Upload
seashell09
View
331
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
The effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions through quality perception
Presenter: Anne ChenAdvisors: Dr. Meng-Jang Lin Dr. Wan-Ching ChenInstructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa HsuDate: October 14, 2013 1
Citation
Ha, J., & Jang, S. (2012). The effects of dining atmospherics on behavioral intentions through quality perception. Journal of Services Marketing, 26(3), 204-215.
2
ContentsIntroduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Result & Conclusion
Limitation
My Future Study
Ⅰ
Ⅱ
Ⅲ
Ⅳ
Ⅴ
Ⅵ
3
Introduction
Food and service can be considered the most critical components for customers to determine satisfaction and future behaviors toward a restaurant.
4
5
Introduction
Atmospherics play an important role in future behaviors, such as spreading positive things or repurchase intention.
(Countryman & Jang, 2006; Jang & Namkung, 2009)
Purpose
To identify how the perception of atmospherics in a restaurant setting influences customer perceptions of service quality and food quality
The extent to which quality perception mediates the relationship between perception of atmospherics and customer behavioral intentions
6
Literature Review
7
Literature Review Environmental components in the service
context can assist customers in evaluating service quality.
(Carbone & Haeckel, 1994)
H1. Perception of atmospherics positively influences perception of service quality.
8
Literature Review
Food quality and food variety during the dining experience as the most influential factors of customer loyalty.
(Clark, 1998 ; Wood, 1999)
H2. Perception of atmospherics positively influences perception of food quality.
9
Literature ReviewEnvironmental factors directly influence behavioral intentions in a study examining the effects of a restaurant’s physical environment.
(Ryu & Jang, 2008)
H3. Perception of atmospherics positively influences behavioral intentions.
10
Literature Review Service quality and food quality, significantly
influence customer behaviors in restaurant settings.
(Bell et al., 2005)
H4. Service quality positively influences behavioral intentions.
H5. Food quality positively influences behavioral intentions.
11
Literature Review
Atmospherics are a predictor of behavioral intentions as well as a significant indicator for perceived quality.
(Ryu & Jang, 2007; Reimer & Kuehn, 2005)
12
H6. The relationship between perception of atmospherics and behavioral intentions is mediated by service quality.
H7. The relationship between perception of atmospherics and behavioral intentions is mediated by food quality.
Literature Review
13
Methodology
14
Methodology
Panel members of Online marketin
g research company in the US
Korean restaurants business in the US
Structural equation modeling (SEM)
3000 panel
members
607 usable
response
Method
15
16
Online marketing research company
Construct Measurement items
Atmospherics The interior design of the restaurant made me feel Korean cultureThe Korean music played in the restaurant entertained meThe layout and facility aesthetics of the Korean restaurant were somewhat different from those of the western restaurant, so they were fun to me
Service quality
The Korean restaurant serves your food exactly as you ordered itThe Korean restaurant provides prompt and quick serviceThe Korean restaurant has employees who can answer your questions completely
Questionnaire - Constructs and measurement items
17
Questionnaire - Constructs and measurement items
Construct Measurement items
Food quality The food I had were tasty, so I enjoyedFood portion in the Korean restaurant was enough, satisfying my hungerI liked a variety of menu choices in the Korean restaurantI liked healthy food options in the Korean restaurant
Behavioral Intentions I would like to dine out in this Korean restaurant againI would like to spread positive things about this Korean restaurant to othersI would like to recommend this Korean restaurant to others
18
Seven-point Liker-type scale(1=strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree)
Result
19
Construct Items (Label)Standardized
loadingsCronbach’s
alpha AVE
Atmospherics Interior design (AT-1)Music (AT-2)Layout (AT-3)
0.800.580.83
0.83 0.56
Service quality Service reliability (SQ-1)Service responsiveness (SQ-2)Service assurance (SQ-3)
0.870.800.69
0.84 0.62
Food quality Taste (FQ-1)Food portion (FQ-2)Menu variety (FQ-3)Healthy food option (FQ-4)
0.910.830.810.69
0.89 0.66
Behavioral intentions
Revisit intent (B1-1)Positive word of mouth (B1-2)Willingness to recommend (B1-3)
0.930.930.96
0.94 0.89
Notes: Model fit indices: Chi-square=180.598, df=59, Chi-square/df=3.061, NFI=0.974, TLI=0.973, CFI=0.982, RMSEA=0.058; AVE: Average variance extracted
Table I Results of confirmatory factor analysis
0.5↑ 0.7↑ 0.5↑
20
21
H1. Perception of atmospherics positively influences perception of service quality.
H2. Perception of atmospherics positively influences perception of food quality.
H3. Perception of atmospherics positively influences behavioral intentions.
H4. Service quality positively influences behavioral intentions.
H5. Food quality positively influences behavioral intentions.
Hypotheses
Hypothesized path Standardized coefficients t
Result for hypothesis
H1: Atmospherics → Service quality (βa-s)
0.51 10.067*** Supported
H2: Atmospherics → Food quality (βa-f)
0.49 9.301*** Supported
H3: Atmospherics → Behavioral intentions (βa-b)
0.09 2.273* Supported
H4: Service quality → Behavioral intentions (βs-b)
0.30 5.696*** Supported
H5: Food quality → Behavioral intentions (βf-b)
0.51 9.106*** Supported
Notes: X2=157.83; df=50; p=0.000; NFI=0.976; TLI=0.974; CFI=0.983; RMSEA=0.060; *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001
Table II Results of the structural model
22
23
Hypotheses
H6. The relationship between perception of atmospherics and behavioral intentions is mediated by service quality.
H7. The relationship between perception of atmospherics and behavioral intentions is mediated by food quality.
Model Path coefficient X2 df
Constrained modelγa-b=0.86*** 383.88 52
Mediating model βa-b=0.09* 157.83 50
Notes: X△ 2=226.05; df=2; p<0.01; *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001△
Table III The mediating effect of service quality and food quality
H6 and H7 were supported
24
25
Predictors Standardized coefficients t p-value
Intercept 22.936 0.000
Interior design 0.217 0.878*** 0.000
Korean music 0.022 0.0441 0.659
Layout 0.224 4.449*** 0.000
Notes: F=42.270; R2=0.174; Adjusted R2=0.170; *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001
Table IV The effects of perceived atmospherics on service quality
26
Predictors Standardized coefficients t p-value
Intercept 24.569 0.000
Interior design 0.176 3.173** 0.002
Korean music 0.046 0.944 0.346
Layout 0.270 5.423*** 0.000
Notes: F=47.928; R2=0.193; Adjusted R2=0.189; *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001
Table V The effect of perceived atmospherics on food quality
27
Predictors Standardized coefficients t p-value
Intercept 18.491*** 0.000
Interior design 0.231 4.137*** 0.000
Korean music -0.007 -0.146 0.884
Layout 0.241 4.810*** 0.000
Notes: F=44.479; R2=0.181; Adjusted R2=0.177; *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001
Table VI The effect of perceived atmospherics on behavioral intentions
Conclusion
28
Conclusion
The main findings indicated that atmospherics could influence behavioral intentions in both direct and indirect ways through quality perception.
29
Limitation
30
Limitation
This study used a web-based survey, so the respondents largely relied on their memory to respond to the survey questions, which might cause memory bias.
Applications of the findings are limited to Korean restaurant management and casual dining restaurants.
31
Limitation
The items for atmospherics were general, specific environmental arrangements could not be suggested in this study.
32
My future study
33
My Future Study
Variable
Atmosphere Word-of-mouth Perceived value Behavioral intention
Participants 500 customers Standing nearby places
Locations Princess Annie's Garden Moncoeur Lavender Cottage
Instrument
Questionnaire Atmosphere items by Cheng (2012) Word-of-mouth items by Huang (2011) Perceived value items by Chen et al.
(2012) Behavioral intention items by Chen (2011)
Data Analysis Regression analysis
Duration 3 months (January – March 2014) 34
Thank you for listening.
35