Upload
thai-rebelguy
View
196
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
12th JASIC
Asia Government / Industry Meeting
Nov. 27-29, 2007 Hyatt Hotel and Casino Manila
Manila, Philippines
Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC)-
Land Transportation Office (LTO), Philippines Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization
Center (JASIC)
Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center3F, Shoei-Rokubancho Bldg., 6, Rokubancho,
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0085, JAPAN
Tel:+81-3-5216-7241, Fax:+81-3-5216-7244
The 12th JASIC ASIA
GOVERNMENT/ INDUSTRY MEETING Date: Nov. 27 - Nov. 29, 2007
Place: HYATT HOTEL AND CASINO MANILA
MANILA, PHILIPPINES
Address: 1588 Pedro Gil cor. M.H. del Pilar, Malate, Manila 1004, Philippines
Phone: +63-2-245-1234
Fax: +63-2-247-1234
E-mail: [email protected]
Hosted by
Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC)-
Land Transportation Office (LTO), Philippines
Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center (JASIC)
2nd Bulletin of Asia Government / Industry Meeting 1
The 12th JASIC Asia Government / Industry Meeting
- Accession to the 1958/1998 Agreements and improved Asian presence in WP29 - Date: Nov. 27 (Tue) 2007, 8:30-17:00 Place: Ballroom ll, Hyatt Hotel and Casino Manila
Co-chaired by: Ms. Anneli R. Lontoc, Undersecretary, Department of Transportation and Communications
Philippines Mr. Michio Miyamoto, Chairman, Asia G / I Meeting WG, International cooperation
Committee, JASIC 8:30 - 9:00 Registration of the Participants 9:00 - 9:10 Welcome Speech
Ms. Anneli R. Lontoc, Undersecretary, Department of Transportation and communications, Philippines
9:10 - 9:20 Welcome Address from Industry Mr. Vicente Mills, President, Philippine Automotive Federation Incorporated (PAFI),
Philippines 9:20 - 9:30 Opening Remark Mr. Noritoshi Horigome, Director General, JASIC
9:30 - 9:45 Keynote Speech-1 Mr. Masayuki Shima, Director, International Affairs Office, Engineering and Safety Department, Road Transport Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan 9:45 - 10:00 Keynote Speech-2
General Leandro R. Mendoza,Secretary, Department of Transportation and Communications, Philippines
1
0:00– 10:45 Coffee Break
10:45 - 11:00 Report-1: The 6th Asia Forum Mr.Hiromi Kimura, Chief, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan
11:00 - 11:45 Report-2: Industry meeting Representative, Automotive Industry (RACE meeting)
Mr.Kiminori Hyodo and Mr.Hiroya Katagiri, Automotive Parts Industry Mr. Hiroyuki Nonaka, Japan Automobile Tyre Manufacturers Association Inc. 11:45 - 12:00 Report-3: Information of ACCSQ-APWG
Mr.Soerjono, Deputy Director, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Indonesia 12:00 - 12:20 Report-4: Briefing on JASIC’s long and medium-term agenda Mr. Tadaomi Akiba, Executive Director, JASIC
1
2:20 – 14:00 Lunch
14:00 - 15:15 Round Discussion: Short Presentation and speech on the Progress of Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations and MRA by Each country
-Continued- 15:15 – 15:30 Coffee Break 15:30 - 17:00 Round Discussion: Short Presentation and speech on the Progress of
Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations and MRA by Each country
2nd Bulletin of Asia Government / Industry Meeting 2
19:00 – 21:00 Welcome reception hosted by LTO
The 12th JASIC Asia Government / Industry Meeting
- Accession to the 1958/1998 Agreements and improved Asian presence in WP29 - Date: Nov. 28(Wed) 2007, 09:00-17:20
Place: Ballroom ll, Hyatt Hotel and Casino Manila Co-chaired by: Mr. Masayuki Shima, Director, International Affairs Office, Engineering and Safety Department,
Road Transport Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan
Ms. Anneli R. Lontoc, Undersecretary, Department of Transportation and Communications Philippines
9:00 –10:00 Presentation of the latest development of international conference WP29 & GRs : Mr.Tadaomi Akiba, Executive Director and Ms.Toba, JASIC Mr.Oh Dongsoo, Senior Researcher Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute, Mr.Kahnei Charan Behera, Under Secretary, Department of Road Transport and Highways.India
10:00 - 10:30 Coffee Break 10:30 - 11:50 Report on the Expert Meetings in 2007
1. Type Approval Systems, Philippines 2. Accession to the 1958 Agreement, Indonesia 3. Accession to the 1958 Agreement, Vietnam 4. Administrative matters regarding accession to the 1958 Agreement, India 5. Noise in two and four- wheeled vehicles, Indonesia
11:50-12:00 Plan of the Expert Meetings in 2008, Mr.Kenichi Tsujimura, Director, JASIC
12:00 – 13:30 Lunch
13:30 - 16:00 Panel Discussion :
Directions to be followed by countries having signed and countries planning to accede to the 1958 Agreement toward the establishment of regulations and certification systems – 3rd Discussion of the series
Coordinator: Mr. Masayuki Shima, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan Panelists: Representative of Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, India, Japan
16:00 - 16:30 Plenary Session: Next series and Drafting of Joint Statement 16:30 - 17:00 Coffee Break 17:00 - 17:15 Adoption of Joint Statement 17:15 - 17:20 Closing Address
General Reynaldo I. Berroya, Assistant Secretary, Land Transportation and Communications, Philippines
19:00 – 21:00 Farewell Reception hosted by JASIC
2nd Bulletin of Asia Government / Industry Meeting 3
12th JASIC Asia Government / Industry Meeting
- Technical Tour - Date: November 29 (Thu) 2007
Place: Honda Cars Philippines Inc
2nd Bulletin of Asia Government / Industry Meeting 4
12th JASIC
Asia Government / Industry Meeting
- Day 1 -
Nov. 27, 2007 Hyatt Hotel and Casino
Manila, Philippines
Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC)-
Land Transportation Office (LTO), Philippines Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization
Center (JASIC)
MINUTES OF THE MEETING The 12th JASIC Asia Government / Industry Meeting – Accession to the 1958/1998 Agreements and Improved Asian Presence in WP29 9:00 – 17:20, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 Ballroom II, Hyatt Hotel and Casino Manila Mr. Michio Miyamoto, Chairman Asia G/I Meeting WG International Cooperation Committee, JASIC Honorable Anneli R. Lontoc, Co-Chair Undersecretary, Department of Transportation and Communications, Philippines OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Welcome Speech
Honorable Anneli R. Lontoc, Undersecretary for Road Transport, Department of Transportation and Communications, Philippines, formally opened the meeting. She welcomed all the representatives from the participating countries with honor and privilege of hosting The 12th JASIC Asia Government/Industry Meeting, mentioning the significance of gathering together various stakeholders both from public and private sectors to the possibility of harnessing approaches toward addressing the concerns for the international harmonization of regulations and certifications system.
2. Welcome Address from the Industry.
Welcome address from the industry was delivered by Mr. Vicente Mills, President, Philippine Automotive Federation Incorporated (PAFI). As from the automotive sector, the producers of the vehicle parts, components and services for land transport sector, they were very keenly interested in seeing how they can truly harmonize their product standards and specifications to improve the production capacities and capabilities across the regions. He mentioned that the ability to produce products that are safe and good, to meet the specifications and requirements of their customers needs harmonization of standards. It is therefore with utmost importance that this conference under the WP29 and 1958/1998 Agreements move trice to standardize and to put harmonization to the numerous standards and specifications around the world that no nations and industry can move by itself.
3. Opening Remarks
Opening remarks was delivered by Mr. Noritoshi Horigome, Director General, JASIC. As the representative of JASIC, he welcomed all the participants to The 12th JASIC Asia Government/Industry Meeting, expressing his deep gratitude to the Philippine Land Transport Office, which is jointly holding this Government/Industry Meeting with the backing of the Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and
the special support of the Philippine Government. He made mentioned that the meeting of JASIC Asia Government/Industry Meeting had been fruitful in which it was previously held 11 times since 1998 to achieve international standard harmonization and mutual recognition of approvals among Asian countries. He expressed his appreciation to those countries that joined the 1958/1998 Agreements last year namely: Malaysia 1958/1998 Agreements, Thailand 1958 Agreement and India 1998 Agreement.
This Government/Industry Meeting with the theme “Accession to the 1058/1998 Agreements and improved Asian presence in WP29” was held as part of the 4-Part Series. Mr. Horigome was grateful that many government and private sector representatives involved with automobile standards and approval in various Asian countries participated in this meeting. This does not only show a very high interest in promoting automobile standard harmonization activities and achieving mutual approval but also affirms in recognizing the importance of establishing cooperation between government and private sector, which is the objective of the Government/Industry Meetings.
4. Keynote Speech 1
Mr. Masayuki Shima, Director, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan gave keynote speech 1. He is indeed grateful that he made a keynote speech in behalf of the MLIT of Government of Japan at the timing of The 12th JASIC Asia Government/Industry Meeting in Manila in which to be the last meeting for the 4th Series of the Government/Industry meeting hosted by DOTC/LTO of the Government of the Philippines and also by JASIC. Mr. Shima outlined the regulations and the type approval system in Japan and the relationship between this system and UNECE WP29. He discussed the review of the 4th Series of Government-Industry Meetings wherein some Asian Countries have joined the 1958/1998 Agreements in which the number of countries joining gradually increased and so with the number of countries participating in WP29 also increased. Some Asian countries started to express their opinion on the information based on the situation in Asian areas like traffic concerns and social problems, regression and type approval system. Strengthening ties among Asian countries also achieved by meetings, hosted by each country to promote common understanding and to extend their views among Asian countries. He encouraged all countries participating in this meeting to make an effort to hold the participating meetings from now on. Mr. Shima also made a presentation of solutions to the problems on safety and environment protection for motor vehicles; the process of designing regulations for vehicles in Japan; the vehicle type approval system in Japan; and the advantages of WP29 activities for type approval system in Japan.
5. Keynote Speech 2
Gen. Leandro R. Mendoza, Secretary, Department of Transportation and Communications, Philippines delivered keynote speech 2. Secretary Mendoza was indeed very happy to be part of this very important gathering which bring together the
distinguish members of the road transportation community in the Asian regions. In behalf of the Philippine Government, Her Excellency President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, he warmly welcomed all the delegates from 13 countries of The 12th JASIC Asia Government/Industry Meeting. He appreciated the presence of all the participants from the Asian countries to this important forum, which allows the unique opportunities to discuss the vital issues and concerns on road transportation. It is significant that the prime movers and stakeholders on the road transportation in Asia have gathered together with the decision makers and the policy framers to explore the possibility of harnessing approaches toward addressing concerns for the international harmonization of regulation and certification system and building consensus on how to advance the vital sectors of the economist. He assured that the Philippine Government has taken this matter seriously and attached a high priority to meet the current global trends in harmonization and standards. He made mention that the President issued a Presidential Executive Order No. 628 creating a committee on harmonization of vehicle standards and regulations in line with the WP29 in pursuance to its objectives of establishing a uniform and simplified standards procedures and regulations for reciprocal acceptance and recognition by the world community. The committee is responsible for the effective coordination of efforts by various government agencies, international organizations and private sectors pertaining to harmonization of vehicle standards and regulations and has drafted a road map for the Philippines eventual participation in the WP29 and accession to its agreements. He also made mentioned of the various laws enacted and one was the legislation on vehicle safety, is the seatbelt law. He look forward to seeing the government and industry sectors of Asian countries take an active part in the meeting and enriching the discussions and deliberations with views, ideas and experiences, especially from those countries who already have signed the 1958/1998 Agreements.
AGENDA PROPER 6. Report 1 - The 6th Asia Forum
Mr. Hiromi Kimura, Chief, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan reported the Asia Forum on regulation and certification as the meeting place of Asian government participating in the WP29 to exchange political, economical and administrative information. The activities were exchange of opinion among the participating Asian countries on policies and technologies concerning mutual recognition of certification. There were active discussions among participants in relation to WP29 that pointed out to possible or existing problems to adopt ECE regulations or to join the 1958 Agreement as follows: manpower; understanding of ECE regulations; budget; domestic legal procedures; translation to local language; expertise; test laboratories; and government jurisdiction. He confirmed the continuation of the Asia Forum and the next meeting will be held along with the 13th GI Meeting scheduled in Thailand.
o Mr. Guan from Singapore proposed sharing of investments on testing facilities, as
this seems to be the common problems among Asian countries.
o Mr. Akiba, Executive Director of JASIC acknowledged the proposal of Mr. Guan
and suggested that the qualifications of technical services could be discussed more in details later on but he reiterated that the 1958 Agreement clearly mentioned certain category of technical services and some of them do not need to have any testing facilities.
7. Report 2 – Industry Meeting • Wrap-Up of the 12th RACE (Regulation and Certification Experts) Meeting
Mr. Allen Rufo, CAMPI, Philippines presented the wrap-up of 12th RACE meeting and made a report on the following: - WP29 main updates in which the Automobile Association in Asia was informed
by JAMA that MLIT and JASIC officially announced the proposed establishment of the Whole Vehicle Certification System by 2015 in the 142nd session of WP29.
- Adoption of UNECE regulations in which the industry reached a consensus on the
following steps: 1. Adopt UNECE regulations as an optional requirements parallel with the
current regulations; and 2. Enforce UNECE regulations as mandatory and replace national regulations, if
necessary.
- The industry wished each government in Asia to solve the following obstacles in adopting the UNECE regulations: 1. Asian countries to accede to the 1958 Agreement; 2. Building of testing facilities and capacity building for human resources; 3. UNECE regulations adopting plans of each Asian country which create barrier
in the facilitation of MRA; and 4. Capacity and awareness of local component makers.
- The meeting confirmed the difference in the definition of “adoption”,
“adaptation”, and “reference” and “alignment” in UNECE regulations. - Establishment of type approval system in which the following problems were
identified: 1. Regulation of VTA not backed up by the official gazette; 2. No comprehensive regulations and procedures; 3. Unique domestic vehicle might not be able to comply with VTA system; 4. No single/centralized government agency to take charge of the TA system; 5. Limited certification experts in the government sectors; 6. Lack of national committee to make policies across each vehicle regulations
related ministries; 7. Existing law not empowered to establish VTA; and 8. Limited government financial resources.
With this wrap-up report, the industry hoped that it opened-up some venues for discussion to further proceed with harmonization in their region.
o Question: Did the wrap-up meeting also take up steps on how to overcome the
obstacles that had been identified? Due to lack of time, solutions to the obstacles were not tackled, maybe in the
next RACE meeting or other forums or events, whereby the industry can discuss the solutions towards these obstacles.
o Director Jesus Mootoomul of Bureau of Product Standards, Department of Trade
and Industries commented on the report of the Industry especially on item nos. 2 and 4. As to item no. 2 he commented as a regulatory body in the Philippines and as to some extend they are regulating the automotive products wherein there is always an issue with regards to harmonizing the international standards and at the same time with the UNECE standards. He asked the industry to look into the issues of standard very carefully. As to item no. 4, he commented on the issue of adoption, alignment or harmonization, wherein internationally, there were already ISO-ECE guidelines for harmonization in which the industry can utilize in order to come up with a uniform basis for harmonization.
Mr. Rufo welcomed the comments and suggestions of Director Mootoomul.
• Philippine Initiative on Vehicle Regulation Harmonization by CAMPI
Mr. Allen Rufo presented the Philippine initiative on vehicle regulation harmonization by CAMPI. He gave the background wherein the aim of the Automotive Industry was presented, as to provide vehicles that are friendly to both the environment and the motorist. He enumerated the complications as to what standards to use; the test procedures; limits; applicability; and responsible agencies to standardize, test and certify. There are more complications that arise on globalization and global warming. With these developments, the government and industry collaborated to address the rising complications by conducting seminars, meetings, workshops, fora and conferences. Mr. Rufo also mentioned the overlapping of responsibilities by the government agencies, namely DOTC, LTO, DTI-BPS, BOI and others. As to the solution from the government, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo issued Executive Order creating a Committee on Harmonization for Vehicle Standards and Regulations (CHVSR) who shall initiate the formulation and consolidation of work plans and programs for the participation to WP29 and accession to its agreements. The initiative of the government was supported by the Industry.
• Renewal Proposal of Adoption of UN/ECE Regulations by (JAMA)
Mr. Shigeo Yoshizawa, Chairman, Asian WG9 Chief Engineer, JAMA presented the renewal of JAMA proposal for the adoption of UNECE regulations. He gave a background as to the automotive safety & environmental issues; collaboration among ministries of transport and industry; the regulatory trends worldwide; road map for the establishment of VTAS; and what should be done after joining 1958 Agreement. He discussed the adoption of UN/ECE regulations for M1 and N1, guideline of step-by-step ECE regulation and sufficient lead-time for the implementation of UNECE regulations in collaboration among the ministries of transport and industry.
• Opportunities provided by UN/ECE 1958 Agreement for Asian Parts
Manufacturers (JAPIA)
Mr.Kiminori Hyodo of Japan Auto Parts Industries Association (JAPIA) presented the opportunities for Asia parts manufacturers to which a vehicle is an assembly of individual parts. More than 75% of the vehicle regulations are related to parts. To achieve the safety vehicle society and prosperity in the world is its aim and harmonization of requirements and MRA as its methods. Mr. Hyodo enumerated the merits for both Asian countries and Asian automotive industry. As a summary to his presentation, their wish for Asian countries is to harmonize their own national regulations and to utilize MRA by UNECE certificates in order to effectively achieve safety vehicle society and prosperity in Asia.
• Tyre Regulations and Certifications Current Situation in Asia
Mr.Hiroyuki Nonaka, Japan Automobile Tyre Manufacturers Association, Inc. (JATMA) presented the current regulations and certification situation in Asia. Tyre, an automobile part plays a vital role in terms of safety by applying technical regulations and certifications system. Each country has adopted a very unique regulation and certification schemes. Moreover, there is a requirement to move the certification marks on the tyre sidewall, which will become a hindrance primarily to the users due to redundant regulation and certification procedures. Concerning the current situation of certification scheme in Asia, there are scheme for tyre certification, which are for the automobile type approval system, and the product certification scheme for the tyre adopted in Asian countries, such that technical regulation are not being harmonize among the Asian countries. Regarding the technical regulation for tyre, a global technical regulation is being studied in an informal working group of GRRF in WP 29 to establish harmonize technical standard GTR with target date to complete the proposal by 2009. The draft of the proposal for each requirement will be submitted to the next GRRF meeting in February next year and the final proposal in September 2008 except high-speed performance requirement, which will be finalized in February 2009. Finally the aforementioned harmonization of the technical regulation and certification scheme, which is not only for Japanese tyre industry but also for the tyre industry in the world that the government of each
country is going to adopt the scheme of mutual recognition approval based on the 1958 agreement in the future.
8. Report 3 – Information of ACCSQ-APWG • ASEAN Consultative Committee on Standards and Quality – Automotive Product
Working Group (ACCSQ-APWG) Activities
Mr. Soerjono, Deputy Director, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Indonesia presented the information of the APWG ACCSQ, its main objectives and its effort to facilitate standard harmonization. He informed the participants that the APWG is opened for any input from developed countries in the world, whoever would like to help ASEAN in accelerating ASEAN’s effort in pursuing standard and technical harmonization. (Details of the presentation please refer to the handouts)
9. Report 4 – Briefing on JASIC’s Long and Medium Term Agenda • Mutual Recognition of Whole Vehicle Certification, JASIC Long Term Action
Program Mr. Tadaomi Akiba, Executive Director of JASIC presented the current activities of JASIC, its purpose and organization in which to assist the MLIT of Japan in promoting the international harmonization of automobile technical regulations and certifications system; and harmonization activities for WP29 to support the Asian countries to participate in WP29 and accession to 1958 Agreement. Mr. Akiba discussed the long term action program of JASIC wherein the contracting parties to the 1958 agreement agreed with the elements for mutual recognition of a whole vehicle certification and established 12 GTRs and new GTRs unified with UNECE regulation. There are 47 ECE regulations that were recommended for M1 category, 42 ECE regulations for N1 category and 16 ECE regulations for L category. He presented the final image of JASIC future activity, which is the MRA in 2015 wherein, gathering of required ECE certification, type approval of motor vehicle and registration in each contracting party are among the activities in the mutual recognition of the whole vehicle certification under the UNECE. And finally he presented the long term action program of WP29 and G/I meeting that by the year 2008 – make clear of the subject to be considered to WP29 in March, June and November; 2009 – Final solution of each subject in WP 29; and 2010 – draft proposal of WVC under WP29. All activities of JASIC are geared towards the realization of 2015.
10. Round Discussion – Progress of Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations and
Mutual Recognition of Approvals by Each Country
Japan Mr. Masayuki Shima, Director, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulations and MRA whereby the
history of the activities of Japan on the ECE/WP29 was likewise presented: In 1977 Japan declared attendance to WP29 as observer; 1987 establishment of JASIC head office in Geneva; 1998 JAPAN acceded to UNECE 1958 Agreement; and 1999 Japan acceded to UNECE 1998 Agreement. He made a presentation on the activities of Japan in ECE/WP29, which is the amendment to ECE regulations and information. Mr. Shima cited also the adoption of ECE/WP29 regulations in Japan wherein the aim of adopting ECE regulations is under the1958 Agreement. He made mention also of the list of ECE-WP29 from 1998-2007.
Philippines
Ms. Florencia Creus, Chief, Operations Division, Land Transportation Office, DOTC, Philippines, presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulations and mutual recognition of approvals in the Philippines. The Philippines attended the World Forum for harmonization of vehicle regulations as observer on June 20-23, 2006 and June 25 – 29, 2007. Lack of understanding on the whole concept of WP29 and its agreements hinders participation to the WP29 but the problem can be resolved by continuous education for both motor vehicle industry and government through attendance to the experts meetings and other activities where WP29 and its agreements are being discussed.
In the Philippine roadmap on harmonization of MV regulations and standards, the Philippine intends to accede to the 1958 Agreement in 2008 and in the 1998 Agreement in 2010 but due to legal process involving legislation and ratification of the Senate it may take sometime. The following are the various considerations for the Philippine Accession to 1958/1998 Agreements: government’s ability and expertise; local industries’ capability to comply with UNECE regulations; necessity to implement various regulations; and some ECE regulations may conflict with existing Philippine National Standards, Department Administrative Order, and etc. Executive Order No 628 creating a committee on the Harmonization of Vehicle Standards and Regulations was issued to address the harmonization of existing rules and regulations of various government agencies involved in the development and regulations of motor vehicles. Ms. Creus made updates on the introduction of ECE regulations, progress of domestic activity for standards and regulations harmonization and creation of sub-committees under EO 628. She mentioned that the progress of domestic activities for regulation harmonization in the conduct of testing and certification is hampered by lack of expertise, equipment and infrastructure. Likewise lack of proper coordination among government agencies and private sectors contributed in the delay of the implementation, but this may be resolved with the creation of the sub-committees under EO 628.
Finally, Ms. Creus made mention that the series of G/I meetings should support the Asian countries in the participation to the WP29 by providing guidelines in the establishment of ECE regulations and MRA in holding the Asian Expert Meetings and should be funded by bilateral cooperation. With regards to the Expert Meeting on Noise Standard and Regulations, the Committee on the Harmonization of Vehicle
Standards and Regulations (CHVSR) would like to propose for the passing of the Noise Control Act with some information on the process and technology.
o Ms. Creus answered the question of the representative from Indonesia on the
composition of the CHVSR under Executive Order 628 wherein the Chairman is the Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Communications
Chinese Taipei
Sheng-Jung Hsieh of the Automotive Research and Testing Center presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulations and mutual recognition of approval in Taiwan. Chinese Taipei is willing to participate in the WP29 and/or GRs but they are not yet a member of the United Nations, and so with the accession to the 1958/1998 Agreements. He mentioned the latest situation on WP29 and 1958/1998 Agreements wherein they already adopted 25 ECEs in 2006 and plan to adopt 18 ECEs by 2010 and 8 ECEs after 2010. He cited the problems on the regulation harmonization wherein they need help to clarify the details of the testing, certification and COP in the regulation of ECE and they also need information on the revision of ECE regulations and how to regulate some technology that has not been regulated yet.
He also made comments that it is not suitable for them to accept the UNECE certificate unilaterally since Taiwan is not a contracting party to the 1958 Agreement and MRA, but MOTC is open to talk about the subject of mutual recognition or mutual acceptance of type approval certificate if other countries consider it necessary.
Vietnam
A representative from Vietnam, representing Mr. Pham Quang Thanh, Vietnam Register, Ministry of Transport presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulations and mutual recognition of approval in Vietnam. The 9th Expert Meeting on accession to the 1958 Agreement was held in April 2007 in Hanoi with 80 participants from Asian countries and co-organized by 3 countries, Japan, Thailand and Vietnam. JASIC presented the outline and explanation of the 1958 Agreement, Vietnam presented the application of ECE regulations and Thailand presented their experiences in the accession to 1958 Agreement. Vietnam planned to participate to the 1958/1998 Agreements by 2010. He made a presentation on the main work of Vietnam in the coming years: the conversion of the existing mandatory standards base on ECE regulations into National Technical Regulations (NTR) to be finished by 2009; the withdrawal of local unique standards not suited to international standards by 2008; the step by step conversion of the existing volunteer standards based on ECE R into NTR; and to continue to develop step by step new National Technical Standards (NTS) based on ECE R. They will also introduce ECR regulations by 2007, 2008 and 2010 and continue to attend the WP29 meetings and establish the national working group preparation for the accession to the 1958 Agreement.
Thailand
A representative from Thailand presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation and mutual recognition of approval in Thailand. Thailand is attending WP29 once a year and the GRs every 2 years. They acceded to the 1958 Agreement in 2006 wherein they encounter no problems because foreseen problems have been under control. They did not accede yet to 1998 Agreement because there are no clear cut benefits in the 1998 Agreement over 1958 Agreement and also because of manpower constraint. She made mentioned of the plans to introduce UNECE regulations by 2010, 11 DLT and 53 TISI. The latest situation on WP29 and 1958/1998 Agreements were presented in which after 2010 they plan to continue the set up and the outcome of previous implementation which should first be completed. The main problems they encountered were the inflexibility of legal process, insufficient expertise, manpower constraint and test facilities required for TISI, which is a compulsory standard. She discussed the progress of regulation harmonization in which the amendment of Ministerial Regulation No. 22 was approved by the Cabinet in January 2007 and was also considered by the Council of State. The DLT was discussed to the Council twice in May and July 2007 and drafted the notification in line with the UNECE regulations for the Council’s consideration. The present vehicle/component certification systems and DLT vehicle approval type system exists under the Land Transport Act and no conformity is available yet for the small vehicle. The TISI component/system type approval system is a compulsory standard. With regards to the upgrading of certification process they amended the MR22-add vehicle parts type approval system under Motor Vehicle Act (MVA); drafted WVTA for MVA – amending MVA under the Council’s consideration; and plan to accept UNECE certificate only on regulation adopted in WP29. New theme of the GI Meeting will be approved if they will be educated by the type approval system in the same direction and take into consideration different background of each country, the legal structure and administrative agencies, and the topic on the next expert meeting to be discussed by the TAIA.
Singapore
The representative from the Industry of Singapore presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation and mutual recognition of approval in Singapore. Singapore considers participating in the WP29 as an observer in the year 2008/2009. With regards to decision to sign in the Agreements would have to be made by the Singapore Government at the Cabinet level. The Ministry of Transport and the Land Transport Authority would submit a proposal, in consultation with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for Cabinet consideration. Singapore accepts vehicles that have already been designed and tested to comply with the UNECE regulations or other international standards. They already have 6 items references to the UNECE regulations and plan to adopt 47 items more. Singapore is not a vehicle-manufacturing country and vehicles complied with the UNECE regulations were not subjected to additional tests and still they are market friendly, therefore there is no strong justification or immediate need to sign the
1958/1998 Agreements. The government and industry hold a regular dialogue with Motor Traders Association of Singapore on matters concerning the new regulations and requirements including the adoption of UNECE regulations. And finally they consider participating in the Expert Meetings organized by other countries.
Malaysia
A representative from Malaysia presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation and mutual recognition of approval in Malaysia. Malaysia was accepted by United Nation to become a contracting party of the 1958/1998 Agreements on April 4, 2006 though they acceded to the 1958/1998 Agreements, they did not become a contracting party to any of the UNECE regulations. Ministry of Transport and Road Transport Department was given the responsibility of coordinating and participating in the WP29 activities for Malaysia. He discussed the introduction to the vehicle type approval system in Malaysia in which this control the construction of motor vehicle and update technical data and records prior to the registration and licensing of vehicles by RTD; this requirements applies to all new models that are to be registered with the RTD effective January 1, 2005; and that all vehicles needs to undergo VTA inspection and road test by RTD before it can be approved for registration. The purpose of which are to ensure compliance of legal requirements by locally manufactured/assembled/new and imported used vehicles, wherein the legal framework is the Road Transport Act of 1987; Construction and Use Rules of 1959; and other regulations made under the act. He presented the vehicle type approval process chart and vehicle type approval application format. Finally, he made mention on the constraints encountered in the establishment of vehicle type approval and the counter measures as well. Malaysia’s requests were welcomed by Japan and ASEAN industry to establish harmonization of VTA in Asian/ASEAN countries by 2015.
Myanmar
Mr. U Khin Maung Lin, Chief Engineer, Road Transport Administration Department presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation and mutual recognition of approval in Malaysia. Type approval system in Malaysia controls the motor vehicle registration and update technical data and records in Road Transport Administration Department wherein all vehicles need to undergo Vehicle Type Approval Roadworthiness prior to registration. He made mention that Myanmar is still in the process of considering the participation to WP29 or GRs. As member of the ASEAN Myanmar accepts or recognizes the certificate issued by the ASEAN member countries and only when Myanmar becomes UNECE member they will consider accepting UNECE certificate. On the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation, they would like to participate in the coming G/I meetings, attend all coming expert meetings and wish to hold expert meeting after 2010.
Lao PDR Mr. Bounta Kaunlavong, Director of Planning and Budgeting Division, Department of Transport, Ministry of CTPC presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation and mutual recognition of approval in Lao PDR. Mr. Kaunlavong
enumerated contents of his presentation - the vehicle statistics, tariff rates, importation in CKD and CBU and authorities of Lao PDR taking part in harmonization of regulation. The agencies involve in harmonization of technical regulation and mutual recognition of approval was the Science Technology and Environment Agency, Ministry of Public Works and Transport and Ministry of Industry and Commerce. The Ministry of Public Works and Transport is the one responsible in issuing or undertaking the issuance of certificate in the registration of imported motor vehicle. They also have the regulation on safety, which is the wearing of helmet and etc. Concerning the assessment, ratification and adoption to the 1958/1998 agreements they still have to know the availability of their resources.
Korea
Mr. Eundok Lee, Senior Researcher, Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation and mutual recognition of approval in Korea. As a background, he made mention the importance in the enforcement of NCAP and self-certification to ensure safety of the in-use vehicles in Korea. The exponential increase of low products endangers the safety of passengers, which generate consumer’s complaints, that leads to the serious social problems in Korea. He presented the overview system on the part of the manufacturer and importer in which self-certification of parts and equipment complies with safety regulation and standards prior to sale. On the part of the government, investigation of parts and equipment complies with safety regulations and standards after sale. Mr. Lee made a discussion on the action and the benefit it will provide.
Indonesia
A representative from Indonesia presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation and mutual recognition of approval in Indonesia. There is no adequate perception among ministries/departments who are also the stakeholders with regards to the responsibility in automotive sector. Like in the Ministry of Energy the Euro 2 standard emission was already implemented and yet they are still facing the problem in the application of fuel that would be appropriate for the standard, which become difficult for the car manufacturer who already produced the engine with Euro 2 standards. The Ministry of Finance was informed on the importance of joining the WP29 and implementation of the UNECE standards. They started to become an observer last year and continue to be an observer again in March if the Ministry of Finance will give them the budget. It is important for them to deeply understand the discussion in the WP29 meeting especially with the problem they are facing which should be resolved one-by-one and hoping that just like the Philippines they can create a committee to be signed by their president to implement the program. The representative from Indonesia appreciated the concern of Mr. Akiba in guiding the Asian countries and automotive industry to be developed. He presented also the newly launched activities to help promote harmonization and the future prospect for development.
India Mr. K C Behera, Undersecretary, Department of Road Transport & Highways presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation and mutual recognition of approval in India. India is a signatory to the 1998 Agreement but not a contracting party to the 1958 Agreement. They hold several meetings considering the possibility of joining the 1958 Agreement. Activities started in 2006 when India participated in WP29. Mr. Behera discussed the latest situation on WP29 and the 1958/1998 Agreements in which the government of India signed the 1998 Agreement in February 2006 and actively participated with the signatory countries and contributed to the global technical regulations. In principle their national policy has to be aligned to the national standards with the ECE regulations. They are reviewing the implications of the 1958 Agreement and learn the experiences of the Asian countries and pay attention to the country specific requirements. He also enumerated the highlights of their participation to WP29. The status of their plan to align with the ECE regulations was already 74%.
China
Mr. Oyan Tau of China Automotive Technology and Research Center presented the progress of harmonization of vehicle regulation and mutual recognition of approval in China. China started to participate in WP29 and some GTRs activities in 1996 and acceded to 1998 Agreement in 2000. China Automotive Technology and Research Center has been providing technical support to comment in their participation to WP29 and responsible in organizing experts from the industry to participate in GRs activities. They participated in various meetings of the GTRs in 2007 and such effort will be continued and will even be intensified by 2008 onwards. As a contracting party to the 1998 agreement, China actively takes part in the department of GTRs and reflects the real situation in the GTR. With respect to the 1958 Agreement on how to harmonize the GTRs, China started the regional standard and introduced the GTRs to the regulatory system. The study has to wait because there is no definite accession yet and there is a need to promote the vehicle safety and environmental protection. 80 ECE regulations have already been introduced to the regulatory system. Mr. Tau enumerated the problems encountered in their participation to WP29. He mentioned that the administration of auto industry and type approval system is complicated. He did mention also the different functions of the government agencies involved in the program and the procedures for approval of new types of auto products.
11. Summary of Day 1 Session • Mr. Michio Miyamoto, Chairman, Asia G/I Meeting thanked the participants for
sharing the latest information of each countries and the exchange of information regarding the accession to the 1958 Agreement. Based on the answers to the JASIC questionnaire the summary was made on the accession and adoption plans of ECE regulations and the tables will be sent to the participants after G/I meeting for review and comments. The common issues and obstacles were highlighted and the key words were listed which will be discussed during the panel discussions to find solutions and directions.
• Ms. Anneli R. Lontoc, Undersecretary for Road Transport, DOTC thanked the active
participation of the participants in the discussion noting the progress made by various countries with regards to the accession to the 1958/1998 Agreements and the introduction plan of the UNECE regulations and establishments or improvement of the MRA system. Issues were recognized and remained to be addressed especially the grave concern on manpower constraints and capability and in essence, concerns are institutional and technical. She thanked JASIC for the new information on the Mutual Recognition Approval of the whole motor vehicle certification based on the 1958 Agreement and information sharing during G/I meetings. She requested JASIC to consider the holding or sending experts for a short-term engagement to provide focus assistance on the start up process of accession. She thanked everybody and adjourned the first day session.
Philippines
Welcome Speech
Ms. Anneli R. Lontoc, Undersecretary, Department of
Transportation and Communications,
Philippines
Welcome Address from Industry
Mr. Vicente Mills, President,
Philippine Automotive Federation Incorporated (PAFI)
JAPAN
Opening Remark
Mr. Noritoshi Horigome Director General
Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center (JASIC)
Japan
Keynote Speech - 1
Mr. Masayuki Shima Director,
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and TransportMinistry of Land, Infrastructure and TransportJapanJapan
Advantages of WP29 Activities for Type Approval System in Japan
November 2007November 2007
Review of the 4th Series of Government-Industry Meetings
(1) Ratification of the 1958/1998 Agreements by countries/territories of Asia and increasing the number of ratifying countries/territories
・ Korea, Thailand, Malaysia acceded the 1958 Agreement, and some other countries preparing to accession.
(2) Increasing the number of countries/territories participating in WP29 and communicating the enactment of agreements and rules that reflect the current status of Asia
・Viet num, Indonesia and Philippine participated to WP29 for the first time.
(3) Strengthening ties among Asian countries/territories to ensure a smooth transition to the new Government-Industry Meetings
・ 3 countries held the Expert meetings in 2006, and 5 countries will have held the Expert meetings in 2007, 6 countries have the plan of holding the Expert meeting in 2008 and beyond.
And to be continuing to the 5th Series
Establish the regulations for safety and environmental protection for motor vehicles
Solutions for problems of Safety and Environment Protectionfor motor vehicles
Problems of safety and environment protection for motor vehicles
・Reduction to fatalities and injuries caused by traffic accidents・Protections from environment pollution (e.g. emission gases)
Securing of the regulations
Utilization of Vehicle Type Approval System
Safety Regulations for motor vehicles
Type Approval System
Process of designing Regulations for Vehicles in Japan
Establish the Safety Regulations for motor vehicles
Analysis of Accidents Research of environment pollution
Consideration of designing Regulations
Technical ValidationsChecking up costs etc.
or
Producing Vehicles(Necessity of matching the Safety Regulations for motor vehicles )
Vehicle Type Approval System
Vehicle Type Approval System in Japan
Type Approval System for Devices
Reviews of・Suitability of the Regulation by using Sample Items
・Manufacturers’quality management System
In the case of using designated devices, applicants can abbreviate the reviews of suitability of the Regulation.
Reviews of・Suitability of the Regulation by using Sample Vehicles・Manufacturers’ quality management System
(Manufacturers etc.)
Advantages of WP29 Activities for Type Approval System
Improvement the performance of vehicles by adopting the international regulations
Advantages of Mutual Recognition by acceding the 1958 Agreement
・Streamlining of procedure for type Approval for devices
・Solution for problems of Safety and Environmental Protection for motor vehicles
・Cutting various costs for producing vehicles by using harmonized regulations
Safety Regulations for motor vehicles
Vehicle Type Approval System
Advantages of WP29 Activities for Type Approval System in Japan
Advantages of WP29 Activities for Type Approval System
<Concrete Advantage>Improvement the performance of vehicles by adopting the international regulations
<Advantages of Mutual Recognition>・ Streamlining of procedure for type Approval for components
Substantial corroborative system for gaining the advantages of mutual recognition.
Type Approval System for Devices
Operating on mutual recognition and adoption ECE Regulation
Thank you for your kind attention !Thank you for your kind attention !
Philippines
Keynote Speech - 2
General Leandro R. Mendoza,
Secretary Department of Transportation and
Communications
JAPAN
Report-1
The 6th Asia Forum
Mr. Hiromi Kimura Chief,
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan
The 6th Asia Forumon Regulation and Certification
Manila, Philippine18:30-21:00 h
26 November 2007
Participants
IndiaIndonesiaPhilippinesThailandJapan
PurposeBuild a cooperative network of Asian countries
concerning harmonization of regulations and mutual recognition of certification
ActivitiesExchange of opinions on policies and
technologies concerning regulation harmonization and mutual recognition of certifications among Asian governments participating in WP29.
(REF: Asia Forum on Regulation and Certification- purpose and activities – )
Agenda1. Adoption of the agenda2. Review of the last meeting (Indonesia 2006)3. Discussion3-1. WP29 (Japan)3-2. Reports from each country (each county)
4. Future activities of the Asia Forum 5. Conclusion5-1. Next meeting5-2. Report to the GI meeting
The 6th Asia Forum on Regulation and CertificationManila, Philippine
18:30-20:00h 26 NOV. 2007
ConclusionParticipants exchanged their status and activities related to WP29, the 58 Agreement.The discussion pointed possible or existing problems to adopt ECE Regulations or to join the 1958 Agreement as below;
Man PowerUnderstanding of ECE RegulationsBudgetDomestic Legal ProcedureTranslation to local languageExpertiseTest laboratoriesGovernmental Jurisdiction
Scheduled Expert MeetingThailand and Philippines
Future plan of Asian Meeting for effective participation in WP29 at GenevaContinuation of the ASIA Forum is confirmed.
Next meeting will be held along with the 13th GI Meeting scheduled in Thailand.
Thank you for your kind attention !Thank you for your kind attention !
Industries
Report-2
Industry Meeting
Representative of Automotive Industry
Representative of Automotive Parts Industry
Representative of Tire Industry
Wrap-Up of 12th RACE (Regulation and Certification Experts) Meeting<WP29 Main Updates>1. The automobile associations in Asia were informed by JAMA that the Japanese governments (MLIT) and JASIC have officially announced the proposal to establish the Whole Vehicle Certification System by 2015 in the 142nd Session of WP29 this June.
<Adoption of UNECE Regulations>2. On the needs of some Asian countries to incorporate UNECE regulations into national regulations, the industry reached a consensus on the following steps:
Step1: Adopt UNECE regulations as an optional requirement in parallel with current regulation. (i.e. Manufacturers to be allowed for either option)
Step 2: Enforce UNECE regulations as mandatory and replace current national regulations, if necessary.
3. The industry wishes each government in Asia to solve the following obstacles in adopting UNECE regulations:(i) Asian countries, in general, have yet to accede the 1958 Agreement (ii) difficulties in building of testing facilities and human resource;(iii) different UNECE regulations adopting plans of each Asia country that create a
barrier towards the facilitation of MRA;
(iv) capacity and awareness issues of local component makers.
4. The Meeting confirmed that there are different definitions of“adoption”/“adaptation”/ “reference”/ “alignment” towards UNECE regulations.
<Establishment of vehicle type approval system>
5. The following problems in establishing VTA Systems amongst Asian countries are identified in the Meeting:(i) Regulation of VTA not backed up by official gazette ;(ii) No comprehensive regulation and unique procedures ;(iii) Unique domestic vehicles might not be able to comply with VTA System ;(iv) no single/centralized government agency to take charge of T/A system ;(v) limited certification experts in government sector ;(vi) lacking of a national committee in making coherent policies across each vehicle
regulations related ministries ;(vii) Existing law is not empowered to establish VTA ;(viii) limited government financial resources to facilitate VTA system
C A M P I
Philippine Initiative on Vehicle Regulation Harmonization
By: Chamber of Automotive Manufacturers in the Philippines Inc.
Member: Philippine Automotive Federation Inc.(PAFI)
C A M P I
BACKGROUND:
The automotive industry in it’s aim to provide vehicles that are friendly to the environment and safe for motorist and public, complied to the government regulations on emission and safety and seek government certification for vehicle roadworthiness .
C A M P I
In the effort of Government and Industry to certify parts and vehicles, the following complications surfaced.
What standards to use?Test proceduresLimitsApplicabilityResponsible agencies to:
StandardizeTestcertify
Rise of Complications
C A M P I
GlobalizationFree TradeWTOAFTA,APECEconomic Treaties UN-ECE 58,98agreementsHarmonization
Global WarmingStringent EmissionBio FuelsAlternative fuels
Rise of more complications
C A M P I
Industry and Government in it’s aim to resolve all issues affecting roadworthiness of vehicle, conducted number of seminars. Meetings, workshops, forums and conferences to address safety and emission matters
The same industry also had the same collaboration on the government on Trade rated issues, in order to provide more products for the market.
Government and Industry Collaborations
C A M P I
Overlapping Responsibilities
DOTC- Road Transport RegulationsLTO- Vehicle RegistrationDTI-BPS- Standards DevelopmentDOE- Fuel StandardsBOI- Trade InvestmentsAnd others agencies…
C A M P I
Philippine President Arroyo Issued Executive Order 628 mandating the creation of Committee on Harmonization for Vehicle Standards and Regulation (CHVSR)
The CHVSR shall initiate and pursue the formulation and consolidation of reasonable and workable plans and programs aimed at preparing the country’s eventual participation to the WP29 and accession to its Agreement.
Government Solution:
C A M P I
The industry is appreciative and supportive to what the Philippine Government had initiated. The following are some of the benefits of having this harmonization committee:
Identifying responsible agencies and their role in vehicle harmonizationMore efficient communication and collaboration of Government and Industry due to reduction of redundant meetingsGoal and Target in sight
Industry’s appreciation and support to this Initiative
C A M P I
THANK YOU
12th Asian Regulation & Certification Experts (RACE) Meeting
Nov. 26, 2007
Asian Type Approval & Regulation Experts GroupJapan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA)
Renewal Proposal of Adoption of UN/ECE Regulations
1. Back Ground 1. Back Ground - Automotive Safety & Environmental Issues- Collaboration among Ministries of Transport and Industry- Regulatory Trends Worldwide- Road Map of “Establishment of Vehicle Type Approval System”- What should be done after joining 1958 Agreement ?
2. Renewal of Proposal of Adoption of UN/ECE Regulations2. Renewal of Proposal of Adoption of UN/ECE Regulations- Adoption of UN/ECE regulations for M1 and N1- Guideline of Step-by-Step ECE Reg. introduction- Sufficient lead-time for Implementation of UN/ECE Regulations
< Agenda>
12th Asian Regulation & Certification Experts (RACE) Meeting
Vehicle specifications
Basic Factors in Safety
Road traffic environment
Human factors
Mobile sources
Stationary sources
Natural sources
Major Sources of Pollution
Major Air Pollutants
CO
HC
NOx
SOx
SPM
Pb
etc.
Accident reduction Environmental protection
Automotive Safety & Environmental Issues
NecessityNecessityfor for
TechnicalTechnicalRegulationsRegulations
Transport MinistriesSociety (Safety & Environment)Accident reduction, Environmental protection
Trade/Industry MinistriesEconomy (free trade)Removal of trade barriers
Harmonization & Mutual Recognition of Certification
through adoption of UN/ECE Regulations(1958 Agreement)
Collaboration among Ministries of Transport and Industry
Harmonization
ECE Regs
U.S. Regs
Regulatory Trends Worldwide
Australia Regs:
Integrated ECE
ECE Reg. will be becoming worldwide Regulations
EU Directives to ECE Regulations(Safety)
Based on ECE
Based on ECE
Switching to ECE
AsiaAsia
(Participating in GTRs)Japan
EU
Join formulating GTR
GTR to ECE
USA
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Vehicle Type Approval System
1. Common formatof Applicationdocument
2.Adoption ofUN/ECE Approvalitems
4. OthersCOP, Lab. Type,Definitions, etc.
3. Vehicle Check
Accede UN/ECE/58 Agreement
Road Map of “Establishment of Vehicle Type Approval System”
EstablishmentAgreed
Basic Items
Link
Link
ThaiMalaysia
SingaporePhilippines
IndonesiaVietnam
What should be done after joining 1958 Agreement ?
Choosing UN-ECE regulations to be applied
How to choose ?
It can be referred to JAMA Renewal Guideline and support/recommend to Governments !
If it is difficult to choose by your side
Adoption of UN/ECE regulations for M1 and N1
Renewal of Proposal of Adoption of UN/ECE RegulationsRenewal of Proposal of Adoption Renewal of Proposal of Adoption of UN/ECE Regulationsof UN/ECE Regulations
<Basic idea of adoption of UN/ECE regulations>
Dividing 4 steps Package as below
-1st Step : Package of General Safety Items including Tire, Glass andSeat Belt which are adopting in almost countries as nationallaw
-1.5nd Step : Package of Lighting parts Items including installation requirement
-2nd Step : Package of Safety items not including above items and Environment items
-3rd Step : Package of passive safety items with Radio InterferenceSuppression
Adoption of UN/ECE regulations for M1 and N1
1st Step (from about 2010)11(Door Latches and Hinges), 13(Braking), 13H(Braking-M1), 14(Belt Anchorages),16(Safety Belts), 17(Seats), 28(Audible Warning Devices), 30(Pneumatic Tires-Passenger Vehicle), 39(Speedometer), 43(Safety Glazing Materials), 44(Child Restraint Systems), 46(Rear-View Mirrors), 54(Pneumatic Tires-Commercial Vehicle), 79(Steering Equipment)1.5th Step (From about 2012)3(Reflex Reflectors), 4(Rear Registration Plate Lamps), 6(Direction Indicators), 7(Front and Rear Position Lamps, Stop Lamps and End-Outline Marker Lamps), 19(Front Fog Lamps), 23(Reversing Lamps), 37(Filament Lamps), 38(Rear Fog Lamps), 45(Headlamp Cleaners), 48(Installation of Lights), 77(Parking Lamps), 91(Side-Marker Lamps), 98(Gas-Discharge Headlamps) , 99(Gas-Discharge Light Sources), 112(Headlamps-with an Asymmetrical Passing Beam), 119(Cornering Lamps)2nd Step (From about 2014)34(Prevention of Fire Risks), 51(Noise), 55(Mechanical Coupling), 64(Temporary-Use Spare Wheels/Tires), 89(Speed Limitation Devices), 101(Emission of Carbon Dioxide and Fuel Consumption-Passenger Car), 116(Protection Against Unauthorized Use), 117(The Approval of Tires with Regard to Rolling Sound Emissions), 121(Location and Identification of Hand Controls, Tell-Tales and Indicators)3rd Step (from about 2015)10(Radio Interference Suppression), 21(Interior Fittings), 26(External Projections), 61(External Projections-Commercial Vehicle), 94(Protection of the Occupants in the event of a Frontal Collision), 95(Protection of the Occupants in the event of a Lateral Collision)
Guideline of Step-by-Step ECE Reg. introduction
Exhaust Emission : <Gasoline> Euro2-Euro4 (2005-2012)<Diesel> Euro2-Euro4 (2005-2012)
Cat. M1 and N1
2020
IdealCondition
2015
Only system/parts approval
(Almost nothing for Vehicle Type Approval)
Ultimate GoalAccept any Vehicle Type
Approval certificate issued by anyone from Asia
Mid term targetEstablishment of
Vehicle Type ApprovalSystem
(with UN/ECE Reg.)
1st Step11、13、13H、14、16、17、 28、 30、39、43、44、46、54、79
2nd Step34、51、 55(if fitted) 、64、85 、89 (if fitted) 、101、116 、117、121
3rd Step10、(21)、(26)、(61)、94、95
1.5th Step< Lighting>
Guideline of Step-by-Step ECE Reg. introduction
Time(year)
Euro2Euro2 Euro4Euro4
Cat. M1 and N1
Not recommend the following items to selectNot recommend the following items to select• ECE25 requirement is included in ECE17, hence not in use practically.
ECE1, 2, 8, 12, 15, 18, 20, 32, 84, 97, can be replaced by other ECE regulations.
• ECE59, 67, 90,103,108,109,114,115, are for aftermarket parts.(Since ECE44, 55 are accessory parts, these might be necessary for vehicle type approval.)
• ECE87 is unnecessary for the countries which are close to the equator.
• ECE33, 35, 42 are old design requirements.
• ECE27,68 are not for vehicle construction requirement.
Guideline of Step-by-Step ECE Reg. introduction
Note;It is sometimes difficult to make sure and conform for interpretation of Interior Fittings and External Projections(ECE21,26). In general, If clash safety requirement(ECE94,95) will be adopted, it seems that it is not so much important for them. So, ECE21,26 and 61 are added for blanket.
Cat. M1 and N1
1st Step : Adopt ECE as an optional requirementin parallel with current regulation.(Manufacturer can choose one of them)
2nd Step:ECE become mandatory and replace current regulation, if necessary
Guideline of Step-by-Step ECE Reg. introduction
JAMA recommends that sufficient lead-time should be ensured for new (X) and existing (Y) model respectively when ECE regulations become mandatory.
<Regulation Implementation Flow><Regulation Implementation Flow>
When the authorities decided to mandate When the authorities decided to mandate ECE as national regulationECE as national regulation
Implementation forImplementation for New type ModelNew type Model
Implementation forImplementation for Existing Model Existing Model
X=2 YearsX=2 Years
Lead-timeLeadLead--timetime
Sufficient lead-time for Implementation of UN ECE Regulations
Adoption of ECE as an alternative national regulation
22ndnd StepStep
11stst StepStep
Y=2 YearsY=2 Years
(Due to some reasons, X, Y can be less than 2 Years)
Thank you !
Adoption plans of UN-ECE Regulations in Asian Countries (2006)
(Before) 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
Malaysia
Indonesia
Thailand
Singapore
Philippines
Vietnam
Taiwan
India
R15, R83R16, R51
Euro3 (Petroil)Euro2 (Diesel)R30, R53
R3, R4, R6, R7, R46, R48, R112R28, R39, R94, R95
No Plan !
R16, R30, R43R54
R11, R13H, R14, R17, R25, R46,R48, R51, R101
R21, R26, R28, R39, R79, R85
R10,R12,R18
R1 to 8, 11 to 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 28, 30 to 33, 35, 37, 39, 42, 43, 45, 46, 50, 53, 54, 57, 59, 72, 94, 95, 98, 99, 112 and 113
R15, R19, R24, R38, R40, R48,R58, R73, R83, R89, R104
<GOV’T PLAN>Philippines will fully harmonize with ECE by 2010
Establish 30-item ECE Regulations Establish 50-item ECE Regulations2006/ 7/ 1:R3, R6, R7, R16, R19, R23, R28, R30, R37, R39, R43, R54, R77, R91, R98, R99,R104
2008/ 1/ 1 : R5, R10, R11, R12, R13, R13H, R14, R17, R25, R31, R34, R38, R46, R48, R67, R79, R94, R95, R112, R113
R11,R12,R34
R1,4,6,7,8,19,20,23,38,77,91,98,112,56,57,72,76,112,113,7,99
R2,13/13H,78,30,54,75 R29,66,80
= Last Year’s Information =
(From RACE meeting)
(1/22)JAPIA
Opportunities provided Opportunities provided by by UN/ECE 1958 AgreementUN/ECE 1958 Agreement
for for Asian Parts ManufacturersAsian Parts Manufacturers
JAPAN AUTO PARTS INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATIONJAPAN AUTO PARTS INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION
Mr.Kiminori HYODOMr.Hiroya KATAGIRI
Nov. 2007
(2/22)JAPIA
A vehicle is an assembly of individual parts
about 50,000 parts / vehicle
Headlamp
Tail lamp
Tire
Seat Belt
Mirror
Wiper
Horn
Opportunities for Opportunities for Asian Parts ManufacturersAsian Parts Manufacturers
(3/22)JAPIA
More than 75 % of the vehicle regulations are related to parts
UN-ECE regulations
Parts
reg.
Carreg.
Regulations on Vehicle Parts
(4/22)JAPIA
UN-ECE 1958 Agreement
To achieve the safety vehicle society
and prosperity in the world.
Aim :
Methods :
2) MRA(Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
1) Harmonization of Requirements
(5/22)JAPIA
2) MRA(Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
UN-ECE 1958 Agreement
To achieve the safety vehicle society
and prosperity in the world.
Aim :
Methods :
1) Harmonization of Requirements
(6/22)JAPIA
Our Asian countries should discuss the necessity of our unique requirements.
1) If they are reasonable, unique requirementsmay be remained.
2) If they are unreasonable, unique requirementsshould be harmonized.
UN-ECE Reg.
Reg. for Asiancountry A
Unique req. against ECE
Reg. for Asiancountry B
Unique req.against ECE
Reg. for Asiancountry B
Reg. for Asiancountry A
Unique req.between Asia
current situation in Asia
1) Harmonization of Requirements
(7/22)JAPIA
current situation in Asia
1) Harmonization of Requirements
Reg. for Asiancountry B
Unique requirementagainst ECE
Reg. for Asiancountry A
Unique requirement against ECE
UN-ECE Reg.Our wish
(8/22)JAPIA
We wish Asian countries1) To introduce UN-ECE Reg. into the
national regulation or 2) To accept UN-ECE Reg. as alternative
regulationexcept for reasonable unique requirements.
JAPIA
• Clear• Safety• International
UN-ECE Regulations
Asian countries can get Various Merits.
(9/22)JAPIA
UN-ECE 1958 Agreement
To achieve the safety vehicle society
and prosperity in the world.
Aim :
Methods :
2) MRA(Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
1) Harmonization of Requirements
(10/22)JAPIA
UN-ECE 1958 Agreement
To achieve the safety vehicle society
and prosperity in the world.
Aim :
Methods :
2) MRA(Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
1) Harmonization of Requirements
(11/22)JAPIA
AsianAsianCountriesCountries
ExportExport ExportExportImportImport ImportImport
UN-ECE 1958 Agreement
2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
with E
(12/22)JAPIA
Parts
2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
current situation in Asia
Individual certification Individual markingA
country
C ..
yes
B yesyes
Individual approval marking
E
(13/22)JAPIA 2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
current situation in Asia
Individual certification Individual markingA
country
B C .
yesyesyes
Re-making samples
Re-making test-standRe-testing in Laboratory
Re-sending samples
Re-making application doc.Re-certificationRe-adding other marking
BA
C D Cost up
Expense on users
E
(14/22)JAPIA
Parts
2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
Individual approval marking
E
Re-making samples
Re-making test-standRe-testing in Laboratory
Re-sending samples
Re-making application doc.Re-certificationRe-adding other marking
BA
C D Cost up
Expense on users
E
Our wish
(15/22)JAPIA
UN-ECE 1958 Agreement
To achieve the safety vehicle society
and prosperity in the world.
Aim :
Methods :
2) MRA(Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
1) Harmonization of Requirements
(16/22)JAPIA
Merits for Asian countries
1. To guarantee safety by ECE certification mark2. To contribute to society by safety vehicles3. Internationalization of own countries4. Easy to import / export parts and vehicles
into / from Asian countries-----economic growth5. No overlap test by government
• No equipment cost and no examiner cost• Reduce procedural work
(17/22)JAPIA
1. Actively to import / export parts and vehiclesinto / from Asian countries-----economic growth
Merits for Asian automotive industry
Low product cost User’s merit
3. To become more international enterprise
2. No re-acquisition of Certificate• No Certificate charge• Reduce procedural work• Shorten development period• World common design
(18/22)JAPIA
Summary
We wish Asian countries
to harmonize own national regulationsby UN-ECE regulations
to realize MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)by UN-ECE certificates
in order to achievesafety vehicle society and prosperityin Asia, effectively.
(19/22)JAPIA
Safety Driving Comfortable
Driving
Keep Environment
(20/22)JAPIA
Clear
Safety
International
UN-ECE Regulation
2) MRA (Mutual Recognition of Approvals)
1) Harmonization of Requirements
(21/22)JAPIA JAPAN AUTO PARTS INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATIONJAPAN AUTO PARTS INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION
Let’s challenge together harmonization activity
for Requirement and MRA in Asia
(22/22)JAPIA
Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention
JAPIAJAPIA(Japan Auto(Japan Auto--Parts Industries Association)Parts Industries Association)
Tyre Regulations and Certifications
Current Situation in Asia
27 November, 2007
JATMA
Summary of National Tire RegulationsSummary of National Tire Regulations
RegulationCome into
forceType of
certificationTechnical requirement(Type)
COP Marking
Australia ADR23or
ECE R30
1980?
2007
Third party FMVSS or
ECE R30
One year validation
Not required
E Mark
Malaysia Malaysian StandardECE or FMVSSas alternative
January 2008? Declaration? FMVSS Not decided MS MarkE MarkDOT Mark
China GB standard August 2003 Third party-CQC-CCCT
FMVSS + ECE
One year validation (certificate & factory audit)
CCC mark and factory number
Japan Adoption of ECE Regulations
January 2005 Third party- ECE
ECE Not required E Marking is Acceptable
India AIS (Automotive Industry Standard)
April 2006 Third party certification- CIRT
FMVSS + ECE
Not required Mandatory ISI Marking is proposed
Indonesia SNI (Standard National Indonesia)
March 23, 2006 Third party - PCB, accredited by KAN
FMVSS+ECE
Regular surveillance at factory
SNI mark: sticker for Radial
Philippines PNS 25/1995 1995 Initial Shipment Testing
FMVSS Does not exist Earth Marking (arbitrary)
Updated Nov. 07
RegulationCome into
forceType of
certificationTechnical requirement(Type)
COP Marking
South Korea Signed 1958 Agreement
KS Standards
December 2004
March 2007
No requirement
Third party
No requirement
JIS
No requirement
No requirement
No requirement
KS Sticker
Thailand Adoption of TISI based on ECE Regulation
2008 for MC?2009 for PC?
Third party(Arbitrary)- TISI
ECE Not decided TIS Mark?
Taiwan Adoption of ECE Regulation
July 2006 Third party ECE No requirement No marking
Summary of National Tire RegulationsSummary of National Tire Regulations Updated Nov. 07
Regulations & Certifications in Asia
Rules and Regulations for Tyre Products
1. Current situation:
(1)Type Approval Certification Scheme
(2)Product Certification Scheme
South Korea, P.R. China,
(Thailand), (Malaysia)
Indonesia, (India [BIS]), Philippines,
Taiwan,
Japan,
India [AIS],
Australia,
New Zealand
Technical Standards Certification Scheme
2. Structure of Scheme
&
Tyre GTR MRA with modified ECE Regulations for Tyres
2007/11/27
JATMA
Module1 - Permissive Requirement1)Plunger Energy Test2)Bead Unseating Test
Module2 - Permissive Requirement1) Tyre Rolling Sound
Mandatory Minimum Requirement
3)HarmonisedHarmonised High SpeedHigh SpeedSafety TestSafety Test
4)Endurance / Low Pressure Test5)Tyre Wet Grip Test
1)Marking2)Dimensions
Proposed Tyre GTR Structure( Approved at the 140th WP29)
Tyre GTR: Development Status 2007/11/27
JATMA
WG Leader
1) JATMA
2) ETRTO
3) ETRTO
4) RMA-TRA
5) ISO
Module-11) RMA-TRA2) RMA-TRA
Module-21) ISO
(At the 59th GRRF Meeting
& Informal TYRE GTR Meeting)
Road map for Tyre GTR
Dimensions
Marking
Plunger &
Bead Unseating
Tyre Endurance Low pressure
High Speed
2007 1Q 2007 2Q 2007 3Q 2007 4Q 2008 1Q 2008 2Q 2008 3Q
Feb 2008GRRF
Sept 2007GRRF
Feb 2007GRRF
Sept 2008GRRF
2007/11/27
JATMA
Pre-liminary DRAFT Final DRAFT
2008 4Q 2009 1Q
Feb 2009GRRF
Indonesia
Report-3
Information of ACCSQ-APWG
Mr. Soerjiono
Deputy Director, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Indonesia
INFORMATION ON ASEAN CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS AND QUALITY -
AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCT WORKING GROUP (ACCSQ-APWG) ACTIVITIES
Distinguished participants, Ladies and Gentlemen, Assalamu’alaikum Wr.Wb. First of all I would like to thank the JASIC Meeting organizer for the opportunity to brief the meeting on the activities of ACCSQ’s Auto Product Working Group, which was tasked to handle harmonization of automotive standard and technical regulation in ASEAN. At the 24th ACCSQ Meeting held in Kuala Lumpur from 3rd – 4th August 2004, the ASEAN Leaders agreed to establish 5 Product Working Groups namely working group on automotive, wood base product, traditional medicine and health supplement, rubber based product and medical devices in order to facilitate harmonization of standard in ASEAN. Since its establishment, the Product Working Group on Automotive (APWG) has organized 6 times meeting, the latest one in July 2007 in Hanoi-Viet Nam. The main objective of APWG is to help ACCSQ in the elimination of technical barrier to trade related to automotive products. The APWG in its effort to facilitate standard harmonization has done the following: 1. Exchanging information on standards, rules, regulations, procedures and mandatory
requirements in each ASEAN member country related to automotive sector. To date, the APWG has collected all those information and have analyzed them to see their respective similarities and differences.
2. Identifying areas for possible harmonization and MRAs with the focus on harmonization of Asean automotive safety and emission standard based on UN-ECE regulation.
3. At the 6th APWG meeting held in Hanoi, Vietnam, member countries have agreed to adopt some UN-ECE regulations for automotive such as: R16 (safety belts), R30 ( pneumatic tyres for PV), R54 (pneumatic tyres for CV), R22 (motorcycle helmet), R43 (safety glass and emission& environment), R40 (exhaust emission for motorcycle), R49 (diesel emission), R83 (gaseous pollutant), R41 (noise for motorcycle), and R51 (noise). Member countries agreed that the timeframe for completion of alignment with each national standard will be by 31 December 2008 with flexibility for Cambodia, Lao PDR and Myanmar.
4. Identifying required technical infrastructures for the establishment of mutual recognition arrangements for product’s conformance and assessment. At this present,
1
member countries are in the process of studying the suitable system to be applied on standard conformance and assessment.
Ladies and gentlemen, APWG do realize that the needs for another media in addition to the existing formal APWG’s meetings, such as ASEAN Portal Application (ASAP) – the web based application is very important in order to facilitate further in depth discussion and exchange of information related to automotive standard as well as facilitating the transparencies of information among ASEAN member countries. ASEAN member countries have varied level of capabilities in adopting UN-ECE and to become a member of WP29. APWG in its work has reviewed and analyzed the list of UNE-ECE regulation related to automotive in order to identify possible area for harmonization and has found that harmonization of standard should be conducted in a gradual manner. It is obvious that some obstacles are still exist in our way to reach automotive standard and regulation harmonization in ASEAN due especially to the following four facts: 1. Uniqueness of characteristics of standards in each ASEAN member country. 2. Shortage of English version of standards and regulation of each ASEAN member
country. 3. Varied or different reference using in developing standards and regulation in each
ASEAN member country. 4. Shortage of expertise in standardization especially for ECE-Regulation experts. Ladies and gentlemen, The APWG is ofcourse opened for and in need of any input from both private sectors as well as from any well-established institution. APWG thank to: 1. ASEAN Automotive Federation who has provided APWG its invaluable inputs
regarding our effort in pursuing harmonization such as on 1) the focus of harmonization which is on safety, certification and environment, 2) the focus of safety aspect which is on safety belt, tyre, and safety glass, 3) the implementation of type approval system which is in line with UN-ECE regulation, and 4) the time frame for implementation of EURO standard which is at latest 2008 for EURO-2 and end of 2012 for EURO-4.
2. Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center (JASIC) gave a presentation on the
UNECE 1958 Agreement covering issues such as mutual recognition approval of contracting parties and rights and duties of contracting parties.
3. JAMA for its invaluable inputs on Vehicle Type Approval System, which the development
of a Vehicle Type Approval (VTA) System for Car Registration with clear technical requirements within this VTA System for ASEAN would help simplify procedures in the
2
region with the view to align regulations with the UN-ECE Regulations. It is may be a good activity to begin with under the ASEAN–Japan cooperation. It is also an activity in line with the strategies of the APWG work programmed, namely enhancing conformity assessment/ technical infrastructure in ASEAN, building mutual confidence in conformity assessment/technical infrastructure, and developing cooperation with Dialogue Partners.
APWG propose to JAMA to consider technical assistance and capacity building programmed on accession to the WP 29, UN ECE 1958 Agreement (rights and duties), Vehicle Type Approval Systems and COP, harmonization of emission standards, human resource training and development, and enhancing testing capabilities of automotive testing facilities.
4. US Department of Commerce which has been hold a workshop on “Biofuels and Automotive
Industry”. Biofuels as an alternative fuel is needed to reduce our dependences from gasoline and our effort to reduce greenhouse gases (CO2) and also 1998 agreement is introduces as a way to implement global regulation is needed.
Ladies and gentlemen, APWG is also opened for any input from developed countries in the world who would like to offer their helping hand to help ASEAN in accelerating ASEAN’s effort in pursuing automotive standard and technical regulation. I do hope this meeting will produce fruitful deliverables that benefit to all participants especially for ASEAN countries in their effort to pursuing standard and technical regulatory harmonization. Thank you very much for your attention. Wassalamu’alaikum Wr.Wb. Syarif Hidayat Chair of APWG
3
JAPAN
Report-4
Briefing on JASIC’s long and medium term agenda
Mr. Tadaomi Akiba Executive Director
JASIC
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
http://www.jasic.org
The 12th Asia G/I Meeting
Tadaomi AKIBA / JASIC
JASIC LONG TERM ACTION PROGRAM
Mutual Recognition of
Whole Vehicle Certification
Contents
1.Current activities of JASIC 1)Purpose and organization
2)Harmonization activities for WP29
2.Long term action program of JASIC 3.MRA and Vehicle Type Approval
under the 1958 Agreement
1. Current activities of JASIC
1)Purpose and organization
2)Harmonization activities for WP29
Assist the MLIT-Japan in promoting the international harmonization of technical regulations and certification system with government and industry cooperation
Purpose1) Purpose and organization
Organization
Light Motor Vehicle Inspection OrganizationJapan Automobile Manufacturers Association,Inc. Japan Auto Parts Industries AssociationJapan Automobile Importers AssociationJapan Automotive Service Equipment AssociationAutomobile Inspection & Registration AssociationJapan Auto-Body Industries Association,Inc. The Japan Automobile Tyre Manufacturers Association,Inc.Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of JapanJapan Land Engine Manufacture Association
Industry
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport
Government
JASIC activitiesJASIC activities
1. Harmonization activities for WP29
2. Harmonization activities for Asia
3. Public relations
Ministry of EnvironmentNational traffic safety and environment laboratory
The Japan Automobile Research InstituteSociety of Automotive Engineers of Japan,Inc.
Cooperation organization
2) Harmonization activities for WP29 in JASIC
1. To propose new ECE 2. To modify existing ECE
To introduceECE Reg.
JASIC Committee
Harmonization of Reg.
UN/WP29 + GRs
Mutual Recognition of Approvals
Summary of JASIC Activities
Support Asian Countries to participate in WP29 and to accede to 58 agreement
1. JASIC G/I Meeting2. ODA/JICA Seminar3. Public Relations etc.
Passenger BrakePassenger Brake
Installation of lighting and light-signaling devicesInstallation of lighting and light-signaling devicesECE R13H
ECE R48
1) JASIC contributed to the harmonization work at WP29, especially in the following areas
Before accession to 1958 Agreement & 1998 Agreement (1987-1997)
Contribution to WP29 activities of JAPAN Since JASIC was established in 1987, we have been promotingworldwide harmonization work
1987 1997 2007 2015
2) JASIC contributed to modify 1958 Agreement. As a result, the door was opened to the world.
ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2
199819981998 Japan acceded to the 1958 AgreementJapan acceded to the 1958 Agreement
199919991999 Japan acceded to the 1998 AgreementJapan acceded to the 1998 Agreement
Japan’s policy on promoting harmonizationContinuously increase the number of applying ECE regulations based on the 1958 Agreement
Applying 37 regulationsActively take part in the work to establish gtrs based on the 98 Agreement
Established 5gtrs and SR1Support the new activities on ITS
The report March 2007Welcome the moves in Asian countries towards activities under WP29
We did welcome several new member countries
Contribution to WP29 activities of JAPAN
After accession to 1958 Agreement & 1998 agreement (1998-)
1987 1997 2007 2015Start G/I Meeting in 1998
2. Long term action program of JASIC
20152015
Long term action program of JASIC
The Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement agree with the elements for mutual recognition of a whole vehicle certification
I. Promotion of international harmonization and mutual recognition of approvals under UN/ECE/WP29
II. Studying the issues involved in the future mutual recognition of a whole vehicle certification and development its proposal to UN
III. Identifying the trends of the motor vehicle inspection/maintenance system
IV. JASIC public relations activities
Establish 12 gtrs, New gtrs unified with UN/ECE Regulation
Subject of JASIC activities Goal in FY2015
Approach to GOAL
Recommended Recommended regulationsregulations
Elements for mutual recognition of a whole vehicle certification
Current status of JAPAN
Type designation system
Safety regulation for Road vehicle
Filling the gapFilling the gapFilling the gap
GOAL in FY2015
1958 Agreement1958 AgreementUN/ECE regulationUN/ECE regulation
Filling the gapFilling the gapFilling the gap
Recommended as regulation necessary for M1 category
R3, R4, R6, R7, R10, R11, R13H, R14, R16, R17, R19, R21, R23, R25, R26, R28, R30, R34, R37, R38, R39, R43, R44, R45, R46, R48, R51, R64, R77, R79, R83, R85, R89, R91, R94, R95, R98, R99, R100, R101, R112, R116, R117, R119, R121, R123, R125
47 ECE regulations
Recommended as regulation necessary for N1 category
R3, R4, R6, R7, R10, R11, R13/R13H, R14, R16, R17, R19, R23, R25, R28, R34, R37, R38, R39, R43, R44, R45, R46, R48, R51, R54, R61, R77, R79, R83, R85, R89, R91, R98, R99, R100, R101, R112, R116, R117, R119, R121, R123
42 ECE regulations
Recommended as regulation necessary for L category
R3, R10, R28, R37, R39, R40, R41, R50, R53, R60, R62, R75, R78, R81, R112, R113
16 ECE regulations
Elements for mutual recognition of a whole vehicle certification
Vehicle type
Category
Weight
Dimension
Application documents
Test condition
Unique regulation
Propose to WP29 by FY2009
“The frame of mutual recognition of a whole vehicle certification under UN/ECE/WP29 ”
Target
Propose to GRs and WP29 each time“Amendment each ECE regulations”
Vehicle Type Approval System
Key Element to use a vehicle on the road
Surrounding vehicle
Road
Driver
Tax
Insurance
Periodical Inspection
Maintenance system
Registration
UN/ECE/1958 Agreement
ECE regulation
E Marking C O P
You can drive on the road !! Certificates for Technical
requirements=UN/ECE Regulations
MRA
Final image of JASIC future activity
Mutual Recognition of a Whole Vehicle Certification
MRA in 2015
UN/ECE/1958 Agreement
ECE regulation
E Marking C O P
Certificates for Technicalrequirements
=UN/ECE Regulations
MRA under 1958 Agreement
Mutual recognition of a whole vehicle certification under UN/ECE
Registration in each Contracting party
Type Approval for motor vehicle
Drive on the road
ECE R13 Brake
ECE R16 Seat belt
ECE R51 Noise
ECE R83Emission etc…
Gathering Required ECE certificates (Parts or system)
ECE Regulations
Certificate of each ECE regulations
Responsibility among all stake folders
Manufacturer Applicant Government Technical serviceE
CE
regulations (S
ystem or com
ponents)
Application documents
Initial Assessment for applicant
Certification Tests
ReportCertificate
Whole vehicle
COC
Application documents
Initial Assessment for applicant
Certification Tests
ReportCertificate
Registration by User
AssemblyCOP
AssemblyCOP
3. MRA and Vehicle Type Approval under the 1958 Agreement
Vehicle type approval
• Vehicle type approval is a system whereby the government assures that every motor vehicle has complied with the technical regulations concerning safety, the environment, etc. before motor vehicles are registered.
Key Element for MRAApplicant
Initial assessment
COP Administrative department
Issue of certificate
Designate and control to technical services
Technical service
Necessary competence of technical knowledge(i.e. EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005, EN ISO/IEC 17020:2004 or EN 45012:1998)
Carry out check or test
Make official repot
Conformity of productionspecified in Appendix 2 of the 1958 Agreement
1. Initial assessment
ISO 9002 or equivalent accreditation standard
2. Conformity of production
The existence of adequate arrangements and documented control plans
para 2.3. Requirements for the holder of the approval
para 2.4. Requirements for the authority
List of administrative department and technical services (TRANS/WP29/343/Rev.XX)
Contracting party Administrative department
Technical service
GERMANY
LUXEMBOURG2 administrative departments
4 technical services
JAPAN 1 administrative department
1 technical service
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
1 administrative departments
33 technical services
1 administrative department
EXAMPLE
E31
E1
E43
E13
Designated Administrative
Department and DesignatedTechnicalService
Indicated in the document of TRANS/WP.29/343/Rev.XX
JAPAN
Conformity of Production (COP) ProceduresInitial Assessment <before granting type approval>
ManufacturerAdministrative Authority
ISO9002 or relevant accreditation
ISO9002 or relevant accreditation
existence of satisfactory arrangements and procedures for ensuring effective control
so that vehicles, equipment or parts when in production conform to the approved type
An approval authority of another Contracting Party
to the Agreement
Elements of 1958 Agreement
Conformity of production (COP) ProceduresManufacturer (holder of the approval)
Select samples and send them to technical service to be checked
Inspector
Test records and production records
Test records and production records
At every inspection
Select samples at
random to be tested
Where the nature of the test is appropriate
Where the level of control appears unsatisfactory
Elements of 1958 Agreement
Long term Action program to WP29 and G/I meeting
2008 year 2009 year 2010 year
Proposal from JAPAN
Inform Asian countries on information of WP29 through G/I meeting and expert meeting
Make clear subject to be considers to
WP29 in March, June and Nov.
Find out solution of each subject in WP29
Draft proposal of WVC under WP29
Consider mutual recognition of a Whole Vehicle Certification in G/I meeting
Consider mutual recognition of a Whole Vehicle Certification in G/I meeting
Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center
Contact address : [email protected]
Thank you for your attention
Round Discussion
“Short Presentation and Speech on the Progress of Harmonization of
Vehicle Regulations and Mutual Recognition of Approvals by Each
country”
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE 12TH G/I MEETING
No. Question Page
Question 2: The latest situation on WP29 and the 1958/1998 Agreement
2-1 Regarding WP29 participation. 2
2-2 Accession to the 1958 Agreement. 3
2-3 Accession to the 1998 Agreement. 5
2-4
What is your plan regarding the introduction of ECE regulations? Please fill in the number of items you plan to introduce by 2010 and after 2010, respectively. Also please fill in ECE Regulation number you plan to adopt, if possible. What problems do you have on introduction of ECE Regulation in your country? How should you resolve these problems?
6
2-5 Please describe the outline of the progress of your domestic activity for regulation harmonization, problems currently encountered in promoting the harmonization, activities you have newly launched to help promote harmonization and your prospect of future development.
11
Question 3: Comments for Panel Discussion
3-1 Please advise the outline of the present vehicle/component certification processes in your country. 13
3-2
Would your country plan to upgrade certification processes in accordance with planned introduction of the UN/ECE regulations in the future? If so, please advise the outline and timing. What problems do you have on establishment of vehicle type approval in your country? How should you resolve these problems?
15
3-3 Would your country plan to accept UN/ECE certificates issued by the UN/ECE member countries? 16
3-4 Would your country have a government/industry working group for discussion of UN/ECE regulations and new certification systems? If so, please explain the participating organizations and outline of decision-making process.
17
Question 4: Request for G/I Meeting in the future
4-1 Your country is requested to mention your opinion regarding the theme and expectation for the oncoming 5th Series. 19
Question 5: Intention on holding Asia Expert Meeting
5-1 In your country, are there any plans to hold some Expert Meeting(s) within three years from now on? 20
5-2 In case your country organizes the Expert Meeting, What theme is the most benefit for your country? What is its reason? 20
5-3 Any other comments/request for the Expert Meeting? 21
- 1 -
Question 2: The latest situation on WP29 and the 1958/1998Agreement 2-1: Regarding WP29 participation - For the participating country; What problems do you have on your country’s continuous participation in WP29 and/or GRs? How should you resolve these problems? - For the not participating country; When does your country plan to participate in WP29 and/or GRs? What problems do you have on your country’s first participation in WP29 and/or GRs? How should you resolve these problems? China budget, manpower, knowledge, experiences in testing
Hong Kong NA
India India has started participation in WP.29 and GR sessions since 2003 and about 50 various sessions were participated by Indian delegation which are of national interest.
Indonesia
Indonesia already came to WP 29 as observer in Nov 2005 and June 2007, and will continuously participate as observer. Problem and countermeasure in continuing the participation: a. Coordination among ministries/department who are the stakeholder in regard of their
responsibility in automotive sector. b. Financial problem: convince the Finance Department and National Planning Board of
the importance of this meeting for the development of automotive industries. (to make it as nation budgetary)
Japan Japan has been participated since 1977. (In the beginning, Japan participated as observer.)
Korea What Problems do you have on your country’s participation in WP29 and GRs? - No problem.
Laos
- Not yet indicated time frame - Need to get understanding the WP29 and GRs - Introduce the WP29 and GRs by organizing
Country level workshops/seminars and set up a group national expert/committee for studying, translating and asking for approval from Government
Malaysia We have attended the meeting twice. So far, the only problem we are facing is budget constraint to send our officers to attend the meeting in Europe. We would like to propose for WP29 meetings to be rotated in different region such as Asia.
Myanmar We are still in the process of consideration to participate in WP29 or GR.
Philippines The Philippines attended the WP 29 World Forum as observer on June 20-23, 2006 and June 25-29, 2007.
Singapore Plan to consider participation in WP29 as an observer in the year 2008/2009.
Thailand
Budget constraint and lack of expertise are our main problems for continuous WP.29 participation. The ways to solve these problems are vary, e.g. maximize utilization of existing budget and expertise, recruit new engineer from abroad, looking for other financial support.
Vietnam 2 times: in 2004 and this year - the 142nd session between 26-29 June no problems
Chinese Taipei Chinese Taipei is willing to participate in the WP.29 and/or GRs. But since Chinese Taipei is not a member of the UN, there is still difficulty for us to participate in the WP.29 and/or GRs.
- 2 -
2-2: Accession to the 1958 Agreement - For the acceded country; What problems do you have after accession to the 1958 Agreement? How should you resolve these problems? - For the not acceded country; What problems do you have to realize accession to the 1958 Agreement? How do you resolve these problems? What kind of procedures does your country need to decide signing the Agreements domestically?Which organization takes lead for drafting? Which organizations participate in the deliberation of this draft? Which organization(s) have authorities to make the final decision for the country? China the study is ongoing
Hong Kong NA
India
Government of India is examining the pros and cons of signing 1958 Agreement with its all stake holders. Ministry of Road Transport & Highways is the nodal agency in dealing with the matters related to WP 29. Under the Chairmanship of Joint Secretary, MoSRTH, a National Standing Committee is formulated. All the stakeholders like vehicle manufacturers, component manufacturers, test agencies, government agencies; Bureau of Indian Standards, etc are the members of this standing committee. Government of India has presently entrusted Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) with the responsibility of providing Technical Secretariat assistance to the National Standing Committee on WP 29 matters. ARAI is the premier testing and research organization having state of the art facility and expertise in the automotive field. Under this standing committee, 6 special working groups are formed as mirror committees to 6 GR groups of WP 29 (namely GRE, GRRF, GRPE, GRSP, GRSG and GRB). India had started active participation in this important global activity. Each of the above groups deals with specific subjects/ regulations. The group members are the technical experts from vehicle/component manufacturer’s and test agencies. Extensive technical deliberations bring out national viewpoints on every subject, which are consolidated by the secretariat. Wherever national participation is felt necessary, delegation is sent by the Government to participate in respective meetings in Geneva or other host countries. To ensure representation of national interest and compliance to the national policies, in the right perspective, suitable briefing sessions are held at ARAI with all concerned stakeholders. The National Standing Committee takes final decision.
Indonesia
a. Problem and countermeasure in realizing to accede: - Coordination among ministries/department who are the stakeholder in regard of
their responsibility in automotive sector. - financial problem: convince the Finance Department and National Planning Board
of the importance of this meeting for the development of automotive industries - Convince the parliament for accessing the 1958 Agreement.
b. after coordination among ministries, we go to the National Planning Board, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and National Secretary to bring it to Parliament for approval.
c. MOT and MOI d. MO Energy, MO Environment, Ministry of Trade, National Standard Board, Parts and
Automotive Association, others. e. MO Foreign Affairs.
- 3 -
Japan Japan has already acceded to the 1958 Agreement in 1998.
Korea What Problems do you have after accession to the 1958 Agreement? - No problem.
Laos
- Not yet indicated time frame - Need to get understanding the WP29 and GRs - Introduce the WP29 and GRs by organizing
Country level workshops/seminars and set up a group national expert/committee for studying, translating and asking for approval from Government
Malaysia We are still reviewing our Road Transport Rules to be in line with UNECE Regulations. At the moment, we accept UNECE Regulations as alternative regulations in Malaysia.
Myanmar
Myanmar is now just in the process of trying to produce motor vehicles for domestic use. So it will take time to become a country that can manufacture vehicles for export. In this situation, we have to accept the standards of relevant manufacturing countries for the vehicles imported to our country, in line with the vehicle regulation applied in our country. Our domestic procedure for signing the agreements are as follow: Three ministries have to involve for drafting. They are Ministry of Rail Transportation (under which is Road Transport Administration Department), Ministry of Industry (1), and Ministry of Industry (2). Then, the case has to be presented to Foreign Affairs Policy Committee (FAPC) which will proceed it to the Cabinet. The Cabinet has the authority to make the final decision.
Philippines The Philippine Roadmap on Harmonization of MV Regulations and Standards states that Philippine Accession to the1958 Agreement is by 2008.
Singapore
The decision to sign the Agreements would have to be made by the Singapore Government at the Cabinet level. The Ministry of Transport (MOT) and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) would submit a proposal, in consultation with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), for Cabinet’s consideration.
Thailand Since Thailand has been a Contracting Party since May 1, 2006, the problem is our internal legal system to take more time for improving our technical regulations in line with UNECE.
Vietnam
- What problems do you have to realize accession to the 1958 Agreement? Ans.: The limited ability to apply ECE regulations: test facilities, small output of manufacturers etc.
- How do you resolve these problems? Ans.: ODA, domestic budget, privatize testing; Acrediting foreign test labs. Enhance awareness on big output of maker
- What kind of procedures does your country need to decide signing the Agreements domestically?
Ans.: Ministry of Transport (MOT) submits proposal document to Government. If approved, MOFA will do the administrative works specified by The1958 Agreement
- Which organization takes lead for drafting? Ans.: Vietnam Register – Authority of motor vehicle approval of Vietnam
- Which organizations participate in the deliberation of this draft? Ans.: Vietnam Register and other relative Departments of MOT, MOST, Ministry of Industry and Trade (MIT), MOFA
- Which organization(s) have authorities to make the final decision for the country? Ans.: Government or a Ministry authorized by Government
Chinese Taipei Since Chinese Taipei is not a member of the UN, there is still difficulty to accede to the 1958 Agreement.
- 4 -
2-3: Accession to the 1998 Agreement For the acceded country; What problems do you have after accession to the 1998 Agreement? How should you resolve these problems? For the not acceded country; What problems do you have to realize accession to the 1998 Agreement? How should you resolve these problems? China harmonize GTRs with national regulatory system
Hong Kong In this regard, we follow People’s Republic of China.
India
India has signed 1998 Agreement in 2006 and accession is effective from April 2006. India has actively participated in formulation of GTRs on: - World-wide motorcycle emission test cycle (WMTC) - Motorcycle braking - World-wide heavy-duty certification procedure (WHDC) - Heavy-duty on-board diagnostics (WWH-OBD) India wishes to exchange views with other signatory countries about implementation GTRs in national rule making.
Indonesia
a. Problem and countermeasure in realizing to accede: - Coordination among ministries/department who are the stakeholder in regard of
their responsibility in automotive sector. - financial problem: convince the Finance Department and National Planning Board
of the importance of this meeting for the development of automotive industries - Convince the parliament for accessing the 1958 Agreement.
b. after coordination among ministries, we go to the National Planning Board, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and National Secretary to bring it to Parliament for approval.
c. MOT and MOI d. MO Energy, MO Environment, Ministry of Trade, National Standard Board, Parts and
Automotive Association, others. e. MO Foreign Affairs.
Japan Japan has already acceded to the 1998 Agreement in 1999.
Korea What Problems do you have after accession to the 1998 Agreement? - No problem.
Laos
- Not yet indicated time frame - Need to get understanding the WP29 and GRs - Introduce the WP29 and GRs by organizing
Country level workshops/seminars and set up a group national expert/committee for studying, translating and asking for approval from Government
Malaysia We are still reviewing our Road Transport Rules to be in line with UNECE Regulations. At the moment, we accept UNECE Regulations as alternative regulations in Malaysia.
- 5 -
Myanmar
Myanmar is now just in the process of trying to produce motor vehicles for domestic use. So it will take time to become a country that can manufacture vehicles for export. In this situation, we have to accept the standards of relevant manufacturing countries for the vehicles imported to our country, in line with the vehicle regulation applied in our country. Our domestic procedure for signing the agreements are as follow: Three ministries have to involve for drafting. They are Ministry of Rail Transportation (under which is Road Transport Administration Department), Ministry of Industry (1), and Ministry of Industry (2). Then, the case has to be presented to Foreign Affairs Policy Committee (FAPC) which will proceed it to the Cabinet. The Cabinet has the authority to make the final decision.
Philippines Accession to the 1998 Agreement is by 2010.
Singapore
The decision to sign the Agreements would have to be made by the Singapore Government at the Cabinet level. The Ministry of Transport (MOT) and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) would submit a proposal, in consultation with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), for Cabinet’s consideration.
Thailand It is still not a clear picture for more benefit of accession to 1998 Agreement that accession to 1958 Agreement. With the existing manpower shortage we may need a wait –and- see position until the implementation of 1998 Agreement is settled well.
Vietnam
- What problems do you have to realize accession to the 1998 Agreement? Ans.: Difficult to apply global technical regulation
- How should you resolve these problems? Ans.: Having long term plan
Chinese Taipei Since Chinese Taipei is not a member of the UN, there is still difficulty to accede to the 1998 Agreement.
2-4: What is your plan regarding the introduction of ECE regulations? Please fill in the number of items you plan to introduce by 2010 and after 2010, respectively. Also please fill in ECE Regulation number you plan to adopt, if possible. What problems do you have on introduction of ECE Regulation in your country? How should you resolve these problems?
China
By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted: 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted: 2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items adopted: 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
no definite plan, it depends on the real situation and the need of the industry
- 6 -
Hong Kong
ECEs already in Law: R14, R16, R17, R21, R25, R39, R43, R44, R80 and R118 By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted:
26 items related to door lock and lighting devices are in draft legislation stage (exact timing of legislation is not yet known)
2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted: The proposed list of standards to be accepted under the above legislation are R3, R4, R6, R5, R7, R11, R19, R21, R23, R31, R37, R38, R45, R48, R50, R53, R74, R77, R86, R87, R91, R98, R99, R104, R112 and R113.
2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items adopted: - 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted: -
India
At present 74% of ECE regulations are partially or fully aligned. Following is tentative plan for alignment with ECE regulations: By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted: 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted: 2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items adopted: 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted: Tentative schedule is drawn for implementation of -Euro IV/ V equivalent emission norms -Frontal crash -EMI-EMC -Remaining ECE regulations
Indonesia
By 2010: 1) Number of items introduced: 26 items 2) ECE Regulation’s number introduced:
R113, R37, R3, R23, R38, R78, R17, R25, R14, R16, R27, R110, R105, R44, R46, R81, R58, R103, R13, R80, R67, R66, R51, R41, R84, R85
3) Number of items adopted: 11 items 4) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
R16, R14, R40, R49, R83, R41, R51, R22, R43, R30, R54 2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items introduced: not yet decided 2) ECE Regulation’s number introduced: 3) Number of items adopted: not yet decided 4) ECE Regulation’s number adopted: Problem in introduction of ECE Regulation:
a. Language b. Expert/human resources c. Testing facilities
Countermeasures: a. held expert meeting b. held discussion/exchange experience among stakeholder c. propose the development of testing facilities both from nation and private sector
- 7 -
Japan
By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted:
In preparation: 12, plan to adopt 3-4 items each year. 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
ECE10, ECE16, ECE40, ECE41, ECE50, ECE53, ECE79, ECE98, ECE99, ECE112, ECE113, ECE121
2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items adopted:
Plan to adopt 3-4 items each year. 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
Korea
By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted: 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
ECE regulations (Adoption procedure of ECE regulations is under consideration) - Harmonized Items : R13H, R19, R58, R25, R39, R94, R 121, GTR 1 - Plan to harmonize (’07-‘08)
ECE regulation : R123, R87 GTR : GTR 3
By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted: 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
- Plan to harmonize 5 to 6 items each year 2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items adopted: 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
- Plan to harmonize 5 to 6 items each year
Laos
By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted: Not yet indicated 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted: Not yet indicated 2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items adopted: Not yet indicated 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted: Not yet indicated
Malaysia
Automotive Cabinet Committee has approved the following UNECE Regulations to be adopted in Malaysia:- a) UNECE R36 b) UNECE R52 c) UNECE R66 d) UNECE R80 By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted: 19 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
UNECE 11, 13, 13H, 16, 17, 28, 39, 44, 46, 79, 14, 40, 49, 83, 30, 54, 51, 22, 43. 2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items adopted: 32 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
UNECE 3, 4, 6, 7, 19, 23, 37, 38, 45, 48, 77, 91, 98, 99, 112, 119, 123, 34, 51, 55, 64, 85, 89, 116, 117, 121, 10, 21, 26, 61, 94, 95
Myanmar
By 2010 1) Number of items adopted: 10 items 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
R 16, R40, R 49, R 83, R30, R 54, R 51, R 41, R 22, R 43
- 8 -
Philippines
Regulation 2-wheeled 4-wheeled Fuel Properties and Emission Regulations Safety Regulations
ECE 40:01 (current) Euro I by 2008 (industry’s proposal) Euro 4 by 2012 (industry’s proposal)
Euro 2 (current) Euro 4 (by 2012) R3:2005 R4:2005 R6:2005 R7:2005 R112:2005 R13:2005 R13h:2005 R22 R67 R115
Singapore
Singapore accepts vehicles that have been designed and tested to comply with UNECE Regulations or other international standards, such as the Japanese Safety Regulations and US Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, or their equivalent. We have made reference to the following UNECE Regulations in our domestic regulations:- Already made reference to UNECE Regulation (6 items): R19 - Front Fog Lamps R38 - Rear Fog Lamps R58 - Rear Under-Run Protection R73 - Lateral Protection R89 - Speed Limiters R104 - Retro-reflective Marking for Heavy and Long vehicles We plan to progressively make reference to the following UNECE Regulations in our domestic regulations:- Plan to adopt UNECE Regulation (47 items): R1 & 2 - Headlamps R3 - Reflex Reflectors R4 - Rear Registration plate lamp R5 - Sealed Beam Headlamps R6 - Direction Indicators R7 - Front and Rear Position (Side) Lamps, Stop Lamps and End-Outline marker lamps R8 - Halogen Headlamps (H1,H2,H3,HB3,HB4,H7,H8,H9,HIR1 and/or HIR2) R10 - Radio Interference Suppression R11 - Door latches and hinges R12 - Behaviour Steering Device R13 - Braking R14 - Seat Belt Anchorage R16 – Seat Belts & Restraints R17 - Seats & Anchorages R20 - Halogen Headlamps (H4) R21 - Interior Fittings R23 - Reversing Lamps R25 - Head Restraints R26 - External Projections R28 - Audio Warning Devices R30 - Pneumatic Tires (Passenger vehicle) R31 - Halogen Sealed Beam Headlamps R32 - Rear-End Collision
- 9 -
R33 - Head-on Collision R35 - Arrangement of foot controls R37 - Filament Lamps R39 - Speedometers R42 - Front and Rear Protective devices R43 - Uniform provisions concerning the approval of safety glazing materials R45 - Headlamp cleaners R46 - Rear view mirrors R48 - Lighting installation R50 - Light (Moped, motor cycle) R53 - Installation of lights (Motor cycle) R54 - Pneumatic Tires (Commercial vehicle) R57 - Headlamps (Motor cycle) R59 - Replacement Silencing System R67 - Specific Equipment of vehicles using LPG R72 - Halogen Headlamps (HS1 for Motor cycle) R94 - Protection of the occupants in the event of a frontal collision R95 - Protection of the occupants in the event of a lateral collision R98 - Gas-discharge headlamps R99 - Gas-discharge light sources R110 - Specific components for CNG R112 - Motor vehicle headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam or a driving beam or both and equipped with filament lamps R113 - Motor vehicle headlamps emitting a symmetrical passing beam or a driving beam or both and equipped with filament lamps
Thailand
By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted: DLT-11, TISI- 53 (voluntary standards) 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
DLT- R11, R13H, R14, R16 (Part II), R17, R41, R46, R48, R51, R75, R81 TISI- R3, R4,R6, R7, R8, R10, R11, R12, R13, R13H, R14, R16, R17, R18, R19,
R20, R21, R23, R25, R26, R28, R30, R31, R37, R38, R39, R41, R43, R46, R48, R50, R51, R53, R54, R55, R58, R60, R62, R73, R75, R77, R78, R79, R81, R85, R91, R98, R99, R101, R112, R113, R116, R121
2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items adopted:
DLT- Already planned but also depending on the outcome of the previous implementation
TISI-We are considering to adopt more ECE Regulations 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
DLT - nil TISI - nil
The problems of introducing ECE are inflexibility of legal process and insufficient expertise. In addition, test facilities within the country are required for TISI’s compulsory standard.
Vietnam
What is your plan regarding the introduction of ECE regulations? 1) Number of items: 6 2) ECE Regulation’s number:
48 (Installation of lights), 112 (Head lamps), 28 (horn), 39 (Speedometer), 51, 41 (Noise), 13 & 13H (brake), 14 & 16 (safety belt & Anchorages)
What problems do you have on introduction of ECE Regulation in your country?
Ans.: Difficult to apply ECE regulations, particularly technical aspect How should you resolve these problems?
Ans.: Having long term plan
- 10 -
Chinese Taipei
Already Adopted(2006): 1) Number of items adopted: 25 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
R3, R6, R7, R16, R19, R23, R28, R30, R36, R37, R39, R43, R48, R52, R53, R54, R60, R74, R77, R81, R91, R98, R99, R104, R78
By 2010: 1) Number of items adopted: 18 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
R5, R11, R12, R13, R13H, R14, R17, R25, R31, R38, R50, R79, R80, R94, R95, R112, R113, R66, R36/52(Fire Protection)
2010 afterwards: 1) Number of items adopted: 8 2) ECE Regulation’s number adopted:
R10, R21, R26, R46, R61, R87, R110, R123
2-5: Please describe the outline of the progress of your domestic activity for regulation harmonization, problems currently encountered in promoting the harmonization, activities you have newly launched to help promote harmonization and your prospect of future development. China ---
Hong Kong Shortage of manpower
India Harmonization process has to be correlated with the socio-economic conditions prevailing in the country, as also the level of advancement of the Industry at large and as such has to be a gradual process. India has already made significant progress towards alignment.
Indonesia
a. Progress for regulation harmonization: - All national standards and regulation decided to be adopted should be align with
UN ECE by Dec 31, 2008. b. Problems encountered in promoting harmonization:
there is no adequate perception among ministries/department who are the stakeholder in regard of their responsibility in automotive sector. (MoEnergy, MoEnvironment, MoFinance, National Standard Board and Automotive Industries)
c. Activities newly launched to help promote harmonization: - Drafting coordination decree among two ministries and other stakeholder on
promoting harmonization. - Held 2 expert meeting in February and October 2007
d. Prospect future development: Follow the Bogor Declaration roadmap.
Japan Japan has been participated WP29 since 1977 and acceded to the 1958 Agreement in 1998 and the 1998 Agreement in 1999 respectively. Now we participate to all GRs.
Korea No problem.
Laos The harmonization has been in line with ASEAN and GMS Cooperation Agreements.
Malaysia No problem. Malaysia is supporting Regulations harmonization in ASIAN/ASEAN countries. Currently, the department is reviewing any possible problems to harmonize vehicle regulations in Malaysia.
Myanmar
As we are a member of ASEAN, we have undertaken our regulation to be harmonized with that of ASEAN. We have no specific problem currently encountered in promoting the harmonization with ASEAN, but we would need technical assistance and National Workshop to promote the harmonization with ECE regulation.
- 11 -
Philippines
1. Drafting of the National Strategic Standardization Master Plan for Automotive by the Philippine Working Group on Automotive
2. Conduct of Planning Workshops on motor vehicle standards and regulations harmonization participated by DOTC-LTO, DTI-BPS, DENR-EMB, DOE, TMG.
3. Drafting of the Roadmap for Harmonization of Vehicle Standards and Regulations 4. Issuance of Executive Order 628 creating the Committee on Harmonization of Vehicle
Standards and Regulations 5. Drafting of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Executive Order 628. The progress of the domestic activity for regulation harmonization is hampered by the lack of technical expertise, equipment and infrastructure to conduct testing and certifications. Lack of proper coordination among government agencies and private organizations likewise affect the implementations of programs and projects.
Singapore
Singapore is not a vehicle-manufacturing country. We currently accept vehicles that have been designed and tested to comply with UNECE Regulations and do not subject vehicles to additional tests. Hence, we are already market-friendly. Therefore, there are currently no strong justifications or immediate need to sign the 1958 and 1998 Agreements.
Thailand
Amendment of Ministerial Regulation No.22 under Motor Vehicle Act (1979) is a key regulation harmonization activity for passenger car , pickup truck and motorcycle on their vehicle systems/parts. In January 2007 the cabinet approved the principle of the amendment and sent to the Council of State to scrutinize. DLT has discussed with the Council twice: May and July 2007. Simultaneously Notification on UNECE regulations in 2-5 has been studied and drafted. Some of them were sent to Thai Automotive Industry Association (TAIA) for requesting official comments, e.g. R11, R51, R48. Thus, as soon as the amendment of MR.22 has been enforced, the notification will be announced and enforced. The best way to do is to encourage the Council in speedy scrunity.
Vietnam
- Outline of the progress of domestic activity for regulation (reg) harmonization: Keep direction of adopting ECE regs. determinedly by annually issuing of volunteer standards and national technical regulations based on ECE regs;
- Problems currently encountered: Lack of testing facility in compliance with ECE regs., technology and financial capacity of domestic manufacturers regarding compliance with most ECE regs. is weak (generally, assembly companies with small production scale – too many companies who shares a small market). For Vietnam, the weak capacity of the companies is main, big and difficult problem to overcome during the process of ECE res. introduction.
- Newly launching activities to help promote harmonization: implement the Law of technical standards and regulations which enforced on the 1st January 2007. There will be the short - term to long - term roadmaps to convert the technical standards based on ECE regs. into technical regulations, to replace non – equivalent to ECE regs. old standards by regulations equivalent to ECE regs.
- Prospect of future development: It mainly depends on the future of Vietnam automotive industry after Vietnam joins the WTO.
Chinese Taipei
1. Chinese Taipei needs help to clarify the detail of the testing, certification and COP in these ECE Regulations. And we also need the information about the revision of ECE regulations.
2. For some new technology which has not regulated in the regulations (Ex. LED Headlamp), how to regulate it?
- 12 -
Question 3: Comments for Panel Discussion 3-1: Please advise the outline of the present vehicle/component certification processes in your country. China gazette system, CCC system
Hong Kong We encourage manufacturer to get the UN/ECE certificate because that will be the basic requirement in future. We have no plan/need to develop the component approval system by ourselves.
India
In India the Rules and Regulations related to driving license, registration of motor vehicles, control of traffic, construction & maintenance of motor vehicles etc are governed by the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (MVA) and the Central Motor Vehicles rules 1989 (CMVR). The Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways (MoSRT&H) acts as a nodal agency for formulation and implementation of various provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act and CMVR. In order to involve all stake holders in regulation formulation, MoSRT&H has constituted two Committees to deliberate and advise Ministry on issues relating to Safety and Emission Regulations, namely – -CMVR- Technical Standing Committee (CMVR-TSC) -Standing Committee on Implementation of Emission Legislation (SCOE) CMVR-TSC is assisted by another Committee called the Automobile Industry Standards Committee (AISC) having members from various stakeholders in drafting the technical standards related to Safety. Director, ARAI is the Chairman of this committee and ARAI provides Secretariat. The National Standards for Automotive Industry are prepared by Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The standards formulated by both BIS and AISC are considered by CMVR-TSC for implementation. Standing Committee on Implementation of Emission Legislation (SCOE) deliberates the issues related to implementation of emission regulation. Based on the recommendations from CMVR-TSC and SCOE, MoSRT&H issues notification for necessary amendments / modifications in the in Central Motor Vehicle Rules. In addition, the other Ministries like Ministry of Environment & Forest (MoEF), Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas (MoPNG) and Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources are also involved in formulation of regulations relating to Emissions, Noise, Fuels and Alternative Fuel vehicles. Every vehicle type is required to comply with the safety and emission standards, which are notified on the date of manufacturing of the vehicle. Manufacture submits the vehicle/ components to the notified test agencies for necessary testing and approval. Type approval certificate from the notified test agency is a pre-requisite for registration of every vehicle. Conformity of Production Certificate for compliance to emission regulations is required for the vehicles in production. For this purpose, test agency randomly selects the vehicle from production line.
Indonesia Attached.
Japan There is a Type Designation of Motor Vehicles System and Type Designation of Devices System in Japan and the designation for devices type is utilized at the time of motor vehicle type designation.
- 13 -
Korea
Self-certification system is in effect in Korea since January 1st, 2003. 1. Manufacturer/importer registers with MOCT before manufacturing or importing
vehicles. 2. Labels affixed to vehicles upon declaration by the manufacturer/importer that the
vehicles are in compliance with all applicable safety standards 3. Manufacturer/importer notifies MOCT of vehicle specification before selling vehicles 4. The government (MOCT) authorized institute (KATRI) purchases vehicles randomly
investigates the compatibility of safety standards and possibility of manufacturing 5. After investigation, correction measures are prescribed if safety defect is founded.
Laos Issued by Department of Transport before import and Registration.
Malaysia Please refer to Malaysia presentation on Malaysia WVTA.
Myanmar
In our country, vehicle Inspection Certificate (VIC) is issued to every vehicle after being inspected annually. But issuing certificate for vehicle components has not been undertaken. VIC is issued by Road Transport Administration Department which is under the Ministry of Rail Transportation.
Philippines ---
Singapore
Singapore accepts vehicles that have been designed and tested to comply with UNECE Regulations or other international standards, such as the Japanese Safety Regulations and US Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, or their equivalent. Currently, motor agents are required to submit the vehicle manufacturer’s certification and test reports for a list of applicable vehicle components, among other documents, through our electronic Vehicle Inspection & Type-Approval System (VITAS) for vehicle type approval applications. In addition to the documents, motor agents are required to send 1 unit of the new vehicle make and model for an inspection. Once the vehicle model has been type approved, there is no need to send subsequent units of the same vehicle make and model for inspection so long as they conform to the same specifications as the unit that was type approved.
Thailand
A whole vehicle approval for LTA is carried out by Department of Land Transport. Resembling a system in other countries, the car manufacturer is required to submit applications, documents providing vehicles drawings/pictures, technical information pursuance to the related laws, and other documents (if any) to DLT to be initially checked. A vehicle sample must be submitted for inspection, measurement, and necessary tests e.g. dimensions, weights, mandatory items, basic performance tests, etc. But no Conformity of Production is yet implemented. There are some compulsory standards for vehicle parts/systems e.g. safety belts, safety glasses, motorcycle exhaust muffler, engines, emissions. Those standards are certified by Thailand Industrial Standard Institute (TISI).
- 14 -
Vietnam
The present vehicle/component certification processes regulated by the 4 Decisions of MT minister (No. 34 for produced automobiles, No. 35 for imported automobiles, No. 2557 for produced motorcycles and mopeds, No. 1378 for imported motorcycles and mopeds).
- Step 1: Manufacturers submit the application for type approval of produced vehicle/component. In cases of imported vehicles, importers submit the application for quality certification of imported vehicles/engines (in cases of motorcycles and mopeds).
- Step 2: Examination of the application for type approval - Step 3: Test/inspection
* In case of produced vehicle/component: Testing samples of the vehicle/component type that needs approval. At the same time, examinating manufactures’ capacities on COP.
* In cases of imported vehicles (only second hand automobiles, and motorcycles and mopeds): Inspecting all second hand automobiles, samples of each imported motorcycle, moped batch.
- Step 4: Grant type approval certificate (produced vehicles/components) or quality certificate (imported vehicles/components).
In addition (only produced vehicles/components): Annually, authority extend or withdraw type approval certificate based on considering conditions regarding quality of products.
Chinese Taipei
For safety type approval: Application →Accept of application and scheduling →vehicle/component inspection/testing →Examination of testing result/COP plan →Certification report →MOTC review →Certificate producing →MOTC approval →Issue of certificate →Periodic COP check
3-2: Would your country plan to upgrade certification processes in accordance with planned introduction of the UN/ECE regulations in the future? If so, please advise the outline and timing. What problems do you have on establishment of vehicle type approval in your country? How should you resolve these problems? China ---
Hong Kong No.
India Our type approval procedure is similar to the whole vehicle type approval procedure followed in ECE. Our national safety and emission standards are also based on ECE regulations to certain extent. Full alignment with ECE regulations is planned for future.
Indonesia Not yet.
Japan NA
Korea The introduction of parts and equipment self-certification system is considered to enhance safety of motor vehicle parts and equipment.
Laos ---
Malaysia Yes. The Government would review on the necessity to strengthen the current certification processes in National Vehicle Type Approval Committee and would consult industry for inputs.
Myanmar Yes. After 2010
Philippines ---
Singapore N.A.
- 15 -
Thailand
Ministry of Transport by Department of Land Transport set up a 10-year plan to improve vehicle certification systems called Implementation Plan for Vehicle Type Approval Establishment (2000-2009). The core objectives are to establish type approval system for vehicles under Motor Vehicle Act 1979 and to improve the type approval system under Land Transport Act 1979 along with improving national vehicle regulations in line with regulations internationally accepted. A whole vehicle type approval for passenger cars and pickup trucks under MVA is the first priority to draft. The final draft will be finalized and enforced if the merging act: LTA and MVA, is enforced first. In addition, amendment of MR.22 under MVA, not only add more essential vehicle system/parts for safety and environmental protection but also authority to type approval of vehicle systems/parts.
Vietnam
- The procedure regulations and regulation on mandatory standrads list regarding motorcycles and mopeds are in revision and will be issued this year by MOT.
- Problems: Local companies are not real manufacturers in accordance with its meaning at the countries having developed automobile industry but are real vehicle assembly companies.
- Therefore, the certification procedure is not able as same as ECE’s ones; document for type approval has to be simplified. In addition, COP is also changed so that suitable to the companies.
Chinese Taipei NA
3-3: Would your country plan to accept UN/ECE certificates issued by the UN/ECE member countries? China Yes or No: No
Hong Kong Yes or No: Yes We will consider to review our local regulation and to accept the UN/ECE certificates as a proof of compliance through legislation if necessary.
India Yes or No: - As explained in para 2.2, India is in the process of considering the accession to 1958 Agreement. Mutual exchange of reports will be considered subsequently.
Indonesia Yes or No: Yes After become contracting party of WP29 and accede the 1958 Agreement.
Japan NA
Korea No Plan.
Laos Not yet scheduled.
Malaysia Yes or No: Yes Currently, the RTD is accepting UNECE Certificates.
Myanmar At the present moment, as Myanmar is a member of ASEAN, we accept or recognize the certificates issued by ASEAN member countries. Likewise, only when Myanmar becomes UN/ECE Member countries, we would consider to accept UN/ ECE certificates.
Philippines ---
Singapore Yes or No: - Already accept UNECE certificates.
- 16 -
Thailand
Yes or No: No Even though Thailand has already become a Contracting Part to the 1958 Agreement with a declaration not to be bound by any Regulation attached to the Agreement until further notification; we have no plan to adopt any Regulation right away after accession. A plan to accept UN/ECE certificates needs to be internally discussed with all related agencies especially local manufacturers. By the way, test report from technical services under 1958 Agreement, which is one of several options, would be accepted under new auspices of whole vehicle or vehicle systems/part type approval systems.
Vietnam Vietnam has still accepted UN/ECE certificates.
Chinese Taipei
Since Taiwan is not the contracting country of the 1958 agreement and mutual recognition should be based on mutual benefits, it is considered not suitable for us to accept the EU certificate unilaterally. But the authority MOTC welcomes talk about the subject of mutual recognition or mutual acceptance of type approval certificate if other country considers necessary.
3-4: Would your country have a government/industry working group for discussion of UN/ECE regulations and new certification systems? If so, please explain the participating organizations and outline of decision-making process. China ---
Hong Kong Government / Industry Working group: No
India Interaction of government and the automotive industry is explained in Para 2-2, 2-4 and 3-1 above.
Indonesia Government / Industry Working group: Yes MoT, MoI, MoEnergy, MoEnvironment, Ministry of Trade, National Standard Board, Parts and Automotive Association, others
Japan Government / Industry Working group: Yes Japan established JASIC in 1987 to make cooperation between government and industry for promoting harmonization.
Korea
Government / Industry Working group: Yes A task force team composed of MOCT, KATRI and manufacturers was organized in 2003 to promote international standards harmonization (WP29) (Plenary meeting and six expert groups corresponding to WP29) ㅇ Organization
- Government : Motor Vehicles Team in the MOCT - Manufacturer : KAMA, automotive and component manufacturer - Testing institute for compliance : KATRI
ㅇ Activities : Research and consultation with regard to international harmonization of motor vehicle safety (WP29 and GR meetings, selecting items for harmonization, research on items for harmonization)
ㅇ Decision-making process : Make decisions through consultation with stakeholder such as manufacture - Discussion regarding technical parts led by KATRI - Plenary meeting led by MOCT - feedback for technical parts – Final decision
Laos No yet at this moment.
Malaysia Government / Industry Working group: Yes The committee members would comprise of relevant Government Ministries/Agencies and industry representatives.
- 17 -
Myanmar
We have already formed "Myanmar Industrial Development Committee" headed by Minister of the Ministry of Industry (1) and "Myanmar Industrial Development Working Committee" headed by Minister of the Ministry of Industry (2). There are nine sub-committees and, two of them are: -Regional Industrial Coordination -Standardization & Quality Improvement. Outline of the decision making process can be described as: Sub-committee ->Working Committee ->Committee ->FAPC ->Cabinet
Philippines ---
Singapore
Government / Industry Working group: No However, we hold regular dialogue sessions with the Motor Traders Association of Singapore (MTA) and would seek their views and discuss on matters concerning the introduction of new regulations and requirements, including the adoption of UNECE Regulations.
Thailand
Government / Industry Working group: Yes To discuss UN/ECE Regulations and improve vehicle certification systems, 2 working groups were officially formed up under the lead of Department of Land Transport (DLT). A working group on technical regulations consists of representatives from DLT, Thai Industrial Standards Institute, Pollution Control Department, Thai Automotive Institute, Thai Society of Automotive Engineering, and vehicle/parts manufacturers. A meeting of the working group has been held regularly 2-3 times a year since 2001 to discuss the plan of studying and improving national regulations. In order to work more effectively, sub working-groups were formed corresponding to GR groups of WP29. Each sub working-group has a meeting every 2-4 weeks to study the UN/ECE Regulation with a goal to draft a national regulation based on the studied UN/ECE Regulation. The draft national regulations done by the sub working-groups will then be circulated to related agencies especially to the vehicle/parts manufacturers in concern to receive final comments prior to submitting the final drafts to DLT Legal division for a legal process. A working group on improving vehicle certification systems has a similar structure to the former working group but the work itself is being carried out in a different way. Rather forming sub working-groups, an informal meeting is held just before a regular working group meeting (2-3 times a year) to really have a detailed discussion and specific comments from the vehicle/parts manufacturers particularly on the draft of type approval scheme. Then, an outcome/progress from the informal meeting and other related subjects is reported to the Working group meeting to have approval and comments.
Vietnam Under development of setting up.
Chinese Taipei
For vehicle safety type approval, there is no formal working group for discussion of UN/ECE regulations and certification systems among government and industry. However, when the MOTC plans to introduce new regulation or revise current regulation, it will notify the related industry and ARTC for the multi-stage discussions. The regulation draft will be corrected according to the discussion conclusions and then proposed to the minister for the publication
- 18 -
Question 4: Request for G/I Meeting in the future 4-1: Your country is requested to mention your opinion regarding the theme and expectation for the oncoming 5th Series.
China
Since many Asian countries have not acceded to 1958 Agreement, some efforts may be paid to establishing bilateral or multilateral agreement among Asian economies on recognition of testing results presented by designated test facilities, which are approved by all interest parties.
Hong Kong No.
India
We feel that the forth coming G/I meeting could discuss following topics: -Transport Management Systems -I & M and phasing out of old vehicles -ULEV/ non-conventional energy -Passive Safety -Country-wise Implementation of GTRs notified under 1998 agreement -Rationalization of regional/ country-specific requirements
Indonesia Please also consider to discuss also about 1997 and 1998 agreement, not only 1958 Agreement.
Japan Nothing Particular
Korea ---
Laos Understanding of foundation building for international vehicle certification/mutual recognition system.
Malaysia
Malaysia would like to propose for roadmap on harmonization of vehicle type approval in Asian counties by 2015. Comprehensive discussion between Governments and industry should be held in order to achieve the proposed deadline in 2015.
Myanmar We would participate and cooperate on the coming 5th Series G/I Meeting.
Philippines The series of G/I meetings should support the Asian countries in WP 29 participation by providing some guidance in establishing ECE Regulations and mutual recognition certifications.
Singapore ---
Thailand
It is acceptable to educate vehicle type approval system into the same direction. Anyway It should bear in mind that each country may have different background, different legal structure or even various relevant agencies. In addition, it is an internal legal process which need more time from more legal agencies to fulfill.
Vietnam Understanding of foundation building for an international vehicle certification/mutual recognition system among major Asian countries is still very neccessary to get high consensus of the things that to be carried out for the system.
Chinese Taipei Chinese Taipei considers the proposed theme of 5th series meeting is appropriate and would be helpful for harmonization of vehicle regulations and MRA among Asian countries.
- 19 -
Question 5: Intention on holding Asia Expert Meeting 5-1: In your country, are there any plans to hold some Expert Meeting(s) within three years from now on? China no plan for hosting expert meeting(s)
Hong Kong No.
India Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways and Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises are nodal agencies to host such meetings. India would examine this request and communicate our views in future.
Indonesia Not yet decided.
Japan No plan. Japan expects Asian country having less experience of vehicle technical standards and their certification to hold the Expert Meeting to get the knowledge of those systems.
Korea No Plan.
Laos ---
Malaysia
Yes. Malaysia would like to propose for the following meeting: Year 2008: Tyres: R30, R54, R75 Seat, safety belts, safety belt anchorage: R14, R16, R17 Year 2009: Malaysia: Safety Glazing Materials; R43 Head restraint: R25
Myanmar We wish to hold some expert Meetings after 2010.
Philippines The Philippines can hold expert meetings if funded by bilateral cooperation.
Singapore We would consider participating in Expert Meetings organised by other countries.
Thailand 2008 (2-3 days in August or September)
Vietnam Consider 2009
Chinese Taipei There is no plan to hold Expert Meeting in Chinese Taipei in the near future. But our authority will consider to propose the request of such meetings when there is demand domestically.
5-2: In case your country organizes the Expert Meeting, What theme is the most benefit for your country? What is its reason? China ---
Hong Kong ---
India It is suggested to have a theme “Addressing the needs of developing nations while formulating global technical regulations”
Indonesia ---
Japan Not available
- 20 -
Korea ---
Laos ---
Malaysia Malaysia is preparing to adopt the above UNECE Regulation with in 5 years time. Therefore, comprehensive understanding by industry players is necessary. Expert meeting could help them to understand the regulations.
Myanmar "Accession to the 1958/1998 Agreement and WP 29".
Philippines The theme that is most benefit for the Philippines is the “Intent of UN/ECE Regulations and Mutual Recognition of Certifications”
Singapore N.A
Thailand
We plan to organize Expert Meeting on active safety regulations for motorcycles because the sub-working group on improving motorcycle regulations has finished studying and drafting some regulations as planned. The Expert Meeting on motorcycle regulations, namely R53, R78 and R113, will definitely provide a better understanding of those regulations prior to actually implementing them.
Vietnam Braking and passive safety (safety belt & Anchorages)
Chinese Taipei NA
5-3: Any other comments/request for the Expert Meeting? China ---
Hong Kong ---
India No comments.
Indonesia ---
Japan Japan will assist the country having an intention to hold the Expert Meeting in cooperation with JASIC. Basically, Japan will send Japanese Expert to the Meeting through JASIC.
Korea ---
Laos ---
Malaysia ---
Myanmar
We wish to hold, after 2010, the Expert Meeting in Myanmar with the theme of "Accession to the 1958/1998 Agreement and WP 29". And we (Road Transport Administration Department which undertakes vehicle regulation) also wish to attend the all coming Expert Meetings.
Philippines The Philippine Committee on Harmonization of MV Standards and Regulations would like to propose for the passing of the Noise Control Act. An Experts Meeting which will provide information on the process and technology would be helpful.
Singapore N.A
Thailand Expert meeting in 2009 for Thailand will be proposed during the meeting. Vietnam ---
Chinese Taipei NA
- 21 -
China Automotive Technology andChina Automotive Technology andResearch CenterResearch Center
BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF CHINABRIEF INTRODUCTION OF CHINAAT THE AT THE 1122TH G/I MEETINGTH G/I MEETING
WP29 Participation and WP29 Participation and AchievementsAchievements
••Started participation of WP29 and some Started participation of WP29 and some GRsGRsactivities in 1996activities in 1996
••Increased participation in selected Increased participation in selected GRsGRs
••Acceded to 1998 agreement in 2000Acceded to 1998 agreement in 2000
••Study on 1958 agreement under wayStudy on 1958 agreement under way
••Over 80 ECE regulations have been introducedOver 80 ECE regulations have been introduced
ProblemsProblems
Limited budget and shortage of suitable Limited budget and shortage of suitable manpowermanpower
Lack ofLack of experiences in testing experiences in testing
LanguageLanguage
MisMis--interpretation of requirementsinterpretation of requirements
Administration of Auto industry Administration of Auto industry and Type approval systemand Type approval system
Governments Involved:Governments Involved:NDRC , AQSIQ , SEPA, MOP , MOCNDRC , AQSIQ , SEPA, MOP , MOC
CCC and Notification (Gazette) systemCCC and Notification (Gazette) system
ND
RC
ND
RC
Department of Industrial
policy
Department of Industrial
policy
• Administration of auto product.• Formulation and revision of auto industrial policies.
• To supervise implement of industrial policies.
• Administration of auto product.• Formulation and revision of auto industrial policies.
• To supervise implement of industrial policies.
Department of Industry
Department of Industry
• Administration of auto product •Formulation and revision of auto industrial policies.
• Formulation of technical regulations and auto industrial standards.
• Administration of auto product •Formulation and revision of auto industrial policies.
• Formulation of technical regulations and auto industrial standards.
MOCMOC •Administration of road security and transportation.•Administration of road security and transportation.
AQSIQAQSIQ • CCC certification•Administration of imported vehicles.• CCC certification•Administration of imported vehicles.
MPSMPS
Traffic Administration
Bureau
Traffic Administration
Bureau
• To study and formulate the policies, provisions, regulations and standards for the vehicle operation.
• To study and formulate the policies, provisions, regulations and standards for the vehicle operation.
•Inspection and registration of vehicles•Administration of traffic and drivers• Periodical inspection of vehicles in used on local basis
•Inspection and registration of vehicles•Administration of traffic and drivers• Periodical inspection of vehicles in used on local basis
Local Vehicle Administration
Office
Local Vehicle Administration
Office
SEPASEPA•Formulation of environmental protection standards•List of automotive products with respect to environmental protection
•Formulation of environmental protection standards•List of automotive products with respect to environmental protection
Remarks: “〇” applicant;“□” CQC or Test Organization
Submit:1.Application2.Related
documents
Post:1 . Certification
charge notice
2.Provide sample notice
1.Charge for certification
2.Provide sample to the specific test organization
Assign test task to relative organization
1.Test on sample
2.Write test report and submit to CQC
Post:1 . Manufactory
inspection notice
2.Personnel list of manufactory inspection work group
1.Deliver invitation letter (Foreign enterprise) 2.Preparation for inspection
1.Implement inspection
2.Write inspection report
1. Examine test report and inspection report
2. 2 . Approve and issue certificate
applicant CQC
TEST organization
( Supervision inspection at least once a year )
On CCC (Flow chart for certification)
Procedures for Approval of New Types of Auto Products
Internet declare system for new types of auto productsInternet declare system for new types of auto products
Test facilitiesTest facilities
Submit test reportsSubmit test reports
EnterprisesEnterprisesTechnical ExpertsTechnical Experts
Submit parameters of new products
Submit parameters of new products
Get the relative documents from the other two systems and examine all
information
Get the relative documents from the other two systems and examine all
information
Department of Industrial Policy (NDRC)
Department of Industrial Policy (NDRC)
Department of Industry (NDRC)Department of
Industry (NDRC)
Examine related item of new products
Examine related item of new products
Examine new productsExamine new products
Review/Approval
(director of NDRC)
Review/Approval
(director of NDRC)
Promulgation(NDRC)
Promulgation(NDRC)
1
12th JASIC Asia G/I Meeting(27-29 Nov 2007)
Manila, Philippines
Round Discussion: Presentation on Progress of Regulations and MRA
K C BeheraUnder Secretary
Department of Road Transport & HighwaysGovernment of India
November 27, 2007
2
Indian Participation in WP.29• Activity was started in Year 2002• Major Focus
– To project the Indian views at international forum– To participate in GTR formulation– To observe development of ECE Regulations– To be associated in technical deliberations of Expert Groups – To explore global co-operation
• Involvement of technical experts in Working groups– Component manufacturers– Vehicle Manufacturers– Test Agencies– Government Ministries– Regulatory bodies
3
Latest situation on WP.29 and the 1958/ 1998 Agreements
• Government of India has signed 1998 agreement in February 2006
• Our National Policy is to align National Standards with ECE regulations
• We are reviewing implications of 1958 agreement. 10th Asia Expert meeting on Accession to 1958 Agreement was held on 27-28 Sep 2007 in New Delhi, India to learn the experience of Asian countries
• Attention is paid to country specific requirements
4
Highlights of our participation in WP.29
• GTR on motorcycle brakes
• World Harmonized Test cycle for 2 wheelers
• Regulations on CNG/ LPG retrofitment
• Emission regulations on Non-road mobile machinery
• Field of driver’s vision for other than M1
5
Plan of Alignment with ECE regulations
74% of ECE regulations are partially/Fully aligned.
Remaining will be aligned by Year 2010 ( Crash, EMC,Euro IV/V equivalent norms)
Status of alignment with ECE
92
14
18
Partially / fully aligned
Work in progress
Yet to be taken up
6
Action Plan • Auto Policy is announced by Government• Test facilities are being upgraded under a National
Project• Development work is taken up in new technology
areas• Component industry is looking for export business• Roadmap of Safety and Emission Regulations is
drawn and is under implementation• MoUs are signed with international certification
agencies
7
Thank You !
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF LAND TRANSPORTATION
Manila Nov 27 – 29, 2007
12th JASIC Government-Industry Meeting
Progress of Harmonization of Vehicle Regulation and MRA in Indonesia
Vehicle Manufacturers / importers
Tested inVTCC-DGLT
DGLT-MOT
Fail
Repair
Re - Test
Passed
Procedure of Vehicle Type Approval Procedure of Vehicle Type Approval (Recent Condition)(Recent Condition)
MOT = Ministry of TransportationDGLT = Directorate General
of Land TransportationVTCC = Vehicle Testing and
Certification CenterNTA = National Type Approval
Application toDGLT-MOT
Obtain NTA Certificate
Test Result
SOURCES :GOVERNMENTCONSUMERPRODUCERSNGO
PROPOSED
PRODUCTS
STANDARDS
INDUST. STD’
(SII)
W T O
M O I
-TECHN’L MEETG-PRE-CONSENSUS-NAT’L CONSENSUS
M O IM O ITECHNICALCOMMITTEE
M O ICENTRE FOR STANDARDIZATION
NAT. STANDZT’NAGENCY(BSN)
NAT’L STD
(S N I)
NOTIFICATION
II. Procedures for the establishment of SNI (Indonesian NationalStandard)
FINAL DRAFTOF INDUSTRIAL STANDARDS
REVISED & NEW PROPOSEDSTANDARDS
REF: INT’L STD’
COMPULSORY BYMINISTRIAL DEGREE
VOLUNTARY
S N I
Component Certification Procedure *)Component Certification Procedure *)
APPLICANT
TestingLaboratory Testing Result
Product
Application
Document Evaluation
AUDIT
ASSESSOR
DECISION
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION BODY
Certificate
OtherDocuments
Quality Management
System Certificate
*) With Indonesia National Standard (SNI) Marking
Progress of Harmonization of Vehicle Regulation and MRA in Indonesia
Recent Condition :There is no adequate perception among ministries/department who also are the stakeholder in regard of their responsibility in automotive sector. (Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Finance, National Standard Board and Automotive Industries)
Activities newly launched to help promote harmonization:
Drafting coordination decree among two ministries and other stakeholder on promoting harmonization.Held 2 expert meetings in February and October 2007
Prospect future development:Follow the Bogor Declaration roadmap
Progress of Harmonization of Vehicle Regulation and MRA in Indonesia
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and TransportMinistry of Land, Infrastructure and TransportJapanJapan
Progress of Harmonization of Motor Vehicle Regulations Progress of Harmonization of Motor Vehicle Regulations and Mutual Recognition of Approval of Japanand Mutual Recognition of Approval of Japan
November 2007November 2007
History of Activities at ECE/WP29 with JapanHistory of Activities at ECE/WP29 with Japan
197719771977 Japan declared attendance at WP 29 asobserver.Japan declared attendance at WP 29 asobserver.
198719871987 Establishment of JASIC head office and Geneva Office Establishment of JASIC head office and Geneva Office
199819981998 Japan acceded to UN/ECE 1958 agreement.Japan acceded to UN/ECE 1958 agreement.
199919991999 Japan acceded to UN/ECE 1998 agreement.Japan acceded to UN/ECE 1998 agreement.
Activities of Japan in ECE/WP29Activities of Japan in ECE/WP29Amendment to ECE regulations and information Amendment to ECE regulations and information service proposed by Japanservice proposed by Japan
22 19
59
7378
65 67
60102030405060708090
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Particular
Japan has the aim of adopting ECE RegulationsJapan has the aim of adopting ECE Regulationssteadily under 1958 Agreement steadily under 1958 Agreement
Adoption of ECE/WP29 Regulations in JAPANAdoption of ECE/WP29 Regulations in JAPAN
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 futureplan
30
20
10
40
50
60
Under study
Applying List of ECE/WP29 Regulationsin 1998-2007
1 ECE 3 Reflex Reflectors
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 ECE 39 Speedometer
18 ECE 44 Child Restraint Systems
19 ECE 45 Headlamp Cleaners
20 ECE 48 Installation of Lights
ECE 6 Direction Indicators
ECE 11 Door Latches and Hinges
ECE 12 Steering Mechanism
ECE 14 Safety Belt Anchorages
ECE 17 Seats
ECE 30 Pneumatic Tires (Passenger Vehicle)
ECE 38 Rear Fog Lamps
ECE 23 Reversing Lamps
ECE 27 Warning Triangles
ECE 7 Front and Rear Position Lamps,Stop Lamps and End-Outline Marker
ECE 13-H Braking (M1)
ECE 19 Front Fog Lamps
ECE 25 Head Restraints
ECE 26 External Projections
ECE 28 Audible Warning Devices
21 ECE 54 Pneumatic Tires (Commercial Vehicle)
22 ECE 58 Rear Underrun Protection
23
24 ECE 70 Rear Marking Plates for heavy and long vehicles
27 ECE 78 Braking (Motorcycle)
31 ECE 93 Front Underrun Protection
36 ECE 119 Cornering Lamps
32 ECE 94 Protection of the Occupants in the event of a Frontal Collision
25
26
28
29
30
33
34
35
37
ECE 62 Protection Against Unauthorised Use (Motor Cycle)
ECE 80 Seat (Large Passenger Vehicle)
ECE 116 Protection Against Unauthorized Use
ECE 75 Pneumatic Tires (Motor Cycle)
ECE 81 Rear-View Mirrors (Motor Cycle)
ECE 91 Side-Marker Lamps
ECE 95 Protection of the Occupants in the event of a Lateral Collision
ECE 77 Parking Lamps
ECE 104 Retro-reflective Markings for Heavy and Long Vehicle
ECE 123 Adaptive front-lighting systems
*Yellow: Adopted in 2007
In Preparation Items of ECE/WP29 Regulations
ECE 50 Lights (Moped, Motor Cycle)
ECE 53 Installation of Lights (Motor Cycle)
ECE 98 Gas-Discharge Headlamps
ECE 99 Gas-Discharge Light Sources
ECE 113 Headlamps (with a Symmetrical Passing Beam)
ECE 112 Headlamps (with an Asymmetrical Passing Beam)
Making revisions to the related ordinances・Preparation of the draft for ordinances・Collected public comments etc.
Domestic procedure in Japan
Adopting Announcement to UN
Enacted within 60 days.
Public announcement about the amendment by UN
Agreement of amendment to ECE Regulations in WP29
Automatically enacted after 6 months.
<The case of still not adopting the regulation.>
Enacted the Regulations
Domestic Procedure of adopting ECE RegulationDomestic Procedure of adopting ECE Regulation
Direct reference to original ECE Regulations for streamlining preparation of the draft.
Procedure for adoption of ECE reg. Taking account of ensuring safety of vehicles and environmental protection, continuously applying ECE regulations on the priority basis, following proposal to amend the regulation concerned at WP29, if necessary.
Improvement of legal procedureImprovement of legal procedure
Improved in 2006Improved in 2006
ECERegulation
No.11
1. Scope…
5. Specifications6. Tests
…
欧州経済委員会規則第11号
1. 適用範囲…
5. 仕様6. テスト
…
保安基準
技術要件…を満たすもの。
…試験
…の試験を行う。
保安基準
技術要件R11.5を満たすもの。
…試験
R11.6の試験を行う。…
Direct referenceDirect reference
TranslationTranslation ConversionConversion
Safety standards
Safety standards
Thank you for your kind attention !Thank you for your kind attention !
Part & Equipment Self-certification system
Nov. 27, 2007
EundokEundok LEE, Senior researcherLEE, Senior researcherKorea Automobile Testing and Korea Automobile Testing and
Research InstituteResearch Institute
12th G/I Meeting
NCAP and self-certification system is enforced to insure safety
of in-use vehicles in Korea
It is important to insure safety of parts and equipments
Due to exponential increase of low quality products
- Endanger passenger’s safety and generate consumer
complaints
leading to serious social problems
Background
Status of Other Countries
USA Europe
Year 1966 1958
Applicable Parts 16 items including tire22 items including Lightning
system
Certification Self-certification Compulsory certification
Marking DOT E
After production Compliance test COP
Certification Agency NHTSAGovernment-Authorized Institute Within 1958 Contraction parties
Testing Institute Designated Institute VCA,TUV etc
System overview
Investigation that parts and equipmentsInvestigation that parts and equipments
comply with safety regulations and standardscomply with safety regulations and standards
after saleafter sale
SaleSale
(Government)(Government)
SelfSelf--certification that parts and equipmentscertification that parts and equipments
comply with safety regulations and standardscomply with safety regulations and standards
Prior to salePrior to sale
(Part Manufacturer, Importer)(Part Manufacturer, Importer)
Recall for nonRecall for non--compliance partscompliance parts
PenaltiesPenalties
▶ MOCT proposed amendment of the introduction of parts and equipments self-
certification to Motor Vehicle Management Act
▶ Draft under development : MOCT, KATRI
▶ KATRI has equipped with testing facilities to assess safety of vehicles and
parts
☞ Proving ground, Crash test, Impact test, Engine test, Emission test, Noise test,
Environmental test, Lighting and visibility test
▶ Plan to purchase additional testing facilities for assessment
▶ Experience of recall system operation on In-use vehicle
▶ Reserve Experts and Know-how
□ Prepare a draft of relevant regulations of the parts & equipmentself-certification
□ Competency necessary for system operation
□ Testing Facilities
Actions Plan
□ Provide maximum protection of passenger by safety
guarantee of parts and equipments as well as vehicles
□ Clear up responsibility for defective products and minimize
conflicts between manufacturers and consumers
□ Help small-medium companies to enter vehicle’s parts and
equipments market and strengthen competitiveness by
certifying product quality certification
□ Prohibit distribution of products low quality and provide
consumer protection
Benefits
Thank You
LAO SITUATION ON AUTOMOBILE
By Mr. Bounta KOUNLAVONGDirector of Planning and BudgetingDivision, Department of TransportMinistry of CTPC, Lao PDR
At the 12 th JASIC Meeting 27-29 November, 2007 , Manila, Philippines
CONTENTS
VEHICLE STATISTICSTARIFF RATES
IMPORTATION IN CKD and CBUAUTHORITIES TAKE PART IN HARMORNIZATION OF REGULATION
VEHICLE STATISTICS
No. VEHICLE TYPE
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
1 MOTORCYCLE 171,158 195,353 208,544 288,960 461,599
2 CAR 31,478 39,367 53,001 54,591 81,126
3 BUS 4,348 5,013 7,710 7,941 10,269
4 TRUCK 11,525 11,424 11,334 11,674 15,296
TOTAL 218,509 251,157 280,589 363,166 568,290
CBU
Private car (%)Displacement (cc) Within ASEAN Outside ASEAN< 1,000 40 401,001-1,500 40 401,501-3,000 40 40> 3,001 40 40Commercial vehicle (%)Displacement (cc) Within ASEAN Outside ASEAN
5-30 5-304 WD (%)Displacement (cc) Within ASEAN Outside ASEAN
30 30
TARIFF RATE FORCBU
CKD
Private car:Within ASEAN (%) Outside ASEAN (%)
40 40
Commercial vehicle:Displacement (cc) Within ASEAN (%) Outside ASEAN(%)
< 1,000 5-30 5-30>1,500 5-30 5-304 WD:
Within ASEAN ( % ) Outside ASEAN ( % )30 30
TARIFF RATE FORCKD
NUMBERS OF IMPORTED VEHICLE PER YEAR
No. VEHICLE TYPES
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
1 MOTORCYCLE
1,211 925 963 1,262 1,316
2 CAR 1,404 3,359 2,579 3,370 4,086
3 BUS 108 234 781 1,123 722
4 TRUCK 1,232 710 612 984 1,291
TOTAL 3,955 5,228 4,935 6,739 7,415
AGENCIES INVOVE IN HARMONIZATION OF TECHNICAL REGULATION AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF APPROVAL
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (STEA)MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORT MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE
THANK YOU !FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION
ByU Khin Maung Lin
Chief EngineerRoad Transport Administration Department
Myanmar Presentation
Vehicle Type Approval System
Type approval is to control motor vehicle registration and update technical data and records in Road Transport Administration Department.All vehicle will need to undergo Vehicle Type Approval Roadworthiness Test by RTAD before it can be approved for registration.
Procedure of Vehicle Type Approval
New CarsIndustrial Zones+Importers
Used Cars
Registration Units (RTAD)
Inspection Units (RTAD)Record/Roadworhtiness
Vehicle Registration
Harmonization of Vehicle Regulation
We are still in the process of consideration of participate in WP 29 or GR.At the present moment, as Myanmar is a member of ASEAN, we accept or recognize the certificate issued by ASEAN member countries.Likewise, only when Myanmar becomes UNECE member countries, we would consider to accept UNECE certificate.
Progresss of Harmonization of Vehicle Regulation
We would participate and cooperate on the coming G/I meeting.We wish to attend the all coming Epert meeting And we wish to hold some Expert meeting after 2010.
1212thth JASIC ASIA Government /Industry MeetingJASIC ASIA Government /Industry Meeting
Country ReportMalaysia Efforts Toward the Establishment of
WVTA After Acceded 1958 Agreement
MALAYSIA12th JASIC G/I Meeting
Manila, PhilippinesNovember 27-28, 2007
Presentation by:Road Transport DepartmentRoad Transport Department
MALAYSIAMALAYSIA
12th JASIC ASIA Government /Industry MeetingManila, Philippines
November 27-28, 2007
Malaysia Accession to WP29 Agreement
• Malaysia has been accepted by United Nation to become a contracting party of 1958 and 1998 Agreement. Adhesion date of both agreements are effective from 4th April 2006. Although Malaysia has acceded the 1958 Agreement and 1998 Agreement, Malaysia has not become contracting party to any of the UNECE Regulations yet.
• Ministry of Transport (MOT) and Road Transport Department (RTD), Malaysia has been appointed as responsible Government agency in coordinating and participating WP29 activities for Malaysia.
1. Vehicle Type Approval System In Malaysia1. Vehicle Type Approval System In Malaysia
Introduction
Type approval is to control the construction of motor vehicle and update technical data and records prior to the registration and licensing of vehicles by Road Transport Department (RTD).
This requirement applies to all new models (effective from 1 January 2005) that are to be registered with RTD.
All vehicles will need to undergo Vehicle Type Approval inspection and road test by RTD before it can be approved for registration.
Purpose
1. To ensure compliance of legal requirements by locally manufactured/assembled, new and imported used vehicles
2. The legal framework :
* Road Transport Act 1987- Section 66 (1)
“ The Minister …to prescribe the type approval of any model of motor vehicle that is introduced and to regulate the quality of manufacturing or assembling of motor vehicles and the recall mechanism .. “
Purpose (…continued)
* Construction and Use Rules 1959.
* Other Regulations made under the Act.- Motor Vehicles ( Construction and Use )
(Vehicles Carrying Petreleum Products )Rules 1965
- Motor Vehicles ( Safety Seat-Belts ) Rules,1978
- Motor Vehicles ( Construction, Equipment and Use )
(Prohibition of Certain Type of Glass ) Rules 1978.
- Motor Vehicles ( Control of Smoke and Gas Emission )
Rules, 1977
Start
Obtain and complete Type Approval Form and submit 2 copies to Technical Department counter.
1. Check and confirm Give back to applicant for completed document.complete document. 2. Fix date and venue for
physical inspection and test drive
- Discussion (R&D / RTD)- Document checking- Explaination by applicant on
technicalities.- Vehicle specification- Test drive- Opinion and advise on technical
MALAYSIA WHOLE VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL PROCESS CHART
YesNo
ApproveFail
RTD
RTDand
Applicant
RTD
Applicant
Vehicle Type Approval Process Chart
Process Chart (…continued)
1. Applicant must rectify the Re-submit the completed vehicle untill it meets document with technical C&U 1959 and RTD 1987. specification and 2 copies
2. Rejection of Type Type Approval form to Technical Dept.Approval if has problem withassembly or does not complywith C&U Rule 1959 and Issue Type Approval CertificateRTA 1987. for R&D / Importer / Supplier
Issue certificate1. Original certificate for owner.2. Original certificate for failing.3. Copy for License Department.4. Copy for IT Department to
include model code in JPJ'scomputer system.
Vehicle Registration
ApproveFail
Applicant
RTD
RTD
Applicant
Applicant
Manufacturer Declaration(Compliance to regulation/std)
Vehicle Type Approval Application FormatSchedule I Schedule II
Part IVehicle General Information
““INFORMATION DOCUMENT FOR THE INFORMATION DOCUMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF VEHICLE TYPEPURPOSES OF VEHICLE TYPE--APPROVALAPPROVAL””
ANNEXIII of EC Council Directive 70/156/EECANNEXIII of EC Council Directive 70/156/EEC
Part IIPart II0. GENERAL0.1. Make (trade name of manufacturer)0.2. Type0.2.1. Commercial name(s) (if available)0.3. Means of identification of type, if marked on the vehicle0.3.1. Location of that marking0.4. Category of vehicle
Part IIIOther Information(Applicant declaration)
Other documents
BrakeTest Report
NoiseTest Report
EmissionTest report
VIN Explanationplus
2. Constraints Encountered In Establishment of 2. Constraints Encountered In Establishment of Vehicle Type ApprovalVehicle Type ApprovalLack of manpower.Lack of facility for conformity of production/complianceLack of training in conducting roadworthiness for WVTA
CountermeasuresTo hire more technical engineer.To establish necessary testing facility for COP/ compliance
checking.To attend comprehensive training on WVTA especially in
conducting roadworthiness test.To produce WVTA guidebook for the industry.
Conclusion• According to the Construction and Use Rule 1959, every constructed vehicle for on road and off road use that has chassis and engine and moving by driving must obtainType Approval as required by Road Transport Act to ensure the comfort and safety of the driver, passengers and other road users.
• In accordance to government policy to enhance motor vehicle safety, reduce road accidents, RTD has taken a step to control the vehicles construction and use according to rules and regulations of International Regulations andstandards such as ECE Regulations.
Conclusion (…continued)
• RTD is responsible to control the entry and registration of vehicles smoothly and accordingly to rules.
• Before the directive to implement ‘Type Approval’requirement, there are no control on vehicles coming into this country. Any one can submit any vehicle for registration.
• With Type Approval, motor vehicles can be fully controlled before it can be registered at RTD where all the information can be gathered according to makes and models.
•Malaysia is welcome by Japan & ASEAN industry request to establish harmonization of Vehicle Type Approval in ASIAN/ASEAN countries by 2015.
End of presentation
TERIMA KASIHTERIMA KASIH
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
PROGRESS OF HARMONIZATION OF VEHICLE REGULATIONS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF APPROVALS IN THE
PHILIPPINES
12th JASIC ASIA GOVERNMENT INDUSTRY MEETING
MANILA, PHILIPPINES27-29 NOVEMBER 2007
WP29 PARTICIPATION AND THE 1958 / 1998 AGREEMENT
WP 29 Participation
The Philippines attended the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations as observer on June 20-23, 2006 and June 25 – 29, 2007
Lack of understanding on the whole concept of WP29 and its Agreements hinders participation to the WP29
The problem can be resolved by continuous education for both motor vehicle industry and government through attendance to the experts meetings and other activities where WP29 and its Agreements are being discussed.
ACCESSION TO THE 1958 / 1998 AGREEMENTSIn the Philippine Roadmap on Harmonization of MV Regulations andStandards, the Philippine intends to accede to the 1958 Agreement in 2008 and in the 1998 Agreement in 2010. Accession however wouldentail legal process involving legislation and ratification of the Senate which might take sometimeThere are various considerations for the Philippine Accession to the 1958 / 1998 Agreements such as:- government’s ability and expertise;- local industries’ capability to comply with UNECE regulations: - necessity to implement various regulations; and- some ECE regulations may have conflict with existing PNS,
DAO, etcThere is a need to harmonize existing rules and regulations of various government agencies involved in the development and regulations of motor vehiclesExecutive Order No 628 creating a committee on the Harmonization of Vehicle Standards and Regulations was issued to address the issues
INTRODUCTION OF ECE REGULATIONSCurrently, mandatory regulations has requirement for authentication and PS mark Fuel Properties and Emission Regulations- four-wheeled
1. currently implementing Euro 2 emission standards2. Implementation of Euro 4 emission standards by
2012- two-wheeled
1. currently implementing ECE 40.012. implementation of Euro 1 by 2008 (industry’s
proposal)3. Implementation of Euro 4 by 2012 (industry’s
proposal)
INTRODUCTION OF ECE REGULATIONS
Safety Regulations recommended for mandatory implementation
1. PNS UN ECE R3:2005 – Retro-reflecting 2. PNS UN ECE R4:2005 – Illumination of rear – registration plates
of motor vehicles (except motorcycles) and their trailers3. PNS UN ECE R6:2005 – Direction indicator lamp4. PNS UN ECE R7:2005 – Front and rear position (side) lamps,
stop-lamps and end-outline marker lamps for motor vehicles (except motorcycles) and their trailers
5. PNS UN ECE R112:2005 - Motor vehicle headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam or driving beam or both and equipped with filament lamps
6. PNS UN ECE R13:2005 – Braking on vehicles of categories M,N and O.
7. PNS UN ECE R13h:2005 – Braking of passenger cars8. PNS UNECE 22 - Helmet9. PNS UNECE 67 – Auto LPG
10. PNS UNECE 115 – Retrofit of Auto LPG
PROGRESS OF DOMESTIC ACTIVITY FOR STANDARDS & REGULATIONS HARMONIZATION
Planning workshops on motor vehicle standards and regulations harmonization were conducted participated by various government agencies, particularly: DOTC-LTO, DTI-BPS, DOE, DENR-EMB and TMGThe Roadmap on Harmonization of Vehicle Standards and Regulations was draftedExecutive Order No 628 creating a Committee on Harmonization of Vehicle Standards and Regulations was approved by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. The Committee will evaluate existing situation in the Philippines and come up with reasonable workable plans and programs to eventually make the Philippines ready for its participation to the WP29 and accession to its AgreementThe TWG of the Committee is currently drafting the Implementing Rules and Regulation of EO 628.
CREATION OF SUB-COMMITTEES UNDER EO 628 which created the Committee on Harmonization of Motor Vehicle Standards and Regulations
Sub-committee on standards developmentSub-committee on certification and regulationsSub-committee on WP29 participationSub-committee on Road Vehicle Act
The progress of the domestic activities for regulations harmonization is hampered by lack of expertise, equipment and infrastructure to conduct testing and certification. Lack of proper coordination among government agencies and private sector likewise contribute to the implementation delays
The creation of various sub-committees composed of representatives from the government and private sectors involved in motor vehicle standards and regulations may help resolve the issues.
HOLDING OF ASIA EXPERTS MEETING
The series of G/I meetings should support the Asian countries in the WP29 participation by providing some guidelines in establishing ECE regulations and mutual recognition certificationHolding of experts meeting should be funded by bilateral cooperationAn expert meeting on the Intent of UN/ECE Regulation and Mutual Recognition of Certification would be of helpExperts meeting on Noise Standards and RegulationsThe Committee on the Harmonization of Motor Vehicle Standards and Regulations would like to propose for the passing of the Noise Control Act, hence the need for some information on the process and technology.
SHORT PRESENTATION
Progress of Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulation and Mutual Recognition of Approval
on
12th Government/Industry Meeting
THE LATEST SITUATION ON WP.29 AND 1958/1998 AGREEMENT
Thailand attend WP.29 once a year (June session) and some of GRs every 2 years
1958 AgreementAcceded to 1958 Agreement a year ago (2006)Problems after the accession did not occur because foreseen problems has been under controlled
1998 AgreementThailand did not accede to 1998 Agreement yetNo clear-cut benefit of 1998 Agreement over of 1958 AgreementManpower constraint
PLAN FOR INTRODUCING UNECE REGULATION
Plan for introducing UNECE regulation by 2010:
- DLT 11: R11, R13H,R14, R16 (Part II), R17, R41, R46, R48, R51, R75, R81
- TISI 53 (Voluntary): R3, R4, R6, R7, R8,R10, R11, R12, R13, R13(H), R14, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R23, R25, R26, R28, R30, R31,R37, R38, R39, R41, R43, R46,R48, R50, R51, R53, R54, R55, R58, R60, R62, R73, R75, R77, R78, R79, R81, R85, R91,R98, R99, R101, R112, R113, R116, R121
THE LATEST SITUATION ON WP.29 AND 1958/1998 AGREEMENT
After 2010, a continuous plan was set up but the outcome of previous implementation should be fulfilled first
Main problems are - inflexibility of legal process - insufficient expertise- manpower constraint - test facilities required for TISI’s compulsory standard
PROGRESS OF REGULATION HARMONISATION
Amendment of Ministerial Regulation No.22 approved by the Cabinet in January 2007 after that considered by Council of the State
DLT discussed with the Council twice: May and July 2007
Drafted Notification in line with UNECE as mentioned above
Encouraging to speedy the Council ‘s consideration
PRESENT VEHICLE/COMPONENT CERTIFICATION SYSTEM
DLT- Vehicle type approval system exists under Land Transport Act (Bus and Truck) include dimension, weight, basic performance test, mandatory regulations, e.g. R85
- No conformity is available
TISI- Component/system type approval system (Compulsory Standard) e.g. safety glass, safety belt, exhausted emission
UPGRADING CERTIFICATION PROCESS
Amend MR22- add Vehicle parts type approval system under Motor Vehicle Act (MVA)
Draft WVTA for MVA (passenger car, pick-up truck, motorcycle) – amending MVA under the Council’s consideration
Plan to accept UNECE certificate only regulation adopted in WP.29, but now plan to accept only test report issued by technical services under 1958 Agreement for vehicle parts type approval system under MVA
G/I MEETING/EXPERT MEETING
New theme of G/I Meeting :- OK, if educate type approval system into the same direction- bear in mind the each country has different background, legal structure, and administrative agencies
Expert meeting in 2008 on Motorcycle safety, e.g. R53, R78, R113
Next expert meeting in 2009, the topic is discussed by TAIA
~Thank you for your attention~
1
12TH G/I MEETING
Progress of Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations and Mutual
Recognition of Approval by Vietnam
Pham Quang ThanhVietnam RegisterMinistry of Transport
2
1. About the 9th Expert Meeting- The 9 th Expert Meeting on Accession to the 1958 Agreement was held on April, 2007 in Hanoi.
- JASIC and Vietnam Register co-organized - Participants: 80- Countries: Japan, Thailand and Vietnam- Presentations: Japan, Thailand, Vietnam
- !958 Agreement: Outline and Explanation (JASIC)- Application of ECE R. in Vietnam- Experience of Thailand in Accession to 1958
3
1. About the 9th Expert MeetingVietnam Plan for PARTICIPATION IN WP29 AND ACCESSION TO
1958 / 1998 AGREEMENT OF VIETNAM
Joint the 1958 Agreement: Around 2010
Joint the 1998 Agreement: Around 2010
4
2. MAIN WORKS IN THE COMINGYEARS1) In combination of The Vietnam Technical Standard & Regulation Law and applying ECE R.:
• Convert the existing mandatory standards based on ECE R. into National Technical Regulations (NTR): deadline - December, 2009.
• Withdraw local unique standards not suitable to international standards: deadline - December, 2008.
5
2. MAIN WORKS IN THE COMINGYEARS1) In combination of The Vietnam Technical Standard & Regulation Law and applying ECE R.:
• Convert the existing volunteer standards based on ECE R. into NTR step by step (slide 6).
• Continue to develop new National Technical Standards based on ECE R. and then convert them into NTR step by step
• Develop new NTR based on ECE R.
6
2. MAIN WORKS IN THE COMINGYEARS2) Introduction of ECE Regulations
Year Number of items ECE number
2007 1 (Emission) 24, 40, 47, 49, 83
2008 2 (Rear view- mirror, tire of passenger car)
46, 30, 43?
2010 6 (Lamp instalation & Headlamp, horn, speedometer, acceleration noise, braking, safety bel)
48 & 112, 28, 39, 51, 41?, 13 & 13H, 14 & 16
7
3) Continue to attend the WP29 meeting – 2004: 01 meeting
– 2007: 02 meetings
– 2008 – 2010: 01 to 02 meetings per year
4) Establish the National Working Group to
prepare for accession 1958 Agreement:
Ministry of Transport – Main responsible for
doing all things necessary to accession the
Agreement
8
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
1
Progress of Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations and Mutual Recognition
of Approval in Taiwan
Sheng-Jung HsiehAutomotive Research and Testing Center
Manila, Philippines 2007.11.2712th JASIC Asia Government/ Industry Meeting
2
The latest situation on WP29 and the 1958/1998 Agreement(1)
2-1 Participation in WP29:Chinese Taipei is willing to participate in the WP.29 and/or GRs. But since Chinese Taipei is not a member of the UN, there is still difficulty for us to participate in the WP.29 and/or GRs.
2-2 The1958 Agreement:Since Chinese Taipei is not a member of the UN, there is still difficulty to accede to the 1958 Agreement.
2-3 The1998 Agreement:Since Chinese Taipei is not a member of the UN, there is still difficulty to accede to the 1998 Agreement.
3
The latest situation on WP29 and the 1958/1998 Agreement(2)
2-5 Introduction of ECE Regulation:Already Adopted(2006):
Number of items adopted: 25ECE Regulation’s number adopted:R3, R6, R7, R16, R19, R23, R28, R30, R36, R37, R39, R43, R48, R52, R53, R54, R60, R74, R77, R81, R91, R98, R99, R104, R78
By 2010:Number of items adopted: 18ECE Regulation’s number adopted: R5, R11, R12, R13, R13H, R14, R17, R25, R31, R38, R50, R79, R80, R94, R95, R112, R113, R66, R36/52(Fire Protection)
2010 afterwards:Number of items adopted: 8ECE Regulation’s number adopted: R10, R21, R26, R46, R61, R87, R110, R123
2-6 Any problems on Regulation Harmonization:1.Chinese Taipei needs help to clarify the detail of the testing, certification and COP in these
ECE Regulations. And we also need the information about the revision of ECE regulations.2. For some new technology which has not been regulated in the regulations(Ex. LED
Headlamp), how to regulate it?
4
Comments for Panel Discussion(1)
3-1 Current Vehicle/ Component Certification Processes:
5
Comments for Panel Discussion(2)
3-3 Plan to Accept UN/ECE Certificates:Since Taiwan is not the contracting country of the 1958 agreement and mutual recognition should be based on mutual benefits, it is considered not suitable for us to accept the EU certificate unilaterally. But the authority MOTC welcomes talk about the subject of mutual recognition or mutual acceptance of type approval certificate if other country considers necessary.
3-4 Decision-Making Process:For vehicle safety type approval, there is no formal working group for discussion of UN/ECE regulations and certification systems amonggovernment and industry. However, when the MOTC plans to introduce new regulation or revise current regulation, it will notify the related industry and ARTC for the multi-stage discussions. The regulation draft will be corrected according to the discussion conclusions and then proposed to the minister for the publication.
6
Request for G/I Meeting in the futureIntention on holding Asia Expert Meeting
4-1 Request for G/I Meeting:Chinese Taipei considers the proposed theme of 5th series meeting is appropriate and would be helpful for harmonization of vehicle regulations and MRA among Asian countries.
5-1 The Meeting Plan:There is no plan to hold Expert Meeting in Chinese Taipei in the near future. But our authority will consider to propose the request of such meetings when there is demand domestically.
1
2
3
4
5
」
6
12th JASIC Asia Government / Industry
Meeting
- Day 2 -
Nov. 28, 2007 Hyatt Hotel and Casino
Manila, Phlippines
Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC)-
Land Transportation Office (LTO), Philippines Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization
Center (JASIC)
HIGHLIGHTS OF MEETING The 12th JASIC Asia Government / Industry Meeting – Accession to the 1958/1998 Agreements and Improved Asian Presence in WP29 9:00 – 17:20, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 Ballroom II, Hyatt Hotel and Casino Manila The meeting convened at 9:15 am with greetings from: Co Chairs: Mr. Masayuki Shima, Director, International Affairs Office Engineering and safety Department, Road Transport Bureau, MLIT, Japan and Honorable Anneli R. Lontoc, Undersecretary, Road Transport, Department of Transportation and Communications, Philippines 1. Presentation of the latest Development of International Conference
WP29 & GRs
• JASIC Mr. Tadaomi Akiba, Executive Director and Ms. Toba presented the activities in Geneva and he acknowledged the participants from India and Korea. He explained the outline of Geneva organization and activities of WP29 and the 6 GRs. WP29 belongs to Economic Commission for Europe but since 1958 Agreement was modified in 1995, WP29 was renamed to World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations, which means opening the door to member of United Nation. WP29 has 6 specific GRs and 4 Administrative bodies. Under the WP29 and 6 GRs there are various working groups to develop ECEs and GTRs, which was named as the informal group. Under WP29, there are 2 informal groups the hydrogen and the fuel service which were tasked to develop GTRs and ITS in which Japan and UK governments chaired. The important points discussed was that 1998 Agreement only have technical requirement and 1958 Agreement not only have technical requirement but certification process including the COP. The WP29 meeting was held as the 143rd sessions, which was chaired and co-chaired by Russia and France respectively and on the part of Asian countries, India, Japan, China, Thailand and Korea, are among the participants. WP29 is scheduled 3 times a year and they already have the fixed schedules for the rest of the sessions and Mr. Akiba asked the participants to put in the agenda the schedules of the WP29 meetings and to see everybody in Geneva. The main discussions would be the following considerations: reports of the working parties; subsidiaries in WP29; draft amendments to the existing regulations; draft of new regulations, which is important in the WP29 session because even if the participants are not yet member of the contracting parties, they can contribute in the discussions with regards to the situation and background in their respective countries; the AC1 which is the draft amendment to existing regulations and new draft regulations; AC3 for 1998 Agreement; and AC4 for 1997 Agreement.
He explained the ITS informal group, which are co-chaired by Mr. Shima and Mr. Yarnold of Japan and UK respectively. They considered 3 elements to be developed: the assistance to driver capability; decision making; and assistance to operation. They discussed on how to improve in the future the existing regulations or GTRs. Mr. Akiba explained the GRSP, WP29 on passive safety. The scheduled meetings was fixed for the 42nd, 43rd and 44th wherein Japan already adopted this GR in their national regulations. This will be the last meeting for the GRSP on May, which will be chaired by Ms. Meyerson of USA. One of the biggest topics to be discussed is to develop the pedestrian safety for GTR. GRSG had its 2nd meeting last October 2007 as the 93rd session and the schedule for the succeeding meetings were already fixed. Japan again adopted this GR as national regulation. There are GTRs that has to be developed but for the meantime they put it on hold. The status of the last meeting, which was chaired by Mr. Antonio Erario of Italy were: the lighting to assist boarding and alighting of passengers; safety of wheelchair users in vehicles; sleeper coaches and laminated safety gazing; fire safety on buses; frontal collision of buses; requirements for service doors; windows and emergency exits; and provision for drivers’ workplace. On the GRE, Ms Toba discussed the WP29 on lighting and light signaling. She outlined the activities of GRE wherein the schedule of meetings were already fixed and chaired by Mr. Gorzkowski of Canada, The lighting installation for motor vehicle-1; the lighting installation for motor vehicle-2; and lighting installation for motor vehicle-3 where likewise discussed. The recent topic of head led headlamp was agreed in the 57th meeting of the GRE. The proposal was adopted as amendment to Rg. No. 112 at the 143rd session of WP29. On GRB, Ms. Toba explained the WP29 on noise. She discussed the outline of GRB wherein the scheduled meetings for 2007 and 2008 were already fixed. The ECE R41 and R51 drafted a new method considering the urban driving conditions. The participants of GRB were chaired by Mr. Meyer who will serve up to September 2007 and by Mr. Theis of Germany from February 2008. Recent topic on New Test Method for ECE R51 was based on the revised ISO 362. The draft proposal of the new test method was approved during the 140th WP29 in November 2006. The Informal Group started their work in November 2004 and the draft amendment of R41 including the ASEP will be submitted to GRB session in 2008.
• Korea Mr. Oh Dongsoo, Senior Researcher Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute presented the outline of GRRF wherein the calendar of meetings were already fixed and chaired by Mr. Yarnold of UK. The main issues to be discussed are the GTR 3 – Motorcycle Braking, development of ESC GTR and Endurance Brake System; Emergency Stop Signal; Automatically Commanded Braking Stop Signal; and etc. He discussed the background of motorcycle braking, the outline, test surface, and the test sequence. He made mention of the development of ESC GTR wherein USA is the technical sponsor. The timeline for the development of electronic stability
control GTR was enumerated. The outline of ESC wherein the integrated system of sensors, actuators and computer designed to retain vehicle’s steering stability to prevent loss of control due to over steer or under steer was discussed. He presented the graph of the estimated ABS and ESC installation in USA. Mr. Dongsoo also made a presentation on endurance brake system (ECE R13), emergency stop signal (ECE R13H), Automatically commanded braking signal (ECE R13 and R13H), pneumatic tyres for motorcycles and mopeds (ECE R75) to which these were all adopted. Other business was likewise mentioned like the Private Vehicle Brake GTR (PVGTR) and Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems (TPMS) wherein the establishment of PVGTR was postponed and active participation of the contracting parties was requested.
• India
Mr. Kahnei Charan Behera, Undersecretary, Department of Road Transport and Highways presented the development of GRPE in 2007. The 53rd session of GRPE wherein the informal group met on hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles; worldwide motorcycle emission test cycle; emissions from non-road mobile machinery; particulate measurement programme; and off-cycle emission (OCE) on 2007 GRPE 53rd and 54th meetings in Geneva. He presented the exchange of views of the participants in the development of ECE regulations under which were: the amendments in the existing regulations on emission; CNG/LPG vehicle component and fuel consumption; and the new regulations on GTR on World-Wide Light Duty Test Procedure (WLTP). He enumerated the GTR proposals approved by AC.3: the global technical regulation no. 4; global technical regulation no. 2; proposal to develop a hydrogen/fuel cell vehicles; the exhaust emissions from non-road mobile machinery; the heavy duty off-cycle emission vehicles; the heavy duty vehicle exhaust-emissions type/approval/certification procedure; the world-wide motorcycle emissions test cycle; and the on-board diagnostic system for heavy-duty vehicles and engine. The development of the GTRs was also discussed. Finally the new technology areas/future trends were presented in which the proposal to develop a global technical regulation concerning hydrogen/fuel cell vehicles was adopted by AC.3 in June 2007 and agreed to transmit it to GRPE and GRSP for consideration. The 3rd conference for the EFV conference was held in Dresden (Germany) in November 2007.
3. Report on the Expert Meetings in 2007 • Philippines
Ms. Florencia Creus, Chief, Operations Division, Land Transportation Office made a report on the 7th Asian Experts Meeting on the Seminar-workshop for Motor Vehicle Type Approval System conducted by JASIC and National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory (NTSEL), which was held at the Holiday Inn Galleria Manila last February 15-16, 2007. It was attended by participants from the DOTC, LTO, other government agencies such as: DTI, DENR, DOE, PNP-TMG, UPNCTS and participants from the motor vehicle industry.
Ms. Creus presented the background information of LTO mandates wherein RA 4136 provides the uniformity of registration fees and classification; and may refuse the registration of motor vehicle if found to be unfit and not in conformity to the minimum standards and specifications. The MVUC law provides that all manufacturers and/or assemblers shall submit specifications for new model and shall be recommended for approval of the DOTC Secretary. The Philippines intends to participate in the WP29 and accede to the 1958 and 1998 Agreements. The realization of mutual recognition of approvals requires adoption of ECE regulations to which the Motor Vehicle Type Approval System should be established. As background information, under the Philippine laws, TAS should be applied but this is only being applied by DENR on emission standard. As of this time the Philippine has yet to start, the reason why the government requested for the conduct of expert meeting on TAS and it was done last February 2007. The topics discussed during the TAS seminar were the 1958 Agreement; the right and duty of the Agreement; MRA of the Agreement; and technical service. On the TAS, this was done on new motor vehicles; included in the rights and duties of the countries acceding to the 1958 Agreement; necessary in granting approval markings; important in taking measures on non-conformity; and establishment of TAS as one of the important steps in the realization of MRA. In line with all the objectives, the implementation plan was drawn in which to conduct a study to implement the TAS in the Philippines; preparation for the implementation; and to be implemented by 2010.
• Indonesia
Mr. P. Dewanto, Directorate General Of Land Transportation reported the 11th Asian Expert Meeting on ECE R41 and R51 on the noise for two and four wheeler vehicles. The objectives of the meeting are to introduce standard, methods and procedures for inspection of noise for motor vehicle and to exchange experiences among the participants in conducting the noise inspection for motor vehicles. The meeting was concluded in two days and participated mostly from several ministries, automotive parts industries, Japan, Thailand and Malaysia. The objectives of the meeting, which is the introduction of ECE R41 and R51, exchanging experiences among participants were likewise discussed. On the First day there were presentations and discussions on ECE R41 and R 51 among experts and participants and on the second day a field demonstration for noise inspection on acceleration test and stationary test were conducted.
• Vietnam
Nguyen Thai Hung reported on Vietnam legal documents related to motor vehicles, they have the Law on Road Transport wherein the law is mandatory for safety standards and regulations; the Law on Standards and Regulations; and Law on Environmental Protection wherein the law is mandatory to environmental standards and regulations. The Ministry of Transport issues all the requirements of these laws. Mr. Hung presented RTL Article 48: The operation permission on public roads of motor vehicles wherein the MOT decides the type/quality and technical safety standards/regulations of vehicles permitted to operate on public roads. RTL Article 50
include: the assurance quality standards; technical safety and environmental protection for motor vehicle wherein the MOT decides and organizes the TAS; and periodical inspection for all kind of motor vehicles. He also presented the legal regulations of TAS for motor vehicles in Vietnam: the outline of TAS for motor vehicle assembly in Vietnam, the outline of the certification system for imported motor vehicles in Vietnam and the test laboratory system for motor vehicles in Vietnam.
• India
K C Behera Undersecretary Department of Road Transport & Highways Government of India reported the 10th Expert Meeting Administrative Matters regarding Accession to the 1958 Agreement, participating were Japan and India. He discussed on the rule making in India, technical and commercial implications in joining the 1958 Agreement, perspective on the accession to the 1958 Agreement, testing and technical services requirements for the 1958 Agreement, key issues and the objectives to increase vehicle and road safety, vehicle environmental performance and facilitate vehicles through uniform prescriptions for vehicles and their parts, the TAS and reciprocal recognition and the eligibility to become a contracting party wherein each country has a vote in the decision-making. The subject to be considered in the implementation of TAS as contracting party to the 1958 Agreement was discussed. Administrative matters of the 1958 Agreement were enumerated: the type approval certification; Regulation 2-1 wherein the contracting party are not obliged to apply existing regulations, new regulations, and the possibility to cease regulations; Regulation 2-2 the adoption of regulation; Regulation 2-3 concept of alternative within the existing regulation; and Adoption of amendment to existing regulations.
• Indonesia
Mr. Surjono of Indonesia presented the expert meeting report – accession to the 1958 Agreement and Adoption to the UNECE Regulations. The subject considered prior to the accession to the 1958 Agreement were the rule of making process in line with 1958 Agreement, participation of ECE/WP29 discussion, certification system and technical service. He also considered the sharing from Japan on the procedure of the TAS and the test facilities of automobile type approval system. The Asia expert meeting, JASIC supported the development of rule and certification system related to the 1958 Agreement. Government and industry considerations were needed for the accession to the 1958 Agreement. In conclusion, expert meetings improve the understanding to the accession to the 1958 Agreement – adoption to the UNECE regulations, and developing countries such as Indonesia still require help and support from advance countries and harmonization of motorcycle technical regulation. Also considered was Asia specification as the biggest producer and market.
• Japan
Kenichi Tsujimura, Director, Technical section of JASIC presented the concept of the expert meetings with the objective to improve the understanding of the 1958 Agreement and particularly the ECE regulations by the Asian countries and to
strengthen the population among Asian countries because expert meeting is an open forum for the Asian countries. He explained the relationship of participants in the GI/experts meetings. He reported the history schedules of participating Asian countries with plans of accession to the 1958 Agreements. He explained very briefly the topics wherein the Secretary of the UNECE/WP29 was invited to the 10th JASIC expert meeting in India and the demonstration test conducted at the 11th JASIC expert meeting in Indonesia in which all the participants undertook the noise regulation deeply through actual practice before the participants run for discussion and this meeting showed new direction for future expert meeting. Discussions were made on the 2008 proposals for each country to hold experts meetings with corresponding specific topics as follows:
Future Plan Organization Timing Theme
Noise regulations GRPE (Emission, Fuel) GRE Administration Requirement for
Philippines 2008
Accession to 1958 Agreement Motorcycle safety (R53, R78, R113) Noise regulations
Thailand 2008
GRPE (Emission, Fuel, OBD) R13, R13H Seats, Safety belts, Safety Belt anchorages (R14, R16, R17) Head restraint (R25)
2008
Safety Glazing (R43)
Malaysia
2009 R44 Safety Glass Exhaust gas emission Indonesia Beginning March 2008Fuel property Accession to the 1958/1998 Myanmar 2010~ Agreement and WP29
Mr. Tsujimura in his presentation mentioned that the table for the future plans for expert meetings are still incomplete and he asked the body to give their proposals, suggestions, if needs addition or comments to the future plan. With all the suggestions, comments, proposals and additions, Mr. Tsujimura noted them intensively.
4. Panel Discussion – Discussions to be followed by countries having signed and countries planning to accede to the 1958 Agreement toward the establishment of regulations and certification systems - 3rd Discussion of the series
Coordinator: Mr. Masayuki Shima, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan Mr. Shima begun the discussion by thanking the panels from the participating Asian countries and this panel discussion will be the last for the 4th series. In order to ensure the continuity on all the discussions of the series he would like to keep in mind the last proceeds of the last 2 panel discussions. He made mentioned that they have obtained the participation of the Asian countries in line with the participation in the WP29. He discussed the things he wanted to be the outcome of the panel discussion: one is find a way to resolve issues in the establishment of vehicle type approval system and the other one is to promote ECE adoption after the establishment of the vehicle type approval system. • Indonesia Mr. P. Dewanto, Directorate General of Land Transportation made his presentation by giving more information on the effort of Indonesia to join the WP29 Forum and also accession to 1958 Agreement. He then made a discussion on the recent condition of Indonesia wherein Indonesia has already the whole vehicle type approval system and parts and components certification procedure, which is different from the regulated UNECE. They get no adequate perception among ministries/department wherein they are also the stakeholders with regards to the responsibility in automotive sector. As to the efforts, Indonesia will continue to participate in the WP29 as an observer, set up the plan to continuously adopt ECE regulations, draft the coordination decree among the two ministries to promote harmonization, review the existing certification system and learn the experiences of countries signatory to the 1958 Agreement.
• India Mr K C Behera, Under Secretary, Department of Road Transport and Highways, Ministry of Shipping Road Transport & Highways Government of India presented the rule making and certification systems in India. He gave the overview and outline on the institutional structure under which are the Automotive Industry Standards Committee, CMVR – Technical Standard Committee, Bureau of Indian Standards, Standing Committee on Implementation of Emission Legislation, Indian Regulations and ECE, Type Approval and Certification, and In-use vehicles. He discussed the Institutional framework and structure for automotive regulations. The Automotive Industry Standards Committee (AISC), which is the permanent committee, set up by MoSRT&H wherein standards are prepared. The final draft of which are for wide circulation in the website and submitted to CMVR-TSC for approval. On the Central Motor Vehicle Rule - Technical Standing Committee (CMVR-TSC), the Secretary is the Chairman of both MoSRT and CMVR-TSC. He explained the functions of the CMVR-TSC as the one who adopts, finalizes and recommends implementations. He also made mentioned of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) with 2 committees for
automotive related standards with 17 sectional committees under the TED and 8 sectional committees for automotive standards. They also have the Standing Committee on the Implementation of Emission Legislation (SCOE), who issues emission norms through gazette notification. The summary status of alignment of AIS and IS discussed and they already have 124 ECE regulations, fully and partially aligned is 92/75% of the total, 14 still in process and 18 under evaluation. He mentioned that each country has its own scheme of issuing the approval and generally fall into two classes: the Self Certification, generally issued by the manufacturer; and the Type Approval, generally issued by the government (followed by most countries including India.) After the enactment of Motor Vehicle Act 1988 and Central Motor Vehicle Rules of 1989, the technical regulations became applicable throughout the country and Rule No. 126 in CMVR was included as the system of pro-type approval which became mandatory beginning January 14, 1991. With regards to the COP, the manufacturers ensure that every vehicle produced is in conformity with the details specified in the TA. All in-use vehicles have to undergo a mandatory emission check at least every six months and all commercial vehicles have to undergo an annual fitness check.
• Philippines Director Ildefonso T. Patdu, Jr., Project Development Service, Department of Transportation and Communications presented from the perspective of the country planning to accede in the WP29. The time lines for the accession to the WP29 of the Philippines are as follows: Accession to 1958 Agreement by 2008; and Accession to 1997 and 1998 Agreements by 2010. On the Vehicle Type Approval as component of accession to WP29, the legal frameworks are the RA 4136 which is the Land Transportation and Traffic Code of the Philippines, the MVUC Law which provides that all manufacturers and assemblers of motor vehicle shall not later than 3 months prior to the introduction of any new model of motor vehicle in the market, submit the specifications of such new model to Land Transportation Office. Another very important law relating to the VTA is the RA 8749, Clean Air Act, which provides legal framework or legal basis for the establishment of the VTAS of the country under the mandate of the DOTC. With regards to the existing institutional framework on the technical regulations and enforcement of motor vehicle there are various inter-governmental organizations working on the technical regulations of the country, one is the DOTC specifically the LTO, Department of Trade and Industry, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Department of Energy and the Philippine National Police. Director Patdu presented the functional delineation among governmental organizations in relation to motor vehicle certification, wherein LTO provides the regulations for the whole vehicle unit and conduct inspection as to the roadworthiness; DTI/BPS promulgates standards on MV parts and aligned about 41 ECE regulations into PNS; DENR issues certificate of conformity to new vehicle prior to registration on emission standard only; DOTC/LTO issues the certificate of compliance to emission standards on second-hand vehicle. On the issues and concerns, Director Patdu presented them in relation to BPA: compartmentalize agency regulation in terms of vehicle classification borne out on the stabilizing of fees and charges; limited expertise in the government sector; lack of comprehensive
regulations in terms of VTA; limited support infrastructure particularly testing facilities; limited coordination on decision making process; and control and reduction of negative impact of harmonization costing the harmonization cost. The way forward to achieve the objectives of harmonization are: for the government to take an integrated approach towards harmonization of vehicle standards and regulations; build capacities at national and local level; partnership with industry players; collaborate effectively with international and regional partners and institutions; effective allocation and utilization of the Road User Tax under the Special Vehicle Pollution Control Fund towards the improvement in air quality thru mitigation and abatement of pollution from mobile sources; institutional strengthening, which all laws required in the establishment of VTAS are in place; formulate roadmap on harmonization of vehicle standards and regulations (drafting of National Strategic Master Plan for Automotive sector to be completed by 2008); and to enhance and to have comprehensive development program there should be a legislative reforms (Road Vehicle Act) as part of the legislative requirements. He made mention of the programs and projects aligned under the SVPCF which is on automatic appropriation per year: the accession to WP29; the vehicle standard development under the BPS; the emission factor development to determine the level of pollution arising from the mobile sources; the vehicle classification system; the VTAS; and the National MV inspection and maintenance programs which are all required in the Clean Air Act.
• Malaysia Mr. Terima Kasih, Road Transport Department made a presentation on the Vehicle Type Approval System in Malaysia, wherein TA control the construction of motor vehicle and update technical data. All vehicles prior to registration shall have to pass through the VTAS inspection and road test by RTD. The purpose of VTAS is to ensure compliance of the legal requirements by local manufacturer/assembler, new and imported used vehicles. The legal framework has to implemented like the Road Transport Act 1987 – Section 66 (1) wherein the Minister prescribe the type approval of any motor vehicle; construction and Use Rules 1959; and other regulations made under the Act. He also made mention of the VTA Process Chart and VTA Application Format. And finally, he presented the constraints encountered in the establishment of VTA and its countermeasures. In conclusion he explained the functions being served by the Type Approval System in Malaysia.
• Thailand A representative from Thailand presented the establishment of vehicle verification system wherein the Ministerial Regulation No. 22 was amended to add vehicle parts type approval system under the Motor Vehicle Act. The draft WVTA for MVA amended by the LTA and MVA merging is under the consideration of the Council before sending to the Parliament. Some UNECE regulations have already been studied and drafted and the amendment of MR22, which was approved by the Cabinet in January 2007, and after for the consideration of the Council of State was likewise discussed. She enumerated the main problems encountered in the establishment of
vehicle verification system, which were attributed to inflexibility of legal process insufficient expertise, manpower constraints, and test facilities.
• Japan Mr. Kenji Maruyama of JASIC International Cooperation Committee presented the outline of the 4th Series Outputs in which the most significant change the initiated study on a vehicle type approval concept utilizing the UNECE regulations and certificates, wherein many discussions related to the 4 wheeled vehicle type approval arises. He presented the summary on the 11th G/I Meeting where many countries planned to adopt the ECE regulations. Mr. Maruyama cited the 10th G/I meeting wherein they had a presentation from Hong Kong in the person of M. Kelvin Yuen, who made very good suggestions of what should be the framework in the establishment of TAS. The purpose of his presentation was how to incorporate the UNECE regulations into local regulation for safety. His presentation was focused only on the issue of safety in which the Hong Kong Transport Department is responsible for safety regulations, certification and inspection. Mr. Maruyama presented the change and graph of trends on casualties and showed examples on the vehicle performance, passengers and drivers in Hong Kong. With the various accidents, Hong Kong TD decided to modify the existing law and adopt UNECE regulations as technical requirements. The objective of Hong TD was to manage the huge task with the limited resources wherein the very common concern among the Asian countries was the manpower constraints. Another objective is to update the regulations, introduce more safety standards and introduce the vehicle standard system to which it takes time for one regulation to be approved. Hong Kong has 50 regulations to be amended every year. With regards to the regulations in progress 2 they need to recognize the ECE regulations by aligning the technical provisions with ECE regulations and adopting ECE regulations unilaterally by putting them under the equivalent standard list. Mr. Maruyama briefly mentioned the VTAS wherein registration of vehicle manufacturers can make application to the TAS; the approval forms the concept of the approval document is derived from EC WVTA system; and the ECE regulations and EC approval format, which is very important to submit to the Hong Kong Government. Mr. Maruyama pointed out that after working on the TAS and establishing the certification, the countries should get together to talk on the harmonization certificate and come out with a common format framework then set up the very similar systematic certification system. The reason why JASIC has been talking of this system is to set a level certification system of vehicle, but unfortunately in the ECE there is only the parts and no VTA process. Japan made a proposal by the end of 2009 and at the same time there might be some proposal from Asian countries to establish a very good framework to which Japan may be a party. And finally, with regards to key points 2, definitions and responsibilities of the Vehicle Type Approval Applicant is very important in the definition of vehicle category in Japan which should be harmonized first so it would be much easier.
• Discussion of keywords The panel finalized the following keywords from the 1st day discussion as follows: o Insufficient expertise / Lack of experiences o Language / Mis-interpretation of requirements o Testing facilities o Qualification of testing laboratory / applicant o Inflexibility of legal process o Shortage of trained manpower o Limited budget o Cabinet policy of each country o Closer cooperation between ACCSQ-APWG and the JASIC G/I meeting
Additional opinion on the issues
- Trend mental instead of manpower - Regulatory regime to look into the regulatory framework which redound
to revisiting the Motor Vehicle Act of each country - Address the institutional infrastructure - Technical infrastructure need in administering the scheme - Strengthen the post market surveillance system - Common institutional framework for harmonization - Administrative approach to the accession/adoption of the agreements
Expert meeting has been focused on more kind of a lecture and more understanding of ECE regulation or accession to the agreements. Maybe in the future on this kind of subject, the participants can best establish a common baseline or system on the vehicle type approval in the region. If this could be the kind of Expert Meeting maybe the participants can continue to exchange knowledge or opinion on special conditions and share the full understanding and trust each other maybe they can be able to establish the best road system.
- Glossary of items - Japan to develop individual guidelines for each country to see to it that
each country can accede on a proper manner looking at each country’s policy rules and regulations and its intricacies as a country. We suggest that JASIC put in set of recommendations specific for each country and follow it through all the way if it can be translated into local language.
5. 13tht JASIC G/I meeting
Representative of Thailand formally announced the 13th JASIC G/I meeting to be held in Thailand on the last week of November 2008.
6. Plenary Session: Next Series and drafting and Adoption of Joint Statement
A draft Joint Statement was presented for the group’s discussion. Several corrections and amendments were incorporated. After a thorough discussion, the group agreed on its contents and approved the Joint Statement for this Meeting. See attached copy.
7. Closing Session
General Reynaldo I. Beroya, Assistant Secretary, Land Transportation Office, Department of Transportation and Communications of the Philippines delivered inspiring closing remarks. He congratulated all participants for the conclusion of the 12th JASIC G/I meeting. He mentioned that the series of GI meetings have shown the beauty of complementation and regional cooperation. This beginning can be sustained through the vigor and enthusiasm that was shown by the participating countries.
Undersecretary Lontoc in behalf of both co-chairs expressed sincere appreciation to all participants. She recognized that their active support given have successfully completed the last two meetings. She reiterated the schedule of the 13th JASIC Asia GI meeting and hoped to see everyone in Thailand next year.
The meeting adjourned at 17:00 pm.
Korea / India / Japan
Presentation of the latest development of international conference
WP29 and GRs
Korea
India
Japan Mr. Akiba & Ms. Toba
JASIC
Activities of WP29 GRRF
Nov. 28, 2007
DongsooDongsoo OH, Senior researcherOH, Senior researcherKorea Automobile Testing and Korea Automobile Testing and
Research InstituteResearch Institute
12th G/I Meeting
I. 1998 Agreement
II.II. 1958 Agreement 1958 Agreement
III.III. Other BusinessOther Business
Contents
Calendar of Meeting
60th 18-21 Sep. 2006
61st 5-9 Feb. 2007
62nd 15-19 Sep 2007
Venue : Geneva
Chair : Mr. I. Yarnold (UK)
Participants : 23 Countries, 9 NGOs
Main Issues
GTR 3(Motorcycle Braking), Development of ESC GTR
Endurance Brake System, Emergency Stop Signal, Auto-
matically Commanded Braking Stop Signal, etc
Outline of GRRF
Background
Motorcycle brake regulations have not been kept up with the
advancement of new technologies
Recent Motorcycles on sale are equipped with the new technologies
such as ABS
The development of MCGTR is required to reduce the injuries and
fatalities associated with motorcycle accidents
To propose well-defined and objective test procedures and
requirements
Contracting parties need the international harmonization of
motorcycle braking standard
Motorcycle Braking GTR(GTR 3)
Outline
Oct. 2002 : Establishment of Motorcycle Braking Informal Group
July 2003 : 1st Informal group Meeting
June 2006 : 6th Informal group Meeting
June 2006 : Special Session, Finalize of Motorcycle braking GTR
Nov. 2006 : 140th WP29, Adoption of MCGTR
☞☞ The attendees for the informal groupThe attendees for the informal group
-- Canada, USA, Italy, United Kingdom, Japan, India Canada, USA, Italy, United Kingdom, Japan, India
-- IMMA, FMEA, AMA, JAMAIMMA, FMEA, AMA, JAMA
Motorcycle Braking GTR(GTR 3)
Test surface
PBC = Peak Brake Coefficient
Motorcycle Braking GTR(GTR 3)
Classification Condition Remark
High friction surfaceClean, dry and level surface, gradient≤1%
PBC=0.9
Low friction surfaceClean, dry and level surface, gradient≤1%
PBC ≤ 0.45
Measurement of PBC ASTM method E1337-90, at a speed of 40mph
Test lane width
Vehicle categories 3-1 and 3-3 : 2.5m
Vehicle categories 3-2,3-4 and 3-5 : 2.5m+the vehicle width
Test sequence
Motorcycle Braking GTR(GTR 3)
Test order Paragraph
1. Dry stop – single brake control actuated 4.3
2. Dry stop – all service brake controls actuated 4.4
3. High speed 4.5
4. Wet brake 4.6
5. Heat fade 4.7
6. Parking brake system 4.8
7. ABS 4.9
8. Partial failure, for split service brake systems 4.10
9. Power-assisted braking system failure 4.11
Development of ESC GTR
Technical Sponsor : USA
Making Proposal : ECE/WP29/GRRF
Existing regulations and directive
→ U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 49 :
Transportation ; Part 571 and 585
→ International Voluntary Standards
SAE J2564 Revised June 2004
Development of ESC GTR
GTR Timeline
June 2007 : ESC GTR 1st Informal group meeting
July 2007 : ESC GTR 2nd Informal group meeting
Jan. 2008 : ESC GTR 3rd Informal group meeting
Feb. 2008 : 63rd GRRF Expert meeting
Mar. 2008 : 144th WP29, Review of official document
June 2008 : 145th WP29, Approval GTR (If Possible)
Development of ESC GTR
Outline of ESC
Integrated system of sensors, actuators and computers designed to retain
vehicle’s steering stability to prevent loss of control due to over steer or under
steer
Development of ESC GTR
Basic Components of ESCBasic Components of ESC
Estimated ABS and ESC Installations in USA
☞ GM to have 100% ESC by 2010 & Ford 100% ESC on all SUVs by 2008
ESC Installation effects in USA
NHTSA concluded that ESC reduces the incidence of crashes by 35% in 2004.
IIHS states that up to 10,000 fatal crashes could be avoided annually by ESC.
☞ IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety )
Development of ESC GTR
66 61 56 50 45 42 37 33 31
10 16 19 29 41 46 52 57 59
0102030405060708090
100
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011Vehicle Model Year
(%) ABS Only ESC
Endurance brake system
ECE No : R13
Doc. No : GRRF/2007/6(By CLEPA) : Adopted
Amended requirements for activity the stop lamp of endurance brake system
with electronic signaling to control
The stop lamp shall be activated when the endurance brake system in
operation in case of vehicle without electronic signaling to control
The stop lamp shall not be generated when retardation is produced by the
natural braking effect of an engine alone
Deceleration Thresholds
≤ 1.0m/s2 ≥ 1.0m/s2
May generate the signal Shall generate the signal
Emergency Stop Signal
ECE No : 13H
Doc. No : GRRF/2006/29(By OICA) : Adopted
This proposal aims to align the provisions of Regulation No. 13This proposal aims to align the provisions of Regulation No. 13--H with the H with the
corresponding amendments to Regulation No.corresponding amendments to Regulation No.13 13
Deceleration standards about emergency stop signal
CategoryDeceleration Thresholds
Deceleration ≥ 6m/s2
ActivatedM1 and N1
Deceleration < 2.5m/s2
De-activated
Automatically commanded Braking Stop SignalBraking Stop Signal
ECE No : R13 and R13H
Doc. No : GRRF/2006/30(By OICA) : AdoptedIncreasing vehicles equipped with the adaptive cruise control or cruise
control system
The latest adaptive cruise control functions may brake the vehicle until a
complete stop
No need to differentiate the speed under and over 50km/h
# Summary standards about stop lamps in ECE R13
Classification Thresholds Remark
Service brake Operation of service brake
Endurance braking system Deceleration < 0.7m/s2 Except by operating engine brake alone
Automatically commanded braking Deceleration ≥ 0.7m/s2
Selective braking N. A.
Pneumatic Tyres for Motorcycles and Mopedsand Mopeds
ECE No : R 75
Doc. No : GRRF/2007/2(By EC)The revised proposal on the scope of application of the ECE No. 30, ECE No.
54, ECE No. 75
The revised proposal on the scope of application of theof the ECE No. 30, ECE No.
54 : Differed
The revised proposal on the scope of application of the ECE NO. 75 :
Adopted
The revised proposal on the ECE NO. 75
ECE R 75(Pnematic Tyres for Motorcycles and Mopeds)
Current New
ALL Category L L1, L2, L3, L4, L5
PVGTR (Passenger Vehicle Brake GTR)Doc. No : ECE/TRANS/WP29/1058, para.83(By GRRF)
Oct. 2000 – Sep. 2005 : 7 times of Informal group meeting
Postponed the establishment of PVGTR after Nov. 2005
Request contracting parties’ opinion with regard to resume the establishment of PVGTR : 61St
Request active participation of contracting parties in the establishment PVGTR : 62nd
TPMS (Tyre Pressure Monitoring systems)Doc. No : GRRF-62-10(By Germany)
It is unreasonable to include TPMS standards in ECE R64
Need a establishment of new regulation and active participation of contracting parties
Request to hold a informal group meeting to Germany
Nov. 2007 : 1st Informal group meeting (By Germany)
Other Business
1998 Agreement
GTR No. 3 : Motorcycle Braking
Establishment of GTR in progress
- Electronic Stability Control, Tyres
Prospective establishment of GTR under consideration
- Passenger Vehicle Brake
1958 Agreement
Amendment of ECE Reg.
- Endurance Brake System, Emergency Stop Signal,
Automatically Commanded Braking Stop Signal,
Pneumatic Tyres for Motorcycles and Mopeds and Mopeds etc
Exchange of Information
Summary
Thank You
1
Developments In GRPE During Year 2007
Presentation ByIndia
28 November, 2007
12th JASIC Asia G/I Meeting(27-29 Nov 2007)
Manila, Philippines
2
Meetings during 20071.0 53rd Session of GRPE (8-12 Jan.2007, Geneva)
1.1 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicles – Subgroup Environment (HFCV-SGE)-8 Jan 2007
1.2 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on Worldwide Motorcycle emission Test Cycle (WMTC)-9th Jan 2007
1.3 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on the emissions from Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM)-9th Jan 2007
1.4 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on Particulate Measurement Programme (PMP)-10th
Jan 20071.5 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on
Off-Cycle Emissions (OCE)-10th Jan 2007
3
Meetings during 20072.0 54th Session of GRPE (4-8 June 2007, Geneva)2.1 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on Hydrogen
and Fuel Cell Vehicles – Subgroup Environment (HFCV-SGE)-4th June 2007
2.2 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on the emissions from Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM)-5th June 2007
2.3 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on Off-Cycle Emissions (OCE)-5th June 2007
2.4 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on Worldwide harmonized heavy-duty certification procedure (WHDC) -6th June 2007
2.5 Informal meeting of the GRPE working group on Particulate Measurement Programme (PMP)-6th Jun 2007
3.0 WMTC FEG Meeting 9-10th October 2007 Germany4.0 21st WHDC Meeting - San Francisco, USA, 18./19 October
2007
4
ECE Regulations under GRPEECE R SUBJECTS15 Emissions for M1 and N124 Diesel Smoke and Power40 Motorcycle emissions47 Moped emissions49 Diesel emission67 LPG vehicles/ equipment83 Emissions for M1 and N184 Fuel consumption (old)85 Engine net power category M & N96 Tractor emissions101 Fuel consumption (new)103 Replacement catalytic converters110 CNG components115 LPG and CNG retrofit equipment120 Power of tractor engine
5
Developments in ECE Regulations
•Amendments in existing Regulations:Emission: R 24,R 40, R 47, R 49, R 83CNG/LPG Vehicle/Component: R 67, R 110, R 115Fuel Consumption: R 101
•New Regulations: GTR on World-Wide Light Duty Test Procedure (WLTP)- Exchange of views started.
6
GTR Proposals Approved by AC.3
• ECE/TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/20 - (EC) Proposal to amend global technical regulation No. 4 (World-wide harmonized heavy-duty certification procedure)- 23rd July 2007
• ECE/TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/19 - (Germany) Proposal to amend global technical regulation No. 2 (World-wide harmonized motorcycle emission test cycle (WMTC))- 23rd July 2007
• ECE/TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/17 - (Germany, Japan, USA) Proposal to develop a global technical regulation concerning hydrogen / fuel cell vehicles -Hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles (HFCV)-25th July 2007
7
GTR Proposals Approved by AC.3TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/14 - (EC) Proposal to develop a global technical regulation concerning the exhaust emissions from non-road mobile machinery (NRMM)-14 July 2005
TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/12 - (USA) Proposal to develop a global technical regulation concerning the heavy-duty off-cycle emissions vehicles-8 April 2005
TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/8 - (European Union) Proposal to develop a global technical regulation concerning heavy-duty vehicle exhaust-emissions type/approval/ certification procedure-5 April 2004
TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/6 - (Germany) Proposal to develop a global technical regulation concerning world-wide motorcycle emissions test cycle-5 December 2003
TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/1 - (USA) Proposal to develop a global technical regulation concerning on-board diagnostic system for heavy-duty vehicles and engines-10 April 2003
8
Development of GTRs• GTR on Exhaust Emissions from Non - road Mobile
Machinery (NRMM)- All NRMM will get covered under this GTR, presently
Draft A 4 -3.- The round robin testing are under progress to ascertain the
uncertainty due to testing procedure and fuel quality.- India suggested to include gasoline engine for Genset and
Agril. Implements, diesel engines for Agricultural purpose.
- All the details have been provided on test facility at ARAI (India)
- Progress on this GTR will continue in Informal Group / GRPE.
9
• GTR on Heavy Duty Off-Cycle Emissions Vehicles
- GTR would address vehicle emission which are not covered under traditional laboratory test cycles.
- An important step to address emission control under a wide range of operating conditions of vehicle.
- The basis will be harmonized procedures for ensuring that emission control technologies are actually effective under normal operating conditions because they test a broad range of normal driving conditions that are otherwise not subject to traditional emissions testing.
- Work will continue on this GTR in Informal Group/GRPE.
Development of GTRs ( Cont…)
10
• GTR on Heavy Duty Vehicle Exhaust - Emissions Type / Approval / Certification Procedure (WHDC)
- Adopted by GRPE in their 52nd session held during 6 - 9 June 2006.
- It came for voting in 140th Session of WP.29 in Nov. 2006, India has voted for the adoption of the GTR
- The objective is to establish a harmonised GTR covering the type approval procedure for heavy duty engine exhaust emissions.
- This GTR would ensure harmonised test procedure as against varied test cycles and methods of emissions measurement.
Development of GTRs ( Cont…)
11
• GTR on World-Wide Motorcycle Emission Test Cycle (WMTC)- Objective of this GTR is to establish world-wide harmonised test
cycle for measurements of motorcycle emissions.- This will ensure use of uniform test methods and the benefit
to the environment as well as efficient use of energy.
- This will enable vehicle manufacturers to develop new models most effectively and GTR is an important step forward.
- Low powered vehicle manufactured in India, concern withback-up data was raised which are under consideration anddiscussion.
- WMTC Fundamental Element Group (FEG) Task Force (TF)meetings were held in Germany from 9-10th Oct 2007.
Development of GTRs ( Cont…)
12
• GTR on World-Wide Motorcycle Emission Test Cycle (WMTC)- Work ongoing regarding the second phase of the established gtrfocusing on the concerns by India and China. A proposal solving these concerns had already been adopted by GRPE and would be submitted to AC.3 for consideration and vote at its November 2007 session
-Discussions would continue in next GRPE and WP.29.
Development of GTRs ( Cont…)
13
• GTR on On-board Diagnostic System for Heavy-duty Vehicles and Engines (OBD)- Adopted by GRPE in their 52nd Session held during
6 - 9 June 2006. - It came for voting in 140th Session of WP.29 in Nov. 2006.India has voted for the adoption of the GTR- The objective of the GTR is to establish a set of worldwide
harmonised requirements for On-board Diagnostic Systems on Heavy-duty vehicles.
- GTR is directed only at OBD requirements for heavy-duty engines / vehicles necessary to maintain emission related performance ( i.e. emissions - OBD)
- Nonetheless, the GTR has been structured in a manner thatfacilitates a wider application of OBD to other vehicle systems in the future.
Development of GTRs ( Cont…)
14
GTR on On-board Diagnostic System for Heavy-duty Vehicles and Engines (OBD) (Cont….)
- The GTR also sets forth a basic set of demonstration requirements for manufacturers, so that compliance can bedemonstrated in a consistent manner.
- Also included are requirements to standardize the communication of on-board information to off-board devices to assist in maintenance of the increasingly complex modern diesel engines, and to facilitate the future use of OBD as a roadworthiness indicator for heavy-duty vehicles.
Development of GTRs ( Cont…)
15
New Technology Areas /Future Trends
• Proposal to develop a global technical regulation concerning hydrogen / fuel cell vehicles was adopted by the AC.3 in June 2007. and has agreed to transmit it to GRPE and GRSP for consideration
16
New Technology Areas /Future Trends• Environmentally Friendly Vehicles: The Third EFV conference
will be held in Dresden (Germany) on 19 and 20 November 2007
Japan EFV Emission Targets
Outline of Super Clean Diesel Engine
Source: NTSEL, Japan
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0 2 4 6NOx g/kWh
PM g
/kW
h
1997
JAPAN2003
JAPAN
2005JAPAN 2005
EURO4
2000EURO3
1998US
2004US
2008EURO5
2007US
Emission target of next-generation EFVs by 2010(NOx:0.2g/kWh, PM:0.0g/kWh)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0 2 4 6NOx g/kWh
PM g
/kW
h
1997
JAPAN2003
JAPAN
2005JAPAN 2005
EURO4
2000EURO3
1998US
2004US
2008EURO5
2007US
Emission target of next-generation EFVs by 2010(NOx:0.2g/kWh, PM:0.0g/kWh)
Electrically controlled EGR system
Electrically controlled turbo charger
NOx and λsensor
High Pmax structure
Electrically controlled nozzle
4 valve system
Variable swirl intake port
New combustion chamber
Next generation common rail system
Electrically controlled EGR system
Electrically controlled turbo charger
NOx and λsensor
High Pmax structure
Electrically controlled nozzle
4 valve system
Variable swirl intake port
New combustion chamber
Next generation common rail system
Environmentally Friendly Vehicles 1.an 18 tonne DME truck with NOx adsorber and "de-oxidation chemicals";2.a 25 tonne Natural Gas truck with 3 way catalyst; 3.a 14 tonne Series Hybrid HCCI (Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition) bus; 4.a 13 tonne 4 litre Parallel hybrid truck; 5.and Super Clean Diesel engine for a 25 tonne vehicle, using simultaneous NOx and PM reduction.
17
Configuration of DME Engine System
TurboCharger
Muffler
Inter-cooler
EGRvalve De-oxidation chemicals
NOx adsorption catalyst
High pressure pump
Injector
DME cylinderLow pressure pump
Common rail
ECU
Engine
EGRcoolerTurboCharger
Muffler
Inter-cooler
EGRvalve De-oxidation chemicals
NOx adsorption catalyst
High pressure pump
Injector
DME cylinderLow pressure pump
Common rail
ECU
Engine
EGRcooler
Source: NTSEL, Japan
Intercooler
O2 sensor
CNG fuel
ISC solenoid valveCoil
Ignition
Press. sensor
Crank angle sensor
Throttle valve
RegulatorFuel filter
Cut valve
Fuel injectionT sensor
Injector
Main valve
PCVvalve
Oil separator
M/V
Exh.
Air
3W catalyst
Turbo charger
Exh. shutter
Valve
EGR coolerIntercooler
O2 sensor
CNG fuel
ISC solenoid valveCoil
Ignition
Press. sensor
Crank angle sensor
Throttle valve
RegulatorFuel filter
Cut valve
Fuel injectionT sensor
Injector
Main valve
PCVvalve
Oil separator
M/V
Exh.
Air
3W catalyst
Turbo charger
Exh. shutter
Valve
EGR cooler
Heavy-Duty CNG Engine System
18
Outline of Series Hybrid Bus
Lithium batteryMotor
GeneratorInverter
Engine
Source: NTSEL, Japan
IPTTrack Supply
One way clutch
Li-Ion battery
IPT Pickup
Electric Transmission
Electric fuel injection
(4L)DieselEngine
Sup. Motor Coil
Inverter
ECU
Engine ECU
IPT Track Supply
After treatment
Synchronous motor
IPTTrack Supply
One way clutch
Li-Ion battery
IPT Pickup
Electric Transmission
Electric fuel injection
(4L)DieselEngine
Sup. Motor Coil
Inverter
ECU
Engine ECU
IPT Track Supply
After treatment
Synchronous motor
Outline of Parallel Hybrid Truck
19
Thank You
Activities of UN/ECE/WP29Outline of the meeting WP29,
GRSP, GRSG, GRE, and GRB
Japan Automobile Standard Internationalization Center
T. AKIBA, Y.TOBA
The 12th Asia G/I Meeting
Organization
ECEEconomic Commission for Europe
ESCAPE. C. for Asia & the Pacific
WP29World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations
AC1,AC2AC3,AC4
U N / General Assembly
GRPEG R B GRSPGRSGGRRFG R E
ITCInland Transport Committee
ECOSOCEconomic and Social Council
UN/ECE/WP29
ESC (gtr)
Advanced Vehicle Security System (AVSS)
WWH-OCE (gtr)PMP <completed>
WMTC (gtr)WHDC (gtr)
GRPE
G R B
GRSP
GRSG
GRRF
G R E
Motorcycle noise (R41)ASEP (R51 Additional Sound Emission Provisions)
Event data record (EDR)
R66 Strength of the superstructure
Tyre (gtr)
Organization 2
Head restraint (gtr)operating voltage issues
Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) (gtr)
Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicle (gtr)
R29 Cabs of commercial vehiclesR44 CRSElectric Safety of vehicles
WLTP (gtr)
I T S
World Forum for Harmonization World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations of Vehicle Regulations
(UN/ECE/WP29)(UN/ECE/WP29)
1958 ECE
1998 GTR
1997 Rule
Agreements
Outputs
Agreements under WP29
Agreements under WP29Agreement 1958
Agreement1998
Agreement1997
AgreementAdministrative
committee WP29/AC1 WP29/AC3 WP29/AC4
Vote Two-thirds majority
Unanimous agreement
Two-thirds majority
ActivityEstablish and develop ECE regulation
Establish and develop gtr(global technical regulation)
Establish and developInspection item
Contents
Technical requirement Certification processCOP
Technical requirement
WP29(World forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations)
WP29(World forum for harmonization of vehicle regulations)Chairman :
Government :
Mr. B. Gauvin (France )
Australia, Austria, Belgium,Canada, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Macedonia, France, Germany, Hungary, India
Non-Government :IEA, ISO, OICA, IMMA, CLEPA, IRF, GTB, ETRTO, etc.
, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, New Zealand, China, Poland, Korea, South Africa, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA, EC
Vice Chairman :Mr. B. Kisulenko (Russian federation )
List of participants of the 143rd session (13-16/Nov.)
Calendar of meeting of WP29 for 2007-2008# 143rd 13-16 November, 2007# 144th 11-14 March, 2008# 145th 24-27 June, 2008# 146th 11-14 November, 2008
Main discussion itemsConsideration of the reports of the working parties subsidiary to WP29Consideration of draft amendments to existing regulationsConsideration of new draft regulationsDraft amendments to existing regulations and new draft regulations -Voting (AC.1)1998 agreement of the executive committee (AC.3)1997 agreement of the administrative committee (AC.4)
Result of #143rd WP29 and its AC1Adoption of amendment to existing ECE regulations
Related to GRB
Related to GRSG
Related to GRRF
Related to GRSP
None
43, 46, 58, 107, 121,
13, 64
16, 44, 94, 95
Related to GRPE 83, 115
Related to GRE 4, 6, 7, 10, 19, 23, 37, 38, 48, 50, 53, 77, 87, 91, 98, 104, 112, 113, 119, 123
Usage of LED, Opt DRL for M1
Strengthen Rear Underrun Protection
EVSC for M2,M3,N2,N3,O3 & O4
Mr. M. SHIMA ( Japan )Mr. I. Yarnold (UK)
Started the meeting:
Chairman :
ITS(Intelligent Transport Systems)Informal Group meeting
Terms of reference
Position of this informal group is under the WP29 session
To develop common understanding of driver assistancesystemsTo exchange information on technology trendTo review activity in the second year to WP29
June 2002
WP29 agreed “Report of Two Years Activities was finalized in ITS informal group meeting” in March, 2007.
ASV Vehicle
Non-ASV Vehicle
WarningDamage mitigation by automatic brake
Delayed perception
Late brake application
Damage Mitigating Brake Lane-keeping Assistance System
The system detects the lane by a camera and assists steering operation to stay in the lane along the straight sections of highways.
Lane detection sensor (camera)
Steering actuator Controller
- Examples of advanced safety technologies for motor vehicles
Artificial Intelligence
Warning :Assistance for Decision-making
Information presentation :Assistance for Cognition
Advanced Driving
Conventional Driving
Human DriverEnvironment
Feedback of Vehicle Behavior
Vehicle
Control :Assistance for Operation
In vehicle ITS : advanced driving system
ITS informal -Advisory Body to WP29-
ITSinformal
WP29GRPEGRB
GRSGGRRFGRE
GRSP
:Brake, Steering
:Lighting
Role of the ITS Informal GroupThe ITS Informal Group assumes the role of a "strategic group" who, for supporting the development of new technologies for enhancingsafety, works to expand the knowledge of these technologies, develops a common understanding of them, discusses the course oftheir handling in the regulatory framework if necessary, and reports the discussion results to the WP29.
GRSP(Working party on Passive Safety)
ECE R11 Door Latches and HingesECE R12 Steering MechanismECE R14 Safety Belt AnchoragesECE R16 Safety BeltsECE R17 SeatsECE R21 Interior FittingsECE R22 Motor Cycles and Mopeds HelmetECE R25 Head RestraintsECE R29 Cab of a Commercial VehicleECE R32 Rear-end CollisionECE R33 Head-on CollisionECE R44 Child Restraint SystemsECE R80 Seat (Large Passenger Vehicle)ECE R94 Protection of the Occupants in the event of a Frontal CollisionECE R95 Protection of the Occupants in the event of a Lateral CollisionECE R114 Replacement Air bag SystemNew (R126) Partitioning Systemgtr No.1 Door Locks and Door Retention Components
Calendar of meeting of GRSP for 2007-2008
Object ECE regulations and gtr of GRSP
Outline of GRSP# 42nd 11-14 December, 2007 # 43rd 19-23 May, 2008# 44th 11-12 December, 2008
CI, OICA, CLEPA, EEVC
PARTICIPANTS of GRSPChairperson:
Mrs. S. Meyerson (USA)
Government:Australia, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan,Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Republic of Korea,South Africa, Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA & EC
Non-Government:
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY gtr
Adult Head impactor(4.5kg,35km/h)
LFI
Child Head impactor(3.5kg,35km/h)
WAD(1700)
WAD : WRAP AROUND DISTANCE
LFI : LEG FORM IMPACTOR
Recent Topic◆P.S. gtr was agreed in a meeting of 41st GRSP.◆This gtr will be adopted in WP29 of March/June in 2008.◆Purpose is reduction of road traffic casualties.◆Test procedure outline is below.
Test Device
Head impactor
Child Restraint Systems(ECE R44)◆Improvement in both level of protection and ease of use.
( From Consumers International; CI )◆France will make TOR (term of reference) for the informal group
establishment in the next GRSP in December.
(1)Short term:– Permanence and visibility of labels– CRS shell size and legroom for Group 0+– Replacing a CRS after an accident
(2)Medium term:– Overlap between Group 0+ and Group I should be
reduced– Upper mass limit of Group III should be extended(3)Longer term:– Upgrade of the dynamic tests• Deceleration pulse more state of the art• Better dummy bio fidelity: Q series– Introduce Side Impact Test Procedure– Improve accessibility of the system for consumers
・Proposal divided into three terms, shown as below.<Outline of CI proposal>
Current Side collision test(ECE R95)•MOBILE DEFORMABLE BARRIER 950Kg•Test speed 50km/h
NCAP / Photo source : National Organization for Automotive Safety & Victims’
◆EEVC WG13 is under consideration the improvement of the deformable barrier to reducethe risk of injury to road vehicle occupants in the event of side impact.
◆Currently, under investigation of traffic accidents.
Current Offset frontal collision test (ECE R94)
•Offset of BARRIER 40%•Test speed 56 km/h
Impact dummyFor frontal collision test For side collision test
*1 HYBRID Ⅲ *3 WorldSID
*2 ES-2
*3 Currently this dummy is being developed as a dummy of world unification.
*2 Currently this dummy is used in ECE Reg. 95
*1 This dummy is used in ECE Reg. 94
GRSG(Working party on General Safety)
ECE R18 Protection Against Unauthorized UseECE R26 External ProjectionsECE R34 Prevention of Fire RisksECE R35 Arrangement of Foot ControlsECE R36 Construction of Public Service VehiclesECE R39 SpeedometerECE R42 Front & Rear Protective DevicesECE R43 Uniform Provisions Concerning The
Approval of Safety Glazing MaterialsECE R46 Rear-View MirrorsECE R52 Construction of Small Capacity Public
Service VehiclesECE R58 Rear Underrun Protection
ECE R60 Driver Operated Controls (Moped, Motor Cycle)
ECE R61 External Projections (Commercial Vehicle)
Calendar of meeting of GRSG for 2007- 2008
Object ECE regulations of GRSG
# 93rd 23-26 October, 2007# 94th 21-25 April, 2008# 95th 21-24 October, 2008
ECE R62 Protection Against Unauthorised Use (Motor Cycle)
ECE R66 Strength of Super Structure (Large Passenger Vehicle)
ECE R71 Agricultural tractors with regard to the driver’s field of vision
ECE R73 Lateral Protection (Goods Vehicle)ECE R81 Rear-View Mirrors (Motor Cycle)ECE R93 Front underrun protective devicesECE R97 Vehicle Alarm SystemsECE R105 The Carriage of Dangerous Goods with
Regard to their Specific ConstructionalECE R107 Double-Deck Large Passenger Vehicles
with Regard to their General Construction
ECE R116 Protection Against Unauthorized Use ECE R118 The Burning Behaviour of Materials UsedECE R121 Hand controls, tell-tale and indicatorECE R122 Heating system
Outline of GRSG
Draft gtrs- safety glazing
This gtr specifies performance requirements for various types of glazing (i.e., laminated and toughened glass).⇒Final draft was submitted to the 93rd GRSG, October 2007.
- identification of controls, tell-tales and indicators This gtr specifies requirements for the location,
identification, colour, and illumination of motor vehicle hand controls, tell-tales and indicators.
⇒ It was moved in the field of an exchange ofviews at the last AC3/WP29 meeting.
ISO, AIT/FIA, CI, OICA, CLEPA, IMMA, IRU
PARTICIPANTS of GRSGChairman:
Mr. Antonio ERARIO (Italy)
Government:Australia, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, P.R. China, Republic of Korea,Romania, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA & EC
Non-Government:
Lighting to assist boarding and alighting of passengers
Recent Topic 1
Discussion item for R107 (Bus and coaches)
Safety of wheelchair users in vehiclesDiscussion on Wheelchair space, guide dog space and etc
Adopted at 92nd GRSG
Adopted at 92nd GRSG
Recent Topic 1 (cont’d)
Sleeper coaches
Exchange of information
Laminated safety glazing
The measures preventing passengers' ejection through windows.
Fire safety in buses
Frontal collision of buses
Requirements for service doors, windows andemergency exits
Provisions for driver's workplace
consider concrete proposals to improve safety concerning fire risks
Recent Topic 1 (cont’d)
AVSS (Advanced Vehicle Security System)
Recent Topic 2
Discussion item for R97 and R116
GRE(Working party on Lighting and Light-signalling )
ECE R1&2 HeadlampsECE R3 Reflex ReflectorsECE R4 Rear Registration Plate LampsECE R5 Sealed Beam HeadlampsECE R6 Direction IndicatorsECE R7 Front and Rear Position ( Side ) Lamps,
Stop Lamps and End-Outline Marker LampsECE R8 Halogen HeadlampsECE R10 Radio Interference SuppressionECE R19 Front Fog LampsECE R20 Halogen Headlamps ( H4 ) ECE R23 Reversing LampsECE R27 Warning TrianglesECE R31 Halogen Sealed Beam Headlamps ECE R37 Filament Lamps ECE R38 Rear Fog LampsECE R45 Headlamp CleanersECE R48 Installation of Lights ECE R50 Lights ( Moped, Motor Cycle )ECE R53 Installation of Light( Motor Cycle )ECE R56 Headlamps ( Moped ) ECE R57 Headlamps (Motor Cycle )
Calendar of meeting of GRE for 2007-2008
Object ECE regulations of GRE
# 57th 26-30 March, 2007# 58th 1-5 October, 2007# 59th 31 March - 4 April, 2008
Outline of GRE
ECE R65 Special Warning LightsECE R69 Rear marking plates
(slow-moving vehicles and their trailer) ECE R70 Rear Marking Plates for Heavy
and Long Vehicles ECE R72 Halogen Headlamps ( HS1 for Motor Cycle )ECE R74 Installation of Lights (Moped)ECE R76 Headlamps (Moped) ECE R77 Parking LampsECE R82 Halogen Headlamps (HS2 for Moped)ECE R86 lighting and light-signalling devices
(agricultural or forestry tractors) ECE R87 Daytime Running LampsECE R91 Side-Marker LampsECE R98 Gas-Discharge HeadlampsECE R99 Gas-Discharge Light SourcesECE R104 Retro-Reflective Markings for Heavy and Long VehiclesECE R112 Headlamps (with an Asymmetrical Passing Beam)ECE R113 Headlamps (with a Symmetrical Passing Beam)ECE R119 Cornering Lamps ECE R123 Adaptive Front-lighting system
PARTICIPANTS of GREChairman:
Mr. M. Gorzkowski ( Canada ) Government:
Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, India,
Non-Government:AMA, IEC, OICA, IMMA, FEMA, CLEPA, GTB, CLCCR
Italy, Japan, Luxembourg,Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Republic of Korea, South Africa, Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine,United Kingdom, USA & EC
Front
Headlamp(Daytime Running Lamp)
Fr. Direction Indicator Lamp
Ft. Position Lamp
Fr. Fog Lamp
Side Direction IndicatorSide Reflex Reflector
MandatoryOptional
1. Mandatory / Optional Lamp
Lighting Installation for Motor Vehicles - 1
ECE48
Rear
Rr. Fog Lamp*Japan/Optional
High Mounted Stop Lamp
License Plate Lamp
Reversing Lamp
Rr. Direction Indicator Lamp
Rr. Position LampStop Lamp
MandatoryOptional
Lighting Installation for Motor Vehicles - 2
ECE48
Rr. Side Direction IndicatorRr. Side Marker Lamp
ECE48
2. Lamp Installation on Vehicles
Lighting Installation for Motor Vehicles - 3
Recent Topic
◆As a light source, the use of LED was agreed in the meeting of 57th GRE.◆This proposal was adopted as the amendment to Reg. No. 112 at 143rd
session of WP29.◆ Miniaturization of a head lamp ◆ Expand the possibility of car design◆ Low consumption electricity ◆ Long-life light source
LED HEAD LAMP
ECE R123 AFS ( Adaptive Front lighting System )
AFS
Head Lamp ControllerSteering
AFS Lamp
Vehicle signals・velocity signal・steering signal
◆“Adaptive front lighting system" (AFS) meansa lighting device type-approved according to ECE Reg, No.123, providing beam with differing characteristics for automatic adaptation to varying condition of use of the passing beam.
◆Bending mode
City road
Highway
Intersection
AFS ( Adaptive Front lighting System )Town mode Bending mode Motorway mode
Reduction of the glare for pedestrian.
Improvement of far frontvisibility.
Improvement of visibility of the traveling direction, when the vehicle running the curves or intersections of the road, .
Night vision system
Head up displayA light source for night visions View with night vision
on display
Night vision system (cont’d)
This picture is view with low beam. This picture is view with night vision system
Cannot confirm a pedestrian! pedestrian
COMPARISON
GRB(Working party on NOISE)
ECE R9 Noise (Three-Wheeled Vehicles)
ECE R28 Audible Warning Devices
ECE R41 Noise (Motorcycle)
ECE R51 Noise (Passenger cars, trucks, buses)
ECE R59 Replacement Silencing System
ECE R63 Noise (Moped)
ECE R92 Replacement Silencing System (Motorcycle)
ECE R117 Tyres with regard to rolling sound emissions
Object ECE regulations of GRB
Outline of GRBCalendar of meeting of GRB for 2007-2008
# 45th 20-22 February, 2007# 46th 3-5 September, 2007 # 47th 19-21 February, 2008
New Test Methods are being drafted considering the urban driving
conditions
AMA, ISO, OICA, CLEPA, IMMA, T&E, ETRTO, SEMA
PARTICIPANTS of GRBChairman:
Mr. D. Meyer (GERMANY) ---until September 2007Mr. C. Theis (GERMANY) ---from February 2008
Government:Belgium, Czech Republic; France; Germany; Hungary; India; Italy; Japan; Netherlands; Norway; Poland; Republic of South Africa; Russian Federation; Serbia; Slovakia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; USA; EC
Non-Government:
Recent Topic
Comparison of the current ECE R51-02 and New Test Methods
New Test Methods for ECE R51 based on the revised ISO362
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175
PMR, kW/t
Engi
ne S
peed(
BB
Lin
e), S
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175
PMR, kW/t
Engi
ne S
peed(
BB
Lin
e), S
Urban driving, N95
(Japan)Urban driving, N95
(Japan)
M1 N1 M1 N1ECE R51/02 New test method
The draft proposal of the new test method was approved at the 140th
WP29 in November 2006.
The New Test Method for ECE R51(Acceleration Noise test considering the urban driving condition)
ECE/TRANS/WP29/2006/31, 2006/31/Add.1, 2006/31/Amend.1, 2006/31/Add.1/Rev.1, 2006/31/Add.1/Rev.1/Amend.1
These documents were adopted at 140th WP29 as Supplement 5 to 02 Series of ECE R51.
-Additional Sound Emission Provisions (ASEP)
-Limit values for this new test method
Next tasks
The proposal to be submitted to
GRB around 2010
ASEP (Additional Sound Emission Provisions)
To prepare a draft proposal for ASEP (for M1 and N1 vehicles only) to be included in the already-issued Supl.5 to 02 Series of Regulation No. 51, GRB established an informal group for ASEP in September 2005.
the preventive requirements intended to also cover driving conditions of the vehicle in real traffic, which can be environmentally relevant concerning their sound emission and which differs from those during type approval.
The proposal of ASEP for R51 will be submitted to GRB within 2008. The idea is also taken into the discussion to amend R41 for motorcycles.
New Test Methods for ECE R41The new test method is based on the ISO362 to
reflect the real-world driving, following the work already done for R51
The main test method is almost fixed, and ASEP is under discussion
Data collection analysis is processing for the purpose of discussion of limit values
The informal group started its work in November 2004.The draft amendment of R41 including the ASEP is expected to be submitted to GRB session in 2008.
Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center
Contact address : [email protected]
Thank you for your attention
See you soon in Geneva
Philippines / Indonesia Vietnam / India
Report on the Expert Meeting in 2007
LTO, Philippines
MOI, Indonesia
VR, Vietnam
MOSRTH, India
DGLT, Indonesia
Report on the 7th ASIA Experts Meeting
Seminar-workshop on Motor Vehicle Type Approval
Seminar-workshop on Motor Vehicle Type Approval
The 7th Asia Experts meeting on the Seminar-workshop on motor vehicle type approval was conducted by JASIC and National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory (NTSEL) was held at the Holiday Inn Galleria Manila last February 15-16, 2007Attended by participants from the DOTC, LTO, other government agencies such as: DTI, DENR, DOE, PNP-TMG, UPNCTS and participants from the motor vehicle industry
Background Information
RA 4136 provides the following:1. For uniformity of registration fees and classification, all manufacturers and/or assemblers of motor vehicles, prior to introduction of a new model of motor vehicle shall submit the specifications of the said model to LTO which shall determine under what schedule of registration fees the said model should fall
2. If on inspection, any motor vehicle is found to be unsightly, unsafe, overloaded, improperly marked or equipped, or otherwise unfit to be operated or capable of causing damage to the highways, or not conforming to minimum standards and specifications, the LTO may refuse the registration of the motor vehicle
Background info…
The MVUC Law provides that all manufacturers and / or assemblers of motor vehicles shall, not later than 3 months prior to the introduction of any new model of motor vehicle in the market, submit the specifications of such new model to LTO which shall recommend for approval by the Secretary, proper classification of the new model and the rate of the MVUC under which the new model shall fall
The Philippines intends to participate in the WP29 and accede to the 1958 and 1998 Agreements
The realization of mutual recognition of approvals requires adoption of the ECE regulations, hence the need for the establishment of theVehicle Type Approval System whereby the government assures thatevery motor vehicle has complied with the technical regulations concerning safety, environment, etc, before the motor vehicles are registered.
Topics discussed during the seminar
The 1958 Agreement – The rule making process in line with 1958 AgreementThe right and duty of the AgreementMutual recognition and Approval of the AgreementType approval systemAdministrative BodyQualification system of Application BodyTechnical ServiceHuman resourcesFacility
Type Approval System
Being done on new motor vehicles that will be introduced to the marketIncluded in the rights and duties of the countries acceding to the 1958 AgreementNecessary in granting approval markings, advising component authorities on non-conformityImportant in taking measures on non-conformity to the approved type, acceptance of those approved by other countries and confirmation of conformity of production (COP) in granting type approvalEstablishment of type approval system is one of the important steps in the realization of mutual recognition of approvals which is in line with the objective of WP29 of initiating and pursuingactions aimed at the worldwide harmonization or development of technical regulations for vehicles
Implementation Plan
Conduct a study to implement the type approval system in the Philippines- how type approval is being done- analyze, evaluate and determine what type approval system
can be better implemented in the Philippines by benchmarkingin other countries with established successful type approval system
Preparation for the implementation- necessary resources: funding, technical expertise, infrastructure, equipment, etc (depending on the kind of system to be implemented)
Implement by 2010 (earliest)- project management office to monitor implementation, etc
EXPERT MEETING REPORT
Accession to the 1958 Agreement –Adoption the UN ECE Regulations
Jakarta, 20th February 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
Rule Making Process in line with 1958 AgreementRule Making Process in line with 1958 Agreement
Participation of ECE/WP29 discussionParticipation of ECE/WP29 discussionHuman ResourcesHuman Resources
Certification SystemCertification SystemAdministrative body Administrative body Qualification system of Application BodyQualification system of Application Body
Technical ServiceTechnical ServiceHuman resourcesHuman resourcesFacilityFacilityCOPCOP
Subject to be consideredSubject to be consideredprior to the accession to the 1958 agreementprior to the accession to the 1958 agreement
Jakarta, 20th February 2007
EXPERT MEETING REPORT
Sharing From Japan Experience• The procedure of Type Approval in Japan:
The relationship of manufacturer/importer to MLIT as administrative department and NTSEL as technical service.
• Test Facilities of the Automobile Type Approval:Protection of the Occupants in a Frontal Collision, Protection of the Occupants in a Lateral Collision, Test of Pedestrians’ Head Protection, Layout of Proving Ground
EXPERT MEETING REPORT
Jakarta, 20th February 2007
Through Asia Expert Meeting, JASIC will support a development of rule & certification system related to
the 1958 agreement
developing countries such as Indonesia still require help and support from advance countries
such as Japan in increasing its ability to in technical service
(facilities, human resource)
INDONESIA CONSIDERATION FOR INDONESIA CONSIDERATION FOR ACCESSION 1958 AGREEMENTACCESSION 1958 AGREEMENT
A. Government ConsiderationA. Government Consideration
MOI has develop SNI base on UNECE regulation MOI has develop SNI base on UNECE regulation for 15 titles, and will develop 10 titles on 2007.for 15 titles, and will develop 10 titles on 2007.Safety and environment is a main aspect in Safety and environment is a main aspect in developing SNI base on UNECE Regulations.developing SNI base on UNECE Regulations.MOI has a target to set up SNI equal to UNECE MOI has a target to set up SNI equal to UNECE Regulation (Full Adoption) on 2010.Regulation (Full Adoption) on 2010.
EXPERT MEETING REPORT
Jakarta, 20th February 2007
In October 12, 2006 : DGLTIn October 12, 2006 : DGLT--MOT and DG of MOT and DG of Transportation Equipment and ICT Transportation Equipment and ICT IndustriesIndustries--MOI agreed to establish the new MOI agreed to establish the new committee.committee.
The CommitteeThe Committee’’s task is to formulate an s task is to formulate an activity in line with WP 29 activity.activity in line with WP 29 activity.
The committee consist of Government and The committee consist of Government and Industry representatives.Industry representatives.
Indonesia has been implemented Emission Indonesia has been implemented Emission ECE Regulation for the new type vehicles ECE Regulation for the new type vehicles since 2005since 2005 and to be implemented for the and to be implemented for the current production type start from current production type start from January January 2007.2007.
1. Social Demands1. Social DemandsAdopt internationally harmonized technical Regulations & Standards (UN-ECE), which mitigate the social problems (safety and environment) most effectively.
2. Step2. Step--byby--step Adoption UNstep Adoption UN--ECE RegulationsECE RegulationsFundamental items Advanced technologyFundamental items Advanced technology
3. Unique Local Requirements 3. Unique Local Requirements Unique Regulations should be minimized. It is recommended to adopt UN-ECE Regulations as
alternatives.4. Harmonization in the ASEAN region4. Harmonization in the ASEAN region
Move in step together utilizing ACCSQ-APWG forum.
B. Industry Consideration
EXPERT MEETING REPORT
Jakarta, 20th February 2007
5. For Motorcycle Production in The World, Those countries whoseannual production exceeds one million units are dominated mostlyby Asian countries, showing an absolute share of approx. 90%.
6. → Harmonization of Motorcycle Technical Regulation should consider Asia as the biggest producer and market.
7. ECE Regulations related to Motorcycle
1. R60 Control Telltale2. R81 Rear View Mirror3. R39 Speedometer4. R75 Tire5. R28 Horn6. R62 Anti Theft7. R53 Light Installation8. R50 Light
9. R113 Head lamp (symmetrical)
10. R37 Bulb11. R3 Reflector12. R78 Brake13. R10 EMC14. R40 Exhaust Emission15. R41 Noise
EXPERT MEETING REPORT
Jakarta, 20th February 2007
CONCLUSION1. Expert meeting improving understanding of
Accession to the 1958 Agreement – Adoption the UN ECE Regulations
2. Developing countries such as Indonesia still require help and support from advance countries such as Japan in increasing its ability to in technical service (facilities, human resource).
3. Harmonization of Motorcycle Technical Regulation should also consider Asia specification as the biggest producer and market.
EXPERT MEETING REPORT
THANK YOU
Ministry of TransportVietnam register
Type approval process for vietnam
Ha noi, November 28, 2007By Nguyen Thai Hung
1
Vietnam Legal DocumentsRelated to Motor Vehicles
Law on Road TransportLaw on Standards
and RegulationsLaw on
Environmental Protection
The Requirements issued by MOT
Manufacturer’s Standards
Mandatory Environmental
Standards/Regulations
MandatorySafety
Standards/Regulations
2
Ministry of TransportVietnam register
ROAD - TRANSPORT LAW(This law was passed on 29 June 2001 by the National Assembly ofthe Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 10th legislature, at its 9th session)
Article 48: The operation permission on the public roads of motor vehicles.
...
...
...
Item 5: Minister of Ministry of Transport decides the type/ quality and technical safety Standards/Regulations of vehicles are permited to operate on public roads, ...
3
Ministry of TransportVietnam register
4
ROAD - TRANSPORT LAW(This law was passed on 29 June 2001 by the National Assembly ofthe Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 10th legislature, at its 9th session)
Article 50: Assurance the quality standards, technical safety and environtmental protection for motor vehicle
...
...
...Item 6: Minister of Ministry of Transport decides and organize
the Type Approval and periodical inspection for all kind of motor vehicles ...
Ministry of TransportVietnam register
- Decision No 2557/2002/Q§-BGTVT dated 16 August 2002 of the Minister of MOT enacting the regulations on type approval of motorcycles and mopeds manufacturing assembling in Vietnam.- Decision No 34/2005/Q§-BGTVT dated 21 July 2005 of the Minister of MOT enacting the regulations on type approval of motor vehicles manufacturing assembling in Vietnam.- Decision No 1378/2003/Q§-BGTVT dated 15 August 2003 of the Minister of MOT enacting the regulations on inspection of imported motorcycles and engines.
- Decision No 35/2005/Q§-BGTVT dated 21 July 2005 of the Minister of MOT enacting the regulations on inspection of imported motor vehicles.
tHE LEGAL REGULATIONs OF TYPE APPROVAL SYSTEM FOR MOTOR VEHICLEs IN VIET NAM
5
the outline of type approval system for motor vehicles asembly in viet nam
user’s
Test Report
Technical service
+ Testing of sample motor vehicles.+ Issue of Test Report.
manufacture
+ Preparing of sample motor vehicles
1
2
Information package(Information folder + Test Report)
3
CERTIFICATECertificate
GiÊy CNCL
4
+ Sales+ Predelivery inspection+ Mass product
5
Ministry of transportViet nam register(Approval Authority)
+ Checking all of information package.
+ COP assessment.
+ Issue of Type Approval Certificate.
6
Ministry of TransportVietnam register
- Finishing the Customs formalities.
- To Sell.
- Checking documents.- Carry out the test.(For motorcycles: The sample vehicle
will be tested in VMTC)
Issued The Certificate of conformity.
MOT : Ministry of TransportVR : Vietnam RegisterVMTC : Vietnam motor test centre
Ministry of TransportVietnam register
tHE OUTLINE OF THE certifiction SYSTEM FOR imported MOTOR VEHICLES IN VIET NAM
CERTIFICATION
MOTVIETNAM REGISTER
importER
- Documents - Import the vehicles
7
1 2
3market
Ministry of TransportVietnam register
the tEST LAB. SYSTEM FOR MOTOR VEHICLES
tEST LAB. IN VIETNAM
vrVietnam Motor
Test Centre(vmtc)
vr
Emission Test Lab.(Hanoi)
vr
Proving Ground For Motor Vehicle
OTHERS- Test Lab. of
Manufacturers- Test Lab. of
Institutes(Approved by VR)
tEST LAB. IN other countries
Test Lab of any Technical Services
(Approved by VR)
Test Lab of Manufacturers/ or Institutes in other countries
(Approved by VR)
8
roadworthiness
Asembled vehicles Imported vehicles Modified vehiclesDocuments DocumentsDocuments for Type Approval
MOT (VR)
police
Inspect -ion station- s (VR and LlT)
License plate. License plate.
Finishing the customs formalities
Mass product
Predilivery Inspection
Product.
Predilivery Inspection and repot the test result. To VR or LLT)
Periodical motor vehicle inspection certificte for technical safety and
environmental protection.
Inspection for seting the certification record of periodical
- Checking documents- COP essessment
- Checking documents
- Carry out the test
- Checking documents
- Carry out the test (VR or Local Land of Transport)
Manuf -acture / import -er
9
Issued the Certificate of conformityIsueed the Type Approval Certificate Issued the Certificate of conformity
License plate.
Inspection for seting the certification record of periodical
Inspection for seting the certification record of periodical
Periodical motor vehicle inspection certificte for technical safety and
environmental protection.
Periodical motor vehicle inspection certificte for technical safety and
environmental protection.
Thanks for your attention!
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT
Vietnam Register
12th JASIC Asia G/I Meeting(27-29 Nov 2007)
Manila, Philippines
K C BeheraUnder Secretary
Department of Road Transport & HighwaysGovernment of India
28 November, 2007
10th Expert MeetingAdministrative Matters regarding Accession to
the 1958 Agreement(27-28 Sep 2007, India)
• Participating Countries:- India, Japan, ----- UNECE WP.29
• Subjects Discussed:- Rule making in India- Technical & Commercial implications for joining 1958 Agreement
- Perspective on Accession to the 1958 Agreement- Testing & Technical Services requirements for the 1958 Agreement - Key Issues & Challenges- Indian Industry perspective on 1958 Agreement
The 1958 Agreement (1)
Objectives:
Increase vehicle and road safety, vehicle environmental performance and facilitate vehicles’ trade through:
• Uniform prescriptions for vehicles and their parts (UNECE Regulations annexed to the Agreement)
• Type approval of vehicles and their parts
• Reciprocal recognition of approvals granted
The 1958 Agreement (2)
• Eligibility to become Contracting Party (Article 6)- All UN Countries- Regional Economic Integration Organizations
(REIOs)
Each country has a vote in the decision making
Subjects to be considered for the implementation of Type approval systemas Contracting Party to the 1958 Agreement
• Rule making process in line with 1958 Agreement• Participation in WP.29 discussions• Competent Authorities
- for certification system
• Technical Service- Human resources
- Test facilities- CoP
Administrative Matters of the 1958 Agreement:Type Approval Certification (1)
(Article -1 para. 1,5,6, Article -2,3,4,5)
Competent Authority (CA) of Contracting Party ( CP):• Designates the technical services• Grants type approval certificates, if the tests are passed• Conducts pre-type approval assessment of the applicant • Ensures CoP as per laid down procedures in Appendix 2 of the
1958 Agreement• Grants, refuses or withdraws type approval• Sends above information monthly to the competent
authorities of other Contracting Parties• Accepts certificates for applied Regulation from other CP under
MRA• Where self-certification procedure is an alternative procedure;
the CA may verify by random sampling on the market that self-certified products comply with the given Regulation
Administrative Matters of the 1958 Agreement: Regulations (2-1)
(Article-1 para.2-, Article-12 , Appendix-1)
• Being a Contracting Party :- Not obliged to apply existing regulations- Not obliged to apply new regulations- Possibility to apply /cease regulations
CP not applying a regulation may at any time notify the SG that it intendshenceforth to apply for it. On the 60th day after this notification, the regulationwill enter into force for this CPCP applying a Regulation may at any time notify the SG, subject to one year’snotice, that its administration intends to cease applying it.
• Establishment of a new regulation:- A quorum of not less than half of the CPs is required- New draft regulation is established by a 2/3 majority of those
present and voted
Administrative Matters of the 1958 Agreement: Regulations (2-2)
• Adoption of Regulation- AC.1 communicates to Sect. Gen. of United Nations- Sect. Gen notifies to CPs- The Regulation will be considered as adopted unless more than
1/3 of CPs inform Sect. Gen. about their disagreement- When a regulation is adopted S.G. notifies to all CPs
o Specifies which CPs have objection and regulation shall not enter into force to that CPs
o The adopted regulation shall come into force on the date(s) specified on it for all other CPs
Administrative Matters of the 1958 Agreement: Regulations (2-3)
• Establishment of Amendment to existing Regulation:- Voting procedure is same as for new regulation mentioned above- AC.1 notifies to Sect. Gen of United Nations- Sect. Gen. notifies to CPs applying the regulation
Administrative Matters of the 1958 Agreement: Regulations (2-4)
• Concept of Alternatives within the existing regulation:– Where necessary an amendment may include the existing
requirements as an alternative– CPs shall specify which alternatives within the Regulations they
will apply– CPs applying alternative(s) within a Regulation shall not be
obliged to accept approvals to preceding alternative(s) within the same Regulation
– CPs applying only the most recent amendments shall not be obliged to accept approvals to preceding amendments or to unamended Regulations.
– CPs applying an earlier series of amendments or the unamended Regulation shall accept approvals granted to a later amendment series.
Administrative Matters for Contracting Party: Regulations (2-5)
• Adoption of Amendment to existing Regulation:- An amendment to a Regulation is considered adopted unless more than one-third of the CPs applying that Regulation inform the S.G.of their disagreement with the amendment within six months from the notification
- If the S.G. does not receive disagreement of more than one-third of the CPs applying the Regulation, the S.G. notifies the amendment as adopted and binding upon those CPs who did not declare themselves opposed to it.
• When at least one-fifth of the CPs applying the unamended Regulationdeclare that they wish to continue to apply the unamended Regulation
- the unamended Regulation will be regarded as an alternative to the amended Regulation- it will be incorporated formally as such into the Regulation with effect from the date of adoption of the amendment or its entry into force
Thank You !
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF LAND TRANSPORTATION
Manila Nov 27 – 29, 2007
12th JASIC Government-Industry Meeting
Report of the 11th Asian Expert Meeting on ECE R41 and R 51 (Noise for Two and Four Wheeler Vehicles)
Objective of the meetingTo introduce standard, methods and procedures for inspection of noise for motor vehicle (ECE R41 and R51).Exchange experience among participants in conducting the noise inspection for motor vehicles
ASIA EXPERT MEETING ON ECE R 41 AND R 51 (NOISE FOR TWO AND FOUR WHEELER VEHICLES)
ParticipantsParticipants for the Meeting is 98 persons, mostly from Indonesia, who came from several ministries and Automotive and Parts Industries 7 Participants came from outside Indonesia, which is Japan (including the panelists), Thailand and Malaysia
ASIA EXPERT MEETING ON ECE R 41 AND R 51 (NOISE FOR TWO AND FOUR WHEELER VEHICLES)
The Meeting:The meeting concluded in two days, which is:day 1: presentation and discussionday 2: demonstration of inspectionThe meeting took place in :day 1: Grand Melia Hotel, Jakartaday 2: Pusarpedal, Serpong, Banten
ASIA EXPERT MEETING ON ECE R 41 AND R 51 (NOISE FOR TWO AND FOUR WHEELER VEHICLES)
Content of the meeting (day 1)Welcome speech by DGLT and JASICKey note speech by Deputy Minister of EnvironmentNoise Condition in Indonesia by Mr. Wisnu Eka Yulianto from Pusarpedal (Indonesia’s National Environment Laboratory Center)
ASIA EXPERT MEETING ON ECE R 41 AND R 51 (NOISE FOR TWO AND FOUR WHEELER VEHICLES)
Content of the meeting (day 1 cont….)
Introduction to ECE R 41 and R51 by Mr. Hideo Ohno from JASICGaikindo position on ECE Standard R51
(Noise) by Mr. Budi PS from GAIKINDOSpecific Information Regarding ECE R41 by Mr. Kenichi Tsujimura from JASIC
Content of the meeting (day 1 cont…)
Motorcycle Noise by Mr. Mahardian from AISISpecific Information Regarding ECE R51 by Mr. Yoshihiro Shirahashi from JASICQuestion and Answer
ASIA EXPERT MEETING ON ECE R 41 AND R 51 (NOISE FOR TWO AND FOUR WHEELER VEHICLES)
Content of the meeting (day 2)Demonstration for noise inspection
*) Acceleration test*) Stationary test
ASIA EXPERT MEETING ON ECE R 41 AND R 51 (NOISE FOR TWO AND FOUR WHEELER VEHICLES)
Japan
Plan of the Expert Meeting in 2008
From JASIC
Kenichi TsujimuraDirector,
Technical section of JASIC
28 November, 2006
The JASICAsia Expert Meeting
in 2008
Concept
To improve the understanding of the 1958 Agreement and the ECE Regulations by the Asian countries.
To strengthen the cooperation among Asian countries.
Under the JASIC ASIA G/I meeting,Under the JASIC ASIA G/I meeting,
G/I meetingG/I meetingG/I meeting
Exp meetingExp meetingExp meeting JASICJASICJASIC
Relationship
• Proposal&
• Agreement
• Cooperation
• Reporting
G/I meeting member
• Brunei Darussalam• Cambodia• China• Chinese Taipei• Hong Kong• India• Indonesia• Japan• Korea• Lao PDR• Malaysia• Myanmar• Philippines• Singapore• Thailand• Vietnam
G/I meeting memberG/I meeting member
•• Brunei DarussalamBrunei Darussalam•• CambodiaCambodia•• ChinaChina•• Chinese TaipeiChinese Taipei•• Hong KongHong Kong•• IndiaIndia•• IndonesiaIndonesia•• JapanJapan•• KoreaKorea•• Lao PDRLao PDR•• MalaysiaMalaysia•• MyanmarMyanmar•• PhilippinesPhilippines•• SingaporeSingapore•• ThailandThailand•• VietnamVietnam
• Participation
History (up to 2006)2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
♠ “Installation of lamps” in Thailand♠ “Installation of lamps” in Thailand
♣ “Accession to the 1958 Agreement” in Indonesia♣ “Accession to the 1958 Agreement” in Indonesia
♥ “Brakes(R13H)” in Thailand♥ “Brakes(R13H)” in Thailand
♦ “WP29 Participation” in Philippines♦ “WP29 Participation” in Philippines
♪ “Type approval systems” in Hong Kong♪ “Type approval systems” in Hong Kong
♠ “Seats, Safety belts, Safety belt anchorages and Head restraint” in Thailand
♠ “Seats, Safety belts, Safety belt anchorages and Head restraint” in Thailand
History (2007)
2007 2008
♦ “Accession to the 1958 Agreement” in Vietnam♦ “Accession to the 1958 Agreement” in Vietnam
♪ “The 1958 Agreement” in India♪ “The 1958 Agreement” in India
♫ “Noise on 2 and 4 wheelers” in Indonesia♫ “Noise on 2 and 4 wheelers” in Indonesia
♥“Accession to the 1958 Agreement” in Indonesia♥“Accession to the 1958 Agreement” in Indonesia
♣ “Motor vehicle type approvals” in Philippines♣ “Motor vehicle type approvals” in Philippines
Topics
•• A secretary of the UN/ECE/WP29 was invited A secretary of the UN/ECE/WP29 was invited to the 10to the 10thth JASIC Expert meeting in India.JASIC Expert meeting in India.
•• Demonstration test was conducted at the 11Demonstration test was conducted at the 11thth
JASIC Expert meeting in Indonesia.JASIC Expert meeting in Indonesia.
Highly specialized knowledge regarding the UN/ECE/WP29 and the 1958 Agreement was expressed.
Participants understood the noise regulations deeply though the actual practice.
Future plan
• Meetings proposed at the last G/I meeting
♣ “Seats, Safety belts, Safety belt anchorages and Head restraint” in Malaysia♣ “Seats, Safety belts, Safety belt anchorages and Head restraint” in Malaysia
♣ “Safety glasses” in Malaysia♣ “Safety glasses” in Malaysia
♣ “Steering” in India♣ “Steering” in India
♣ “Interior fitting” in India♣ “Interior fitting” in India
♣ “Motorcycle safety” in Thailand♣ “Motorcycle safety” in Thailand
Myanmar, Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia stated that they consider holding the Expert meeting in 2008 or 2009.
In 2008,
Future planOrganizationOrganization TimingTiming ThemeTheme
Noise regulationsGRPE (Emission, Fuel)GREAdministration requirement for accession to 1958 ag.Motorcycle safety (R53, R78, R113)Noise regulationsGRPE (Emission, Fuel, OBD)
2008
2008Thailand
Philippines
Future planOrganizationOrganization TimingTiming ThemeTheme
R13, R13HSeats, Safety belts, Safety belt anchorages(R14, R16, R17) Head restraint (R25)
2008Malaysia
Indonesia Big.Mar.2008Safety GlassExhaust gas EmissionFuel property
Safety Glazing (R43)2009 R44
Accession to the 1958/1998 agreement and WP292010~Myanmar
Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention
PANEL DISCUSSION
“Discussions to be followed by countries having signed and countries planning to accede to the 1958 Agreement toward the
establishment of regulations and certification systems”
3rd discussion of the series
India Indonesia
Japan Malaysia
Philippines Thailand
Panel Discussion
12th Government/Industry Meeting
1
Amend Ministerial Regulation No.22 - add Vehicle parts type approval system under Motor Vehicle Act (MVA)
Draft WVTA for MVA (passenger car, pick-up truck, motorcycle) – amended by LTA&MVA merging under the Council’s consideration
Meanwhile some UNECE regulations studied and drafted
2
Amendment of MR22 approved by the Cabinet in January 2007 after that considered by Council of the State
DLT discussed with the Council twice: May and July 2007
LTA & MVA merging is considering by the Council before sending to the parliament
Encouraging to speedy the Council ‘s consideration
3
inflexibility of legal process –take long time
insufficient expertise – more expert meeting or training
manpower constraint – fit workload to match manpower, IT, outsourcing
test facilities in the country -required for TISI’s compulsory standard , but not necessary for DLT’s regulation
4
1212thth JASIC ASIA Government /Industry MeetingJASIC ASIA Government /Industry Meeting
Country ReportMalaysia Efforts Toward the Establishment of
WVTA After Acceded 1958 Agreement
MALAYSIA12th JASIC G/I Meeting
Manila, PhilippinesNovember 27-28, 2007
Presentation by:Road Transport DepartmentRoad Transport Department
MALAYSIAMALAYSIA
12th JASIC ASIA Government /Industry MeetingManila, Philippines
November 27-28, 2007
1. Vehicle Type Approval System In Malaysia1. Vehicle Type Approval System In Malaysia
Introduction
Type approval is to control the construction of motor vehicle and update technical data and records prior to the registration and licensing of vehicles by Road Transport Department (RTD).
This requirement applies to all new models (effective from 1 January 2005) that are to be registered with RTD.
All vehicles will need to undergo Vehicle Type Approval inspection and road test by RTD before it can be approved for registration.
Purpose
1. To ensure compliance of legal requirements by locally manufactured/assembled, new and imported used vehicles
2. The legal framework :
* Road Transport Act 1987- Section 66 (1)
“ The Minister …to prescribe the type approval of any model of motor vehicle that is introduced and to regulate the quality of manufacturing or assembling of motor vehicles and the recall mechanism .. “
Purpose (…continued)
* Construction and Use Rules 1959.
* Other Regulations made under the Act.- Motor Vehicles ( Construction and Use )
(Vehicles Carrying Petreleum Products )Rules 1965
- Motor Vehicles ( Safety Seat-Belts ) Rules,1978
- Motor Vehicles ( Construction, Equipment and Use )
(Prohibition of Certain Type of Glass ) Rules 1978.
- Motor Vehicles ( Control of Smoke and Gas Emission )
Rules, 1977
Start
Obtain and complete Type Approval Form and submit 2 copies to Technical Department counter.
1. Check and confirm Give back to applicant for completed document.complete document. 2. Fix date and venue for
physical inspection and test drive
- Discussion (R&D / RTD)- Document checking- Explaination by applicant on
technicalities.- Vehicle specification- Test drive- Opinion and advise on technical
MALAYSIA WHOLE VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL PROCESS CHART
YesNo
ApproveFail
RTD
RTDand
Applicant
RTD
Applicant
Vehicle Type Approval Process Chart
Process Chart (…continued)
1. Applicant must rectify the Re-submit the completed vehicle untill it meets document with technical C&U 1959 and RTD 1987. specification and 2 copies
2. Rejection of Type Type Approval form to Technical Dept.Approval if has problem withassembly or does not complywith C&U Rule 1959 and Issue Type Approval CertificateRTA 1987. for R&D / Importer / Supplier
Issue certificate1. Original certificate for owner.2. Original certificate for failing.3. Copy for License Department.4. Copy for IT Department to
include model code in JPJ'scomputer system.
Vehicle Registration
ApproveFail
Applicant
RTD
RTD
Applicant
Applicant
Manufacturer Declaration(Compliance to regulation/std)
Vehicle Type Approval Application FormatSchedule I Schedule II
Part IVehicle General Information
““INFORMATION DOCUMENT FOR THE INFORMATION DOCUMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF VEHICLE TYPEPURPOSES OF VEHICLE TYPE--APPROVALAPPROVAL””
ANNEXIII of EC Council Directive 70/156/EECANNEXIII of EC Council Directive 70/156/EEC
Part IIPart II0. GENERAL0.1. Make (trade name of manufacturer)0.2. Type0.2.1. Commercial name(s) (if available)0.3. Means of identification of type, if marked on the vehicle0.3.1. Location of that marking0.4. Category of vehicle
Part IIIOther Information(Applicant declaration)
Other documents
BrakeTest Report
NoiseTest Report
EmissionTest report
VIN Explanationplus
2. Constraints Encountered In Establishment of 2. Constraints Encountered In Establishment of Vehicle Type ApprovalVehicle Type ApprovalLack of manpower.Lack of facility for conformity of production/complianceLack of training in conducting roadworthiness for WVTA
CountermeasuresTo hire more technical engineer.To establish necessary testing facility for COP/ compliance
checking.To attend comprehensive training on WVTA especially in
conducting roadworthiness test.To produce WVTA guidebook for the industry.
Conclusion• According to the Construction and Use Rule 1959, every constructed vehicle for on road and off road use that has chassis and engine and moving by driving must obtainType Approval as required by Road Transport Act to ensure the comfort and safety of the driver, passengers and other road users.
• In accordance to government policy to enhance motor vehicle safety, reduce road accidents, RTD has taken a step to control the vehicles construction and use according to rules and regulations of International Regulations andstandards such as ECE Regulations.
Conclusion (…continued)
• RTD is responsible to control the entry and registration of vehicles smoothly and accordingly to rules.
• Before the directive to implement ‘Type Approval’requirement, there are no control on vehicles coming into this country. Any one can submit any vehicle for registration.
• With Type Approval, motor vehicles can be fully controlled before it can be registered at RTD where all the information can be gathered according to makes and models.
•Malaysia is welcome by Japan & ASEAN industry request to establish harmonization of Vehicle Type Approval in ASIAN/ASEAN countries by 2015.
End of presentation
TERIMA KASIHTERIMA KASIH
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF LAND TRANSPORTATION
Manila Nov 27 – 29, 2007
12th JASIC Government-Industry Meeting
Indonesian Efforts to Access the 1958 Agreement
(Panel Discussion 2)
Recent Condition:Indonesia already has whole vehicle type approval system and parts/components certification procedure, which is different than regulated in UN ECE.There is no adequate perception among ministries/department who also are the stakeholder in regard of their responsibility in automotive sector. (Ministry of Energy, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Finance, National Standard Board and Automotive Industries)
Continue to participate in the WP 29 meeting as observerSetup a Plan for Adoption ECE Regulation ContinuouslyDrafting coordination decree among two ministries and other stakeholder on promoting harmonization.
Our Efforts:
Our Efforts:Review the Existing Certification SystemLearn Experiences from another countries having signed the 1958 AgreementContinuously participate the G/I Meeting and held 2 expert meetings in February and October 2007
Prospect future development:Follow the Bogor Declaration roadmap
1212thth JASIC Government/Industry MeetingJASIC Government/Industry MeetingManila, PhilippinesManila, Philippines
2727--29 November 200729 November 2007
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONSDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS
ILDEFONSOILDEFONSO T. T. PATDUPATDU JR.JR.Project Development ServiceProject Development Service
Resolving Issues to Establish the Vehicle Verification
System and Promoting ECE Adoption after Establishment of the Vehicle
Verification System
Participated as observer to the WP29 World Forum held in Geneva Last June 2006 and June 2007
Accession to 1958 Agreement by 2008
Accession to 1997 and 1998 Agreements by 2010
Participation in WP29 and Accession to 1958/1997/1998 Agreements
LEGAL FRAMEWORKLEGAL FRAMEWORK
• RA 4136 provides that for uniformity of registration fees and classification, all manufacturers and/or assemblers of motor vehicle, prior to introduction of a new model of motor vehicle shall submit the specifications of the said model to LTO which shall determine under what schedule of registration fees the said model should fall
•• The The MVUCMVUC Law provides that all manufacturers and/or Law provides that all manufacturers and/or assemblers of motor vehicle shall, not later than 3 assemblers of motor vehicle shall, not later than 3 months prior to the introduction of any new model of months prior to the introduction of any new model of motor vehicle in the market, submit the specifications motor vehicle in the market, submit the specifications of such new model to of such new model to LTOLTO which shall recommend for which shall recommend for approval by the Secretary, proper classification of the approval by the Secretary, proper classification of the new model and the rate of the new model and the rate of the MVUCMVUC under which the under which the new model shall fall.new model shall fall.
Existing Institutional FrameworkExisting Institutional Framework
DOTCDOTC DTIDTI DENRDENR DOEDOE
Whole MV unit
PNPPNP
MV parts andcomponents
EmissionStandards
Fuel quality
Anti-theft
• Land Transportation and Traffic Code (RA 4136)
• Seatbelt Law (RA 8750)
Product Standards Law (RA 4109)
Toxic and Hazardous Waste (RA 6969)
Anti-CarnappingAct
Clean Air Act (RA 8749)
PRESENT MOTOR VEHICLE/COMPONENT PRESENT MOTOR VEHICLE/COMPONENT CERTIFICATION PROCESSESCERTIFICATION PROCESSES
•• DOTC/DOTC/LTOLTO provides the regulations for the whole provides the regulations for the whole vehicle unit and conduct inspection of the same vehicle unit and conduct inspection of the same
•• DTI/BPS promulgates standards on motor vehicle DTI/BPS promulgates standards on motor vehicle partsparts
•• BornedBorned out of insufficient infrastructure, selfout of insufficient infrastructure, self--certification from the manufacturers and certification from the manufacturers and assemblers is required to guarantee the assemblers is required to guarantee the roadworthiness of the motor vehicleroadworthiness of the motor vehicle
•• DENRDENR issues Certificate of Conformity (issues Certificate of Conformity (COCCOC) to ) to new vehicle prior to registrationnew vehicle prior to registration
•• DOTC/DOTC/LTOLTO issues the Certificate of Compliance to issues the Certificate of Compliance to Emission Standards (Emission Standards (CCESCCES))
Issues
•• Compartmentalize agency regulation in terms of Compartmentalize agency regulation in terms of vehicle classificationvehicle classification
•• Limited experts in government sectorLimited experts in government sector
•• Lack of comprehensive regulations in terms of Lack of comprehensive regulations in terms of vehicle type approvalvehicle type approval
•• Limited support infrastructureLimited support infrastructure
•• Limited coordination on decision making processLimited coordination on decision making process
•• Control and reduction of negative impact of Control and reduction of negative impact of harmonizationharmonization
• Take an integrated approach towards harmonization of vehicle standards and regulations
• Build capacities at national and local level
• Collaborate effectively with international and regional partners and institutions
• Partnership with industry players
Effective allocation and utilization of Effective allocation and utilization of Road Users taxes under Special Vehicle Road Users taxes under Special Vehicle Pollution Control Fund towards Pollution Control Fund towards sustainable improvement in air quality sustainable improvement in air quality thru mitigation and abatement of thru mitigation and abatement of pollution from mobile sources.pollution from mobile sources.
Benchmarking and possible replication Benchmarking and possible replication of regionof region’’s best practices on VTA.s best practices on VTA.
• Institutional Strengthening
− Executive Order No. 628 creating a Committee on Harmonization of Vehicle Standards and Regulations issued by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo on 20 June 2007. The Committee will evaluate existing situation in the Philippines and come up with reasonable workable plans and programs to eventually make the Philippines ready for its participation to the WP29 and accession to its Agreement.
• Formulate roadmap on harmonization of vehicle standards and regulations (drafting of National Strategic Master Plan for Automotive by 2008)
• Legislative Reforms (Road Vehicle Act)
•Work towards a common vision. Think internationally and regionally, invest nationally.
Thank Thank you!you!
1
Rule making and certification systems in India
Mr K C BeheraUnder Secretary
Department of Road Transport and HighwaysMinistry of Shipping Road Transport & Highways
Government of India
November 28, 2007
12th JASIC Asia G/I Meeting(27-29 Nov 2007)
Manila, Philippines
2
Outline of presentation .. Institutional structure
Automotive Industry Standards CommitteeCMVR-Technical Standing CommitteeBureau of Indian Standards (BIS)Standing Committee on Implementation of Emission LegislationIndian regulations and ECEType Approval and CertificationIn –use vehicles
3
MoSRT&H(Motor Vehicles Act &
Central Motor Vehicles Rules)
Standing Committee on Implementation of Emission Legislation
Mr S K Dash, Jt.Secretary, (MoSRT&H)Members: Tests Agencies, SIAM, TMA,
MoP&NG, MoHI&PE, MoEF & Others
CMVR-Technical Standing CommitteeMr S K Dash, Joint Secretary, MoSRT&HMembers: Test Agencies, SIAM, ACMA,
TMA, MoHI&PE, BIS & Others
Automotive Industry Standards Committee
Chairman-Mr S R Marathe, Director, ARAI
Institutional Framework for Automotive Regulations
Emission Safety
3 SIAM
Bureau of Indian StandardsTransport
Divisional Council
Ministry of Environment &
Forests
Ministry of Petroleum & Natural
Gas
4
Institutional structure for automotive regulations
Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways is the nodal ministry for motor vehicle regulations in IndiaMotor Vehicle Act, 1988 and Central Motor Vehicle Rules (CMVR), 1989, are principal instruments governing motor vehicles in the countryMotor Vehicle Act can be amended through a Bill in Parliament (Union Legislature) and CMVR amended through GSR and S.O. Safety standards and emission norms are recommended for introduction by CMVR-TSC (CMVR Technical Standing Committee) and SCOE (Standing Committee on Implementation of Emission Legislation)Safety standards are prepared by Automotive Industry Standards Committee and Bureau of Indian Standards
5
Automotive Industry Standards Committee (AISC)
AISC – a permanent committee set up by MoSRT&HStandards in AISC are prepared by separate Panel comprising of representatives of various stakeholder associations.Finalised draft hosted on AISC secretariat website for wide circulation Standards prepared by AISC are submitted to CMVR-TSC for approval
6
Central Motor Vehicle Rule- Technical Standing Committee (CMVR-TSC)
Joint Secretary, MoSRT&H is Chairman, CMVR-TSCCMVR-TSC comprises representatives
Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public EnterprisesBureau of Indian Standard (BIS)Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India (ACMA)Select State GovernmentsTesting agenciesSIAMUser groups – invitees
CMVR-TSC adopts finalised standards and recommends implementationsStandards notified through General Statutory Rule/Statutory OrderIndian standards issued by Bureau of Indian standards (BIS) also notified under CMVRGeneral Statutory Rules (GSR) – first draft notification issued- : 45-60 days given for comments and thereafter final notification issued
7
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)Two Committees for automotive related standards
Transport Engineering Division (TED)Civil Engineering Division (CED)
17 Sectional Committees under TED Council About 8 Sectional Committees for automotive standards
8
Standing Committee on Implementation of Emission Legislation (SCOE)
Joint Secretary, MoSRT&H is Chairman, SCOESCOE comprises of representatives of :
Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF)Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoP&NG)Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises (MoHI&PE)Testing AgenciesSIAM
Emission norms issued through gazette notification-draft notification issued first and thereafter final notification is issued after due consideration of comments received
9
Total Number of ECE Regulations -124Fully /Partially aligned - 92In Process- 14Under Evaluation-18
Summary of Status of Alignment of AIS and IS
10
Introduction to Type Approval and Conformity of Production
Each country has its own scheme of issue of the approvalGenerally these fall into two classes:
issued by the vehicle manufacturer himself {generally known as Self Certification}
orApproval issued by a Government Agency {generally known as Type Approval (TA)}
Type approval is followed by most of countries including India.
11
Genesis of Type Approval in India
After the enactment of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (MVA) and Central Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 (CMVR):Technical regulations applicable throughout IndiaA system of the prototype approval by authorised test agencies was included as Rule No. 126 in Central Motor vehicles Rules 1989.This certification system became mandatory from 1.4.1991 Since then, the subjects covered by the CMVR have increased considerably and type approval procedure has been further streamlined.
12
Rule No. 126
The requirements of Rule 126 areEvery manufacturer of motor vehicles other than trailers and semi-trailers shall submit the prototype of the vehicle to be manufactured by him for test by a test agency for granting a certificate by that agency as to the compliance of provisions ofthe Act and these Rules.Provided that the procedure of type approval and certification of motor vehicles for compliance to these rules shall be in accordance with the AIS:017-2000, (Procedure for Type Approval and Certification of Vehicles for Compliance to Central Motor Vehicles Rules) as amended from time to time.
13
Six Testing agencies are currently authorised under Rule 126 of Central Motor Vehicle Rules, CMVR
ARAI, Pune (Western India)VRDE, Ahmednagar (Western India)Central Machinery Testing and Training Institute, Budni (Central India)Indian Institute of Petroleum, IIP, Dehradun (Northern India)CIRT, PuneICAT, Manesar
Rule No. 126
14
Time frame for issue of approvalThe process of the type approval generally takes about three months.The same procedure is applicable to imported vehicles and components also.VEHICLE MANUFACTURER SUBMITS THIS CERTIFICATE TO THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONERS OF VARIOUS STATES FOR GETTING PERMISSON TO REGISTER A NEW MODEL
15
Conformity of Production (COP)
The manufacturer ensures that:every vehicle produced are in conformance with the details of specification based on which TA is granted. Conforms to provisions.
Manufacturer confirms this in the form of a certificate, as per Form 22 of CMVR.A notified provision for COP by a test agency is now applicable only for emission.A procedure for the rest of provisions (Safety Critical items) is under preparation.
16
COP for emissionThe test agency randomly selects a vehicle at specified periodicity from the factory.Running in, and servicing prescribed in the manual are carried out on this vehicle under the supervision of the test agency.Emission tests (mass emission and tail pipe emission) are carried out by the test agency.COP provisions provide for extended trials and recall in the case of failure
17
In –Use vehiclesAll in-use vehicles have to undergo a mandatory emission check- atleast once in six monthsAll commercial vehicles have to undergo an annual fitness check
18
THANK YOU
Nov. 28, 2007Nov. 28, 2007
44thth Series Review and Priority Series Review and Priority Subjects for the G/I MeetingSubjects for the G/I Meeting
DRAFTDRAFTKenji MaruyamaKenji Maruyama
JASIC International Cooperation Committee JASIC International Cooperation Committee The 12The 12thth JASIC Asia G/I MeetingJASIC Asia G/I Meeting
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
44thth Series OutputsSeries Outputs
•• Consensus was further developed on:Consensus was further developed on:–– Merit of the 1958 UN/ECE agreement Merit of the 1958 UN/ECE agreement
accessionaccession–– Regulatory harmonization and MRARegulatory harmonization and MRA
•• Realization of accession to the 1958 Realization of accession to the 1958 and/or 1998 Agreementsand/or 1998 Agreements
•• Initiated study on a Vehicle Type Approval Initiated study on a Vehicle Type Approval Concept utilizing the UN/ECE regulations Concept utilizing the UN/ECE regulations and certificatesand certificates
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Suggestions made by Suggestions made by Hong Kong Transport DepartmentHong Kong Transport Department
•• Mr. Kelvin Yuen made suggestions to the Mr. Kelvin Yuen made suggestions to the JASIC G/I meeting members on the JASIC G/I meeting members on the essential logic for using UN/ECE essential logic for using UN/ECE regulations for establishing their new regulations for establishing their new safety Vehicle Type Approval systems at safety Vehicle Type Approval systems at the 10the 10thth G/I Meeting held in Kuala Lumpur, G/I Meeting held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and the 5Malaysia and the 5thth JASIC Expert Meeting JASIC Expert Meeting in Jun. 2006.in Jun. 2006.
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Since Hong Kong Transport Department is responsible for the safety regulations, certification and inspection, this presentation center focuses on the safety issues only.
On the other hand, Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department (EPD) controls vehicle environmental subjects in a separate law.
HOW TO INCORPORATE UN/ECE REGULATIONS?
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Hong Kong TD decided to modify the existing law and adopt UN/ECE regulations as technical requirements
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Hong Kong TD’s another objective was how to manage this huge task with limited resources at the TD.
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
y Point
ese UN/ECE and Vehicle Type proval practices
e very effective d can work as a mmon frame rk for the
gional MRA actice in the ure.
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Key Points Key Points –– 11
1.1. By the accession to the 1958 UN/ECE agreement, the By the accession to the 1958 UN/ECE agreement, the conditions for MRA will be assured.conditions for MRA will be assured.
2.2. Legislation and certification responsibilities must be Legislation and certification responsibilities must be clarified in a basic lawclarified in a basic law
3.3. Vehicle Type Approval System should be established to Vehicle Type Approval System should be established to utilize UN/ECE regulations systematically, i.e. putting utilize UN/ECE regulations systematically, i.e. putting UN/ECE regulations as a separate list aligning to the UN/ECE regulations as a separate list aligning to the UN/ECE numbering.UN/ECE numbering.
4.4. FollowFollow--up process for UN/ECE regulations must be up process for UN/ECE regulations must be considered considered –– frequent amendment to incorporate frequent amendment to incorporate technical progress in the world.technical progress in the world.
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Key Points Key Points –– 22
5.5. Definitions and responsibilities of the Vehicle Type Definitions and responsibilities of the Vehicle Type Approval Applicant, Manufacturers, Government and Approval Applicant, Manufacturers, Government and Technical Services must be well defined.Technical Services must be well defined.
6.6. EU WVTA concept was adopted by Hong Kong TD to EU WVTA concept was adopted by Hong Kong TD to clarify the requirements of management rules such as clarify the requirements of management rules such as COC, COP, Inspection and Recall, which will assure COC, COP, Inspection and Recall, which will assure compliance of the regulatory requirements in the compliance of the regulatory requirements in the useful life of vehicles.useful life of vehicles.
7.7. Drastic reduction of workload for the legislation of new Drastic reduction of workload for the legislation of new regulations can be achieved by utilizing UN/ECE regulations can be achieved by utilizing UN/ECE regulations, which will align the TBT treatment regulations, which will align the TBT treatment requirement in WTO.requirement in WTO.
Nov. 28, 2007, DRAFTNov. 28, 2007, DRAFT
Further ConsiderationFurther Consideration
•• Once the common concept for the Vehicle Once the common concept for the Vehicle Type Approval and regulatory process utilizing Type Approval and regulatory process utilizing the UN/ECE regulations, this will become basis the UN/ECE regulations, this will become basis for the regional common Vehicle Type for the regional common Vehicle Type Approval and MRA in the future.Approval and MRA in the future.
•• The next step for the region will be agreement The next step for the region will be agreement on which UN/ECE regulations adopted for the on which UN/ECE regulations adopted for the vehicle type approval MRA. vehicle type approval MRA.
KeywordsKeywords•• Insufficient expertise / Lack of experiencesInsufficient expertise / Lack of experiences•• Language / MisLanguage / Mis--interpretation of requirementsinterpretation of requirements•• Testing facilitiesTesting facilities•• Qualification of testing laboratory / applicantQualification of testing laboratory / applicant•• Inflexibility of legal processInflexibility of legal process•• Shortage of trained manpowerShortage of trained manpower•• Limited budgetLimited budget•• Cabinet policy of each countryCabinet policy of each country•• Closer cooperation between ACCSQCloser cooperation between ACCSQ--APWG APWG
and the JASIC G/I meetingand the JASIC G/I meeting
JOINTSTATEMENT
1
November 28, 2007 Joint Statement
12th JASIC Asia Government/Industry Meeting 14 Country/Region Agreement
A. The 12th meeting under the 4th series of G/I Meeting was successfully held in Manila from November
27-29, 2007 under the theme “Accession to the 1958/1998 Agreement and increased Asian presence in WP29”, and based on the output of the Government/Industry Meeting 3rd series, the participants focused on the following activities.
1. Accession to the 1958/1998 Agreements by Asian countries 2. Increasing the number of countries participating in WP.29 and communicating the
enactment of agreements and rules that reflect the current status of Asia 3. Strengthening ties among Asian countries/territories to ensure smooth transition to the new
Government-Industry Meetings
On Item 1, the following countries acceded to the 1958Agreement: South Korea (December 2004), Malaysia (April 2006), and Thailand (May 2006) accede the 1958 Agreement. In addition, the following countries expressed their intention to accede: the Philippines, Indonesia, and Vietnam. India is also actively examining the possibility of acceding to the 1958 Agreement. All the participating government and industry representatives constructively discussed during this series, the directions the member countries should take. All countries have recognized the importance of building robust automobile type approval systems. In this regard, Japan proposed the mutual recognition of whole vehicle certification to the various countries. The member countries have agreed to keep in close contact and exchange information to work toward mutual recognition of whole vehicle certification.
On Item 2, Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines participated as observer in WP29 for the first time. China, South Korea, India, Thailand, and Japan have continued to participate in WP29 and contribute to its activities. Singapore expressed that it plans to consider participation in WP29 as an observer in year 2008/2009. China, South Korea, India, and Japan are also actively participating in GRs. It is hoped that the enthusiasm holds and leads to a unified voice of Asia in WP29.
On Item 3, Future Government/Industry Meetings will be used as venues for exchanging WP29 related information between government and industry, and for establishing vehicle regulations and vehicle type approval systems in Asian countries, so expert meetings will be held under the auspices of the Government/Industry Meetings to improve understanding of the 1958 Agreement and the ECE Regulations by the various countries as well as to strengthen the cooperation among Asian countries. Participating members recognized the importance of holding these expert meetings regularly and of fostering an environment for smooth transition of Government/Industry Meetings towards its future role.
4th Series Results of Expert Meeting
2005: Indonesia (2nd), Thailand (3rd) 2006: Philippines (4th), Hong Kong (5th), Thailand (6th)
2007: Philippines (7th), Indonesia (8th), Vietnam (9th), India (10th), Indonesia (11th)
Country Proposed Plans for Expert Meeting in 2008 and beyond March 2008 : Indonesia: Safety Glass
Exhaust gas Emission Fuel property
2008 : Malaysia: Braking (R13, R13H) Seats, Safety belts, Safety belt anchorages (R14, R16, 17) Head restraint (R25) 2008 : Philippines:Noise regulations
GRPE (Emission, Fuel)
2
GRE Administration requirement for accession to 1958 Agreement
2008 : Thailand: Motorcycle safety (R53, R78, R113) Noise regulations GRPE (Emission, Fuel, OBD) 2009 : Malaysia: R44 2010- : Myammar: Accession to the 1958/1998 Agreement and WP29
B. While progress had been made generally during this 4th series, the participants also recognized that nothing
much had been made in the mutual recognition of approvals based on the 1958 Agreement. One reason for this is the yet-to-be established automobile type approval system in the different countries. Thus, the countries agreed to seriously address the issue during the coming 5th series Government/Industry Meetings. Participating members agreed on the following theme for the 5th series. “Strengthening of the Mutual Recognition of a Whole Vehicle Certification infrastructure under the 1958 Agreement” ・ Promote knowledge on the international whole vehicle certification system infrastructure by Asian
countries ・ Develop the vehicle type approval systems in each Asian country ・ Promote application of the ECE regulations necessary for mutual recognition of whole vehicle
certification system. ・ Expand the number of Contracting Parties on the 1958 Agreement among the Asian countries ・ Continue Government/Industry Meetings and Expert Meetings in accordance with expectations for
internationalization of vehicle type approval.
C. It was decided to hold the next Government/Industry Meeting as follows: Schedule: 26-28 November, 2008 Location: Thailand Organized by: Department of Land Transport (DLT),
And JASIC
Vietnam expects to co-organize the Government/Industry Meeting in 2009.
End
3
Appendix Results of Government/Industry Meetings to Date
1. Government/Industry Meetings 1st Series (1st to 3rd Government/Industry Meetings) a. The need for international harmonization of automobile technical standards and mutual recognition
system was confirmed. b. It was confirmed that the optimum forum for promoting automobile safety and environmental
protection and for smooth international distribution is the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (UN/ECE/WP29) and that membership in the 1958 and 1998 Agreements is important.
c. Each country will set the policies and action plans that it should pursue and then based on these joint statement will be issued which in turn shall be the basis for each country’s formation and accomplishment of short-term, medium-term, and long-term targets.
2. Government/Industry Meetings 2nd Series (4th to 6th Government/Industry Meetings)
a. The 2nd series activities will focus on the short-term targets from the Government/Industry Meetings 1st Series under the theme of “Expanding and promoting observer participation in WP29.”
b. As the first step toward international harmonization of automobile technical standards and mutual recognition of certification, the activities of WP29 and its groups (UN/ECE/WP29/GRs) will be understood and the factors hindering participating in WP29/GRs will be analyzed.
c. Hindrance factors identified were the cost of participation, insufficient technological knowledge, and language problem. To resolve these obstacles, government, industry, and academe will work together to resolve the technological issues and get the upper management layers of organizations to recognize the importance of automobile standard harmonization activities to make it easier to obtain budget. The language problem can be resolved by using the official languages of WP29, so none of these issues are essential problems.
d. Each country will craft an action plan for the course that it should take. A joint statement will be issued, and based on this each country will set short-term, medium-term, and long-term targets it should achieve.
3. Government/Industry Meetings 3rd Series (7th to 9th Government/Industry Meetings)
a. Based on the results of the Government/Industry Meetings 2nd Series, 3rd series activities will be pursued under the theme “Achieving participation in WP29/GR activities and expanding use of ECE regulations.”
b. As regards to WP29/GR, Malaysia and India recently participated in, while Vietnam and the Philippines seriously studied participating as observers. The number of countries participating in WP29 also increased the understanding of the importance of WP29 activities and confirmed the common recognition that membership in the 1958 Agreement and mutual recognition under the Agreement is headed in the direction of standards harmonization in Asia.
c. On the matter of expanding use of ECE regulations, many countries created action plans based on their needs, and it was clear that much work on standards harmonization activities using ECE regulations will be done going forward along with membership in the 1958 Agreement.
d. In regards to new activities for future Government/Industry Meetings, the results from trial holding of expert meetings in accordance with the needs of the countries, an expert meeting on lights was held in Thailand and served as basis for the structure of future Government/Industry Meetings. Further, on Indonesia’s first year of membership in the 1958 Agreement in 2005, it was announced in 2005 that Thailand would hold a meeting regarding brake standards. Many countries are expected to participate in this expert meeting.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12th JASIC
Asia Government / Industry Meeting
- Day 3 -
Technical Tour
Honda Cars Philippines Inc
1
November 29 Technical Tou r
2
Printing Materials
* JASIC GUIDE *Pamphlet on 1958/1998 Agreement
Notice: This page is only for information. Actual
materials are omitted to be attached in this CD-ROM.
Attendee Survey 12th JASIC Asia Government / Industry Meeting
Nov. 27 – Nov.29, 2007 1. As for the theme of 4th series of G/I Meeting, "Accession to the 1958/ 1998 Agreements and improved Asian presence in WP29”
□interesting (60) □not so much of my interests (0) No answer (1)
--- Day 1 --- 2. As for the contents throughout Day 1
□easy (7) □adequate (52) □difficult (2) 3. Please evaluate length of time allocated each item.
Speech □too long (1) □enough (58) □too short (1) No answer (1) Presentation □too long (0) □enough (55) □too short (5) No answer (1) Q & A □too long (3) □enough (44) □too short (14) No answer (0)
4. Please write any questions and/or comments at this meeting (Day 1), if you have. * That is great to can keep every sessions on time. (Thailand) * Not much engagement from delegates during Question and Answer period. (Singapore) * Understanding of type approval system of attending countries and not of same level.
(Philippines) * Not so clear explanation from India. More information or sharing from component
industries are necessary to develop the involvement of ASEAN component industries in this activities. (Indonesia)
* It is good to know the situation of ECE Regulations introducing plan in each country. (Chinese Taipei)
* For Q&A session, try to ask in short and precise – easier to answer. Meeting, simplify the question that on want to ask. (Malaysia)
* Hardcopy of material, some of them are unavailable (mostly from local presenter). (Indonesia)
* Hard copy for presentation that isn’t available in folder, please make more arrangement on it. I can see that mostly the presentation that isn’t available is coming from host country. (Indonesia)
* Please provide CD of the presentations. (India)
1/6
* There are many presentation missed (not attached) in the meeting material especially the presentation from Philippines. It would be really beneficial if the organizer could gather all presentation ready a real of using. (Thailand)
* Venue is too small and clod. Lunch menu is too limited. Materials quality is not proper. (Thailand)
* All the presentation material including the one such as joint statement may be shown through e-mail. The meeting was very effective. (India)
* The subject of whole vehicle type approval is important and would go a long way in standardizing the testing procedure and would ensure safe and environment by friendly vehicles. The process needs to be expedited and finished by 2012. (India)
* For next we would like to suggest the meeting binder might be not necessary. It would be efficient and reduce cost if deliver meeting material in CD or flash disk. Advantage: Cost lower, for filing system more easy, easy to carry, easy for make report/sharing info in the company/government (Indonesia)
* Some panel discussion if more preferable. (Vietnam) * Some materials missing from folder/file including speeches. Presentation sequence not the
same as material sequence. Too much cutting of time for Q&A. Should allow more questions. (Malaysia)
* Should provide more Q&A time. Q&A would provide opportunity for participants to lean and understand issues, problems and achievement. (Malaysia)
* Presentation on: How is the procedure to establish and practice of COP and appointed of technical service. Experience of each countries while adopting ECE or plan to adopt UNECE under Agreement 1958/1998 should detail e.g. facing to adopt UNECE in part of government and industry (Malaysia)
* The MRA in the Asia Pacific region or ASEAN in particular is beneficial and good for member countries. Harmonization should start first ASEAN members before accession of WP29, 1958 and 1998 Agreement. (Philippines)
* I was very satisfied and the sessions were very informative and substantial. (Philippines) * Since we don’t have time to absorb all reports/presentation, a soft copy of all presentation
would be most welcome for the benefit of our association. (Philippines) * Present a real example in regard with UNECE regulation revision process wince proposal
discussion in GTR up to WP29 forum vote. (Indonesia) * With the president interest on the Philippines involvement into this undertaking and the
commitment and leaderships of our USEC for Land Transport we could foresee certain adjustment of our PNS related to vehicle and parts and that of the MVUC law and the ECE regulation and/or a certain of organizational structure within LTO responsible for road safety and vehicle safety regulation if not an R&D. Need of single institutional structure in the development of regulation. (Philippines)
2/6
--- Day 2 --- 1. As for the contents throughout Day 2
□easy (4) □enough (55) □difficult (0) No answer (2)
2. Please evaluate length of time allocated each item.
Reports □too long (3) □enough (54) □too short (2) No answer (2) Panel Discussion □too long (2) □enough (45) □too short (6) No answer (8)
3. Please provide any comments and/or questions at panel discussion (Day 2), if you have. * Whether each country joint each GTR-WP29 through TV conference program directly from
Geneva. (Indonesia) * Meeting room should be sufficient for the all participants comfortably. (Thailand) * The panel discussion was very informative in going updates on the status of accession to the
1958 and 1998 Agreement. (Philippines) * This sharing experiences and progress of each country are beneficial for each other country.
(Indonesia) * The introduce to activities of WP29, GRSP…etc. is useful for me to understand the situation
and the future topic in those working groups, and its good for us to consider the revise or adopt regulations. (Chinese Taipei)
* Hard copy for presentation that isn’t available in folder, please make more arrangement on it. I can see that mostly the presentation that isn’t available is coming from host country. (Indonesia)
* A bit less of comment/question either from panel or floor. (Thailand) * As country which prepare to join WP29 expected the country which already become
contracting party give the detail information about their preparation before join WP29. (Indonesia)
* More effective through panel discussion. (Vietnam) * Unclear on materials presented. Should elaborate the expert meetings rather than just brief
the agenda. More clearer directions from all countries especially presentation from authorities/government rather than just from industry. Keywords can be reduced/minimized. Some items can be combined. Since JASIC wants to lead the harmonization vehicle regulations, so if should support all Asian countries activities and provide experts to educate countries including drawing up roadmap in order to have one voice from the Asian region. (Malaysia)
3/6
* Should accelerate the process. It is a bit slow. (Malaysia) * Panel discussion was very ideal and the length of time for presentation was well planned
and encourage the participation of all the delegates. (Philippines) * On expert meeting, discussing ECE regulation to include actual demonstration test.
(Philippines) * For common key word to ASEAN on harmonization is to have a “Transport Vehicle Act” or
another name but encompasses standards, agreements, facilities, manpower qualifications, to aiming requirements all backed up by law from each country – to serve as a common framework for each country to work on. (Philippines)
---As for the G/I Meeting in the future ---
1. Please provide any additional comments on activity of G/I Meeting in the future,
if you have. * Directly program by TV conference between GTR-WP29 meeting and each countries in
ASEAN. (Indonesia) * Should have the concrete action plan for each country like ACCSQ-APWG is doing.
(Thailand) * Should consider to hold the meeting outside ASEAN countries. (Thailand) * It would be very greatly to can have a chance to visit the car business in other country (ex.
This time also has a nice arrangement for car manufacturers but please also consider for the parts manufacturer neet time.) (Thailand)
* The presentation should be bigger. (Thailand) * For expert meeting, please include motorcycle type approval system. Please include or add
motorcycle issued in G/I meeting in the future. Global fuel quality and trends of alternatives fuel particularly bioethanol. Helmets issue and AHO (Automatic Headline On). (Philippines)
* JASIC must see to it that participating economies level of understanding of all topics being discussed are of same level. (Philippines)
* Please consider how to get real (applicable) solution in order to improve and solve the problems (obstacles) in accessing the 1958/1998 Agreement and implement the UN-ECE Regulation among Asian countries. (Indonesia)
* An exhibition of the vehicle parts or components covered by the ECE regulation should be included shown at the G/I meetings for better appreciation by the participants. Pictures or actual samples. (Philippines)
* Guest speakers from WP29 should be invited to the G/I meeting to show experience,
4/6
expertise, and update of WP29 and GRs on regular basis. (Thailand) * One session should be kept to take up one safety regulation of priority to the region for
detail and adoption in a time bound manner. (India) * Please prepare two screens in order to all participants comfort on ratify of G/I meeting.
(Indonesia) * Invite speakers from WP29 for more insight information and detail discussion. (Vietnam) * Have clear directions, action plans, countermeasures in order to achieve its objectives. More
government officers from participating countries should join. More industry players should also participate. (Malaysia)
* Countermeasure on harmonization of technical regulations and certification according to UNECE. (Malaysia)
* I congratulate the organizer for a job well done. (Philippines) * For current issues on UNECE amendments, on priority regulations, better to have details as
reference materials for participants to understand contents of proposed amendments. (Philippines)
* Make it more informative by specific Q&A and request member countries to present/answer questions provided by JASIC. (Malaysia)
2. Would you like to participate in the next G/I Meeting?
□Yes (55) □No (1) * Limited budget and lack of manpower. (Chinese Taipei) No answer (5)
4. Other
Please write comments and/or questions concerning this meeting. * Meeting room too small to accommodate all participants. (Thailand) * More visual presentation necessary (e.g. video, photo, illustration) especially from each
country experience/progress. (Indonesia) * The meeting is really helpful for us. We can update the situation of each country in region.
Thank you very much. (Vietnam) * Handouts/meeting reference materials, please consider to print it into double-sized page.
Reasons – light weight and const effective. (Malaysia) * In Laos, we have at least two main organizations that responsible for automobile, namely
Ministry of Commerce and Industry and Ministry of Public Works and Transport. Therefore if JASIC invite both ministries so they will joint the meeting with us. (Laos)
* Tank you for your hard work. (Indonesia) * Very well organized meeting. (Malaysia) * Asia G/I meetings helps in increasing co-operation among Asian countries – towards WP29
5/6
activities. ARAI (India) may provide expertise/guidance on test facilities for Asian countries. (India)
* The presentation material may be sent through e-mail. The meeting was very effective. (India)
* JASIC can collect fate program for next expert meeting and distribute to ASEAN country. So each ASEAN country can not only budgeting for held the expert meeting also can budgeting to attend the expert meeting held in other ASEAN country. (Indonesia)
* Sorry I didn’t get a presenter for round discussion and panel discussion, because our leader (Mr. Suryono) wants him as a presenter. (Indonesia)
* In general, G/I meeting is fruitful for all participants and important forum for harmonization of regulation and certification in Asia. Thank you very much. (Vietnam)
* Please invite UNECE WP29 secretary to participate in future meetings. JASIC should also invite Ministry of Industry to participate in future meetings. (Malaysia)
* The G/I meetings in the future should assist, help, give and support the Asian countries in WP29 to include our country Philippines by providing guidance in establishing ECE regulations and recognition certificates applicable to us for our adoption, particularly our proposed type approval system. (Philippines)
* The ballroom facility should be equipped with the biggest screen for the projector so the participants that seating down in the behind can look well the presentation display. (Indonesia)
* A thank to the organizers of this meeting for a job well done and well coordinated and approved. (Philippines)
* Involvement from WP29 secretariat is vital for implement of this meeting in the near future. (Malaysia)
* Please include in the regular agenda a specific portion/topic discussion for motorcycle issues not common of 4-wheels, for better understanding of government representatives and industry players. (Philippines)
* In the case of the Philippines, efforts is necessary to involve policy and/or low makers to address lack of legal basis or presence of legal barriers. (Philippines)
6/6