25
2 nd Consortium meeting WP3 progress Preliminary evaluation of received information 4-5 February, Split

2 nd Consortium meeting WP3 progress Preliminary evaluation of received information

  • Upload
    gates

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2 nd Consortium meeting WP3 progress Preliminary evaluation of received information 4-5 February, Split. decreasing environmental and social impacts of quarrying and improving reclamation, reducing illegal quarrying, and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

2nd Consortium meeting

WP3 progress

Preliminary evaluation of received information

4-5 February, Split

Page 2: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

WP-3: Extraction and Demolition Site Level Activities

Objectives

• decreasing environmental and social impacts of quarrying and improving reclamation,

• reducing illegal quarrying, and • increasing recycling, which will

decrease the use of primary aggregates

Page 3: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

WP3 Activities• 3.1: Best practicesedition of manuals/guides/toolboxestowards aggregates sustainability • 3.2: Illegal quarrying good communication, capacity building and stakeholder consultation to achievesocial license to operate • 3.3: Recycling re-use of quarry and demolition wastes. • 3.4: Outreach/CommunicationStakeholders’ handbook

Page 4: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Geographical location of model sites

FUSHE KRUJE-AL

TERSTENIK-HR

>20 modelsites in

7 countries

Page 5: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Activity 3.1: Environmentally friendly extraction practices (TUC)

model sites

• GR: Lakka, Mandalos, Araxos,• IT: Lanca dei Francesi,• SR: Fruska gora,(Kovilovaca quarry)• RO: Iacobdeal, Luminita-Tasaul,• HR: Terstenik

Page 6: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

3.2. Illegal quarrying(IGR) model sites

• RO: Gostavatu,

• GR: Lakka,

• IT: Taro River,

• AL: Fushe Kruje,

• HR: Terstenik

Page 7: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

3.3. Recycling model sites

• AL: Fushe Kruje,• GR: Vermio, Vavdos/Gerakini, • IT: Nerviano, Legnano• RO: Moldova Noua, Deva• SI: V. Pirešica, Sežana, Hotavlje,

Dogoše, Novo mesto, Stahovica

Page 8: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

WP3 Split Agenda• WP3 overview and introductory comments (N. Arvanitidis) - Activity 3.1 work progress ( Z. Agioutantis)

–  Araxos (3.1 & 3.3)- GR (K. Hatzilazaridou)– Mandalos (3.1 & 3.3) -GR (N. Arvanitidis)– Laka (3.1 & 3.2) -GR (N. Arvanitidis)– Lanka dei Francesi -IT (U. Cibin)– Fruska gora or Kovilovaca quarry -SR – Iacobdeal, Luminita –Tasaul –RO– Terstenik (3.1 & 3.2)-HR

  

Page 9: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

WP3 Split Agenda• Activity 3.2 work progress (M. Maruntiu )

– Gostavatu –RO– Taro river -IT–  Fushe Kruje - AL (3.2 & 3.3)

• Activity 3.3 work progress (G. Blengini)– Vermio -GR (F. Chalkiopoulou)– Vavdos / Gerakini-GR (N. Arvanitidis)– Nerviano, Legnano-IT (?)– Moldova Noua, Deva-RO V. Piresica, Sezana

etc.-SI

Page 10: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

WP3 Split Agenda

• Activity 3.4 work progress (F. Chalkiopoulou)

– Preliminary evaluation of SQ referred to 3.1 & 3.2, and of SQ+R referred to 3.3

Page 11: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Methodology approach • To address the WP3 objectives the

following tools were elaborated and used:– Questionnaires based on an aggregates

oriented version of the RMI framework and the Extractive Industries Value Chain document

– Templates to obtain model sites information to be used in the data base, the reports and manuals, and the quarry life cycle studies

Page 12: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Why policy concerned Questionnaires

• The strategic and regulatory context affects the aggregates permissions for new quarries and for extensions of existing operations, as part of the land use planning taken place.

• The appraisal of the legal framework on aggregates from the point of view and perspective of the regional and local level decision making administration (Governmental Mineral Bureau, Regional Mine Inspectorate, Land Use Planners etc), the aggregates producers and other potential stakeholders.

• The expectations that “Critical views” on legislative issues may become Best Practice tools optimizing the efficiency and sustaining then resource supply and life cycle of aggregates quarrying.

Page 13: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Two Questionnaires• SARMa Questionnaire (SQ)

– Turn administrative and legislative decision making into driving force for environmentally friendly aggregates extraction practices and increased legal quarrying

• SARMa Questionnaire for Recycling (SQ+R)– Promote and carry out the specific LCA targeted

studies – has to be improved

Page 14: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Two Templates• Model sites evaluation and assessment to

elaborate Best Practice indicators with respect to planning, design, operation and post-closure phases of legal and illegal aggregates quarrying, and recycled wastes at site level, using,– SARMa DataBase (SDB); to create and establish an

aggregate quarries GIS database model compliant to interoperability and standardization rules of INSPIRE

– Baseline Study Reports (BSR); to review the current state of the model site quarries, and identify and recommend Best Practice guidelines towards sustainable aggregates

SDB will be slightly modified and additional questions may be asked

Page 15: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Statistics of A3.1- Best Practices• 7 of 9 SDB, and • 4 of 8 BSR received

– Missing: Fruska gora - SR (probably replaced by Kovilovaca quarry for which the SDB form was completed and sent recently but the BSR is still missing), Iacobdeal, Luminita-Tasaul – RO (change of sites underway), Terstenik - HR.

– Please pay attention! The BSR template is a proposed contextual structure for a full report and not a set of questions to be answered.

Page 16: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Statistics of A3.2 – Illegal mining• 4 SDB of 5, and• 4 BSR of 5 received

– Missing: Terstenik – HR.

Statistics of A3.3 – Recycling• 7 of 11 BSR• 7 of 11 SDB

– Missing both BSR and SDB: Nerviano, Legnano - IT, Moldova Noua, Deva –RO.

• 8 of 10 SQ+R– Missing from Italy (?) and Romania

Page 17: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Statistics of A3.3 – Recycling

Received• 7 of 11 BSR• 7 of 11 SDB

– Missing both BSR and SDB: Nerviano, Legnano - IT, Moldova Noua, Deva –RO.

• 8 of 10 SQ+R– Missing from Italy and Romania

Page 18: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Statistics of A3.4 – HandbookReceived

• 11 of 15 SQ– From Greece: Ministry in charge, 2 Regions, 2

Prefectures.– Missing: Hungary, Bosnia, Croatia, Albania– Additional documentation on legal issues was

submitted by Serbia (4 environmental laws), Albania (mining law and prospecting permit), Austria (mineral policy, mineral plan, federal waste plan, guidelines for recycled building materials).

Page 19: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Completed Questionnaires and Templates

• 48 (34+14) completed versions of 74 were received– 17 of 25 SDB

– 15 of 24 BSR

– 8 of 10 SQ+R

– 11 of 17 SQ

Page 20: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

To do list-A3.1- Best Practices• 5 Preparatory reports on the basis of case

study analyses of each model site: MINGORP, IGME + PELLA, ER + PARMA, FGG, RGF (O1a) (end of April

• 1 Synthesis report on the basis of preparatory reports on environmentally acceptable quarrying (O9)

• 2 Study visits at partners’ locations (O8)• 2 Prepared recommendations for socially

acceptable quarrying for industry and for authorities (O10)

Page 21: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

To do list-A3.2 – Illegal mining• 5 Preparatory reports on the basis of case study

analyses of each model site: ER, MINGORP, METE, PELLA + IGME, IGR (O1a) (end of April)

• 1 Synthesis report on the basis of preparatory reports on prevention of illegal quarrying (O9)

• 1 Study visit at partners’ locations (O8)• 1 Prepared recommendations on socially

acceptable mining (O10)• 1 Action plan for social licence to quarry (O12)• 1 Database framework for illegal quarrying

(O13)

Page 22: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

To do list-A3.3 – Recycling• 5 Preparatory reports on the basis of case study

analyses of each model site: METE, IGME, ANPAR, IGR, GeoZS (O1a) (end of April)

• 1 Synthesis report on the basis of preparatory reports on recycling (O9)

• 2 Study visits at partners’ locations (O8)• 1 Manual on life cycle analyses (O4) - 2200

copies: 30 per partner in English + 280 for LP; 100 per partner in local language

• 1 Prepared recommendations on quarry waste (O10)

• 1 New service developed: scheme for lifecycle analysis (LCA) (O19)

Page 23: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

To do list-A3.4 – Handbook

• 1 Joint manual for stakeholders' decision making at local level: How to achieve aggregates resource efficiency in local communities (O4) - 2200 copies: 30 per partner in English + 280 for LP; 100 per partner in local language

Page 24: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Almost all WP3 participants mobilized

• Thank you for your cooperation and contributions to now

• Further work needs to be undertaken to collect the field and other operational data from the model sites as required by SDB and BSR.

• Improvements on the SQ-R and SDB underway

Page 25: 2 nd  Consortium meeting WP3 progress   Preliminary evaluation of received information

Outreach communicationhttp://www.ditikiellada.gov.gr

• ΔΕΛΤΙΟ ΤΥΠΟΥ • PRESS RELEASE• ΣΥΝΑΝΤΗΣΗ ΜΕ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΗ

ΟΜΑΔΑ ΤΟΥ ΙΓΜΕ

• Επιστημονική ομάδα του ΙΓΜΕ συναντήθηκε, στις 26 Ιανουαρίου 2010 με το Γενικό Γραμματέα Περιφέρειας Δυτικής Ελλάδας κ.Τάσο Αποστολόπουλο και συζήτησαν πρωτοβουλίες και δράσεις πάνω σε ευρωπαϊκά προγράμματα και ιδιαίτερα τις διακρατικές και επιστημονικές συνεργασίες.

IGME SARMa participants visiting the General Secretary of the Region of West Greece