Upload
allen-haynes
View
230
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Driver Ed Perspectives
Scan of Zoom Bookby
Istvan BanyaiBuy the book to get the message
How Does This Apply To Driver Ed?
We are all someplace on the continuum
We all have limited vision because of our place on the Continuum
We believe we have full understanding of the issues
We have difficulty grasping the realities of the situation that are too far away from us on the continuum
A Brief History in Time
Driver Education
Beginnings
• Started in 1928
Founding Father
• Amos Neyhart
Amos Neyhart
• Master’s thesis was on Traffic Safety• Developed and expanded DE program from his
thesis• Taught DE at State College High School in the
early ‘30s.
Amos Neyhart
• Developed the teacher training program at Penn State College in 1936
• Wrote the first driver ed book “The Safe Operation of an Automobile” in 1934
Used his 1929 Graham-Paige auto to teach behind the wheel
First National Conference
• 1949• Jackson’s Mill, West Virginia• Professionals and Presidents of state
associations met• Developed the first de facto national
standards – Most notably 30-6-6
Explosive Growth1950’s to 1970’s
• Newly developed university traffic safety centers
• Produced an abundance of driver educators• Pushed by the insurance industry
– Believed that safe drivers will take classes and therefore will be a safe risk for insurance companies
Explosive Growth
• National Commission on Safety Education • Birth of ADTSEA in 1956• DE remained optional in most states
The ‘70s
• The birth of DSAA in Boston—1973• Newer national standards
1970’s Opposition to Driver Ed
• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety began a campaign against DE--1977– Predicted who would take DE– Delay licensing until 18 at parent’s request
DeKalb Research Project 1977
• Biggest and best ever study of DE• Two study groups and one control group
– Safe Performance Curriculum—70 hrs of instruction
– Pre-Driver Licensing Curriculum—20 hrs classroom, 1 hour btw
– Parent taught—Control Group• Mixed results from the study said that DE was
not an effective strategy for reducing crashes
What Happened After the Study
State decision makers reduced funding to DE
in schools
What Happened After the Study
Reduction of programs in the school day and
in high schools
What Happened After the Study
Loss of support from the community for
more than just getting student’s license
What Happened After the Study
Rapid growth of commercial providers
What Happened After the Study
Movement of DE out of DOE supervision and
loss of state supervisors
What Happened After the Study
Began to be seen by local administrations and school boards as
frivolous and not necessary
Reduction in University Traffic Safety Courses Being offered
• Fewer students means fewer classes• Fewer classes means fewer faculty positions• Universities not preparing future PhDs in
traffic safety• University programs ending because of
retirements– Wisconsin– North Carolina
We Are Left Without Adequate Teacher Training Options
Crisis
Crisis Creates:
• Opportunity to Do Some Self Examination• Opportunities for Innovation• Opportunity to Change the Rules• Opportunity to Build Flexibility in the Process
Current Teacher Training Models
• Traditional Face-to-face– credit based (college or university)– competency based
• Hybrid– Face-to-face– Online, synchronous and asynchronous
• Online– All instruction and evaluation
Training Model Grid
F2F Online HybridUniversity Based
New HampshireIllinois
North DakotaMinnesota
MontanaVirginiaIllinois
Cadre Based HawaiiOregon
? OregonVermont
Owner OperatorOwner Trained
MichiganNorth CarolinaWashington
Idaho ?
St. Cloud State University
• University credit based required for endorsement
• Completely online• 13 semester hours/5 classes
North Dakota
• University credit based required for endorsement– Minor Equivalency Endorsement
• Completely online• 12 semester hours/6 classes
Montana
• Hybrid Model University based credits–Montana Northern in Havre
• Eight credits to licensure–5 online–3 F2F
Vermont• Cadre—Hybrid—Endorsement• Higher Education Collaborative• Castleton College• Online
– Synchronous (webinar)
Vermont
• Asynchronous (DQ, assignments, papers)• Face-to-Face
– Meet 2 or 3 Saturdays for ZC and In-Vehicle– One week in July
• Six total classes, 4 driver education specific
Oregon
• Originally university based at OSU• Dropped when professor retired• Nothing for about 10 years• 1999 law changed the requirement for teacher
training• ADTSEA employed to Train the Trainer
– Foundations of Traffic Safety– Fundamentals of Classroom Instruction– Fundamentals of BTW
Oregon
• 1999 law change required that:• All practicing teachers needed to be retrained• All new teachers had to meet certain
requirements and be trained
Oregon
• Originally face-to-face• Now a combination of ways to train
– Intensive Track all face-to-face 6 – Face-to-face traditional track 9 weekends– Hybrid track multiphase—Online and F2F
• Can take courses for credit but not required
So How Are We Doing
• Through the 3rd quarter of this year– 51 participants completed training– 46 have become licensed driver education
instructors
Professional Development
• Check with your state before you do the work• Chemeketa.edu
– Search Driver Education– Introduction to the Playbook– Brain Based Learning– Future
• Connecting the Playbook to BTW• Integrating technology into DE
We Have The:
• Opportunity to Do Some Self Examination• Opportunitiy for Innovation• Opportunity to Change the Rules• Opportunity to Build Flexibility in the Process
Hiroo Onoda
Onoda At His Surrender
Realize that the battle changes over time
Someone with a different perspective sometimes has to show you how the battle has
changed
Understand that sometimes the battle has moved on without us
Take the opportunity to change your battle plan