43
Connecting Northern Tanzania A socio-economic comparison of the alternative routes for a highway from Arusha to Musoma by Frankfurt Zoological Society J. Grant C. Hopcraft (May, 2011)

FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Frankfurt Zoological Society conducted alternative routes connecting Northern Tanzania - two southern routes vs crossing through Serengeti in the north. The data show the advantages of surrounding Serengeti National Park via a southern route instead crossing.

Citation preview

Page 1: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Connecting Northern Tanzania

A socio-economic comparison of the alternative routes for a highway from Arusha

to Musoma

by Frankfurt Zoological SocietyJ. Grant C. Hopcraft (May, 2011)

Page 2: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Tanzania’s Road Network & New Alternative Routes

Page 3: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Three Alternative Routes

Page 4: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Three Alternative Routes

Page 5: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Three Alternative Routes

Page 6: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Elevation and Distance: North Route

Page 7: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Elevation and Distance: North Route

Total distance: 548 km

Elevation change: 1537 m

Page 8: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Elevation and Distance: Eyasi Route

Page 9: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Elevation and Distance: Eyasi Route

Total distance: 628 km

Elevation change: 674 m

Page 10: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Elevation and Distance: Mbulu Route

Page 11: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Elevation and Distance: Mbulu Route

Total distance: 692 km

Elevation change: 1099 m

Page 12: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Elevation and Distance: Summary

Page 13: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Elevation and Distance: Summary

548 km1537 m

628 km674 m

692 km1099 m

• shortest distance

• greatest elevation gain

• too steep for oil / gas pipelines or railways

• least elevation gain

• longest distance

Page 14: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Current Conditions

Page 15: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Current Conditions

402.9270.8132.2288.5691.5South Mbulu

332.4249.383.1296.0628.3South Eyasi

428.2208.6219.7119.5547.8North Route

Km of new pavement required

Km Currently Seasonal 

Tracks or No Road

Km Currently 

All‐Seasonal Murum

Km Currently Paved

Total KmProposed Route

North Route is shortest, but requires the most amount of new pavement (i.e. most

expensive)

Page 16: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Estimated Travel Times

Page 17: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Estimated Travel Times

691.5

628.3

547.8

Total Km

8.6 hours

691.50South Mbulu

7.8 hours

628.30South Eyasi

7.9 hours

396.6151.1North Route

Total Travel Time

Total Km outside Protected Areas (80 km/hr speed limit)

Total Km inside Protected Areas (50 km/hr speed limit) 

Proposed Route

North Route is shorter distance, but would be longer travel time

Page 18: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Human Density

Page 19: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Human Density

• fewest number of people

• connects very few high human density areas (ie red bars)

Page 20: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Voter Population

Page 21: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Voter Population

• fewest number of voters

Page 22: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Economic Activity

Page 23: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Economic Activity

• fewest number of economically active people

• connects the least number of economic hubs (red bars)

Page 24: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Total Number of Unemployed

Page 25: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Total Number of Unemployed

• largest unemployment in the south

• number of unemployed people on South Mbuluroute is almost equal to total number of people on North route

Page 26: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

School Aged Children (5-19 years old)

Page 27: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

School Aged Children (5-19 years old)

• greatest number of school aged children in the south

• many centres with large numbers of school aged children (red bars)

Page 28: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Access to Agriculture

Page 29: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Access to Agriculture

05

10152025

3035404550

South Mbulu South Eyasi North Route

Are

a un

der a

gric

ultu

re p

er k

m o

f roa

d

Tree / Shrub Crops

Herbaceous Crops

• twice as much agriculture / km2

• mainly herbaceous crops sold at local markets (and some cash crops)

Page 30: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Livestock Density

Page 31: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

South Mbulu South Eyasi North Route

Tota

l num

ber o

f Liv

esto

ck w

ithin

20k

m o

f rou

te

• three times as many livestock than northern route

Livestock Density

Page 32: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Future Agriculture: Rainfall

Page 33: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Future Agriculture: Rainfall

• highest annual rainfall

Page 34: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Future Agriculture: Soil Quality

Page 35: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Future Agriculture: Soil Quality

• high average soil fertility but low rainfall

Page 36: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Biodiversity & Conservation Issues

Page 37: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Wildebeest Migration: Wet Season

Page 38: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Wildebeest Migration: Wet to Dry Transition

Page 39: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Wildebeest Migration: Dry Season

Page 40: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Threatened Species: Rhino and Wild dog

Page 41: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Letter from Tanzania’s Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (22, June 2011)

1) The proposed road will not dissect the Serengeti National Park

4) The Government of Tanzania is considering the construction of a route south of the park (many donors including the World Bank and the German Government have already offered support)

3) New paved roads to address the socio-economic needs of rural communities will not be adjacent to the park (122 km of ecologically sensitive area between Loliondoand Mugumu will be left)

2) TANAPA will maintain jurisdiction of all roads in the Serengeti for tourism and administration only (not commercial traffic)

Page 42: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

Sources of Data

Elevation: NASA SRTM Digital Elevation Model

Human demography: Tanzania Bureau of Statistics

Livestock: FAO Gridded Livestock of the World 2007

Agriculture, Crops & Rainfall: FAO AfriCover

Soil: World Harmonized Soil Data base

Maps: Frankfurt Zoological Society and Tanzania National Parks

Page 43: FZS presentation_ConnectingNorthernTanzania_Evaluation_of_alternative_routes

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND TOURISM

Telegrams: "MALIASILI" P.O. Box 9372 DAR ES SALAAM DAR ES SALAAM Telephone: 255 22 21 11063 Fax: 255 22 2123158 On reply please quote:

Ref. NO. EA.297?593/01/20 22"d June 201 1

Director, World Heritage Centre, 7, Place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP, FRANCE

Re: STATE OF CONSERVATION OF SERENGETI NATIONAL PARK

The United Republic of Tanzania is honored to take this opportunity to clarify on the proposed tarmac road in northern Tanzania.

The proposed road will be constructed in two sections: (i) The eastern stretch of 214 km tarmac road which will be constructed from Mto wa Mbu to

Loliondo, (ii) The western stretch tarmac road that will be constructed from Makutano-Natta-Mugumu, a distance of 117 km. The stretch of 12 km from Mugumu to the Serengeti National Park western border plus a corresponding stretch of 57.6 km from Loliondo to Serengeti National Park eastern border will not be tannac. The 53 km section traversing Serengeti National Park will remain gravel road and continue to be managed by TANAPA mainly for tourism and administrative purposes as it is currently.

In view of this intended plan of constsuction, the State Party confirms that the proposed road will not dissect the Serengeti National Park and therefore will not affect the migration and conservation values of the Property. The ongoing ESIA will take into consideration these developments and will be submitted to WHC accordingly.

This decision has been reached in order to address the increasing socio-economic needs of the rural communities in Northern Tanzania while safeguarding the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of Serengeti National Park. The Government of United Republic of Tanzania is also seriously considering the constsuction of a road from Mugumu to Arusha running south of Ngorongoro Conservation Area and Serengeti National Park.

EZEKIEL MAIGE MINISTER FOR NATURAL RESOURCES AND TOURISM