12
About Frankia Literature Review Suzanna Kruger Biology 523 Microbial Ecology Dr. Anna-Louise Reysenbach 3 June 2003

About Frankia Literature Review Suzanna Kruger Biology 523 Microbial Ecology Dr. Anna-Louise Reysenbach 3 June 2003

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

About Frankia Literature Review

Suzanna KrugerBiology 523 Microbial EcologyDr. Anna-Louise Reysenbach

3 June 2003

Overview

• Frankia taxonomy

• Host species

• Role in nitrogen cycle

• Methods of isolation

• Anatomy of nodule formation

• Anatomy and Metabolism

• Ecological relationships

Frankia Taxonomy• Filamentous, High GC,

Gram-Positive Bacteria

• Group III Actinomycete– Nitrogen-fixing symbiont

of plants(Madigan, 2003)

http://www.msu.edu/~batzli/whats_frankia.html

http://helios.bto.ed.ac.uk/bto/microbes/microbes.htm#Microorganisms%20and%20the%20"Tree%20of%20Life"

Host Species

• Hosts are non-leguminous, woody angiosperms

• 8 Families, 23 genera including:– Alnus (Betulacaceae)– Ceanothus

(Rhamnaceae)– Rubus (Rosaceae)

http://www.msu.edu/~batzli/graphics/alder_forest.jpg

Red Alder Forest, Washington

Role in Nitrogen Cycle

(Madigan, 2003)

Nitrogen fixation:

N2 + 8H+ + 8e- + 16 ATP = 2NH3 + H2 + 16ADP + 16 Pi

•Catalyzed by nitrogenase

Reasons for interest inFrankia are related to theNitrogen Cycle:

• Forestry management• Land reclamation• Soil improvment

Methods of Isolation and Culture of Frankia

ISOLATION of:• First isolated 1978 (Cervantes and Rodríguez-Barrueco, 1992)

• Sterilization, mechanical disruption, or lytic enzymes (Cervantes and Rodríguez-Barrueco, 1992)

CULTURE of:• Simple culture media which includes glucose and propionate as a carbon

source, casein hydrolysate as a nitrogen source, and vitamins, salts and trace elements. Lipids may also be helpful. (Cervantes and Rodríguez-Barrueco, 1992)

WHY:• It’s not an obligate relationship, so having these tools allows scientists and

those interested in forestry management or soil amelioration to inoculate stands of alder or other sp.

Identification of Frankia strains

11th International Conference on Frankia and Actinorhizal Plants (1998)

1. 16s rRNA (Ritchie et al., 1999)

2. PCR + DNA hybridization (Nalin et al., 1999)

3. PCR + RFLPs (Lumini and Bosco, 1999)

4. Antibiotic resistance patterns (Tisa et al., 1999)

Anatomy of Nodule FormationBerg, 1999:• Nodule development is under

the plant’s control…great variety of nodule morphology across species

• Three steps to invasion of host by Frankia:– Infection threads with

“interfacial matrix”, formation of cytoplasmic bridges (filamentous)

– Vegetative hyphae (filamentous)

– Symbiotic vesicles - where N2-fixation occurs (multicellular and spherical)

http://helios.bto.ed.ac.uk/bto/microbes/nitrogen.htm

Anatomy and Metabolism: O2 and Nitrogenase

Silvester et al., 1999• Frankia grows best at atmospheric

pO2.• In most species, symbiotic vesicles

develop an envelope to protect nitrogenase.

– Example: In Alnus, envelope thickness adjusts to ambient thickness.

• Coriaria and Dastica do not have a multilaminate envelope - how do they protect nitrogenase?

• Methods: Miscroscopy• High concentrations of mitochondria

around the base of the symbiotic vesicles may protect nitrogenase.

Tjepkema et al., 1999• Dastica has a similar morphology to

legumes, which have a variable diffusion barrier to O2. Does Dastica?

• Methods: Nitrogenase activity was measured via C2H2 reduction and the evolution of CO2.

• Results: Nitrogenase activity was not restored to predecline values by increasing external pO2.

• Furthermore, calculations of O2 uptake by mitochondria are not sufficient to reduce the diffusion of O2 past the mitochondria…

• HA: Nitrogenase activity is compartmenalized in multiple vesicles so that if activity is decreased in one, it is increased in another.

Ecological Relationships• Clawson et al., 1999• What are the interactions and relationships

that address dominance, competition and distribution among Frankia strains growing in a variety of conditions?

• Methods: Obtained strains and developed clades based on 16s rRNA.

• Results: Diversity in a single alder stand is low; instead it is dominated by a single strain or set of similar strains.

• Further research: Are there different ecotypes associated with different soil conditions?

Markham and Chanway, 1999• Does past contact reduce the degree of

mutualism in the Alnus rubra - Frankia symbiosis?

• Methods: Three low-elevation and three high-elevation populations of Red Alder were inoculated with Frankia, either a familiar or an unfamiliar strain.

• Results: – Low elevation: High nitrogen in soils.

Plants inoculated with the unfamiliar strain grew larger than those with the familiar strain.

– High elevation: Low nitrogen in soils. Plants inoculated with the familiar strain grew larger.

• Conclusion: The degree of mutualism depends on environmental conditions and may decrease with time.

Relationship to Mycorrhizal co-Symbionts

Cervantes, E. and C. Rodríguez-Barrueco. 1992. “Relationships between the Mycorrhizal and Actinorhizal Symbioses in Non-legumes,” in Methods in Microbiology, Volume 24: Techniques for the Study of Mycorrhiza, Norris J.R., D.J. Read and A.K. Varma, Editors. Academic Press: New York. 417-432.

• Alnus sp. forms symbiotic relationships with fungi also, including:– Cortinariaceae

– Hygrophoraceae

– Russulaceae

– Boletaceae

– Fungi Imperfecti

• Presence of Frankia and N-fixing activity may put increased pressure on the plant for the production of ATP.

• Ectomycorrhizal association as been shown to enhance phosphate uptake for Alnus viridis.

ReferencesBerg, R. Howard. 1999. “Frankia forms infection threads.” Canadian Journal of Botany. 77:1327-1333.Berg, R. Howard. 1999. “Cytoplasmic bridge formation in the nodule apex of actinorhizal root nodules.” Canadian Journal of

Botany. 77:1351-1357Cervantes, E. and C. Rodríguez-Barrueco. 1992. “Relationships between the Mycorrhizal and Actinorhizal Symbioses in Non-

legumes,” in Methods in Microbiology, Volume 24: Techniques for the Study of Mycorrhiza, Norris J.R., D.J. Read and A.K. Varma, Editors. Academic Press: New York. 417-432.

Clawson, Michael L., Jeffrey Gawronski and David R. Benson. 1999. “Dominance of Frankia strains in stands of Alnus incana subsp. Rugosa and Myrica pensylvanica.” Canadian Journal of Botany. 77:1203-1207.

Lumini, Erica and Marco Bosco. 1999. “Polymerase chain reaction - restriction fragment length polymorphisms for assessing and increasing biodiversity of Frankia culture collections.” Canadian Journal of Botany. 77:1261-1269.

Madigan, M.T., J.M. Martinko and J. Parker. Brock Biology of Microorganisms, 10th Edition. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.

Markham, John H. and Chris P. Chanway. 1999. “Does past contact reduce the degree of mutualism in the Alnus rubra - Frankia symbiosis?” Canadian Journal of Botany. 77:434-441.

Nalin, R., P Normand, P. Simonet and A.M. Domenach. 1999. “Polymerase chain reaction and hybridazation on DNA extracted from soil as a tool for Frankia spp. Population distribution studies in soil.” Canadian Journal of Botany. 77:1239-1247.

Ritchie, Nancy J. and David D. Myrold. 1999. “Phylogenetic placement of uncultured Ceanothus microsymbionts using 16s rRNA gene sequences.” Canadian Journal of Botany. 77:1208-1213.

Silverster, Warwick B., Birgit Langenstein, R. Howard Berg. 1999. “Do mitochondria provide the oxygen diffusion barrier in root nodules of Coriaria and Dastica?” Canadian Journal of Botany. 77:1358-1366

Tisa, Louis S., Matthew Chval, Glenn D. Krumholz and Joel Richards. 1999. “Antibiotic resistance patterns of Frankia stains.” Canadian Journal of Botany. 77:1257-1260.

Tjepkema, John D., Gangyi Du and Christa R. Schwintzer. 1999. “Response of respiration and nitrogenase activity in Dastica glomerata (Presl.) Baill. to changes in pO2.” Canadian Journal of Botany. 77:1367-1372.