farmers for to produce as per demand of consumer first & sell next.

2. Exposure visit of farmers to distant markets, farmer producer companies, private markets.

3. Providing market survey & marketing intelligence service to farmers.

4. Encouraging SHGs to create market facilities local for their products

5. Training & demonstration for farmers about value addition.

6. Training of branding, packing, grading, storage, & Primary

7. Direct marketing of Agri., Horticulture produce.

8. Creation of farmers producer company/organization.

9. Awareness of organic produce and marketing.

10. Providing market infrastructure at taluka level.


VII. 6 Farmers Producers Organization.

Farmers Producer Organization is a legal form of the company. In 2002 an Act was passed in

parliament and this legal form was created. It takes the care of flaws in the cooperative societies but keeps it

strengths. It has also borrowed the strengths of the corporate companies. According to this new law, only farmer

producers can be members of the FPO and the farmer members themselves will manage this company. Paid staff

can be employed to help the famer producers to run the FPO These FPCs will be promoted by the farmers and

will be run by the farmers and for the benefits of the farmers. Over the year the surplus would be shared among

the farmers only.

This FPO is being established so that it can improve returns to farmers through several ways such as

collective input purchase, collective marketing, processing increasing productivity through better inputs,

increasing knowledge of farmers and ensuring quality with equality principle.

In the Kolhapur districts 22 clusters are identified for the FPO out of those FPOs would run properly

according to their progress which we have assessed. Those sixteen FPOs are listed as Pargaon, Sajni, Adkur,

Dhanoli, Kasbe Walva, Nandni, Sawarde, Kasarwadi, Tamdalge, Tkawade, Kapsi, Ajra, uttur, Pimpalgaon,

Kadgaon and Megholi. Out of those 22 clusters, 9 FPOs will be on Soyabean crop, 5 would be on Rice, 3 would

be on vegetables, 2 on Cashew, 2 on Livestock and one is one Ragi.

These FPOs have great and very beneficiary future ahed. Earlier India was the agriculture based

country but now days it becomes India as a Agrarian society. This is the main reason for scarcity of food grains.

Population is increasing hugely day by day but on the other agricultural land is decreasing. Here FPOs would

play major role to maintain such ratio and cycle of demand and supply. Farmers will spend less money on

cultivation and harvesting and will get reasonable price for their production through the FPOs. Along with this

they will get easily market access beside this it will impact on farmers well being, it will help to maintain

lifestyle. The main benefit is farmers may become a traders.

VII. 7. PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

The green revolution in India is happened as a result of public sector research &extension.

Yet there are more new challenges in terms of relevance, accountability & sustainability in agriculture

extension. The public extension system is not sufficient to fulfill all the requirements of the

agriculture system. The private sector like agro service center, input dealers NGOs, ACABC are

playing role in agriculture extension. Opportunity for PPPIAD for following commodities.

1. PPPIAD – Paddy, 2. PPPIAD – Banana, 3. PPPIAD – Potato, 4 PPPIAD – Sugarcane 5. PPPIAD –

Sericulture, 6. PPPIAD – Cage culture in fishiries.

PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP STRATEGIES

1. Training of farmers in organic farming certification & marketing

2. Training on organic farming to extension workers & farmers

3. Create awareness about organic farming

4. Market linkage for organic produce

5. Cultivating the hybrid rice varieties

6. Exposure visit to the hitech floriculture.

VII. 8. BURNING PROBLEMS IN THE DISTRICT KOLHAPUR

1) Elephant & Bison menance in AES II, & AES III causing heavily damages to agriculture crops &

horticultural crops.

2) Fear of loss of crops due flood condition occurred during rainy season.

3) Electricity laod shedding causes decrease in yield of crop.

4) Outbreak of White Grubs infestation in all AES.


Extension is last but not the least important input for agricultural development. Agricultural

extension worker who are supposed to visit farmers at regular intervals & enlightened them on recent

development in agriculture & get a feed back on problems being faced by them with present crop

situation. It must be the extension machinery is well functioning & to the best of its capability.

Capacity building of extension workers is being taken up. These extension workers & farmers

should be trained at following Agricultural University, KVK, Agri - Poly clinics situated in the

District.

1. Regional Agriculture Extension Management Training Institute, Kolhapur

2. Agricultural Research Centre, Radhanagari, & Gadhinglaj Dist. Kolhapur

3. KVK, Talasande Tal- Hatkanagale Dist.- Kolhapur

4. Sugarcane & Jaggery Research station, Kolhapur

5. Agri Poly clinics At Jayasingpur, Tal- Shirol

6. Agri Poly clinics At Radhanagari

7. Agri Poly clinics At Gadhinglaj

8. Agri Poly clinics At Shirgaon Tal- Chandgad

9. Agri Poly clinics At Ajra.

10. Human Development Centre, Talsande, Tal. Hatkanangale,

11. Human Development Centre, Nivde, Tal. Gaganbawada.

12. Farm information and advisory centre, Ajara.

13. District Farmers Information and Advisory Centre and ATMA Office, Chalisthana,

Kasba Bawada, Kolhapur.

14. Farm information and advisory center for each taluka.

15. Government Office infrastructure at each taluka and Sub Division level.

16. Krishi Bhavan and Common Service cum FIAC at District level for Agriculture and allied

Department.

CHAPTER VIII. STRATEGIES FOR HUMAN RESOURCE

DEVELOPMENT


Proposed extension strategy for human resource management

Sr

No

.

Depar-

tment

Strategy for

development Training need

Cadre of

participant

Topic of

training

No. of

trai-

ning

Name of the

institution for

training

1

Agriculture

1. Paddy

A. To promote &

make farmer aware

of 4 point

cultivation

programme and use

of high yielding

varieties.

A. Create

awareness

about 4 point

cultivation of

paddy, package

of practices

Farmers 4 point

cultivation

&package

of practices

180 ARC,Radhanagari,

Gadhinglaj, Manav

Vikas Kendra,

Talsande, Nivade

FIAC, Ajara,

Karveer,

DTC,Kolhapur

B. Seed production

technology

B. Create

awareness

Agril.

Supervisors/

Agril. Asst.

BTM/ATM

Seed

production

technique

5 Agriculture

college, Kolhapur

C. PPP mode paddy

production

technology.

1. Processing

2. GI Crops

3. One variety in

One Mandal or

Circle

Create

awareness

1. Processing

Farmers

2. Agril.

Supervisors/

Agril. Asst.

BTM/ATM

3.

Agril.Officer

/Agril.

Supervisors/

Agril. Asst.

BTM/ATM

1. Paddy

Processing

2. GI of

different

crops and

enterprises.

3. Area

expansion

of single

variety

50

50

50

Agriculture

college, Kolhapur

FIAC.

RAMEI, Kolhapur

RAMEI, Kolhapur

D. Marketing and

PHT technology

Grading, Packging,

Branding, Marketing

Create

awareness

Farmers. Marketing

and PHT,

Branding,

Packging

50 Agriculture

college, Kolhapur

KVK, Talsande

E. Farm Waste

Management

technology

dissemination.

Create

awareness

Farmers. Farm

Waste

Manageme

nt

50 Agriculture

college, Kolhapur

KVK, Talsande

2. Sugarcane

A. Promotion of

sugarcane nursery

plantation and

intercropping.

Create

awareness

about organic

cultivation of

sugarcane

Farmers Organic

cultivation

of

sugarcane

100 Sugarcane &

Jaggery Research

Station, Kolhapur

& DTC

Jaysingpur.

B. Promotion of

marketing for

organic products

from jaggery

Create

awareness

about demand

of organic

products &

their marketing

Farmers Marketing

of organic

products

25 Sugarcane &

Jaggery Research

Station, Kolhapur

& DTC

Jaysingpur.

C. Promotion of

adoption of package

of practices & IPM

Create

awareness aout

package of

practices

Farmers &

A.S./ A.A.

BTM/ATM

Cultivation

of

sugarcane

25 Agril college &

Sugarcane &

Jaggery Research

Station, Kolhapur

D. Production of

Sustainable

Sugarcane initative

Create

awareness aout

package of

practices

Farmer Cultivation

of

sugarcane

290 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, APC, DTC

Kolhapur


Sr

No

Depar-

tment

Strategy for


Cadre of

partic-

ipant

Topic of

training

No. of

training

Name of the

institution for

training

Agri-

culture

E. Promotion of EDP

on Sugarcane nursery.

Create

awareness

Farmer Employment

generation

programme

300 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, APC,

DTC Kolhapur

F. Promotion of Jaggery

value addition and

marketing.

Create

awareness

Farmer Jaggery

value

addition

100 RSRS, Kolhapur

G. Promotion of

Sugarcane ratoon

management

Create

awareness

Farmer Ratoon

management

300 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, APC,

DTC Kolhapur

H. Promotion of

Sugarcane Trash Mulch

Management and use of

farm residues in

recycling

Create

awareness about

trash

management

Farmer Trash

management

and carbon

credit.

30 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, APC,

DTC Kolhapur

3. Soybean

A. Promotion of seed

village programme

Create

awareness about

seed production

technique

Farmer

Seed

production

technique

25 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, DTC Kop.

B. Promotion of

adoption of IPM

Create

awareness about

adoption of IPM

Farmer

IPM

technology

in soybean

10 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, DTC Kop.

C. Promotion of INM

and IPM

Create

awareness about

cultivation

practices of

Soybean

Farmer

package of

practices of

nagali

25 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, DTC

Kolhapur

D. Promotion of

Soyabean processing

and value addition.

Create

awareness

Farmer Processing

and value

addition

200 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, DTC Kop.

4. Nagali

To promote the farmer

to use high yielding

varieties & adoption of

package of practices &

value addition.

Create

awareness about

package of

practices

Farmer

package of

practices of

nagali

50 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, DTC

Kolhapur

5. Groundnut

A. Promotion of seed

village programme

Create

awareness about

seed production

Farmer &

Extension

worker

Seed

production

technique

20 KVK, FIAC,

DTC Kop Manav

Vikas Kendra

Talasande,

B. Promotion of

package of practices

Create

awareness about

package of

practices

Farmer package of

practices of

groundnut

30 Agro poly clinics

of FIAC

C. Promotion and HPC

technology for value

addition.

Create

awareness

Farmer HPC

Technology.

25 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, DTC Kop.

D. Processing of

Ground nut, Gound nut

milk, Paneer etc.

Create

awareness

Farmer Groundnut

processing

and value

addition.

25 All Agri.

Polyclinic of

FIAC, DTC

Kolhapur


Sr

No

Depar-

tment

Strategy for


Cadre of

participa

nt

Topic of

training

No. of

trai-

ning

Name of the

institution for

training

2 Horticulture 1. Cashew nut

A. Promotion of

cashew processing

& marketing.

Create awareness

about value

addition of

cashew nut.

FIGs &

extension

worker

Cashew

processing

&

marketing

20 ARC, Vengurla,

& Agril college,

Kolhapur

B. Adoption of

improved package

of practices

Create awareness

about improved

package of

practices.

Farmer Cultivation

of cashew

nut crop

50 Agri poly

clinics,

C. Promotion of

improved practices

for insitu

cultivation.

Create awareness

about improved

package of

practices.

Farmer In-situ

cultivation

of Cashew

nut

50 ARC, Vengurla,

& Agril college,

Kolhapur

D. PPP mode

cashew cultivation,

processing and

marketing.

Create awareness Farmer Cashew

processing

and

marketing

50 ARC, Vengurla,

& Agril college,

Kolhapur

2. Vegetable

A. Promotion of

vegetable

cultivation in

sheding net.

Create awareness

about cultivation

of vegetable.

Farmer

Cultivation

of vegetable

in sheding

net.

10 KVK, Agri poly

clinics,

B. Promotion of

sustainable

cultivation of

vegetables.

Create awareness Farmer Sustainable

cultivation

of

vegetables.

10 KVK, Agri poly

clinics, Agri

Collage.

C. Promotion of

precision farming.

Create awareness Farmer Precision

farming.

10 KVK, Agri poly

clinics, Agri

Collage.

D. Promotion of

vegetable marketing

through direct

marketing and

Agriculture mall

concept.

Create awareness

about direct

marketing.

Farmer

groups

Direct

Marketing

50 MCED,

Kolhapur

All Agri.

Clinics.

3. Banana

A. Promotion of

cultivation of

Banana

Create awareness

about cultivation

of Banana

Farmer

Cultivation

of Banana

10 KVK, Agri poly

clinics,

B. PPP made

technology and

marketing.

Create awareness Farmer Marketing 25 KVK, Agri poly

clinics,

4. Floriculture

Promotion of open

& green house

cultivation

Create awareness

about new

technologies of

flower

cultivation

Farmer

Open house

& green

house

technology

for

floriculture

10 District training

center,

Jaysingpur

5. Promotion of

Hitech floriculture

production and

value addition.

Create awareness

about hitech

technologies of

floriculture

cultivation

Farmer Hitech

floriculture

10 HTC, Pune.


Sr

No

Depar-

tment

Strategy for


Cadre

of

particip

ant

Topic of

training

No. of

trai-

ning

Name of the

institution for

training

3 Soil &

water

conserva-

tion

A. Promotion of drip

irrigation

Create

awareness about

drip irrigation

Farmers Micro

irrigation

15 District training

center,

Jaysingpur &

agro poly clinics

B. Promotion of

reclamation of

problematic soils.

Create

awareness about

problematic

soils

Farmer Reclamation

of

problematic

soils.

10 College of

agriculture,

Kolhapur

C. Promotion of

community drip on

Lift Irrigation.

Create

awareness

Farmers Community

drip irrigation.

25 College of

agriculture,

Kolhapur

D. Watershed

management aspects

as per land

capability

classification and

watershed, Jalyukta

Shivar Concept.

Create

awareness

Farmers Watershed

management

25 College of

agriculture,

Kolhapur

E. Promotion of

diversion bandara

for natural in

western ghat taluka.

Create

awareness

Farmers Diversion

bandara

25 College of

agriculture,

Kolhapur

4 Animal

Husbandry

1. Promotion of

vaccination of cattle

Create

awareness on

vaccination for

prevention of

disease of cattle.

Farmers Vaccination

of cattle

25 KVK, Kolhapur,

college of

agriculture,

Kolhapur

2. Promotion of

Fodder production

Create

awareness about

nutrition in

cattle

Farmers Fodder

production

15 KVK, Kolhapur,

college of

agriculture,

Kolhapur 3. Promotion of

vaccination

programme in goat

& sheep

Create

awareness on

vaccination for

prevention of

disease of cattle

Farmers Vaccination

of Goat &

Sheep

25 KVK, Kolhapur,

college of

agriculture,

Kolhapur

4. Promotion of

poultry both back

yard as well as

contract farming.

Create

awareness

Farmers Contract

farming.

25 Veterinary

training centre,

Kolhapur

5 Sericulture Promotion of

sericulture in the

District.

Create

awareness about

sericulture

cultivation

Farmers Sericulture 30 KVK, & Dy.

Dir. Sericulture,

Shivaji

University.


Sr

No

Depart-

ment

Strategy for


Cadre

of

particip

ant

Topic of

training

No. of

trai-

ning

Name of the

institution for

training

6 Fisheries 1. Promotion of

fisheries in the

District.

Create

awareness about

aquaculture in

saline soils.

Farmers Aqua culture

in saline soils

20 KVK, Fisheries

dept.

2. Use of small,

medium and major

irrigation project for

fishiculture through

cage rearing

technology.

Create

awareness

Farmers Cage rearing. 30 Fisheries

Department.

7 Social

forestry

1. Promotion of

plantation of

medicinal &

aromatic plants on

waste land

Create

awareness about

cultivation of

medicinal &

aromatic plants.

Farmers Cultivation of

medicinal &

aromatic

plants.

10 KVK, social

Forestry dept.

2. PPP mode

Bamboo plantation,

processing, value

addition and

marketing of

Bamboo furniture

and crafts.

Create

awareness

Farmers Bamboo

plantation,

processing,

value addition

and marketing

10 Social forestry

department.

Coneback

Centre, Kudal.

Dist.

Sindhudurg.

8 Apiculture 1. Promotion of

Apiculture

production in

District.

Create

awareness about

Appiculture

production.

Farmers Apiculture 20 KVK, Shivaji

University,

Kolhapur

2. Honey processing

and marketing.

Create

awareness

Farmers Honey

processing

and

marketing.

20 Shivaji

University,

Kolhapur.NGO,

Panhala.


The following feasible extension strategies have been proposed based on the analysis of

data collected through PRA & related issues, problems in the Kolhapur District.

A. PROPOSED EXTENSION STRATEGIES

Name of

Enterprise

Strategies

proposed

for Extension

Extension

Thrust area Activity

proposed Unit size

Cost per

unit Rs.

No. of

units

Total cost

Rs. In

Lakhs

I. Agriculture crops

1. Paddy

(rainfed)

A. To promote

& make

farmers aware

of use of 4-

point

technology

Create

awareness

about

improved

cultivation of

paddy.

1. Training

2. Method

demonstration

3. Exposure

visit

50 Farmers

1

50 Farmers

12500

4000

20000

180

2500

10

22.50

100.00

2.00

B. Promotion

of seed

production of

high yielding

variety of

paddy.

Create

awareness

about seed

production

technology of

paddy

1. Method

demonstration

2. FFS

1

1

4000

29414

1000

100

40.00

29.41

C. To promote

the farmers

towards

adoption of

IPM

Create

awareness

about IPM

technology.

Method

demonstration

1 1250 20 0.25

C. PPP mode

paddy

production

technology.

1. Processing

2- GI Crops

3. One variety

in One Mandal

One Circle

Create

awareness of

processing.

Method

demonstration

2000 Acre. 4000 20 80.00

D. Marketing

and PHT

technology

Grading,

Packging,

Branding,

Marketing

Create

awareness of

packaging,

grading.

Method

demonstration

100

Groups

750000 10 75.00

E. Farm Waste

Management

technology

dissemination.

Create

awareness

Method

demonstration

100

Groups

4000 100 40.00

CHAPTER IX. ACTVITY SCHEDULE FOR THE IDENTIFIED

EXTENSION & RESEARCH STRATEGIES


Name of

Enterprise

Strategies

proposed

for Extension

Extension


proposed Unit size

Cost per

unit Rs.

No. of

units

Total cost

Rs. In

Lakhs

2. Soybean

(Rainfed)

A. To promote

the the farmer

for adoption of

IPM

technology &

advanced

techno- lodical

practices

Create

awareness

about IPM

technology&

package of

practices.

1. Training

2. Method

demonstration

3. FFS

50 Farmers

1

1

12500

1250

29414

25

10

50

3.125

0.125

14.70

B. To promote

seed

production

prog-ramme

on farmers

field.

Create

awareness

about seed

production

technology of

paddy

1. Training

2. Method

demonstration

3. FFS

50 Farmers

1

1

12500

4000

29414

25

500

50

3.125

20.00

14.70

C. Promotion

and HPC

technology for

value addition.

Create

awareness

Method

demonstration

20 Farmer

group

4000 200 8.00

D. Processing

of Ground nut,

Gound nut

milk, Paneer

etc.

Create

awareness

Method

demonstration

20 Farmer

group

4000 100 4.00

3. Sugarcane

A. To promote

farmer the

farmer for

adoption of

IPM &

improved

package of

practices

Create

awareness

about IPM

technology&

package of

practices.

1. Training

2. Method

demonstration

3. Exposure

visit

4. FFS

50 Farmers

1

50 Farmers

50 Farmers

30 Farmers

12500

1250

20000

40000

29414

100

100

15

10

100

12.50

1.25

3.00

4.00

29.41

B. To promote

farmer

regarding the

use of organic

farming

Create

awareness

about organic

farming &

marketing

1. Training

2. Method

demonstration

3. FFS

50 Farmers

1

30 Farmers

12500

4000

29414

100

500

100

12.50

20.00

29.41

C. Promotion

of marketing

of organic

products from

jaggery

Create

awareness

about demand

of the organic

products of

sugarcane

1. Training

2. Method

demonstration

3. Formation

of FIGs

4. Rewards &

incentives

5. Exposure

visit

6. Farm

School

50 Farmers

1

1

1

50 Farmers

50 Farmers

12500

4000

5000

20000

20000

40000

25

15

50

25

50

25

3.12

50.60

2.50

5.00

10.00

10.00

4. Nagali A. To promote

the farmer for

adoption of

improved

package of

practices

1. Create

awareness

about seed

production

technology of

Nagali.

1. Training

2. Method

demonstration

3. Exposure

visit

4. Formation

of FIGs

5. Seed

money

50 Farmer

1

50 Farmer

50 Farmer

1

12500

4000

20000

5000

10000

20

20

10

10

10

2.50

0.80

2.00

0.50

1.00


Name of

Enterprise

Strategies

proposed

for Extension

Extension


proposed Unit size

Cost per

unit Rs.

No. of

units

Total

cost Rs.

In Lakhs

5.

Groundnut

A. To promote

the farmer for

adoption of

improved

package of

practices

1. Create

awareness

about

improved

cultivation

technology of

G.Nut.

1. Training 2.

Method

demonstration 3.

Exposure visit

50 Farmer

1

20

12500

4000

40000

20

50

5

2.50

2.00

2.00

B. To promote

farmer for

seed

production.

1. Create

awareness

about seed

production

technology of

G.Nut.

1. Training 2.

Method

demonstration 3.

Exposure visit

4. Farm School

50 Faremrs

1

50 Faremrs

62500

4000

40000

10

20

5

6.25

0.80

2.00

6. Kh. Jowar A. To promote

the farmer for

adoption of

improved

processing

technology.

Create

awareness

about

improved

cultivation

technology of

Kh. Jowar.

Method

demonstration

FFS

1

30

4000

29414

25

25

1.00

7.35

H. Horticultural crops

1. Cashew

nut

A. Promotion

of cashew

processing &

marketing.

Create

awareness

about value

addition of

cashew nut.

1. Training

2. Exposure

Visit 3.

Formation of

FIGs

4. Rewards &

incentives

5. Seed money

25

Farmers

50

Farmers

1

1

1

25000

20000

5000

20000

10000

25

10

100

25

25

6.25

2.00

5.00

5.00

2.50

B. Adoption of

improved

package of

practices

Create

awareness

about

improved

package of

practices.

Method

demonstration

Farm School

1

30

4000

29414

100

100

4.00

29.41

2. Vegetable A. Promotion

of cultivation

of tomato

Create

awareness

about

cultivation of

tomato

1. Method

demonstration 2.

Exposure visit

3. Training

4. FFS

1

25

Farmers

25

Farmers

30

4000

20000

6250

29414

100

5

10

50

4.00

1.00

0.625

14.70

3. Banana Promotion of

cultivation of

Banana

Create

awareness

about

cultivation of

banana &

water

management

1. Training

2. FFS

50

Farmers

50

Farmers

12500

29414

20

20

2.50

5.88


Name of

Enterprise

Strategies

proposed for

Extension

Extension


proposed Unit size

Cost per

unit Rs.

No. of

units

Total

cost Rs.

In Lakhs

4.

Floriculture

Promotion of

open & green

house

cultivation

Create

awareness

about new

technologies

of flower

cultivation

1. Training

2. Exposure

Visit

25

Farmers

25

Farmers

25000

20000

10

10

2.50

2.00

III. Animal Husbandry

1. Cows &

Buffalos

1.To promote

the farmer

about breed up

gradation in

local cows &

buffalos

Create

awareness

about

increasing

yield of milk

by breed up

gradation

1. Training

2. Organization

of A.I.Camp 3.

Exposure Visit

4. Formation of

FIGs 5.

Rewards &

incentives

25

Farmers

1

25

Farmers

1

1

6250

20000

5000

20000

50

10

20

5

3.125

2.00

1.00

1.00

2. To promote

the farmer

about good

quality fodder

production

Create

awareness

about nutritive

fodder

production

1. Training 2.

Method

demonstration

25

Farmers

1

25000

4000

20

100

5.00

4.00

3. To promote

farmer about

the diseases of

cattle

Create

awareness

about

vaccination in

cattle

1. Organization

of vaccination

camp

50

Farmers

10000 20 2.00

4. Promotion

of new

technologies

of milk

production

Create

awareness

about

improving milk

production

1. Exposure visit

2. Rewards &

incentives

25

Farmers

10000 20 2.00

5.

Popularization

of milk

producers

society

Organizing

farmers groups

for better

market in

linkage

1. Formation of

FIGs 2. Seed

money 3.

Reward &

incentives

25

Farmers

25

Farmers

25

Farmers

10000

10000

10000

20

20

20

2.00

2.00

2.00

2. Goat &

Sheep

1. To promote

the farmers

about breed up

gradation in

local goats &

sheep

1.Create

awareness

about breed up

gradation in

goats & sheep

1. Training 2.

Exposure visit

3. Farm School

25

Framers

25

Farmers

10000

10000

29414

20

20

50

2.00

2.00

5.88

2. To promote

the farmer

about

vaccination in

goats & sheep

Create

awareness

about diseases

of goats &

sheep

1.Organisation

of vaccination

camp

50

Farmers

20000 10 2.00

3. Poultry To promote

about back

yard poultry.

Create

awareness

about back

yard poultry

production.

1. Training 2.

Exposure visit

3. Farm School

50

Farmers

4000 100 4.00


Name of

Enterprise

Strategies

proposed for

Extension

Extension


proposed Unit size

Cost per

unit Rs.

No. of

units

Total

cost Rs.

In Lakhs

IV. Fisheries

1.Promotion of

aquaculture in

salinity

affected soils.

2. Promotion of

bankers support

to fisheries as a

business

reate

awareness

about the fish

pond

cultivation

Create

awareness

about

financial

assistance by

banks

1. Exposure visit

2. On farm trial

1. Training

2. Farm School

20

1

1

32000

50000

8500

4

3

4

1.28

1.50

0.34

V. Extension management Unit

size

Cost per unit

Rs. In Lakhs

No. of

units

Total cost

Rs. In Lakhs

I. Farmer oriented activities a Developing Strategic Research & Extension

plan

1. One day training to Agril., & line dept

officer

2. Orientation to BTT members

3. Printing of SREP

1 1.50 1 1.50

b Mobilization of farmers, Groups-FIG/WIG/FOs/ COs/FCs

a. Their capacity building, skill development

& support services

20 0.05 1200 60.00

b. Seed money / Revolving fund 20 0.10 200 20.00

c Reward/ Incentives to best organized groups

representing different enterprises 5 Groups

20 0.20 150 30.00

II. Farm Information Dissemination

a District level exhibition, kisan melas,

Fruits/ vegetables shows

1 4.00 15 60.00

b Information dissemination through printed

leaflets etc & local advertisement, PPT,

Apps.

1 4.00 15 60.00

c Development of technology packages on

electronic form to be shared through It

network

1 2.00 20 40.00


Name of

Enter-prise Strategies proposed for Extension

Unit

size

Cost per

unit Rs. In

Lakhs

No. of

units

Total cost

Rs. In

Lakhs

III. Agricultural Technology Refinement, Validation & Adoption

a Farmer Scientist Interactions at district

level

25 0.40 20 8.00

b Joint visits by scientists and extension

workers

1 0.29 25 7.50

c 25 farmers for 2 days

Organization of field days & Kisan Gosthis

to strengthen

1 0.15 120 18.00

d Research- Extension - Farmer linkage

(1 per block in each season)

Assessment, refinement, Validation &

adoption of front-line technologies & other

short term researchable issues through

KVKs & other local research centers

1 2.50 25 62.50

IV. Administrative / capital expenses

a Establishment of ATMA a. Recurring

i) TA/ DA

1 7.80 5 39.00

iii) Hiring of vehicles 1 5.00 5 25.00

b. Non recurring Equipments (Comp. etc.) - 2.00 15 30.00

b Operational expenses exclusively for block

level 1 0.30 60 18.00

c Farm schools 1 0.29414 250 73.53

V. Innovative Activities a Implementation of Extension activities

through agri-preneurs trained under agri-

clinic scheme.

1 0.05 500 25.00

b Support to district level training institution. 1 1.00 15 15.00

c Farmer friend 1 0.06 1204 72.24

d Innovative activities – District Component 1 0.50 60 30.00

VI. Innovative technology dissemination component.

a Display boards 1 0.02 1225 24.50

b Pico projector 1 0.30 30 9.00

c GPRS charges 50 2.50 250 12.50

d Kala jatha 1 0.10 250 25.00


B. PROPOSED RESEARCH STRATEGIES

Name of

Enterprise

Strategies

proposed for

Extension

Research


proposed

Unit

size

Cost

per unit

Rs.

No. of

units

Total cost

Rs. In

Lakhs

I. Agricultural

1. Nagali Use of different

organic matter as

a fertilizer source

Create

awareness about

use of organic

matter

Experiments on

organic farming

0.40

ha.

20000 10 2.00

2.

Soyabean

Development of

rust resistant

varieties.

1. Collection of

germ plasm of

soybean

To collect germ

plasm of soybean

from NBPGR &

abroad ourcesTo

identify the

different host for

pathotype of

rustTo collect the

infested samples

of soybean rust

from different

localities.

1 39000 1 0.39

2. Identification

of pathotype of

rust

1 500000 1 5.00

3. To monitor

the prevalence

of pathotypes of

rust disease

1 50000 1 0.50

3. Organic

farming

Biodegrading of

organic wastes

To identify the

efficient

decomposing

micro -

organism

1. To test the

biodegrading

ability of

promising micro

organisms

1 100000 1 1.00

2. Isolation &

identification of

microorganism

for biodegrading.

1 50000 1 0.50

3. Farm waste

management

1 50000 15 7.50

4. IPM IPM for white

grub entomo

pathogenic

nematode.

To identify the

efficient control

major.

Identification of

entomo

pathogenic

nematode for

different crops.

1 100000 12 12.00

5.

Marketing

Marketing

modules of

different crops.

To identify the

different

modules for

agricultural

crops.

Marketing of

agriculture

produce and their

modules.

1 10000 12 12.00

6. Jaggery Continuous

jaggery making

and marketing of

jaggery

To identify the

sustainable

jaggery

production.

Marketing of

jaggery

byproducts and

suitable variety

for jaggery

making.

1 50000 5 25.00


Name of

Enterprise

Strategies

proposed for

Extension

Research


proposed

Unit

size

Cost

per unit

Rs.

No. of

units

Total cost

Rs. In

Lakhs

Animal Husbandry

1. Cows &

Buffalos

1. Low

conception rate in

crossbred cows

Create

awareness about

conception rate

Establishment of

Research cum

training centre

1 50.00

Lacks

1 50.00

2. Improvement

of non descriptive

cows & buffalos

Development &

selection indices

for male &

female

Establishment of

nucleus herd for

open nucleus

breeding

1 50.00

Lacks

1 50.00

2. Ship and

Goat

3. Cage rearing

ship and goat in

western ghat.

Create

awareness

Cage rearing

technology.

1 50

Lacks

1 50.00

3. Poultry Identification of

sturdy breeds

locally available

Development of

sturdy local

breed of poultry

locally

available.

Survey of local

breeds hens for

faster growth.

1 200000 1 2

Fisheries

Fisheries


Consolidated gaps in adoption & strategies Sr.

No.

Name of

crop Critical gap Strategic issue Proposed Strategy

Relevance

of AES

A) Agriculture

1 Paddy

(rain fed)

1. Higher seed rate due

to broadcasting method

of sowing

Use of recommended

seed rate

1. Demonstration I, II, III

2. Training

2. Use of untreated

seeds

Encouraging sowing

with treated seeds

1. Demonstration I , II , III

2. Training

3. Imbalanced use of

fertilizer dose

To promote the

balanced application

of fertilizer dose.


2. Training

3. Soil testing

4. Use of Urea

brickets

4. Lack of optimum

plant population

Maintain optimum

plant population by

row transplating.


2. Training

5. Use of Over aged

seedling

Transplanting

optimum aged

seedlings

1. Demonstration I, II, III

2. Training

3. Exposure visit

2 Nagali

(rainfed)

1.Use of local varieties To promote these of

improved variety

1. Demonstration III

2. Training

2.No seed treatment Adoption of seed

treatment


2. Training

3. Imbalanced fertilizer

dose

Use of balanced

fertilizer dose


2. Training

4.Higher seed rate Use of recommended

seed rate


2. Training

5. Method of sowing Popularization of

suitable sowing

implementing


2. Training

3. Exposure visit

3 Sugarcane

(suru)

1. Higher seed rate Use of optimum seed

budsticks

1. Demonstration I, II, III, IV

2. Training

2. No sugarcane

nursery plantation

Use of sugarcane

nursery plantation

technology

1. Demonstration I, II, III, IV

2. Training

3. Imbalance use of

fertilizer

To promote the

farmerregarding the

use of balance

fertilizer & use of

organic fertilizers.

1. Method

Demonstration

I, II, III, IV

2. Training

3. Exposure visit

4. Pest & disease

management

To promote farmers to

adopt IPM technology

1. Tr2. Exposure visit

aining

I, II, III, IV


Consolidated gaps in adoption & strategies Sr.

No.

Name of

crop Critical gap Strategic issue Proposed Strategy

Relevance of

AES

4 Groundnut

(rainfed)

1. Low seed rate To promote the farmer to use

optimum seed rate in order

to keep optimum plant

population

1. Demonstration 2.

Training 3.

Exposure visit

II, IV

2. No seed

treatment

Use of seed treatment with

chemical

Training II, IV

3. No use of Bio-

fertilizer

Popularization of Bio

fertilizers

1. Demonstration2.

Training

II, IV

4. Low yield To promote the farmer to

adopt ICRISAT technology

of ground nut cultivation

1. Demonstration

2. Training

3. Exposure visit

II, IV

5 Soyabean 1. No seed

treatment chemical

Use of seed treatment with Training II IV, I

2. No use of Bio -

fertilizer

Popularization of Bio

fertilizers

1. Demonstration 2.

Training

II, IV, I

3. Imbalance use of

fertilizer &

micronutrients


regarding the use of balance

fertilizer & use of organic

fertilizers.

1. Method

Demonstration

2. Training

3. Exposure visit

II, IV, I

4.No use of

recommended

variety

To promote use of short

duration variety

1.Method

Demonstration

2. Training

3. Seed village

scheme

II, IV, I

6 Kh. Jawar Imbalance use of

fertilizers


regarding the use of balance

fertilizer & use of organic

fertilizers.

1.Method

Demonstration 2.

Training 3.

Exposure visit

IV

B) HORTICULTURE PRODUCTION SYSTEM

1 Cashew nut 1.Less use of

Organic manure

Application of

recommended use of

organic matter/ vermin

compost

1.Method

Demonstration 2.

Training

III

Improper use of

fertilizer &

micronutrient

Use of recommended doses

of fertilizer &

micronutrients

1.Method

Demonstration

2. Training

3. Exposure visit

III

Inadequate water

management

Use of drip irrigation 1. Training 2.

Exposure visit

III

Lack post harvest

processing

Promotion of post harvest

practices / value addition

1.MethodDemo-

nstration 2.

Training 3.Exposure

visit 4.Mobilisation

of FIGs, 5. Seed

money to SHGs

III

Poor yield Promotion of farmer to

adopt improved package of

practices.

1.Method

Demonstr-ation 2.

Training

3.Exposure visit

III


Sr.

No.

Name of

crop Critical gap Strategic issue

Proposed

Strategy

Relevance

of AES

2 Mango 1.Low yield Promotion of farmer to

adopt improved package

of practices.

1.Method

Demonstration

2. Training

3.Exposure visit

IV

2. Improper use of

fertilizer &

micronutrient

Use of recommended

doses of fertilizer &

micronutrients

1.Method

Demonstration

2. Training

3. Exposure visit

IV

3 Coconut 1.Low yield

Promotion of farmer to

adopt improved package

of practices.

1.Method

Demonstration

2. Training

3.Exposure visit

IV

2. Improper use of

fertilizer &

micronutrient

Use of recommended

doses of fertilizer &

micronutrients

1.Method

Demonstration

2. Training

3. Exposure visit

IV

4 Tomato 1. Inadequate

plant protection

measure 2. Lack

of group

marketing

1. Adoption of IPM &

IDM 2. To promote

famers to go for group

marketing

1. Method

Demonstration

2.

Training3.Mobili

ation of FIGs,

for

marketing.

IV

5 Banana 1. Non use of

micro nutrient

1. Use of recommended 1. Method nutrients doses micronutrients Demonstration

2. Training

3. Exposure visit

IV

2. Lack of group

marketing

2. To promote famers to

go for group marketing

1.Method

Demonstration

2. Training

3.

Mobilizationof

FIGs, for

marketing.


Sr.

No.

Type of

animal Critical gap Strategic issue Proposed Strategy

Relevance

to AES

C) ANIMAL HUSBANDRY

1 Cow 1. Partial adoption of A.

I.

1. Providing

knowledge about

advantages of A.I.

1. Training of

farmers

I, II, III,

2. Improving % of

conception in A . I.

2. Organization of

A. I. Camps

3. To promote the

breed up gradation in

local cows.

3. Exposure visit

2. Gap in adoption of

feeding Vitamins &

minerals to cows

1. Improving

knowledge about

importance of vitamins

& minerals.

1. Intensify the

awareness

programme

I, II, III, IV

3. Gap in animal health

care

Intensify the awareness

programme of animal

health & vaccination

schedule

1. Training of

farmers

I, II, III, IV

2. Organization of

vaccination

programmes

4. Partial gap in milk

yield camps

Improve the knowledge

about management &

its economics

1. Training of

farmers

I, II, III, IV

2. Exposure visit

2 Goat/

Sheep

1. Breeding with non

descriptive breed

Improving awareness

about

the breeding

Providing graded

bucks i.e.

Sagamneri,

Osmanabad & rams

i.e. Bannur

I, II, III, IV

2. Training of

farmers 2. Gap in adoption of

general management

1. Improve awareness

about general

management

1.Technical training

to womens &

landless labour,

SHGs, regarding

raring.

I, II, III, IV

3. Gap in adoption

regarding health of gaot /

sheep


about importance of

health care

1. Training of

farmers

I, II, III, IV

2. Conducting mass

dosing camps

3 Buffalos 1. Partial adoption of

breed up gradation of A.

I.


about A.I. Importance

1. Conducting A . I.

Camps

I, II, III, IV

2. Improve conception

rate

2.Training of

farmers

3. Exposure visit

2. Full gap in adoption

regarding feeding of

vitamins & minerals

Improve awareness

about feeding

management

1. Training of

farmers

I, II, III, IV

3. Non adoption of

deforming schedule


about deforming

1. Conducting

deforming camps

I, II, III, IV


B-1. SHORT TERM STRATEGIES RESEARCH ISSUES

Sr.

No. Research issues

Agro-ecological situations

I II III IV

I. Agriculture

1 Adoptive research on INM & IPM Y Y Y Y

2 Evolving the organic farming, organic fertilizer doses for different crops Y Y Y Y

3 Methods for bio-degradation for residue of organic wastes. Y Y Y Y

4 Research on foliar nutrition of various crops. Y Y Y Y

5 Use of EPN for control of soil borne pests. Y Y Y Y

6 Cost of cultivation & Production Y Y Y Y

7 Recomondation of Sugarcane base fodder system. Y Y Y Y

II. Horticulture

1 Successful introduction of medicinal & aromatic plants Y Y Y Y

2 Standerdization of harvesting, grading, & packing technology for flouriculture Y Y Y Y

3 Value addition of vegetables Y Y Y Y

4 Use of feromen trap for control of fruits & vegetables borer. Y Y Y Y

5 Inter cropping in orchards Y Y Y Y

6 Trials on use of bio fertilizers in vegetable crops Y Y Y Y

7 Suitable technologies develop for control of Eryphoid mites in coconut Y Y Y Y


1 Outbreaks of enter toxemia, F & M disease in cattle Y Y Y Y

2 Low conception rate in cross bred as well as non descriptive cows. Y Y Y Y

3 Programme for backyard poultry with improved breeds like Giriraj, vanraj Y Y Y Y

IV. Fisheries

1 Studies on scamp farming in saline soils area. - - - Y

B-2. LONG TERM STRATEGIC RESEARCH ISSUES

I. Agriculture

1 Germ plasm collection of paddy, millets, pulses & oil seeds Y Y Y Y

2 Development of rust resistant varieties of soybean. Y Y Y Y

3 Development of salt tolerant varieties of paddy Y Y Y Y

4 Development of Paddy varities sutiable under flood prone condition. Y Y Y --

5 Relation between meterological parameters & incidences of diseases & pests. Y Y Y Y

6 Development of Sugarcane varieties resistant to rust and leaf spot under submountain

area. Y Y Y --

7 IPM on white grub management. Y Y Y Y

8 Entomo pathogenic nematodes for white grub. Y Y Y Y

II. Horticulture

1 Economic feasibility in improved storage techniques at field level. Y Y Y Y

2 Identify suitable mango variety for pulp industry. Y Y Y Y

3 Evolve suitable leaf curl resistant hybrid variety of tomato - - - Y

4 Finalise the residue content of pesticides in vegetables Y Y Y Y


1 Improving genetic matter of N.D. Cows by cross breeding. Y Y Y Y

2 Identification of Etiological factors causing infertility in dairy animals Y Y Y Y

3 Evaluation of suitable & providing vaccine for the control of blue tongue disease Y Y Y Y

4 Genetic improvement of pandharpuri buffalo Y Y Y Y


The policy issues which are addressed to the Government are as follows :

Sr.

No. Issues / Problem Proposed policy Intervention Modality for Implementation.

1 Soil erosion due to

heavy rainfall

More funds required from

Government.

Soil & water conservation

structure are undertaken.

2 Supply of fertilizer More euphonium organic farming Higher subsidies on organic

manures for more availability.

3 Marketing of

agriculture products

Marketing network should be

treated at village level.

Marketing network should make

available at village level.

4 Agriculture credit

availability

Exploitation of rural money lenders

& middlemen

Agriculture credit make available

at low rate of interest & at in time.

5 Reclamation of saline

soils

Integrated scheme of subsurface

drainage systemusing purported

pipe with synthetic filter & land

development treatments.

More funds are required from

Govt.

Surveys & project to be prepared

by Agril. Dept.

6 Use of hand mixed

fertilizer are

discouraged.

Promotion of straight fertilizers.

Possibly ban the manufactured of

hand mixed fertilizer.

Create awareness among the

farmers.

7 Waiving of loan on

seed & inputs

if the crop is failed due

to natural calamities.

A separate allocation may be

earmarked by the banks for this

purpose. This can be done on the

line as the loan for failed units of

small scale industries is waived.

Implementation may be carried

out by taking policy decision at

the loaning institutions

8 Different rate of

subsidies

Rate of subsidies / financial support

to the component should be

uniform & possibly one component

should be implemented by one

agency to avoid the repetition of

subsidy to same beneficiary.

Policy decision can be taken at

Govt. level.

9 No insurance coverage

for fruit crops under

National Insurance

crop scheme

Fruit crop should be included under

National crop insurance scheme.


Govt. level.

10 No insurance coverage

of individual loss of

crop damage.

Individual loss should be

considered in relation to cost of

production.


Govt. level.

11 No permission for

preparation of

Industrial alcohol/

ethanol from cashew

apple.

Cashew apple should be used for

preparation of industrial alcohol or

ethanol


Govt. level.

12 Coverage of farm

families under NICS

Entire farm family should be cover

under NICS.


Govt. level.

CHAPTER X. POLICY ISSUES TO BE ADRESSED TO THE

GOVERNMENT


Sr.

No. Issues / Problem Proposed policy Intervention

Modality for

Implementation.

13 Freedom to use of inputs. Freedom to use of inputs under Govt.

schemes.


Govt. level.

14 Minium support price for

all corps.

All cereals, oil seeds, pulses,

vegetable and fruit crops under MSP.


Govt. level.

15 Soil Health Each farmer should be Soil Health

Card.


Govt. level.

16 Technology Upgradation. All field level Extension Functionery

and Farmer Friend should be

upgraded.

Every mnth one training at

Taluka level

17 Technology

Dissemination

Need based and recent technology

should be given.

Research should be on need

based.

18 Micro Irrigation Credit make available at low rate of

intrest on drip irrigation projects.

Policy decession can be taken

at govt. level.

19 Nutrient Management Intigrated nutrient management

projects on piolet basis.


at govt. level.

20 Intigrated Pest

Management

Fore cast of messages through

mobile to all farmer friends.

Cropsap programme linkage

with Farmer Friend.

21 Mechanisation Freedom for farmer to purchase need

based equipments at any dealer.


at govt. level.

22 Crop Insurance Process to be easy and timely. Help

farm family within stipulated period.


at govt. level.

23 Farmer Family Insurance Entire farm family should be covered

under national insurance crop

scheme.


at govt. level.

24 Post Harvest and Valu

Addition.

Post harvest technology facility at

village level.

Farmer community service

centre at every village of the

district.

25 Marketing Infrastructure. Marketing infrastructure network up

to village level.

Marketing infrastructure

should make available at

village level.

26 Value Addition. Promtion for value addition of

important crops.

Processing facility at taluka

level.

27 Credit Facilities. Credit facility for Seed, Fertilizer

and Pesticides on farm machinery.

Timely available of loan facilicity to

farmers.

Credit make available at low

rate of interest.

28 Input Supply as per

farmer choice.

All state of central Govt. scheme of

agriculture and allied sector, input

supply should be as per farmers

choice.


at Govt. level.

30 Minimum Support Price MSP should on the basis at cost of

cultivation of the crop.


at Govt. level.


Important Agricultural statistics of the Kolhapur districts for the year 2012-13

Sr.

No. Sector Interventions

Base line data

(2012-13)

Achievements by the end

of the project period

(2018)

Area Productivity Area Productivity

in ha. in kg/ha. in ha. in kg/ha.

1

Agriculture/

Horticulture

1. Productivity improvements

a. Paddy 91400 2589 95000 3100

b. Nagali 20800 1837 19000 2000

c. Sugarcane 142100 86 MT 150000 125 MT

d. Soybean 41700 2476 45000 2700

e. Groundnut 41400 1738 42000 1900

2. Diversification- Current are

under crops/ Plantation

A. Sugarcane 0 ha 1200 ha

B. Bamboo plantation on

waste land (through scheme) 845.89 2000 ha.

C. Oil palm plantation

3. Area expansion in HYVs

Area under HYVs crop wise 7500

1. Paddy hybrid 1000 6300 6000 7500

2. Nagali ( GPU 28) -- -- 21000 2000

3 .Groundnut TAG-24, TG 26 355 1738 30000 1900

4. Incremental increase in the

Cropping intensity Current

level

125 % cropping

intensity

160% increase in cropping

intensity

5. Improvements in seed

replacement ratio (SRR)

a. Paddy 26% 50%

b. Soybean 31% 35%

c. Nagali 0% 25%

d. Groundnut 3% 15%

6. Use of IPM/Area under IPM

in Ha. & -number of farmers Area No. of farmers Area

No. of

farmers

a. IPM on Pulses

b. IPM on oil seed crops

c. IPM on sugarcane

7. Use of INM incremental

increase in the area Area No. of farmers Area

No. of

farmers

A. Mango 0 0 500 600

B. Cashew nut 0 0 1000 1300

CHAPTER XI. BASE LINE DATA IN RESPECT OF

INTERVENTIONS LIKELY TO BE CARRIED

OUT BY PIAs (INDICATIVE)


Sr.

No. Sector Interventions

Base line data

Achievements by the

end of the project

period

Area Productivity Area Productivity

in ha. in kg/ha. in ha. in kg/ha.

1 Agriculture/

Horticulture

8. Sustainable Sugarcane Initiation

(SSI)

1600 150 MT 60000 200 MT

1. Raising nursery using single

budded chips.

2. Transplanting yound seedlings.

3. Maintaining wide spacing in the

main field.

4. Providing sufficient moisture

and avoiding inundation of water.

5. Encouraging organic methods

of nutrient management and plant

protection.

6. Practicing intercropping.

9. Production of Chemical free

Jaggery.

0 600 MT 0 5000 MT

10. Intercropping

1. Sugarcane with Potato Crop 32 ha. 62 qt. 5000 ha. 100 qt.

2. Pulses in Sugarcane. 0 0 2000 ha. 1000

3. Baby Corn with sugarcane 0 0 5000

ha

1500

4. Sugarcane with Mary Gold 0 0 500 ha

11. Production of Banana for

Export.

30 ha 650 MT 200 ha 5000 MT

11. Area expansion of Floriculture

under Green House.

95 225

12. Area expansion of Strawberry 2 25 Ton 50 32 Ton

12. water use efficiency through

Micro irrigation scheme (MIS)

4871.27 10000

e. Sprinkler irrigation 1212.45 2500

13. Use of organic farming- (ha.) 1964 3000

13. Promotion Agro Tourism 2 Nos. 50 No’s

14. Area Expansion of Medicinal

and Aromatic Plants.

0 350

15. Sustainable Dry Land Farming 3 No. 12 No.

16. Area expansion of Fodder

Crops.

4125 10000 ha


Animal Husbandry

Interventions

Base line

data

2012-13

Achievement by

the end of

project period

Up gradation of breeds through AI service 146390 212649

Animal health care No. of camps 844 1050

Preservation of deshi cow breeds 5261 8436

Preservation of pandharpuri buffalo breed 12297 19671

Introduction of new new enterprise-

backyard poultry 868319 1042750

Calf rearing 19209 28156

Animal nutrition status(seed supply kg) 55229 71796

Promotion for major employment

development programme

0 0

A}Goat unit 91 455

B}Poultry unit 58 290

Dairy

Intervention Base line

Projection after

five years

Daily milk production (Ltr.) 6.35 Lakh 10.00 Lakh

Milk powder production 75.00 MT 125 MT

Co-operative dairy societies (No.) 6820 8000

By products of milk 470 MT 700 MT

Milk chilling centre (No.) 21 38

Fisheries

Intervention Base line

2012/13

Projection after

five years (2017)

Utilization of Farm Ponds for Fish Farming

No. of

Ponds

-NIL-

No. of Ponds

125

Development of Carp Fish seed Rearing unit

No. of

Rearing

units

-NIL-

No. of Rearing

units 3

Cage culture fishing. (No.) NIL 10

Sericulture

Intervention Base line 2012/13

Projection after five

years (2017)

A. Area expansion under improved varieties of

mulberry - area in ha. 34.00 ha. 600 ha.

B. Introduction of races of silk worm - Nos. 2 4

1. Cocoon production 24.5 Ton 700 Ton

2. Linkage Textile (No.) 1 3

3. C.S.R. Hybrid (No.) 45220 1200000

4. Seed DFIS supply (No.) 5000 30000


Sector Interventions Base line data

Achievements by

the end of the

project period

No. Capacity

M.Ton No.

Capacity

M.Ton

Infrastructure

Godowns 629 155150 1100 275780

APMC 4 - 12 -

Cold Storage 6 12000 12 24000

Private market 28 - 42 -

Rice mills 22 4000/day 35 5000/day

Pack House 26 - 100 -

Cashewnut processing unit 87 - 120 -

Milk processing unit 6 - 12 -

Fruit processing unit 8 1312 25 2000

Framer producer company 1 - 50 --

Branding of commodities - - 10 -

Quality testing laboratory - - 4 -

Farmer accommodation center - - 12 -

Social

Forestry

Interventions Base line data

Achievement by

the end of project

period

Shradhavan 24 No 96

Raising of Grafted Amla Seedlings 12000 No 48000

Raising of Medicinal Plants 60000 No 240000

Rasing of Audible seedlings (Semaroba

& Palm)

24000 No. 96000

Advertisement and Publicity 0

Booklet of Various Tree Species 2400 No 9600

Forest Garden & Information Center 12 No. 12

Various works in Kagal Centeral

Nursary (Solar Light,Wind Flower, )

1 No. 2

Use of waste land 0

Plantation of neem, karnja, jatropa,

undi, etc.

1700 No 7950

Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic

plants

1950 No 3900

Production and supply of seed/planting

material quantity

1200 Kg 4800

Bamboo Mission-PPA-AID

cultivation/processing/marketing

750 Ha 3000

3 days tour & traning programme for

farmers

1200 farmers 4800

3 days study tour & traning programme

for ladies member of Z.P &

P.S.(Panchyat raj system)

300 mem. 1200


Following are the vision for next five years

Sr.No. Sector Base line

2012-13

Intervention

Projection

after five years

I. Agriculture

1. Paddy

A. Productivity

2589 kg/ha. Use of high yielding & hybrid

varieties

3100 kgs/ha.

Control of pests & diseases

B. SRR 26% Adoption of 4 point cultivation of

paddy

50 %

2. Nagali -

A . Productivity 1837 kgs/ha Use of high yielding varieties 2000 kgs/ ha.

B. SRR 0 % Balanced use of fertilizers 25 %

3. Soybean-

A . Productivity 2476 kgs/ha Use of high yielding varieties 2700 kgs/ ha.

B. SRR 31 % Balanced use of fertilizers 35 %

4. Grondnut

A. Productivity 1738 kgs / ha Balanced use of fertilizers 2000 kgs /ha.

B. SRR 3 % Adoption of ICRISAT method of

cultivation

Increase seed replacement ratio 25 %

5. Sugarcane - Balanced use of fertizers

Productivity 86 Mt /ha Adoption of improved package of

practices

125 Mt / ha

6. Sugarcane

nursery plantation

3200 ha. Nursery plantation, Intercropping,

Pairrow system, drip etc.

100000 ha.

II. Hotriculture

1. Cashewnut -

A. Area 17757 ha. 1. Use of EGS linked horticulture 19357 ha.

development scheme & NHM scheme

B. Productivity 3.00 Mt. /ha. Control of pest & diseases 4.50Mt. /ha

2. Mango -

Productivity 4.50 Mt / ha. Pest & disease control 6.00 Mt./ha.

3. Banana

Productivity 60.00 Mt /ha. Use of tissue culture seedlings 75.00Mt./ ha.

CHAPTER XII. VISION FOR THE NEXT 5 YEARS OF KOLHAPUR

DISTRICT


Sr.

No. Sector

Base line

2012-13

Intervention

Projection

after five years

III. Animal hubandry

1. Less per cattle

milk production

6 lit / animal Improved managemnt practices by 15lit./ animal

training & exposure visit of farmers

Imrove disease dignosis

2. Per capita

mutton production

17kgs/animals 1. Improve breeding programme 25 kgs / animals

2. Avoid in breeding

IV. Processing&

value addition

1. Cashew nut

processing unit

87 Formation of FIGs & traininig 120

them on processing 60

2. Fruit processing

unit

8 1. Formation of FIGs & traininig them

on processing

25

V. Organic farming

Area under

organic farming

1964 ha Training the farmers on organic

farming

5000 ha.

VI. Fisheries

Use of saline soil

for fish Farming

No. of tanks-3 Training farmers No. of tanks -10

Exposure visit

VII Sericulture

1 Area under

mulberry

plantation

Area – 34 ha Training the farmers on sericulture

technology

Area 1200ha.

2 Dfl supply 45250 Training of brushing Dfls 2400000

3 Cocoon

production

24.5 MT Traing of improved technology 1200 MT

4 Linkage with

Textile

1 unit Training enterprenurs for silk

production

3


Priority thrust areas identified

Sr.No. Thrust areas

1 Introduction of integreted farming system

2 Populirisation of high yielding varieties of pulses and vegetables

3 Enhancing productivity of horticulture crops through crop diversification

4 scientific livestock manangement with appropriate feeding, breeding and health

management practice

5 Integreted nutrient management in food and fruit crops

6 Improvement of soil health through popularization of organic farming

7 Quality seed production program

8 Capacity building of rural youth and women through vocational training for

taking up of income generating activity through SHG

9 Enpowerment of farm women and rural youth

10 Market led extension

11 Devoloping farm management skills and farm skills

12 Developing of seed bank

13 Pramotion for farm mechanization

14 Populirasation for contract farmng

15 Allied enterprises like Animal husbandry, Sericulture, Mushroom culture,

Apiculture destanderdise and prolifiearated among the farmers for income

generation and solving the seasonal unemployement of the farming community.

16 Developing employment generation programme.

17 Strengthening of exisisting CIG and FIG.


The Agriculture Technology Management Agency (ATMAN) Kolhapur, shall function

under the overall guidance of the GB represented by sixteen members including District Magistrate

as the Chairman. The ATMA Management Committee (AMC) represented by different line

Departments under the Chairmanship of the Project Director will manage the day to day activities

of ATMAN. Operational modalities about planning and implementation of action plan and pattern

of flow of fund are outlined below.

13.1 Preparation of annual action plan

Basing on the SREP of the district a detailed annual work plan to be prepared for each

block as a unit. The Farm Information Advisory Center (FIAC) team would prepare the Block

Action Plan (BAP) that would detail extension activities to be carried out. BAP of each block will

be prepare by taking the following steps.

1. Identification of major ecological situations in each block and number of villages

covered under each AES.

2. The annual action plan for each AES is to be prepared by using the data collected from

each representative village.

3. Prioritizing the extension and researchable issue, the BAP will be prepared.

13.2 Technical approval of BAP

The BAP so prepared by the FIAC team is to be approved by the farmer advisory

Committee before it is approved by G. B. ATMA. The scientist of KVKs and senior officers of the

line department in the district may also participate in the meeting at block level. The convener of

BTT will be responsible for sending the approved BAP to ATMAN.

13.3 Administrative approval of action plan

Project Director, ATMAN shall organize the AMC meeting and put-up the BAPs from all

the blocks for technical scrutiny of their relevance. The ATMAN management committee (AMC)

would ensure that these plans are technically and administratively feasible and consistent with the

SREP. Then the AMC of ATMA, action plan for the District (DAP) shall be prepared by keeping

funds availability in view.

1. The line department of the district and research units would also prepare seasonal or

annual work plan.

2. Organize service training and technical support activities to for FIAC and field level

extension staff.

3. Periodically update the SREP.

13.4 Fund flow Mechanism

The ATMAN will have operational flexibility in use of project funding. However the

overall investment funds for infrastructure development, human resource development, extension

and participatory research component and operational cost will be released.

On receipts of funds by ATMA, at the district level, will be released to the district heads of

the participating organization against their action. Required funds for the program component at

block level, will be released to BTT for the execution of the program in consultation with the

FIAC members.

CHAPTER XII. OPERATIONAL MODALITIES


13.5 Modalities for implementation of various activities.

This includes the IT equipment like purchase of computer.

13.6 Human Resource Development

Vasantrao Naik State Agricultural Management and Extension Training Institute, Nagpur

(VANAMATI) has been identified as SAMETI under NATP to impart extension management

related training to field functionaries of participating organization. VANAMATI may organize off

campus training and on campus training for the officials based on the requirements of the need and

situation for farmers and grass root level workers.

College of Agriculture, Kolhapur RAMETI, Kolhapur have been identified to meet training

needs as the training center fro Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Dairy training, various types

of training courses under the requirement of NATP have been suggested in SREP on the basis of

Training Need Assessment.

I) Execution of extension program.

Once the funds received by the convener, BTT the field programs need to be executed. The

details of which are as follows –

a) Awareness Campaign

Awareness campaign for activities like soil testing, use of bio-fertilizers organic farming

etc. may be undertaken. 50 farmers would participate in each campaign and estimated cost per

campaign may be pegged at Rs. 5000/- Mass media such as News papers, T.V., Radio and ICT

should be used to create awareness about technologies and programs.

b) Farmer’s Training

Demand driven training shall be organized. Two types of training are suggested in SREP.

One is institutional training at District level and village level or block level training for 25 farmers

for 3 day per farmer per day Rs. 400/- and Rs.250/- respectively.

c) Demonstration

The farmer selected for demonstration should be selected crucially who represents the

majority of the targeted community with consultation of FAC members.

The area of demonstration is 0.10 ha. in case of vegetables and cash crops where as it is

0.20 ha. in cas of cereals, pulses and oilseeds. In each demonstration, the cost of critical inputs that

are generally not applied by the farmers are supplied subject to of Rs. 2000/- only. The results of

the demonstration should be documented and presented to FAC/AMC.

d) Field Day and Kisan Gosthis.

Field day is important activity to be organized on completion of demonstration to

strengthen the Research –extension-farmer linkage. The field day would also serve as a awareness

campaign for farmers from new FIGs Rs. 15000/- may be spent on each field days and kisan

gosthis.


II) Execution of Research Program

1. Researchable issues identified in the SREP shall be referred to Zonal Agriculture

Research Extension Council of ZRS or scientific advisory committee of KVKs. The

long term issues shall be communicated to SAU, ICAR institutions for redress. The

short term issues may be addressed with the help of local research institutions such

as KVKs / or ZRS through on farm trials.

2. The BTT, FAC and AMC of ATMAN would be involved in the OFTs for execution

and dissemination of proven technologies.

III) Monitoring of field activities

1. The block level and village level activities would be monitored on monthly basis at

FIAC level. The progress made shall be reviewed during the first week of every

month in the joint meeting of BTT and FAC members. The convener of BTT shall

compile the progress reports of all the line departments and submit to Project

Director, ATMA.

2. The review of progress of activities at district level should be undertaken by AMC

during second week of every month after receipt of progress report from the blocks.

G.B. shall review the progress every quarter.

3. Joint interaction workshop of G B and FAC should be conducted on quarterly basis

under chairmanship of Colector.

IV) Time frame for plan flow and fund flow

* BAP preparation at block level - 5 days

* FAC approval - 1 day

* AMC scrutiny - 3 days

* GB approval - 1 day

As the entire process takes one month, the BAP preparation to be initiated at least

one month in advance from the commencement of the season.

------------x------------------x---------------


Documents

Agriculture Technology Management Agency (ATMA), Kolhapur ...atmamis.org/UploadFiles/2900.pdf · Kolhapur and Vice Chairman, ATMA, Kolhapur for his Guidance, valuable suggestions