27
Slatina-Timiș Case Study How can some communities be healthier than others Iași 6 Noiembrie 2015 Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Slatina-Timiș Case StudyHow can some communities be

healthier than others

Iași6 Noiembrie 2015

Adrian PanăBogdan IleanuCristina VladuIoan Suru

Page 2: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

I. Slatina-Timiș - Background

Page 3: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Creation of ADAM structure Refurbishment of health center Staffing of the health center (one family

doctor, 3 nurses for the population of 3000 persons, one stomatologist, etc)

Creation of a home care service MEDIATEQUE service Social pharmacy Ensuring sustainable funding through contracts

with the Insurance House, membership contribution, etc

Organizational set up

Page 4: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Home care services 82 % of diabetes patients have received a

glucometers and 150 strips, direct relationship with the specialist doctor, diabetes passport (information about the disease, types of insulin, etc.)

24% of patients with HTA have received blood pressure meters, 65%have benefitted from

Patients that need revalidation materials whatever their illness receive materials form the MEDIATEQUE (special beds, toilet chairs, mattresses anti pressure sore, etc.)

ADAM specific activities for different groups of patients

Page 5: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

II. Slatina-Timiș- demographic indicators

Page 6: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

2.5

4.5

6.5

8.5

10.5

12.5

14.5

9.0

11.4

9.7

10.3 10.410.1

7.2

5.44.9

10.7

5.6

3.7

6.3

4.7

5.7

8.0

7.17.4

8.8

12.211.9

12.3 12.4 12.3 12.312.0

11.0 11.010.7

10.510.3 10.1 10.3 10.3

9.79.2

9.5

8.8

Slatina Timis Linear (Slatina Timis) Caras Rural Linear (Caras Rural)

Romania Rural

Bir

th r

ate

s(n

ew

bo

rn/1

00

0.i

nh

)Slatina-Timiș : evolution of Birth rate

Page 7: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

15.0%

16.0%

17.0%

18.0%

19.0%

20.0%

21.0%

22.0%

23.0%

24.0%

16.2%15.9%

16.7%

17.3%

17.9%

18.5%

18.9%

19.6%

20.2%

20.8% 20.8%

20.4%

20.8% 20.8%

20.2%19.8%

19.6%

20.2%

20.7%

21.4%

20.6

%

21.0

% 21.4

%

21.5

%

21.8

%

21.9

%

22.1

%

22.3

%

22.3

%

22.3

%

22.3

%

22.2

%

22.2

%

22.0

%

21.9

%

22.0

%

21.9

%

22.2

%

22.5

%

22.7

%

Romania rural Slatina Timis Caras rural

The s

hare

of

eld

erl

y (

65+

) w

om

en in t

ota

l popula

tion

Slatina-Timiș: evolution of % of women over 65

Page 8: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

11.0%

12.0%

13.0%

14.0%

15.0%

16.0%

17.0%

13.5%13.7%

14.0%14.2%

14.4%14.5%

14.9% 14.9%15.0%

15.1% 15.2%15.0% 15.0%

14.8%14.7%

14.4%14.3%

14.1%14.0% 14.0%

11.6%

11.9%

12.4% 12.5%

13.2%

13.8%

14.3%

14.7%

15.1%15.2%

15.6%

15.3% 15.4%

15.0% 15.0%

15.6%

15.9%15.7%

15.5%

15.9%

Romania rural Slatina Timis Caras rural

The s

hare

of

eld

erl

y (

65+

) m

en in t

ota

l popula

tion

Slatina-Timiș: evolution of % of men over 65

Page 9: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

13.2

25.4

19.6

16.5

21.5 21.6 21.1

11.1 11.3

22.8

19.5

15.5

18.6

27.5

10.7

17.4

11.1

13.8

11.7

23.9

25.625.0

23.3

21.520.8 20.9

19.8 19.4 19.9

17.917.1

14.1 14.0

12.6 12.311.8 11.8 11.5

Slatina Timis Caras Rural Romania Rural

Infa

nt

mort

ality

rate

(0-1

death

s/1000 liv

e b

irth

s)

Slatina-Timiș: evolution of infant mortality

Page 10: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

20.0

22.0

24.0

18.9

22.7

14.6

13.3

14.8

17.2

12.8

14.2

11.3

16.8

13.0 13.1

17.3

19.2

13.4

15.3

16.1

14.5

12.7

17.3

13.213.5 13.4

13.8 13.713.2

12.8 12.712.3 12.4 12.5

12.913.3

13.012.4 12.2 12.4

12.712.4 12.2

15.4

16.415.9

15.2 15.0

14.4

15.3 15.3 15.214.8 14.8

14.514.1 14.2 14.5 14.6

14.1 14.213.7 13.9

Slatina Timis Linear (Slatina Timis) Caras Romania rural

Mort

ality

rate

(num

ber

of

death

s/1000 inh.)

.Slatina-Timiș: evolution of general mortality

Page 11: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

III. Slatina-Timiș- health risks profile

Page 12: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Tobacco daily consumption – Slatina Timiș vs rural county and rural national

Slatina Timis Caras Rural Romania Rural

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

17.4

18.7

17.6

% o

f ad

ult

s d

ail

y s

mo

kers

Page 13: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Alcohol consumption – Slatina Timiș vs rural county and rural national

Slatina Timis Caras Rural Romania Rural

0

5

10

15

20

25

22.7

17.8

21.6

% o

f ad

ult

s w

ith

excess a

lco

ho

l co

nsu

mp

tio

n

Page 14: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Slatina Timis Caras Rural Romania Rural

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

68.1

61.258.9

% o

f ad

ult

s w

ith

ad

dit

ion

al

salt

co

nsu

mp

tio

nSalt consumption – Slatina Timiș vs rural county and rural national

Page 15: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Slatina Timis Caras Rural Romania Rural

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

58.9

41.3

33.9

% r

ed

meat

co

nsu

mp

tio

n f

rom

to

tal

ad

ult

in

h.

Red meat consumption- Slatina -Timiș vs rural county and rural national

Page 16: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

IV. Slatina-Timiș- hospitalized morbidity

Page 17: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

130.5

116.5 117.2 120.5128.4

109.9

295.4 297.6

279.9

251.6

239.9 237.9

239.9 241.6

227.8

209.4203.8 205.1

Slatina Timis Caras rural Romania rural

Inpati

ent

care

case

s/1000 inh.

General hospitalized morbidity; Slatina-Timiș vs rural county and rural country

Page 18: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

0-10 min 11-20 min 21-30 min 31-40 min 41-50 min 51-60 min 61-70 min 70 si peste

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

67.1

51.3

43.841.5

40.0

50.5

40.8

56.2

R² = 0.79085945630486

Distance to the closest hospital

Num

ber

of

avoid

able

hosp

italiza

tion/1

000 inhab.

Avoidable hospitalizations according to distance to the closest hospital - all communities in Caraș-Severin County

Page 19: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

V. Slatina –Timiș - Health outcomes

Page 20: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Average number of years/person lost due to premature death: Slatina-Timiș vs rural county and national rural

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

6.4

9

4.4

3

5.5

6.6

9

5.7

2

5.5

1

6.0

5

3.3

7

6.3

5

6.1

5

6.2

3

6.7

6

5.7

9

5.5

7

5.5

2 5.8

2

7.1

8

6.4

6 6.8

6 7.1

3

6.9

4

6.2

4

5.9

1

5.9

5

Slatina Timis Caras Rural Romania Rural

Averg

ae n

um

ber

of

years

/pers

lost

Page 21: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

VI. Conclusions and reccommendations

Page 22: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

The risk profile of the community highlights risk factors as eating red meat, consuming salt, drinking alcohol as factors that are above of the national average;

Slatina-Timiș faces high challenges such as increased risk profiles doubled with an accelerated growth of the population over 65 years old;

Even if Slatina-Timiș is confronted with an increased burden of diseases appearing on a rapidly growing older population (rate of increase higher that the national and county one), the results in terms of health status are good: general mortality is on a decreasing trend although such tendencies are not found at national or county level

Conclusions

Page 23: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

The ratio of community nurses versus the number of the population existent in Slatina-Timiș seems to be one of the determinant of the better health outcomes and lower resources utilization;

The MEDIATEQUE within ADAM is a good example for fulfilling the need of the community persons; it allows community members to understand in concrete terms what are thier rights/ entitlements, it enables them to trust the health team and be confident in the services received

Health data at present is collected and aggregated at county and national level; this leaves poor health data availability at the community level, with no proper information about its results in terms of population health.

Conclusions (2)

Page 24: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Slatina-Timiș consumes considerable less resources from the health budget as the most expensive level of care, the hospital, is the less utilized by Slatina-Timiș patients.

The ratio of one community nurse per one thousand population has proven useful and successful in activities such as the proper monitoring of newborns and pregnant women, for monitoring chronic diseases, arranging patients’s appointments to specialist care/ hospital;

The recipe of success is comprised of several factors: fully staff Health Center, proactive personnel, community organization into Belgian mutualistic principles and values

Monitoring systems of health data at local level is of tremendous importance for health systems that should be designed at county and national level in order to enable comparisons between results of different communities

Conclusions (3)

Page 25: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

Prevention campaigns in Slatina-Timiș should focus on healthy lifestyle education for lowering the consumption of red meat/ salt intake, alcohol and tobacco reduction.

The local level should have better access to information with regard to its population health, the trends of main health indicators, etc.;

Templates for collecting data and software to analyze data in real time and present decision makers with main findings may be developed at national level;

Reccommendations

Page 26: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

As a model of cost effective intervention, Slatina-Timiș model should be further documented and disseminated nationwide.

The example of the ratio of community nurses per number of population as well as their role in the provision of preventive activities, home care services that are associated with the good results in health outcomes and health resources consumption could represent the basis of a public policy / be disseminated countrywide;

The health system should recognize trends of increasing needs and provide adequate funding and resources for solving the issues as close as possible to the beneficiary (at community level); this would prevent much of the unnecessary spending that otherwise appear in overutilization of the upper levels of care.

Reccomendations (2)

Page 27: Adrian Pană Bogdan Ileanu Cristina Vladu Ioan Suru

As a general conclusion, Slatina –Timiș is a valuable example of organizational set up, good performance of a health care team at community level resulting in more trust of the community towards its health care team, better health of the population and lower consumption of resources. Defining policies to complement this model – i.e. support with additional monitoring and evaluation efforts-, ensuring adequate sustainable funding, defining policies to enable the dissemination of this model of health care organization would be beneficial to the health of other communities as well as to the nation’s health.