79
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

22 Firm Supply

Page 2: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2

Firm Supply

How does a firm decide how much product to supply? This depends upon the firm’s

– technology

– market environment

– goals

– competitors’ behaviors

Page 3: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 3

Market Environments

Are there many other firms, or just a few?

Do other firms’ decisions affect our firm’s payoffs?

Is trading anonymous, in a market? Or are trades arranged with separate buyers by middlemen?

Page 4: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 4

Market Environments

Monopoly: Just one seller that determines the quantity supplied and the market-clearing price.

Oligopoly: A few firms, the decisions of each influencing the payoffs of the others.

Page 5: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5

Market Environments

Dominant Firm: Many firms, but one much larger than the rest. The large firm’s decisions affect the payoffs of each small firm. Decisions by any one small firm do not noticeably affect the payoffs of any other firm.

Page 6: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 6

Market Environments

Monopolistic Competition: Many firms each making a slightly different product. Each firm’s output level is small relative to the total.

Pure Competition: Many firms, all making the same product. Each firm’s output level is small relative to the total.

Page 7: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 7

Market Environments

Later chapters examine monopoly, oligopoly, and the dominant firm.

This chapter explores only pure competition.

Page 8: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 8

Pure Competition

A firm in a perfectly competitive market knows it has no influence over the market price for its product. The firm is a market price-taker.

The firm is free to vary its own price.

Page 9: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 9

Pure Competition

If the firm sets its own price above the market price then the quantity demanded from the firm is zero.

If the firm sets its own price below the market price then the quantity demanded from the firm is the entire market quantity-demanded.

Page 10: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 10

Pure Competition

So what is the demand curve faced by the individual firm?

Page 11: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 11

Pure Competition

Y

$/output unit

Market Supply

Market Demand

pe

Page 12: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 12

Pure Competition

y

$/output unit

Market Supply

pe

p’At a price of p’, zero is demanded from the firm.

Market Demand

Page 13: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 13

Pure Competition

y

$/output unit

Market Supply

pe

p’

p”

At a price of p” the firm faces the entire market demand.

At a price of p’, zero is demanded from the firm.

Market Demand

Page 14: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 14

Pure Competition

So the demand curve faced by the individual firm is ...

Page 15: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 15

Pure Competition

y

$/output unit

Market Supply

pe

p’

p”

At a price of p” the firm faces the entire market demand.

At a price of p’, zero is demanded from the firm.

Market Demand

Page 16: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 16

Pure Competition

Y

$/output unit

pe

p’

p”Market Demand

Page 17: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 17

Smallness

What does it mean to say that an individual firm is “small relative to the industry”?

Page 18: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 18

Smallness$/output unit

y

Firm’s MC

The individual firm’s technology causes italways to supply only a small part of the total quantity demanded at the market price.

Firm’s demand curve

pe

Page 19: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

Each firm is a profit-maximizer and in a short-run.

Q: How does each firm choose its output level?

Page 20: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 20

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

Each firm is a profit-maximizer and in a short-run.

Q: How does each firm choose its output level?

A: By solvingmax ( ) ( ).y

s sy py c y

0

Page 21: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 21

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

maxy≥0

Π s(y) = py − cs(y).

What can the solution ys* look like?

Page 22: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

maxy≥0

Π s(y) = py − cs(y).

What can the solution ys* look like?(a) ys* > 0:

(y)

yys*

( )( )

( )

( )( )

.*

id y

dyp MC y

iid y

dyat y y

ss

ss

0

02

2

Page 23: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 23

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

maxy≥0

Π s(y) = py − cs(y).

What can the solution y* look like?(b) ys* = 0:

(y)

yys* = 0

d ydy

p MC y

at y y

ss

s

( )( )

.*

0

0

Page 24: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 24

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

For the interior case of ys* > 0, the first-order maximum profit condition is

d ydy

p MC yss

( )( ) . 0

That is, p MC ys s ( ).*

So at a profit maximum with ys* > 0, themarket price p equals the marginalcost of production at y = ys*.

Page 25: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 25

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

For the interior case of ys* > 0, the second-order maximum profit condition is

d y

dy

ddy

p MC ydMC y

dys

ss

2

20

( )( )

( ).

That is,dMC y

dys s( )

.*

0

So at a profit maximum with ys* > 0, thefirm’s MC curve must be upward-sloping.

Page 26: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 26

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

$/output unit

y

pe

ys*y’

MCs(y)

Page 27: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 27

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

$/output unit

y

pe

ys*y’

At y = ys*, p = MC and MCslopes upwards. y = ys* is profit-maximizing.

MCs(y)

Page 28: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 28

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

$/output unit

y

pe

ys*y’

At y = ys*, p = MC and MCslopes upwards. y = ys* is profit-maximizing.

At y = y’, p = MC and MC slopes downwards.y = y’ is profit-minimizing.

MCs(y)

Page 29: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 29

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

$/output unit

y

pe

y’

At y = ys*, p = MC and MCslopes upwards. y = ys* is profit-maximizing. So a profit-max. supply level can lie only on the upwards sloping part of the firm’s MC curve.

MCs(y)

ys*

Page 30: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 30

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

But not every point on the upward-sloping part of the firm’s MC curve represents a profit-maximum.

Page 31: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 31

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

But not every point on the upward-sloping part of the firm’s MC curve represents a profit-maximum.

The firm’s profit function is

If the firm chooses y = 0 then its profit is

s s vy py c y py F c y( ) ( ) ( ).

s vy F c F( ) ( ) . 0 0

Page 32: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 32

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

So the firm will choose an output level y > 0 only ifs vy py F c y F( ) ( ) .

Page 33: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 33

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

So the firm will choose an output level y > 0 only if

I.e., only if

Equivalently, only if

s vy py F c y F( ) ( ) .

py c yv ( ) 0

pc y

yAVC yv

s ( )

( ).

Page 34: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 34

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)MCs(y)

$/output unit

y

Page 35: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 35

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)MCs(y)

$/output unit

y

Page 36: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 36

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)MCs(y)

$/output unit

y

p AVCs(y)

Page 37: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 37

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)MCs(y)

p AVCs(y) ys* > 0. $/output unit

y

Page 38: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 38

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)MCs(y)

p AVCs(y) ys* = 0.

$/output unit

y

p AVCs(y) ys* > 0.

Page 39: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 39

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)MCs(y)

p AVCs(y) ys* = 0.

The firm’s short-runsupply curve

$/output unit

y

p AVCs(y) ys* > 0.

Page 40: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 40

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)MCs(y)

The firm’s short-runsupply curve

Shutdown point

$/output unit

y

Page 41: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 41

The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Decision

Shut-down is not the same as exit. Shutting-down means producing no

output (but the firm is still in the industry and suffers its fixed cost).

Exiting means leaving the industry, which the firm can do only in the long-run.

Page 42: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 42

The Firm’s Long-Run Supply Decision

The long-run is the circumstance in which the firm can choose amongst all of its short-run circumstances.

How does the firm’s long-run supply decision compare to its short-run supply decisions?

Page 43: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 43

The Firm’s Long-Run Supply Decision

A competitive firm’s long-run profit function is

The long-run cost c(y) of producing y units of output consists only of variable costs since all inputs are variable in the long-run.

( ) ( ).y py c y

Page 44: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 44

The Firm’s Long-Run Supply Decision

The firm’s long-run supply level decision is to

The 1st and 2nd-order maximization conditions are, for y* > 0,

max ( ) ( ).y

y py c y

0

p MC y anddMC y

dy

( )( )

.0

Page 45: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 45

The Firm’s Long-Run Supply Decision

Additionally, the firm’s economic profit level must not be negative since then the firm would exit the industry. So,

( ) ( )( )

( ).

y py c y

pc y

yAC y

0

Page 46: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 46

The Firm’s Long-Run Supply Decision

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

Page 47: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 47

The Firm’s Long-Run Supply Decision

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

p > AC(y)

Page 48: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 48

The Firm’s Long-Run Supply Decision

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

p > AC(y)

Page 49: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 49

The Firm’s Long-Run Supply Decision

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

The firm’s long-runsupply curve

Page 50: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 50

The Firm’s Long-Run Supply Decision

How is the firm’s long-run supply curve related to all of its short-run supply curves?

Page 51: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 51

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unitACs(y)

MCs(y)

Page 52: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 52

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unitACs(y)

MCs(y)

p’

ys* y*

ys* is profit-maximizing in this short-run.

Page 53: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 53

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unitACs(y)

MCs(y)

p’

ys* y*

ys* is profit-maximizing in this short-run.

s

Page 54: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 54

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unitACs(y)

MCs(y)

p’

ys* y*The firm can increase profit by increasingx2 and producing y* output units.

s

Page 55: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 55

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unitACs(y)

MCs(y)

p”

ys*

ys* is loss-minimizing in this short-run.

Page 56: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 56

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unitACs(y)

MCs(y)

p”

ys*

ys* is loss-minimizing in this short-run.

Loss

Page 57: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 57

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unitACs(y)

MCs(y)

p”

ys*This loss can be eliminated in the long run by the firm exiting the industry.

Loss

Page 58: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 58

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

Page 59: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 59

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

p’

ys*

ys* is profit-maximizing in this short-run.

Page 60: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 60

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

p’

ys*

ys* is profit-maximizing in this short-run.

s

Page 61: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 61

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

p’

ys*

ys* is profit-maximizing in this short-run.y* is profit-maximizing in the long-run.

y*

Page 62: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 62

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

p’

ys*

ys* is profit-maximizing in this short-run.y* is profit-maximizing in the long-run.

y*

Page 63: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 63

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

p’

ys*y*

s

The firm can increase profit by reducingx2 and producing y* units of output.

Page 64: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 64

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

Page 65: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 65

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

Page 66: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 66

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

Page 67: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 67

The Firm’s Long & Short-Run Supply Decisions

MC(y)

AC(y)

y

$/output unit

Short-run supply curves

Long-run supply curve

Page 68: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 68

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

The firm’s producer’s surplus is the accumulation, unit by extra unit of output, of extra revenue less extra production cost.

How is producer’s surplus related profit?

Page 69: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 69

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

y

$/output unit

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)

MCs(y)

Page 70: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 70

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

y

$/output unit

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)

MCs(y)

Page 71: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 71

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

y

$/output unit

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)

MCs(y)

p

y*(p)

Page 72: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 72

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

y

$/output unit

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)

MCs(y)

p

PS

y*(p)

Page 73: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 73

Producer’s Surplus RevisitedSo the firm’s producer’s surplus is

PS p p MC z d z

py p MC z d z

py p c y p

s

y p

s

y p

v

( ) ( ) ( )

* ( ) ( ) ( )

* ( ) * ( ) .

*( )

*( )

0

0

That is, PS = Revenue - Variable Cost.

Page 74: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 74

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

y

$/output unit

AVCs(y)ACs(y)

MCs(y)p

PS

y*(p)

Page 75: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 75

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

y

$/output unit

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)

MCs(y)

p

y*(p)

cv (y * (p)) = MCs(z)d(z)0

y*( p )

Page 76: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 76

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

y

$/output unit

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)

MCs(y)

p

y*(p)

Revenue= py*(p)

Page 77: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 77

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

y

$/output unit

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)

MCs(y)

p

y*(p)

Revenue= py*(p)

cv(y*(p))

Page 78: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 78

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

y

$/output unit

AVCs(y)

ACs(y)

MCs(y)

p

PS

y*(p)

Page 79: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Firm Supply

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 79

Producer’s Surplus Revisited

PS = Revenue - Variable Cost. Profit = Revenue - Total Cost

= Revenue - Fixed Cost - Variable Cost.

So, PS = Profit + Fixed Cost. Only if fixed cost is zero (the long-

run) are PS and profit the same.