Access and Waiting List Policy - Aintree University Hospital
39
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 1 of 39 Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on intranet Issue number: 2 nd Edition Author with contact details David Warwick, Acting Head of Performance Tel: 0151 529 0463 Original Issue date May 2014 Issue Date: May 2016 Review Date: May 2019 Level Trust wide and inclusive of services within the community for which the Trust has a contractual obligation to deliver. Location of Staff applicable to All Trust Staff Staff groups applicable to All clinical staff All patient administration staff All operational management teams To be read In conjunction with / Associated Documents: Please refer to references (Page 33) Information Classification Label NHS Confidential NHS Protect Unclassified Access to Information To access this document in another language or format please contact the policy author. Document Change History (changes from previous issues of policy (if appropriate) : Issue Number Page Changes made with rationale and impact on practice Date 2 6 20 24 Inclusion of Roles and Responsibilities RTT guidance updated (Pause removed &patient initiated delays updated) Patient cancellation of elective admission May 2016 NB: This version of the Trust Access and Waiting List Policy is pending Clinical Commissioning Group approval. ACCESS AND WAITING LIST POLICY
Access and Waiting List Policy - Aintree University Hospital
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 1 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
Issue number: 2nd Edition
Author with contact details
Tel: 0151 529 0463
Issue Date: May 2016 Review Date: May 2019
Level Trust wide and inclusive of services within the community for
which the Trust has a contractual obligation to deliver.
Location of Staff applicable to
All Trust Staff Staff groups applicable to
All clinical staff
Please refer to references (Page 33)
Information Classification Label
NHS Confidential NHS Protect Unclassified
Access to Information To access this document in another language
or format please contact the policy author.
Document Change History (changes from previous issues of policy (if
appropriate) :
Issue Number Page Changes made with rationale and impact on
practice
Date
RTT guidance updated (Pause removed &patient initiated delays
updated)
Patient cancellation of elective admission
May 2016
NB: This version of the Trust Access and Waiting List Policy is
pending Clinical Commissioning Group approval.
ACCESS AND WAITING LIST POLICY
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 2 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
CONTENTS
1.
Summary Page Guiding Principles Scope of the Policy Purpose of the
Policy
3 3 4 4
4
Content 4.1. Waiting Time Standards 4.1.1. Referral to Treatment
(RTT) Access Standards 4.1.2. Cancer Access Standards 4.1.3.
Diagnostic Access Standards (DM01) 4.1.4. Access to Health Services
for Military Veterans 4.1.5. Exceptions 4.2. Time Standards to be
Adhered to by All Staff 4.2.1. Clock Starts 4.2.2. Clock Stops
4.2.3. Adjustments and Delays 4.3. Waiting List Management 4.4.
Training
7 7 7 8 8 9 9
10 10 13 20 23 30
5 Monitoring of Compliance 31
6 Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Statement
32
1 Glossary of Terms 34
2 RTT pathway Guidance 38
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 3 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
1.0 SUMMARY PAGE
Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (hereafter
referred to as ‘the Trust’) is committed to providing an exemplary
standard of care to patients and an important component part of
this is patient access to services. The Trust is committed to
provide a service that is fair and accessible to all, providing
patient choice and delivering a positive patient experience.
This policy outlines the scope and standards which must be followed
explicitly for:
• Pathway management of all patients referred into the Trust •
Current national standards and data definitions
All clinical and non-clinical staff involved in patient pathway
management must ensure that their processes and procedures are
consistent with this policy or have Trust approved Standard
Operating Procedures in place which adhere to the guiding
principles of this policy. 1.1 Guiding Principles
The NHS Constitution establishes the principles and values of the
NHS in England and sets out the rights to which
patients, public and staff are entitled. The constitution
incorporates seven key principles which set out the following
rights;
The NHS provides a comprehensive service, available to all
irrespective of gender, race, disability, age, sexual
orientation, religion, belief, gender reassignment, pregnancy and
maternity or marital or civil partnership status.
Access to NHS services is based on clinical need, not an
individual’s ability to pay. NHS services are free
of charge, except in limited circumstances sanctioned by
Parliament.
The NHS aspires to the highest standards of excellence and
professionalism – in the provision of high
quality care that is safe, effective and focused on patient
experience.
The NHS aspires to put patients at the heart of everything it does.
It should support individuals to
promote and manage their own health. NHS services must reflect, and
should be coordinated around and
tailored to, the needs and preferences of patients, their families
and their carers. Patients, with their families
and carers, where appropriate, will be involved in and consulted on
all decisions about their care and
treatment.
The NHS works across organisational boundaries and in partnership
with other organisations in the
interest of patients, local communities and the wider population.
The NHS is committed to working jointly
with other local authority services, other public sector
organisations and a wide range of private and voluntary
sector organisations to provide and deliver improvements in health
and wellbeing.
The NHS is committed to providing best value for taxpayers’ money
and the most effective, fair and
sustainable use of finite resources.
The NHS is accountable to the public, communities and patients that
it serves.
With effect from 1 st
April 2010 patients have the right to access services within
maximum wait times, or for the NHS
to take all reasonable steps to offer a range of alternative
providers including those within the private healthcare
sector (section 3a NHS Constitution).
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 4 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
The following NHS Constitution process flow must be followed when
dealing with a patient request for further
information relating to exercising their rights under the NHS
constitution.
1.2 Scope of the Policy This policy applies to all patients
referred electively into the Trust for investigation and treatment,
and for all members of staff employed by the Trust. In particular
it applies to those staff involved in delivering or supporting
direct clinical care. In instances where Trust services are unable
to comply with this Access and Waiting List Policy the responsible
Clinical Business Manager/Service Lead and Clinical Lead must,
within a local standard operating procedure, clearly document
revised processes to be followed and standards to be attained and
seek appropriate Divisional and Trust approval for such variations.
1.3 Purpose of the Policy The Purpose of this policy is to
guarantee that the best interests of our patients are served by
ensuring that the Trust’s services are managed in line with
national waiting time standards and the NHS Constitution (April
2010). This document outlines the Trust and Commissioner
Requirements and supporting Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for
managing timely patient access to secondary care services from
referral to treatment, as well as discharge to primary care.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 5 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
2.0 INTRODUCTION
This policy gives guidance to staff within the Trust on providing
access to services for patients. This will be achieved by ensuring
that all staff understand their role in managing patient access and
the delivery of waiting time standards. Patients’ experience of the
NHS can be improved by ensuring they receive high quality care, in
the right place, and
minimising the time they wait for treatment and care. The
underlying principle in relation to consultant-led waiting
times is that patients should receive high quality care without
unnecessary delay.
In the majority of cases, it will be clear how the rules should
apply. However, where there is doubt, or where
decisions on their application are finely balanced, then local
decisions should be made within the framework of
national rules and in line with what is in the best clinical
interests of the patient, and considering how the patient
would perceive their waiting time.
In summary, national waiting time rules provide a framework within
which the NHS has the autonomy to make
sensible, clinically sound decisions about how to apply them, in a
way that is consistent with how patients
experience or perceive their wait. They also ensure that waiting
times are recorded and reported consistently across
the NHS in England.
This document sets out the policy to be followed by all staff when
dealing with or managing waiting lists and patient
waiting times within the Trust, including referral to treatment
(RTT), cancer patients, diagnostics and Ex-Military
Service Personnel and must be provided to the following staff
groups for reference.
Medical staff
Medical secretaries
Operational Management Teams
Cancer Trackers/MDT Coordinators
It is the responsibility of Clinical Business Units (CBU) to ensure
all relevant staff are aware of the correct waiting list
administration processes and that those staff possess the necessary
knowledge and skills to ensure compliance.
The local application of this policy should be considered by the
Clinical Business Units when undertaking
departmental/CBU training needs analysis to ensure that the central
RTT team are appraised of future training
needs and therefore able to plan programmes of education
appropriately. It is the responsibility of all staff to
adhere
to the notes in this policy.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 6 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
This policy document must be readily available in every CBU that
deals with waiting lists/access and must be
available in each clinic room for reference purposes. A signed copy
of this policy should be held by the Clinical
Business Manager.
Chief Executive: The Chief Executive has overall responsibility and
accountability for delivering access targets
as defined in the NHS Plan, NHS Constitution and Operating
Framework.
Chief Operating Officer: The Chief Operating Officer is responsible
for ensuring that there are robust systems
in place for the audit, management and delivery of access
standards.
Divisional Chief Operating Officers: Responsible for the monitoring
of performance in the delivery of all
access standards and ensuring that Clinical Business Units deliver
the activity required to meet those standards.
Divisional Director of Operations for Support Services: Responsible
for final sign off of performance in
relation to the delivery of the 6 week diagnostic wait standard and
all cancer access standards.
Divisional Director of Operations for Surgery and Anaesthesia:
Responsible for final sign off of performance
in relation to the delivery of all RTT access standards.
Clinical Business Managers: Responsible for the monitoring of
performance in the delivery of all relevant
access standards and for ensuring the specialities deliver the
activity required to meet the waiting list targets.
Hospital Consultants: Consultants have a shared responsibility with
their Clinical Business Managers for
managing their patients waiting times in accordance with the
maximum guaranteed waiting time to deliver all
relevant access standards.
Clinical Nurse Specialists: Clinical Nurse Specialists have a
shared responsibility with their Consultants and
Clinical Business Managers for managing their patient’s waiting
times in accordance with the maximum
guaranteed waiting time.
Patient Appointment Centre: The Patient Appointment Centre (PAC) is
responsible for arranging
appointments and for carrying out the operating procedures for the
administration of the patient’s referral and for
entering all information onto the PAS system accurately. In
Clinical Business Units where this function is
devolved responsibility passes to the Clinical Business
Manager.
Head of Business Intelligence, Information Services and Clinical
Coding: Responsible for administering
data required for managing and reporting RTT waiting times,
activity and outcomes.
Waiting List Clerks/Medical Secretaries: Responsible for ensuring
waiting lists are managed in line with their
job descriptions and locally derived standard operating procedures
which underpin this policy. All 2ww patient
referrals, diagnostics, treatment episodes and waiting lists must
be managed on the Trust’s PAS and Somerset
system. All information relating to patient activity must be
recorded accurately and in a timely manner.
MDT Co-ordinators and Data Clerks: Responsible for monitoring
cancer and RTT pathway for patients,
ensuring they are managed in line with this policy and assisting in
the pro-active management of patient
pathways on PAS in line with their job descriptions.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 7 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
All Staff for whom this document applies: All staff will ensure
that any data created, edited, used, or recorded
on Trust IT systems within their area of responsibility is accurate
and recorded in accordance with this policy
and other Trust policies relating to collection, storage and use of
data in order to maintain the highest standards
of data quality and maintain patient confidentiality.
4.0 CONTENT OF THE POLICY
4.1. WAITING TIME STANDARDS
This section describes the waiting time standards to be adhered to
by all staff when dealing with or managing
waiting lists and patient waiting times within the Trust, including
referral to treatment (RTT), cancer patients,
diagnostics and Ex-Military Service Personnel.
4.1.1. Referral to Treatment
The NHS Constitution provides patients with a right to access
services within maximum waiting times, including
the right to start consultant-led treatment within a maximum of 18
weeks from referral for non-urgent conditions.
If this is not possible, the NHS Constitution requires the NHS to
take all reasonable steps to offer patients a
range of suitable alternative providers and it is the
responsibility of the trust to ensure patients have the
information they need to exercise those options if need be. The
Referral to Treatment operational standards
are1;
92% of patients on the active consultant led RTT caseload
(Incomplete Pathways) are waiting no longer than 18 weeks
(Contracted Standard).
90% of admitted patients to be treated within 18 weeks of referral
– admitted patients are patients who have an admission as part of
their consultant led pathway (Local Standard).
95% of non-admitted patients to be treated within 18 weeks of
referral – non admitted patients are patients who do not have an
admission on their consultant led pathway (Local Standard).
To support the delivery of RTT access standards all specialties
will aim to offer patient care within the internal
operating standards and time periods illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Trust Internal Operating Standards and Times
Periods
NB: A guide to RTT codes is included within appendix 2 of this
policy 1 Local targets can be applied by Monitor
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 8 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
4.1.2. Cancer Waiting Times
In addition to the individual patient rights as set out in the NHS
Constitution (and its supporting handbook) there
is a set of cancer waiting time performance measures for which the
NHS is held to account for delivering by
NHS England. There are a number of government pledges on waiting
times, including:
A maximum one month (31-day) wait from the date a decision to treat
(DTT) is made to the first definitive
treatment for all cancers;
A maximum 31-day wait for subsequent treatment where the treatment
is surgery;
A maximum 31-day wait for subsequent treatment where the treatment
is a course of radiotherapy;
A maximum 31-day wait for subsequent treatment where the treatment
is an anti-cancer drug regimen;
A maximum two month (62-day) wait from urgent referral for
suspected cancer to the first definitive
treatment for all cancers;
A maximum 62-day wait from referral from an NHS cancer screening
service to the first definitive treatment
for cancer;
A maximum 62-day wait for the first definitive treatment following
a consultant’s decision to upgrade the
priority of the patient (all cancers);
A maximum two-week wait to see a specialist for all patients
referred with suspected cancer symptoms
A maximum two-week wait to see a specialist for all patients
referred for investigation of breast symptoms,
even if cancer is not initially suspected.
The tolerances within these contracted and locally agreed standards
are there to deal with valid exceptions such
as patient choice to be seen outside of agreed 18 week or cancer
access standards, patients cooperation in
being seen within nationally agreed timescales (i.e. DNA’s and
cancellations), and clinical exceptions, where
patients cannot be treated due to clinical reasons. The overall
goal of the Trust and of this policy is to treat all
patients within nationally agreed timescales.
4.1.3. Diagnostic Waiting Times
Many patients require diagnostics to determine their diagnosis and
therefore appropriate treatment. Diagnostics
must always be performed and reported within clinically appropriate
timescales which do not exceed a maximum
waiting time of 6 weeks.
The Trust reports waiting times on the following 15 key diagnostic
tests:
Imaging - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Physiological Measurement - Cardiology - echocardiography
Physiological Measurement - Cardiology - electrophysiology
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 9 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
Physiological Measurement - Neurophysiology – peripheral
neurophysiology
Physiological Measurement - Respiratory physiology - sleep
studies
Physiological Measurement - Urodynamics - pressures &
flows
Endoscopy - Colonoscopy
Endoscopy - Cystoscopy
Endoscopy – Gastroscopy
Diagnostics should take into account the patient’s stage on pathway
and target date for treatment to ensure that the test is performed
and report available within a timescale that does not delay
treatment.
4.1.4. Access to Health Services for Military Veterans
As per DOH guidance War pensioners and Ex-Military Service
personnel should receive priority treatment if their
condition is directly attributable to injuries sustained during
service (unless there is an emergency case or
another case demands clinical priority) but note that priority
should not be given for unrelated conditions.
General Practitioners should make it clear in referrals for
treatment that the patient is a military veteran and
requires priority treatment for a condition that, in their clinical
opinion, may be related to their military service.
4.1.5. Exceptions
The right to treatment is subject to various exceptions. In
particular, the right to treatment within 18 weeks from
referral will cease to apply in circumstances where:
patients choose to wait longer;
delaying the start of a patients treatment is in their best
clinical interests, for example where smoking
cessation or weight management is likely to improve the outcome of
the treatment
it is clinically appropriate for a patient’s condition to be
actively monitored in secondary care without clinical
intervention or diagnostic procedures at that stage
patients fail to attend appointments which you had chosen from a
set of reasonable options; or
The treatment is no longer necessary.
Guidance relating to the NHS constitution indicates that the Trust
should;
work with the relevant commissioner to identify a range of
alternative providers if one cannot be
sourced through locally agreed arrangements
keep patients informed, including about their length of wait if
they choose not to accept the offer of
having treatment with an alternative provider, and making it clear
that they (the original providers)
remain responsible for patient care
contract with alternative providers and agree any specific
operational details and requirements (e.g.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 10 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
format for transmission of tests and reports, turnaround times,
transmission of any relevant past
diagnostic images and reports)
notify their Commissioners and NHS England if an alternative
provider has failed in its duties, and
Work with the relevant commissioner to ensure cost of treatment is
properly reconciled.
A formal process for dealing with NHS constitution requests has
been set up in the Trust and is identified in
section 1.
4.2 TIME STANDARDS TO BE ADHERED TO BY ALL STAFF
This section describes the waiting time standards to be adhered to
by all staff in relation to;
Clock starts
Clock stops
Waiting List Management, including referral to treatment (RTT),
cancer patients, diagnostics and Ex-Military
Service Personnel.
Sources of referral that
commence 18 week clock
clock)
A waiting time clock starts when a referral is made by any care
professional or service permitted by an English NHS commissioner to
make such referrals. A referrals from the following may start an
18-week clock: General practitioners (GPs) General dental
practitioners (GDPs) General practitioners (and other
practitioners) with a special interest
(GPwSIs) Hospital consultants Optometrists and orthoptists Accident
and emergency (A&E) Minor injuries Units (MIU) Walk in Centres
(WiC) Genitourinary medicine clinics (GUM) National screening
programmes Specialist nurses or allied health professionals where
CCG’s have approved
these Self-referrals if this has been verified by the patient’s GP
Prison health services Referral from private practice
Referrals to services from
Primary Care which start
an 18 week clock
Referrals from primary care to the following services start 18
week
clocks:-
Medical or surgical consultant-led services irrespective of setting
including: Referral-management centres (this covers arrangements
known as clinical
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 11 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
advisory centres, integrated clinical assessment and treatment
services, interface services etc)
Cancer services (for which a 62 day cancer-target clock also
starts) Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics (for which a 14 day waiting
time target for
first outpatient/assessment applies) Diagnostic services provided
the patient will be assessed and might, if
appropriate, be treated by a medical or surgical consultant-led
service, before responsibility is transferred back to the referring
health professional (i.e. ‘straight-to-test’ scopes etc).*
Practitioners with special interests if they are part of the
referral management arrangement as defined above
Referrals to services from
start an 18 week clock
In some circumstances an 18 week clock will start in a secondary
care setting.
Consultant to consultant (or consultant-led services) referrals do
start a clock,
specifically for:
A different condition newly identified by the consultant and
unrelated to the original condition for which the patient was
referred (e.g. cardiology problem identified at assessment
following Orthopaedic referral).
A consultant to consultant referral for the same condition
continues the 18 week clock that commenced in primary care (e.g.
clinician refers to a colleague who may sub specialise in the
management of specific conditions).
A patient may attend A&E/Assessment services and it is
identified that they require to commence an elective pathway within
a medical or surgical specialty*
In cases where a patient has been initially admitted as
non-elective and it is identified that they require further
treatment as an elective patient (e.g. patient admitted with acute
cholecystitis who is listed for cholecystectomy at a future
date)
In some cases where a patient has not been on an 18 week pathway
(e.g. may have been on active monitoring) and a new decision to
treat within a medical or surgical consultant-led service is
made.
Where a Patient has been seen privately by a Clinician but now
requires a follow up appointment in the NHS, the referral must be
treated as a new referral to the Trust and seen in chronological
order (unless clinical priority dictates) within the guaranteed
waiting times. A new Referral to treatment time clock will start at
the point the patient is referred into the NHS. Where the patient
has already had treatment in the private sector and the NHS care is
for postoperative follow up or active monitoring only, this
referral will not start a new RTT period.
*This does not apply to fracture or to anticoagulant clinics since
this is a
continuation of a non-elective pathway.
Referrals that do not
commence an 18 week
clock
Referrals from primary care to the following services do not start
the week clock:
Allied Healthcare Professionals (e.g. physiotherapy) healthcare
science (e.g. audiology) or mental health services that are not
medical or surgical consultant-led (including multidisciplinary
teams and community teams run by mental health trusts) irrespective
of setting.
Diagnostic services if the referral is part of a ‘straight-to-test’
arrangement.* Primary dental services provided by dental students
in hospital settings. Private patients or patients under the care
of a non-English commissioner.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 12 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
Note: Referrals from primary care to diagnostics*
Direct Access – the GP refers for diagnosis reasons and upon
receiving the result/s will make the decision
whether or not to refer the patient on to secondary care. The
direct access diagnostic does not start an 18 week
clock since the GP has not yet determined if the patient requires
onward referral for further
investigation/intervention.
The information below describes, once a clock is to be started, at
which point it should do so. For the majority of
referrals the clock automatically starts when a referral is added
to Sigma. Therefore, it is crucial that referral dates
put onto the Sigma system or sourced via Choose & Book (or its
replacement) are accurate and consistent with
this policy.
starts
In the case of a referral from primary care or a self-referral, the
clock start is recorded as the date when the referral is received
at the provider.
In the case of eRS the clock is recorded as the date that the
patient converted their Unique Booking Reference Number
(UBRN)
If a patient is booked via the Telephone Appointment Line (TAL) the
clock start is recorded as the date the patient made contact with
TAL.
If the referral is from an interface service or another acute
provider, then clock start details must be obtained from the
referring organisation. This will be carried out by the RTT data
entry team. Clock start details should be provided from the
referring provider via an Inter-Provider Transfer Minimum data set
(IPT MDS).
If the interface service provided a first definitive treatment that
was subsequently determined to be unsuccessful or if the patient is
referred on following active monitoring then the clock start will
be when Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust receives that referral.
If the referral is from one consultant-led service to another for a
different condition (e.g. cardiology problem identified at
assessment following orthopaedic referral) the clock starts when
the consultant communicates the decision to refer to the patient.
This also applies when a clinician in A&E/Assessment service
makes a referral to a specialty requesting that the patient is
reviewed on an elective basis.
Note: this is the date that the consultant communicates the
decision to the patient and not the date when the referral is
received. If the referral is from one consultant-led service to
another for the same condition
(e.g. clinician refers to a colleague who may specialise in the
management of a specific condition), the clock start is the date
the initial referral was received from primary care.
Consultant to consultant referral for the same condition does not
start a new 18 week clock but continues the existing clock. The
consultant receiving the referral for specialist management or
advice, should be made aware of current patient clock times and
encouraged, where clinically appropriate, to expedite the advice or
management in order to ensure compliance with the overall treatment
waiting time for the primary condition.
In cases where a patient has been initially admitted on a
non-elective pathway
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 13 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
and it is identified that they require further treatment as an
elective patient (Patient admitted with acute cholecystitis who is
listed for cholecystectomy at a future date).
The start of the 18 week clock would be recorded as the date that a
decision to list was communicated to the patient. In those
circumstances where a decision to list cannot be made during the
non-elective episode e.g. the team caring for the patient need to
refer to another specialty for further advise or carry out the
procedure) the 18 week clock would start on the date on which the
patient was informed that referral to the other consultant led
clinical team was being made.
If a patient has been on active monitoring and a decision is made
that medical or surgical consultant led intervention is required
then a new 18 week clock would start at the time the clinician
identifies further intervention is required and communicates this
to the patient.
Bilateral procedures An 18 week clock would have commenced at the
point at which the patient was
referred for the first stage of treatment. When the first stage of
treatment has
been completed the 18 week clock would stop. Upon completion of the
first stage
of treatment, a new 18 week clock would start when the patient
becomes fit and
ready for the second stage procedure.
4.2.2. Clock stops
The information below describes the decisions and points at which
an 18 week patients RTT clock would stop.
Decisions that stop an
18 week clock
The 18 week clock stops when First definitive treatment begins.
This could be: Treatment provided by an interface service Treatment
provided by a consultant-led service When a clinical decision is
made that treatment is not required When a patient chooses to
decline treatment (permanently) When a period of active monitoring
is commenced A decision is made to add a patient to a transplant
list. A decision is made to return the patient to primary care for
non-consultant-led
treatment in primary care.
18 week clock stops
Clock stop (see above for details of clock stops)
First definitive treatment – the clock stops on the date that the
patient receives the first definitive treatment intended to manage
his or her condition. For inpatient or day case admission, the
clock stops on the day of admission. For treatment provided in an
outpatient setting, the clock stops on the day the
patient attends and is treated A clinical decision that treatment
is not required – the clock stops on the date
that the clinical decision is communicated to the patient. Patient
choice to decline treatment – the clock stops on the date that
the
patient declines treatment, having been offered it. Active
monitoring – the clock stops on the date that the clinical decision
to
commence active monitoring is made and communicated to the patient.
Patients may initiate the start of a period of active monitoring
themselves (for
example by choosing to decline treatment to see how they cope with
their symptoms) and therefore the clock would stop. Except in cases
where a
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 14 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
patient wants to have a particular diagnostic test/ appointment or
other intervention, but wants to delay the appointment for a period
of no greater than 6 weeks.
Decision to return the patient to primary care for
non-medical/surgical consultant-led treatment in primary care – the
clock stops on the date that this is communicated to the
patient.
A patient DNA’s their 1st appointment following initial referral
that started their waiting time clock, provided that the Trust can
demonstrate that the appointment was clearly communicated to the
patient.
A patient DNA’s any other appointment and is subsequently
discharged back to the care of their GP, provided that: The Trust
can demonstrate that the appointment was clearly communicated
to
the patient Discharging the patient is not contrary to their best
clinical interests Discharging the patient is carried out according
to local, publicly
available/published, policies on DNA.
Outpatient treatment (or medical or surgical consultant-led
treatment irrespective of setting) if no subsequent inpatient or
day-case admission is expected.
First-line treatment – less intensive treatments or medical
management attempted with the intention of avoiding more invasive
procedures or treatment.
Inpatient or day-case treatment. Diagnostic tests turned into
therapeutic procedures during the investigation. The fitting of a
medical device. Therapy (for example physiotherapy, speech and
language therapy, podiatry,
counselling) to healthcare science interventions (e.g. hearing aid
fitting) if that is what the medical or surgical consultant-led
service decides is the intervention intended to manage the
patient’s disease, condition or injury and avoid further
intervention.
Interventions that do
clock
The following examples do not stop the patients clock:
Administration of pain relief before a surgical procedure takes
place or other steps to manage a patient’s condition in advance of
definitive treatment.
Treatment for MRSA where this is not the reason why the patient was
referred to the hospital.
Consultant-to-consultant referrals where the underlying condition
remains unchanged. In this case, where an external tertiary
referral is made, an Inter- provider transfer Minimum Data set must
be completed by the medical secretary.
The act of making a tertiary referral or a referral from one
provider to another. The clock does not stop if a provider rejects
a referral, stating that their
service is not appropriate for this patient. The referrer must
re-refer the patient to an appropriate service without delay*
*Note: This means that Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation
Trust (AUH)
will inherit waits from other providers (e.g. ICATS, GMSC, Acute
Trusts) if patients
are rejected as unsuitable. In addition if AUH rejects referrals
sent via eRS then
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 15 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
the GP is able to use the same UBRN number to book the patient into
another
service. The clock will start at the point the original referral
was made.
Planned Patients
1. Bilateral Procedures
A bilateral procedure is a procedure that is performed on both
sides of the body at
matching anatomical sites. Examples include cataract removals and
hip or knee
replacements.
Consultant-led bilateral procedures are covered by 18 weeks with a
separate
clock for each procedure. The 18-week clock for the first
consultant-led bilateral
procedure will stop when the first procedure is carried out (or the
date of
admission for the first procedure if it is an inpatient/day case
procedure). When
the patient becomes fit and ready for the second consultant-led
bilateral
procedure, a new 18 week clock will start.
*Notes*
We should record each episode as it happens which means that
patients can
have the appropriate elective Method of Admission of WL. The second
procedure
should only be added to PAS once the patient is fit and able to
have it. Our
reporting would then report 2 separate pathways.
2. Other Planned Procedures
This means an appointment /procedure or series of appointments/
procedures as
part of an agreed programme of care which is required for clinical
reasons to be
carried out at a specific time or repeated at a specific frequency.
Planned activity
is also sometimes called “surveillance,” “re-do” or “follow-up”.
Examples include 6-
month repeat colonoscopy following removal of a malignancy, tumour,
or polyp.
Patients should only be included on planned waiting lists if there
are clinical
reasons why the patient cannot have the procedure or treatment
until a specified
time. Once the patient is clinically ready for treatment to
commence, the patient
should be transferred to the active waiting list and an 18 week
clock should start.
In many of these cases the patient is planned because they have
already had their
First Treatment and so the planned activity will not be measured
against 18 Weeks.
There will be some patients, though, who are planned but waiting
for their First
Treatment, e.g. a child who can only have the procedure at a
certain age. In these
cases we should be measuring one RTT period up until the decision
to treat and
then another one when the patient is clinically ready to have their
treatment.
4.2.3. Adjustments & Delays
Beyond a certain point, patient initiated delay makes it
unreasonable or impossible for the Trust to provide
treatment within 18 weeks. The way in which patient initiated
delays, either through deferment of treatment,
failure to attend for treatment or repeated cancellation of agreed
appointments, is detailed within this section.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 16 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
Legitimate exceptions
and delays
There is nothing in the 18 week pathway equivalent to the pauses
suspensions or
clock resets which were allowed under the previous measurement of
RTT
pathways.
Pauses cannot be applied to any element of an RTT pathway,
regardless of
whether appointment dates offered are reasonable or not.
*Note: It is crucial that all offers of admission are recorded on
Sigma to provide an
audit trail of notice periods and admission offers made.
Consultant Upgrade Consultant upgrades are a mechanism which allows
consultants (specialists) to
“upgrade” a patient at any time from when the referral was received
until the
decision to treat, but not after.
Upgrading a referral does not convert it into a Two-Week Wait (2WW)
referral.
The 62 day “clock” starts when the consultant makes a decision to
upgrade and
not when the original referral was received.
Reasonable offer of
appointment
The current definition of a “reasonable offer” is that it gives the
patient a minimum
of 3 weeks’ notice for outpatient and diagnostic appointments and 3
weeks for
inpatient and day case procedures with a choice of 2 different
dates if the offer is
made verbally. This information must be clearly documented on Sigma
and it is
the responsibility of the staff member offering the TCI to do this
(Medical
Secretary, waiting list coordinator, Patient Appointment Centre
staff etc.).
Patients who choose
pathway
Some patients will turn down reasonable appointments because they
prefer, for
example, to go on holiday or because of work commitments. Beyond a
certain
point, patient initiated delay like this makes it unreasonable or
impossible for the
NHS to provide treatment within 18 weeks.
Prior to referral onto an 18 week pathway GPs should ensure that
patients are
ready and available to receive treatment within this timeframe. In
such instances
where patients cannot make themselves available for a period of 6
weeks the
patient should, if clinically appropriate, be referred back to
their G.P with
appropriate communication giving rationale for the return of the
referral.
Additions to the
waiting list
Patients can only be added to the in-patient/day case waiting lists
following a pre-
operative assessment which has deemed them medically fit to undergo
their
intended routine procedure. Patients who are not fit for routine
treatment should
not be listed. These patients should be referred back to the GP
unless
optimisation is expected to take less than two weeks.
This needs to be a clinical decision based on the time it will take
to optimise the
patient and the likely gap between decision to admit and date of
admission.
Examples of patients that will not be optimised within two weeks
are as follows:
Patients with high blood pressure Patients needing to lose weight
Patients with cardiac or respiratory problems
Patients requiring a diagnostic test before a definitive decision
to admit can be made
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 17 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
The decision to proceed with these types of patients lies entirely
with the
consultant anaesthetist/consultant surgeon who, following a review
of all clinical
information will make a decision whether to proceed with or defer
treatment. The
responsible consultant must ensure that such decisions are
discussed with the
patient, and/or carer, and clearly documented in the medical
record.
In those circumstances where the patient’s condition is deemed to
be
clinically urgent and the hospital consultant needs to seek advice
/
intervention of another consultant, the 18 week clock will continue
until
such time as the patient received their first definitive treatment
or they are
returned to the care of the GP and asked to re refer the patient
when fit
for surgery.
admission as an
inpatient/day case
Some patients will choose to delay their routine treatment/surgery
because of
personal circumstances. Where a decision to admit for treatment has
been made
(i.e. the patient is listed for treatment as an inpatient/day case)
and following this
the patient wishes to defer treatment for a period less than 6
weeks then this
should be noted on Sigma. The 18 week clock cannot be paused.
If a patient wishes to defer routine treatment for a period in
excess of 6 weeks the
patient records should be reviewed by the responsible clinician
with a view to
discharging the patient back to the GP or referring clinician. In
the event of the
patient remaining on their treatment pathway the responsible
clinician will need to
decide if the time period that the patient wishes to wait would
compromise the
treatment plan and whether the patient would require further
clinical or pre-
operative assessment prior to attending for surgery.
If the clinician decides that further assessment would not be
necessary then the
patient should be listed for surgery and the date they wish to make
themselves
next available for treatment must be recorded on SIGMA.
In circumstances where the clinician decides that deferral of
routine treatment
would require the patient to be reassessed at a later date e.g.
return for further
follow up, the patient should ideally be returned to the care of
their GP and re--
referred at a more appropriate time.
If the patient has declined two reasonable offers of admission for
routine
treatment the patient should ideally be referred back to their GP
or, if appropriate,
their referring clinician with appropriate communication giving
rationale for the
return of the referral.
Exceptions to this are; Clinically very urgent referrals including
cancer, or active surveillance for
cancer and other critical illnesses. Children of 16 years and under
or vulnerable adults In instances where reasonable notice and/or
patient choice cannot be
demonstrated on the patient administration system (PAS).
Discharging the patient is not in their best clinical
interests
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 18 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
Where circumstances were beyond the patient’s control, the Trust
will endeavour to be as flexible as possible.
DNA
(Did not attend)
A DNA is defined strictly as a patient failing to give notice that
they will not be
attending their appointment. Patients who give prior notice,
however small, are
not classed as DNA’s
In line with the Department of Health patient choice agenda, any
patient who does
not attend their agreed routine appointment (new or follow up OPD,
Pre-
Operative Assessment, in-patient/day case surgery, diagnostic test
or direct
access diagnostic appointment) should be automatically discharged
back to the
care of their GP, or referring clinician, if the Trust can
demonstrate that;
Reasonable notice was given. The patient was offered choice The
patient entered into a verbal contract with the Trust, either face
to face or
via telephone, and exercised personal choice in agreeing an
appointment date with less than 21 days’ notice.
Exceptions to this are;
Clinically very urgent referrals including cancer, or active
surveillance for cancer and other critical illnesses.
Children of 16 years and under or vulnerable adults In instances
where reasonable notice and/or patient choice cannot be
demonstrated on the patient administration system (PAS).
Discharging the patient is not in their best clinical interests
Where circumstances beyond the patient’s control can be
demonstrated the
Trust will endeavour to be as flexible as possible. If the patient
is categorised as an exception and falls into one of the
above
categories then the patient must first be contacted to ascertain
the reasons for
DNA and ensure compliance to attend a rescheduled appointment.
The
rescheduled appointment must be made from the original referral, as
it is for the
same condition. However, a follow up patient’s 18 week status will
continue.
DNA First Routine OPD Appointment/Direct Access Diagnostic
Any patient who did not attend their first routine appointment, and
received a
reasonable offer of that appointment, will have their RTT clock
nullified and their
referral returned to the GP (or other referrer). A new clock will
start on the date the
provider receives notice of any subsequent re-referral.
In all instances where a decision is taken to discharge the patient
following a
failure to attend a routine first outpatient appointment or direct
access diagnostic
test the Trust will, within 10 working days, notify the patient and
their GP of this
decision in writing to ensure that on-going management of the
patient can take
place as appropriate. The patients RTT pathway will be
closed.
DNA Routine Follow Up OPD Appointment/Diagnostic/IP or DC
Admission
In the event of a patient failing to attend a routine follow up
appointment,
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 19 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
diagnostic test, pre-operative assessment or for in-patient/day
case surgery the
responsible clinician should undertake a review of the patient’s
records to
ascertain if it is clinically appropriate to discharge the patient
from the service. In
all instances where a decision is taken to discharge the patient
the Trust will,
within 10 working days, notify the patient and their GP of this
decision in writing to
ensure that on-going management of the patient can take place as
appropriate.
The patients RTT pathway will be closed.
In reviewing the action to be taken when a patient DNA’s an
appointment, due
consideration must always be given as to the vulnerability of the
individual. Where
doubt relating to any decision to return a referral back to a GP
exists, this should
be reviewed by a consultant and if necessary discussed with the
referring GP.
Flexibility will be maintained where clinical judgement is that it
is in the best
interests of the patient to offer a further appointment and this
should be clearly
documented within the clinical records.
Any other DNAs along the pathway which do not result in the patient
being
referred back to the care of their GP will not nullify or stop the
18 week clock.
No response following
appointment.
Failure to respond to Trust Invitation of Appointment: First
Routine OPD
Appointment/Direct Access Diagnostic
Should patients not respond to the standard Trust invite i.e. 2
letters requesting
contact to arrange a routine appointment, then their referral will
be returned to the
GP (or other referrer).
In all instances where a decision is taken to discharge the patient
following a
failure to respond to the standard trust invite on 2 occasions the
Trust will, within
10 working days, notify the patient and their GP of this decision
in writing to
ensure that on-going management of the patient can take place as
appropriate.
The patients RTT pathway will be closed.
Failure to respond to Trust Invitation of Appointment: Routine
Follow Up
OPD Appointment/Diagnostic/IP or DC Admission
Should patients not respond to the standard Trust invite i.e. 2
letters requesting
contact to arrange an appointment, then their responsible clinician
should
undertake a review of the patient records to ascertain if it is
clinically appropriate
to discharge the patient from the service.
In the event of a patient not engaging with a service by failing to
respond to 2
invites for a diagnostic test or pre-operative assessment the
relevant service must
inform the responsible clinician within 2 working days. This will
allow a review of
clinical information to take place prior to a decision being made
concerning the
appropriateness of discharging the patient back to the care of
their GP.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 20 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
It is important to note that patients who have previously engaged
with a service
may have outstanding diagnostic results and it is therefore
essential that all
available clinical information is reviewed prior to discharging a
patient back to the
care of their GP.
In all instances where a decision is taken to discharge the patient
the Trust will,
within 10 working days, notify the patient and their GP of this
decision, in writing,
to ensure that on-going management of the patient can take place as
appropriate.
The patients RTT pathway will be closed.
Due consideration must be given to each case to ascertain the
vulnerability of
adults and children. Consultants should also review cases whereby a
patient self-
discharges, to ensure vulnerable individuals are not clinically
disadvantaged by
this decision. For further information please consult the Trusts
safeguarding Lead.
Going further on Cancer waits (v6.7) has specific instructions
relating to Cancer
patients these are:
Patients should not be referred back to their GP after 1st DNA (Did
Not
Attend) of their first appointment
Patients can be referred back to their GP after multiple (2 or
more) DNAs if this is
the agreed local policy.
Hospital Cancellation A hospital cancellation does not stop the
clock
Patient cancellation of
appointments.
Patients who cancel an appointment and are offered an alternative
date at the
time of cancellation will not have their 18 week clock stopped
unless their choice
of a date for a rebooked appointment entails a delay which makes it
unreasonable
or impossible for an 18 week care pathway to be achieved i.e. in
excess of 6
weeks.
Patients should be discharged back to their GP at this point unless
to do so would
compromise their care.
Patient Cancellations: First outpatient attendance
Patients will have the opportunity to cancel, or change their
previously agreed first
routine outpatient appointment, once unless extreme personal
circumstances
exist which support the need to offer a third opportunity to agree
a mutually
convenient date and time. In instances where the patient is
discharged back to
the care of their GP the trust must be able to demonstrate, within
the PAS, that on
each occasion the Trust complied with guidance on reasonable notice
and/or
verbally agreed a date and time which met the needs of the patient
at the point of
booking.
Patients discharged back to the care of their GP will have their
clock removed and
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 21 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
may be re-referred when they are ready, willing and able to
proceed. A new 18
week clock will start at this point.
Patient Cancellations: Routine Follow Up OPD Appointment,
Diagnostic
test, IP or DC Admission
In the event of a patient cancelling consecutive routine follow up
appointments,
diagnostic tests, pre-operative assessment or in-patient/day case
surgery the
responsible clinician should undertake a review of the patient’s
records to
ascertain if it is clinically appropriate to discharge the patient
from the service.
In all instances where a decision is taken to discharge the patient
the Trust will,
within 10 working days, notify the patient and their GP of this
decision in writing to
ensure that on-going management of the patient can take place as
appropriate.
The patients RTT pathway will be closed.
In reviewing the action to be taken when a patient recurrently
cancels their
previously agreed appointment, due consideration must always be
given as to the
vulnerability of the individual. Where doubt relating to any
decision to return a
referral back to a GP exists, this should be reviewed by a
consultant and if
necessary discussed with the referring GP.
Flexibility will be maintained where clinical judgement is that it
is in the best
interests of the patient to offer a further appointment and this
should be clearly
documented within the clinical records.
If a patient wishes to cancel/change their appointment following a
previous
hospital cancellation at short notice within the same speciality, a
further
appointment will be offered to the patient; however their RTT
status will remain.
Patients who have been referred as urgent suspected cancer or rapid
access
chest pain should not cancel their agreed appointment, as the two
week pathway
is then unlikely to be met. The clinical teams must take ownership
of reinforcing to
the patient the need for attendance as if the patient is discharged
back to the GP
their RTT pathway is closed with an outcome of patient declined
treatment.
Patients will be informed of the rules around cancelling
appointments in the letter
confirming their appointment.
Patient Cancellation of
A Patient cancellation does not stop the clock.
Patients who cancel their own routine elective admission date for
reasons other
than sickness/ or extreme personal circumstances at less than 48
hours’ notice,
after receiving reasonable notice of this date (at least three
weeks) will be
removed from the waiting list and a review undertaken by the
responsible clinician
with a view to discharging the patient back to their GP for any
further action in
primary care or re-referral when ready, willing and able to
proceed.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 22 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
Patients, who self-defer for a valid reason, will be informed of
the new
arrangements for their future admission and where possible will be
given the
opportunity to agree a rearranged date. If a patient chooses to
defer routine
treatment for a period exceeding 6 weeks the responsible clinician
will undertake
a review of available information with a view to discharging the
patient back to
their GP for any further action in primary care or re-referral when
ready, willing
and able to proceed.
The patient can be re-referred at the discretion of the GP, by
means of a new
referral letter. The patient will then start a new 18 week
pathway.
Going further on Cancer waits (v6.7) has specific instructions
relating to Cancer
patients these are:
Patients should not be referred back to their GP after a
single
appointment cancellation
Patients should not be referred back to their GP after multiple (2
or more)
appointment cancellations unless this has been agreed with the
patient –
by cancelling an appointment a patient has shown a willingness
to
engage with the NHS.
clinically appropriate
weeks
In some cases, treatment within 18 weeks may prove not to be
possible for
clinical reasons. For instance:
If a series of tests must be done in sequence for clinical reasons
When a second condition presents itself that needs to be treated
before the
first (this should be expedited as clinically appropriate to ensure
treatment within waiting thresholds (or referred back if
appropriate).
Where the patient and consultant have agreed that the patient
should receive a second opinion which despite best efforts adds a
critical delay;
Where the patient is medically unfit to be treated Any patient for
whom there is genuine clinical uncertainty about the
diagnosis
but where active monitoring (and clock stop) is
inappropriate.
Patient is not sure
treatment
If a patient is uncertain about going ahead with treatment, it may
be appropriate to
discharge the patient and refer them back to their GP, where their
on-going care
will continue to be managed within primary care.
The Trust considers a period of 6 weeks to be a reasonable period
of thinking
time therefore patients who wish to take longer than this must be
referred back to
the care of their GP and If and when the patient feels ready for
treatment they can
ask their GP to re-refer them. Referral back to the GP in this
scenario would stop
the 18 week clock and a new 18 week clock would start at the point
when the
patient and GP agreed to re-refer for treatment.
Patients may also choose to commence a period of “patient initiated
active
monitoring” in circumstances where they wish to see how they cope
with
symptoms etc. In such circumstances the clock will be stopped and a
code 31
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 23 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
recorded.
Incomplete pathway
tracking lists
To assist administrative staff involved in the process of booking
patients the Trust
will produce an 18 week PTL (Patient Tracking List). It is
essential to note that the
order of patients for treatment may not be the order in which they
were scheduled.
i.e. a patient only very recently scheduled may be approaching the
maximum 18
weeks target as they may have taken a while to be diagnosed and a
decision to
admit agreed.
A patient may have been scheduled for a longer period of time yet
has a shorter
overall length of pathway. It is essential that listing is in
accordance with clinical
priority or pathway length and not according to the time spent
solely on the
waiting list.
All patients waiting above 6 weeks on the PTL must have a comment
recorded on
their pathway which demonstrates active management of waiting time
standards.
4.3. WAITING LIST MANAGEMENT
With the RTT waiting times the Trust is moving away from the
management of the historic ‘stage of treatment’ waiting time
standards i.e. the separate waits for outpatients, diagnostics and
inpatient/day case treatment. Despite this these distinct waiting
lists still represent a positive way of managing the overall
referral to treatment waiting times. This means that waiting lists
will still have to be managed effectively, in line with waiting
time standards and fully compliant with the NHS Constitution.
Active Waiting Lists
Inpatient/Day case
waiting list
All waiting lists must be reviewed and validated on an on-going
basis (at least weekly) to
ensure that patients are being managed in line with their clinical
priority and within
national or local waiting time standards.
Only patients who have elected to undergo the procedure in question
and following a
pre-operative assessment are deemed clinically suitable at the
treatment time will be
added to Inpatient or Day case waiting list, the corollary being
that patients who are not
fit or willing to be admitted will not be added to the waiting list
and their GP advised
accordingly to re-refer the patient when fit.
Hold or Pending File Clinical Business Units will not operate a
‘hold or pending file’. All patients will be either
fully or partially booked into clinics as per Trust policy.
Appointment Slot
Issues (ASI’s)
ASI’s occur when a patient is unable to be given an outpatient
appointment at the time that they contact the Trust to activate
their UBRN. If patients are left on the ASI work list and their
referrals are not processed by the provider then the following
significant patient safety effects can occur:
Some patients, who may have serious medical problems, may not
receive
appointments within reasonable timescales. In some cases, this
delay to care
could pose a serious danger to their health and wellbeing.
Patients without an appointment will have had no clinical review of
their referral,
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 24 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
as referral information only becomes visible to the provider once
an appointment
is booked in eRS. This means that providers will not have had the
opportunity to
change the priority of a referral, e.g. to upgrade it where the
reviewing clinician
feels that the problem is more urgent.
Patients who have been referred into an inappropriate service will
not have
been identified and there will have been no opportunity to
re-direct them into a
more appropriate service.
eRS guidance suggests that patients on an ASI work list should
always be dealt with using eRS by being contacted within four days
of being placed on the work list and, wherever possible, be offered
a choice of date and time of appointment. It is the Trusts aim to
deliver this standard and all Clinical Business Units must
actively
work with the Patient Appointment Centre to ensure that sufficient
eRS capacity exists
within specialties and that robust processes are in place to ensure
that all patients who
appear on an ASI lists can be contacted within 4 days and a formal
offer of appointment,
based upon clinical urgency, made.
Offer of TCI All patients should be selected for TCI (or offer of
TCI) in accordance with their clinical
priority. Within that priority they should then be broadly selected
for TCI based on length
of wait (i.e. longest waiter within clinical priority first). This
ensures fair access to their
operation for all patients (Theatre list time and team skill
allowing).
Where secondary care clinicians agree that a veteran’s condition is
likely to be service -
related, they are asked to prioritise veterans over other patients
with the same level of
clinical need. However veterans should not be given priority over
other patients with
more urgent clinical needs.
Confirmation of listing All patients should receive a communication
confirming that they have been added to a
waiting list and in addition, the General Practitioner must be
notified.
Hospital Cancellation of
procedures.
The Trust will make every effort to ensure that they do not cancel
patient’s
appointments.
If the hospital cancels an operation/procedure after admission or
on the day of
admission for non-medical reasons, the patient must be given a
rearranged date within
28 days of their original date. This should be noted on the waiting
list record to ensure
that this patient is not cancelled again and is rebooked within the
28 day time frame.
If a patient operation or procedure is cancelled or rescheduled
twice by the Trust this will
need to be escalated immediately by the relevant Clinical Business
Manager to their
respective Divisional Director of Operations.
Where this is unavoidable the Trust will contact the patient and
rearrange their
appointment.
If the cancellation is within two weeks of the appointment date,
the patient will be
telephoned. If the cancellation is outside of the timeframe, the
patient will be contacted
by letter. Appointments will be made as close to the original
appointment as possible.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 25 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
This is particularly important when patients need to re-attend for
test results or to review
medication. The patients 18 week pathway status will remain.
Validation and Review All targeting lists and waiting lists should
be validated on a continuous cycle (weekly)
and comments added to demonstrate that validation has taken place.
The minimum data
set required is Date of validation, action taken and initials of
the validator.
The management and monitoring of validation exercises is the
responsibility of the
appropriate Clinical Business Manager.
reductions
The Trust is committed to offering certainty to patients as well as
choice in arranging
care. As such, every effort will be made to avoid cancelling
patient’s appointments and
every effort made to backfill absent clinicians by the speciality.
The cancellation of a
patient’s outpatient appointment will be a last resort and only and
only take place if all
other avenues to prevent a cancellation have been exhausted.
Clinics should not be
cancelled or reduced for any purpose unless exceptional
circumstances exist.
A minimum of six weeks written notice of planned annual, study or
professional leave
must be given when a doctor or other professional requires a clinic
to be cancelled or
reduced.
Wherever possible patients that have been previously cancelled
should not be cancelled
a second time. Such occurrences require immediate escalation to the
Clinical Business
Manager who must notify their respective Divisional Director of
Operations, or
.
When clinics have to be unavoidably cancelled/reduced at short
notice this must be
approved by the Divisional Director of Operations or nominated
Deputy. Liaison with
Nursing staff, OPD Service Manager, Booking Team and Medical
Records is essential.
This cancellation should only be made after all efforts have been
exhausted to substitute
a suitably qualified clinician.
Booking Capacity
Where the number of patients on the outpatient waiting list
outweighs the number of
slots available, the operational/business manager responsible for
the service must be
informed and must make appropriate arrangements to align capacity
with demand.
Follow Up waiting lists The management of follow up patients can be
complex and all staff should refer to the
Management of Patient Follow Up Appointments policy for further
details, Three key
principles are identified in that policy, these are:
All patients who require a follow up or surveillance appointment
shall be offered one within a timescale that is deemed clinically
appropriate and cognisant of best practice guidelines.
This process shall be closely monitored by the business unit to
ensure no patient waits beyond a clinically appropriate time.
Decisions to reappoint patients or to transfer them back into the
care of their GP, is the responsibility of the clinical teams,
taking into account patient choice.
There are strong clinical governance and safety reasons why
patients’ planned care should not be deferred and all organisations
should treat patients at the right time and in order of clinical
priority. A significant proportion of ‘planned’ activity is
associated with
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 26 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
surveillance of high risk groups of patients who are at risk of
significant clinical deterioration if not managed correctly. The
Management of Patient Follow Up Appointments Policy sets out the
approach and operating procedures for the management of patients
where clinicians identify that patients require some form of follow
up, long term surveillance or monitoring, prior to their transfer
back into the care of their General Practitioner. It is the
responsibility of the Clinical Business Manager to monitor, at
least on a weekly
basis, the number and waiting times of patients on the follow up
waiting list and this
should be supported by an escalation process, from the Patient
Appointment Centre and
Consultant Secretaries, which identifies capacity constraints
preventing a patients
appointment being booked within the clinically agreed
timescale.
Clinically inappropriate
referrals
If the referral is clinically inappropriate, the consultant may not
accept the referral. If this
is the case, the reason for the decision will be communicated to
the referrer, with a
patient copy of the letter being sent within 15 working days of
receipt by the Trust.
Patient cancellation of
outpatient
appointments.
Patients who cancel an appointment and are offered an alternative
date at the time of
cancellation will not have their 18 week clock stopped unless their
choice of a date for a
rebooked appointment entails a delay which makes it unreasonable or
impossible for an
18 week care pathway to be achieved i.e. in excess of 6
weeks.
Patients should be discharged back to their GP at this point unless
to do so would
compromise their care.
Patient Cancellations: First outpatient attendance
Patients will have the opportunity to cancel, or change their
previously agreed first
routine outpatient appointment, once unless extreme personal
circumstances exist
which support the need to offer a third opportunity to agree a
mutually convenient date
and time. In instances where the patient is discharged back to the
care of their GP the
trust must be able to demonstrate, within the PAS, that on each
occasion the Trust
complied with guidance on reasonable notice and/or verbally agreed
a date and time
which met the needs of the patient at the point of booking.
Patients discharged back to the care of their GP will have their
clock removed and may
be re-referred when they are ready, willing and able to proceed. A
new 18 week clock
will start at this point.
Patient Cancellations: Routine Follow Up OPD Appointment,
Diagnostic test, IP or
DC Admission
In the event of a patient cancelling consecutive routine follow up
appointments,
diagnostic tests, pre-operative assessment or in-patient/day case
surgery the
responsible clinician should undertake a review of the patient’s
records to ascertain if it
is clinically appropriate to discharge the patient from the
service.
In all instances where a decision is taken to discharge the patient
the Trust will, within 10
working days, notify the patient and their GP of this decision in
writing to ensure that on-
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 27 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
going management of the patient can take place as appropriate. The
patients RTT
pathway will be closed.
In reviewing the action to be taken when a patient recurrently
cancels their previously
agreed appointment, due consideration must always be given as to
the vulnerability of
the individual. Where doubt relating to any decision to return a
referral back to a GP
exists, this should be reviewed by a consultant and if necessary
discussed with the
referring GP.
Flexibility will be maintained where clinical judgement is that it
is in the best interests of
the patient to offer a further appointment and this should be
clearly documented within
the clinical records.
If a patient wishes to cancel/change their appointment following a
previous hospital
cancellation at short notice within the same speciality, a further
appointment will be
offered to the patient; however their RTT status will remain.
Patients who have been referred as urgent suspected cancer or rapid
access chest pain
should not cancel their agreed appointment, as the two week pathway
is then unlikely to
be met. The clinical teams must take ownership of reinforcing to
the patient the need for
attendance as if the patient is discharged back to the GP their RTT
pathway is closed
with an outcome of patient declined treatment.
Patients will be informed of the rules around cancelling
appointments in the letter
confirming their appointment.
Attend (DNA’s)
A DNA is defined strictly as a patient failing to give notice that
they will not be attending
their appointment. Patients who give prior notice, however small,
are not classed as
DNA’s
In line with the Department of Health patient choice agenda, any
patient who does not
attend their agreed routine appointment (new or follow up OPD,
Pre-Operative
Assessment, in-patient/day case surgery, diagnostic test or direct
access diagnostic
appointment) should be automatically discharged back to the care of
their GP, or
referring clinician, if the Trust can demonstrate;
Reasonable notice was given. The patient was offered choice The
patient entered into a verbal contract with the Trust, either face
to face or via
telephone, and exercised personal choice in agreeing an appointment
date with less than 21 days’ notice.
Exceptions to this are;
Clinically very urgent referrals including cancer, or active
surveillance for cancer and other critical illnesses.
Children of 16 years and under or vulnerable adults In instances
where reasonable notice and/or patient choice cannot be
demonstrated
on the patient administration system (PAS).
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 28 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
Discharging the patient is not in their best clinical interests
Where circumstances beyond the patient’s control can be
demonstrated the Trust
will endeavour to be as flexible as possible. If the patient is
categorised as an exception and falls into one of the above
categories
then the patient must first be contacted to ascertain the reasons
for DNA and ensure
compliance to attend a rescheduled appointment. The rescheduled
appointment must be
made from the original referral, as it is for the same condition.
However, a follow up
patient’s 18 week status will continue.
DNA First Routine OPD Appointment/Direct Access Diagnostic
Any patient who did not attend their first appointment, and
received a reasonable offer of
that appointment will have their RTT clock nullified and their
referral returned to the GP
(or other referrer). A new clock will start on the date the
provider receives notice of any
subsequent re-referral.
In all instances where a decision is taken to discharge the patient
following a failure to
attend a routine first outpatient appointment or direct access
diagnostic test the Trust
will, within 10 working days, notify the patient and their GP of
this decision in writing to
ensure that on-going management of the patient can take place as
appropriate. The
patients RTT pathway will be closed.
DNA Routine Follow Up OPD Appointment/Diagnostic/IP or DC
Admission
In the event of a patient failing to attend a routine follow up
appointment, diagnostic
tests, pre-operative assessment or in-patient/day case surgery the
responsible clinician
should undertake a review of the patient’s records to ascertain if
it is clinically
appropriate to discharge the patient from the service. In all
instances where a decision is
taken to discharge the patient the Trust will, within 10 working
days, notify the patient
and their GP of this decision in writing to ensure that on-going
management of the
patient can take place as appropriate. The patients RTT pathway
will be closed.
In reviewing the action to be taken when a patient DNA’s an
appointment, due
consideration must always be given as to the vulnerability of the
individual. Where doubt
relating to any decision to return a referral back to a GP exists,
this should be reviewed
by a consultant and if necessary discussed with the referring
GP.
Flexibility will be maintained where clinical judgement is that it
is in the best interests of
the patient to offer a further appointment and this should be
clearly documented within
the clinical records.
Any other DNAs along the pathway which do not result in the patient
being referred back
to the care of their GP will not nullify or stop the 18 week
clock.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 29 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
Cashing up of Clinics All attendances within the Trust must have an
attendance (administrative) outcome, a
clinic outcome and an RTT outcome.
Where appropriate the outpatient procedure outcome must be
recorded. Cashing up
must be done on the day of the clinic at the end of each clinic
appointment. The
operational/business manager who is responsible for the
administration staff that run the
clinic are responsible for ensuring all clinics are cashed up as
appropriate and
performance will be monitored via the Trust Operational Performance
Meetings.
All attendances even for closed RTT pathways must have an outcome
against it.
NHS Constitution
All new patient letters must contain an insert advising them of
their rights under the new
NHS constitution and providing a contact number for queries.
Non Commissioned
Procedures.
The availability of some healthcare services is determined
nationally – for example, under the National Institute for Health
and Care Excellence’s technology appraisal recommendations, where
all clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) or the NHS Commissioning
Board (NHS CB) or local authorities have to fund the recommended
drugs and treatments. There are also some services that are
commissioned directly by the NHS CB, which will therefore take a
national decision on their funding. However, in most cases,
decision- making on whether to fund a service or treatment is left
to the local CCG or local authority. This is to enable CCGs and
local authorities to commission services that best fit the needs of
their local population. If a CCG, a local authority or the NHS CB
has decided that a treatment will not normally be funded, the
patient and appropriate clinical team will decide whether to
formally apply, on an exceptional basis, to the appropriate body
using the agreed “Individual Funding Request” process.
Managing Tertiary Referrals
Tertiary referrals are those referrals for treatment that are made
from Consultant to
Consultant inside the Trust (Internal Tertiary Referrals) and from
a Consultant outside
the Trust to an Aintree Consultant (External Tertiary
Referral).
The following are proposed as the actions that should be taken in
response to tertiary
outpatient referrals received by medical staff at Aintree
University Hospital NHS
Foundation Trust. This will apply to consultant tertiary referrals
from both within and
outside of Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and
independent sector
referrals to the NHS. Tertiary Referrals can be made as urgent or
non-urgent referrals in
the same way as other requests for an OPD appointment.
Whilst there are no recognised national breach sharing arrangements
between providers in relation to 18 Weeks RTT pathways, there is an
expectation that departments and providers will work together to
develop 18 Week compliant inter-provider pathways. In the case of
external tertiary referrals received into the Trust departments and
specialties should be aware of particular pathways where it is
likely that patients will be referred into the organisation for
diagnostics or treatment and ensure that appropriate pathway
milestone monitoring is agreed locally between providers.
Additionally, there should be clear and timely communication
channels between providers to share information relating to the
patient’s RTT status and progress along the pathway e.g., clock
stops.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 30 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
Urgent Tertiary Referrals: Urgent referrals will be treated in the
same way as urgent
referrals received from GPs, being governed by the same waiting
time requirements and
clinical judgement.
Non-urgent Tertiary Referrals for Directly Related Condition: Where
a routine
referral for a directly related condition is made, to assist the
referring Consultant in the
management of the patient, the referral should be treated in the
same way as a routine
GP referral, being governed by the same waiting time
requirements.
Non-urgent tertiary referrals for unrelated condition: Where a
consultant identifies
that a patient should, in their opinion, be referred to another
Consultant but this referral
is not vital to the management of the condition which the referring
Consultant is treating
the patient; the referring consultant should not refer to another
consultant. Instead, the
referring consultant should refer the patient back to their GP.
This is suggested for the
following reasons:
If the patient is referred by the GP the waiting time experienced
is likely to be shorter than under a routine tertiary referral
arrangement
The GP may already be aware of the condition identified and have
the management of the condition in hand. GPs, particularly under
Practice based Commissioning, will increasingly want to have more
influence and control over patient referrals
The GP will offer the patient Choice – the patient may choose to go
elsewhere than where the referring consultant may have chosen to
refer the patient
It will help Directorates in managing capacity and waiting times.
If a non-urgent tertiary referral for an unrelated condition is
received within the Trust, the referral should be sent to the
patient’s GP with a copy letter back to the referring consultant
advising them of the Trust’s policy.
4.4. TRAINING Trust staff receive training as per the Trust’s
Training Needs Analysis. The processes for checking that staff
complete relevant training in accordance with the Trust’s Training
Needs Analysis and for following up those who fail to attend
relevant training are described in the Trust’s Learning and
Development Policy.
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 31 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
5.0 MONITORING OF COMPLIANCE
performance management
Job title of individual/ committee
responsible for monitoring
implementation of action plan
RTT Performance at Specialty level (Incl stage of treatment waiting
times)
Performance Management
Group
Performance Management
Group
Performance Management
Audit of compliance with Access Policy: Reasonable Notice, DNA
etc.
Audit Clinical Business Managers
Group
Review of Incidents
Clinical Business Managers
Divisional Chief Operating Officers
Access and Waiting List Policy, 2nd Edition – May 2016 Page 32 of
39
Uncontrolled copy when printed - Current version held on
intranet
6.0 EQUALITY, DIVERSITY AND HUMAN RIGHT STATEMENT
The Trust is committed to an environment that promotes equality and
embraces diversity in its performance both as a service provider
and employer. It will adhere to legal and performance requirements
and will mainstream Equality, Diversity and Human Rights principles
through its policies, procedures, service development and
engagement processes. This policy should be implemented with due
regard to this commitment. 7.0 REFERENCES Referral to Treatment
consultant led waiting times rules
http://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/rtt-waiting-times/rtt-guidance/
Detailed data definitions are available at
http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/datadictionary/websitecontent/navigation/diagramsmenu.asp?shownav=1
Guidance on diagnostic waiting times is available at:
http://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/diagnostics-waiting-times-and-activity/
Guidance on Cancer waiting times is available at:
http://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/cancer-waiting-times/
Calculation of waiting times:
http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/data/nhsdmds/faqs/cds/admitpat/admpatwait/
18-week rules suite “How to Measure” guide
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digit
alassets/@dh/@en/@ps/@sta/@perf/documents/digitalasset/dh_132485.pdf
Referral to treatment consultant –led waiting times – Rules suite,
October 2015
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/464956/RTT_Rules_Suite_October_2
015.pdf Delivering Cancer Waiting Times: A Good Practice Guide
(2014)
http://www.nhsimas.nhs.uk/fileadmin/Files/IST/Delivering_Cancer_Wait_Times.pdf
Achieving Cancer Waiting Times – A How to Guide.
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/how-to-guide.pdf
The NHS Constitution Handbook
http://www.nhs.uk/choiceintheNHS/Rightsandpledges/NHSConstitution/Documents/2013/handbook-to-the-nhs-
constitution.pdf Maximum waiting times: Guidance for Commissioners
(Aug 2013)
http://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/08/wait-times-guid-comms.pdf
Access to he