36
Dimisha Rodgers Maureen Sills Irina Attias Fadwa Nita

Toms Branding

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This was my teams visual aid that we used to show Branding for Toms Shoes in the 2012 Summer

Citation preview

Page 1: Toms Branding

Dimisha

Rodgers

Maureen Sills

Irina Attias

Fadwa Nita

Page 2: Toms Branding

It all started..

Page 3: Toms Branding

They lost…but..

Page 4: Toms Branding

In 2006…

Page 5: Toms Branding
Page 6: Toms Branding

Brand InventoryTarget CustomerSWOTDistribution ChannelPricingCommunicationCompetitorPOP & POD

Brand ExploratoryCustomer KnowledgeSources of Brand EquityBrand AwarnessBrand MantraCBBE Pyramid

Things Are Happing!EventsCo-BrandingIn the Loop

Recommendations

Page 7: Toms Branding

Brand Inventory

Page 8: Toms Branding

menecofriendly

philanthropy

accessories

children

All occasions

family

womenFor all ages

timeless

Moderately priced

One for one

shoes

sustainable

Page 9: Toms Branding

Targeted to

18-25 years old

Page 11: Toms Branding

Pricing

How much do you spend for a pair of shoes on average?

€ 59

€ 65

€ 65

€ 78

€ 39

Page 12: Toms Branding

Communications

Page 13: Toms Branding

€ 65

Page 14: Toms Branding

Parity & Differentiation

Page 15: Toms Branding

Brand Exploratory

Page 16: Toms Branding

comfortable

ethical

campaign /

charity

attractive

moderately

priced

ecofriendly

shoes

summer

community

giving

sustainable

One for One

hipster / city life

Page 17: Toms Branding

Sources of Brand EquityBrand image

Comfort & Casual

Page 18: Toms Branding

Brand mantra

One for one

EssentialMediumNot at all

Page 19: Toms Branding

No Yes0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

72%

28%

TOMS known by name

No Yes0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

75%

25%

TOMS known by logo

Brand

Awareness

Page 20: Toms Branding

Resonance:Lifestyle products

(philantrophy)Consumer loyalty

Customer Based Brand Equity pyramid

Salience: Everyday shoes for all types of occasions and people (ages, genders, styles)One for one -mantra

Judgements:Attractive design for a

good cause

Feelings:Great, guiltless,

socially acceptable, fun & relaxed style

Performance: substantial price quality ratio•Useful, casual, comfort• Everyday style

Imagery: Casual and humanitarian•Young target group 18-25 (”changemakers”)

Page 21: Toms Branding

Things Are Happening!

EventsCelebrity Endorsements

Product PlacementCo-Branding

In the Tabloids

Page 23: Toms Branding

Celebrity

Endorseme

nts

Page 24: Toms Branding

Pretty Little Liars

Make It or Break It

Quest Magazine

Product Placement

Qvest Magazine

Page 25: Toms Branding

ELEMENT THE ROW

Co-Branding

Page 26: Toms Branding

In the Tabloids

Page 27: Toms Branding

ThreatsOpportunities

WeaknessesStrengths

• Strong message• Lifestyle choices

(vegan)

• Limited retail stores

• Low brand awareness

• Lack of visibility

• Pre-existing competition

• Massive shoe market

• Price• Campaign is not

enough

• Potential market extension

• Increasing green consciousness

SW

OT

Page 28: Toms Branding

Recommendations

Page 29: Toms Branding
Page 30: Toms Branding
Page 31: Toms Branding

Internationalize their website

Page 32: Toms Branding

Stress their charity work!

Page 33: Toms Branding

Be more present in the audio visual media ( TV) and also magazines.

Page 34: Toms Branding

QUESTIONS ?

Page 35: Toms Branding

THANK YOU