2011 MPS MCA II and MCA III

8/2/2019 2011 MPS MCA II and MCA III

1/14

Spring2011MCAII&MCAIII

DistrictSummary

Results

SEPTEMBER 12, 2011

REA OfficeofResearchEvaluationandAssessment,807NEBroadway,Minneapolis,55413phone:6126680570fax:6126680575


2/14

PercentofStudentswhoMetorExceededthe

Standardson20092011MCAIIReadingby

TestedGrade(MPSvs.State)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PercentofStudents

MPS2009 58% 51% 51% 48% 45% 46% 54% 51%

MPS2010 54% 52% 53% 50% 46% 50% 54% 52%

MPS2011 58% 56% 61% 52% 54% 54% 55% 56%

State2009 78% 75% 72% 73% 65% 67% 74% 72%

State2010 76% 73% 76% 72% 66% 68% 75% 72%

State2011 79% 75% 80% 75% 70% 68% 75% 75%

Grade3 Grade4 Grade5 Grade6 Grade7 Grade8 Grade10 Total


3/14

Sl ide 2 Not es

MPS MCAII (State Test) Reading proficiencyincreased 4% compared to 2010 and increased 5%over the past two years. The State of MNincreased 3% in two years.

The largest gains relative to the State were ingrade 8 where MPS increased 8% while the Stateincreased 1% over two years.

3


4/14

PercentofStudentsMetorExceededtheStandardson2009

2011MCAII&MCAIIIMathbyTestedGrade(MPSvs.State)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

P

ercent

ofStude

nts

MPS2009(MCAII&MTELL) 60% 48% 44% 36% 40% 39% 26% 43%

MPS2010

(MCA

II&

MTELL) 61% 51% 43% 42% 44% 38% 30% 45%

MPS2011(MCAII&MCAIII) 49% 42% 32% 29% 32% 35% 37% 37%

State2009(MCAII&MTELL) 79% 73% 64% 62% 61% 58% 41% 62%

State2010(MCAII&MTELL) 81% 75% 67% 67% 63% 57% 43% 65%

State2011

(MCA

II&

MCA

III) 70% 67% 54% 50% 52% 53% 49% 56%

Grade3 Grade4 Grade5 Grade6 Grade7 Grade8 Grade11 Total

*Notes: Grades 3-8 Math 2011 figures are based on the new MCA-III, Grade 11 2011 figures are based on the MCA-II


5/14

Sl ide 4 Not es

A new MCAI I I test was administered in grades 3-8in 2010-11. MPS MCAI I I (State Test ) Mathproficiency decreased 8% compared to 2009-10.The State of MN Math proficiency decreased 9% incompared to last year.

These decreases are likely due to more rigorousproficiency cut-scores and/or more difficult items

on the new MCAIII tests.

I n grade 11 the State math test remained thesame ( i.e., MCAI I ) . MPS MCAI I math proficiency

increased 7% while the State increased 6% ingrade 11. 5


6/14

PercentofStudentswhoMetorExceeded

theStandardson20082011MCAIIReading

byEthnicity

(MPS)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percent

ofStudents

MPS2008 34% 31% 48% 35% 84%

MPS2009 37% 32% 47% 36% 85%

MPS2010 37% 33% 49% 36% 86%

MPS2011 40% 39% 54% 41% 86%

NativeAm. AfricanAm. Asian Hispanic Caucasian


7/14

Sl ide 6 Not es

All Students of Color groups showed substantialincreases in MCAI I reading scores over the pasttwo years.

Afr ican American student reading proficiencyincreased 6% in the past year and 7% over t woyears.

Asian student reading proficiency increased 5% in

the past year and 7% over t wo years.7


8/14

PercentofStudentsMeetorExceedtheStandardson2008

2011MCAII,MCAIII&MTELLMathbyEthnicity(MPS)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percen

t

ofStudents

MPS2008(MCAII&MTELL) 28% 21% 44% 30% 73%

MPS2009(MCAII&MTELL) 29% 22% 44% 30% 77%

MPS2010(MCAII&MTELL) 30% 25% 48% 32% 79%

MPS2011(MCAII&MCAIII) 18% 17% 40% 24% 69%

NativeAm. AfricanAm. Asian Hispanic Caucasian



9/14

Sl ide 8 Not es

All racial/ ethnic groups showed substant ialdecreases in Math Proficiency on t he MCAI I I likelydue to more rigorous proficiency cut scores and/ormore difficult items on this new State test .

American I ndian student proficiency decreasedmore than White students.

African American, Asian and Hispanic students

decreased proficiency somewhat less than Whitestudents.9


10/14

Percen t o f St uden t s w ho Met o r Exceeded t heSt anda r ds on 20 08 - 20 11 MCA- I I

Read ing by Sub gr ou ps ( MPS)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percent

of

Students

MPS2008 21% 57% 15% 54% 32% 75%

MPS2009 25% 58% 15% 57% 34% 77%

MPS2010 25% 59% 18% 57% 35% 79%

MPS2011 29% 63% 20% 62% 39% 87%

ELLStudents NonELLStudents SpecialEducation NonSpecialEd. F/RPriceLunchNotEligibleforF/R

PriceLunch


11/14

Sl ide 1 0 Not es

Reading proficiency broken out by ELLstatus, Special Education status, and Freeor reduced price lunch status showed

substantial gains for all groups.

11


12/14

PercentofStudentswhoMetorExceeded

theStandardson20082011MCAII,MCAIII

Mathby

Subgroups

(MPS)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percent

of

Students

MPS2008(MCAII&MTELL) 21% 46% 13% 45% 26% 63%

MPS2009(MCAII&MTELL) 23% 49% 13% 47% 26% 68%

MPS2010(MCAII&MTELL) 26% 51% 16% 50% 29% 72%

MPS2011(MCAII&MCAIII) 17% 43% 12% 41% 20% 68%

ELL StudentsNo nELL

Students

Special

EducationNo nSpecialEd. F/RPriceLunch

No tEligiblefor

F/RPriceLunch



13/14

Sl ide 1 0 Not es

Math proficiency broken out by ELL status,Special Education status, and free orreduced price lunch status showed

substantial decreases for all groups due,m ost likely, to increased proficiency cut -scores and/ or difficulty of the item s in the

MCAIII.

13


14/14

Per cen t o f St uden t s w ho M et o rEx ceeded t h e St andar ds on 20 11

M CA- I I Read ing by Racial / Et hn i cCat ego r y ( MPS v s . St a t e)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PercentofS

tudents

MPS 2011 ( MCAI I ) 40% 39% 54% 31% 86%St at e 2011 (MCAI I ) 54% 52% 65% 53% 81%

Nat ive Am . Af r ican Am . Asian Hispanic Caucasian

14

Documents

2011 MPS MCA II and MCA III