55
Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals by Toronto Training and HR March 2012

Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Half day open training event held in Toronto, Canada.

Citation preview

Page 1: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Conducting effective performance reviews and

appraisals

by Toronto Training and HR

March 2012

Page 2: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Contents

3-4 Introduction to Toronto Training and HR5-7 Development and implementation of 360

degree feedback8-9 Numbers and ratings10-11 Moving away from paper-based reviews12-13 Objectives of performance appraisals14-15 Performance contracting16-17 When employees are dissatisfied18-20 A shift age alternative21-22 Types of performance review23-24 Performance reviews for smaller employers25-26 Strategic plans for appraisals 27-28 An hour each quarter…29-31 Conducting performance appraisals32-35 Practical problems with rating systems36-38 Issues around professional ethos39-41 Typical questions42-43 Questions for the appraisee44-46 Appraiser training47-49 Common themes50-51 Case study52-53 Drill54-55 Conclusion and questions

Page 3: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 3

Introduction

Page 4: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 4

Introduction to Toronto Training and HR

• Toronto Training and HR is a specialist training and human resources consultancy headed by Timothy Holden

• 10 years in banking• 10 years in training and human resources• Freelance practitioner since 2006• The core services provided by Toronto Training and HR

are:- Training event design- Training event delivery- Reducing costs- Saving time- Improving employee engagement &

morale- Services for job seekers

Page 5: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 5

Development and implementation of 360

degree feedback

Page 6: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 6

Development and implementation of 360 degree feedback 1 of 2

Define objectivesDecide on recipientsDecide on who will give the feedbackDecide how feedback will be givenDecide on the areas of work and behaviour on which feedback will be givenDecide on the method of collecting the dataDecide on data analysis and presentation

Page 7: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 7

Development and implementation of 360 degree feedback 2 of 2

Decide on how the data will be usedPlan the initial implementation programAnalyse the outcome of the pilot schemePlan and implement the full programMonitor and evaluate

Page 8: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 8

Numbers and ratings

Page 9: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 9

Numbers and ratings

Using multi-rater surveysSetting or reviewing targets and goals

Page 10: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 10

Moving away from paper-based reviews

Page 11: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 11

Moving away from paper-based reviews

StarteAppraisalsSiloed appraisalsFull circle performance reviews

Page 12: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 12

Objectives of performance appraisals

Page 13: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 13

Objectives of performance appraisals

Clarify what individuals are accountable for “doing” in their organizational rolesProvide individuals with on-going feedback abouttheir level of results deliveryProvide individuals with insight into ways in whichthey can “develop/enhance” their skills setsRelate personal performance levels to performancebased compensation amountsIdentify and address the issue of “under performers”

Page 14: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 14

Performance contracting

Page 15: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 15

Performance contracting

What is performance contracting?What is the relationship between performance contracting and performance appraisal?Differences between performance contracting and performance appraisalSuccessfully implementing performance contracting

Page 16: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 16

When employees are dissatisfied…

Page 17: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 17

When employees are dissatisfied…

Hold your composureReview and analyzeGo through the job descriptionCheck for evaluation errorsDouble check the processPrepare for a meetingBe respectfulTake the next formal stepMove on

Page 18: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 18

A shift-age alternative

Page 19: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 19

A shift age alternative 1 of 2

Open with a brief discussion of how the direct report’s month wentReview  results and commitments made in last month’s review session Review current  month’s leading indicatorsReview the direct report’s performance correction log and previous reviewsGive and receive feedback

Page 20: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 20

A shift age alternative 2 of 2

Establish and agree on next month’s priorities (with measures)Within two business days, write and deliver to the direct report a summary letter of the meeting (include all assessments and agreements)Include a discussion of career aspirations and/or potential every six monthsUse the previous reviews as your source when asked to discuss performance or potential

Page 21: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 21

Types of performance review

Page 22: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 22

Types of performance review

Close-endedOpen-ended

Page 23: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 23

Performance reviews for smaller employers

Page 24: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 24

Performance reviews for smaller employers

Keep it simpleDon’t reinvent the wheelSet a realistic schedulePlace the emphasis on positiveApproach 360 degree feedback with cautionReview the process

Page 25: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 25

Strategic plans for appraisals

Page 26: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 26

Strategic plans for appraisals

Be based on the long-term vision and immediate missionLink each employee to the missionSet goals and objectivesDescribing results to move the mission forwardCreate aligned department plans to achieve a portion of the overall plan

Page 27: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 27

An hour each quarter…

Page 28: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 28

An hour each quarter…

Focus on current and future performance NOT the pastContinuous feedbackPerformance and improvement results integrated with the organization’s needsIndividual awareness of what he or she should be doing at any moment to accomplish the mission

Page 29: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 29

Conducting performance appraisals

Page 30: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 30

Conducting performance appraisals 1 of 2

PreparationMake it a conversationHear what is being saidReward the positivesHelp fix the negativesSet SMART objectives

Page 31: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 31

Conducting performance appraisals 2 of 2

GETTING THE MOST OUT OF THE SITUATIONConstruct a clear to-do listEmphasize clear objectivesAllow the appraisee to leadFollow through on promises

Page 32: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 32

Practical problems with rating systems

Page 33: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 33

Practical problems with rating systems 1 of 3

Tendency to give a good overall assessment on the basis that one particular aspect has been accomplished wellTendency to avoid giving low ratings even when deserved, for fear of angering or upsetting a weak performerTendency to give a poor overall assessment on the basis of poor performance in one area

Page 34: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 34

Practical problems with rating systems 2 of 3

Tendency to rate employee performance as ‘average’ or ‘good’ rather than to use the end-points of ratings scalesTendency to give particular weight to recent occurrences in reaching judgements about individual performanceTendency to give high ratings to people who have performed well historically, whatever their performance over the previous year

Page 35: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 35

Practical problems with rating systems 3 of 3

Tendency to refrain on principle from giving particularly high ratingsTendency to rate subordinates at a lower level than the appraiser achieved when in their position

Page 36: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 36

Issues around professional ethos

Page 37: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 37

Issues around professional ethos 1 of 2

PROFESSIONAL ETHOS TYPIFIED BY:High levels of autonomy and independence of judgementSelf-discipline and adherence to professional standardsPossessing of specialized knowledge and skillsPower and status based on expertiseOperating, and being guided by, a code of ethicsBeing answerable to the governing professional body

Page 38: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 38

Issues around professional ethos 2 of 2

CHARACTERISTICS EMPHASIZED BY APPRAISAL:Hierarchical authority and direction from superiorsAdministrative rules and the following of proceduresDefinition by the organization of standards and objectivesDemand that primary loyalty be given to the organizationBasing of power on one’s legitimate organizational position

Page 39: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 39

Typical questions

Page 40: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 40

Typical questions 1 of 2

What parts of your job give you most satisfaction?What parts of your job give you least satisfaction?How would you assess your technical skills?How would you assess your ability to communicate with your colleagues?How would you describe your working relationships?What do you feel are the main achievements over the past year?What did you fail to achieve? Why?

Page 41: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 41

Typical questions 2 of 2In what areas do you feel you have the ability to improve?What training events would you like to attend in the coming year?What are your career objectives for the coming year?What suggestions do you have for ways in which organization of work in your department could be improved?How could communication in the organization be improved?

Page 42: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 42

Questions for the appraisee

Page 43: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 43

Questions for the appraisee

How have I done in the last year/six months?When did things go well?What do I want to accomplish in the next year/six months?

Page 44: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 44

Appraiser training

Page 45: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 45

Appraiser training 1 of 2

TYPICALLY COVERED ON TRAINING COURSES:Importance of objectivity and consistencyNeed to avoid passing judgement on any aspect of an appraisee’s personality or attitude that does not relate 100% to his or her performance at workNeed to prepare thoroughly for all appraisal interviewsImportance of putting employees at ease and encouraging them to do most of the talking

Page 46: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 46

Appraiser training 2 of 2

TYPICALLY COVERED ON TRAINING COURSES:Need to stress good aspects of performance as much or more than poorer aspectsNeed to take a constructive approach to weaknesses in the employee’s performance and to make positive suggestions as to how matters might be improvedNeed to end appraisal interviews on a forward-looking, positive and constructive note

Page 47: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 47

Common themes

Page 48: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 48

Common themes 1 of 2

RELIABILITY AND DEPENDABILITYExceptional, consistently exceeds expectationsExcellent, frequently exceeds expectationsFully competent, meets expectationsMarginal, occasionally fails to meet expectationsUnsatisfactory, consistently fails to meet expectations

Page 49: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 49

Common themes 2 of 2

INTEGRITYExceptional, consistently exceeds expectationsExcellent, frequently exceeds expectationsFully competent, meets expectationsMarginal, occasionally fails to meet expectationsUnsatisfactory, consistently fails to meet expectations

Page 50: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 50

Case study

Page 51: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 51

Case study

Page 52: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 52

Drill

Page 53: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 53

Drill

Page 54: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 54

Conclusion and questions

Page 55: Conducting effective performance reviews and appraisals March 2012

Page 55

Conclusion and questions

SummaryVideosQuestions