25
A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment- Economics LLC E3

A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

A CASE STUDY in

actual

energy conservation

Presented By Energy-Environment-EconomicsLLC

E3

Page 2: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

What is a Kilo-Watt (kW)? A Kilo-Watt Hour?

What is it? A Kilo-Watt-Hour? 2500 square foot house uses approximately 10 kW What is it worth?

.10$/kWh? 10-15$ per kW?

If energy costs remained constant over the years, nobody would be at this presentation and all of these system types would still be in vogue

Double duct systems Multi-zone air handling units Constant flow air and water systems No energy management capabilities

Page 3: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Commissioning

Design Phase

Construction Phase

Acceptance Phase

Page 4: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Commissioning Defined????

?????????No Industry StandardsTo some it is a glorified Test and Balance

jobTo some it is a point to point verificationTo others it is a “installed per the CD’s”

process

Page 5: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

What Commissioning is NOT

Systems OptimizationProblem solvingOperation and Maintenance cost controlThe biggest bang for your energy buck,

environment buck, or economic buck (E3 that is)

The final destination on your HVAC Systems Energy Conservation journey

Page 6: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

What is OptimissioningSM??

Combination of Commissioning and Systems Optimization

Identifies pre-existing system deficiencies and develops protocols for remediation

Saves energy by fixing your problems, then and only then can the system be optimized for further energy savings

Page 7: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

WAATS CMSB - How did it all start?

Inability to use the p/f heat exchangerExcessive utility costsData Rooms temperature and humidity

control problemsBentley Engineering report concluded

Save $$ by adding more capacity???? Already had 3 times the actual required

capacity

Page 8: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Facility Description

Built in 1992Houses 2 simulator bays with 2 helicopter

simulators each; supporting Data Rooms with Liebert CRAC units

2nd floor office/training/conference areas3 chillers/towers/pumpsHot/chilled water air handling unitsVariable air and water flows BacNet DDC system

Page 9: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Pre and Post OptimissioningSM Energy Consumption

The following slides graphically illustrate energy consumption of the facility. We believe no explanation is necessary, except to say that the results – nearly a 50% reduction in KW and KwH consumption – are nothing short of spectacular considering that only the HVAC component of the facility’s energy consumption was addressed

Page 10: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

CMSB Energy Usage 2003-2005

Page 11: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

CMSB Energy Usage 2003-2005

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

June - May

KW

KW Demand June 01- May 02

KW Demand June 02 - May 03

KW Demand June 03 - May 04

KW Demand June 04 - May 05

Page 12: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

CMSB Energy Usage 2003-2005

KwH Consumption June 2001- May 2005

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

June - May

Kw

H

Kw H June 01 - May 02

Kw H June 02 - May 03

Kw H June 03 - May 04

June 04 - May 05

Page 13: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

CMSB Energy Usage 2003-2005

Annual kWH Totals

0

600000

1200000

1800000

2400000

3000000

02 Annual Total 03 Annual Total 04 Annual Total 05 YTD Total

kWH Annual kWH T otals

Page 14: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Cooling Degree Days

Cooling Degree Days 2001 - 2005

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

June - May

CDD June 01 - May 02

CDD June 02 - May 03

CDD June 03 - May 04

CDD June 04 - May 05

Page 15: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Chilled Water System before

Page 16: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Chilled Water System before

Page 17: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Chilled water system current status

One chiller system now satisfies the building, saving approximately 250 kW

Turned off 6 Liebert CRAC’s, even during plate/frame operation, saving another 30 kW

Plate/frame used 4-5 months/yearDDC system in complete automatic, all setpoints

optimized

Expected to save approximately 1,200,000 kWh this year

Page 18: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

What does it take?

LeadershipVisionTalentExperienceThinking outside the boxCOMMITTMENT

Page 19: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Other benefits???

Besides reduced energy costs Extended system life expectancy - all 3

chillers at CMSB with 30,000+ hours each, only one was ever required

Improved space conditions Reduced O&M costs More $$ for energy projects, including

renewable energy projects

Page 20: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Commissioning

First stepIdentifies existing O & M deficienciesNecessary to develop OptimissioningSM plan 5-10% savings from straight commissioning

latest from CCC - 1.2 million s.f., saves 62K$

Minimum of 30% from OptimissioningSM

Page 21: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Retro-Commissioning

A process to commission existing buildings Will identify problems Will result in $$ savings

Is NOT Systems OptimizationWill identify functional issues, will not develop the

engineering required to provide solutionsWill evaluate EMCS (if existing) point-to point

communication, will not evaluate performance of controls sequences

Page 22: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

OptimissioningSM

A combination of commissioning and systems optimization

Savings 3-5 times traditional commissioningSpecialized skill set required

systems acumen troubleshooting skills controls expertise engineering talent

Page 23: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Typical Characteristics of Troubled Systems

Inability to maintain design supply chilled water temperature during any occupied hour of the year

Constant hot/cold complaintsOut of capacity without adding square feet?LARGE power bills?Excessive maintenance costs

Page 24: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Low system DT’s are a capacity and energy conservation cancer

Delta T is the difference between entering and leaving chilled water

Low (less than design) results in loss of capacity, temperature and humidity control problems

Reasons vary, but typically is a misunderstood phenomenon

Default response is to almost always add more capacity – is unnecessary and expensive

Page 25: A CASE STUDY in actual energy conservation Presented By Energy-Environment-Economics LLC E3

Thanks again for your time!!

Energy-Environment-Economics.LLC

www.e3-az.com

[email protected]