2003 Freshman/Sophomore Survey - Utah State University Sophomore... · 2003 FRESHMAN/SOPHOMORE ... sophomore students to determine their attitudes and perceptions regarding he initial

Analysis, Assessment & Accreditation

2003 Freshman/Sophomore Survey

September 2003

2003 FRESHMAN/SOPHOMORE STUDENT SURVEY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Each year, the Office of Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation conducts a survey of freshman and sophomore students to determine their attitudes and perceptions regarding the initial phase of their USU experience. In addition to some general questions, the focus of this year’s survey was on general education courses, advising, and student computer use. The heavier emphasis on advising resulted from requests by ASUSU, the Office of Advising and Transition Services, and a request from university administration to study advising at USU.

The survey was administered in a random sample of classes with high proportions of freshman and sophomores, and completed surveys were obtained from 1321 students. Demographics of the survey respondents mirrored those of the general population of freshmen and sophomore students at USU in terms of gender, ethnicity and citizenship. About two-thirds of the respondents were 18-20 years old, 54% were female, and 7% were minorities. Among the important findings of the survey are the following: Overall Perceptions of USU

• About 80% of the respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the overall quality of their educations. Only 3% indicated dissatisfaction.

• 82% rated the teaching ability of the faculty as good or very good. • When asked what they would tell their friends about USU, 77% indicated they would say USU is

great or at least say mostly positive things. Only 4% made negative comments. General Education

• About two-thirds of the respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with their general education courses. About 11% said they were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied.

• When asked how well they felt University Studies Courses had prepared them, about 90% said well or very well.

Advising

• The single most important source of information for a majority of respondents for academic planning was USU Major Requirement Sheets--more important than advisors.

• Two-thirds of the respondents had met with their advisor once or not at all during the last year. The most frequently-mentioned reason for not meeting more was that they felt they had already obtained the needed information from the advisor or another source.

• Only 13% said they were dissatisfied with their advisors, but nearly twenty percent said that, overall, they were not satisfied with USU’s advising system.

Computer Facilities and Usage

• Two-thirds agreed or strongly agreed that they had not waited long for a computer in the open access computer laboratories and more than 82% said they were satisfied with the labs.

• Over 90% of respondents said they had access to a privately-owned computer during the school year and, of those with access, more than two-thirds indicated that they used these computers most or all of the time for their school work.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i SURVEY OBJECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 SURVEY ADMINISTRATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 FINDINGS: OVERALL PERCEPTIONS OF USU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 FINDINGS: GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 FINDINGS: ADVISING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 FINDINGS: COMPUTER FACILITIES AND USAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 APPENDIX A: SURVEY INSTRUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 APPENDIX B: FREQUENCY TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 APPENDIX C: CROSS-TABULATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 APPEXDIX D: WHAT THE USU ADVISING SYSTEM IS DOING WELL . . . . . . . . D-1 APPEXDIX E: HOW THE USU ADVISING SYSTEM CAN BE IMPROVED . . . . . . E-1

1

2003 FRESHMAN/SOPHOMORE STUDENT SURVEY

Office of Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation

Joan Kleinke Craig Petersen

September, 2003

SURVEY OBJECTIVES As part of Utah State University’s assessment program, opinions of three groups of students and former students are surveyed—freshman/sophomores, those applying for graduation, and alumni. The freshman/sophomore survey captures the initial perspectives of students as they begin their university experiences. Surveying prospective graduates allows evaluation of how opinions have changed during the undergraduate years. The alumni survey is useful in seeing how attitudes and opinions evolve after students have had time to establish themselves in their careers. Although the three surveys are most insightful when used in conjunction with one another, this report focuses only on results of the 2003 Freshman/Sophomore Student Survey. The primary objectives are to assess the attitudes of beginning students with respect to:

• Overall perceptions of USU • General Education Courses • Advising • Computer Facilities and Usage

SURVEY ADMINISTRATION Development of the Survey Instrument. Meetings were held with faculty, staff, and students to determine the appropriate scope and content of the survey instrument. In addition, nationally- normed instruments were reviewed, advising association guidelines were evaluated, and websites of other universities were searched to determine what was being done elsewhere. A draft survey instrument was submitted for review by academic advisors on the USU campus for their comments and then pilot-tested on students, who were later given the opportunity to voice their comments and concerns. The final version of the survey instrument is included in Appendix A. Sample Selection and Survey Administration. A listing of all Spring 2003 USU classes with at least 50% freshman and sophomore students was obtained. From this listing, a random sample of courses was selected to be surveyed. After the courses were chosen, demographic characteristics of the freshman and sophomore students in the courses were compared to characteristics of all USU freshman and sophomore students. It was determined that the sample was representative of the general population of freshmen and sophomore students in terms of gender, ethnicity, and citizenship.

2

The survey was administered during class time. All the students in each class were asked to fill out the questionnaire, even though some were not freshman or sophomores. The reason for having everyone complete the task was that previous experience determined that if any students were allowed to leave, many of those in the target sample also left. Data Analysis. Because all students were asked to complete the survey, it was necessary to sort out freshman and sophomores. This was done using the student’s identification number and a survey question that asked the student to report the number of credit hours she/he had completed. Registration lists indicated that a total of 2,119 freshman and sophomore students were in the courses where the survey was administered. Because attendance can be substantially less than 100% during any given class period, all the targeted students did not fill out the survey. A total of 1,321 completed survey forms were obtained and these are the basis for the results found in this report. Nearly 59% of the respondents were freshmen and 41% were sophomores. RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS Table 1 shows demographic and other characteristics of the survey respondents. In general, these characteristics mirrored those of the general population of USU freshman and sophomore students in terms of gender, ethnicity, and citizenship. In considering the college breakdowns shown in the table, it is important to note that very few of the respondents (12) were College of Natural Resources majors, so the data for this group are suspect. Also note that a substantial portion (337) of the respondents did not identify a college, indicating “Other”. These respondents were in General Registration or more uncertain about what they really wanted to study. The number of respondents by college follows: Agriculture 49 Business 168 Education 251 Engineering 158 HASS 228 Natural Resources 12 Science 109 Other 337 About two-thirds of the respondents were between 18 and 20 years of age. The colleges of Business, Engineering, and Natural Resources tended to have more respondents that were older than those from other colleges. Overall, there were more women than men, but there was substantial variation among colleges. About 10% of the respondents said they were married and 7% classified themselves as minorities. Nearly 40% were living in USU housing. Housing Office data indicates that this fraction drops sharply for junior and senior students. More than three quarters of the freshman and sophomore respondents came from Utah, while less than 2% were international students. Forty percent indicated that they were working at least half- time while going to school.

TABLE 1. RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS

AG BUS EDUC ENG HASS NR SCI OTHER TOTAL

Age 18-20 years old 73.5% 53.6% 78.5% 47.5% 72.2% 25.0% 56.0% 66.2% 64.8% 21-25 years old 24.5% 42.9% 20.0% 48.1% 25.1% 75.0% 41.3% 30.6% 32.4%

Gender Male 36.7% 65.5% 17.5% 93.0% 30.7% 75.0% 63.0% 42.4% 46.4% Female 63.3% 34.5% 82.5% 7.0% 69.3% 25.0% 37.0% 57.6% 53.6%

Married 6.1% 6.6% 10.0% 16.5% 8.0% 8.3% 11.0% 6.5% 9.0%

Minority 6.0% 4.9% 6.0% 8.5% 7.0% 0.0% 6.5% 6.3% 6.5%

Geographic Origin Cache Valley 26.5% 29.8% 26.7% 30.1% 28.1% 16.7% 34.9% 35.3% 30.5% Utah, not Cache Valley 51.0% 45.8% 46.2% 45.5% 46.1% 41.7% 40.4% 45.4% 45.5% U.S., not Utah 20.5% 20.8% 26.3% 21.2% 24.6% 41.7% 22.9% 18.7% 22.4% Outside the U.S. 2.0% 3.6% 0.8% 3.2% 1.3% 0.0% 1.8% 0.6% 1.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Living in USU Housing 28.6% 36.3% 40.2% 40.8% 42.7% 8.3% 39.4% 31.5% 37.2%

Time Spent Working Not working 34.7% 37.7% 39.3% 45.2% 44.7% 58.3% 40.4% 42.9% 41.7% Full-time 2.0% 9.6% 6.8% 7.0% 5.7% 0.0% 6.4% 10.1% 7.6% Three-fourths time 6.1% 9.0% 8.0% 8.3% 8.3% 0.0% 11.9% 7.1% 8.2% Half-time 28.6% 26.9% 29.6% 20.4% 23.2% 25.0% 22.9% 23.7% 24.9% One-fourth time 28.6% 16.8% 16.4% 19.1% 18.0% 16.7% 18.3% 16.0% 17.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 100.0%

NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to the question.

3

4

FINDINGS: OVERALL PERCEPTIONS OF USU Several questions in the survey were included to determine the general perceptions students had of USU. Results are shown in Table 2. When asked how they felt about the overall quality of their education thus far, nearly 23% of the total respondents said they were very satisfied and nearly 58% marked satisfied, a total of 80% for the two categories. Only 3% indicated that they were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. In evaluating the helpfulness of faculty, 8% indicated dissatisfaction, while over 70% rated the faculty as good or very good in taking a personal interest in students. The faculty also scored well on teaching ability with over 80% of the respondents classifying teaching as good or very good. For the most part, beginning students felt fairly treated at USU. Over 70% were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment thus far. The respondents were asked what they would tell their friends about Utah State University. The five choices were: (1) It’s great, come here, (2) Mostly positive things, (3) Nothing much, either positive or negative, (4) Mostly negative things, and (5) It’s not great, don’t come here. Only 4% selected (4) or (5), while over three-fourths said USU was great or at least mostly positive things about the university. Taken together, these questions imply that lower division respondents were satisfied with their USU experience thus far. However, the respondents were those who have remained at the university for 2-4 semesters. Retention statistics indicate that almost one-third of students do not return for their second year at USU. The views of those non-returning students may be less positive, although previous research suggests that those students who drop out tend to do so for personal, family, or financial reasons and not because of dissatisfaction with USU.

TABLE 2. OVERALL PERCEPTIONS OF USU


Overall Quality of Education Very Satisfied 33.3% 21.9% 28.4% 22.1% 25.1% 25.0% 19.8% 15.0% 22.5% Satisfied 55.6% 56.3% 55.1% 57.1% 58.6% 41.7% 57.1% 61.7% 57.7% Neutral 11.1% 20.5% 13.8% 16.2% 14.7% 33.3% 17.6% 19.5% 16.9% Dissatisfied 0.0% 1.3% 2.7% 4.5% 1.6% 0.0% 3.3% 3.0% 2.6% Very Dissatisfied 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 0.8% 0.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.1%

Helpfulness of Faculty Very Satisfied 22.2% 14.1% 25.7% 19.1% 25.4% 16.7% 16.7% 16.3% 20.1% Satisfied 48.9% 50.3% 44.1% 49.3% 40.2% 33.3% 40.0% 38.1% 43.4% Neutral 22.2% 26.2% 24.3% 23.0% 27.5% 41.7% 34.4% 35.8% 28.5% Dissatisfied 6.7% 6.7% 5.4% 8.6% 5.8% 8.3% 6.7% 7.4% 6.7% Very Dissatisfied 0.0% 2.7% 0.5% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 2.2% 2.3% 1.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Personal Interest of Facultyin Students Very Good 33.3% 25.7% 35.2% 25.3% 33.0% 30.0% 23.2% 25.6% 28.9% Good 35.6% 39.5% 40.8% 40.7% 43.7% 50.0% 45.3% 44.4% 42.2% Fair 22.2% 25.0% 15.9% 20.7% 11.7% 10.0% 16.8% 18.4% 17.9% Poor 2.2% 3.3% 4.7% 4.0% 4.6% 10.0% 9.5% 5.1% 4.9% No Opinion 6.7% 6.6% 3.4% 9.3% 7.1% 0.0% 5.3% 6.5% 6.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.1%

Teaching Ability of Faculty Very Good 47.7% 38.8% 50.0% 41.1% 50.8% 36.4% 32.0% 34.1% 41.9% Good 38.6% 44.1% 38.0% 35.8% 33.7% 54.5% 48.5% 43.3% 40.1% Fair 4.5% 9.9% 7.7% 13.9% 8.5% 9.1% 13.4% 13.3% 10.7% Poor 0.0% 1.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 2.1% 1.7% 0.9% No Opinion 9.1% 5.9% 3.8% 9.3% 6.5% 0.0% 4.1% 7.5% 6.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Degree to Which the StudentFelt Treated Fairly Very Satisfied 26.7% 16.8% 31.1% 21.7% 27.7% 25.0% 18.9% 19.4% 23.4% Satisfied 51.1% 55.0% 45.9% 51.3% 45.7% 33.3% 44.4% 44.7% 47.5% Neutral 17.8% 24.8% 18.5% 22.4% 21.8% 25.0% 30.0% 30.0% 24.0% Dissatisfied 4.4% 2.0% 4.5% 3.3% 4.3% 16.7% 3.3% 4.0% 3.9% Very Dissatisfied 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 1.3% 0.5% 0.0% 3.3% 2.0% 1.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

What Would You Tell YourFriends About USU? Great, come here to school 46.9% 35.5% 42.4% 34.2% 40.9% 25.0% 35.8% 33.8% 37.5% Mostly positive things 32.7% 41.6% 40.4% 38.1% 38.7% 58.3% 38.5% 41.2% 39.9% Nothing much, positive 18.4% 19.3% 14.8% 23.9% 16.9% 16.7% 19.3% 19.9% 18.6% or negative Mostly negative things 0.0% 2.4% 2.4% 1.9% 2.7% 0.0% 5.5% 3.3% 2.8% Not great, don't come here 2.0% 1.2% 0.0% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 1.8% 1.2%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


5

6

FINDINGS: GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES Most freshman and sophomore students spend much of their time in general education courses. These courses are designed to enhance their communication, quantitative, and computer literacy skills and also give them needed background in humanities and in the social, life, and physical sciences. The students were asked how well University Studies Courses (i.e., general education) prepared them in the areas listed above. As shown in Table 3, very well responses ranged from 27% in quantitative literacy to 38% in humanities and arts. “Well + very well” tended to be about 90% in all seven areas, while nearly 10% of the respondents rated these items poorly or very poorly. It should be noted that if respondents took some but did not take all of their general education at USU, they could mark these items “Not at USU” or “Not Applicable”. These respondents were removed from Table 3 in order to reflect only those who had some or all of these experiences at USU. When asked about the overall quality of University Studies/general education courses, nearly two-thirds of the respondents said they were satisfied or very satisfied, while about 11% expressed dissatisfaction. These results seem to suggest that there is general satisfaction with University Studies courses, but there is a need for more detail about how students perceive general education at USU.

TABLE 3. GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES

(Students who have taken USU general education courses)


OVERALL QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY STUDIES/GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES Very satisfied 14.3% 13.7% 19.6% 10.7% 16.4% 20.0% 18.8% 17.3% 16.3% Satisfied 38.1% 46.8% 49.8% 49.3% 48.0% 30.0% 43.5% 48.6% 47.6% Neutral 40.5% 25.9% 24.4% 24.3% 24.6% 20.0% 25.9% 25.1% 25.5% Dissatisfied 7.1% 10.8% 5.7% 12.1% 9.4% 30.0% 8.2% 6.7% 8.6% Very Dissatisfied 0.0% 2.9% 0.5% 3.6% 1.8% 0.0% 3.5% 2.4% 2.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

HOW WELL HAVE UNIVERSITY STUDIES COURSE PREPARED YOU IN THE AREAS OF:

COMMUNICATION Very well 33.3% 26.8% 30.2% 28.6% 32.8% 37.5% 25.0% 30.6% 29.9% Well 55.6% 69.1% 64.8% 61.9% 59.5% 50.0% 61.7% 61.8% 62.5% Poorly 11.1% 1.0% 4.3% 7.6% 7.6% 12.5% 11.7% 5.9% 6.2% Very poorly 0.0% 3.1% 0.6% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 1.6% 1.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%QUANTITATIVE SKILLS Very well 26.3% 31.5% 24.1% 35.0% 25.4% 16.7% 25.0% 24.5% 26.9% Well 65.8% 56.8% 64.1% 54.4% 59.8% 83.3% 63.3% 66.1% 61.8% Poorly 7.9% 9.0% 11.2% 6.8% 13.1% 0.0% 10.0% 6.3% 9.1% Very poorly 0.0% 2.7% 0.6% 3.9% 1.6% 0.0% 1.7% 3.1% 2.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%COMPUTER LITERACY Very well 41.0% 37.4% 37.1% 36.7% 34.8% 14.3% 27.4% 36.7% 35.8% Well 56.4% 52.2% 56.2% 53.2% 55.8% 57.1% 50.7% 52.2% 53.8% Poorly 0.0% 5.2% 6.2% 8.3% 8.0% 28.6% 16.4% 9.7% 8.2% Very poorly 2.6% 5.2% 0.6% 1.8% 1.4% 0.0% 5.5% 1.4% 2.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%HUMANITIES AND ARTS Very well 34.1% 31.7% 43.5% 29.7% 53.5% 22.2% 26.7% 36.6% 38.4% Well 61.4% 57.5% 50.8% 54.1% 41.4% 66.7% 60.0% 53.3% 52.5% Poorly 2.3% 7.5% 4.1% 10.8% 3.2% 11.1% 9.3% 7.9% 6.5% Very poorly 2.3% 3.3% 1.6% 5.4% 1.9% 0.0% 4.0% 2.2% 2.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%SOCIAL SCIENCES Very well 30.6% 29.3% 43.2% 31.3% 42.2% 25.0% 29.3% 36.7% 36.3% Well 66.7% 62.1% 53.2% 59.1% 52.6% 62.5% 65.9% 55.0% 57.1% Poorly 2.8% 6.9% 3.7% 5.2% 3.2% 12.5% 3.7% 6.4% 4.9% Very poorly 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 4.3% 1.9% 0.0% 1.2% 1.8% 1.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%LIFE SCIENCES Very well 32.4% 20.4% 34.7% 27.5% 37.2% 33.3% 34.3% 27.9% 30.7% Well 54.1% 65.5% 57.4% 62.7% 52.7% 66.7% 62.9% 62.0% 59.7% Poorly 13.5% 9.7% 6.3% 6.9% 7.4% 0.0% 1.4% 7.2% 7.1% Very poorly 0.0% 4.4% 1.6% 2.9% 2.7% 0.0% 1.4% 2.9% 2.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%PHYSICAL SCIENCES Very well 27.0% 27.4% 31.2% 29.2% 34.0% 28.6% 33.8% 29.5% 30.5% Well 64.9% 59.0% 60.2% 60.4% 58.2% 71.4% 56.3% 61.4% 60.0% Poorly 5.4% 10.3% 8.1% 5.7% 5.7% 0.0% 8.5% 6.8% 7.2% Very poorly 2.7% 3.4% 0.5% 4.7% 2.1% 0.0% 1.4% 2.4% 2.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


7

8

FINDINGS: ADVISING The survey included a long list of questions about advising at USU, and only a subset, listed in Table 4, is considered here. When asked about their major source of information for academic planning, nearly 40% of the respondents said the Major Requirement Sheets, with advisors second at 27%. This is not surprising in that two-thirds of the respondents reported having never met with their advisor or having met only once during the past school year. The most frequently-mentioned reasons for not meeting more often were that respondents felt they had already obtained the needed information from their advisor or they did not know who their advisor was. Eighty-six percent said that the average duration of appointments with an advisor was twenty minutes or less and 41% said ten minutes or less. Respondents were not really content with the frequency of their advisor contacts - since 65.4% would have preferred to visit with their advisor more often. Nearly a third of the respondents said they would like to meet with their advisor at least monthly, but 67% preferred no more than once every two months or less. A disconcerting result of the survey was that almost a quarter of the respondents did not know who their advisor was. This proportion should be kept in mind as results about student interactions with their advisors are reported. A little over half of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that their advisor was readily available for consultation. Three-fourths said their advisor was friendly and nearly 60% said their advisor did not make them feel rushed during meetings. Nearly 70% felt that their advisor gave them correct and understandable information. When asked to respond to the statement, “Overall, I am satisfied with my advisor,” nearly 65% agreed or strongly agreed and 13% disagreed or strongly disagreed. Given a similar statement about USU’s advising system in general, agree plus strongly agree dropped to nearly 56%, and nearly 20% said they disagreed or strongly disagreed. Taken together, the items on advising suggest that students are not particularly unhappy with advising at USU, but neither do they view it as especially helpful or necessary.

TABLE 4. ADVISING


Student's Major Source of Information for Academic Planning Advisor 35.4% 32.3% 39.7% 28.4% 26.7% 58.3% 11.9% 15.6% 27.1% Other faculty/staff 2.1% 3.1% 3.8% 3.9% 6.8% 0.0% 5.9% 3.6% 4.3% USU Catalog 0.0% 14.3% 7.7% 3.9% 12.1% 0.0% 12.9% 25.1% 12.9% USU Major Requirements Sheets 41.7% 34.8% 38.5% 52.9% 45.6% 41.7% 54.5% 22.5% 38.9% Other Students 14.6% 10.6% 6.8% 6.5% 7.3% 0.0% 10.9% 24.0% 11.9% Other 6.3% 5.0% 3.4% 4.5% 1.5% 0.0% 4.0% 9.1% 4.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Number of Times Student Met with AdvisorDuring the Past School Year Zero 17.4% 19.0% 19.7% 13.1% 28.2% 0.0% 43.1% 41.4% 27.0% One 37.0% 39.3% 37.2% 30.1% 46.4% 50.0% 38.2% 39.2% 38.9% Two 17.4% 24.5% 24.3% 37.3% 15.3% 16.7% 13.7% 11.9% 20.3% Three 19.6% 7.4% 9.2% 13.7% 5.3% 25.0% 4.9% 3.6% 7.7% Four or more 8.7% 9.7% 9.6% 6.0% 4.9% 8.3% 0.0% 3.9% 6.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Would like to visit with their advisor moreif there were no obstacles Yes 67.4% 69.7% 66.4% 57.4% 63.7% 60.0% 65.7% 67.4% 65.4% No 32.6% 30.3% 33.6% 42.6% 36.3% 40.0% 34.3% 32.6% 34.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Number of Times Student Would Like to Have Met with Advisor Weekly 0.0% 3.7% 1.3% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% 2.9% 3.1% 2.3% Every other week 2.1% 8.0% 4.7% 4.5% 3.2% 8.3% 2.9% 4.9% 4.7% Monthly 23.4% 24.5% 27.5% 24.5% 25.5% 41.7% 24.3% 26.5% 25.8% Every couple of months 31.9% 17.2% 22.5% 20.6% 21.8% 16.7% 15.5% 20.6% 20.7% Once per semester 34.0% 41.7% 41.5% 42.6% 41.7% 33.3% 46.6% 35.9% 40.4% Once per year 4.3% 3.1% 2.1% 4.5% 4.2% 0.0% 4.9% 4.9% 3.9% Never 4.3% 1.8% 0.4% 1.3% 1.9% 0.0% 2.9% 4.2% 2.2%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Average Duration of Appointments 1-10 minutes 22.7% 55.5% 27.0% 46.9% 37.6% 33.3% 48.1% 46.9% 41.3% 11-20 minutes 59.1% 37.0% 53.0% 39.5% 52.6% 41.7% 40.3% 40.3% 45.3% 21-30 minutes 11.4% 6.8% 16.7% 10.9% 8.1% 25.0% 7.8% 10.0% 10.8% More than 30 minutes 6.8% 0.7% 3.3% 2.7% 1.7% 0.0% 3.9% 2.8% 2.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Reasons Why Student Did Not MeetWith Advisor More than Once Not necessary 20.7% 11.3% 15.5% 10.5% 14.8% 60.0% 18.5% 23.5% 17.4% Got information on first visit 41.4% 37.7% 45.8% 52.6% 35.8% 40.0% 34.8% 18.9% 34.6% Got informatrion from another source 3.4% 12.3% 10.6% 14.5% 16.7% 0.0% 8.7% 11.8% 12.1% Did not know who advisor was 20.7% 29.2% 20.4% 11.8% 21.6% 0.0% 15.2% 35.3% 24.5% Advisor kept the student informed 10.3% 2.8% 5.6% 3.9% 5.6% 0.0% 7.6% 1.7% 4.4% Advisor was not helpful on first visit 3.4% 6.6% 2.1% 6.6% 5.6% 0.0% 15.2% 8.8% 7.1%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Advisor Was Readily Available forConsultation Strongly agree 22.5% 16.3% 23.8% 11.2% 18.3% 16.7% 13.0% 13.0% 16.9% Agree 50.0% 36.9% 41.0% 25.7% 42.0% 50.0% 29.9% 30.4% 35.8% Neutral 17.5% 31.9% 25.2% 36.2% 24.3% 8.3% 35.1% 35.3% 29.8% Disagree 5.0% 12.1% 6.7% 22.4% 9.5% 16.7% 10.4% 14.7% 12.2% Strongly disagree 5.0% 2.8% 3.3% 4.6% 5.9% 8.3% 11.7% 6.5% 5.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

9

AG BUS EDUC ENG HASS NR SCI OTHER TOTAL Advisor is Friendly Toward Me Strongly agree 61.5% 41.8% 42.7% 31.6% 43.9% 58.3% 28.2% 27.4% 38.0% Agree 28.2% 38.3% 39.0% 36.2% 35.1% 33.3% 26.9% 41.9% 36.9% Neutral 5.1% 12.8% 11.3% 21.7% 14.6% 8.3% 28.2% 19.4% 16.2% Disagree 2.6% 5.0% 4.2% 8.6% 2.3% 0.0% 9.0% 5.9% 5.2% Strongly disagree 2.6% 2.1% 2.8% 2.0% 4.1% 0.0% 7.7% 5.4% 3.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

My Advisor Does Not Make Me Feel RushedDuring Our Meetings Strongly agree 32.5% 22.0% 32.7% 16.4% 24.0% 25.0% 15.8% 18.6% 23.1% Agree 40.0% 36.2% 37.0% 33.6% 43.7% 41.7% 28.9% 32.2% 36.2% Neutral 15.0% 26.2% 16.3% 28.3% 16.8% 16.7% 26.3% 32.2% 23.4% Disagree 7.5% 12.1% 10.1% 17.1% 8.4% 8.3% 18.4% 9.3% 11.5% Strongly disagree 5.0% 3.5% 3.8% 4.6% 7.2% 8.3% 10.5% 7.7% 5.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

My Advisor Gives Me Correct Information onServices/Programs Strongly agree 39.5% 16.5% 26.7% 25.2% 27.5% 33.3% 24.2% 21.7% 24.6% Agree 39.5% 42.1% 47.2% 43.4% 47.0% 55.6% 35.5% 42.2% 43.8% Neutral 15.8% 30.8% 21.0% 23.1% 18.1% 11.1% 30.6% 28.6% 24.0% Disagree 0.0% 4.5% 4.1% 5.6% 4.0% 0.0% 1.6% 4.3% 4.0% Strongly disagree 5.3% 6.0% 1.0% 2.8% 3.4% 0.0% 8.1% 3.1% 3.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

My Advisor Gives Me Advice in a Straight-Forward and Understandable Manner Strongly agree 45.9% 19.9% 29.7% 31.8% 28.1% 30.0% 21.5% 18.1% 26.3% Agree 35.1% 47.1% 44.6% 35.8% 45.8% 50.0% 35.4% 42.5% 42.4% Neutral 5.4% 22.8% 16.3% 22.3% 15.7% 10.0% 23.1% 27.5% 20.1% Disagree 10.8% 5.1% 6.9% 8.1% 5.9% 10.0% 10.8% 8.1% 7.4% Strongly disagree 2.7% 5.1% 2.5% 2.0% 4.6% 0.0% 9.2% 3.8% 3.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

My Advisor is prepared for appointments withappropriate transcripts and degreerequirement sheets Strongly agree 30.0% 20.3% 31.6% 30.5% 27.9% 16.7% 14.9% 17.5% 25.0% Agree 35.0% 50.7% 43.2% 42.4% 41.8% 50.0% 33.8% 42.1% 42.7% Neutral 25.0% 20.3% 16.0% 19.9% 16.4% 25.0% 32.4% 29.5% 21.6% Disagree 2.5% 5.8% 4.9% 5.3% 7.3% 0.0% 5.4% 2.7% 5.0% Strongly disagree 7.5% 2.9% 4.4% 2.0% 6.7% 8.3% 13.5% 8.2% 5.8%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Overall I Am Satisfied with my advisor Strongly agree 50.0% 26.3% 37.5% 22.6% 32.7% 33.3% 26.9% 21.7% 29.5% Agree 31.6% 36.5% 35.5% 34.2% 42.2% 33.3% 25.4% 32.9% 35.1% Neutral 13.2% 20.4% 18.0% 27.4% 16.3% 33.3% 26.9% 30.4% 22.5% Disagree 2.6% 7.3% 4.5% 11.0% 4.8% 0.0% 7.5% 7.5% 6.6% Strongly disagree 2.6% 9.5% 4.5% 4.8% 4.1% 0.0% 13.4% 7.5% 6.3%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Overall I am satisfied with the advisingsystem at USU Strongly agree 28.9% 17.5% 24.1% 16.0% 22.2% 16.7% 13.4% 17.3% 19.7% Agree 39.5% 37.2% 39.4% 34.0% 41.2% 41.7% 29.9% 27.8% 35.8% Neutral 15.8% 25.5% 18.7% 31.3% 20.3% 25.0% 31.3% 32.7% 25.3% Disagree 7.9% 11.7% 12.8% 11.1% 9.2% 16.7% 13.4% 13.0% 11.7% Strongly disagree 7.9% 8.0% 4.9% 7.6% 7.2% 0.0% 11.9% 9.3% 7.5%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


10

11

FINDINGS: COMPUTER FACILITIES AND USAGE One focus of the study was to solicit student views about open access computer laboratories at USU. Respondents seemed to be generally happy with the labs. As shown in Table 5, two-thirds agreed or strongly agreed that they did not have to wait long for a computer. A similar proportion of respondents believed that lab consultants provided them with the help that they needed. Over 80% expressed overall satisfaction with the open access labs. When asked whether they received a good value for their computer fee, support dropped off somewhat, with nearly 63% agreeing or strongly agreeing. Respondents marking “Not Applicable” were removed from Table 5 in order to reflect only those respondents who had experience with the USU computer labs. Several survey questions focused on whether students had access to privately-owned computers while they were at USU. Less than one student in ten indicated that they did not, while 20% said they had access to three or more privately-owned computers. Two-thirds of the respondents who had access used them most or all of the time to meet their computer needs. The data suggest that in planning expansions to open access computer laboratories, the availability of privately-owned computers should be carefully considered.

TABLE 5. COMPUTER FACILITIES AND USAGE


I Don't Wait Long for anAvailable Computer in the Lab Strongly agree 18.2% 27.9% 28.7% 26.7% 22.8% 27.3% 34.8% 21.6% 25.7% Agree 45.5% 39.7% 32.5% 42.7% 42.4% 63.6% 35.9% 47.5% 41.2% Neutral 27.3% 19.1% 23.9% 22.1% 23.9% 9.1% 14.1% 22.4% 21.9% Disagree 9.1% 9.6% 12.0% 6.1% 6.5% 0.0% 10.9% 6.2% 8.3% Strong disagree 0.0% 3.7% 2.9% 2.3% 4.3% 0.0% 4.3% 2.3% 3.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Lab Consultant Provide Me theHelp I Need Strongly agree 25.0% 29.2% 28.4% 21.9% 23.3% 18.2% 31.0% 21.2% 25.0% Agree 36.4% 35.4% 37.5% 40.6% 47.2% 63.6% 36.9% 41.6% 40.5% Neutral 34.1% 25.4% 25.5% 28.1% 23.9% 9.1% 27.4% 31.2% 27.2% Disagree 2.3% 9.2% 7.2% 7.0% 2.8% 9.1% 3.6% 4.8% 5.6% Strong disagree 2.3% 0.8% 1.4% 2.3% 2.8% 0.0% 1.2% 1.2% 1.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Overall, I Am Satisfied with the Open Access Labs Strongly agree 36.4% 38.0% 32.4% 31.7% 31.5% 27.3% 40.0% 27.8% 32.5% Agree 50.0% 43.8% 48.8% 47.5% 56.0% 54.5% 47.8% 51.0% 49.8% Neutral 13.6% 14.6% 16.4% 13.7% 8.7% 18.2% 11.1% 19.3% 14.7% Disagree 0.0% 2.9% 1.9% 7.2% 2.2% 0.0% 1.1% 1.5% 2.5% Strong disagree 0.0% 0.7% 0.5% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.6%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

I Received Good Value for MyComputer Fee Strongly agree 24.4% 28.1% 27.5% 24.5% 22.2% 20.0% 32.2% 20.5% 24.8% Agree 26.7% 36.0% 34.4% 38.5% 45.4% 70.0% 30.0% 39.2% 37.8% Neutral 35.6% 23.7% 29.8% 21.7% 23.2% 10.0% 27.8% 31.0% 27.0% Disagree 8.9% 7.2% 5.0% 5.6% 5.9% 0.0% 5.6% 4.9% 5.6% Strong disagree 4.4% 5.0% 3.2% 9.8% 3.2% 0.0% 4.4% 4.5% 4.7%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Number of Privately OwnedComputers the Student HadAccess to During the Year None 13.3% 8.3% 7.4% 5.1% 7.6% 16.7% 8.9% 6.9% 7.6% One 46.7% 39.7% 51.2% 44.9% 42.7% 33.3% 35.6% 41.0% 43.3% Two 22.2% 26.3% 29.8% 26.9% 29.9% 16.7% 32.7% 31.2% 29.2% Three or more 17.8% 25.6% 11.6% 23.1% 19.9% 33.3% 22.8% 20.8% 19.9%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

For Students Who Had Access,How Often Did They Use thePrivately Owned Computer(s) Never 10.0% 5.9% 3.8% 2.8% 2.2% 0.0% 5.4% 3.9% 4.0% Sometimes 17.5% 33.3% 24.2% 34.0% 25.8% 30.0% 25.0% 30.2% 28.3% Most of the time 32.5% 28.9% 33.2% 38.2% 43.0% 40.0% 37.0% 37.0% 36.3% All of the time 40.0% 31.9% 38.9% 25.0% 29.0% 30.0% 32.6% 28.8% 31.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


12

13

SUMMARY Based on the survey results, lower division respondents seem to have overall positive perceptions of USU. They also appeared to be generally satisfied with University Studies courses and open access computer labs. Although the questions regarding advising did not elicit a high proportion of negative responses, there are indications that advising at USU still needs to be improved. One-fourth of the respondents did not know who their advisor was and even those who did, meet with her/him infrequently. Even so, the respondents seem to feel they are getting adequate information to plan their programs. However, other data, such as retention rates and time to graduation, seem inconsistent with this perspective. The raw data for this study appear as appendices on the University Assessment Web Site, including all frequency tables and cross-tabulations. This report and the additional data can be accessed at www.usu.edu/asmnt/rep.html

Appendix A

Survey Instrument

1. Student ID numbers are needed to relate these and other university data for purposes of university-level assessment. In order to maintain data integrity we request that you enter this unique number (Not mandatory).

- -2. What is your college and major? (If you have a double/dual major indicate both colleges and major. Be sure to mark the appropriate college " " as well as your major.)

Please Indicate the year you filled outthis questionnaire.

To better meet the needs of students, we ask that you take a few minutes to complete this survey. Your opinions arewelcomed and appreciated. Please return this survey to the monitor. Respond to each item by using the alternativeslisted. Responses are only reported in general terms. Just fill in the "O" that is applicable and please fill in each item darkand completely. We appreciate your help.

Freshman/Sophomore Student Survey

AgribusinessAgricultural EconomicsAgricultural EducationAgricultural Machinery TechAgricultural Systems TechAnimal ScienceApplied EconomicsBioveterinary ScienceBiometeorologyCrop ScienceDairy ScienceEcologyEconomicsEnviro Soil/Water ScienceFamily & Consumer Sciences Ed.Food Microbiology & SafetyHorticultureInternational AgribusinessNutrition and Food SciencesOrnamental HorticulturePlant ScienceSoil ScienceToxicology

VoTech Dairy Herdsman

American StudiesAnthropologyArtAsian StudiesCommunicationEnglishFrenchGermanHistoryInterior DesignInternational RelationsJournalismLandscape ArchitectureLiberal Arts and SciencesMusicMusic TherapyPhilosophyPolitical SciencePrelawSecond Language TeachingSocial SciencesSocial WorkSociologySpanishTheatre ArtsTown and Regional Planning

Agriculture Humanities, Arts &Social Sciences

AeronauticsAerospace EngineeringBiological EngineeringBiological & Agricultural EngineeringCivil & Environmental EngineeringCivil EngineeringComputer EngineeringDraftingElectrical EngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringIndustrial Teacher EducationIndustrial TechnologyInformation TechnologyIrrigation EngineeringIT (Aero Technology)IT (Electronics/Computer Tech)IT (Flight Tech)IT (Welding Engineering Tech)Manufacturing Engineering

Mechanical Engineering

Engineering

ScienceBiologyBiochemistryChemistryChemistry TeachingComp Teach -- Biological ScienceComp Teach -- Earth ScienceComp Teach -- Math/CS/StatComp Teach -- Physical Sci (Chem)Comp Teach -- Physical Sci (Physics)Computer ScienceEcologyGeologyIndustrial MathematicsInformation TechnologyLiberal Arts and SciencesMathematicsMathematics EducationMathematical SciencesPhysicsPhysics TeachingPublic HealthStatisticsToxicology

BusinessAccountingApparel and TextilesBusinessBusiness AdministrationBusiness EducationBISBISECommunity Economic DevelopmentEducationEconomicsFinanceHuman Resource MgtInformation TechnologyManagementMarketingMarketing EducationMaster of Business AdministrationOffice Systems SupportProduction ManagementSocial Sciences

Natural ResourcesEcology

Environmental Studies

Fisheries Biology

Fisheries and Wildlife

Forestry

Geography

Natural Resources

Rangeland Resources

Range Science

Rec Resources Mgt

Watershed Science

Wildlife Biology

OtherGeneral RegistrationInterdisciplinary Studies

International Studies

Undeclared

Other

Communicative Disorders & Deaf Ed

Early Childhood Education

Education

Elementary Education

Family & Consumer Sciences

Family & Human Development

Health Education Specialist

Health, Physical Ed & Rec

Information Technology

Instructional Technology

Parks and Recreation

Physical EducationPsychologyRehabilitation Counseling

Secondary Education

Special Education

Education

1660321245

tmurray

tmurray

A-1

Did not think it was necessaryGot the information I wanted/

Got the information I wanted /

Did not know who my advisor wasMy advisor kept me informed

Did not get information I wanted/

Demographics:

3. What is your cumulative GPA?4.0 - 3.63.5 - 3.13.0 - 2.62.5 - 2.0

5. Gender:FemaleMale

6. Citizenship:USOther

7. Ethnicity (Only answer if you are a US citizen):

American Indian or Alaskan NativeHispanicAsian or Pacific IslanderWhite, Non-hispanicBlack, Non-hispanicOther, unspecified

8. Marital Status:SingleMarriedDivorcedWidowedSeparated

9. How many dependents do you have?

Zero12345 +

10. Your age (in years):18 - 2021 - 2526 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6060 +

11. Where do you live when NOT attending USU?

Cache ValleyUtah, outside Cache ValleyOutside Utah in USOutside the USA

13. How long have you been attending USU (in years)?

<1123456 +

14. About how many semester credit hours have you

completed so far?0 - 3031 - 6061 - 9091 - 120

15. What is your employment status?Employed full-timeEmployed part-timeUnemployed

16. Typically, how much time do you work while attending USU?

None1/4 time1/2 time3/4 timeFull-time

18. What do you tell your friends about Utah State University?

It's great; come here to schoolMostly positive thingsNothing much, positive or negativeMostly negative thingsIt's not great; don't come here to school

12. Where do you live while attending USU?

Campus HousingFraternity/SororityOff-campus apartmentOff-campus houseWith parentsWith extended family

17. If you are working, during what part of the day do you normally work?

MorningsAfternoonsEvenings

Graveyard

Advising:From the insert provided, write down the fourdigit code of the academic advisor that youare evaluating in the following questions:

If the name of your academic advisor isnot on the insert please provide his/hername

If you have never met with your advisoror only met with him/her once indicatethe reason(s), (mark all that apply):

needed on the first visit

needed from another source

through e-mail or other sources

How many semesters hasthis person been assignedas your advisor?

1 semester2 semesters3 semesters4 semesters5+ semesters

How many times have youformally changed your major?

Never1 time2 times3 times4+ times

If there were no obstacles I wouldvisit my advisor more frequently

Yes No

In an ideal system I could makean appointment to meet myadvisor

1 hour in advance1 day in advance1 week in advance

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

needed so did not return

4. What is the degree you are working toward? And what is the highest degree you are planning to attain in the future?

WorkingToward

HighestDesired

CertificateAssociateBachelorsMastersDoctorate

8521321248

tmurray

A-2

How often did you meet with youradvisor this past school year?

Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of thefollowing statements about the advisor whose code (or name) youwrote above.

Agreement...

My Advisor:

Never1 time

2 times

3 times

4 times

5 times

6 times7 times

8 times

9 times

10+ timesWhat is the averge length of youradvising appointments?

1-10 minutes11-20 minutes21-30 minutes30 or more minutes

Not Applicable

Is friendly toward meDemonstrates interest in my welfareIs readily available for consultationIs easy to get an appointment withDoes not make me feel rushed during ourmeetingsIs prepared for appointments with appropriatetranscripts and degree requirement analysesCommunicates his/her advice effectivelyListens well to my concernsUnderstands my need for adviceHelps me clarify career and life goalsRefers me to resources that help me clarifycareer and life goalsHelps me understand my interests and abilitiesHelps me evaluate my interests and abilitiesKeeps my interests and abilities in mind whenhelping me choose courses/programsHelps me develop my decision making skillsHelps me with realistic self-appraisalHelps me develop suitable educationalgoals/plansHelps me evaluate my progress toward myestablished educational goals/plansHelps me make academic/career decisionsHelps me to successfully manage my timeHelps me overcome educational problemsand skill deficienciesRefers me to resources that can help meovercome educational problems and skilldeficiencies

Refers me to resources pertinent to myeducational goals (internship, study abroad,honors program, and learning assistanceprograms)Encourages me to participate in experienceswhich lead to my intellectual growthHelps me select appropriate courses and othereducational experiencesInterprets institutional requirements so that theyare understandable to meGives me correct information onservices/programsIs well informed about changes in academicrequirements and keeps me informed ofpertinent changesGives me advice in a straight forwardunderstandable mannerTells me why she/he offers particular adviceEncourages me to participate in extracurricularactivitiesAppears to be well trainedInteractions with my advisor are positiveI don't have to wait long between scheduling andseeing my advisorOverall I am satisfied with the advising system atUSUOverall I am satisfied with the advising system inmy college/departmentOverall I am satisfied with my advisor

Not Applicable

If there were no obstacles I wouldvisit with my advisor:

Weekly

Every other week

Monthly

Every couple of months

Each semester

Once a year

Never

From where do you obtain the major sourceof information to plan your academicprogram? (Choose only one)

AdvisorOther faculty/staffUSU General CatalogMajor requirement sheetsOther students

Other

What is the USU advising system doing well?

How might the advising system be improved?

Strongly DisagreeDisagree

NeutralAgree

Strongly Agree

26.

27.

28. 29.

30.

31.

32.33.34.35.36.

37.

38.39.40.41.42.

43.44.45.

46.47.48.

49.

50.51.52.

53.

Strongly AgreeAgree

NeutralDisagree

Strongly Disagree

54.

55.

56.

57.

58.

59.

60.

61.62.

63.64.65.

66.

67.

68.

9588321242

tmurray

A-3

92. Overall quality of education 93. Overall quality of the program in your major 94. Variety of courses in your major 95. Challenge of courses in your major 96. Accessibility of faculty 97. Helpfulness of faculty 98. The degree to which you were treated fairly

During appointment(s) with your advisor, which of the following topics have you discussed? (Mark all that apply). Indicate your satisfaction with the discussion.

Satisfaction

DissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied

NeutralSatisfied

Very Satisfied

Preparation: In part, higher education is meant to prepareyou in a number of general educational domains; how well doyou feel the University Studies Program has prepared you in the following domains: (If you took most or all of your general education courses at another institution mark "Not at USU," or if you were not required to take the general education courses in your major, mark "Not Applicable".

What is your impression of USU in the following areas?

109. Undergraduate programs110. Your major department111. Teaching ability of faculty112. Personal interest of faculty in students113. Quality of students114. Research activities115. Public relations

Courses for the semesterDegree requirementsMajor requirementsMinor requirementsGeneral Education requirementsSelecting or changing your majorTransfer creditRegistration procedures (drop/add, closed courses)Academic probationCareer choiceInternshipsResearch with facultyHow to get the most out of your educationalexperience at USUStudy skillsConcerns about a specific courseConcerns about a specific faculty memberApplication to graduate/professional schoolsPersonal problemsCredit by examination (CLEP)Advanced Placement (AP) coursesWork study/on-campus employmentJob placement after graduationWithdrawing from USU

102. Communication103. Numeracy104. Computer Literacy105. Humanities and Art106. Social Science107. Life Science108. Physical Science

Not at USU

Very PoorlyPoorly

WellVery Well

Not Applicable

PoorFair

GoodVery Good

No Opinion

Your USU Computer Fee helps to fund: the operation of eleven open access computer labs, your email account at cc.usu.edu, internet access via modem or dorm_ip, maintenance/ replacement of the registration server, and assistive technology support. Indicate theextent to which you agree or disagree with eachof the following statements:

The open access labs had the software I neededLab consultants provided the help I neededI didn't wait long for an available computer in the labOverall, I was satisfied with the open access labsOverall, I was satisfied with my USU email accountOverall, I was satisfied with the USU modem accessOverall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet accessI received good value for my Computer fee

I use the internet address webmail.usu.edu to read my USUemail:

NeverSometimes

Most of the timeAll of the time

Indicate the number of privately owned computers you hadregular access to during the past year.

None1 computer

2 computers3+ computers

If you answered 1 - 3+ computers above, how often did youuse this (these) privately owned computer(s) to do yourschool work?

NeverSometimes


I had regular access during the past year to a USUcomputer, not in an open access lab. (e.g., lab for studentsin a course or in a major).

Yes No

If you answered yes to the above question, how often did youuse this computer to do your school work?

NeverSometimes


To what extent are you satisfied with the following?

If you are taking or have taken most or all of your General Education atUSU, indicate your satisfaction with the following:

Overall quality of University Studies/General EducationcoursesVariety of courses in University Studies/GeneraleducationChallenge of courses in University Studies/Generaleducation

Strongly AgreeAgree

NeutralDisagree

Strongly DisagreeNot Applicable

69.70.71.72.73.74.75.76.77.78.79.80.81.

82.83.84.85.86.87.88.89.90.91.

99.

100.

101.

116.117.118.119.120.121.122.123.

124.

125.

126.

127.

128.

8579321241

tmurray

A-4

Appendix B

Frequency Tables

Table 1. College membership of survey respondents

49 3.7 3.7 3.7168 12.7 12.8 16.5251 19.0 19.1 35.7158 12.0 12.0 47.7

228 17.3 17.4 65.1

12 .9 .9 66.0109 8.3 8.3 74.3337 25.5 25.7 100.0

1312 99.3 100.09 .7

1321 100.0

AgricultureBusinessEducationEngineeringHumanities, Arts andSocial Sciences'Natural ResourcesScienceOtherTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Table 2. College of Agriculture

1270 96.1 96.1 96.16 .5 .5 96.62 .2 .2 96.76 .5 .5 97.22 .2 .2 97.41 .1 .1 97.4

6 .5 .5 97.9

1 .1 .1 98.0

18 1.4 1.4 99.3

5 .4 .4 99.7

1 .1 .1 99.82 .2 .2 99.91 .1 .1 100.0

1321 100.0 100.0

AgribusinessAgricultural EducationAnimal ScienceBioveterinary ScienceCrop ScienceFamily & ConsumerSciences EducationHorticultureNutrition and FoodSciencesNutritiona nd FoodSciencesOrnamental HorticultureToxicologyVoTech Dairy HerdsmanTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

tmurray

B-1

tmurray

tmurray

Table 3. College of Business

1151 87.1 87.1 87.128 2.1 2.1 89.3

2 .2 .2 89.410 .8 .8 90.214 1.1 1.1 91.230 2.3 2.3 93.5

3 .2 .2 93.75 .4 .4 94.1

21 1.6 1.6 95.75 .4 .4 96.12 .2 .2 96.2

14 1.1 1.1 97.330 2.3 2.3 99.5

2 .2 .2 99.7

1 .1 .1 99.8

2 .2 .2 99.91 .1 .1 100.0

1321 100.0 100.0

AccountingApparel and TextilesBISBusinessBusiness AdministrationBusiness EducationEconomicsFinanceHuman Resource MgtInformation TechnologyManagementMarketingMarketing EducaitonMaster of BusinessAdministrationOffice Systems SupportProduction ManagementTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 4. College of Education

1049 79.4 79.4 79.418 1.4 1.4 80.8

20 1.5 1.5 82.3

4 .3 .3 82.649 3.7 3.7 86.3

22 1.7 1.7 88.0

13 1.0 1.0 88.9

4 .3 .3 89.3

8 .6 .6 89.91 .1 .1 89.9

15 1.1 1.1 91.170 5.3 5.3 96.4

1 .1 .1 96.428 2.1 2.1 98.619 1.4 1.4 100.0

1321 100.0 100.0

Communicative DisordersEarly ChildhoodEducationEducationElementary EducationFamily & HumanDevelopmentFamily and ConsumerSciencesHealth EducationSpecialistHealth, Physical Ed & RecParks and RecreationPhysical EducationPsychologyRehabilitationSecondary EducationSpecial EducationTotal


CumulativePercent

tmurray

B-2

Table 5. College of Engineering

1163 88.0 88.0 88.015 1.1 1.1 89.2

4 .3 .3 89.5

6 .5 .5 89.9

34 2.6 2.6 92.55 .4 .4 92.92 .2 .2 93.0

18 1.4 1.4 94.4

1 .1 .1 94.5

5 .4 .4 94.91 .1 .1 94.97 .5 .5 95.5

29 2.2 2.2 97.79 .7 .7 98.3

2 .2 .2 98.5

20 1.5 1.5 100.01321 100.0 100.0

AerospaceBiological EngineeringCivil & EnvironmentalEngineeringCivil EngineeringComputer EngineeringDraftingElectrical EngineeringIndustrial TeacherEducaitonIndustrial TechnologyIrrigation EngineeringIT (Aero Technology)IT (Flight Tech)IT (Industrial Technology)IT (Welding EngineeringTech)Mechanical EngineeringTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 6. College of Humanities, Arts & Social Sciences

1068 80.8 80.8 80.82 .2 .2 81.0

25 1.9 1.9 82.94 .3 .3 83.2

20 1.5 1.5 84.71 .1 .1 84.81 .1 .1 84.9

20 1.5 1.5 86.451 3.9 3.9 90.2

4 .3 .3 90.518 1.4 1.4 91.9

7 .5 .5 92.44 .3 .3 92.7

12 .9 .9 93.66 .5 .5 94.1

20 1.5 1.5 95.64 .3 .3 95.91 .1 .1 96.0

18 1.4 1.4 97.44 .3 .3 97.79 .7 .7 98.3

22 1.7 1.7 100.01321 100.0 100.0

American StudiesArtCommunicationEnglishFrenchGermanHistoryInterior DesignInternational RelationsJournalismLandscape ArchitectureLiberal Arts and SciencesMusicMusic TherapyPolitical SciencePre-lawSocial ScienceSocial WorkSociologySpanishTheatre ArtsTotal


CumulativePercent

tmurray

B-3

Table 7. College of Natural Resources

1309 99.1 99.1 99.12 .2 .2 99.21 .1 .1 99.31 .1 .1 99.44 .3 .3 99.71 .1 .1 99.82 .2 .2 99.91 .1 .1 100.0

1321 100.0 100.0

Environmental StudiesFisheries and WildlifeForestryGeographyRangeland ResourcesRec Resources MgtWildlife BiologyTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 8. College of Science

1213 91.8 91.8 91.81 .1 .1 91.9

53 4.0 4.0 95.98 .6 .6 96.52 .2 .2 96.7

1 .1 .1 96.7

20 1.5 1.5 98.31 .1 .1 98.31 .1 .1 98.44 .3 .3 98.77 .5 .5 99.21 .1 .1 99.39 .7 .7 100.0

1321 100.0 100.0

BiochemistryBiologyChemistryCompositeCompostie TeachingPhysical Science(Physics)Computer ScienceGeologyLiberal Arts and SciencesMathematicsMathematics EducationPhysics TeachingPublic HealthTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 9. Other

973 73.7 73.7 73.715 1.1 1.1 74.814 1.1 1.1 75.936 2.7 2.7 78.6

283 21.4 21.4 100.01321 100.0 100.0

General RegistrationInterdisciplinary StudiesOtherUndeclaredTotal


CumulativePercent

tmurray

B-4

Table 10. Cumulative grade point averages of respondents

347 26.3 27.0 27.0479 36.3 37.2 64.2348 26.3 27.0 91.2113 8.6 8.8 100.0

1287 97.4 100.034 2.6

1321 100.0

4.0 - 3.63.5 - 3.13.0 - 2.62.5 - 2.0Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 11. Degrees sought

35 2.6 2.8 2.8150 11.4 11.9 14.6977 74.0 77.3 91.9

86 6.5 6.8 98.716 1.2 1.3 100.0

1264 95.7 100.057 4.3

1321 100.0

CertificateAssociateBachelorsMastersDoctorateTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 12. Respondent's highest degree planned

3 .2 .3 .314 1.1 1.2 1.4

360 27.3 30.7 32.1572 43.3 48.7 80.8225 17.0 19.2 100.0

1174 88.9 100.0147 11.1

1321 100.0

CertificateAssociateBachelorsMastersDoctorateTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 13. Gender

701 53.1 53.4 53.4611 46.3 46.6 100.0

1312 99.3 100.09 .7

1321 100.0

FemaleMaleTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-5

Table 14. Citizenship of respondents

1291 97.7 98.2 98.223 1.7 1.8 100.0

1314 99.5 100.07 .5

1321 100.0

USOtherTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 15. Ethnicity of respondents

11 .8 .8 .8

23 1.7 1.8 2.621 1.6 1.6 4.2

1213 91.8 93.6 97.88 .6 .6 98.5

20 1.5 1.5 100.01296 98.1 100.0

25 1.91321 100.0

American Indian orAlaskan NativeHispanicAsian or Pacific IslanderWhite, Non-hispanicBlack, Non-hispanicOther, unspecifiedTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 16. Marital Status of respondents

1189 90.0 90.5 90.5118 8.9 9.0 99.5

6 .5 .5 99.91 .1 .1 100.0

1314 99.5 100.07 .5

1321 100.0

SingleMarriedDivorcedSeparatedTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 17. Number of dependents of respondents

1173 88.8 89.8 89.882 6.2 6.3 96.133 2.5 2.5 98.612 .9 .9 99.5

2 .2 .2 99.74 .3 .3 100.0

1306 98.9 100.015 1.1

1321 100.0

Zero12345 +Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-6

Table 18. Age of respondents

853 64.6 64.8 64.8427 32.3 32.4 97.2

30 2.3 2.3 99.56 .5 .5 99.91 .1 .1 100.0

1317 99.7 100.04 .3

1321 100.0

18 - 2021 - 2526 - 3031 - 4041 - 50Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 19. Where respondents live when not attending USU

403 30.5 30.6 30.6

598 45.3 45.4 76.0

295 22.3 22.4 98.421 1.6 1.6 100.0

1317 99.7 100.04 .3

1321 100.0

Cache ValleyUtah, outsideCache ValleyOutside Utah in USOutside the USATotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 20. Where respondents live when attending usu

488 36.9 37.1 37.112 .9 .9 38.0

456 34.5 34.6 72.6158 12.0 12.0 84.6184 13.9 14.0 98.6

19 1.4 1.4 100.01317 99.7 100.0

4 .31321 100.0

Campus HousingFraternity/SororityOff-campus apartmentOff-campus houseWith parentsWith extended familyTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 21. Length of attendance at USU (Years)

859 65.0 65.2 65.2146 11.1 11.1 76.3272 20.6 20.7 97.0

32 2.4 2.4 99.46 .5 .5 99.81 .1 .1 99.91 .1 .1 100.0

1317 99.7 100.04 .3

1321 100.0

<1123456 +Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-7

Table 22. Semester hours completed

774 58.6 58.9 58.9500 37.9 38.1 97.0

37 2.8 2.8 99.83 .2 .2 100.0

1314 99.5 100.07 .5

1321 100.0

0 - 3031 - 6061 - 9091 - 120Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 23. Employment status of respondents

111 8.4 8.4 8.4621 47.0 47.2 55.7583 44.1 44.3 100.0

1315 99.5 100.06 .5

1321 100.0

Employed full-timeEmployed part-timeUnemployedTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 24. Time worked while at USU

547 41.4 41.6 41.6231 17.5 17.6 59.2329 24.9 25.0 84.2108 8.2 8.2 92.4100 7.6 7.6 100.0

1315 99.5 100.06 .5

1321 100.0

None1/4 time1/2 time3/4 timeFull-timeTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 25. Time-of-day working

114 8.6 14.1 14.1309 23.4 38.1 52.2353 26.7 43.5 95.7

35 2.6 4.3 100.0811 61.4 100.0510 38.6

1321 100.0

MorningsAfternoonsEveningsGraveyardTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-8

Table 26. "What would you tell your friends about USU?"

492 37.2 37.6 37.6

522 39.5 39.8 77.4

245 18.5 18.7 96.1

36 2.7 2.7 98.9

15 1.1 1.1 100.0

1310 99.2 100.011 .8

1321 100.0

It's great; come hereto schoolMostly positive thingsNothing much,positive or negativeMostly negative thingsIt's not great; don'tcome here to schoolTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 27. Number of semesters you had your asssigned advisor

497 37.6 52.2 52.2342 25.9 35.9 88.0

51 3.9 5.4 93.452 3.9 5.5 98.811 .8 1.2 100.0

953 72.1 100.0368 27.9

1321 100.0

1 semester2 semesters3 semesters4 semesters5+ semestersTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 28. Reasons why respondents may have never met with their advisor or only met with their advisor once

149 11.3 17.4 17.4

296 22.4 34.5 51.9

105 7.9 12.3 64.2

210 15.9 24.5 88.7

37 2.8 4.3 93.0

60 4.5 7.0 100.0

857 64.9 100.0464 35.1

1321 100.0

Did not think it wasnecessaryGot the information Iwanted/Got the information Iwanted /Did not know who myadvisor wasMy advisor kept meinformedDid not getinformation I wanted/Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-9

Table 29. If there were no obstacles would respondent's meet more frequently with their advisor?

759 57.5 65.5 65.5400 30.3 34.5 100.0

1159 87.7 100.0162 12.3

1321 100.0

YesNoTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 30. Number of times respondent's have changed their major

912 69.0 75.4 75.4262 19.8 21.7 97.1

27 2.0 2.2 99.36 .5 .5 99.82 .2 .2 100.0

1209 91.5 100.0112 8.5

1321 100.0

Never1 time2 times3 times4+ timesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 31. In an ideal situation, time interval I could make an appointment with my advisor

346 26.2 29.3 29.3628 47.5 53.1 82.4208 15.7 17.6 100.0

1182 89.5 100.0139 10.5

1321 100.0

1 hour in advance1 day in advance1 week in advanceTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 32. If there were no obstacles, number of times respondent's would visit their advisor

28 2.1 2.3 2.357 4.3 4.6 6.9

316 23.9 25.8 32.7253 19.2 20.6 53.3497 37.6 40.5 93.9

48 3.6 3.9 97.827 2.0 2.2 100.0

1226 92.8 100.095 7.2

1321 100.0

WeeklyEvery other weekMonthlyEvery couple of monthsEach semesterOnce a yearNeverTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-10

Table 33. Average length of advising appointments

424 32.1 41.2 41.2466 35.3 45.3 86.5112 8.5 10.9 97.4

27 2.0 2.6 100.01029 77.9 100.0

292 22.11321 100.0

1 - 10 minutes11 - 20 minutes21 - 30 minutes30 or more minutesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 34. Number of times respondents met with their advisor in the past school year

329 24.9 27.2 27.2468 35.4 38.7 65.9244 18.5 20.2 86.1

94 7.1 7.8 93.945 3.4 3.7 97.612 .9 1.0 98.6

5 .4 .4 99.02 .2 .2 99.21 .1 .1 99.39 .7 .7 100.0

1209 91.5 100.0112 8.5

1321 100.0

Never1 time2 times3 times4 times5 times6 times7 times8 times10+ timesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 35. Major source of information for academic planning

325 24.6 27.1 27.153 4.0 4.4 31.5

154 11.7 12.8 44.3464 35.1 38.7 83.0145 11.0 12.1 95.1

59 4.5 4.9 100.01200 90.8 100.0

121 9.21321 100.0

AdvisorOther faculty/staffUSU General CatalogMajor requirement sheetsOther studentsOtherTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-11

Table 36. Other sources of information for planning your academic program

1263 95.6 95.6 95.6

1 .1 .1 95.7

3 .2 .2 95.91 .1 .1 96.01 .1 .1 96.11 .1 .1 96.11 .1 .1 96.21 .1 .1 96.36 .5 .5 96.74 .3 .3 97.01 .1 .1 97.1

12 .9 .9 98.01 .1 .1 98.12 .2 .2 98.31 .1 .1 98.31 .1 .1 98.41 .1 .1 98.51 .1 .1 98.61 .1 .1 98.61 .1 .1 98.72 .2 .2 98.91 .1 .1 98.91 .1 .1 99.01 .1 .1 99.16 .5 .5 99.51 .1 .1 99.61 .1 .1 99.71 .1 .1 99.81 .1 .1 99.81 .1 .1 99.91 .1 .1 100.0

1321 100.0 100.0

Advisor andrequirement sheetsAthletics AdvisorBrotherBYU CounselorComputerCousinDifferent schoolFamilyFatherI guess mostlyInternetMed school websitesMotherMulticultral clubMyselfNo infoNo planNursing informationOutsiders insidersParentsPeer AdvisorsPeople at workROTCSelfSisterSOARSuggested four yr planTrial and errorUSU WebsiteWeber State AdvisingTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 37. My advisor is friendly toward me.

380 28.8 37.8 37.8367 27.8 36.5 74.3161 12.2 16.0 90.3

52 3.9 5.2 95.436 2.7 3.6 99.010 .8 1.0 100.0

1006 76.2 100.0315 23.8

1321 100.0

Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly DisagreeNot ApplicableTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-12

Table 38. My advisor demonstrated interest in my welfare.

241 18.2 24.2 24.2387 29.3 38.8 63.0244 18.5 24.5 87.5

79 6.0 7.9 95.438 2.9 3.8 99.2

8 .6 .8 100.0997 75.5 100.0324 24.5

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 39. My advisor was readily available for consultation.

167 12.6 16.8 16.8355 26.9 35.6 52.4294 22.3 29.5 81.9120 9.1 12.0 94.0

52 3.9 5.2 99.28 .6 .8 100.0

996 75.4 100.0325 24.6

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

Table 40. My advisor was easy to get an appointment with.

169 12.8 17.0 17.0357 27.0 36.0 53.0260 19.7 26.2 79.2140 10.6 14.1 93.3

60 4.5 6.0 99.37 .5 .7 100.0

993 75.2 100.0328 24.8

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-13

Table 41. My advisor does not make me feel rushed during our meetings.

228 17.3 23.0 23.0356 26.9 35.9 58.9229 17.3 23.1 82.0113 8.6 11.4 93.3

57 4.3 5.7 99.19 .7 .9 100.0

992 75.1 100.0329 24.9

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 42. My advisor is prepared for appointments with appropriate transcripts and degree requirement analyses.

244 18.5 24.7 24.7414 31.3 42.0 66.7211 16.0 21.4 88.1

48 3.6 4.9 93.056 4.2 5.7 98.713 1.0 1.3 100.0

986 74.6 100.0335 25.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 43. My advisor communicates his/her advice effectively.

260 19.7 26.2 26.2435 32.9 43.8 70.0192 14.5 19.3 89.3

57 4.3 5.7 95.139 3.0 3.9 99.010 .8 1.0 100.0

993 75.2 100.0328 24.8

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-14

Table 44. My advisor listens well to my concerns.

235 17.8 23.7 23.7416 31.5 41.9 65.6229 17.3 23.1 88.6

54 4.1 5.4 94.151 3.9 5.1 99.2

8 .6 .8 100.0993 75.2 100.0328 24.8

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 45. My advisor understands my need for advice.

229 17.3 23.1 23.1395 29.9 39.9 63.0239 18.1 24.1 87.2

62 4.7 6.3 93.456 4.2 5.7 99.1

9 .7 .9 100.0990 74.9 100.0331 25.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 46. My advisor helps me clarify career and life goals.

175 13.2 17.7 17.7314 23.8 31.8 49.5319 24.1 32.3 81.9103 7.8 10.4 92.3

68 5.1 6.9 99.28 .6 .8 100.0

987 74.7 100.0334 25.3

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-15

Table 47. My advisor refers me to resources that help me clarify career and life goals.

153 11.6 15.5 15.5316 23.9 32.0 47.6318 24.1 32.3 79.8117 8.9 11.9 91.7

71 5.4 7.2 98.911 .8 1.1 100.0

986 74.6 100.0335 25.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 48. My advisor helps me understand my interests and abilities.

127 9.6 12.9 12.9270 20.4 27.4 40.3366 27.7 37.1 77.4131 9.9 13.3 90.7

80 6.1 8.1 98.812 .9 1.2 100.0

986 74.6 100.0335 25.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 49. My advisor helps me evaluate my interests and abilities.

127 9.6 12.9 12.9279 21.1 28.4 41.3363 27.5 36.9 78.2122 9.2 12.4 90.5

82 6.2 8.3 98.911 .8 1.1 100.0

984 74.5 100.0337 25.5

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-16

Table 50. My advisor keeps my interest and abilities in mind when helping me choose courses/programs.

160 12.1 16.4 16.4326 24.7 33.5 49.9301 22.8 30.9 80.9100 7.6 10.3 91.2

75 5.7 7.7 98.911 .8 1.1 100.0

973 73.7 100.0348 26.3

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 51. My advisor helps me develop my decision making skills.

120 9.1 12.3 12.3278 21.0 28.5 40.7372 28.2 38.1 78.8120 9.1 12.3 91.1

77 5.8 7.9 99.010 .8 1.0 100.0

977 74.0 100.0344 26.0

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 52. My advisor helps me with realistic self-appraisal.

122 9.2 12.5 12.5284 21.5 29.1 41.6378 28.6 38.8 80.4

98 7.4 10.1 90.581 6.1 8.3 98.812 .9 1.2 100.0

975 73.8 100.0346 26.2

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-17

Table 53. My advisor helps me develop suitable educational goals/plans.

190 14.4 19.4 19.4392 29.7 40.0 59.4258 19.5 26.3 85.7

65 4.9 6.6 92.364 4.8 6.5 98.911 .8 1.1 100.0

980 74.2 100.0341 25.8

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 54. My advisor helps me evaluate my progress toward my established educational goals/plans.

177 13.4 18.1 18.1386 29.2 39.5 57.6284 21.5 29.1 86.7

61 4.6 6.2 92.959 4.5 6.0 99.010 .8 1.0 100.0

977 74.0 100.0344 26.0

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 55. My advisor helps me make academic/career decisions.

174 13.2 17.8 17.8339 25.7 34.6 52.4311 23.5 31.8 84.2

83 6.3 8.5 92.661 4.6 6.2 98.911 .8 1.1 100.0

979 74.1 100.0342 25.9

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-18

Table 56. My advisor helps to successfully manage my time.

115 8.7 11.8 11.8220 16.7 22.5 34.3407 30.8 41.7 76.0134 10.1 13.7 89.8

85 6.4 8.7 98.515 1.1 1.5 100.0

976 73.9 100.0345 26.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 57. My advisor helps me overcome educational problems and skill deficiencies.

110 8.3 11.4 11.4201 15.2 20.9 32.4395 29.9 41.1 73.5126 9.5 13.1 86.6110 8.3 11.4 98.0

19 1.4 2.0 100.0961 72.7 100.0360 27.3

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 58. My advisor refers me to resources that can help me overcome educationalproblems and skills deficiencies.

117 8.9 12.1 12.1243 18.4 25.2 37.4370 28.0 38.4 75.8107 8.1 11.1 86.9105 7.9 10.9 97.8

21 1.6 2.2 100.0963 72.9 100.0358 27.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-19

Table 59. My advisor refers me to resources pertinent to my educational goals(internship, study abroad, honors program, and learning assistance programs).

132 10.0 13.5 13.559 4.5 6.0 19.5

104 7.9 10.6 30.1314 23.8 32.0 62.1243 18.4 24.8 86.9129 9.8 13.1 100.0981 74.3 100.0340 25.7

1321 100.0

Not ApplicableStrongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly AgreeTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 60. My advisor encourages me to participate in experiences which lead to my intellectual growth.

103 7.8 10.5 10.558 4.4 5.9 16.4

110 8.3 11.2 27.6310 23.5 31.5 59.1285 21.6 29.0 88.1117 8.9 11.9 100.0983 74.4 100.0338 25.6

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 61. My advisor helps me select appropriate courses and other educational experiences.

68 5.1 6.9 6.935 2.6 3.6 10.553 4.0 5.4 15.9

188 14.2 19.1 35.0399 30.2 40.6 75.6240 18.2 24.4 100.0983 74.4 100.0338 25.6

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-20

Table 62. My advisor interprets institutional requirements so that they are understandable to me.

69 5.2 7.0 7.043 3.3 4.4 11.460 4.5 6.1 17.5

211 16.0 21.4 38.9367 27.8 37.3 76.2234 17.7 23.8 100.0984 74.5 100.0337 25.5

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 63. My advisor has given me correct information on services/programs.

88 6.7 9.0 9.031 2.3 3.2 12.136 2.7 3.7 15.8

215 16.3 21.9 37.7390 29.5 39.7 77.4222 16.8 22.6 100.0982 74.3 100.0339 25.7

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 64. My advisor is well-informed about changes in academic requirements andkeeps me informed of pertinent changes.

90 6.8 9.1 9.145 3.4 4.6 13.760 4.5 6.1 19.8

235 17.8 23.9 43.7328 24.8 33.3 77.0226 17.1 23.0 100.0984 74.5 100.0337 25.5

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-21

Table 65. My advisor gives me advice in a straight forward understandable manner.

70 5.3 7.1 7.135 2.6 3.6 10.767 5.1 6.8 17.5

183 13.9 18.6 36.0388 29.4 39.4 75.4242 18.3 24.6 100.0985 74.6 100.0336 25.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 66. My advisor tells me why she/he offers particular advice.

96 7.3 9.8 9.840 3.0 4.1 13.889 6.7 9.1 22.9

272 20.6 27.7 50.6324 24.5 33.0 83.5162 12.3 16.5 100.0983 74.4 100.0338 25.6

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 67. My advisor encourages me to participate in extracurricular activities.

131 9.9 13.4 13.451 3.9 5.2 18.6

116 8.8 11.9 30.5343 26.0 35.1 65.7223 16.9 22.8 88.5112 8.5 11.5 100.0976 73.9 100.0345 26.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-22

Table 68. My advisor appears to be well trained.

62 4.7 6.3 6.340 3.0 4.1 10.435 2.6 3.6 13.9

182 13.8 18.5 32.4373 28.2 37.9 70.3292 22.1 29.7 100.0984 74.5 100.0337 25.5

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 69. Interactions with my advisor are positive.

64 4.8 6.5 6.545 3.4 4.6 11.147 3.6 4.8 15.9

180 13.6 18.4 34.3358 27.1 36.6 70.9285 21.6 29.1 100.0979 74.1 100.0342 25.9

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 70. I don't have to wait long between scheduling and seeing my advisor.

89 6.7 9.1 9.170 5.3 7.2 16.2

100 7.6 10.2 26.5226 17.1 23.1 49.5301 22.8 30.7 80.3193 14.6 19.7 100.0979 74.1 100.0342 25.9

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-23

Table 71. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system at USU.

67 5.1 6.8 6.869 5.2 7.0 13.8

107 8.1 10.8 24.6233 17.6 23.6 48.2330 25.0 33.4 81.7181 13.7 18.3 100.0987 74.7 100.0334 25.3

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 72. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system in my college/department.

81 6.1 8.2 8.267 5.1 6.8 15.092 7.0 9.3 24.4

223 16.9 22.7 47.1314 23.8 31.9 79.0207 15.7 21.0 100.0984 74.5 100.0337 25.5

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 73. Overall I am satisfied with my advisor.

73 5.5 7.4 7.457 4.3 5.8 13.260 4.5 6.1 19.3

204 15.4 20.7 40.0321 24.3 32.6 72.6270 20.4 27.4 100.0985 74.6 100.0336 25.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 74. Courses for the semester

312 23.6 34.8 34.8392 29.7 43.8 78.6151 11.4 16.9 95.4

28 2.1 3.1 98.513 1.0 1.5 100.0

896 67.8 100.0425 32.2

1321 100.0

Very SatisfiedSatisfiedNeutralDissatisfiedVery DissatisfiedTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-24

Table 75. Degree requirements

267 20.2 30.8 30.8384 29.1 44.2 75.0170 12.9 19.6 94.6

35 2.6 4.0 98.612 .9 1.4 100.0

868 65.7 100.0453 34.3

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 76. Major requirements

273 20.7 31.4 31.4377 28.5 43.3 74.7177 13.4 20.3 95.1

31 2.3 3.6 98.612 .9 1.4 100.0

870 65.9 100.0451 34.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 77. Minor requirements

149 11.3 19.7 19.7224 17.0 29.6 49.3291 22.0 38.4 87.7

60 4.5 7.9 95.633 2.5 4.4 100.0

757 57.3 100.0564 42.7

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 78. General Education requirements

277 21.0 31.9 31.9342 25.9 39.4 71.3192 14.5 22.1 93.4

39 3.0 4.5 97.918 1.4 2.1 100.0

868 65.7 100.0453 34.3

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-25

Table 79. Selecting or changing your major

128 9.7 17.8 17.8196 14.8 27.3 45.1309 23.4 43.0 88.0

64 4.8 8.9 96.922 1.7 3.1 100.0

719 54.4 100.0602 45.6

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 80. Transfer credit

123 9.3 17.3 17.3187 14.2 26.3 43.7305 23.1 43.0 86.6

62 4.7 8.7 95.433 2.5 4.6 100.0

710 53.7 100.0611 46.3

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 81. Registration procedures (drop/add, closed courses)

152 11.5 20.7 20.7246 18.6 33.6 54.3264 20.0 36.0 90.3

45 3.4 6.1 96.526 2.0 3.5 100.0

733 55.5 100.0588 44.5

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 82. Academic probation

62 4.7 10.4 10.4129 9.8 21.7 32.1343 26.0 57.6 89.7

40 3.0 6.7 96.521 1.6 3.5 100.0

595 45.0 100.0726 55.0

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-26

Table 83. Career choice

121 9.2 17.9 17.9209 15.8 30.9 48.8260 19.7 38.5 87.3

57 4.3 8.4 95.729 2.2 4.3 100.0

676 51.2 100.0645 48.8

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 84. Internships

69 5.2 11.3 11.3124 9.4 20.3 31.5319 24.1 52.1 83.7

60 4.5 9.8 93.540 3.0 6.5 100.0

612 46.3 100.0709 53.7

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 85. Research with faculty

51 3.9 8.8 8.8104 7.9 17.9 26.7332 25.1 57.2 84.0

59 4.5 10.2 94.134 2.6 5.9 100.0

580 43.9 100.0741 56.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 86. How to get the most out of your educational experience at USU

113 8.6 17.1 17.1185 14.0 27.9 45.0276 20.9 41.7 86.7

58 4.4 8.8 95.530 2.3 4.5 100.0

662 50.1 100.0659 49.9

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-27

Table 87. Study Skills

69 5.2 11.1 11.1141 10.7 22.7 33.9313 23.7 50.5 84.4

70 5.3 11.3 95.627 2.0 4.4 100.0

620 46.9 100.0701 53.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 88. Concerns about a specific course

139 10.5 19.5 19.5244 18.5 34.2 53.6262 19.8 36.7 90.3

44 3.3 6.2 96.525 1.9 3.5 100.0

714 54.0 100.0607 46.0

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 89. Concerns about a specific faculty member

56 4.2 9.7 9.7113 8.6 19.5 29.2333 25.2 57.5 86.7

52 3.9 9.0 95.725 1.9 4.3 100.0

579 43.8 100.0742 56.2

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 90. Application to graduate/professional schools

57 4.3 9.9 9.9104 7.9 18.1 28.0334 25.3 58.0 85.9

58 4.4 10.1 96.023 1.7 4.0 100.0

576 43.6 100.0745 56.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-28

Table 91. Personal problems

52 3.9 9.2 9.299 7.5 17.5 26.6

330 25.0 58.2 84.854 4.1 9.5 94.432 2.4 5.6 100.0

567 42.9 100.0754 57.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 92. Credit by examination

66 5.0 11.3 11.3121 9.2 20.6 31.9325 24.6 55.5 87.4

47 3.6 8.0 95.427 2.0 4.6 100.0

586 44.4 100.0735 55.6

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 93. Advanced Placement (AP) courses

91 6.9 14.6 14.6147 11.1 23.5 38.1319 24.1 51.0 89.1

46 3.5 7.4 96.522 1.7 3.5 100.0

625 47.3 100.0696 52.7

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 94. Work study/on-campus employment

52 3.9 9.2 9.2105 7.9 18.5 27.6330 25.0 58.1 85.7

55 4.2 9.7 95.426 2.0 4.6 100.0

568 43.0 100.0753 57.0

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-29

Table 95. Job placement after graduation

62 4.7 10.8 10.8111 8.4 19.3 30.1313 23.7 54.4 84.5

62 4.7 10.8 95.327 2.0 4.7 100.0

575 43.5 100.0746 56.5

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 96. Withdrawing from USU

43 3.3 7.8 7.883 6.3 15.1 23.0

353 26.7 64.3 87.248 3.6 8.7 96.022 1.7 4.0 100.0

549 41.6 100.0772 58.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 97. Overall quality of education

257 19.5 22.5 22.5656 49.7 57.5 80.1194 14.7 17.0 97.1

29 2.2 2.5 99.64 .3 .4 100.0

1140 86.3 100.0181 13.7

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 98. Overall quality of the program in your major

270 20.4 24.6 24.6491 37.2 44.7 69.3279 21.1 25.4 94.7

39 3.0 3.6 98.319 1.4 1.7 100.0

1098 83.1 100.0223 16.9

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-30

Table 99. Variety of courses in your major

232 17.6 21.1 21.1486 36.8 44.2 65.3311 23.5 28.3 93.6

46 3.5 4.2 97.824 1.8 2.2 100.0

1099 83.2 100.0222 16.8

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 100. Challenge of courses in your major

258 19.5 23.6 23.6529 40.0 48.5 72.1266 20.1 24.4 96.5

25 1.9 2.3 98.813 1.0 1.2 100.0

1091 82.6 100.0230 17.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 101. Accessibility of faculty

212 16.0 18.9 18.9463 35.0 41.4 60.3343 26.0 30.7 91.0

82 6.2 7.3 98.319 1.4 1.7 100.0

1119 84.7 100.0202 15.3

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 102. Helpfulness of faculty

226 17.1 20.2 20.2485 36.7 43.3 63.4319 24.1 28.5 91.9

76 5.8 6.8 98.715 1.1 1.3 100.0

1121 84.9 100.0200 15.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-31

Table 103. The degree to which you were treated fairly

262 19.8 23.5 23.5529 40.0 47.4 70.9269 20.4 24.1 95.0

43 3.3 3.9 98.813 1.0 1.2 100.0

1116 84.5 100.0205 15.5

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 104. Overall quality of University Studies/General Education courses

172 13.0 16.3 16.3502 38.0 47.6 63.9268 20.3 25.4 89.3

91 6.9 8.6 97.922 1.7 2.1 100.0

1055 79.9 100.0266 20.1

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 105. Variety of courses in University Studies/General Education

194 14.7 18.4 18.4479 36.3 45.5 64.0267 20.2 25.4 89.4

90 6.8 8.6 97.922 1.7 2.1 100.0

1052 79.6 100.0269 20.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 106. Challenge of courses in University Studies/General Education

187 14.2 17.8 17.8526 39.8 50.2 68.0268 20.3 25.6 93.6

49 3.7 4.7 98.318 1.4 1.7 100.0

1048 79.3 100.0273 20.7

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-32

Table 107. Communication

116 8.8 10.2 10.2235 17.8 20.7 31.0494 37.4 43.6 74.5

49 3.7 4.3 78.810 .8 .9 79.7

230 17.4 20.3 100.01134 85.8 100.0

187 14.21321 100.0

Not at USUVery WellWellPoorlyVery PoorlyNot ApplicableTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 108. Numeracy

104 7.9 9.2 9.2216 16.4 19.2 28.4498 37.7 44.3 72.7

73 5.5 6.5 79.217 1.3 1.5 80.7

217 16.4 19.3 100.01125 85.2 100.0

196 14.81321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 109. Computer Literacy

107 8.1 9.4 9.4310 23.5 27.3 36.7467 35.4 41.1 77.9

71 5.4 6.3 84.119 1.4 1.7 85.8

161 12.2 14.2 100.01135 85.9 100.0

186 14.11321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-33

Table 110. Humanities and Art

83 6.3 7.3 7.3360 27.3 31.6 38.8493 37.3 43.2 82.0

61 4.6 5.3 87.425 1.9 2.2 89.6

119 9.0 10.4 100.01141 86.4 100.0

180 13.61321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 111. Social Science

92 7.0 8.1 8.1335 25.4 29.6 37.7527 39.9 46.6 84.3

45 3.4 4.0 88.315 1.1 1.3 89.6

118 8.9 10.4 100.01132 85.7 100.0

189 14.31321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 112. Life Science

88 6.7 7.7 7.7269 20.4 23.7 31.4523 39.6 46.0 77.5

62 4.7 5.5 82.922 1.7 1.9 84.9

172 13.0 15.1 100.01136 86.0 100.0

185 14.01321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-34

Table 113. Physical Science

87 6.6 7.7 7.7267 20.2 23.5 31.1524 39.7 46.1 77.2

63 4.8 5.5 82.820 1.5 1.8 84.5

176 13.3 15.5 100.01137 86.1 100.0

184 13.91321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 114. Undergraduate programs

144 10.9 12.3 12.3442 33.5 37.6 49.9500 37.9 42.6 92.4

77 5.8 6.6 99.012 .9 1.0 100.0

1175 88.9 100.0146 11.1

1321 100.0

No OpinionVery GoodGoodFairPoorTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 115. Your major department

158 12.0 13.6 13.6541 41.0 46.4 59.9361 27.3 31.0 90.9

71 5.4 6.1 97.035 2.6 3.0 100.0

1166 88.3 100.0155 11.7

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 116. Teaching ability of faculty

76 5.8 6.4 6.4495 37.5 41.8 48.2475 36.0 40.1 88.3126 9.5 10.6 98.9

13 1.0 1.1 100.01185 89.7 100.0

136 10.31321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-35

Table 117. Personal interest of faculty in students

74 5.6 6.3 6.3339 25.7 28.8 35.0497 37.6 42.2 77.2212 16.0 18.0 95.2

57 4.3 4.8 100.01179 89.3 100.0

142 10.71321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 118. Quality of students

90 6.8 7.6 7.6380 28.8 32.2 39.9552 41.8 46.8 86.7139 10.5 11.8 98.5

18 1.4 1.5 100.01179 89.3 100.0

142 10.71321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 119. Research activities

225 17.0 19.3 19.3275 20.8 23.6 42.9499 37.8 42.8 85.8148 11.2 12.7 98.5

18 1.4 1.5 100.01165 88.2 100.0

156 11.81321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 120. Public relations

198 15.0 16.9 16.9289 21.9 24.7 41.6505 38.2 43.1 84.6147 11.1 12.5 97.2

33 2.5 2.8 100.01172 88.7 100.0

149 11.31321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-36

Table 121. The open access labs had the software I needed.

376 28.5 32.4 32.4487 36.9 42.0 74.4153 11.6 13.2 87.6

28 2.1 2.4 90.012 .9 1.0 91.0

104 7.9 9.0 100.01160 87.8 100.0

161 12.21321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 122. Lab consultants provided the help I needed.

261 19.8 22.4 22.4421 31.9 36.2 58.6283 21.4 24.3 82.9

58 4.4 5.0 87.917 1.3 1.5 89.3

124 9.4 10.7 100.01164 88.1 100.0

157 11.91321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 123. I didn't wait long for an available computer in the lab.

277 21.0 23.8 23.8441 33.4 38.0 61.8233 17.6 20.1 81.8

88 6.7 7.6 89.432 2.4 2.8 92.291 6.9 7.8 100.0

1162 88.0 100.0159 12.0

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-37

Table 124. Overall, I was satisfied with the open access labs.

354 26.8 30.5 30.5537 40.7 46.3 76.8158 12.0 13.6 90.4

27 2.0 2.3 92.86 .5 .5 93.3

78 5.9 6.7 100.01160 87.8 100.0

161 12.21321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 125. Overall, I was satisfied with my USU email account.

430 32.6 37.0 37.0523 39.6 45.0 81.9136 10.3 11.7 93.6

18 1.4 1.5 95.214 1.1 1.2 96.442 3.2 3.6 100.0

1163 88.0 100.0158 12.0

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 126. Overall, I was satisfied with the USU modem access.

334 25.3 29.0 29.0451 34.1 39.1 68.1191 14.5 16.6 84.7

35 2.6 3.0 87.817 1.3 1.5 89.2

124 9.4 10.8 100.01152 87.2 100.0

169 12.81321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-38

Table 127. Overall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet access.

265 20.1 23.8 23.8275 20.8 24.7 48.5188 14.2 16.9 65.4

24 1.8 2.2 67.615 1.1 1.3 68.9

346 26.2 31.1 100.01113 84.3 100.0

208 15.71321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 128. I received good value for my Computer fee.

273 20.7 23.6 23.6419 31.7 36.2 59.8297 22.5 25.6 85.4

62 4.7 5.4 90.852 3.9 4.5 95.355 4.2 4.7 100.0

1158 87.7 100.0163 12.3

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 129. I use the internet address webmail.usu.edu to ready my USU email.

67 5.1 5.4 5.4236 17.9 18.9 24.3293 22.2 23.5 47.7653 49.4 52.3 100.0

1249 94.5 100.072 5.5

1321 100.0

NeverSometimesMost of the timeAll of the timeTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 130. Indicate the number of privately owned computers you had regular access to during the past year.

96 7.3 7.7 7.7542 41.0 43.4 51.1362 27.4 29.0 80.1248 18.8 19.9 100.0

1248 94.5 100.073 5.5

1321 100.0

None1 computer2 computers3+ computersTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-39

Table 131. If you answered 1-3+ computers above, how often did you use this(these) privately owned computer(s) to do your school work?

44 3.3 4.0 4.0315 23.8 28.5 32.5400 30.3 36.2 68.8345 26.1 31.3 100.0

1104 83.6 100.0217 16.4

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 132. I had regular access during the past year to a USU computer,not in an open access lab (e.g., lab for students in a course or in a major).

591 44.7 48.0 48.0640 48.4 52.0 100.0

1231 93.2 100.090 6.8

1321 100.0

YesNoTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 133. If you answered yes to the above question, how often did you use this computer to do your school work?

125 9.5 19.2 19.2303 22.9 46.5 65.7152 11.5 23.3 89.1

71 5.4 10.9 100.0651 49.3 100.0670 50.7

1321 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

tmurray

B-40

Appendix C

Cross-tabulations

Crosstabs

Table 1. Cumulative grade point averages of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

14 23 10 1 4829.2% 47.9% 20.8% 2.1% 100.0%

1.1% 1.8% .8% .1% 3.8%.3 1.2 -.8 -1.6

47 59 47 13 16628.3% 35.5% 28.3% 7.8% 100.0%

3.7% 4.6% 3.7% 1.0% 13.0%.3 -.3 .3 -.4

53 99 76 19 24721.5% 40.1% 30.8% 7.7% 100.0%

4.1% 7.7% 5.9% 1.5% 19.3%-1.7 .7 1.1 -.6

51 46 38 17 15233.6% 30.3% 25.0% 11.2% 100.0%

4.0% 3.6% 3.0% 1.3% 11.9%1.6 -1.4 -.5 1.058 96 52 15 221

26.2% 43.4% 23.5% 6.8% 100.0%4.5% 7.5% 4.1% 1.2% 17.3%

-.2 1.5 -1.0 -1.02 2 6 2 12

16.7% 16.7% 50.0% 16.7% 100.0%.2% .2% .5% .2% .9%

-.7 -1.2 1.5 .935 34 27 10 106

33.0% 32.1% 25.5% 9.4% 100.0%2.7% 2.7% 2.1% .8% 8.3%

1.2 -.9 -.3 .285 117 91 35 328

25.9% 35.7% 27.7% 10.7% 100.0%6.6% 9.1% 7.1% 2.7% 25.6%

-.4 -.5 .2 1.2345 476 347 112 1280

27.0% 37.2% 27.1% 8.8% 100.0%27.0% 37.2% 27.1% 8.8% 100.0%

Count% within College% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within College% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within College% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within College% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within College% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within College% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within College% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within College% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within College% of Total

Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Humanities, Arts andSocial Sciences'

Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

4.0 - 3.6 3.5 - 3.1 3.0 - 2.6 2.5 - 2.0cumgpa

Total

tmurray

C-1

Table 2. Degrees sought--cross-tabulation by college.

1 1 41 12.2% 2.2% 91.1% 2.2%

.1% .1% 3.3% .1%-.2 -1.9 1.0 -1.2

6 17 127 123.7% 10.4% 77.4% 7.3%

.5% 1.4% 10.1% 1.0%.7 -.6 .0 .32 25 192 21

.8% 10.4% 80.0% 8.8%

.2% 2.0% 15.3% 1.7%-1.8 -.7 .5 1.2

2 10 131 81.3% 6.6% 86.8% 5.3%

.2% .8% 10.4% .6%-1.0 -1.9 1.3 -.7

6 19 177 202.7% 8.5% 79.0% 8.9%

.5% 1.5% 14.1% 1.6%.0 -1.5 .3 1.30 1 8 3

.0% 8.3% 66.7% 25.0%

.0% .1% .6% .2%-.6 -.4 -.4 2.5

4 12 80 23.9% 11.8% 78.4% 2.0%

.3% 1.0% 6.4% .2%.7 .0 .1 -1.8

13 65 217 174.1% 20.4% 68.0% 5.3%1.0% 5.2% 17.3% 1.4%

1.5 4.4 -1.9 -.934 150 973 84

2.7% 11.9% 77.4% 6.7%2.7% 11.9% 77.4% 6.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Certificate Associate Bachelors Mastersworktowa

tmurray

C-2

Table 2. Degrees sought--cross-tabulation by college.

1 452.2% 100.0%

.1% 3.6%.62 164

1.2% 100.0%.2% 13.0%

-.10 240

.0% 100.0%

.0% 19.1%-1.7

0 151.0% 100.0%.0% 12.0%-1.4

2 224.9% 100.0%.2% 17.8%

-.50 12

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.0%-.4

4 1023.9% 100.0%

.3% 8.1%2.4

7 3192.2% 100.0%

.6% 25.4%1.516 1257

1.3% 100.0%1.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Doctorateworktowa

Total

tmurray

C-3

Table 3. Respondent's highest degree planned--cross-tabulation by college.

0 1 16 22.0% 2.3% 36.4% 50.0%.0% .1% 1.4% 1.9%

-.3 .7 .7 .10 1 31 98

.0% .7% 20.7% 65.3%

.0% .1% 2.7% 8.4%-.6 -.6 -2.2 3.0

1 1 71 106.4% .4% 31.8% 47.5%.1% .1% 6.1% 9.1%

.6 -1.0 .3 -.21 2 30 82

.7% 1.4% 21.6% 59.0%

.1% .2% 2.6% 7.0%1.1 .3 -1.9 1.8

0 2 65 105.0% 1.0% 31.7% 51.2%.0% .2% 5.6% 9.0%

-.7 -.3 .3 .50 0 4 4

.0% .0% 36.4% 36.4%

.0% .0% .3% .3%-.2 -.4 .3 -.6

0 0 31 33.0% .0% 30.4% 32.4%.0% .0% 2.7% 2.8%

-.5 -1.1 -.1 -2.31 7 111 117

.3% 2.4% 37.8% 39.8%

.1% .6% 9.5% 10.0%.3 1.9 2.2 -2.23 14 359 567

.3% 1.2% 30.7% 48.5%

.3% 1.2% 30.7% 48.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Certificate Associate Bachelors MastersHighdegr

tmurray

C-4

Table 3. Respondent's highest degree planned--cross-tabulation by college.

5 4411.4% 100.0%

.4% 3.8%-1.2

20 15013.3% 100.0%

1.7% 12.8%-1.7

44 22319.7% 100.0%

3.8% 19.1%.2

24 13917.3% 100.0%

2.1% 11.9%-.533 205

16.1% 100.0%2.8% 17.6%

-1.03 11

27.3% 100.0%.3% .9%

.638 102

37.3% 100.0%3.3% 8.7%

4.158 294

19.7% 100.0%5.0% 25.2%

.2225 1168

19.3% 100.0%19.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

DoctorateHighdegr

Total

tmurray

C-5

Table 4. Gender--cross-tabulation by college.

31 18 4963.3% 36.7% 100.0%

2.4% 1.4% 3.8%.9 -1.0

58 110 16834.5% 65.5% 100.0%

4.4% 8.4% 12.9%-3.4 3.6207 44 251

82.5% 17.5% 100.0%15.9% 3.4% 19.2%

6.3 -6.711 146 157

7.0% 93.0% 100.0%.8% 11.2% 12.0%-8.0 8.6156 69 225

69.3% 30.7% 100.0%12.0% 5.3% 17.2%

3.2 -3.53 9 12

25.0% 75.0% 100.0%.2% .7% .9%-1.4 1.5

40 68 10837.0% 63.0% 100.0%

3.1% 5.2% 8.3%-2.3 2.5193 142 335

57.6% 42.4% 100.0%14.8% 10.9% 25.7%

1.0 -1.1699 606 1305

53.6% 46.4% 100.0%53.6% 46.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

tmurray

C-6

Table 5. Citizenship of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

48 1 4998.0% 2.0% 100.0%

3.7% .1% 3.7%.0 .1

163 5 16897.0% 3.0% 100.0%12.5% .4% 12.9%

-.2 1.2246 3 249

98.8% 1.2% 100.0%18.8% .2% 19.1%

.1 -.7154 4 158

97.5% 2.5% 100.0%11.8% .3% 12.1%

-.1 .7224 3 227

98.7% 1.3% 100.0%17.1% .2% 17.4%

.1 -.512 0 12

100.0% .0% 100.0%.9% .0% .9%

.1 -.5105 4 109

96.3% 3.7% 100.0%8.0% .3% 8.3%

-.2 1.5332 3 335

99.1% .9% 100.0%25.4% .2% 25.6%

.2 -1.21284 23 1307

98.2% 1.8% 100.0%98.2% 1.8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

US Othercitizen

Total

tmurray

C-7

Table 6. Ethnicity of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

0 1 1 46.0% 2.0% 2.0% 93.9%.0% .1% .1% 3.6%

-.6 .1 .2 .01 0 2 154

.6% .0% 1.2% 95.1%

.1% .0% .2% 11.9%-.3 -1.7 -.4 .2

2 6 5 233.8% 2.4% 2.0% 94.0%.2% .5% .4% 18.1%

-.1 .7 .5 .12 2 5 140

1.3% 1.3% 3.3% 91.5%.2% .2% .4% 10.9%

.6 -.4 1.6 -.32 7 3 207

.9% 3.1% 1.3% 92.8%

.2% .5% .2% 16.1%.1 1.5 -.3 -.10 0 0 12

.0% .0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% .0% .9%-.3 -.5 -.4 .2

1 1 2 99.9% .9% 1.9% 93.4%.1% .1% .2% 7.7%

.1 -.6 .2 .03 6 3 315

.9% 1.8% .9% 93.8%

.2% .5% .2% 24.4%.1 .0 -1.1 .0

11 23 21 1206.9% 1.8% 1.6% 93.6%.9% 1.8% 1.6% 93.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AmericanIndian orAlaskanNative Hispanic

Asian orPacific

IslanderWhite,

Non-hispanic

Ethnic

tmurray

C-8

Table 6. Ethnicity of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

0 1 49.0% 2.0% 100.0%.0% .1% 3.8%

-.6 .31 4 162

.6% 2.5% 100.0%

.1% .3% 12.6%.0 .92 0 248

.8% .0% 100.0%

.2% .0% 19.2%.4 -2.01 3 153

.7% 2.0% 100.0%

.1% .2% 11.9%.1 .41 3 223

.4% 1.3% 100.0%

.1% .2% 17.3%-.3 -.2

0 0 12.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% .9%

-.3 -.40 3 106

.0% 2.8% 100.0%

.0% .2% 8.2%-.8 1.1

3 6 336.9% 1.8% 100.0%.2% .5% 26.1%

.6 .38 20 1289

.6% 1.6% 100.0%

.6% 1.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Black,Non-hispanic

Other,unspecified

Ethnic

Total

tmurray

C-9

Table 7. Marital status of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

46 3 0 0 4993.9% 6.1% .0% .0% 100.0%

3.5% .2% .0% .0% 3.7%.3 -.7 -.5 -.2

156 11 0 0 16793.4% 6.6% .0% .0% 100.0%11.9% .8% .0% .0% 12.8%

.4 -1.1 -.9 -.4223 25 2 0 250

89.2% 10.0% .8% .0% 100.0%17.1% 1.9% .2% .0% 19.1%

-.2 .5 .8 -.4132 26 0 0 158

83.5% 16.5% .0% .0% 100.0%10.1% 2.0% .0% .0% 12.1%

-.9 3.1 -.9 -.3207 18 1 0 226

91.6% 8.0% .4% .0% 100.0%15.8% 1.4% .1% .0% 17.3%

.2 -.5 .0 -.411 1 0 0 12

91.7% 8.3% .0% .0% 100.0%.8% .1% .0% .0% .9%

.0 -.1 -.2 -.196 12 1 0 109

88.1% 11.0% .9% .0% 100.0%7.3% .9% .1% .0% 8.3%

-.3 .7 .7 -.3311 22 2 1 336

92.6% 6.5% .6% .3% 100.0%23.8% 1.7% .2% .1% 25.7%

.4 -1.5 .4 1.51182 118 6 1 1307

90.4% 9.0% .5% .1% 100.0%90.4% 9.0% .5% .1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Single Married Divorced Separatedmaritals

Total

tmurray

C-10

Table 8. Number of dependents of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

44 4 1 089.8% 8.2% 2.0% .0%

3.4% .3% .1% .0%.0 .5 -.2 -.7

150 10 5 189.8% 6.0% 3.0% .6%11.5% .8% .4% .1%

.0 -.2 .4 -.4224 14 5 2

90.7% 5.7% 2.0% .8%17.2% 1.1% .4% .2%

.1 -.4 -.4 -.2133 15 8 2

84.2% 9.5% 5.1% 1.3%10.2% 1.2% .6% .2%

-.8 1.6 2.1 .4209 11 4 0

93.3% 4.9% 1.8% .0%16.1% .8% .3% .0%

.5 -.8 -.6 -1.410 2 0 0

83.3% 16.7% .0% .0%.8% .2% .0% .0%

-.2 1.4 -.5 -.395 10 4 0

87.2% 9.2% 3.7% .0%7.3% .8% .3% .0%

-.3 1.2 .8 -1.0302 16 5 7

90.7% 4.8% 1.5% 2.1%23.2% 1.2% .4% .5%

.2 -1.1 -1.1 2.21167 82 32 12

89.8% 6.3% 2.5% .9%89.8% 6.3% 2.5% .9%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Zero 1 2 3depend

tmurray

C-11

Table 8. Number of dependents of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

0 0 49.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% 3.8%

-.3 -.41 0 167

.6% .0% 100.0%

.1% .0% 12.9%1.5 -.7

1 1 247.4% .4% 100.0%.1% .1% 19.0%1.0 .3

0 0 158.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% 12.2%

-.5 -.70 0 224

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 17.2%-.6 -.8

0 0 12.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% .9%

-.1 -.20 0 109

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 8.4%-.4 -.6

0 3 333.0% .9% 100.0%.0% .2% 25.6%

-.7 1.92 4 1299

.2% .3% 100.0%

.2% .3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

4 5 +depend

Total

tmurray

C-12

Table 9. Age of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

36 12 1 073.5% 24.5% 2.0% .0%

2.7% .9% .1% .0%.8 -1.0 -.1 -.5

90 72 6 053.6% 42.9% 3.6% .0%

6.9% 5.5% .5% .0%-1.8 2.4 1.1 -.9197 50 2 1

78.8% 20.0% .8% .4%15.0% 3.8% .2% .1%

2.7 -3.4 -1.6 -.175 76 6 1

47.5% 48.1% 3.8% .6%5.7% 5.8% .5% .1%

-2.7 3.5 1.3 .3164 57 4 2

72.2% 25.1% 1.8% .9%12.5% 4.4% .3% .2%

1.4 -1.9 -.5 .93 9 0 0

25.0% 75.0% .0% .0%.2% .7% .0% .0%-1.7 2.6 -.5 -.2

61 45 3 056.0% 41.3% 2.8% .0%

4.7% 3.4% .2% .0%-1.1 1.6 .3 -.7223 103 8 2

66.2% 30.6% 2.4% .6%17.0% 7.9% .6% .2%

.3 -.6 .1 .4849 424 30 6

64.8% 32.4% 2.3% .5%64.8% 32.4% 2.3% .5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

18 - 20 21 - 25 26 - 30 31 - 40age

tmurray

C-13

Table 9. Age of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

0 49.0% 100.0%.0% 3.7%

-.20 168

.0% 100.0%

.0% 12.8%-.4

0 250.0% 100.0%.0% 19.1%

-.40 158

.0% 100.0%

.0% 12.1%-.3

0 227.0% 100.0%.0% 17.3%

-.40 12

.0% 100.0%

.0% .9%-.1

0 109.0% 100.0%.0% 8.3%

-.31 337

.3% 100.0%

.1% 25.7%1.5

1 1310.1% 100.0%.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

41 - 50age

Total

tmurray

C-14

Table 10. Where respondents live when not attending USU--cross-tabulation by college.

13 25 1026.5% 51.0% 20.4%

1.0% 1.9% .8%-.5 .6 -.350 77 35

29.8% 45.8% 20.8%3.8% 5.9% 2.7%

-.2 .1 -.467 116 66

26.7% 46.2% 26.3%5.1% 8.9% 5.0%

-1.1 .2 1.347 71 33

30.1% 45.5% 21.2%3.6% 5.4% 2.5%

-.1 .0 -.364 105 56

28.1% 46.1% 24.6%4.9% 8.0% 4.3%

-.7 .1 .72 5 5

16.7% 41.7% 41.7%.2% .4% .4%

-.9 -.2 1.438 44 25

34.9% 40.4% 22.9%2.9% 3.4% 1.9%

.8 -.8 .1119 153 63

35.3% 45.4% 18.7%9.1% 11.7% 4.8%

1.6 .0 -1.4400 596 293

30.5% 45.5% 22.4%30.5% 45.5% 22.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Cache ValleyUtah, outsideCache Valley

OutsideUtah in US

livenusu

tmurray

C-15

Table 10. Where respondents live when not attending USU--cross-tabulation by college.

1 492.0% 100.0%

.1% 3.7%.26 168

3.6% 100.0%.5% 12.8%2.0

2 251.8% 100.0%.2% 19.2%-1.0

5 1563.2% 100.0%

.4% 11.9%1.6

3 2281.3% 100.0%

.2% 17.4%-.3

0 12.0% 100.0%.0% .9%

-.42 109

1.8% 100.0%.2% 8.3%

.22 337

.6% 100.0%

.2% 25.7%-1.5

21 13101.6% 100.0%1.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Outsidethe USA

livenusu

Total

tmurray

C-16

Table 11. Where respondents live when attending USU--cross-tabulation by college.

14 0 24 528.6% .0% 49.0% 10.2%

1.1% .0% 1.8% .4%-1.0 -.7 1.7 -.4

61 2 58 2336.3% 1.2% 34.5% 13.7%

4.7% .2% 4.4% 1.8%-.2 .4 .0 .6

101 3 96 1940.2% 1.2% 38.2% 7.6%

7.7% .2% 7.3% 1.5%.8 .5 1.0 -2.0

64 0 56 1440.8% .0% 35.7% 8.9%

4.9% .0% 4.3% 1.1%.7 -1.2 .2 -1.1

97 2 70 3042.7% .9% 30.8% 13.2%

7.4% .2% 5.3% 2.3%1.4 -.1 -1.0 .5

1 0 5 48.3% .0% 41.7% 33.3%

.1% .0% .4% .3%-1.6 -.3 .4 2.1

43 0 31 1839.4% .0% 28.4% 16.5%

3.3% .0% 2.4% 1.4%.4 -1.0 -1.1 1.4

106 5 113 4431.5% 1.5% 33.5% 13.1%

8.1% .4% 8.6% 3.4%-1.7 1.1 -.3 .6487 12 453 157

37.2% .9% 34.6% 12.0%37.2% .9% 34.6% 12.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

CampusHousing

Fraternity/Sorority

Off-campusapartment

Off-campushouse

liveusu

tmurray

C-17

Table 11. Where respondents live when attending USU--cross-tabulation by college.

6 0 4912.2% .0% 100.0%

.5% .0% 3.7%-.3 -.822 2 168

13.1% 1.2% 100.0%1.7% .2% 12.8%

-.3 -.329 3 251

11.6% 1.2% 100.0%2.2% .2% 19.2%

-1.0 -.322 1 157

14.0% .6% 100.0%1.7% .1% 12.0%

.0 -.823 5 227

10.1% 2.2% 100.0%1.8% .4% 17.3%

-1.5 .91 1 12

8.3% 8.3% 100.0%.1% .1% .9%

-.5 2.016 1 109

14.7% .9% 100.0%1.2% .1% 8.3%

.2 -.563 6 337

18.7% 1.8% 100.0%4.8% .5% 25.7%

2.4 .5182 19 1310

13.9% 1.5% 100.0%13.9% 1.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

With parentsWith extended

family

liveusu

Total

tmurray

C-18

Table 12. Length of attendance at USU (years)--cross-tabulation by college.

27 9 13 055.1% 18.4% 26.5% .0%

2.1% .7% 1.0% .0%-.9 1.5 .9 -1.1

105 26 33 362.5% 15.5% 19.6% 1.8%

8.0% 2.0% 2.5% .2%-.4 1.7 -.3 -.5

157 20 67 662.5% 8.0% 26.7% 2.4%12.0% 1.5% 5.1% .5%

-.5 -1.5 2.1 -.191 26 35 5

58.0% 16.6% 22.3% 3.2%6.9% 2.0% 2.7% .4%

-1.1 2.1 .4 .6146 22 52 5

64.3% 9.7% 22.9% 2.2%11.1% 1.7% 4.0% .4%

-.2 -.6 .7 -.27 1 3 0

58.3% 8.3% 25.0% .0%.5% .1% .2% .0%

-.3 -.3 .3 -.572 11 19 5

66.1% 10.1% 17.4% 4.6%5.5% .8% 1.5% .4%

.1 -.3 -.7 1.4249 30 49 8

73.9% 8.9% 14.5% 2.4%19.0% 2.3% 3.7% .6%

2.0 -1.2 -2.5 -.1854 145 271 32

65.2% 11.1% 20.7% 2.4%65.2% 11.1% 20.7% 2.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

<1 1 2 3lengattd

tmurray

C-19

Table 12. Length of attendance at USU (years)--cross-tabulation by college.

0 0 0 49.0% .0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% .0% 3.7%

-.5 -.2 -.20 0 1 168

.0% .0% .6% 100.0%

.0% .0% .1% 12.8%-.9 -.4 2.4

1 0 0 251.4% .0% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% .0% 19.2%

-.1 -.4 -.40 0 0 157

.0% .0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% .0% 12.0%-.8 -.3 -.3

1 1 0 227.4% .4% .0% 100.0%.1% .1% .0% 17.3%

.0 2.0 -.41 0 0 12

8.3% .0% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% .0% .9%4.0 -.1 -.1

2 0 0 1091.8% .0% .0% 100.0%

.2% .0% .0% 8.3%2.1 -.3 -.3

1 0 0 337.3% .0% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% .0% 25.7%

-.4 -.5 -.56 1 1 1310

.5% .1% .1% 100.0%

.5% .1% .1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

4 5 6 +lengattd

Total

tmurray

C-20

Table 13. Semester hours completed--cross-tabulation by college.

22 27 0 0 4944.9% 55.1% .0% .0% 100.0%

1.7% 2.1% .0% .0% 3.7%-1.3 1.9 -1.2 -.3

98 64 4 1 16758.7% 38.3% 2.4% .6% 100.0%

7.5% 4.9% .3% .1% 12.8%.0 .0 -.3 1.0

134 109 6 1 25053.6% 43.6% 2.4% .4% 100.0%10.3% 8.3% .5% .1% 19.1%

-1.1 1.4 -.4 .675 73 7 1 156

48.1% 46.8% 4.5% .6% 100.0%5.7% 5.6% .5% .1% 11.9%

-1.8 1.8 1.2 1.1126 95 7 0 228

55.3% 41.7% 3.1% .0% 100.0%9.6% 7.3% .5% .0% 17.4%

-.7 .9 .2 -.74 7 1 0 12

33.3% 58.3% 8.3% .0% 100.0%.3% .5% .1% .0% .9%-1.2 1.1 1.1 -.2

62 41 6 0 10956.9% 37.6% 5.5% .0% 100.0%

4.7% 3.1% .5% .0% 8.3%-.3 -.1 1.7 -.5

248 82 6 0 33673.8% 24.4% 1.8% .0% 100.0%19.0% 6.3% .5% .0% 25.7%

3.6 -4.1 -1.1 -.9769 498 37 3 1307

58.8% 38.1% 2.8% .2% 100.0%58.8% 38.1% 2.8% .2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

0 - 30 31 - 60 61 - 90 91 - 120chours

Total

tmurray

C-21

Table 14. Employment status of respondents--cross-tabulation by college.

1 29 19 492.0% 59.2% 38.8% 100.0%

.1% 2.2% 1.5% 3.7%-1.5 1.2 -.6

19 80 68 16711.4% 47.9% 40.7% 100.0%

1.5% 6.1% 5.2% 12.8%1.4 .1 -.716 124 110 250

6.4% 49.6% 44.0% 100.0%1.2% 9.5% 8.4% 19.1%

-1.1 .6 -.113 70 74 157

8.3% 44.6% 47.1% 100.0%1.0% 5.4% 5.7% 12.0%

.0 -.5 .516 104 108 228

7.0% 45.6% 47.4% 100.0%1.2% 8.0% 8.3% 17.4%

-.7 -.3 .70 5 7 12

.0% 41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

.0% .4% .5% .9%-1.0 -.3 .7

7 54 47 1086.5% 50.0% 43.5% 100.0%

.5% 4.1% 3.6% 8.3%-.7 .4 -.237 151 149 337

11.0% 44.8% 44.2% 100.0%2.8% 11.5% 11.4% 25.8%

1.7 -.6 -.1109 617 582 1308

8.3% 47.2% 44.5% 100.0%8.3% 47.2% 44.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Employedfull-time

Employedpart-time Unemployed

employst

Total

tmurray

C-22

Table 15. Time worked while at USU--cross-tabulation by college.

17 14 14 334.7% 28.6% 28.6% 6.1%

1.3% 1.1% 1.1% .2%-.8 1.8 .5 -.563 28 45 15

37.7% 16.8% 26.9% 9.0%4.8% 2.1% 3.4% 1.1%

-.8 -.3 .5 .498 41 74 20

39.2% 16.4% 29.6% 8.0%7.5% 3.1% 5.7% 1.5%

-.6 -.4 1.5 -.171 30 32 13

45.2% 19.1% 20.4% 8.3%5.4% 2.3% 2.4% 1.0%

.7 .5 -1.1 .0102 41 53 19

44.7% 18.0% 23.2% 8.3%7.8% 3.1% 4.1% 1.5%

.7 .1 -.5 .17 2 3 0

58.3% 16.7% 25.0% .0%.5% .2% .2% .0%

.9 -.1 .0 -1.044 20 25 13

40.4% 18.3% 22.9% 11.9%3.4% 1.5% 1.9% 1.0%

-.2 .2 -.4 1.4144 54 80 24

42.9% 16.1% 23.8% 7.1%11.0% 4.1% 6.1% 1.8%

.3 -.7 -.4 -.7546 230 326 107

41.7% 17.6% 24.9% 8.2%41.7% 17.6% 24.9% 8.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

None 1/4 time 1/2 time 3/4 timeamtwork

tmurray

C-23

Table 15. Time worked while at USU--cross-tabulation by college.

1 492.0% 100.0%

.1% 3.7%-1.4

16 1679.6% 100.0%1.2% 12.8%

.917 250

6.8% 100.0%1.3% 19.1%

-.411 157

7.0% 100.0%.8% 12.0%

-.313 228

5.7% 100.0%1.0% 17.4%

-1.00 12

.0% 100.0%

.0% .9%-1.0

7 1096.4% 100.0%

.5% 8.3%-.434 336

10.1% 100.0%2.6% 25.7%

1.799 1308

7.6% 100.0%7.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Full-timeamtwork

Total

tmurray

C-24

Table 16. Time-of-day working--cross-tabulation by college.

5 17 1015.2% 51.5% 30.3%

.6% 2.1% 1.2%.2 1.2 -1.1

16 51 4214.3% 45.5% 37.5%

2.0% 6.3% 5.2%.1 1.2 -1.0

22 59 7114.0% 37.6% 45.2%

2.7% 7.3% 8.8%.0 -.1 .39 32 45

9.5% 33.7% 47.4%1.1% 4.0% 5.6%

-1.2 -.7 .616 47 71

11.6% 34.1% 51.4%2.0% 5.8% 8.8%

-.7 -.8 1.42 1 2

40.0% 20.0% 40.0%.2% .1% .2%1.6 -.7 -.111 24 28

16.4% 35.8% 41.8%1.4% 3.0% 3.5%

.5 -.3 -.231 77 81

15.7% 38.9% 40.9%3.9% 9.6% 10.1%

.7 .1 -.5112 308 350

13.9% 38.3% 43.5%13.9% 38.3% 43.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Mornings Afternoons Eveningsworktime

tmurray

C-25

Table 16. Time-of-day working--cross-tabulation by college.

1 333.0% 100.0%

.1% 4.1%-.4

3 1122.7% 100.0%

.4% 13.9%-.8

5 1573.2% 100.0%

.6% 19.5%-.7

9 959.5% 100.0%1.1% 11.8%

2.44 138

2.9% 100.0%.5% 17.1%

-.80 5

.0% 100.0%

.0% .6%-.5

4 676.0% 100.0%

.5% 8.3%.69 198

4.5% 100.0%1.1% 24.6%

.135 805

4.3% 100.0%4.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Graveyardworktime

Total

tmurray

C-26

Table 17. "What would you tell your friends about USU?"--cross-tabulation by college.

23 16 9 046.9% 32.7% 18.4% .0%

1.8% 1.2% .7% .0%1.1 -.8 .0 -1.259 69 32 4

35.5% 41.6% 19.3% 2.4%4.5% 5.3% 2.5% .3%

-.4 .3 .2 -.3106 101 37 6

42.4% 40.4% 14.8% 2.4%8.1% 7.8% 2.8% .5%

1.3 .1 -1.4 -.353 59 37 3

34.2% 38.1% 23.9% 1.9%4.1% 4.5% 2.8% .2%

-.7 -.4 1.5 -.692 87 38 6

40.9% 38.7% 16.9% 2.7%7.1% 6.7% 2.9% .5%

.8 -.3 -.6 -.13 7 2 0

25.0% 58.3% 16.7% .0%.2% .5% .2% .0%

-.7 1.0 -.2 -.639 42 21 6

35.8% 38.5% 19.3% 5.5%3.0% 3.2% 1.6% .5%

-.3 -.2 .1 1.7114 139 67 11

33.8% 41.2% 19.9% 3.3%8.7% 10.7% 5.1% .8%

-1.1 .4 .5 .6489 520 243 36

37.5% 39.9% 18.6% 2.8%37.5% 39.9% 18.6% 2.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

It's great;come hereto school

Mostlypositivethings

Nothingmuch,

positive ornegative

Mostlynegative

things

tellausu

tmurray

C-27

Table 17. "What would you tell your friends about USU?"--cross-tabulation by college.

1 492.0% 100.0%

.1% 3.8%.62 166

1.2% 100.0%.2% 12.7%

.10 250

.0% 100.0%

.0% 19.2%-1.7

3 1551.9% 100.0%

.2% 11.9%.92 225

.9% 100.0%

.2% 17.3%-.4

0 12.0% 100.0%.0% .9%

-.41 109

.9% 100.0%

.1% 8.4%-.2

6 3371.8% 100.0%

.5% 25.9%1.115 1303

1.2% 100.0%1.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

It's not great;don't come

here to school

tellausu

Total

tmurray

C-28

Table 18. Number of semesters you had your assigned advisor--cross-tabulation by college.

24 16 1 254.5% 36.4% 2.3% 4.5%

2.5% 1.7% .1% .2%.2 .0 -.9 -.2

81 35 5 663.3% 27.3% 3.9% 4.7%

8.5% 3.7% .5% .6%1.8 -1.6 -.7 -.393 93 8 12

44.5% 44.5% 3.8% 5.7%9.8% 9.8% .8% 1.3%

-1.5 2.0 -1.0 .269 56 13 14

45.4% 36.8% 8.6% 9.2%7.3% 5.9% 1.4% 1.5%

-1.1 .2 1.7 2.089 57 11 8

53.6% 34.3% 6.6% 4.8%9.4% 6.0% 1.2% .8%

.3 -.4 .7 -.35 4 1 2

41.7% 33.3% 8.3% 16.7%.5% .4% .1% .2%

-.5 -.2 .4 1.736 31 9 3

44.4% 38.3% 11.1% 3.7%3.8% 3.3% .9% .3%

-1.0 .3 2.2 -.698 50 3 4

62.0% 31.6% 1.9% 2.5%10.3% 5.3% .3% .4%

1.7 -.9 -1.9 -1.5495 342 51 51

52.1% 36.0% 5.4% 5.4%52.1% 36.0% 5.4% 5.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

1 semester 2 semesters 3 semesters 4 semestersassigadv

tmurray

C-29

Table 18. Number of semesters you had your assigned advisor--cross-tabulation by college.

1 442.3% 100.0%

.1% 4.6%.71 128

.8% 100.0%

.1% 13.5%-.4

3 2091.4% 100.0%

.3% 22.0%.40 152

.0% 100.0%

.0% 16.0%-1.3

1 166.6% 100.0%.1% 17.5%

-.70 12

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.3%-.4

2 812.5% 100.0%

.2% 8.5%1.1

3 1581.9% 100.0%

.3% 16.6%.9

11 9501.2% 100.0%1.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

5+ semestersassigadv

Total

tmurray

C-30

Table 19. Reasons why respondents may have never met with their advisor or only met with their advisoronce--cross-tabulation by college.

6 12 1 620.7% 41.4% 3.4% 20.7%

.7% 1.4% .1% .7%.4 .6 -1.3 -.4

12 40 13 3111.3% 37.7% 12.3% 29.2%

1.4% 4.7% 1.5% 3.6%-1.5 .6 .0 1.0

22 65 15 2915.5% 45.8% 10.6% 20.4%

2.6% 7.6% 1.8% 3.4%-.5 2.3 -.5 -1.0

8 40 11 910.5% 52.6% 14.5% 11.8%

.9% 4.7% 1.3% 1.1%-1.4 2.7 .6 -2.2

24 58 27 3514.8% 35.8% 16.7% 21.6%

2.8% 6.8% 3.2% 4.1%-.8 .3 1.7 -.7

3 2 0 060.0% 40.0% .0% .0%

.4% .2% .0% .0%2.3 .2 -.8 -1.117 32 8 14

18.5% 34.8% 8.7% 15.2%2.0% 3.8% .9% 1.6%

.2 .0 -.9 -1.856 45 28 84

23.5% 18.9% 11.8% 35.3%6.6% 5.3% 3.3% 9.9%

2.3 -4.1 -.2 3.4148 294 103 208

17.4% 34.6% 12.1% 24.5%17.4% 34.6% 12.1% 24.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Did notthink it wasnecessary

Got theinformation I

wanted/

Got theinformation I

wanted /

Did not knowwho my

advisor was

nevermet

tmurray

C-31

Table 19. Reasons why respondents may have never met with their advisor or only met with their advisoronce--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 2910.3% 3.4% 100.0%

.4% .1% 3.4%1.5 -.7

3 7 1062.8% 6.6% 100.0%

.4% .8% 12.5%-.8 -.2

8 3 1425.6% 2.1% 100.0%

.9% .4% 16.7%.7 -2.23 5 76

3.9% 6.6% 100.0%.4% .6% 8.9%

-.2 -.29 9 162

5.6% 5.6% 100.0%1.1% 1.1% 19.1%

.7 -.70 0 5

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% .6%-.5 -.6

7 14 927.6% 15.2% 100.0%

.8% 1.6% 10.8%1.5 2.9

4 21 2381.7% 8.8% 100.0%

.5% 2.5% 28.0%-2.0 1.0

37 60 8504.4% 7.1% 100.0%4.4% 7.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

My advisorkept meinformed

Did not getinformation I

wanted/

nevermet

Total

tmurray

C-32

Table 20. If there were no obstacles would respondents meet more frequently with theiradvisor?--cross-tabulation by college.

31 15 4667.4% 32.6% 100.0%

2.7% 1.3% 4.0%.2 -.2

106 46 15269.7% 30.3% 100.0%

9.2% 4.0% 13.2%.7 -.9

148 75 22366.4% 33.6% 100.0%12.8% 6.5% 19.4%

.2 -.385 63 148

57.4% 42.6% 100.0%7.4% 5.5% 12.8%

-1.2 1.6130 74 204

63.7% 36.3% 100.0%11.3% 6.4% 17.7%

-.3 .46 4 10

60.0% 40.0% 100.0%.5% .3% .9%

-.2 .365 34 99

65.7% 34.3% 100.0%5.6% 3.0% 8.6%

.0 .0182 88 270

67.4% 32.6% 100.0%15.8% 7.6% 23.4%

.4 -.6753 399 1152

65.4% 34.6% 100.0%65.4% 34.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Yes Novisitmor

Total

tmurray

C-33

Table 21. Number of times respondents have changed their major--cross-tabulation by college.

29 16 1 161.7% 34.0% 2.1% 2.1%

2.4% 1.3% .1% .1%-1.1 1.8 -.1 1.6111 39 6 2

69.8% 24.5% 3.8% 1.3%9.2% 3.2% .5% .2%

-.8 .7 1.3 1.4171 59 6 1

72.2% 24.9% 2.5% .4%14.2% 4.9% .5% .1%

-.6 1.0 .3 -.2118 33 1 1

77.1% 21.6% .7% .7%9.8% 2.7% .1% .1%

.3 -.1 -1.3 .3155 52 7 1

72.1% 24.2% 3.3% .5%12.9% 4.3% .6% .1%

-.5 .8 1.0 -.18 4 0 0

66.7% 33.3% .0% .0%.7% .3% .0% .0%

-.3 .9 -.5 -.272 28 2 0

70.6% 27.5% 2.0% .0%6.0% 2.3% .2% .0%

-.5 1.2 -.2 -.7241 31 4 0

87.0% 11.2% 1.4% .0%20.0% 2.6% .3% .0%

2.2 -3.8 -.9 -1.2905 262 27 6

75.3% 21.8% 2.2% .5%75.3% 21.8% 2.2% .5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Never 1 time 2 times 3 timeschangmaj

tmurray

C-34

Table 21. Number of times respondents have changed their major--cross-tabulation by college.

0 47.0% 100.0%.0% 3.9%

-.31 159

.6% 100.0%

.1% 13.2%1.4

0 237.0% 100.0%.0% 19.7%

-.60 153

.0% 100.0%

.0% 12.7%-.5

0 215.0% 100.0%.0% 17.9%

-.60 12

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.0%-.1

0 102.0% 100.0%.0% 8.5%

-.41 277

.4% 100.0%

.1% 23.0%.82 1202

.2% 100.0%

.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

4+ timeschangmaj

Total

tmurray

C-35

Table 22. In an ideal situation, time interval I could make an appointment with myadvisor--cross-tabulation by college.

18 19 9 4639.1% 41.3% 19.6% 100.0%

1.5% 1.6% .8% 3.9%1.3 -1.1 .352 83 21 156

33.3% 53.2% 13.5% 100.0%4.4% 7.1% 1.8% 13.3%

1.0 .0 -1.263 134 36 233

27.0% 57.5% 15.5% 100.0%5.4% 11.4% 3.1% 19.8%

-.6 .9 -.837 74 38 149

24.8% 49.7% 25.5% 100.0%3.1% 6.3% 3.2% 12.7%

-1.0 -.6 2.356 115 38 209

26.8% 55.0% 18.2% 100.0%4.8% 9.8% 3.2% 17.8%

-.6 .4 .24 6 2 12

33.3% 50.0% 16.7% 100.0%.3% .5% .2% 1.0%

.3 -.2 -.119 62 17 98

19.4% 63.3% 17.3% 100.0%1.6% 5.3% 1.4% 8.3%

-1.8 1.4 -.194 133 46 273

34.4% 48.7% 16.8% 100.0%8.0% 11.3% 3.9% 23.2%

1.6 -1.0 -.3343 626 207 1176

29.2% 53.2% 17.6% 100.0%29.2% 53.2% 17.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

1 hour inadvance

1 day inadvance

1 week inadvance

makeappt

Total

tmurray

C-36

Table 23. If there were no obstacles, number of times respondents would visit their advisor--cross-tabulation bycollege.

0 1 11 15.0% 2.1% 23.4% 31.9%.0% .1% .9% 1.2%-1.0 -.8 -.3 1.7

6 13 40 283.7% 8.0% 24.5% 17.2%

.5% 1.1% 3.3% 2.3%1.2 1.9 -.3 -1.0

3 11 65 531.3% 4.7% 27.5% 22.5%

.2% .9% 5.3% 4.3%-1.0 .0 .5 .6

3 7 38 321.9% 4.5% 24.5% 20.6%

.2% .6% 3.1% 2.6%-.3 -.1 -.3 .0

4 7 55 471.9% 3.2% 25.5% 21.8%

.3% .6% 4.5% 3.9%-.4 -1.0 -.1 .4

0 1 5 2.0% 8.3% 41.7% 16.7%.0% .1% .4% .2%

-.5 .6 1.1 -.33 3 25 16

2.9% 2.9% 24.3% 15.5%.2% .2% 2.1% 1.3%

.4 -.8 -.3 -1.19 14 76 59

3.1% 4.9% 26.5% 20.6%.7% 1.1% 6.2% 4.8%

.9 .2 .2 .028 57 315 252

2.3% 4.7% 25.8% 20.7%2.3% 4.7% 25.8% 20.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

WeeklyEvery other

week MonthlyEvery couple

of months

visitwhen

tmurray

C-37

Table 23. If there were no obstacles, number of times respondents would visit their advisor--cross-tabulation bycollege.

16 2 2 4734.0% 4.3% 4.3% 100.0%

1.3% .2% .2% 3.9%-.7 .1 .968 5 3 163

41.7% 3.1% 1.8% 100.0%5.6% .4% .2% 13.4%

.3 -.5 -.398 5 1 236

41.5% 2.1% .4% 100.0%8.0% .4% .1% 19.4%

.3 -1.4 -1.866 7 2 155

42.6% 4.5% 1.3% 100.0%5.4% .6% .2% 12.7%

.4 .4 -.890 9 4 216

41.7% 4.2% 1.9% 100.0%7.4% .7% .3% 17.7%

.3 .2 -.44 0 0 12

33.3% .0% .0% 100.0%.3% .0% .0% 1.0%

-.4 -.7 -.548 5 3 103

46.6% 4.9% 2.9% 100.0%3.9% .4% .2% 8.4%

1.0 .5 .5103 14 12 287

35.9% 4.9% 4.2% 100.0%8.4% 1.1% 1.0% 23.5%

-1.2 .9 2.2493 47 27 1219

40.4% 3.9% 2.2% 100.0%40.4% 3.9% 2.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Eachsemester Once a year Never

visitwhen

Total

tmurray

C-38

Table 24. Average length of advising appointments--cross-tabulation by college.

10 26 522.7% 59.1% 11.4%

1.0% 2.5% .5%-1.9 1.4 .1

81 54 1055.5% 37.0% 6.8%

7.9% 5.3% 1.0%2.7 -1.5 -1.558 114 36

27.0% 53.0% 16.7%5.7% 11.1% 3.5%

-3.3 1.7 2.669 58 16

46.9% 39.5% 10.9%6.7% 5.7% 1.6%

1.1 -1.0 .065 91 14

37.6% 52.6% 8.1%6.3% 8.9% 1.4%

-.8 1.4 -1.14 5 3

33.3% 41.7% 25.0%.4% .5% .3%

-.4 -.2 1.537 31 6

48.1% 40.3% 7.8%3.6% 3.0% .6%

.9 -.7 -.899 85 21

46.9% 40.3% 10.0%9.7% 8.3% 2.0%

1.3 -1.1 -.4423 464 111

41.3% 45.3% 10.8%41.3% 45.3% 10.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

1 - 10minutes

11 - 20minutes

21 - 30minutes

lengappt

tmurray

C-39

Table 24. Average length of advising appointments--cross-tabulation by college.

3 446.8% 100.0%

.3% 4.3%1.7

1 146.7% 100.0%.1% 14.2%-1.5

7 2153.3% 100.0%

.7% 21.0%.64 147

2.7% 100.0%.4% 14.3%

.13 173

1.7% 100.0%.3% 16.9%

-.70 12

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.2%-.6

3 773.9% 100.0%

.3% 7.5%.76 211

2.8% 100.0%.6% 20.6%

.227 1025

2.6% 100.0%2.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

30 or moreminutes

lengappt

Total

tmurray

C-40

Table 25. Number of times respondents met with their advisor in the past school year--cross-tabulation by college.

8 17 8 917.4% 37.0% 17.4% 19.6%

.7% 1.4% .7% .7%-1.2 -.2 -.4 2.9

31 64 40 1219.0% 39.3% 24.5% 7.4%

2.6% 5.3% 3.3% 1.0%-2.0 .1 1.2 -.2

47 89 58 2219.7% 37.2% 24.3% 9.2%

3.9% 7.4% 4.8% 1.8%-2.2 -.4 1.4 .8

20 46 57 2113.1% 30.1% 37.3% 13.7%

1.7% 3.8% 4.7% 1.7%-3.3 -1.7 4.7 2.7

59 97 32 1128.2% 46.4% 15.3% 5.3%

4.9% 8.1% 2.7% .9%.4 1.8 -1.6 -1.30 6 2 3

.0% 50.0% 16.7% 25.0%

.0% .5% .2% .2%-1.8 .6 -.3 2.1

44 39 14 543.1% 38.2% 13.7% 4.9%

3.7% 3.2% 1.2% .4%3.1 -.1 -1.5 -1.0

115 109 33 1041.4% 39.2% 11.9% 3.6%

9.6% 9.1% 2.7% .8%4.6 .1 -3.1 -2.5

324 467 244 9327.0% 38.9% 20.3% 7.7%27.0% 38.9% 20.3% 7.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Never 1 time 2 times 3 timestimesmet

tmurray

C-41


3 1 0 06.5% 2.2% .0% .0%

.2% .1% .0% .0%1.0 .8 -.4 -.310 1 1 1

6.1% .6% .6% .6%.8% .1% .1% .1%1.6 -.5 .4 1.416 4 2 1

6.7% 1.7% .8% .4%1.3% .3% .2% .1%

2.4 1.0 1.0 1.07 1 0 0

4.6% .7% .0% .0%.6% .1% .0% .0%

.5 -.4 -.8 -.55 1 2 0

2.4% .5% 1.0% .0%.4% .1% .2% .0%-1.0 -.8 1.2 -.6

0 0 0 0.0% .0% .0% .0%.0% .0% .0% .0%

-.7 -.3 -.2 -.10 0 0 0

.0% .0% .0% .0%

.0% .0% .0% .0%-2.0 -1.0 -.7 -.4

4 4 0 01.4% 1.4% .0% .0%

.3% .3% .0% .0%-2.0 .7 -1.1 -.7

45 12 5 23.7% 1.0% .4% .2%3.7% 1.0% .4% .2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

4 times 5 times 6 times 7 timestimesmet

tmurray

C-42


0 0 46.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% 3.8%

-.2 -.60 3 163

.0% 1.8% 100.0%

.0% .2% 13.6%-.4 1.6

0 0 239.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% 19.9%

-.4 -1.31 0 153

.7% .0% 100.0%

.1% .0% 12.7%2.4 -1.1

0 2 209.0% 1.0% 100.0%.0% .2% 17.4%

-.4 .30 1 12

.0% 8.3% 100.0%

.0% .1% 1.0%-.1 3.0

0 0 102.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% 8.5%

-.3 -.90 3 278

.0% 1.1% 100.0%

.0% .2% 23.1%-.5 .6

1 9 1202.1% .7% 100.0%.1% .7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

8 times 10+ timestimesmet

Total

tmurray

C-43

Table 26. Major source of information for academic planning--cross-tabulation by college.

17 1 0 2035.4% 2.1% .0% 41.7%

1.4% .1% .0% 1.7%1.1 -.7 -2.5 .352 5 23 56

32.3% 3.1% 14.3% 34.8%4.4% .4% 1.9% 4.7%

1.3 -.7 .5 -.893 9 18 90

39.7% 3.8% 7.7% 38.5%7.8% .8% 1.5% 7.6%

3.7 -.3 -2.2 -.144 6 6 82

28.4% 3.9% 3.9% 52.9%3.7% .5% .5% 6.9%

.3 -.2 -3.1 2.855 14 25 94

26.7% 6.8% 12.1% 45.6%4.6% 1.2% 2.1% 7.9%

-.1 1.7 -.3 1.57 0 0 5

58.3% .0% .0% 41.7%.6% .0% .0% .4%2.1 -.7 -1.2 .212 6 13 55

11.9% 5.9% 12.9% 54.5%1.0% .5% 1.1% 4.6%

-2.9 .8 .0 2.543 10 69 62

15.6% 3.6% 25.1% 22.5%3.6% .8% 5.8% 5.2%

-3.7 -.5 5.6 -4.4323 51 154 464

27.1% 4.3% 12.9% 38.9%27.1% 4.3% 12.9% 38.9%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AdvisorOther

faculty/staffUSU General

Catalog

Majorrequirement

sheets

sourcinf

tmurray

C-44

Table 26. Major source of information for academic planning--cross-tabulation by college.

7 3 4814.6% 6.3% 100.0%

.6% .3% 4.0%.5 .4

17 8 16110.6% 5.0% 100.0%

1.4% .7% 13.5%-.5 .116 8 234

6.8% 3.4% 100.0%1.3% .7% 19.6%

-2.2 -1.010 7 155

6.5% 4.5% 100.0%.8% .6% 13.0%-2.0 -.2

15 3 2067.3% 1.5% 100.0%1.3% .3% 17.3%

-1.9 -2.20 0 12

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 1.0%-1.2 -.8

11 4 10110.9% 4.0% 100.0%

.9% .3% 8.5%-.3 -.466 25 275

24.0% 9.1% 100.0%5.5% 2.1% 23.1%

5.8 3.2142 58 1192

11.9% 4.9% 100.0%11.9% 4.9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Otherstudents Other

sourcinf

Total

tmurray

C-45

Table 27. My advisor is friendly toward me--cross-tabulation by college.

24 11 2 158.5% 26.8% 4.9% 2.4%

2.4% 1.1% .2% .1%2.2 -1.0 -1.8 -.859 54 18 7

41.8% 38.3% 12.8% 5.0%5.9% 5.4% 1.8% .7%

.8 .3 -1.0 -.191 83 24 9

42.1% 38.4% 11.1% 4.2%9.1% 8.3% 2.4% .9%

1.1 .5 -1.8 -.748 55 33 13

31.6% 36.2% 21.7% 8.6%4.8% 5.5% 3.3% 1.3%

-1.2 -.1 1.7 1.875 60 25 4

43.6% 34.9% 14.5% 2.3%7.5% 6.0% 2.5% .4%

1.3 -.4 -.5 -1.67 4 1 0

58.3% 33.3% 8.3% .0%.7% .4% .1% .0%1.2 -.2 -.7 -.822 21 22 7

28.2% 26.9% 28.2% 9.0%2.2% 2.1% 2.2% .7%

-1.4 -1.4 2.7 1.551 78 36 11

26.8% 41.1% 18.9% 5.8%5.1% 7.8% 3.6% 1.1%

-2.4 1.0 1.0 .4377 366 161 52

37.6% 36.5% 16.1% 5.2%37.6% 36.5% 16.1% 5.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyAgree Agree Neutral Disagree

advfrien

tmurray

C-46

Table 27. My advisor is friendly toward me--cross-tabulation by college.

1 2 412.4% 4.9% 100.0%

.1% .2% 4.1%-.4 2.5

3 0 1412.1% .0% 100.0%

.3% .0% 14.1%-.9 -1.2

6 3 2162.8% 1.4% 100.0%

.6% .3% 21.6%-.6 .6

3 0 1522.0% .0% 100.0%

.3% .0% 15.2%-1.1 -1.2

7 1 1724.1% .6% 100.0%

.7% .1% 17.2%.3 -.50 0 12

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 1.2%-.7 -.3

6 0 787.7% .0% 100.0%

.6% .0% 7.8%1.9 -.910 4 190

5.3% 2.1% 100.0%1.0% .4% 19.0%

1.2 1.536 10 1002

3.6% 1.0% 100.0%3.6% 1.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advfrien

Total

tmurray

C-47

Table 28. My advisor demonstrated interest in my welfare--cross-tabulation by college.

15 14 7 336.6% 34.1% 17.1% 7.3%

1.5% 1.4% .7% .3%1.6 -.5 -1.0 -.134 57 37 10

24.1% 40.4% 26.2% 7.1%3.4% 5.7% 3.7% 1.0%

.0 .3 .4 -.459 86 50 10

27.6% 40.2% 23.4% 4.7%5.9% 8.7% 5.0% 1.0%

1.0 .3 -.4 -1.738 62 36 13

25.2% 41.1% 23.8% 8.6%3.8% 6.2% 3.6% 1.3%

.3 .5 -.2 .342 69 38 12

24.9% 40.8% 22.5% 7.1%4.2% 6.9% 3.8% 1.2%

.2 .4 -.5 -.44 5 3 0

33.3% 41.7% 25.0% .0%.4% .5% .3% .0%

.7 .2 .0 -1.013 29 17 12

16.9% 37.7% 22.1% 15.6%1.3% 2.9% 1.7% 1.2%

-1.3 -.2 -.4 2.434 63 56 19

18.1% 33.5% 29.8% 10.1%3.4% 6.3% 5.6% 1.9%

-1.7 -1.2 1.4 1.0239 385 244 79

24.1% 38.8% 24.6% 8.0%24.1% 38.8% 24.6% 8.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advinter

tmurray

C-48

Table 28. My advisor demonstrated interest in my welfare--cross-tabulation by college.

1 1 412.4% 2.4% 100.0%

.1% .1% 4.1%-.5 1.2

3 0 1412.1% .0% 100.0%

.3% .0% 14.2%-1.0 -1.1

6 3 2142.8% 1.4% 100.0%

.6% .3% 21.6%-.8 1.0

2 0 1511.3% .0% 100.0%

.2% .0% 15.2%-1.6 -1.1

8 0 1694.7% .0% 100.0%

.8% .0% 17.0%.6 -1.20 0 12

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 1.2%-.7 -.3

6 0 777.8% .0% 100.0%

.6% .0% 7.8%1.8 -.812 4 188

6.4% 2.1% 100.0%1.2% .4% 18.9%

1.8 2.038 8 993

3.8% .8% 100.0%3.8% .8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advinter

Total

tmurray

C-49

Table 29. My advisor was readily available for consultation--cross-tabulation by college.

9 20 7 222.0% 48.8% 17.1% 4.9%

.9% 2.0% .7% .2%.8 1.4 -1.5 -1.3

23 52 45 1716.3% 36.9% 31.9% 12.1%

2.3% 5.2% 4.5% 1.7%-.1 .3 .5 .050 86 53 14

23.5% 40.4% 24.9% 6.6%5.0% 8.7% 5.3% 1.4%

2.4 1.2 -1.3 -2.317 39 55 34

11.2% 25.7% 36.2% 22.4%1.7% 3.9% 5.5% 3.4%

-1.7 -2.0 1.5 3.631 71 41 16

18.3% 42.0% 24.3% 9.5%3.1% 7.2% 4.1% 1.6%

.5 1.4 -1.3 -1.02 6 1 2

16.7% 50.0% 8.3% 16.7%.2% .6% .1% .2%

.0 .8 -1.4 .510 23 27 8

13.0% 29.9% 35.1% 10.4%1.0% 2.3% 2.7% .8%

-.8 -.8 .9 -.424 56 65 27

12.8% 29.8% 34.6% 14.4%2.4% 5.6% 6.5% 2.7%

-1.3 -1.3 1.3 .9166 353 294 120

16.7% 35.5% 29.6% 12.1%16.7% 35.5% 29.6% 12.1%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advavail

tmurray

C-50

Table 29. My advisor was readily available for consultation--cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 414.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.1%-.1 1.2

4 0 1412.8% .0% 100.0%

.4% .0% 14.2%-1.2 -1.1

7 3 2133.3% 1.4% 100.0%

.7% .3% 21.5%-1.2 1.0

7 0 1524.6% .0% 100.0%

.7% .0% 15.3%-.3 -1.110 0 169

5.9% .0% 100.0%1.0% .0% 17.0%

.4 -1.21 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.5 -.39 0 77

11.7% .0% 100.0%.9% .0% 7.8%2.5 -.812 4 188

6.4% 2.1% 100.0%1.2% .4% 18.9%

.7 2.052 8 993

5.2% .8% 100.0%5.2% .8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advavail

Total

tmurray

C-51

Table 30. My advisor was easy to get an appointment with--cross-tabulation by college.

11 20 4 326.8% 48.8% 9.8% 7.3%

1.1% 2.0% .4% .3%1.5 1.4 -2.1 -1.222 54 46 18

15.6% 38.3% 32.6% 12.8%2.2% 5.5% 4.7% 1.8%

-.4 .5 1.5 -.455 82 42 19

26.1% 38.9% 19.9% 9.0%5.6% 8.3% 4.2% 1.9%

3.2 .7 -1.8 -2.013 48 44 39

8.6% 31.6% 28.9% 25.7%1.3% 4.9% 4.4% 3.9%

-2.5 -.9 .7 3.830 62 49 16

17.8% 36.7% 29.0% 9.5%3.0% 6.3% 5.0% 1.6%

.2 .1 .7 -1.62 6 1 2

16.7% 50.0% 8.3% 16.7%.2% .6% .1% .2%

.0 .8 -1.2 .28 31 19 7

10.7% 41.3% 25.3% 9.3%.8% 3.1% 1.9% .7%-1.3 .8 -.1 -1.1

27 53 54 3514.4% 28.2% 28.7% 18.6%

2.7% 5.4% 5.5% 3.5%-.9 -1.8 .7 1.7

168 356 259 13917.0% 36.0% 26.2% 14.1%17.0% 36.0% 26.2% 14.1%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advappt

tmurray

C-52

Table 30. My advisor was easy to get an appointment with--cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 414.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.1%-.3 1.3

1 0 141.7% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 14.3%-2.6 -1.0

11 2 2115.2% .9% 100.0%1.1% .2% 21.3%

-.5 .48 0 152

5.3% .0% 100.0%.8% .0% 15.4%

-.4 -1.012 0 169

7.1% .0% 100.0%1.2% .0% 17.1%

.5 -1.11 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.3 -.310 0 75

13.3% .0% 100.0%1.0% .0% 7.6%

2.6 -.715 4 188

8.0% 2.1% 100.0%1.5% .4% 19.0%

1.1 2.360 7 989

6.1% .7% 100.0%6.1% .7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advappt

Total

tmurray

C-53

Table 31. My advisor does not make me feel rushed during our meetings--cross-tabulation by college.

13 16 6 331.7% 39.0% 14.6% 7.3%

1.3% 1.6% .6% .3%1.2 .3 -1.1 -.831 51 37 17

22.0% 36.2% 26.2% 12.1%3.1% 5.2% 3.7% 1.7%

-.2 .1 .8 .268 77 34 21

32.2% 36.5% 16.1% 10.0%6.9% 7.8% 3.4% 2.1%

2.8 .2 -2.1 -.625 51 43 26

16.4% 33.6% 28.3% 17.1%2.5% 5.2% 4.4% 2.6%

-1.7 -.5 1.3 2.140 73 28 14

23.8% 43.5% 16.7% 8.3%4.0% 7.4% 2.8% 1.4%

.3 1.7 -1.8 -1.23 5 2 1

25.0% 41.7% 16.7% 8.3%.3% .5% .2% .1%

.2 .3 -.5 -.312 22 20 14

15.8% 28.9% 26.3% 18.4%1.2% 2.2% 2.0% 1.4%

-1.3 -1.0 .6 1.834 59 59 17

18.2% 31.6% 31.6% 9.1%3.4% 6.0% 6.0% 1.7%

-1.3 -1.0 2.4 -.9226 354 229 113

22.9% 35.8% 23.2% 11.4%22.9% 35.8% 23.2% 11.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advrush

tmurray

C-54

Table 31. My advisor does not make me feel rushed during our meetings--cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 414.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.1%-.2 1.0

5 0 1413.5% .0% 100.0%

.5% .0% 14.3%-1.1 -1.1

8 3 2113.8% 1.4% 100.0%

.8% .3% 21.4%-1.2 .8

7 0 1524.6% .0% 100.0%

.7% .0% 15.4%-.6 -1.212 1 168

7.1% .6% 100.0%1.2% .1% 17.0%

.7 -.41 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.4 -.38 0 76

10.5% .0% 100.0%.8% .0% 7.7%1.7 -.814 4 187

7.5% 2.1% 100.0%1.4% .4% 18.9%

1.0 1.857 9 988

5.8% .9% 100.0%5.8% .9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advrush

Total

tmurray

C-55

Table 32. My advisor is prepared for appointments with appropriate transcripts and degree requirementanalyses--cross-tabulation by college.

12 14 10 129.3% 34.1% 24.4% 2.4%

1.2% 1.4% 1.0% .1%.6 -.8 .4 -.7

28 70 28 820.1% 50.4% 20.1% 5.8%

2.9% 7.1% 2.9% .8%-1.1 1.5 -.3 .5

65 89 33 1031.1% 42.6% 15.8% 4.8%

6.6% 9.1% 3.4% 1.0%1.9 .1 -1.7 -.146 64 30 8

30.3% 42.1% 19.7% 5.3%4.7% 6.5% 3.1% .8%

1.4 .0 -.4 .246 69 27 12

27.7% 41.6% 16.3% 7.2%4.7% 7.0% 2.7% 1.2%

.8 -.1 -1.4 1.42 6 3 0

16.7% 50.0% 25.0% .0%.2% .6% .3% .0%

-.6 .4 .3 -.811 25 24 4

14.7% 33.3% 32.0% 5.3%1.1% 2.5% 2.4% .4%

-1.7 -1.2 2.0 .232 77 54 5

17.0% 41.0% 28.7% 2.7%3.3% 7.8% 5.5% .5%

-2.1 -.3 2.2 -1.4242 414 209 48

24.6% 42.2% 21.3% 4.9%24.6% 42.2% 21.3% 4.9%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advprep

tmurray

C-56

Table 32. My advisor is prepared for appointments with appropriate transcripts and degree requirementanalyses--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 417.3% 2.4% 100.0%

.3% .1% 4.2%.4 .64 1 139

2.9% .7% 100.0%.4% .1% 14.2%-1.4 -.6

9 3 2094.3% 1.4% 100.0%

.9% .3% 21.3%-.8 .1

3 1 1522.0% .7% 100.0%

.3% .1% 15.5%-1.9 -.7

11 1 1666.6% .6% 100.0%1.1% .1% 16.9%

.5 -.81 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.4 -.410 1 75

13.3% 1.3% 100.0%1.0% .1% 7.6%

2.8 .015 5 188

8.0% 2.7% 100.0%1.5% .5% 19.1%

1.3 1.656 13 982

5.7% 1.3% 100.0%5.7% 1.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advprep

Total

tmurray

C-57

Table 33. My advisor communicates his/her advice effectively--cross-tabulation by college.

16 15 6 139.0% 36.6% 14.6% 2.4%

1.6% 1.5% .6% .1%1.6 -.7 -.7 -.929 77 26 4

20.6% 54.6% 18.4% 2.8%2.9% 7.8% 2.6% .4%

-1.3 1.9 -.3 -1.466 98 30 9

31.3% 46.4% 14.2% 4.3%6.7% 9.9% 3.0% .9%

1.5 .6 -1.7 -.947 64 32 6

30.9% 42.1% 21.1% 3.9%4.8% 6.5% 3.2% .6%

1.2 -.3 .5 -.948 74 29 9

28.6% 44.0% 17.3% 5.4%4.9% 7.5% 2.9% .9%

.6 .1 -.6 -.23 6 3 0

25.0% 50.0% 25.0% .0%.3% .6% .3% .0%

-.1 .3 .4 -.813 30 16 11

17.1% 39.5% 21.1% 14.5%1.3% 3.0% 1.6% 1.1%

-1.5 -.6 .3 3.236 69 50 17

19.1% 36.7% 26.6% 9.0%3.6% 7.0% 5.1% 1.7%

-1.9 -1.5 2.2 1.9258 433 192 57

26.1% 43.8% 19.4% 5.8%26.1% 43.8% 19.4% 5.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advcomm

tmurray

C-58

Table 33. My advisor communicates his/her advice effectively--cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 414.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.1%.3 .95 0 141

3.5% .0% 100.0%.5% .0% 14.3%

-.2 -1.25 3 211

2.4% 1.4% 100.0%.5% .3% 21.3%-1.2 .6

3 0 1522.0% .0% 100.0%

.3% .0% 15.4%-1.2 -1.2

8 0 1684.8% .0% 100.0%

.8% .0% 17.0%.5 -1.30 0 12

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 1.2%-.7 -.3

5 1 766.6% 1.3% 100.0%

.5% .1% 7.7%1.2 .311 5 188

5.9% 2.7% 100.0%1.1% .5% 19.0%

1.3 2.239 10 989

3.9% 1.0% 100.0%3.9% 1.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advcomm

Total

tmurray

C-59

Table 34. My advisor listens well to my concerns--cross-tabulation by college.

16 16 6 039.0% 39.0% 14.6% .0%

1.6% 1.6% .6% .0%2.0 -.3 -1.1 -1.533 62 33 8

23.4% 44.0% 23.4% 5.7%3.3% 6.3% 3.3% .8%

.0 .4 .1 .161 93 39 10

28.8% 43.9% 18.4% 4.7%6.2% 9.4% 3.9% 1.0%

1.6 .5 -1.4 -.530 63 44 9

19.9% 41.7% 29.1% 6.0%3.0% 6.4% 4.4% .9%

-.9 .0 1.5 .344 73 33 7

26.2% 43.5% 19.6% 4.2%4.4% 7.4% 3.3% .7%

.7 .3 -.9 -.73 5 3 0

25.0% 41.7% 25.0% .0%.3% .5% .3% .0%

.1 .0 .1 -.89 31 19 8

11.8% 40.8% 25.0% 10.5%.9% 3.1% 1.9% .8%-2.1 -.1 .3 1.9

37 71 52 1219.7% 37.8% 27.7% 6.4%

3.7% 7.2% 5.3% 1.2%-1.1 -.9 1.3 .5233 414 229 54

23.6% 41.9% 23.2% 5.5%23.6% 41.9% 23.2% 5.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advliste

tmurray

C-60

Table 34. My advisor listens well to my concerns--cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 414.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.1%-.1 1.2

5 0 1413.5% .0% 100.0%

.5% .0% 14.3%-.8 -1.1

6 3 2122.8% 1.4% 100.0%

.6% .3% 21.4%-1.5 1.0

5 0 1513.3% .0% 100.0%

.5% .0% 15.3%-1.0 -1.1

11 0 1686.5% .0% 100.0%1.1% .0% 17.0%

.8 -1.21 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.5 -.39 0 76

11.8% .0% 100.0%.9% .0% 7.7%2.6 -.812 4 188

6.4% 2.1% 100.0%1.2% .4% 19.0%

.7 2.051 8 989

5.2% .8% 100.0%5.2% .8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advliste

Total

tmurray

C-61

Table 35. My advisor understands my need for advice--cross-tabulation by college.

18 12 6 243.9% 29.3% 14.6% 4.9%

1.8% 1.2% .6% .2%2.8 -1.1 -1.2 -.431 62 37 6

22.0% 44.0% 26.2% 4.3%3.1% 6.3% 3.8% .6%

-.3 .8 .5 -1.056 87 48 10

26.7% 41.4% 22.9% 4.8%5.7% 8.8% 4.9% 1.0%

1.1 .4 -.4 -.932 66 41 8

21.1% 43.4% 27.0% 5.3%3.2% 6.7% 4.2% .8%

-.5 .7 .7 -.541 74 30 10

24.7% 44.6% 18.1% 6.0%4.2% 7.5% 3.0% 1.0%

.5 1.0 -1.6 -.12 4 4 1

16.7% 33.3% 33.3% 8.3%.2% .4% .4% .1%

-.5 -.4 .6 .310 25 22 7

13.2% 32.9% 28.9% 9.2%1.0% 2.5% 2.2% .7%

-1.8 -1.0 .8 1.037 63 51 18

19.7% 33.5% 27.1% 9.6%3.8% 6.4% 5.2% 1.8%

-1.0 -1.4 .8 1.8227 393 239 62

23.0% 39.9% 24.2% 6.3%23.0% 39.9% 24.2% 6.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advunder

tmurray

C-62

Table 35. My advisor understands my need for advice--cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 414.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.2%-.2 1.0

5 0 1413.5% .0% 100.0%

.5% .0% 14.3%-1.1 -1.1

6 3 2102.9% 1.4% 100.0%

.6% .3% 21.3%-1.7 .8

5 0 1523.3% .0% 100.0%

.5% .0% 15.4%-1.2 -1.2

11 0 1666.6% .0% 100.0%1.1% .0% 16.8%

.5 -1.21 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.4 -.312 0 76

15.8% .0% 100.0%1.2% .0% 7.7%

3.7 -.814 5 188

7.4% 2.7% 100.0%1.4% .5% 19.1%

1.0 2.556 9 986

5.7% .9% 100.0%5.7% .9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advunder

Total

tmurray

C-63

Table 36. My advisor helps me clarify career and life goals--cross-tabulation by college.

13 14 8 233.3% 35.9% 20.5% 5.1%

1.3% 1.4% .8% .2%2.3 .5 -1.3 -1.024 43 47 17

17.3% 30.9% 33.8% 12.2%2.4% 4.4% 4.8% 1.7%

-.1 -.2 .3 .649 74 57 20

23.1% 34.9% 26.9% 9.4%5.0% 7.5% 5.8% 2.0%

1.9 .8 -1.4 -.523 48 58 15

15.1% 31.6% 38.2% 9.9%2.3% 4.9% 5.9% 1.5%

-.8 .0 1.3 -.231 54 53 15

18.8% 32.7% 32.1% 9.1%3.2% 5.5% 5.4% 1.5%

.3 .2 -.1 -.61 7 1 3

8.3% 58.3% 8.3% 25.0%.1% .7% .1% .3%

-.8 1.6 -1.5 1.610 25 23 9

13.2% 32.9% 30.3% 11.8%1.0% 2.5% 2.3% .9%

-.9 .2 -.3 .423 47 71 22

12.2% 25.0% 37.8% 11.7%2.3% 4.8% 7.2% 2.2%

-1.8 -1.6 1.3 .5174 312 318 103

17.7% 31.7% 32.3% 10.5%17.7% 31.7% 32.3% 10.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advcgoal

tmurray

C-64

Table 36. My advisor helps me clarify career and life goals--cross-tabulation by college.

2 0 395.1% .0% 100.0%

.2% .0% 4.0%-.4 -.6

8 0 1395.8% .0% 100.0%

.8% .0% 14.1%-.5 -1.1

9 3 2124.2% 1.4% 100.0%

.9% .3% 21.6%-1.5 1.0

8 0 1525.3% .0% 100.0%

.8% .0% 15.5%-.8 -1.111 1 165

6.7% .6% 100.0%1.1% .1% 16.8%

-.1 -.30 0 12

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 1.2%-.9 -.3

9 0 7611.8% .0% 100.0%

.9% .0% 7.7%1.6 -.821 4 188

11.2% 2.1% 100.0%2.1% .4% 19.1%

2.2 2.068 8 983

6.9% .8% 100.0%6.9% .8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advcgoal

Total

tmurray

C-65

Table 37. My advisor refers me to resources that help me clarify career and life goals--cross-tabulation by college.

7 19 9 317.1% 46.3% 22.0% 7.3%

.7% 1.9% .9% .3%.3 1.6 -1.2 -.9

24 46 46 1217.4% 33.3% 33.3% 8.7%

2.4% 4.7% 4.7% 1.2%.6 .3 .2 -1.1

43 70 59 2120.4% 33.2% 28.0% 10.0%

4.4% 7.1% 6.0% 2.1%1.8 .3 -1.1 -.816 39 68 20

10.5% 25.7% 44.7% 13.2%1.6% 4.0% 6.9% 2.0%

-1.6 -1.4 2.7 .424 68 45 18

14.5% 41.2% 27.3% 10.9%2.4% 6.9% 4.6% 1.8%

-.3 2.1 -1.1 -.40 4 3 3

.0% 33.3% 25.0% 25.0%

.0% .4% .3% .3%-1.4 .1 -.4 1.3

12 19 24 915.8% 25.0% 31.6% 11.8%

1.2% 1.9% 2.4% .9%.1 -1.1 -.1 .0

26 49 63 3113.9% 26.2% 33.7% 16.6%

2.6% 5.0% 6.4% 3.2%-.5 -1.4 .3 1.8

152 314 317 11715.5% 32.0% 32.3% 11.9%15.5% 32.0% 32.3% 11.9%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advrgoal

tmurray

C-66

Table 37. My advisor refers me to resources that help me clarify career and life goals--cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 414.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.2%-.6 .8

9 1 1386.5% .7% 100.0%

.9% .1% 14.1%-.3 -.414 4 211

6.6% 1.9% 100.0%1.4% .4% 21.5%

-.3 1.19 0 152

5.9% .0% 100.0%.9% .0% 15.5%

-.6 -1.310 0 165

6.1% .0% 100.0%1.0% .0% 16.8%

-.6 -1.42 0 12

16.7% .0% 100.0%.2% .0% 1.2%1.2 -.411 1 76

14.5% 1.3% 100.0%1.1% .1% 7.7%

2.3 .214 4 187

7.5% 2.1% 100.0%1.4% .4% 19.0%

.1 1.371 11 982

7.2% 1.1% 100.0%7.2% 1.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advrgoal

Total

tmurray

C-67

Table 38. My advisor helps me understand my interests and abilities--cross-tabulation by college.

7 20 5 517.1% 48.8% 12.2% 12.2%

.7% 2.0% .5% .5%.8 2.6 -2.6 -.2

18 39 62 1212.9% 27.9% 44.3% 8.6%

1.8% 4.0% 6.3% 1.2%.0 .1 1.4 -1.5

33 61 74 2615.6% 28.9% 35.1% 12.3%

3.4% 6.2% 7.5% 2.6%1.1 .5 -.5 -.412 39 66 26

7.9% 25.7% 43.4% 17.1%1.2% 4.0% 6.7% 2.6%

-1.7 -.4 1.3 1.325 52 52 22

15.2% 31.5% 31.5% 13.3%2.5% 5.3% 5.3% 2.2%

.8 1.0 -1.2 .01 3 5 2

8.3% 25.0% 41.7% 16.7%.1% .3% .5% .2%

-.4 -.2 .3 .36 13 27 14

8.0% 17.3% 36.0% 18.7%.6% 1.3% 2.7% 1.4%-1.2 -1.7 -.2 1.3

24 41 74 2412.9% 22.0% 39.8% 12.9%

2.4% 4.2% 7.5% 2.4%.0 -1.4 .6 -.2

126 268 365 13112.8% 27.3% 37.2% 13.3%12.8% 27.3% 37.2% 13.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advhelps

tmurray

C-68

Table 38. My advisor helps me understand my interests and abilities--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 417.3% 2.4% 100.0%

.3% .1% 4.2%-.2 .7

8 1 1405.7% .7% 100.0%

.8% .1% 14.3%-1.0 -.5

14 3 2116.6% 1.4% 100.0%1.4% .3% 21.5%

-.8 .39 0 152

5.9% .0% 100.0%.9% .0% 15.5%-1.0 -1.4

13 1 1657.9% .6% 100.0%1.3% .1% 16.8%

-.1 -.71 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.0 -.413 2 75

17.3% 2.7% 100.0%1.3% .2% 7.6%

2.8 1.119 4 186

10.2% 2.2% 100.0%1.9% .4% 18.9%

1.0 1.180 12 982

8.1% 1.2% 100.0%8.1% 1.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advhelps

Total

tmurray

C-69

Table 39. My advisor helps me evaluate my interests and abilities--cross-tabulation by college.

8 19 5 420.0% 47.5% 12.5% 10.0%

.8% 1.9% .5% .4%1.3 2.3 -2.6 -.418 39 58 13

12.9% 27.9% 41.4% 9.3%1.8% 4.0% 5.9% 1.3%

.0 -.1 .9 -1.132 61 75 26

15.2% 29.0% 35.7% 12.4%3.3% 6.2% 7.7% 2.7%

1.0 .2 -.3 .013 44 68 19

8.6% 28.9% 44.7% 12.5%1.3% 4.5% 6.9% 1.9%

-1.5 .2 1.6 .025 47 63 16

15.2% 28.5% 38.2% 9.7%2.6% 4.8% 6.4% 1.6%

.8 .1 .2 -1.01 4 4 2

8.3% 33.3% 33.3% 16.7%.1% .4% .4% .2%

-.4 .3 -.2 .47 18 22 14

9.3% 24.0% 29.3% 18.7%.7% 1.8% 2.2% 1.4%

-.9 -.7 -1.1 1.522 44 68 28

11.8% 23.7% 36.6% 15.1%2.2% 4.5% 6.9% 2.9%

-.4 -1.2 -.1 1.0126 276 363 122

12.9% 28.2% 37.0% 12.4%12.9% 28.2% 37.0% 12.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


adveval

tmurray

C-70

Table 39. My advisor helps me evaluate my interests and abilities--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 407.5% 2.5% 100.0%

.3% .1% 4.1%-.2 .811 1 140

7.9% .7% 100.0%1.1% .1% 14.3%

-.2 -.514 2 210

6.7% 1.0% 100.0%1.4% .2% 21.4%

-.9 -.28 0 152

5.3% .0% 100.0%.8% .0% 15.5%-1.3 -1.3

13 1 1657.9% .6% 100.0%1.3% .1% 16.8%

-.2 -.61 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.0 -.412 2 75

16.0% 2.7% 100.0%1.2% .2% 7.7%

2.3 1.320 4 186

10.8% 2.2% 100.0%2.0% .4% 19.0%

1.1 1.382 11 980

8.4% 1.1% 100.0%8.4% 1.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

adveval

Total

tmurray

C-71

Table 40. My advisor keeps my interest and abilities in mind when helping me choosecourses/programs--cross-tabulation by college.

14 15 5 434.1% 36.6% 12.2% 9.8%

1.4% 1.5% .5% .4%2.8 .4 -2.2 -.119 48 47 12

13.8% 34.8% 34.1% 8.7%2.0% 5.0% 4.9% 1.2%

-.8 .3 .6 -.640 77 55 23

19.0% 36.7% 26.2% 11.0%4.1% 7.9% 5.7% 2.4%

.9 .8 -1.3 .320 40 66 15

13.3% 26.7% 44.0% 10.0%2.1% 4.1% 6.8% 1.5%

-.9 -1.4 2.8 -.133 64 41 15

20.0% 38.8% 24.8% 9.1%3.4% 6.6% 4.2% 1.5%

1.1 1.2 -1.4 -.51 5 3 2

8.3% 41.7% 25.0% 16.7%.1% .5% .3% .2%

-.7 .5 -.4 .77 16 22 13

9.6% 21.9% 30.1% 17.8%.7% 1.7% 2.3% 1.3%-1.4 -1.7 -.1 2.0

25 58 62 1613.9% 32.2% 34.4% 8.9%

2.6% 6.0% 6.4% 1.7%-.8 -.3 .8 -.6

159 323 301 10016.4% 33.3% 31.1% 10.3%16.4% 33.3% 31.1% 10.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advchoos

tmurray

C-72

Table 40. My advisor keeps my interest and abilities in mind when helping me choosecourses/programs--cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 414.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.2%-.7 .811 1 138

8.0% .7% 100.0%1.1% .1% 14.2%

.1 -.513 2 210

6.2% 1.0% 100.0%1.3% .2% 21.7%

-.8 -.29 0 150

6.0% .0% 100.0%.9% .0% 15.5%

-.8 -1.312 0 165

7.3% .0% 100.0%1.2% .0% 17.0%

-.2 -1.41 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.1 -.412 3 73

16.4% 4.1% 100.0%1.2% .3% 7.5%

2.7 2.415 4 180

8.3% 2.2% 100.0%1.5% .4% 18.6%

.3 1.475 11 969

7.7% 1.1% 100.0%7.7% 1.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advchoos

Total

tmurray

C-73

Table 41. My advisor helps me develop my decision making skills-cross-tabulation by college.

10 17 7 424.4% 41.5% 17.1% 9.8%

1.0% 1.7% .7% .4%2.2 1.6 -2.2 -.519 43 51 16

13.7% 30.9% 36.7% 11.5%2.0% 4.4% 5.2% 1.6%

.5 .5 -.3 -.328 67 84 16

13.4% 32.1% 40.2% 7.7%2.9% 6.9% 8.6% 1.6%

.5 1.0 .5 -1.912 43 66 21

8.0% 28.7% 44.0% 14.0%1.2% 4.4% 6.8% 2.2%

-1.5 .0 1.2 .621 53 55 21

12.8% 32.3% 33.5% 12.8%2.2% 5.4% 5.7% 2.2%

.2 .9 -.9 .21 3 6 1

8.3% 25.0% 50.0% 8.3%.1% .3% .6% .1%

-.4 -.2 .7 -.46 14 26 12

8.2% 19.2% 35.6% 16.4%.6% 1.4% 2.7% 1.2%-1.0 -1.5 -.3 1.0

22 37 75 2911.9% 20.0% 40.5% 15.7%

2.3% 3.8% 7.7% 3.0%-.1 -2.2 .6 1.3

119 277 370 12012.2% 28.5% 38.0% 12.3%12.2% 28.5% 38.0% 12.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advdecis

tmurray

C-74

Table 41. My advisor helps me develop my decision making skills-cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 414.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.2%-.7 .9

9 1 1396.5% .7% 100.0%

.9% .1% 14.3%-.6 -.412 2 209

5.7% 1.0% 100.0%1.2% .2% 21.5%

-1.1 -.18 0 150

5.3% .0% 100.0%.8% .0% 15.4%-1.1 -1.2

14 0 1648.5% .0% 100.0%1.4% .0% 16.9%

.3 -1.31 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.1 -.413 2 73

17.8% 2.7% 100.0%1.3% .2% 7.5%

3.0 1.418 4 185

9.7% 2.2% 100.0%1.8% .4% 19.0%

.9 1.577 10 973

7.9% 1.0% 100.0%7.9% 1.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advdecis

Total

tmurray

C-75

Table 42. My advisor helps me with realistic self-appraisal--cross-tabulation by college.

9 19 6 322.0% 46.3% 14.6% 7.3%

.9% 2.0% .6% .3%1.7 2.0 -2.5 -.619 43 57 10

13.8% 31.2% 41.3% 7.2%2.0% 4.4% 5.9% 1.0%

.5 .4 .5 -1.128 70 73 21

13.3% 33.3% 34.8% 10.0%2.9% 7.2% 7.5% 2.2%

.4 1.1 -.9 .014 40 72 14

9.5% 27.2% 49.0% 9.5%1.4% 4.1% 7.4% 1.4%

-1.0 -.5 2.0 -.221 55 56 18

12.7% 33.3% 33.9% 10.9%2.2% 5.7% 5.8% 1.9%

.1 1.0 -1.0 .31 4 6 0

8.3% 33.3% 50.0% .0%.1% .4% .6% .0%

-.4 .3 .6 -1.18 6 38 9

10.8% 8.1% 51.4% 12.2%.8% .6% 3.9% .9%

-.4 -3.4 1.7 .620 47 68 23

10.9% 25.5% 37.0% 12.5%2.1% 4.8% 7.0% 2.4%

-.6 -.9 -.4 1.0120 284 376 98

12.4% 29.2% 38.7% 10.1%12.4% 29.2% 38.7% 10.1%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advselfa

tmurray

C-76

Table 42. My advisor helps me with realistic self-appraisal--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 417.3% 2.4% 100.0%

.3% .1% 4.2%-.2 .7

8 1 1385.8% .7% 100.0%

.8% .1% 14.2%-1.0 -.5

16 2 2107.6% 1.0% 100.0%1.6% .2% 21.6%

-.4 -.47 0 147

4.8% .0% 100.0%.7% .0% 15.1%-1.5 -1.3

14 1 1658.5% .6% 100.0%1.4% .1% 17.0%

.1 -.71 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.0 -.411 2 74

14.9% 2.7% 100.0%1.1% .2% 7.6%

1.9 1.121 5 184

11.4% 2.7% 100.0%2.2% .5% 18.9%

1.4 1.881 12 971

8.3% 1.2% 100.0%8.3% 1.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advselfa

Total

tmurray

C-77

Table 43. My advisor helps me develop suitable educational goals/plans--cross-tabulation by college.

16 14 5 139.0% 34.1% 12.2% 2.4%

1.6% 1.4% .5% .1%2.9 -.6 -1.8 -1.020 70 32 7

14.3% 50.0% 22.9% 5.0%2.0% 7.2% 3.3% .7%

-1.4 1.9 -.8 -.853 92 46 8

25.2% 43.8% 21.9% 3.8%5.4% 9.4% 4.7% .8%

1.9 .9 -1.2 -1.626 62 47 10

17.2% 41.1% 31.1% 6.6%2.7% 6.4% 4.8% 1.0%

-.6 .2 1.2 .034 62 44 13

20.6% 37.6% 26.7% 7.9%3.5% 6.4% 4.5% 1.3%

.4 -.5 .1 .62 7 3 0

16.7% 58.3% 25.0% .0%.2% .7% .3% .0%

-.2 1.0 -.1 -.911 26 18 9

14.9% 35.1% 24.3% 12.2%1.1% 2.7% 1.8% .9%

-.9 -.7 -.3 1.827 58 61 17

14.8% 31.7% 33.3% 9.3%2.8% 5.9% 6.3% 1.7%

-1.4 -1.8 1.9 1.4189 391 256 65

19.4% 40.1% 26.2% 6.7%19.4% 40.1% 26.2% 6.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advdevg

tmurray

C-78

Table 43. My advisor helps me develop suitable educational goals/plans--cross-tabulation by college.

4 1 419.8% 2.4% 100.0%

.4% .1% 4.2%.8 .8

10 1 1407.1% .7% 100.0%1.0% .1% 14.3%

.3 -.59 2 210

4.3% 1.0% 100.0%.9% .2% 21.5%-1.3 -.2

6 0 1514.0% .0% 100.0%

.6% .0% 15.5%-1.2 -1.3

11 1 1656.7% .6% 100.0%1.1% .1% 16.9%

.1 -.60 0 12

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 1.2%-.9 -.4

9 1 7412.2% 1.4% 100.0%

.9% .1% 7.6%1.9 .215 5 183

8.2% 2.7% 100.0%1.5% .5% 18.8%

.9 2.064 11 976

6.6% 1.1% 100.0%6.6% 1.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advdevg

Total

tmurray

C-79

Table 44. My advisor helps me evaluate my progress toward my established educationalgoals/plans--cross-tabulation by college.

13 18 4 231.7% 43.9% 9.8% 4.9%

1.3% 1.8% .4% .2%2.1 .4 -2.3 -.424 58 43 6

17.1% 41.4% 30.7% 4.3%2.5% 6.0% 4.4% .6%

-.3 .3 .4 -.949 89 51 9

23.4% 42.6% 24.4% 4.3%5.0% 9.1% 5.2% .9%

1.8 .7 -1.2 -1.120 69 44 11

13.3% 46.0% 29.3% 7.3%2.1% 7.1% 4.5% 1.1%

-1.4 1.3 .1 .533 68 44 8

20.1% 41.5% 26.8% 4.9%3.4% 7.0% 4.5% .8%

.6 .4 -.5 -.74 4 3 0

33.3% 33.3% 25.0% .0%.4% .4% .3% .0%1.2 -.3 -.3 -.9

8 24 25 611.0% 32.9% 34.2% 8.2%

.8% 2.5% 2.6% .6%-1.4 -.9 .8 .7

25 55 68 1913.6% 29.9% 37.0% 10.3%

2.6% 5.7% 7.0% 2.0%-1.4 -2.1 2.0 2.2176 385 282 61

18.1% 39.6% 29.0% 6.3%18.1% 39.6% 29.0% 6.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advevalp

tmurray

C-80

Table 44. My advisor helps me evaluate my progress toward my established educationalgoals/plans--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 417.3% 2.4% 100.0%

.3% .1% 4.2%.3 .98 1 140

5.7% .7% 100.0%.8% .1% 14.4%

-.2 -.49 2 209

4.3% 1.0% 100.0%.9% .2% 21.5%-1.0 -.1

6 0 1504.0% .0% 100.0%

.6% .0% 15.4%-1.0 -1.2

11 0 1646.7% .0% 100.0%1.1% .0% 16.9%

.3 -1.31 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.3 -.49 1 73

12.3% 1.4% 100.0%.9% .1% 7.5%2.2 .312 5 184

6.5% 2.7% 100.0%1.2% .5% 18.9%

.3 2.359 10 973

6.1% 1.0% 100.0%6.1% 1.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advevalp

Total

tmurray

C-81

Table 45. My advisor helps me make academic/career decisions--cross-tabulation by college.

14 16 6 134.1% 39.0% 14.6% 2.4%

1.4% 1.6% .6% .1%2.5 .5 -1.9 -1.326 49 43 11

18.6% 35.0% 30.7% 7.9%2.7% 5.0% 4.4% 1.1%

.2 .1 -.2 -.346 74 59 17

21.9% 35.2% 28.1% 8.1%4.7% 7.6% 6.1% 1.7%

1.4 .2 -1.0 -.224 56 55 11

16.0% 37.3% 36.7% 7.3%2.5% 5.7% 5.6% 1.1%

-.5 .6 1.1 -.530 69 46 8

18.3% 42.1% 28.0% 4.9%3.1% 7.1% 4.7% .8%

.2 1.6 -.9 -1.63 3 6 0

25.0% 25.0% 50.0% .0%.3% .3% .6% .0%

.6 -.6 1.1 -1.07 27 21 8

9.5% 36.5% 28.4% 10.8%.7% 2.8% 2.2% .8%-1.7 .3 -.5 .7

23 43 74 2712.5% 23.4% 40.2% 14.7%

2.4% 4.4% 7.6% 2.8%-1.7 -2.6 2.0 2.9173 337 310 83

17.7% 34.6% 31.8% 8.5%17.7% 34.6% 31.8% 8.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advacad

tmurray

C-82

Table 45. My advisor helps me make academic/career decisions--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 417.3% 2.4% 100.0%

.3% .1% 4.2%.3 .8

10 1 1407.1% .7% 100.0%1.0% .1% 14.4%

.4 -.512 2 210

5.7% 1.0% 100.0%1.2% .2% 21.5%

-.3 -.24 0 150

2.7% .0% 100.0%.4% .0% 15.4%-1.8 -1.3

10 1 1646.1% .6% 100.0%1.0% .1% 16.8%

-.1 -.60 0 12

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 1.2%-.9 -.4

9 2 7412.2% 2.7% 100.0%

.9% .2% 7.6%2.0 1.313 4 184

7.1% 2.2% 100.0%1.3% .4% 18.9%

.4 1.361 11 975

6.3% 1.1% 100.0%6.3% 1.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advacad

Total

tmurray

C-83

Table 46. My advisor helps me to successfully manage my time--cross-tabulation by college.

5 16 11 412.2% 39.0% 26.8% 9.8%

.5% 1.6% 1.1% .4%.1 2.2 -1.5 -.7

16 38 57 1711.5% 27.3% 41.0% 12.2%

1.6% 3.9% 5.9% 1.7%-.1 1.2 -.1 -.530 46 88 25

14.4% 22.0% 42.1% 12.0%3.1% 4.7% 9.1% 2.6%

1.1 -.1 .1 -.713 38 72 17

8.7% 25.3% 48.0% 11.3%1.3% 3.9% 7.4% 1.7%

-1.1 .8 1.2 -.825 36 63 24

15.3% 22.1% 38.7% 14.7%2.6% 3.7% 6.5% 2.5%

1.3 -.1 -.6 .30 1 9 1

.0% 8.3% 75.0% 8.3%

.0% .1% .9% .1%-1.2 -1.0 1.8 -.5

5 13 28 146.7% 17.3% 37.3% 18.7%

.5% 1.3% 2.9% 1.4%-1.3 -.9 -.6 1.1

20 30 78 3210.9% 16.4% 42.6% 17.5%

2.1% 3.1% 8.0% 3.3%-.3 -1.7 .2 1.3

114 218 406 13411.7% 22.4% 41.8% 13.8%11.7% 22.4% 41.8% 13.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advmgtim

tmurray

C-84

Table 46. My advisor helps me to successfully manage my time--cross-tabulation by college.

4 1 419.8% 2.4% 100.0%

.4% .1% 4.2%.2 .5

10 1 1397.2% .7% 100.0%1.0% .1% 14.3%

-.6 -.816 4 209

7.7% 1.9% 100.0%1.6% .4% 21.5%

-.5 .49 1 150

6.0% .7% 100.0%.9% .1% 15.4%-1.1 -.9

14 1 1638.6% .6% 100.0%1.4% .1% 16.8%

-.1 -1.01 0 12

8.3% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% 1.2%

.0 -.413 2 75

17.3% 2.7% 100.0%1.3% .2% 7.7%

2.5 .818 5 183

9.8% 2.7% 100.0%1.9% .5% 18.8%

.5 1.385 15 972

8.7% 1.5% 100.0%8.7% 1.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advmgtim

Total

tmurray

C-85

Table 47. My advisor helps me overcome educational problems and skill deficiencies--cross-tabulation by college.

8 10 15 219.5% 24.4% 36.6% 4.9%

.8% 1.0% 1.6% .2%1.5 .5 -.4 -1.516 38 54 16

11.8% 27.9% 39.7% 11.8%1.7% 4.0% 5.6% 1.7%

.1 1.8 -.2 -.525 40 90 23

12.1% 19.3% 43.5% 11.1%2.6% 4.2% 9.4% 2.4%

.3 -.5 .5 -.811 29 74 14

7.4% 19.6% 50.0% 9.5%1.1% 3.0% 7.7% 1.5%

-1.4 -.3 1.7 -1.226 37 56 24

16.1% 23.0% 34.8% 14.9%2.7% 3.9% 5.9% 2.5%

1.8 .6 -1.2 .61 5 4 0

8.3% 41.7% 33.3% .0%.1% .5% .4% .0%

-.3 1.6 -.4 -1.35 10 30 14

6.9% 13.9% 41.7% 19.4%.5% 1.0% 3.1% 1.5%-1.1 -1.3 .1 1.5

17 31 70 339.4% 17.2% 38.9% 18.3%1.8% 3.2% 7.3% 3.4%

-.8 -1.1 -.5 1.9109 200 393 126

11.4% 20.9% 41.1% 13.2%11.4% 20.9% 41.1% 13.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


advedprob

tmurray

C-86

Table 47. My advisor helps me overcome educational problems and skill deficiencies--cross-tabulation by college.

5 1 4112.2% 2.4% 100.0%

.5% .1% 4.3%.1 .2

11 1 1368.1% .7% 100.0%1.1% .1% 14.2%

-1.2 -1.025 4 207

12.1% 1.9% 100.0%2.6% .4% 21.6%

.2 -.118 2 148

12.2% 1.4% 100.0%1.9% .2% 15.5%

.2 -.516 2 161

9.9% 1.2% 100.0%1.7% .2% 16.8%

-.6 -.72 0 12

16.7% .0% 100.0%.2% .0% 1.3%

.5 -.510 3 72

13.9% 4.2% 100.0%1.0% .3% 7.5%

.6 1.323 6 180

12.8% 3.3% 100.0%2.4% .6% 18.8%

.5 1.3110 19 957

11.5% 2.0% 100.0%11.5% 2.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advedprob

Total

tmurray

C-87

Table 48. My advisor refers me to resources that can help me overcome educational problems and skilldeficiencies--cross-tabulation by college.

5 17 11 212.5% 42.5% 27.5% 5.0%

.5% 1.8% 1.1% .2%.1 2.2 -1.1 -1.2

20 38 48 1714.6% 27.7% 35.0% 12.4%

2.1% 4.0% 5.0% 1.8%.8 .6 -.6 .4

29 48 74 2413.9% 23.1% 35.6% 11.5%

3.0% 5.0% 7.7% 2.5%.8 -.6 -.7 .27 36 78 10

4.8% 24.5% 53.1% 6.8%.7% 3.8% 8.1% 1.0%-2.6 -.2 2.9 -1.6

23 45 57 2014.2% 27.8% 35.2% 12.3%

2.4% 4.7% 5.9% 2.1%.8 .6 -.7 .50 4 5 0

.0% 36.4% 45.5% .0%

.0% .4% .5% .0%-1.2 .7 .4 -1.1

7 17 25 109.7% 23.6% 34.7% 13.9%

.7% 1.8% 2.6% 1.0%-.6 -.3 -.5 .725 37 70 24

13.7% 20.3% 38.5% 13.2%2.6% 3.9% 7.3% 2.5%

.6 -1.3 .0 .8116 242 368 107

12.1% 25.2% 38.4% 11.2%12.1% 25.2% 38.4% 11.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


adveprob

tmurray

C-88

Table 48. My advisor refers me to resources that can help me overcome educational problems and skilldeficiencies--cross-tabulation by college.

5 0 4012.5% .0% 100.0%

.5% .0% 4.2%.3 -.9

11 3 1378.0% 2.2% 100.0%1.1% .3% 14.3%

-1.0 .027 6 208

13.0% 2.9% 100.0%2.8% .6% 21.7%

.9 .714 2 147

9.5% 1.4% 100.0%1.5% .2% 15.3%

-.5 -.715 2 162

9.3% 1.2% 100.0%1.6% .2% 16.9%

-.6 -.82 0 11

18.2% .0% 100.0%.2% .0% 1.1%

.7 -.511 2 72

15.3% 2.8% 100.0%1.1% .2% 7.5%

1.1 .320 6 182

11.0% 3.3% 100.0%2.1% .6% 19.0%

.0 1.0105 21 959

10.9% 2.2% 100.0%10.9% 2.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

adveprob

Total

tmurray

C-89

Table 49. My advisor refers me to resources pertinent to my educational goals (internship, study abroad, honorsprogram, and learning assistance programs)--cross-tabulation by college.

4 3 1 79.8% 7.3% 2.4% 17.1%

.4% .3% .1% .7%-.7 .4 -1.6 -1.714 8 14 43

10.1% 5.8% 10.1% 30.9%1.4% .8% 1.4% 4.4%

-1.1 -.1 -.2 -.225 10 24 66

11.7% 4.7% 11.3% 31.0%2.6% 1.0% 2.5% 6.8%

-.7 -.7 .3 -.314 11 20 61

9.4% 7.4% 13.4% 40.9%1.4% 1.1% 2.0% 6.2%

-1.4 .7 1.0 1.923 5 15 48

13.9% 3.0% 9.0% 28.9%2.4% .5% 1.5% 4.9%

.1 -1.5 -.6 -.71 1 2 3

8.3% 8.3% 16.7% 25.0%.1% .1% .2% .3%

-.5 .3 .6 -.417 8 7 17

23.3% 11.0% 9.6% 23.3%1.7% .8% .7% 1.7%

2.3 1.8 -.3 -1.334 12 21 68

18.5% 6.5% 11.4% 37.0%3.5% 1.2% 2.1% 7.0%

1.8 .3 .3 1.2132 58 104 313

13.5% 5.9% 10.6% 32.0%13.5% 5.9% 10.6% 32.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable

StronglyDisagree Disagree Neutral

advresou

tmurray

C-90

Table 49. My advisor refers me to resources pertinent to my educational goals (internship, study abroad, honorsprogram, and learning assistance programs)--cross-tabulation by college.

15 11 4136.6% 26.8% 100.0%

1.5% 1.1% 4.2%1.5 2.443 17 139

30.9% 12.2% 100.0%4.4% 1.7% 14.2%

1.5 -.358 30 213

27.2% 14.1% 100.0%5.9% 3.1% 21.8%

.7 .429 14 149

19.5% 9.4% 100.0%3.0% 1.4% 15.3%

-1.3 -1.246 29 166

27.7% 17.5% 100.0%4.7% 3.0% 17.0%

.8 1.64 1 12

33.3% 8.3% 100.0%.4% .1% 1.2%

.6 -.516 8 73

21.9% 11.0% 100.0%1.6% .8% 7.5%

-.5 -.531 18 184

16.8% 9.8% 100.0%3.2% 1.8% 18.8%

-2.2 -1.2242 128 977

24.8% 13.1% 100.0%24.8% 13.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advresou

Total

tmurray

C-91

Table 50. My advisor encourages me to participate in experiences which lead me to my intellectualgrowth--cross-tabulation by college.

4 2 2 79.8% 4.9% 4.9% 17.1%

.4% .2% .2% .7%-.2 -.3 -1.2 -1.711 10 18 50

7.9% 7.1% 12.9% 35.7%1.1% 1.0% 1.8% 5.1%

-1.0 .6 .6 .921 6 24 68

9.9% 2.8% 11.3% 31.9%2.1% .6% 2.5% 6.9%

-.3 -1.9 .0 .16 13 19 61

4.1% 8.8% 12.8% 41.2%.6% 1.3% 1.9% 6.2%-2.4 1.4 .6 2.1

16 9 12 389.5% 5.4% 7.1% 22.6%1.6% .9% 1.2% 3.9%

-.4 -.3 -1.6 -2.10 1 2 4

.0% 8.3% 16.7% 33.3%

.0% .1% .2% .4%-1.1 .3 .6 .1

14 7 12 2319.2% 9.6% 16.4% 31.5%

1.4% .7% 1.2% 2.3%2.3 1.3 1.3 .031 10 21 59

16.8% 5.4% 11.4% 32.1%3.2% 1.0% 2.1% 6.0%

2.6 -.3 .1 .1103 58 110 310

10.5% 5.9% 11.2% 31.7%10.5% 5.9% 11.2% 31.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advintelg

tmurray

C-92

Table 50. My advisor encourages me to participate in experiences which lead me to my intellectualgrowth--cross-tabulation by college.

14 12 4134.1% 29.3% 100.0%

1.4% 1.2% 4.2%.6 3.2

41 10 14029.3% 7.1% 100.0%

4.2% 1.0% 14.3%.1 -1.6

71 23 21333.3% 10.8% 100.0%

7.3% 2.3% 21.8%1.2 -.433 16 148

22.3% 10.8% 100.0%3.4% 1.6% 15.1%

-1.5 -.463 30 168

37.5% 17.9% 100.0%6.4% 3.1% 17.2%

2.1 2.33 2 12

25.0% 16.7% 100.0%.3% .2% 1.2%

-.2 .512 5 73

16.4% 6.8% 100.0%1.2% .5% 7.5%

-2.0 -1.245 18 184

24.5% 9.8% 100.0%4.6% 1.8% 18.8%

-1.1 -.8282 116 979

28.8% 11.8% 100.0%28.8% 11.8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advintelg

Total

tmurray

C-93

Table 51. My advisor helps me select appropriate courses and other educational experiences--cross-tabulation bycollege.

3 2 2 17.3% 4.9% 4.9% 2.4%

.3% .2% .2% .1%.1 .4 -.1 -2.44 8 11 32

2.8% 5.7% 7.8% 22.7%.4% .8% 1.1% 3.3%-1.9 1.3 1.2 .9

9 4 11 334.2% 1.9% 5.2% 15.6%

.9% .4% 1.1% 3.4%-1.5 -1.3 -.1 -1.2

3 5 10 342.0% 3.4% 6.7% 22.8%

.3% .5% 1.0% 3.5%-2.3 -.1 .7 1.0

18 3 6 2710.7% 1.8% 3.6% 16.1%

1.8% .3% .6% 2.8%1.9 -1.2 -1.0 -.9

0 0 0 1.0% .0% .0% 9.1%.0% .0% .0% .1%

-.9 -.6 -.8 -.89 6 5 13

12.2% 8.1% 6.8% 17.6%.9% .6% .5% 1.3%1.7 2.1 .5 -.322 7 8 47

12.0% 3.8% 4.4% 25.7%2.2% .7% .8% 4.8%

2.6 .2 -.6 2.068 35 53 188

6.9% 3.6% 5.4% 19.2%6.9% 3.6% 5.4% 19.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advscour

tmurray

C-94

Table 51. My advisor helps me select appropriate courses and other educational experiences--cross-tabulation bycollege.

15 18 4136.6% 43.9% 100.0%

1.5% 1.8% 4.2%-.4 2.552 34 141

36.9% 24.1% 100.0%5.3% 3.5% 14.4%

-.7 -.196 59 212

45.3% 27.8% 100.0%9.8% 6.0% 21.7%

1.1 1.061 36 149

40.9% 24.2% 100.0%6.2% 3.7% 15.2%

.1 -.167 47 168

39.9% 28.0% 100.0%6.8% 4.8% 17.2%

-.1 .96 4 11

54.5% 36.4% 100.0%.6% .4% 1.1%

.7 .830 11 74

40.5% 14.9% 100.0%3.1% 1.1% 7.6%

.0 -1.769 30 183

37.7% 16.4% 100.0%7.0% 3.1% 18.7%

-.6 -2.2396 239 979

40.4% 24.4% 100.0%40.4% 24.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advscour

Total

tmurray

C-95

Table 52. My advisor interprets institutional requirements so that they are understandable to me--cross-tabulation bycollege.

3 2 2 47.3% 4.9% 4.9% 9.8%

.3% .2% .2% .4%.1 .1 -.3 -1.64 8 9 34

2.9% 5.7% 6.4% 24.3%.4% .8% .9% 3.5%-1.9 .7 .1 .7

12 7 12 415.6% 3.3% 5.6% 19.2%1.2% .7% 1.2% 4.2%

-.8 -.8 -.3 -.71 7 9 33

.7% 4.7% 6.0% 22.1%

.1% .7% .9% 3.4%-2.9 .2 .0 .2

18 6 10 3110.8% 3.6% 6.0% 18.6%

1.8% .6% 1.0% 3.2%1.8 -.5 -.1 -.8

0 1 0 2.0% 8.3% .0% 16.7%.0% .1% .0% .2%

-.9 .7 -.9 -.410 6 8 13

13.5% 8.1% 10.8% 17.6%1.0% .6% .8% 1.3%

2.1 1.5 1.6 -.721 6 10 53

11.4% 3.3% 5.4% 28.8%2.1% .6% 1.0% 5.4%

2.2 -.7 -.4 2.169 43 60 211

7.0% 4.4% 6.1% 21.5%7.0% 4.4% 6.1% 21.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advireq

tmurray

C-96

Table 52. My advisor interprets institutional requirements so that they are understandable to me--cross-tabulation bycollege.

15 15 4136.6% 36.6% 100.0%

1.5% 1.5% 4.2%-.1 1.754 31 140

38.6% 22.1% 100.0%5.5% 3.2% 14.3%

.3 -.480 61 213

37.6% 28.6% 100.0%8.2% 6.2% 21.7%

.1 1.565 34 149

43.6% 22.8% 100.0%6.6% 3.5% 15.2%

1.3 -.258 44 167

34.7% 26.3% 100.0%5.9% 4.5% 17.0%

-.5 .76 3 12

50.0% 25.0% 100.0%.6% .3% 1.2%

.7 .124 13 74

32.4% 17.6% 100.0%2.4% 1.3% 7.6%

-.7 -1.162 32 184

33.7% 17.4% 100.0%6.3% 3.3% 18.8%

-.8 -1.8364 233 980

37.1% 23.8% 100.0%37.1% 23.8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advireq

Total

tmurray

C-97

Table 53. My advisor has given me correct information on services/programs--cross-tabulation by college.

3 2 0 67.3% 4.9% .0% 14.6%

.3% .2% .0% .6%-.4 .6 -1.2 -1.0

7 8 6 415.0% 5.7% 4.3% 29.3%

.7% .8% .6% 4.2%-1.6 1.7 .4 1.9

17 2 8 418.0% .9% 3.8% 19.3%1.7% .2% .8% 4.2%

-.5 -1.8 .1 -.84 4 8 33

2.7% 2.7% 5.4% 22.4%.4% .4% .8% 3.4%-2.5 -.3 1.1 .1

19 5 6 2711.3% 3.0% 3.6% 16.1%

1.9% .5% .6% 2.8%1.0 -.1 -.1 -1.6

3 0 0 125.0% .0% .0% 8.3%

.3% .0% .0% .1%1.8 -.6 -.7 -1.012 5 1 19

16.2% 6.8% 1.4% 25.7%1.2% .5% .1% 1.9%

2.1 1.7 -1.0 .723 5 7 46

12.5% 2.7% 3.8% 25.0%2.4% .5% .7% 4.7%

1.6 -.3 .1 .988 31 36 214

9.0% 3.2% 3.7% 21.9%9.0% 3.2% 3.7% 21.9%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advcinfo

tmurray

C-98

Table 53. My advisor has given me correct information on services/programs--cross-tabulation by college.

15 15 4136.6% 36.6% 100.0%

1.5% 1.5% 4.2%-.3 1.956 22 140

40.0% 15.7% 100.0%5.7% 2.2% 14.3%

.0 -1.792 52 212

43.4% 24.5% 100.0%9.4% 5.3% 21.7%

.8 .762 36 147

42.2% 24.5% 100.0%6.3% 3.7% 15.0%

.4 .570 41 168

41.7% 24.4% 100.0%7.2% 4.2% 17.2%

.4 .65 3 12

41.7% 25.0% 100.0%.5% .3% 1.2%

.1 .222 15 74

29.7% 20.3% 100.0%2.2% 1.5% 7.6%

-1.4 -.468 35 184

37.0% 19.0% 100.0%7.0% 3.6% 18.8%

-.6 -1.0390 219 978

39.9% 22.4% 100.0%39.9% 22.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advcinfo

Total

tmurray

C-99

Table 54. My advisor is well informed about changes in academic requirements and keeps me informed of pertinentchanges--cross-tabulation by college.

4 2 1 49.8% 4.9% 2.4% 9.8%

.4% .2% .1% .4%.1 .1 -1.0 -1.95 12 7 31

3.6% 8.6% 5.0% 22.1%.5% 1.2% .7% 3.2%-2.2 2.2 -.5 -.4

16 8 16 457.5% 3.8% 7.5% 21.1%1.6% .8% 1.6% 4.6%

-.8 -.6 .8 -.92 4 9 46

1.3% 2.7% 6.0% 30.9%.2% .4% .9% 4.7%-3.2 -1.1 .0 1.7

19 8 5 3111.3% 4.8% 3.0% 18.5%

1.9% .8% .5% 3.2%.9 .1 -1.6 -1.51 1 1 1

8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3%.1% .1% .1% .1%

-.1 .6 .3 -1.110 3 8 25

13.5% 4.1% 10.8% 33.8%1.0% .3% .8% 2.6%

1.2 -.2 1.6 1.733 7 13 52

18.0% 3.8% 7.1% 28.4%3.4% .7% 1.3% 5.3%

4.0 -.5 .5 1.290 45 60 235

9.2% 4.6% 6.1% 24.0%9.2% 4.6% 6.1% 24.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advinfor

tmurray

C-100

Table 54. My advisor is well informed about changes in academic requirements and keeps me informed of pertinentchanges--cross-tabulation by college.

15 15 4136.6% 36.6% 100.0%

1.5% 1.5% 4.2%.4 1.8

50 35 14035.7% 25.0% 100.0%

5.1% 3.6% 14.3%.5 .5

78 50 21336.6% 23.5% 100.0%

8.0% 5.1% 21.7%.8 .2

46 42 14930.9% 28.2% 100.0%

4.7% 4.3% 15.2%-.5 1.462 43 168

36.9% 25.6% 100.0%6.3% 4.4% 17.1%

.8 .75 3 12

41.7% 25.0% 100.0%.5% .3% 1.2%

.5 .221 7 74

28.4% 9.5% 100.0%2.1% .7% 7.6%

-.7 -2.449 29 183

26.8% 15.8% 100.0%5.0% 3.0% 18.7%

-1.5 -2.0326 224 980

33.3% 22.9% 100.0%33.3% 22.9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advinfor

Total

tmurray

C-101

FacEval

Table 55. My advisor gives me advice in a straight forward understandable manner--cross-tabulation by college.

4 1 4 29.8% 2.4% 9.8% 4.9%

.4% .1% .4% .2%.6 -.4 .7 -2.05 7 7 31

3.5% 5.0% 5.0% 22.0%.5% .7% .7% 3.2%-1.6 .9 -.8 .9

11 5 14 335.2% 2.3% 6.6% 15.5%1.1% .5% 1.4% 3.4%

-1.1 -.9 -.1 -1.11 3 12 33

.7% 2.0% 8.1% 22.1%

.1% .3% 1.2% 3.4%-3.0 -1.0 .6 1.0

15 7 9 248.9% 4.2% 5.4% 14.3%1.5% .7% .9% 2.4%

.9 .4 -.7 -1.32 0 1 1

16.7% .0% 8.3% 8.3%.2% .0% .1% .1%1.2 -.7 .2 -.8

9 6 7 1512.2% 8.1% 9.5% 20.3%

.9% .6% .7% 1.5%1.6 2.1 .9 .323 6 13 44

12.6% 3.3% 7.1% 24.0%2.3% .6% 1.3% 4.5%

2.8 -.2 .1 1.770 35 67 183

7.1% 3.6% 6.8% 18.7%7.1% 3.6% 6.8% 18.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advadvic

tmurray

C-102

Table 55. My advisor gives me advice in a straight forward understandable manner--cross-tabulation by college.

13 17 4131.7% 41.5% 100.0%

1.3% 1.7% 4.2%-.8 2.264 27 141

45.4% 19.1% 100.0%6.5% 2.8% 14.4%

1.1 -1.390 60 213

42.3% 28.2% 100.0%9.2% 6.1% 21.7%

.7 1.153 47 149

35.6% 31.5% 100.0%5.4% 4.8% 15.2%

-.7 1.770 43 168

41.7% 25.6% 100.0%7.1% 4.4% 17.1%

.5 .35 3 12

41.7% 25.0% 100.0%.5% .3% 1.2%

.1 .023 14 74

31.1% 18.9% 100.0%2.3% 1.4% 7.5%

-1.1 -1.068 29 183

37.2% 15.8% 100.0%6.9% 3.0% 18.7%

-.5 -2.4386 240 981

39.3% 24.5% 100.0%39.3% 24.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advadvic

Total

tmurray

C-103

Table 56. My advisor tells me why he/she offers particular advice--cross-tabulation by college.

4 2 3 29.8% 4.9% 7.3% 4.9%

.4% .2% .3% .2%.0 .3 -.4 -2.88 9 16 40

5.7% 6.4% 11.4% 28.6%.8% .9% 1.6% 4.1%-1.5 1.4 .9 .2

14 5 19 576.6% 2.3% 8.9% 26.8%1.4% .5% 1.9% 5.8%

-1.5 -1.3 -.1 -.34 9 8 51

2.7% 6.0% 5.4% 34.2%.4% .9% .8% 5.2%-2.8 1.2 -1.5 1.5

22 5 11 4013.1% 3.0% 6.5% 23.8%

2.2% .5% 1.1% 4.1%1.4 -.7 -1.1 -1.0

2 0 1 216.7% .0% 8.3% 16.7%

.2% .0% .1% .2%.8 -.7 -.1 -.7

14 4 9 1619.2% 5.5% 12.3% 21.9%

1.4% .4% .9% 1.6%2.6 .6 .9 -.928 6 22 63

15.3% 3.3% 12.0% 34.4%2.9% .6% 2.2% 6.4%

2.4 -.5 1.3 1.796 40 89 271

9.8% 4.1% 9.1% 27.7%9.8% 4.1% 9.1% 27.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advtells

tmurray

C-104

Table 56. My advisor tells me why he/she offers particular advice--cross-tabulation by college.

17 13 4141.5% 31.7% 100.0%

1.7% 1.3% 4.2%.9 2.4

50 17 14035.7% 12.1% 100.0%

5.1% 1.7% 14.3%.6 -1.2

77 41 21336.2% 19.2% 100.0%

7.9% 4.2% 21.8%.8 1.0

51 26 14934.2% 17.4% 100.0%

5.2% 2.7% 15.2%.3 .3

59 31 16835.1% 18.5% 100.0%

6.0% 3.2% 17.2%.5 .75 2 12

41.7% 16.7% 100.0%.5% .2% 1.2%

.5 .020 10 73

27.4% 13.7% 100.0%2.0% 1.0% 7.5%

-.8 -.644 20 183

24.0% 10.9% 100.0%4.5% 2.0% 18.7%

-2.1 -1.8323 160 979

33.0% 16.3% 100.0%33.0% 16.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advtells

Total

tmurray

C-105

Table 57. My advisor encourages me to participate in extracurricular activities--cross-tabulation by college.

5 2 2 612.2% 4.9% 4.9% 14.6%

.5% .2% .2% .6%-.2 -.1 -1.3 -2.214 12 19 53

10.0% 8.6% 13.6% 37.9%1.4% 1.2% 2.0% 5.5%

-1.1 1.7 .6 .525 9 30 68

11.9% 4.3% 14.3% 32.4%2.6% .9% 3.1% 7.0%

-.6 -.6 1.0 -.712 5 18 74

8.1% 3.4% 12.2% 50.0%1.2% .5% 1.9% 7.6%

-1.8 -1.0 .1 3.024 6 16 51

14.5% 3.6% 9.6% 30.7%2.5% .6% 1.6% 5.2%

.3 -.9 -.9 -1.01 1 1 6

8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 50.0%.1% .1% .1% .6%

-.5 .5 -.4 .916 7 11 20

21.6% 9.5% 14.9% 27.0%1.6% .7% 1.1% 2.1%

1.9 1.6 .7 -1.234 9 19 64

18.8% 5.0% 10.5% 35.4%3.5% .9% 2.0% 6.6%

1.9 -.2 -.6 .0131 51 116 342

13.5% 5.2% 11.9% 35.2%13.5% 5.2% 11.9% 35.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advextra

tmurray

C-106

Table 57. My advisor encourages me to participate in extracurricular activities--cross-tabulation by college.

16 10 4139.0% 24.4% 100.0%

1.6% 1.0% 4.2%2.2 2.530 12 140

21.4% 8.6% 100.0%3.1% 1.2% 14.4%

-.3 -1.055 23 210

26.2% 11.0% 100.0%5.7% 2.4% 21.6%

1.0 -.227 12 148

18.2% 8.1% 100.0%2.8% 1.2% 15.2%

-1.1 -1.246 23 166

27.7% 13.9% 100.0%4.7% 2.4% 17.1%

1.3 .91 2 12

8.3% 16.7% 100.0%.1% .2% 1.2%-1.0 .5

14 6 7418.9% 8.1% 100.0%

1.4% .6% 7.6%-.7 -.832 23 181

17.7% 12.7% 100.0%3.3% 2.4% 18.6%

-1.4 .5221 111 972

22.7% 11.4% 100.0%22.7% 11.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advextra

Total

tmurray

C-107

Table 58. My advisor appears to be well trained--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 1 57.3% 2.4% 2.4% 12.2%

.3% .1% .1% .5%.3 -.5 -.4 -.94 12 4 27

2.8% 8.5% 2.8% 19.1%.4% 1.2% .4% 2.8%-1.6 2.6 -.5 .2

11 4 6 315.2% 1.9% 2.8% 14.6%1.1% .4% .6% 3.2%

-.7 -1.6 -.6 -1.41 9 4 33

.7% 6.1% 2.7% 22.3%

.1% .9% .4% 3.4%-2.7 1.2 -.6 1.1

14 4 3 248.3% 2.4% 1.8% 14.3%1.4% .4% .3% 2.4%

1.0 -1.1 -1.2 -1.30 0 1 2

.0% .0% 8.3% 16.7%

.0% .0% .1% .2%-.9 -.7 .9 -.2

9 2 4 1612.2% 2.7% 5.4% 21.6%

.9% .2% .4% 1.6%2.0 -.6 .8 .620 8 12 44

10.9% 4.4% 6.6% 24.0%2.0% .8% 1.2% 4.5%

2.5 .2 2.1 1.762 40 35 182

6.3% 4.1% 3.6% 18.6%6.3% 4.1% 3.6% 18.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advtrain

tmurray

C-108

Table 58. My advisor appears to be well trained--cross-tabulation by college.

15 16 4136.6% 39.0% 100.0%

1.5% 1.6% 4.2%-.1 1.156 38 141

39.7% 27.0% 100.0%5.7% 3.9% 14.4%

.4 -.689 72 213

41.8% 33.8% 100.0%9.1% 7.3% 21.7%

.9 1.157 44 148

38.5% 29.7% 100.0%5.8% 4.5% 15.1%

.1 .059 64 168

35.1% 38.1% 100.0%6.0% 6.5% 17.1%

-.6 2.05 4 12

41.7% 33.3% 100.0%.5% .4% 1.2%

.2 .227 16 74

36.5% 21.6% 100.0%2.8% 1.6% 7.6%

-.2 -1.363 36 183

34.4% 19.7% 100.0%6.4% 3.7% 18.7%

-.8 -2.5371 290 980

37.9% 29.6% 100.0%37.9% 29.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advtrain

Total

tmurray

C-109

Table 59. Interactions with my advisor are positive--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 0 47.3% 2.4% .0% 9.8%

.3% .1% .0% .4%.2 -.6 -1.4 -1.34 10 8 25

2.9% 7.1% 5.7% 17.9%.4% 1.0% .8% 2.6%-1.7 1.4 .5 -.2

9 8 8 294.3% 3.8% 3.8% 13.7%

.9% .8% .8% 3.0%-1.3 -.6 -.7 -1.6

1 10 6 41.7% 6.7% 4.0% 27.5%.1% 1.0% .6% 4.2%-2.8 1.2 -.4 2.6

13 5 6 197.8% 3.0% 3.6% 11.4%1.3% .5% .6% 1.9%

.6 -1.0 -.7 -2.11 0 0 2

8.3% .0% .0% 16.7%.1% .0% .0% .2%

.2 -.7 -.8 -.112 5 5 15

16.2% 6.8% 6.8% 20.3%1.2% .5% .5% 1.5%

3.2 .9 .8 .421 6 14 45

11.5% 3.3% 7.7% 24.7%2.2% .6% 1.4% 4.6%

2.6 -.8 1.8 2.064 45 47 180

6.6% 4.6% 4.8% 18.5%6.6% 4.6% 4.8% 18.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advpost

tmurray

C-110

Table 59. Interactions with my advisor are positive--cross-tabulation by college.

16 17 4139.0% 41.5% 100.0%

1.6% 1.7% 4.2%.3 1.5

57 36 14040.7% 25.7% 100.0%

5.8% 3.7% 14.4%.8 -.7

81 76 21138.4% 36.0% 100.0%

8.3% 7.8% 21.6%.5 1.9

49 42 14932.9% 28.2% 100.0%

5.0% 4.3% 15.3%-.7 -.267 56 166

40.4% 33.7% 100.0%6.9% 5.7% 17.0%

.8 1.15 4 12

41.7% 33.3% 100.0%.5% .4% 1.2%

.3 .324 13 74

32.4% 17.6% 100.0%2.5% 1.3% 7.6%

-.6 -1.857 39 182

31.3% 21.4% 100.0%5.8% 4.0% 18.7%

-1.2 -1.9356 283 975

36.5% 29.0% 100.0%36.5% 29.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advpost

Total

tmurray

C-111

Table 60. I don't have to wait long between scheduling and seeing my advisor--cross-tabulation by college.

4 1 1 59.8% 2.4% 2.4% 12.2%

.4% .1% .1% .5%.1 -1.1 -1.6 -1.55 13 16 38

3.6% 9.4% 11.5% 27.3%.5% 1.3% 1.6% 3.9%-2.2 1.0 .5 1.0

15 8 16 407.0% 3.8% 7.5% 18.8%1.5% .8% 1.6% 4.1%

-1.0 -1.9 -1.2 -1.34 15 26 44

2.7% 10.1% 17.6% 29.7%.4% 1.5% 2.7% 4.5%-2.6 1.3 2.8 1.7

21 9 12 3012.6% 5.4% 7.2% 18.0%

2.2% .9% 1.2% 3.1%1.5 -.9 -1.2 -1.4

2 0 2 216.7% .0% 16.7% 16.7%

.2% .0% .2% .2%.9 -.9 .7 -.5

12 4 7 2016.4% 5.5% 9.6% 27.4%

1.2% .4% .7% 2.1%2.1 -.5 -.2 .726 20 19 47

14.3% 11.0% 10.4% 25.8%2.7% 2.1% 1.9% 4.8%

2.3 1.9 .1 .789 70 99 226

9.1% 7.2% 10.2% 23.2%9.1% 7.2% 10.2% 23.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advnowt

tmurray

C-112

Table 60. I don't have to wait long between scheduling and seeing my advisor--cross-tabulation by college.

16 14 4139.0% 34.1% 100.0%

1.6% 1.4% 4.2%1.0 2.144 23 139

31.7% 16.5% 100.0%4.5% 2.4% 14.3%

.2 -.868 66 213

31.9% 31.0% 100.0%7.0% 6.8% 21.8%

.3 3.747 12 148

31.8% 8.1% 100.0%4.8% 1.2% 15.2%

.2 -3.257 38 167

34.1% 22.8% 100.0%5.8% 3.9% 17.1%

.8 .93 3 12

25.0% 25.0% 100.0%.3% .3% 1.2%

-.4 .420 10 73

27.4% 13.7% 100.0%2.1% 1.0% 7.5%

-.5 -1.244 26 182

24.2% 14.3% 100.0%4.5% 2.7% 18.7%

-1.6 -1.6299 192 975

30.7% 19.7% 100.0%30.7% 19.7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advnowt

Total

tmurray

C-113

Table 61. Overall I am satisifed with the advising system at USU--cross-tabulation by college.

3 3 3 67.3% 7.3% 7.3% 14.6%

.3% .3% .3% .6%.1 .1 -.7 -1.24 11 16 35

2.8% 7.8% 11.3% 24.8%.4% 1.1% 1.6% 3.6%-1.8 .4 .2 .3

10 10 26 384.7% 4.7% 12.2% 17.8%1.0% 1.0% 2.6% 3.9%

-1.2 -1.3 .6 -1.74 11 16 45

2.7% 7.4% 10.8% 30.4%.4% 1.1% 1.6% 4.6%-1.9 .2 .0 1.7

15 11 14 318.9% 6.5% 8.3% 18.5%1.5% 1.1% 1.4% 3.2%

1.0 -.2 -1.0 -1.40 0 2 3

.0% .0% 16.7% 25.0%

.0% .0% .2% .3%-.9 -.9 .6 .1

9 8 9 2111.8% 10.5% 11.8% 27.6%

.9% .8% .9% 2.1%1.7 1.2 .3 .722 15 21 53

12.0% 8.2% 11.4% 28.8%2.2% 1.5% 2.1% 5.4%

2.7 .6 .2 1.567 69 107 232

6.8% 7.0% 10.9% 23.6%6.8% 7.0% 10.9% 23.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advsusu

tmurray

C-114

Table 61. Overall I am satisifed with the advising system at USU--cross-tabulation by college.

15 11 4136.6% 26.8% 100.0%

1.5% 1.1% 4.2%.4 1.3

51 24 14136.2% 17.0% 100.0%

5.2% 2.4% 14.3%.6 -.4

80 49 21337.6% 23.0% 100.0%

8.1% 5.0% 21.7%1.1 1.649 23 148

33.1% 15.5% 100.0%5.0% 2.3% 15.1%

-.1 -.863 34 168

37.5% 20.2% 100.0%6.4% 3.5% 17.1%

.9 .65 2 12

41.7% 16.7% 100.0%.5% .2% 1.2%

.5 -.120 9 76

26.3% 11.8% 100.0%2.0% .9% 7.7%

-1.1 -1.345 28 184

24.5% 15.2% 100.0%4.6% 2.8% 18.7%

-2.1 -1.0328 180 983

33.4% 18.3% 100.0%33.4% 18.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advsusu

Total

tmurray

C-115

Table 62. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system in my college/department--cross-tabulation by college.

3 2 1 87.3% 4.9% 2.4% 19.5%

.3% .2% .1% .8%-.2 -.5 -1.5 -.4

7 14 15 325.0% 9.9% 10.6% 22.7%

.7% 1.4% 1.5% 3.3%-1.4 1.4 .5 .0

10 9 16 374.7% 4.2% 7.5% 17.5%1.0% .9% 1.6% 3.8%

-1.8 -1.4 -.9 -1.62 12 15 41

1.4% 8.1% 10.1% 27.7%.2% 1.2% 1.5% 4.2%-2.9 .6 .3 1.3

15 11 13 288.9% 6.5% 7.7% 16.7%1.5% 1.1% 1.3% 2.9%

.3 -.1 -.7 -1.60 0 2 3

.0% .0% 16.7% 25.0%

.0% .0% .2% .3%-1.0 -.9 .8 .2

9 9 8 1711.8% 11.8% 10.5% 22.4%

.9% .9% .8% 1.7%1.1 1.7 .3 -.135 10 22 56

19.2% 5.5% 12.1% 30.8%3.6% 1.0% 2.2% 5.7%

5.1 -.7 1.2 2.381 67 92 222

8.3% 6.8% 9.4% 22.7%8.3% 6.8% 9.4% 22.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advsdept

tmurray

C-116

Table 62. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system in my college/department--cross-tabulation by college.

13 14 4131.7% 34.1% 100.0%

1.3% 1.4% 4.2%.0 1.8

50 23 14135.5% 16.3% 100.0%

5.1% 2.3% 14.4%.8 -1.2

78 62 21236.8% 29.2% 100.0%

8.0% 6.3% 21.6%1.3 2.651 27 148

34.5% 18.2% 100.0%5.2% 2.8% 15.1%

.6 -.760 41 168

35.7% 24.4% 100.0%6.1% 4.2% 17.1%

.9 1.05 2 12

41.7% 16.7% 100.0%.5% .2% 1.2%

.6 -.321 12 76

27.6% 15.8% 100.0%2.1% 1.2% 7.8%

-.6 -1.034 25 182

18.7% 13.7% 100.0%3.5% 2.6% 18.6%

-3.1 -2.1312 206 980

31.8% 21.0% 100.0%31.8% 21.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advsdept

Total

tmurray

C-117

Table 63. Overall I am satisfied with my advisor--cross-tabulation by college.

3 1 1 57.3% 2.4% 2.4% 12.2%

.3% .1% .1% .5%.0 -.9 -1.0 -1.23 13 10 28

2.1% 9.3% 7.1% 20.0%.3% 1.3% 1.0% 2.9%-2.3 1.7 .5 -.2

12 9 9 365.7% 4.2% 4.2% 17.0%1.2% .9% .9% 3.7%

-1.0 -.9 -1.1 -1.23 7 16 40

2.0% 4.7% 10.7% 26.8%.3% .7% 1.6% 4.1%-2.4 -.6 2.3 1.6

21 6 7 2412.5% 3.6% 4.2% 14.3%

2.1% .6% .7% 2.4%2.4 -1.2 -1.0 -1.9

0 0 0 4.0% .0% .0% 33.3%.0% .0% .0% .4%

-.9 -.8 -.9 1.09 9 5 18

11.8% 11.8% 6.6% 23.7%.9% .9% .5% 1.8%1.4 2.2 .2 .622 12 12 49

12.0% 6.6% 6.6% 26.8%2.2% 1.2% 1.2% 5.0%

2.3 .4 .2 1.873 57 60 204

7.4% 5.8% 6.1% 20.8%7.4% 5.8% 6.1% 20.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

NotApplicable


advsatis

tmurray

C-118

Table 63. Overall I am satisfied with my advisor--cross-tabulation by college.

12 19 4129.3% 46.3% 100.0%

1.2% 1.9% 4.2%-.4 2.350 36 140

35.7% 25.7% 100.0%5.1% 3.7% 14.3%

.7 -.471 75 212

33.5% 35.4% 100.0%7.2% 7.6% 21.6%

.2 2.250 33 149

33.6% 22.1% 100.0%5.1% 3.4% 15.2%

.2 -1.262 48 168

36.9% 28.6% 100.0%6.3% 4.9% 17.1%

1.0 .34 4 12

33.3% 33.3% 100.0%.4% .4% 1.2%

.0 .417 18 76

22.4% 23.7% 100.0%1.7% 1.8% 7.7%

-1.6 -.653 35 183

29.0% 19.1% 100.0%5.4% 3.6% 18.7%

-.8 -2.1319 268 981

32.5% 27.3% 100.0%32.5% 27.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

AgreeStronglyAgree

advsatis

Total

tmurray

C-119

Table 64. Courses for the semester--cross tabulation by college.

20 12 5 151.3% 30.8% 12.8% 2.6%

2.2% 1.3% .6% .1%1.7 -1.2 -.6 -.245 59 21 4

33.8% 44.4% 15.8% 3.0%5.0% 6.6% 2.4% .4%

-.2 .1 -.3 -.183 88 22 4

41.9% 44.4% 11.1% 2.0%9.3% 9.9% 2.5% .4%

1.7 .2 -2.0 -.943 69 27 6

29.5% 47.3% 18.5% 4.1%4.8% 7.7% 3.0% .7%

-1.1 .7 .5 .754 65 21 4

37.5% 45.1% 14.6% 2.8%6.0% 7.3% 2.4% .4%

.5 .3 -.7 -.25 6 1 0

41.7% 50.0% 8.3% .0%.6% .7% .1% .0%

.4 .3 -.7 -.618 25 16 2

28.1% 39.1% 25.0% 3.1%2.0% 2.8% 1.8% .2%

-.9 -.6 1.6 .043 66 38 7

27.4% 42.0% 24.2% 4.5%4.8% 7.4% 4.3% .8%

-1.6 -.3 2.2 .9311 390 151 28

34.8% 43.7% 16.9% 3.1%34.8% 43.7% 16.9% 3.1%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied

topcours

tmurray

C-120

Table 64. Courses for the semester--cross tabulation by college.

1 392.6% 100.0%

.1% 4.4%.64 133

3.0% 100.0%.4% 14.9%1.5

1 198.5% 100.0%.1% 22.2%-1.1

1 146.7% 100.0%.1% 16.3%

-.80 144

.0% 100.0%

.0% 16.1%-1.4

0 12.0% 100.0%.0% 1.3%

-.43 64

4.7% 100.0%.3% 7.2%2.1

3 1571.9% 100.0%

.3% 17.6%.5

13 8931.5% 100.0%1.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topcours

Total

tmurray

C-121

Table 65. Degree requirements--cross-tabulation by college.

17 13 3 345.9% 35.1% 8.1% 8.1%

2.0% 1.5% .3% .3%1.7 -.8 -1.6 1.241 57 23 6

31.8% 44.2% 17.8% 4.7%4.7% 6.6% 2.7% .7%

.2 .0 -.5 .377 89 28 1

39.1% 45.2% 14.2% .5%8.9% 10.3% 3.2% .1%

2.1 .2 -1.7 -2.539 73 23 6

27.5% 51.4% 16.2% 4.2%4.5% 8.4% 2.7% .7%

-.7 1.3 -.9 .149 65 19 7

34.8% 46.1% 13.5% 5.0%5.7% 7.5% 2.2% .8%

.9 .3 -1.7 .54 6 1 1

33.3% 50.0% 8.3% 8.3%.5% .7% .1% .1%

.2 .3 -.9 .715 25 19 4

23.1% 38.5% 29.2% 6.2%1.7% 2.9% 2.2% .5%

-1.1 -.7 1.7 .824 54 54 7

16.9% 38.0% 38.0% 4.9%2.8% 6.2% 6.2% .8%

-3.0 -1.1 4.9 .5266 382 170 35

30.8% 44.2% 19.7% 4.0%30.8% 44.2% 19.7% 4.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topdegre

tmurray

C-122

Table 65. Degree requirements--cross-tabulation by college.

1 372.7% 100.0%

.1% 4.3%.72 129

1.6% 100.0%.2% 14.9%

.22 197

1.0% 100.0%.2% 22.8%

-.41 142

.7% 100.0%

.1% 16.4%-.7

1 141.7% 100.0%.1% 16.3%

-.70 12

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.4%-.4

2 653.1% 100.0%

.2% 7.5%1.2

3 1422.1% 100.0%

.3% 16.4%.7

12 8651.4% 100.0%1.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topdegre

Total

tmurray

C-123

Table 66. Major requirements--cross-tabulation by college.

16 15 3 342.1% 39.5% 7.9% 7.9%

1.8% 1.7% .3% .3%1.2 -.3 -1.7 1.442 57 20 4

33.3% 45.2% 15.9% 3.2%4.8% 6.6% 2.3% .5%

.4 .3 -1.1 -.282 86 27 1

41.4% 43.4% 13.6% .5%9.4% 9.9% 3.1% .1%

2.5 .0 -2.1 -2.339 76 28 1

26.9% 52.4% 19.3% .7%4.5% 8.8% 3.2% .1%

-1.0 1.7 -.3 -1.856 62 21 7

38.4% 42.5% 14.4% 4.8%6.5% 7.1% 2.4% .8%

1.5 -.1 -1.6 .84 6 1 1

33.3% 50.0% 8.3% 8.3%.5% .7% .1% .1%

.1 .4 -.9 .914 26 19 4

21.5% 40.0% 29.2% 6.2%1.6% 3.0% 2.2% .5%

-1.4 -.4 1.6 1.120 47 58 10

14.5% 34.1% 42.0% 7.2%2.3% 5.4% 6.7% 1.2%

-3.6 -1.6 5.6 2.3273 375 177 31

31.5% 43.2% 20.4% 3.6%31.5% 43.2% 20.4% 3.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topmajor

tmurray

C-124

Table 66. Major requirements--cross-tabulation by college.

1 382.6% 100.0%

.1% 4.4%.73 126

2.4% 100.0%.3% 14.5%1.0

2 1981.0% 100.0%

.2% 22.8%-.4

1 145.7% 100.0%.1% 16.7%

-.70 146

.0% 100.0%

.0% 16.8%-1.4

0 12.0% 100.0%.0% 1.4%

-.42 65

3.1% 100.0%.2% 7.5%1.2

3 1382.2% 100.0%

.3% 15.9%.8

12 8681.4% 100.0%1.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topmajor

Total

tmurray

C-125

Table 67. Minor requirements--cross-tabulation by college.

6 9 14 218.8% 28.1% 43.8% 6.3%

.8% 1.2% 1.9% .3%-.1 -.1 .5 -.320 43 39 7

17.9% 38.4% 34.8% 6.3%2.6% 5.7% 5.2% .9%

-.4 1.8 -.6 -.651 55 59 10

28.3% 30.6% 32.8% 5.6%6.8% 7.3% 7.8% 1.3%

2.6 .3 -1.2 -1.120 30 45 11

18.0% 27.0% 40.5% 9.9%2.6% 4.0% 6.0% 1.5%

-.4 -.5 .3 .728 36 46 11

22.2% 28.6% 36.5% 8.7%3.7% 4.8% 6.1% 1.5%

.6 -.2 -.4 .31 2 6 1

9.1% 18.2% 54.5% 9.1%.1% .3% .8% .1%

-.8 -.7 .9 .110 16 14 6

19.6% 31.4% 27.5% 11.8%1.3% 2.1% 1.9% .8%

.0 .3 -1.3 1.013 31 68 12

9.8% 23.5% 51.5% 9.1%1.7% 4.1% 9.0% 1.6%

-2.6 -1.3 2.4 .5149 222 291 60

19.7% 29.4% 38.5% 7.9%19.7% 29.4% 38.5% 7.9%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topminor

tmurray

C-126

Table 67. Minor requirements--cross-tabulation by college.

1 323.1% 100.0%

.1% 4.2%-.3

3 1122.7% 100.0%

.4% 14.8%-.9

5 1802.8% 100.0%

.7% 23.8%-1.0

5 1114.5% 100.0%

.7% 14.7%.15 126

4.0% 100.0%.7% 16.7%

-.21 11

9.1% 100.0%.1% 1.5%

.75 51

9.8% 100.0%.7% 6.8%1.9

8 1326.1% 100.0%1.1% 17.5%

.933 755

4.4% 100.0%4.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topminor

Total

tmurray

C-127

Table 68. General Education requirements--cross-tabulation by college.

15 12 7 140.5% 32.4% 18.9% 2.7%

1.7% 1.4% .8% .1%.9 -.7 -.4 -.5

39 55 27 530.2% 42.6% 20.9% 3.9%

4.5% 6.4% 3.1% .6%-.3 .6 -.3 -.375 82 29 6

38.7% 42.3% 14.9% 3.1%8.7% 9.5% 3.4% .7%

1.7 .6 -2.1 -.938 58 30 8

27.7% 42.3% 21.9% 5.8%4.4% 6.7% 3.5% .9%

-.8 .5 -.1 .745 50 38 4

32.4% 36.0% 27.3% 2.9%5.2% 5.8% 4.4% .5%

.1 -.6 1.3 -.93 4 3 1

27.3% 36.4% 27.3% 9.1%.3% .5% .3% .1%

-.3 -.2 .4 .713 22 19 7

20.6% 34.9% 30.2% 11.1%1.5% 2.5% 2.2% .8%

-1.6 -.6 1.3 2.547 58 39 7

30.3% 37.4% 25.2% 4.5%5.4% 6.7% 4.5% .8%

-.3 -.4 .8 .0275 341 192 39

31.8% 39.4% 22.2% 4.5%31.8% 39.4% 22.2% 4.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topgened

tmurray

C-128

Table 68. General Education requirements--cross-tabulation by college.

2 375.4% 100.0%

.2% 4.3%1.4

3 1292.3% 100.0%

.3% 14.9%.22 194

1.0% 100.0%.2% 22.4%-1.0

3 1372.2% 100.0%

.3% 15.8%.12 139

1.4% 100.0%.2% 16.1%

-.50 11

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.3%-.5

2 633.2% 100.0%

.2% 7.3%.64 155

2.6% 100.0%.5% 17.9%

.418 865

2.1% 100.0%2.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topgened

Total

tmurray

C-129

Table 69. Selecting or changing your major--cross-tabulation by college.

10 10 8 331.3% 31.3% 25.0% 9.4%

1.4% 1.4% 1.1% .4%1.8 .4 -1.5 .114 40 52 5

12.4% 35.4% 46.0% 4.4%1.9% 5.6% 7.2% .7%

-1.4 1.6 .5 -1.637 48 69 9

22.4% 29.1% 41.8% 5.5%5.2% 6.7% 9.6% 1.3%

1.4 .4 -.2 -1.514 26 49 11

13.7% 25.5% 48.0% 10.8%1.9% 3.6% 6.8% 1.5%

-1.0 -.3 .8 .624 31 48 11

20.3% 26.3% 40.7% 9.3%3.3% 4.3% 6.7% 1.5%

.6 -.2 -.4 .12 1 5 1

20.0% 10.0% 50.0% 10.0%.3% .1% .7% .1%

.2 -1.0 .3 .17 10 17 8

15.9% 22.7% 38.6% 18.2%1.0% 1.4% 2.4% 1.1%

-.3 -.6 -.4 2.120 30 60 16

14.9% 22.4% 44.8% 11.9%2.8% 4.2% 8.4% 2.2%

-.8 -1.1 .3 1.2128 196 308 64

17.8% 27.3% 42.9% 8.9%17.8% 27.3% 42.9% 8.9%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topchange

tmurray

C-130

Table 69. Selecting or changing your major--cross-tabulation by college.

1 323.1% 100.0%

.1% 4.5%.02 113

1.8% 100.0%.3% 15.7%

-.82 165

1.2% 100.0%.3% 23.0%-1.4

2 1022.0% 100.0%

.3% 14.2%-.6

4 1183.4% 100.0%

.6% 16.4%.21 10

10.0% 100.0%.1% 1.4%1.3

2 444.5% 100.0%

.3% 6.1%.68 134

6.0% 100.0%1.1% 18.7%

1.922 718

3.1% 100.0%3.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topchange

Total

tmurray

C-131

Table 70. Transfer credit--cross-tabulation by college.

3 9 15 39.4% 28.1% 46.9% 9.4%

.4% 1.3% 2.1% .4%-1.1 .2 .3 .1

24 32 50 720.7% 27.6% 43.1% 6.0%

3.4% 4.5% 7.1% 1.0%.9 .3 .0 -.9

30 44 66 719.9% 29.1% 43.7% 4.6%

4.2% 6.2% 9.3% 1.0%.7 .7 .1 -1.7

16 30 33 1316.2% 30.3% 33.3% 13.1%

2.3% 4.2% 4.7% 1.8%-.3 .8 -1.5 1.525 30 51 7

21.2% 25.4% 43.2% 5.9%3.5% 4.2% 7.2% 1.0%

1.0 -.2 .0 -1.03 1 7 0

27.3% 9.1% 63.6% .0%.4% .1% 1.0% .0%

.8 -1.1 1.0 -1.05 6 23 8

11.1% 13.3% 51.1% 17.8%.7% .8% 3.2% 1.1%-1.0 -1.7 .8 2.1

17 34 60 1612.5% 25.0% 44.1% 11.8%

2.4% 4.8% 8.5% 2.3%-1.4 -.3 .2 1.3123 186 305 61

17.4% 26.3% 43.1% 8.6%17.4% 26.3% 43.1% 8.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


toptrans

tmurray

C-132

Table 70. Transfer credit--cross-tabulation by college.

2 326.3% 100.0%

.3% 4.5%.43 116

2.6% 100.0%.4% 16.4%-1.0

4 1512.6% 100.0%

.6% 21.3%-1.1

7 997.1% 100.0%1.0% 14.0%

1.15 118

4.2% 100.0%.7% 16.7%

-.20 11

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.6%-.7

3 456.7% 100.0%

.4% 6.4%.69 136

6.6% 100.0%1.3% 19.2%

1.133 708

4.7% 100.0%4.7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

toptrans

Total

tmurray

C-133

Table 71. Registration procedures (drop/add, closed courses)--cross-tabulation by college.

10 11 7 232.3% 35.5% 22.6% 6.5%

1.4% 1.5% 1.0% .3%1.4 .2 -1.3 .121 41 38 7

19.1% 37.3% 34.5% 6.4%2.9% 5.6% 5.2% 1.0%

-.4 .7 -.3 .137 52 58 10

23.3% 32.7% 36.5% 6.3%5.1% 7.1% 7.9% 1.4%

.7 -.2 .1 .121 44 38 5

18.1% 37.9% 32.8% 4.3%2.9% 6.0% 5.2% .7%

-.6 .8 -.6 -.828 47 44 4

22.4% 37.6% 35.2% 3.2%3.8% 6.4% 6.0% .5%

.4 .8 -.2 -1.32 3 4 1

20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 10.0%.3% .4% .5% .1%

.0 -.2 .2 .58 8 19 7

17.4% 17.4% 41.3% 15.2%1.1% 1.1% 2.6% 1.0%

-.5 -1.9 .6 2.524 39 56 9

17.9% 29.1% 41.8% 6.7%3.3% 5.3% 7.7% 1.2%

-.7 -.9 1.1 .3151 245 264 45

20.7% 33.5% 36.1% 6.2%20.7% 33.5% 36.1% 6.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topregis

tmurray

C-134

Table 71. Registration procedures (drop/add, closed courses)--cross-tabulation by college.

1 313.2% 100.0%

.1% 4.2%-.1

3 1102.7% 100.0%

.4% 15.0%-.5

2 1591.3% 100.0%

.3% 21.8%-1.5

8 1166.9% 100.0%1.1% 15.9%

1.92 125

1.6% 100.0%.3% 17.1%-1.2

0 10.0% 100.0%.0% 1.4%

-.64 46

8.7% 100.0%.5% 6.3%1.8

6 1344.5% 100.0%

.8% 18.3%.6

26 7313.6% 100.0%3.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topregis

Total

tmurray

C-135

Table 72. Academic probation--cross-tabulation by college.

2 6 11 38.7% 26.1% 47.8% 13.0%

.3% 1.0% 1.9% .5%-.2 .4 -.6 1.211 23 53 7

11.6% 24.2% 55.8% 7.4%1.9% 3.9% 8.9% 1.2%

.4 .5 -.3 .312 25 80 8

9.4% 19.7% 63.0% 6.3%2.0% 4.2% 13.5% 1.3%

-.3 -.5 .8 -.18 18 47 2

10.0% 22.5% 58.8% 2.5%1.3% 3.0% 7.9% .3%

-.1 .1 .1 -1.412 24 56 4

12.0% 24.0% 56.0% 4.0%2.0% 4.0% 9.4% .7%

.5 .5 -.2 -1.02 1 5 0

25.0% 12.5% 62.5% .0%.3% .2% .8% .0%1.3 -.6 .2 -.7

2 5 25 55.1% 12.8% 64.1% 12.8%

.3% .8% 4.2% .8%-1.0 -1.2 .5 1.5

12 27 66 109.9% 22.3% 54.5% 8.3%2.0% 4.6% 11.1% 1.7%

-.1 .1 -.5 .761 129 343 39

10.3% 21.8% 57.8% 6.6%10.3% 21.8% 57.8% 6.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topprob

tmurray

C-136

Table 72. Academic probation--cross-tabulation by college.

1 234.3% 100.0%

.2% 3.9%.21 95

1.1% 100.0%.2% 16.0%-1.3

2 1271.6% 100.0%

.3% 21.4%-1.2

5 806.3% 100.0%

.8% 13.5%1.3

4 1004.0% 100.0%

.7% 16.9%.20 8

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.3%-.5

2 395.1% 100.0%

.3% 6.6%.56 121

5.0% 100.0%1.0% 20.4%

.821 593

3.5% 100.0%3.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topprob

Total

tmurray

C-137

Table 73. Career choice--cross-tabulation by college.

10 8 8 333.3% 26.7% 26.7% 10.0%

1.5% 1.2% 1.2% .4%2.0 -.4 -1.0 .312 29 47 10

11.8% 28.4% 46.1% 9.8%1.8% 4.3% 7.0% 1.5%

-1.5 -.4 1.2 .538 51 54 9

24.7% 33.1% 35.1% 5.8%5.6% 7.6% 8.0% 1.3%

2.0 .5 -.7 -1.114 26 40 8

15.1% 28.0% 43.0% 8.6%2.1% 3.9% 5.9% 1.2%

-.7 -.5 .7 .022 46 33 5

19.8% 41.4% 29.7% 4.5%3.3% 6.8% 4.9% .7%

.5 2.0 -1.5 -1.42 2 5 1

20.0% 20.0% 50.0% 10.0%.3% .3% .7% .1%

.2 -.6 .6 .27 14 13 9

15.6% 31.1% 28.9% 20.0%1.0% 2.1% 1.9% 1.3%

-.4 .0 -1.0 2.716 32 59 12

12.4% 24.8% 45.7% 9.3%2.4% 4.7% 8.8% 1.8%

-1.5 -1.2 1.3 .3121 208 259 57

18.0% 30.9% 38.4% 8.5%18.0% 30.9% 38.4% 8.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topcaree

tmurray

C-138

Table 73. Career choice--cross-tabulation by college.

1 303.3% 100.0%

.1% 4.5%-.3

4 1023.9% 100.0%

.6% 15.1%-.2

2 1541.3% 100.0%

.3% 22.8%-1.8

5 935.4% 100.0%

.7% 13.8%.55 111

4.5% 100.0%.7% 16.5%

.10 10

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.5%-.7

2 454.4% 100.0%

.3% 6.7%.0

10 1297.8% 100.0%1.5% 19.1%

1.929 674

4.3% 100.0%4.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topcaree

Total

tmurray

C-139

Table 74. Internships--cross-tabulation by college.

8 9 8 228.6% 32.1% 28.6% 7.1%

1.3% 1.5% 1.3% .3%2.7 1.4 -1.7 -.5

9 22 54 89.3% 22.7% 55.7% 8.2%1.5% 3.6% 8.8% 1.3%

-.6 .5 .5 -.518 25 76 11

13.4% 18.7% 56.7% 8.2%2.9% 4.1% 12.4% 1.8%

.7 -.4 .7 -.69 16 42 11

10.5% 18.6% 48.8% 12.8%1.5% 2.6% 6.9% 1.8%

-.2 -.3 -.4 .913 28 43 10

12.7% 27.5% 42.2% 9.8%2.1% 4.6% 7.0% 1.6%

.4 1.6 -1.4 .01 0 8 0

11.1% .0% 88.9% .0%.2% .0% 1.3% .0%

.0 -1.4 1.5 -.93 7 18 8

7.7% 17.9% 46.2% 20.5%.5% 1.1% 2.9% 1.3%

-.7 -.3 -.5 2.18 17 69 10

6.9% 14.7% 59.5% 8.6%1.3% 2.8% 11.3% 1.6%

-1.4 -1.3 1.1 -.469 124 318 60

11.3% 20.3% 52.0% 9.8%11.3% 20.3% 52.0% 9.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topintern

tmurray

C-140

Table 74. Internships--cross-tabulation by college.

1 283.6% 100.0%

.2% 4.6%-.6

4 974.1% 100.0%

.7% 15.9%-.9

4 1343.0% 100.0%

.7% 21.9%-1.6

8 869.3% 100.0%1.3% 14.1%

1.08 102

7.8% 100.0%1.3% 16.7%

.50 9

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.5%-.8

3 397.7% 100.0%

.5% 6.4%.3

12 11610.3% 100.0%

2.0% 19.0%1.640 611

6.5% 100.0%6.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topintern

Total

tmurray

C-141

Table 75. Research with faculty--cross-tabulation by college.

2 6 11 48.3% 25.0% 45.8% 16.7%

.3% 1.0% 1.9% .7%-.1 .8 -.7 1.0

8 20 52 118.6% 21.5% 55.9% 11.8%1.4% 3.5% 9.0% 1.9%

-.1 .8 -.2 .510 22 75 12

8.1% 17.7% 60.5% 9.7%1.7% 3.8% 13.0% 2.1%

-.3 -.1 .5 -.28 13 48 6

10.0% 16.3% 60.0% 7.5%1.4% 2.2% 8.3% 1.0%

.4 -.4 .3 -.810 21 50 10

10.1% 21.2% 50.5% 10.1%1.7% 3.6% 8.6% 1.7%

.4 .8 -.9 .01 0 7 0

12.5% .0% 87.5% .0%.2% .0% 1.2% .0%

.4 -1.2 1.1 -.93 4 22 8

7.5% 10.0% 55.0% 20.0%.5% .7% 3.8% 1.4%

-.3 -1.2 -.2 1.99 18 66 8

8.1% 16.2% 59.5% 7.2%1.6% 3.1% 11.4% 1.4%

-.2 -.4 .3 -1.051 104 331 59

8.8% 18.0% 57.2% 10.2%8.8% 18.0% 57.2% 10.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


toprsch

tmurray

C-142

Table 75. Research with faculty--cross-tabulation by college.

1 244.2% 100.0%

.2% 4.1%-.3

2 932.2% 100.0%

.3% 16.1%-1.5

5 1244.0% 100.0%

.9% 21.4%-.8

5 806.3% 100.0%

.9% 13.8%.18 99

8.1% 100.0%1.4% 17.1%

.90 8

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.4%-.7

3 407.5% 100.0%

.5% 6.9%.4

10 1119.0% 100.0%1.7% 19.2%

1.434 579

5.9% 100.0%5.9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

toprsch

Total

tmurray

C-143

Table 76. How to get the most out of your educational experience at USU--cross-tabulation by college.

6 11 4 323.1% 42.3% 15.4% 11.5%

.9% 1.7% .6% .5%.7 1.4 -2.1 .5

14 31 43 714.0% 31.0% 43.0% 7.0%

2.1% 4.7% 6.5% 1.1%-.7 .6 .2 -.631 39 63 12

20.8% 26.2% 42.3% 8.1%4.7% 5.9% 9.5% 1.8%

1.1 -.4 .1 -.314 21 42 9

15.1% 22.6% 45.2% 9.7%2.1% 3.2% 6.4% 1.4%

-.5 -1.0 .5 .326 39 41 7

22.2% 33.3% 35.0% 6.0%3.9% 5.9% 6.2% 1.1%

1.3 1.1 -1.1 -1.01 4 3 1

11.1% 44.4% 33.3% 11.1%.2% .6% .5% .2%

-.4 .9 -.4 .23 5 23 9

7.1% 11.9% 54.8% 21.4%.5% .8% 3.5% 1.4%-1.6 -2.0 1.3 2.8

18 34 57 1014.4% 27.2% 45.6% 8.0%

2.7% 5.1% 8.6% 1.5%-.7 -.1 .7 -.3

113 184 276 5817.1% 27.8% 41.8% 8.8%17.1% 27.8% 41.8% 8.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


toprduc

tmurray

C-144

Table 76. How to get the most out of your educational experience at USU--cross-tabulation by college.

2 267.7% 100.0%

.3% 3.9%.85 100

5.0% 100.0%.8% 15.1%

.24 149

2.7% 100.0%.6% 22.5%-1.1

7 937.5% 100.0%1.1% 14.1%

1.44 117

3.4% 100.0%.6% 17.7%

-.60 9

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.4%-.6

2 424.8% 100.0%

.3% 6.4%.16 125

4.8% 100.0%.9% 18.9%

.130 661

4.5% 100.0%4.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

toprduc

Total

tmurray

C-145

Table 77. Study skills--cross-tabulation by college.

2 7 11 28.3% 29.2% 45.8% 8.3%

.3% 1.1% 1.8% .3%-.4 .7 -.3 -.410 21 49 16

10.3% 21.6% 50.5% 16.5%1.6% 3.4% 7.9% 2.6%

-.2 -.2 .0 1.513 30 75 15

9.6% 22.1% 55.1% 11.0%2.1% 4.8% 12.1% 2.4%

-.6 -.2 .8 -.18 18 48 6

9.3% 20.9% 55.8% 7.0%1.3% 2.9% 7.8% 1.0%

-.5 -.4 .7 -1.220 27 46 9

18.5% 25.0% 42.6% 8.3%3.2% 4.4% 7.4% 1.5%

2.3 .5 -1.1 -.91 2 5 0

12.5% 25.0% 62.5% .0%.2% .3% .8% .0%

.1 .1 .5 -1.03 5 23 8

7.1% 11.9% 54.8% 19.0%.5% .8% 3.7% 1.3%

-.8 -1.5 .4 1.512 31 55 14

10.2% 26.3% 46.6% 11.9%1.9% 5.0% 8.9% 2.3%

-.3 .8 -.6 .269 141 312 70

11.1% 22.8% 50.4% 11.3%11.1% 22.8% 50.4% 11.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topstudy

tmurray

C-146

Table 77. Study skills--cross-tabulation by college.

2 248.3% 100.0%

.3% 3.9%.91 97

1.0% 100.0%.2% 15.7%-1.6

3 1362.2% 100.0%

.5% 22.0%-1.2

6 867.0% 100.0%1.0% 13.9%

1.26 108

5.6% 100.0%1.0% 17.4%

.60 8

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.3%-.6

3 427.1% 100.0%

.5% 6.8%.96 118

5.1% 100.0%1.0% 19.1%

.427 619

4.4% 100.0%4.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topstudy

Total

tmurray

C-147

Table 78. Concerns about a specific course--cross-tabulation by college.

12 10 7 236.4% 30.3% 21.2% 6.1%

1.7% 1.4% 1.0% .3%2.2 -.4 -1.5 .019 24 51 9

17.9% 22.6% 48.1% 8.5%2.7% 3.4% 7.2% 1.3%

-.4 -2.0 1.9 1.032 60 59 6

19.9% 37.3% 36.6% 3.7%4.5% 8.4% 8.3% .8%

.1 .7 .0 -1.218 46 33 8

16.7% 42.6% 30.6% 7.4%2.5% 6.5% 4.6% 1.1%

-.7 1.5 -1.1 .631 42 37 5

26.3% 35.6% 31.4% 4.2%4.3% 5.9% 5.2% .7%

1.7 .3 -1.0 -.81 3 4 1

11.1% 33.3% 44.4% 11.1%.1% .4% .6% .1%

-.6 .0 .4 .66 14 22 4

12.2% 28.6% 44.9% 8.2%.8% 2.0% 3.1% .6%-1.1 -.7 .9 .6

20 45 49 815.5% 34.9% 38.0% 6.2%

2.8% 6.3% 6.9% 1.1%-1.0 .1 .2 .1139 244 262 43

19.5% 34.2% 36.7% 6.0%19.5% 34.2% 36.7% 6.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topspecc

tmurray

C-148

Table 78. Concerns about a specific course--cross-tabulation by college.

2 336.1% 100.0%

.3% 4.6%.83 106

2.8% 100.0%.4% 14.9%

-.44 161

2.5% 100.0%.6% 22.6%

-.73 108

2.8% 100.0%.4% 15.1%

-.43 118

2.5% 100.0%.4% 16.5%

-.60 9

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.3%-.6

3 496.1% 100.0%

.4% 6.9%1.0

7 1295.4% 100.0%1.0% 18.1%

1.225 713

3.5% 100.0%3.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topspecc

Total

tmurray

C-149

Table 79. Concerns about a specific faculty member--cross-tabulation by college.

2 7 12 28.3% 29.2% 50.0% 8.3%

.3% 1.2% 2.1% .3%-.2 1.1 -.5 -.1

7 19 54 97.5% 20.4% 58.1% 9.7%1.2% 3.3% 9.3% 1.6%

-.7 .2 .1 .39 26 79 9

7.2% 20.8% 63.2% 7.2%1.6% 4.5% 13.7% 1.6%

-.9 .3 .8 -.611 16 43 6

13.9% 20.3% 54.4% 7.6%1.9% 2.8% 7.4% 1.0%

1.2 .1 -.4 -.413 21 46 10

13.7% 22.1% 48.4% 10.5%2.2% 3.6% 8.0% 1.7%

1.3 .6 -1.2 .61 1 6 1

11.1% 11.1% 66.7% 11.1%.2% .2% 1.0% .2%

.1 -.6 .4 .22 4 26 6

5.0% 10.0% 65.0% 15.0%.3% .7% 4.5% 1.0%-1.0 -1.4 .6 1.3

11 19 67 89.7% 16.8% 59.3% 7.1%1.9% 3.3% 11.6% 1.4%

.0 -.7 .2 -.656 113 333 51

9.7% 19.6% 57.6% 8.8%9.7% 19.6% 57.6% 8.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topspcf

tmurray

C-150

Table 79. Concerns about a specific faculty member--cross-tabulation by college.

1 244.2% 100.0%

.2% 4.2%.04 93

4.3% 100.0%.7% 16.1%

.02 125

1.6% 100.0%.3% 21.6%-1.5

3 793.8% 100.0%

.5% 13.7%-.2

5 955.3% 100.0%

.9% 16.4%.40 9

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.6%-.6

2 405.0% 100.0%

.3% 6.9%.28 113

7.1% 100.0%1.4% 19.6%

1.425 578

4.3% 100.0%4.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topspcf

Total

tmurray

C-151

Table 80. Application to graduate/professional schools--cross-tabulation by college.

5 3 10 421.7% 13.0% 43.5% 17.4%

.9% .5% 1.7% .7%1.8 -.6 -.9 1.1

7 16 54 107.9% 18.0% 60.7% 11.2%1.2% 2.8% 9.4% 1.7%

-.6 .0 .3 .39 24 80 12

7.1% 19.0% 63.5% 9.5%1.6% 4.2% 13.9% 2.1%

-1.0 .3 .8 -.211 16 42 7

13.8% 20.0% 52.5% 8.8%1.9% 2.8% 7.3% 1.2%

1.1 .4 -.6 -.412 23 47 8

12.5% 24.0% 49.0% 8.3%2.1% 4.0% 8.2% 1.4%

.8 1.4 -1.2 -.51 1 6 0

12.5% 12.5% 75.0% .0%.2% .2% 1.0% .0%

.2 -.4 .6 -.94 5 22 9

9.5% 11.9% 52.4% 21.4%.7% .9% 3.8% 1.6%

-.1 -.9 -.5 2.38 16 72 8

7.2% 14.4% 64.9% 7.2%1.4% 2.8% 12.5% 1.4%

-.9 -.9 1.0 -1.057 104 333 58

9.9% 18.1% 57.9% 10.1%9.9% 18.1% 57.9% 10.1%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topappli

tmurray

C-152

Table 80. Application to graduate/professional schools--cross-tabulation by college.

1 234.3% 100.0%

.2% 4.0%.12 89

2.2% 100.0%.3% 15.5%

-.81 126

.8% 100.0%

.2% 21.9%-1.8

4 805.0% 100.0%

.7% 13.9%.46 96

6.3% 100.0%1.0% 16.7%

1.10 8

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.4%-.6

2 424.8% 100.0%

.3% 7.3%.27 111

6.3% 100.0%1.2% 19.3%

1.223 575

4.0% 100.0%4.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topappli

Total

tmurray

C-153

Table 81. Personal problems--cross-tabulation by college.

2 9 10 18.3% 37.5% 41.7% 4.2%

.4% 1.6% 1.8% .2%-.1 2.3 -1.1 -.9

9 16 51 910.2% 18.2% 58.0% 10.2%

1.6% 2.8% 9.0% 1.6%.3 .2 .0 .29 22 82 9

7.3% 17.7% 66.1% 7.3%1.6% 3.9% 14.5% 1.6%

-.7 .1 1.2 -.86 10 45 10

8.0% 13.3% 60.0% 13.3%1.1% 1.8% 8.0% 1.8%

-.3 -.9 .2 1.113 18 48 8

13.4% 18.6% 49.5% 8.2%2.3% 3.2% 8.5% 1.4%

1.4 .3 -1.1 -.41 0 6 1

12.5% .0% 75.0% 12.5%.2% .0% 1.1% .2%

.3 -1.2 .6 .32 5 24 6

5.1% 12.8% 61.5% 15.4%.4% .9% 4.2% 1.1%

-.8 -.7 .3 1.210 19 63 10

9.0% 17.1% 56.8% 9.0%1.8% 3.4% 11.1% 1.8%

-.1 -.1 -.2 -.252 99 329 54

9.2% 17.5% 58.1% 9.5%9.2% 17.5% 58.1% 9.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topprobs

tmurray

C-154

Table 81. Personal problems--cross-tabulation by college.

2 248.3% 100.0%

.4% 4.2%.63 88

3.4% 100.0%.5% 15.5%

-.92 124

1.6% 100.0%.4% 21.9%-1.9

4 755.3% 100.0%

.7% 13.3%-.110 97

10.3% 100.0%1.8% 17.1%

1.90 8

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.4%-.7

2 395.1% 100.0%

.4% 6.9%-.1

9 1118.1% 100.0%1.6% 19.6%

1.132 566

5.7% 100.0%5.7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topprobs

Total

tmurray

C-155

Table 82. Credit by examination (CLEP)--cross-tabulation by college.

3 6 10 213.0% 26.1% 43.5% 8.7%

.5% 1.0% 1.7% .3%.3 .6 -.8 .19 15 57 7

10.1% 16.9% 64.0% 7.9%1.5% 2.6% 9.7% 1.2%

-.3 -.8 1.1 -.112 25 78 10

9.5% 19.8% 61.9% 7.9%2.1% 4.3% 13.3% 1.7%

-.6 -.2 1.0 .014 15 43 3

16.3% 17.4% 50.0% 3.5%2.4% 2.6% 7.4% .5%

1.4 -.7 -.7 -1.516 27 46 6

16.2% 27.3% 46.5% 6.1%2.7% 4.6% 7.9% 1.0%

1.4 1.4 -1.2 -.71 0 6 1

12.5% .0% 75.0% 12.5%.2% .0% 1.0% .2%

.1 -1.3 .7 .42 6 21 7

5.1% 15.4% 53.8% 17.9%.3% 1.0% 3.6% 1.2%-1.1 -.7 -.1 2.2

9 27 63 117.8% 23.5% 54.8% 9.6%1.5% 4.6% 10.8% 1.9%

-1.1 .7 -.1 .666 121 324 47

11.3% 20.7% 55.4% 8.0%11.3% 20.7% 55.4% 8.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topclep

tmurray

C-156

Table 82. Credit by examination (CLEP)--cross-tabulation by college.

2 238.7% 100.0%

.3% 3.9%.91 89

1.1% 100.0%.2% 15.2%-1.5

1 126.8% 100.0%.2% 21.5%-2.0

11 8612.8% 100.0%

1.9% 14.7%3.5

4 994.0% 100.0%

.7% 16.9%-.3

0 8.0% 100.0%.0% 1.4%

-.63 39

7.7% 100.0%.5% 6.7%

.95 115

4.3% 100.0%.9% 19.7%

-.127 585

4.6% 100.0%4.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topclep

Total

tmurray

C-157

Table 83. Advanced Placement (AP) courses--cross-tabulation by college.

3 6 12 212.5% 25.0% 50.0% 8.3%

.5% 1.0% 1.9% .3%-.3 .1 -.1 .212 29 50 7

12.1% 29.3% 50.5% 7.1%1.9% 4.6% 8.0% 1.1%

-.6 1.2 -.1 -.118 29 75 10

13.6% 22.0% 56.8% 7.6%2.9% 4.6% 12.0% 1.6%

-.3 -.4 .9 .116 21 44 6

17.0% 22.3% 46.8% 6.4%2.6% 3.4% 7.1% 1.0%

.6 -.2 -.6 -.422 32 46 3

20.2% 29.4% 42.2% 2.8%3.5% 5.1% 7.4% .5%

1.5 1.2 -1.3 -1.81 0 7 0

12.5% .0% 87.5% .0%.2% .0% 1.1% .0%

-.2 -1.4 1.4 -.84 8 21 5

10.0% 20.0% 52.5% 12.5%.6% 1.3% 3.4% .8%

-.8 -.5 .1 1.215 22 63 13

12.7% 18.6% 53.4% 11.0%2.4% 3.5% 10.1% 2.1%

-.5 -1.1 .4 1.591 147 318 46

14.6% 23.6% 51.0% 7.4%14.6% 23.6% 51.0% 7.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topap

tmurray

C-158

Table 83. Advanced Placement (AP) courses--cross-tabulation by college.

1 244.2% 100.0%

.2% 3.8%.21 99

1.0% 100.0%.2% 15.9%-1.3

0 132.0% 100.0%.0% 21.2%-2.2

7 947.4% 100.0%1.1% 15.1%

2.06 109

5.5% 100.0%1.0% 17.5%

1.10 8

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.3%-.5

2 405.0% 100.0%

.3% 6.4%.55 118

4.2% 100.0%.8% 18.9%

.422 624

3.5% 100.0%3.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topap

Total

tmurray

C-159

Table 84. Work study/on-campus employment--cross-tabulation by college.

6 5 13 221.4% 17.9% 46.4% 7.1%

1.1% .9% 2.3% .4%2.1 -.1 -.8 -.4

6 22 50 76.8% 25.0% 56.8% 8.0%1.1% 3.9% 8.8% 1.2%

-.7 1.4 -.1 -.510 18 81 12

8.3% 14.9% 66.9% 9.9%1.8% 3.2% 14.3% 2.1%

-.3 -.9 1.3 .16 13 47 5

7.6% 16.5% 59.5% 6.3%1.1% 2.3% 8.3% .9%

-.5 -.4 .2 -1.013 23 48 8

13.4% 23.7% 49.5% 8.2%2.3% 4.1% 8.5% 1.4%

1.4 1.2 -1.1 -.51 1 5 1

12.5% 12.5% 62.5% 12.5%.2% .2% .9% .2%

.3 -.4 .2 .32 4 21 8

5.3% 10.5% 55.3% 21.1%.4% .7% 3.7% 1.4%

-.8 -1.1 -.2 2.28 19 64 12

7.4% 17.6% 59.3% 11.1%1.4% 3.4% 11.3% 2.1%

-.6 -.2 .2 .552 105 329 55

9.2% 18.5% 58.0% 9.7%9.2% 18.5% 58.0% 9.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topwork

tmurray

C-160

Table 84. Work study/on-campus employment--cross-tabulation by college.

2 287.1% 100.0%

.4% 4.9%.63 88

3.4% 100.0%.5% 15.5%

-.50 121

.0% 100.0%

.0% 21.3%-2.4

8 7910.1% 100.0%

1.4% 13.9%2.3

5 975.2% 100.0%

.9% 17.1%.30 8

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.4%-.6

3 387.9% 100.0%

.5% 6.7%1.0

5 1084.6% 100.0%

.9% 19.0%.0

26 5674.6% 100.0%4.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topwork

Total

tmurray

C-161

Table 85. Job placement after graduation--cross-tabulation by college.

3 8 10 212.5% 33.3% 41.7% 8.3%

.5% 1.4% 1.7% .3%.3 1.6 -.8 -.4

11 18 50 1112.1% 19.8% 54.9% 12.1%

1.9% 3.1% 8.7% 1.9%.4 .1 .1 .4

14 23 78 911.1% 18.3% 61.9% 7.1%

2.4% 4.0% 13.6% 1.6%.1 -.3 1.1 -1.25 17 44 4

6.3% 21.5% 55.7% 5.1%.9% 3.0% 7.7% .7%-1.2 .4 .2 -1.6

13 22 44 1213.5% 22.9% 45.8% 12.5%

2.3% 3.8% 7.7% 2.1%.8 .8 -1.1 .52 2 3 2

22.2% 22.2% 33.3% 22.2%.3% .3% .5% .3%1.0 .2 -.9 1.0

2 7 19 75.3% 18.4% 50.0% 18.4%

.3% 1.2% 3.3% 1.2%-1.0 -.1 -.4 1.4

12 14 64 1510.8% 12.6% 57.7% 13.5%

2.1% 2.4% 11.1% 2.6%.0 -1.6 .5 .9

62 111 312 6210.8% 19.3% 54.4% 10.8%10.8% 19.3% 54.4% 10.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topjob

tmurray

C-162

Table 85. Job placement after graduation--cross-tabulation by college.

1 244.2% 100.0%

.2% 4.2%-.1

1 911.1% 100.0%

.2% 15.9%-1.6

2 1261.6% 100.0%

.3% 22.0%-1.6

9 7911.4% 100.0%

1.6% 13.8%2.7

5 965.2% 100.0%

.9% 16.7%.20 9

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.6%-.7

3 387.9% 100.0%

.5% 6.6%.96 111

5.4% 100.0%1.0% 19.3%

.327 574

4.7% 100.0%4.7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topjob

Total

tmurray

C-163

Table 86. Withdrawing from USU--cross-tabulation by college.

1 4 15 24.3% 17.4% 65.2% 8.7%

.2% .7% 2.7% .4%-.6 .3 .1 .0

6 14 58 67.0% 16.3% 67.4% 7.0%1.1% 2.6% 10.6% 1.1%

-.3 .3 .4 -.67 21 80 9

5.9% 17.6% 67.2% 7.6%1.3% 3.8% 14.6% 1.6%

-.8 .7 .4 -.45 10 51 4

6.8% 13.5% 68.9% 5.4%.9% 1.8% 9.3% .7%

-.3 -.4 .5 -1.012 17 49 7

13.3% 18.9% 54.4% 7.8%2.2% 3.1% 8.9% 1.3%

1.9 .9 -1.2 -.31 1 6 0

12.5% 12.5% 75.0% .0%.2% .2% 1.1% .0%

.5 -.2 .4 -.82 2 25 6

5.4% 5.4% 67.6% 16.2%.4% .4% 4.6% 1.1%

-.5 -1.5 .3 1.59 14 68 14

8.1% 12.6% 61.3% 12.6%1.6% 2.6% 12.4% 2.6%

.1 -.7 -.4 1.443 83 352 48

7.8% 15.1% 64.2% 8.8%7.8% 15.1% 64.2% 8.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


topwithd

tmurray

C-164

Table 86. Withdrawing from USU--cross-tabulation by college.

1 234.3% 100.0%

.2% 4.2%.12 86

2.3% 100.0%.4% 15.7%

-.82 119

1.7% 100.0%.4% 21.7%-1.3

4 745.4% 100.0%

.7% 13.5%.65 90

5.6% 100.0%.9% 16.4%

.70 8

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.5%-.6

2 375.4% 100.0%

.4% 6.8%.46 111

5.4% 100.0%1.1% 20.3%

.722 548

4.0% 100.0%4.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

topwithd

Total

tmurray

C-165

Table 87. Overall quality of education--cross-tabulation by college.

15 25 5 033.3% 55.6% 11.1% .0%

1.3% 2.2% .4% .0%1.5 -.2 -.9 -1.133 85 31 2

21.9% 56.3% 20.5% 1.3%2.9% 7.5% 2.7% .2%

-.2 -.2 1.1 -.964 124 31 6

28.4% 55.1% 13.8% 2.7%5.6% 10.9% 2.7% .5%

1.9 -.5 -1.1 .134 88 25 7

22.1% 57.1% 16.2% 4.5%3.0% 7.8% 2.2% .6%

-.1 -.1 -.2 1.548 112 28 3

25.1% 58.6% 14.7% 1.6%4.2% 9.9% 2.5% .3%

.8 .2 -.8 -.93 5 4 0

25.0% 41.7% 33.3% .0%.3% .4% .4% .0%

.2 -.7 1.4 -.618 52 16 3

19.8% 57.1% 17.6% 3.3%1.6% 4.6% 1.4% .3%

-.5 -.1 .2 .440 164 52 8

15.0% 61.7% 19.5% 3.0%3.5% 14.4% 4.6% .7%

-2.6 .8 1.0 .5255 655 192 29

22.5% 57.7% 16.9% 2.6%22.5% 57.7% 16.9% 2.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


overaledu

tmurray

C-166

Table 87. Overall quality of education--cross-tabulation by college.

0 45.0% 100.0%.0% 4.0%

-.40 151

.0% 100.0%

.0% 13.3%-.7

0 225.0% 100.0%.0% 19.8%

-.90 154

.0% 100.0%

.0% 13.6%-.7

0 191.0% 100.0%.0% 16.8%

-.80 12

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.1%-.2

2 912.2% 100.0%

.2% 8.0%3.0

2 266.8% 100.0%.2% 23.4%1.1

4 1135.4% 100.0%.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

overaledu

Total

tmurray

C-167

Table 88. Overall quality of the program in your major--cross-tabulation by college.

19 15 8 242.2% 33.3% 17.8% 4.4%

1.7% 1.4% .7% .2%2.4 -1.1 -1.0 .430 86 31 2

20.1% 57.7% 20.8% 1.3%2.7% 7.9% 2.8% .2%

-1.1 2.4 -1.1 -1.478 103 37 4

35.1% 46.4% 16.7% 1.8%7.1% 9.4% 3.4% .4%

3.1 .4 -2.6 -1.347 76 22 4

31.3% 50.7% 14.7% 2.7%4.3% 6.9% 2.0% .4%

1.6 1.1 -2.6 -.562 82 32 8

32.6% 43.2% 16.8% 4.2%5.7% 7.5% 2.9% .7%

2.2 -.3 -2.4 .52 5 2 2

16.7% 41.7% 16.7% 16.7%.2% .5% .2% .2%

-.6 -.2 -.6 2.515 49 21 2

16.7% 54.4% 23.3% 2.2%1.4% 4.5% 1.9% .2%

-1.5 1.4 -.4 -.617 73 126 14

7.2% 30.8% 53.2% 5.9%1.6% 6.7% 11.5% 1.3%

-5.4 -3.2 8.4 2.0270 489 279 38

24.7% 44.7% 25.5% 3.5%24.7% 44.7% 25.5% 3.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


overmajo

tmurray

C-168

Table 88. Overall quality of the program in your major--cross-tabulation by college.

1 452.2% 100.0%

.1% 4.1%.20 149

.0% 100.0%

.0% 13.6%-1.6

0 222.0% 100.0%.0% 20.3%-2.0

1 150.7% 100.0%.1% 13.7%-1.0

6 1903.2% 100.0%

.5% 17.4%1.5

1 128.3% 100.0%

.1% 1.1%1.7

3 903.3% 100.0%

.3% 8.2%1.2

7 2373.0% 100.0%

.6% 21.6%1.419 1095

1.7% 100.0%1.7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

overmajo

Total

tmurray

C-169

Table 89. Variety of courses in your major--cross-tabulation by college.

16 19 8 235.6% 42.2% 17.8% 4.4%

1.5% 1.7% .7% .2%2.1 -.2 -1.3 .127 80 37 7

17.9% 53.0% 24.5% 4.6%2.5% 7.3% 3.4% .6%

-.9 1.6 -.9 .365 110 37 10

29.3% 49.5% 16.7% 4.5%5.9% 10.0% 3.4% .9%

2.6 1.2 -3.3 .331 71 46 3

20.4% 46.7% 30.3% 2.0%2.8% 6.5% 4.2% .3%

-.2 .5 .5 -1.357 82 33 9

30.0% 43.2% 17.4% 4.7%5.2% 7.5% 3.0% .8%

2.6 -.2 -2.8 .41 6 2 2

8.3% 50.0% 16.7% 16.7%.1% .5% .2% .2%-1.0 .3 -.8 2.1

16 45 23 417.8% 50.0% 25.6% 4.4%

1.5% 4.1% 2.1% .4%-.7 .8 -.5 .219 72 124 8

8.1% 30.8% 53.0% 3.4%1.7% 6.6% 11.3% .7%

-4.3 -3.1 7.1 -.5232 485 310 45

21.2% 44.3% 28.3% 4.1%21.2% 44.3% 28.3% 4.1%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


varcours

tmurray

C-170

Table 89. Variety of courses in your major--cross-tabulation by college.

0 45.0% 100.0%.0% 4.1%-1.0

0 151.0% 100.0%.0% 13.8%-1.8

0 222.0% 100.0%.0% 20.3%-2.2

1 152.7% 100.0%.1% 13.9%-1.3

9 1904.7% 100.0%

.8% 17.3%2.4

1 128.3% 100.0%

.1% 1.1%1.4

2 902.2% 100.0%

.2% 8.2%.0

11 2344.7% 100.0%1.0% 21.4%

2.624 1096

2.2% 100.0%2.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

varcours

Total

tmurray

C-171

Table 90. Challenge of courses in your major--cross-tabulation by college.

14 21 9 031.1% 46.7% 20.0% .0%

1.3% 1.9% .8% .0%1.0 -.2 -.6 -1.028 85 35 2

18.7% 56.7% 23.3% 1.3%2.6% 7.8% 3.2% .2%

-1.3 1.4 -.3 -.768 114 33 6

30.8% 51.6% 14.9% 2.7%6.3% 10.5% 3.0% .6%

2.2 .7 -2.8 .536 76 31 7

23.8% 50.3% 20.5% 4.6%3.3% 7.0% 2.8% .6%

.0 .3 -1.0 2.060 91 33 2

31.9% 48.4% 17.6% 1.1%5.5% 8.4% 3.0% .2%

2.3 .0 -1.9 -1.13 5 2 1

25.0% 41.7% 16.7% 8.3%.3% .5% .2% .1%

.1 -.3 -.5 1.423 47 16 1

25.6% 52.2% 17.8% 1.1%2.1% 4.3% 1.5% .1%

.4 .5 -1.3 -.726 89 106 5

11.3% 38.5% 45.9% 2.2%2.4% 8.2% 9.7% .5%

-3.9 -2.2 6.6 .0258 528 265 24

23.7% 48.5% 24.4% 2.2%23.7% 48.5% 24.4% 2.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


challmaj

tmurray

C-172

Table 90. Challenge of courses in your major--cross-tabulation by college.

1 452.2% 100.0%

.1% 4.1%.60 150

.0% 100.0%

.0% 13.8%-1.3

0 221.0% 100.0%.0% 20.3%-1.6

1 151.7% 100.0%.1% 13.9%

-.62 188

1.1% 100.0%.2% 17.3%

-.21 12

8.3% 100.0%.1% 1.1%2.3

3 903.3% 100.0%

.3% 8.3%1.9

5 2312.2% 100.0%

.5% 21.2%1.313 1088

1.2% 100.0%1.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

challmaj

Total

tmurray

C-173

Table 91. Accessibility of faculty--cross-tabulation by college.

10 22 10 322.2% 48.9% 22.2% 6.7%

.9% 2.0% .9% .3%.5 .8 -1.0 -.2

18 69 48 1312.1% 46.3% 32.2% 8.7%

1.6% 6.2% 4.3% 1.2%-1.9 .9 .3 .7

58 92 59 1226.0% 41.3% 26.5% 5.4%

5.2% 8.3% 5.3% 1.1%2.5 -.1 -1.1 -1.026 65 45 15

17.1% 42.8% 29.6% 9.9%2.3% 5.8% 4.0% 1.3%

-.5 .2 -.2 1.241 81 50 10

21.9% 43.3% 26.7% 5.3%3.7% 7.3% 4.5% .9%

1.0 .4 -1.0 -1.02 5 3 1

16.7% 41.7% 25.0% 8.3%.2% .4% .3% .1%

-.2 .0 -.4 .115 36 30 6

16.9% 40.4% 33.7% 6.7%1.3% 3.2% 2.7% .5%

-.4 -.1 .5 -.240 92 97 21

15.6% 35.8% 37.7% 8.2%3.6% 8.3% 8.7% 1.9%

-1.2 -1.4 2.0 .5210 462 342 81

18.9% 41.5% 30.7% 7.3%18.9% 41.5% 30.7% 7.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


accesfac

tmurray

C-174

Table 91. Accessibility of faculty--cross-tabulation by college.

0 45.0% 100.0%.0% 4.0%

-.91 149

.7% 100.0%

.1% 13.4%-1.0

2 223.9% 100.0%.2% 20.0%

-.91 152

.7% 100.0%

.1% 13.6%-1.0

5 1872.7% 100.0%

.4% 16.8%1.0

1 128.3% 100.0%

.1% 1.1%1.8

2 892.2% 100.0%

.2% 8.0%.47 257

2.7% 100.0%.6% 23.1%1.219 1114

1.7% 100.0%1.7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

accesfac

Total

tmurray

C-175

Table 92. Helpfulness of faculty--cross-tabulation by college.

10 22 10 322.2% 48.9% 22.2% 6.7%

.9% 2.0% .9% .3%.3 .6 -.8 .0

21 75 39 1014.1% 50.3% 26.2% 6.7%

1.9% 6.7% 3.5% .9%-1.6 1.3 -.5 .0

57 98 54 1225.7% 44.1% 24.3% 5.4%

5.1% 8.8% 4.8% 1.1%1.9 .2 -1.2 -.829 75 35 13

19.1% 49.3% 23.0% 8.6%2.6% 6.7% 3.1% 1.2%

-.3 1.1 -1.3 .948 76 52 11

25.4% 40.2% 27.5% 5.8%4.3% 6.8% 4.7% 1.0%

1.6 -.7 -.3 -.52 4 5 1

16.7% 33.3% 41.7% 8.3%.2% .4% .4% .1%

-.3 -.5 .9 .215 36 31 6

16.7% 40.0% 34.4% 6.7%1.3% 3.2% 2.8% .5%

-.7 -.5 1.1 .042 98 92 19

16.3% 38.1% 35.8% 7.4%3.8% 8.8% 8.2% 1.7%

-1.3 -1.3 2.2 .4224 484 318 75

20.1% 43.4% 28.5% 6.7%20.1% 43.4% 28.5% 6.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


helpfac

tmurray

C-176

Table 92. Helpfulness of faculty--cross-tabulation by college.

0 45.0% 100.0%.0% 4.0%

-.84 149

2.7% 100.0%.4% 13.4%1.4

1 222.5% 100.0%.1% 19.9%-1.1

0 152.0% 100.0%.0% 13.6%-1.4

2 1891.1% 100.0%

.2% 16.9%-.3

0 12.0% 100.0%.0% 1.1%

-.42 90

2.2% 100.0%.2% 8.1%

.76 257

2.3% 100.0%.5% 23.0%1.415 1116

1.3% 100.0%1.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

helpfac

Total

tmurray

C-177

Table 93. The degree to which you were treated fairly--cross-tabulation by college.

12 23 8 226.7% 51.1% 17.8% 4.4%

1.1% 2.1% .7% .2%.5 .3 -.9 .2

25 82 37 316.8% 55.0% 24.8% 2.0%

2.3% 7.4% 3.3% .3%-1.7 1.3 .2 -1.2

69 102 41 1031.1% 45.9% 18.5% 4.5%

6.2% 9.2% 3.7% .9%2.4 -.3 -1.7 .533 78 34 5

21.7% 51.3% 22.4% 3.3%3.0% 7.0% 3.1% .5%

-.4 .7 -.4 -.452 86 41 8

27.7% 45.7% 21.8% 4.3%4.7% 7.7% 3.7% .7%

1.2 -.4 -.6 .33 4 3 2

25.0% 33.3% 25.0% 16.7%.3% .4% .3% .2%

.1 -.7 .1 2.317 40 27 3

18.9% 44.4% 30.0% 3.3%1.5% 3.6% 2.4% .3%

-.9 -.4 1.2 -.349 113 76 10

19.4% 44.7% 30.0% 4.0%4.4% 10.2% 6.8% .9%

-1.3 -.7 1.9 .1260 528 267 43

23.4% 47.5% 24.0% 3.9%23.4% 47.5% 24.0% 3.9%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


treatedf

tmurray

C-178

Table 93. The degree to which you were treated fairly--cross-tabulation by college.

0 45.0% 100.0%.0% 4.1%

-.72 149

1.3% 100.0%.2% 13.4%

.20 222

.0% 100.0%

.0% 20.0%-1.6

2 1521.3% 100.0%

.2% 13.7%.21 188

.5% 100.0%

.1% 16.9%-.8

0 12.0% 100.0%.0% 1.1%

-.43 90

3.3% 100.0%.3% 8.1%1.9

5 2532.0% 100.0%

.5% 22.8%1.213 1111

1.2% 100.0%1.2% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

treatedf

Total

tmurray

C-179

Table 94. Overall quality of Unitersity Studies/General Education courses--cross-tabulation by college.

6 16 17 314.3% 38.1% 40.5% 7.1%

.6% 1.5% 1.6% .3%-.3 -.9 1.9 -.319 65 36 15

13.7% 46.8% 25.9% 10.8%1.8% 6.2% 3.4% 1.4%

-.8 -.1 .1 .941 104 51 12

19.6% 49.8% 24.4% 5.7%3.9% 9.9% 4.9% 1.1%

1.2 .5 -.3 -1.415 69 34 17

10.7% 49.3% 24.3% 12.1%1.4% 6.6% 3.2% 1.6%

-1.6 .3 -.3 1.428 82 42 16

16.4% 48.0% 24.6% 9.4%2.7% 7.8% 4.0% 1.5%

.0 .1 -.2 .42 3 2 3

20.0% 30.0% 20.0% 30.0%.2% .3% .2% .3%

.3 -.8 -.3 2.316 37 22 7

18.8% 43.5% 25.9% 8.2%1.5% 3.5% 2.1% .7%

.6 -.5 .1 -.144 124 64 17

17.3% 48.6% 25.1% 6.7%4.2% 11.8% 6.1% 1.6%

.4 .2 -.1 -1.0171 500 268 90

16.3% 47.6% 25.5% 8.6%16.3% 47.6% 25.5% 8.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


qualgene

tmurray

C-180

Table 94. Overall quality of Unitersity Studies/General Education courses--cross-tabulation by college.

0 42.0% 100.0%.0% 4.0%

-.94 139

2.9% 100.0%.4% 13.2%

.61 209

.5% 100.0%

.1% 19.9%-1.6

5 1403.6% 100.0%

.5% 13.3%1.2

3 1711.8% 100.0%

.3% 16.3%-.3

0 10.0% 100.0%.0% 1.0%

-.53 85

3.5% 100.0%.3% 8.1%

.96 255

2.4% 100.0%.6% 24.3%

.322 1051

2.1% 100.0%2.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

qualgene

Total

tmurray

C-181

Table 95. Variety of courses in University Studies/General Education--cross-tabulation by college.

4 20 14 49.5% 47.6% 33.3% 9.5%

.4% 1.9% 1.3% .4%-1.3 .2 1.0 .2

20 75 28 1214.4% 54.0% 20.1% 8.6%

1.9% 7.2% 2.7% 1.1%-1.1 1.5 -1.2 .1

52 96 46 1424.9% 45.9% 22.0% 6.7%

5.0% 9.2% 4.4% 1.3%2.2 .1 -1.0 -.919 68 30 19

13.6% 48.6% 21.4% 13.6%1.8% 6.5% 2.9% 1.8%

-1.3 .5 -.9 2.130 73 51 14

17.4% 42.4% 29.7% 8.1%2.9% 7.0% 4.9% 1.3%

-.3 -.6 1.1 -.22 5 1 2

20.0% 50.0% 10.0% 20.0%.2% .5% .1% .2%

.1 .2 -1.0 1.216 31 25 8

19.0% 36.9% 29.8% 9.5%1.5% 3.0% 2.4% .8%

.1 -1.2 .8 .350 109 72 16

19.8% 43.3% 28.6% 6.3%4.8% 10.4% 6.9% 1.5%

.5 -.5 1.0 -1.2193 477 267 89

18.4% 45.5% 25.5% 8.5%18.4% 45.5% 25.5% 8.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


vargened

tmurray

C-182

Table 95. Variety of courses in University Studies/General Education--cross-tabulation by college.

0 42.0% 100.0%.0% 4.0%

-.94 139

2.9% 100.0%.4% 13.3%

.61 209

.5% 100.0%

.1% 19.9%-1.6

4 1402.9% 100.0%

.4% 13.4%.64 172

2.3% 100.0%.4% 16.4%

.20 10

.0% 100.0%

.0% 1.0%-.5

4 844.8% 100.0%

.4% 8.0%1.7

5 2522.0% 100.0%

.5% 24.0%-.122 1048

2.1% 100.0%2.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

vargened

Total

tmurray

C-183

Table 96. Challenge of courses in University Studies/General Education--cross-tabulation by college.

8 21 11 119.0% 50.0% 26.2% 2.4%

.8% 2.0% 1.1% .1%.2 .0 .1 -.7

23 70 40 416.5% 50.4% 28.8% 2.9%

2.2% 6.7% 3.8% .4%-.4 .0 .7 -1.048 101 55 4

23.0% 48.3% 26.3% 1.9%4.6% 9.7% 5.3% .4%

1.8 -.4 .2 -1.912 74 39 10

8.6% 53.2% 28.1% 7.2%1.1% 7.1% 3.7% 1.0%

-2.6 .5 .6 1.434 79 41 12

19.9% 46.2% 24.0% 7.0%3.3% 7.6% 3.9% 1.1%

.6 -.7 -.4 1.42 6 2 0

20.0% 60.0% 20.0% .0%.2% .6% .2% .0%

.2 .4 -.4 -.716 40 22 4

19.0% 47.6% 26.2% 4.8%1.5% 3.8% 2.1% .4%

.3 -.3 .1 .043 132 58 14

17.2% 52.8% 23.2% 5.6%4.1% 12.6% 5.6% 1.3%

-.2 .6 -.8 .7186 523 268 49

17.8% 50.1% 25.7% 4.7%17.8% 50.1% 25.7% 4.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


challgen

tmurray

C-184

Table 96. Challenge of courses in University Studies/General Education--cross-tabulation by college.

1 422.4% 100.0%

.1% 4.0%.32 139

1.4% 100.0%.2% 13.3%

-.31 209

.5% 100.0%

.1% 20.0%-1.4

4 1392.9% 100.0%

.4% 13.3%1.0

5 1712.9% 100.0%

.5% 16.4%1.2

0 10.0% 100.0%.0% 1.0%

-.42 84

2.4% 100.0%.2% 8.0%

.53 250

1.2% 100.0%.3% 23.9%

-.618 1044

1.7% 100.0%1.7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

VeryDissatisfied

challgen

Total

tmurray

C-185

Table 97. Communication--cross-tabulation by college.

2 12 20 44.4% 26.7% 44.4% 8.9%

.2% 1.1% 1.8% .4%-1.2 .9 .1 1.5

20 26 67 113.7% 17.8% 45.9% .7%

1.8% 2.3% 5.9% .1%1.3 -.8 .4 -2.124 49 105 7

10.7% 21.9% 46.9% 3.1%2.1% 4.3% 9.3% .6%

.3 .4 .8 -.917 30 65 8

11.8% 20.8% 45.1% 5.6%1.5% 2.7% 5.8% .7%

.6 .0 .3 .722 43 78 10

11.8% 23.1% 41.9% 5.4%1.9% 3.8% 6.9% .9%

.7 .7 -.3 .73 3 4 1

25.0% 25.0% 33.3% 8.3%.3% .3% .4% .1%1.6 .3 -.5 .7

6 15 37 76.4% 16.0% 39.4% 7.4%

.5% 1.3% 3.3% .6%-1.2 -1.0 -.6 1.4

21 57 115 117.5% 20.4% 41.2% 3.9%1.9% 5.0% 10.2% 1.0%

-1.4 -.1 -.6 -.3115 235 491 49

10.2% 20.8% 43.5% 4.3%10.2% 20.8% 43.5% 4.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Not at USU Very Well Well Poorly

prepcomm

tmurray

C-186

Table 97. Communication--cross-tabulation by college.

0 7 45.0% 15.6% 100.0%.0% .6% 4.0%

-.6 -.73 29 146

2.1% 19.9% 100.0%.3% 2.6% 12.9%1.5 -.1

1 38 224.4% 17.0% 100.0%.1% 3.4% 19.8%

-.7 -1.12 22 144

1.4% 15.3% 100.0%.2% 1.9% 12.7%

.6 -1.40 33 186

.0% 17.7% 100.0%

.0% 2.9% 16.5%-1.3 -.8

0 1 12.0% 8.3% 100.0%.0% .1% 1.1%

-.3 -.91 28 94

1.1% 29.8% 100.0%.1% 2.5% 8.3%

.2 2.03 72 279

1.1% 25.8% 100.0%.3% 6.4% 24.7%

.3 2.010 230 1130

.9% 20.4% 100.0%

.9% 20.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Very PoorlyNot

Applicable

prepcomm

Total

tmurray

C-187

Table 98. Numeracy--cross-tabulation by college.

1 10 25 32.2% 22.2% 55.6% 6.7%

.1% .9% 2.2% .3%-1.6 .5 1.1 .0

14 35 63 109.7% 24.1% 43.4% 6.9%1.2% 3.1% 5.6% .9%

.2 1.3 -.1 .218 41 109 19

8.0% 18.3% 48.7% 8.5%1.6% 3.7% 9.7% 1.7%

-.6 -.3 1.0 1.212 36 56 7

8.5% 25.4% 39.4% 4.9%1.1% 3.2% 5.0% .6%

-.3 1.7 -.9 -.724 31 73 16

13.0% 16.8% 39.7% 8.7%2.1% 2.8% 6.5% 1.4%

1.7 -.7 -.9 1.23 1 5 0

25.0% 8.3% 41.7% .0%.3% .1% .4% .0%1.8 -.9 -.1 -.9

7 15 38 67.4% 16.0% 40.4% 6.4%

.6% 1.3% 3.4% .5%-.6 -.7 -.6 .025 47 127 12

9.1% 17.0% 46.0% 4.3%2.2% 4.2% 11.3% 1.1%

-.1 -.8 .5 -1.4104 216 496 73

9.3% 19.3% 44.2% 6.5%9.3% 19.3% 44.2% 6.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


prepnume

tmurray

C-188

Table 98. Numeracy--cross-tabulation by college.

0 6 45.0% 13.3% 100.0%.0% .5% 4.0%

-.8 -.93 20 145

2.1% 13.8% 100.0%.3% 1.8% 12.9%

.5 -1.51 36 224

.4% 16.1% 100.0%

.1% 3.2% 20.0%-1.3 -1.1

4 27 1422.8% 19.0% 100.0%

.4% 2.4% 12.7%1.3 -.1

2 38 1841.1% 20.7% 100.0%

.2% 3.4% 16.4%-.5 .4

0 3 12.0% 25.0% 100.0%.0% .3% 1.1%

-.4 .51 27 94

1.1% 28.7% 100.0%.1% 2.4% 8.4%

-.4 2.16 59 276

2.2% 21.4% 100.0%.5% 5.3% 24.6%

.9 .817 216 1122

1.5% 19.3% 100.0%1.5% 19.3% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Very PoorlyNot

Applicable

prepnume

Total

tmurray

C-189

Table 99. Computer Literacy--cross-tabulation by college.

2 16 22 04.4% 35.6% 48.9% .0%

.2% 1.4% 1.9% .0%-1.1 1.1 .8 -1.7

15 43 60 610.1% 29.1% 40.5% 4.1%

1.3% 3.8% 5.3% .5%.3 .4 -.1 -1.1

26 66 100 1111.6% 29.3% 44.4% 4.9%

2.3% 5.8% 8.8% 1.0%1.0 .6 .8 -.814 40 58 9

9.5% 27.2% 39.5% 6.1%1.2% 3.5% 5.1% .8%

.0 .0 -.3 -.121 48 77 11

11.4% 26.1% 41.8% 6.0%1.9% 4.2% 6.8% 1.0%

.9 -.3 .2 -.23 1 4 2

25.0% 8.3% 33.3% 16.7%.3% .1% .4% .2%1.8 -1.3 -.4 1.4

4 20 37 124.2% 20.8% 38.5% 12.5%

.4% 1.8% 3.3% 1.1%-1.7 -1.2 -.4 2.4

22 76 108 208.0% 27.5% 39.1% 7.2%1.9% 6.7% 9.5% 1.8%

-.8 .1 -.5 .7107 310 466 71

9.4% 27.4% 41.1% 6.3%9.4% 27.4% 41.1% 6.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


prepcomp

tmurray

C-190

Table 99. Computer Literacy--cross-tabulation by college.

1 4 452.2% 8.9% 100.0%

.1% .4% 4.0%.3 -.96 18 148

4.1% 12.2% 100.0%.5% 1.6% 13.1%2.2 -.6

1 21 225.4% 9.3% 100.0%.1% 1.9% 19.9%-1.4 -1.9

2 24 1471.4% 16.3% 100.0%

.2% 2.1% 13.0%-.3 .7

2 25 1841.1% 13.6% 100.0%

.2% 2.2% 16.2%-.6 -.2

0 2 12.0% 16.7% 100.0%.0% .2% 1.1%

-.4 .24 19 96

4.2% 19.8% 100.0%.4% 1.7% 8.5%1.9 1.5

3 47 2761.1% 17.0% 100.0%

.3% 4.1% 24.4%-.8 1.319 160 1133

1.7% 14.1% 100.0%1.7% 14.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Very PoorlyNot

Applicable

prepcomp

Total

tmurray

C-191

Table 100. Humanities and Art--cross-tabulation by college.

1 15 27 12.2% 33.3% 60.0% 2.2%

.1% 1.3% 2.4% .1%-1.2 .2 1.7 -.9

9 38 69 96.1% 25.9% 46.9% 6.1%

.8% 3.3% 6.1% .8%-.5 -1.2 .7 .420 84 98 8

8.8% 36.8% 43.0% 3.5%1.8% 7.4% 8.6% .7%

.9 1.4 .0 -1.211 33 60 12

7.5% 22.6% 41.1% 8.2%1.0% 2.9% 5.3% 1.1%

.1 -1.9 -.4 1.515 84 65 5

8.0% 44.9% 34.8% 2.7%1.3% 7.4% 5.7% .4%

.4 3.2 -1.8 -1.62 2 6 1

16.7% 16.7% 50.0% 8.3%.2% .2% .5% .1%1.2 -.9 .4 .4

8 20 45 78.4% 21.1% 47.4% 7.4%

.7% 1.8% 4.0% .6%.4 -1.8 .6 .8

16 83 121 185.8% 30.0% 43.7% 6.5%1.4% 7.3% 10.6% 1.6%

-.9 -.5 .1 .882 359 491 61

7.2% 31.6% 43.2% 5.4%7.2% 31.6% 43.2% 5.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


prephuma

tmurray

C-192

Table 100. Humanities and Art--cross-tabulation by college.

1 0 452.2% .0% 100.0%

.1% .0% 4.0%.0 -2.24 18 147

2.7% 12.2% 100.0%.4% 1.6% 12.9%

.4 .73 15 228

1.3% 6.6% 100.0%.3% 1.3% 20.1%

-.9 -1.86 24 146

4.1% 16.4% 100.0%.5% 2.1% 12.8%1.6 2.2

3 15 1871.6% 8.0% 100.0%

.3% 1.3% 16.4%-.5 -1.0

0 1 12.0% 8.3% 100.0%.0% .1% 1.1%

-.5 -.23 12 95

3.2% 12.6% 100.0%.3% 1.1% 8.4%

.6 .75 34 277

1.8% 12.3% 100.0%.4% 3.0% 24.4%

-.4 .925 119 1137

2.2% 10.5% 100.0%2.2% 10.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Very PoorlyNot

Applicable

prephuma

Total

tmurray

C-193

Table 101. Social Science--cross-tabulation by college.

3 11 24 17.0% 25.6% 55.8% 2.3%

.3% 1.0% 2.1% .1%-.3 -.5 .9 -.514 34 72 8

9.6% 23.3% 49.3% 5.5%1.2% 3.0% 6.4% .7%

.6 -1.4 .5 .915 82 101 7

6.8% 36.9% 45.5% 3.2%1.3% 7.3% 8.9% .6%

-.7 2.0 -.2 -.611 36 68 6

7.6% 25.0% 47.2% 4.2%1.0% 3.2% 6.0% .5%

-.2 -1.0 .1 .121 65 81 5

11.2% 34.6% 43.1% 2.7%1.9% 5.8% 7.2% .4%

1.5 1.3 -.7 -.92 2 5 1

16.7% 16.7% 41.7% 8.3%.2% .2% .4% .1%1.0 -.8 -.2 .8

3 24 54 33.2% 25.3% 56.8% 3.2%

.3% 2.1% 4.8% .3%-1.7 -.8 1.5 -.4

23 80 120 148.2% 28.7% 43.0% 5.0%2.0% 7.1% 10.6% 1.2%

.1 -.3 -.9 .992 334 525 45

8.1% 29.6% 46.5% 4.0%8.1% 29.6% 46.5% 4.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


prepsocs

tmurray

C-194

Table 101. Social Science--cross-tabulation by college.

0 4 43.0% 9.3% 100.0%.0% .4% 3.8%

-.8 -.22 16 146

1.4% 11.0% 100.0%.2% 1.4% 12.9%

.0 .20 17 222

.0% 7.7% 100.0%

.0% 1.5% 19.7%-1.7 -1.3

5 18 1443.5% 12.5% 100.0%

.4% 1.6% 12.8%2.2 .8

3 13 1881.6% 6.9% 100.0%

.3% 1.2% 16.7%.3 -1.50 2 12

.0% 16.7% 100.0%

.0% .2% 1.1%-.4 .7

1 10 951.1% 10.5% 100.0%

.1% .9% 8.4%-.2 .0

4 38 2791.4% 13.6% 100.0%

.4% 3.4% 24.7%.2 1.6

15 118 11291.3% 10.5% 100.0%1.3% 10.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Very PoorlyNot

Applicable

prepsocs

Total

tmurray

C-195

Table 102. Life Science--cross-tabulation by college.

3 12 20 56.8% 27.3% 45.5% 11.4%

.3% 1.1% 1.8% .4%-.2 .5 -.1 1.710 23 74 11

6.8% 15.8% 50.7% 7.5%.9% 2.0% 6.5% 1.0%

-.4 -2.0 .8 1.118 66 109 12

8.0% 29.3% 48.4% 5.3%1.6% 5.8% 9.6% 1.1%

.1 1.8 .5 -.112 28 64 7

8.3% 19.3% 44.1% 4.8%1.1% 2.5% 5.6% .6%

.2 -1.1 -.3 -.314 55 78 11

7.6% 29.7% 42.2% 5.9%1.2% 4.9% 6.9% 1.0%

-.1 1.7 -.8 .32 2 4 0

16.7% 16.7% 33.3% .0%.2% .2% .4% .0%1.1 -.5 -.7 -.8

8 24 44 18.4% 25.3% 46.3% 1.1%

.7% 2.1% 3.9% .1%.2 .3 .0 -1.8

21 58 129 157.5% 20.6% 45.9% 5.3%1.9% 5.1% 11.4% 1.3%

-.2 -1.0 .0 -.188 268 522 62

7.8% 23.7% 46.1% 5.5%7.8% 23.7% 46.1% 5.5%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


preplfsc

tmurray

C-196

Table 102. Life Science--cross-tabulation by college.

0 4 44.0% 9.1% 100.0%.0% .4% 3.9%

-.9 -1.05 23 146

3.4% 15.8% 100.0%.4% 2.0% 12.9%1.3 .2

3 17 2251.3% 7.6% 100.0%

.3% 1.5% 19.9%-.7 -2.9

3 31 1452.1% 21.4% 100.0%

.3% 2.7% 12.8%.1 1.94 23 185

2.2% 12.4% 100.0%.4% 2.0% 16.3%

.2 -.90 4 12

.0% 33.3% 100.0%

.0% .4% 1.1%-.5 1.6

1 17 951.1% 17.9% 100.0%

.1% 1.5% 8.4%-.6 .7

6 52 2812.1% 18.5% 100.0%

.5% 4.6% 24.8%.2 1.5

22 171 11331.9% 15.1% 100.0%1.9% 15.1% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Very PoorlyNot

Applicable

preplfsc

Total

tmurray

C-197

Table 103. Physical Science--cross-tabulation by college.

3 10 24 26.7% 22.2% 53.3% 4.4%

.3% .9% 2.1% .2%-.2 -.2 .7 -.3

8 32 69 125.4% 21.8% 46.9% 8.2%

.7% 2.8% 6.1% 1.1%-1.0 -.4 .1 1.3

11 58 112 154.9% 25.9% 50.0% 6.7%1.0% 5.1% 9.9% 1.3%

-1.5 .8 .9 .713 31 64 6

8.9% 21.2% 43.8% 4.1%1.1% 2.7% 5.6% .5%

.5 -.6 -.4 -.719 48 82 8

10.2% 25.7% 43.9% 4.3%1.7% 4.2% 7.2% .7%

1.2 .6 -.5 -.72 2 5 0

16.7% 16.7% 41.7% .0%.2% .2% .4% .0%1.1 -.5 -.2 -.8

8 24 40 68.3% 25.0% 41.7% 6.3%

.7% 2.1% 3.5% .5%.2 .3 -.6 .3

23 61 127 148.3% 22.0% 45.8% 5.1%2.0% 5.4% 11.2% 1.2%

.4 -.5 -.1 -.487 266 523 63

7.7% 23.5% 46.1% 5.6%7.7% 23.5% 46.1% 5.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


prepphys

tmurray

C-198

Table 103. Physical Science--cross-tabulation by college.

1 5 452.2% 11.1% 100.0%

.1% .4% 4.0%.2 -.74 22 147

2.7% 15.0% 100.0%.4% 1.9% 13.0%

.9 -.11 27 224

.4% 12.1% 100.0%

.1% 2.4% 19.8%-1.5 -1.3

5 27 1463.4% 18.5% 100.0%

.4% 2.4% 12.9%1.5 .9

3 27 1871.6% 14.4% 100.0%

.3% 2.4% 16.5%-.2 -.3

0 3 12.0% 25.0% 100.0%.0% .3% 1.1%

-.5 .81 17 96

1.0% 17.7% 100.0%.1% 1.5% 8.5%

-.5 .65 47 277

1.8% 17.0% 100.0%.4% 4.1% 24.4%

.1 .720 175 1134

1.8% 15.4% 100.0%1.8% 15.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Very PoorlyNot

Applicable

prepphys

Total

tmurray

C-199

Table 104. Undergraduate programs--cross-tabulation by college.

3 22 18 16.7% 48.9% 40.0% 2.2%

.3% 1.9% 1.5% .1%-1.1 1.2 -.3 -1.1

14 57 70 109.2% 37.5% 46.1% 6.6%1.2% 4.9% 6.0% .9%

-1.1 .0 .7 .124 110 86 12

10.3% 47.4% 37.1% 5.2%2.0% 9.4% 7.3% 1.0%

-.8 2.4 -1.3 -.719 58 64 10

12.6% 38.4% 42.4% 6.6%1.6% 4.9% 5.5% .9%

.1 .1 .0 .128 70 85 12

14.2% 35.5% 43.1% 6.1%2.4% 6.0% 7.3% 1.0%

.8 -.5 .1 -.21 3 5 1

10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 10.0%.1% .3% .4% .1%

-.2 -.4 .4 .57 34 48 7

7.2% 35.1% 49.5% 7.2%.6% 2.9% 4.1% .6%-1.4 -.4 1.0 .3

48 88 123 2216.7% 30.6% 42.7% 7.6%

4.1% 7.5% 10.5% 1.9%2.1 -2.0 .0 .8

144 442 499 7512.3% 37.7% 42.6% 6.4%12.3% 37.7% 42.6% 6.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fairimpugpgs

tmurray

C-200

Table 104. Undergraduate programs--cross-tabulation by college.

1 452.2% 100.0%

.1% 3.8%.81 152

.7% 100.0%

.1% 13.0%-.4

0 232.0% 100.0%.0% 19.8%-1.5

0 151.0% 100.0%.0% 12.9%-1.2

2 1971.0% 100.0%

.2% 16.8%.00 10

.0% 100.0%

.0% .9%-.3

1 971.0% 100.0%

.1% 8.3%.07 288

2.4% 100.0%.6% 24.6%2.412 1172

1.0% 100.0%1.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Poorimpugpgs

Total

tmurray

C-201

Table 105. Your major department--cross-tabulation by college.

3 27 10 46.7% 60.0% 22.2% 8.9%

.3% 2.3% .9% .3%-1.3 1.3 -1.1 .8

8 76 58 75.3% 50.0% 38.2% 4.6%

.7% 6.5% 5.0% .6%-2.8 .6 1.6 -.7

14 152 60 76.0% 65.0% 25.6% 3.0%1.2% 13.1% 5.2% .6%

-3.2 4.1 -1.5 -1.911 94 37 8

7.3% 62.3% 24.5% 5.3%.9% 8.1% 3.2% .7%-2.1 2.8 -1.4 -.4

17 97 63 128.6% 49.2% 32.0% 6.1%1.5% 8.3% 5.4% 1.0%

-1.9 .6 .3 .01 6 0 3

10.0% 60.0% .0% 30.0%.1% .5% .0% .3%

-.3 .6 -1.8 3.15 38 44 7

5.2% 39.2% 45.4% 7.2%.4% 3.3% 3.8% .6%-2.3 -1.1 2.6 .5

99 51 88 2235.7% 18.4% 31.8% 7.9%

8.5% 4.4% 7.6% 1.9%10.0 -6.9 .2 1.3158 541 360 70

13.6% 46.5% 31.0% 6.0%13.6% 46.5% 31.0% 6.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fairimpmdept

tmurray

C-202

Table 105. Your major department--cross-tabulation by college.

1 452.2% 100.0%

.1% 3.9%-.3

3 1522.0% 100.0%

.3% 13.1%-.7

1 234.4% 100.0%.1% 20.1%-2.2

1 151.7% 100.0%.1% 13.0%-1.6

8 1974.1% 100.0%

.7% 16.9%.90 10

.0% 100.0%

.0% .9%-.5

3 973.1% 100.0%

.3% 8.3%.1

17 2776.1% 100.0%1.5% 23.8%

3.134 1163

2.9% 100.0%2.9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Poorimpmdept

Total

tmurray

C-203

Table 106. Teaching ability of faculty--cross-tabulation by college.

4 21 17 29.1% 47.7% 38.6% 4.5%

.3% 1.8% 1.4% .2%.7 .6 -.2 -1.29 59 67 15

5.9% 38.8% 44.1% 9.9%.8% 5.0% 5.7% 1.3%

-.2 -.6 .8 -.39 117 89 18

3.8% 50.0% 38.0% 7.7%.8% 9.9% 7.5% 1.5%-1.5 1.9 -.5 -1.4

14 62 54 219.3% 41.1% 35.8% 13.9%1.2% 5.2% 4.6% 1.8%

1.4 -.2 -.8 1.213 101 67 17

6.5% 50.8% 33.7% 8.5%1.1% 8.6% 5.7% 1.4%

.1 1.9 -1.4 -.90 4 6 1

.0% 36.4% 54.5% 9.1%

.0% .3% .5% .1%-.8 -.3 .8 -.2

4 31 47 134.1% 32.0% 48.5% 13.4%

.3% 2.6% 4.0% 1.1%-.9 -1.5 1.3 .822 100 127 39

7.5% 34.1% 43.3% 13.3%1.9% 8.5% 10.8% 3.3%

.8 -2.1 .9 1.475 495 474 126

6.4% 41.9% 40.1% 10.7%6.4% 41.9% 40.1% 10.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fairimpteach

tmurray

C-204

Table 106. Teaching ability of faculty--cross-tabulation by college.

0 44.0% 100.0%.0% 3.7%

-.62 152

1.3% 100.0%.2% 12.9%

.51 234

.4% 100.0%

.1% 19.8%-.8

0 151.0% 100.0%.0% 12.8%-1.2

1 199.5% 100.0%.1% 16.9%

-.60 11

.0% 100.0%

.0% .9%-.3

2 972.1% 100.0%

.2% 8.2%1.2

5 2931.7% 100.0%

.4% 24.8%1.411 1181

.9% 100.0%

.9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Poorimpteach

Total

tmurray

C-205

Table 107. PErsonal interest of faculty in students--cross-tabulation by college.

3 15 16 106.7% 33.3% 35.6% 22.2%

.3% 1.3% 1.4% .9%.1 .6 -.7 .7

10 39 60 386.6% 25.7% 39.5% 25.0%

.9% 3.3% 5.1% 3.2%.2 -.7 -.5 2.18 82 95 37

3.4% 35.2% 40.8% 15.9%.7% 7.0% 8.1% 3.1%-1.7 1.8 -.3 -.7

14 38 61 319.3% 25.3% 40.7% 20.7%1.2% 3.2% 5.2% 2.6%

1.5 -.8 -.3 .814 65 86 23

7.1% 33.0% 43.7% 11.7%1.2% 5.5% 7.3% 2.0%

.5 1.1 .3 -2.10 3 5 1

.0% 30.0% 50.0% 10.0%

.0% .3% .4% .1%-.8 .1 .4 -.6

5 22 43 165.3% 23.2% 45.3% 16.8%

.4% 1.9% 3.7% 1.4%-.4 -1.0 .5 -.219 75 130 54

6.5% 25.6% 44.4% 18.4%1.6% 6.4% 11.1% 4.6%

.2 -1.0 .6 .273 339 496 210

6.2% 28.9% 42.2% 17.9%6.2% 28.9% 42.2% 17.9%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fairimpfacul

tmurray

C-206

Table 107. PErsonal interest of faculty in students--cross-tabulation by college.

1 452.2% 100.0%

.1% 3.8%-.8

5 1523.3% 100.0%

.4% 12.9%-.911 233

4.7% 100.0%.9% 19.8%

-.16 150

4.0% 100.0%.5% 12.8%

-.59 197

4.6% 100.0%.8% 16.8%

-.21 10

10.0% 100.0%.1% .9%

.79 95

9.5% 100.0%.8% 8.1%2.015 293

5.1% 100.0%1.3% 24.9%

.257 1175

4.9% 100.0%4.9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Poorimpfacul

Total

tmurray

C-207

Table 108. Quality of students--cross-tabulation by college.

5 13 20 511.4% 29.5% 45.5% 11.4%

.4% 1.1% 1.7% .4%.9 -.3 -.1 -.1

11 44 78 167.3% 29.1% 51.7% 10.6%

.9% 3.7% 6.6% 1.4%-.2 -.7 .9 -.415 91 102 24

6.4% 38.9% 43.6% 10.3%1.3% 7.7% 8.7% 2.0%

-.7 1.8 -.7 -.715 40 77 17

10.0% 26.7% 51.3% 11.3%1.3% 3.4% 6.6% 1.4%

1.0 -1.2 .8 -.214 71 85 22

7.1% 36.2% 43.4% 11.2%1.2% 6.0% 7.2% 1.9%

-.3 1.0 -.7 -.21 3 5 2

9.1% 27.3% 45.5% 18.2%.1% .3% .4% .2%

.2 -.3 -.1 .68 28 45 15

8.2% 28.9% 46.4% 15.5%.7% 2.4% 3.8% 1.3%

.2 -.6 .0 1.021 89 137 38

7.2% 30.5% 46.9% 13.0%1.8% 7.6% 11.7% 3.2%

-.3 -.5 .0 .690 379 549 139

7.7% 32.3% 46.7% 11.8%7.7% 32.3% 46.7% 11.8%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fairimpqstud

tmurray

C-208

Table 108. Quality of students--cross-tabulation by college.

1 442.3% 100.0%

.1% 3.7%.42 151

1.3% 100.0%.2% 12.9%

-.22 234

.9% 100.0%

.2% 19.9%-.8

1 150.7% 100.0%.1% 12.8%

-.94 196

2.0% 100.0%.3% 16.7%

.60 11

.0% 100.0%

.0% .9%-.4

1 971.0% 100.0%

.1% 8.3%-.4

7 2922.4% 100.0%

.6% 24.9%1.218 1175

1.5% 100.0%1.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Poorimpqstud

Total

tmurray

C-209

Table 109. Research activities--cross-tabulation by college.

10 14 16 223.3% 32.6% 37.2% 4.7%

.9% 1.2% 1.4% .2%.6 1.2 -.6 -1.5

30 32 66 2319.7% 21.1% 43.4% 15.1%

2.6% 2.8% 5.7% 2.0%.1 -.7 .1 .8

33 68 94 3214.3% 29.4% 40.7% 13.9%

2.8% 5.9% 8.1% 2.8%-1.7 1.8 -.5 .5

26 43 56 2117.6% 29.1% 37.8% 14.2%

2.2% 3.7% 4.8% 1.8%-.5 1.3 -.9 .533 47 90 24

16.8% 24.0% 45.9% 12.2%2.8% 4.0% 7.7% 2.1%

-.8 .1 .7 -.23 4 2 0

30.0% 40.0% 20.0% .0%.3% .3% .2% .0%

.8 1.1 -1.1 -1.124 11 45 16

25.0% 11.5% 46.9% 16.7%2.1% .9% 3.9% 1.4%

1.3 -2.5 .6 1.165 56 128 30

22.7% 19.6% 44.8% 10.5%5.6% 4.8% 11.0% 2.6%

1.3 -1.4 .5 -1.1224 275 497 148

19.3% 23.7% 42.8% 12.7%19.3% 23.7% 42.8% 12.7%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fairimpresea

tmurray

C-210

Table 109. Research activities--cross-tabulation by college.

1 432.3% 100.0%

.1% 3.7%.41 152

.7% 100.0%

.1% 13.1%-.9

4 2311.7% 100.0%

.3% 19.9%.22 148

1.4% 100.0%.2% 12.7%

-.22 196

1.0% 100.0%.2% 16.9%

-.61 10

10.0% 100.0%.1% .9%2.1

0 96.0% 100.0%.0% 8.3%-1.2

7 2862.4% 100.0%

.6% 24.6%1.218 1162

1.5% 100.0%1.5% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Poorimpresea

Total

tmurray

C-211

Table 110. Public relations--cross-tabulation by college.

5 11 24 311.6% 25.6% 55.8% 7.0%

.4% .9% 2.1% .3%-.8 .1 1.3 -1.025 38 60 24

16.6% 25.2% 39.7% 15.9%2.1% 3.3% 5.1% 2.1%

-.1 .1 -.6 1.232 65 94 35

13.8% 28.0% 40.5% 15.1%2.7% 5.6% 8.0% 3.0%

-1.2 1.0 -.6 1.127 30 67 23

17.9% 19.9% 44.4% 15.2%2.3% 2.6% 5.7% 2.0%

.3 -1.2 .3 .933 54 81 20

16.8% 27.4% 41.1% 10.2%2.8% 4.6% 6.9% 1.7%

-.1 .8 -.4 -1.03 3 3 0

30.0% 30.0% 30.0% .0%.3% .3% .3% .0%1.0 .3 -.6 -1.121 15 44 14

21.9% 15.6% 45.8% 14.6%1.8% 1.3% 3.8% 1.2%

1.2 -1.8 .4 .652 72 130 28

18.0% 24.9% 45.0% 9.7%4.4% 6.2% 11.1% 2.4%

.4 .1 .5 -1.4198 288 503 147

16.9% 24.6% 43.0% 12.6%16.9% 24.6% 43.0% 12.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fairimpprela

tmurray

C-212

Table 110. Public relations--cross-tabulation by college.

0 43.0% 100.0%.0% 3.7%-1.1

4 1512.6% 100.0%

.3% 12.9%-.1

6 2322.6% 100.0%

.5% 19.8%-.2

4 1512.6% 100.0%

.3% 12.9%-.1

9 1974.6% 100.0%

.8% 16.9%1.5

1 1010.0% 100.0%

.1% .9%1.4

2 962.1% 100.0%

.2% 8.2%-.4

7 2892.4% 100.0%

.6% 24.7%-.433 1169

2.8% 100.0%2.8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Poorimpprela

Total

tmurray

C-213

Table 111. The open access labs had the software I needed--cross-tabulation by college.

16 19 9 034.8% 41.3% 19.6% .0%

1.4% 1.6% .8% .0%.3 -.1 1.2 -1.1

57 56 18 138.3% 37.6% 12.1% .7%

4.9% 4.8% 1.6% .1%1.3 -.8 -.4 -1.479 88 37 5

34.8% 38.8% 16.3% 2.2%6.8% 7.6% 3.2% .4%

.7 -.8 1.3 -.250 59 18 6

34.0% 40.1% 12.2% 4.1%4.3% 5.1% 1.6% .5%

.4 -.4 -.3 1.353 96 20 8

26.8% 48.5% 10.1% 4.0%4.6% 8.3% 1.7% .7%

-1.3 1.4 -1.2 1.54 6 0 1

36.4% 54.5% .0% 9.1%.3% .5% .0% .1%

.2 .6 -1.2 1.433 39 11 1

35.9% 42.4% 12.0% 1.1%2.9% 3.4% 1.0% .1%

.6 .0 -.3 -.880 123 40 6

28.1% 43.2% 14.0% 2.1%6.9% 10.6% 3.5% .5%

-1.2 .3 .4 -.3372 486 153 28

32.2% 42.1% 13.2% 2.4%32.2% 42.1% 13.2% 2.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


softneed

tmurray

C-214

Table 111. The open access labs had the software I needed--cross-tabulation by college.

0 2 46.0% 4.3% 100.0%.0% .2% 4.0%

-.7 -1.13 14 149

2.0% 9.4% 100.0%.3% 1.2% 12.9%1.2 .2

2 16 227.9% 7.0% 100.0%.2% 1.4% 19.7%

-.2 -1.01 13 147

.7% 8.8% 100.0%

.1% 1.1% 12.7%-.4 -.1

2 19 1981.0% 9.6% 100.0%

.2% 1.6% 17.1%.0 .30 0 11

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% 1.0%-.3 -1.0

0 8 92.0% 8.7% 100.0%.0% .7% 8.0%-1.0 -.1

4 32 2851.4% 11.2% 100.0%

.3% 2.8% 24.7%.6 1.3

12 104 11551.0% 9.0% 100.0%1.0% 9.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

softneed

Total

tmurray

C-215

Table 112. Lab consultants provided the help I needed--cross-tabulation by college.

11 16 15 123.9% 34.8% 32.6% 2.2%

.9% 1.4% 1.3% .1%.2 -.2 1.1 -.9

38 46 33 1225.3% 30.7% 22.0% 8.0%

3.3% 4.0% 2.8% 1.0%.8 -1.1 -.6 1.6

59 78 53 1526.0% 34.4% 23.3% 6.6%

5.1% 6.7% 4.6% 1.3%1.2 -.4 -.3 1.128 52 36 9

18.9% 35.1% 24.3% 6.1%2.4% 4.5% 3.1% .8%

-.9 -.2 .0 .642 85 43 5

21.2% 42.9% 21.7% 2.5%3.6% 7.3% 3.7% .4%

-.3 1.6 -.7 -1.62 7 1 1

18.2% 63.6% 9.1% 9.1%.2% .6% .1% .1%

-.3 1.5 -1.0 .626 31 23 3

28.3% 33.7% 25.0% 3.3%2.2% 2.7% 2.0% .3%

1.2 -.4 .1 -.753 104 78 12

18.5% 36.2% 27.2% 4.2%4.6% 9.0% 6.7% 1.0%

-1.4 .0 1.0 -.6259 419 282 58

22.3% 36.2% 24.3% 5.0%22.3% 36.2% 24.3% 5.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


helpneed

tmurray

C-216

Table 112. Lab consultants provided the help I needed--cross-tabulation by college.

1 2 462.2% 4.3% 100.0%

.1% .2% 4.0%.4 -1.31 20 150

.7% 13.3% 100.0%

.1% 1.7% 12.9%-.8 1.0

3 19 2271.3% 8.4% 100.0%

.3% 1.6% 19.6%-.2 -1.1

3 20 1482.0% 13.5% 100.0%

.3% 1.7% 12.8%.6 1.05 18 198

2.5% 9.1% 100.0%.4% 1.6% 17.1%1.2 -.7

0 0 11.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% .9%

-.4 -1.11 8 92

1.1% 8.7% 100.0%.1% .7% 7.9%

-.3 -.63 37 287

1.0% 12.9% 100.0%.3% 3.2% 24.8%

-.6 1.117 124 1159

1.5% 10.7% 100.0%1.5% 10.7% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

helpneed

Total

tmurray

C-217

Table 113. I didn't wait long for an available computer in the lab--cross-tabulation by college.

8 20 12 417.4% 43.5% 26.1% 8.7%

.7% 1.7% 1.0% .3%-.9 .6 .9 .338 54 26 13

25.3% 36.0% 17.3% 8.7%3.3% 4.7% 2.2% 1.1%

.4 -.4 -.8 .560 68 50 25

26.5% 30.1% 22.1% 11.1%5.2% 5.9% 4.3% 2.2%

.9 -1.9 .7 1.935 56 29 8

23.6% 37.8% 19.6% 5.4%3.0% 4.8% 2.5% .7%

.0 .0 -.1 -1.042 78 44 12

21.2% 39.4% 22.2% 6.1%3.6% 6.7% 3.8% 1.0%

-.7 .3 .7 -.83 7 1 0

27.3% 63.6% 9.1% .0%.3% .6% .1% .0%

.2 1.4 -.8 -.932 33 13 10

34.8% 35.9% 14.1% 10.9%2.8% 2.9% 1.1% .9%

2.2 -.3 -1.3 1.156 123 58 16

19.6% 43.0% 20.3% 5.6%4.8% 10.6% 5.0% 1.4%

-1.4 1.4 .1 -1.2274 439 233 88

23.7% 37.9% 20.1% 7.6%23.7% 37.9% 20.1% 7.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


waitcomp

tmurray

C-218

Table 113. I didn't wait long for an available computer in the lab--cross-tabulation by college.

0 2 46.0% 4.3% 100.0%.0% .2% 4.0%-1.1 -.9

5 14 1503.3% 9.3% 100.0%

.4% 1.2% 13.0%.4 .66 17 226

2.7% 7.5% 100.0%.5% 1.5% 19.5%

-.1 -.23 17 148

2.0% 11.5% 100.0%.3% 1.5% 12.8%

-.5 1.68 14 198

4.0% 7.1% 100.0%.7% 1.2% 17.1%1.1 -.4

0 0 11.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% 1.0%

-.6 -.94 0 92

4.3% .0% 100.0%.3% .0% 8.0%

.9 -2.76 27 286

2.1% 9.4% 100.0%.5% 2.3% 24.7%

-.7 .932 91 1157

2.8% 7.9% 100.0%2.8% 7.9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

waitcomp

Total

tmurray

C-219

Table 114. Overall, I was satisfied wtih the open access labs--cross-tabulation by college.

16 22 6 034.8% 47.8% 13.0% .0%

1.4% 1.9% .5% .0%.6 .1 -.1 -1.0

52 60 20 434.7% 40.0% 13.3% 2.7%

4.5% 5.2% 1.7% .3%1.0 -1.2 -.1 .369 104 35 4

30.4% 45.8% 15.4% 1.8%6.0% 9.0% 3.0% .3%

.0 -.1 .7 -.644 66 19 10

29.7% 44.6% 12.8% 6.8%3.8% 5.7% 1.6% .9%

-.1 -.3 -.3 3.558 103 16 4

29.4% 52.3% 8.1% 2.0%5.0% 8.9% 1.4% .3%

-.2 1.2 -2.1 -.33 6 2 0

27.3% 54.5% 18.2% .0%.3% .5% .2% .0%

-.2 .4 .4 -.536 43 10 1

39.6% 47.3% 11.0% 1.1%3.1% 3.7% .9% .1%

1.6 .1 -.7 -.872 132 50 4

25.3% 46.3% 17.5% 1.4%6.2% 11.4% 4.3% .3%

-1.5 .0 1.8 -1.0350 536 158 27

30.3% 46.4% 13.7% 2.3%30.3% 46.4% 13.7% 2.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


satislab

tmurray

C-220

Table 114. Overall, I was satisfied wtih the open access labs--cross-tabulation by college.

0 2 46.0% 4.3% 100.0%.0% .2% 4.0%

-.5 -.61 13 150

.7% 8.7% 100.0%

.1% 1.1% 13.0%.3 .91 14 227

.4% 6.2% 100.0%

.1% 1.2% 19.7%-.2 -.3

0 9 148.0% 6.1% 100.0%.0% .8% 12.8%

-.9 -.33 13 197

1.5% 6.6% 100.0%.3% 1.1% 17.1%2.0 -.1

0 0 11.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% 1.0%

-.2 -.90 1 91

.0% 1.1% 100.0%

.0% .1% 7.9%-.7 -2.1

1 26 285.4% 9.1% 100.0%.1% 2.3% 24.7%

-.4 1.56 78 1155

.5% 6.8% 100.0%

.5% 6.8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satislab

Total

tmurray

C-221

Table 115. Overall, I was satisfied with my USU email account--cross-tabulation by college.

20 20 4 143.5% 43.5% 8.7% 2.2%

1.7% 1.7% .3% .1%.7 -.2 -.6 .3

52 66 22 134.7% 44.0% 14.7% .7%

4.5% 5.7% 1.9% .1%-.4 -.2 1.1 -.987 103 24 5

38.5% 45.6% 10.6% 2.2%7.5% 8.9% 2.1% .4%

.4 .1 -.5 .854 64 18 2

36.2% 43.0% 12.1% 1.3%4.7% 5.5% 1.6% .2%

-.1 -.4 .2 -.271 93 20 5

35.9% 47.0% 10.1% 2.5%6.1% 8.0% 1.7% .4%

-.2 .4 -.6 1.14 7 0 0

36.4% 63.6% .0% .0%.3% .6% .0% .0%

.0 .9 -1.1 -.436 45 9 0

39.1% 48.9% 9.8% .0%3.1% 3.9% .8% .0%

.4 .5 -.5 -1.2103 124 38 4

36.0% 43.4% 13.3% 1.4%8.9% 10.7% 3.3% .3%

-.2 -.4 .8 -.2427 522 135 18

36.9% 45.1% 11.7% 1.6%36.9% 45.1% 11.7% 1.6%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


satisemail

tmurray

C-222

Table 115. Overall, I was satisfied with my USU email account--cross-tabulation by college.

0 1 46.0% 2.2% 100.0%.0% .1% 4.0%

-.7 -.52 7 150

1.3% 4.7% 100.0%.2% .6% 13.0%

.1 .71 6 226

.4% 2.7% 100.0%

.1% .5% 19.5%-1.0 -.8

5 6 1493.4% 4.0% 100.0%

.4% .5% 12.9%2.4 .3

1 8 198.5% 4.0% 100.0%.1% .7% 17.1%

-.9 .30 0 11

.0% .0% 100.0%

.0% .0% .9%-.4 -.6

2 0 922.2% .0% 100.0%

.2% .0% 7.9%.8 -1.83 14 286

1.0% 4.9% 100.0%.3% 1.2% 24.7%

-.2 1.114 42 1158

1.2% 3.6% 100.0%1.2% 3.6% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satisemail

Total

tmurray

C-223

Table 116. Overall, I was satisfied with the USU modem access--cross-tabulation by college.

16 21 6 134.8% 45.7% 13.0% 2.2%

1.4% 1.8% .5% .1%.8 .7 -.6 -.3

46 62 24 030.9% 41.6% 16.1% .0%

4.0% 5.4% 2.1% .0%.5 .5 -.2 -2.1

72 93 29 731.9% 41.2% 12.8% 3.1%

6.3% 8.1% 2.5% .6%.9 .5 -1.4 .0

37 43 23 825.3% 29.5% 15.8% 5.5%

3.2% 3.7% 2.0% .7%-.8 -1.9 -.3 1.751 94 28 5

26.2% 48.2% 14.4% 2.6%4.4% 8.2% 2.4% .4%

-.7 2.0 -.8 -.42 7 1 1

18.2% 63.6% 9.1% 9.1%.2% .6% .1% .1%

-.7 1.3 -.6 1.125 30 19 6

27.8% 33.3% 21.1% 6.7%2.2% 2.6% 1.7% .5%

-.2 -.9 1.0 2.081 100 61 7

28.5% 35.2% 21.5% 2.5%7.1% 8.7% 5.3% .6%

-.1 -1.1 2.0 -.6330 450 191 35

28.8% 39.2% 16.7% 3.1%28.8% 39.2% 16.7% 3.1%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


satismodem

tmurray

C-224

Table 116. Overall, I was satisfied with the USU modem access--cross-tabulation by college.

0 2 46.0% 4.3% 100.0%.0% .2% 4.0%

-.8 -1.33 14 149

2.0% 9.4% 100.0%.3% 1.2% 13.0%

.5 -.54 21 226

1.8% 9.3% 100.0%.3% 1.8% 19.7%

.4 -.74 31 146

2.7% 21.2% 100.0%.3% 2.7% 12.7%1.2 3.8

1 16 195.5% 8.2% 100.0%.1% 1.4% 17.0%-1.1 -1.1

0 0 11.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% 1.0%

-.4 -1.12 8 90

2.2% 8.9% 100.0%.2% .7% 7.8%

.6 -.63 32 284

1.1% 11.3% 100.0%.3% 2.8% 24.8%

-.6 .217 124 1147

1.5% 10.8% 100.0%1.5% 10.8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satismodem

Total

tmurray

C-225

Table 117. Overall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet access--cross-tabulation by college.

12 11 8 126.7% 24.4% 17.8% 2.2%

1.1% 1.0% .7% .1%.4 .0 .1 .0

32 33 22 322.5% 23.2% 15.5% 2.1%

2.9% 3.0% 2.0% .3%-.3 -.4 -.4 .055 59 38 5

25.1% 26.9% 17.4% 2.3%5.0% 5.3% 3.4% .5%

.4 .7 .1 .132 30 25 4

22.9% 21.4% 17.9% 2.9%2.9% 2.7% 2.3% .4%

-.2 -.8 .3 .643 59 29 0

22.6% 31.1% 15.3% .0%3.9% 5.3% 2.6% .0%

-.3 1.8 -.6 -2.03 3 1 0

30.0% 30.0% 10.0% .0%.3% .3% .1% .0%

.4 .3 -.5 -.523 18 15 7

26.1% 20.5% 17.0% 8.0%2.1% 1.6% 1.4% .6%

.5 -.8 .0 3.763 61 50 4

23.0% 22.3% 18.2% 1.5%5.7% 5.5% 4.5% .4%

-.3 -.8 .5 -.8263 274 188 24

23.7% 24.7% 17.0% 2.2%23.7% 24.7% 17.0% 2.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


satisinternet

tmurray

C-226

Table 117. Overall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet access--cross-tabulation by college.

0 13 45.0% 28.9% 100.0%.0% 1.2% 4.1%

-.8 -.32 50 142

1.4% 35.2% 100.0%.2% 4.5% 12.8%

.1 .95 57 219

2.3% 26.0% 100.0%.5% 5.1% 19.8%1.2 -1.3

3 46 1402.1% 32.9% 100.0%

.3% 4.2% 12.6%.8 .41 58 190

.5% 30.5% 100.0%

.1% 5.2% 17.1%-1.0 -.1

0 3 10.0% 30.0% 100.0%.0% .3% .9%

-.4 -.11 24 88

1.1% 27.3% 100.0%.1% 2.2% 7.9%

-.2 -.63 93 274

1.1% 33.9% 100.0%.3% 8.4% 24.7%

-.4 .915 344 1108

1.4% 31.0% 100.0%1.4% 31.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satisinternet

Total

tmurray

C-227

Table 118. I received good value for my computer fee--cross-tabulation by college.

11 12 16 423.9% 26.1% 34.8% 8.7%

1.0% 1.0% 1.4% .3%.0 -1.1 1.2 1.0

39 50 33 1026.4% 33.8% 22.3% 6.8%

3.4% 4.3% 2.9% .9%.7 -.4 -.8 .7

60 75 65 1126.4% 33.0% 28.6% 4.8%

5.2% 6.5% 5.6% 1.0%.9 -.7 .9 -.3

35 55 31 823.6% 37.2% 20.9% 5.4%

3.0% 4.8% 2.7% .7%.0 .2 -1.2 .0

41 84 43 1120.8% 42.6% 21.8% 5.6%

3.6% 7.3% 3.7% 1.0%-.8 1.6 -1.1 .1

2 7 1 020.0% 70.0% 10.0% .0%

.2% .6% .1% .0%-.2 1.8 -1.0 -.729 27 25 5

31.5% 29.3% 27.2% 5.4%2.5% 2.3% 2.2% .4%

1.6 -1.1 .3 .055 105 83 13

19.3% 36.8% 29.1% 4.6%4.8% 9.1% 7.2% 1.1%

-1.5 .2 1.1 -.6272 415 297 62

23.6% 36.0% 25.8% 5.4%23.6% 36.0% 25.8% 5.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


goodvalu

tmurray

C-228

Table 118. I received good value for my computer fee--cross-tabulation by college.

2 1 464.3% 2.2% 100.0%

.2% .1% 4.0%-.1 -.8

7 9 1484.7% 6.1% 100.0%

.6% .8% 12.8%.1 .77 9 227

3.1% 4.0% 100.0%.6% .8% 19.7%-1.0 -.6

14 5 1489.5% 3.4% 100.0%1.2% .4% 12.8%

2.8 -.86 12 197

3.0% 6.1% 100.0%.5% 1.0% 17.1%-1.0 .8

0 0 10.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .0% .9%

-.7 -.74 2 92

4.3% 2.2% 100.0%.3% .2% 8.0%

-.1 -1.112 17 285

4.2% 6.0% 100.0%1.0% 1.5% 24.7%

-.2 .952 55 1153

4.5% 4.8% 100.0%4.5% 4.8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

goodvalu

Total

tmurray

C-229

Table 119. I use the internet address webmail.usu.edu to ready my USU email--cross-tabulation by college.

0 7 13.0% 15.6% 28.9%.0% .6% 1.0%-1.6 -.5 .8

8 26 405.1% 16.7% 25.6%

.6% 2.1% 3.2%-.1 -.6 .616 39 58

6.6% 16.1% 24.0%1.3% 3.1% 4.7%

.8 -1.0 .211 35 34

7.1% 22.4% 21.8%.9% 2.8% 2.7%

.9 1.1 -.411 41 48

5.2% 19.4% 22.7%.9% 3.3% 3.9%

-.1 .2 -.20 4 3

.0% 33.3% 25.0%

.0% .3% .2%-.8 1.2 .1

4 19 213.9% 18.6% 20.6%

.3% 1.5% 1.7%-.6 .0 -.617 62 74

5.4% 19.6% 23.3%1.4% 5.0% 6.0%

.0 .3 .067 233 291

5.4% 18.8% 23.4%5.4% 18.8% 23.4%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Never SometimesMost ofthe time

webedu

tmurray

C-230

Table 119. I use the internet address webmail.usu.edu to ready my USU email--cross-tabulation by college.

25 4555.6% 100.0%

2.0% 3.6%.3

82 15652.6% 100.0%

6.6% 12.6%.0

129 24253.3% 100.0%10.4% 19.5%

.276 156

48.7% 100.0%6.1% 12.6%

-.6111 211

52.6% 100.0%8.9% 17.0%

.05 12

41.7% 100.0%.4% 1.0%

-.558 102

56.9% 100.0%4.7% 8.2%

.6164 317

51.7% 100.0%13.2% 25.5%

-.2650 1241

52.4% 100.0%52.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

All of the time

webedu

Total

tmurray

C-231

Table 120. Indicate the number of privately owned computers you had regular access to during the pastyear--cross-tabulation by college.

6 21 1013.3% 46.7% 22.2%

.5% 1.7% .8%1.4 .3 -.913 62 41

8.3% 39.7% 26.3%1.0% 5.0% 3.3%

.3 -.7 -.718 124 72

7.4% 51.2% 29.8%1.5% 10.0% 5.8%

-.1 1.9 .28 70 42

5.1% 44.9% 26.9%.6% 5.6% 3.4%-1.1 .3 -.5

16 90 637.6% 42.7% 29.9%1.3% 7.3% 5.1%

.0 -.1 .22 4 2

16.7% 33.3% 16.7%.2% .3% .2%1.1 -.5 -.8

9 36 338.9% 35.6% 32.7%

.7% 2.9% 2.7%.5 -1.2 .6

22 130 996.9% 41.0% 31.2%1.8% 10.5% 8.0%

-.4 -.6 .794 537 362

7.6% 43.3% 29.2%7.6% 43.3% 29.2%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

None 1 computer 2 computerscompown

tmurray

C-232

Table 120. Indicate the number of privately owned computers you had regular access to during the pastyear--cross-tabulation by college.

8 4517.8% 100.0%

.6% 3.6%-.340 156

25.6% 100.0%3.2% 12.6%

1.628 242

11.6% 100.0%2.3% 19.5%

-2.936 156

23.1% 100.0%2.9% 12.6%

.942 211

19.9% 100.0%3.4% 17.0%

.04 12

33.3% 100.0%.3% 1.0%1.023 101

22.8% 100.0%1.9% 8.1%

.666 317

20.8% 100.0%5.3% 25.6%

.4247 1240

19.9% 100.0%19.9% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

3+ computerscompown

Total

tmurray

C-233

Table 121. If you answered 1-3+ computers above, how often did you use this (these) privately owned computer(s) todo your school work?--cross-tabulation by college.

4 7 1310.0% 17.5% 32.5%

.4% .6% 1.2%1.9 -1.3 -.4

8 45 395.9% 33.3% 28.9%

.7% 4.1% 3.5%1.1 1.1 -1.4

8 51 703.8% 24.2% 33.2%

.7% 4.6% 6.4%-.2 -1.1 -.8

4 49 552.8% 34.0% 38.2%

.4% 4.5% 5.0%-.7 1.3 .4

4 48 802.2% 25.8% 43.0%

.4% 4.4% 7.3%-1.3 -.6 1.5

0 3 4.0% 30.0% 40.0%.0% .3% .4%

-.6 .1 .25 23 34

5.4% 25.0% 37.0%.5% 2.1% 3.1%

.7 -.6 .111 85 104

3.9% 30.2% 37.0%1.0% 7.7% 9.5%

-.1 .6 .244 311 399

4.0% 28.3% 36.3%4.0% 28.3% 36.3%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


useownc

tmurray

C-234

Table 121. If you answered 1-3+ computers above, how often did you use this (these) privately owned computer(s) todo your school work?--cross-tabulation by college.

16 4040.0% 100.0%

1.5% 3.6%1.043 135

31.9% 100.0%3.9% 12.3%

.182 211

38.9% 100.0%7.5% 19.2%

1.936 144

25.0% 100.0%3.3% 13.1%

-1.454 186

29.0% 100.0%4.9% 16.9%

-.63 10

30.0% 100.0%.3% .9%

-.130 92

32.6% 100.0%2.7% 8.4%

.281 281

28.8% 100.0%7.4% 25.6%

-.8345 1099

31.4% 100.0%31.4% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

All of the time

useownc

Total

tmurray

C-235

FacEval

Table 122. I had regular access during the past year to a USU computer, not in an openaccess lab (e.g., lab for students in a course or in a major)--cross-tabulation by college.

17 27 4438.6% 61.4% 100.0%

1.4% 2.2% 3.6%-.9 .967 89 156

42.9% 57.1% 100.0%5.5% 7.3% 12.7%

-.9 .9117 123 240

48.8% 51.3% 100.0%9.6% 10.0% 19.6%

.2 -.282 70 152

53.9% 46.1% 100.0%6.7% 5.7% 12.4%

1.1 -1.0103 108 211

48.8% 51.2% 100.0%8.4% 8.8% 17.2%

.2 -.25 6 11

45.5% 54.5% 100.0%.4% .5% .9%

-.1 .152 47 99

52.5% 47.5% 100.0%4.2% 3.8% 8.1%

.6 -.6145 167 312

46.5% 53.5% 100.0%11.8% 13.6% 25.5%

-.4 .4588 637 1225

48.0% 52.0% 100.0%48.0% 52.0% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

Yes Nousucomp

Total

tmurray

C-236

Table 123. If you answered yes to the above question, how often did you use this computer to do your schoolwork?--cross-tabulation by college.

1 11 55.6% 61.1% 27.8%

.2% 1.7% .8%-1.3 .9 .4

17 31 2022.4% 40.8% 26.3%

2.6% 4.8% 3.1%.6 -.8 .6

23 59 2618.3% 46.8% 20.6%

3.5% 9.1% 4.0%-.3 .0 -.616 47 16

17.4% 51.1% 17.4%2.5% 7.3% 2.5%

-.4 .6 -1.121 55 29

18.3% 47.8% 25.2%3.2% 8.5% 4.5%

-.3 .2 .50 2 3

.0% 40.0% 60.0%

.0% .3% .5%-1.0 -.2 1.7

11 26 1519.3% 45.6% 26.3%

1.7% 4.0% 2.3%.0 -.1 .5

36 72 3622.6% 45.3% 22.6%

5.6% 11.1% 5.6%1.0 -.3 -.1

125 303 15019.3% 46.8% 23.1%19.3% 46.8% 23.1%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total


useusuc

tmurray

C-237

Table 123. If you answered yes to the above question, how often did you use this computer to do your schoolwork?--cross-tabulation by college.

1 185.6% 100.0%

.2% 2.8%-.7

8 7610.5% 100.0%

1.2% 11.7%-.118 126

14.3% 100.0%2.8% 19.4%

1.213 92

14.1% 100.0%2.0% 14.2%

1.010 115

8.7% 100.0%1.5% 17.7%

-.70 5

.0% 100.0%

.0% .8%-.7

5 578.8% 100.0%

.8% 8.8%-.515 159

9.4% 100.0%2.3% 24.5%

-.570 648

10.8% 100.0%10.8% 100.0%


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering


Natural Resources

Science

Other

College

Total

All of the time

useusuc

Total

tmurray

C-238

Appendix D

What the USU advising system is doing well

D-1

APPENDIX D

What is the USU advising system doing well?

Advising helps students to choose classes.Advising on classes needed and how they can fit into class schedule.Advising people & telling them how to excel.Advising those that need help. Helping them schedule there semester.Advising.Advisor had my information and suggestions ready when I showed up.Advisor wants to meet with, willing to answer any questions.Advisor willing and easily contacted.Advisors are informed, helpful.Advisors are readily available to us and know the things we don't.Advisors care.Advisors help plan well.All my questions were answered & (Advisors Name) helped me decide my options.Allowing us someone to meet w/ to help us feel comfortable & confident in our schooling.Always answered my questions & helped me plan for things.Always there to help.Always willing to sep up appointments.Answer questions if I have any.Answering questions well.Appointments could be a little longer.Assist you when needed.At least you can have an advisor.Available when needed. They know what they are talking about, & they really seem to care.Available, helpful, my advisor builds & gives positive feedback.Being able to contact someone for info. and assistance.Being accommodating and useful.Being available for students to take advantage of. My advisor was very willing to help me andguide me through the registration process.Being available! Giving info for when to apply for programs, etc.Being flexible with student schedules.Being honest and helpful.Being out to lunch.Being personal w/ students.Being straight forward w/ requirements.Being there. Easy to work with.Being very organized in how and what needs to be taken and graduate as soon as possible.Brian Evans answers all my questions and gives helpful advice. All info. needed is readilyavailable.Brian is doing an excellent job. He keeps track of all the athletes & knows them personally. Heeven comes to do attendance checks.Can't really answer.Cannot say anything good.Caring for students.Confusing me.Contacting students, helping plan semesters.Directing individuals who are interested in the field but don't know how to pursue that interest.Distribute a very clear layout of all the classes I will need to graduate.Doing all they can to help. The know what they are talking about, keeping us well-informed.Doing good but I don't know nursing advisor and not comfortable talking with her.

D-2

Don't know about them, but the recent cutting of a number of technology programs sucks.Don't know because I haven't used it yet.Don't know have not had much contact.Don't know, I haven't met with them.Don't know, never been.Don't know, never had an advisor. Only went once to my assigned advisor.Don’t know, I've never net with one.Drop by hours, very efficient and told me exactly what I needed to do for the next year.Easy to find who advisor is. Great advisor that took time to prepare materials.Easy to see advisor if needed. Helpful information & supportive.Easy to talk to.Effective in contacting the students.E-mailing students when they ask questions.EverythingEverything for me.Everything, They are okay.Everything.Fairly flexible and willing to help.For one of my classes I was assigned to meet w/ my advisor.Forcing people to see an advisor before registering.FriendlyFriendly & helpful.Friendly, try to be helpful.Friendly, very helpful, want students to succeed.Gets you into right classes, so far.Getting an advisor that cared was a good thing.Getting announcements out for meetings, organized.Getting appointment schedules with great times.Getting back to me quickly & staying on top of things.Getting correct info.Getting in contact and inviting students. Laying out curriculums for a given major.Getting me through in good time.Getting my academic plan laid out.Getting my classes all lined up for graduation.Getting the job done.Getting us requirement sheets.Gives info I need.Gives you an up front outline of the classes required for your degree.Giving a 4 yr. plan to students.Giving everyone advisor. Making sure we know the requirements for graduation.Giving help & assistance when needed.Giving important advice.Giving info on what classes are needed for majors.Giving information.Giving many sources to look up info. such as internet & catalogs.Giving out major requirement sheets.Giving students the info. needed.Giving us access to all helpful information.Good advise- helps a lot.Good advising in general. Advisors at the SOAR program were a complete joke. I ended up takinga class that I did not have to because they did such a bad job.Good advisors, easy to contact through info given out by advising.Good friendly people.

D-3

Good information on degrees and how to complete them.Good job.Good with athletes.Good with feedback & answering questions.Good.Good. They know what they are doing.Got good advisors.Great help!Haven't been much.Having enough advisors to accommodate each major.Having information available.Having requirement sheets & experienced, excited advisors.Having sheet posted of hours advisor is available.Having the major req. sheet to know what classes to take.Having the system is the positive thing.Having transferred in, I am not too familiar.He was very helpful & willing. I wish I knew why he resigned.Help in picking classes.Help me find what classes to take.Help students plan their schedules for optimal efficiency.Helped me out very well & very knowledgeable.Helped me with my classes for my major.Helpful when you actually get an appointment.Helpful, friendly, She hasn't killed me yet.Helpful, straight forwardHelping freshman know what to do & where to go.Helping get schedules corrected.Helping in a courteous manner.Helping me choose my classes & stay eligible.Helping me create a schedule.Helping me decide what I want to do & what I need to do to get there and making sure I makeright choices.Helping me get closer to major.Helping me get my classes.Helping me keep on track w/ my chosen degree, helping me understand what credits I need tograduate.Helping me know what classes are needed & those that aren't necessary for my major & minor.Helping me pick the right classes, setting my schedule accordingly.Helping me plan out my 4 year plan.Helping me to know which classes I need to get done & what I need to be in.Helping me to plan my schedule. Helping students.Helping me understand what classes are necessary.Helping me whenever I need it.Helping me with my schedule.Helping set up classes for each semester, to graduate as quickly as possible.Helping students acquire there education as fast and quickly as possible.Helping students get on the path they want to.Helping students get on the right track towards graduation.Helping students get the classes they need.Helping students get through school as quickly as possible.Helping students know if their major is right for them and specific requirements.Helping students not waste time & money on unnecessary classes.Helping students plan out semesters, fitting classes to schedules.

D-4

Helping students take the classes they need to graduate & helping them have a plan for the next 4yrs.Helping students understand requisites for graduating.Helping to get me on track for graduation.Helping to know what classes I need.Helping to know what classes to take.Helping to know what to take.Helping to organize my classes so that I can work and go to school.Helping us choose classes to achieve our academic goals.Helping us to schedule what classes we need to take to benefit us in our major.Helping w/ schedules.Helping you take the classes needed. Having someone there to help students make sure they’retaking the courses needed.Helping you understand what classes to take & prioritizing them.Helping you with questions.Helping.Helps deal w/ what I need done.Helps me know which classes to take now and which classes would be best to take later.Helps me take the right classes so I don't waste my money.Helps new students understand the classes they need and get into them. Someone to talk to aboutyour field of study.Helps w/ courses.Helps when it is needed.Helps you understand course work and goals.Helps you w/ courses when I can get an appt. with him.I'm not sure, they did help me choose classes that would transfer if I wanted.I'm not that familiar w/ the system yet.I'm not to familiar w/ it yet. I'm glad that Janet Karen had been replaced w/ someone who seemsconcerned w/ the students progress.I'm sure if I had a good advisor who knew what I needed I would be further in college.I've never been.I am a freshman & they gave me a sheet major req., that was all I needed.I am in classes.I am just getting started so everything has worked out well so far.I attended BYU & the advising system is much better here. They actually care about the students& where you are going in school.I can always schedule an apt. when I need to and can get in.I don't go enough to really know what is done well.I don't have much experience but so far they’ve helped me understand the major req sheets &what I need to do to graduate.I don't know anything about it yet. This is my first semester.I don't know because I haven't met them.I don't know I have never gone.I don't know I have only been once for about 5 min.I don't know I have only been once.I don't know I have only visited once.I don't know I have never been.I don't know much about it.I don't know much about them.I don't know, haven't really got advised.I don't know.I feel comfortable asking questions & I felt like the answers were helpful.I feel the advisors are super helpful.

D-5

I felt like the advisor was very thoughtful of my personal situation.I felt my advisor was very experienced as well as helpful. In one visit I was able to sort everythingout and get all my classes.I forgot her name but was extremely friendly & helpful. She gave me all of my options. She isassociated w/ aviation program.I get confirmation, recommendation through e-mails from advisor.I get lots of e-mails from my advisor to keep me up-to-date w/ what’s going on.I got my major requirement sheet and it lists when I need to take each class. It is rather helpful.I have been to my advisor twice in the past two years, both times they were very helpful.I have has nothing good from advising.I have never been to see an advisor b/c I don't know where to find them.I have never had any problems so far. My advisor is always available and helpful.I have never known who my advisor was and I do need information.I have never met or talked to an advisor.I have never met with my advisor.I have no had enough experience w/ them to say except they did mail reminders to visit them- thatwas good.I have not had enough experience to say.I have nothing positive to say.I have only been to an advisor once and she told me she couldn't help me and referred me tosomeone else.I have only met once, I don’t have a specific advisor. They showed me what generals I needed tofinish them up. They told me how to declare my major when I decide.I have only talked to my advisor on the phon.I have the opportunity to ask questions.I haven't been often enough.I haven't seen this yet with my experience.I haven't used it enough; I hope to change my major soon.I know exactly what to take. They make decisions really clear & easy. They give great advice.I know the athletic academic advisors get us in all the classes we need.I like (Advisors Name).I like being able to see my advisor whenever I need to.I like how they have made it clear for your requirements.I like how you could meet with your adviser as much as you see fit. There is no limit to academiccounsel.I like the availability of the advisors & the wide range of office hours.I like the fact that I have an advisor and that she is easy to reach and get an appointment with.I like the plan.I like the req. sheets. The system is fairly decent except the communication between educationand Family Life. Requirements keep changing.I love having a peer advisor. Sometimes I feel that an advisor is so intimidating so the peeradvisor is very comfortable.I met w/ a very informative women in the HAAS counseling office. She even mailed me a letterafter our visit.Informs w/ proper info.I really enjoy the seminars & I think that helps me w/ most information.I really like my advisor, she does a good job at knowing the requirements & answering myquestions.I really like that they have your info. before your appointment and are up-to-date.I really like the peer advisors b/c they can help w/ a better description of a class if they have takenit.I think I have a good advisor, she was very helpful & nice.I think it helps to make sure that students will graduate on time.

D-6

I think it is well organized. When I have questions I just go to my advisor & she helps me out.I think its just fine.I think my advisor is great. That is why I don't declare a major because I want to keep my advisor.I think she knows very well what she is doing and was a lot of help. USU is hiring great advisors.I think that it does a good job trying to meet w/ students when they are available.I think they are doing fine.I think they honestly want to help students succeed and are doing their best to help students whosee them.I thought the advice I received was very good. I liked my advisor.I was able to know what classes I need to take so I don't waste time.I went to the HASS advisor w/ questions all were answered. Since changing majors I have no cluewho my advisor is.I went to two different ones and the lady did help me a lot. The guy didn't help at all.If you come to them, they will show you all of the requirements plus things you should know.If you have a major they can help you get through in the most efficient way.Im able to get info on my major & receive answers to questions w/out being pushed into classes Idon't want.Information, not sure need to see one.Informative and helpful.Informative handouts. My student advisor knew a lot about the program & its classes.Informing me what I need to do.Informing students.Initially contacting me and letting me know I had an advisor and could contact her.It's there if you need it.It could do better.It doesn't seem that hard to see my advisor.It has helped me figure out classes I need to take to do four semesters of classes in three.It has helped me to get into all the right classes for my major.It is available.It is clear what the req. are for my major as well as what I need to do to complete them.It is easy to get hold w/ the advisor.It is important to have good advisors that are well informed.It is very helpful.It is well assigned & well informed.It isn't too hard to meet w/ an advisor & they are willing to help.It makes advisors readily available.It normally works ok.It was really easy to get a hold of (Advisor’s Name) & our meetings were very productive.Its great, answered all questions.Its helpful in giving times for pre-registration appointments. & other necessary info.Its pretty easy to figure out who your advisor is.Its pretty easy to get an appt. Their very informative & if they make a mistake they will try to fix itpromptly.Its quick.Its there in case you need help.Its there.I’ve never been but I'm sure that it is.Just being available.(Advisor’s Name) is great. The undergraduate I have spoken to have lead me astray.Karen worked with me even while I was out of the state before I came to school. I would have hadno idea what classes to take if it weren't for her help.Kathy & her department are doing great, Kathy is very knowledgeable, pretty available, fastrespond, & is helpful!

D-7

(Advisor’s Name) is energetic and enthusiastic. She's always been willing to help and renderadvise.(Advisor’s Name) is great. Her knowledge of the college and its requirements is unsurpassed.(Advisor’s Name) is very on top of things, she is aware of all opportunities and requirements.(Advisor’s Name) knows her stuff. The are way too many questions on this.(Advisor’s Name) was not very encouraging. I do track for USU advisor said it was not possible todo Mechanical Engineering.(Advisor’s Name) has let me know what I need to take as far as classes go.(Advisor’s Name) is very organized and knows exactly what I need.(Advisor’s Name) knows her stuff & is frank about sharing it.Keeping all my records on track. Very helpful in planning schedule.Keeping involved.Keeping me confused.Keeping me informed about classes, deadlines, and other important info.Keeping me informed about what is required for my major.Keeping me informed of changes, & being personable.Keeping me on top of things . Gets me into classes I want and need.Keeping me well informed about classes I need to take for my major.Keeping people well informed & suggesting ideas for classes.Keeping track of their students.Keeping well on top of things, they get back to you on questions ASAP.Know what you need and when.Knowing info.Knowing what goes into the program.Knowledgeable staff(Advisor’s Name) knows the requirements & is acquainted w/ students & their particular needs.(Advisor’s Name) is always on top of things & very efficient. She makes sure Im doing everythingright.Lets you know the classes I need to take during what semester.Letting me know what classes are available.Letting me know what classes I need to take first, which to take together because some are hard.Letting me know which credits will transfer.Letting us know what we need to graduate.Looking and advising where you've been and where you should go academically.Lots of advisors, the advisors have time to meet w/ all their students, if there are only a few.Lots of hours during registration for the next semester.Lots of info helps you know what you need to.(Advisor’s Name) is great, very helpful and friendly on and off campus.Major requirement sheet access.Major requirement sheets.Major sheets are niceMaking clear the requirements needed for the major & giving advice on classes to take.Making clear what is required to do for major.Making it easy to go to them.Making major class requirement sheet.Making me aware of problems and options.Making req. and recommended classes for my major & emphasis very clear which helps me planbetter.Making sure I know what classes to take.Making sure the classes that are prerequisites are completed.Making themselves available.Marilyn outlined all my classes for me until I graduate. It took a lot of pressure off my shoulders.Meet students questions.

D-8

Meeting w/ students.Meeting with students.Most things.(Advisor’s Name) knows what she is doing, she is helpful for me to plan my classes.Multi-culture student office.My advisor does all she can to help out even if she doesn't know a solution right off.My advisor does send me email, keeping me informed on announcements.My advisor doesn't really know what is going on. There getting rid of FL department so everythingis messed up.My advisor gives several suggestions to help me make decisions.My advisor has always been available for when I need info.My advisor has done a fantastic job.My advisor has not contacted me in anyway, not very helpful in information I needed.My advisor helped me plan out my semesters so I can see the end-It feels good!My advisor is awesome at knowing what he is doing.My advisor is doing awesome. She is very helpful and always willing.My advisor is easy to schedule with, easy to talk to and she knows a lot of university wideinformation.My advisor is good about e-mailing all the info I need to know.My advisor is knowledgeable about academic requirements for my major.My advisor is nice. She helps me w/ the questions I have.My advisor is really experienced & qualified.My advisor is very friendly & helpful.My advisor is very helpful. She knows a lot of info. & can answer almost of all my questions w/ outreferring to another source. Impressive.My advisor is very nice, patient & well-informed.My advisor is very personable and easy to talk to.My advisor keeps me informed through email.My advisor keeps me well informed on speakers and other activities in my field.My advisor knew feedback from students on classes & knew what to suggest.My advisor met me for the fist time 30 min. after I called him. He explained very well what wouldbe the best route for me to take.My advisor presented info. in a concise, efficient manner & I left her office knowing what to do.My advisor quit & I have not idea who my new one is.My advisor really seems to know what she is talking about and is helpful when I can talk to her.My advisor showed me exactly what I needed to do to reach advanced standing in the accountingfield. They know what they are doing.My advisor was friendly and understanding. She signed me into the program I wanted.My advisor was helpful in planning my schedule.My advisor was very helpful in answering all my questions and helping me get on the right track.My advisor was very informative & knew what she was talking about. She was trained to advise, itwas not a side duty to her.My advisor was very informative and helped me with my schedule and answered all my questions.My advisor was very nice, helpful, and willing to answer my questions. She also pointed me in theright direction.My advisor was well organized and had a semester schedule broken down of classes I needed totake.My appt. went very well and the advisor was very helpful.My counselor is available, fully answered my questions & doesn't act bored when I go to see him.My LAED advisor is wonderful! He acts like he really cares; tries to remember everything wediscuss.My major has been changed into a different college b/c the family life is no longer availablemaking things difficult.

D-9

My questions were answered the best they could be. Since I'm undeclared it was difficult for theadvisor to be specific.Never been.Never used it.Nice.No experience.No idea.Not hounding me down, letting me make the decisions.Not muchNot much I haven't enjoyed any of my visits w/ my advisor.Not much, I was misinformed by 2 different advisors.Not much.Not sure I don't think I have been here long enough to tell.Not too familiar with it.Not too much, trying to have more & more pre-req for classes that don't need them. Holdingeveryone up in their majors.Not very much. My 1st experience w/ an advisor I knew more than he did!!!Not very much.NothingNothing as far as I concernedNothing as far as Im concerned.Nothing for me.Nothing that I’ve seen.Nothing, I don't even know who mine is.Nothing. Every time I have met w/ an advisor they have given me invalid info & it has put meback.Obviously nothing, if I don't even know who my advisor is.Offering help.Office hours.Once they stopped giving me the run around they were helpful.Once you declare your major you have an excellent advisor.Once you do finally get to meet with an advisor, they are helpful and dependable.One-on-one help planning 4 semesters in advance.Open office hours.Peer advisors & req. sheets.Planning a course schedule.Planning for classes to meet graduation requirements, giving synopsis of what classes are like,what classes are helpful, etc.Planning future classes.Planning out the long-term plans to graduate on time.Preparing you for your major by giving you the right classes.Pretty easy to access & helpfulPretty much everything. I think they are doing a good job. They have helped me a lot.Provide the advising resource.Providing clear requirements.Providing informationProviding the necessary info.Providing papers and pamphlets to help students.Putting out sheets.Satisfied.Scaring me.School enthusiasm, encouraging education, working w/ students positively to achieve what theywant.

D-10

Sending letters to the students to let them know who their advisor is.Setting current appointments.Setting semester plans, being available and non-judgemental.Setting up appointments, informing of what classes need to be taken.Setting up classes.She is very helpful & informative.She is very helpful and knows her stuff.She was very encouraging & uplifting, when I was able to visit w/ her. Grad students help too.She was very nice. She was well prepared.Showed me options I didn't know were possible.Showing me how my scheduling will progress and which classes to take.Sitting behind the desk.So far so good.SOAR helped me a lot.SOAR ProgramSome advisors are very educated & well prepared w/ handout info.Some departments have open advising. I think that is really helpful.Speaking more to me.Steve helped me a lot just told me straight out what I needed to do.Still new. Some I am not sure. Ronnie helps with all she can.Student who went through the USU psi dept. work in advising office & give opinions about classes,teachers, etc.Stuff.Taking surveys.Talking to students who need help.Telling me my prerequisetes I need for certain classes.Telling me what classes I don and don't need.Telling me what to take.Telling us what we need to do when we do see them.Telling what required classes are and signing us up for the classes.Telling what we need to do.Telling you what is required, what classes you need to take.Telling you what you have to have.The advising system helps students get the classes they need keeps students on the right track.The advisors are helpful and friendly usually know answers to your questions.The advisors are made known, so I could meet w/ them.The advisors are making their time flexible for students.The advisors are prepared & care about my future.The advisors are very informative and know their material.The advisors are very nice, friendly, & seems very willing to help.The advisors have all the information to let you know where you are standing and what you needto do.The advisors I've met with are kind & willing to work with me.The advisors seem to know what they’re doing.The are providing SI for students. They are being understanding if I am not able to be in class,and help me catch up.The business orientation class.The care about you.The computer system helps to know if you can get in. Sally is very educated in knowing what Ineed.The info. is there for us.The lady I went to see was not condescending or mean in any way.The major outline paper has helped me a lot.

D-11

The major req. sheet & gen catalog are helpful! There are some helpful advisors.The major req. sheets tell me what I need to take and what I have taken. If I need to see myadvisor its not impossible.The one time I went they gave me all my options & helped me see the best path.The people are very knowledgeable as to what needs to take place and when.The people that are hired are good and seem to know what they are doing.The staff seems very knowledgeable & helpful. They show a desire to help.The technology is very good & the knowledge of the advisor is also very helpful.The USU advising system works well in telling the student what he/she needs to be taking nextsemester.Their advisors are awesome.Their guidelines that they can give us are great!There seems to be enough advisors.They're willing to meet w/ students. (Advisor’s Name) is a good advisor.They answer my questions well.They are available and are friendly.They are clear on what you need to do & are generally available to meet w/ you.They are cooperative & are willing to answer your questions.They are easy to get a hold of and very well to work with.They are easy to meet w/ very accommodating and always very helpful.They are flexible to meet with you (at least mine is).They are getting out needed info. and it is easy to access.They are good with the e-mails. I probably need to do my part in contacting my advisor.They are helpful if you take the time to meet with them and are fairly flexible with their hours.They are helping me clarify things I don't understand about college.They are helping students pick the major they want & get ready for graduation.They are lacking in so many areas.They are letting us know what requirements we need to have to graduate and how to get the mostcredits out of the least amount of classes.They are making it hard to see your advisor you have to call a couple of weeks in advance.They are not doing well. My advisor is horrible.They are organized.They are really good about letting us know about upcoming events, & helping us try to reach ourpotential goals.They are there if I need them.They are updated on all the schools & students information.They are very courteous & genuinely care about your future.They are very helpful at showing you where you are headed & what you need to do to get there.They are very helpful in helping decide what classes to take and how to go about selectingcourses.They are very helpful.They are well informed & know what they are doing and how to help.They are willing to help you out. They are ready to answer any questions.They do their best to help you know what classes you need to take.They dress well.They encourage us to come in as much as possible.They get the work done.They get you in and help you with what you need in a short amount of time.They give a time when they will be in. They answer a lot of questions & do the best to help.They give good advice for classes as an undeclared.They have a friendly advising group.They have a lot of outside resources that can be used.They have been friendly and encouraging. They try to help us do what would be best for our

D-12

education.They have good major and minor requirement sheets. I have been very impressed with (Advisor’sName).They have the information available.They help give you info. and email me when I need an advising appointment.They help me plan out my schedule and that I need to do in order to get into my major.They help me stay on track.They help plan out your schedule well.They help to ease you into the classes needed for your major.They help to get on the right track.They help you do what you need done, example- registering.They helped me get into the classes I needed this semester.They helped me w/ semester course plan.They hire really good people to work with.They kind of let us know what’s up.They know a lot about what I need to do to accomplish my goals.They know what you need to do to get where you want.They let me know in what order I should take my classes and how many credits I should take eachsemester.They let us know what's going on in our major so were not confused.They let you know what classes you need to take.They mail information on advising. The advisors are good.They make it easy to get an advisor and schedule appointments.They make sources available to students & advisors are helpful when used.They make the effort to be accessible.They produce easy to read, concise major req. sheets.They provide information and are knowledgeable.They provide information to help graduate.they provide many services to help us even if we are not able to actually meet with an advisor.They put people in the right direction.They really helped me. I had only a couple of days to visit, I got an appt. She helped me get theclasses I needed!They seem like they want to help and are willing to spend the time.They seem to be doing great, there is usually always someone you can talk to at all times. Theyare helpful & friendly.They seem to be only looking at your best interests.They take their time.They tell you what you need to take and when. They are nice.They try to make sure everyone has an advisor.They were helpful in telling me what classes to take.They work with students well and answer their questions pretty well also.They’re always trying to improve & the advisor helps when you visit him.Treating me as a person, not just a number.Trying to get people graduated in 4 yrs.Trying to get their program alive.Trying to organize the student's goals & college plans.Understanding what class will benefit the student the most.USU advising is the greatest ever.USU is doing well at having advisors who really specialize in one area. They know & can tell useverything we need.USU offers advisors to each student. My advisor is very friendly and helpful.Very disappointed.Very easy to meet w/ him & make appointments. quickly & easily. I’ve only met w/ 1 guy & wasn't

D-13

sure if he was my advisor.Very easy to set up times to meet.Very friendly & willing to help.Very friendly, helpful, & easy to work with. (Advisors Name) is a wonderful professor & advisor.Very good set and descriptions of needed classes.Very helpful & informative.Very helpful in helping me choose my classes & getting me started w/ school.Very helpful when you go visit them.Very helpful(especially to a new freshman)I have my classes planned out for the next 4 yrs ofattending here.Very informative.Very informative/helpful getting credits I need to graduate.Very Little.Very organized and have open time to help. Friendly.Very smart in her field.Very willing to help those students who choose to use the system.Well acknowledgeable staff that are not students.Well informed, for the most part.Well organized.When I can get in to talk I get good advice and have been pointed in the right direction.When I did make the appointment to meet w/ my advisor I was able to be worked in w/in about aday.When I have a question they are always quick to respond w/ the info I need.When you first meet them they explain a lot on how to graduate early.When you visit w/ the advisor they make it quick & to the point. They help you know what youneed to take.Wide info. resource.Wish they would hold major meetings more.Working around my schedule.Works well, Advisor knows how to help you.Yes my advisor helps me out immensely.You have advisors.

Appendix E

How the USU advising system can be improved

E-1

APPENDIX E

How might the USU advising system be improved?

A little sheet of paper that says who your advisor is & how you can go about meeting w/ him or her.Ability to make appointments with short notice.Accessability first of all.Actually tell students who their advisor is and when can meet with them.Actually tell students who there advisor is and when can meet with them!Add 1-2 more hrs or a few more assistants so ideally no one is every turned away because they arebusy or don't have an appointment.Advising students on what they should take not just classes they need. Need to improve onavailability of the advisors. What else should they be doing?Advisor should be able to get more info for you.Advisors could share more interest in their students, & make sure they are aware of any changes.Advisors in general need to be willing to take time and really help students and direct them. Toooften I feel I am taking up too much of their time.Advisors more readily available. Maybe assigned to 2 in case 1 is out of town or busy. My advisorhas always been gone or unavailable.Advisors need to be more consistent and up to date on requirements and info.Advisors need to be more knowledgeable about generals & have an idea about other areas than theirown. they should help you plan out the 4 yrs.Advisors need to show themselves to students more. Incoming freshman should be required to meetw/ an advisor even if they are "undeclared".Advisors should be much easier to contact face to face. Email is nice but it's not the same.Advisors should contact us.Advisors should know what they are talking about so they don't cost me time & money by having tostay in school longer.Advisors should try to let there people know who they are & when they’re free or how to make anappt. Most people don’t even know who their advisor is.All more advisors. All to often advisors are booked for weeks.All the advisors as well trained as (Advisor’s Name).Allow more personal appointments to students.Allow my music advisor to help with all classes instead of making me have a music advisor and ageneral advisor.(Advisor’s Name) is great, but before I switched my major I never say my advisor, the secretary hadto help me instead.Appointments scheduled in a shorter period of time. The advisor already have your file open andquickly read over so they have a slight idea of your situation.As a freshman we haven't developed a good working relationship yet.Ask me more what interests I have, then decide what classes would be better for me.Assign advisors to all students. I had to find my own!At first I didn't know who my advisor was. Maybe if somehow I was told or contacted.Be able to get you in more often.Be able to go to appt. & not have to wait. They are always canceling appointments. or having a verylong lunch or the out of office b/c of sick children. Their minds aren't at work.Be able to meet w/ advisor more often as a check-up; just to talk- not about something very specific.Be available more often.Be better at letting the students know who they are to go to.Be easily accessed, more easily accessed, and personable.Be happy and advise me to take the classes I need to in order to graduate soon.Be in the office more often.Be more available and when students do go to advisors listen to them and take time. Don't be sorushed.

E-2

Be more available, make sure students know who their advisor is.Be more available.Be more clear on classes needed.Be more helpful, they just directed me to go to the other dept. They also advised me to take a class Ishouldn't have.Be more interested in students concerns.Be more involved in the actual planning of each semester and different opportunities that relate toyour major.Be more involved with students academic life.Be more involved. Contact me.Be more knowledgeable about their dept. & the req. for graduating. And it is hard to get in to see anadvisor.Be more open to students. Have more time to be open for student talk.Be more people oriented, know what you are advising about and know the requirements.Be more personable, offer suggestions & talk about other options. Talk about your major & jobsmore. Show that they actually care & want to help. Ask "How are your classes?" "What are youstruggling with?"Be more personal in planning and students academic program.Be more personal.Be more positive. I once heard the phrase "We don't care..." It wasn't a big deal, my question wasanswered but I was looking for guidance for a minor.Be more readily available.Be more supportive.Be more understanding, wanting to hear your plans & help you achieve those plans.Be more willing to spend more than 5 min. w/ students, & try to care about what they are trying to do.Be nicer to the people they advise and not treat them like children.Be open to criticism and also make sure there is no misleading information and answers beingprovided to students such as giving them the wrong classes.Be there during registration week.Be there when appointments are made.Besides (Advisor’s Name), the other advisors I’ve seen are not very helpful.Better attitude.Better availability of time to meet & longer sessions.Better availability; Early help (Before you take a bunch of classes that you didn't need to because ofACT test scores or AP credit)Better explanations.Better grants & financial aid so I could focus more on school.Better inform new students who their advisor is and how to contact them.Better information, more helpful.Better office hours.Better scheduling.Better student records program for all advisor's computers.Between the counselor & the catalog, they seem to have a discrepancy.By being able to help student find their advisors.By having power to get me into classes I need.By helping you figure out what it is you wantBy letting us meet with them on a regular basis.By making the requirements to get into a major easier.By not having different students every semester be my advisor because one person tell mesomething & the other person another thing. Its confusing!!Call for appointment times to see how things are going.Call students and see if they need to meet them.Care more about the student as an individual & their future rather than causing them to feel like a #.Checking up on its students to make sure they are on the right track.

E-3

Clarify where & who undeclared students should talk to. I was under the impression that I didn't havean advisor.Class schedules could be made available much earlier. Its pointless to meet w/ my advisor if I don'tknow my class options going in.Contact students more often, provide further information.Contact the students to tell them who their advisor is.Contacting every student, letting them know who their advisor is, & inform them of the servicesadvisors give.Contacting the students by via e-mail, mail so that the students could get more info. needed for theirfuture field of work.Could advise better for undeclared students.Could explain majors easier and help with explaining the system better.Do more advertisement to help people be more aware of what the advisors can do to help them.Do more to let people know who their advisor is and how they can locate or get a hold of them.Do not be so discouraging to students about applying for their programs.Doing more stuff.Don't be critical and be a little bit more realistic with scheduling students semesters.Don't be so impersonal. Give ideas about various programs and activities.Don't be so pushy.Don't know, never been.Don't need reservation.Don't overload the advisors so much. It takes an hour or more to get in & visit for just 10-15 min.Don't really care if you are in the best major for you.Don't say they can reach you w/ email & then tell them to call you, especially for an appointment.Don’t do a bad job by getting students in & out of their office ASAP.Don’t make us run around campus trying to accomplish 1 simple task. There is no reason to have togo back & forth between diff. dept. just for a signature.(Advisor’s Name) is the new fill in & is quite unhelpful & too busy b/c he is spread too thin!! We needa new advisor for Interior Design.Each student required to meet with their advisor.Each student should have more access to the advisors. Establish a system online to makeappointments and schedule time to meet together.Easier methods to contact advisor.Easier to get an appointment and actually know who my advisor is via email or other means.Easier to get an appointment with your advisor.Easier to get in & longer visits.Easier to make appointments.Easier to meet with advisor.Education & Family Life need to work together more, rather than merely informing each other ofwhat is going on.Email me.Employ more advisors for students.Entirely too much runaround between offices.Every advisor should have a bowl of candy on their desk.Every time I go to HASS I get a new advisor and I had such a horrible experience last time I'd ratherdo it on my own.Every time I have tried to call it is busy or no one picks up.Express the importance to students of meeting w/ their advisor more often. I think a lot of studentsjust don't see the importance of an advisor.Find out what students interests are at the beg. of their freshman yr.Fine how it is.Follow up w/ students better. I gave paperwork to the advisor about 2 months ago and I haven'theard anything.Free cookies.

E-4

Friendlier advisors that are truly interested in helping you plan out your schedules & graduationrequirements. More availability.From my experience it is difficult to actually set up appointments and get in to see them.Get advisors who really understand the major. The one I called really had no useful info for me. I hadto call a different place to get advice.Get an advisor the shows they care about me. My advisor acted like I was the biggest bother.Get better/friendlier counselors.Get everyone an advisor to meet w/. If need be have that advisor call them personally.Get more advisors for my major so it isn't so hared to get in.Get more people like (Advisor’s Name).Get more teachers like (Advisor’s Name).Get nicer advisors. The only one time I went to my advisor, I was told I was stupid and should dropout of college.Get out more info to students.Get rid of SOAR. Let the incoming students meet advisors & sign up for classes on their own time.Getting someone who is more open to ideas.Give a little more info. of things we as students can get.(scholarships, internships) how to get themand help us achieve them.Give advisors more say in letting Interior Design students have their own art classes!! PLEASE!Give an incentive or credit to advisors & students who use the system.Give more guidance- show us which breadth classes would be more interesting to us given ourmajor.Give more info about semesters, farther away than the next one starting.Give students names of their advisors & ideas of how they can help the student.Hard to get in there.Hardly in office, takes forever to call me back, & when I did meet w/ him he told me nothing. Getmore enthusiastic advisors who want to help & care.Have a better attitude towards students when I met with my advisor, she acted like I was stupid.Have a better advising system for undeclared students (freshman) Have advisors that can answerquestions about majors & what classes fill what requirements.Have advisors available more.Have advisors help a student stick to the requirements, so they can graduate as quickly as possible.Have advisors know what is going on in classes. Inform us of changes in major requirements.Have advisors send e-mail to their students.Have candy dishes for students.Have mandatory meetings. Make it mandatory for advisor to contact students @ least once a year.Have an advising team to make it feasible.Have more advisors for each major.Have more advisors for English; (Advisor’s Name) is a great advisor but other advisors need moretime though.Have more advisors.Have more advisors. We have 22,000+ students @ USU and the ration of counselors to students isterrible.Have more appointments & make us meet w/ our advisors to make sure we are staying on track.Have more available appointments.Have more available hours. When I called for advising, all the appointments. for the week or monthwere taken.Have more info about programs you do not have. Be able to tell the student where they could go orwhat classes would benefit them while staying at USU.Have more than one advisor so they are more available to reach. Sometimes it can be hard toschedule an appt. especially around registration times.Have more times to schedule.Have my advisor tell me they are my advisor by email. Nursing advisor?Have non biased help. When they see your grades they are only negative and help less if you are

E-5

having a bad semester.Have one mandatory meeting with your advisor a semester.Have scheduled appointments made by advisor.Have the advisor send a mass email to everyone introducing themselves & explaining how they canhelp.Have the advisors be in contact w/ the students more.Have the advisors be more nicer to the students. The advisor needs to take more time with thestudent.Have the advisors be nicer and more approachable.Have the advisors have guidelines to follow to help each student.Have the advisors help the students instead of socializing all day.Have the advisors meet or share info between departments. more. Especially w/ the registrar'soffice.Have the counselors be more available & spend more time w/ the student, not such a rush. Clarifyclasses you need to take, advisors need a better knowledge.Have them be more available more friendly & more interested in the students. They chose theirjob..Right?!?Have them help direct you an area to go & an organized plan.Having too many students, not enough time w/ each student.Help me to weed out what Im interested in, suggest classes that could really help me decide.Help more efficiently.Help more with scholarships by informing the business students.Help out more, spend more time with student on a one-on-one basis.Help people who have not declared their major.Help student plan their school better, make students feel like they can even get into the program.Help students get the info they need about other schools as well.Help students understand better what their options are.Help undeclared students to know who their advisors are and when they can contact them.Help us plan out how to get to our goals. Help us to decide when to take what classes. Help us planso we know how long we'll be in school.Help you long term & answer unasked questions. Tell you more than the surface.Helping freshman know who they are assigned to and how to go about meeting w/ that person.Helping freshman students find an advisor.Hire advisors that actually care about the student. This is my last semester here. I am leavingbecause of the lack of care and help here.Hiring advisor that are supportive of your decisions. Advisors that don't discourage you before youeven try something.I'm not sure what my major is.I'm not sure, I don't have a ton of experience with it.I'm not sure, one I declare I'm sure I'll have a better opinion.I've never met with an advisor.I've only met w/ my advisor once during my SOAR date.I always seem rushed and not like a person.I am constantly referred to student advisors. I am paying the same tuition as the seniors-juniors. Iwant to meet w/ the head advisor!I am doing a co-operative program through Weber State so sometimes I can't get enough info aboutwhat I need to do w/ my credits here.I did not know who my advisor was for the first little while, so let us know who it is as soon as we getto school.I didn't feel comfortable in any of my visits. She made me feel stupid several times.I didn't think she was understanding that I did not know what to do. I felt like she was trying to sell meto LAS as a major. She had a closed mind about it-not open minded.I don't always like being brushed off to the student advisors. They help but sometimes I come to seemy advisor.

E-6

I don't even feel like going to my advisor. She doesn't even know me and because I am a freshmanshe treats me like I don't know anything.I don't even know who my advisor is.I don't even know who my counselor is.I don't even think that a lot of students even know they have access to an advisor & many don’t knowhow to use them.I don't feel like the advisors care much.I don't have an advisor.I don't have enough experience to know.I don't know who my advisor is or how to contact them.I don't know. The only reason I don't go to advising anymore is because my advisor moved.I don't like the SOAR Requirements. Its kind of a run around. I’ve been to 3 colleges & the advisorshaven't been able to provide any info. that seemed new.I don't really know who my advisor is. I talk to (Advisor’s Name) at SOAR but I haven't ever had anassigned advisor that I know of. I wish we knew who our advisors were.I don't think they put into consideration the information to those in different situations.I don't use it enough to give a honest answer.I don’t know much about it.I feel like my advisor wants our appointments to be ASAP regardless of how many questions I mayhave. Not impressed w/ willingness to help me.I feel so rushed & they are always rude. Take time to know the students, their needs. No rush. I metw/ my bus advisor & she was very nice but didn't seem like she enjoyed helping me.I feel there is so much info. and so little time to study for all that is covered.I found it hard to find an advisor that could help me, that was in my field.I guess a lot of people don't know their advisors or don't know how to reach them.I had 1 good advisor and 1 bad. It’s the people. If they don't enjoy helping us, then we don't enjoy iteither.I have found it difficult to find someone that understands more than just the specific major that theyare over.I have had difficulty contacting my advisor. There was little info to help me find out who my advisorwas or how I could contact him.I have had other people in the advising staff & were rude & unhelpful. Learn to be nice & helpful like(Advisor’s Name)!!I have never attended the advising system but my advisor does send me cards that encourage me toattend.I have never been informed of it. Never attended.I have no clue who my advisor is partly that is my fault but they are always full when I need an appt.so I don’t bother going.I have no complaints. Pay them more.I have no idea if I even have an assigned advisor. I met with student advisor one time.I have not had enough experience to say.I have only seen 1 person so I do not know how to complete this question.I haven't ever met w/ my advisor. She works at home & all she did was send me a major req. sheet &that’s it. I didn't get the feeling that she really cared.I haven't gone enough to know.I haven't had any problems w/ the system thus far. (Advisor’s Name) let me know what I needed todo & offered continual help for the semesters to come.I haven't had enough experience to answer this.I haven't had the experience with anything to answer.I haven't seen my advisor enough times to tell.I haven't taken advantage of it to know.I just need to know how to contact my advisor.I know I'm undeclared along with many people so maybe you could have more advisors to help us sothat we don't have to wait so long.

E-7

I loved my advisor. She really helped me out and was very encouraging.I met with my advisor during SOAR. I don't know who it was and that’s the only time I've been. I don'tknow how to answer the following questions from the one visit.I never know where to go even if I ask the people in HASS. Nobody knows anything over there.I really don't know. I haven't met w/ an advisor. I have no idea where to go to get an advisor.I received negative input on plans to get on the fast track to graduating.I think it's great. I don't have much time but if I could I would visit more often.I think it should be required to meet w/ counselors at least 1 time before they register at the start ofeach yr.I think that if there was more availability & also if we could have more direction on the classes totake.I think that the student needs to have more time during their scheduled visit. I have a hard timeasking all the question I need to ask in ten minutes.I think the advisers should take more initiative to contact students when the students don't contactthem.I think the advisors should check up on their advisee’s, just in case the student doesn't know what todo.I think they need another person to help with registration. (Advisor’s Name) has a lot of students onher hands.I waited 15 minutes after my scheduled time before I was taken into the office.I was told a class would count towards my generals, but it didn't.I was unable to meet with her when I wanted to. She was always booked.I was very disappointed w/ the advice (Advisor’s Name) gave me. She said because of myoccupational goals I might be at the wrong university.I went in to talk to an advisor w/ a quick question & was told I would have to make an appt. for thefollowing day. This is very inconvenient unless you live on campus.I wish he would have had more time for me.I wish I could get in to see her a lot more often.I wish it were more private during walk-in hrs.I wish the advisors had more time to get to know us better. I think they should try to figure out thesituation of the student before telling them what to do.I would just like to know who it is!I would like the appointment. process to be easier & quicker. The 1 time I went, it was helpful & Ididn't have to wait too long even though it was a busy time of year.I would like to know who my advisor is not that they changed.I would really like my advisor to be the same every time that I go and that they could spend just alittle more time.I would say more would help, because they are always so busy.If I just felt more comfortable going to my advisor. I don't even know her or how to get in contact w/her.If requirements were more clear we wouldn't need advisors so much.If she did not think only 4.0 students are good students & suggest list of general education classesthat would apply to my major.If the advisors spent more time and effort helping student know exactly what they are doing and whatthey need to do.If there is a good way to keep track of your students to help keep them motivated to do well, I think itwould benefit USU students.If they have many students to meet w/, not to rush the students & give them other places to get infothat they need. My education is important to me.If you are undeclared you are automatically sent to HASS. They don't really help you figure anythingout they just say take some generals.If you don't ask question, you don't get answers. They do not offer info. readily.(dept. & fin. advisors)If you had a specific advisor for each individual student in your major and they met w/ the student ona monthly basis.

E-8

Improve journalism department. Very poorly ran.In my case, getting rid of (Advisor’s Name) would be the only way to better the system.In the my prev. dept,(music) I received no help as far as req. & suggested studies. There were notrained advisors so students had no direction.Inform kids of their advisors.Inform student of opportunities concerning their degree.Inform students on how to obtain an advisor- I don't even know where to go to get one.It's doing fine.It can be very difficult to meet at certain times of the year.It is fine.It is hard to get appointments to meet with advisors.It is very difficult to get in to see her, maybe if she make herself more available during times of highdemand.It is very difficult to get to see advisors, and then the meeting has to be very short.It might be improved if the advisors would contact the student with informed info or welcome thestudent to come visit them.It might help if there were a few more, so it wouldn't be as hard to get an appointment.It needs to be easier to get in, I ended up spending a lot of time waiting at designated times, and stillnever get in.It seems as though because my GPA is not at or really close to 4.0 she wants nothing to do with me.It seems hard to obtain an appointment.It takes forever to get an appointment.It took me 2 months to get into my advisors office last time. That could change!It was frustrating trying to get an appt. w/ my advisor, every time I went to get an appt. that week wasalready full!It was hard to meet with my advisor. I would like to see the system improved by having onlineadvising chat rooms.It would be easier if I had to meet with her regularly because then I'd make the time.It would be nice if more was known about advisors. Perhaps more info. on where the general collegeadvisors are.Its good!Its good. Maybe have more than 1 advisor.Its hard to get an appt. w/ my gen advisor so I normally go through (Advisor’s Name).I’ve had a good experience so far.I’ve had trouble figuring out who to talk to but everyone I have has been very helpful & niceespecially the student advisors.I’ve heard of some advisors giving out wrong info. about requirements but I’ve never experiencedthis.I’ve only met w/ an advisor once.I’ve only met w/ him during SCAR & I got the info. I needed.Just let me know what I need to do. Thanks.(Advisor’s Name) is far too busy. I like visiting her as much as I like visiting the dentist. Advisorsshould know students current capabilities.Keep us more informed. My advisor quit & by chance I found out my new advisor not b/c I wascontacted.Keeping them more updated so they can inform students on new policies before they areimplemented (such as new rule on certain # of independent credits).Keeping us updated on what we still need to complete, classes to take, how well or not we areprogressing.Knock off the anal policies. The student is the one paying to go to school so forget any policy that willinconvenience us.Know a little bit more about the courses, I know its really difficult because there are so many but itwould be great.Know info. better, about requirements fo students for graduation, classes, forms, etc.

E-9

Know more about there field, have more time, plan better.Know the students better, know what the student can and cannot take and be sure of this knowledge.Less student to advisor ratio.Less waiting time.Let incoming freshman know who their advisor is & where they can be found. Also, Advisors give outa lot of wrong info.Let info out about where to find advisors b/c it certainly wasn't known to me.Let people know more about how an advisor is vital!Let people know who their advisor is.Let people know who their advisors are.Let students know every so often (maybe beg. of each semester) who their advisor is exactly.Let students know who their advisor is & how to contact them.Let students know who their advisor is. Keep in contact w/ the students via letter, email so thestudents feel comfortable going to the advisor.Let you know more about them. If it is vital that you see them, then the system could be more helpfulby letting you know all the things they can help you with.Letting students know more clearly who their advisors are, possible through an email everysemester.Letting you get in at the last minute.List are good. Lists of both the classes needed and classes that would help with those classesneeded.Little more help on transfer credits/certificate of completion.Little more info on class descriptions.Mail a copy of the advisors name, room #, phone # to student.Make advisors available at different hours. The only time that they are available is when students arein class.Make an attempt at putting a good class schedule together for every person. Not possible but at leasttry.Make annual appointments with students to assess our transcripts. Inform students about who theiradvisor is.Make at least a small amount of time available everyday.Make it a little easier to transfer from 1 dept. to another.Make it a voluntary commodity. I felt like I had to see an advisor & when I did she was very kind butdidn't give me any info I didn't know.Make it better known to students who they should see or assign times to meet w/ advisors foreveryone & make meetings mandatory.Make it easier for beginners to know what they need to do in the long run i.e. college, interns, etc.And to get appointments.Make it easier for Freshman who aren't in their major meet w/ someone.Make it easier to figure out who your advisor is. I didn't know who mine was and i didn't know how tofind out.Make it easier to find out who each students advisor is.Make it easier to find who the advisors are.Make it easier to get an appointment.Make it easier to get in during busy times.Make it easier to get in.Make it easier to know who advisors are for each student.Make it easier to meet.Make it easier to see an advisor make it easier to know what advisor you should go to.Make it more known to students who they are assigned to.Make it more known where they are and who the advisors are.Make it more known who your advisor is & easier to make an appt.Make it more personalized. Care a bit more. Sometimes I feel like a number instead of a student.Make it more well known and more accessible.

E-10

Make it possible to see your actual advisor when you go in for help as opposed to assistants.Make it so when we need to see the advisors we can.Make it work.Make more advisors available.Make students feel more important when in offices, be more friendly in your attitude.Make students more aware of who their advisor is and what is required for graduation.Make sure every advisor is listed. I don't have my advisors email or phone number so its really hardto get a hold of her.Make sure everyone know who their advisor is. I have just had to go to the advisor at the BrighamCity because I didn't think I had one here.Make sure I am placed in the correct major. Be willing to help us understand, especially freshman.Have only 1 advisor. Don't make the student feel stupid.Make sure that each student is getting same opportunity & same advising. Make sure I take the rightclasses.Make sure that everyone knows who their advisor is.Make sure that when I go, I am seeing MY official advisor.Make sure they understand what is required of the students, so they can help us. When I went to thegen. advisement office in the TSC 2 different advisors told me different classes that I needed.Make the advisors more available. Be willing to speak w/ me about my concerns, My new advisor islike that.Make them more available.Make them more known and easier to contact. Tell Freshman what to do to see them & what to talkto them about.Make who the students advisors better known.Make yourselves better known to students. help with transfers.Making advisors more known!Making it easier to get info, telling everyone who their advisor is, scheduling advisement sessions.Making themselves more accessible.Mandatory meeting system is required.(once a month or so.)Market it more- show that it is available.Maybe by evaluating him/her every year and make some change if they are not doing well with thestudents.Maybe contact the students through email.Maybe have more advisors so you are not on a long waiting list.Maybe have the advisors reach out to the students. Can email students to introduce themselves andtell them what time their office hours are.Maybe if when you had a problem there could be a place you could go that would tell you exactlywhere to go.Maybe if you could schedule appointments online rather than having to go into the secretary just tomake the appointment.Maybe invite us to see them the very first thing.Maybe to call and check up on our completion.Meet needs better, help us know what classes we need!Meet the population of students better. There should be peer advisors that can answer questions onpeople.Meet w/ students more often.Meet w/ us not us going and making appointments. with them.Might mention where to go other than having to hunt it down.Make it easier to get an appointment.More accessible and available and flexible.More advisors @ time of high demand. Lines get very long & timely.More advisors in Business.More advisors that really care about the students and their needs. They also just need more peopleso it is more possible to get an appointment.

E-11

More advisors to be able to reach all students & not have to take these surveys to see whenimprovement is taking place.More advisors(too many people for 1 advisor. I feel bad taking up their time even though they do notindicate I am taking up too much time.More advisors, easier to access.More advisors, less "advisor helpers"- I want to talk to the person in charge.More advisors, Let the student talk more & advisors listen to find out what the students needs are.More advisors.More advisors. Advise on other things besides classes, like scholarships.More advisors. It is hard to get in contact with them sometimes.More appointments available.More assistance w/ advisor, b/c sometimes it is hard to get an appt.More available, flexible hours. I’ve only me w/ a student advisor once due to the unavailability ofadvisors.More availability.More available times to meet with advisor.More awareness; Im not even sure where to find out who my advisor is.More career testingMore clear & accessible. More advisors who are TRULY informed.More clear on where to go if you never have been or if you are undeclared.More communication, easier to get appointments, get the info "out there" about advisors & how toget help.More easily accessible.More e-mails or letters.More friendly advisor who cares about the students performance.More friendly, show more concern in seeing me succeed.More in-office time every day-it is hard to find a time when she is there & I’m not in class.More info. given around registration time.More info. on how to get an advisor.More information on what kind of opportunities the major will provide.More involved in freshman studies.More knowledgeable advisors. Know exact requirements for majors.More knowledge of all areas of general education requirements.More knowledgeable peer advisors. They seem to help more than the actual advisor.More office hours.More open schedules.More people, generally, are needed to help plan out schedules semester by semester.More personal advising.More personal background breakdown of each student. Check and advise student more personally tofind their weak points for a better suited education.More personalized. Spend more time about the individual and not the program.More processes and notices need to be streamlined and easier for incoming freshman.More professional feedback rather than info. I could have gotten off the website or catalog.More sessions.More time put into making clear what is expected for the major & to show the student you care abouttheir specific concerns.More time to meet with students. Each time I have gone to the general student advisor I have to waitin line and I run out of time.More time to work w/ students, clear written down things of what they want you to do or whom theywant you to see, clear info for students about transcripts.More time, but I understand they're busy all the time.More times available, easier access to appt.More times to meet w/ advisor.More times to meet w/ students and get to know you on a more personal level.

E-12

More user friendly. I’ve never met my advisor.More visits with advisors.My 1st visit I didn't know what questions to ask and she just wanted to answer my questions, shecould just explain how my program works & what is required.My advisor at times could be more encouraging rather than narrow minded due to past statistics ofthe success of students.My advisor did not give me all the pertinent info. I needed to choose my courses wisely. I felt shewas just trying to get me out of her office.My advisor doesn't answer my questions. I think she is pushy and doesn't give me the time Ideserve.My advisor keeps changing & I never know who it is. I don't ever know what is going on in my majorbecause my advisor doesn't seem informed.My advisor needs to be available.My advisor needs to be more positive and supportive that I can do this. Also, he never remembersreally who I am.My advisor was NO help to me. She told me to call a guy from Weber which I was never able to geta hold of. She could have helped me look at my past transcripts & see if some of the classes couldfill req. for my major.My advisor was very good but he assumed I knew more than I did so I did not understand all theadvising he had for me. He went too fast.My little sister’s advisor printed out a schedule of all classes needed for her major. I think that wouldcome in handy. Also the minor people should do that too.My old Biology major was so impersonal & acted like I was wasting his time even when I showed myhigh qualities.Need to be friendlier. They need to reach out more and help the students to understand and want togo to these colleges.Needs more advisors to help with the demand.Needs to be able to help the student work around their time schedules and develop plans to betteruse that time.Nicer advisors.Not have a massive weight at the counseling office.Not so long of lines for Undeclared & know more about the classes that are frequently taken or arenew.Notice of who my advisor is.Offer better peer advisors.One way would be to help people figure out who their advisor is. No one seems to know and they arenot very helpful.Organization.Others have told me the system isn't personalized enough, but I have no complaints.Personalize it a little more, maybe a few advisors for each major.Post their hours more availability to see.Print more documentation on what is needed per major.Provide better information.Provide more time and more advisors.Provide more times when students can meet w/ advisors. Make advising times more well known.Provide opportunity updates that concern your major.Provide students w/ more info. Let them know how to contact an advisor, what the purpose of anadvisor is, & how having one may benefit the student.Quicker appointments.Reminders that registration is coming up so I can go see my advisor about the next semester.Require that you must meet with them every so often.Schedule more meetings, use email more often.Scheduling to see advisors could be made a little easier.Seeing a peer advisor didn't help me at all b/c she couldn't help me pick a major & since I have my

E-13

generals done she couldn't help me keep on track. Maybe seeing a real advisor would have helped.Seems good to me.Semestral meetings and or e-mails to update us on new classes, projects, activities.Send students e-mails about advisors, who they are, why we need them. It would be very helpful toall of us.Sending e-mails, keeping track of their students.Set times that the advisor has to meet w/ each student on some form of every other week basis.Having the advisor give you a correct & lengthy time for your visit.Set up more of a relationship w/ new students. With grad student along with advisor.She seemed to be rushed when helping me although I was only there for about 15 minutes. Takeyour time to help students.Shorter wait times.Should be more communication w/ other schools on transferring credits.Show more concern & dedication in helping me to succeed.Smarter advisors. They miss informed me about the quality of Bio 1210, Chem 1210 classes.Smile once in awhile & act like they care. Spend more time than 2 min. w/ me. I came from BYU &they had no trouble w/ this so I know it is possible.So far I have no complaints.Some advisors don't seem to care about the students needs or concerns.Some how better inform students of who there advisor is.Some majors have more people so its impossible to get an appt. Some forget that they should bethere for the student.Somehow have it be easier to have an appointment earlier than a week after you needed it.Somehow make it easier to set up appointments. The sign up sheets are always full.Sometimes long waits to see advisor.Sometimes seem to not want to help me. Think that they should still talk to people that might not bein that major.Spend time w/ students don't just tell us what we want to hear. Call us into their office periodically toverify progress.Stager lunch among advisors so someone is always available.Stay in constant contact with student.Stop cutting fine programs.Stop cutting the programs.Take longer time w/ students. Have more so you can get in easier!Tell me how to get a hold of them.Tell me who my advisor is!Tell me who my advisor is.Tell people about the advising system.Tell students about all the classes they need & when they are offered. I had to research it out or Iwould be behind & I'm a freshman.Tell students what classes they need.Tell students who their advisor is.Tell us who our advisor is when we apply.The 1 counselor I saw this yr. gave me wrong info w/ fin. aid at BATC. As a result, I didn't includeBATC as an option until I found out she was wrong.The ability to get an appointment. (Advisor’s Name) is very busy.The advisor was on the phone during the entire meeting.The advisors are too busy to do you any good as an individual-there is not enough time.The advisors could actually sit down w/ students & help map out individual programs.The advisors I’ve seen didn't know very much about each class. The peer advisors knew more aboutclasses. I feel like the advisors for undeclared majors don't help much.The advisors need to act like they care about helping you, not like you are just another student takingup their time!The first few days of each semester are a mess, the lines are long but I think that is expected.

E-14

The gen.(undeclared) advising secretary has been very rude & unwilling to schedule me. Studentsneed gen. class advising.The graduation requirements for my major changed, but my advisor did not inform me of this when Ienrolled for classes. I think they could be a little more on top of things.The lady in my advisors office who was answering the phones said I didn't need to see her andwouldn't schedule an appointment for me.The Nutrition Bldg. is really far away from the rest of campus.The one appointment I have had felt rushed and not really important to my advisor.The people in Multi-cultural Center need to be prepared to advise Spanish speaking students. Theydon't know what classes to take to feel better adaptation.The real advisors don't know anything. I went in there for an undeclared major & they couldn't eventell me which generals I needed or which professors were good.The secretary made me feel like dirt. I had to wait forever to see an advisor.The student advisors that are there don't know very much info. They need to be informed better to behelpful.There are some really anal policies that could be done without. The student is the one forking overtons of money to the school and it seems to just disappear.There needs to be an advisor even before you choose a major.There needs to be more class available for my major. More teachers perhaps.There needs to be more than one main advisor for the engineering department. At registration time,getting an appointment is all but impossible.There should be a clear list of what AP credits will do for you. My advisor assumed an AP creditwould count for a specific breadth course & it didn't.There should be some kind of overview of graduate requirements & not just a list of req. classes. Iget confused about what I have to do to get accepted into my program.They are doing a fine job.They are overworked & the stress & frustration shows in meetings, especially near semesterchanges.They come and check up on their students.They could be at least willing to meet w/ people. I have went in several times & they won't meet w/me so Im doing it on my own, & it stinks.They could be more knowledgeable in some areas.They could try to get all students in at least once a month.They could work on helping us more identify the minors and what upper level classes we need.They discouraged me against certain things of my personal interest weren't very supportive.They do pretty well.They don’t care about people in undeclared. You’re a # not a person. Little explaining with poorattitude.They have too many students to advise to really take an interest & help. She has too much to do toexplain & help w/ everything.They haven’t advised me yet at all, I have no idea what the specifics of my major will be, but I wouldlike to meet w/ her in person to discuss it.They need to keep tabs on the students they are seeing.They seem like they don't know too much and they don't really care.They seem really busy most of the time. More advising staff would be helpful. I have to schedule aweek in advance most of the time.They should make sure you know what the requirements are and other options that are available.Thorough detailed planning with our advisors. Lay it out in lay mans terms as simple as possible.To be honest, have not been enough to tell you.To get an appointment is ridiculously difficult.To have it more understanding.To help students prepare for a future.Too many students/advisor ratio. They need appointments instead of 1st come 1st serve basis. Iwaited 2 hrs and the advising only lasted 10 min.

E-15

Too many to list.Try & make the students really know their goals & jobs.Try to be a bit more patient because when I come in as a freshman I was made to feel stupid.Try to contact the students more.(email, mail or phone) Make it easier to get appointments.Try to respond a little more quickly to e-mails or letters.Understand that new freshman know absolutely nothing about college life/req's. They assume thatyou know everything.USU needs to let each student know who their advisor is!Waiting for open advising was annoying.We need more advisors for the undeclared majors.Well, you cancelled my program and that covers it.Were not very helpful in my classes that I need to be taking to get on course.When an advisor has been changed to a new one, Let us know!When I ask them about declaring a major they give me the runaround and sen me somewhere else.When I went to my advisor she arrived 10 min late eating food & condescendingly looked at me andsaid "What".When I went to see her, she gave me the impression that I was interfering with her time. She shouldbe more friendly & open.When I went to the advisor I already wrote out my schedule & she really didn't guide me in anydirection. I felt like it was a waste of time.When staring the semester they need more advisors working!When students go a lot of advisors make you feel like you are wasting their time. They can improveon this big time.When talking about gen. ed. classes give examples of classes they can take so they know there issome variety.When wanting to make an appointment, I was turned away because it was to early to make anappointment. They should change the way they handle appointments.Who is my advisor?Who is my advisor?????? Advanced standing and pre standing?????Work more hours so more people can see her or have more advisors.You ask too many questions on a survey.You could be informed how to meet w/ your advisor.You have to have exact questions, I just need general guidance & direction. More explanation onwhat I can do for the distant future in my program.You need to let us know that there are more advisors than just (Advisor’s Name) then you can getbetter help with specifics of your major.

Documents

2003 Freshman/Sophomore Survey - Utah State University Sophomore... · 2003 FRESHMAN/SOPHOMORE ... sophomore students to determine their attitudes and perceptions regarding he initial