1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

  • Upload
    sbsnews

  • View
    222

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    1/31

    CABINETIN O

    FIDEN E

    44

    opy No

    C A B I N E T M I N U T E

    Canberra, 26 Ju ly

    1988

    No. 11487

    Submission

    No.

    5890

    and Minute

    Higher Education

    Pol icy Statement

    No.

    11354

    (SA)

    The

    Cabinet agreed tha t

    : -

    (a)

    the

    Pol icy

    Statement

    on Higher

    Educat ion be

    endorsed and

    re leased;

    (b) the f u l l

    fee

    overseas s tudent guide l ines be

    amended to permit

    i n s t i t u t i o n s

    to

    r e t a in the

    f u l l

    cap i t a l

    element

    o f

    fees to

    be

    appl ied

    to

    cap i t a l works a t the

    i ns t i tu t ion ;

    and

    (c)

    the Austra l ian Nat iona l

    Univers i ty

    Canberra

    College

    o f Advanced Educat ion and

    Canberra

    I n s t i t u t e

    of

    the Arts be

    consol ida ted to

    form a

    s ing le i n s t i t u t i on and

    t ha t

    the

    Government s

    i n t en t i on be conveyed

    to

    the

    th ree

    i n s t i t u t i o n s

    by the Minis ter for Employment, Educat ion

    and

    Train ing

    fo l lowing publ ic r e l ease o f

    the

    Pol icy

    Statement

    on Higher Educat ion.

    . . /2

    This

    docu

    me

    nt is t he

    prope rty

    of t he

    u

    stralian Governm ent a

    nd

    is

    no

    t

    to

    be copied

    or

    re pro

    du

    ced

    CABINET IN CONFIDENCE

    [1]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    2/31

    CABIN E IN CON

    Fl DENCE

    2.

    No. 11487

    (Cont d )

    2.

    The

    Cabinet

    noted

    : -

    a )

    t h a t the

    Minis ter

    for Employment, Educat ion and

    Train ing

    w i l l bring forward a r e l a t e d Submission

    on

    resources

    for

    higher

    educa t ion

    fo r the

    1989-91 t r iennium;

    (b)

    the

    outcome

    of d i scuss ions between

    the Minis ter

    for Employment, Educat ion and Train ing , the

    Min is te r

    fo r Arts and Ter r i to r ie s , and

    the

    Min is te r

    for Defence Science and Personnel

    on

    fu tu re arrangements

    for

    higher educat ion in t he

    ACT;

    c ) t h a t the

    Aus t ra l i an Defence Force

    Academy would

    be

    inc luded

    in

    new arrangements for

    Aust ra l i an

    Research Council ARC)

    grant s ,

    which

    would

    requi re the

    t r a n s f e r

    from the Defence por t fo l io

    to

    the

    increased

    RC re sea rch funds pool of

    t he

    same

    proport ional cu t

    in

    funding

    as

    othe r

    in s t i tu t ions ;

    (d) tha t the Pol icy Statement

    would

    be

    amended

    to

    c l a r i fy t ha t

    sa l a ry f l e x i b i l i t y

    chap te r

    10 o f

    the

    Pol icy

    Statement re fe r s )

    wi l l have

    only

    l imi ted appl ica t ion ;

    . . .

    /3

    This

    document

    is

    the

    property of

    the

    ustralian Government and is not to

    e

    copied

    or reproduced

    CABIN ET 1

    N CON

    Fl

    DENCE

    [2]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    3/31

    CABINET

    IN CON

    Fl

    DENCE

    3.

    No. 11487 (Cont d)

    (e)

    t ha t

    re fe rence to

    the

    s ta tu to ry

    obl iga t ions

    of

    h igher

    educat ion

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    under

    the

    Aff i rmat ive Action

    Act

    1986

    would be

    included

    in

    the Pol icy

    Statement;

    ( f )

    t ha t of f i c i a l s

    from

    the

    Departments of Finance

    and Employment, Educat ion and Train ing would

    discuss Finance concerns i n r e l a t i on to

    measurement

    of

    unmet demand and s e l f -

    accred i ta t ion of courses , with the

    f ina l

    form

    of

    the

    re levant

    sec t ions

    of the

    Pol icy Statement to

    be s e t t l ed

    by

    the Minis te r for Employment,

    Educat ion

    and Train ing;

    (g)

    t ha t

    re ference

    t o ch i ld ca re provis ion in

    Chapter o f the

    Pol icy Statement be

    amended to

    r e f e r

    to

    the

    provis ion

    of addi t iona l

    places in

    off-campus chi ld ca re se rv i ces for

    needy

    s tudent s ;

    and

    (h) the des i rab i l i t y of encouraging a

    grea t e r

    consciousness

    among

    both

    ind iv idua l s

    and

    indus t ry

    in re la t ion

    to

    p r iva t e endowments

    for

    higher educat ion

    i n s t i t u t i ons .

    (This va r i e s Minute

    No.

    11354 (SA)

    of

    13

    Ju ly

    1988.)

    Secre ta ry to

    Cabinet

    This document is the property of the ustralian

    Government

    nd is not to be copied or reproduced

    CABINET I

    CONFIDENCE

    [3]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    4/31

    CABINET IN CONFIDENCE

    Copy No

    C B I N E T M I N U T E

    St ruc tura l

    Adjustment Committee

    Canberra,

    13

    Ju ly 1988

    No.

    11354 SA)

    Submission No.

    5890

    Higher Educat ion Pol icy Statement

    2.

    The Committee

    agreed t ha t

    : -

    a ) the

    Pol icy

    Statement on Higher Educat ion be

    endorsed

    and re leased;

    and

    b)

    the

    f u l l

    fee overseas

    s tudent

    gu ide l ine s be

    amended to permit

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    to

    r e t a i n

    the

    f u l l

    cap i t a l

    element o f

    fees

    to

    be appl ied

    to

    cap i t a l

    works a t

    the

    i n s t i t u t i on .

    a )

    The

    Committee

    noted : -

    t h a t

    t he Min i s t e r for Employment, Educat ion and

    Train ing wi l l bring

    forward a re la ted

    Submission

    on resources for

    higher educat ion

    fo r the

    1989-91 t r iennium;

    2

    This

    document is the

    property

    of the ustralian Government and is

    not

    to be copied

    or

    reproduced

    CABINET IN CONFIDENCE

    [4]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    5/31

    CABINET.

    IN C 0 N

    FIDE

    NCE

    2.

    No. 11354

    (SA)(Cont d)

    (b) the ac t ion proposed in

    respec t of

    Commonwealth

    higher educa t ion

    i n s t i t u t i ons ,

    inc luding

    a

    par t icu la r

    re ference

    in the Pol i cy Statement to

    amalgamation o f

    the

    Aus t ra l ian National

    Univers i ty ,

    the Canberra College o f Advanced

    Education and

    the

    CT

    In s t i t u t e

    o f

    Arts ,

    subjec t

    to

    discuss ions

    with

    the

    Minis te r

    fo r Arts and

    Ter r i t o r i e s ;

    c) t ha t the Aust ra l ia

    n

    Defence Force Academy would

    be included in new arrangements for Aust ra l ian

    Research Council ARC)

    grant s ,

    which

    would

    require

    the

    t r ans fe r from the Defence

    por t fo l io

    to the increased RC re sea rch

    funds

    pool

    of the

    same

    proport ional

    cut

    in

    funding as

    other

    in s t i tu t ions ;

    (d)

    tha t

    the

    Pol icy

    Statement would be amended to

    c l a r i f y

    t ha t

    sa l a ry f l e x i b i l i t y chapte r 10 o f

    the Pol icy

    Statement re fe r s )

    wi l l have only

    l imi ted appl ica t ion ;

    e )

    tha t

    reference to the

    s ta tu to ry obl iga t ions

    o f

    higher

    educat ion i n s t i t u t i ons under the

    Affirmative Action

    Act

    1986 would be inc luded in

    the Pol icy Sta tement ;

    f ) tha t of f i c i a l s from the

    Depar tments

    o f Finance

    and Employment , Educat ion

    and

    Train ing would

    discuss Finance concerns

    in

    r e l a t i o n to

    . . . /3

    This document is the property of the ustralian Government nd is not to be copied or reproduced

    CABINET I

    N CO N

    FlDEN

    CE

    [5]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    6/31

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    7/31

    CABINET

    -IN-C

    0 N

    FIDE

    NCE

    Submission

    No

    .

    FOR

    CABINET

    Copy

    No

    .

    Title

    Minister

    Purpose/Issues

    Relation to

    existing policy

    Sensitivity Criticism

    Legislation

    involved

    Jency:

    Lsl

    tical significant

    dates

    sultation:

    . M inisters/Depts

    consulted

    Is there

    agreement?

    Timing handling

    of

    announcement

    Cost

    CORRIGENDUM TO HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY

    STATEMENT

    The

    Bon.

    J S Dawkins

    MP

    Minister

    for

    Employment

    Education

    and

    Training

    12

    July

    988

    add following new page 24 Attachment B.

    Fin

    Yr

    Fin Yr Fin

    Yr

    his document is the property o the

    ustralian

    Government and is not to

    be copied

    or reproduced

    CABINET

    -IN-CO

    NFIDEN E

    I

    [7]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    8/31

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    9/31

    Title

    Minister

    Relation

    to

    existing

    policy

    Sensitivity Criticism

    Legislation

    involved

    Urgency:

    Critical/significant

    dates

    Consultation:

    Ministers/Depts

    consulted

    s

    there

    agre-ement?

    Timing/handling of

    announcement

    Cost

    CABINET IN C

    N

    FIDE

    NCE

    Submission

    No

    .

    5 ~ 1 0

    FOR

    C BINET

    Copy No.

    HIGHER

    EDUCATION

    POLICY

    STATEMENT

    The Hon. J .S. Dawkins

    P

    Minister

    for

    Employment

    Education

    and

    Training

    To obtain

    Cabinet approval

    for the release

    of

    a

    Policy Statement

    on Higher

    Education.

    The

    release of nHigher Education:

    A

    Policy

    Discussion Papern

    as

    the basis for

    consultation

    and

    development

    of

    t is

    Policy Statement

    was

    agreed

    to by

    Cabinet

    on 8 December 1987 CD No.

    10571).

    Respondents in

    the Policy

    Discussion Paper

    supported the

    broad

    directions of the

    Governmen t s approach.

    See paragraphs

    2-5.

    N/A

    The

    Policy

    Discussion Paper announced the release

    of the Policy Statement

    by mid

    1988.

    Finance;

    Prime Minister

    and Cabinet;

    Treasury;

    Industry, Technology and

    Commerce;

    Industr ial

    Relations; Primary Industry and Energy;

    Arts,

    Sport,

    the Environment, Tourism and

    Terri tor ies;

    Defence;

    Australian Science

    and

    Technology

    Council;

    Community Services

    and

    Health;

    Affirmative

    Action

    Agency;

    Immigration, Local

    Government and Ethnic

    Affairs .

    No.

    See

    paragraph

    15

    and

    Attachment

    B

    Policy Statement

    to be released in week

    beginning

    25

    July 1988

    Fin

    Yr

    Fin

    Yr

    Fin

    Yr

    Nil

    This

    document

    is

    the

    property o

    the

    ustralian

    Government and

    is

    not

    to be copied

    or reproduced

    CABINET

    IN C

    NF DENCE

    [9]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    10/31

    C BINET IN CONFIDE CE

    2.

    B CKGROUND

    The Pol i c y Statement de t a i l s the

    pr inc ip l e s

    underly ing t he

    Government s plans fo r reform in higher educa t ion . Copies

    have been lodged with

    the

    Cabinet Office and a re ava i l ab le

    to Minis te r s on reques t . summary of the Pol icy Sta tement

    i s a t Attachment A.

    Some

    minor dra f t ing changes s ince

    lodgement may be necessa ry

    and

    w i l l be

    author i sed

    by me.

    ISSUES FOR CONSIDER TION

    2. The Pol i c y

    Discuss ion

    Paper, re leased in December 1987,

    a t t r ac t ed

    over

    600 submissions and

    responses

    from

    i n s t i t u t i o n s

    academics,

    Sta t e governments , pro fess i ona l

    bodies and

    unions .

    There

    was s t rong support for

    the

    Government s proposals for growth and

    equi ty .

    Some

    respondents

    argued

    fo r

    these ob jec t ives

    to

    be s t rengthened

    fu r the r .

    3 . Where c r i t i c i s m occurred t re f l ec ted a percept ion

    t h a t

    the Government was over ly

    concerned

    with narrow

    economic goals a t

    the

    expense of t r ad i t i ona l

    scholarsh ip

    o r

    t he a r t s and

    humani t ies ;

    disagreement on p r i o r i t i e s ; some

    ques t ioning

    whether the

    means

    proposed

    would

    achieve

    agreed

    goal s .

    4 .

    The

    dra f t

    Statement

    dea ls

    with

    these

    concerns

    by

    ou t l in ing

    a coherent

    soc ia l and

    educa t iona l

    phi losophy

    for

    the

    Governm ent s ac t ions .

    This

    framework emphasises the

    cont r ibu t ioL

    of

    a l l d isc ip l ine s

    to

    the development of

    a

    more s k i l l ed popula t ion and i den t i f i e s soc ia l

    and

    cu l t u r a l

    goa ls as wel l as those

    which

    r e l a t e d i r e c t l y

    to economic

    development and s t r uc t u r a l adjustment .

    C BINET IN CONFIDE

    E

    [10]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    11/31

    C BINET INCO FIDE CE

    3.

    5 .

    In

    t he a rea s of

    c re d i t

    t r ans fe r , i n s t i t u t io n a l

    conso l ida t ions

    and

    ex te rna l s tud ies , consu l ta t ions were

    he ld with the Aust ra l ian

    Vice-Chance l lors

    Committee AVCC>,

    t he

    A us t ra l i an Committee of Direc tors and

    Pr inc ip l e s

    in

    Advanced Educat ion ACDP>, academic

    unions , the

    CTU and

    peak employer bodies .

    In

    each

    case , the di rec t ions taken

    in t he d ra f t Sta tement were agreed to be t he most

    app rop r i a t e

    ava i lab le

    and suppor ted by a l l groups on t h a t

    bas i s . The s t a f f i n g reforms proposed in the Po l icy

    Discussion Paper

    were

    l a rge ly implemented as p a r t of the

    second

    t i e r

    agreement fo r academic s t a f f .

    6. The d r a f t Statement dea ls with t he

    i s sues

    of growth and

    funding only in broad

    te rms.

    The proposals of

    t he Wran

    Committee on Higher Educat ion Funding and other funding

    opt ions

    w i l l

    be

    the sub jec t of a sepa ra t e Submission

    with

    t he Government s

    i n t en t i ons

    fo r the 1989-91 t r i enn ium to be

    d e a l t

    with in a plan fo r t he expansion of h igher educa t ion

    fo r r e l ease in

    the

    Budget

    context .

    The

    d ra f t

    Sta tement

    d o ~ s however, commit t he Government to a t l e a s t main ta in

    t he

    cu r r en t ,

    1988,

    funding

    base

    inc lud ing

    p ipe l i ne

    e f f e c t s

    of growth in in takes

    in

    198g and e a r l i e r years .

    7 .

    The

    Government s commitment to equ i ty i s

    s p e l t

    out in

    r e l a t i o n

    to the oppor tun i t i e s growth wi l l presen t fo r a

    broader range of

    Aust ra l ians

    to share

    in

    t he benef i t s

    of

    h ighe r

    educa t ion .

    As

    wel l

    as

    f i na nc i a l l y

    disadvantaged

    groups ,

    Abor ig ina ls ,

    women

    and migrant

    groups

    inc lud ing

    inadequate recogni t ion of overseas q u a l i f i c a t i o n s ) , the

    need to improve t he low

    l eve l s of

    par t i c ipa t ion by people

    from ru ra l areas i s acknowledged. National equ i ty

    ob jec t ives

    w i l l be publ ished

    as

    a

    guide

    to i n s t i t u t i o n s and

    t he scope of cur ren t equ i ty programs inc reased .

    C BINET

    N

    CONFIDENCE

    [11]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    12/31

    C BINET

    N CONFIDENCE

    4.

    8 . Support fo r growth w i l l be d i r ec t ed

    to

    those

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    which

    choose

    to jo in

    the

    new

    uni f ied na t iona l

    system. As

    p a r t

    of t h e i r app l i ca t i on to

    j o in ,

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    w i l l need

    to

    make commitments on c r ed i t t r ans f e r ,

    management, a common academic year and s t a f f i ng .

    I n s t i t u t i ons w i l l

    need

    a sus ta inable s tudent load of a t

    l e a s t 2000 Equiva lent

    Ful l - t ime

    Student Uni t s

    funded for

    course

    development .

    Other

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    w i l l be funded a t a reduced r a t e

    to

    o f f e r DEC courses .

    11.

    The d r a f t Statement supports the

    d i r ec t ions

    s e t out in

    the Pol icy

    Discuss ion

    Paper

    on

    the equa l i s a t ion

    of

    the

    base

    l e v e l

    of funding of i n s t i t u t i ons , r o l l i ng t r i enn i a and the

    es tab l i shment of J o in t Planning

    Committees with

    t he

    Sta t e s

    to which Sta te Education Minis te r s have

    agreed.

    C BINET

    CONFIDENCE

    [12]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    13/31

    C BINET N CONFIDENCE

    s.

    12. The

    Statement

    ou t l ines measures to i nc rease t he

    f l e x i b i l i t y i n s t i t u t i ons

    have

    in

    managing t he i r

    resources .

    n important i s sue i s

    the

    requirement under

    the

    f u l l

    fee

    overseas

    s tudent

    guide l ines

    to

    remi t from 1989,

    a

    propor t ion of the c a p i t a l element of fees to t he

    Commonwealth fo r r e d i s t r i b u t i o n for major cap i t a l works .

    Allowing i n s t i t u t i ons

    to

    r e t a i n

    these

    resources

    would

    provide

    an

    i ncen t i ve

    to

    expand fu l l

    fee

    opera t ions . I

    propose

    to

    amend t he guide l ines

    to

    enable

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    to

    app ly

    these

    funds

    to

    major

    c a p i t a l

    works

    pro jec t s .

    There

    i s no budgetary impact from

    t h i s

    proposal as any funds

    remi t t ed

    to

    the

    Government from 1989 would have been

    re turned

    to

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    for c a p i t a l works.

    13.

    The Comm onwealth s t r ea tment of ts own

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    must be cons i s t en t with the c o ~ s o l i d t i o n pr inc ip le s in the

    Sta tement . The

    Statement announces

    t ha t the Government

    w i l l

    examine i n s t i t u t i ona l arrangements in t he

    ACT.

    This

    examinat ion w i l l be under taken j o i n t l y with

    the Mini s t e r

    fo r

    T er r i t o r i e s . I

    have a l ready

    rece ived a

    review

    of the

    Aus t ra l i an Marit ime

    College which ra i s e s

    ts incorpora t ion

    i n t o

    one i n s t i t u t i o n in Tasmania.

    I w i l l

    r e l ea se t h i s

    repo r t

    shor t ly .

    FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

    14. The re source

    requirements

    of t he higher educa t ion

    sec to r

    fo r

    the 1989-91

    t r iennium i s

    t he sub j ec t

    o f

    a

    sepe ra t e Submission.

    CO ORDINATION

    15.

    All

    Departments support

    the

    broad t h r us t of t he

    submiss ion .

    A

    number,

    however, have

    made

    comments

    on

    s p e c i f i c

    i s sues . These

    a re de ta i l ed

    a t

    Attachment

    B.

    C BINET IN

    CO FIDENCE

    [13]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    14/31

    C BINET

    N

    CONFIDENCE

    6.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    16.

    recommend t ha t Cabinet :

    a)

    agree

    to the Pol icy Statement

    on

    Higher

    Education and i t s re lease ;

    b> note t ha t the Mini s t e r for Employment,

    Education

    and Train ing wi l l br ing forward a

    r e l a t ed

    submission

    on

    resources

    for

    higher

    education

    for

    the

    1989-91

    t r iennium.

    C ) agree to amend the fu l l

    fee

    overseas s tudent

    guide l ines to permit i n s t i t u t i ons to r e t a in

    the fu l l

    cap i t a l element

    of

    fees to be

    appl ied to cap i t a l works a t the i n s t i t u t i on ;

    and

    d> note the

    ac t ion

    proposed in

    respec t

    of

    Commonwealth

    higher

    education i n s t i t u t i ons .

    11

    Ju ly

    1988

    J S Dawkins

    C BINET

    N CONFIDENCE

    [14]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    15/31

    C BINET

    IN

    CO FIDENCE

    7 .

    TT CHMENT A

    HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY ST TEMENT SUMM RY

    Background

    This Pol i c y Sta tement se t s out t he

    pr inc ip l e s

    t ha t the

    Government w i l l adopt fo r the

    long- te rm development

    of

    A us t r a l i a s

    h igher

    educat ion system. t

    i s an i n t e g ra l p a r t

    of

    t he Government s

    wider agenda

    fo r growth

    and

    q u a l i t y a t

    a l l

    l eve l s

    o f

    our

    educat ion

    and

    t r a in ing system. As

    a

    s t ra tegy

    for

    the fu tu re , it

    must be

    viewed

    aga i ns t

    a background

    of broad

    community support fo r t he ob j ec t i ves ou t l i ned in Higher

    Educat ion:

    A

    Pol ic

    y

    Discuss ion Pa

    p

    e r , ( the Pol icy Discuss ion

    Paper>,

    r e l eased

    fo r publ ic

    comment

    in December 1988. In

    pa r t i cu l a r , t he re was s t rong support fo r

    the

    Governm ent s

    goals

    o f

    s ig n i f i c a n t

    growth in the system

    and a

    broadening o f access

    t o higher educat ion

    by a

    much

    wide.r

    range of Aus t ra l ians t han

    has

    been

    the case to da t e .

    2. The fu t u re d i r ec t ions s e t out in the Statement were

    developed in

    the

    context of

    a

    coherent

    soc ia l and

    educa t iona l

    phi losophy. Our higher educat ion i n s t i t u t i o n s cannot be

    i s o l a t e d from

    the

    major changes occur r ing in

    Aust ra l i an

    soc ie ty

    and

    the

    economy. They a re prime agents in t he process of

    change, both th rough t h e i r teaching a c t i v i t i e s and th rough t h e i r

    con t r i bu t i on

    to

    re sea rch

    and

    innovat ion .

    While i n i t i a t i n g and

    responding to

    change, the higher educat ion system must a l so

    prese rve the

    bes t

    of

    its i nhe r i t ed

    t r ad i t i ons . Freedom of

    i nqu i ry and express ion , i n t e l l e c t u a l r i g o ~ r

    a

    broad spectrum of

    teaching

    and

    research ,

    and

    the preserva t ion and

    development

    of

    our na t iona l

    cu l tu re and

    i den t i t y

    have

    a l l been nur tured wi th in

    our i n s t i t u t i ons .

    C BINET

    N

    CONFIDENCE

    [15]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    16/31

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    17/31

    C BINET

    IN CO

    IDE CE

    9 .

    ATTACHMENT

    A

    7. Unmet demand

    s

    s t i l l a

    major

    problem. The Austral ian

    Vice-Chancellors Committee and the Austral ian

    Council

    of

    Directors

    and Principles in Advanced Education

    /

    ACDP> estimate up to

    2

    qual i f ied people

    were

    unable

    to gain entry to higher education a t

    the

    s t a r t of

    the 1988

    academic year. Around half of these were school leavers.

    While

    there

    wi l l

    be a drop in demographic pressures

    from

    young people in the early 1990s

    th is

    t rend

    wil l

    be

    reversed by

    the

    end of the century. Increases in Year 12

    re tent ion ra tes

    wi l l

    continue to create addi t ional

    pressures as

    wil l

    greater demands for adul t t ra in ing and

    re t ra in ing.

    8.

    Pr io r i ty in

    the

    al locat ion

    of growth places in the

    1989-91 t r iennium wil l be

    directed

    to

    areas

    of strong

    demand

    from

    students and industry.

    These

    include

    engineering information technology business

    administra t ion

    economics and

    Asian

    studies . In

    .

    consul ta t ion

    with

    the

    Sta tes the

    Government

    has

    established

    a

    disc ip l ine

    review

    of mathematics

    and

    science

    teaching

    to improve ra tes of t ransfer to technology-based

    courses

    part icular ly

    by

    g i r l s .

    A

    review

    covering computer

    service and information technology wil l also be conducted.

    9.

    Growth

    wil l

    require subs tant ia l addit ional

    resources

    for both

    recurrent

    funding and

    to

    meet the pressing capi ta l

    needs

    of the

    system. The Government i s considering

    the

    recommendations

    of the

    Wran

    Committee

    on Higher Education

    Funding. In

    a plan

    for the expansion of higher education

    to

    be re leased a t the time of the 1988 Budget the

    Commonwealth wil l make a deta i led

    statement on growth in

    higher education

    including specif ic

    growth objectives

    and

    resource

    requirements

    for

    the

    1989-91

    triennium.

    C BINET

    IN

    CONFIDENCE

    [17]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    18/31

    C BI

    1

    CO IDENCE

    10.

    TT CHMENT A

    10. Those

    groups which

    have t r ad i t i ona l l y

    not pa r t i c ipa ted

    n

    higher

    educat ion

    a re

    a

    major

    source

    of

    new demand

    fo r

    higher educat ion. The achievement of grea te r equ i t y

    and

    access s heavi ly dependent on t he oppor t un i t i e s growth

    w i l l presen t but

    9rowth by

    i t s e l f

    w i l l

    be

    i n s u f f i c i en t .

    Spec i f ic

    s t r a t eg i e s w i l l

    need to

    be

    implemented a t

    t he

    i n s t i t u t i ona l Sta t e

    and na t i ona l

    l eve l inc luding

    improved

    s t r a t eg i e s

    by

    a t

    l e a s t some schools .

    11. People

    from

    r u r a l

    and

    reg iona l Aust ra l i a a re a l so

    a

    po t en t i a l l y

    s ig n i f i c a n t source

    of growth. The t r ans f e r

    r a t e s of

    count ry school

    l eave rs

    i n to

    higher

    educat ion

    a re

    wel l

    below

    those of t h e i r metropol i tan counterpar t s . The i r

    needs

    and the s k i l l needs of the

    primary

    indus t ry sec to r

    were

    t aken

    in to

    account

    n

    developing the Statement and

    a

    fu r t h e r

    s ta tement

    on educat ion

    and

    t r a in ing fo r

    r u r a l

    and

    r eg i ona l

    Aus t r a l i a w i l l be

    re leased

    ~ t e r

    t h i s

    year .

    Unif ied Nat ional

    System

    12.

    Support for growth and reform n higher

    educat ion

    w i l l

    be based on the

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    t ha t jo in the un i f i ed na t iona l

    system of h ighe r educa t ion . Many

    ex i s t ing cons t r a in t s

    on

    i n s t i t u t i o n s

    w i l l be dispensed

    with . I n s t i t u t i ons n the

    un i f i ed na t iona l system wil l e s tab l i sh t he i r

    own

    p r i o r i t i e s

    and

    areas of exce l l ence

    acc red i t t h e i r

    own

    courses

    develop

    a

    broader base of funding suppor t and in t roduce

    more f l ex ib le

    s t a f f i ng

    ar rangements . Unnecessary

    r e s t r i c t i o n s

    w i l l

    be

    l i f t e d n

    areas such

    as course

    approva l sa la ry de te rmina t ion and

    the

    l e g i s l a t i ve

    c o n ~ i t i o n s a t t ach i ng

    to

    the

    use of Commonwealth gran ts .

    The

    Government

    w i l l ensure t h a t

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    are f ree to

    manage

    t h e i r

    own

    re sources whi le a t

    the same

    t ime

    remaining

    accountable

    fo r

    t h e i r

    dec is ions

    and

    ac t ions .

    C BINET

    N

    CONFIDENCE

    [18]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    19/31

    C BINE

    IN CONFIDENCE

    11.

    ATTACHMENT

    A

    13. The uni f ied na t iona l system

    w i l l

    need to develop

    s t rong l i nks

    with

    t he

    schools ,

    TAFE

    i ndus t ry

    t r a i n in g

    and

    r ecu r ren t educat ion systems.

    The ro le of

    TAFE

    in expanding

    higher

    educat ion

    oppor tunt ie s w i l l be

    t aken up with

    t he

    S ta t e s .

    14. To j o in ,

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    w i l l be

    requi red to have

    a

    minimum

    sus ta inable s tudent

    load

    of

    2000 EFTSU

    and

    wi l l -

    need

    to make a

    formal app l i ca t i on

    i nd ica t ing t h e i r

    commitment

    to

    reform

    in a

    number of importan t areas

    inc luding equi ty , c r ed i t t r ans f e r ,

    a common

    academic year

    and

    s t a f f i ng ,

    and i

    they

    share adjacent

    s i t e s ,

    to combine

    under a s ing le

    management s t ruc tu re . The i n i t i a l

    agreement

    on c r ed i t t r ans f e r , w i ll commit i n s t i t u t i ons to guide l ines

    designed to

    a s s i s t

    s tudents

    to

    rece ive

    the maximum c r ed i t

    fo r work

    under taken e lsewhere

    and to overcome t he ad hoc

    and was te fu l na ture of

    u r r e ~ t

    arrangements .

    15. Each i n s t i t u t i o n w i l l develop

    an

    educa t iona l pr o f i l e

    to

    def i ne i t s . b ro a d mission , and i d e n t i fy its s t rengths and

    p r i o r i t i e s .

    Agreement on

    the pr o f i l e w i l l be

    negot i a ted

    w i th the Commonwealth and provide t he bas i s for t he

    assessment

    of resources needed

    by

    the i n s t i t u t i o n , and for

    subsequent assessment

    of

    performance

    aga i ns t

    its agreed

    ob jec t ives . The

    pr o f i l e developed by an i n s t i t u t i o n w i l l

    be

    based on

    and i n t e g ra l

    t o ,

    i t s own

    planning processes .

    16.

    An educa t iona l pr o f i l e

    w i l l conta in s ix

    heads of

    agreement . These

    a re

    a

    descr ip t ion of the

    i n s t i t u t i o n s

    miss ion

    and objec t ives ; its proposed teaching

    a c t i v i t i e s

    inc luding commencements and

    complet ions ; a

    research

    management plan;

    a s ta tement

    o f i n t en t

    on

    nat iona l

    p r i o r i t i e s

    inc luding equi ty ; de t a i l s of o t he r s ign i f i can t

    a c t i v i t i e s ;

    and approved funding l eve l s .

    CABINET I CONFIDE CE

    [19]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    20/31

    C BINET

    N CONFIDENCE

    12.

    TT CHMENT

    A

    In s t i t u t i ona l St ruc t u res

    17. The Government

    i s

    committed to

    t he ob j ec t i ve o f

    fewer

    l a rg e r

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    which o f f e r s i g n i f i c a n t

    educa t iona l

    advantages

    inc luding a grea te r range of course offe r ings to

    s tudents . The minimum s i z e fo r pa r t i c ipa t ion in the

    un i f i ed

    na t iona l

    system w i l l

    be 2000

    EFTSU. While t he re

    w i l l always

    be a

    d i ve r s i t y of i n s t i t u t i ons the

    Government

    w i l l encourage those

    i n s t i t u t i ons

    with a

    s tudent

    load in

    t he

    2000-5000

    EFTSU range

    to

    give

    ser ious cons idera t ion to

    t h e i r fu t u re

    as independent

    i n s t i t u t i ons . I n s t i t u t i ons i n

    t h i s

    ca tegory

    cannot

    e f f i c i e n t l y

    support a comprehensive

    t eaching and re sea rch

    program

    spread ac ross a broad

    range

    o f d i f f e r en t academic f i e lds . These d i f f i c u l t i e s ~ r e

    s ubs t an t i a l l y reduced as an i n s t i t u t i o n grows

    beyond

    the

    l eve l of 5000

    EFTSU. At around

    8000

    EFTSU, t he re

    i s t he

    bas i s to provide a

    wide range

    of t eaching

    programs

    whi le

    mainta ining

    a

    comprehensive

    re sea rch

    i n f r a s t ru c tu r e .

    18:

    A v a r i e ty

    of consol ida t ion models w i l l

    be

    poss ib le .

    For

    reg iona l i n s t i t u t i ons in pa r t i cu l a r the

    form

    of

    consol ida t ion adopted

    should

    be

    appropr ia te

    to

    t he

    ci rcumstances of the region concerned. The Government w i l l

    not

    support any proposals which

    would

    diminish prov i s ion o r

    access i n r u r a l a reas and there w i l l be no campus

    c losures .

    19. The cos t

    of

    developing and de l ive r ing ex te rna l courses

    i s

    l e s s

    per s tudent

    than on

    campus

    provided economies

    of

    sca l e

    a re

    a t t a ined .

    Ins t i tu t ions wi l l

    be i nv i t ed to

    t ender

    to

    become

    one of

    around s ix Distance Educat ion Centres

    DECs>

    funded for course

    development .

    ~ h e r i n s t i t u t i ons

    w i l l be funded a t a reduced r a t e

    to

    of f e r DEC courses .

    C BINET

    N

    CONFIDENCE

    [20]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    21/31

    .

    C BINET IN CONFIDENCE

    13.

    ATTACHMENT A

    Equity Strategies

    20. The Commonwealth s aim ~ to ensure tha t

    equity

    objectives

    become

    an

    integral

    part

    of higher education

    management,

    planning and

    review.

    nst i tu t ions wi l l be

    asked to specify

    appropriate equity

    goals , s t ra tegies

    and

    measures of performance to meet both

    nat ional

    and regional

    needs

    within

    the i r

    educational

    profi le

    statements.

    The

    Government

    wil l

    develop

    national

    equi ty

    objectives

    as a

    guide to ins t i tu t ions and future funding allocations wil l

    have di rec t regard to

    the

    progress made by ins t i tu t ions

    towards

    the achievement of

    agreed goals.

    21. Some work has

    already

    commenced in th i s

    area.

    A Task

    Force has been

    establ ished

    to develop a National Aboriginal

    Education

    Policy,

    which

    wil l

    provide

    a

    framework

    for

    improving

    the

    par t ic ipa t ion of Aboriginal

    people

    in higher

    education.

    A

    draf t National Policy

    and

    Plan of Action for

    Women

    wi l l

    form a

    basis for

    the development of nat ional

    objectives

    for women in higher education.

    22. The

    Government

    wil l continue to support specif ic

    equity

    programs which

    encourage

    innovation and

    the

    applicat ion of

    proven approaches

    towards

    achieving

    equity

    goals.

    The

    scope

    of the

    Higher

    Education Equity

    Program

    wi l l

    be

    increased

    to include seeding grants . A chi ld care

    component

    wil l

    be added to buy places in

    exis t ing

    community

    based

    chi ld care services. The Aboriginal Part ic ipat ion

    ni t ia t ive

    API> and Special Course Funding under ABSTUDY

    wil l continue.

    C BINET

    IN

    CONFIDENCE

    [21]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    22/31

    C BINET

    I CO

    FIDENCE

    14.

    ATTACHMENT

    A

    Advisory

    Arrangements

    23. The Government

    wil l

    create

    a more effec t ive operat ing

    environment for ins t i tu t ions by providing

    clear national

    direct ion and co-ordinat ion. This wil l be

    based

    on an

    independent advisory structure

    and

    agreed

    consulta t ive

    arrangements

    with Sta te

    and

    Terr i tory

    Governments.

    24. At

    the

    Commonwealth level

    the

    National Board of

    Employment

    Education

    and

    Training

    NBEET>,

    i t s

    Higher

    Education

    Council

    HEC>

    and the

    Austral ian

    Research

    Council

    have been establ ished

    to

    provide advice on nat ional

    higher

    education

    object ives

    and

    pr io r i t i e s

    and

    general

    resource

    al locat ion

    issues .

    To

    ensure

    col laborat ion

    between the Commonwealth and

    the States

    in general

    higher

    education planning a system of Joint Planning Committees

    wil l .be

    establ ished

    to co-ordinate advice on Sta te

    and

    regional

    higher education

    needs.

    Resources.

    25. The

    resource

    a l loca t ion

    processes detai led in the

    Statement wi l l provide ins t i tu t ions with greater

    f l ex ib i l i t y in resource al locat ion

    and

    a secure basis for

    ins t i tu t iona l planning. Current dis tor t ions in

    the

    base

    funding of ins t i tu t ions wil l be removed

    and

    future

    funding

    arrangements

    wil l be developed to take account of a range

    of

    output qual i ty and performance

    measures.

    The

    Commonwealth

    wil l

    no longer intervene in detai led resource

    issues

    such as

    the

    al locat ion of minor

    works

    equipment and

    special

    research

    grants .

    Ins t i tu t ions

    wil l

    be

    al located

    a

    s ingle operat ing

    grant

    and

    be

    free

    to

    determine

    the

    most

    e f f i c ien t dis t r ibut ion

    of

    funds among the i r ac t iv i t i e s .

    C BINET

    N

    CONFIDENCE

    [22]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    23/31

    C BINET N

    CONFIDENCE

    15.

    TT CHMENT A

    26.

    The

    int roduct ion of

    guaranteed t r i enn ia l

    funding for

    ins t i tu t ions

    on

    a

    ro l l ing

    basis

    wil l

    provide

    the

    system

    with

    unprecedented sure ty of funding against which to

    plan. A

    reserve fund of per cent of to ta l operat ing

    grants wil l

    be

    se t aside

    and

    al located

    on

    a

    competit ive

    basis to areas of nat ional pr io r i ty .

    27. Further

    growth in

    student numbers

    can only be

    achieved

    by a subs tant ia l increase in

    the

    provision

    of

    capi ta l .

    Capital

    funds

    wil l

    continue

    to

    be

    di rec ted

    to

    pr io r i ty

    locat ions and the i r al loca t ion wil l take account of the

    need both

    to

    accommodate

    growth

    including provision of

    student res idences and to refurbish exis t ing f ac i l i t i e s .

    Research and

    Post

    g

    raduate Education

    28.

    The higher

    education

    system provides

    the major par t

    of

    A ust ra l ia s

    research

    ef for t

    and

    th is

    function

    wil l

    continue

    to

    be supported

    and

    strengthened. Basic research

    wi l l

    continue to be fos tered across the en t i re

    range

    of academic

    f ie lds but the appl ica t ion of research findings

    for

    di rec t

    soc ia l or economic benef i t

    must

    be increased. The RC wi l l

    make

    recommendations on

    nat ional research pr io r i t i e s ,

    co-ordinat ion of research

    pol icy

    the development and

    funding requirements of research

    support

    schemes research

    t ra in ing

    and measures

    to

    improve

    in terac t ions in

    research

    between

    the public

    and

    priva te sec tors .

    29. Most research funding wil l

    continue

    to

    be

    provided in

    the operat ing grants of

    ins t i tu t ions . In

    the long term

    performance

    wi l l be taken

    in to considerat ion

    in

    adjust ing

    research funds. The

    Government

    wil l ,

    however continue

    to

    rea l loca te funds from univers i ty operat ing grants to the

    RC

    for

    competit ive

    al loca t ion.

    C BINET

    N

    CONFIDENCE

    [23]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    24/31

    C BINET

    N CONFIDENCE

    16.

    ATTACHMENT

    30.

    The

    Government

    wil l ask the HEC and

    the

    ARC through

    NBEET to conduct

    a

    review of research

    based

    postgraduate

    s tudies .

    The

    findings of

    the review

    wil l provide

    guidance

    about

    the

    s t ruc ture spread and qual i ty

    of

    courses.

    The

    Government has

    also asked the ARC to advise

    on future

    arrangements for the

    Commonwealth Postgraduate ward

    Program. In the

    interim,

    the Government

    wil l

    index

    the

    st ipend

    payable

    and

    increase t by a fur ther 10 per cent in

    rea l terms.

    Ins t i tu t iona l Management and Staff ing

    31.

    Improving ins t i tu t iona l management

    p ~ c t i c e s

    and

    s ta f f ing polic ies wil l

    be

    v i ta l in the development of an

    expanded

    and

    more

    effect ive higher education system. The

    Government

    wi l l not dicta te

    ins t i tu t iona l management

    s t ruc tures

    ( the

    l eg i s la t ive responsib i l i ty

    rests

    with the

    States

    and

    Terr i tor ies>,

    but

    wil l

    ass i s t

    ins t i tu t ions

    to

    review

    the i r management

    structures to ensure

    tha t

    i t s

    goals

    are met.

    32.

    The Government s object ives

    for ins t i tu t iona l s taff ing

    pol icy aim to allow a s igni f icant

    degree

    of

    f lex ib i l i ty

    in

    the use

    of s t a f f

    resources across the higher

    education

    system

    and provide an

    environment

    in which individual

    excellence

    can

    be

    recognised

    and

    rewarded.

    The s taff ing

    reform principles proposed in the Policy Discussion

    Paper

    were designed to meet these object ives. In large par t

    they were accepted

    by

    the

    employers

    and

    academic ~ n i o n s as

    the basis for the recent

    academic

    second

    t i e r

    wage

    increase.

    C BINET N CONFIDENCE

    [24]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    25/31

    C BINET N CONFIDENCE

    17.

    ATTACHMENT

    B

    CO-ORDINATION COMMENTS

    The

    Department

    of Defence s t rongly supports the

    overa l l

    thrus t of the submission. The

    emphasis

    on

    external s tudies

    and

    on cred i t

    t ransfer between

    ins t i tu t ions

    wi l l be of

    grea t benef i t to

    Service

    personnel and ~ h e i r families who

    are now disadvantaged in the i r effor ts

    to

    undertake

    t e r t i a ry studies

    by the i r mobility.

    2. ADFA. The paper s ta tes tha t

    ARC grants

    to

    researchers

    a t ADFA wil l continue on condition tha t ADFA contr ibute

    to

    the process of

    rea l loca t ion

    of

    resources .

    This i s

    understood to mean tha t ADFA wil l suffer the same

    proport ional cut

    in

    funding

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    26/31

    C BINET

    N CONFIDENCE

    18.

    TT CHMENT

    4.

    The Department

    of Community Services

    and

    Health

    supports

    the

    Submission s proposals

    for

    growth and

    equi ty,

    in par t icular ,

    the recognit ion that

    barr ie rs to

    the fu l l

    and equal par t ic ipa t ion of disadvantaged groups

    in higher

    education and in

    subsequent employment represent

    a major

    source of s t ruc tura l r ig id i ty

    and

    ineffic iency. The

    Department therefore supports

    the inclusion

    of a Child Care

    -Grant component in the

    Higher

    Education

    Equity Program.

    These

    funds

    wil l enable

    the purchase

    of

    addit ional places

    in

    services

    funded

    by the Children s

    Services Program and

    ensure

    the

    access of

    cl ients

    who

    are pr ior i ty groups for

    t e r t i a ry

    ins t i tu t ions . DCSH

    agrees

    with the

    proposi t ion

    tha t child care

    i s a

    student service

    which should

    receive

    on-going

    funding

    from the general

    operat ing grants

    of

    ins t i tu t ions .

    I t

    also

    supports

    the time l imited

    and

    ta rge ted provision

    of the

    child

    care

    grant

    proposed

    to

    f ac i l i t a te the access

    ~

    students in

    less

    well provided

    for

    campuses to

    child care.

    5.

    Were

    the Minister for

    Community

    Service s and

    Health

    chi ld care

    new

    pol icy

    proposal

    for

    a

    fur ther four year

    program

    to be approved, DCSH would be in the best posi t ion

    to

    ass i s t

    ins t i tu t ions

    wishing to purchase chi ld care

    places and would

    also

    be

    in

    a posi t ion

    to negot iate jo in t

    funding arrangements

    where ins t i tu t ions

    are

    located in

    communities with a high need for

    child care. DCSH

    recognises that

    ongoing funds for

    child

    care l ike

    other

    student services would

    come

    from the

    ins t i tu t ions

    general

    grants

    ra ther than

    from spec i f ic purpose grants .

    C BINET N CONFIDENCE

    [26]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    27/31

    C BINET

    IN CONFIDENCE

    19

    TT CHMENT

    B

    6.

    The

    Department of Primary Industry

    and Energy supports

    the

    th rus t

    of

    the

    submission

    and

    notes

    tha t

    fur ther

    considerat ion

    wil l be

    given

    to providing support

    for

    disadvantaged

    groups.

    These

    in i t i a t ives should

    include

    spec i f ic

    considerat ion of

    the

    di f f icu l t ie s faced

    by rura l

    people

    in obtaining

    access to higher education.

    7.

    Finance supports the

    thrus t

    of the proposed

    Policy

    Statement,

    part icular ly

    the moves

    to

    increased

    f l ex ib i l i t y

    combined

    with increased

    accountabi l i ty for

    ef f ic iency and

    ef fec t iveness . Finance s concerns

    are essent ia l ly

    re la ted

    to points

    of emphasis

    and to

    making commitments

    ahead of

    more

    careful budget

    del iberat ions

    .

    .

    8.

    On

    points

    of emphasis:

    while

    the Ppper

    now

    has no long-term t a rge t for growth,

    Finance s t i l l considers t

    gives greater emphasis to

    growth

    than can

    current ly be substant ia ted;

    some

    recognit ion should be given

    to

    the Paper to the

    r i sk to

    qual i ty in the

    proposals

    for

    se l f accredi ta t ion

    of courses by ins t i tu t ions

    combined

    with the

    expectat ion

    tha t

    receiving

    ins t i tu t ions wi l l

    grant fu l l

    cred i t for

    studies undertaken

    elsewhere.

    This

    question

    should

    be kept under

    review;

    the

    references

    to

    amalgamation seem excessively

    prescr ipt ive and

    bureaucrat ic Finance

    suggests tha t

    moves to

    standard funding of different

    courses

    should

    place the necessary addi t ional pressure on

    ins t i tu t ions

    to amalgamate where economies of

    scale

    ex is t ;

    C BINET

    IN

    CON IDENCE

    [27]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    28/31

    CABINET IN CO FIDENCE

    20.

    ATTACHMENT

    B

    while supporting

    some

    redi rec t ion of research

    funds

    through

    ARC,

    Finance

    questions

    the

    amount

    proposed

    and also

    quest ions

    whether there i s scope for the ARC

    to

    withdraw from

    funding

    minor research

    projects

    which

    are

    ~ t t e r

    assessed

    and

    pr io r i t i sed

    within ins t i tu t ions ,

    noting

    tha t projects as

    small

    as

    5,000

    current ly receive ARC

    support .

    9.

    On

    budgetary

    matters:

    Finance would prefer

    tha t any overal l f inancial

    commitment be held

    over

    unt i l the Submission on

    Resources

    for

    1989-91,

    including

    the quest ion of

    a l te rna t ive

    funding sources i .e . the Wran Report>, has

    been

    considered in

    the budget context . I f some

    commitment

    needs to

    be addressed

    in

    the Policy

    Statement

    ahead

    of

    the

    Budget,

    Finance

    suggests

    tha t t

    be to maintain

    the 1988 rea l

    leve l

    of funding not

    including the pipeline effects , thus leaving open the

    poss ib i l i ty tha t a l l

    future

    growth be funded

    from

    other

    sources;

    Finance

    i s opposed

    to the provision

    of

    addit ional funds

    for a specif ic

    program of

    purchasing

    chi ld

    care places

    for

    needy

    students

    and

    notes

    tha t

    the quest ion

    of

    the

    Commonwealth's provision

    of chi ld

    care places

    i s under

    broader review;

    a commitment

    to increasing the

    Commowealth

    Postgraduate

    Award

    by

    10

    in rea l

    terms

    in 1989

    should not

    be

    made

    in

    the

    Policy

    Statement, but be considered in the

    Resources

    Submission.

    CABINET IN CO FIDENCE

    [28]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    29/31

    CABINET IN CONFIDENCE

    21.

    TT CHMENT B

    10. Finance

    has no objec t ion

    to

    recommendation c)

    concerning

    t he

    amendment

    of

    the guide l ines fo r

    fu l l - f e e

    paying overseas s t uden t s ,

    subjec t

    to

    i n s t i t u t i ons t ak ing

    f u l l

    r e s p o n s ib i l i t y fo r any add i t iona l cap i t a l inves tments

    needed in t h i s area .

    11. The Department of t he Prime ~ n i s t r and Cabine t

    cons ide rs t h a t , as f a r as

    t

    goes and in t h i s reqa rd

    recognis ing t he

    impor tant

    supplementat ion ro le of

    the

    Higher Education

    Development

    Plan

    the

    proposed

    Pol icy

    Sta tement embodies a sound approach

    to

    higher educat ion

    provi s ion .

    We pa r t i cu l a r l y

    applaud the

    Sta t e m e n t s

    eschewing

    of

    long- te rm

    growth

    t a rg e t s

    in

    favour

    of

    t r i e n n i a l l y determined

    growth ra te s

    based

    on

    s tudent

    demand, labour

    market requi rements and budgeta ry

    cons t ra in t s .

    12.

    The

    Department

    notes

    the i n t en t ion

    to

    develop

    na t iona l

    objec t ives in r e l a t i o n t o

    equi ty

    and

    regards

    t h i s and the

    s p e c i f i c measures

    ou t l i ned

    in

    the

    Statement as

    the

    minimum

    requi red

    to address

    the under- representa t ion of

    pa r t i cu l a r

    groups in

    higher educat ion . The Department suggests t h a t

    the Minis te r br ing forward

    in the

    f i r s t ha l f

    of 1989

    a

    Submission

    s e t t i ng out t he

    proposed

    equ i t y

    ob jec t ives .

    13. Treasury

    supports t he

    broad t h r us t of the

    po l ic ie s

    proposed in the

    White

    Paper. In r e l a t i on to some

    of

    the

    i s sues canvassed

    t he re ,

    and in the Submission, t notes the

    fo l lowing

    po in t s .

    CABINET IN CONFIDENCE

    [29]

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    30/31

  • 8/10/2019 1988-89 cabinet paper 5890

    31/31

    0

    CABINET IN CONFIDENCE

    23.

    TT CHMENT

    B

    16. As they currently

    stand,

    the

    range

    of speci f ic

    commitments

    given

    in

    the

    White

    Paper

    for

    Government

    funding

    (e .g. t r i a l / p i l o t programs for

    longer academic

    years and

    summer terms, equi ty programs and ear ly re t i rement

    packages> may ra ise the _expectat ion of addi t ional

    expenditure

    on

    higher education. While t i s s ta ted tha t

    funding for some programs wi l l be met

    from

    sources such as

    the proposed

    Reserve Fund , a c lear statement

    should

    be

    made to the

    ef fec t

    tha t

    a l l speci f ic

    commitments wil l be

    funded

    from

    within

    exis t ing

    overal l

    resources

    levels .

    I f

    the speci f ic commitments in the Paper do enta i l a

    net

    cos t

    the references to

    them

    should

    be

    deleted and they

    should

    be

    brought forward

    in

    the new policy context .

    17. To the

    extent

    tha t the proposal

    for

    ro l l ing t r i enn ia l

    arrangements and the annual l egis la t ion

    of update

    t r iennium

    grants

    resul ts in

    locking

    in future levels

    of

    funding

    th i s

    wi l l

    fur ther

    const rain

    already

    l imi ted

    budgetary

    f l ex ib i l i t y

    and they

    are

    not supported.

    18.

    Final ly , i f the proposed

    addi t ional

    funding

    to

    chi ld

    care i s to be target ted

    to

    achieve the maximum ef fec t in

    terms of the Commonwealth's

    pr ior i ty groups, th is would

    be

    best done by providing funding to individuals , not

    ins t i tu t ions .

    [31]