16
Last Rev.: 12 JUL 08 Flow Meters Lab : MIME 3470 Page 1 Grading Sheet ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ MIME 3470—Thermal Science Laboratory ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Experiment №. 4 FLOW METERS Students’ Names Section № POINTS SCORE TOTAL APPEARANCE 10 ORGANIZATION 5 ENGLISH and GRAMMAR 10 MATHCAD ORDERED DATA, DIMENSIONS, PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 7 VENTURI METER: COMBINED PLOT: h flow vs. Q theo & h flow vs. Q act 5 PLOT OF 5 ORIFICE METER: COMBINED PLOT: h flow vs. Q theo & h flow vs. Q act 5 PLOT OF 5 TURBINE METER: PLOT OF Q act vs. Q ind 5 REGRESSED PLOTTED CALIBRATION LINE 8 ROTAMETER: PLOT OF Q act vs. Q ind 5 COMBINED PLOT: h fric vs. Q act FOR THE 4 METERS 5 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 10 CONCLUSIONS 10 ORIGINAL DATASHEET 5 TOTAL 100 Comments

04 Flow Meters

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

asas

Citation preview

xcvsv

Last Rev.: 12 JUL 08Flow Meters Lab : MIME 3470

Page 2

Grading Sheet

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MIME 3470Thermal Science Laboratory~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Experiment . 4 Flow Meters Students Names Section POINTS SCORETOTAL

APPEARANCE10

ORGANIZATION 5

ENGLISH and GRAMMAR 10

MATHCAD

Ordered Data, Dimensions, Physical Properties7

VENTURI METER: COMBINED PLOT: (hflow vs. Qtheo & (hflow vs. Qact

5

PLOT OF Cv vs. Re 5

ORIFICE METER: COMBINED PLOT: (hflow vs. Qtheo & (hflow vs. Qact

5

PLOT OF Co vs. Re5

TURBINE METER: PLOT OF Qact vs. Qind5

REGRESSED & PLOTTED CALIBRATION LINE8

ROTAMETER: PLOT OF Qact vs. Qind5

COMBINED PLOT: (h fric vs. Qact FOR THE 4 METERS 5

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS10

CONCLUSIONS10

ORIGINAL DATASHEET 5

TOTAL100

Comments

GRADERd

MIME 3470Thermal Science Laboratory~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Experiment . 4Flow Meters

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Lab Partners: Name Name

NameName

NameNameSectionExperiment Time/Date:Time, date~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ObjectiveThe objective of this experiment is to familiarize the student with few of the more common types of flow meters used in engineering applications and to compare performances. The students will construct calibration curves and determine meter flow characteristics such as discharge coefficients and friction drop.IntroductionThere are many different meters used to measure fluid flow: the turbine-type flow meter, the rotameter, the orifice meter, and the Venturi meter are only a few. Each meter works by its ability to alter a certain physical property of the flowing fluid and then allows this alteration to be measured. The measured alteration is then related to the flow. The subject of this experiment is to analyze the features of certain meters.TheoryThe operating principles of these various meters need to be developed in order to meaningfully compare their performance.The Venturi Meter The Venturi meter is constructed as shown in Figure 1. It has a constriction within itself. When fluid flows through the constriction, it experiences an increase in velocity. This increase in velocity causes a decrease in static pressure at the constriction (throat). The greater the flow, the greater the pressure drop at the throat. The pressure difference between the upstream and the downstream flow, hflow, can be found as a function of the flow rate. Applying Bernoullis equation to points ( and ( of the Venturi meter and relating the pressure difference to the flow rate yields

(1)or

.(2)This equation relates the pressure difference, hflow, to the flow rate Qtheo, and represents the theoretical curve for the Venturi meter.

To determine Qtheo, first, one needs to find the relationship between the velocities V1 and V2 using Bernoullis equation.

.

(3)Forandand z1 = z2

(4)Knowing that V = Q/A and Q1 = Q2 = Q

.(5)Thus,

.(6)The Venturi meter is characterized by small pressure losses due to viscous shear and frictional effects. Thus, for any hflow, the actual flow rate will be less than the theoretical flow rate.

(7)where Cv is the Venturi meter discharge coefficient. As flow increases, the discharge coefficient for a Venturi meter levels off at about 0.9. Note: Reynolds number for the Venturi meter is based on the inlet diameter not the throat diameter. The Orifice Meter: The orifice meter consists of a throttling device (an orifice plate) inserted in the flow. This orifice plate creates a measurable pressure difference between its upstream and downstream sides. This pressure is then related to the flow rate. Like the Venturi meter, the pressure difference varies directly with the flow rate. The orifice meter is constructed as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2Cutaway view of the orifice meter [1]Applying Bernoullis equation to points and yields

.(8)For any pressure difference, hflow, there will be two associated flow rates: the theoretical flow rate from the above equation and the actual flow rate measured in the laboratory. As in the Venturi meter case, the difference between these flows is indicated by a discharge coefficient ,Co, defined as

.(9)With increasing flow, values for the discharge coefficient level off at around Co ( 0.8 for the orifice meter. Referring to Figure 2, recall that Bernoullis equation was applied to Points and . However, because it is difficult to place a pressure tap in the orifice itself, pressure measurements are actually made at and . So the reader asks: how accurate can such a measurement be? Reference 4 explains that (see Figure 3) the flow at is almost the same as the slug of flow at and thus the pressures are almost the same. This is true for a short distance downstream of the orificethen pressure recovery sets in. With these assumptions, Bernoullis equation is the same, except pressure measurements are made at instead of .It should also be noted that the shape of the orifice is important to the flow quality.

Figure 3(a) The approximate velocity profiles at several planes near a sharp-edged orifice plate. Note: the jet emerging from the hole is somewhat smaller than the hole itself; in highly turbulent flow the jet necks down to a minimum cross section at the vena contracta. Note that there is some backflow near the wall. (b) It is assumed that the velocity profile at is given by the approximate profile shown. It is also assumed that the velocity profile at is uniform [4]. From boundary layer theory, the pressure of the plug flow at is transmitted across the (assumed stagnate) interval from the plug to the pressure port. The Turbine-type Flow Meter: The turbine-type flow meter consists of a section of pipe into which a small turbine is placed. As the flow travels through the turbine blades, the turbine spins at an angular velocity proportional to the flow rate. After a certain number of revolutions, the turbine sends an electrical pulse to a preamplifier which, in turn, sends the pulse to a digital totalizer. The totalizer in effect sums the pulses and translates them to a digital readout which gives the volumetric fluid flow that pass through the meter. In addition, the totalizer will show the actual flow rate of the fluid. Figure 4 is a schematic of the turbine-type flow meter. The Variable Area Meter (Rotameter): The variable area meter consists of a tapered metering tube and a float that is free to move inside the tube. The tube is mounted vertically with the inlet at the bottom. At any flow rate within the operating range of the meter, fluid entering the bottom raises the float and the tube inside diameter increases (because of the tapering). The flow rate is indicated by the float position read against the graduated scale.

Figure 5The rotameter and its operation [1] Three common types of graduated scales are: 1.Percent of maximum flowa meter factor is given or deter-mined to convert a scale reading to a flow rate. Many fluids can be used with the meter, the only variable being the scale factor. 2.Diameter ratio typea calibration curve is associated with the ratio of the tubes cross-sectional diameter to the diameter of the float. 3.Direct readinga scale shows actual flow rate in the desired units. Experimental Procedure: The fluid meter apparatus is shown in Figure 6. It consists of a centrifugal pump that draws water from a tank and pumps it to any of the four meters. In testing any of the four meters, the actual flow, Qact, is measured by diverting the flow to the collec-tion tank (volumetric measuring tank) which is graduated in gallons, and measuring with a stopwatch how long it takes to collect a volume of water. Strive for collection times in excess of 1 minutea little extra time spent in collecting good data significantly improves the quality of the results.

For all four meters, the flow is regulated by the upstream valve. For several valve positions, record the appropriate meter data that indicates flow rate, the actual flow rate, and the pressure drop across the meter, (hfric, which is measured with a manometer. Be extremely careful that the pressure differences to be measured by manometers are not so great that the water column on either side of the manometer goes over the top of the inverted U-shaped manometer tube. Thus, it is recommended that one establishes a maximum flow that does not cause this problem by adjusting the upstream valve. Then subsequent, lesser, flow can be set by slightly closing the valve. The data particular to individual meters is discussed next.Venturi MeterSee warning just above about maxing out the manometers. Two manometers are associated with this meter. The first manometer measures the total frictional pressure drop across the entire length of the Venturi meter, (hfric, as a difference in head pres-sure. The second manometer measures the head pressure difference, (hflow, between points and of Figure 1. From (hflow, the theore-tical volumetric flow rate, Qtheo, can be determined from Equation 6. For your report, on one graph, plot (hflow vs.

Figure 6Flow Meters ApparatusOrifice MeterUse the procedure and write up requirements as spe-cified for the Venturi meter. The expected discharge coefficient is 0.8.Turbine-Type Flow MeterThe totalizer reading is the measure of indicated or theoretical flow. The actual flow is still measured using the collection tank and a stopwatch. For your report, plot the measured flow rate against (vs.) the flow rate reading and determine and plot a regressed line of this data all on the same graph. This is a calibration curve. The Mathcad linear regression function is documented at the right (source Mathcad Help). RotameterFor the rotameter, record the position of the float, the pressure drop across the meter, and the measured flow rate. For your report, plot the measured flow rate vs. indicated flow rate. Again a calibration curve; but without regression. Finally, on one graph, plot friction pressure drops, (hfrict, across each meter vs. the actual flow rate through the meter. REFERENCES

1.Flowmeters: Introduction, efunda (engineering fundamentals), http://www.efunda.com/DesignStandards/sensors/flowmeters/flowmeter_intro.cfm

2.Simon & Schuster New Millennium Encyc. & Reference Library, 2000

3.Prandtl, L., and Tietjens, O.G., Applied Hydro- and Aeromechanics, Dover Pubs., 1957. [Based on Prandtls Lectures. Composed by Prandtls student, Tietjens, who turned the lecture notes into a text. Translated by J.P. Den Hartog. First published by United Engineering Trustees, Inc., 1934]

4.Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., & Lightfoot, E.N., Transport Phenomena, John-Wiley & Sons, 1960.

5.Ross, S.M. (1998), A First Course in Probability, 5th ed., Prentice-HallOrdered Data, Calculations, and Results

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

APPENDICES

Appendix AClepsydras (water thief), Ancient Fluid Meters When one thinks of a fluid meter, they envision a device that ascertains a flow rate per unit of time. The ancients looked at flow meters the other way aroundthey used fluid meters to determine a unit of time per flow rate.

In this experiment, the student used a stopwatch to time a flow into a catch basin to determine a flow rate. With water clocks, a known flow rate is used and the tank becomes the stopwatch.

Water Clocks

Source: National Institute of Standards and Technology Physics Laboratory

Water clocks were among the earliest timekeepers that didn't depend on the observation of celestial bodies. One of the oldest was found in the tomb of Amenhotep I, buried around 1500 BC. Later named clepsydras (water thief) by the Greeks, who began using them about 325 BC, these were stone vessels with sloping sides that allowed water to drip at a nearly constant rate from a small hole near the bottom. Other clepsydras were cylindrical or bowl-shaped containers designed to slowly fill with water coming in at a constant rate. Markings on the inside surfaces measured the passage of hours as the water level reached them. These clocks were used to determine hours at night, but may have been used in daylight as well. Another version consisted of a metal bowl with a hole in the bottom; when placed in a container of water the bowl would fill and sink in a certain time. These were still in use in North Africa this century.

More elaborate and impressive mec-hanized water clocks were develop-ped between 100BC and 500 AD by Greek and Roman horologists and astronomers. The added complexity was aimed at making the flow more constant by regulating the pressure, and at providing fancier displays of the passage of time. Some water clocks rang bells and gongs, others opened doors and windows to show little figures of people, or moved pointers, dials, and astrological models of the universe. A Greek astronomer, Andronikos, supervised the construction of the Tower of the Winds in Athens in the 1st century BC. This octagonal struc-ture featured a 24-hour clepsydra and indicators for the eight winds from which the tower got its name, and it displayed the seasons of the year and astrological dates and periods. The Romans also develop-ped mechanized clepsydras, though their complexity accomplished little improvement over simpler methods for determining the passage of time. In the Far East, mechanized astronomical/astrological clock making developed from 200 to 1300 AD. Third-century Chinese clepsydras drove various mechanisms that illustrated astronomical phenomena. One of the most elaborate clock towers was built by Su Sung and his associates in 1088 AD. Su Sung's mechanism incorporated a water-driven escapement invented about 725 AD. The Su Sung clock tower, over 30 feet tall, possessed a bronze power-driven armillary sphere for observations, an automatically rotating celestial globe, and five front panels with doors that permitted the viewing of changing mannikins which rang bells or gongs, and held tablets indicating the hour or other special times of the day. Since the rate of flow of water is very difficult to control accurately, a clock based on that flow can never achieve excellent accuracy.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0855491.html

SU-SUNG'S CLOCK

Today, Su-Sung's wonderful clock. The University of Houston's College of Engineering presents this series about the machines that make our civilization run, and the people whose ingenuity created them.

When 16th-century Jesuit missio-naries went to China, they found time-keeping in a deplorable state. Not even sundials were reliable! And the clocks they brought as gifts were seen only as playthings. Timekeeping was hardly on China's radar screen. Of course, the purpose of all ancient clocks was not so much the simple telling of time as it was display. Old clocks typically had bells and dials, and they displayed planetary motions.

In the West, water clocks had evolved from remote antiquity until mechanical clocks finally replaced them seven hundred years ago. The Greek name for a water clock was clepsydra. That means "a stealer of water" because all water clocks depended on a steady flow of water to meter time. Greco-Egyptian engineers of the 2nd century BC had added feedback control to regulate the water flow. That idea was carried forward by Arab artisans until the Moors of medieval Spain were building the finest clocks in the West.

The Chinese had also built water clocks for millennia, but without feed-back control. In Western water clocks, a float on the surface of a stea-dily draining tank drove the displays. But float indicators exerted scant force for driving extra machinery. The Chinese, on the other hand, created a new kind of water-wheel-driven clock during the 8th to 11th centuries. A steady inflow filled buckets around the rim, one at a time. As each bucket became heavy enough to trip a mechanism, it fell forward carrying the bucket behind into place under the water spout. That water wheel provided power to drive displays of lunar cycles, the movements of the heavens, and time as well.

Those clocks reached their apogee when the emperor of the Sung dynasty charged an official, Su-Sung, with creating the grandest clock that'd ever been built. Su-Sung assembled a team and finished the clock by 1092. It was hugeforty feet high.

The tick-tock motion of the falling buckets has caused some historians to call it a mechanical clock. But it had nothing resembling the inertial escapement that began turning European clocks into precision instruments by 1300. Neither did it have the feedback control of Arab water clocks.

Invading Tatars stole the clock when they ended the Sung dynasty in 1126. They couldn't get it running again, and the high art of Chinese clockmaking disappeared. Even before the Tatar invasion, Taoistic reformers had come into power and let the great clock fall into disrepair. When Jesuits eventually brought Su-Sung's book on clockmaking back to Europe, it astonished the West -- even though the escapement clock was then light-years beyond it.

Su-Sung's clock seems to've been pretty accurate. Whether it reached the fifteen-minute-a-day accuracy of the best Western water clocks, we don't know. But, for a time, the Chinese were ahead of the West once again, with the grandest clock in the world.

I'm John Lienhard, at the University of Houston, where we're interested in the way inventive minds work. Temple, R., The Genius of China. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc., 1986, pp. 103-110.

The following website provides a great deal of information on Su-Sung's clock as well as detailed drawings in PDF format: http://www.lucknow.com/horus/etexts/susung1.html.

by John H. Lienhard, Engines of Our Ingenuity 1580http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi1580.htm The Water Clock

Besides the gnomon or sundial, the Egyptians used the water clock, which had the advantage over the former of showing time during the night as well as during the day.

A complete example was found in the Amon Temple of Karnak (Thebes), 25.5 north of the equator. This water clock dates from the time of Amenhotep III of the Eighteenth Dynasty, father of Ikhnaton. The jar has an opening through which water flows out; marks are incised on the inner surface of the jar to indicate the time. Since the Egyptian day was divided into hours which changed in length with the length of the day, the jar has different sets of markings for the various seasons of the year. Four time points are prominently important: the autumnal equinox, the winter solstice, the vernal equinox, and the summer solstice. The equinoxes have equal days and nights in all latitudes. But on the solstices, when either the day or the night is the longest of the year, the length of the daylight varies with the latitude: the farther from the equator, the greater is the difference between the day and the night on the day of the solstice. This difference also depends on the inclination of the equator to the plane of the orbit or ecliptic, which is at present 23 . Should this inclination change, or in other words, should the polar axis change its astronomical position (direction), or should the polar axis change its geographical position with each pole shifting to another point, the length of the day and night (on any day except the equinoxes) would change, too.

The water clock of Amenhotep III presented its investigator with a very strange time scale. Calculating the length of the day of the winter sol-stice, he found that the clock was constructed for a day of 11 hours 18 minutes, whereas the day of the solstice at 25 north latitude is 10 hours 26 minutes, a difference of fifty-two minutes. Similarly, the builder of the clock reckoned the night of the winter solstice to be 12 hours 42 min-utes, where as it is 13 hours 34 minutesfifty-two minutes too short. On the summer solstice, the longest day, the clock anticipated a day of 12 hours 48 minutes, where as it is 13 hours and 41 minutes, and a night of 11 hours 12 minutes, where as it is 10 hours 19 minutes.

On the vernal and autumnal equinoxes the day is 11 hours and 56 minutes long, and the clock actually shows 11 hours and 56 minutes; the night is 12 hours 4 minutes long, and the clock show exactly 12 hours 4 minutes.

The difference between the present values and the values of the day for which the clock is adjusted is very consistent: on the winter solstice the day of the clock is fifty-two minutes longer than the present day of the winter solstice in Karnak, and the night is fifty-two minutes shorter; on the summer solstice the day is fifty-three minutes shorter on the clock and the night fifty-three minutes longer.

The figures on the clock show a smaller difference between the length of the daylight on the solstices or between the longest and the shortest days of the year than is observed at Karnak at the present time. Thus the water clock of Amenhotep III, if it was correctly built and correctly interpreted, indicates either that Thebes was closer to the equator or that the inclination of the equator toward the ecliptic was less than the present angle of 23 . In either case the climate of the latitudes of Egypt could not have been the same as it is in our age. As we find from the present research, the clock of Amenhotep III became obsolete in the middle of the eighth century; and the clock that might have replaced it at that time would have been make obsolete in the catastrophes of the end of the eighth and the beginning of the seventh centuries, when once more the axis changed its direction in the sky and its position on the globe as well. Worlds in Collision, Immanuel Velikovsky,

Delta Book (Dell Publishing Co.), Inc., 1950

In 1952, this was on the New York Times Best Seller list. Despite this, Velikovsky upset academics in many fieldshistory, religion, astronomy (including physics), . Those of astronomy [see below], told Velikovskys then publisher that if they continued to publish the book that their schools would no longer purchase that publishers textbooks. The publisher caved. So much for academic freedom.Most academics and pedestrians having not read this and subsequent works formed their opinions from hearsay. Einstein was no different at first. Once Velikovsky, who also lived in Princeton, got Einsteins atten-tion, Einstein felt that there was much to Velikovskys interdisciplinary study and his hypotheses deserved much more research. This does not mean that Einstein fully agreed with Velikovsky; instead, the weight of evidence more than justified further investigation. Einstein wrote the following:

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Velikovsky! At the occasion of this inauspicious birthday [Einsteins], you have presented me once more with the fruits of an almost eruptive productivity. I look forward with pleasure to reading the historical book that does not bring into danger the toes of my guild. How it stands with the toes of the other faculty [the book, Ages in Chaos, would upset the historians], I do not know as yet. I think of the touching prayer: Holy St. Florian, spare my house, put fire to others!

I have already read carefully the first volume of the memoirs to Worlds in Collisions and have supplied it with a few marginal notes in pencil that can easily be erased. I admire your dramatic talent and also the art and the straight forwardness of Thackeray [Thackrey], who has compelled the roaring astronomical lion [Shapley] to pull in a little his royal tail, yet not showing enough respect for the truth. Also, I would feel happy if you could savor the whole episode for its humorous side.

Unimaginable letter debts and unread manuscripts that were sent in, force me to be brief. Many thanks to both of you and friendly wishes.

Your

A. Einstein

Velikovsky Reconsidered, by the editors of Pense

Doubleday and Company, Inc., 1966

If this person has the story correct, Einstein told Velikovsky that he must make scientific predictions based on his historical research if his hypothesis of early history was ever to get scientific attention. One of Vs predictions was that there was an electromagnetic belt around the earth. At the time, astronomers considered the mechanisms of the solar system and universe to be governed simply by Newtonian gravi-tational phenomena. Velikovsky proposed that electromagnetic attrac-tions / repulsions also were in play. This greatly incensed astronomers being instructed by someone outside their field. Yet, early space exploration did indeed establish the existence of such an electromag-netic beltit is known to us today as the van Allen radiation belt.

The historical appendices to these labs have been added for a reason. They exist to help round out the student. Think of them as brain candy light facts that you will not be tested on. But, there is a further reason. Velikovskys works were truly interdisciplinaryincorporating history, astronomy, cosmology, psychology, geology, and paleontology. With such a broad base, he was able to advance truly astounding ideas. Maybe one of you might catch the bug. There is often money to be made where two fields overlap. More important than money, however, is the excitement of truly unearthing something new not just developing a better brake system.

APPENDIX BDATA SHEET FOR FLOW METERSTime/Date:___________________

Lab Partners____________________________ ________________________________________________________

____________________________ ________________________________________________________ Venturi Meter:hflow

inH20hfrictioninH20Water in tank

gal.Times.

d

d

d

d

d

Orifice Meter:hflow

inH20hfrictioninH20Water in tank

gal.Times.

d

d

d

d

d

Turbine Flow Meter:Flow Indicated by Counter, %hfrictioninH20Water in tank

gal.Times.

100% = _________ gpmd

d

d

d

d

Rotameter:% of FlowhfrictioninH20Water in tank

gal.Times.

100% = _________ gpm

d

d

d

d

d

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

Measure flow at

corner of float

EMBED Equation.3

Figure 4Schematic of the basic operation of the turbine-type flow meter [1]

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

The Invention of ClocksPart 2:

Sun Clocks, Water Clocks, Obelisks

HYPERLINK "http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa071401a.htm" http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa071401a.htm

INCLUDEPICTURE "http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/GreekScience/Students/Jesse/cleps.gif" \* MERGEFORMATINET

A Brief History of Clocks:

From Thales to Ptolemy

By: Jesse Weissman

HYPERLINK "http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/GreekScience/Students/Jesse/CLOCK1A.html" http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/GreekScience/Students/Jesse/CLOCK1A.html

INCLUDEPICTURE "http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/galileo/images/expe_inclpln_5stops.gif" \* MERGEFORMATINET

Using a water clock and an inclined plane, Galileo was able to determine the rate of acceleration due to gravity. by timing how long it takes for the ball to roll from the marked distances.

[He found that] it takes one unit of time for the ball to roll one unit of distance, two units of time to roll four units of distance, three units of time for the ball to roll nine units of distance, . NovaGalileos Battle for the Heavens

HYPERLINK "http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/galileo/expe_inpl_2.html#clock" http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/galileo/expe_inpl_2.html#clock

Galileo made an amazing contribution to timekeeping, simply by not paying attention in church. In 1581, Galileo was 17 and he was standing in the Cathe-dral of Pisa watching a huge chandelier swinging back and forth from the ceiling. Galileo noticed that no matter how short or long the arc of the chan-delier was, it took exactly the same amount of time to complete a full swing.

The chandelier gave Galileo the idea to create a pendulum clock. While the clock would eventually run of energy, it would keep accurate time until the pendulum stopped. If the pendulum was set swinging again before it stopped, there would never be a loss in accuracy. Because of this, pendulums caught on and are still widely used today. The History of Time

HYPERLINK "http://library.thinkquest.org/C008179/historical/basichistory.html#galileo" http://library.thinkquest.org/C008179/historical/basichistory.html#galileo

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

Fluid enters the tube from the bottom. As it enters, it causes the float to rise to a position of equilibrium. The position of equilibrium is at the point where the weight of the float is balanced by the weight of the fluid it displaces (the buoyant force exerted on the float by the fluid) and the pressure due to velocity (dynamic pressure). The higher the float position the greater the flow rate. Note that as the float rises, the annular area formed between the float and the tube increases. Maximum flow is at maximum annular area or when the float is at the top of the tube. Minimum area, of course, represents minimum flow rate and is when the float is at the bottom of the tube.

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

EMBED Equation.3

Venturi, Giovanni Battista (17461822) Italian physicist, credited with first observing the phenomenon upon which the operation of the Venturi tube (later invented by Clemens Herschel) depends. [2]

Certain difficulties are encountered in attempting to restore (downstream of the throat) the original pressure by decreasing the velocity to its original value. In order to do this, it is necessary to increase the cross section gradually from the narrowest section to the original cross section. This type of arrangement, shown in Fig. 208, is called a Venturi meter. Herschel* first suggested its use for the measurement of delivered volume in pipe lines. In order to find the relation between the pressure difference and the mean velocity in the pipe a calibration curve of a geometrically similar Venturi meter has to be known. In addition, in cases where the velocity of approach is not very small with respect to the velocity in the throat this geometrical similarity has to be extended to the approach as well. For Venturi tubes of the shape shown in Fig. 208 the velocity coefficient is approximately 1.00.

* Herschel, Cl., The Venturi Meter, paper read before the Am. Soc. Civil Eng., December 1887. [3]

BernoulliName of three generations of a family of mathematicians and scientists of Basel, Switzerland, that started with Jakob I [aka Jacob, Jacques, Jaques, and James] (16541705); prof. of mathematics at U. of Basel (from 1687); pioneer in application of Leibnizian calculus to a variety of problems; introduced term integral; studied catenaries, and applied calculus to bridge design. Author of Conamen novi systematis cometarum (1682), Dissetatio de gravitate aetheris (1683), Ars conjectandi (contains binomial distribution, pub. posthum. by Nikolaus in 1713), etc. His brother Johann I (16671748); prof. of mathematics at U. of Basel (from 1705); was a pioneer in exponential calculus; teacher of Euler, and collaborator of LHospital. Their nephew Nikolaus (16871759); prof. of mathematics at Padua (171622), then of law and logic at U. of Basel; contributed to probability theory and infinite series. Johanns sons: Daniel (17001782), mathematics prof. at St. Petersburg (172432), of anatomy, botany, and physics, and then of philosophy, at U. of Basel; discovered Bernoullis principle relating fluid velocity and pressure; contributed to probability, kinetic theory of gases, celestial mechanics; author of Hydrodynamica (1738) and works on acoustics, astronomy, etc.; and Johann II (17101790), prof. of eloquence and of mathematics, known for his contribution to theories of heat and light. Two sons of the last named: Johann III (17441807), astronomer to the Acad. of Berlin, author of Recueil pour les astronomes (177276); and Jakob II (17591789), prof. of mathematics at St. Petersburg. Christoph (17821863), grandson of Johann II and nephew of Johann III and Jakob II, was naturalist and prof. at U. of Basel (from 1818); author of Vademecum des Mechanikers (1829), etc. [2]

Bernoulli may well be the most famous mathematical family of all time. There were 8-12 Bernoulli mathematiciansthe confusion arises as the same given names were used in more than one generation [5].

Bernoullis Equation: applies to incompressible (Mach < 0.3 for gases), inviscid, irrotational fluids. If applying the equation along a streamline, can drop the irrotational partconstant energy along a streamline.

Students will often refer to g, the acceleration of gravity, as the gravitational constant. The gravitational constant is the gc shown in Bernoullis equation above. In the English Gravitational System of units, EMBED Equation.3 . In the SI system EMBED Equation.3 if one wants force expressed as Newtons, N, instead of EMBED Equation.3 . Many people curse the English Gravitational System; but, it is ancientvery ancientin many of its units. For example, the English inch is a smidgen off an ancient inch, found for example in the Great Pyramid of Giza. This ancient (at least 3500 years old) inch can be found by dividing the polar diameter of the earth by 500,000,000; e.g., EMBED Equation.3 . Our modern inch has been maintained to with in 0.001in of its original value. Isaac Newton was aware of this ancient measure and verified two ancient cubits based on its length.

While through a Venturi meter the pressure drop is very small (about 15 to 20 percent of the pressure drop in the throat), its practical application is limited by its large (long) size. Therefore standardized orifices as shown in Figs. 209 and 210 are used more frequently. The pressure diagrams in these two figures show that with this kind of apparatus, the loss in pressure is from 60 to 70% of the pressure drop in the orifice. The velocity coefficient has been found to be 0.96 to 0.98 with the standardized (German) rounded-approach orifice (Fig. 209). For the sharp-edged orifice shown in Fig. 210 the coefficient depends very much upon the ratio of the cross sections a/A. For instance, for a/A = 0.15, we have =0.61, whereas for a/A = 0.75, the velocity coefficient is = 0.91.

[3]

Remember, to plot A vs. B, B is the independent variable (horizontal axis) and A is the dependent variable (vertical axis). Thus, A vs. B could be alternately stated as A as a function of B.

L. Borchardt, Die altgyptische Zeitrechnung (1920), pp. 6-25.

_1137948051.unknown

_1137952494.unknown

_1218351181.unknown

_1277294863.bin

_1137954887.unknown

_1145909637.unknown

_1137953071.unknown

_1137948218.unknown

_1137948422.unknown

_1137948207.unknown

_1137944600.unknown

_1137947163.unknown

_1137948049.unknown

_1137947177.unknown

_1137947148.unknown

_1126289532.unknown

_1137943571.unknown

_1137942206.unknown

_1137943002.unknown

_1137942032.unknown

_1137942043.unknown

_1126289417.unknown