14
FIEDLER’S THEORY Yata. Veera Brahmam ROOL.NO:9051

Fiedlers contingency thery

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fiedlers contingency thery

FIEDLER

’S THEORY

Yata. Veera Brahmam ROOL.NO:9051

Page 2: Fiedlers contingency thery

FIEDLER’S MODEL POSTULATES THAT EFFECTIVENESS OF A LEADER DEPENDS UPON

1.HIS MOTIVATIONAL STYLE (BEHAVIOR)

AND2.SITUATION FAVORABLENESS (SITUATIONS)

Page 3: Fiedlers contingency thery

DIFFERENT BEHAVIOURS ARE SUITABLE FOR DIFFERENT SITUATIONS FAVOURABLENESS

THOSE DIFFERENT SITUATIONS ARE BASED ON COMBINATION OF DIFFERENT FACTORS.

TASK STRUCTURE(STRUCTURED/UN STRUCTURED)

LEADER POSITION POWER(STRONG/WEAK)

LEADER-MEMBER RELATIONS (GOOD/POOR)

Page 4: Fiedlers contingency thery

DIFFERENT SITUATIONS

Page 5: Fiedlers contingency thery

THIS MODEL POSTULATES THAT ONE BEHAVIOUR IS NOT SUITABLE FOR ALL SITUATIONS HE DIVIDED THIS BEHAVIOUR INTO TWO TYPES BY USING “LEAST PREFERRED CO-WORKERS SCALE”

RELATION-ORIENTATION

TASK-ORIENTATION

Page 6: Fiedlers contingency thery

Pleasant 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 UnpleasantRejecting 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AcceptingTense 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RelaxedDistant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CloseCold 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WarmSupportive 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 HostileBoring 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 InterestingQuarrelsome 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Harmonious

Gloomy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CheerfulOpen 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 GuardedBackbiting 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LoyalUntrustworthy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 TrustworthyConsiderate 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Inconsiderate

Nasty 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NiceAgreeable 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Disagreeable

Insincere 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SincereKind 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unkind

Page 7: Fiedlers contingency thery

Instructionsthe leaders are asked to describe this person by circling numbers at the appropriate points on each of the following pairs of bipolaradjectives. Work rapidly. There are no right or wrong answers.o the responses of these scale will total and average

a high LPC score suggested that the leader has ‘relation-oriented’, while the low Lpc indicates A ‘task-oriented’.

Page 8: Fiedlers contingency thery

ESSENTIALS OF RELATION-ORIENTED AND TASK-ORIENTED LEADERSHIP STYLES:

RELATION-ORIENTED : TASK-ORIENTED: Good interpersonal

relations Sensitive to the needs

and feelings of others open communication

with subordinates

Use of power Task structure No consultations with

subordinates

Page 9: Fiedlers contingency thery

ESSENTIALS OF RELATION-ORIENTED AND TASK-ORIENTED LEADERSHIP STYLES:

BEHAVIER(SKILLS)

SITUATION

RELATION-ORIENTED TASK-ORIENTED

TASK STRUCTURE UNPERFECT PERFECT

LEADER-MEMBER RELATIONS

PERFECT UNPERFECT

LEADER POSITION POWER

LOW HIGH

Page 10: Fiedlers contingency thery

T T T T R R T T

MOST UN FAVOURABLEMODERATE

Page 11: Fiedlers contingency thery

different behaviours are suitable for different situations:

Most un favourable

Page 12: Fiedlers contingency thery
Page 13: Fiedlers contingency thery

high favourable/controllable situation:Task-oriented: able to relax.

Relation-oriented: able to solve problems with interpersonal skills.moderate favourable/controllable situation:Relation-oriented: perform best in this situation. Because they are sensitive to the needs of members

Task-oriented: they are not able to deal patently.Low favourable/controllable situation:Task-oriented: able to provide the direction that the employees want.Relation-oriented: not able to solve problems with interpersonal skills.

Page 14: Fiedlers contingency thery

THANK YOU