51
1 Driven Pile Foundation Driven Pile Foundation Support-Cost Components Support-Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011 June 20-24, 2011 Van E. Komurka, P.E. Van E. Komurka, P.E.

1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

1

Driven Pile Foundation Driven Pile Foundation Support-Cost ComponentsSupport-Cost Components

Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc.

2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute

June 20-24, 2011June 20-24, 2011

Van E. Komurka, P.E.Van E. Komurka, P.E.

Page 2: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

2

• Glass is half empty.Glass is half empty.

• Glass is half full.Glass is half full.

• Glass is twice Glass is twice as big as it as big as it needs to be!needs to be!

Page 3: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

3

• Discuss support-cost components:Discuss support-cost components:– PilePile• ConventionalConventional• Profile (as a function of depth)Profile (as a function of depth)

– CapCap– Column (matching allowable pile loads to Column (matching allowable pile loads to

structure column loads)structure column loads)– SystemSystem

Talk OutlineTalk Outline• Define support cost.Define support cost.

• Present case histories (large and small) Present case histories (large and small) illustrating load-matching approach.illustrating load-matching approach.

Page 4: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

4

The cost of an installed or constructed The cost of an installed or constructed foundation element or system divided by foundation element or system divided by its allowable load, usually expressed in its allowable load, usually expressed in dollars per ton (i.e., how many dollars it dollars per ton (i.e., how many dollars it costs to support one ton of load).costs to support one ton of load).

Sup•portSup•port'' Cost (S Cost (Sŭŭ•pōrt•pōrt'' Kŏst) Kŏst)

Page 5: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

5

• As a normalized parameter, allows direct As a normalized parameter, allows direct (apples-to-apples) economic comparison (apples-to-apples) economic comparison of different foundation alternatives:of different foundation alternatives:– Shallow vs. deep (e.g., spread footings vs. piles)Shallow vs. deep (e.g., spread footings vs. piles)– Deep vs. deep (e.g., drilled piers vs. piles)Deep vs. deep (e.g., drilled piers vs. piles)– Pile section vs. pile section (e.g., 10.75” vs. 12.75”)Pile section vs. pile section (e.g., 10.75” vs. 12.75”)– Pile capacity vs. pile capacity (e.g., 70Pile capacity vs. pile capacity (e.g., 70TT vs. 150 vs. 150TT))

Sup•portSup•port'' Cost (S Cost (Sŭŭ•pōrt•pōrt'' Kŏst) Kŏst)

• Allows economic evaluation and Allows economic evaluation and optimization of deep foundation system optimization of deep foundation system cost componentscost components

Page 6: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

6

CapCap

PilesPiles

Design Column Design Column LoadLoad

ColumnColumn

Deep Foundation Deep Foundation System System ComponentsComponents

Page 7: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

7

Pile Support Pile Support CostCost

Pile CostPile Cost

Allowable Pile Allowable Pile LoadLoad

In general, higher allowable pile In general, higher allowable pile loads result in lower pile loads result in lower pile support costs:support costs:• Spread pile length invested to Spread pile length invested to penetrate through poor soils penetrate through poor soils over more capacityover more capacity•In competent soils, capacity In competent soils, capacity generally increases faster with generally increases faster with depth than does costdepth than does cost

=

Page 8: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

8

Pile Support CostPile Support Cost

Pile Support Cost Pile Support Cost ==

Pile CostPile Cost

Allowable Pile LoadAllowable Pile Load

$1,500 per $1,500 per pilepile

50-ton allow. 50-ton allow. loadload

= $30 / ton= $30 / ton $3,000 per $3,000 per pilepile

150-ton allow. 150-ton allow. loadload

= $20 / ton= $20 / ton

Page 9: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

9

WKGWKG22 Pile Support Costs Pile Support Costs

Project Name Pile TypeAllowable Pile

Load, tons

Pile Support Cost, dollars per

allowable ton

Midwest Express (Wisconsin) Center, Phase 1 10.75 x 0.36512.75 x 0.365

100150

12.1211.52

Miller Park 16-inch Monotube 200 12.20

Johnson Controls Brengel Technology Center 12.75 x 0.312 148 13.48

Potawatomi Casino ExpansionPotawatomi Casino Parking Structure

10.75 x 0.25010.75 x 0.250

8083

Overall Project Average 15.55

Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Production Facility 10.75 x 0.307

4065758085

20.5916.9715.1215.3414.81

Overall Project Average 15.64

Sixth Street Viaduct Replacement10.75 x 0.25012.75 x 0.37512.75 x 0.37512.75 x 0.375

65154182190

20.4710.508.62

13.92

Overall Project Average 15.28

State Fair Park Exposition Hall 9.625 x 0.545 200 9.40

Great Lakes Aquatarium/Discovery World Museum(Pier Wisconsin)

10.75 x 0.36513.375 x 0.48013.375 x 0.480

91180251

14.7313.369.91

Page 10: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

10

y = 90.662x-0.402

R2 = 0.712

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260

Pile Support Costs – WKGPile Support Costs – WKG22 Projects ProjectsP

ile S

up

port

Cost,

dollars

per

allow

ab

le

Pile S

up

port

Cost,

dollars

per

allow

ab

le

ton

ton

Allowable Pile Load, tons (factor of safety = 2.0)Allowable Pile Load, tons (factor of safety = 2.0)

Page 11: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

11

Pile Support Costs – Sixth Street Pile Support Costs – Sixth Street Viaduct ReplacementViaduct Replacement

y = 245.41x-0.5529

R2 = 0.4787

y = 35.326e-0.0058x

R2 = 0.5423

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190

Allowable Pile Load, tonsAllowable Pile Load, tons

Pile S

up

port

Cost,

dollars

per

Pile S

up

port

Cost,

dollars

per

allow

ab

le t

on

allow

ab

le t

on

Various: Pile Diameters (10.75- and 12.75-inch- O.D.) Safety Factor (from 2.0 to 2.5) Installation Criteria (WEAP, Modified EN) Subsurface Conditions (from till at 4 feet, to 60 feet of organic silt)

Page 12: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

12

Achieving Higher-Capacity PilesAchieving Higher-Capacity Piles

Use larger section, larger hammer, drive Use larger section, larger hammer, drive piles “harder,” perhaps deeper.piles “harder,” perhaps deeper.

Increase design stresses (e.g., from 9-12 ksi to Increase design stresses (e.g., from 9-12 ksi to 16 ksi)16 ksi)

Incorporate soil/pile set-up:Incorporate soil/pile set-up: Use displacement pile.Use displacement pile. Adjust testing program (wait longer to test, Adjust testing program (wait longer to test,

restrike testing, etc.).restrike testing, etc.).

Use higher-strength concrete (e.g., in Use higher-strength concrete (e.g., in concrete-filled pipe piles from 3-4 ksi to 6 ksi)concrete-filled pipe piles from 3-4 ksi to 6 ksi)

Page 13: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

13

StructuralStructural

GeotechnicaGeotechnicall

Long-Long-TermTerm

ChangeChangeInitialInitialCapacityCapacity

Relatively Low

Set-Up Relatively High

Relatively Low (Steel Shell Only)

Concrete Fill

Relatively High (Steel & Concrete Composite Section)

TIME TIME

Page 14: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

14

Marquette South Marquette South LegLeg

Canal Street Canal Street ViaductViaduct

• Structural capacity derived from both steel (expensive) and concrete (inexpensive)

• Structural capacity derived only from steel (expensive)

16 x 0.500As=24.35 in2

16 x 1.350As=62.13 in2

Pile Type – Structural Pile Type – Structural CapacityCapacity

Page 15: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

15

Cap Support Cap Support CostCost

Cap CostCap Cost

Design Column Design Column LoadLoad

Higher allowable pile loads Higher allowable pile loads result in fewer piles, smaller result in fewer piles, smaller caps, and therefore lower caps, and therefore lower cap support costs.cap support costs.

Minimized cap support cost Minimized cap support cost results from using the results from using the minimum required number minimum required number of piles.of piles.

=

Page 16: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

16

Cap Support CostsCap Support CostsC

ap

Su

pp

ort

Cost,

dollars

per

allow

ab

le

Cap

Su

pp

ort

Cost,

dollars

per

allow

ab

le

ton

ton

Design Column Load, kipsDesign Column Load, kips

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000

50-Ton Piles

75-Ton Piles

100-Ton Piles

250-Ton Piles

150-Ton Piles200-Ton Piles

3-Pile Minimum

Page 17: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

17

Column Support Column Support CostCost

Pile Cap Cost + Pile Cap Cost + ΣΣ Pile Costs Pile Costs

Design Column Design Column LoadLoad

Measures how well the Measures how well the allowable pile load, in allowable pile load, in conjunction with the minimum conjunction with the minimum required number of piles, required number of piles, matches the design column matches the design column load.load.

Minimum column support cost Minimum column support cost results from using the optimum results from using the optimum allowable pile load.allowable pile load.

=

Page 18: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

18

Optimum Allowable Pile Optimum Allowable Pile LoadLoad

Design Column LoadDesign Column Load

Minimum Req’d No. of Minimum Req’d No. of PilesPiles

Design Column Load = 900 kipsDesign Column Load = 900 kips

Minimum Req’d No. of Piles = 3Minimum Req’d No. of Piles = 3

Optimum Allowable Pile Load = Optimum Allowable Pile Load =

900 kips900 kips

3 piles3 piles

= 300 kips/pile = 150 tons/pile= 300 kips/pile = 150 tons/pile

900K

=

Page 19: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

19

Lower-Than-Optimum Allowable Pile Lower-Than-Optimum Allowable Pile LoadsLoads

Increased pile support costs – each ton of Increased pile support costs – each ton of allowable pile load costs more than it would allowable pile load costs more than it would have with higher-capacity piles.have with higher-capacity piles.

Increased cap support costs – each cap is Increased cap support costs – each cap is larger than it would have been with higher-larger than it would have been with higher-capacity piles.capacity piles. Increased column support costs – for a given Increased column support costs – for a given column load, pile and cap costs are higher column load, pile and cap costs are higher than they would have been with higher-than they would have been with higher-capacity (closer to optimum allowable load) capacity (closer to optimum allowable load) piles.piles. Increased number of pile installations – may Increased number of pile installations – may increase total project drive time.increase total project drive time.

Page 20: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

20

Higher-Than-Optimum Allowable Higher-Than-Optimum Allowable LoadsLoads

Increased column support costs – although Increased column support costs – although pile support costs are low, and cap costs are pile support costs are low, and cap costs are minimized, unnecessary capacity is installed minimized, unnecessary capacity is installed (unnecessary cost is incurred).(unnecessary cost is incurred).

Low unit cost. All you need.

Page 21: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

21

Match Allowable Pile Loads to Column Match Allowable Pile Loads to Column Loads!Loads!

Piles are below-grade structural extensions Piles are below-grade structural extensions of above-grade structural elements; their of above-grade structural elements; their design should be integrated with the above-design should be integrated with the above-grade design.grade design. Using one allowable pile load for a project is Using one allowable pile load for a project is analogous to using one beam or column analogous to using one beam or column design throughout a building.design throughout a building.

Two fixed design components:Two fixed design components: Structural loads to support (column load Structural loads to support (column load

schedule).schedule). Soil/pile resistance behavior to support Soil/pile resistance behavior to support

structural loads (depth vs. capacity structural loads (depth vs. capacity relationships).relationships).

Deep foundation system design flexibility Deep foundation system design flexibility (choice of pile type, section, allowable load, (choice of pile type, section, allowable load, safety factor, etc.) allows accommodating safety factor, etc.) allows accommodating fixed design components.fixed design components.

Page 22: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

22

System Support System Support CostCost

ΣΣ Deep Foundation System Deep Foundation System CostsCostsΣΣ Column Design Loads Column Design Loads

Measures overall cost-Measures overall cost-effectiveness of deep effectiveness of deep foundation system. Provides foundation system. Provides basis for comparison of basis for comparison of viable design and installation viable design and installation options.options.

=

Page 23: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

23

Load-Matching Design ApproachLoad-Matching Design Approach

Obtain foundation layout, column load Obtain foundation layout, column load schedule, and the minimum required schedule, and the minimum required number of piles at each cap, from structural number of piles at each cap, from structural engineer.engineer. Calculate optimum allowable pile load for Calculate optimum allowable pile load for each cap.each cap.

If desired, calculate required “ultimate” pile If desired, calculate required “ultimate” pile capacity for each cap. To evaluate the cost-capacity for each cap. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of field testing, this can be effectiveness of field testing, this can be done for a range of factors of safety.done for a range of factors of safety.

Page 24: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

24

Page 25: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

25

Page 26: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

26

F.S. = 2.00Maximum

Optimum RequiredAllowable "Ultimate"

Column Min. Column Pile PileLine No. Load, Load, Capacity,

Designation of Piles kips tons tons

0.A-8.5 1 158 79 1580.A-0.5 1 180 90 180

P-3.3 1 181 91 181P-3.7 1 181 91 181P-4.5 1 181 91 181P-5 1 181 91 181

P-5.5 1 181 91 181P-6 1 181 91 181

0.A-8 1 203 102 203M.5-8 1 228 114 228

N-8.5 1 360 180 360P.7-8.5 1 360 180 360P-0.5 1 360 180 360P-8.5 1 360 180 360Q.8-3 1 360 180 360Q-0.5 1 360 180 360M.5-4 1 368 184 368J -5 2 748 187 374

G-7 3 1479 247 493H-7 3 1479 247 493K-6 3 1484 247 495B-7 3 1487 248 496B-6 3 1507 251 502C-8 3 1508 251 503

R1-5.9 3 1510 252 503K-7 3 1529 255 510

C-4 3 1874 312 625F-6 3 1879 313 626J -6 3 1942 324 647J -4 3 1995 333 665Q-9 3 2003 334 668R-9 3 2003 334 668

448

Pier Pier WisconsinWisconsin

Page 27: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

27

Load-Matching Design ApproachLoad-Matching Design Approach

Obtain foundation layout, column load Obtain foundation layout, column load schedule, and an indication of the minimum schedule, and an indication of the minimum required number of piles at each cap, from required number of piles at each cap, from structural engineer.structural engineer. Calculate optimum allowable pile load for Calculate optimum allowable pile load for each cap.each cap.

Calculate required “ultimate” pile capacity Calculate required “ultimate” pile capacity for each cap. To evaluate the cost-for each cap. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of field testing, this can be effectiveness of field testing, this can be done for a range of factors of safety.done for a range of factors of safety.

Generate histogram of optimized allowable Generate histogram of optimized allowable pile loads (or of “ultimate” pile capacities).pile loads (or of “ultimate” pile capacities).

Page 28: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

28

194

tons

91 to

ns

180

tons

227

tons

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375

Allowable Pile Load HistogramAllowable Pile Load HistogramPier WisconsinPier Wisconsin

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Piles

Piles

Allowable Pile Load, tonsAllowable Pile Load, tons

Page 29: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

29

Load-Matching Design ApproachLoad-Matching Design Approach

Obtain foundation layout, column load Obtain foundation layout, column load schedule, and an indication of the minimum schedule, and an indication of the minimum required number of piles at each cap, from required number of piles at each cap, from structural engineer.structural engineer. Calculate optimum allowable pile load for Calculate optimum allowable pile load for each cap.each cap.

Calculate required ultimate pile capacity for Calculate required ultimate pile capacity for each cap. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness each cap. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of field testing, this can be done for a range of field testing, this can be done for a range of factors of safety.of factors of safety. Generate histogram of optimized allowable, Generate histogram of optimized allowable, and/or ultimate, pile capacities.and/or ultimate, pile capacities.

Select appropriate allowable pile loads (or Select appropriate allowable pile loads (or “ultimate” pile capacities), with design-“ultimate” pile capacities), with design-team input.team input.

Page 30: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

30

194

tons

91 to

ns

180

tons

227

tons

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375

Allowable Pile Load HistogramAllowable Pile Load HistogramPier WisconsinPier Wisconsin

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Piles

Piles

Allowable Pile Load, tonsAllowable Pile Load, tons

180 tons

251 tons

91 tons

Page 31: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

31

Load-Matching Design Approach Load-Matching Design Approach (continued)(continued)

Select viable pile type(s) and section(s) for Select viable pile type(s) and section(s) for selected allowable loads/capacities (91selected allowable loads/capacities (91TT, 180, 180TT, , and 251and 251TT) ) {borings}{borings}..

Estimate individual pile lengths required for Estimate individual pile lengths required for selected pile capacities.selected pile capacities.

Page 32: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

32

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Estimated Ultimate Pile Capacity - Estimated Ultimate Pile Capacity - BoringsBorings

13.375-inch-diameter Pipe Piles13.375-inch-diameter Pipe Piles

Pile T

oe E

levati

on

, fe

et

Pile T

oe E

levati

on

, fe

et

Estimated “Ultimate” Pile Capacity, tonsEstimated “Ultimate” Pile Capacity, tons

Page 33: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

33

-130

-120

-110

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Estimated “Ultimate” Capacity, tonsEstimated “Ultimate” Capacity, tons

Pile T

oe E

levati

on

, fe

et

Pile T

oe E

levati

on

, fe

et Pile Test Pile Test

Program Program Capacity Capacity ProfileProfileLong-

term Capacity

EOID Capacity

Set-Up

Page 34: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

34

Load-Matching Design Approach Load-Matching Design Approach (continued)(continued)

Select viable pile type and section for Select viable pile type and section for selected pile capacities.selected pile capacities.

Estimate individual pile lengths required for Estimate individual pile lengths required for selected pile capacities.selected pile capacities.

Estimate total pile lengths required for Estimate total pile lengths required for project.project.

Using representative prices, estimate total Using representative prices, estimate total pile cost for project.pile cost for project.

Page 35: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

35

Allowable Pile Load HistogramAllowable Pile Load HistogramPier WisconsinPier Wisconsin

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Piles

Piles

Allowable Pile Load, tonsAllowable Pile Load, tons

227

tons

180

tons

91 to

ns

194

tons

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375

180 tons

251 tons

91 tons

Page 36: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

36

F.S. = 2.00Maximum

Optimum RequiredAllowable "Ultimate"

Column Min. Column Pile Pile Est. Pile Est. Pile(s) Est. Pile(s)Line No. Load, Load, Capacity, No. Length, Footage, Cost,

Designation of Piles kips tons tons of Piles feet feet dollars

0.A-8.5 1 158 79 158 1 62 62 1,3400.A-0.5 1 180 90 180 1 62 62 1,340

P-3.3 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 91-ton max. P-3.7 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 allow. load:P-4.5 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 71P-5 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 10.75x0.365

P-5.5 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 feet:P-6 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 4,402

0.A-8 1 203 102 203 1 86 86 2,405M.5-8 1 228 114 228 1 86 86 2,405

N-8.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 180-ton max.P.7-8.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 allow. load:P-0.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 108P-8.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 13-3/8" 0.480Q.8-3 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 feet:Q-0.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 9,288M.5-4 1 368 184 368 1 95 95 2,657J -5 2 748 187 374 2 95 190 5,314

G-7 3 1479 247 493 3 95 285 7,971 251-ton max. H-7 3 1479 247 493 3 95 285 7,971 allow. load:K-6 3 1484 247 495 3 95 285 7,971 177B-7 3 1487 248 496 3 95 285 7,971 13-3/8" 0.480B-6 3 1507 251 502 3 95 285 7,971 feet:C-8 3 1508 251 503 3 95 285 7,971 16,815

R1-5.9 3 1510 252 503 4 95 380 10,629K-7 3 1529 255 510 4 95 380 10,629

C-4 3 1874 312 625 4 95 380 10,629 251-ton max.F-6 3 1879 313 626 4 95 380 10,629 allow. load:J -6 3 1942 324 647 4 95 380 10,629 125J -4 3 1995 333 665 4 95 380 10,629 13-3/8" 0.480Q-9 3 2003 334 668 4 95 380 10,629 feet:R-9 3 2003 334 668 4 95 380 10,629 11,875

448 481 42,380 $1,157,416

3 Capacities (91, 180, and 251 tons)

$21.61 / ft

$27.97 / ft

Page 37: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

37

Load-Matching Design Approach Load-Matching Design Approach (continued)(continued)

Select viable pile type and section for Select viable pile type and section for selected pile capacities.selected pile capacities.

Estimate individual pile lengths required for Estimate individual pile lengths required for selected pile capacities.selected pile capacities.

Calculate total pile lengths required for Calculate total pile lengths required for project.project.

Calculate total pile cost for project.Calculate total pile cost for project.

Perform additional iterations as desired.Perform additional iterations as desired.

Page 38: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

38

F.S. = 2.00Maximum

Optimum RequiredAllowable "Ultimate"

Column Min. Column Pile Pile Est. Pile Est. Pile(s) Est. Pile(s) Est. Pile Est. Pile(s) Est. Pile(s)Line No. Load, Load, Capacity, No. Length, Footage, Cost, Number Length, Footage, Cost,

Designation of Piles kips tons tons of Piles feet feet dollars of Piles feet feet dollars

0.A-8.5 1 158 79 158 1 62 62 1,340 2 58 116 2,2230.A-0.5 1 180 90 180 1 62 62 1,340 2 58 116 2,223

P-3.3 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 91-ton max. 2 58 116 2,223P-3.7 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 allow. load: 2 58 116 2,223P-4.5 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 71 2 58 116 2,223P-5 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 10.75x0.365 2 58 116 2,223

P-5.5 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 feet: 2 58 116 2,223P-6 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 4,402 2 58 116 2,223

0.A-8 1 203 102 203 1 86 86 2,405 2 58 116 2,223M.5-8 1 228 114 228 1 86 86 2,405 2 58 116 2,223

N-8.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 180-ton max. 3 58 174 3,334P.7-8.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 allow. load: 3 58 174 3,334P-0.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 108 3 58 174 3,334P-8.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 13-3/8" 0.480 3 58 174 3,334Q.8-3 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 feet: 3 58 174 3,334Q-0.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 9,288 3 58 174 3,334M.5-4 1 368 184 368 1 95 95 2,657 3 58 174 3,334J -5 2 748 187 374 2 95 190 5,314 6 58 348 6,668

G-7 3 1479 247 493 3 95 285 7,971 251-ton max. 12 58 696 13,335H-7 3 1479 247 493 3 95 285 7,971 allow. load: 12 58 696 13,335K-6 3 1484 247 495 3 95 285 7,971 177 12 58 696 13,335B-7 3 1487 248 496 3 95 285 7,971 13-3/8" 0.480 12 58 696 13,335B-6 3 1507 251 502 3 95 285 7,971 feet: 12 58 696 13,335C-8 3 1508 251 503 3 95 285 7,971 16,815 12 58 696 13,335

R1-5.9 3 1510 252 503 4 95 380 10,629 12 58 696 13,335K-7 3 1529 255 510 4 95 380 10,629 13 58 754 14,447

C-4 3 1874 312 625 4 95 380 10,629 251-ton max. 15 58 870 16,669F-6 3 1879 313 626 4 95 380 10,629 allow. load: 15 58 870 16,669J -6 3 1942 324 647 4 95 380 10,629 125 16 58 928 17,780J -4 3 1995 333 665 4 95 380 10,629 13-3/8" 0.480 16 58 928 17,780Q-9 3 2003 334 668 4 95 380 10,629 feet: 16 58 928 17,780R-9 3 2003 334 668 4 95 380 10,629 11,875 16 58 928 17,780

448 481 42,380 $1,157,416 1,560 90,480 $1,733,597

$576,181

3 Capacities (91, 180, and 251 tons) 1 Capacity (10.75 x 0.188, 63 tons)

$19.16 / ft

$21.61 / ft

$27.97 / ft

Page 39: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

39

F.S. = 2.00Maximum

Optimum RequiredAllowable "Ultimate"

Column Min. Column Pile Pile Est. Pile Est. Pile(s) Est. Pile(s) Est. Pile Est. Pile(s) Est. Pile(s)Line No. Load, Load, Capacity, No. Length, Footage, Cost, Number Length, Footage, Cost,

Designation of Piles kips tons tons of Piles feet feet dollars of Piles feet feet dollars

0.A-8.5 1 158 79 158 1 62 62 1,340 2 58 116 2,2230.A-0.5 1 180 90 180 1 62 62 1,340 2 58 116 2,223

P-3.3 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 91-ton max. 2 58 116 2,223P-3.7 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 allow. load: 2 58 116 2,223P-4.5 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 71 2 58 116 2,223P-5 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 10.75x0.365 2 58 116 2,223

P-5.5 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 feet: 2 58 116 2,223P-6 1 181 91 181 1 62 62 1,340 4,402 2 58 116 2,223

0.A-8 1 203 102 203 1 86 86 2,405 2 58 116 2,223M.5-8 1 228 114 228 1 86 86 2,405 2 58 116 2,223

N-8.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 180-ton max. 3 58 174 3,334P.7-8.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 allow. load: 3 58 174 3,334P-0.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 108 3 58 174 3,334P-8.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 13-3/8" 0.480 3 58 174 3,334Q.8-3 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 feet: 3 58 174 3,334Q-0.5 1 360 180 360 1 86 86 2,405 9,288 3 58 174 3,334M.5-4 1 368 184 368 1 95 95 2,657 3 58 174 3,334J -5 2 748 187 374 2 95 190 5,314 6 58 348 6,668

G-7 3 1479 247 493 3 95 285 7,971 251-ton max. 12 58 696 13,335H-7 3 1479 247 493 3 95 285 7,971 allow. load: 12 58 696 13,335K-6 3 1484 247 495 3 95 285 7,971 177 12 58 696 13,335B-7 3 1487 248 496 3 95 285 7,971 13-3/8" 0.480 12 58 696 13,335B-6 3 1507 251 502 3 95 285 7,971 feet: 12 58 696 13,335C-8 3 1508 251 503 3 95 285 7,971 16,815 12 58 696 13,335

R1-5.9 3 1510 252 503 4 95 380 10,629 12 58 696 13,335K-7 3 1529 255 510 4 95 380 10,629 13 58 754 14,447

C-4 3 1874 312 625 4 95 380 10,629 251-ton max. 15 58 870 16,669F-6 3 1879 313 626 4 95 380 10,629 allow. load: 15 58 870 16,669J -6 3 1942 324 647 4 95 380 10,629 125 16 58 928 17,780J -4 3 1995 333 665 4 95 380 10,629 13-3/8" 0.480 16 58 928 17,780Q-9 3 2003 334 668 4 95 380 10,629 feet: 16 58 928 17,780R-9 3 2003 334 668 4 95 380 10,629 11,875 16 58 928 17,780

448 481 42,380 $1,157,416 1,560 90,480 $1,733,597

$576,181

3 Capacities (91, 180, and 251 tons) 1 Capacity (10.75 x 0.188, 63 tons)

$19.16 / ft

$21.61 / ft

$27.97 / ft

Page 40: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

40

Pile Support Costs – WKGPile Support Costs – WKG22 Projects ProjectsP

ile S

up

port

Cost,

dollars

per

allow

ab

le

Pile S

up

port

Cost,

dollars

per

allow

ab

le

ton

ton

Allowable Pile Load, tons (safety factor = 2.0)Allowable Pile Load, tons (safety factor = 2.0)

y = 90.662x-0.402

R2 = 0.712

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260

Page 41: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

41

First Place CondominiumsFirst Place Condominiums

Relatively small project, approximately 200 Relatively small project, approximately 200 piles required.piles required.

Renovation of a former storage warehouse Renovation of a former storage warehouse into condominiums.into condominiums.

Piles required only beneath small building Piles required only beneath small building addition.addition.

Existing geotechnical engineering report Existing geotechnical engineering report prepared for different site development prepared for different site development plans.plans.

A review of existing recommendations A review of existing recommendations relative to currently proposed development relative to currently proposed development was desired.was desired.

Page 42: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

42

21

5

50

36

12

5

42

10

8

12

9

54

72

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Piles

Piles

Allowable Pile Load, tonsAllowable Pile Load, tons

Optimum Allowable Pile Load Optimum Allowable Pile Load HistogramHistogram

First Place CondominiumsFirst Place Condominiums

Page 43: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

43

First Place Condominiums - Proposed First Place Condominiums - Proposed DesignsDesigns

AllowableAllowable NumberNumber EstimatedEstimated

DesignDesign Load, tonsLoad, tons of Pilesof Piles FootageFootage

OriginalOriginal 7070 205205 15,58015,580

Page 44: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

44

21

5

50

36

12

5

42

10

8

12

9

54

72

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Piles

Piles

Allowable Pile Load, tonsAllowable Pile Load, tons

Optimum Allowable Pile Load Optimum Allowable Pile Load HistogramHistogram

First Place CondominiumsFirst Place Condominiums

Page 45: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

45

First Place Condominiums - Proposed First Place Condominiums - Proposed DesignsDesigns

AllowableAllowable NumberNumber EstimatedEstimated

DesignDesign Load, tonsLoad, tons of Pilesof Piles FootageFootage

OriginalOriginal 7070 205205 15,58015,580

RevisedRevised 7272 180180 14,04014,040

SAVE:SAVE: 2525 1,5401,540

$34,250 + cap costs$34,250 + cap costs

on $346,500 worth of pileson $346,500 worth of piles

Page 46: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

46

First Place Condominiums - Proposed First Place Condominiums - Proposed DesignsDesigns

AllowableAllowable NumberNumber EstimatedEstimated

DesignDesign Load, tonsLoad, tons of Pilesof Piles FootageFootage

OriginalOriginal 7070 205205 15,58015,580

RevisedRevised 7272 180180 14,04014,040

Alternate Alternate 100100 130130 $60,000 $60,000 savingssavings

72 tons per pile x 180 piles = 12,960 tons to 72 tons per pile x 180 piles = 12,960 tons to supportsupport

12,960 tons / 100 tons per pile = 130 piles12,960 tons / 100 tons per pile = 130 piles

Save 50 piles & $60,000 ?Save 50 piles & $60,000 ?

Page 47: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

47

21

5

50

36

12

5

42

10

8

12

9

54

72

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Op

tim

um

(M

inim

um

) R

eq

uir

ed

Nu

mb

er

of

Piles

Piles

Allowable Pile Load, tonsAllowable Pile Load, tons

Optimum Allowable Pile Load Optimum Allowable Pile Load HistogramHistogram

First Place CondominiumsFirst Place Condominiums

Page 48: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

48

72-ton 72-ton allowaballowab

lele

100-ton 100-ton allowaballowab

lele

72 tons 72 tons 72 tons

100 tons

100 tons

100 tons

Page 49: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

49

First Place Condominiums - Proposed First Place Condominiums - Proposed DesignsDesigns

AllowableAllowable NumberNumber EstimatedEstimated

DesignDesign Load, tonsLoad, tons of Pilesof Piles FootageFootage

OriginalOriginal 7070 205205 15,58015,580

RevisedRevised 7272 180180 14,04014,040

AlternateAlternate 100100 164164 15,74415,744

SAVE:SAVE: 16 (not 50)16 (not 50) -1,704-1,704

($37,897)($37,897) (if same pile section is used) (if same pile section is used)

Page 50: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

50

ConclusionsConclusions• Consider using higher-capacity piles Consider using higher-capacity piles

(when building loads warrant)(when building loads warrant)- Lower pile support costLower pile support cost- Lower cap support costLower cap support cost

• Consider matching (optimizing) Consider matching (optimizing) allowable pile loads to column loadsallowable pile loads to column loads- Lower column support costLower column support cost

• All should result in more-cost-All should result in more-cost-effective driven pile foundationseffective driven pile foundations

• Evaluate design options/alternatives Evaluate design options/alternatives using actual column loads and allowable using actual column loads and allowable pile load histogrampile load histogram

Page 51: 1 Driven Pile Foundation Support- Cost Components Wagner Komurka Geotechnical Group, Inc. 2011 PDCA Professors’ Driven Pile Institute June 20-24, 2011

51

Questions / Comments?Questions / Comments?