22
consulting | research | contracting Challenging Traditional Process Thinking BPR vs. CEM Swati Saigal Senior Process Consultant Megan Menasce Senior Process Consultant

Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

consulting | research | contracting

Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

BPR vs. CEM

Swati Saigal

Senior Process Consultant

Megan Menasce

Senior Process Consultant

Page 2: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

2

History Lesson

Page 3: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

3

Page 4: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

4

Page 5: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

5

Page 6: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

6

Page 7: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

7

Page 8: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

8

Page 9: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

9

Page 10: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

10

Page 11: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

11

Page 12: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

12

CEO

Marketing SalesCustomer

ServiceOperations Finance

Page 13: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

13

Do you dare to change?

Page 14: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

14

Insanity

Page 15: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

15

The question

Page 16: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

16

The process evolution

Page 17: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

17

You may be doing stuff right, but are you doing the right stuff?

Six Sigma

• Fixing problems. Doing Stuff Right.

Structured approach to Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve and Control process.

• In a typical example - people may not be filling in a form correctly. Six Sigma understands how often, where and what could be done to improve the accuracy of the form.

Lean

• Similar to Six Sigma however goes a stage further in removing waste associated with form completion by removing unnecessary steps and sometimes as a consequence negates the need for a form entirely. In doing so occasionally, but not by design, stumbles onto doing the right thing.

• Both Six Sigma and Lean don’t challenge directly whether the form helps to achieve a Successful Customer Outcome.

CEM and Customer

• Asks whether the form contributes to the achievement of the Successful Customer Outcome. If it doesn’t, we stop doing it. It is typical to find that a massive amount of work in a CX examined process becomes unnecessary and in doing so frees up scarce resource, improves service and gets more done with less.

Page 18: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

18

Achieving the right mix

Doing things RIGHT

Doing things FAST

Doing the RIGHT thing

Page 19: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

19

How then can CEM and BPR co-exist?

Customer

Needs

Operational Efficiencies

Operational Efficiencies

Operational Efficiencies

Operational Efficiencies

Operational Efficiencies

• CEM will then be used to design

the appropriate interactions,

• CEM looks at a wider

end-goal focus of

customer needs

• This then requires

operational changes

to fulfil customer

expectations

supported by BPR to optimise

those processes further to be

more cost effective (without

negatively impacting the

customer experience).

• i.e. Understand what you are trying to achieve, then use the tools appropriately

Page 20: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

20

Page 21: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

21

Final thought…

Page 22: Challenging Traditional Process Thinking

22

Swati Saigal

[email protected]

Megan Menasce

[email protected]

IQ Business Park

Third Avenue

Rivonia

Johannesburg

011 259 4000

www.iqbusiness.net

[email protected]

[email protected]