8/3/2019 1996.03.28 - Stefan Marinov - MARINOV ANNUS HORRIBILIS

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/19960328-stefan-marinov-marinov-annus-horribilis 1/2

. . ,· . .. ·· · · ·· · ·:: - r . . t . o : ~ n r. ·•: .. ; • · , ..:· : .: ;   •. , 1. · · r · · .. .... ....;..._..._--..;..;_.....,;____ ....._ ........ ~ - - - - - - - ............. . ---------·-.

· AOVERT.ISEMENT: ·· . . ..

M A R I N O V : A N N U s H O R ~ I B I L I SThe year 1998 will be an earthquake year tor conventlonal·phyalca:many formulas In the textbooks will be changed, many century-olddogmas will be renounced 'and many saints will be de-sainted.This radical change had to begin tens ol years ago but the lack ofglasnost In physics all over the world has delayed It and Instead tohave evolutlonal step-by-step reformations and several 'fighterearthquakes. now there will be a tremendous one. Vou.s l'avez

vou/u, Georges DandinslBy my half-a-century experimenta l and theoretical worl( I

sh.owed the following (see references In my 18 books, so ·re fereedpapers. 8 pa id advertisements and numerous papers and edltqr 'scomments In the journal DEUTSCHE PHYSIK edited by me):

t . Tile principle of re/allv/ly Is wrong. Indeed, I measured three

times optlco-mechanlcafly and once electromagnetically 'h eEarth's absolute velocity. Its magnitude Is 350 km sec· • with

equator ial coordinates of Its a p e x ~ -2 0•, 11 = 12" (approx.).2. The pr inciple of equivalence Is wrong. Indeed, my lnter1ero

metrJc "c oupled mirrors" exper iment which was carried outduring a year showed' that when the laboratory's acceleration

was kinematic (acceleration wlth "?'espect to distant stars), thelaboratory's velocity changed, while when it was dynamic (gravl·.

ra tional attraction by the Earth) there was no change.3. The energy conservation law Is wrong. My machines MAMIN

COLIU and VENETIN COLIU which work with zero, or near to zero,

Lenz effect. and SIBERIAN COLIU which tyorks with anii·Lenzelfect violated this law. Only because of lack of money I could notclose the energetic circle In the i lrst two, but the third one was not

expensive and I could run it as a perpetuum mobile. The day whenI shalf present this machine at a press-QOnference wil l the startday lor the ea rthquake.

4. The Lorentz equa tion Is wrong. II there are two electriccharges q, q' moving with velocities v, v' and the vector-distancefrom q' to q Is r , according to the Lorentz equation the Ioree withwhich q'v' acts on qv Is given by the following Grassmann formula

f0 = (p0qq'/4nr){(v·r)v'- (v·v')r}. (1)

' .N4merous experiments done by other authors (Hering's experi·ments are /rom the beginning of the century!) and by me showedIhat the force acting on qv can be .not only transverse to its

velocity, as required by (1), but also longitudinal. Any rat ionalman when seeing at least one l alsltylng experiment refects the

respective fo rmula (Popper), however lor thousands and thou·sa nds of B e t o n k ~ p f e even hundred experiments were not enough.In lhe photograph there Is one such falsifying experiment which(aswell as the other) can be carried out by children: A !Jyllndrlcal

magnet Is cut along one of Its axial 'planes and the one half Is

turned up-down (the magnetic forces themselves do the rqtatlon).Around this magnet. there is a trough filled with me rcu r!/ln which

the copper ring wh ich can be seen at right swims (the chlldreh take

sa lt' solution11

nd suspend the ring on threads). After sendingcurrent of some te ns of amperes !rom the battery at left, which Isregulated by the rheostat, the ring begins to rotate. That's al ii

;>. The Lorentz-Mar/nov eqvation Is the right one. As accordingto (.1) f'0 is not equal and oppositely directed to f0 , I obtainedMar/nov ormu/11 by the mostsimple andnatural symmetrization of(1) (take Into account that r = -r')

fu = (f0 - ( 0 )/ 2 = (p0qq'f8nr ){ (v' ·r)v + (v·r)v' - 2(v·v')r}. (2) .•

Proceeding from (2), and assuming 0, 8Af 8t 0,1 obtained

by· the mosl simple calculations that the force with which anelectric system acts on a test charge q moving with velocity v Is

f / q = - gradCI>- DA/ 81 + v x B + vS = E,., + v x B + vS, '(3)

where Cl> , A are the electric and magnetic potentials generated bythe system at the PC?Int of the charge's location, a,., = r.otA Is theLorentz magnetic Intensity, s••, = - dlvA/21s the Whltlaker mag

netic Intensity and. .

Bmo• = - ()lo/ 811}J '(v X Y}(r •v)fv'r ,

S,.., = ~ ~ J ' (v ·v' )(r ·v)/v'r'

(4)

..

. .AMa ·mtaT qJ tHHM HawwaE nron :t .. ar_e · the Mer/nov vector and scalar magnet ic i n t e n

B ='II,.,+ B.,., Ia .called vector magnetic IntensityS '"'s..,. + S...., Is called eca/ar megnetlc Intensity. (3) is ca l:;)rl

the Lorentz-Mar/nov equation. If neglecting the last terrnunderBwe understand il.,,.we obtain the Lorentz equation whicl'l tcall the Lorentz- Giassmsnn equation. That's the wl]ole th eory!

8. The Bngularmomentum conservation law Is wrong. Elul·

Cub machine wi lh Interrupted current and rotating Amperewith in terrupted current rotated under the action of in ternal lotccsonly. Marlnov's formula allows violation of th e angular momcmuu.conservallon law as the magnetic torces wilh which two h a r ~ ; ·interact are equal and oppositely directed but ma y not lie on ti le

line connecting them.7.11 is Impossible to violate the "!Omentum conserva:ic r. t: . i:;

electromBgnellsm. Obvious conclusion from Marinov's tormula8. Dlsplacement.current does not exist. For closed circvirs bolll

Grassmann and Marlnov formulas do not attow violal ion ol the

momentum and angular momentum conservation laws as lh e firstterms in (1 ) and (2) contain total dil ferenlials. As convcnrion;. tphysics bel ieves In the displacement cu rrent of Ma>.w€:11. it

accepts that all currents. always are closed. I showed 1J1

numerous experiments that there is no displacem ent curre :> :(neither In vacuum nor In dielectrics) and one can in te rrupt 11 •• ·circuits by the help ot condensers. At the age ol 15 1 unoersroo· :that dlspfacement current is a phantasmagoria and presenl(l() [t )

my teacher In Sofia the fottowing objection: "11 the displacemc>:!current between the plates of a condenser acts with rnagnci>Cforces on other currents, then according to Newton's th i rd'""-' 11 '!

o!her currents must act with magnetic lorceson the di sptaccrn"""·lcur rent and set It In motion. But how. comrade· teacher, c i! n

vacuum be set In motion?" Teacher's answer was: " Shut v;J.

chfldl "9. The gavge transformations are il legitimate. Accordi ng 10

conventional physics not the potentials but the Intensities de ter·

mine the motion ol the test charge (exactly the opposite is !r ue).

and thus any change olthe potentials which leaves th e intensi ti <Osthe same Is attowable, I.e., one can "c alibrate" the potentials. 11 iseasy to see that the cal ibration divA = 0 Is allowable . Thu">

conventional physics believes that a really existing lorC'J, 11· .,

Wh it taker force f, . = - qvdivA/ 2 = qvs •••. can be put equal 1

zero. Monstrosity! To see the action of f .,, take two me tal sphere>the one charged posit ively and the ohter n ! ' g ~ t i v e t y Put around

one of the spheres a circular wire along wh ich cu rrent IIOw$ . so

that i l ls perpendicular to the line connecting the spheres. Wh·::n

connecting the spheres by a wire and current begins to I!ow . l ilu

circular wire begins to rotate. The only Ioree which acts on tMc'lrcular wire Is f. ,.

10. There Is no propagation of interaction. As only mass canmove trom one point to another, " interaction" can be only a ghost.

But a rational man does not believe in ghosts. On the other hand.the mathematical expressions of B.,., and Sm., show that the

" fields" cannot propagate In space with a certain ve locity. M

B.,., and s .. depend on the direction of motion of the test ch<trg'!.

To these people who may object that one Is not sure whc tt >c: r II>C

Lorentz-Marlnov equation Is the right one, my answer is: Unlil the

day when some falsifying experiment should be presented ( ltlisday w il l never come!) the world is impelled to accept it as !rue .

11. Potential, radiation and radiation reaction electric io:ansl·1/es. These kinds of Intensities can be obtained if puHing inthe expression for the Lorentz electr ic Intensity (see (3)) th-:;observation electric ant! magnetic potentials

Cl> = qf 4ntJor, A= ~ ~ o q v 4 n r (5)

with r = I - v' ·r'/c.

. ' '/= v + u r c.

where r, v. u are distance, velocity and acceleration at theobservation moment t and I ; v, u' at the advanced moment( = t -I c (conventional physics wrongly calls r " retardedmoment" ). Conventional ph ysics, following Lienard and Wiccllen .

wrongly writes A with v' . For this reason conventional physicsobtains only the potential and radiation Intensities. E..,.. E,. . and

artificially Introduces the radiation reacti on Intensity E,., . cQm ing

8/3/2019 1996.03.28 - Stefan Marinov - MARINOV ANNUS HORRIBILIS

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/19960328-stefan-marinov-marinov-annus-horribilis 2/2

.to phantasmagoric "sell-accelerations". Proeeeding from (5) I ,(and any child who can differentiate') obtained also the·radiation

reaction Intensity E, . = -)1oqw/6nc, where w"' w' Ia the charge's super-acceleration. 1!, . = ~ ~ o q r ' x { ( r ' - v'r' c) x"ti}/4n(t ' - v' r' c)' Is due to moving mass (radiated e n e ~ g y ) , as -charges moving with acceleration lose energy,- while E,.. act$on the radiating charge lisell. To obtain all radiation effects onehas simply to lntegrafe the obtained formulas lor11 single charge.That's nearly al l atiol.il radiation ol electromagnetic waves!

12. There are no "flelqs ". According to the " f l e l d - m a r s ~ a l s " the

'fields" exist physically. One can move them and a movingmagnetic field produces electric field, etc. When I hear all thesestupld/1/es.l get diarrhea. Aller repeath1g the Rowland experiment(a·magnetic needle near a charged disk deviates when the disk Issetln rotation). I carried out the Inverse one (the dlsk·at rest.. heneedle rotates) and the co-moving one (disk and needle rotate),taking instead ol a needle a H a l ~ d e t e c t o r According to the "field

marshals" the inverse experiment must give the same effect asthe direct one (I observed no effect). while the co-moving experiment must give null result (I observed the same effect as at thedirect experiment). The inertial experiments can be done charginga conveyer belt.

13. Current conducting wires become charged p,os/1/vely. Conventional physics asserts that they remain neutral (Clausius

postulate). Meanwhile always alter measurements, the rheostatin the photograph remained charged and touching It by hand therewas a spark. The positive sign was established .by the methodknown to ancient Greeks. Every child explains the effect takinginto account that the positive electrode ol the battery "sucks"

•electrons !rom the wire. while the negative electrode "spits"

electrons and the former ellectis primary.14. B-machlnes and S-machlnes. The electromagnetic

machines working on a are called 8-msch/nes and these onesworking on S are called S-mach/nes. By the help ol thellrst threelingers or his right hand any child older than 15 can show whenlooking at the third term In (3) that the 8-generators brake. Meanwhile by the help ol only one linger any child younger than 15 canshow when looking at the fourth' term in (3) that the S-generators

accelerate.15. The perpetuum mobile SIBE,RIANCOLIU. S..,.ls produced bythe lirstterm in (2) and lor a complete circuit is null. For this reasonSw,,. can be observed only at Interrupted circuits (see Item 9) .

However s..,., can be dlllerent.lrom zero also lo r a complete circuit.Why then has nobody observed 11?-,Because all people haveworked with cylindrical or quasi-cylindrical magnets lo r whichs ..,. = 0. Who has cut a cylindrical magnet In two pieces rotatfngthe one hall up-down?-NOBODY!!I The first man wt'!o has donethis is called Gennadl Nicolaev and lives In Tomsk B rnymHcH6HpCKOit For this reason I called this magnet the SIBERIAN.COLIU magnet and the perpetuum mobile which I constructed withit the SIBERIAN COLIU machine • The machine shown In thephotograph is a SIBERIAN COLIU machine. It will work as aperpetuum mobile II the driving torque produced by the current

Induced In the ring when II will be set In rotation with a certain

. -

:velocity will .be larger than the lrlctlon forqu·e. I constructed ti le

machine In thli.photograph In 1993 and the last three years 1 oi(!

·nothingelse than to try to ncrease Its driving torq'ue and decreaseIts friction torque. noting that all 8-currents Induced fn· the rotorg e n e ~ a t e d additional friction torque. The driving torque wasproduced only by the S (i.e • S.,,.) currents. s...,, Is very strongnear the·cutting plane, from the one side positive, from the othernegative. The dozens ol my SIBERIAN COLIU machines arepresented with photographs In OEUTSQHE PHYSIK.

I

16. A/1 convent/oral theories lo r the origin of Earth's magr.eti·

zatlon are wrong. II rotating a cylindrical piece of any metal by aboring machine, one sees that II becomes magnetized. Conventional physics believes first that only ferromagnetics become

magnetized and second that the magnetization Is proportion a1 to ,the angular rotational velciclty, as this was promulgated by Inett.Mylrlend C.Monstefn demonstrated that the magnetization s

proportional to the linear rotational velocity and I called rl1s 1he

Monstetn-BIIrnett effect. Proceeding from the Monstein-Barnetteffect I calculated the magnetization ol the Earth, the Sun ano theplanets, obtaining excellent coincidences with the measuredvalues. As Venus Is the only planet whose nucleus Is liquid, il is Inot magnetized. The most cherished FOnventional theory for 1Earth's magnetization Is the "unipolar dynamo theory" of Ets:.;s- !ser. It Is ridiculous. es a unipolar m·achine can work on ly at ttoe

existence ol sliding contacts and moving with respect to eachother parts.17. Megratlc anergy does exist. By the most elementary spec

ulations and calculations I showe·d that: a) the gravitational energy·or two masses' ls not a negative quantf.ty, as accepted by corwentlonaf physics. but a positive quantity, b) the gravitational potentialgenerated by all masses or the universe is equal to c'.c) electrici tyand gravity are two completely analogical sciences !rom a ma tt1·

ematfcal point of view. The only difference is that the gravitationa l"charges" are the proper masses m0 = m/(1 - v' c') 1

' and th atnegative masses do not e ~ l s t . There are no other ditterences.Thus a magretlc energy, I.e., a " magnetic kind" or energy in

. gravity, must exist and gravity Is to be r.alled gravlmagretism(this Is the title ol part IV ol my encyclopaedic work CLASS! CALPHYSICS). ! 'proposed a vary simple e ~ p e r i m e n t which can revealthe existence of magretlc energy. This. experiment, moreover. canserve lo r measurement olthe Earth's absolute velocity.

18. The recession hypothesis fo r the ·galaxies is wrong. I call i

stellar "red shill" this one which is caysed by the gravitationalaction oltlle star on the emitted by It ligtu, galactic "red shift" this·one which· is caused ·by the gravitational action ol the respectivegalaxy and cosmic-by all cosmic matter. Conventional physics Ibelieves that the big "red shifts" ol, light coming !rom rem otegalaxies are due to their recession velocities. This is a phantasmagoria. The most simple calculation, which can be carried ovt by.any child, ~ h o w s that they are due to the gravitational action of all

_osmic matter and that they are proportional not to the distance to

the emitting galaxy (or quasar) but to the square or this distance. 1

showed that the experimental data 1ft much better to a square plot.

. Respectively, instead of q Hubble constant, a Hubble-Marinovconstant Is to be introduced, lo r whlc,h the chifdren· obtain the Istrictly del/ned value HI.= i n y j J { ~ . where y is the gravitational !constant and IllS the average mass density in the Un iverse.

1NOTE. On the 5 March 1996 I submitted io NATURE my paperAFTER 500 YEARS COLUMBUS-EGG-PROBLEM HAS FINALLY

·.;;,. ~ E E N SOLVED, ·In which I show how a body can' be maintained· In an UNSTABLE equilibrium (problem which. contrary to the

general opinion, Columbus. has NOT solved). My "Marinov egg"Is supported by magnetic lorces. lf./1 has-SPHERICAL form . it has

· . · three degrees ol freedom (the Euler angles) free and represents I· · moreover a PERPETUUM MOBILE. II before the !·May the P"per !·. · w/11 not appear IQ the scientific columns ofNATURE, 1shall pvbtish it I

. as a paid advertisement. In the lirst (or o n d ) case 15 da ys aller

.:.· the 'pub/lest/on I shall present my SIBERIAN COLIU perpetuvm.· ·mobile at a p.ress conference. ·..

• 'I ' • '

".. .,. . . . Stefan Marinov

!'Aorellenleldgasse 16, A-8010 Graz.. . ' . .

..

' .: · R f ; A D E R ~ 9 U ~ ~ ~ ~ ? _

· ;· · .• ....... ... :· : .. · . :'4" . · · · ·· •· ·· . .. •'