41
1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

  • View
    219

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

11

Action research and reflective practice in university teaching

MALTHE

LTHM003

Page 2: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

22

Some learning and teaching issues….

Why are students not attending my lectures? Why don’t students read? What can I do to enthuse my students? What can I do to help students become more analytical in

their writing? How can I help students to link theory with their practice? What is going wrong in my seminars when my students

don’t speak? Why won’t students use the library? Why are retention and progression rates falling? What can I do to make my lecturing style more accessible?

Page 3: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

33

OutlineWhy pedagogical action research?Pedagogical action research in the

university contextThe role of reflective practiceThe scholarship of teaching and learningThe case for Pedagogical action

research

Page 4: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

44

Pedagogical action research: a definition

“the fundamental purpose of pedagogical action research is to systematically investigate one’s own teaching/learning facilitation practice with the dual aim of modifying practice and contributing to theoretical knowledge”. (Norton, 2009)

Using a reflective lens to look at some problem and then determining a methodical set of steps to research

that problem and to take action

Page 5: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

55

University context is crucial Unless we take into account the influences that are

operating on us within the university context it is unlikely that carrying out pedagogical action research will be as influential as it might be:

‘ University departments are hives of intrigue and conspiracy. Trying to reach an understanding of issues concerned with teaching and learning, therefore, implies getting to grips with a whole range of human issues such as the attitude of students, the politics within departments and the ethos and environment of the institution’

(Kember, 2000, p.25)

Page 6: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

66

The university context

According to Fanghanel’s (2007) framework, there are filters that are fluid and influence the choices academics make to privilege certain activities over others:

The micro level (internal predispositions, aspirations goals)

The meso level (the department, the discipline) The macro level (institution, external factors, research –

teaching nexus)

Page 7: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

77

The micro level:Academic identities

Why did you come into Higher Education? How would you describe your primary role-

researcher or teacher? Which do you enjoy the most? Which do you spend the most time on? What does your department//institution expect

you to do? Why when we have more work than time, do we

apply to ‘buy ourselves out of teaching’? Do academics ever ask to ‘buy themselves out

of research’?

Page 8: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

88

Meso level of practice: your department

Departments and how they are run have a huge influence and hold on academics

Tacit knowledge: “that’s the way we do things around here” – more powerful than any formal mechanisms such as CPD, induction etc, includes: norms, discourse and value sets associated with

assessment, teaching practices, research culture as well as daily work practices.

Can cause stress for new academics who are trying to establish a role identity, professional knowledge and competence (Norton et al, in press)

Page 9: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

99

Meso level of practice: the discipline

Pure

Applied

Hard SoftA B

C D

Neumann, Parry & Becher’s (2002) adaptation of Biglan’s (1973) subject classification:

Page 10: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1010

Description of quadrantsA. Hard pure knowledge: concerned with universals,

simplification and a quantitative approach.

B. Soft pure knowledge: tends to be holistic concerned with particulars and is likely to favour a qualitative approach

C. Hard applied knowledge : derived from hard pure knowledge, concerned with applications (ie mastering the physical environment), aimed at products and techniques

D.  Soft applied knowledge: derived from soft pure knowledge, concerned with enhancing professional practice,aimed at protocols and procedures.

Page 11: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1111

Implications for how academics view teaching and research

Neumann et al findings:

hard pure and hard applied - strongly committed to research and less committed to teaching, (generally seen as relatively straightforward and unproblematic), collaborative research and teaching

soft pure and soft applied - greater emphasis on scholarly

knowledge that translates readily into teaching, more emphasis on individualistic enquiry and not so much acceptance of joint teaching

Page 12: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1212

Macro level of practice: External factors:

Globalisation Managerialism Internationalisation Entrepreneurialism

Institutional policy particularly relating to teaching and research: Selection and Promotions policies Resourcing Recognitions and value

Page 13: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1313

Action research: a practical solution

“Action research is action-and-research (Dick 2000). Action research combines twin aims in a single process. Action researchers wish to improve some aspect of professional practice or social process, while generating new knowledge at the same time. Action research is not action for research (doing something to increase understanding), nor research for action (increasing knowledge to be applied later). These two purposes come together in a single project.” Hughes (2004)

Page 14: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1414

The role of reflective practice in action research

Over-used term (Knight,2002)

Reflective practice should be seen as systematic, active and enabling us to give up what sometimes might be our most dearly cherished beliefs about teaching and learning:

‘reflective thinking is always more or less troublesome…it involves willingness to endure a

condition of mental unrest’

(Dewey, 1910)

Page 15: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1515

Reflection applied to education

Work of Donald SchÖn (1983) The reflective practitioner

SchÖn’s thinking developed from earlier work with Argyris on the distinction between‘Espoused theories’ and ‘Theories in use’

Argyris, C & SchÖn, D. (1974) Theory into practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass

Page 16: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1616

How does reflective practice link to pedagogical action research? Action research enables us to reflect on our practice

systematically (Parker, 1997) Action research enables us to take control of our own

CPD Action research can help us transform our professional

perspective Action research is often collaborative and thus guards

against being too inward –looking and serving to confirm our previously-held assumptions

Page 17: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1717

The scholarship of teaching and learning (SOTL)

Contested in the literature and not yet readily accepted by the UK sector but its core elements are valuable in helping to raise the profile of teaching in universities

Boyer’s (1990) four domains of scholarship: Discovery Integration Application Teaching

Boyer argued that the scholarship of teaching should have its own status and recognition

Page 18: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1818

Brown’s (2008) definition

…if we are serious about it, “research-informed teaching” goes far beyond the usual idea that students are taught by research active lecturers and that the content of the curriculum reflects the outcomes of lecturers’ research. I see it as a synonym of how an institution brings together its academic research and scholarship – both disciplinary and pedagogic – and its student education so that both are enriched. (Emphasis added)

Page 19: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

1919

Brown’s conclusions

1. We should make a serious effort to integrate staff research and scholarship with student education at all levels.

2. The keys to this are an approach to the curriculum which sees every student as a researcher, together with a broader approach to what is meant by “research”.

3. Staff engagement in pedagogical research is also a professional requirement. (emphasis added)

Page 20: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2020

SOTL- why is it important?

SOTL includes both ongoing learning about teaching AND the demonstration of teaching knowledge ( Kreber & Cranton, 2000)

SOTL helps to raise the status of teaching, enables teachers to teach more knowledgeably and provides a framework in which teaching quality can be assessed (Trigwell & Shale, 2004)

SOTL has the potential to bring about significant change to how the sector sees the goals and purposes of a higher education (Kreber, 2005)

Page 21: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2121

Key elements of scholarship of teaching and learning (Chalkely 2003)1. “Keeping abreast of developments in the theory, and

practice of teaching, particularly in one’s own discipline or specialist field;

2. Reflecting carefully and critically on one’s own teaching and on its successes and failures in promoting high quality learning;

3. Engaging in pedagogic research so as to help provide a firm basis of evidence for the adoption or rejection of particular learning and teaching methods;

4. Contributing to the communication and dissemination of good practice in the learning and teaching of one’s discipline or specialist field:

5. Bringing to one’s work in teaching and curriculum development the same high standards of intellectual rigour and peer review which are commonplace in research.”

Page 22: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2222

The scholarship of teaching: what’s the problem? Bass (1999)

Bass makes the telling point that one of the differences between scholarship (teaching) and discipline based research is the way we think about the problem:

In research the problem is at the heart of the enquiry process and we’re proud of it

In teaching, the problem is something we don’t usually want to have and we’re ashamed of it

Page 23: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2323

Changing the status of the problem

In pedagogical action research, this is precisely what happens….

The teaching problem: Psychology students don’t use enough journals in

their essays The research problem translated into a research

hypothesis: A multi-layered intervention (librarians’ input, revised

formative assessment, exemplars ) will increase the use of journals in an essay

(Norton, Norton & Thomas, 2004)

Page 24: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2424

The case for pedagogical action research

We are living in a time when research is viewed in terms of measurable outputs (REF and impacts)

Pedagogical research (of any sort, including action research) has been seen as having less value than subject research, but there is a change… We recommend that the Research Excellence Framework explicitly

recognises and gives credence to research into pedagogy and the teaching within, and across, disciplines. In other words, a chemistry lecturer who researches teaching in chemistry must have a category in which such activity can be recorded and recognised with new "expert pedagogic research" panels established, if necessary, and able to do that job. (IUSS, 2009)

Page 25: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2525

Action research in the context of pedagogy

“ The primary aim of action research is to solve a problem within the process of the research. In the context of teaching your subject, it contributes both to pedagogical knowledge and to the subsequent modification of your teaching practice and your students’ learning…

…It is a cyclical process of planning, action, and investigating the state of affairs after action has occurred”

Lindsay, Breen & Jenkins (2002)

Page 26: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2626

7 characteristics of action research (Kember, 2000)

1. A social practice (Not decontextualised from environment or spearating researcher form the researched)

2. Aimed towards improvement (Essential)3. Cyclical (not necessarily simple spirals of reflection,

acting, planning observing but progressive refinements4. Systematic enquiry (does not mean ’soft option’)5. Reflective (outward not inward)6. Participative (guards against making mistaken

assumptions about one’s own practice)7. Practitioner determined (driven from own need to

know)

Page 27: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2727

Action research: a practical solution

“Action research is action-and-research (Dick 2000). Action research combines twin aims in a single process. Action researchers wish to improve some aspect of professional practice orsocial process, while generating new knowledge at the same time. Action research is not action for research (doing something to increase understanding), nor research for action (increasing knowledge to be applied later). These two purposes come together in a single project.” Hughes (2004)

Page 28: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2828

Action research as improving practice

“Action research is simply a form of self-reflective enquiry undertaken by participants in social situations in order to improve the rationality and justice of their own practices, their understanding of these practices, and the situations in which the practices are carried out”

(Carr and Kemmis 1986).

Page 29: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

2929

Criticisms of Action research

1. Not ‘proper’ research as seen in the positivist scientific tradition (issues round generalisability, validity)

2. Largely un-theorised descriptions of practice

Page 30: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3030

The methodological-cum-organizational problem (Lindsay et al, 2002)

Managers rarely use pedagogical evidence so while academic staff can and do make changes within their own courses, the chances of influencing institutional policy in learning and teaching are modest, but practical principles can help:

Choose research studies that are directly relevant to your institution’s policies

Design studies where evidence is compelling as possible (often quantitative)

Present your findings to as many committees as possible

Page 31: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3131

Reponding to the criticisms Positivist research is a narrow view where experimental

design and cause and effect seeking is privileged over any other form of enquiry

Kember (2000) suggests ‘sensible adaptation’ and fine tuning’ rather than generalisability and validity

Bartlett & Burton (2006) say that action research is inevitably unique as its carried out by professionals in the context of their own working practice. They suggest concept of ‘relatability’

Page 32: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3232

Responding to the criticisms (2) Bartlett & Burton (2006) argue that the description of

practice can often actually constitute the data

Cotton & Griffiths (2007) in framing descriptive accounts we have to draw on the theoretical in order to make our

research accessible and meaningful to those we disseminate it to.

In order to be action research rather than curriculum development or reflective practice- it must be subject to peer scrutiny and review. It’s critical questioning and appraisal that makes it research

Page 33: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3333

Pedagogical action research as an intensity spectrum (adapted from Kember 2006)

Reflection Action research Action research

on L & T on L&T which contributes to

theory

Seminar Refereed Journal

paper conference paper paper

Page 34: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3434

Pedagogical Action Research, reflective practice and SOTL:

killing three birds with one stone

1. Carrying out research on your own teaching and/or on your students’ learning is interwoven with being a reflective practitioner.

2. Pedagogical action research is an empowering form of CPD, particularly in engaging with the scholarship of learning and teaching (SOTL)

3. Pedagogical action research needs to be disseminated and open to public scrutiny through peer reviewed conference papers and journal articles

Page 35: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3535

Pedagogical action research: some additional benefits

Researching pedagogical problems, using a traditional research model (e.g. lit review, aims, methodology, analysis, interpretation,) has additional benefits of:

1. telling you about your own teaching/and or your students’ learning: Reflective practice

2. By applying your findings to modify some element of your teaching: Improving student learning

3. Engaging in the pedagogical literature, aligning yourself to communities of subject practitioner/researchers encourages conference attendance: Continuing Professional Development

4. By being rigorous is just as worthy as subject research

Page 36: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3636

Pedagogical Action Research and reflective practice

Carrying out research on your own teaching and/or on your students’ learning is interwoven with being a reflective practitioner.

Pedagogical action research is an empowering form of CPD, particularly in engaging with the scholarship of learning and teaching (SOTL)

Pedagogical action research needs to be disseminated not only to share good practice but to ‘grow’ the initiative/intervention/field of enquiry by bringing on board other professionals in a further cycle of research.

Page 37: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3737

Pedagogical Action Research and reflective practice

Carrying out research on your own teaching and/or on your students’ learning is interwoven with being a reflective practitioner.

Pedagogical action research is an empowering form of CPD, particularly in engaging with the scholarship of learning and teaching (SOTL)

Pedagogical action research needs to be disseminated not only to share good practice but to ‘grow’ the initiative/intervention/field of enquiry by bringing on board other professionals in a further cycle of research.

Page 38: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3838

The role of reflective practice in action research

Over-used term (Knight,2002)

Reflective practice should be seen as systematic, active and enabling us to give up what sometimes might be our most dearly cherished beliefs about teaching and learning:

‘reflective thinking is always more or less

troublesome…it involves willingness to endure a

condition of mental unrest’

(Dewey, 1910)

Page 39: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

3939

Reflection applied to education

Work of Donald SchÖn (1983) The reflective practitioner

SchÖn’s thinking developed from earlier work with Argyris on the distinction between‘Espoused theories’ and ‘Theories in use’

Argyris, C & SchÖn, D. (1974) Theory into practice. San Francisco: Jossey Bass

Page 40: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

4040

How does reflective practice link to action research?

Action research enables us to reflect on our practice systematically (Parker, 1997)

Action research can help us transform our professional perspective

Action research is often collaborative and thus guards against being too inward –looking and serving to confirm our previously-held assumptions

Page 41: 1 Action research and reflective practice in university teaching MALTHE LTHM003

4141

References

Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee - Eleventh Report Students and Universities (2009) chaired by Phil Willis http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmdius/170/17002.htm