Adaptation on Climate Change

7/26/2019 Adaptation on Climate Change

1/9

1

Adaptation to Climate Change

Climate change has now become the biggest environmental changes that

brought serious threat to human life. Some of the impacts of these changes canalready be found in some parts of the world. Planting and harvest season is

erratic, and sometimes interspersed with a very long drought. Sea level rise is

increasing and it is feared will be able to drown small islands. This rise also

makes seawater infiltrated the river delta that can further destroy the livelihood

of the people.

Global climate change emerged as a result of the increase in global air

temperature after increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, CFC,

HFC, N2O), especially the increase in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Global climate change as the implications of global warming has led to instability

in the lower layers of the atmosphere, especially that close to the earth's surface.

Global warming is caused by increased greenhouse gases caused by the dominant

industries. Greenhouse gases are increasing the reflectivity and absorption

effects of the long waves that are heat (infrared) emitted by Earth's surface back

to the surface of the earth.

Concerning the magnitude of the danger to be faced, the world's

population already had to make a big and complete effort to respond to the

consequences of this change and reduce its impact on life. The UNFCCC has

emphasized the importance of strategy made a very important response,

mitigation and adaptation. While mitigation tries to limit climate change by

reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and to improve the 'sink'

opportunities, adaptation aims to reduce the negative impacts through a wide-

range of system-specific actions (Fussel and Klein, 2002).

Despite acknowledging the urgencies of applying both strategies at the

same time, this essay will focus on discussing the implementation of adaptation

addressing climate change as a form of response adjustments made to cope with


2/9

2

the impacts of climate change (UNISDR, UNDP, 2012) and its influence on the

development process. Huge international attention is paid to the this adaptation

strategy. Article 3 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change

encourages governments to adapt to climate change, and the Delhi Ministerial

Declaration on Climate Change and Sustainable Development in 2002, stated that

adaptation is of high priority for all countries and that adaptation requires

urgent attention and action on the part of all countries.

In this essay, the author will start by trying to discuss the concept of

adaptation and the ability of communities to adapt. And in the next section, I will

attempt to explore the relationship of this adaptation process of the formation ofthe development process that occurs in the community.

Understanding Adaptation to Climate Change

Environmental issues started to become a trend around 1970s. It is

characterized by the convening of the United Nations (UN) Conference on the

Environment in 1972 in Stockholm, Sweden better known as the Stockholm

Conference. The Conference is the answer to the declining quality of the

environment and the increasing concern in the world at that time.

After becoming a serious debate among scientist, United Nations

negotiated the UNFCCC at the UN Conference on environment and development

(UNCED) commonly known as Earth Summit on 1992 in Rio de Janeiro. The

objective of the treaty is to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the

atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous interference with the climate

system. Climate change is treated as one of the all-encompassing global

environmental changes likely to have deleterious effects on natural and human

systems, economies and infrastructure. Any potential risk associated with it call


3/9

3

for a broad spectrum of policy responses and strategies at the local, regional,

national and global level.

The UNFCCC emphasize two important response strategies: namelymitigation and adaptation in trying to reduce the effects of climate change. While

mitigation seeks to limit climate change by reducing the emissions of greenhouse

gases (GHG) and adaptation aims to alleviate the adverse impacts through a wide-

range of system-specific actions (Fussel and Klein, 2002).

In the study of human adaptability to the environment, the ecosystem is

the overall situation where adaptability takes place. Because the human

population spread in various parts of the world, the context of the adaptability

would be very different. A population in a particular ecosystem adapt to the

environmental conditions in specific ways. Environment, especially climate, plays

an important role in the lives of all human beings. Every human action and

interaction will be determined by their ability to create mechanisms to face the

challenges that come to him.

Therefore, according to Adger et al, vulnerability is socially constructed

phenomenon determined by the availability of resources and the ability and

opportunity to adapt to any changes, so adaptation may take the form of reducing

dependence on vulnerable systems (Adger, et al, 2003). According to Blaikie, et al,

vulnerability may be understood as the characteristics of a person, or group in

terms of their capacity to anticipate, cope with, resist and recover from the

impact of a natural hazard (Blaikie et al. 1994).

From the definition of vulnerability mentioned above, we can know that

every community or country has a various level of vulnerability. Due to uneven

temperature and precipitation, the effects of climate change will not be the same

in every part of the earth A common theme in the climate change impacts and

vulnerability. deployment of resources and unequal wealth also led to differences

in the level of vulnerability.


4/9

4

Many scholars tried to provide definitions about adaptation. Hardesty

argues that adaptation is the process which beneficial relationships are

established and maintained between an organism and its environment (Hardesty,

1977). Meanwhile, cultural ecologists defined adaptation as adjustment strategy

used by humankind during his life to respond to changes in environmental and

social (Alland, 1975, Harris, 1968, Moran 1982).

As a body established to fasilitate the application of the UNFCCC, the

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) defines adaptation as

adjustments in ecological, social or economic systems in response to actual or

expected stimuli and their effects or impacts. This term refers to changes inprocesses, practices and structures to moderate potential damages or to benefit

from opportunities associated with climate change (IPCC 2001). According to

IPCC, depending on its timing, goal and motive of its implementation, adaptation

can either be reactive or anticipatory, private or public, planned or autonomous.

Adaptations can also be short or long term, localised or widespread (IPCC 2001).

Besides adaptation, there are also the term resilience. In fact, these terms

are often used interchangeably. Some scholars refer resilience as the potential of

a system to remain in a particular configuration and to maintain its feedbacks and

function, and involves the ability of the system to re-organise, following

disturbance-driven change (Anderies et al, 2002). Another definition of resilience

is the amount of change the system can undergo and still retain the same controls

on function and structure, or still be in the same state within the same domain of

attraction (Resilience Alliance, 2002).

Mitigation and adaptation are the strategy to take in order to respond the

climate change. Some may have difficulties in differentiate the two of them. The

first difference between mitigation and adaptation is related to their scope and

duration. We can not directly see the benefits of mitigation as it relates to the

cycle of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, but the benefits will be felt globally.


5/9

5

While the benefit of adaptation can be seen earlier but only for its surroundings.

The second difference is the comparison of costs and benefits between the

methodes. With the diversity of choice, mitigation is only intended to reduce

greenhouse gas emissions and with its global benefits, its location does not

matter. The benefits between the methodes of mitigation can be determined and

compared. Meanwhile, adaptation have different objectives regarding the

locations, and the benefit is more difficult to quantify, because can only be

counted in the events of damage. The third difference is on the actor and the

types policies. The actors involved in mitigation, mostly from industries, are less

than those in adaptation, but better organised. While adaptation has so many

different sectoral interests with various policy recomendations (Klein, et al,

2003).

Through these definitions, we can understand that adaptation to the

environment indicate interrelationships between people and the environment. In

this context, human ecology approach emphasizes and shows an interplay

between the physical environment and socio-cultural systems. Rambo explained

model of human ecology system that shows linkages between the social systemand the ecological system that includes the transfer of energy, materials, and

information, from one system to another and between the components of each

system. In this interdependent relationship, a change in one component will

cause changes in the other components (Rambo, 1984).

Synergizing Adaptation to Development

It is so bad to be poor people as the global awareness of environmental

condition is increasing. These people oftenly got blamed on environmental

degradation. And when the impacts of climate change struck in, they deteriorate

most severly. Like Elliott said it, whilst the linkages between poverty and the

environment are complex, the numbers of people in poverty worldwide remains


6/9

6

large and it is the poorest groups who suffer the impacts of environmental

degradation most extensively and acutely (Elliott, 2006). And to counter some

opinion that blame poor people for the environmental degradation, Rogers

emphasized that what actually happens is the opposite with the more affluent

class of people having responsible for the most serious environmental damage

(Rogers: 2008).

Because of little resources they have, poor people in developing countries

seems to be more vulnerable to climate change. With difficulties in fulfilling their

own daily needs, they also had trouble getting out of condition exposed the

dangers of climate change effects. Some conditions make them more prone toclimate change, such as relying on agriculture and fisheries which are very

climate-sensitive and living in geographically marginal areas with potential

hazards.

Their poor conditions have been the concerns of development agencies.

According to Kline et al, this concern led to a shift in the discussion of climate

policy, which now has three roles, namely to control the concentration of

greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, prepare for and mitigate the effects of

climate change and to address issues of equity and development. The third roles

required as a condition for the success of climate policy in developing countries

(Kline et al: 2003).

Focus of attention that had been in the process of mitigation moved to

adaptation side due to the awareness of big threat coming from climate change

that it could fail the achievement of Millennium Development Goals. Growing

attentions are being paid to the process of adaptation to climate change. In spite

of interconnectedness between climate and development, it is also influenced by

the great number of groups involved and concerned in this adaptation strategies.

The shift is considered crucial within the broader context of sustainable

development to enhance the capacity of countries and communities to adapt to


7/9

7

climate change, which is often limited by lack of resources, poor institutions and

inadequate infrastructure, amongst other things (Smit et al., 2003).

To integrate the policies and efforts to tackle climate change with thedevelopment process, the term mainstreaming is used to ensure long-term

funding, while at the same time reduce bad impacts of development activities to

climatic conditions. According to ADB et al, the process of adaptation is better

achieved through mainstreaming and integrating climate responses into

development and poverty eradication processes, rather than by identifying and

treating them separately (ADB et al, 2003).

Many scholars found out that even if they were constructed in different

context, climate change and sustainable development link with each other and

can work together. Climate change can threat the achievement of MDGs with the

destructing effects, such as to agriculture, forest, global health. This link make it

more necessary for the developing countries to prepare their development plans

and ensure their synergy with their strategy in adaptation to climate change

(Huq, 2002).

However to do such a thing is not easy. The difficulty comes from fact that

the climate change and sustainable development have different objective. The

projects of adaptation to climate change are under the international mechanisms

that only have authority only to focus on environmental impacts. While

sustainable development arrangement cover three interdependent dimensions

namely environmental, economic and social.

This led to international action to a dilemma in the middle of the need for

reductionist identification of the climate-related part of global social and

economic trends, versus the desire to see climate change as another important

dimension of global environmental threats to development (Adger et al, 2003).

This is an interesting challenge for development agencies. They need to find a


8/9

8

specific formula that can include both concepts in the program and consistent

with poverty reduction policies.

In conclusion, Adaptation to climate change is needed to reduce thedangerous impact of climate change. This strategy also brings new challenges in

the form of competing objectives of sustainable development, which hopefully

will bring more benefit to the people. Like most development projects, it will be

successful only if the local community is getting involved in the planning and

implementation process. And by providing the long-term benefits of the program,

it is possible to build support from the local community.

Reference

ADB et al. 2002, Poverty and Climate Change: Reducing the Vulnerability of the

Poor through Adaptation, www.oecd.org/dataoecd/60/27/2502872.pdf

Adger, W.N, et al. 2003. Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. In

Progress in Development Studies 3: 179.

Alland, A. Jr. 1975. Adaptation. InAnnual Review of Anthropology, 4:59-73.

Anderies, J. M., et al. 2002. Grazing Management, Resilience And The Dynamics Of A

Fire Driven Rangeland System. In Ecosystems5:2344.

Bennet, John W. 1996. Human Ecology as Human Behavior. New brunswick, Ney

Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Blaikie, P., et al. 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, Peoples Vulnerability and

Disasters, London: Routledge

Elliott, J.A. 2006. An Introduction on Sustainable Development: Third Edition.

Routledge. London.

Fussel, H.M., and Klein, R.J.T., 2002, "Assessing the Vulnerability and Adaptation to

Climate Change: An Evolution of Conceptual Thinking", Paper presented at the

UNDP Expert Group Meeting on Integrating Disaster Reduction and Adaptation to

Climate Change, Havana, Cuba, 1719th June 2002.

Hardesty, D. L. 1977. Ecological Anthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill.


9/9

9

Harris, Marvin. 1968. The Rise of Anthropological Theory. New York: Thomas Y.

Crowell.

Hawley, Amos H. 1986. Human Ecology a Theoretical Essay. Chicago, The

University of Chicago.

Huq, S., 2005, "Adaptation to Climate Change", Paper for the International Climate

Change Taskforce, London: Institute for Public Policy Research,

www.ippr.org.uk/ ecomm/files.adaptation.pdf

IPCC 2001, Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability,

McCarthy, J.J., et al (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University

Klein, RJT. et al. 2003. Integrating Mitigation and adaptation into climate and

development Policy: Three Research Questions. Tyndall Center for Climate Change

Research. Working Paper 40

Miller, Elmer S. Dan Charles A. Weitz.An Introduction to Anthropology. Englewood

Cliffs. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1979.

Moran, Emilio F. 1982. Human Adaptability An Introduction to Ecological

Anthropology.Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, Inc.

Rambo, Terry. Human Ecology Research by Social Scientist on TropicalAgroecosystem. In A. Terry Rambo & Percy E. Sajise, An Introduction to Human

Ecology Research on Agricultural Systems in Southeast Asia. Los Banos: University

of the Philippines.

Rogers, Peter P, et al. 2008. An Introduction to Sustainable Development. Glen

Educational Foundation. London.

Sahlins, M.D. 1968. Culture and Environment: The Study of Cultural Ecology.Dalam Robert A. Manners dan David Kaplan (eds.), Theory in Anthropology: A

Source Book, Chicago: Aldine.

Smit, B., et al. 2000, "An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability",

Climatic Change, Vol. 45, pages: 223251
http://www.ippr.org.uk/http://www.ippr.org.uk/

Documents

Adaptation on Climate Change