53
1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region Fort Belvoir, VA (703) 805-3755; DSN 655-3755 E-mail: [email protected] Workshop #45 2010 PDI – June 2010

1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

1

Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition

ProgramsProfessor Gerry Land

CPA, CDFM-ADefense Acquisition University

Capital & Northeast Region

Fort Belvoir, VA

(703) 805-3755; DSN 655-3755

E-mail: [email protected]

Workshop #45 2010 PDI – June 2010

Page 2: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

2

• Basic Contracting Information– Contract Families and Types in those Families

– Characteristics of Contract Types

– Elements of Contract Types

– Broad Policies of Contracting

• Budgeting for Acquisition Contracts • Special Topics

– Multi-Year Contracts

– Planning for Contract Award

– Unique Contract Provisions and Clauses

– “Contracting” Through use of MIPRs

– Management of on-going Acquisition Contracts

• Summary

Workshop Topics

Page 3: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

3

• Fixed Price Contracts

• Cost Reimbursement Contracts

– Provides for firm price or, in appropriate cases, an adjustable price

– Contractor’s profit built into price– Use when specific requirements known before award

– Provides for payment of allowable incurred costs

– Contractor’s profit = fee

– Use when uncertainties in contract performance prevent sufficiently accurate estimate of costs for fixed-price contract

Two Families of Contracts

Page 4: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

4

Two Families of Contracts

Cost Reimbursement FamilyCost Reimbursement FamilyFixed Price FamilyFixed Price Family

Types Within the Families

Firm Fixed Price (FFP)

Fixed Price (EPA)

Fixed Price Incentive (FPI)

Types Types

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)

Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)

Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF)

Page 5: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

5

Fixed Price

Contractor’s Promise Best Efforts Deliver specifics

Financial Risk to Contractor Low High

Financial Risk to Government High ? ? ?

Cash Flow to Contractor As Cost Incurred On Delivery

Progress Payments ------ % Incurred Performance Based Payments ------ Milestones

(Preferred)

Government Administration High Low

Fee or Profit ? Fee Profit

Characteristics of Contract Families

Cost Reimbursement

Page 6: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

6

Elements of Contract Types

• Firm Fixed Price (FFP)– Negotiated Price (Includes cost and profit)

• Fixed Price Economic Price Adjustment (FP-EPA)– Negotiated Price (Includes cost and profit)– Price Adjustment (+ or - based on stated economic conditions)

• Fixed Price Incentive (FPI)– Target Cost – Target Profit– Share Ratio (Government / Contractor)– Ceiling Price

Page 7: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

7

• Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)– Estimated Cost– Fixed Fee

• Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF)– Estimated Cost – Base Fee (< 3% of estimated cost)– Award Fee Pool

• Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)– Target Cost– Target Fee– Share Ratio (Government / Contractor)– Minimum Fee– Maximum Fee

Elements of Contract Types(Continued)

Page 8: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

8

Schematics Showing Elements of Contract Types

Cost

Profit

0/100 Share

FFP

(PTA)

CeilingPrice

TargetProfit

Fee Adjustment Formula (Ratio)

FPIF

Target Cost

Target Cost

CPIF

TargetFee

Max Fee

Min Fee

Fee Adjustment Formula (Ratio)

Estimated Cost

Fixed Fee

100/0 Share

CPFF

Base Fee (0-3%)

Award Fee Pool

Estimated Cost

CPAFMaxFee

Base Fee

Page 9: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

9

• Contracting Officers have relatively broad discretion in determining best type contract for a particular requirement

• Contract type selected should be based on appropriate criteria

• Contract should promote Government’s interests and motivate contractor to achieve objectives

• Restrictions on contract types:– “Cost-Plus-Percentage-of-Cost” contracts are not authorized– Fixed Price development contracts > $25M must be approved by

USD (AT&L) – Limitations on Fees for Cost Reimbursement Contracts

• CPAF – Base Fee may be “0-3%” of the estimated cost• CPFF – Maximum Fixed Fee Percentages

R&D Effort: 15% Production: 10% Architectural & Engineering (A&E) : 6%

Broad Policies Relative to Contracts

Page 10: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

10

Factors in Selecting Type Contract

• Timing on the acquisition continuum

• Degree of complexity to satisfy requirement

• Risk of successful performance

• Shared responsibility of risk involved

• Cost, schedule, performance and other incentives

• Fair and reasonable prices through competition

• Contracting Officer determines “best” contract type for required work effort and “most reasonable” cost to the government

For Acquisition Programs

Page 11: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

11

Defense Acquisition Management System

• The Materiel Development Decision precedes entry into any phase of the acquisition management system

• Entrance Criteria met before entering phase

• Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability

IOC: Initial Operational CapabilityFOC: Full Operational Capability

PDR: Preliminary Design ReviewCDR: Critical Design ReviewFRP: Full Rate Production

IOCBA

Technology Opportunities & Resources

MaterielSolutionAnalysis

FRPDecisionReview

FOC

Materiel DevelopmentDecision

User Needs

PDR CDR

CDD CPD

ICD

AoA

Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment

Post CDRAssessment

PDR

Technology Development

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

Engineering and Manufacturing Development

Post PDRAssessment

C

or

With Emphasis on Contract Type Appropriate to Phase

CPFFFFP (LOE)

CPFFCPIF

CPAF FPI FFPFFPFPI

Generally Preferred Contract Type For Different Phases

Based on DoDI 5000.02; 8 Dec 08

Page 12: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

12

Cost and Pricing

• Government policy is to pay a “fair and reasonable” price for goods and services for which a contract is awarded

• One responsibility of the contracting officer is to determine the “fair and reasonable” price

• Key Question: What is a “fair and reasonable” price and how is it determined?

Page 13: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

13

Price Analysis vs. Cost Analysis

Price Analysis• Fast and “cheap” to perform

• Used to analyze sealed bids, small purchases and competitive proposals

Cost Analysis• Slow and costly to perform

• Used to analyze sole source and, occasionally, competitive proposals

Used when Purchasing:

• Research and Development efforts

• Unique sole source items

• Purchases > $500,000

• Standard, off-the-shelf items

• Repeat buys of other items

• Purchases < $500,000

Used when Purchasing:

Performed by Government Contracting Officer

Page 14: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

14

Funding Policies forAcquisition - Related Contracts

• For Research and Development Efforts

• RDT&E Appropriation

• Incremental Funding Policy: Budget on basis of cost expected to be incurred during given fiscal year

• For Production

• Procurement Appropriation

• Full Funding Policy: Budget on basis of all cost for specific quantity of militarily usable end items expected to be put on contract during given fiscal year

Page 15: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

15

Relationship Between Budgeting and Contracting

• Budgeting

• Accomplished well in advance of planned contract award

• In compliance with funding policies of appropriation to be used

• Amount based on “most likely price” of planned work effort

• Funds above budgeted amount may be needed for contract modifications, overruns, requests for equitable adjustments, claims and litigation judgments; request funds when known

• Contracting

• Action during execution phase of the acquisition process

• Upon contract award or modification, must have – and obligate – total amount of funds (budget authority) for “price” of work effort appropriate for contract type (i.e., cost reimbursement vs. fixed price)

• Contract “price” = contractor’s “cost” plus company profit or fee

Page 16: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

16

FFP Negotiated Price

FP – EPA Negotiated Price (not including EPA)

FPI Target Cost + Target Profit

CPFF Estimated Cost + Fixed Fee

CPIF Target Cost + Target Fee

CPAF Estimated Cost + Base Fee + Maximum Award Fee

Budgeting for Different Contract TypesGeneral Rule: Budget to Most Likely Price

Contract Type Budgeted Amount

Page 17: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

17

• Elements of Contract:– Estimated Cost: 2,000– Fixed Fee: 150– Budget Estimate:

Budgeting for a CPFF Contract

• Step One: Determine Estimated Cost

• Step Three: Determine Budget Estimate

• Step Two: Determine Fixed Fee

Estimated Cost

Fixed Fee

100/0 Share

CPFF

2,150

Fixed Fee Limitations:

• R&D - 15%

• Production - 10%

• A&E - 6%Budget Estimate = Estimated Cost

plus Fixed Fee

Page 18: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

18

• Elements of Contract:– Target Cost: 1,000– Target Fee: 80– Maximum Fee: 100– Minimum Fee: 60– Sharing Arrangement: 80/20

Target Cost10001000

Budgeting for a CPIF Contract

– Target Price: 1,080

• Step One: Determine Target Cost

• Step Three: Determine Other Elements

Target Price = Target Cost + Target Fee

• Step Two: Determine Target Fee

• Step Four: Determine Target Price

• Step Five: Determine Budget Estimate

Budget Estimate = Target Price

100100

6060

8080Target Fee

80/2080/20

Slope%CPIF

Page 19: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

19

• Elements of Contract:– Estimated Cost: 2,000– Base Fee: 80– Maximum Award Fee: 120

Budgeting for a CPAF Contract

– Budget Estimate: 2,200

• Step One: Determine Estimated Cost

• Step Three: Determine Maximum Award Fee

• Step Two: Determine Base Fee

• Step Four: Determine Budget Estimate

Budget Estimate = Estimated Cost; Base Fee; and Maximum Award Fee

Base Fee (0-3%)

Award Fee Pool

Estimated Cost

CPAFMaxFee

Base Fee

Page 20: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

20

Budgeting for Severable

• DoD may budget for and enter into a contract for severable services that begin one fiscal year and ends during the next fiscal year if the contract period does not exceed one year

• Funds made available for a given fiscal year may be obligated for the total amount of that contract

References: (1) Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 2410a(2) Comptroller General Decision B-259274 (22 May 96)

Services Contracts

Page 21: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

21

Budgeting for Termination Liability

• Unliquidated obligation on incrementally funded contract must be sufficient to cover cost of terminating for convenience (if action required)

• Termination costs can not increase total budget needed• If contract terminated, termination costs to be financed

from unliquidated obligations without reprogramming • Exceptions (expected to be rarely used):

– Statutory Waivers: When exempted by Public Law (then budgeted on a pay-as-you-go basis)

– Special Termination Cost Clause: Permitted by DFAR in fixed-price incentive and incrementally funded cost reimbursement contracts; approval requires notification of House and Senate Appropriations Committees

On Incrementally Funded RDT&E Contracts

Page 22: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

22

• Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract most suitable when government wants to incentivize contractor in areas other than just cost (e.g., subjective areas such as timeliness and technical performance)

• Total Award Fee consists of two elements:– Base Fee (0 – 3% of estimated cost of contract minus Award Fee) – Award Fee Pool (from which contractor earns fee based on

superior performance in satisfying criteria stated in Award Fee Plan)

• Amount of fee actually paid is judgment decision made in accordance with criteria in Award Fee Plan

• Fee to be paid contractor is a unilateral government decision; generally, decision is not subject to “Disputes” clause

• Can be contentious topic for both contractor and government

BackgroundAward Fees

Page 23: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

23

Base Fee (0 - 3%)Base Fee (0 - 3%)

PeriodsPeriods

Award Fee PoolAward Fee Pool

11 22 33 44 55• Elements of Award Fee

• Award Fee Base (0 – 3 %)

• Award Fee Pool • Evaluation Periods

• Total Award Fee must be available at contract award

• Financial actions re Award Fee• Commitment made before start of award period

• Obligation made after end of award period (but before payment)

Application of Award Fees

• Payment action may be based on:• Specific milestones• Time periods • Combination of milestones and time periods

• Evaluation Criteria

Page 24: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

24

• Criteria for earning specified in Award Fee Plan Criteria for earning specified in Award Fee Plan

• Frequency is important to the processFrequency is important to the process

• Time based periods (usually 6, 9 or 12 month periods)Time based periods (usually 6, 9 or 12 month periods)

• Milestone or event-based periodsMilestone or event-based periods

• BothBoth time-based and milestone/event-based periods time-based and milestone/event-based periods

• Unearned Award Fee – How can it be used? Unearned Award Fee – How can it be used?

Determination for Earning Award Fee

• FAR prohibits “rollover” of unearned award fee to future FAR prohibits “rollover” of unearned award fee to future evaluation periods or events evaluation periods or events

• Unearned award fee may be used by PMO or returned to Unearned award fee may be used by PMO or returned to higher command level for other requirements higher command level for other requirements

*

Paragraph 16.401(e)(4), dated 14 Oct 2009 *

Page 25: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

25

Special Topics

Page 26: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

26

Multi-Year Service Contracts

• Must be a continuing requirement for the services

• Furnishing of services will require a substantial initial investment in plant or equipment, or the incurrence of substantial contingent liabilitiesfor the assembly, training, or transportation of a specialized work force

Criteria for This Type Service Contract

• Use of such a contract will promote the best interest of the U.S. by encouraging effective competition and promoting economies of operation

Chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, Sec 2306C, Multiyear Services Contracts.(Originated in 2000 Authorization language)

Page 27: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

27

• Operation, maintenance and support of facilities and installations

• Maintenance or modification of aircraft, ships, vehicles, and other highly complex military equipment

• Specialized training necessitating high quality instructor skills (e.g., Pilot and aircrew members; foreign language training)

• Base services (e.g., Ground maintenance; plane refueling; bus transportation; refuse collection and disposal)

Multi-Year Service ContractsType Services Appropriate for Such Contracts

Chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, Sec 2306C, Multiyear Services Contracts.(Originated in 2000 Authorization language)

Page 28: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

28

Cancellation Ceiling for

• Cancellation Ceiling may cover: – Non-recurring Costs

– Recurring Cost (with approval of Agency Head and USD (C))

• Cancellation Ceiling is:– Negotiated along with other provisions of the contract– A decreasing amount each year– Not an additional amount to be budgeted

Multiyear Procurement Contracts

• MYP contracts with Cancellation Ceiling > $100M require 30 day written notice to Congressional Defense Committees prior to award

Page 29: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

29

Planning for Contract Awards

• Consider contract type and award timing early– Factor this information into cost and budget estimates

– Avoid execution issues resulting from planned contract award in first or fourth quarter of fiscal year

• Initial planning done as part of obligation plan• Consult contracting officer when preparing obligation

plans

• Proper planning usually results in better execution

Page 30: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

30

• Two formal methods to change a contract:– Preferred is the “Supplemental Agreement”: Fully negotiated

agreement on specific work, price and schedule. – Less preferred is the “Undefinitized Change Order”: Tentative

agreement on work and schedule but final agreements not yet negotiated; usually has a “not-to-exceed” price.

Contract Changes

• Constructive change: government action causes contractor to perform work differently than required by written contract

• Standard changes clause: allows contracting officers to unilaterally direct changes in specification (what), shipping destination (where) and packing (how packaged); contractor may request equitable adjustment in cost and/or schedule

Page 31: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

31

• Contractor required to notify government 60 days prior to incurring costs equal to 75% of amount obligated – Incrementally Funded Cost-Reimbursement Contracts

• Called “Limitation of Funds Clause (LOF)”– Fully Funded Cost-Reimbursement Contracts

• Called “Limitation of Cost Clause (LOC)”

Contract Clauses that ProvideSome Control over Unliquidated Obligations

• Contractor required to notify government 90 days prior to incurring costs equal to 85% of amount obligated– Incrementally Funded Fixed Price Contracts

• Called “Limitation of Government Obligation Clause (LOGO)”

• Notification allows termination liability to be covered by unliquidated obligations on that specific contract

Page 32: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

32

“Contracting” of Goods and Services through Use of MIPR

• Three types of actions by which DoD activities can use Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (MIPRs) to obtain goods and services:– Project Orders– Economy Act Orders – Non-Economy Act Orders

• A MIPR (DD Form 448) is normally used to transfer budget authority from one DoD activity (requesting agency) to another DoD activity (servicing agency) to provide specific goods or services

• The servicing agency signs and returns DD Form 448-2 (MIPR Acceptance) to requesting agency to indicate agreement to provide the goods or services

Page 33: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

33

Project Order

• MIPR must specifically state the request for goods or services is a Project Order

• MIPR is then treated as if it were a contract• Funds identified on MIPR considered obligated when servicing

agency signs and returns DD Form 448-2

• Three tests must be satisfied for action to be considered a Project Order: – Request must be for specific, identifiable supply, material,

equipment, work or service;

– Servicing agency must be capable of performing requested action;

– Requested work must be started within 90 days of acceptance or by first of January of following year.

References: US Code, Title 41, Section 23 and DoDI 7220.1

Page 34: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

34

Economy Act Order

• An Economy Act Order is not treated as if it were a contract but, rather, an interagency acquisition agreement

• While funds on the MIPR are normally considered obligated when accepted by servicing agency, the servicing agency is simply an extension of requesting agency

• Funds on the MIPR retain original period of availability for obligation purposes

• Required criteria for requesting agency to use this type order: – Required amount of funding must be available;

– Head of requesting agency decides the order is in best interest of the government;

– Servicing agency is capable of filling the order or getting by contract the requested goods or services;

– Head of requesting agency decides ordered goods or services can not be provided as conveniently or cheaply by contract with a commercial enterprise

References: US Code, Title 31, Chapter 15, Section 1535; FMR, Volume 11A, Chapter 3; and FAR at Sub-part 17.5

Page 35: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

35

Non-Economy Act Order

• Non-Economy Act Orders are for intra-governmental support where a DoD activity obtains required goods or services from a Non-DoD agency by sending funds to that servicing agency with understanding it will award a contract on its behalf.

• There must be specific statutory authority to place an order with a Non-DoD agency for this type action and to pay associated fees (there are limited such statutory authorities)

• Required criteria for requesting agency to use this type order: – Proper funding must be available;

– The Non-Economy Act Order does not conflict with another agency’s designated responsibilities;

– Requesting agency determines order is in best interest of DoD;

– Servicing agency is able and authorized to provide requested goods or services

Reference: FMR, Volume 11A, Chapter 18 (new chapter as of Feb 08)

• Non-Economy Act Orders are subject to same fiscal limitations as appropriation from which the funds are provided

Highly Controversial Method of DoD “Contracting”

Page 36: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

36

Managing On-Going Contracts

• As with other DoD entities, Acquisition Program Offices forecast obligations and expenditures in Obligation and Expenditure Plans

• Acquisition Program Offices are responsible for managing obligations and expenditures associated with contracts awarded for their programs

• Better (i.e., more realistic) forecasts usually result in better execution of those plans

• Deviations from planned obligations and expenditures must be reported and justified to higher headquarters

From Resource Management Perspective

Page 37: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

37

Managing On-Going Contracts

• Vast majority of Program Office funding is obligated against contracts

• Proper management of fiscal aspect of contracts requires close coordination with contractors

• Contractors provide status reports on many contracts

• Government Program Offices receive – and should use – information from contractor–provided reports and other government sources (e.g., DCMA) to help manage fiscal aspects of contracts

• Poor execution of contracts usually result in loss of funds

From Contract Management Perspective

Page 38: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

38

• Many acquisition-related contracts require contractors to provide periodic reports reflecting status of contract work effort and costs

• Earned Value Management– IAW DoDI 5000.02 (Enclosure 4, Table 5):

• cost or incentive contracts valued at or greater than $20M in then-year dollars are required to implement EVMS

• whenever implementation of EVMS is required on a contract, a Contract Performance Report (CPR) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) is a requirement of that contract

• EVM related reports not required for firm-fixed price, level of effort or time and materials contracts (use must be approved by MDA)

– CPR compares actual work performed on contract and actual cost incurred to planned work and budgeted cost at same point in time

– Variances between plans and actuals show potential schedule slips and/or cost overruns

– Cost overruns usually impact near term budget requirements

Information Available to Improve Management of On-Going Contracts

Page 39: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

ThresholdsContracts Requirements

> $50M

Cost orIncentiveEqual to or Above Threshold

- Compliance with industry EVM standard- Formal EVM system validation- Contract Performance Report- Integrated Master Schedule - Integrated Baseline Reviews - Ongoing surveillance

< $50Mbut

> $20M

Cost orIncentiveLess Than UpperThreshold butEqual to orAbove LowerThreshold

- Compliance with industry EVM standard- No formal EVM system validation- Contract Performance Report (tailored)- Integrated Master Schedule (tailored)- Integrated Baseline Reviews- Ongoing surveillance

< $20M

Cost orIncentiveLess ThanThreshold

- EVM optional (risk-based decision)- Cost-benefit analysis required

DoD EVM Application Thresholds(DoDI 5000.02, Enclosure 4, Table 5)

Page 40: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

40

• Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR)– Applicable for contracts over six months in duration– Normally not required for firm fixed price contracts unless

circumstances require specific funding visibility– Generally required quarterly unless contract states otherwise– Contractor-prepared report provides basic fiscal information:

• Initial and adjusted contract price

• Funds obligated to date

• Accrued expenditures

• Contract work authorized and forecast

• Projected total price of contracted work

• Forecast of billings to the government by period

• Estimated termination costs by period

Information Available to Improve Management of On-Going Contracts

Page 41: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

41

• Contracting environment is continually changing

• Contracting is a team effort in partnership with contractor to meet mission needs

• Fair and realistic prices under competition

• Contracting Officers have broad discretion in determining contract type

• Contracting requires knowledge of policy and regulations plus business judgment

• Actions of contracting personnel are limited to authority delegated for specific purposes

SummaryFrom Contract Management Perspective

Page 42: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

42

Summary

• Government requires some contractors – by terms of the contract – to periodically report on status of work actually accomplished and at what cost and projected data

• Government can and should make maximum use of data contained in those reports to better manage execution of the program, to include management of resources

• Acquisition program offices must follow provisions of Financial Management Regulation (DoD 7000.14-R) for fiscal matters and FAR/DFAR for contracting matters

• Vast majority of budget authority provided defense acquisition programs is obligated against contracts

• Resource management in acquisition program offices requires active management of fiscal aspects of contracts

From Resource Management Perspective

Page 43: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

43

Now for the DAU optional “commercial”

Page 44: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

Briefing for DAU Students

Learn. Perform.

Succeed.

Jan 2010’05 ’06 ’07

#1

’02 ’06 ’04 ’06 ’07 ’09 ’03 ’04

Page 45: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

Provide a global learning environment to support a mission-ready Defense Acquisition Workforce that develops, delivers, and sustains effective and affordable warfighting capabilities.

DAU Mission

Impact acquisition excellence through:Acquisition certification and

leadership trainingMission assistance to

acquisition organizationsOnline knowledge sharing

resourcesContinuous learning assetsStrategic workforce planning

Page 46: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

AT&L Performance Learning Model

Knowledge SharingDAP - Online portal to Big A & HCI knowledgeACC - DoD's online collaborative communitiesVirtual Library - Online connection to DAU research collection

Training CoursesClassroom & online DAWIA, Core Plus, & Executive

Mission AssistanceConsulting - Helping organizations solve complex acquisition problemsTargeted Training - Tailored organizational trainingRapid Deployment Training - On-site & online training on the latest AT&L policies

Continuous LearningCL Modules - Online, self-paced learning modulesConferences - PEO / SYSCOM, Business Managers, DAU Acquisition Community Symposium

Formal & informal learning at the point

of need

Page 47: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

Located with our Customers

We are part of the community, not just a place to take classes.

Region Location Workforce

Capital/Northeast Fort Belvoir, VA 31,566

Mid-Atlantic California, MD 23,110

Midwest Kettering, OH 18,604

South Huntsville, AL 28,360

West San Diego, CA 25,465

Page 48: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

Learning assets at www.dau.mil

Acquisition Community Connection

https://acc.dau.mil/

http://www.dau.mil/images/Pages/mission_assistance.aspx

Mission Assistance

https://dap.dau.mil

http://icatalog.dau.mil/

Defense Acquisition Portal

DAU Training & CL Courses

DAU Acker Library

http://www.dau.mil/Library/

Acquisition BestPractices Clearinghouse

https://bpch.dau.mil/

Page 49: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

DAU’s iCatalog

• Most current resource for information regarding DAU courses and the Certification & Core Plus Development Guides

• Accessible from the DAU home page (http://dau.mil) or directly at http://icatalog.dau.mil/

Page 50: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

FY10 Training - Financial Management

BCF 301Advanced

Financial Management

CLM 031Improve Statement

of Work

CLM 013Work Breakdown

Structure

Level III Certification

ACQ 101Fundamentals of Systems Acquisition Management

BCF 106 Fundamentals of

Cost Analysis

BCF 103Fundamentals of Business

Financial Management

BCF 102Fundamentals of Earned

Value Management

Level I Certification Level II Certification

BCF 211Intermediate Business

Acquisition Management

BCF 203Intermediate Earned Value Management

BCF 205Contractor Business

Strategies

CLM 017Risk Management

CLM 024Contracting Overview

Level I “Core Plus”Courses & CL Module

(See DAU iCatalog)

Level III “Core Plus”Courses & CL Module

(See DAU iCatalog)

Level II “Core Plus”Courses & CL Module

(See DAU iCatalog)

Case Based Case BasedKnowledge Based

Vers 10

25 hrs, online

26 hrs, online

15 hrs, online

40 hrs, online

9 days classroom 4 days classroom

5 days classroom

9 days classroom

ACQ 201BIntermediate Systems

Acquisition , Part B

5 days classroom

ACQ 201AIntermediate Systems

Acquisition, Part A

37 hrs, online

Page 51: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

FY10 Training - Cost Estimating

Level II Certification Level III CertificationLevel I Certification

ACQ 101Fundamentals of Systems Acquisition Management

ACQ 201BIntermediate Systems

Acquisition, Part B

BCF 211Acquisition Business

Management

BCF 106 Fundamentals of Cost

Analysis

BCF 103Fundamentals of

Business Financial Management

BCF 102Fundamentals of

Earned Value Management

BCF 107Applied Cost

Analysis

BCF 302Advanced Concepts in Cost

Analysis

CLB 030Cost Data Sources

CLB 023Software Cost Estimating

BCF 206Cost Risk Analysis

BCF 204Intermediate Cost Analysis

BCF 215Operating and Support

Cost Analysis

CLB 029Rates

CLB 026Forecasting Techniques

Level I “Core Plus”Courses & CL Module

(See DAU iCatalog)

Level III “Core Plus”Courses & CL Module

(See DAU iCatalog)

Level II “Core Plus”Courses & CL Module

(See DAU iCatalog)

Case Based Case BasedKnowledge Based

Vers 10

25 hrs, online

26 hours, online15 hrs, online

5 days classroom40 hrs, online 5 days classroom

10 days classroom 4 days classroom

5 days classroom

5 days classroom

5 days classroom

ACQ 201AIntermediate Systems

Acquisition, Part A

37 hrs, online

Page 52: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

DAU’s Commitment to the Defense Acquisition Workforce

Shaping a culture of engagement and career-long learning

•Training - 24 / 7 learning assets: in the classroom and in the workplace

•Continuous Learning - Helping you learn in the workplace: what you need to know , when you need to know it

•Mission Assistance - Supporting your organization

•Knowledge Sharing - Connecting you – the Engaged Learner - with the experts, resources and materials you need to do your job

Page 53: 1 Financial Implications of Contracting for Acquisition Programs Professor Gerry Land CPA, CDFM-A Defense Acquisition University Capital & Northeast Region

53