7
P1 Sep–Oct 2012 • Timothy Van Zandt • Prices & Markets Session 15 • Strategic Commitment Page 1 1 Game Theory and Strategic Analysis 11. Static Games and Nash Equilibrium 12. Imperfect Competition 13. Explicit and Implicit Cooperation 14. Strategic Commitment (a) Sequential games and backward induction. (b) How timing matters: Stackelberg games 2 Sequential games and backwards induction Life must be understood backward, but … it must be lived forward. – Soren Kierkegaard

1 Game Theory and Strategic Analysis - … Game Theory and Strategic Analysis 11. Static Games and Nash Equilibrium 12. ... Assume that each pirate votes in favor of a proposal if

  • Upload
    vokien

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

P1 Sep–Oct 2012 • Timothy Van Zandt • Prices & MarketsSession 15 • Strategic Commitment Page 1

1 Game Theory and Strategic Analysis

11.✓ Static Games and Nash Equilibrium

12.✓ Imperfect Competition

13.✓ Explicit and Implicit Cooperation

14.➥ Strategic Commitment

(a) Sequential games and backward induction.

(b) How timing matters: Stackelberg games

2 Sequential games and backwards induction

Life must be understood backward, but … it must be lived forward.– Soren Kierkegaard

P1 Sep–Oct 2012 • Timothy Van Zandt • Prices & MarketsSession 15 • Strategic Commitment Page 2

3 Pirates puzzle

There are 5 pirates, named A,B,C,D,E. They are intelligent and greedy.

They have 100 gold pieces to share. Here are the rules of distribution:

Pirate A proposes distribution of coins amongst the pirates. All pirates vote.

If the majority vote against, then Pirate A is thrown to the sharks and Pirate

B must propose a coin distribution. And so on.

Some details:

1. Each time, all remaining pirates vote, including the proposer.

2. In case of a tie, a proposal is accepted.

3. Assume that each pirate votes in favor of a proposal if and only if it gives a

strictly higher payoff than what he/she gets if the proposal is defeated.

What happens?

4 Backward induction solution

1. First round:

Pirate A proposes … [ 98 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 ]

2. If 2nd round is reached, Pirates B, C, D, E remain:

Then Pirate B proposes … [ 99 , 0 , 1 , 0 ]

3. If 3rd round is reached, Pirates C, D, E remain:

Then Pirate C proposes … [ 99 , 0 , 1 ]

4. If 4th round is reached, Pirates D and E remain:

Then Pirate D proposes … [ 100 , 0 ]

[ A B C D E ]

P1 Sep–Oct 2012 • Timothy Van Zandt • Prices & MarketsSession 15 • Strategic Commitment Page 3

5 An entry deterrance game Part ofExercise 15.1

The figure below illustrates the following strategic situation involving Sony, which

currently has a monopoly in the Discman, and JVC, which may enter the market.

JVC

Sony

Enter

( 5 , -2 )

Highoutput

( 6 , 6 )

Lowoutput

Sony

Stay out

( 12 , 0 )

Highoutput

( 8 , 0 )

Lowoutput

6 Suppose Sony is making plans to build a new plant

Sony

JVC

Large plant

Sony

Enter

( 4 , -2 )

Highoutput

( 3 , 6 )

Lowoutput

Sony

Stay out

( 11 , 0 )

Highoutput

( 5 , 0 )

Lowoutput

JVC

Small plant

Sony

Enter

( 5 , -2 )

Highoutput

( 6 , 6 )

Lowoutput

Sony

Stay out

( 12 , 0 )

Highoutput

( 8 , 0 )

Lowoutput

P1 Sep–Oct 2012 • Timothy Van Zandt • Prices & MarketsSession 15 • Strategic Commitment Page 4

7 Game Theory and Strategic Analysis

11.✓ Static Games and Nash Equilibrium

12.✓ Imperfect Competition

13.✓ Explicit and Implicit Cooperation

14.➥ Strategic Commitment

(a)✓ Sequential games and backward induction.

(b)➥ How timing matters: Stackelberg games

8 Pricing game from Session 12

Firm BLow Med High

Low19

20

18

25

10

33

Firm A Med24

23

28

31

22

38

High30

15

40

27

34

42

P1 Sep–Oct 2012 • Timothy Van Zandt • Prices & MarketsSession 15 • Strategic Commitment Page 5

9 Suppose that Firm B can commit to its price first

Firm B

Firm A ( 24 , 23 )

Low

( 19 , 20 )

Low

( 24 , 23 )

Med

( 30 , 15 )

High

( 28 , 31 ) Firm A

Med

( 18 , 25 )

Low

( 28 , 31 )

Med

( 40 , 27 )

High

( 34 , 42 ) Firm A

High

( 10 , 33 )

Low

( 22 , 38 )

Med

( 34 , 42 )

High

10 Summary: What are Stackelberg games?

From these ingredients:

two players: 1 and 2

player 1 chooses action A1 and player 2 chooses action A2

We can have three different strategic situations, depending on the timing:

Simultaneous moves

Sequential game in which player 1 moves first

Sequential game in which player 2 moves first

Such sequential games are called Stackelberg games.

Player who moves first is the leader; other player is the follower.

P1 Sep–Oct 2012 • Timothy Van Zandt • Prices & MarketsSession 15 • Strategic Commitment Page 6

11 Summary: What about Stackelberg games?

They let us see how timing and strategic commmitment matter.

Who is behaving differently in Stackelberg vs. Nash?

Follower?

Leader?

12 Preemptive investments

Your firm is first to develop the next generation memory chip. You thus willbe the first firm to install capacity. What are you thinking?

P1 Sep–Oct 2012 • Timothy Van Zandt • Prices & MarketsSession 15 • Strategic Commitment Page 7

13 Wrap up on strategic commitment

When you have the chance to commit, think about:

1. In what way you want to influence the other players’ actions.

2. How you can achieve this.

14 Review (Tuesday) … Session 16 (Thursday)

No new material will be covered in either session!

The review session is optional; Session 16 is mandatory