Процессор Intel Xeon

11 * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Процессоры Intel® Xeon®

Игорь Рудым

Менеджер по развитию рынка компании Intel

2

* Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Legal Disclaimer• Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice.

• Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configurationmay affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products,visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations

• Intel does not control or audit the design or implementation of third party benchmarks or Web sites referenced in this document.Intel encourages all of its customers to visit the referenced Web sites or others where similar performance benchmarks are reported and confirm whether the referenced benchmarks are accurate and reflect performance of systems available for purchase.

• Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family,not across different processor families. See www.intel.com/products/processor_number for details.

• Intel, processors, chipsets, and desktop boards may contain design defects or errors known as errata, which may cause the product to deviate from published specifications. Current characterized errata are available on request.

• Hyper-Threading Technology requires a computer system with a processor supporting HT Technology and an HT Technology-enabled chipset, BIOS and operating system. Performance will vary depending on the specific hardware and software you use. For more information including details on which processors support HT Technology, see here

• Intel® Turbo Boost Technology requires a PC with a processor with Intel Turbo Boost Technology capability. Intel Turbo Boost Technology performance varies depending on hardware, software and overall system configuration. Check with your PC manufacturer on whether your system delivers Intel Turbo Boost Technology. For more information, see http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost

• Intel Virtualization Technology requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, virtual machine monitor (VMM) andapplications enabled for virtualization technology. Functionality, performance or other virtualization technology benefits will vary depending on hardware and software configurations. Virtualization technology-enabled BIOS and VMM applications are currently in development.

• 64-bit computing on Intel architecture requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, operating system, device drivers and applications enabled for Intel® 64 architecture. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations. Consult with your system vendor for more information.

• Lead-free: 45nm product is manufactured on a lead-free process. Lead is below 1000 PPM per EU RoHS directive (2002/95/EC, Annex A). Some EU RoHS exemptions for lead may apply to other components used in the product package.

• Halogen-free: Applies only to halogenated flame retardants and PVC in components. Halogens are below 900 PPM bromine and 900 PPM chlorine.

• Intel, Intel Xeon, Intel Core microarchitecture, and the Intel logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.

• © 2009 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC) logo is reprinted with permission

http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm

http://www.intel.com/info/hyperthreading

http://www.intel.com/technology/turboboost

3


Базируется на лидирующей платформе Xeon® 5500

Перспективная платформа для виртуализации

Увеличенная производительность до

40%1

Улучшенная Энерго-Эффективность

Новые функции безопасности

Серия процессоров Intel® Xeon® 5600Технология 32нм со вторым поколение High-k диэлектрика

• 1 Source: Internal Intel measurements based on Xeon® X5680 vs. Xeon® X5570 – Measured results on SPECint*_rate_base2006 and OLTP workload. See backup for system configurations.

Intel® 5520 Chipset

PCI Express* 2.0

ICH 9/10Intel® X25-ESSDs

Intel® 82599 10GbE Controller

Intel® Data Center Manager

Intel® Node Manager Technology

Intel®

Xeon® 5600Intel®

Xeon® 5600

130W

95W

80W

60W (6C)

40W (4C)

4


Intel® Виртуализация & Безопасность

Intel® AES-NI

Аппаратные функции шифрования

Шифрование

Intel® TXT

Защита при миграции виртуальных систем

Защита

VMM

VM1

??

VM2

VM1

Intel® VT &Intel® TXTИзоляция виртуальных систем

Изоляция

Intel® TXT Запускает только подписанные ОС

VM1

VM2

VMM

5


Advanced• 6.4 GT/s QPI• 8MB / 12MB• DDR3 1333• Turbo Boost• HT

Standard• 5.86 GT/s QPI• 8MB / 12MB• DDR3 1066• Turbo Boost• HT

Basic• 4.8 GT/s QPI• 4M cache• DDR3 800

80W

L5640 6C2.26 GHz1

Xeon® 5500 Xeon® 5600

Xeon® 5500Применение

Xeon® 5600

X55702.93 GHz

X55602.80 GHz

X55502.66 GHz

E55402.53 GHz

E55302.40 GHz

E55202.26 GHz

E55062.13 GHz

E55042.00 GHz

95W

95W

95W

80W

80W

80W

80W

80W

E55021.86 (2C)

80W

X5670 6C2.93 GHz

X5660 6C2.80 GHz

X5650 6C2.66 GHz

E5640 4C2.66 GHz

E5630 4C2.53 GHz

E5620 4C2.40 GHz

95W

95W

95W

80W

80W

X5680 6C3.33 GHz

130W

E55072.26 GHz (4C)

E55062.13GHz (4C)

80W

80W

E55032.00 GHz (2C)

80W

60W

80W

L5630 4C2.13 GHz2

40W

L5609 4C1.86 GHz3

40W

Xeon®

5600 (Westmere-EP) SKUs

Xeon®

5500 SKUs

Lo

w P

ow

er O

ptio

ns

X5677 4C3.46 GHz 130W

Freq

-Op

timiz

ed

X5667 4C3.06 GHz

95WМаксимальнаяпроизводи-тельность

6 Cores4 Cores (freq optimized)

Экономичное

Higher FrequencyXeon

®

E5500 SKUs

Лучшая цена/производит.

Higher FreqMore Cache

1 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1333MHz2 SKU supports 5.86 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz3 SKU supports 4.80 GT/s QPI speed and DDR3 1066MHz, with Turbo and HT off.

6


Эволюция с процессорамисерии Intel® Xeon® 5600

Xeon®

5300Xeon®

5400Xeon®

5500

2007 2008 2009 2010Xeon®

5600

Intel® VT FlexMigrationпенсионеры

Новые серверы для растущего бизнеса

Производительно, энергопотребление, виртуализация

Совместимость с Intel® VT FlexMigration

Расширение архитектуры (Intel® VT, Intel® AES-NI, Intel® TXT)

Обновление

Source: Intel measurements as of Feb 2010. Performance comparison using server side java bops (business operations per second). Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. For detailed calculations, configurations and assumptions refer to the legal information slide in backup.

7


2010

обновление15:1

Годовое сокращение энергопотребления

на 93%1 серверная стойка на базе Intel® Xeon® 5600

Обновление1:1

Прирост производительности

до 15x

15 серверных стоек на базе Intel® Xeon®

5600

Предполагаемое сокращение годового энергопотребления

8%

Тот же уровень производительности

2005

15 стоек одноядерных

серверовIntel® Xeon®

Серверное обновление: 2010Физическая консолидация с одноядерных Xeon® 5600

– или –


8


Обновление1:1


до 5x

5 серверных стоек на базе Intel® Xeon®

5600

Предполагаемое сокращение годового энергопотребления

8%

Прирост производительност

и до 5x


и до 5x


и до 5x


и до 5x

2006

5 стоек двухядерных

серверовIntel® Xeon®

– или –


Серверное обновление: 2010Физическая консолидация с двухядерных Xeon® 5600

2010

обновление5:1

Годовое сокращение энергопотребления

на 82%1 серверная стойка на

базе Intel® Xeon®

5600

Тот же уровень производительности

9* Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation.

Платформа для 4 процессоров Intel Xeon 7500

IO HUB

IO HUB

Nehalem-EX Nehalem-EX


Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer

Память

8 ядер, 64 потока

24Mb кэш L3

Архитектура QPI

Буферизованное соединение Intel™ Scalable Memory

Interconnect

64 DIMM слотов – до 1 Тб памяти

Подсистема ввода-вывода нового поколения с

аппаратной виртуализацией


Возможности Nehalem-EX: 8 сокетов

Intel® Scalable Memory Buffer

Memory

Nehalem-EX

Nehalem-EX

Nehalem-EX

Nehalem-EX

IO HUB IO HUB


IO HUB


IO HUB

8 сокетов и 128 потоков команд

Масштабируемость за счѐт модульности

Возможности отказоустойчивости уровня Machine Check Architecture

High-end системы корпоративного уровня


Intel® Xeon® Processor 7500/6500 Series Product Options

+ 1066 Mhz frequency runs at an effective frequency of 978 Mhz when run at 5.86GHz SMI link speed¥Max Scale Glueless: Scaling capability refers to maximum supported number of CPUs in a ―glueless‖ Boxboro-EX platform (e.g. 8 skt means this SKU can be used to populate up to 8 sockets in a single system)**Max Turbo Boost frequency based on number of 133 MHz increments above base freq (+2 = 0.266 GHz, +3 = 0.400 GHz)

***E6510 may not be scaled above 2 sockets even with a customer node controller

8 and 4 socket/ Scalable

Advanced features available on higher end processors

UsageProcessor

Number/Freq

¥Max Scale

GluelessCores/ Threads Cache

QPI Speed

Max MemSpeed TDP

**Turbo HT

AdvancedX7560 (2.26GHz) 8 skt

8/1624M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3

X7550 (2 GHz) 8 skt 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3

Standard

X7542 (2.66GHz) 8 skt 6/6 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 130W +1 No

E7540 (2 GHz) 8 skt6/12

18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 105W +2

E7530 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 12M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2

Basic E7520 (1.86GHz) 4 skt 4/8 18M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 95W No Turbo

Low VoltageL7555 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 8/16 24M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5

L7545 (1.86 GHz) 8 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 95W +5

UsageProcessor

Number/Freq

¥Max Scale

GluelessCores/ Threads Cache

QPI Speed

Max MemSpeed TDP

**Turbo HT

Advanced X6550 (2 GHz) 2 skt 8/16 18M 6.4 GT/s 1066 MHz 130W +3

Standard E6540 (2 GHz) 2 skt 6/12 18M 5.86 GT/s 1066(978) MHz+ 105W +2

Basic E6510 (1.73 GHz)

2 skt only2 skt*** 4/8 12M 4.8 GT/s 800 MHz 105W No Turbo

2 socket/ Scalable



Процессоры Intel Xeon® серии 7500 (Nehalem-EX)

Intel® Turbo Boost Technology

Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology

При благоприятных условиях, увеличивает производительность за счет увеличения частоты процессора

Fre

qu

en

cy

Co

re 0

Co

re 1

Co

re 2

Co

re 3

Все ядра на стандартной

частоте

Все ядра на повышенной частоте

Co

re 0

Повышенная производительность по

запросу

Несколько ядер на еще более

высокой частоте

4C TurboNormal <4C Turbo

Увеличивает производительность потоковых приложений ускоряя

обработку и снижая время отклика

Повышенная производительность для потоковых приложений

Up to 30% higher†

Co

re 1

Co

re 2

Co

re 3

Co

re 0

Co

re 1

† Source: Intel internal measurements, January 2009. For notes and disclaimers, see performance and legal information slides at end of this presentation.

TDP = 105 Ватт

Idle = 10 Ватт


Процессоры Intel® Xeon® 7500 4S сравнение с 2S Xeon® серия 5600

Source: Best published results on SPEC.org or VMware.com as of 29 March 2010. Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htmResults have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance.Copyright © 2010, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Почти в 2.2x раза быстрее, чем Xeon® 5600

1.95

2.01

2.04

2.11

2.12

2.13

2.17

2.19

1.00Xeon® X5680 Baseline

SPECompM*2001

VMmark*

SPECint*_rate_base2006

SPECmpi*2007

SAP* SD 2-tier

SPECjAppServer*2004

SPECjbb*2005

SPECfp*_rate_base2006

Relative resultsHigher is better

4S

/6

4T

In

tel®

Xeo

n®

Pro

cesso

r X

75

60

(2

4M

C

ach

e,

2.2

6 G

Hz,

6.4

0 G

T/

s I

nte

l® Q

PI)

Xeon® 7500 and Xeon® 5600 benchmark results represent best top-bin published results as of 29 March 2010. See notes for details.

(6C, 12M Cache, 3.33GHz)

http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm


Advanced RAS Необходима экосистема

Состоит из трех частей: Кремния, Инновация и ОС

Mission Critical OS

OEM Innovation

Intel Silicon


Memory

• Inter-socket Memory Mirroring• Intel® Scalable Memory

Interconnect (Intel® SMI) Lane Failover

• Intel® SMI Clock Fail Over• Intel® SMI Packet Retry• Memory Address Parity • Failed DIMM Isolation• Memory Board Hot

Add/Remove• Dynamic Memory Migration*• OS Memory On-lining *• Recovery from Single DRAM

Device Failure (SDDC) plus random bit error

• Memory Thermal Throttling• Demand and Patrol scrubbing• Fail Over from Single DRAM

Device Failure (SDDC)• Memory DIMM and Rank

Sparing• Intra-socket Memory Mirroring• Mirrored Memory Board Hot

Add/Remove

Аппаратное устранение ошибокФункции обеспечения надежности Xeon® 7500

Bold text denoted new feature for Xeon® 7500* Feature requires OS support, check with your OS vendor for support plansSome features require OEM server implementation and validation and may not be provided in all server platforms

Более 20 функций RAS в процессорах Intel Xeon 7500

I/O Hub

• Physical IOH Hot Add• OS IOH On-lining*• PCI-E Hot Plug

CPU/Socket

• Machine Check Architecture (MCA) recovery

• Corrected Machine Check Interrupt (CMCI)

• Corrupt Data Containment Mode

• Viral Mode• OS Assisted Processor Socket

Migration*• OS CPU on-lining *• CPU Board Hot Add at QPI• Electronically Isolated (Static)

Partitioning• Single Core Disable for Fault

Resilient Boot

Intel® QuickPath Interconnect

• Intel QPI Packet Retry• Intel QPI Protocol Protection

via CRC (8bit or 16bit rolling)• QPI Clock Fail Over• QPI Self-Healing


HW Un-correctable Errors

Machine Check Architecture RecoveryАппаратное устранение ошибок на системах Xeonраньше, только в RISC, mainframe, и Itanium системах

*Errors detected using Patrol Scrub or Explicit Write-back from cache

Allows Recovery From Otherwise Fatal System Errors

Normal StatusWith Error Prevention

System Recovery with OS

Error Corrected

Error Detected*

Error Contained

HW Correctable ErrorsUn-correctable Errors

System works in conjunction with OS or

VMM to recover or restart processes and

continue normal operation

Bad memory location flagged so data will not

be used by OS or applications

Error information passed to OS /

VMM

MCA Recovery


Увеличениеэффективности

20:1

Снижение ежегодных

расходов на электроэнергию до

92% (Ожидаемый результат)

1 стойка с серверами на базе процессоров

Intel® Xeon® 7500

Срок окупаемости

<1 года (оценка)

Источник: Собственные измерения Intel от марта 2010 г. Сравнивались системы на базе процессоров Xeon 7500 и четырехпроцессорные системы на базе одноядерных процессоров Xeon MP. Производительность сравнивалась по результатам эталонного теста SPECint_rate_base2006. Результаты оценки основаны на собственном анализе Intel и приводятся только для информационных целей. Любые различия в аппаратных средствах, программном обеспечении или конфигурации системы могут повлиять на реальные значения производительности. Подробные расчеты, конфигурации и условные допущения приведены на слайде

- ИЛИ -

2010 г.

Увеличениепроизводитель-

ности1:1

Производительнос

ть выше

до 20 раз (Ожидаемое увеличение)

20 стоек с серверами на базе процессоров

Intel® Xeon® 7500

2005 г.

20 стоек с серверами на базе

одноядерных процессоров Intel® Xeon®

Обновление серверного парка: 2010 г.


Что еще, кроме процессора

1 Based on Intel internal results. Actual results may vary significantly based on workload and product configurations. See backup for more details on the results.

Итоги1

• Up to 46X lower power• Lower TCO (fewer drives)• Up to 6X read perf improvement

Итоги1

• Up to 10X increase IO bandwidth• >5X port count reduction• Up to 4.5X power per Gb reduction

Сетевые интерфейсы• Unified networking• Eliminate switches/cables • Scalable with multi-core CPUs

SSD• Низкое энергопотребление• Высокая надежность• Самый быстрый HDD

Intel® 10GbE

Intel® X25-M SSDs

19


20


Performance Summary BackupMainstream Server Benchmarks42% gain on Single Node server SPECpower*_ssj2008 at similar power level over previous generation processors supported by the following:

• Baseline Configuration and Score: Referenced as published at 2053 overall ssj_ops/watt http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q4/power_ssj2008-20091023-00205.html

• New Configuration and Score: IBM x3650 M3 was configured with the Intel Xeon Processor X5670 (2.93GHz, 256KB L2 cache per core, 12MB L3 cache per processor—12 cores/2 chips/6 cores per chip) and 12GB of PC3L-10600R(6 x 2GB) memory and ran IBM Java™6 Runtime Environment and Microsoft® Windows® Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64 Edition. Score: 2,927 overall ssj_ops/watt. Submitted and in review at www.spec.org

46% gain on SPECjbb2005 supported by the following:

• Baseline Configuration and Score: 632,425 bops, SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM = 158106 http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2005/results/res2010q1/jbb2005-20100210-00803.html

• New Configuration and Score: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processors X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, Data Reuse Optimization disabled, all prefetchers disabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1 x Seagate 73GB 10K RPM 2.5‖ SAS HDD, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise, IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows Server 2008 amd64-64 jvmwa6460sr6-20090923_42924). Source: Fujitsu Performance Lab testing as of Mar 2010. SPECjbb2005 score: bops= 928393, bops/JVM= 154732 http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=71488796-7a53-46b8-9163-61373214c2ef

27% boost on SAP ERP 6.0 Unicode over previous generation supported by the following:

• Baseline Configuration and Score: 3800 Number of SAP SD benchmark users http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C259FFE6AB54898440C838DED66684AFD7D58B23A917F4C0D

• New Configuration and Score : Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), 88 GB main memory, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, SQL Server 2008, SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode). Source: www.sap.com Score: 4860 Number of SAP SD benchmark users

40% gain on SPECint_rate_2006 over previous generation supported by the following:

• Baseline Configuration and Score: Score: 253

• http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100202-09561.html

• New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 12 workloads: 355

42% gain on VMMark* over previous generation supported by the following:

• Baseline Configuration and Score: Cisco result referenced as published at 25.06 at 17 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Cisco-2010-01-12-B200M1.pdf

• New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Cisco UCS B250 M2 platform with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, 6-core, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 192GB memory (48x4GB DDR3 1333), EMC CLARiiON CX4-240 storage system with 25x73GB SSD, 20 x 450GB 15K RPM, 5 x 300GB 15K RPM, VMware vSphere 4,0 U1 Source: www.cisco.com. Score of 35.83@26 tiles. For more information see: www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/ps10265/at_work_promo.html#~industry_benchmarks.

http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q4/power_ssj2008-20091023-00205.html





http://www.spec.org/

http://www.spec.org/osg/jbb2005/results/res2010q1/jbb2005-20100210-00803.html





http://docs.ts.fujitsu.com/dl.aspx?id=71488796-7a53-46b8-9163-61373214c2ef









http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C259FFE6AB54898440C838DED66684AFD7D58B23A917F4C0D

http://www.sap.com/

http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100202-09561.html






http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Cisco-2010-01-12-B200M1.pdf











http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/ps10265/at_work_promo.html

21


Performance Summary BackupTechnical Computing Benchmarks• STREAM: Baseline Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4

GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing TR1012. Score of workloads: 36588.0 MB/s

New Configuration and Score on Stream-MP Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Disabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red HatEL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: MB/s.

• CAE: Baseline Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications

New Configuration and Score on CAE Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for nine applications

• SPECfp_rate: 25% gain on SPECfp_rate_base2006 over previous generation supported by the following:

Baseline Configuration and Score: Score 197, Referenced as published at http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q2/cpu2006-20090511-07354.html

New Configuration and Score: Dell PowerEdge R710 system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, six-core, 130W TDP), Maximum Performance Power Management mode, Data Reuse Disabled, C1E Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 1x146GB 15K RPM SAS HDD, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (2.6.27.19-5-smp). Source: Submitted to www.spec.org for publication as of March 15 2010. Geomean Score of 17 workloads: 248.

• LIFE SCIENCES: Baseline Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 95W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications

New Configuration and Score on Life Sciences Vertical: Intel pre-production 2-socket server with Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB LLC, 6.4 GT/S QPI, 130W TDP), Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled or Disabled for best performance on each application, 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333 registered ECC), 4x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat 5.4 64-bit OS (2.6.18-164-el5). Source: Intel internal testing as of January 2010. Geometric mean score for ten applications

• LINPACK: Baseline Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 02/23/2009, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U3 kernel 2.6.18-128.el5 for x86_64). Source: Intel internal testing TR1011A. Score of workloads: 91 GFlops.

New Configuration and Score on Linpack Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Hex-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010, C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Disabled, NUMA Enabled, 24 GB (6x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, Red Hat EL5-U4 kernel 2.6.18-164.el5 experimental.8). Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 146 GFlops.

• BLACKSCHOLES*: Baseline Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 (2.93 GHz, 8 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 18.74 seconds.

New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Intel pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12 MB last level cache, 6.4 GT/sec QPI), 24GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 4 x 150GB 10K RPM SATA RAID0 for scratch, Red Hat* EL 5 Update 4 64-bit OS. Source: Intel internal testing as of February 2010. SunGard v3.0 source code compiled with Intel v11.0 compiler. Elapsed time to run benchmark: 11.51 seconds.

22


5 Month Single Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back Up

• 5 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Single Core Intel® Xeon® 3.80 with 2M L2 Cache and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 15x.

– Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon Processor 3.80Ghz with 2M L2 Cache, 800 FSB, 8x1GB DDR2-400 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances

– New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances

• Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.

23


Single Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details

2005 2010 Delta / Notes

Product Intel® Xeon® 3.8GHz with 2M cache

Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz)

Performance per Server

1 Up to 15x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010

Server Power Idle / Active Power

228W idle / 382W active


Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day

# Servers needed 315 21 ~ 15:1 server consolidation

# Racks needed 15 racks 1 rack 15:1 Rack Consolidation

Annual Server kWh 772,904 37,938 Up to 95% lower energy costs

Total Annual Energy Costs

$154,581 $7,588 $146,993 electricity cost reduction per year.

Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor

Operating System Licensing Costs

$283,500 $18,900 $264,600 less per yearAssumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900

Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08

Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $411,593

Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server

Estimated Payback Period of 5 months

24


15 Month Dual Core Refresh ROI Claim – Back up

• 15 month ROI claim estimated based on comparison between 2S Dual Core Intel® Xeon® 5160 (3.0GHz) and 2S Intel® Xeon® X5680 based servers. Calculation includes analysis based on performance, power, cooling, electricity rates, operating system annual license costs and estimated server costs. This assumes 8kW racks, $0.10 per kWh, cooling costs are 2x the server power consumption costs, operating system license cost of $900/year per server, per server cost of $7200 based on estimated list prices and estimated server utilization rates. All dollar figures are approximate. Performance and power comparisons are based on measured server side java benchmark results (Intel Corporation Feb 2010). Platform power was measured during the steady state window of the benchmark run and at idle. Performance gain compared to baseline was 5x.

– Baseline platform: Intel server platform with two Dual-core Intel® Xeon® Processor 5160, 3.33GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 8x2GB FBDMIMM DDR2-667 memory, 1 hard drive, 1 power supply, Microsoft* Windows* Server 2003 Ent. SP1, Oracle* JRockit* build P27.4.0-windows-x86_64 run with 2 JVM instances

– New platform: Intel server platform with two Intel® Xeon® Processor X5680 (12M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 24 GB memory (6x4GB DDR3-1333), 1 SATA 10krpm 150GB hard drive, 1 800w power supply, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 64 bit SP2, Oracle* JRockit* build P28.0.0-29 run with 4 JVM instances

• Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit Intel Performance Benchmark Limitations.

25


Dual Core Energy Efficient Refresh Calculation Details

2005 2010 Delta / Notes

Product Intel Xeon 5100 series (3.00GHz)

Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz)

Performance per Server

1 Up to 5x increase Intel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010

Server Power

Idle / Active Power



Server idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day

# Servers needed 105 21 5:1 server consolidation

# Racks needed 5 racks 1 rack 5:1 Rack Consolidation

Annual kWhr 281,883 37,938 Estimated 85% lower energy costs

Annual Energy Costs

$56,376 $7,588 $45,169 electricity cost reduction per year.

Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor

OS Licensing Costs $94,500 $18,900 $75,600 less per yearAssumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900

Source www.dell.com as of 12/16/08

Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $120,769

Cost of new HW n/a $151,200 Assume $7,200 per server

Estimated Payback Period of 15 months

26


Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006

Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1

• X5680: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0.






• E5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5640 (2.66 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 226.0.



• E5507: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor E5507 (2.26 GHz, 4MB L3, 4.8 GT/s, Quad-core, 80W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1066 QR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 143.0.



• L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 259.0.

27


Intel Xeon® 5600 Downbins: SPECfp_rate2006

Benchmark:- SPECCPU2006 V1.1





• X5660: upermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5660 (2.80 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 95W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 232.0.








• L5640: Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor L5640 (2.26 GHz, 12MB L3, 5.86 GT/s, Quad-core, 60W TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 189.0.

28


Xeon® L5600 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006

• SPECint*_rate2006

– L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 269 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10097.html

– L5630: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 181http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100324-10131.html


• SPECfp*_rate2006

– L5640: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S6. Score: 193 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q2/cpu2006-20100317-10098.html



Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of April 16, 2010
































29


Xeon® L5500 SKU Downbins: SPECint*_rate2006 and SPECint*_rate2006

• SPECint*_rate2006

– L5530: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 194 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08776.html

– L5520: UCS C210 M1.Score: 188http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q1/cpu2006-20100119-09411.html

– L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 133http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08772.html

• SPECfp*_rate2006

– L5530: IBM System x3550 M2. Score: 158 http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091007-08823.html

– L5520: PowerEdge R510. Score: 155http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20091012-08892.html

– L5506: IBM System dx 360 M2. Score: 115http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q4/cpu2006-20090929-08775.html

Source: Highest published results on www.spec.org as of March 24, 2010
































30


Integer Throughput Performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006 benchmarkComparison based on published/submitted results to www.spec.org as of February 2010.

• Intel® Xeon® processor 3.80 with 2M L2 cache based platform details

• HP* ProLiant* DL380 G4 server platform with two 64-bit Intel Xeon processor 3.80GHz with 2M L2 cache, 800 FSB, 8GB memory, Microsoft Windows Server 2003* Ent. SP1,

Intel® C++ Compiler 9.1 for 32-bit apps, Build 20060323Z Package ID: W_CC_P_9.1.020. Referenced as published at 20.9. For more information see

http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q3/cpu2006-20060513-00027.html.

• Intel® Xeon® processor 5160 based platform details

• IBM System X* 3550 platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00GHz, 4Mb L2 cache, 16GB memory (8 x 2GB DDR2-5300F ECC), SUSE* Linux* Enterprise Server 10

(x86_64) 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux* version 10.0. Published in August 2007. Referenced as published at 60.8. For more information see

http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q3/cpu2006-20070803-01638.html.


• Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two Intel Xeon X5365, 3.00 GHz, 1333MHz system, 8 MB (4 MB shared / 2 cores L3 Cache), 16GB memory (8x2 GB 667 MHz ECC CL5 FB-DIMM),

SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 10 Compiler: Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64. Published August 2007. Referenced as published at 99.1. For more information see


• Intel® Xeon® processor X5470 based platform details

• Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY* RX200 S4 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 12MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 16GB memory (8x2GB DDR2 PC2-

5300F, 2 rank, CAS 5-5-5, with ECC), SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.21-smp*, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32* and Linux64* version 11.0

build 20080730. Referenced as published at 140. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080901-05156.html.


• ASUS Z8PE-D12X based server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 24 GB memory (6x4GB PC3-10600R, CL9-9-9, ECC),

SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.34-smp, Intel C++ Compiler for Linux32 and Linux64 version 11.0 build 20090131. Referenced as published at

241. For more information see http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2009q1/cpu2006-20090316-06703.html

•

• Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (WSM-EP) platform (Score: 352)

• New Configuration and Score on Benchmark:- Supermicro* pre-production system with two Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 (3.33 GHz, 12MB L3, 6.4 GT/s, Quad-core, 130W

TDP), BIOS rev 01/06/2010 ,C3 Disabled, C6 Enabled, Turbo Enabled, HT Enabled, NUMA Enabled, 48 GB (12x4GB DDR3-1333 DR registered ECC), 1x150GB 10K RPM

SATA HDD, SLES 11 kernel: 2.6.27.19-5-default x86_64. Source: Intel internal testing as of Feb 2010. Score of workloads: 352.0.

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or

software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on

performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 SeriesSPECint*_rate_base2006

Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010.



























31


Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600 SeriesVMmark* Performance (generational)

• Virtualization Performance on VMware* ESX using VMmark* benchmark

• Comparison based on published/submitted/approved results as of April 27, 2009. Results are posted at http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html


• Dell PowerEdge* 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors 5160 3.00Ghz, 4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory (8x4GB 667MHz ECC CL5 DDR2 FB-DIMM), VMware ESX Server* V3.0.1. Published at 3.89@3 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark_dell3.PDF


• Dell PowerEdge 2950 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5365 3.00GHz, 2x4MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 32GB memory, VMware ESX Server V3.0.1.Published at 7.03@5 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/vmmark_dell2.PDF


• HP Proliant* ML370 G5 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5470 3.33GHz, 2x6MB L2 cache, 1333MHz FSB, 48GB memory, VMware ESX V3.5. Update 3 Published at 9.15@7 tiles. For more information see www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-HP-2008-10-09-ML370.pdf

• Intel® Xeon® processor X5570 based platform details:

• Dell PowerEdge* R710 Server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5570 2.93GHz, 8MB L3 cache, 6.4GT/s QPI, 96 GB memory (12x8GB DDR3-1066MHz), VMware ESX v4.0. VMmark V1.1. Result measured at 24.0@17 tiles. For more information see http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Dell-2009-04-21-R710.pdf

• Intel® Xeon® processor X5680 based platform details:

• Intel reference platform using two Intel Xeon processors X5680 (12 M Cache, 3.33 GHz, 6.40 GT/s Intel® QPI), 96 GB memory (12x 8 GB DDR3-800 Reg ECC DIMMs), VMware ESX* V4.0 Update 1. Performance measured at 32.25@ 26 tiles.

Performance tests and ratings are measured using specific computer systems and/or components and reflect the approximate performance of Intel products as measured by those tests. Any difference in system hardware or

software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Buyers should consult other sources of information to evaluate the performance of systems or components they are considering purchasing. For more information on

performance tests and on the performance of Intel products, visit http://www.intel.com/performance/resources/limits.htm Copyright © 2009, Intel Corporation. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Source: Published/submitted/approved results as of Feb 2010

http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html

http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark_dell3.PDF

http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/vmmark_dell2.PDF

http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-HP-2008-10-09-ML370.pdf











http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vmmark/VMmark-Dell-2009-04-21-R710.pdf











32


DDR3L Power Testing: System Configuration

Item Details

Server Intel 1U S5500WBV server

Processor 2x Xeon® X5650 (Westmere 2.66GHz, 6 cores, 95W TDP, pre-production parts)

Power Supply 1x 450W PSU

Hard Disk: 1x Seagate Barracuda 120GB, ST3120026AS

Memory:

4x4GB DDR3-13332 DIMMs installed per CPU

Before (1.5v): Samsung PC3-10600R -M393B5170FH0-CH9

After (1.35v): Samsung PC3L-10600R -M393B5170FH0-YH9

Source: Intel internal measurements Feb 2010 using server side java benchmark across a load linePower measurement at the wall using same system configuration; memory was the only variable changedBefore: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3-10600R - M393B5170FH0-CH9 (1.5V)After: 4 x 4GB Samsung PC3L-10600R - M393B5170FH0-YH9 (1.35V)Note: System level power reductions of 0.52W at idle and 1.42W under 100% load were approx the same per DIMM with 6 DIMMs installed

Documents

Процессор Intel Xeon