21
220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

220-2954

Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors

July 29, 2010

Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational

Priorities

Page 2: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

2

Survey Project Goals

• Community surveys were conducted in June 2009 and June 2010, as critical components of a District and Stakeholder coalition planning process to engage the community in the funding needs of our schools.

• With the input of the Board and Superintendent, the June 2010 Survey assessed:

• community support for the Strategic Vision that was unanimously adopted by the Board.

• willingness to support a potential parcel tax measure to benefit Student Achievement, Support, and Safety.

Page 3: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

3

Key Survey Findings

The Oakland community strongly supports various aspects of the Strategic Vision, particularly those that address the whole needs of the child.

Oakland voters strongly believe that effective, experienced teachers and school staff are needed and that the District should be financially stable.

The Oakland community continues to support our neighborhood schools. A $195 Parcel Tax is viable in November 2010 at the two-thirds requirement level.

Unlike other jurisdictions, a 4-year sunset term is not as appealing as a 10-year sunset, because of a strong recognition that our schools and children need funding to succeed.

Page 4: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

4

Additional Observations

When comparing these poll results against the 2009 Community Survey results and the responses of mail ballot voters in both 2009 and 2010 surveys:

A low-turnout or mail-ballot election in today’s economy will likely not be viable and is not recommended.

If the District opts not to proceed in November 2010, we recommend that the District wait until 2012, unless the economy changes dramatically.

Page 5: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

5

Attitudes Toward Education Issues

Page 6: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

6

21%

15%

19%

23%

59%

71%

79%

61%

57%

58%

8%

10%

20%

23%

24%

20%

13%

19%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2010

2009

2010

2009

2010

2009

Very/S.W. Fav. S.W./Very Unfav. NHO/DKHE

Voters continue to hold teachers and local schools in high regard.

2. I'm going to read you a short list of public figures and organizations. For each one you have heard of, please tell me whether, overall, you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable or very unfavorable opinion. *Split Sample

(Ranked by % Total Favorable)

Local teachers

*Local charter schools

*Your neighborhood school

Page 7: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

7

38%

25%23%

42%

37%

39% 31%

36%

32%

17%

19%

14%

11%

8%

20%

8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Very Acc. S.W. Acc. S.W./Very Inacc. DK/NA

7 in 10 believe the District does not have the resources to increase

teacher and staff salaries.

9. I would like to read you some statements about Oakland neighborhood public schools. Please tell me if you think each of the following statements is accurate or inaccurate. ^Not part of Split Sample

(Ranked by % Very Accurate)

Improving the quality of your neighborhood schools maintains and often increases

property values in the neighborhood.

Oakland USD doesn’t currently have enough money to increase teacher and staff salaries.

Our neighborhood schools need emergency funding to get through unprecedented state

cuts to public education.

^Schools in my neighborhood don’t get their fair share of resources and school spending.

Page 8: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

8

Support for a Parcel Tax Measure

Page 9: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

9

A $195 parcel tax measure with a 10 year sunset garners

robust support.

4. If the election were held today, would you vote yes in favor of this measure or no to oppose it?

43%

23%

4%

4%

3%

16%

7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Definitely yes

Probably yes

Undecided, lean yes

Undecided, lean no

Probably no

Definitely no

Undecided

Total NoTotal No27%27%

Total YesTotal Yes70%70%

Page 10: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

10

Suppose the measure I just described was for _____________ per parcel instead of $195 dollars. In that case, would you vote yes in favor of it or no to oppose it?

(Ranked by % Definitely Yes)

43%

19%

23%

27%

44%

48%

11%

12%

12%

16%

16%

16% 3%

5%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

$95

$150

$195

Def. Yes Prob/Lean Yes Lean/Prob. No Def. No Undecided

The measure enjoys 2/3rds support at each cost point tested.

Q3/4 and Q5.

70%70% 27%27%

67%67% 28%28%

67%67% 28%28%

Page 11: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

11

Funding Priorities

Page 12: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

12

10%

9%

16%

79%

86%

84%

86%

78%

75%

76%

12%

12%

6%

9%

9%

7%

4%

7%

6%

6%

4%

2%

2%

2%

1 %

6%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Ext./Very Impt. S.W. Impt. Not Too Impt. DK/NA

Student achievement, college and career readiness and retaining teachers

are top priorities.

11a/b/d/e/f/h/j/k/l/m/n/o/p/q/t. If this measure passes, the money could be used for a number of things and various structural features could be included. Please tell me how important it is to you that each of the following be funded or included in the measure: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample

(Ranked by % Total Extremely/Very Important)

Improving student achievement

Preparing students for college and career

Retaining experienced, effective teachers

Improving teacher performance

Working towards every student reading at or above grade level

Creating financial stability in the District

Ensuring that every school has adequate student support staff, including teacher’s

aides, safety officers and custodians

Page 13: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

13

13%

22%

23%

19%

62%

72%

69%

71%

61%

52%

55%

61%

22%

24%

17%

11%

14%

24%

19%

14%

15%

15%

9%

13%

5%

3%

3%

3%

1 %

4%

1 %

3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Ext./Very Impt. S.W. Impt. Not Too Impt. DK/NA

Voters also care about offsetting state budget cuts, school safety and meeting a

comprehensive set of student needs.

Offsetting state budget cuts

Improving school safety

Ensuring that schools meet children’s essential social, emotional and academic

needs

Installing computers and technology in the classroom

Keeping class sizes low

Improving classroom technology to support student learning and engagement

Creating a School Innovation Fund to reward creative and effective approaches to

improving student achievement

Exempting low income taxpayers

11a/b/d/e/f/h/j/k/l/m/n/o/p/q/t. If this measure passes, the money could be used for a number of things and various structural features could be included. Please tell me how important it is to you that each of the following be funded or included in the measure: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample

Page 14: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

14

13%

29%

68%

84%

69%

79%

60%

40%

18%

21%

12%

10%

23%

14%

13%

13%

7%

6%

2%

5%

1%

5%

8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Ext./Very Impt. S.W. Impt. Not Too Impt. DK/NA

Improving teacher performance is important

11c/g/k/p/r/s. If this measure passes, the money could be used for a number of things and various structural features could be included. Please tell me how important it is to you that each of the following be funded or included in the measure: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample

(Ranked by % Total Extremely/Very Important)

Retaining experienced, effective teachers

Improving teacher performance

Retaining teachers

Ensuring that teachers’ salaries are brought up to the level of surrounding school

districts

Expanding teacher training programs

Providing salary increases to teachers based on the academic achievement and

progress of their students

Page 15: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

15

75%

65% 15%

16%

15%

7%

5%

2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Ext./Very Impt. S.W. Impt. Not Too Impt. DK/NA

Linking support staff to their impacton students resonates well with voters.

11i/q. If this measure passes, the money could be used for a number of things and various structural features could be included. Please tell me how important it is to you that each of the following be funded or included in the measure: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample

(Ranked by % Total Extremely/Very Important)

Ensuring that every school has adequate student support staff,

including teacher’s aides, safety officers and custodians

Ensuring that experienced student support staff are retained by bringing

salaries up to the level of other East Bay school districts

Page 16: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

16

Additional Concepts of Importance to Voters

Page 17: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

17

32%

27%

29%

48%

47%

45%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Very Conv. S.W. Conv.

Fully equipping schools to meet student needs emerges as the most compelling

reason to support the measure.

12. I am going to read you some statements made by people who support the parcel tax measure we have been discussing. Please tell me whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason to vote yes on the measure. Split Sample.

77%77%

76%76%

(Ranked by Total Convincing)

75%75%

Local schools must be equipped to meet children’s essential social, emotional and academic needs. By providing funding to keep the

best teachers and school support staff in Oakland this measure will help ensure kids get the support they need to succeed.

This measure will help ensure that all schools receive additional funding—not just a select few—so that all schools—including those

that need it the most—have the resources and staff needed to help all students get a better education and succeed.

Due to state budget cuts, reduced federal funding and a down economy the District is facing a $110 million budget deficit. The

District has already laid-off over 450 people, including teachers. This measure will provide vital temporary emergency funding to

support kids and education at a time when they need it most.

Page 18: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

18

31%

29%

31%

36%

36%

38%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Very Conv. S.W. Conv.

Voters also find the goal of retaining experienced, effective teachers to be a compelling reason to

support the measure.

69%69%

67%67%

65%65%

12. I am going to read you some statements made by people who support the parcel tax measure we have been discussing. Please tell me whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason to vote yes on the measure. Split Sample.

The most important factor in improving student achievement is ensuring that every student has an experienced, effective teacher.

Oakland can only retain the best teachers if it begins to pay competitive salaries. By passing this measure we can help keep

excellent Oakland teachers in Oakland schools.

Sacramento continues to cut funding for education at an unprecedented rate. In Oakland, funding for local schools has been

cut by $110 million. This temporary, emergency measure empowers local voters to maintain vital funding for our local schools that, by

law, cannot be taken by Sacramento.

Gangs, drugs and juvenile crime are a major problem in Oakland. This measure will allow local schools to maintain school security

officers to keep gangs out of schools and provide students with the support they need to stay out of trouble and away from gangs and

drugs.

Page 19: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

19

69%69%70%

27% 26%27%

3% 4% 5%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Total Yes Total No Undecided

Total Yes 70% 69% 69%

Total No 27% 27% 26%

Undecided 3% 4% 5%

Initial Vote 2nd Vote 3rd Vote

$195 10-Year Parcel Tax Measure Vote Progression

3/4/ and 13/15. If the election were held today, would you vote yes in favor of this measure or no to oppose it?

Page 20: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

20

Consultant Observations and Recommendations

We recommend that the District place a $195 parcel tax with a 10-year sunset on the November 2010 ballot to implement its Strategic Vision.

Unlike other local measures that will appear on the upcoming ballot, voters are clearly supportive of Oakland’s children and quality education.

The Parcel Tax ballot language has been carefully crafted to specifically address voter and stakeholder priorities identified by our team, over the past year.

A unanimous vote of the School Board to place the measure on the ballot to allow voters to decide is strongly recommended.

Page 21: 220-2954 Presentation to Oakland Unified School District Board of Directors July 29, 2010 Oakland Community Support for Local Schools and Educational Priorities

1999 Harrison St., Suite 1290Oakland, CA 94612

Phone (510) 451-9521Fax (510) 451-0384

[email protected]

For more information, contact:

5454 Broadway Oakland, CA 94618

P.O. Box 21215 Oakland, CA 94620tel: 510/594-0224 fax: 510/420-0734

[email protected]