4- Log Resistivitas

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    1/45

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    2/45

    Well LogSP Resistivity

    RESISTIVITY LOG

    Most abundant data for formation evaluation and

    determination of fluid saturations

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    3/45

    TYPICAL RESISTIVITY LOG RESPONSE

    RESISTIVITY LOG

    With know ing of f lu ids resi t iv i ty,

    we cou ld ident i fy the f lu ids

    content (Gas, Oil , Water)

    GR (API) 1500

    Sand

    Sand

    Gas/Oil

    Water

    Gas/Oil

    Res (ohm-m) 200.2

    Contact

    GR

    Res

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    4/45

    IDEALIZED LOG SET

    = 0.30

    = 0.35

    = 0.07

    R = 0.4

    R = 0.3

    R = 4

    R = 8

    Sand

    Shale

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    5/45

    FOUR COMPONENTS OF SANDSTONE

    MATRIXFRAMEWORK

    (QUARTZ)

    FRAMEWORK(FELDSPAR)

    CEMENT

    PORE

    Note different use of matrix

    by geologists and engineers

    0.25 mm

    1. Framework2. Matrix

    3. Cement

    4. Pores

    Engineering

    matrix

    Geologists Classification

    Ayers, 2001

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    6/45

    FLUID SATURATIONS

    Grain Water Gas Oil

    Initially, water fills pores and wets the rock surface

    Hydrocarbons migrate into the reservoir rock, displacing some water

    Hydrocarbon distribution determined by gravity and capillary forces,

    and by wettability

    and matrix

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    7/45

    RESISTIVITY

    Resistivity

    The voltage required to cause one amp to pass

    through a cube having a face area of one

    square meter

    Units are ohm-m2/m; usually ohm-m (.m)

    tyConductivi

    1yResistivit

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    8/45

    RESISTIVITY OF EARTH MATERIALS

    tyConductivi

    1yResistivit

    Incr

    easing

    Res

    istivity

    (1) Rock

    (2) Gas

    (3) Oil

    (4) Fresh Water

    (5) Salt Water

    Increasing

    Conductivity

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    9/45

    Resistivity of water

    Porosity of the formation,

    Pore geometry - tortuosity Lithology of the formation

    Degree of cementation, and

    Type and amount of clay in the rock

    FACTOR AFFECTING RESISTIVITY

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    10/45

    ELECTRICITY AND EARTH

    MATERIALS

    Conduction is by ions in water

    Na+ and Cl- are very common Other monovalent ions K+ and OH-

    Common bivalent ions: Ca++, Mg++

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    11/45

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    12/45

    Resistivity of NaCl Solutions

    (GEN-5 H or GEN-9 S)

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    13/45

    ARPS FORMULA

    For constant solution R1(T1 + 7) = R2(T2 + 7) (T in deg F)

    R1(T1 + 21.5) = R2(T2 + 21.5) (T in deg C)

    Example

    Rm = 0.32 ohm-m @ surface (25 deg C)

    What is Rm at 145 deg C?

    R2 = R1(T1 + 21.5)/(T2 + 21.5) R2 = 0.32(25+21.5)/(145+21.5) = 0.089 ohm-m

    Check this on the chart!

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    14/45

    ARCHIES FIRST LAW

    As the salt water content increases, the formationresistivity will decrease.

    A rock containing oil or gas will have a higherresistivity than the same rock completely saturatedwith salt water.

    As the shale content increases, the rock matrix willbecome more conductive.

    Ro = Resistivity of a rock that is 100%saturated with formation water

    Rw = Resistivity of formation waterRo = F Rw

    F = Formation factor (formation resistivityfactor)

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    15/45

    The formation factor (F) depends on:

    Porosity of the formation;

    Pore geometry; Lithology of the formation;

    Degree of cementation; and

    Type and amount of clay in the rock.

    FORMATION FACTOR

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    16/45

    For a clean formation (no shale), the formation factor

    can usually be empirically correlated with porosity.

    a = constant 1.0 for most formationsm = cementation factor 2 for most formations

    Common values

    F = 0.8/2 (Tixier) or F = 0.62/2.15 (Humble) for

    sandstones

    F = 0.8/2 for carbonates

    m

    aF

    FORMATION FACTOR

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    17/45

    Formation Resistivity Factor Versus Porosity

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    18/45

    RELATION OF FORMATION FACTOR

    TO VOLUMETRIC POROSITY

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    19/45

    RESISTIVITY FACTOR TO SHALINESS

    The formation factor (F) is constant for a clean sand;

    Fdecreases for shaly sand as value ofRwincreases

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    20/45

    IfRt= R0, then the formation is 100%saturated with formation water. IfRt> Ro,

    then the formation contains oil or gas.

    General formula:

    t

    m

    w

    t

    w

    t

    on

    w

    R

    Ra

    R

    RF

    R

    RS

    **

    For clean sands, n = 2is common.

    Like a and m, nis measured in the lab.

    ARCHIES SECOND LAW

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    21/45

    LAB EVALUATION OF n

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    22/45

    DRILLING DISTURBS FORMATION

    Drilling and rock crushing Damage zone

    Mud systems and invasion

    Oil based mud

    Small conductivity mud

    Shallow invasion

    Thin cake

    Water based mud

    Moderate to very conductivemud

    Shallow to deep invasion

    Thin to thick cake

    Mudcake

    Invading filtrate

    Damaged zone

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    23/45

    EFFECTS OF DRILLING AND

    MUD FILTRATE INVASION

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    24/45

    MUD FILTRATE INVASION

    Modified from J. Jensen

    Wellbore

    Mud

    (Rm)

    Mud Cake(Rmc)

    UninvadedZone

    (Rt)Invaded

    Zone (Rxo)

    UninvadedZone

    (Rt)

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    25/45

    Resistivity of zone

    Resistivity of the water in the zone

    Water saturation in the zone

    R1

    Rs

    Rs

    Rw

    Sw

    Rm

    Mud

    hmc Flushedzone Zone of

    transitionor

    annulus

    didj

    Adjacent bed

    rj

    dh

    Hole

    diameter

    Adjacent bed

    h

    dh

    Uninvadedzone

    (Bed

    thickness)

    (Invasion diameters)

    Sxo

    Rm1

    Rxd

    Rmc

    Mudcake

    After Schlumberger

    SYMBOLS USED

    IN LOGINTERPRETATION

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    26/45

    Borehole

    Rm : Borehole mud resistivity

    Rmc : Mudcake resistivity

    Invaded zone

    Rmf : Mud filtrate resistivityRxo : Invaded zone resistivity

    Sxo : Invaded zone water saturation

    Uninvaded zone

    Rw : Interstitial water resistivity

    Rt : Uninvaded zone resistivity

    Sw : Uninvaded zone water saturation

    COMMON TERMINOLOGY

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    27/45

    SUMMARY - RESISTIVITY

    Resistivity important property Depends on ions in water

    Water resistivity depends on

    Concentration

    Temperature

    Species

    Archies First Law relates rock resistivity to Rw

    Archies Second Law relates Sw to Rt

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    28/45

    Uninvaded Zone resistivity,Rt measurement is affected by:

    Mud resistivity, Rm Mudcake resistivity, Rmc

    Flushed zone resistivity, Rxo

    Three resistivity measurements are made to get an accurate

    resistivity, Rt, since no tool can read uninvaded zone (as far

    as 5-7 ft from borehole) resistivities without compromising

    vertical resolution or being affected by flushed zone

    resistivity, mud resistivity and mudcake resistivity.

    Typical depths of investigation:

    Resistivity Tool Depth of Investigation

    Deep resistivity 5-7 feet.

    Shallow resistivity 2-3 feet.

    Micro resistivity A few inches ( 2~3 inches)

    WHY 3 DIFFERENT RESISTIVITY MEASUREMENTS?

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    29/45

    To obtain a value for Rt, we use of correction charts The three resistivity measurements are corrected for the

    presence of mud, mudcake and invasion effects and also

    for other environmental factors like borehole size and tool

    position in the borehole.

    NOTE :When doing a Quicklook analysis on the wellsite, it

    is common practice to use the deep measurement as an

    approximate value for Rt and the shallow measurement anapproximation of Rxo.

    CORRECTION CHARTS

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    30/45

    There are two kinds of Resistivity tools :

    Resistivity tools - Measure resistivity, eg.

    Dual LaterologConductivity tools - Measure conductivity,

    eg. Array Induction

    Tool

    RESISTIVITY TOOLS

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    31/45

    Deep and shallow measurement systems worksimultaneously - this is the dual aspect of the tool

    Deep and shallow measurement systems operation at

    different frequencies of and have different depths of

    investigation

    Both measurements maintain the same vertical

    resolution of 2 feet

    All currents (deep and shallow) are emitted

    circumferentially from the tool in a disc pattern

    RESISTIVITY TOOL: THE DUAL LATEROLOG

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    32/45

    LLD-LLS CURRENT PATTERNS

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    33/45

    ttxoxommLL RJRJRJR

    PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION

    Where Jm, Jxo, Jt are geometric factors giving the

    contribution of each zone to the resistivity read by the tool.

    In the laterolog tool, the zones add up in series. The tool

    responds therefore to the most resistive zone and hence

    the DLL is used where:

    Mud is saline or WBM (low resistivity); or

    Formation is highly resistive.

    A rule of thumb is to use the DLL when Rw/Rt>2.5

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    34/45

    These tools provide conductivity measurements

    They provide both deep and a shallow measurements

    A transmitter coil with an alternating current passing

    through it sets up an alternating magnetic field through the

    borehole and formation. Faradays Law predicts that thistime varying field will establish an EMF in the formation that

    causes current flow through the formation in circular paths.

    Magnitude of these currents is proportional to the formation

    conductivity.

    Current loops produce their own magnetic fields that cutthrough the receiver coil and induce an alternating voltage

    at the receiver that is proportional to the strength of the

    secondary magnetic field and, hence, the formation

    conductivity.

    CONDUCTIVITY TOOLS: INDUCTION TOOLS

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    35/45

    INDUCTION TOOL OPERATION

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    36/45

    There are current loops in the mud, in the mudcake, in the

    invaded zone and in the uninvaded zone

    Therefore, apparent conductivity read by the induction tool,

    Ca is:

    ttxoxomma CGCGCGC

    Measurements are corrected for the effects of the borehole

    and other environmental effects

    Tool responds to the most conductive medium surroundingit, so we use an induction tool where we have:

    Low salinity mud or OBM (low conductivity);

    Low resistivity formations; or

    Where Rw/Rmf> 2.5

    PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    37/45

    SELECTING THE RESISTIVITY TOOL

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    38/45

    Micro-resistivity has a very shallow depth of

    investigation - approximately 2-3 inches.

    Micro-resistivity is measured with tools like the

    micro-spherically Focused Tool.

    All three types of resistivity tools help determine Rt,

    with the use of correction charts.

    RESISTIVITY TOOL SUMMARY

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    39/45

    RESISTIVITY TOOL

    APPLICATIONS

    Well to well correlation

    Sxo and Sw computation

    Presence and depth of hydrocarbons

    Invasion profile analysis/Imaging

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    40/45

    Rt

    Ro

    Rw

    Cube of water

    having resistivity,Rw

    Non-shaly rock, 100% saturated

    with water having resistivity,

    Rw

    Rock containing pores saturated

    with water and hydrocarbons

    Increasing

    Resistivity

    (1) Rock

    (2) Gas

    (3) Oil

    (4) Fresh Water

    (5) Salt Water

    Increasing

    Conductivity

    = 100%Sw = 100%

    = 20%

    Sw = 100%

    = 20%Sw = 20%

    mw

    oa

    RRF

    SATURATION MEASUREMENT

    FROM RESISTIVITY

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    41/45

    xo

    mf

    m

    n

    xo

    t

    w

    m

    n

    w

    R

    RAS

    R

    RAS

    Uninvaded Zone water

    saturation

    Invaded/Flushed zone water

    saturation

    Archies Law

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    42/45

    n/1

    tm

    ww

    R

    RaS

    VARIABLES DETERMINED

    FROM WIRELINE LOGS

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    43/45

    ARCHIES EQUATION

    n

    t

    m

    w

    w

    R

    Ra

    S

    Water

    saturation,

    fraction

    wS

    Resistivity of

    formation water,-mw

    R

    Resistivity of

    uninvaded

    formation, -mt

    R

    Porosity,fraction

    Empirical constant

    (usually near unity)

    a

    Saturation

    exponent(also usually

    near 2)

    n Cementationexponent

    (usually near 2)

    m

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    44/45

    Archies equation is based on the followingrelationships

    HOW ARCHIES EQUATION WORKS

    Rock type 1

    Rock type 2

    1000

    100

    10

    1.01 .1 1.0

    FR

    Solving for Ro when

    water saturation is 100%

    mw

    o a

    R

    R

  • 7/27/2019 4- Log Resistivitas

    45/45

    Solving for Ro when

    is constant

    HOW ARCHIES EQUATION WORKS

    Rock type 1

    Rock type 2

    1000

    100

    10

    1.01 .1 1.0

    Sw

    IR=

    Rt

    R0

    nwo

    t

    S1

    RR