Upload
patrick-jones
View
226
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
How to do Words with Things.
Citation preview
Patrick Jones a free-dragging manifesto(HOW TO DO WORDS WITH THINGS)
All writing is propaganda. —Derrick Jensen (among others)
1
Only words and conventions can isolate us from ...
2
... the entirely undefinable something which is everything. —Alan Watts 1
3
4
Leaving books
Early in 2004 Jason
Workman walked into my
bookshop in Trentham, a town
neighbouring the Wombat
Forest, north-west of the
Australian city of Melbourne.
The region, known since white
occupation for its timber, spuds2
and radioactive spring water,
was originally inhabited by the
Djadja wurrung people – possum
skin coat-makers who traded
survival textiles for European
pathologies. Workman left some
hand-made books and a short
note that effectively said, Perhaps
we’re on the same page?
At this time he was working
three shifts a week as a nurse at
a home for elderly folk, writing
essays, farming Namibian sheep,
gleaning from roadside fruit
trees and bottling the fruit, and
nearby I was attempting to make
a living from second-hand books.
While waiting for customers I
was drawing poetry and writing
art, sleeping atrociously (a new
father) and, for actual income,
building on my days off – bread
and butter money in John and
Janette Howard’s3 building boom
bubble.
Among the publications
Workman left was his essay
Practising in the Space of the
Everyday, which is both a critique
of culture capitalism and a
personal treatise for art-making.
In this essay, Workman explains a
way of making art that takes place
and is experienced in everyday
social space, that observes
intimate life as poetical and
material banality – sensitive to
place, unheroic, simple, gestural,
philosophical, non-exploitative,
humorous and tending towards
the loose. Workman: Art work is
‘supposed’ to signify something other
than what it appears to be. The process
required to decipher this ‘hidden’
meaning renders common, everyday
subjectivity inadequate as one requires
recourse to the code which enables the
specialised language of contemporary
art to be ‘read’. Artists ‘make happen’
but they do so predominantly through
the utilisation of mediating constructs
that hinder the possibility of direct
experience.4 At art school
I was initiated into a tradition of
art framed by its white definition:
art is a skill as opposed to nature. I
came to art school with a simple
desire to make life with art, but
direct experience was not what
the institution had in mind for
its students, with the exception
of one lecturer, Glen Dunn. Dunn
articulated art practice as being
like a child that wakes you in
the night and requires constant
attention and nurture.
Dunn was focussed on the
unfashionable principle of
observation. In life drawing he
asked us to look at the body,
find five tones, squint, then
ten, look harder, fifty and draw
them down. While the work we
produced may not have been
particularly consequential, it
was the practice of squintsight
– the idea of seeing everyday life
intensely – that enabled me, at
age twenty, to begin to be aware
of a world of generality, hype and
spin. But I also came to
understand that the flip side to
critical observation is dislocation
– from other things, other
people, and potentially from the
environment in which you live:
the romantic notion of the artist
as removed, strange and alone.
1. Alan Watts, The Wisdom of Insecurity: a Message for the Age of Anxiety (1951),
Rider, an imprint of Ebury Press,
Random House, 7th edition, 1997.
2. Potatoes
3. John Howard, Liberal Prime
Minister of Australia 1996–2007, and
his spouse Janette.
4. Jason Workman, Practising in the Space of the Everyday, privately printed booklet,
Victoria 2004.
5
In this post-democratic corporate
age, diminishing biodiversity
– caused by global warming,
gene privatisation and economic
theories based on profit growth –
is already radically reducing our
ability to live with and from the
land. And Governments are not
helping. The natural
world works by a synchronicity
of adaptive and haphazard
processes that feed and roll, build
and collide. We are decisive as
much as involuntary beings,
conscious and self-sovereign as
much as powerlessly hopeful
and enslaved. By
leaving his work for me at a small
rural bookshop, Workman was
strategically rolling dice. The
black dots that appeared face up
on the counter at Reverie Books –
spelled out the future anarchical
and chance-based practice of
WorkmanJones and, inevitably,
the cut-and-come-again seed
of this Free-dragging Manifesto.
By 1967 inventorist Marshall
McLuhan believed the singular
age of observation had given
way to a new age of pluralism –
one of social interdependence
triggered by electrical
information: The older training
of observation has become quite
irrelevant in this new time, because
it is based on psychological responses
and concepts conditioned by the
former technology – mechanization.5
McLuhan likened
mechanisation to a very linear
logic, which he believed was
ill-equipped to function within
the electric drama of the new age.
Renaissance Legacy. / The
Vanishing Point = Self-Effacement, /
Detached Observer. / No Involvement!6
Let’s be monist!
To see critically – to practice
observation and scrutiny – is
to find surprise in the smallest,
most inconspicuous, everyday
things. This is involvement.
And once you find surprise in
intimate and everyday things,
the spectacle of consumer culture
– the dominant hegemony – is
revealed as dull and vacuous,
abusive, dualistic and turgid.
While electrical and digital
technologies have encouraged
some unification and involvement
– the partially self-governing
environments such as YouTube,
blogsites and Wikipedia, for
example – McLuhan did not
foresee the continuation of linear
mechanised patriarchal logic
remaining with such brutal force
within the environment of his
global village.
In outlining his approach to
practising in the space of the
everyday, Workman advocates
non-exclusivity between
observation and involvement.
Workman: Life imposed
upon by the dictates of the dominant
capitalist hegemony carries with
it a price. What is that price? The
substitution of quantity (surplus) for
quality (meaning), the substitution
of survival for that of living. The ‘art’
of the spectacle is to ‘dress up’ survival
as life.7 If we lose the
ability to observe the interlocking
tones that make up the body of
the dominant hegemony, we lose
the ability to see and therefore
act against the ecocides and
genocides that are its inevitable
corollary. For, capitalism is
not a success story, although
we are repeatedly told it is.
Industrial civilisation
has fuelled population growth
necessitating increased food
production. Over the past
decade the US Food and Drug
Administration, stacked with
former Monsanto executives,
has relentlessly pushed seed
privatisation onto the global
village and begun to dump its
terminator (or suicide) gene
technology into the environment.
Monsanto’s terminator
seeds, which grow only when
sprayed with glyphosate based
Roundup, become sterile after
one generation. This Bush
Administration-endorsed
Roundup Ready (Rapture-Ready!)
bio-terrorism could potentially
obliterate seed diversity on the
planet, with catastrophic effects
for the majority of humans and
non-humans alike.
5. Marshall McLuhan, The Medium is the Massage, New York: Bantam Books /
Random House 1967, p8.
6. ibid, p53.
7. Workman, Practising in the Space of the Everyday.
6
7
In the chance Cage
…the Absurd is not in
man (if such a metaphor could have
meaning) nor in the world, but in
their presence together. —Albert
Camus 8 The word free-
dragging has no useful or logical
definition to speak of. It is a term
coined by Jason Workman and I
to mark a type of street art that
we have practised since 2005.
Where Workman’s reading of
Situationist International texts
greatly informed our practice, I
brought to the partnership the
influence of John Cage.
A significant early influence on
Cage was Sri Lanka-born Ananda
K.Coomaraswamy (1877–1947),
a translator of Indian culture
and philosopher of Indian art.
Coomaraswamy’s statement
that art is the imitation of nature
in her manner of operation became
a key premise upon which Cage
built a life’s work – creating
musical scores, lectures,
essays, poems and art prints,
while instigating numerous
collaborations with other
artists, dancers and musicians –
involving social and ecological
principles of participatory
anarchy and non-duality. Cage
made non-linear, de-authorised,
non-representative work that
could, like life, mimic, mutate
and regenerate. Composer and
conceptual composter, Cage
practised a mimetic, ‘post-
medium’9 art that included its
environment; that became its
environment; and he believed
that a work of art, like any
environment, is never static.
Cage’s broad practice
coincided with the land art
movement. In the 1960s Eastern
thought was once again having
a substantial impact on Western
art, and as a result the natural
world was back in focus. As
capitalism’s main thrust since
the 1920’s has been an ever-
expanding war on natural
ecosystems (with Monsanto a
consistently leading player), land
art and eco-poetics have been
direct responses from artists
and poets. Robert
Smithson’s Spiral Jetty (1970) is
a cornerstone of the land art
movement. It is an aggressive
intervention of dirt and rock
spiralling out 500 metres
into Great Salt Lake in Utah.
This work is an artist’s direct,
sleeves-rolled-up, encounter
with the land, albeit with
radical ecological disturbances
to the habitat caused by his
bulldozers. While it could be
said that this artwork is another
case of industrialised brutality,
Spiral Jetty has no museum
humidifier or white-glove
treatment that usually signifies
Western culture’s perceived
dominion over nature. Instead,
indeterminately and in its own
time, this giant scarification will
gradually crumble or subside into
the lake.
The lack of museum precious-
ness and the honesty of this
work has more in common
with the subsistence and ritual
land practices of traditional
communities – sacred earth
mounds, agricultural terracing,
carved rock housing, strategic
renewal burning – than with
the civilised foundations of
Western art. McLuhan:
The viewer of Renaissance art is
systematically placed outside the
frame of experience…Since the
Renaissance the Western artist
perceived his environment primarily
in terms of the visual. Everything was
dominated by the eye of the beholder.
His conception of space was in terms of
a perspective projection upon a plane
surface consisting of formal units of
spatial measurements.10
Australian cultural commentator
Marcus Westbury, in his 2007
ABC television series Not Quite Art,
observes that despite the Sydney
Opera House being a major global
tourist landmark, he cannot
think of one important opera to
have come out of Sydney since the
building’s inception. Westbury’s
argument is that museums bury
culture, not generate it. Similarly
he argues that classical orchestras
are exceedingly expensive cover-
bands, venerated by a cultured
elite and funded by governments
and corporations who recognise
art as either quantifiable antique
or the display of ‘genius’.
8. Albert Camus, ‘An Absurd Reasoning’,
The Myth of Sisyphus (1942), Penguin
Modern Classics, 1975, p.34.
9. Michael Farrell used this term in
regard to my practice, at a talk in
Japan on Australian poetry. He first
encountered it in the writing of
American art critic, professor, and
theorist, Rosalind Krauss.
10. McLuhan, The Medium is the Massage,
pp.53, 56.
8
9
10
11
12
In contrast, John Cage’s ideal
context for art is not artificially
segregated from life. When
confined to the monoculture of
the concert hall, the assembled
life is an integral part of the work,
as with his composition 4’33’’ –
the ‘silent piece’. In this work the
sounds of the audience’s coughs,
mumblings, chair squeaking,
shoe scratching etc. are heard
for precisely four minutes
and thirty-three seconds. The
performer, employed to create
the prompt for an environment
of listening, sits motionless at
their instrument. So there is no
virtuosic talent on display – the
expected convention at a concert.
A Shakespearian actor
recently told me that the most
powerful sound to be heard
during a performance is the
spontaneous cry of a baby. You
can’t compete with it, he said. We
were discussing Cage’s use of
chance after I had asked him
to read a randomnly selected
Shakespearean sonnet backwards
at a 2007 realization of Cage’s
Musicircus in Melbourne –
an event at which as many
musicians, actors, dancers,
artists, poets as were interested,
came together at a nominated
time and place, where they
performed independently but
simultaneously in a mass free-
for-all. Here the late composer,
or rather the well-turned humus
of his thoughts, continued to
provide a conceptual framework
for an event where we, the natural
world, were materially and
directly responsible for its multi-
layered form.
Where evolutionary biologist
Richard Dawkins uses the words
luck and random to split hairs
over the existence of chance
in evolutionary life, fellow
evolutionist, Douglas J. Futuyma,
is less pedantic: Chance means
essentially that you cannot predict
the outcome … Philosophers and
scientists use “chance” in the sense
of unpredictability … Evolution
certainly does involve randomness;
it does involve unpredictable chance.
For example, the origin of new genetic
variation by mutation is a process
that involves a great deal of chance.11
Workman and I found
by incorporating chance into our
practice, and therefore by not
being able to predict or determine
the outcome, we could lessen the
clutch we had over the things
we were making, writing and
doing. Cage’s interest
in relinquishing control lead him
to what he termed mesostics. A
mesostic is a centred acrostic – an
acrostic being a poem in which
the first letter of each line spells
out the subject word of the poem
when read vertically down the
left side of the page:
considerate of
others while immobile to our
militant rains –
pathologies turn beneath the
orange-active
skies of
transformation.
In a mesostic the subject word
falls in the centre of the page
with lines extending to the left
and right. Cage believed that
conventional representations
of thought as printed in books
did not facilitate the discovery
and expression of non-linear,
non-hierarchical ideas, but
rather endorsed uniformed,
authorised codes – words lining
up like soldiers of conventional
logic, marching across the page
in ordered formation.
Here is the first of 20 mesostic
poems from Cage’s book Anarchy:
the peter kropotkin mesostic,
composed in 1988 with the aid of
a computer program to simulate
the coin toss of the I Ching.12
I
sPirit of
him for onE
corporaTions
arE
failuRe
Know-how of
aRe
idOls will
free rePublic
each thrOugh
Them in
maKe
I
to me
aNarchism 12
11. Futuyma in conversation online:
www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/futuyma12. John Cage, Anarchy, Wesleyan
University Press (1988), 2001. p.1.
13
In introducing Anarchy, Cage
writes: My mesostic texts do not make
ordinary sense. They make nonsense
… if non-sense is found intolerable,
think of my work as music…13 By this
I believe Cage also means think of
my work as matter. Joan
Retallack, a poet and scholar of
Cage’s literary and philosophical
work (whose own book How to
do Things with Words, is a catalyst
text for this publication) writes:
Ludwig Wittgenstein, who felt the
language of poetry could express
certain things unspeakable in ordinary
language, lamented the effects on
philosophy of a general reluctance to
change language habits.14
Cage’s mesostic experiments
visually demilitarise and
semantically lessen the clutch
he had over his texts. They are
a model of doing-saying that
is directly involved with the
physical world, antithetical
to spin-doctoring and
authoritarianism – chance being
an antidote to spin because
the result is determined by an
indifferent collective (nature)
– even though the facilitating
framework is constructed
strategically by the author.
Liz Kotz in her book
Words to Be Looked At: Language
in 1960s Art, states that the
materiality of language is
enormously complex, making it
difficult to treat words purely as
things. By their nature,
words are both here – concretely and
physically present on the page, or in
the moment of utterance – and yet
also elsewhere – referring to, evoking,
or metaphorically conjuring up sets
of ideas, objects, or experiences that
are somewhere else.15
Cage’s mesostics are both here
and there; things and words, not
only matter, not only nonsense
or music, but observation:
corporations are indeed failure.
Following the lead
Scratch any educational
philosophy and you’ll uncover
a political scheme. Every time.
—Thomas De Zengotita16
Natural selection builds
child brains with a tendency to
believe whatever their parents and
tribal elders tell them. Such trusting
obedience is valuable for survival…
but the flip side of trusting obedience
is slavish gullibility. —Richard
Dawkins17 Today my
five-year-old son is figuring the
relationship between letters and
the natural world. He has just
enlightened me with his Ns and
Zs are from the sky, daddy. I look
over to the page on which he is
drawing. Ns and Zs bring thunder
and lightning daddy. I’m
not sure why this understanding
of the pictorial form of letters
in relation to the natural world
is such a revelation to me. I’ve
read with awe Johanna Drucker’s
Alphabetic Labyrinth, which
painstakingly illustrates the
evolution of letters from pictures,
and pictures from life.18 Perhaps
it has something to do with how
I continue to take the physical
properties of the alphabet for
granted, despite my practice of
poetry being very much focussed
on the materiality of language.
Or perhaps it is just that Zephyr’s
non-specialised, pre-schooled
mind is a free and responsive
conduit to nature.
Carl Orff, the noted German composer,
has refused to accept as a student any
but the pre-schooled child – the child
whose spontaneous sense perceptions
have not yet been channelled by
formal, literary, visual prejudices.19
13. John Cage, Anarchy, Wesleyan
University Press (1988), 2001, p.vi.
14. Joan Retallack, ‘What Is
Experimental Poetry & Why Do We
Need It?’ Jacket 32, April 2007, http://jacketmagazine.com/32/p-retallack.shtml15. Liz Kotz, Words to Be Looked At: Language in 1960s Art, MIT Press,
Cambridge, Massachusetts/London,
England, 2007, p3.
16. Thomas De Zengotita, Mediated: how the media shape your world, Bloomsbury,
London, 2007, p46.
17. The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins,
Bantam Press, 2006, p176.
18. Johanna Drucker, The Alphabetic Labyrinth, place, publisher.
19. McLuhan, The Medium is the Massage,
p56.
20. Gertrude Stein, The World is Round,
(1939), Barefoot Books, Boston and
Bath, 1993.
14
In 1939 the American writer
Gertrude Stein and her partner
Alice B. Toklas met a little girl
called Rose d’Aiguy and her
family, while holidaying near the
village of Bilignin in France. Rose
became the heroine in Stein’s only
work for children, The World
Is Round. In this work Stein
imitates the music and eloquent
nonsense she finds naturally
present in Rose’s imaginative
speech. It starts: Once upon a time
the world was round and you could go
on it round and round.20
In this work a child’s speech
dictates to the artist, and the
artist intelligently follows the
child’s lead. But in the writing,
the child is neither foreground
nor background; no Gestaltian
division of space occurs, rather
she is part of a Cubist field,
diffused throughout the whole
environment. I look
again to Zephyr’s drawing and
think about the world he is
defining, the world he’s stepping
into and think about Rose in
France in 1939, and what was
ahead of her.
But, even if the skyworks thunder and
blast the Ns and Zs above the land
base Ohs, for the culture of occupation
you’re raised the world is round like
an O, and you can go on it round and
round —
Z
N Z Z N
Z N Z
N
Z O N
Z ZN
Z Z N
Z
N Z Z N
Z N Z
N
Z O N
Z ZN
Z Z N
15
A contemporary of Stein,
Wyndham Lewis, discloses his
own literary prejudice when he
brands her work with crit-tags
such as child-personality and child
cult.21 Here the significance of
the child’s mind is lost on the
grownup; the primitive, child-
like or uncivilised is arrogantly
dismissed by the overly serious
and authoritative. The
schools that I attended were not
designed to follow the lead of
a child’s free and unspecialised
mind, or even meet it half way.
In fact the direct opposite was
true. The curriculum was top-
down authoritarian, and neither
practical nor philosophical.
We didn’t, for example, learn
to change a tyre, grow food,
recycle water, compost or build
shelter. Nor were we encouraged
to understand our activities as
affecting our environmental
footprint, despite what we’ve
known at least since Henry
David Thoreau (1817–62).
The young today
(1967) … encounter instruction in
situations organised by means of
classified information – subjects are
unrelated, they are visually conceived
in terms of a blueprint.22
Conformity and militarism
in mainstream schools is
continuing still. I have recently
witnessed children in both
Christian and secular schools
beginning a formal education
in which art classes comprise
each student colouring in the
same photocopied line drawing.
Art is taught as a completely
separate thing to English, English
as separate to science and so on.
This type of education primes
the child for a life alienated
from natural world processes –
compartmentalising knowledge
so that the links between
things are severed. If we cannot
see the links between where
we have come from, what
we become, what we eat and
drink and breathe, how we
say things and what we do, as
part of biological life, then we
have little to offer ourselves
or anyone else. In
schools the militarising effects
of uniforms, rows of desks,
lunchtime detentions, sports
fields, assemblies, hierarchical
social structures and time-sirens
all contribute to creating an
environment and calendar for
the production of the next-
generation consumer and
consequently the next-generation
abuser. Of course
some people will come through
the modern mainstream school
system and find significant
counter-points to a dominant
capitalist hegemony. But
sadly, most will become mere
instruments of commerce –
blind-led consumers following
their parents down a path of
debt and a lifetime of interest
on it: Christian-capitalists,
corporatist abusers, humourless
fundamentalists, proto-baby-
boomer-multiple-property-
owners, cashed-up-bogans (who,
according to the Australian writer
Catherine Deveny, are folk whose
TVs are wider than their washing
machines) or weight-orientated
(either the bulimic or unburnt-fat
variety) pop-fascists.
The newest subset that can
be added to this list is one of
the worst, and one of the most
camouflaged – the wealthy eco-
bourgeois shopper. Like the
English writer George Monbiot
I believe the zeitgeist of green
consumerism is just another
pox on the planet, where ‘ethical’
purchasing enables a plant-a-
tree-here-so-we-can-offset-the-
fuck-up-we’re-making-over-there
mentality. Monbiot: If
it merely swapped the damaging goods
we buy for less damaging ones, I would
champion it. But two parallel markets
are developing – one for unethical
products and one for ethical products,
and the expansion of the second does
little to hinder the growth of the first
... the middle classes rebrand their
lives, congratulate themselves on
going green, and carry on buying and
flying as much as before.23
Considering the civilised world’s
indifference and aggression
towards the natural world that
supports it, and its dependence
upon compliant citzens, it is
not surprising that children
and other uncivilised [sic] and
vulnerable beings are the focus
of intense recruitment and
oppression.
21. Wyndham Lewis, The Revolutionary Simpleton,” The Enemy, no.1 (Jan.1927),
quoted in Mark McGurl, The Novel Art: Elevations of American Fiction after Henry James, Princeton, NJ., 2001, p8.
22. McLuhan, The Medium is the Massage,
p100.
23. George Monbiot, ‘Ethical shopping
is a charade of the rich’, The Guardian Weekly, August 3, 2007.
16
17
The Stolen Generations of
Australian aborigines, created
through a partnership of the
Church and the State, is one
relatively recent example of this
oppression. Richard Dawkins
makes the point in The God
Delusion that there is little or
no difference between feeding
children the pill of religion,
the pill of Marxism, or that of
nationalism or consumerism. But
in medicating kids with ideology
some things seem to be more
acceptable than others.
Today, thanks to marketing
psychologists, child-focussed
consuming opportunities
(whether birthdays or religious
events such as Christmas and
Easter) occur almost every day
of the year. Treats of food, toys,
clothes and gadgets proliferate
and are abundantly available to
nearly every child born under the
banner: Ally to the American Empire.
In our civilised
societies, along with petroleum,
sugar is a key material of
exploitation and distraction,
effectively constituting a culture
of child-abuse. The average
Australian now consumes
22 teaspoons of sugar every
day.24 While in rich nations
responsibility-relinquishing
pathologies such as ADHD
and ADD are understood to
be exacerbated by highly-
processed, overly-refined food
and cheap distractions, rather
than modifying high-sugar
diets, many parents still prefer
to give their offspring sedatives.
Added to this, the schism
between our industrialised and
digitalised psyches helps to
generate tremendous anxiety
in parents, which is transferred
to children, making them
competitors and thus servants in
the global village. What McLuhan
failed to foresee in his electro-
romantic worldview, is that the
pathologies of civilisation and
progress – whether mechanised,
industrialised, electronic or
digitalised – are essentially
against nature, and for the
commodification of every aspect
of life. The anxieties
of parents are multiplied and
intensified by a smorgasbord of
activities invented and packaged
for and around children – pre-
natal university, Baby Einstein,
musical instruments drills,
early-onset multilingualism,
after-school tuition, the right
TV shows and clothing brands,
and a ready supply of sugar-rich
food treats. Modern parents are
being increasingly pressured or
pressure themselves to choose
more and more from this
smorgasbord because they are
terrified of being out of step, of
compromising their children’s
opportunities – terrified of
unconventional surprise, of
unscripted play, of raising
children who resent convention
and cultural militarism – and
terrified of lives that enjoy
a simple, everyday intimacy
with the natural world while
questioning the imperatives of
supermarkets, fast foods and
sweatshop-produced brand
names.
A sonnet for Zephyr (mesostic version)
ˇ
ˇ
Two Harriers circle above you
PrepAring ground for summer’s breed
No moRal pathology brings reed or stick
No weighty aiR of god to push –
Your small body playIng bones on the hill
No transformativE punishment
calls you heRe
Your Parents circle around you
Preparing beds on neArby hills
Cruel phantoms cReep your happy books
The myths of gods bEd lit to push –
Your body tucked N’er your father’s read
No material punishmenT callS you here
A sonnet for Zephyr
Two
Prep
No mo
No weighty ai
Your small body play
No transformativ
calls you her
Your
Preparing beds on ne
Cruel phantoms c
The myths of gods b
Your body tucked
No material punishmen
call
HAR R I E R
P A R E N T S
arriers circle above you
ring ground for summer’s breed
al pathology brings reed or stick
of god to push —
ng bones on the hill
punishment
e
arents circle around you
rby hills
eep your happy books
d lit to push –
’er your father’s read
you here
18
24. Rennee Switzer, “The Bitter Sweet
Truth”, Business Age, The Sunday Age, 17
June 2007.
19
20
21
22
The problem of civilisation
Like Cage, Jensen is multi-skilled
– an environmentalist, writer,
smallholding farmer and teacher.
His work is founded on a central
question: If civilisation is destroying
us and the earth, do we need to bring
down civilisation? Where
Cage saw authoritarianism,
and by association abuse and
exploitation, embedded in the
conventional setting down of
thought, Jensen sees these things
enmeshed in the spin-speak of
corporations and governments.
My dentist, a Muslim
Melbournian, added a line to
my (post-Christian) definition
of pop-fascism: “No longer is
a Goebbels-style propaganda
ministry required,” he said. There
is no single office of propaganda
that can be held accountable or
shut down because such obvious
and visible authoritarianism
would not be tolerated today.
Instead, political parties and
corporations thread propaganda
through the very fabric of
things making it harder to
identify and oppose. Through
their deviousness and our own
passivity, trust and hopefulness,
we have unwittingly become
pop-fascist subjects.
Australia’s representative
democracy, like the USA’s, is
essentially a parliamentary
system with two main parties,
both of which are further to the
right politically than the general
population. According to my slow
food cook friend Gary Thomas,
while aspiring representatives
may be motivated by a genuine
commitment to their local
communities, once in office they
become increasingly subservient
to national and global industry
needs.
The constituency’s acceptance
of this situation, and our
reluctance to organise active
participatory democracy in
the form of grass-roots, self-
governing communities, assists
this state of centralised pop-
fascism. Demoralised by debt,
our political will is weakened
and, although cheered-up with
spasms of pop culture, we accept
top-down government. We
have become apolitical in the
wrong way – anti-intellectually.
Anarchism and
participatory democracy have
more in common with each
other than representative
democracy, which today favours
monocultural corporatism. This
essentially means, in rich nations
at least, that existence within the
global village is the enslavement
of a majority who appear rich,
for the benefit of a few who are
genuinely rich.
Just as Al Qaeda is simply the
collective name for many varied-
scale transnational Islamic
militias connected by a common
cause, pop-fascism is a collective
name for many varied-scale
transnational corporations (and
their supporters: the share-
holders/consumers) connected
by a common cause. And in
American styled pop-fascism
(including secular, Christian and
Judaic brands), as in jihad, the
propaganda is instilled in the
children early on.
Actions are held to be good
or bad, not on their own merits, but
according to who does them, and there
is almost no kind of outrage – torture,
the use of hostages, forced labour,
mass deportations, imprisonment
without trial, forgery, assassination,
the bombing of civilians – which
does not change its moral colour
when it is committed by “our” side.25
—George Orwell
We’re at the start of this new wave
where the environment is going to be
economically priced but there’s a long
way to go … it’s a bit early in the piece
to start patting everyone on the back. 26 Dorjee Sun, a young Sydney
businessman, 2007.
We are enslaved by debt, made
docile by entertainment, addicted
to some substance or situation,
and hopeful that somebody or
something will deliver us from
it all. This is the general state of
pop-fascism in which we live,
governed by corporatism – the
private control of trade and
industry in collusion with the
state – to the detriment of the
environment and society at
large. More urgent
and pragmatic than Cage’s
conceptual, eco-anarchical
writing and Gertrude Stein’s
world-as-everything experiments
concerning the seeing of things
before the speaking of words,
is Derrick Jensen’s recent work.
25. George Orwell, “Notes on
Nationalism”, May 1945, Essays, Penguin
Classics, 1994 p.300–317.
26. Dorjee Sun, “Bali’s Business
Bonanza”, Business Day, The Age 14
December 2007
23
Capturing this shopping/
bombing dichotomy a friend of
mine, Toby Sime, graffitis Et in
Al-Qaeda ego around and about
our small eco-tourist, slow-
food town, after the Latin Et in
Arcadia ego (meaning I too was in
paradise). I recently
subjected an excerpt from a
Jensen podcast to a decentralised
Cagean mesostic procedure, to
create an example of what I want
to call slow text – a text where the
once streamlined words become a
little disobedient on the page:
so, if you can sliDe your
premIse-
S by people you’ve got
theM... so, in the new
book I didn’t
wAnt to do that. I
waN-
Ted to
Lay out my
prEmises in
bold fa-
Ce so,
If people don’t like the premises
they won’t get suckered in...
so, the first premise of the book
is that
industrial
ciV
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N is not
and can never be sustainable.
Here we begin to encounter a
resistance to the eye.
In his talk Jensen went on to
say that any population centre
reliant upon the importation
of resources can never be
sustainable. He is a primitivist.
It’s very easy to argue his case
that progress is killing us. If we
have the will to squint five or
ten tones through the spin in
any direction, we can see this.
Jensen believes that the only truly
sustainable level of technology
was that developed in the Stone
Age. Masdar, a small,
oil-funded city being built in
Abu Dhabi in conjunction with
the World Wide Fund for Nature
(WWF), is hoping to challenge
this view. Masdar will be the
world’s first zero-carbon, zero-
waste, car-free city, making it,
according to its creators, a global
benchmark for sustainable urban
development. However
there is still the problem of the
city, especially the millions of
extremely toxic pre-existing
cities which Masdar does not
address. This city’s concept seems
like another case of Monbiot’s
parallel market – a technology-
driven, design-based eco-bubble.
On the Masdar website
(www.masdaruae.com) the Abu
Dhabi government and the
developers list a number of key
objectives, which in principle
sound like commonsense. But
the urban mentality is a deeply
conceited one, and so when I
read the following objective, my
already diminishing enthusiasm
gave way to full-blown cynicism:
HABITATS AND WILDLIFE –
All valuable species to be conserved
or relocated with positive mitigation
targets.
I’d like to slow this sentence
down in a tonal way and suggest
some subtext and critique by
means of a greyscale.
All valuable species ...
whose values and what are the
criteria for these values that
determine one species’ worth
over another’s? ...
to be conserved ...
the gentrification of some
of nature is an acceptable
compromise for our important
new city ...
or relocated ...
the inconvenience of the natural,
uncivilised world is apparent
when the planner rules straight
lines, draws up objectives, walls
a city off from undesirables or
forcibly relocates them ...
with positive ...
spin
mitigation ...
a legal term to make a crime
appear less serious ...
targets.
habitats and wildlife can be
managed by stats, numbers and
lines on graphs and spreadsheets
– the sort of simplistic arrogance
that has necessitated the building
of this city in the first place.
Did you spot all six tones, or,
rather four between 0% white and
100% black? Note: after
the ‘with positive’ entry I have
written the word ‘spin’ with 0%
ink, but it blends in so well it is
invisible.
24
25
Masdar is a grandly-designed
pilot plan conceived by heroic
architects and designers for
the rich. The civilised world’s
answer to the question of the
future city will be walled to
protect food crops from the
harsh desert winds. But as we
have seen throughout history,
walls serve many purposes,
and I wonder if the switch to
efficient buildings, renewable
energies and organic foods will
be enough to shift the exclusive,
destructive and elitist mindset
of its inhabitants? But
let’s reduce the scale of change
to the everyday, to the here and
now and imagine the impact it
would have if our newspapers,
tomorrow, were printed in slow
text with vegetable-based inks
– so that the words of our court
journalists and spin doctors
couldn’t slide by so fast, and so
that our composts could become
less toxic. Generated by chance-
based computer programs, the
type might look something like
the paragraph above.
from the rest of the world: The
root of the difficulty is that we have
developed the power of thinking so
rapidly and one-sidedly that we have
forgotten the proper relation between
thoughts and events, words and
things.27 Like Gertrude
Stein, Watts is particularly
conscious of the civilised mind’s
dissociation from the body, and
he points the finger at language:
Words and measures do not give life;
they merely symbolise it.28
Accepting this goes some way to
explaining the idiocy and cruelty
of centralised societies, and how
a reliance upon the importation
of resources, for instance, that
seemingly make us ‘civilised’
(meaning ‘of the city’) in real
terms make us abusers and self-
abusers.
There is no artifice or clever
design here – dice were rolled to
create variation throughout the
text. The ‘soldiers’ look more like
deserters or people of all colours
and persuasions. How possible
would it be for corporations and
governments – with their fast
texts – to slide their premises by
us if they were dressed-down in
slow text? Would propaganda
survive as successfully if it
were more slowly accessed; if
there was more resistance to
the eye? Imagine a billboard
with the words cities can never be
sustainable treated in slow text,
replacing the giant Hummer
SUV advertisements currently
posted above Melbourne streets.
In The Wisdom of
Insecurity: a message for an age of
anxiety (1951), Alan Watts outlines
what he perceives to be the
human mind’s limitations in
understanding its displacement
The clutch we have over things as
artists, architects, designers and
plann
ers is precisely the clutch we
have over things as people. This is
the psychology of unsustainabil
ity – ma
king art that reduc
es the simple
infinity of nature into si
mplistic little
boxes and straight lines.
27. Alan Watts, The Wisdom of Insecurity: a message for the age of anxiety, Rider, 1997
(first published 1951) p.41.
28. ibid, p.45.
26
27
28
Watts again: We have been taught
to neglect, despise and violate our
bodies, and to put all faith in our
brains. Indeed, the specialised disease
of civilised man might be described as
a block or schism between his brain
and the rest of his body.29
Watts refers to the knowledge
of traditional communities
when he writes that the body is
contiguous with the rest of the
world, so that the air and water
are as central to us as our lungs
and heart. It seems crazy that this
simple statement is a revelation
for us today – its foreignness goes
some way towards explaining
why in rich nations we so blindly
disregard that which truly
supports us. Monbiot agrees: The
rich nations seeking to cut climate
change have this in common: they lie
… The governments making genuine
efforts to tackle global warming are
using figures they know to be false.30
Another lie specific to
industrial-digital civilisation, and
one used especially by members
of the American empire, is the
super-gentrification of barbarism
– suited men and women spin-
speaking the word – democracy
– but not practising the thing
– by the people for the people.
Jensen illustrates this
when he shows how a CIA Torture
Manual becomes a Pain Compliance
Manual becomes a Human Resource
Exploitation Training Manual,
1993.31 Three easy language shifts
create an enormous lie – that
torture is a considered practice
that can be acceptably taught and
applied by the rational and sane.
The civilised mind tends to
create a gated existence –
individualistic and detached
from a consciously active, actively
conscious relationship with the
natural world. This makes it
easy for us to elect and re-elect
governments who place a higher
priority on individualism and
self-interest, than on collective
social and environmental health.
McLuhan: The idea of detention
in a closed space as a form of human
punitive corrective action seems
to have come in very much in the
thirteenth and fourteenth centuries –
at the time perspective and pictorial
space was developing in our Western
world.32 When the
former Australian immigration
minister, Phillip Ruddock, a key
player in the recently ousted
Howard government, visited
the concentration camp he had
helped create in 2001 on the
tiny Pacific island of Nauru, it
was reported that he walked
past a welcoming line-up of
detainees ignoring every single
one of them. For Ruddock to have
personally acknowledged the
incarcerated Iraqis, Afghans and
Iranians he would have had to
face the personal horror he was
subjecting these people to – no
news, no services, no place to
call home, no work, no access
to communications, no future.
These refugees – many
of whom had fled the Taliban and
Saddam Hussein regimes, and
who might well have been seen
as allies in the War on Terror – put
on brave smiles to mask their
misery, in the hope of some word
of liberation from the Amnesty
International badge-wearing
Ruddock. Not only did he not
acknowledge them, he left them
on the island for a few more years.
In 2003, the 95 Iraqi refugees
were sent back to the country
Australia was helping to plunge
into civil war.
Æmpiricism>–
b
b o
b o m
b o m b
b o m b s
o m b s
m b s
b s
refugeesearefugeesearefugeesearefugeesearefugeesea s
29. Watts, The Wisdom of Insecurity: a message for the age of anxiety, p.53.
30. George Monbiot, Bring on the Apocalypse: six arguments for global justice,
Atlantic Books London, 2008 p43.
31. Derrick Jensen, Endgame, Volume 1: The Problem of Civilization, Seven Stories
Press, 2006.
32. McLuhan The Medium is the Massage,
p61.
29
Meanwhile, back in Australia,
our cities filled with government-
produced posters requesting that
we report anything suspicious
– such as baggage left in public
places – the implication being
that terrorists might already
be among us. Also raised was
the possibility that groups of
refugees attempting to reach
our shores in small leaky boats
may well include terrorists. In
late 2001, with falling popularity
before his third-term election,
John Howard declared: We will
decide who comes to this country
and the circumstances in which they
come. And he romped
back to power. With
Nauru, Australia outsourced its
abusiveness, at home the Howard
regime successfully frightened
the public enough to maintain
the right to behave in this way for
six more years.
Warming up
Scientists talk about
the improbable origins and
subsequent evolution of life on
Earth as the result of a Goldilocks
Effect – a set of conditions for
life to occur that are not too
much, not too little, not too hot/
cold, wet/dry, but just right. They
speak about the origins and
evolution of life being activated
by a combination of ingredients
such as prehistorical detonations
of a stellar porridge pot rich in
oxygen, iron, carbon, and silicon;
and the Earth’s optimum distance
from the sun. And they talk about
a Greenhouse Effect – a natural
system of cooling the Earth at
night, by releasing from the
atmosphere infrared radiation
which is generated by the sun
during the day. This keeps the
Earth’s average temperature at
around 150 Celsius. Humans have
thrived under these conditions
for thousands of years, growing
and hunting food, working
collectively in small groups,
making art and inventing gods to
celebrate the earth that supports
them.
Within a relatively short period
of time the average temperature
on Earth is expected to rise to 180
Celsius. This is due to a radical
increase in greenhouse gases,
which act like a blanket covering
the Earth, and prevent the heat
generated by infrared radiation
from escaping the atmosphere.
The increase in temperature is
already causing the glaciers and
the permafrost to melt, sea levels
to rise threatening low-lying
coastal areas and islands, and
climate zones to change – some
cooling, some warming. Soon we
will begin to see an increase of
extreme weather events, a decline
of wetlands, a scarcity of fresh
water, a decrease of agricultural
productivity, environmental
refugees, an increase in pests and
pathogens and the expansion
of tropical diseases.
Scientists cannot accurately
predict the future effects that
melting glaciers will have on
ocean currents; they can’t foresee
which areas of the planet will
freeze and which will overheat.
A consensus of scientists and
analysts, however, have estimated
that well before the year 2100,
global warming will have caused
such a scarcity of food and water
that the remaining years of
human existence may degenerate
into a horrible bloodbath.
The pop-fascist effect
is Goldilocks without her sensory
faculties. She no longer knows
what is just right, rather she is
unwittingly extreme right, and her
tongue has blistered to show for
it.
30
31
32
Lalgambook
Traditional communities
do not often voluntarily give up
or sell the resources on which their
communities are based until their
communities have been destroyed.
They also do not willingly allow
their landbases to be damaged so
that other resources – gold, oil, and so
on – can be extracted. It follows that
those who want the resources will do
what they can to destroy traditional
communities. —Derrick Jensen33
At a public lecture in
Castlemaine, the historian Ian
Clark read aloud excerpts from
the journals of early European
farmers, who had settled in
the Castlemaine/Loddon area.
Some recalled that significant
numbers of Djadja wurrung men
(of the Kulin nation) had become
farmhands almost overnight,
replacing white hired-help who
had deserted for the goldfields.
In the Loddon region
today, however, the resource most
exploited is not cheap Djadja
wurrung labour, but cheap Djadja
wurrung water.
Coca-Cola Amatil (CCA) and a
number of companies including
Cadbury Schweppes and Fosters
(trading as Spargo) have been
buying groundwater in the area
for just over $2 per megalitre (5c
per tanker!). Privacy laws make it
is impossible to obtain accurate
information from Goulbourn-
Murray Water (GMW), the
company that monitors the
commercial use of this Djadja
wurrung resource. However,
Richard Carter from GMW
confirmed that both CCA and
Cadbury Schweppes have been
taking water from the area for
the past two decades. Bore water,
otherwise known as groundwater,
is transported to the city in
trucks, bottled in plastic, and sold
as a convenience commodity for
around $2.50 a litre, at the time
of writing. This compares with
a cost of 1c per litre for tapwater.
The CCA product,
named after the significant
Loddon region landmark Mt
Franklin, is the largest brand of
bottled water in Australia, and
has approximately 70% of the
national market. Before settlers
and gold miners had dispossessed
the Djadja wurrung of their
land and resources this ancient
volcano, from which the brand
name derives, was known by the
Djadja wurrung as Lalgambook.
On its website CCA claims:
Mount Franklin water comes from
the most pristine and sustainable
water sources in Australia. It took
a mere 30 years of European
occupation – between the mid-
1830s to the mid-1860s – to see
the Djadja wurrung eradicated
from the region, the last refuge
being the Loddon protectorate at
Mt Franklin. Despite
the sympathetic efforts of the
chief protector of Victorian
Aborigines G A Robinson and the
Mt Franklin protector Edward
Parker, the miners and squatters
who appropriated the land
had both official and unofficial
authority of entitlement to it. In
his research paper concerning
the massacres and killings of
Victorian Aborigines, Ian Clark
writes: Edward Parker believed that
by the time he had established his
permanent station at Mt Franklin
in 1841 the Djadja wurrung had
recognised the overwhelming power
of the whites to exclude them from
their lands…When the local aboriginal
people first met [Edward Parker],
they ... enacted the ceremony of the
tanderrum, or ‘freedom of the bush’,
a diplomatic rite symbolising the
landholder’s hospitality, in which
strangers were allowed temporary
access to clan resources after a ritual
exchange of gifts. 34
I have conservatively estimated
that for each $2 CCA spends on
“purchasing” Djadja wurrung
groundwater, the profit after
production, salary, advertising
and distribution costs is in the
vicinity of $1–3M.
33. Jensen, “The Problem of Civilization,
Premise Two”, Endgame Volume 1, p.IX.
34. Ian D Clark, Place Names and Land Tenure – Windows into Aboriginal Land-scapes: essays in Victorian Aboriginal Histroy,
Ballarat Heritage Services, 2003, p.117.
33
34
One day last year, I spent seven
and a half hours walking every
street in Melbourne’s CBD
locating and testing public
drinking fountains. Of the
28 that I found, only 19 were
fully operational. I made a
map for myself and others,
showing where to access free
drinking water while visiting
the city. An estimated 710,600
people use Melbourne’s CBD
every day.35 This means there
is approximately one working
public water point for every
40,000 people. The
only thing we can reasonably
assume from this is that the
City of Melbourne wants people
to buy their water packaged in
plastic, that it fully supports
the privatisation of water, and
is happy to encourage unethical
corporate behaviour.
35. Referenced from the City of
Melbourne website, 2007
36. Julian Lee, “Message on a bottle
labelled as greenwash”, The Sydney Morning Herald, 27 February 2008.
37. Jason Koutsoukis , “The real cost of
bottled water”, The Age, 19 August 2007.
38. Source: The Australasian Bottled
Water Institute Inc. 2006.
39. Derrick Jensen , “Bringing Down
Civilisation”, http://www.tucradio.org/ 0913jensenone.mp3 and http://www.tucradio.org/0920jensentwo.mp3
CCA’s spokeswoman (former
ABC radio schmooze) Sally Loane,
doesn’t see what all the fuss is
about. In a recent Age article
she was quoted as saying, Any
individual who claims that we ‘rape
the environment’ is speaking from
the depths of ignorance … we are
committed to being a good corporate
citizen, particularly when it comes to
water.36 In an earlier Age article,
titled The Real Cost of Bottled Water,
she stated, There is a market for it.
Consumers like the convenience of
bottled water. A lot of people believe it
tastes better. It’s nice and cold. That’s
what consumers want, and that’s
what we’re giving them.37
Loane is effectively saying that it
is ok to burn 314,465 barrels of oil
every year to produce the plastic
for Australians’ bottled water 38;
that the large number of these
bottles that end up as landfill
and general waste has little to do
with her company; that it’s ok to
have polluting trucks running
up and down our highways for
the sake of a resource already
gravity-fed to our taps; and that
the renaming of Lalgambook to
Mt Franklin is an appropriate
exploit in light of how her
company occupies Mt Franklin as
a brand name today. At
the Oakland talk last year Derrick
Jensen paused from his address
to the large group of students
and digressed: If I had a thing of
bottled water I would hold it up and
say this is why we’re not going to have
a revolution, because if people will pay
for water bottled in plastic they will
suffer any indignity.39
As Jensen reminds us in Endgame,
if you abuse downwards on the
societal ladder there is far less
accountability or scrutiny than
when you abuse upwards. But
what really makes our high-
end abusers so camouflaged, so
protected from scrutiny? The
recent film The Corporation – which
Rupert Murdoch tried to have
censored – lays out a meticulous
answer to this question, namely:
When corporations want things
they attain the same legal
rights as a person, but when
corporations are scrutinised
they can miraculously turn
themselves back into a thing; a
brand or a label that cannot be
held accountable in the same way
a person can. Jillian
Broadbent’s corporate portfolio
is a stunning trifecta when it
comes to bottled water. As well
as being a director of CCA, she
sits on the board of Woodside
Petroleum and has just been
re-appointed to the board of the
Reserve Bank of Australia. The
chapter of Broadbent’s résumé
related to the arts assists with her
corporate camouflage. She has
been on the board of the Sydney
Theatre Company, a founding
director of the Australian
Brandenburg Orchestra, and
a Trustee, Vice President and
Treasurer of the Art Gallery of
New South Wales and in 2005 she
was appointed Chairman of the
National Institute of Dramatic
Art.
35
36
PANOPLYFASCISM
37
In rich nations such as Australia
the arts act as capitalism’s
moderator or patronised
spouse. For many high-end
arts organisations, employing
corporate fiscal strategies
and personnel simply means
continued – and often increased
– high-end patronage.
My own low-end cultural
practice, as played out in the
film Lalgambook, is in the form
of poetical terrorism or physical
graffiti, where public space is
disrupted – even terrorised
– by ambiguous and poetical
interventions. At commercial
outlets I leave stickers on the
caps of bottled water directing
consumers to a website (www.
myspace.com/justfreewater) where
they can access a range of articles
concerning water, packaging,
governments and corporates –
counter-propaganda.
When I see a vending machine
selling refrigerated water and
junk food items, if I can find the
switch I turn it off. This simple
act of anti-corporate activism in
the everyday is a liberty-chaser.
A small shock of adrenaline
charges through my body as I
flick the switch. It is not from
a sense of hope that I carry out
these physical poems – poems
that practice in the space of the
everyday – but rather from the
consideration: traditional forms
of poetry seem ridiculous this late
in history.
UK economist Nicholas Stern’s
gloomy ‘Report on the Economics
of Climate Change’ does not
cause me to fly to Thailand and
live out civilisation’s final years
in a debauched and drug-crazed
reverie, although it’s tempting.
I will stay in Djadja wurrung
country as long as I can, ’fess up
to white occupation and continue
to compost. When the crash does
come – with mass death caused
by failed crops and lack of water –
the role of people like Broadbent
and Loane should be publicly
known. Regularly
switching off vending machines
that sell water bottled in plastic
makes barely a ripple in terms of
tackling our problems with the
physical world, but conceptually
it’s a big leap forward. Accept-
ance of a reliance upon the
importation of resources is our
civilisation’s zeitgeist – our
cultural pathology – and it needs
to be switched off. If we
are killing people and habitats for
oil to maintain our toxic lifestyle
now, then what future violence
awaits us with diminishing
water supplies taken from
small communities and bottled
in plastic for massive global
shareholder profits?
Art of the problem
Where do I begin and
end in space? I have relations to the
sun and air which are just as vital
parts of my existence as my heart.
—Alan Watts40 Long
before reading the likes of John
Cage and Derrick Jensen, I spent
a considerable amount of time
making, moving, planting and
installing things in the area of
the Wombat State Forest that lies
between the upper tributaries of
the Loddon and Coliban rivers.
I made graffiti in the bush.
The Helen Lempriere
National Sculpture Award is an
annual Australian art prize that
takes place at Werribee Mansion,
just west of Melbourne. I’m not
normally interested in an event
or activity like this, however the
prize money could keep you alive
for years. For this reason in 2005
I sold out and bought a ticket in
the lottery, submitting some of
my bush graffiti works. I was a
short-listed finalist with a one in
twenty-nine chance of winning.
Needless to say I didn’t, but as
I’d come close, I tried again the
following year.
While developing my 2006
submission I walked around
Werribee Mansion’s grounds,
thinking about the building and
its history. It is a classic example
of occupationist architecture –
a colossal monument to colonial
empire-building by private
money, in bricks and mortar. I
stood on the vast, water-thirsty
lawn where drought-hardy
wallaby grasses had once
grown, and I faced the building.
40. Watts, The Wisdom of Insecurity, p.46
38
39
It stood to attention, humour-
less and arrogant, surveying its
own wealth. My eyes fixed on
the forty metres of sandstone
balustrade spanning the second
storey balcony. I imagined
adding to its already locatable
and mortared repression at home,
expansion abroad appearance 41 a
blaze-red vinyl banner with my
own ‘expression fixé’: Everyday
consensus is no counter power to
the psychopaths of everyday rule.
Werribee Mansion
began life as a shrine to stately
imperialism and was then a
draughty Christian seminary
for a few decades. These days it
is an exclusive, centrally heated
restaurant and luxury hotel
geared to accommodate high-
end corporate conferences – and
in its grounds, a yearly national
sculpture prize. In
2006 my proposal wasn’t even
short-listed, so I gave up the
gambling game and went back
to doing what I do best – making
temporary autonomous zones.42
Following is an excerpt
from the document: The Australian
Law Reform Commission Inquiry into
Schedule 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act
(No. 2) 2005 and Part IIA of the Crimes
Act 1914 Submission by The National
Association for the Visual Arts (NAVA)
10 April 2006, which describes the
background to one of these zones.
7.4.3. In 2006, just prior to the staging
of the Commonwealth Games in
Melbourne, the Victorian State
Government used the Commonwealth
Games Arrangements Act which gave it
the power to remove all graffiti, stencil
art and political posters from public
places in Melbourne. Premier Steve
Bracks was reported as declaring this
intention publicly, vowing that within
two hours of posters going up they
would be removed. Melbourne City
Council followed through by painting
out and obliterating all the street art it
could find in a bid to present a “clean
city” for the Commonwealth Games.
Artist Patrick Jones initiated a protest
against this act of cultural destruction
and censorship. Melbourne
is internationally renowned for
having one of the most vibrant and
creative street art scenes in the world,
something Jones was keen to protect
and promote. So he photographed
stencil and graffiti art at risk of being
cleaned away and made a series of
placards with these images. He joined
with a group of friends and carried
the placards through the city [over
several days during the time
of the games] as a roaming wall
of protest. Jones was questioned by
police for the action but was allowed
to continue unhampered.
At this time Jason Workman and
I were helping each other with
individual projects. We had days
in Melbourne handing out bogus
leaflets and pasting up our own
public notices, carrying out what
we called reverse thefts or add-ins
to retail spaces. When
Workman moved to Brooklyn
in 2007, he found employment
fabricating large-scale sculptures
at a reputable art foundry. After
some weeks he told me that the
conditions for the workers were
pretty terrible, especially as it was
summer and full body suits,
masks and goggles had to
be worn in an unventilated
workshop. The
foundry’s clients included high-
profile artists such as Barbara
Kruger, Paul McCarthy and Chris
Olfili. Workman told me that
the hazardous waste from the
factory is dumped directly into
the gutters, and the toxic resins,
plastics and fibreglass particles
are allowed to blow around the
streets of the local, largely Polish
neighbourhood.
I should add that
foundry employees were never
invited to the exhibition
openings of the works that they
had made. After a few months
the social and environmental
conditions became too much,
and Workman left.
I googled Kruger to find some
apt quote of hers regarding abuse
and/or misuse of power – there
have been so many. Her widely
documented art text Abuse of
power comes as no surprise, and
that of her contemporary, Jenny
Holzer: Protect me from what I want,
had first sprung to mind. But I
wanted to find something less
notorious to capture here. Instead
the following Sotheby’s online
catalogue entry spoke to me:
Lot 353 is a fine large photographic
silkscreen on vinyl by Barbara
Kruger (b. 1945). Entitled “Not Stupid
Enough”, it measures 109 inches square
and was executed in 1997. It was
included in the retrospective exhibition
on the artist in 1999–2000 at The
Museum of Contemporary Art in Los
Angeles and the Whitney Museum
of American Art in New York. It has
an estimate of $250,000 to $350,000.
41. Adapted from the quote: Civilization originates in conquest abroad and repression at home. Stanley Diamond quoted in
Derrick Jensen, Endgame (Vol 1), p.15.
42. Hakim Bey, “The Temporary
Autonomous Zone”, Ontological Anarchy, Poetical Terrorism, Autonomedia, second
edition, 2003.
40
41
42
We will never attain the level of
sustainability required to save
our species from annihilation
while our culture is founded on
such pathology that a photo-
graphic silkscreen print is worth
$250,000 or more. As civilisation
and its cities have developed
away from natural world cycles,
our art has become a pointless,
dislocated commodity of abuser
culture. Artists who choose to
dwell in cities make art based on
the pathologies of their urban
environment, and then sell their
work in order to survive there.
It’s a narrow, self-serving cycle
of resource wasting.
A recently-seen documentary,
The Real Dirt on Farmer John,
puts Kruger and Co into some
perspective. It’s a film about
the everyday life of a farmer,
John Peterson, who grows
food and makes art inclusively,
with little separation between
tilling, despairing, writing,
constructing, failing, loving
and heaving. Unlike Kruger’s
art, which attempts to critique
Western (specifically male)
brutality but itself ends up as
another power base fighting
for both capital and egotistical
space – for transformation
– Peterson’s documentary
highlights an art that belongs
to the farm, to a specific location
and to natural cycles – art that
centres on making in the space
of the everyday; art that involves
many participants. But the
transformationists are never
far away.
For twenty years Peterson
endured the wrath of his
Christian neighbours for not
thinking the baby Jesus a
particularly interesting figure
in the scheme of biodynamic
life. The Real Dirt
on Farmer John surveys a life’s
body of work. It documents
the trials and tribulations of
an independent farmer in the
midst of the corporatist welfare
state that is US agriculture.
Peterson’s collaborations with
singer/songwriters, filmmakers,
playwrights, poets and artists are
inculcated into daily life on the
farm. One of the most impressive
results of this life’s work is the
year-round provision of bio-
dynamic fruit and vegetables to
around 6,000 Chicago families
from Peterson’s small Round-up
Ready-free farm. Just as
Peterson’s agricultural output is
not museum quality, so too his
filmic memoir has not generated
the waste typical of civilised art.
As an occasional set builder on
films I have experienced first-
hand the tremendous waste that
results from their production.
In direct contrast, Peterson is
an example of the kind of artist
whose work the world could
really eat now.
Tonight a friend emailed me
requesting a radio advertisement
for a student sound project she
was doing. I responded:
EXCLUSIVE only to reformed
collectors of fine art comes
COMPOSTED ART TEA!
Cultural waste product has never been
so available so we’ve DESIGNED
a product to take care of the surplus
and, what’s more it can be delivered
to your door free of charge. Impress
your friends with AFFORDABLE
ART at its most rotting.
When you need that extra something
for your garden hang the expense
and think: COMPOSTED ART
TEA! Dribble some on the
lettuces and in a few weeks see them
explode with a simultaneous contrast
of colours. Garlic has never tasted so
delicious; rhubarb never possessed
such form! So, in order to
meet future standards in art practice
the BEST of modern culture has
undergone our most rigorous aerobic
pitchforking. We’re talking
painting, sculpture, writing, drawing,
installation art, pop and folk shopping
music, fashion, set construction, design
– even gallerists and museum staff are
in the mix. COMPOSTED
ART TEA! Mixing art with
the whole environment!
43
44
45
image captions All images are by Patrick Jones
unless otherwise indicated
front cover• untitled photograph
(yellow road sign) 2005 (detail)• Nicholas Hansen (Mutiny Media),
documentation of WorkmanJones’ practice, Melbourne CBD 2006 (detail)
inside front cover + p1• entrance brass, Reverie Books,
Trentham, Victoria, 2005 • untitled photograph
(yellow road sign), 2005 (detail)
pp.2 –3 • untitled photograph
(yellow road sign), 2005 (detail)• front room Reverie Books,
Trentham, Victoria, 2005
p.4• Dualism~Fuelism, Patrick Jones,
White-Ant #2 anthology, How do you know what the truth is? White-Ant Press, Melbourne 2005
p.7• Cage books, personal library, 2005
p.9 • painted rock (with Zephyr),
Wombat Forest, Victoria, 2005 (detail)
pp.10–11 • painted rock (detail)• Homage to Duchamp, coffin
intervention National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, 2005 (detail)
• Chance, film still (with Toby Sime and Michael Farrell), Centre Place, Melbourne 2006 (original footage: Ivor Bowen) (detail)
pp.12 • Chance, film still (detail), with
photograph intervention (single dot) by Peter Tyndall
p.15 • Zephyr’s play, Melbourne, 2006 p.17• The mind and matter of human hope (a
country party version), ink drawing, 2007
p.19• The mind and matter of human hope (city
version), ink drawing, 2007 (previously published in Going Down Swinging #26
pp.20–21 • be your own Ian, street sign
intervention, Melbourne, 2006. Photograph: Mel Ogden
p.22 • Swanston Street tree intervention,
Melbourne, 2006. Photograph: Jason Workman
p.25 • Jason Workman, Words against
Capitalism booklet, add-in (reverse theft), Melbourne shoe store, 2006, (previously published in, Patrick Jones, “The Word as Art”, Artlink vol 27 no 1, 2007)
• Jason Workman, add-in (reverse theft), tourist bureau intervention, Melbourne, 2006
p.27• bus-stop add-in, Melbourne, 2005• Department of Lost Liberties, letter sent to Liberal and Labor
politicians, 2005
p.28• phone booth add-in, Trentham,
Victoria, 2005
p.31 • Letter to the editor, The Age, 5 July 2007• free-hand graf, Melbourne, 2006
p.32• Double white Australia line policy
(A4 version), Trentham-Daylesford Road, Victoria, 2005
• Lalgambook film still (with Josh Bowes). Image: Meg Ulman, 2008
p.34• map of Melbourne’s public drinking
fountains, drawing, 2007
p.35• Roundup Ready public water drinking
in Melbourne, 2007
p.36• Just Free Water, participant, New
Years Eve Parade, Daylesford, 2008, Photograph: Kyle Barnes for The Advocate newspaper
p.37 • concrete poem with Mt Franklin
water bottle stand, 2007
p.39 • Pine for the scarce hell leaky cum primates
and the war gas, Wombat Forest, Victoria, 2003
• unsuccessful HLNSA proposal, 2006
p.41 • A Temporary Autonomous zone – Roaming
Graffiti Wall (with Jason Workman, Peter O’Mara, Ivor Bowen, Tim O’Sullivan, Petra Beuskens, Nikki Blanch, Cath Ryan, Tara Gilbee, Jeff Stewart and Jasmine Salomon), 2006. Photograph: Penny Stephens (reproduced courtesy of The Age)
• Jason Workman, public notice intervention, Melbourne 2006
p.42• Jason Workman, stencil,
Carlton park, Melbourne 2006• Situationist quote (1969) intervention,
(with Hen and Millie Cheshire and James Holden), Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney, 2006
pp.44–45 • home compost with hand-shredded
Free-dragging Manifesto draft manuscript, Daylesford, 2008
pp.47 • Nicholas Hansen (Mutiny Media)
documentation of WorkmanJones’ free-dragging practice, Melbourne CBD, 2006 (detail)
pp.48–63 • Nicholas Hansen (Mutiny Media),
documentation of WorkmanJones’ free-dragging practice, Melbourne CBD, 2006
pp.64–65• home compost with family
pitchforker, Daylesford (with Meg Ulman), 2008
p.67 • More Prohibitions in the Age of
Interpretative Signage, 2005 (CAD drawings by Multiplicity)
46
PHOTOGRAPHS BY NICHOLAS HANSEN
a free-dragging manifesto
Page becomes stage transfigured into time-bracketed instances of a continuous present; written language becomes a surprising performance of its charged materiality. —Joan Retallack1
47
Wishfulness is conscious defeat. Hope is delusion.
Hope is fast food for the demoralised. Hope is
unburnt fat. Hope – an addiction concurrent with
the mainstay pathologies of civilisation – sugar-oil-drugs-
gods etc. Hope is the desire for transform
ation.
1. Joan Retallack, ‘What Is Experimental Poetry & Why Do We Need It?’ Jacket 32, April 2007. http://jacketmagazine.com/32/p-retallack.shtml
48
Hope is no good matter. Transformation is
spin. Spin is counter to the rotation of material life.
Hopefulness is mind over matte
r. To trust
the pathological stake
holders of civilisatio
n – monotheists-
governments-corporatists – is ho
peful defeat. Spin
49
is the first cousin of hope. Spin is fast text.
Spin is the art of selling something hopeful which ends up
wasteful. Hope is waste. Was
te is the non-
compostable by-product of the centralised – the civilised.
Waste has no bounds. A city
’s reliance upon
50
the importation of resources impoverishes its citizens
who in turn impoverish and toxify the land. The
Cuban says: ‘the food has to be walking distance’2.
In the rich nations the reliance upon the importation of
resources occurs through the outsourcing of brutality –
2.Roberto Perez, visiting Cuban permaculturalist, speaking at Daylesford Town Hall, Victoria, Australia, 3 April 2008
51
forests cleared, soils contaminated
, air polluted, soldiers
shipped, oceans vacuumed of life and used as dumping
grounds. It is hopeless. Free-dragging is the
practice of hopelessness. Free-drag
ging is monist.
We practice hopelessness with the acceptance that
52
material life is all we have and when it is over it is over.
Hopelessness becomes inspiration – inspiration,
the tenacity to act independent
ly of governments and goods
and gods. Anxiety is hope
fulne
ss transfigured into fear.
Fear empowers the authority of governments and
53
goods and gods – the debts of which demoral
ise and enslave.
This entire cycle is wasteful and hopeful. We
are enslaved to amaterial structures - taxes create borders –
borders create gods and armies – the killing schedule proceeds
on our side’s beha
lf. Hopele
ssness as practiced in
54
free-dragging is li
beration – which manifests materially as
poetical terrorism – the material trans
ference of which is non-
delusional play – civil disobedience. Free-dragging is
aerobic poetry of the body – free-dragging is pitchforking.
Free-dragging is anaerobic poetry of the mind – we
55
two worms forever crawling. We are materialists
because we are purely mind and matter. We need two
good mea
ls a da
y and the ‘irreducible complexity’3 of the
sun, soil, seeds and water to have this. The Cuban says: ‘ca
tch
your own water, grow your own food, say hello to your
3. from Darwin’s ‘organs of extreme perfection and complication’, as revisted in Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion, 2006.
56
neighbour.’4 The earth, air and water as lungs,
heart and brain. The aesthetic-athletics and ethics of
free-dragging are inde
terminate and mutab
le. The
re
is no authority here. Authorship is immutab
le
constraint. Authorship is court journalism – the
4. ibid. Roberto Perez. 57
dutiful reportage of spin and gree
nwash. Free-
drag
ging is the poem writte
n by the body – physical graffiti
kicking in the street. As so
on as it is writte
n it is gone.
God obsolete. In nature change is recu
rrent.
Seeds grow publicly and find opportunities for
58
autonomy. We defend this. We practice
in the space of the eve
ryday. We ripen and fall like
public fruit, bletting on the street. We understand
enslavement when we free-drag. We understand
the conventions that enslave – paying interest upon interest.
59
In small collectives we act fo
r ourselves. We do not
need supermarkets. We share water and grow fo
od.
No need for governments. We defend ourselves in
small communities. Nation-states dissolve. Cage says:
‘We must make the ear
th safe for poverty without dependence
60
on government.’5
The waste architect packs thermal
mass into old car tyres – rammed earth off the grid.
Night falls. We drag each ot
her through the city an
d
jump into building skips, our stockings ladder. Oil
peaks. Lying on the bi
tumen our hands in the soil turn it over.
5. John Cage, Anarchy, Wesleyan University Press (1988), 2001. 61
62
63
64
This work is compost ready.
65
Patrick Jones A Free-dragging Manifesto
[how to do words with things]
Published by Tree-Elbow Publications
July 2008 Edition 750 isbn 978–0–9580307–4–8
Jointly published with subtext: Peter O’Mara
©/ Patrick Jones. All rights relinquished
with the exception of the following images:
p.36 © Kyle Barnes, The Advocate
cover, pp.47–63 © Nicholas Hansen,
Mutiny Media (www.mutinymedia.com)
p.41 © Penny Stephens, The Age
acknowledgements
A Free-dragging Manifesto has been made possible through
the generosity and support of a number of friends and
collaborators. Peter O’Mara put the flint to the stone
in suggesting it was time we produced a joint book. His
friendship is purely and simply a central mechanism for
this work. Jason Workman believed in co-originating
a practice of self-liberation. His considerations, poetical
activities and friendship are at the core of this work.
Kate Fagan provided an early editorial framework and
suggested the title. Filmmaker and photographer
Nicholas Hansen provided quality photographic document-
ation and important editorial input. Verity Higgins
(RAV) assisted with the funding process and helped Peter
and I to mediate our language for the application.
Peter Tyndall, both formally and informally committed
his support to this project. Vivienne and Ross Ulman
gifted hours of proofreading, critical editing and belief.
Thanks to Vivienne Shark LeWitt for some timely and
helpful comments. Ian Robertson once again provided
an important philosophical environment with the design.
His ideas and friendship significantly shaped this work.
Jude Walton provided a critical eye to our practice,
and laughed and frowned at appropriate and inappropriate
moments. Zephyr has kept me on my toes and
fingertips, and has taught me everything I know and don’t
know about being a dad. Meg Ulman essentially
funded this work with love. Her sensitivities to other people
and the planet are a daily source of inspiration.
funding
This project has been made possible by the
Australian Government’s regional arts program,
the Regional Arts Fund, which gives all
Australians, wherever they live, better access
to opportunities to practice and experience the
arts. The Regional Arts Fund is administered in
Victoria by Regional Arts Victoria and funded by
the Department of Communications Information
Technology and the Arts. The Regional Arts Fund
is an Australian Government initiative supporting
the arts in regional and remote Australia.
production
Graphic design: Ian Robertson
Printing: Finsbury Green Printing, Melbourne
Printed using vegetable oil-based inks
on Printspeed Laser – a paper produced with
elemental chlorine-free pulp derived from
sustainable plantation forests
tree-elbow publications
PO Box 482 Daylesford Australia 3460
Email [email protected]
66
67
subPeter O’Mara
(HOW TO DO WORDS WITH THINGS) text