Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Central H
ighlands Region W
ater Corporation W
ater Quality R
epo
rt 2011/12
2011/2012WATER QUALITY REPORT
02 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
Introduction 3
What is Drinking Water? 3
Sources of Water 3
Table 1 - The Source of Your Water 4
Table 2 - Reservoir Capacity and Current Levels 5
Managing Water Quality 6
Ensuring Your Water is Safe 8
How Your Water is Treated 10
Table 3 - Treatment Processes and Added Substances 12 for Central Highlands Water Supply Systems
Risk Management 13
Summary of Audit Findings 14 Risk Management Plan Audit Certificate 16
Water Quality Improvement Projects 17
Distribution System Improvements 18
Water Treatment Plant Improvements 19
Source Water Improvements 20
Emergency / Incident Management 22
System Summaries 25
Understanding Concentration and Limits 28
Further Information 29
WaterQualityTables
Table 4: Escherichia coli (E. coli) 30 Figure 1: E. coli Trending 31
Table 5: Chloroacetic Acid 32 Figure 2: Chloroacetic Acid Trending 33
Table 6: Dichloroacetic Acid 34 Figure 3: Dichloroacetic Acid Trending 35
Table 7: Trichloroacetic Acid 36 Figure 4: Trichloroacetic Acid Trending 37
Table 8: Trihalomethanes 38 Figure 5: Trihalomethanes Trending 39 Figure 5a: Trihalomethanes Monthly Trending 39
Table 9: Bromate 40 Figure 6: Bromate Trending 40 Figure 6a: Bromate Monthly Trending 40
Table 10: Formaldehyde 41 Figure 7: Formaldehyde Trending 41
Table 11: Aluminium (Acid Soluble) 42 Figure 8: Aluminium (Acid Soluble) Trending 43
Table 12: Turbidity 44 Figure 9: Turbidity Trending 45
Table 13: Fluoride 46 Figure 10: Fluoride Trending 47
Table 14: Aesthetic Parameters - pH 48 Figure 11: pH Trending 49
Table 15: Aesthetic Parameters - Total Dissolved Solids 50 Figure 12: Total Dissolved Solids Trending 51
Table 16: Aesthetic Parameters - True Colour 52 Figure 13: True Colour Trending 53
Table 17: Aesthetic Parameters - Hardness 54
Table 18: Aesthetic Parameters - Iron 55
Table 19: Aesthetic Parameters - Zinc 56
Table 20: Other Substances - Cadmium 57
Table 21: Other Substances - Copper 58
Table 22: Other Substances - Lead 59
Table 23: Other Substances - Manganese 60
Table 24: Other Substances - Nickel 61
Table 25: Other Substances - Arsenic 62
Table 26: Other Substances - Chromium (Total) 62
Table 27: Other Substances - Cyanide 63
Table 28: Other Substances - Mercury 63
Table 29: Other Substances - Selenium 64
Table 30: Health Related Organic Compounds 65
Table 31: Pesticides 66
Table 32: Percentage of potable water sampling 67 localities receiving complying water
Table 33: Percentage of population receiving 67 complying potable water
Table 34: Complaints and Responses 68 Central Highlands Water Service Area Map 69
Abbreviations 70
CONTENTS
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 71
NOTES
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 03
INTRODUCTION
Central Highlands Region Water Corporation (Central Highlands Water) is responsible for delivering domestic drinking water services to approximately 130,000 residents in more than 60 locations throughout the Central and Western regions of Victoria.
This report provides a record of the water quality for each water supply system for the financial year 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 and aims to illustrate the extent of the water quality monitoring and testing regime in place at Central Highlands Water (CHW).
Guidance regarding the structure of the 2011/12 Water Quality Report has been provided by the Department of Health in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 and the current Drinking Water Regulation Guidance Note, May 2012.
During the year, CHW delivered more than 11,100 million litres of water to more than 62,700 properties across the region. CHW services customers in 15 distinct water supply systems, which are comprised of 38 specific water sampling localities and three regulated water supplies.
The 15 water supply systems are:
• Amphitheatre• Avoca• Ballarat and District (including the major towns of Ballan,
Buninyong, Creswick, Skipton, Smythesdale and many smaller townships)
• Beaufort (including Raglan)• Blackwood (including Barrys Reef)• Clunes• Daylesford (including Hepburn)• Dean• Forest Hill (serving the towns of Allendale, Broomfield, Kingston,
Newlyn, Smeaton and Springmount)• Landsborough (including Navarre)• Learmonth• Lexton• Maryborough and District (including Carisbrook, Daisy Hill, Talbot
and several smaller townships)• Redbank• Waubra
Amphitheatre, Raglan and Redbank are Regulated (non-drinking) water supplies. Landsborough/Navarre has been classed as a potable (drinking water) supply from 5 March 2012.
The service area map on page 69 shows the location of each water supply system.
CHW has a water treatment services agreement with Ballarat Water Pty Ltd, which is responsible for the management of the following water treatment facilities:
• Beaufort Water Treatment Plant
• Blackwood Water Treatment Plant
• Clunes Water Treatment Plant
• Forest Hill Water Treatment Plant
• Lal Lal Water Treatment Plant
• White Swan Water Treatment Plant
United Water International operates these facilities on behalf of Ballarat Water Pty Ltd.
What is Drinking Water?Drinking water is defined by the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 as water that is intended for human consumption or for the purposes connected with human consumption, such as the preparation of food or the making of ice for consumption or for the preservation of unpacked food, whether or not the water is used for other purposes.
Drinking water should be safe to use and aesthetically pleasing. Ideally, it should be clear, colourless and well-aerated, with no unpalatable taste or odour, and it should contain no suspended matter, harmful chemical substances or pathogenic (disease-causing) micro-organisms.
Appearance, taste and colour are generally the characteristics by which the public judge water quality and are therefore useful indicators of the quality of water. However, water which is turbid, coloured or has an objectionable taste or odour may not necessarily be unsafe to drink. Conversely, the absence of any unpleasant qualities does not guarantee the water’s safety. The safety of water, in public health terms, is determined by its microbiological, physical, chemical and radiological quality.
sources of WaterThe CHW supply systems are supplied from stream diversions, on-stream storages and groundwater bores as detailed in Table 1.
Most of the headwork systems (reservoir storage and groundwater assets) are owned and operated by CHW; however some assets are shared with or owned by others, including:
• CHW shares the Lal Lal Reservoir with Barwon Water, but is responsible for all operation and maintenance activities. There is also an environmental reserve component of this storage.
• CHW has a delivery entitlement for Newlyn and Tullaroop Reservoirs which are owned and operated by Goulburn-Murray Water.
• CHW operates the Goldfields Superpipe which sources water from the Goulburn system.
CHW has Bulk Entitlements (BEs) for its surface supplies, which specify how much water can be extracted and under what conditions. These were negotiated with the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE), Rural Water Authorities (RWAs) and Catchment Management Authorities (CMAs).
CHW has groundwater extraction licences for its groundwater supplied systems which, similarly to BEs, specify extraction rates and volumes. Groundwater licences are managed by rural water Corporations, including Goulburn-Murray Water, Southern Rural Water and Grampians Wimmera Mallee Water.
CHW also works closely with associated CMAs in areas of improving land management and river health.
04 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 1THE SOURCE OF WATER
Water Supply Systems / Water Sampling Locality Population Serviced Source Water Storage Treatment PlantDRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca 1,030 Sugarloaf ReservoirLead Reservoir^Bung Bong Bore 1Bung Bong Bore 2
- Avoca WTP
BallaratBallanBallarat CentralBallarat Nth / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
2,27033,2504,3503707,9807802,700360509404,0001604808509,16049085032,300
Kirks Reservoir^Gong Gong Reservoir^Pincotts ReservoirCosgrave Reservoir^Bungaree BoreSuperpipe**Newlyn Reservoir^
Wilsons ReservoirBeales ReservoirMoorabool Reservoir
Ballarat West Bore 1^ Ballarat West Bore 2^Ballarat West Bore 3^
White Swan Reservoir
Lal Lal Reservoir
White Swan WTP
Lal Lal WTP
Ballarat West Disinfection
Beaufort 1,350 Cave Hill CreekTroys Reservoir^Side Spring Creek^ The GlutRaglan Bore^
Musical Gully Reservoir Beaufort WTP
Blackwood / Barrys Reef 430 Kyneton CreekLong Gully CreekBlackwood Bore^
Blackwood Basin Blackwood WTP
Clunes 1,650 Bore 1^Bore 2 Bore 3
- Clunes WTP
DaylesfordDaylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
1,6302,290
Wombat ReservoirBullarto ReservoirHepburn Reservoir^ Coomora Bore^
- Daylesford WTP
Dean 40 Dean Bore - Dean Disinfection
Forest Hill 950 Bore 1Bore 1ABore 2Bore 3^
- Forest Hill WTP
Landsborough 230 Landsborough Bore 1^ Landsborough Bore 2
- Landsborough WTP
Learmonth 300 Bore 1Bore 2^
- Learmonth Disinfection
Lexton 200 Lexton Reservoir - Lexton WTP
MaryboroughAlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
4103201,0004302007,320450180
Tullaroop ReservoirEvansford ReservoirTalbot Reservoir^ Moolort Bore 1^Moolort Bore 2^ Stoney Creek Bore^
Centenary Reservoir Maryborough WTP
Waubra 260 Bore 1Bore 2
- Waubra Disinfection
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre* 120 Amphitheatre Reservoir Amphitheatre Bore^
- -
Raglan* 120 Cave Hill Creek Side Spring Creek^ The GlutRaglan Bore^
- -
Redbank* 50 Redbank ReservoirRedbank Bore^
- -
* Non-potable water supply system^ Not used in 2011/12** 109ML used for operational testing purposes, maintenance and water quality management
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 05
TABLE 2RESERVOIR CAPACITY AND CURRENT LEVELS
Reservoir Capacity (megalitres)
% full as at 30 June 2011
% full as at 30 June 2012
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
AvocaSugarloaf ReservoirLead Reservoir
304118
9443
5828
BallaratBeales ReservoirCosgrave ReservoirGong Gong ReservoirKirks ReservoirLal Lal ReservoirMoorabool ReservoirNewlyn ReservoirPincotts ReservoirWhite Swan ReservoirWilsons Reservoir
415680
1,902400
59,549 (CHW share 35,670)^^
6,192500 (CHW entitlement)**
21814,1071,010
291002#
9392 (CHW share 93)
99-
939541
561005079
92 (CHW share 98)96-
1007344
BeaufortMusical Gully ReservoirTroys Reservoir^
25368
10047
9937
Blackwood / Barrys ReefBlackwood Basin 22 99 100
Clunes(Groundwater source) - - -
DaylesfordBullarto ReservoirHepburn ReservoirWombat Reservoir
21935
568
9986
100
10010099
Dean(Groundwater source) - - -
Forest Hill(Groundwater source) - - -
Landsborough(Groundwater source) - - -
Learmonth(Groundwater source) - - -
LextonLexton Reservoir 120 100 86
MaryboroughCentenary ReservoirEvansford ReservoirTalbot ReservoirTullaroop Reservoir
1801,346846
2,100 (CHW entitlement)**§
5810086-
959384-
Waubra(Groundwater source) - - -
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre*Amphitheatre Reservoir 67 100 72
Raglan*(Cave Hill to Musical Gully Reservoir Pipeline)
- - -
Redbank*Redbank Reservoir 132 78 33
* Non-potable water supply system** CHW entitlements are determined by Goulburn Murray Water allocations for these storages, Tullaroop capacity 72,950ML§ CHW Bulk Entitlement 1200ML annual allocation and carryover of unused allocation from previous year of 900ML^ Not in use^^ 7,086ML Lal Lal Reservoir Environmental Reserve
# Gong Gong Reservoir was drained during 2010/11 to allow dam safety works to be carried out
06 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
The impact of the changing regulatory environment has essentially been driven through the enactment of the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 and the supporting Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005.
regulatory stanDarDsSchedule 2 of the Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005 specifies the following mandatory testing of drinking water quality standards at customer taps:
• Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a subgroup of coliforms which are a group of organisms that cannot reproduce outside the intestinal tract of warm-blooded animals, but can survive better than other pathogens in water. The presence of E. coli is a reliable health indicator of the presence of contamination from human or animal waste. Its presence most likely indicates a breach of a water quality barrier or contamination during distribution of the water
• Trihalomethanes (THMs) are a range of organic compounds formed when chlorine reacts with naturally occurring organic matter in water supplies
• Chloroacetic acids are produced in drinking water as by-products of the reaction between chlorine and naturally occurring humic and fulvic acids
• Formaldehyde may be present in drinking water through ozonation of naturally occurring humic material, contamination by accidental spills or deposition from the atmosphere
• Bromate is not a normal component of water but may be formed from bromide during ozonation
• Turbidity describes the cloudiness of the water and is caused by the presence of suspended material such as clay, silt and finely divided organic material.
• Aluminium may be present in water due to natural leaching from soil and rock. Aluminium is used as a coagulant to assist filtration effectiveness, however it is removed during the treatment process
The Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 also specifies that a risk management plan must be developed to address any risk to human health that arises from the presence in water of:
• Pathogenic micro-organisms
• Inorganic chemicals, including inorganic disinfection by-products
• Organic chemicals, including pesticides, pesticide residues and organic disinfection by-products
• Radiological parameters
• Algal toxins
The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines is a technical reference document which CHW utilises to assess the microbiological, chemical, physical and radiological performance of the drinking water it supplies to consumers.
If a parameter is detected above specified guideline values in samples, then any of the following protocols may be initiated, subject to long term and short term impacts:
• Immediate operational corrective actions undertaken in close consultation with Department of Health and associated regulatory guidance notes, when required
• Referral to standard operating procedures and/or incident response plans
• Consideration to water quality improvement programs through capital investment
The Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005 also specify the need for CHW to develop steps and initiatives to address aesthetic variations to water quality including:
• Taste and Odour
CHW has a group which meets regularly to assess taste and odour for a number of water supply systems.
• pH, Colour and Clarity
CHW undertakes a routine water quality monitoring program which considers pH, colour and clarity, refer to Tables 14, 16 and 12 respectively.
MANAGINGWATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 07
unDertakingsIn accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 an “Undertaking Application” is required to be formally submitted to the Department of Health for secretarial approval if CHW is, or is likely to be, in contravention of the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 or associated regulations.
Examples of where an undertaking would be applicable are:
• Where one or more water quality standards are not being met
• A regulatory audit of a Risk Management Plan identifies non-conformances with the plan
No undertakings are currently in place for CHW.
exemptionsIn accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 a water supplier may apply to the Minister for Health and, if satisfied, will be exempt from a water quality standard as it applies to drinking water supplied by the water supplier.
Approved exemptions release water suppliers from the requirement to meet a specified quality standard for a period of time, but do not release them from the obligation to minimise any risk to the public.
For example, in response to a natural disaster such as major bushfire or flood in a catchment area, CHW may apply for an exemption from meeting a specific standard until the situation has been rectified.
regulateD Water DeterminationIn accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 the Minister for Health may declare certain water supplies as “Regulated Water”, to protect public health. Regulated water is classified as water that is not intended for drinking, but which could be reasonably mistaken for drinking water.
CHW continues to manage three Regulated water supply systems of Amphitheatre, Raglan and Redbank. The Minister for Health declared these water supplies as Regulated in 2006; Government Gazette numbers G31 and G35.
On 20 January 2012, a specification was published in the Victoria Government Gazette (Special Edition 13) declaring Landsborough/Navarre as a drinking water sampling locality, effective from 5 March 2012. The plant was officially opened by the Hon Peter Walsh MLA, Minister for Water on 4 May 2012.
08 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
Drinking Water QualityCHW is required to undertake water quality compliance monitoring in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 and Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005. The due diligence requirements of the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines are used for developing microbiological, physical, chemical and radiological monitoring programs and also for benchmarking performance.
CHW’s 38 water sampling localities are tested at the source, at treatment facilities, at tanks throughout the distribution system and at specified customer taps for microbiological, physical, chemical and radiological parameters. Testing within the water sampling localities, at customer taps, is conducted on a structured, but random basis in accordance with the specified regulations. The frequency of testing varies for each locality according to population and risk. The geographic location of customer sampling taps is designed to ensure representative samples are collected across the water sampling locality.
CHW has within its resources a National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) registered laboratory to perform the majority of routine and non-routine testing.
NATA accreditation ensures that testing is conducted according to strict guidelines using quality assurance systems, and provides a high level of independence. The data supplied by the CHW NATA accredited laboratory is used for all compliance reporting. In addition to this independent monitoring, CHW conducts operational testing to further extend the monitoring of water supplies.
performance monitoring anD compliance criteriaDuring 2011/12, specified microbiological and chemical performance monitoring was scheduled in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005, refer to Tables 4 through to 29. Most parameters listed in these tables are tested at customer tap locations and do not include treated water storage or non-routine monitoring programs. Additionally, data prior to 5 March 2012 for the Landsborough/Navarre system has been excluded due to the conversion to a potable supply.
A review of aesthetic and health-related testing and monitoring needs is scheduled annually across all systems. The monitoring frequency is determined through an understanding of the real or potential risk to consumers. CHW determines the frequency of testing, which is representative of the water supplied to customers, on a case by case basis for each water sampling locality.
CHW also conducted organic compound and pesticide sampling during 2011/12, refer to Tables 30 and 31.
approveD analysts for Water testingIncluded in the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 and the Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005 is mandatory National Analytical Testing Association (NATA) accreditation for laboratories. This also requires qualified staff employed by water testing laboratories to submit applications with the Department of Health to become approved analysts for regulatory parameters.
Laboratory services are provided to CHW by its own “in house” laboratory. CHW Laboratory Services holds NATA accreditation in the chemical and biological field, and has several approved analysts for E. coli and turbidity as required under the legislation.
Both CHW and CHW Laboratory Services are signatories to a “Service Level Agreement”, which outlines the provision of laboratory services.
compliance With Drinking Water Quality stanDarDs CHW endeavours to maintain a high and consistent level of compliance with all of the water quality standards in the Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005 and guideline values in the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines. Details of compliance are available in Tables 4 through 31 of this report.
algae monitoringThe presence of high numbers of blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) in surface water storages can present operational interferences, but more importantly aesthetic and potential health risks to customers.
During warmer months a combination of sunlight, low rainfall, lack of inflow to catchments and reduced storage levels favours accelerated growth of algae. Reporting of events during 2011/12 where blue-green algae results reached reportable trigger levels in water storages was undertaken in accordance with regulatory protocols and CHW’s Blue-Green Algae Management Plan. Notifications were sent to the Department of Sustainability and Environment as required.
Management actions associated with these blooms (if applicable) can be found on pages 22-24.
ENSURING YOURWATER IS SAFE
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 09
compliance performance summaryDuring 2011/12 a number of non-compliances occurred in CHW’s drinking water supplies. All non-compliances were managed in accordance with established procedures and regulatory requirements. This generally includes site investigations, re-sampling, consideration of disinfectant levels, flushing, identifying areas for operational or capital improvements, plus informing the Department of Health.
Non-compliant results with Schedule 2 parameters, Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005, occurred in the following water supply systems:
• Trihalomethanes – Avoca
• Bromate – Clunes
Details of these non-compliances can be found on pages 22-24.
Other parameters non-compliant with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines occurred in the following water supply systems:
• Colour - Lexton
Additionally, the following water supply systems did not meet the desirable range recommended in the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines for the following parameters:
• TDS - Waubra
• Hardness - Waubra
Details of all results can be found in Tables 4 through 31.
10 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
central highlanDs Water treatment processesCHW uses a number of different technologies to treat the water. The process used depends on the quality of the water to be treated. The treatment process and added substances are detailed in Table 3, and processes are described below.
coagulation / flocculationCoagulation / Flocculation is a complex process where a controlled amount of chemical coagulant is added into the water to destabilise particles, allowing clumps to form (flocculation) and settle out of suspension. This occurs in a mixing tank prior to the filtration process. The particles are then easily removed during the sedimentation and filtration stage. The type of filtration process used to remove the particles depends on the weight of the particles formed.
The coagulation / flocculation process is utilised at the water treatment plants at Avoca, Ballarat, Beaufort, Blackwood, Daylesford, Landsborough and Maryborough.
seDimentation / filtrationWhere the raw water quality allows large heavy particles (floc) to be formed during the coagulation / flocculation process, the water is further treated by the sedimentation process. The floc forms a blanket which continues to trap more suspended particles. The particles sink to the bottom of the sedimentation tank and are drawn off to waste. The clear water which flows to the surface of the sedimentation tank is collected and then passed through sand filters. Any particles not removed in the sedimentation process are filtered out by the sand filter. The filters are washed regularly to remove the collected material to waste. Filtration of the water removes naturally occurring particulate material from the water prior to disinfection. The process improves the effectiveness of disinfection; assists with clarity; reduces the risk of taste and odour and ensures a consistent quality of supply.
This process is utilised at the Avoca and Maryborough water treatment plants.
DissolveD air flotation anD filtration (Daff)Some waters contain coagulated matter which is lighter and will not easily sink. For these supplies Dissolved Air Flotation and Filtration (DAFF) is utilised. DAFF relies on the injection of microscopic air bubbles into the water stream, causing the flocculated particles to float to the surface of the filtration tank. The particles are drawn off the surface of the filtration tank and removed to waste. Clear water then passes down through filtering material in the bottom of the filtration tank, capturing any fine particles that were not removed by the air.
The DAFF process is utilised at the Ballarat, Beaufort, Blackwood and Daylesford water treatment plants.
microfiltrationMicrofiltration is used to remove suspended solids and some colloidal matter from the source water. The water is pumped through a filter membrane trapping suspended solids in the process. The concentrate (material that does not pass through the membrane) is periodically removed to waste to prevent the blocking of the membrane filters.
The Lexton water treatment plant utilises membrane microfiltration technology.
lime / soDa ash / soDium hyDroxiDe aDDitionTo assist the water treatment process and to ensure the pH level in filtered water is within a desirable target range, high quality lime, soda ash or sodium hydroxide is automatically added to the water in the treatment plant. Maintaining pH in the desired range optimises the effectiveness of treatment and disinfection, minimises the risk of corrosion/scaling and improves taste.
This process is utilised at the Avoca, Ballarat, Beaufort, Blackwood, Clunes, Daylesford, Forest Hill, Landsborough and Maryborough water treatment plants.
chlorinationChlorine is widely used throughout the world to disinfect drinking water to reduce the risk of disease-causing organisms. Chlorination requires minimal contact time with the water to effectively destroy these organisms.
Chlorination is utilised at the Beaufort, Clunes, Daylesford, Dean, Forest Hill, Landsborough, Learmonth and Waubra water treatment plants.
chloraminationChloramination is used throughout the world as a means of disinfecting drinking water to destroy any disease-causing organisms. Small amounts of chlorine and ammonia are added to the water to form chloramines, providing a relatively long lasting process to safely disinfect water. Chloramination is less likely to cause taste and odour problems compared to chlorine alone, providing the water supply system is cleaned regularly.
Chloramination is utilised at the Avoca, Ballarat, Lexton and Maryborough water treatment plants.
HOW YOUR WATERIS TREATED
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 11
ultra violet DisinfectionUltra Violet (U.V.) light is an effective means of disinfection; however, efficiency is only at the point of application as U.V. treatment has no lasting effect. Effectiveness also relies on the water having low turbidity as particulates minimise the amount of U.V. light penetration, hence potentially allowing the survival of micro-organisms that could present a health risk.
U.V. disinfection is utilised at the Beaufort and Blackwood water treatment plants.
Water softeningWater softening, or de-alkalisation, is a process used to remove the calcium and magnesium salts from the water to reduce the hardness and hence the “scaling” effect of the water.
This process is utilised at the Clunes and Forest Hill water treatment plants.
ozonationOzone pre-treatment is used specifically at the Clunes water treatment plant to reduce the levels of iron and manganese that can be present in this groundwater source. The process involves oxidation of the soluble iron and manganese from the water, and removal during the filtration process. The oxidising process also assists in minimising colour and odour-causing sulphides.
fluoriDationIn accordance with Department of Health requirements, the Ballarat and District water supply is fluoridated. All other CHW systems are currently non-fluoridated. Any fluoride present in these non-fluoridated systems is due to naturally occurring sources.
reverse osmosisReverse Osmosis is used to remove dissolved salts from the source water. Pre-treated water is pumped at high pressure through spiral wound membranes, trapping dissolved salts in the process. The concentrate (material that does not pass through the membrane) is periodically removed to waste. The water passing through the membranes is extremely pure and is blended to maintain an acceptable salt balance in the water.
The Avoca water treatment plant utilises Reverse Osmosis membrane technology.
electroDialysis reversalElectrodialysis is used to remove dissolved salts from the source water. Water is transferred to a treatment unit and an electrical DC voltage is applied, removing dissolved salts through special ion exchange membranes. The concentrate (material that passes through the membranes) is periodically removed to waste by reversing the charge or polarity across the membranes. This treatment process has the advantage of being robust and flexible, and results in high product recoveries.
The Landsborough water treatment plant utilises Electrodialysis Reversal membrane technology.
12 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 3 - TREATMENT PROCESSES AND ADDEDSUBSTANCES FOR CHW SUPPLY SYSTEMS
* Non-potable water supply system ^ Added substance if required
Water Supply System Water Sampling Locality Treatment Process / Disinfection Added Substances
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Coagulation + Flocculation Sedimentation/Clarification Granular Media FiltrationReverse Osmosis Chloramination
Aluminium Sulphate Sodium Hydroxide Chlorine Gas Aqueous AmmoniaAluminium Chlorohydrate^Hydrochloric Acid^Antiscalant^Potassium Permanganate^ Powder Activated Carbon^
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat Nth / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
Coagulation + Flocculation Dissolved Air Flotation Granular Media Filtration ChloraminationFluoridation
Coagulation + Flocculation Dissolved Air Flotation Granular Media Filtration ChloraminationFluoridation
Chloramination Fluoridation
White Swan Treatment PlantLime Aluminium Sulphate Poly Electrolyte Chlorine Gas Aqueous Ammonia Fluorosilicic AcidSodium Hydroxide^ Powder Activated Carbon^ Potassium Permanganate^ Lal Lal Treatment PlantSoda Ash Aluminium Chlorohydrate Poly Electrolyte Chlorine Gas Aqueous Ammonia Fluorosilicic AcidSodium Hydroxide^ Powder Activated Carbon^ Potassium Permanganate^ Ballarat West Disinfection PlantChlorine Gas Aqueous Ammonia Fluorosilicic Acid
Beaufort Beaufort Coagulation + Flocculation Dissolved Air Flotation Granular Media Filtration Ultra Violet (U.V.) LightChlorination
Aluminium Sulphate Sodium Hydroxide Sodium Hypochlorite Powder Activated Carbon^ Potassium Permanganate^
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Coagulation + Flocculation Dissolved Air Flotation Granular Media Filtration Ultra Violet (U.V.) Light
Aluminium Chlorohydrate Poly Electrolyte Sodium Hydroxide Powder Activated Carbon^ Potassium Permanganate^
Clunes Clunes OzonationCartridge Filtration Dealkalisation (Ion Exchange) Chlorination
Sodium Hydroxide Chlorine Gas Ozone Gas
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
Coagulation + Flocculation Dissolved Air Flotation Granular Media Filtration Chlorination
Polyaluminium Chloride Sodium Hydroxide Poly Electrolyte Chlorine Gas Potassium Permanganate^Powder Activated Carbon^ Aqueous Ammonia^
Dean Dean Chlorination Sodium Hypochlorite
Forest Hill Forest Hill Dealkalisation (Ion Exchange) Chlorination
Sodium Hydroxide Chlorine Gas
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Coagulation + Flocculation Pressure Filtration Electrodialysis Reversal Chlorination
Sodium Hydroxide Sodium Hypochlorite Ferric Sulphate^
Learmonth Learmonth Chlorination Chlorine Gas
Lexton Lexton Membrane Microfiltration Chloramination
Chlorine Gas Aqueous AmmoniaPotassium Permanganate^ Sodium Hypochlorite^
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
Coagulation + Flocculation Sedimentation/Clarification Granular Media Filtration Chloramination
Soda Ash Aluminium Sulphate Poly Electrolyte Chlorine GasAqueous AmmoniaPowder Activated Carbon^ Potassium Permanganate^
Waubra Waubra Chlorination Chlorine Gas
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre* Amphitheatre No Treatment
Raglan* Raglan No Treatment
Redbank* Redbank No Treatment
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 13
CHW continually strives to improve the integrity of its water supply catchment, water supply systems and associated infrastructure, and also undertakes independent research and development into drinking water quality. CHW maintains an awareness of developments in the water industry, to use research findings to further improve the quality and safety of the water supply.
CHW also convenes a Water Quality Committee which regularly meets to provide oversight over the Risk Management Plan.
A number of projects were undertaken throughout 2011/12, as follows:
monitoring program revieWA review of CHW’s water quality monitoring program was completed in 2011/12. An annual review of the program incorporates any changes to the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003, Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005 and the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, plus any identified risks to water supply systems. The review includes number and location of monitoring sites, sampling frequencies and inclusion of additional monitoring of specific health and non-health related parameters, making for a more robust system and ensuring the water supplied to CHW’s customers is safe to drink.
risk management planIn 2011/12, CHW continued to regularly review and update the Risk Management Plan for all water supply systems as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003. CHW has invested resources into the continued development of standard operating procedures and associated forms and checklists designed to assist in the management of water quality. All these documents become auditable elements under the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003.
The review of the Risk Management Plan resulted in further additions to CHW’s Improvement Plan, to continually improve performance in future years.
In line with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, CHW has developed Critical Control Points within its water treatment plants and water disinfection plants to manage critical operational activities that eliminate or reduce hazards in drinking water to safe and/or acceptable levels.
risk management plan auDitIn November 2011 the Department of Health, under Section 11 of the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003, required Central Highlands Water to have its Risk Management Plan audited by an approved external auditor. The audit covered the period from 1 April 2010 to the date of the audit, and was completed by Dr Daniel Deere of Water Futures.
The audit found that Central Highlands Water complied with the obligations imposed by the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003. No non-conformances were identified during the audit, however in the philosophy of continuous improvement, eight Opportunities For Improvement (OFIs) were proposed.
A copy of the audit certificate is provided on page 16.
Additionally, an ongoing program of internal audits was completed during the reporting period to ensure CHW strives to continuously improve its performance as part of routine business operations.
RISKMANAGEMENT
14 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
RISKMANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
summary of auDit finDingsOPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT (OFI) ACTIONS UNDERTAKEN IN RESPONSE TO OFI TIMEFRAME
1. Whilst external stakeholders were involved in the Water Quality risk register hazard identification, we understand that risk assessments are carried out by CHW staff. We suggest that external catchment stakeholders should be involved in the risk assessments when these are updated.
CHW conducts risk assessment workshops with a range of key internal CHW staff members. In turn, these staff members liaise with many external stakeholders such as Catchment Management Authorities and the Department of Sustainability and Environment. By this process, inputs from these external stakeholders are fed into risk assessments. CHW believe this is the most appropriate mechanism to engage these stakeholders, however, we will continue to explore further opportunities to include catchment stakeholders in risk assessment processes where deemed applicable and of value.
Ongoing
2. Review whether there would be benefit in capturing some of the catchment and distribution system controls (within the RMP Appendices) with the same level of precision and formalisation as the treatment controls – to help ensure their long-term retention.
During the next scheduled review of the RMP, CHW intends to incorporate references to these specific controls within the RMP with a sufficient level of detail to demonstrate their importance in controlling hazards to the water supply.
31 Dec 2012
3. Review whether there are treated water storages that are vulnerable to litter and debris blocking the drainage and in turn leading to risks of ingress and, if so, review means of reliably mitigating this risk.
During the audit, this observation was made at the Daylesford Low Level Storage Basin which is a distribution treated water storage within the Daylesford supply system. The drainage channel was cleared on the day of the audit. CHW is planning to implement a more formal inspection and reporting program for all treated water storages such that monitoring for any potential hazards is more closely controlled, documented and actioned. These works will be scheduled and tracked through the Asset Management system.
1 July 2012
4. Review the long-term resourcing needs of maintaining the now-essential SCADA systems given the competition for the relevant skills arising from the resources boom.
CHW is aware of the resourcing needs for online monitoring systems and their importance in Risk Management Programs. CHW commits to ensuring that this area of the business has the capability to meet current and future Safe Drinking Water regulatory drivers.
Ongoing
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 15
summary of auDit finDingsOPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT (OFI) ACTIONS UNDERTAKEN IN RESPONSE TO OFI TIMEFRAME
5. Seek to formalise the process used to ensure that items purchased for field services activities are fully compliant with both AS 4020 and are of a suitably high standard.
Purchase order terms and conditions have been submitted for legal review and these will now include the additional condition that materials purchased for potable water contact meet the requirements of WSAA and AS 4020. Specifically, the review will involve incorporating a standard text reference on all purchase orders that are generated to vendors and the modification of the standard purchasing terms and conditions. Training/awareness sessions will be held with relevant staff to ensure all are aware of the expectations.
31 March 2012
6. Review, at a high level, whether or not there needs to be a shelf-life limit on some of the water treatment chemicals.
CHW will contact our chemical suppliers to ascertain the stability of the various chemicals used and consult with the water treatment team to assess potential impacts on treatment processes. Where this information cannot be reliably obtained, sampling trials will be instigated to assess impacts on regulatory compliance.
30 June 2012
7. Consider removing/repairing mechanical level indicators on treated water storages where these indicators are not working and/or are not used.
During the audit, this observation was made on the Polyaluminium Chloride chemical storage tank at the Daylesford water treatment plant. A work order has been raised via the CHW asset management system to repair this manual indicator. CHW will assess the functionality of all chemical and water tank manual indicator systems to ensure proper operation.
30 June 2012
8. Ensure that the incorporation of key drinking water quality management system documents is effective under the roll out of the new document management system and have this highlighted as an audit item under the next Act audit.
The Intranet site for CHW’s Quality Management Systems has recently undergone a complete revision and upgrade with a full implementation program planned. As part of the revised process, quality management system documents and procedures are now stored in and fully controlled and supported by CHW’s Electronic Document and Records Management System (EDRMS) [TRIM]. Key drinking water quality management system documentation and quality procedures have been incorporated into this new process. Drinking water quality management system documents and quality procedures are now published via controlled links from the EDRMS to an internal Intranet site. The efficacy of this new system will be reviewed on an ongoing basis as a part of routine operations. CHW will ensure that this revised management system is externally audited as part of future audits.
31 March 2012
16 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
RISK MANAGEMENT PLANAUDIT CERTIFICATE
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 17
staff aWareness / trainingWater quality risk management training and auditing was undertaken by key operational staff enabling internal development, assessment and ongoing review of water quality risk management plans and systems.
Trained and skilled staff are vital to protecting and maintaining high quality water, therefore improving employee skills and contractor awareness remain high priorities. CHW is committed to improving employees’ awareness and involvement in drinking water quality management issues.
Competency and awareness based training for relevant CHW staff in 2011/12 included:
• Chlorine operator training
• Operator training in various water treatment processes
• Water Quality Sampler training - employees involved in sampling completed refresher training in the collection, handling and transportation of water samples
• Team based internal presentations on water quality and regulations
• Refresher training on categorisation of water quality complaints
• Selected training at non-CHW treatment plants
• Attendance by key staff at numerous seminars and conferences
• Chemical contaminants – Significance, monitoring and interpretation
• Chloramination
• Membrane treatment design and operation
• Blue green algae identification and management
seminar / conference attenDanceSeminars and conferences of note that were attended by key staff throughout the year focussed on the following water quality issues:
• New Technology
• Regulation
• Environmental Management
• Quality Systems
• Industry and International Benchmarking
• UV disinfection monitoring
• Online turbidity operational monitoring
publishing results on the central highlanDs Water WebsiteSection 23 of the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 requires that CHW makes available for inspection by the public the results of any water quality monitoring program conducted on any drinking water supplied by CHW. Customers and members of the public may access drinking water quality data by contacting CHW on 1800 061 514.
As part of keeping the customer closely informed on the quality of treated water supplied to their area, CHW also publishes water quality performance results monthly on our website, www.chw.net.au
Additionally these can be obtained by contacting CHW directly. Also included on the website is the current annual Water Quality Report.
WATER QUALITYIMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
18 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
mains cleaning programCHW undertakes systematic mains cleaning through the water supply systems to improve the quality of drinking water supplied to customers. During 2011/12 over 34,000 meters of water mains in the Ballarat water supply system and over 11,000 meters of water mains in the Landsborough/Navarre water supply system were air scoured. The Landsborough/Navarre water supply network was also disinfected during 2011/12.
The normal cleaning process varies, either through traditional flushing from hydrants or utilising air scouring techniques. Air scouring involves the controlled injection of filtered compressed air into the water mains, increasing the water flow above that of normal operation. The increased flow, together with a controlled mix of air and water, scours the pipe and removes a build-up of sediment that can potentially contribute to dirty water, taste and odour, and microbiological non-compliance. The process also conserves more water than traditional flushing.
The Blackwood reticulation system continues to be cleaned on a regular basis to complement the U.V. disinfection process utilised at the water treatment plant. The minimum maintenance regime consists of:
• Air scouring of the reticulation system annually
• Disinfection of the entire pipe network six-monthly
• Flushing of dead end mains two-monthly
mains reneWal programCHW’s water network comprises of approximately 2,400 kilometres of pipelines. For many reasons, water mains can burst, leak or cause dirty water. These events are monitored, recorded and analysed. A program, focussed on repeat problems with older pipes, is developed to replace a number of mains each year, which also assists in maintaining high water quality. During 2011/12 over 3,000 metres of water mains were replaced on this basis.
tank cleaning programCHW maintains 57 water storage tanks.
Condition assessments are conducted on tanks which determine the tank cleaning program. Tanks may also be cleaned based on water quality results, or alternatively if tanks are taken off line or returned to service to meet operational or supply needs.
nitrification controlFrom 21/01/12 to 05/03/12 the Avoca water supply disinfection system changed from chloramination to chlorination to manage system nitrification. Nitrification processes create difficulties in maintaining a stable disinfectant residual throughout the supply area. After this period, this system was returned to its normal disinfection method of chloramination and disinfection residuals significantly improved throughout the distribution network.
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMIMPROVEMENTS
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 19
A number of water treatment plant improvement programs focusing on improved treatment and operational reliability continued to be delivered across the region in 2011/12. This program is in accordance with CHW’s Essential Services Commission Water Plan.
ballarat Water treatment plantsThe controls at both the White Swan and Lal Lal treatment plants have been modified by programming a plant emergency stop function to minimise flow into the system in the event of a chemical dosing malfunction. Additionally, at both plants a new water quality compliance page has been added to SCADA to facilitate closer monitoring of plant performance by operators. At the White Swan treatment facility, the chlorinators along with the service water pumps and delivery lines have been replaced to improve operational control. At the Lal Lal treatment facility, aluminium sulphate coagulation has been replaced with aluminium chlorohydrate. This change has improved water quality and improved filtration performance, and resulted in less chemical addition and a more stable pH throughout the treatment process. A new Ballan pump has been installed and the old pump refurbished, acting as a backup to improve pumping reliability.
beaufort Water treatment plantThe chlorine dosing installation has been upgraded to a permanent system with the facility for an emergency top up dosing option.
blackWooD Water treatment plantAluminium sulphate coagulation has been replaced with aluminium chlorohydrate. This change has improved water quality and improved filtration performance.
A second raw water storage basin has been constructed to provide increased reliability of supply.
clunes Water treatment plantAn upgraded telemetry link between the treatment plant and the Clear Water Storage tank site has been installed to improve operational control. Additionally, an online ozone concentration analyser has been installed to further optimise ozone dosing.
DaylesforD Water treatment plantUpgrades to optimise the chlorine dosing system have been completed. Chemical dosing pumps have also been upgraded to better control the coagulation and pH adjustment processes. Both duty and standby air compressors have been replaced with higher efficiency units to reduce energy usage.
lanDsborough Water treatment plantThe Landsborough treatment plant was officially opened during May 2012, supplying quality drinking water to the customers of Landsborough and Navarre. The plant consists of a new filtration, desalination and disinfection process, ensuring the supply is of a potable standard. Part of the plant construction included the commissioning of a new bore supply to assure water security. Additionally, evaporation basins have been constructed to accept brine waste from the plant.
maryborough Water treatment plantIn September 2011, the automation upgrade to the Maryborough water treatment plant was completed. Plant upgrades included the installation of new filter inlet valves to improve backwashing processes and controls over filter operations.
Additionally, the chlorine analysers and service water pumps have been upgraded to better control chlorine dosing and optimise chemical usage. The automation upgrade has given operators better control over treatment processes and optimised plant performance.
WATER TREATMENTPLANT IMPROVEMENTS
20 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
Water supply DemanD strategies.Victoria has an integrated and dynamic water planning framework, in which Water Supply Demand Strategies play an important role in guiding strategic local planning for regional urban water corporations. The purpose of Water Supply Demand Strategies is to identify the best mix of measures to maintain a balance between the demand for water and available supply in our towns over a 50 year outlook.
CHW released a Water Supply Demand Strategy for each of its fifteen water supply systems in 2007 and is required to review the strategy at 5 year intervals. As such, CHW completed the formal review of the Water Supply Demand Strategy in 2011/12 and released the final strategy in March 2012. The development process included detailed technical analysis, community workshops, stakeholder consultation, draft strategies, public submissions, CHW senior management approval and scrutiny by the DSE.
toWn planningWater quality can be affected by inappropriate development within catchments and incremental land use change from broad-scale agriculture to residential development. To protect against these risks, CHW actively participates in Victoria’s Planning Policy Framework by influencing planning at a state and local level.
At a state level, CHW influences planning by:
• Providing input and recommendations during the development of government guidelines relating to planning permits and residential developments in water supply catchments
• Ensuring water supply catchments are listed under Schedule 5 of the Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994, which establishes CHW as a referral authority
At a local level, CHW protects water supply catchments and influences planning by:
• Ensuring that Local Planning Policy Frameworks include policy statements, zoning and overlays that protect water catchments
• Actively exercising referral powers by not supporting inappropriate development and disputing planning permit decisions
In 2011/12, CHW processed approximately 57 planning permit applications for proposed development within special water supply catchments. The majority of these applications were supported by CHW and included permit conditions necessary to manage the impact of the proposed development on water quality.
To ensure a consistent approach in assessing planning permit referrals, CHW utilises its Water Catchment Protection Policy. This is a common policy developed in partnership with Barwon Water, Western Water and Southern Rural Water that outlines relevant objectives and policy standards for water catchment protection.
CHW is also undertaking a number of reviews, including catchments, with a view of identifying areas most at risk. CHW will also seek amendments to the relevant planning schemes within our catchments to ensure adequate planning controls and planning permit referral powers are in place.
catchment risk managementCHW continued to implement actions to reduce risks to water quality within its declared water supply catchments. Key actions to control risks in addition to statutory planning in catchments are detailed below.
Water Catchment Protection Policy
Reviewed and updated Water Catchment Protection Policy for the Moorabool Planning Scheme. The updates to the policy include changes to the Victorian planning scheme zones and schedules. Consultation with partner water corporations will be undertaken in late 2012.
Approved 48 out of 54 planning referrals within the Corporation’s declared special water supply catchment areas.
Revised Catchment Related Water Quality Procedures
These procedures were revised to ensure accuracy and relevance to the Water Quality Risk Management Plan and the Safe Drinking Water Act audits. Refresher training for field staff in the revised procedures was also completed.
Delivered on Ground Works to Improve Catchment Water Quality
• Ballarat Catchment
Decommissioned two on-stream dams on the tributaries immediately above Wilsons Reservoir.
Completed willow removal along the West Moorabool River from Mollongghip to Moorabool Reservoir, Giles Creek at Kirks Reservoir and Fellmongers Creek at Gong Gong Reservoir.
Replaced 6km of perimeter fence line at Lal Lal, Wilsons and Moorabool Reservoir.
• Evansford Reservoir Catchment
Developed access into McCallum’s Creek diversion weir and erected fencing to exclude stock access around the asset.
Obtained Committee of Management status for a one kilometre section of unreserved crown land along McCallum’s Creek.
SOURCE WATERIMPROVEMENTS
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 21
Partnered with the adjacent landholder at the Evansford Reservoir to implement waterway fencing and stock exclusion.
• Amphitheatre Reservoir Catchment
Implemented extensive erosion control earth works and stock exclusion fencing with an upstream landholder.
• Avoca Reservoir Catchment
Partnered with the adjacent landholder at the Sugarloaf Reservoir race line to implement waterway fencing and stock exclusion.
Fuel reduction burning in water catchments
Liaised with DSE to minimise the impact of fuel reduction burning with water supply catchments at Avoca, Blackwood, Maryborough and Ballarat.
Partnered the North Central Catchment Management Authority in the Flood Recovery Employment Project in response to the January 2011 Storm Events on Catchment Assets.
CHW partnered the North Central CMA in the delivery of a number of flood recovery projects on CHW land within the Hepburn, Pyrenees and Central Goldfields shires.
A range of flood recovery tasks were completed at:
• Sugarloaf Reservoir
• Talbot Reservoir
• Creswick Creek
• Bullarto Reservoir Catchment
• Lawrence Weir – Birches Creek
• Maryborough Wastewater Treatment Plant - Two Mile Creek
regional catchment strategyCHW continued to engage with CMAs with regard to the Corporation’s assets and their association with regional natural resources. This was underpinned by the reinforcement of drinking water quality standards and the impact of broader catchment land use.
Collaboration has been maintained in the salinity knowledge and statutory planning decisions. Negotiations over bulk entitlement passing flow and monitoring requirements were ongoing.
The deadlines for the renewal of Regional Catchment Strategies (RCS) has been extended to late 2012. CHW is liaising with the following five CMA regions that are located in CHW’s drinking water catchments:
• Corangamite CMA
• North Central CMA
• Glenelg Hopkins CMA
• Port Phillip and Western Port CMA
• Wimmera CMA
victorian river health strategyA CHW staff member continued to participate in the Stakeholder Reference Committee for the Victorian Waterway Strategy. The Committee revised draft policy papers in preparation for the release of the Draft Strategy in 2012. Notably this includes water quality, wastewater discharges, extreme events and riparian land management.
Ongoing management of CHW’s 34km of waterway included the continued removal and rehabilitation of willow, hawthorn and elderberry infestations at Cosgrave, Gong Gong, Kirks and Wilsons Reservoirs.
22 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
The information reported below provides a summary of each incident, issue or event during 2011/12 which had a potential or actual impact on the quality of drinking water.
Section 22 Incidents
The objective of Section 22 of the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 is to protect public health. CHW must inform the Department of Health of any potential or actual contaminated water supplied for drinking purposes. Information relating to all Section 22 incidents during 2011/12 is listed below.
EMERGENCY / INCIDENTMANAGEMENT
Date (and Duration) of Incident
Location of Incident
Nature of Incident
Potentially Affected / Affected Drinking Water Supplies
Actions Taken in Response to Incident
4 August 2011 (41 days)
Clunes Customer Tap Bromate - 0.03 mg/L Clunes Reticulation Informed DH. Thorough investigations conducted in conjunction with treatment contractor. Works completed to optimise control of ozone dosing while assessing impacts on sulphide and manganese removal capability. Increased frequency of bromate monitoring during trials.
15 August 2011 (3 days)
Beaufort Clear Water Storage Tank, Beaufort
E. coli - 4 org/100mL Beaufort Reticulation No E. coli detected in an additional sample taken by treatment contractor at the same location and on the same day. Routine locality sample clear. Site investigation and resamples collected. Confirmed disinfectant levels and correct operation of plant. No E. coli detected in resamples. Informed DH of initial and resample results.
18 August 2011 (5 days)
Gordon/Mt Egerton Customer Tap (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 3 org/100mL Gordon/Mt Egerton Reticulation (Ballarat System)
Site investigation and locality resamples collected. Confirmed disinfectant levels. No E. coli detected in resamples. Informed DH of initial and resample results.
8 September 2011 (5 days)
Warrenheip Basin, Warrenheip (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 1 org/100mL ~ 50% of Ballarat Reticulation
Resample collected and confirmed disinfectant levels. No E. coli detected in resample. Informed DH of initial and resample results.
22 September 2011 (6 days)
South Wallace Tank, Bungaree/Wallace (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 2 org/100mL Bungaree/Wallace Reticulation (Ballarat System)
Tank isolated from supply and site inspection conducted. Confirmed disinfectant levels. Routine locality sample clear. Both tanks spot dosed with chlorine. Resamples collected and no E. coli detected. Operations protocol for tanks reviewed. Informed DH of initial and resample results.
26 September 2011 (2 days)
Beaufort Customer Tap Turbidity - 7.87 NTU Beaufort Reticulation Adequate disinfectant residual present at sample address and no detection of E. coli or total coliforms. A resample was collected and water usage at the site was investigated. The resample showed a low turbidity result (1 NTU). Informed DH of intial and resample results. Decision to relocate sample point to a more representative location.
26 September 2011 (3 days)
Skipton Customer Tap (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 1 org/100mL Skipton Reticulation (Ballarat System)
Disinfectant levels and the correct operation of the upstream chlorine booster unit confirmed. Site inspection conducted and locality resamples collected. No E. coli detected in resamples. Informed DH of initial and resample results. Decision to relocate sample point to a more appropriate location to minimise interferences during sampling processes.
9 November 2011 (6 days)
Ballarat Road Basin, Creswick (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 18 org/100mL Creswick Reticulation (Ballarat System)
Site inspection conducted. Confirmed disinfectant levels. Basin spot dosed with chlorine. Basin and locality resamples collected and no E. coli detected. Operations protocol for basin reviewed. Informed DH of initial and resample results.
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 23
Date (and Duration) of Incident
Location of Incident
Nature of Incident
Potentially Affected / Affected Drinking Water Supplies
Actions Taken in Response to Incident
18 November 2011 (13 days)
Maryborough (All Localities)
Widespread customer taste and odour complaints (45)
Maryborough Reticulation (All Localities)
BGA bloom experienced in raw water service reservoir to treatment plant. Reservoir spot dosed with algaecide. Issues experienced with Powder Activated Carbon dosing facility at plant, which was subsequently corrected. Absence of toxins and copper residual in treated water confirmed. Reticulation network thoroughly flushed to remove affected water. Informed DH during incident of corrective and preventative actions undertaken by CHW.
28 January 2012 (6 days)
Fiskville/Glenmore (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 100 org/100mL
E. coli - 200 org/100mL
Fiskville/Glenmore Reticulation (Ballarat System)
Initial samples taken following a site inspection at a network break pressure pit. Site inspection confirmed that the overflow for the pit was not adequately protected from potential contamination. A series of investigative and follow up samples taken. Downstream customers placed on a boil water advisory for the duration of the incident and an emergency water supply was provided. Sections of network were flushed and disinfected and a faulty meter was replaced. DH was informed of all resample results and of the flushing and disinfection program.
17 February 2012 (4 days)
Mt Helen Tank, Mt Helen (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 27 org/100mL Buninyong/Mount Helen Reticulation (Ballarat System)
Site investigation conducted. Tank and locality resamples collected. Confirmed disinfectant levels. No E. coli detected in resamples. Informed DH of initial and resample results.
1 March 2012 (6 days)
North Wallace Tank, Bungaree/Wallace (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 2 org/100mL Bungaree/Wallace Reticulation (Ballarat System)
Tank isolated from supply and site inspection conducted. Confirmed disinfectant levels. Both tanks spot dosed with chlorine. Resamples collected and no E. coli detected. Informed DH of initial and resample results.
15 March 2012 (5 days)
Warrenheip Basin, Warrenheip (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 1 org/100mL ~ 50% of Ballarat Reticulation
Site inspection conducted. Resample collected and confirmed disinfectant levels. No E. coli detected in resample. Informed DH of initial and resample results. Decision to relocate sample point to a more appropriate location to minimise interferences during sampling processes.
16 March 2012 (4 days)
Buninyong Tank, Buninyong (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 1 org/100mL Buninyong Reticulation (Ballarat System)
Tank isolated from supply and site inspection conducted. Resample collected and confirmed disinfectant levels. E. coli detected in resample. Informed DH of initial and resample results. Decision to relocate sample point to a more appropriate location to minimise interferences during sampling processes. Tank remains offline until spot disinfection completed when required.
24 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
EMERGENCY / INCIDENTMANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
Date (and Duration) of Incident
Location of Incident
Nature of Incident
Potentially Affected / Affected Drinking Water Supplies
Actions Taken in Response to Incident
8 June 2012 (19 days)
Enfield Customer Tap (Ballarat System)
E. coli - 11 org/100mL Enfield Reticulation (Ballarat System)
Site inspections conducted. A series of investigative and follow up samples taken. Downstream customers placed on a boil water advisory for the duration of the incident and emergency water supplies were provided. Sections of network were flushed and disinfected. All meters within locality checked for backflow. Manual ongoing disinfection of upstream storage basin. DH informed of all resample results and of the flushing and disinfection program.
25 June 2012 (3 days)
Smeaton Tanks (Forest Hill System)
E. coli - 1 org/100mL Forest Hill Reticulation Site inspection conducted. Confirmed disinfectant levels. Resample collected and no E. coli detected. Informed DH of initial and resample results.
Section 18 Incidents
The objective of Section 18 of the Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 is to alert the Department of Health to potential issues in relation to the supply of drinking water that may not comply with specific standards, which requires further investigation or actions. In the 2011/2012 reporting period, CHW submitted a Section 18 notification to the Department of Health in relation to the Avoca water sampling locality. This locality failed compliance (0.35 mg/L) due to a single trihalomethane detection (in February 2012) above the standard within the 12 month period. This was due to the reversion to free chlorination within this system from 21 January 2012 to 5 March 2012 to control system nitrification and low disinfectant residuals. The system was subsequently returned to the usual operating mode using chloramination, with compliant trihalomethane results thereafter. See Pages 38 and 39 for further details.
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 25
This section of the report provides a summary of each water supply system and any operational event where Central Highlands Water (CHW) notified customers or regulatory bodies that there would likely be an impact on water quality.
‘Water Quality Notice’ communications and ‘Reminder Water Quality Notice’ communications were issued during the 2011/12 year.
‘Water Supply Update Notice’ communications issued during the 2011/12 year provided a range of information relating to water supplies such as water quality, water saving rules, restrictions and follow up communications.
avocaThe Avoca water supply system consists of Sugarloaf Reservoir, Bung Bong Bore groundwater supply and Lead Reservoir.
CHW has had the option of blending surface water and groundwater when the surface water supply is available. The blending of surface water and groundwater prior to water treatment can generate substantial improvements in water quality, reducing salinity and hardness levels.
The Avoca Treatment Plant upgrade included the installation of a desalination plant and has been providing Avoca with a secure potable (drinking) water supply for the previous 12 months and for the future.
Customer Communications 2011/12
• A ‘Reminder Water Quality Notice’ was issued on 14 December 2011 and 12 June 2012 to a small number of supply by agreement customers (supplied with untreated water)
• An updated Avoca Desalination Plant Project Fact Sheet was made available online at www.chw.net.au during the reporting period.
• A Water Supply Update Notice was issued on 20 January 2012 advising of routine maintenance and a temporary change in disinfection method. A follow up Water Supply Update Notice was issued 20 February 2012 advising customers that the related routine maintenance had been completed and the disinfection method would return to normal in the following weeks.
ballarat & DistrictBallarat & District is the largest water supply system in the Central Highlands Region and includes the townships of Ballarat, Ballan, Creswick, Linton, Smythesdale and Skipton. The Ballarat & District system has several major sources of water supply including the White Swan Reservoir, Lal Lal Reservoir, the Goldfields Superpipe and the Ballarat West groundwater supply.
The Goldfields Superpipe and Ballarat West groundwater was not utilised for the drinking water supply in the 2011/12 reporting period.
The rainfall events during the 2011/12 period have replenished both surface and groundwater supplies to near and above capacity in many reservoirs and allowed Permanent Water Saving Rules to continue.
Customer Communications 2011/12
• Weekly water resource updates were published in the local newspaper and provided on the website
beaufortThe Beaufort water supply system is sourced from the Musical Gully Reservoir and has a groundwater supply if needed.
Musical Gully Reservoir continued to receive good inflows in the 2011/12 period and maintained near full capacity.
Customer Communications 2011/12
• Weekly water resource updates were published in the local newspaper and provided on the website
blackWooDThe Blackwood and Barrys Reef water supply system is sourced from stream diversions and is disinfected using an Ultra Violet Light Disinfection (U.V.) process.
• As part of the continued Blackwood Water Quality Improvement Program, a new storage basin was constructed and completed during the reporting period ensuring a secure supply throughout the year.
SYSTEMSUMMARIES
26 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
clunesClunes has been receiving a high quality groundwater supply since the system was upgraded in 2006.
DaylesforDDaylesford receives high quality water from a water filtration plant, which has been operating since 2000. In June 2009, the Coomoora groundwater bore was commissioned as part of the Daylesford-Hepburn long-term water resource plan. The Coomoora groundwater bore is an additional source of water for the Daylesford water supply system in the future. Bullarto Reservoir continued to undergo planned dam safety works during the reporting period.
DeanDean is the smallest water supply system in the region, serving 20 connections. The water supply for Dean is from local groundwater sources.
forest hillForest Hill has been receiving a high quality groundwater supply since the system was upgraded. Rainfall events and completion of groundwater bore infrastructure upgrades in 2011/12 enabled the Forest Hill system to reduce water restrictions to Permanent Water Saving Rules.
lanDsborough anD navarreThe Landsborough-Navarre water supply system shifted from a non-potable water supply to a potable (drinking water) supply from 5 March 2012.
The Landsborough–Navarre desalination and disinfection plant was officially opened on 4 May 2012 by the Hon Peter Walsh MLA, Minister for Water.
Customer Communications 2011/12
• Landsborough–Navarre Water Quality Update letter was issued on 25 October 2011
• A ‘Reminder Water Quality’ notice was issued to Landsborough-Navarre customers on 14 December 2011
learmonthLearmonth draws its water from local groundwater sources, which provide good quality water.
lextonThe Lexton water supply is obtained from the Lexton Reservoir and the water is filtered using microfiltration technology. Investigations are continuing in relation to source water from an alternate supply to improve water quality.
Customer Communications 2011/12
• CHW distributed a customer notification of possible pressure changes due to maintenance works scheduled for 4 September on 27 August 2012
maryborough & DistrictMaryborough & District’s water supply is the second largest system managed by CHW, providing filtered water to Maryborough and several surrounding rural towns.
The water is sourced from Evansford Reservoir, Talbot Reservoir and Tullaroop Reservoir, prior to being diverted and stored in Centenary Reservoir.
Customer Communications 2011/12
• A letter dated 15 August 2011 was sent to Maryborough district residents advising mains cleaning will take place on 15 August 2011
• A letter dated 6 September 2011 was sent to Daisy Hill residents advising air scouring was occurring on 28 and 29 September 2011
• A letter dated 22 November 2011 was sent to Maryborough customers advising reasons for odour issues identified over a two day period and remedial works undertaken to rectify the problem. Customers were also advised of further mains cleaning programs scheduled in the future.
• Notices to a small number of supply by agreement customers (supplied with untreated water) were issued on 14 December 2011 and 12 June 2012
• Weekly water resource updates were published in the local newspaper and provided on the website
WaubraWaubra draws its water supply from local groundwater sources. The Waubra water supply consists of two groundwater bores.
SYSTEMSUMMARIES (CONTINUED)
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 27
regulateD supplies These systems are supplied with non-potable water (untreated), and the water is not provided for drinking purposes or other human consumption such as food preparation or ice making. To indicate this, signs are displayed at publicly accessible taps throughout these supplies.
amphitheatreThis system sources water from the Amphitheatre Reservoir. A groundwater bore is available as a supplementary supply.
Customer Communications 2011/12
• A ‘Reminder Water Quality Notice’ was issued 14 December 2011 and 12 June 2012
raglanThe Raglan system is supplied upstream of the Beaufort treatment plant.
During the 2011/12 period Raglan water was supplied from the Mount Cole diversions.
Customer Communications 2011/12
• A ‘Reminder Water Quality’ notice was issued to Raglan customers on 14 December 2011 and 12 June 2012
• Weekly water resource updates were published in the local newspaper and provided on the website
reDbankThis system is currently supplied from the Redbank Reservoir.
Customer Communications 2011/12
• A ‘Reminder Water Quality Notice’ was issued to Redbank customers on 14 December 2011 and 12 June 2012
28 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
In most cases, standard limits are expressed as concentrations, which is the amount of substance dissolved in a certain volume of water. This allows for meaningful comparisons between different samples.
For example, the symbol “mg/L”, widely used in this report, means “milligrams per litre” and indicates how many milligrams (a thousandth of a gram) of the substance is dissolved in every litre of water. Another way of expressing mg/L is parts per million.
As is evident, water quality is concerned with measuring minute concentrations of substances.
The symbol “<” is used to denote “less than”. As an example, < 0.05 mg/L means that the concentration of a parameter tested in water should be less than 0.05 milligrams per litre (0.05 parts per million).
UNDERSTANDINGCONCENTRATION AND LIMITS
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 29
Further information regarding water quality can be obtained by contacting CHW directly by telephone on 1800 061 514 during normal office hours.
The internet also offers a wide range of sources of water quality information.
Sites that may be of interest include:
Australian Water Association http://www.awa.asn.au/
Australian Water Quality Centre http://www.awqc.com.au/
Australian Drinking Water Guidelines http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/publications/eh52
Central Highlands Water http://www.chw.net.au
CSIRO Australia http://www.csiro.au/
Department of Health (Victoria) http://www.health.vic.gov.au/
Department of Sustainability and Environment http://www.dse.vic.gov.au
Essential Services Commission http://www.esc.vic.gov.au/
National Association of Testing Authorities http://www.nata.asn.au/
Rainwater Tanks - Your Private Drinking Water Supply http://www.health.vic.gov.au/environment/water/tanks.htm
Safe Drinking Water Act 2003 http://www.health.vic.gov.au/environment/water/d-wateract.htm
Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005 http://www.health.vic.gov.au/environment/water/d-wateract.htm
Victorian Government Health Information - Water http://www.health.vic.gov.au/environment/water/index.htm
Victorian Water Industry Association http://www.vicwater.org.au/
Water Quality Research Australia http://www.wqra.com.au/
Water Services Association of Australia http://www.wsaa.asn.au/
World Health Organisation - Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2011/dwq_guidelines/en/index.html
FURTHERINFORMATION
30 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
Standard At least 98% of samples of drinking water collected in any 12-month period to contain no E. coli (SDWR)
Description Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a subgroup of coliforms which are a group of organisms which cannot reproduce outside the intestinal tract of warm-blooded mammals, but can survive better than other pathogens in water. The presence of E. coli is a reliable health indicator of the presence of recent contamination from human or animal waste. Its presence most likely indicates a breach of a water quality barrier or contamination during the distribution of the water.
TABLE 4Escherichia coli (E.coli)
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max Result (orgs/100mL)
% Samples with no E. coli
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Weekly 52 0 100 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
WeeklyWeekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #
52128525265525253525252535253655252
128
0000000
110300000100
10010010010010010010098.110098.110010010010010098.1100100
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Weekly 52 0 100 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Weekly 52 0 100 Yes
Clunes Clunes Weekly 52 0 100 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
WeeklyWeekly
5252
00
100100
YesYes
Dean Dean Weekly 52 0 100 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Weekly 52 0 100 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Weekly 17 0 100 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Weekly 52 0 100 Yes
Lexton Lexton Weekly 52 0 100 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
5252525252635252
00000000
100100100100100100100100
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Weekly 52 0 100 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre Fortnightly 24 15 66.7 N/A
Raglan * Raglan Fortnightly 24 72 45.8 N/A
Redbank * Redbank Fortnightly 24 1 79.2 N/A
* Non-potable water supply system # Weekly sampling with increases for population (ADWG 2011, Section 9.5.2)
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 31
FIGURE 1E.coli TRENDING
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
n
Haddo
nLa
l Lal
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Perc
enta
ge w
ith n
o E.
col
i
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: At least 98% of samples of drinking water collected in any 12-month period to contain no E. coli per 100mL
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
f
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rnDea
n
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Lexto
nAlm
aBe
t Bet
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Perc
enta
ge w
ith n
o E.
col
i
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: At least 98% of samples of drinking water collected in any 12-month period to contain no E. coli per 100mL
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
n
Haddo
nLa
l Lal
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Perc
enta
ge w
ith n
o E.
col
i
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: At least 98% of samples of drinking water collected in any 12-month period to contain no E. coli per 100mL
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
f
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rnDea
n
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Lexto
nAlm
aBe
t Bet
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Perc
enta
ge w
ith n
o E.
col
i
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: At least 98% of samples of drinking water collected in any 12-month period to contain no E. coli per 100mL
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Trending Summary • All regulated (non-potable) water supply systems have not been included in trending analysis
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 4
• All potable systems have demonstrated compliance with the SDWR criteria. There were some isolated events in the Enfield, Gordon/Mt. Egerton and Skipton water sampling localities.
• Refer to Page 22-24 for details of Section 22 non-compliances.
32 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 5CHLOROACETIC ACID
Standard Must not exceed 0.15 mg/L (SDWR)
Description Chloroacetic acids are produced in drinking water as a by-product of the reaction between chlorine and naturally occurring humic and fulvic acids.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
No. of Non Complying Samples
Max (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 0 0.005 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
000000000000000000
< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef - - - - -
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
Monthly Monthly
1212
00
< 0.005< 0.005
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 4 0 < 0.005 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
1212121212121212
00000000
< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - -
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 33
FIGURE 2CHLOROACETIC ACID TRENDING
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
0.125
0.150
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Chlo
roac
etic
aci
d (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.15 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
0.125
0.150
Chlo
roac
etic
aci
d (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.15 mg/L
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
0.125
0.150
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Chlo
roac
etic
aci
d (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.15 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
0.125
0.150
Chlo
roac
etic
aci
d (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.15 mg/L
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 5
• All systems sampled for chloroacetic acid were compliant.
34 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 6DICHLOROACETIC ACID
Standard Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L (SDWR)
Description Chloroacetic acids are produced in drinking water as a by-product of the reaction between chlorine and naturally occurring humic and fulvic acids..
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
No. of Non Complying Samples
Max (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 0 0.030 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
000000000000000000
0.0110.0090.0050.0290.0120.0090.006
< 0.0050.0150.0140.0100.010
< 0.0050.0110.0120.0070.0110.006
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 0 0.031 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef - - - - -
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
Monthly Monthly
1212
00
0.0140.016
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 4 0 < 0.005 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 0 0.029 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
1212121212121212
00000000
0.008< 0.0050.0090.012
< 0.0050.0110.0120.010
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - -
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 35
FIGURE 3DICHLOROACETIC ACID TRENDING
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
Dich
loro
acet
ic a
cid
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
Dich
loro
acet
ic a
cid
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
Dich
loro
acet
ic a
cid
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
Dich
loro
acet
ic a
cid
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 6
• All systems sampled for dichloroacetic acid were compliant.
36 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 7TRICHLOROACETIC ACID
Standard Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L (SDWR)
Description Chloroacetic acids are produced in drinking water as a by-product of the reaction between chlorine and naturally occurring humic and fulvic acids..
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
No. of Non Complying Samples
Max (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 0 0.049 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
000000000000000000
< 0.005< 0.005< 0.0050.014
< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 0 0.027 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef - - - - -
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
Monthly Monthly
1212
00
0.0110.009
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 4 0 < 0.005 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 0 0.006 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
1212121212121212
00000000
< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 0 < 0.005 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - -
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 37
FIGURE 4TRICHLOROACETIC ACID TRENDING
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
Tric
hlor
oace
tic a
cid
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
Tric
hlor
oace
tic a
cid
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
0.000
0.025
0.050
0.075
0.100
Tric
hlor
oace
tic a
cid
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
Tric
hlor
oace
tic a
cid
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.1 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Trending Summary • An elevated trichloroacetic acid result from the 2009/10 financial year in the Lexton water supply system was due to high treated water organics combined with a period of reversion to chlorination. This system is listed on the Capital Improvement Program for works to improve trichloroacetic acid compliance by sourcing water from an alternative supply.
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 7
• All systems sampled for trichloroacetic acid were compliant.
38 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 8TRIHALOMETHANES
Standard Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L (SDWR)
Description Trihalomethanes are a range of organic compounds formed when chlorine reacts with naturally occurring organic matter in water supplies.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
No. of Non Complying Samples
Max (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 1 0.350 No
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
000000000000000000
0.0060.0050.0060.1600.0080.0060.0050.1100.0060.0060.0060.0050.1200.0080.0080.0790.0410.006
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 0 0.130 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef - - - - -
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 0 0.110 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
Monthly Monthly
1212
00
0.0720.059
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 0 0.017 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 12 0 0.013 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 4 0 0.055 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 0 0.008 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 0 0.065 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
1212121212121212
00000000
0.0230.0210.0240.0210.0210.0240.0260.025
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 0 0.005 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - -
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 39
FIGURE 5TRIHALOMETHANES TRENDING
FIGURE 5aTRIHALOMETHANES MONTHLY TRENDING
Trending Summary
• Elevated THM results from the 2009/10 financial year in the Lexton water supply system was due to high treated water organics combined with a period of reversion to chlorination. This system is listed on the Capital Improvement Program for works to improve THM compliance by sourcing water from an alternative supply.
• Details of monthly compliance can be found in Figure 5a for the Avoca system where non-compliances have occurred in 2011/12.
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 8
• With the exception of the Avoca water sampling locality, all other systems sampled for THMs have demonstrated compliance with the SDWR criteria.
• The Avoca system marginally failed compliance (during February 2012) due to a period of reversion to chlorination from 21/01/12 to 05/03/12 to manage system nitrification and improve disinfectant residuals. Refer to Page 24 for details of the Section 18 non-compliance.
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
Trih
alom
etha
nes
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.000
0.250
0.500
0.750
1.000
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Trih
alom
etha
nes
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12
Month
0.000
0.250
0.500
0.750
1.000
Trih
alom
etha
nes
(mg/
L)
Standard: Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L Avoca
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
Trih
alom
etha
nes
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.000
0.250
0.500
0.750
1.000
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Trih
alom
etha
nes
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12
Month
0.000
0.250
0.500
0.750
1.000
Trih
alom
etha
nes
(mg/
L)
Standard: Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L Avoca
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
Trih
alom
etha
nes
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.000
0.250
0.500
0.750
1.000
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Clunes
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Trih
alom
etha
nes
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12
Month
0.000
0.250
0.500
0.750
1.000
Trih
alom
etha
nes
(mg/
L)
Standard: Must not exceed 0.25 mg/L Avoca
40 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 9BROMATE
Standard Must not exceed 0.02 mg/L (SDWR)
Description Bromate is not a normal component of water, but may be formed from bromide during ozonation.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
No. of Non Complying Samples
Max (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 1 0.03 No
Trending Summary
• Elevated bromate results from the 2010/11 financial year in the Clunes water supply system was due to constraints in achieving a stable ozone dose rate at the treatment plant.
• Details of monthly compliance can be found in Figure 6a for the Clunes system where non-compliances have occurred in 2011/12.
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 9
• Clunes is the only system at Central Highlands Water to use ozonation.
• A bromate exceedence occurred in August 2011 at a level marginally above the standard. CHW has implemented a number of further corrective and preventative actions in regards to this exceedence. Refer to Page 22-24 for details of the Section 22 non-compliance.
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Clunes
Brom
ate
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.02 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Brom
ate
(mg/
L)
Standard: Must not exceed 0.02 mg/L
Month
Clunes
Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Clunes
Brom
ate
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.02 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Brom
ate
(mg/
L)
Standard: Must not exceed 0.02 mg/L
Month
Clunes
Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12
FIGURE 6BROMATE TRENDING
FIGURE 6aBROMATE MONTHLY TRENDING
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 41
TABLE 10FORMALDEHYDE
Standard Must not exceed 0.5 mg/L (SDWR)
Description Formaldehyde may be present in drinking water through ozonation of naturally occurring humic material, contamination by accidental spills or deposition from the atmosphere.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
No. of Non Complying Samples
Max (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 0 0.1 Yes
FIGURE 7FORMALDEHYDE TRENDING
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Clunes
Form
alde
hyde
(mg/
L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.5 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 10
• Clunes is the only system at Central Highlands Water to use ozonation.
• The Clunes system was compliant for formaldehyde.
42 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 11ALUMINIUM (ACID SOLUBLE)
Standard Must not exceed 0.2 mg/L (SDWR)
Description Aluminium may be present in water due to natural leaching from rock or soil. Aluminium is used as a coagulant to assist filtration effectiveness, however it is removed during the treatment process.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
No. of Non Complying Samples
Max (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 0 0.03 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
000000000000000000
0.020.040.060.010.030.030.040.020.020.020.030.030.040.020.020.030.030.04
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 0 0.03 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Monthly 12 0 0.02 Yes
Clunes Clunes - - - - -
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
Monthly Monthly
1212
00
0.050.06
YesYes
Dean Dean - - - - -
Forest Hill Forest Hill - - - - -
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre - - - - -
Learmonth Learmonth - - - - -
Lexton Lexton - - - - -
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
1212121212121212
00000000
0.030.030.030.040.030.030.040.03
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra - - - - -
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - -
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 43
FIGURE 8ALUMINIUM (ACID SOLUBLE) TRENDING
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Alum
iniu
m -
Aci
d So
lubl
e (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.2 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Alum
iniu
m -
Aci
d So
lubl
e (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.2 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
f
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Alma
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Alum
iniu
m -
Aci
d So
lubl
e (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.2 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Alum
iniu
m -
Aci
d So
lubl
e (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Must not exceed 0.2 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
f
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Alma
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 11
• All systems sampled for aluminium (acid soluble) were compliant.
44 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 12TURBIDITY
Standard 95% UCL of mean of drinking water samples collected in preceding 12-months must not exceed 5.0 NTU (SDWR).
Description Turbidity describes the cloudiness of the water and is caused by the presence of suspended material such as clay, silt and finely divided organic material. Levels less than 1 NTU are desirable for effective disinfection.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (NTU)
95% of UCL of Mean
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Weekly 52 0.6 0.2 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
WeeklyWeekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #
52128525265525253525252535253655252
128
0.51.80.60.60.60.81.10.56.00.70.70.20.40.80.41.00.40.7
0.20.20.20.20.20.20.30.20.50.20.20.10.20.20.10.20.20.2
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Weekly 52 7.9 0.7 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Weekly 52 2.2 0.5 Yes
Clunes Clunes Weekly 52 0.8 0.2 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
WeeklyWeekly
5252
0.80.4
0.20.2
YesYes
Dean Dean Weekly 52 0.7 0.2 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Weekly 52 0.9 0.2 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Weekly 17 0.7 0.4 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Weekly 52 1.0 0.2 Yes
Lexton Lexton Weekly 52 0.4 0.2 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
5252525252635252
0.80.71.01.00.81.10.51.5
0.30.30.40.40.30.40.30.4
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Weekly 52 1.2 0.3 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre Fortnightly 24 5.8 2.5 N/A
Raglan * Raglan Fortnightly 24 7.5 1.6 N/A
Redbank * Redbank Fortnightly 24 3.9 2.9 N/A
* Non-potable water supply system # Weekly sampling with increases for population (ADWG 2011, Section 9.5.2)UCL - Upper Confidence Limit
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 45
FIGURE 9TURBIDITY TRENDING
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Turb
idity
- 9
5% U
CL o
f Mea
n (N
TU)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: 95% UCL of mean of drinking water samples collected in the preceding 12-months must be less than or equal to 5 NTU
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
fClun
es
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Turb
idity
- 9
5% U
CL o
f Mea
n (N
TU)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: 95% UCL of mean of drinking water samples collected in the preceding 12-months must be less than or equal to 5 NTU
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Turb
idity
- 9
5% U
CL o
f Mea
n (N
TU)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: 95% UCL of mean of drinking water samples collected in the preceding 12-months must be less than or equal to 5 NTU
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
fClun
es
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Turb
idity
- 9
5% U
CL o
f Mea
n (N
TU)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: 95% UCL of mean of drinking water samples collected in the preceding 12-months must be less than or equal to 5 NTU
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 12
• All regulated (non-potable) water supply systems have not been included in trending analysis.
• All systems sampled for turbidity were compliant.
46 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 13FLUORIDE
Standard <1.5 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH) Mean result must not exceed 1.0 mg/L (HFA)
Description Fluoride is currently added to the Ballarat & District supply only. Fluoride detections in other systems are from natural sources only.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
No. of Non Complying Samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Mean (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Annually 1 0 0.02 0.02 0.02 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
525452525352525352525253525353525254
000000000000000000
0.940.960.980.930.970.970.950.960.960.961.1
0.960.951.0
0.960.960.940.98
0.840.840.830.840.840.820.820.840.840.850.830.840.860.850.850.820.850.81
0.890.900.900.880.900.910.900.890.900.900.910.900.900.900.890.900.900.90
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Annually 1 0 0.01 0.01 0.01 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Annually 1 0 0.01 0.01 0.01 Yes
Clunes Clunes Annually 1 0 0.32 0.32 0.32 Yes
Daylesford Annually 1 0 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 Yes
Dean Dean Annually 1 0 0.02 0.02 0.02 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Annually 1 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Annually 1 0 0.15 0.15 0.15 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Annually 1 0 0.05 0.05 0.05 Yes
Lexton Lexton Annually 1 0 0.20 0.20 0.20 Yes
Maryborough Annually 1 0 0.05 0.05 0.05 Yes
Waubra Waubra Annually 1 0 0.10 0.10 0.10 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - - - -
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 47
FIGURE 10FLUORIDE TRENDING
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Max
imum
Flu
orid
e (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Maximum concentration must not exceed 1.5 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
n
Haddo
nLa
l Lal
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Mea
n Fl
uorid
e (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Mean concentration must be less than or equal to 1.0 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Max
imum
Flu
orid
e (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Maximum concentration must not exceed 1.5 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
n
Haddo
nLa
l Lal
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Mea
n Fl
uorid
e (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Standard: Mean concentration must be less than or equal to 1.0 mg/L
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Trending Summary • Levels of fluoride have fluctuated from 2009/10 through to 2011/12 due to the incremental introduction of fluoride and a set point target change to a value of 0.9 mg/L from May 2010.
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 13
• The Ballarat & District water supply is the only system at Central Highlands Water that is fluoridated.
• The Ballarat system was compliant for fluoride.
48 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 14AESTHETIC PARAMETERS - pH
Standard >6.5 and <8.5 units desirable, up to 9.2 is acceptable provided microbiological performance is satisfactory (ADWG)
Description The pH of a water sample is an indicator of the acidity or alkalinity of the water. Water with a pH of seven is considered neutral. Concrete tanks and cement mortar lined pipes can significantly increase pH. For aesthetic reasons, and to reduce the risk of corrosion, it is preferable that pH is maintained between 6.5 and 8.5 units. pH values up to 9.2 may be tolerated provided monitoring indicates no deterioration in microbial quality.
* Non-potable water supply system ª Considered to meet guidelines if the mean is within the guideline values of 6.5 to 9.2 (ADWG 2011, Section 10.3.3)# Weekly sampling with increases for population (ADWG 2011, Section 9.5.2)
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Mean Max Min Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Weekly 52 7.8 8.7 7.3 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
WeeklyWeekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #
52128525365525253525252535253655252
128
8.07.77.58.27.98.07.68.28.08.18.17.88.27.87.88.57.97.8
8.48.17.98.58.48.78.18.68.48.59.08.08.78.28.38.98.48.8
7.67.26.47.97.57.67.27.87.57.67.57.47.87.57.48.17.37.2
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Weekly 52 8.2 9.1 7.2 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Weekly 52 8.9 10.0 6.8 Yesª
Clunes Clunes Weekly 52 7.9 8.3 7.8 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
WeeklyWeekly
5252
7.77.7
8.88.1
7.27.2
YesYes
Dean Dean Weekly 52 7.2 8.0 6.7 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Weekly 52 8.2 8.8 7.8 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Weekly 17 8.1 8.6 7.6 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Weekly 52 8.1 8.3 6.9 Yes
Lexton Lexton Weekly 52 7.7 8.2 7.3 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
5252525252635252
7.68.07.78.38.18.08.38.1
8.18.88.18.98.78.38.88.5
7.47.57.57.67.57.77.97.8
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Weekly 52 7.1 7.4 6.9 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre Fortnightly 24 7.3 7.7 7.0 N/A
Raglan * Raglan Fortnightly 24 7.6 8.4 7.3 N/A
Redbank * Redbank Fortnightly 24 7.0 7.3 6.8 N/A
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 49
FIGURE 11pH TRENDING
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
pH
Guideline: >6.5 and <9.2 units
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Water Sampling Locality
Averages used
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
pH
Guideline: >6.5 and <9.2 units Averages used
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
fClun
es
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Water Sampling Locality
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
pH
Guideline: >6.5 and <9.2 units
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Water Sampling Locality
Averages used
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
pH
Guideline: >6.5 and <9.2 units Averages used
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
fClun
es
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Water Sampling Locality
Trending Summary • All regulated (non-potable) water supply systems have not been included in trending analysis.
• Higher pH levels have been experienced from 2009/10 through to 2011/12 in some water sampling localities, namely Ballarat (Ballan, Bungaree/Wallace, Enfield, Fiskville/Glenmore, Gordon/Mt Egerton, Haddon, Linton, and Skipton) and Blackwood/Barrys Reef. This has been predominantly due to the use of low alkalinity source waters providing minimal buffering against pH changes caused by carbonate leaching from concrete lined pipes. In all cases there was no impact of the efficacy of disinfection processes. Due to the recovery of Ballarat water supplies, the use of low alkalinity Superpipe water was discontinued from August 2010 and pH levels have since stabilised.
• The Blackwood source water historically has low alkalinity and the supply is subject to higher reticulation pH levels due to carbonate leaching.
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 14
• All systems sampled for pH were compliant.
50 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 15AESTHETIC PARAMETERS - TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
Standard <600 mg/L (ADWG)
Description Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) represents the total amount of material dissolved in the water and includes materials such as carbonates, bicarbonates, chlorides and sulphates of calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium. The palatability of drinking water may be affected with increasing TDS levels.
* Non-potable water supply system Considered to meet guidelines if the mean is less than the guideline value (ADWG 2011, Section 10.3.3)# Weekly sampling with increases for population (ADWG 2011, Section 9.5.2)- Not applicable Total Dissolved Solids data derived from Electrical Conductivity data (x 0.5)
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Mean (mg/L)
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Weekly 52 300 370 220 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
WeeklyWeekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #
52127525365525253525252535253655252
128
277204155281272169155287277275200270206277271208203160
295290165305290265165310295295285290260340290290260285
230150145235230155145245230235155230180235180170175130
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Weekly 52 83 90 75 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Weekly 51 93 110 80 Yes
Clunes Clunes Weekly 51 340 350 330 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
WeeklyWeekly
5252
6767
7575
5560
YesYes
Dean Dean Weekly 52 138 160 130 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Weekly 52 239 275 225 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Weekly 15 372 385 355 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Weekly 52 277 285 270 Yes
Lexton Lexton Weekly 52 455 550 345 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
5252525252635152
276281277280281278281281
305315305310310305310310
230240240240240240240245
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Weekly 52 688 750 650 No
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - - -
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 51
FIGURE 12TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS TRENDING
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Tota
l Dis
solv
ed S
olid
s (m
g/L)
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Water Sampling Locality
Guideline: <600 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12Averages used
Guideline: <600 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12Averages used
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
fClun
es
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Tota
l Dis
solv
ed S
olid
s (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Tota
l Dis
solv
ed S
olid
s (m
g/L)
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Water Sampling Locality
Guideline: <600 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12Averages used
Guideline: <600 mg/L
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12Averages used
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
fClun
es
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Tota
l Dis
solv
ed S
olid
s (m
g/L)
Water Sampling Locality
Trending Summary • TDS exceedences from previous financial years in the Lexton and Maryborough systems were caused by drought conditions combined with supplementary groundwater use in the Maryborough system. Strong inflows into water storages combined with no requirement for groundwater use in the Maryborough system from 2010/11, have caused TDS levels to decrease significantly.
• At Avoca, the commissioning of the Reverse Osmosis salt reduction facility from the first half of 2011 has resulted in much lower TDS water being supplied to the Avoca system on an ongoing basis.
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 15
• All systems sampled for TDS were compliant, with the exception of Waubra.
• Waubra sources its water from groundwater supplies with increased TDS levels.
52 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 16AESTHETIC PARAMETERS - TRUE COLOUR
Standard <15 HU (ADWG), equivalent to Platinum-Cobalt (Pt.-Co.) units.
Description Colour is the actual true appearance of the water with suspended material removed. Colour can result from organic matter, sources of algae or inorganic materials such as manganese, copper and iron.
* Non-potable water supply system # Weekly sampling with increases for population (ADWG 2011, Section 9.5.2)
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Mean (HU)
Max (HU)
Min (HU)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Weekly 52 3 7 < 1 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
WeeklyWeekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
Weekly #
52128525265525253525252535253655252
128
421442234424244122
663664556647476445
1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Weekly 52 1 4 < 1 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Weekly 52 2 5 < 1 Yes
Clunes Clunes Weekly 52 1 3 < 1 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
WeeklyWeekly
5252
11
33
< 1< 1
YesYes
Dean Dean Weekly 52 1 3 < 1 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Weekly 52 1 1 < 1 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Weekly 17 1 3 < 1 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Weekly 52 1 1 < 1 Yes
Lexton Lexton Weekly 52 20 40 9 No
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
WeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeeklyWeekly
Weekly #WeeklyWeekly
5252525252635252
22222222
46555545
< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Weekly 52 1 2 < 1 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre Fortnightly 24 29 60 15 N/A
Raglan * Raglan Fortnightly 24 51 140 21 N/A
Redbank * Redbank Fortnightly 24 161 220 95 N/A
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 53
FIGURE 13TRUE COLOUR TRENDING
Guideline: <15 HU
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12Averages used
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Colo
ur (H
U)
Water Sampling Locality
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Guideline: <15 HU
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12Averages used
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Colo
ur (H
U)
Water Sampling Locality
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
fClun
es
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Guideline: <15 HU
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12Averages used
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Colo
ur (H
U)
Water Sampling Locality
Ballan
Ballar
at Cen
tral
Ballar
at Nort
h / Nerr
ina
Bung
aree /
Walla
ce
Bunin
yong /
Mt H
elen
Cardiga
n Villa
ge
Creswick
Enfie
ld
Fiskvi
lle / G
lenmore
Gordon
/ Mt E
gerto
nHad
don
Lal L
al
Linton
Napole
ons
Seba
stopo
l
Skipt
on
Smyth
esda
le
Wendo
uree
Guideline: <15 HU
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12Averages used
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Colo
ur (H
U)
Water Sampling Locality
Avoc
a
Beau
fort
Black
wood /
Barry
s Ree
fClun
es
Dayles
ford H
igh Le
vel
Dayles
ford L
ow Le
vel / H
epbu
rn Dean
Fores
t Hill
Learm
onth
Land
sboro
ugh /
Navarre
Lexto
nAlm
a
Bet B
et
Carisb
rook
Daisy H
ill
Majorca
Marybo
rough
Talbo
tTim
or
Waubra
Trending Summary • All regulated (non-potable) water supply systems have not been included in trending analysis.
• The Lexton WTP is not designed to remove colour. Although the colour is normally elevated, strong reservoir inflows during 2010/11 resulted in the colour increasing substantially for a period following these rain events.
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 16
• All systems sampled for colour were compliant, with the exception of Lexton. This system is listed on the Capital Improvement Program for works to improve colour compliance by sourcing water from an alternative supply.
54 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 17AESTHETIC PARAMETERS - HARDNESS
Standard <200 mg/L (ADWG)
Description Hardness is predominantly caused by calcium and magnesium ions and is a parameter unique to the water source and does not normally change. Hard water sometimes causes difficulty in creating a lather and it can also form a deposit on hot water pipes and fittings under certain conditions.
* Non-potable water supply system Considered to meet guidelines if the mean is less than the guideline value (ADWG 2011, Section 10.3.3)- Not applicable
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Mean (mg/L)
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 144 180 90 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
1219892
12811610591
12712311811211611612111311811396
130120100140130120100130130130130120120130130130120110
1108883
1201109483
12011011098
11010011010011010084
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 17 20 15 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Monthly 12 31 40 23 Yes
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 72 79 66 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
MonthlyMonthly
1212
2322
2725
1919
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 103 130 90 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 11 101 110 90 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 3 45 48 44 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 140 150 130 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 220 270 180 No
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
1212121212121212
140147142148146141148146
160170160170160160170160
110120120120130120130130
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 462 480 440 No
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - - -
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 17
• All systems sampled for hardness were compliant, with the exception of the Lexton and Waubra water supply systems. • The Lexton system is listed on the Capital Improvement Program for works to improve hardness compliance by sourcing water from an alternative supply.• Waubra sources its water from groundwater supplies with increased hardness levels.
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 55
TABLE 18AESTHETIC PARAMETERS - IRON
Standard <0.3 mg/L (ADWG)
Description Iron occurs naturally in surface water, but is found in higher levels in oxygen-depleted groundwater. A change in taste may be noticed above 0.3 mg/L and higher levels may cause stained laundry and plumbing fittings. Iron does not pose a health risk at concentrations found in water supplies.
* Non-potable water supply system
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 18
• All systems sampled for iron were compliant.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 0.09 < 0.01 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
< 0.020.040.040.020.040.040.020.040.270.020.020.040.190.020.020.060.040.02
< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 0.11 < 0.01 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Monthly 12 0.25 0.01 Yes
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 0.14 < 0.01 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
MonthlyMonthly
1212
0.040.05
< 0.01< 0.01
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 0.01 < 0.01 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 12 0.15 < 0.01 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 4 0.07 0.02 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 < 0.02 < 0.01 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 0.05 0.01 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
1212121212121212
0.030.020.050.020.010.030.010.02
< 0.01< 0.010.01
< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01< 0.01
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 0.03 < 0.01 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre Monthly 12 2.8 0.04 N/A
Raglan * Raglan Monthly 12 0.48 0.05 N/A
Redbank * Redbank Monthly 12 5.0 1.4 N/A
56 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 19AESTHETIC PARAMETERS - ZINC
Standard <3 mg/L (ADWG)
Description Zinc is widely distributed and occurs in small amounts in almost all rocks, commonly as sulphide. Tap water can contain zinc as a result of the corrosion of zinc coated pipes and fittings. The guideline value is based on aesthetic considerations.
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 19
• All systems sampled for zinc were compliant.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 0.013 0.003 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
0.0130.0100.0050.0310.0160.0050.0040.0220.0080.0460.0080.0080.0310.0080.0070.0060.0080.005
0.0010.0020.0010.0030.0010.001
< 0.0010.0030.0020.0020.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.0010.003
< 0.001
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 0.007 0.001 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Monthly 12 0.120 0.002 Yes
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 0.005 0.002 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
MonthlyMonthly
1212
0.0060.018
< 0.0010.001
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 0.160 < 0.001 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 12 0.013 0.001 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 4 0.015 0.004 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 0.014 0.007 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 0.063 0.021 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
1212121212121212
0.0080.0030.0050.0040.0040.0080.0030.013
0.002< 0.0010.002
< 0.0010.0010.002
< 0.001< 0.001
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 0.042 0.004 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - -
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 57
TABLE 20OTHER SUBSTANCES - CADMIUM
Standard <0.002 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH)
Description Cadmium in drinking water generally indicates industrial wastes or contamination from impurities in galvanised (zinc) fittings, solders and brasses. The risk of cadmium contamination is considered very low.
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 20
• All systems sampled for cadmium were compliant.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Quarterly 4 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
QuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterly
444444444444444444
< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002
< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Quarterly 4 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Quarterly 4 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
Clunes Clunes Quarterly 4 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
QuarterlyQuarterly
44
< 0.0002< 0.0002
< 0.0002< 0.0002
YesYes
Dean Dean Quarterly 4 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Quarterly 4 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Quarterly 2 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Quarterly 4 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
Lexton Lexton Quarterly 4 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
QuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterly
44444444
< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002
< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002< 0.0002
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Quarterly 4 < 0.0002 < 0.0002 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - -
58 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 21OTHER SUBSTANCES - COPPER
Standard <2 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH); <1 mg/L (ADWG-AESTHETIC)
Description Copper is widely distributed in rocks and soils as carbonate and sulphide materials. Principal sources in water supplies are from the corrosion of brass and copper pipes. High levels may cause a metallic taste and cause blue staining on sanitary fittings.
* Non-potable water supply system
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 21
• All systems sampled for copper were compliant with the ADWG health and aesthetic guidelines.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 0.012 < 0.001 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
0.0370.1100.0080.2200.7900.0300.0370.0220.0150.0230.0090.0230.0090.0660.0210.0050.0120.029
0.0030.0070.0020.0020.0040.0020.0020.0040.0030.0020.0020.0020.0020.0030.0040.0010.0020.002
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 0.079 0.001 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Monthly 12 0.460 0.001 Yes
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 0.011 0.001 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
MonthlyMonthly
1212
0.0200.380
0.0010.003
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 0.039 < 0.001 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 12 0.006 < 0.001 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 4 0.019 0.008 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 0.026 0.001 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 0.023 0.004 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
1212121212121212
0.0340.0200.0480.0340.0430.0260.0140.083
0.0070.0060.0150.0030.0050.0080.0020.005
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 0.024 0.005 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre Monthly 12 0.260 0.002 N/A
Raglan * Raglan Monthly 12 0.720 0.001 N/A
Redbank * Redbank Monthly 12 0.041 0.007 N/A
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 59
TABLE 22OTHER SUBSTANCES - LEAD
Standard <0.01 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH))
Description Lead occurs in water through dissolution from natural sources or rare occasions where household plumbing contains lead (e.g. pipes, solder). Lead contamination in the reticulation is considered a low risk.
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 22
• All systems sampled for lead were compliant.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
0.0060.0010.001
< 0.0010.002
< 0.0010.0010.0020.0080.001
< 0.001< 0.0010.0070.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Monthly 12 0.006 < 0.001 Yes
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
MonthlyMonthly
1212
0.0030.006
< 0.001< 0.001
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 0.010 < 0.001 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 12 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 4 0.004 < 0.001 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
1212121212121212
0.0010.0010.002
< 0.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - -
60 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 23OTHER SUBSTANCES - MANGANESE
Standard <0.5 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH); <0.1 mg/L (ADWG-AESTHETIC)
Description Manganese occurs naturally in surface water and groundwater. At levels exceeding 0.15 mg/L manganese in water supplies stains plumbing fixtures and laundry. At higher concentrations, it causes undesirable tastes.
* Non-potable water supply system
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 23
• All systems sampled for manganese were compliant with the ADWG health and aesthetic guidelines.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Monthly 12 0.014 < 0.001 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
121212121212121212121212121212121212
0.0050.0040.0030.0050.0070.0020.0020.0020.0110.0070.0020.0160.0090.0060.0080.0100.0040.002
0.0010.002
< 0.001< 0.0010.002
< 0.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.0010.002
< 0.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.0010.002
< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Monthly 12 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Monthly 12 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Clunes Clunes Monthly 12 0.008 < 0.001 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
MonthlyMonthly
1212
0.0060.008
< 0.001< 0.001
YesYes
Dean Dean Monthly 12 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Monthly 12 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Monthly 4 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Monthly 12 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Lexton Lexton Monthly 12 0.033 0.001 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
MonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthly
1212121212121212
0.0290.0360.0400.0250.0130.0320.0240.028
< 0.0010.0020.0090.0050.0080.0110.0040.007
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Monthly 12 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre Monthly 12 0.230 0.001 N/A
Raglan * Raglan Monthly 12 0.015 < 0.001 N/A
Redbank * Redbank Monthly 12 0.660 0.006 N/A
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 61
TABLE 24OTHER SUBSTANCES - NICKEL
Standard <0.02 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH)
Description Drinking water generally contains very low concentrations of nickel. Unusually high concentrations, up to 0.5 mg/L, have been reported where water has been in prolonged contact with nickel-plated tap and plumbing fittings.
* Non-potable water supply system - Not applicable
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 24
• All systems sampled for nickel were compliant.
Water Supply System
Water Sampling Locality Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Avoca Quarterly 4 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Ballarat BallanBallarat CentralBallarat North / NerrinaBungaree / WallaceBuninyong / Mt HelenCardigan VillageCreswickEnfieldFiskville / GlenmoreGordon / Mt EgertonHaddonLal LalLintonNapoleonsSebastopolSkiptonSmythesdaleWendouree
QuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterly
444444444444444444
0.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.0010.010
< 0.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.0010.001
< 0.0010.001
< 0.001
< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Beaufort Beaufort Quarterly 4 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Blackwood Blackwood / Barrys Reef Quarterly 4 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Clunes Clunes Quarterly 4 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Daylesford Daylesford High LevelDaylesford Low Level / Hepburn
QuarterlyQuarterly
44
< 0.001< 0.001
< 0.001< 0.001
YesYes
Dean Dean Quarterly 4 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Forest Hill Forest Hill Quarterly 4 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Landsborough Landsborough / Navarre Quarterly 2 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Learmonth Learmonth Quarterly 4 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Lexton Lexton Quarterly 4 0.002 < 0.001 Yes
Maryborough AlmaBet BetCarisbrookDaisy HillMajorcaMaryboroughTalbotTimor
QuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterlyQuarterly
44444444
0.0020.0010.0010.001
< 0.0010.0020.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.001
< 0.001< 0.001
YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Waubra Waubra Quarterly 4 0.002 0.001 Yes
REGULATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Amphitheatre * Amphitheatre - - - - -
Raglan * Raglan - - - - -
Redbank * Redbank - - - - -
62 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 25 OTHER SUBSTANCES - ARSENIC
TABLE 26 OTHER SUBSTANCES - CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
Standard <0.01 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH)
Description Arsenic originates from natural sources, as well as mining, industrial and agricultural wastes.
Standard <0.05 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH)
Description Chromium is derived from industrial contamination of raw water or corrosion of materials in the distribution system / plumbing. The risk of chromium contamination is very low.
Water Supply System
Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Ballarat Annually 2 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Beaufort Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Blackwood Quarterly 4 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Clunes Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Daylesford Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Dean Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Forest Hill Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Landsborough Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Learmonth Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Lexton Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Maryborough Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Waubra Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Water Supply System
Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Ballarat Annually 2 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Beaufort Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Blackwood Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Clunes Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Daylesford Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Dean Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Forest Hill Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Landsborough Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Learmonth Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Lexton Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Maryborough Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Waubra Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 25
• All systems sampled for arsenic were compliant.
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 26
• All systems sampled for chromium (total) were compliant.
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 63
TABLE 27 OTHER SUBSTANCES - CYANIDE
TABLE 28 OTHER SUBSTANCES - MERCURY
Standard <0.08 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH)
Description Cyanide can be present in drinking water primarily through the contamination of source water. Cyanide was traditionally used in the extraction of gold and silver from low-grade ores and is also used in the electroplating, steel and chemical industries. The risk of cyanide contamination is very low.
Standard <0.001 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH))
Description Mercury originates through industrial emissions and spills with very low concentrations occurring naturally. Mercury in drinking water is of inorganic form and is poorly absorbed.
Water Supply System
Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Ballarat Annually 2 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Beaufort Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Blackwood Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Clunes Annually 1 0.007 0.007 Yes
Daylesford Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Dean Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Forest Hill Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Landsborough Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Learmonth Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Lexton Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Maryborough Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Waubra Annually 1 < 0.005 < 0.005 Yes
Water Supply System
Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Ballarat Annually 2 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Beaufort Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Blackwood Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Clunes Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Daylesford Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Dean Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Forest Hill Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Landsborough Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Learmonth Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Lexton Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Maryborough Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
Waubra Annually 1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 Yes
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 27
• All systems sampled for cyanide were compliant.
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 28
• All systems sampled for mercury were compliant.
64 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 29OTHER SUBSTANCES - SELENIUM
Standard <0.01 mg/L (ADWG-HEALTH)
Description Selenium generally occurs at very low concentrations in water supplies.
Water Supply System
Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
Max (mg/L)
Min (mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Ballarat Annually 2 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Beaufort Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Blackwood Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Clunes Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Daylesford Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Dean Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Forest Hill Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Landsborough Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Learmonth Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Lexton Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Maryborough Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Waubra Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 29
• All systems sampled for selenium were compliant.
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 65
TABLE 30HEALTH RELATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Water Supply System
Frequency of
sampling
No. of samples
Benzene(mg/L)
Benzo(a) pyrene(mg/L)
Carbon tetrachloridea
(mg/L)
1,2- dichloroethane
(mg/L)
1,1- dichloroethene
(mg/L)
Penta chlorophenola
(mg/L)
Tetra chloroethene
(mg/L)
Tri chloroethene
(mg/L)
2,4,6- trichlorophenola
(mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Annually 3 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Ballarat Annually 2 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Beaufort Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Blackwood Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.000002 - < 0.001 < 0.0001 - < 0.001 < 0.001 - Yes
Clunes Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Daylesford Annually 3 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Dean Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Forest Hill Annually 2 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Landsborough Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Learmonth Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Lexton Annually 1 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Maryborough Annually 4 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
Waubra Annually 2 < 0.001 < 0.000002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 Yes
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 30
• All systems sampled for health related organic compounds were compliant.
• Samples collected from untreated source water locations: except aCarbon tetrachloride, pentachlorophenol and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol analysed on chlorine based disinfected treated water samples (single samples).
66 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
TABLE 31PESTICIDES
Water Supply System
Frequency of sampling
No. of samples
OC Scanª(mg/L)
OP Scanb
(mg/L)Triazinesc
(mg/L)Herbicidesd
(mg/L)Cyanazine
(mg/L)Metsulfuron
methyl(mg/L)
Metribuzin(mg/L)
Diquat(mg/L)
Paraquat(mg/L)
Hexazinone(mg/L)
Glyphosate(mg/L)
Complying (Yes / No)
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Avoca Annually 3 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Ballarat Annually 2 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.00005 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Beaufort Annually 1 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Blackwood Annually 1 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Clunes Annually 1 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Daylesford Annually 3 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Dean Annually 1 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Forest Hill Annually 2 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Landsborough Annually 1 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Learmonth Annually 1 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Lexton Annually 1 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Maryborough Annually 4 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 < 0.00005 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
Waubra Annually 2 ND ND ND ND < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.0001 - - < 0.0001 < 0.03 Yes
2011/12 Compliance Summary
Refer to Table 31
• All systems sampled for pesticides were compliant.
• Samples collected from untreated source water locations.
ND - Not Detected - Not applicablea The Organo-Chlorine (OC) Scan includes the following parameters: Aldrin, BHC (alpha isomer), BHC (beta isomer), BHC (delta isomer), cis-chlordane, trans-chlordane, 4,4’-DDD, 4,4’-DDE, 4,4’-DDT, dieldrin, endosulfan I, endosufan II, endosulfan sulfate, endrin, endrin aldehyde, hexachlorobenzene, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide, lindane (BHC gamma isomer), methoxychlor, endrin ketoneb The Organo-Phosphorus (OP) Scan includes the following parameters: Dichlorvos, monocrotophos, prophos, tetraethyldithiopyrphos, phorate, demeton-S, diazinon, methyl parathion, ronnel (fenchlorphos), malathion (maldison), fenthion, chlorpyrifos, (ethyl) parathion, trichlorinate, tetrachlovinphos, tukuthion, Fensulfothion, EPN, coumaphosc The Triazine Scan includes the following parameters: Ametryn, atrazine, prometon, prometryn, propazine, simazine, simetryn, terbuthylazine, terbutrynd The Herbicide Scan includes the following parameters: MCPA, 2,4,5-T, 2,4-D
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 67
The following tables show the percentage compliance across all potable sampling localities for the SDWR Schedule 2 parameters over the past three financial years.
percentageCOMPLIANCE
table 32PERCENTAGE OF POTABLE WATER SAMPLING LOCALITIES RECEIVING COMPLYING WATER
table 33PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION RECEIVING COMPLYING POTABLE WATER
Parameter 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12E. coli 100 97.3 100
Chloroacetic acid 100 100 100
Dichloroacetic acid 100 100 100
Trichloroacetic acid 97.3 100 100
Trihalomethanes 97.3 100 97.4
Bromate 100 97.3 97.4
Formaldehyde 100 100 100
Aluminium (acid soluble) 100 100 100
Turbidity 100 100 100
• All regulated (non-potable) water supply systems have not been included in trending analysis
Parameter 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12E. coli 100 98.1 100
Chloroacetic acid 100 100 100
Dichloroacetic acid 100 100 100
Trichloroacetic acid 99.8 100 100
Trihalomethanes 99.8 100 99.2
Bromate 100 98.6 98.6
Formaldehyde 100 100 100
Aluminium (acid soluble) 100 100 100
Turbidity 100 100 100
• All regulated (non-potable) water supply systems have not been included in trending analysis
Trending Summary
• Percentage compliance for E. coli has improved in 2011/12.
• Percentage compliance for Trihalomethanes has marginally decreased in 2011/12 due to the mitigation of nitrification effects and low system disinfectant residuals in the Avoca water sampling locality. See page 24 for details.
• Percentage compliance for Bromate has remained lower from 2010/11 through to 2011/12 due to detections in the Clunes water sampling locality. See pages 22-24 for details.
• Other parameters have achieved a consistent high level of compliance through to 2011/12.
68 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
complaints summaryWater quality complaints relating to faults, for example discoloured and first contact taste and odour, are generally reported to CHW’s Operations and Maintenance staff for immediate action. More complex complaints, for example health, disinfection by-products and unresolved taste and odour complaints, are forwarded to CHW’s Customer Resolution Officer or Coordinator Drinking Water Compliance for further investigation and resolution.
• Discoloured water - Complaints are normally responded to by flushing mains and cleaning water meters. Samples are obtained for testing in the laboratory in some circumstances. Where it is suspected that discoloured water may be caused by galvanised iron service pipes CHW may check the iron content relative to the mains supply. Advice is also provided on how customers may mitigate any effects of discoloured water.
• Taste and odour - CHW will obtain information from customers regarding the nature of the taste and or odour. CHW’s response may include flushing mains and cleaning the meter. Samples may be taken before and after flushing for on-site or laboratory testing.
• Blue water - If CHW received a suspected blue water complaint a site visit would take place to examine any available evidence and samples would be obtained for testing.
• Air in water - After clarification of symptoms with customers CHW will either suggest methods for the customer to remove the air or attend on-site and flush the main and or service pipe.
• Suspected illness - Complaints of this nature are forwarded to the Coordinator Drinking Water Compliance for immediate consideration. CHW will seek information on the symptoms associated with the illness and take the appropriate action in accordance with operating procedures. CHW advises the Department of Health where an illness is suspected or has been confirmed.
• Other complaints - Are investigated and responded to based on the nature of the complaint.
Customer complaints are recorded in a corporate database managed by the Customer Resolution Officer and complaint matters are followed up with the goal of providing satisfactory resolution. Complaints data is reported monthly to CHW’s senior management and Board. Systemic matters are addressed at several levels with outcomes such as improved policy / procedure, asset management, community consultation and staff training.
An elevated number of taste and odour complaints were received within the Maryborough supply (45) during November 2011 due to algae growth within the supply reservoir. See page 23 for details.
During 2011/12 CHW experienced an 18% reduction from 2010/11 in the number of water quality complaints received.
The easing of drought conditions throughout the region coupled by significant rainfall events were the major drivers behind this improvement.
System operational changes influencing the decreased number of water quality customer contacts between 2010/11 and 2011/12 can be attributed to the following key areas:
1. The recovery of smaller local surface water storage supply systems across many of our systems has contributed to improved standards of water quality to customers;
2. Water quality in Maryborough has improved significantly and the automation of the Water Treatment Plant has assisted in delivering consistent water quality; and
3. Distribution maintenance programs have enabled CHW to supply better quality water.
TABLE 34COMPLAINTS AND RESPONSES
Type of Complaint Number of ComplaintsNumber of Complaints
per 100 Customers suppliedDiscoloured Water 108 0.17
Taste / Odour 76 0.12
Blue Water 0 0.00
Air in Water 15 0.02
Alleged Illness 1 0.01
Other 11 0.02
There were no water sampling localities that recorded a total number of complaints greater than 10 per 100 customers during the reporting period.
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 69
CENTRAL HIGHLANDS WATER SERVICE AREA MAP
Water Supply District Boundary
Central Highlands Water Region
Towns Supplied Water
Towns Supplied Water & Sewerage Service
70 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
ADWG Australian Drinking Water Guidelines
AWA Australian Water Association
BE Bulk Entitlement
BGA Blue-Green Algae
CHW Central Highlands Water
CLPA Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994
CMA Catchment Management Authority
CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
DBP Disinfection By-Product
DC Direct Current
DH Department of Health
DSE Department of Sustainability and Environment
EDR Electrodialysis Reversal
EDRMS Electronic Document and Records Management System
EPA Environmental Protection Authority Victoria
ESC Essential Services Commission
E. coli Escherichia coli, a thermo tolerant indicator bacteria
HFA Health (Fluoridation) Act 1973
HU Hazen Unit, a measure of the colour of water (=Pt. Co. units)
< Less than
mg/L Milligrams per litre
ML Megalitres. One megalitre is equal to one million litres
NATA National Association of Testing Authorities
NHMRC National Health and Medical Research Council
NOM Natural Organic Matter
NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Units, a measure of turbidity
OFI Opportunity For Improvement
Pathogen Disease causing micro-organism
PoU Point of Use
RCS Regional Catchment Strategies
RMP Risk Management Plan
RO Reverse Osmosis
RWA Rural Water Authority
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act 2003
SDWR Safe Drinking Water Regulations 2005
TDS Total Dissolved Solids
THM Trihalomethanes
TRIM Total Records Information Management
UCL Upper Confidence Limit
UV Ultra Violet
VCAT Victorian Civil Administrative Tribunal
WHO World Health Organisation
WSAA Water Services Association of Australia
WSDS Water Supply Demand Strategy
WTP Water Treatment Plant
ABBREVIATIONSABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT
02 WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012
Introduction 3
What is Drinking Water? 3
Sources of Water 3
Table 1 - The Source of Your Water 4
Table 2 - Reservoir Capacity and Current Levels 5
Managing Water Quality 6
Ensuring Your Water is Safe 8
How Your Water is Treated 10
Table 3 - Treatment Processes and Added Substances 12 for Central Highlands Water Supply Systems
Risk Management 13
Summary of Audit Findings 14 Risk Management Plan Audit Certificate 16
Water Quality Improvement Projects 17
Distribution System Improvements 18
Water Treatment Plant Improvements 19
Source Water Improvements 20
Emergency / Incident Management 22
System Summaries 25
Understanding Concentration and Limits 28
Further Information 29
WaterQualityTables
Table 4: Escherichia coli (E. coli) 30 Figure 1: E. coli Trending 31
Table 5: Chloroacetic Acid 32 Figure 2: Chloroacetic Acid Trending 33
Table 6: Dichloroacetic Acid 34 Figure 3: Dichloroacetic Acid Trending 35
Table 7: Trichloroacetic Acid 36 Figure 4: Trichloroacetic Acid Trending 37
Table 8: Trihalomethanes 38 Figure 5: Trihalomethanes Trending 39 Figure 5a: Trihalomethanes Monthly Trending 39
Table 9: Bromate 40 Figure 6: Bromate Trending 40 Figure 6a: Bromate Monthly Trending 40
Table 10: Formaldehyde 41 Figure 7: Formaldehyde Trending 41
Table 11: Aluminium (Acid Soluble) 42 Figure 8: Aluminium (Acid Soluble) Trending 43
Table 12: Turbidity 44 Figure 9: Turbidity Trending 45
Table 13: Fluoride 46 Figure 10: Fluoride Trending 47
Table 14: Aesthetic Parameters - pH 48 Figure 11: pH Trending 49
Table 15: Aesthetic Parameters - Total Dissolved Solids 50 Figure 12: Total Dissolved Solids Trending 51
Table 16: Aesthetic Parameters - True Colour 52 Figure 13: True Colour Trending 53
Table 17: Aesthetic Parameters - Hardness 54
Table 18: Aesthetic Parameters - Iron 55
Table 19: Aesthetic Parameters - Zinc 56
Table 20: Other Substances - Cadmium 57
Table 21: Other Substances - Copper 58
Table 22: Other Substances - Lead 59
Table 23: Other Substances - Manganese 60
Table 24: Other Substances - Nickel 61
Table 25: Other Substances - Arsenic 62
Table 26: Other Substances - Chromium (Total) 62
Table 27: Other Substances - Cyanide 63
Table 28: Other Substances - Mercury 63
Table 29: Other Substances - Selenium 64
Table 30: Health Related Organic Compounds 65
Table 31: Pesticides 66
Table 32: Percentage of potable water sampling 67 localities receiving complying water
Table 33: Percentage of population receiving 67 complying potable water
Table 34: Complaints and Responses 68 Central Highlands Water Service Area Map 69
Abbreviations 70
CONTENTS
WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011/2012 71
NOTES
Central H
ighlands Region W
ater Corporation W
ater Quality R
epo
rt 2011/12
2011/2012WATER QUALITY REPORT