Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Academic Preservation Trust. Introducing APTrust. In the beginning…. How the discussion began . This we believe*…. Explicitly for preservation. Always and forever Leverage intentional interdependence Leverage investments that we are making separately - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Academic Preservation Trust
Introducing APTrust
HOW THE DISCUSSION BEGAN In the beginning…
This we believe*…
• Explicitly for preservation. Always and forever
• Leverage intentional interdependence
• Leverage investments that we are making separately
• Enables the digital copy to become the copy of record
• Ensures the durability and accessibility of the scholarly record for future generations
*From Aug 2011 meeting to discuss possibility of a regional repository
WHAT IS APTRUST?Who do we say we are…
APTrust is…a consortium committed to using a Fedora-based repository to aggregate curated [academic] content as part of a long-term preservation strategy
Added Value we see so far…
• Commitment to scalable, long-term preservation
• Disaster recovery services• Aggregated content • Community-building
APTrust Partners
Columbia University University of North Carolina
Duke University Notre Dame
Emory University North Carolina State University
Johns Hopkins University Stanford University
University of Maryland Syracuse University
University of Michigan University of TX Austin
University of Virginia
APTrust Consortium
Business & Marketing Strategy
Governance, Policy, & Legal
Framework
Repository Implementatio
n Plan
Preservation & Collection
Framework
WHERE DOES APTRUST FIT?The repository landscape as we see it…
Personal RepositoryAPTrust
Repository
Institutional Repository
e.g., SSOAR
e.g., CERN
e.g., ACM
Repository Landscape
ResearcherInstitution Discipline Specific
Personal Repository
Institutional Repository
APTrust Repository
Winnowing of Content
APTrust Aggregation
Univ 2
Univ 3
Univ 1
UVA
*Admin and simple user retrieval
APTrust Access*
DPN’s ReplicatingNode Framework ApTrust
Node
SDR Node
Node TBD
INITIAL WORKING ASSUMPTIONSevolving working assumptions…
Content AssumptionsPartner-determined collection strategy
Preservation/basic content formats
Single and aggregate content types
Metadata determines future access
IP rights provided by submitters
Simple web-based access (off)
High barrier to de-accessioning
System Architecture Assumptions
Replicate content at two additional sites
Replicating node for DPN
Regular audits of content
Local solutions remain independent
Blacklight, SOLR, Fedora, cloudsync, et al
THE CURRENT STATEplans, timelines, etc.
UVa’s Implementation TeamCENTRAL IT
James HiltonKen RuggaberTim Sigmon
UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
Karin WittenborgAndrew CurleyBradley DaigleRobin RuggaberMartha SitesAdam SorokaDonna Tolson
Start-up Business Plan
UVa Resource Contributions• Project management and business functions• 2 software engineers and project director until
March 2014• Repository infrastructure
Partner Resource Contributions• $20,000 each for start-up
aptrust.org [email protected]@tweet/aptrust
Timelines
Milestones May 2012Additional Software Engineer Summer 2012Interim Project Manager April 2012Project Director Summer 2012Full Production December 2013
Next Steps
University Librarians
Content/Preservation
Liaisons
Technology Liaisons
Questions?
